1: % This paper can be typeset using REVTeX 3.0.
2: \documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
3: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,aps]{revtex}
4: %\documentstyle[aps]{revtex}
5: \def\btt#1{{\tt$\backslash$#1}}
6: \begin{document}
7: \draft
8: \preprint{}
9: \title{The Magnetic Excitation Spectrum and Thermodynamics of
10: High-$T_c$ Superconductors}
11: \author{Pengcheng Dai,$^{1,\ast}$ H. A. Mook,$^{1}$ S. M. Hayden,$^{2}$ G.
12: Aeppli,$^{3}$
13: T. G. Perring,$^4$ R. D. Hunt,$^5$ and F. Do$\rm\breve{g}$an$^6$}
14: \address{\rm
15: $^1$Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6393, USA.
16: $^2$H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 ITL, UK.
17: $^3$NEC Research Institute, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.
18: $^4$Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, UK.
19: $^5$Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6221, USA.
20: $^6$Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
21: University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. \\
22: $^\ast$ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: piq@ornl.gov
23: }
24: \maketitle
25: \begin{abstract}
26: Inelastic neutron scattering was used to study the wavevector- and
27: frequency-dependent magnetic fluctuations in single crystals of
28: superconducting YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+x}$. The spectra contain several important
29: features, including a gap in the superconducting state, a pseudogap in the
30: normal state and the much-discussed resonance peak.
31: The appearance of the pseudogap determined from transport and nuclear
32: resonance
33: coincides with formation of the resonance in the magnetic excitations.
34: The exchange energy associated with the
35: resonance has the temperature and doping dependences as well as the magnitude to
36: describe approximately the
37: electronic specific heat near the superconducting transition temperature ($T_c$).
38: \end{abstract}
39: \newpage
40:
41:
42: \narrowtext
43: The parent compounds of the high-transition-temperature (high-$T_c$) cuprate
44: superconductors are antiferromagnetic (AF) insulators
45: characterised by a simple doubling of the crystallographic unit cells in the
46: CuO$_2$ planes. When holes are doped into these planes, the long-range AF
47: ordered phase
48: disappears and the lamellar copper oxide materials become metallic and
49: superconducting
50: with persistent short-range AF spin correlations (fluctuations).
51: Although spin fluctuations in cuprate superconductors
52: are observed for materials such as YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+x}$ [denote as
53: (123)O$_{6+x}$]
54: at all hole doping levels, $x$ \cite{mignod,mook,fong,dai1,fong1,bourges},
55: the role
56: of such fluctuations in the pairing mechanism and superconductivity
57: is still a subject of controversy \cite{conference}.
58: The most prominent feature in the fluctuations for (123)O$_{6+x}$ is a
59: sharp resonance
60: which for
61: highly doped compositions appears below
62: the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$
63: at an energy of 41 meV \cite{mignod,mook,fong}.
64: We show that the temperature-dependent resonance intensity is correlated
65: with the electronic part of the specific heat of (123)O$_{6+x}$,
66: $C^{el}(x,T)$ \cite{loram1,loram},
67: including the extended fluctuation regime (``pseudogap phase''), and that
68: the pseudogap
69: temperature $T^\ast$ determined
70: from the onset of the resonance intensity agrees with results of
71: transport and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques.
72: By making absolute intensity measurements of the magnetic resonance,
73: $S_{res}(q,\omega)$, we estimate the contribution of its exchange energy
74: \cite{scalapino,demlerzhang} to the $C^{el}(x,T)$ anomaly around $T_c$.
75: We find that the temperature and doping
76: dependence of the resonance exchange energy can account for the
77: $C^{el}(x,T)$ anomaly \cite{loram},
78: suggesting that a large part of this anomaly is due to
79: spin fluctuations.
80:
81:
82: Our experiments were performed using triple-axis spectrometers at the
83: High-Flux
84: Isotope Reactor (HFIR) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
85: \cite{mook,dai1} and the MARI direct geometry
86: chopper spectrometer
87: at the ISIS pulsed spallation neutron source of the Rutherford Appleton
88: Laboratory \cite{aeppli}.
89: The momentum transfer $(q_x,q_y,q_z)$ is measured in units of \AA$^{-1}$
90: and reciprocal space positions are specified in reciprocal
91: lattice units (rlu) $(h,k,l)=(q_xa/2\pi,q_yb/2\pi,q_zc/2\pi)$,
92: where $a$, $b$ ($\simeq a$), and $c$ are the lattice parameters of the
93: orthorhombic unit cell of (123)O$_{6+x}$. For this study, we
94: prepared four
95: single-crystal samples by the melt texture growth technique \cite{mook,dai1}.
96: Subsequent annealing resulted in oxygen stoichiometries of $x=0.6$, 0.7, 0.8,
97: 0.93 with superconducting transitions at $T_c=62.7$, 74, 82, 92.5 K,
98: respectively.
99:
100:
101: The complete magnetic excitation spectra (Fig. 1) are obtained by
102: integration of the
103: magnetic neutron scattering over the two-dimensional
104: Brillouin zone (BZ) of (123)O$_{6+x}$ for $x=0.6$ at several temperatures
105: \cite{hayden,note1}. Because the CuO$_2$ planes in (123)O$_{6+x}$ actually
106: appear in coupled bilayers,
107: magnetic fluctuations
108: that are in-phase (acoustic or $\chi^{\prime\prime}_{ac}$) or out-of phase
109: (optical or $\chi^{\prime\prime}_{op}$) \cite{note2} with respect
110: to the neighboring plane
111: will have different
112: spectra \cite{mignod,mook,fong,dai1,fong1,bourges}.
113: That the optical excitations occur at higher energies
114: than the acoustic excitations, and are characterized by a substantial
115: gap even in
116: the normal state at 80 K,
117: demonstrates that the bilayer coupling remains antiferromagnetic on going
118: from the insulating parent to the
119: superconducting metal.
120: Upon lowering the temperature from 290 K to 35 K, the
121: most dramatic change in the local-susceptibility $\chi^{\prime\prime}(\omega)$
122: for energies less than 100 meV is the appearance of a resonance
123: at 34 meV in the acoustic mode as shown in the shaded areas of Fig. 1.
124: For $x=0.6$, the resonance is clearly present not only below $T_c$ but also
125: at 80 K, albeit in
126: reduced form. Beyond the resonance, there is a broad feature extending at
127: least
128: to 220 meV, with a maximum at approximately 75 meV. This broad feature
129: is reminiscent of the continuum, peaked at around 20 meV, seen in the
130: single layer compound
131: La$_{1.86}$Sr$_{0.14}$CuO$_4$ \cite{hayden1}. Well below the resonance
132: peak, scattering is
133: suppressed and a true spin-gap with a value of about 20 meV develops in the
134: superconducting state (Fig. 1A).
135: At room temperature, the optical and acoustic spectra (Figs. 1C and 1F)
136: show no maxima over the range of our measurements.
137:
138: Because the most dramatic change in the magnetic spectrum is
139: the change in the resonance intensity, we focus on the
140: temperature and
141: composition dependence of the resonance.
142: The detailed momentum and frequency dependence of $S_{res}(q,\omega)$
143: obtained at HFIR at various temperatures around
144: the resonance energy for (123)O$_{6.6}$ (Fig. 2) show that
145: in the low temperature superconducting state (Fig. 2A), the
146: spectrum is dominated by the resonance at 34 meV.
147: At temperatures just
148: above $T_c$ (Fig. 2B), the resonance broadens and decreases in intensity, consistent with
149: the ISIS data of Fig. 1. The resonance peak intensity appears to shift
150: smoothly toward
151: higher energies in the normal state with increasing temperature.
152: A signature of the resonance remains at 125 K and 150 K, but essentially
153: vanishes at 200 K. Previous temperature dependent measurements
154: for underdoped (123)O$_{6+x}$
155: indicate that the resonance peak
156: intensity changes its characteristics at $T_c$ \cite{dai1,fong1}. While the
157: intensity at
158: the resonance energy has a noticeable upturn upon cooling through $T_c$, the
159: scattering at frequencies above and below the resonance decrease below
160: $T_c$ \cite{dai1,fong1}.
161: This behavior can now be understood as arising from the narrowing of the resonance
162: in energy from the normal to the superconducting states.
163:
164:
165:
166: The temperature dependence of the resonance peak intensity
167: [$S_{res}(q,\omega)$]
168: for three (123)O$_{6+x}$ samples with different doping levels and
169: transition temperatures is shown in Fig. 3, A throught C.
170: For $x=0.6$, the temperature dependence of the momentum- and frequency-
171: integrated resonance
172: is found to be different from that of the peak intensity (Fig. 3A). For
173: (123)O$_{6.8}$, similar behavior also
174: occurs, but because the resonance is weaker above
175: $T_c$, the counting times required to obtain reliable integrals of the type
176: found for $x=0.6$ are prohibitive, and
177: so we are content with simply plotting the peak intensities. Finally,
178: for $x=0.93$, no broadening in either
179: energy or wave vector has been identified \cite{mignod,mook,fong}, and so
180: in this case, the temperature dependence
181: of the integrated spectral weight does actually follow the peak intensity.
182: We define the mean-squared
183: (fluctuating) moment associated with the resonance
184: as $
185: \langle m_{res}^2\rangle=3/(2\pi) \int d(\hbar\omega)\chi^{\prime\prime}_{res}
186: (\omega)/(1-\exp(-\hbar\omega/kT))
187: $,
188: where $\hbar$ is the Planck's constant divided by $2\pi$, $k$ is the Boltzmann's
189: constant,
190: $\chi^{\prime\prime}_{res}(\omega)$ \cite{note1,note2} is
191: the resonance part of the acoustic spectrum of Fig. 1,
192: and the factor of
193: $1/2$ arises from averaging $\sin^2(q_z d /2)$ over $q_z$.
194: For (123)O$_{6.6}$ and (123)O$_{6.93}$ our measurements are expressed in
195: absolute units obtained by
196: scaling to the low
197: temperature measurements performed on both compounds at ISIS \cite{hayden}.
198:
199: The most obvious feature of Figs. 3, A throught C, is that as the doping level and
200: $T_c$ decrease,
201: there is a progressively larger pretransitional regime above $T_c$.
202: Specifically, for the ideally doped sample ($x=0.93$), the onset
203: of the resonance occurs at a temperature $T^\ast$ which almost coincides
204: with $T_c$. For $x=0.8$ and 0.6, $T^\ast$ increases to
205: approximately $115\pm 15$ and $150\pm 20$ K, respectively, even while both
206: $T_c$ and the resonance energy itself are
207: reduced. Thus, the weight of the temperature-dependent resonance
208: joins the long
209: list of properties which show pretransitional
210: behavior in suboptimally doped (123)O$_{6+x}$. The cross-over temperature
211: $T^\ast$ (Fig. 4A) coincides with the temperatures
212: below which the temperature derivatives of the electrical resistivity
213: $d\rho(T)/dT$ \cite{ito,wuyts} and the Cu nuclear
214: $(T_1T)^{-1}$ relaxation rate \cite{takigawa} reaches a broad maxima. The
215: anomalies occurring at $T^\ast$ are generally
216: associated with the opening of a pseudogap in the low-energy spin excitation
217: spectrum, a supposition also supported by
218: neutron scattering data such as those in Fig. 1.
219:
220:
221:
222: According to thermodynamics, a metal undergoes a transition into the superconducting
223: state because such a transition can
224: lower its
225: total free energy, $F$ \cite{bcs}.
226: The difference in free energy of the system between the normal state,
227: extrapolated to zero temperature, ($F_N$) and
228: the superconducting state ($F_S$) is the condensation energy, that is,
229: $E_C=(F_N-F_S)_{T=0}$. In principle, the free energy of a system, and
230: therefore $E_C$, can be derived
231: from the temperature dependence of $C^{el}(x,T)$ \cite{loram1}. For
232: (123)O$_{6+x}$, $C^{el}(x,T)$
233: has been measured by Loram {\it et al.} \cite{loram}.
234: The key features of the corresponding data (Fig. 3E)
235: are a sharp jump at $T_c$ for the optimally doped (123)O$_{6.92}$, which
236: becomes much suppressed upon reduction of the oxygen content.
237: Although there is less entropy released at $T_c$, more seems to be
238: released at temperatures above $T_c$, as $x$ is reduced below its optimal
239: value. Thus,
240: the specific
241: heat tracks the temperature derivative (Fig. 3D) of the spectral weight of
242: the resonance. Just as
243: for the specific heat, decreasing doping reduces the maximum in $d\langle
244: m_{res}^2\rangle /dT$ at
245: $T_c$ and introduces progressively broader high-temperature tails.
246:
247:
248: In the $t$-$J$ model \cite{zhangrice},
249: the Hamiltonian of the system consists of a nearest-neighbor hopping
250: ($t$) term
251: accounting for the kinetic energy ($E_K$) of the carriers and a
252: magnetic exchange ($J$) term of the type describing the
253: insulating antiferromagnetic parent compound \cite{hayden96b}.
254: Magnetic fluctuations with a particular
255: wavevector
256: $q$ contribute to the exchange energy ($E_J$) via a product with $J(q)$, the
257: Fourier transform of the
258: exchange interactions \cite{scalapino}.
259: Although
260: magnetic spectra as complicated as those in
261: Fig. 1 will be difficult to describe within such a simple model,
262: the exchange part of the $t$-$J$ Hamiltonian does
263: provide a convenient way to quantitatively estimate the effect of
264: magnetic fluctuations on the thermodynamic properties of high-$T_c$
265: superconductors.
266: For (123)O$_{6+x}$, which has two coupled CuO$_2$ layers
267: per unit cell,
268: the exchange interactions consist of the nearest-neighbor spin-spin
269: coupling $J$
270: in the same CuO$_2$ plane and the coupling $J_\perp$ between two
271: CuO$_2$ planes within the unit cell. Since $J$ is much larger than $J_\perp$ \cite{hayden96b},
272: the exchange energy is \cite{scalapino,demlerzhang,noteeq}:
273: \begin{eqnarray}
274: E_J\simeq {3\over
275: (g\mu_{\rm B})^2}({a\over
276: 2\pi})^2\int \frac{d(\hbar\omega)}{\pi} \int dq_xdq_y
277: \frac{1}{2}J[\cos(q_xa)+\cos(q_yb)]
278: \frac{[\chi^{\prime\prime}_{ac}(q_x,q_y,\omega)
279: +\chi^{\prime\prime}_{op}(q_x,q_y,\omega)]}
280: {1-\exp(-\hbar\omega/kT)}
281: \end{eqnarray}
282: where $g$ is the Lande factor ($\simeq 2$) and $\mu_B$ is the Bohr magneton. Thus,
283: Eq.~1 gives the contribution of
284: the exchange energy to the total energy. Since the heat capacity is
285: the temperature derivative of the total energy, we can estimate how
286: the magnetic fluctuations responsible for the resonance affect the
287: thermodynamic properties of (123)O$_{6+x}$
288: \cite{loram1,loram}.
289: As the resonance grows, more spins fluctuating at the resonance frequency
290: are correlated
291: antiferromagnetically, and the exchange energy is correspondingly reduced.
292: Assuming that the spins accounting for the resonance are not spatially correlated at high
293: temperatures and therefore do not contribute to Eq. 1, the contribution
294: of the exchange energy of the resonance
295: ($E_J^{res}$) to the specific heat, or $C^{res}_J(x,T)$, is
296: then
297: $$
298: C^{res}_J(x,T)\simeq {dE_J^{res}\over dT} =-{3\over 4\mu_{\rm B}^2}J
299: \frac{d}{dT} \left( \int \frac{d (\hbar\omega) }{\pi}
300: \frac{\chi^{\prime\prime}_{res}(\omega)}{1-\exp(-\hbar\omega/kT)}
301: \right)
302: = -{J\over 2\mu_{B}^2} \frac{d \langle m_{res}^2\rangle}{dT} \;\;\;\; (2).
303: $$
304: Therefore,
305: $C^{res}_J(x,T)$ is approximately proportional to the temperature
306: derivative of
307: the spectral weight of the resonance, as we already discovered
308: from comparison of our
309: data with the measured specific heat. In deriving Eq. 2 from Eq. 1 we
310: relied on the fact that
311: the resonance is sharply peaked around $(\pi/a,\pi/b)$.
312: The contribution of the resonance exchange energy to the heat capacity
313: calculated using Eq. 2 with the measured exchange coupling $J=125\pm 20$ meV
314: for (123)O$_{6.6}$ \cite{hayden} is shown in Fig. 3D (right
315: hand scale) and can be compared to the measured $C^{el}(x,T)$ of Loram {\it et al.}
316: in Fig. 3E \cite{loram}.
317: The model calculation with no
318: adjustable parameters shows that the resonance
319: can provide enough temperature-dependent exchange energy to yield the
320: superconducting
321: anomaly in the specific heat \cite{note4}. This suggests that a large part
322: of the
323: specific heat near $T_c$ and its associated
324: entropy are due to spin fluctuations.
325:
326: Clearly, the measured specific heat
327: includes contributions other than
328: that due to the exchange energy of the resonance ($E_J^{res}$).
329: While we included the most obvious
330: temperature dependent feature
331: in our calculation, the temperature evolution of the remainder of the spin
332: excitation spectrum is neglected. Most notably we ignored the formation
333: of the spin pseudogap below $T^{\ast}$ and spin gap below $T_c$,
334: both of which could
335: increase $E_J$.
336: Further, we have not considered the contribution of $E_K$
337: to $C^{el}(x,T)$. For superconductors, $E_K$ is expected to
338: increase from the normal to the
339: superconducting state \cite{scalapino}. Both this effect and spin (pseudo)gap
340: formation could partially compensate for the
341: reduction of $E_J$ due to the appearance of the resonance.
342: Such compensation might explain why the
343: area of the calculated
344: $C^{res}_J(x,T)$ anomaly is considerably larger than that of the
345: $C^{el}(x,T)$ measurement.
346:
347: In the next few years, the contributions missing from the
348: present analysis should become calculable using better neutron and optical
349: conductivity data, which would provide the necessary information on the temperature-dependent
350: magnetic exchange and kinetic energy terms, respectively.
351: It would also be of considerable interest to make further model
352: calculations to estimate the change in the resonance exchange energy between
353: the normal and superconducting states at zero temperature and hence the
354: resonance exchange energy contribution to the condensation energy
355: \cite{scalapino,demlerzhang}.
356: Unfortunately, this comparison is difficult because the normal state
357: $S(q,\omega)$ must be extrapolated to zero temperature. This cannot be done
358: reliably with the present data and presents a challenge for the future.
359:
360: In summary, we show that a pseudogap regime bounded by a temperature
361: $T^\ast >T_c$
362: determined from transport, NMR, and thermodynamic measurements can be
363: associated with
364: the appearance of the resonance peak and the suppression of the low
365: frequency response in the
366: magnetic excitation spectrum. Our complete spectra allow us to
367: establish the weight of the resonance relative to that of other spectral
368: features.
369: A simple calculation of the exchange energy using the measured
370: temperature dependence of the resonance
371: shows that
372: spin fluctuations can account for
373: a large part of the electronic
374: specific heat near the superconducting transition.
375:
376:
377:
378:
379: \begin{references}
380: \bibitem{mignod} J. Rossat-Mignod {\it et al.},
381: Physica (Amsterdam) {\bf 185C}, 86 (1991).
382: \bibitem{mook} H. A. Mook, M. Yethiraj, G. Aeppli, T. E. Mason, and T.
383: Armstrong,
384: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70}, 3490 (1993).
385: \bibitem{fong} H. F. Fong {\it et al.},
386: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 316 (1995).
387: \bibitem{dai1} P. Dai, M. Yethiraj, H. A. Mook, T. B. Lindemer, and F.
388: Do$\rm\breve{g}$an, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77},
389: 5425 (1996).
390: \bibitem{fong1} H. F. Fong, B. Keimer, D. L. Milius, and I. A. Aksay, Phys.
391: Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 713 (1997).
392: \bibitem{bourges} P. Bourges {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, R11439
393: (1997).
394: \bibitem{conference} Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary HTS Workshop on
395: Physics, Materials, and
396: Applications, Eds. B. Batlogg, C. W. Chu, W. K. Chu, D. V. Gubser, and K.
397: A. Muller, (World
398: Scientific) 1996.
399: \bibitem{loram1} J. W. Loram, K. A. Mirza, and P. F. Freeman, Physica C
400: {\bf 171}, 243 (1990).
401: \bibitem{loram} J. W. Loram, K. A. Mirza, J. R. Cooper, W. Y. Liang, and J.
402: M. Wade, J. Superconductivity {\bf 7}, 243
403: (1994).
404: \bibitem{scalapino} D. J. Scalapino and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58},
405: 8222 (1998).
406: \bibitem{demlerzhang} E. Demler and S. C. Zhang, Nature {\bf 396}, 733 (1998).
407: \bibitem{aeppli} See, for example, G. Aeppli, S. M. Hayden, and T. G.
408: Perring, Physics World,
409: December 1998, p33.
410: \bibitem{hayden} S. M. Hayden {\it et al.}, Physica B {\bf 241-243}, 765
411: (1998).
412: \bibitem{note1} We have used the elastic incoherent scattering
413: from a vanadium standard under the same experimental conditions to put the
414: two-dimensional wavevector integrated or local- susceptibility
415: $\chi^{\prime\prime}(\omega)=(a/2\pi)^2\int_{\rm
416: BZ}\chi^{\prime\prime}(q_x,q_y,\omega)dq_x dq_y$
417: from (123)O$_{6+x}$
418: on an absolute scale (see, for example, Ref.\cite{hayden1}).
419: Although at low frequencies $\chi^{\prime\prime}(q,\omega)$
420: for (123)O$_{6.6}$ has been shown to peak at
421: wavevector positions incommensurate from the underlying crystallographic
422: lattice in the low temperature superconducting state \cite{dai2,mook1}, we
423: have only used a Gaussian convolved with the instrumental resolution
424: to carry out
425: the
426: momentum integration within the scattering plane (see Fig. 6 of Ref.
427: \cite{hayden}). The poor out-of-plane
428: resolution of the instrument means that the integration of the magnetic
429: intensity over
430: momentum transfer perpendicular to the scattering plane is carried out
431: automatically.
432: The validity of such procedure to obtain $\chi^{\prime\prime}(\omega)$ has
433: been
434: confirmed by integrating the two-dimensional images of
435: $\chi^{\prime\prime}(q_x,q_y,\omega)$ at 24 meV and 34 meV \cite{mook1}.
436: \bibitem{note2}
437: It is convenient to split the magnetic response into two parts
438: $\chi^{\prime\prime}(q,\omega) =
439: \chi^{\prime\prime}_{ac}(q_x,q_y,\omega) \sin^2 (q_z d /2) +
440: \chi^{\prime\prime}_{op}(q_x,q_y,\omega) \cos^2 (q_z d /2)
441: $, where $d$ is the spacing between nearest-neighbor CuO planes.
442: \bibitem{hayden1} S. M. Hayden {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76},
443: 1344 (1996).
444: \bibitem{dai2} P. Dai, H. A. Mook, and F. Do$\rm\breve{g}$an, Phys. Rev.
445: Lett. {\bf 80}, 1738 (1998).
446: \bibitem{mook1} H. A. Mook {\it et al.}, Nature {\bf 395}, 580 (1998).
447: \bibitem{ito} T. Ito, K. Takenaka, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
448: 70}, 3995 (1993).
449: \bibitem{wuyts} B. Wuyts, V. V. Moshchalkov, and Y. Bruynseraede, Phy. Rev.
450: B {\bf 53}, 9418 (1996).
451: \bibitem{takigawa} M. Takigawa {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 43}, 247 (1991).
452: \bibitem{bcs} J. R. Shrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, {\it
453: Addison-Wesley, MA,} (1964).
454: \bibitem{zhangrice} F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 37}, 3759
455: (1988).
456: \bibitem{hayden96b} See, for example, S. M. Hayden, G. Aeppli, T. G. Perring,
457: H. A. Mook, and F. Do$\rm\breve{g}$an, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54},
458: R6905 (1996).
459: \bibitem{noteeq} Note that our susceptibility
460: $\chi$ is defined as $\frac{1}{3}(\chi_{xx}+\chi_{yy}+\chi_{zz})$ while
461: $\chi_{+-}$ is used in Ref.~\cite{demlerzhang}. We wish to thank
462: E. Demler for pointing this out and for many discussions about
463: condensation energy in the high-$T_c$ superconductors.
464: \bibitem{note4} $C^{res}_J(x,T)$ is the resonance contribution
465: to the $C^{el}(x,T)$, not $C^{el}(x,T)$ itself. Therefore, one should only
466: compare $C^{res}_J(x,T)$ to the
467: change in $C^{el}(x,T)$ above the sloped background.
468: \bibitem{final} We thank B. Batlogg, E. Demler, R. S. Fishman, J. W. Loram,
469: D. Morr, D. Pines,
470: D. J. Scalapino, and S. C. Zhang for
471: stimulating discussions. The work at Oak Ridge
472: was supported by the US DOE under Contract No. DE-AC05-96OR22464 with
473: Lockheed Martin
474: Energy Research Corp.
475: \end{references}
476:
477:
478:
479: \begin{figure}
480: \caption{Local- or wavevector-integrated frequency-dependent magnetic
481: susceptibility
482: $\chi^{\prime\prime}(\omega)$
483: for acoustic and optical modes in (123)O$_{6.6}$ corrected for
484: the isotropic Cu$^{2+}$ magnetic form factor and instrumental resolution [13].
485: The effect of Cu$^{2+}$
486: anisotropic form factor [S. Shamoto, M. Sato, J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb,
487: and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 48}, 13817 (1993)] is not considered.
488: The data
489: were collected
490: with the crystal mounted in the $(h,h,l)$ scattering plane
491: at MARI spectrometer at ISIS. ({\bf A}-{\bf C}) were chosen
492: at $q_z$ positions to emphasize acoustic modes and ({\bf D}-{\bf F}) the
493: optical modes.
494: Integrating the area under the resonance
495: peak and converting to moment squared yields $\langle m_{res}^2\rangle
496: = 0.06\pm0.04$ $\mu_{\rm B}^2$f.u.$^{-1}$ at 35 K and $0.04\pm0.03$
497: $\mu_{\rm B}^2$f.u.$^{-1}$
498: at 80 K. The resonance in (123)O$_{6.6}$ accounts for about 14\% of the
499: spectral weight up to 80 meV
500: at 35 K (Fig. 1A) and about 1\% of the total moment-squared
501: 2$g^{2}\mu_{B}^{2}S(S+1)=6$ $\mu_{B}^2$ expected per formula unit (f.u.)
502: assuming $S=1/2$ for each copper ion.
503: Similarly, we find
504: that
505: the 41 meV resonance for (123)O$_{6.93}$ has
506: $\langle m_{res}^2\rangle =0.06\pm0.04$ $\mu_{\rm B}^2$f.u$^{-1}$ at 25 K.
507: Note that the estimated error in $\langle m_{res}^2\rangle$
508: does not include the $\sim$30\%
509: systematic error involved
510: in normalizing the scattering to a vanadium standard.
511: }
512: \end{figure}
513:
514:
515:
516: \begin{figure}
517: \caption{The magnetic structure factor $S_{res}(q,\omega$) around the
518: resonance energy for (123)O$_{6.6}$ at various temperatures. The data were
519: taken with the HB-3 triple-axis
520: spectrometer at HFIR using pyrolytic graphite as monochromator, analyzer,
521: and filters.
522: The
523: collimations were, proceeding from the reactor to the detector,
524: 50$^\prime$-40$^\prime$-80$^\prime$-240$^\prime$, and the final neutron
525: energy was fixed at
526: 30.5 meV. To compose the color figures,
527: constant-energy scans along the $(h,3h,1.7)$
528: direction [3,4] from $h=0.42$ to 0.58 rlu
529: were performed at energy transfers of $\hbar\omega = 25$, 27, 30, 34, 37,
530: 40, 43,
531: and 46 meV. Magnetic intensity was
532: assumed to be scattering above the linear background of the
533: constant-energy scans. The scattering at different temperatures
534: was normalized to 300 monitor counts which correspond to 7 minutes per
535: point at $\hbar\omega = 34$ meV.
536: Note the change in the vertical color bar scales, made to
537: better display the dramatic decrease of the magnetic intensities on warming.
538: }
539:
540: \end{figure}
541:
542:
543:
544:
545:
546: \begin{figure}
547:
548: \caption{
549: Temperature dependence of the
550: resonance peak intensity (filled circles) for ({\bf A}) (123)O$_{6.6}$ at
551: $\hbar\omega =34$ meV,
552: ({\bf B}) (123)O$_{6.8}$ at 39 meV, and ({\bf C}) (123)O$_{6.93}$ at 40 meV
553: at the (0.5,1.5,1.7) rlu position on triple-axis spectrometers at HFIR.
554: Left axes show intensity normalized to $\langle m_{res}^2\rangle$ and right
555: axes to the
556: peak intensity at low temperatures. The error bars in ({\bf A-C}) include only
557: the statistical errors of the triple-axis measurements.
558: The squares in ({\bf A}) are the integrated
559: $S_{res}(q,\omega)$ and the triangles in ({\bf C}) are from Ref. 2.
560: $T^\ast$s are defined as the initial appearance of the resonance.
561: The solid line in ({\bf C}) below $T_c$ is a fit using the modified two
562: fluid model [$I(T)/I(0)=1-(T/T_c)^{3.09}$].
563: ({\bf D}) The estimated $d\langle m_{res}^2\rangle /dT$ for (123)O$_{6+x}$
564: is from the temperature
565: derivative of the solid lines in ({\bf A}-{\bf C}). To calculate the
566: absolute magnitude of
567: $C^{res}_J(x,T)$ using Eq. 2, we have assumed $J=125$ meV (Ref. 13), $\langle
568: m_{res}^2\rangle =0.06$
569: $\mu_{\rm B}^2$f.u$^{-1}$, and 1 mole $=666.15$ grams for each of the three compositions.
570: Note we have not considered the uncertainties of $C^{res}_J(x,T)$
571: arising from the systematic errors in determining the absolute magnitude of
572: $\langle m_{res}^2\rangle$, due most notably to the ambiguity in removing the
573: nonresonance portion of the signal (Fig. 1A).
574: ({\bf E}) $C^{el}(x,T)$ from Ref. 9 was converted to SI units
575: using 1 g-at.$\equiv1/(12+x)$ moles.
576: }
577:
578: \end{figure}
579:
580:
581:
582: \begin{figure}
583: \caption{Phase diagram of (123)O$_{6+x}$ summarizing the results of
584: transport, NMR, and neutron scattering.
585: Because various methods of oxygenation, slightly different $T_c$ values are
586: reported for the same nominal doping of (123)O$_{6+x}$.
587: We avoid this inconsistency by
588: plotting characteristic temperatures as a function of $T_c$. ({\bf A})
589: The open circles and open squares are temperatures which $d\rho(T)/dT$
590: reaches a broad
591: maximum (Refs. 19, 20). The open diamonds show the the pseudogap
592: temperature $T^\ast$
593: determined from NMR measurements (Ref. 21).
594: The filled circles locate $T_c$ and $T^\ast$, where the resonance first appears
595: in our samples. ({\bf B})
596: Filled circles show resonance energy versus
597: the transition temperature $T_c$.
598: Filled squares are from Fong {\it et al.} (Ref. 5).
599: Horizontal error bars are superconducting transition
600: widths. The solid lines are guides to the eye.
601: }
602:
603: \label{autonum}
604:
605: \end{figure}
606:
607: \end{document}
608: