1: %% This document created by Scientific Word (R) Version 2.5

2: %% Starting shell: article

3: 

4: 

5: \documentclass[12pt,thmsa,a4paper,oneside,onecolumn]{article}

6: \usepackage{amssymb}

7: 

8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9: %\usepackage{sw20geoj}

10: \usepackage[]{cite}

11: 

12: %TCIDATA{TCIstyle=article/art2.lat,geoj,article}

13: 

14: %TCIDATA{Created=Tue Nov 09 14:14:25 1999}

15: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Mon Dec 20 10:03:00 1999}

16: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}

17: 

18: \input{tcilatex}

19: \begin{document}

20: 

21: \author{Yi-Hang Nie$^{1,2}$,Yan-Hong Jin$^{1,5}$, \and J.-Q.Liang$^{1,3}$%

22: ,H.J.W.M\"{u}ller-Kirsten$^3$,D.K.Park$^{3,4}$,F.-C.Pu$^{5,6}${\small \ } \\

23: %EndAName

24: $^1${\small Institute of Theoretical Physics and Department of

25: Physics,Shanxi University,}\\

26: {\small Taiyuan,Shanxi 030006,\ People}$^{,}${\small s Republic of China}\\

27: $^2${\small Department of physics,Yanbei Normal Institute, Datong Shanxi

28: 037000, }\\

29: {\small People}$^{,}${\small s Republic of China}\\

30: {\small \ \ }$^3${\small Department of Physics, University of\

31: Kaiserslautern D-67653 Kaiserslautern,Germany}\\

32: {\small \ \ }$^4${\small Department of Physics, Kyungnam University, Masan,

33: 631-701, Korea}\\

34: {\small \ \ }$^5${\small Institute\ of\ Physics\ and\ Center for Condensed

35: Matter Physics\ ,}\\

36: {\small Chinese Academy of Sciences,} {\small Beijing 100080,People}$^{,}$%

37: {\small s Republic of China, \ }\\

38: $^6${\small \ Department of Physics, Guangzhou Normal College, Guangzhou

39: 510400,}\\

40: {\small People}$^{,}${\small s Republic of China }}

41: \title{Macroscopic Quantum Phase Interference in\\

42: Antiferromagnetic Particles }

43: \date{{\small 20 Dec. 1999 }}

44: \maketitle

45: 

46: \begin{abstract}

47: \textrm{The tunnel splitting in biaxial antiferromagnetic particles is

48: studied with a magnetic field applied along the hard anisotropy axis. We

49: observe the oscillation of tunnel splitting as a function of the magnetic

50: field due to the quantum phase interference of two tunneling paths of

51: opposite windings. The oscillation is similar to the recent experimental

52: result with Fe}$_8$\textrm{\ molecular clusters.}

53: \end{abstract}

54: 

55: The macroscopic quantum phenomenon of magnetic particles at low temperature

56: has attracted considerable attention both theoretically and experimentally

57: in recent years\cite{E.M.Chud,B.Barbara,Proceeding}. The magnetization

58: vector in solids is traditionally viewed as a classical variable. The

59: quantum transition of the magnetization vector\textbf{\ M} between different

60: easy directions in a single domain ferromagnetic (FM) grain, in particular

61: the coherent tunneling between two degenerate orientations of the

62: magnetization called the macroscopic quantum coherence (MQC)\cite{A.Garg PRL}%

63: , has been studied extensively for its exotic characters far from that of

64: classical system. Quenching of MQC for half-integer spin is a fascinating

65: effect \cite{D.Loss,EMC DPD,N.V.P,J.Q.Liang}and can be used to test the

66: macroscopic quantum tunneling experimentally. The quenching of MQC in spin

67: particles is analysed with the help of the phase interference of spin

68: coherent state-paths which possess a phase with an obvious geometric meaning%

69: \cite{D.Loss}. Although the quenching of MQC has been interpreted as Kramers$%

70: ^{\text{,}}$ degeneracy, the effect of geometric phase interference is far

71: richer than that. By investigating the quantum tunneling in biaxial

72: ferromagnetic particles with a magnetic field applied along the hard axis

73: Garg\cite{A.Garg} found a new quenching of tunneling splitting which is not

74: related to Kramers$^{,}$ degeneracy since the external field breaks the time

75: reversal symmetry. The Zeeman energy of the biaxial spin particle in the

76: external magnetic field results in additional topological phases of the

77: tunnel paths which lead to the quantum phase interference. The tunneling

78: splitting therefore oscillates with respect to the magnetic field.

79: 

80: According to a recent report\cite{W.Werns} the oscillation of tunneling

81: splitting was observed experimentally in molecular clusters Fe$_8$ which at

82: low temperature behavior like a nanomagnet, namely, a ferromegnetic

83: particle. A more detailed analysis of quantum phase interference with

84: instanton method in context of spin coherent-state-path-integrals has been

85: given recently \cite{S.P.Kou}. In the present letter we investigate the

86: similar effect of quantum phase interference in antiferromagnetic (AFM)

87: particles. Since the tunneling rate in AFM particles is much higher than

88: that in the FM particles of the same volume\cite{J.M.Duan}, the\ AFM

89: particles are expected to be a better candidate for the observation of MQP

90: than the FM particles\cite{J.M.Duan}. The AFM particle is usually described

91: by the N\'{e}el vector of the two collinear sublattices whose magnetizations

92: are coupled by strong exchange interaction. External magnetic field dose not

93: play a role since the net magnetic moment vanishes for idealized

94: sublattices. The quantum and classical transitions of the N\'{e}el vector in

95: antiferromagnet have been well studied\cite{H.Sima} in terms of the

96: idealized sublattice model. The temperature dependence of quantum tunneling

97: was also given for the same model\cite{J.Q.L Mu Nie} and the theoretical

98: result agrees with the experimental observation\cite{J.Tejada}. A biaxial

99: AFM particle with a small non-compensation of sublattices in the absence of

100: an external magnetic field was studied in Ref.\cite{E.M.C.in} where it was

101: shown that the uncompensated magnetic moment leads to a modification of the

102: oscillation frequency around the equilibrium orientations of the N\'{e}el

103: vector. In the present letter we demonstrate that the uncompensated magnetic

104: moment of a small biaxial AFM particle possesses a Zeeman energy in an

105: external magnetic field applied along hard axis and thus a topological phase

106: depending on the magnetic field is introduced similarly to the phase in

107: ferromagnetic particles\cite{A.Garg}. The quantum phase interference results

108: in the oscillation of tunneling splitting as a function of magnetic field

109: which may be regarded as a kind of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

110: 

111: We consider in the following a biaxial AFM particle of two collinear FM

112: sublattices with a small non-compensation. Assuming that the particle

113: possesses a X easy axis and XY easy plane , and the magnetic field $h$ is

114: applied along the hard axis (Z axis), the Hamiltonian operator of the AFM

115: particle has the form

116: 

117: \begin{equation}

118: \hat{H}=\stackunder{a=1,2}{\sum }\left( k_{\bot }\hat{S}_{{\small a}%

119: }^{z2}+k_{\shortparallel }\hat{S}_a^{y2}-\gamma h\hat{S}_a^z\right) +J\hat{S}%

120: _1\cdot \hat{S}_2

121: \end{equation}

122: where $k_{\bot },k_{\shortparallel }>0$ are the anisotropy constants, $J$ is

123: the exchange constant, $\gamma $ is the gyromagnetic ratio,and the spin

124: operators in two sublattices $\hat{S}_1$ and $\hat{S}_2$ obey the usual

125: commutation relation $\left[ \hat{S}_a^i,\hat{S}_b^j\right] =i\hbar \epsilon

126: _{ijk}\delta _{ab}\hat{S}_b^k\ \left( i,j,k=x,y,z;a,b=1,2\right) $. The

127: matrix element of the evolution operator in spin coherent-state

128: representation is

129: 

130: \begin{equation}

131: \langle N_f|e^{-2i\hat{H}T/\hbar }|N_i\rangle =\int \left[ \stackunder{k=1}{%

132: \stackrel{M-1}{\prod }}d\mu \left( \text{N}_k\right) \right] \left[ 

133: \stackunder{k=1}{\stackrel{M}{\prod }}\langle \text{N}_k|e^{-i\epsilon \hat{H%

134: }/\hbar }|\text{N}_{k-1}\rangle \right]

135: \end{equation}

136: Here we define $|$N$\rangle =|$n$_1\rangle |$n$_2\rangle $, $|$N$_M\rangle

137: =| $N$_f\rangle =|$n$_{1,f}\rangle |$n$_{2,f}\rangle ,$ $|$N$_o\rangle =|$N$%

138: _i\rangle =|$n$_{1,i}\rangle |$n$_{2,i}\rangle $, $t_f-t_i=2T$ and $\epsilon

139: =2T/M$. The spin coherent state is defined as

140: 

141: \begin{equation}

142: |\text{n}_a\rangle =e^{-i\theta _a\hat{C}}|S_a,S_a\rangle ,\left(

143: a=1,2\right)

144: \end{equation}

145: where n$_a=\left( \sin \theta _a\text{cos}\phi _a,\text{sin}\theta _a\text{%

146: sin}\phi _a,\text{cos}\theta _a\right) $ is the unit vector, \^{C}$_a=$sin$%

147: \phi _a\hat{S}_a^x-$cos$\phi _a\hat{S}_a^y$ and $|S_{a\text{,}}S_a\rangle $

148: is the reference spin eigenstate. The measure is defined by

149: 

150: \begin{equation}

151: d\mu \left( \text{N}_k\right) =\stackunder{a=1,2}{\prod }\frac{2S_a+1}{4\pi }%

152: d\text{n}_{a,k\text{ }},\qquad d\text{n}_{a,k}=\text{sin}\theta

153: _{a,k}d\theta _{a,k}d\phi _{a,k},

154: \end{equation}

155: In the large $S$ limit we obtain\cite{Nie}

156: 

157: \begin{equation}

158: \langle \text{N}_f|e^{-2i\hat{H}T/\hbar }|\text{N}_i\rangle =e^{-iS_0\left(

159: \phi _f-\phi _i\right) }\int \stackunder{a=1,2}{\prod }D[\theta _a]D[\phi

160: _a]\exp \left( \frac i\hbar \int_{t_i}^{t_f}Ldt\right)

161: \end{equation}

162: The Lagrangian is defined by $L=L_0+L_1$ with ~

163: 

164: \begin{equation}

165: L_0=\stackunder{a=1,2}{\sum }S_a\dot{\phi}_acos\theta _a~-JS_1S_2\left[ \sin

166: \theta _1\cos \theta _2\cos \left( \phi _1-\phi _2\right) +\cos \theta

167: _1\cos \theta _2\right]

168: \end{equation}

169: 

170: \begin{equation}

171: L_1=\stackunder{a=1,2}{\sum }\left( k_{\bot }S_a^2\cos ^2\theta

172: +k_{\shortparallel }S_a^2\sin ^2\theta _a\sin ^2\phi _a-\gamma hS_a\cos

173: \theta _a\right)

174: \end{equation}

175: where $S_0=S_1+S_2$ is total spin of two sublattices. Since $S_1$ and $S_2$

176: is almost antiparallel, we may replace $\theta _2$ and $\phi _2$ by $\theta

177: _2=\pi -\theta _1-\epsilon _{_\theta }$and $\phi _2=\pi +\phi _1+\epsilon

178: _{_\phi },$ where $\epsilon _{_\theta }$ and $\epsilon _{_\phi }$ denote

179: small fluctuations .Working out the fluctuation integrations over $\epsilon

180: _{_\theta }$ and $\epsilon _{_\phi }$ the transition amplitude Eq.(5)

181: reduces to

182: 

183: \begin{equation}

184: \langle \text{N}_f|e^{-2i\hat{H}T/\hbar }|\text{N}_i\rangle =e^{-iS_0\left(

185: \phi _f-\phi _i\right) }\int \stackunder{a=1,2}{\prod }D[\theta ]D[\phi

186: ]\exp \left( \frac i\hbar \int_{t_i}^{t_f}\bar{L}dt\right)

187: \end{equation}

188: 

189: \begin{equation}

190: \bar{L}=\Omega \left[ \frac m\gamma \dot{\phi}\cos \theta +\frac{\chi _{\bot

191: }}\gamma H\dot{\phi}\text{sin}^2\theta +\frac \chi {2\gamma ^2}\left( \dot{%

192: \theta}^2+\dot{\phi}^2\sin ^2\theta \right) \right] -V\left( \theta ,\phi

193: \right) ,

194: \end{equation}

195: where $V\left( \theta ,\phi \right) =\left( \Omega K_{\bot }\cos ^2\theta

196: +K_{\shortparallel }\sin ^2\theta \sin ^2\phi -mh\cos \theta -\frac{\chi

197: _{\bot }}2h^2\sin ^2\theta \right) ,$and $\left( \theta _1,\phi _1\right) $

198: has been replaced by $\left( \theta ,\phi \right) $. $m=\gamma \hbar \left(

199: S_1-S_2\right) /\Omega $ with $\Omega $ being the volume of the AFM particle

200: and $\chi _{\bot }=\frac{\gamma ^2}J$. $K_{\bot }=2k_{\bot }S^2/\Omega $ and 

201: $K_{\shortparallel }=2k_{\shortparallel }S^2/\Omega $ (setting $S_1=S_2=S$

202: except in the term containing $S_1-S_2$) denote the transverse and the

203: longitudinal anisotropy constants, respectively.

204: 

205: We assume a very strong transverse anisotropy, $i.e.$ $K_{\bot }\gg $ $%

206: K_{\shortparallel }$ .In this case the N\'{e}el vector is forced to lie near

207: the XY plane. Replacing $\theta $ by $\frac \pi 2+$ $\eta $ where $\eta $

208: denotes the small fluctuation and carrying out the integral over $\eta $ we

209: obtain

210: 

211: \begin{equation}

212: \langle N_f|e^{-2\hat{H}\beta /\hbar }|N_i\rangle =\int D[\phi ]\exp \left(

213: -\frac 1\hbar \int_{\tau _i}^{\tau _f}L_{eff}d\tau \right)

214: \end{equation}

215: where

216: 

217: \begin{equation}

218: L_{eff}=\frac I2\left( \frac{d\phi }{d\tau }\right) ^2+i\Theta \frac{d\phi }{%

219: d\tau }+V\left( \phi \right)

220: \end{equation}

221: is the effective Euclidean Lagrangian. $\tau =it$ and $\beta =iT$ .$I=\Omega

222: \left( I_a+I_f\right) $ where $I_a=m^2/\left( 2\gamma ^2K_{\bot }\right) $

223: and $I_f=\chi _{\bot }/\gamma ^2$ are the effective FM and AFM moments of

224: inertia\cite{E.M.Chudnovsky}, respectively. $V\left( \phi \right) =\Omega

225: K_{\shortparallel }\sin ^2\phi $ is the effective potential and $\Theta

226: =\hbar S_0-I\gamma h$. The second term in Eq.(11) , $i.e.$ $i\Theta \frac{%

227: d\phi }{d\tau }$ which is the total time derivative has no effect on the

228: classical equation of motion, however it leads to a path dependent phase in

229: Euclidean action. The classical equation of motion is seen to be

230: 

231: \begin{equation}

232: \frac I2\left( \frac{d\phi }{d\tau }\right) ^2-V\left( \phi \right) =0

233: \end{equation}

234: $\phi =0$ and $\pi $ are two equilibrium orientation of the N\'{e}el vector.

235: The N\'{e}el vector may transit by tunneling through potential barriers from

236: one orientation ($\phi =0$) to another ($\phi =\pi $) along clockwise or

237: anticlockwise paths. The instanton solutions of Eq.(12) are then obtained as

238: 

239: \begin{equation}

240: \phi _c^{\pm }\left( \tau \right) =\pm 2\arctan \left( \text{e}^{\omega

241: _0\tau }\right)

242: \end{equation}

243: where $\omega _0=\sqrt{2K_{\shortparallel }\Omega /I}$ is the small

244: oscillation frequency of the N\'{e}el vector around its equilibrium

245: orientation. $\phi _c^{-}\left( \tau \right) $ and $\phi _c^{+}\left( \tau

246: \right) $ denote instanton solutions with clockwise and anticlockwise

247: windings respectively. The Euclidean actions evaluated along the instanton

248: trajectories are seen to be

249: 

250: \begin{equation}

251: S_E^{\pm }=\int L_{eff}d\tau =2I\omega _0\pm \Theta \pi

252: \end{equation}

253: The quantum phase interference of clockwise path ``$-$'' and anticlockwise

254: path ``+'' is seen to be (see Fig.1)

255: 

256: \begin{equation}

257: e^{-S_E^{+}}+e^{-S_E^{-}}\sim e^{-2I\omega _0/\hbar }\cos \left( \Lambda \pi

258: \right)

259: \end{equation}

260: where $\Lambda =\frac \Theta \hbar $ $=S_0+\frac h{h_c}$ with $h_c=\frac

261: \hbar {\gamma I}$ . Since the potential $V\left( \phi \right) $ is periodic

262: and can be regarded as a one-dimensional superlattice. Using the Bloch

263: theory the low-lying energy spectrum could be determined as\cite{J.Q.Liang.H}

264: 

265: \begin{equation}

266: E_0=\varepsilon _0-2\Delta \varepsilon _0\cos \pi \left( \Lambda +\xi \right)

267: \end{equation}

268: Where $\xi $ is Bloch wave vector which can be assumed to take either of the

269: two values 0 and 1\cite{J.Q.Liang.Y}. $\Delta \varepsilon _0=\frac{2\hbar

270: \omega _0}\pi $e$^{-2I\omega _0/\hbar }$ is the usual overlap integral or

271: simply the level shift induced by tunneling through any one of the barriers

272: . Thus the tunneling splitting is seen to be

273: 

274: \begin{equation}

275: \Delta \varepsilon =\left| 2\Delta \varepsilon _0\cos \pi \left( \Lambda

276: +1\right) -2\Delta \varepsilon _0\cos \pi \Lambda \right| =4\Delta

277: \varepsilon _0\left| \cos \pi \Lambda \right|

278: \end{equation}

279: which is a function of the external magnetic field like in the ferromagnetic

280: particle case \cite{A.Garg,W.Werns,S.P.Kou}.When $h=0$, Eq.(17) reduces to

281: the previous result\cite{E.M.C.in} where the tunneling splitting is quenched

282: when $S_0=$half-integer. With nonzero magnetic field the tunneling splitting

283: would be quenched whenever $\Lambda =n+\frac 12$ or $h=\left( S_0-n-\frac

284: 12\right) \hbar /I\gamma $ where $n$ is an integer. Fig.2 shows the

285: oscillation of the tunneling splitting with respect to the external magnetic

286: field. This quenching is due to the quantum phase interference of two

287: tunneling paths of opposite windings. The period of oscillation is given by

288: 

289: \begin{equation}

290: \Delta h=\frac \hbar {I\gamma }.

291: \end{equation}

292: 

293: We have demonstrated a macroscopic quantum interference effect in the

294: tunneling of the magnetization of antiferromagnetic particles. Such

295: particles open thus a new avenue to test macroscopic quantum interference

296: effects. Experimental tests of our prediction could thus make an important

297: contribution to our understanding of the transition region between the

298: microscopic and the macroscopic world.

299: 

300: \begin{description}

301: \item  \textbf{Acknowledgements: }

302: 

303: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

304: under Grant Nos. 1967701 and 19775033. J.-Q.L and D.K.P also acknowledge

305: support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

306: \end{description}

307: 

308: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

309: \bibitem{E.M.Chud}  Chudnovsky E M and Gunther L 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 

310: \textbf{60} 661

311: 

312: \bibitem{B.Barbara}  Barbara B and Chudnovsky E M 1990 Phys. Lett. A \textbf{%

313: 145} 205

314: 

315: \bibitem{Proceeding}  Gunther L and Barbara B (Eds) 1995 Procedings of the

316: Meeting on Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization-QTM$^{^{\prime }}$94, Vol. 

317: \textbf{301} of NATO ASI series (Dordrecht: Kluwer)

318: 

319: \bibitem{A.Garg PRL}  Garg A 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{71} 4249

320: 

321: \bibitem{D.Loss}  Loss D DiVincenzo D Grinstein G 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 

322: \textbf{69} 3232

323: 

324: \bibitem{EMC DPD}  Chudnovsky E M and DiVincenzo D D 1993 Phys.Rev.B \textbf{%

325: 48} 10548

326: 

327: \bibitem{N.V.P}  Prokofev N V and Stamp P C E 1993 J.Phys. Condens.Matter 

328: \textbf{5} L661

329: 

330: \bibitem{J.Q.Liang}  Liang J -Q, M\"{u}ller-Kirsten H J W and Zhou J -G 1997

331: Z. Physik. B \textbf{102} 525

332: 

333: \bibitem{A.Garg}  Garg A 1993 Europhys. Lett. \textbf{22} 209

334: 

335: \bibitem{W.Werns}  Wernsdorfer W and Sessoli R 1999 Science \textbf{284} 133

336: 

337: \bibitem{S.P.Kou}  Kou S -P, Liang J -Q, Zhang Y -B and Pu F -C 1999

338: Phys.Rev.B \textbf{59} 11792

339: 

340: \bibitem{J.M.Duan}  J.M.Duan and A.Garg 1995 J. Phys.:Condense Matter 

341: \textbf{7} 2171

342: 

343: \bibitem{H.Sima}  Simanjuntak 1994 J.Phys.: Condens.Matter \textbf{6} 2925

344: 

345: \bibitem{J.Q.L Mu Nie}  Liang J -Q, M\"{u}ller-Kirsten H J W, Nie Y-H, Pu F

346: -C and Zhang Y -B 1998 Phys.Lett. A \textbf{248} 434

347: 

348: \bibitem{J.Tejada}  Tejada J, Zhang X X 1994 J Phys.: Condes. Matter \textbf{%

349: 6 }263

350: 

351: \bibitem{E.M.C.in}  Chudnovsky E M in:Gunth L and Barbara B (Eds) Quantum

352: Tunneling of Magnetization QTM$^{^{\prime }}$94 pp 77-89

353: 

354: \bibitem{Nie}  Nie Y-H, ZhangY-B, Liang J -Q, M\"{u}ller-Kirsten H J W and

355: Pu F -C 1999 Physica B \textbf{270} 95

356: 

357: \bibitem{E.M.Chudnovsky}  Chudnovsky E M 1995 J Magn. Matter \textbf{140-144}

358: 1821

359: 

360: \bibitem{J.Q.Liang.H}  Liang J -Q, M\"{u}ller-Kirsten H J W, Zhou J -G,

361: Zimmerschied F and Pu F -C 1997 Phys. Lett. B \textbf{393} 368

362: 

363: \bibitem{J.Q.Liang.Y}  Liang J -Q, ZhangY -B, M\"{u}ller-Kirsten H J W, Zhou

364: J -G, Zimmerschied F and Pu F -C 1998 Phys. Rev. B \textbf{57} 529

365: \end{thebibliography}

366: 

367: \textbf{Figure Caption:}

368: 

369: Fig.1: Quantum phase interference of two tunnel paths of opposite windings

370: 

371: Fig.2: Oscillation of tunneling splitting as a function of the external

372: field with the solid line for $S_0=$half-integer and the dotted line for $%

373: S_0=\func{integer}$

374: 

375: \end{document}

376: