1: \documentstyle[prb,aps,epsf,floats,twocolumn]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[multicol,prb,aps,epsf,floats]{revtex}
3: %\documentstyle[aps,prl,epsf,multicol]{revtex}
4: %documentstyle[prb,aps,epsf,floats,preprint]{revtex}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \draft
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: \author{Yoshihiro Takushima, Akihisa Koga, and Norio Kawakami}
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: \address{Department of Applied Physics,
12: Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan}
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: %%\title{Haldane gap system in a staggered field : mixed-spin model treatment}
15: \title{Magnetic Double Structure for $S=1, 1/2$ Mixed-Spin Systems}
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \date{\today}
18: \sloppy
19: \maketitle
20: \begin{abstract}
21: We investigate the zero-temperature and the
22: finite-temperature properties of the two-dimensional
23: antiferromagnetic quantum spin system composed of the
24: $s=1/2$ and $s=1$ spins. The spin excitation spectrum
25: as well as the thermodynamic quantities are computed
26: by means of the Schwinger-boson mean-field theory.
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: % Revised 1
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: We discuss how the magnetic double structure with the gapful and the
31: gapless excitations is generated, and apply the results systematically
32: to the Haldane gap system in a staggered magnetic field and also to the
33: weakly coupled ferrimagnetic mixed-spin chains. It is confirmed
34: that the results obtained are consistent with the experiments for
35: the quasi-one-dimensional Haldane compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_5$.
36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37: %By observing how the magnetic double structure with the gapful and
38: %the gapless excitations generates, we show that
39: %the Haldane gap system in a staggered magnetic field
40: %is adiabatically connected to the mixed-spin chain with
41: %ferrimagnetic ground state. It is confirmed that the results
42: %obtained are consistent with the experiments for
43: %the quasi-one-dimensional Haldane compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_5$.
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47: %\begin{multicols}{2}
48:
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: \section{Introduction}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52: The Haldane gap system\cite{Haldane}
53: has been one of the most fascinating subjects
54: in condensed matter physics, for which
55: extensive experimental and theoretical investigations have been
56: providing a variety of new interesting phenomena.
57: One of the hot topics is the magnetic double structure
58: in the quasi-one-dimensional (1D) Haldane systems
59: observed for the rare-earth compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_5$.
60: \cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr}
61: In the case with $R=\rm Y^{3+}$, the system has a disordered ground state
62: with the Haldane gap. \cite{HalGap1}
63: If $R$ is substituted by other magnetic ions such as $\rm Nd^{3+}$
64: and $\rm Pr^{3+}$,\cite{Pr,Str} the $s=1/2$ spins on the
65: $R^{3+}$ sublattice order magnetically at low temperatures, thus
66: giving rise to the magnetic double structure composed of
67: the Haldane gap excitation and
68: the gapless excitation induced by the long-range order.
69: This system has been theoretically treated as the
70: Haldane chains with a {\it static}
71: staggered field which are induced by the ordered $s=1/2$ spins
72: on the $R^{3+}$ sublattice so far.\cite{Gin,HcDMRG}
73: In a recent paper,\cite{longi} however, it has been
74: pointed out that the dynamics of the $s=1/2$ spins may be also
75: important, stimulating us to treat the system by a mixed-spin model.
76: Concerning the magnetic double structure, there is another
77: interesting spin system of current interest, i.e. the
78: quantum ferrimagnetic chain composed of
79: two kinds of mixed spins.\cite{ferri,Yee,Pati,Yama,Yama4,Wu}
80: Several compounds have been already found, which indeed realize
81: the mixed-spin system.\cite{ferri,Yee} This has
82: been stimulating further intensive theoretical studies on this
83: subject.\cite{Pati,Yama,Yama4,Wu}
84: In particular, it has been pointed out that such a ferrimagnetic chain
85: has the double structure for the spin excitation spectrum,
86: which controls the characteristic properties in the
87: ferrimagnetic chain.\cite{Yama4}
88:
89: The above two subjects, which have been studied experimentally
90: in different contexts, should possess the common interesting
91: physics, because both systems are characterized by the mixture of
92: two kinds of distinct spins.
93: Motivated by these hot topics, we here study the properties of
94: the antiferromagnetic mixed-spin system in detail,
95: for which the $s=1$ and $s=1/2$
96: spin chains are stacked alternately. We exploit the
97: two-dimensional (2D) system as the simplest model
98: which possesses the magnetic long-range order at zero temperature.
99: %%%%% Revise 1-1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
100: %%We shall explicitly demonstrate that the
101: %%Haldane gap system in a staggered field has the important connection
102: %%to the ferrimagnetic chain.
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104: By computing the dispersion relation and the staggered magnetization
105: by means of the Schwinger-boson mean-field theory,\cite{DPAro}
106: we clarify how our system generates the magnetic double structure,
107: which naturally interpolates the above two interesting spin systems.
108: We also show that the results obtained
109: are consistent with the experimental findings
110: for quasi-1D Haldane compounds
111: $R_2 \rm BaNiO_5$.\cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr}
112:
113: This paper is organized as follows. We introduce the model
114: and then briefly summarize the Schwinger-boson techniques
115: in Sec. II. We discuss the zero-temperature properties in Sec. III,
116: and finally move to the thermodynamic properties in Sec. IV.
117: A brief summary is given in Sec. V.
118:
119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
120: \section{Schwinger-boson Mean-Field Theory}
121: %%\section{Model Hamiltonian}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123:
124: Let us consider a 2D mixed-spin model on the square lattice,
125: which is described by the following Hamiltonian,
126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
127: \begin{eqnarray}
128: H&=&J_{1}\sum_{i,j,\eta}\left[{\bf S}_{2i,2j}^{A_{1}}
129: \cdot{\bf S}_{2i+\eta,2j}^{B_{1}}+
130: {\bf S}_{2i+\eta,2j+1}^{B_{2}}\cdot{\bf S}_{2i,2j+1}^{A_{2}}
131: \right]\nonumber\\
132: &+&\sum_{i,j,\eta}\left[J_{2}{\bf S}_{2i,2j}^{A_{1}}
133: \cdot{\bf S}_{2i,2j+\eta}^{A_{2}}+
134: J_{3}{\bf S}_{2i+1,2j}^{B_{1}}\cdot{\bf S}_{2i+1,2j+\eta}^{B_{2}}\right],
135: \label{eq:model}
136: \end{eqnarray}
137: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
138: where ${\bf S}_{i,j}^{A}$ (${\bf S}_{i,j}^{B}$) is the spin operator
139: at the $(i,j)$-th site in the $(x,y)$ plane, and $\eta$ implies the
140: summation to be taken over nearest-neighbor sites.
141: All the exchange couplings $J_{1}, J_{2}$ and $J_{3}$
142: are assumed to be antiferromagnetic.
143: We here focus on the mixed-spin system
144: composed of $S^{A}=1/2$ and $S^B=1$ spins,
145: since it is straightforward to generalize the results
146: to the arbitrary-spin case.
147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
148: \begin{figure}[htb]
149: \epsfxsize=7cm
150: \centerline{\epsfbox{model.eps}}
151: \vspace{0.1cm}
152: \caption{2D mixed-spin model on a square lattice.
153: The small (large) circle represents $S^A = 1/2$ ($S^B = 1$) spin.
154: The bold dashed, the thin dashed and the bold solid lines represent
155: the coupling constants $J_{1}, J_{2}$ and $J_{3}$, respectively.
156: $A_{1}, A_{2}, B_{1}$ and $B_{2}$ specify four spins in the unit cell.}
157: \label{fig:md}%-----------------------------------------
158: \end{figure}
159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
160: %%%%%%%% Revised 2, FIG.1 J1,J2,J3 %%%%%
161: In Fig. \ref{fig:md}, we have drawn the mixed-spin model schematically.
162: The indices $A_m$ and $B_m$ label the sublattice in the unit cell.
163: Note that this mixed-spin model is constructed in two ways
164: depending on how we stack the independent spin chains by
165: introducing three kinds of the coupling constants.
166: By taking $J_3\gg J_1, J_2$,
167: we can study the characteristic properties of the
168: $s=1$ Haldane spin chains coupled with
169: the $s=1/2$ gapless spin chains, which may have
170: the relevance to the Haldane gap system in a staggered field
171: observed in the compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_5$.
172: \cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr}
173: On the other hand, by setting the coupling
174: constants $J_1\gg J_2, J_3$, we can investigate how the
175: independent ferrimagnetic chains $(J_2=J_3=0)$, which have been studied
176: extensively in recent years,\cite{ferri,Yee,Pati,Yama,Yama4,Wu}
177: are combined to form the 2D system.
178: The advantage of our mixed-spin approach is that we can
179: systematically describe these two
180: interesting systems by continuously varying the parameters
181: $J_1, J_2$ and $J_3$.
182:
183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
184: %%\section{Schwinger-boson Mean-Field Theory}
185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
186:
187: %%%%%% Revised 3, ADDED REF. SWT %%%%%%%%%
188: We employ the Schwinger-boson mean-field theory (SBMFT)\cite{DPAro}
189: to study the above mixed-spin model.\cite{SWT}
190: This method was applied successfully to the 2D Heisenberg
191: model with uniform spins,\cite{DPAro,Sar} and then to
192: the bilayer system,\cite{bil} the double-exchange system,\cite{Sar1}
193: the ferrimagnetic chain,\cite{Wu} etc.
194: It is known that the SBMFT can describe the magnetically ordered phase,
195: which is characterized by the condensation of the
196: Schwinger-bosons.\cite{Sar} In the Schwinger-boson representation,
197: the spin operators are expressed in terms of the boson creation and
198: annihilation operators $\gamma_{\alpha}^{\dagger}$, $\gamma_{\alpha}$,
199: with the Pauli matrix {\boldmath $\sigma$} as ${\bf S}=\frac{1}{2}
200: \gamma_{\alpha}^{\dagger}${\boldmath $\sigma$}$_{\alpha\beta}\gamma_{\beta}$
201: $(\alpha,\beta=\uparrow,\downarrow)$.
202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
203: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
204: Since the unit cell in our model includes four sites,
205: we necessarily introduce eight kinds of Bose operators
206: $\gamma_{\alpha}=a^{(1)}_{\alpha}, a^{(2)}_{\alpha},
207: b^{(1)}_{\alpha}, b^{(2)}_{\alpha}$ %$(\alpha=\uparrow,\downarrow)$
208: which belong to the $A_1, A_2, B_1, B_2$ sublattices, respectively.
209: By imposing the constraint
210: $\gamma_{i\uparrow}^{\dagger}\gamma_{i\uparrow}+
211: \gamma_{i\downarrow}^{\dagger}\gamma_{i\downarrow} = 2S^{A}$ or $2S^{B}$
212: on each site, we can correctly map
213: the original spin system to the boson system.
214: Introducing the Lagrange multipliers
215: $\lambda^{A}_{ij}$ and $\lambda^{B}_{ij}$,
216: the Hamiltonian with the constraints is recast to
217: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
218: \begin{eqnarray}
219: H&=&-2\sum_{i,j,\eta}\left[J_{1}\left(A_{ij\eta}^{\dagger}A_{ij\eta}+
220: B_{ij\eta}^{\dagger}B_{ij\eta}\right)\right.\nonumber\\
221: &+&\left.J_{2}C_{ij\eta}^{\dagger}C_{ij\eta}+
222: J_{3}D_{ij\eta}^{\dagger}D_{ij\eta}\right]\nonumber\\
223: %%%%%%%%%%%%
224: &+&\sum_{n=1}^{2}\left[\sum_{(ij)\in A_n} \lambda^{A}_{ij}
225: \left(\sum_\sigma a_{ij\sigma}^{(n)\dagger}a_{ij\sigma}^{(n)}-
226: 2S^{A}\right)\right.\nonumber\\
227: &+&\left.\sum_{(ij)\in B_n} \lambda^{B}_{ij}
228: \left(\sum_\sigma b_{ij\sigma}^{(n)\dagger}b_{ij\sigma}^{(n)}-
229: 2S^{B}\right)\right]\nonumber\\
230: &+&\sum_{i,j,\eta}\left[
231: J_{1}\left(S^{A_{1}}S^{B_{1}}+S^{A_{2}}S^{B_{2}}\right)\right.\nonumber\\
232: &+&\left.
233: J_{2}S^{A_{1}}S^{A_{2}}+J_{3}S^{B_{1}}S^{B_{2}}\right],
234: \label{eq:hamil}
235: \end{eqnarray}
236: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
237: where four bond operators are introduced as
238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
239: \begin{eqnarray}
240: A_{ij\eta}&=&a^{(1)}_{2i,2j\uparrow}b^{(1)}_{2i+\eta,2j\downarrow}
241: -a^{(1)}_{2i,2j\downarrow}b^{(1)}_{2i+\eta,2j\uparrow},\\
242: B_{ij\eta}&=&a^{(2)}_{2i,2j+1\uparrow}b^{(2)}_{2i+\eta,2j+1\downarrow}
243: -a^{(2)}_{2i,2j+1\downarrow}b^{(2)}_{2i+\eta,2j+1\uparrow},\\
244: C_{ij\eta}&=&a^{(1)}_{2i,2j\uparrow}a^{(2)}_{2i,2j+\eta\downarrow}
245: -a^{(1)}_{2i,2j\downarrow}a^{(2)}_{2i,2j+\eta\uparrow},\\
246: D_{ij\eta}&=&b^{(1)}_{2i+1,2j\uparrow}b^{(2)}_{2i+1,2j+\eta\downarrow}
247: -b^{(1)}_{2i+1,2j\downarrow}b^{(2)}_{2i+1,2j+\eta\uparrow}.
248: \end{eqnarray}
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250: We perform a Hartree-Fock decomposition of eq. (\ref{eq:hamil})
251: by taking the thermal average $<A_{ij\eta}>=A$,
252: $<\lambda^{A}_{ij}>=\lambda_{A}$, etc.,
253: which means that these values are assumed to be uniform and static.
254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
255:
256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
257: By diagonalizing the mean-field Hamiltonian via the
258: Bogoliubov transformation, we have
259: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
260: \begin{eqnarray}
261: H_{\rm MF}&=&\sum_{{\bf k}\sigma}\sum_{n=1}^{2}\left[
262: E_{\bf k}^{(1)}\alpha_{{\bf k}\sigma}^{(n)\dag}
263: \alpha_{{\bf k}\sigma}^{(n)}+
264: E_{\bf k}^{(2)}\beta_{{\bf k}\sigma}^{(n)\dag}
265: \beta_{{\bf k}\sigma}^{(n)}\right],
266: \label{bogo}
267: \end{eqnarray}
268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
269: where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the Bose operators for
270: normal modes.
271: The corresponding energy spectrums read
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273: \begin{eqnarray}
274: E_{\bf k}^{(1)}&=&\sqrt{\frac{E_{0}-\sqrt{E_{1}}}{2}},\ \ \
275: E_{\bf k}^{(2)}=\sqrt{\frac{E_{0}+\sqrt{E_{1}}}{2}},
276: \end{eqnarray}
277: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
278: where $E_{0}$ and $E_{1}$ are given by
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280: \begin{eqnarray}
281: E_{0}&=&\lambda_{A}^{2}+\lambda_{B}^{2}-2d_{\bf k}^{2}
282: -e_{\bf k}^{2}-f_{\bf k}^{2},
283: \nonumber\\
284: &&\\
285: E_{1}&=&(\lambda_{A}^{2}-\lambda_{B}^{2}-e_{\bf k}^{2}
286: +f_{\bf k}^{2})^{2}\nonumber\\
287: &&\nonumber\\
288: &&-4d_{\bf k}^{2}\left( (\lambda_{A}-\lambda_{B})^{2}
289: -(e_{\bf k}+f_{\bf k})^{2}\right),
290: \nonumber
291: \end{eqnarray}
292: %%%%%%%%%
293: with
294: %%%%%%%%%
295: \begin{eqnarray}
296: d_{\bf k}&=&2AJ_{1}\cos k_{x},\ \ \ e_{\bf k}=2CJ_{2}\cos k_{y},\nonumber\\
297: f_{\bf k}&=&2DJ_{3}\cos k_{y}.\nonumber
298: \end{eqnarray}
299: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
300: By minimizing the free energy thus obtained at finite temperatures,
301: we end up with the self-consistent equations
302: for $A=B, C, D, \lambda_{A}, \lambda_{B}$,
303: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
304: \begin{eqnarray}
305: &&1+2S^{A}=
306: \sum_{n}\int \frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}
307: \coth \kappa E_{\bf k}^{(n)} \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}
308: {\partial\lambda_{A}},
309: \label{sel1}
310: \\
311: &&1+2S^{B}=
312: \sum_{n}\int \frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}
313: \coth \kappa E_{\bf k}^{(n)} \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}
314: {\partial\lambda_{B}},
315: \label{sel2}
316: \\
317: &&-8J_{1}A=
318: \sum_{n}\int \frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}
319: \coth \kappa E_{\bf k}^{(n)} \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}{\partial A},
320: \label{sel3}\\
321: &&-4J_{2}C=
322: \sum_{n}\int \frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}
323: \coth \kappa E_{\bf k}^{(n)} \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}{\partial C},
324: \label{sel4}\\
325: &&-4J_{3}D=
326: \sum_{n}\int \frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}
327: \coth \kappa E_{\bf k}^{(n)} \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}{\partial D},
328: \label{sel5}
329: \end{eqnarray}
330: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
331: with $\kappa=1/(2k_BT)$,
332: where we have assumed that the bond operators which link the $s=1$
333: and $s=1/2$ spins take the same mean value, $A = B$.
334: This completes our formulation based on the SBMFT. In the following
335: sections, we solve these self-consistent equations to estimate the
336: excitation spectrum and the thermodynamic quantities.
337: Since it is not easy to analytically perform the Bogoliubov transformation,
338: we numerically diagonalize the mean-field Hamiltonian
339: to compute the energy dispersions $E_{\bf k}^{(1)}$ and $E_{\bf k}^{(2)}$.
340:
341:
342: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
343: \section{Properties at Zero Temperature}
344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
345:
346: In order to treat the ground state properties, it should be
347: taken into account that the Bogoliubov particles of the $\alpha$ branch
348: in eq.(\ref{bogo})
349: may condense at absolute zero, because
350: the excitation energy $E^{(1)}_{\bf k}$
351: has its minimal value $E^{(1)}_{\bf k}=0$ at ${\bf k=0}$
352: while the $\beta$ branch has a finite gap even at $T=0$.
353: Sarker {\it et al.}\cite{Sar} showed that the long-range order
354: is described by the condensation of the Schwinger-bosons for
355: the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic Heisenberg models.
356: This is also the case for our 2D mixed-spin model on a square lattice.
357:
358: Suppose that the bosons condense at the states
359: of $\alpha^{(1)}_{\uparrow}|_{\bf k=0}$ and
360: $\alpha^{(2)}_{\downarrow}|_{\bf k=0}$, by fictitiously
361: applying an infinitesimal external staggered field to the
362: $A$ and $B$ lattices. The self-consistent equations at
363: $T=0$ , which include the Bose condensation,
364: now read,
365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
366: \begin{eqnarray}
367: \Gamma&=&\frac{2}{N^{2}}
368: \coth \kappa E_{\bf k=0}^{(1)}|_{\kappa\rightarrow\infty}
369: \nonumber\\
370: &=&\frac{\left[1+2S^{A}
371: -\sum_{n}\int \frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}
372: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}{\partial \lambda_{A}}\right]}
373: {\partial E_{\bf k=0}^{(1)}/\partial \lambda_{A}},\\
374: 1+2S^{B}
375: &=&\Gamma\left.
376: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(1)}}{\partial\lambda_{B}}\right|_{\bf k=0}
377: +\sum_{n}\int\frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}\frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}
378: {\partial \lambda_{B}},\\
379: -4A&=&\Gamma\left.
380: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(1)}}{\partial d_{\bf k}}\right|_{\bf k=0}
381: +\sum_{n}\int\frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}\cos k_{x}
382: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}
383: {\partial d_{\bf k}},\nonumber\\
384: &&\\
385: -2C&=&\Gamma\left.
386: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(1)}}{\partial e_{\bf k}}\right|_{\bf k=0}
387: +\sum_{n}\int\frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}\cos k_{y}
388: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}
389: {\partial e_{\bf k}},\nonumber\\
390: &&\\
391: -2D&=&\Gamma\left.
392: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(1)}}{\partial f_{\bf k}}\right|_{k=0}
393: +\sum_{n}\int\frac{d{\bf k}}{\pi^{2}}\cos k_{y}
394: \frac{\partial E_{\bf k}^{(n)}}
395: {\partial f_{\bf k}}.\nonumber\\
396: &&
397: \end{eqnarray}
398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
399: We shall solve these equations numerically for given coupling
400: constants $J_{1}, J_{2}$ and $J_{3}$.
401:
402:
403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
404: \subsection{Dispersion relation}
405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
406:
407: We start our discussions with the case that may be regarded as
408: the Haldane gap system in a staggered field. When $J_1=0$, the 2D
409: system is completely decoupled into the $s=1$ massive Haldane
410: chains and the $s=1/2$ massless spin chains. When we introduce the
411: interchain couplings among them, the ground state has the long-range
412: order mainly due to the $s=1/2$ spins. The important point is that
413: even though we have the long-range order, the Haldane-type
414: gapful excitation still exists. Therefore, as far as
415: the case with small $J_1$ and $J_2$ is concerned, the system
416: is regarded as the one often called the Haldane gap system
417: in a staggered field.\cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr}
418: In Fig. $\ref{fig:sp2}$, we show the dispersion relation
419: calculated for $J_{1}=J_{2}=1/2$ and $J_{3}=1$.
420: %%%%%% MOVED TO BELOW %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
421: %%Although we have also performed
422: %%the calculation for the cases with
423: %%smaller $J_1$ and $J_2$, the obtained dispersion of the
424: %%optical branch becomes almost flat in the $k_x$-direction,
425: %%so that we have not shown them here.\cite{comment}
426: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
427: \begin{figure}[htb]
428: \epsfxsize=8cm
429: \centerline{\epsfbox{spea2.eps}}
430: \vspace{0.1cm}
431: \caption{The excitation spectrum for the mixed-spin model
432: which may be regarded as the {\it Haldane gap in a staggered field}
433: ($J_{1}=J_{2}=1/2 ,J_{3}=1$).
434: Note that the Brillouin zone is reduced to a quarter of
435: that for the uniform spin case,
436: since the unit cell now includes the four sites.
437: }
438: \label{fig:sp2}%-----------------------------------------
439: \end{figure}
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441: As seen in this figure, the lower branch is gapless with linear
442: dispersion relation, reflecting the antiferromagnetic long-range order,
443: whereas the upper optical mode is mainly
444: composed of the Haldane-type excitation.
445: It is observed that the dispersion in the $k_{x}$-direction is indeed weak
446: for the optical mode, since the interchain coupling is much smaller than the
447: energy gap for the optical mode,
448: which confirms that the system in Fig. \ref{fig:sp2}
449: may be regarded as the Haldane gap system in a staggered field.
450: %%%%%%% Revised 4 %%%%%%%%
451: %%%%%%% MOVED FROM ABOVE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
452: Although we have also performed
453: the calculation for the cases with
454: smaller $J_1$ and $J_2$, the obtained dispersion of the
455: optical branch becomes almost flat in the $k_x$-direction,
456: so that we have not shown them here.
457: %%%%% PREVIOUS REFERENCE, MOFDIFIED %%%%%%%
458: Concerning this limit of small $J_1$, we here make a brief comment
459: on the validity of the SBMFT. When $J_1$ takes too small value,
460: for which the system is almost decoupled into independent $s=1$ and
461: $s=1/2$ chains, the SBMFT may lead to a pathological result: although
462: the Haldane gap for the $s=1$ chain is well described by the SBMFT,
463: it is not the case for the gapless $s=1/2$ chains, for which we are
464: left with a gapful phase. Actually, if the value of $J_1$ ($=J_2$) becomes
465: smaller than $J_1/J_3 \sim 10^{-2}$, we encounter a problem that the
466: present self-consistent calculation does not converge, implying
467: that our assumption for the antiferromagnetic ordered state does not
468: hold anymore. Nevertheless, we find that the correct behavior with
469: the antiferromagnetic ground state is still obtained except for this
470: small parameter region.
471: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
472:
473: By increasing the coupling parameters $J_{2}, J_{3}$
474: continuously, we naturally enter
475: in the 2D ordered mixed-spin system. Note that although during this process
476: the magnetic double structure is kept unchanged
477: in its typical feature, the nature of the optical mode
478: is gradually changed from the Haldane-gap excitation: i.e.
479: the gapful excitation may be equally contributed from
480: both the $s=1$ and $s=1/2$ spin sectors.
481: As a reference, we show the dispersion relation
482: for the mixed-spin model with the isotropic bonds $J_1=J_2=J_3=1$
483: in Fig. \ref{fig:sp1}.
484: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
485: \begin{figure}[htb]
486: \epsfxsize=8cm
487: \centerline{\epsfbox{spea1.eps}}
488: \vspace{0.1cm}
489: \caption{The excitation spectrum for the 2D mixed-spin model
490: ($J_{1}=J_{2}=J_{3}=1$).}
491: \label{fig:sp1}%-----------------------------------------
492: \end{figure}
493: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
494: If we further decrease the couplings $J_{2}$ and $J_{3}$,
495: the system gradually approaches the quasi-1D
496: ferrimagnetic chains with the periodic arrangement
497: of spins $1/2 \circ 1 \circ 1/2 \circ 1$.
498: The dispersion relation obtained in the
499: corresponding parameter region
500: is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sp3}.
501: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
502: \begin{figure}[htb]
503: \epsfxsize=8cm
504: \centerline{\epsfbox{spea3.eps}}
505: \vspace{0.1cm}
506: \caption{The excitation spectrum for the {\it coupled ferrimagnetic chains}
507: ($J_{1}=1 ,J_{2}=J_{3}=1/2$).}
508: \label{fig:sp3}%-----------------------------------------
509: \end{figure}
510: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
511: Now the optical mode with a weak dispersion in the $k_{y}$-direction
512: is essentially the same as that found for the
513: ferrimagnetic chain.\cite{Yama4}
514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
515: %%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @%%
516: %% Revised 5, ADDED FIG,
517: %% %%
518: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
520: \begin{figure}[htb]
521: \epsfxsize=8cm
522: \centerline{\epsfbox{gap-ferrit0.eps}}
523: \vspace{0.1cm}
524: \caption{The gapless dispersion for the
525: {\it coupled ferrimagnetic chains}
526: at $k_y$=0. The solid, the dash-dotted and the dashed lines
527: correspond to the cases of $J_2=J_3=0.5$, 0.1 and 0 ($J_1=1$).}
528: \label{fig:sp4}%-----------------------------------------
529: \end{figure}
530: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
531: %%%%% Revised 6, FERRI LIMIT kx^2 DEPENDENCE %
532: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
533: In order to clearly observe how the gapless dispersion changes its
534: character in the ferrimagnetic-chain limit, we have shown the low-energy
535: dispersion relation at $k_y$=0 in Fig. \ref{fig:sp4}. It is seen that
536: with the decrease of the coupling constants $J_2$ and $J_3$, the
537: $k_x$-linear dependence is gradually changed to the $k_x^2$ dependence
538: characteristic of the ferrimagnetic chain except for the small $k_x$
539: region where the 2D antiferromagnetic order still gives rise to the
540: $k_x$-linear dependence. At $J_2=J_3=0$, the system is reduced to
541: the isolated ferrimagnetic chains, for which the 2D character completely
542: disappears, and thus the gapless dispersion simply follows the
543: $k_x^2$ dependence.
544: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
545: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
546: %Actually, we have confirmed that
547: %at $J_2=J_3=0$ the system is correctly reduced to the isolated
548: %ferrimagnetic chains, for which the gapless
549: %dispersion shows the $k_x^2$-dependence instead of the
550: %$k_x$-linear dependence for the 2D case.
551: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
552: We note that the ferrimagnetic chains have been experimentally
553: realized in the compounds such as $\rm NiCu(C_2O_4)_2\cdot 4H_2O$
554: and $\rm MnCu(pba)(H_2O)_3\cdot 2H_2O$,\cite{Yee} and have been
555: studied theoretically by many groups.\cite{Pati,Yama,Yama4}
556: Among others, it has been reported \cite{Yama4} that this system
557: exhibits the dual properties consistent with our
558: results: the physical quantities are controlled
559: by the $s=1$ antiferromagnetic spin chain at high temperatures
560: and by the effective $s=1/2$ ferromagnetic spin chain
561: at low temperatures.
562:
563: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
564: % Revised 7, ADDIABATICALLY
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: The above analysis of the excitation spectrum implies that
567: the quasi-1D Haldane gap system in a staggered
568: field\cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr} and
569: the quasi-1D weakly coupled ferrimagnetic chains,\cite{ferri,Yee}
570: which have been studied in different contexts
571: experimentally, share common interesting physics
572: inherent in the mixed-spin systems. In particular, it is highly
573: desirable to experimentally observe the magnetic double structure
574: in the excitation spectrum for the ferrimagnetic-chain compounds.
575: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
576: %The above analysis of the excitation spectrum implies that
577: %the Haldane gap system in a staggered field and
578: %the ferrimagnetic chains, which have been studied in
579: %different contexts experimentally,\cite{ferri,Yee}
580: %are adiabatically connected with each other.
581: %We can thus say that the double structure observed
582: %in the rare-earth compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_{5}$
583: %\cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr}
584: %has essentially the same
585: %origin as in the ferrimagnetic chain.\cite{Yama4}
586: %%%%%%%%
587:
588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
589: \subsection{Haldane gap in a staggered field}
590: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
591:
592: Let us discuss the case of the Haldane gap
593: system in a staggered field in more detail.
594: We here observe how the effective staggered field
595: induced by the $s=1/2$ spin chains
596: affects the properties of the Haldane gap,
597: by changing the coupling constants $J_1$ and $J_2$.
598: For small values of $J_1$ and $J_2$, we define the
599: effective staggered field on the $s=1$ Haldane chain
600: by $H_{\rm ST}^{\rm eff}=J_{1} <S_{z}^{A}>$,
601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
602: where $<S_{z}^{A}>$
603: is the spontaneous staggered magnetization of the $s=1/2$ spin chain.
604: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
605: We numerically estimate the effective staggered field,
606: and show the obtained results in Fig. \ref{fig:hal2}.
607: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
608: \begin{figure}[htb]
609: \epsfxsize=7cm
610: \centerline{\epsfbox{Hsta.eps}}
611: \vspace{0.1cm}
612: \caption{The effective staggered field $H_{\rm ST}^{{\rm eff}}$
613: as a function of
614: the coupling constant $J_1$ (=$J_2$) where we set $J_3=1$.}
615: \label{fig:hal2}%-----------------------------------------
616: \end{figure}
617: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
618: It is seen that the effective staggered field
619: increases monotonously with the increase of $J_1$ and $J_2$,
620: as should be expected. In a similar way, we also compute the
621: staggered magnetization $<S_z^B>$ of the $s=1$ spin chains,
622: and as well as the Haldane gap which
623: is defined as the minimum of the excitation energy
624: in the optical branch $\Delta=E_{{\bf k}=(\frac{\pi}{2},0)}^{(2)}$.
625: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
626: \begin{figure}[htb]
627: \epsfxsize=7cm
628: \centerline{\epsfbox{Hst-Msta.eps}}
629: \vspace{0.1cm}
630: \caption{Plots of the
631: staggered magnetization $M_{\rm ST }$
632: as a function of the effective staggered magnetic field.
633: }
634: \label{fig:hal1}%-----------------------------------------
635: \end{figure}
636: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
637: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
638: \begin{figure}[htb]
639: \epsfxsize=7cm
640: \centerline{\epsfbox{M2-D2c.eps}}
641: \vspace{0.1cm}
642: \caption{Plots of the square of the Haldane gap $\Delta$
643: as a function of the square of the
644: staggered magnetization $M_{\rm ST }$.}
645: \label{fig:hal3}%-----------------------------------------
646: \end{figure}
647: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
648: These quantities are shown in Figs. \ref{fig:hal1} and \ref{fig:hal3}.
649: Following the way used for the experimental analysis,
650: \cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E2}
651: we have plotted the staggered magnetization (the square of the
652: Haldane gap) as a function of the
653: effective staggered field (the square of the staggered
654: magnetization). It is seen that as the staggered field is increased,
655: the staggered magnetization as well as the Haldane
656: gap $\Delta$ are increased, being consistent with
657: the result pointed out for the Haldane chain
658: system with a {\it static} magnetic field.
659: \cite{Gin,HcDMRG}
660:
661: Since we are dealing with the 2D model at zero temperature, our
662: results may not be directly applied to the experiments.
663: Nevertheless,
664: we can confirm whether the present results are consistent with
665: the experiments for the rare-earth compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_{5}$
666: \cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E1,Nd-E2,longi,cond,Pr} with
667: $R= \rm Nd^{3+}$ or $\rm Pr^{3+}$.\cite{Pr,Str}
668: Experimentally, as the temperature is decreased, the system shows the
669: phase transition to the magnetically ordered phase.
670: When the temperature is further decreased, the
671: staggered moment for the $s=1/2$ sector develops,
672: and thereby gives rise to the increase of the staggered field,
673: which indeed enhances the
674: magnitude of the Haldane gap.\cite{Gin,HcDMRG} Also, the
675: staggered moment on the Haldane chains increases, as
676: should be expected. These
677: characteristic features are consistent with our results, and
678: in particular, the qualitative behaviors for the
679: staggered magnetization and the Haldane gap shown in
680: Figs. \ref{fig:hal1} and \ref{fig:hal3} agree fairly well
681: with experimental findings.\cite{Hal-ch1,Nd-E2}
682:
683:
684: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
685: \subsection{Coupled ferrimagnetic chains}
686: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
687:
688: Before closing this section, we briefly discuss the case
689: close to the ferrimagnetic
690: chain, which is realized by taking the limit of $J_1 \gg J_2, J_3$.
691: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
692: % Revised 8, FERIRI LIMIT
693: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
694: Even in this one-dimensional limit, the system
695: still exhibits the antiferromagnetic order as far as
696: $J_2$ and $J_3$ take finite values. As mentioned above,
697: at $J_2=J_3=0$, the system shows the ferrimagnetic order, and hence
698: the dispersion relation for the acoustic mode is changed to the quadratic
699: one.\cite{Yama,Yama4,Wu} In this way,
700: the crossover-like behavior is seen in the gapless mode, whereas
701: much simpler behavior is observed in the gapful mode.
702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
703: %Even in this one-dimensional limit of independent chains, the system
704: %still exhibits the ferrimagnetic order as is the case for the
705: %ferromagnetic chain. Hence, the dispersion relation for the
706: %acoustic mode has the quadratic dependence on the momentum,
707: %as mentioned above.\cite{Yama,Yama4,Wu}
708: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
709: % Revised 8, COMPARISON WITH QMC
710: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
711: In Fig. \ref{fig:FgapT0-1}, we display
712: the spin gap $\Delta$ for the optical branch in the ferrimagnetic-chain
713: limit. With decreasing $J_2$ and $J_3$, the spin gap monotonically
714: decreases, and reaches the value of $\Delta$=1.778 at $J_{2}=J_{3}=0$,
715: which is very close to that of the quantum Monte Carlo method,
716: $\Delta$=1.767,\cite{Yama}
717: as already demonstrated by Wu {\it et al}.\cite{Wu} In this way, in the
718: ferrimagnetic-chain limit, the SBMFT may provide the reliable
719: estimates of the physical quantities even at quantitative level.
720: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
721: As discussed by Yamamoto and Fukui,\cite{Yama4} this optical mode
722: is mainly composed of excitations in the
723: effective $s=1$ antiferromagnetic spin chain, whereas the
724: acoustic mode is given by excitations in
725: the effective $s=1/2$ ferromagnetic chain.
726: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
727: %Wu {\it et al}.\cite{Wu}
728: % have already studied this ferrimagnetic chain by means
729: %of the Schwinger-boson method. Our results indeed reproduce
730: %their results in this case. As a reference,
731: %the spin gap for the optical branch is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:FgapT0-1}.
732: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
733: \begin{figure}[htb]
734: \epsfxsize=7cm
735: \centerline{\epsfbox{Fgap-T0a.eps}}
736: \vspace{0.1cm}
737: \caption{Plots of the spin gap for the optical branch in the limit of
738: the coupled ferrimagnetic chains ($J_2=J_3$).
739: }
740: \label{fig:FgapT0-1}%-----------------------------------------
741: \end{figure}
742: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
743: %We note that at $J_2=J_3=0$, the spin gap exactly
744: %coincides with that obtained by Wu {\it et al}.\cite{Wu}
745: %As discussed by Yamamoto and Fukui,\cite{Yama4} this optical mode
746: %is mainly composed of excitations in the
747: %effective $s=1$ antiferromagnetic spin chain, whereas the
748: %acoustic mode is given by excitations in
749: %the effective $s=1/2$ ferromagnetic chain.
750:
751:
752:
753: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
754: \section{Thermodynamic Properties at Finite Temperatures}
755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
756: We now move to the thermodynamic properties at finite temperatures.
757: The self-consistent equations (\ref{sel1})-(\ref{sel5}) are solved
758: numerically at finite temperatures to obtain the
759: thermodynamic quantities. We here briefly summarize the
760: results obtained. In the previous section, it has been shown
761: that even for the set of the parameters
762: $J_{1}=J_{2}=1/2,J_{3}=1$ ($J_{1}=1,J_{2}=J_{3}=1/2$),
763: the system may be approximately
764: described by the Haldane gap system in a staggered field
765: (coupled ferrimagnetic chains), so that we
766: shall show the results for these parameters below.
767: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
768: \begin{figure}[htb]
769: \epsfxsize=7cm
770: \centerline{\epsfbox{Gapa.eps}}
771: \vspace{0.1cm}
772: \caption{The spin gaps for the optical and
773: acoustic branches as a function of the
774: temperature $T$: the solid lines correspond to
775: the case for $J_{1}=J_{2}=1/2,J_{3}=1$ while the dashed lines
776: for $J_{1}=1, J_{2}=J_{3}=1/2$. Note that at higher temperatures
777: our SBMF approach breaks down, so that we have plotted the data
778: available for each choice of parameters.}
779: \label{fig:half1}%-----------------------------------------
780: \end{figure}
781: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
782: We start with the effective spin gaps calculated at finite temperatures,
783: which are shown as a function of the
784: temperature in Fig. \ref{fig:half1}. It is seen that both of
785: the two cases exhibit similar temperature dependence in the
786: spin gap. For each case, there are two distinct
787: spin gaps, corresponding respectively to
788: the optical mode and the acoustic mode,
789: reflecting the double structure
790: for the excitation spectrum. Note that
791: both of two modes should be massive at finite temperatures.
792: It may be physically sensible to
793: regard these spin gaps as the inverse of the correlation lengths.
794: As should be expected, the spin gap for the optical mode increases
795: up to the zero-temperature value with the decrease of the temperature.
796: On the other hand, the spin gap for the
797: acoustic mode decreases, leading to the divergent correlation length
798: which characterizes the magnetically ordered state at $T=0$.
799:
800: The uniform and staggered spin susceptibilities,
801: $\chi_{\rm uni}$ and $\chi_{\rm stag}$, are calculated
802: by using the standard linear-response formulae,
803: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
804: \begin{eqnarray}
805: &&\chi_{\rm uni}=\sum_{i,j=1,2}\left[
806: \langle\langle S^{A_{i}}_{z}S^{A_{j}}_{z}\rangle\rangle_{{\bf q},\omega}
807: +\langle\langle S^{B_{i}}_{z}S^{B_{j}}_{z}\rangle\rangle_{{\bf q},\omega}
808: \right.\nonumber\\
809: &&\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ +\left.
810: 2\langle\langle S^{A_{i}}_{z}S^{B_{j}}_{z}\rangle\rangle_{{\bf q},\omega}
811: \right]|_{{\bf q},\omega\rightarrow 0},\\
812: \nonumber \\
813: &&\chi_{\rm stag}= \nonumber\\
814: &&\sum_{i,j=1,2}\left[(-1)^{i+j}(
815: \langle\langle S^{A_{i}}_{z}S^{A_{j}}_{z}\rangle\rangle_{{\bf q},\omega}
816: +\langle\langle S^{B_{i}}_{z}S^{B_{j}}_{z}\rangle\rangle_{{\bf q},\omega}
817: )\right.\nonumber\\
818: &&\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ +\left.2(-1)^{i+j+1}
819: \langle\langle S^{A_{i}}_{z}S^{B_{j}}_{z}\rangle\rangle_{{\bf q},\omega}
820: \right]|_{{\bf q},\omega\rightarrow 0},
821: \end{eqnarray}
822: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
823: where $\langle\langle S^{A_{1}}_{z}S^{A_{1}}_{z}\rangle\rangle
824: _{{\bf q},\omega}$, etc.,
825: are the retarded spin correlation functions.
826: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
827: \begin{figure}[htb]
828: \epsfxsize=7cm
829: \centerline{\epsfbox{Xna.eps}}
830: \vspace{0.1cm}
831: \caption{Plots of $T\chi_{\rm stag}$ for the
832: staggered susceptibility and
833: $T \chi_{\rm uni}$ for the uniform susceptibility
834: as a function of the temperature $T$: the solid lines for
835: $J_{1}=J_{2}=1/2,J_{3}=1$ and the dashed lines
836: for $J_{1}=1, J_{2}=J_{3}=1/2$
837: }
838: \label{fig:half4}%-----------------------------------------
839: \end{figure}
840: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
841: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
842: In Fig. \ref{fig:half4},
843: we plot the effective Curie constants $T \chi_{\rm uni}$ and
844: $T \chi_{\rm stag}$ as a function of $T$.
845: It is seen that the effective Curie constant for the uniform sector
846: is gradually decreased as the temperature is decreased, while
847: that for the staggered sector diverges,
848: implying that the antiferromagnetic correlation is enhanced
849: at low temperatures.
850: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
851: %\begin{figure}[htb]
852: %\epsfxsize=7cm
853: %\centerline{\epsfbox{Spa.eps}}
854: %\vspace{0.1cm}
855: %\caption{The specific heat $C$ per unit cell as a function of the
856: %temperature $T$:
857: %the solid lines for
858: % $J_{1}=J_{2}=1/2,J_{3}=1$ and the dashed lines
859: % for $J_{1}=1, J_{2}=J_{3}=1/2$ }
860: %\label{fig:half5}%-----------------------------------------
861: %\end{figure}
862: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
863: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
864: %%%%% Revised DROPPED SPECIFIC HEAT
865: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
866: %The computed results for
867: %the specific heat $C$ are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:half5}.
868: %It is expected that the magnetic double structure may
869: %be observed in the temperature-dependent specific heat:
870: %i.e. the low-temperature behavior is controlled by
871: % the gapless magnons, while the Schottky-type hump
872: %may appear in higher temperatures.
873: %Although the rapid increase of the specific heat in higher
874: %temperatures in Fig. \ref{fig:half5} may be assigned as
875: %the tendency to the Schottky-type behavior, we cannot
876: %observe the hump structure explicitly,
877: %since our approach based on the SBMFT breaks down
878: %at higher temperatures.
879: %To see such a double structure
880: %in the specific heat correctly, it is thus needed to improve our
881: %SBMFT in the high temperature region.
882: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
883: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
884:
885: As seen from the above results, the thermodynamic properties
886: at finite temperatures show
887: quite similar behavior both for the Haldane chain
888: in a staggered field and for the quasi-1D ferrimagnetic chain,
889: reflecting the magnetic double structure inherent in these
890: mixed-spin systems.
891:
892:
893: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
894: \section{summary}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
895: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
896: We have studied the 2D mixed-spin model for which
897: the $s=1/2$ and $s=1$ spin chains are stacked alternately.
898: This mixed-spin model includes two interesting spin systems addressed recently:
899: the Haldane gap system in a staggered field as well as the ferrimagnetic chain.
900: By calculating the dispersion relation and the thermodynamic quantities
901: by means of the Schwinger-boson mean-field theory, we have
902: discussed the magnetic double structure inherent in our mixed-spin
903: systems.
904: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
905: % Revised, ADIABATICALLY
906: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
907: In particular, we have treated systematically
908: the quasi-1D Haldane gap system in a staggered magnetic field and also
909: the mixed-spin chain with the ferrimagnetic ground state.
910: This implies that these two spin systems, which have
911: been studied in different contexts experimentally,
912: should possess interesting physics common to the mixed spin systems.
913: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
914: %In particular,
915: %we have shown that the Haldane gap system in a staggered field is
916: %adiabatically connected to the ferrimagnetic chain without
917: %any phase transitions between them.
918: %This implies that these two interesting spin systems, which have
919: %been studied in different contexts experimentally,
920: %should possess essentially the same physics.
921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
922: We have also found that the results obtained for the staggered-field
923: effect on the Haldane gap system
924: are qualitatively consistent with the experimental findings
925: in the rare-earth compounds $R_2 \rm BaNiO_{5}$.
926: It remains an interesting problem to evaluate dynamical quantities
927: related to the neutron scattering, etc. Also, it is important to
928: study how the string-order parameter behaves,\cite{Stri} when the
929: system changes from the Haldane system to the ferrimagnetic chain.
930: These problems are now under consideration.
931:
932: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
933: \section*{acknowledgments}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
934: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
935: The work is partly supported by a
936: Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture.
937: A. K. is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
938: N. K. wishes to thank K. Ueda for the warm hospitality at ISSP,
939: University of Tokyo.
940:
941: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
942: \begin{thebibliography}{99}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
943: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
944:
945: \bibitem{Haldane}
946: F. D. M. Haldane,
947: Phys. Lett. {\bf 93A} 464 (1983);
948: F. D. M. Haldane,
949: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 50}, 1153 (1983).
950:
951: %%%%%% kokokara %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
952:
953: %E Haldane chain in st-H %%
954: \bibitem{Hal-ch1}
955: A. Zheludev, E. Ressouche, S. Maslov, T. Yokoo, S. Raymond, and J. Akimitsu,
956: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 80}, 3630 (1998).
957:
958: %E NdBaNiO by PINS %%
959: \bibitem{Nd-E1}
960: T. Yokoo, A. Zheludev, M. Nakamura, and J.Akimitsu,
961: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 11516 (1997).
962:
963: %E (NdY)BaNiO %%
964: \bibitem{Nd-E2}
965: T. Yokoo, S. Raymond. A. Zheludev, S. Maslov,
966: E. Ressouche, I. Zaliznyak. R. Erwin, M. Nakamura, and J. Akimitsu,
967: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58}, 14424 (1998).
968:
969: %E longitudinal mode %%
970: \bibitem{longi}
971: S. Raymond, T. Yokoo, A. Zheludev, S. E. Nagler, A. Wildes, and J. Akimitsu,
972: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 82}, 2382 (1999).
973:
974: %Recent cond/matt %%
975: \bibitem{cond}
976: A. Zheludev, S. Maslov, T. Yokoo, J. Akimitsu, S. Raymond,
977: S. E. Nagler, and K. Hirota,
978: cond-matt/9910335
979:
980: \bibitem{Pr}
981: A. Zheludev, J. M. Tranquada, and T. Vogt,
982: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 6437 (1996).
983:
984: %E Haldane gap in YBaNiO at first %%
985: \bibitem{HalGap1}
986: J. F. DiTusa {\it{et al}}.,
987: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 73}, 1857 (1994).
988:
989: \bibitem{Str}
990: D. J. Buttrey, J. D. Sullivan, and A. L. Rheingold,
991: J. Solid State Chem. {\bf 88}, 291 (1990);
992: E. Garcia-Matres {\it et al.},
993: J. Solid State Chem. {\bf 103}, 322 (1993);
994: V. Sachan, D. J. Buttrey, J. M. Tranquada, and G. Shirane,
995: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 49}, 9658 (1994).
996:
997: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
998: %% theory isolated Haldane chain in st field %%
999: %T Gintuburg Landau 1 %%
1000: \bibitem{Gin}
1001: S. Maslov and A. Zheludev,
1002: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57} 68 (1998),
1003: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 80}, 5786 (1998).
1004:
1005: %T Haldane chain in stag-field by DMRG %%
1006: \bibitem{HcDMRG}
1007: J. L. Lou, X. Dai, S. Qui, Z. Su, and L. Yu,
1008: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 60}, 52 (1999).
1009: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1010: %%%%%%%%%% ferri chain ex. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1011:
1012: \bibitem{ferri}
1013: M. Verdanguer, M. Julve, A. Michalowicz, and O. Kahn,
1014: Inorg. Chem. {\bf 22}, 2624 (1983).
1015:
1016: \bibitem{Yee}
1017: G. T. Yee, J. M. Manriquez, D. A Dixon, R. S. McLean, D. M. Groski,
1018: R. B. Flippen, K. S. Narayan, A. J. Epstein, and J. S. Miller,
1019: Adv. Mater. {\bf 3}, 309 (1991);
1020: %M. Verdaguer, M. Julve, A. Michalowicz, and O. Kahn,
1021: Inorg. Chem. {\bf 22}, 2624 (1983);
1022: %Y. Pei, M. Verdaguer, O. Kahn, J. Sletten and J.-P. Renard,
1023: Inorg. Chem. {\bf 26}, 138 (1987).
1024: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1025:
1026: % mixed-spin chain
1027: \bibitem{Pati}
1028: S. K. Pati, S. Ramasesha, and D. Sen:
1029: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 8894 (1997);
1030: A. K. Kolezhuk, H.-J. Mikeska, and S. Yamamoto,
1031: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, R3336 (1997);
1032: F. C. Alcaraz and A. L. Malvezzi
1033: J. Phys. A {\bf 30}, 767 (1997);
1034: H. Niggemann, G. Uimin, and J. Zittartz,
1035: J. Phys. Cond. Matt. {\bf 9}, 9031 (1997).
1036:
1037: \bibitem{Yama}
1038: S. Brehmer, H.-J. Mikeska, and S. Yamamoto,
1039: J. Phys. C {\bf 9}, 3921 (1997);
1040: %T Feri chain by MD %%
1041: %\bibitem{Yama2}
1042: A. K. Kolezhuk, H.-J. Mikeska, and S. Yamamoto,
1043: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, R3336 (1997);
1044: %\bibitem{Yama3}
1045: S. Yamamoto, S. Brehmer, and H.-J. Mikeska,
1046: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, 13610 (1998).
1047:
1048: \bibitem{Yama4}
1049: S. Yamamoto and T. Fukui,
1050: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, R14008 (1997).
1051:
1052:
1053: %T Feri chain by Schwinger boson %%
1054: \bibitem{Wu}
1055: C. Wu, B. Chen, Xi. Dai, Y. Yu, and Z. Su,
1056: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 60}, 1057 (1999).
1057:
1058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1059: %T Schwinger boson %%
1060: \bibitem{DPAro}
1061: D. P. Arovas and A. Auerbach,
1062: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 38}, 316 (1988);
1063: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 61}, 617 (1988).
1064:
1065: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1066: %% Revised %%%%%
1067: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1068: \bibitem{SWT}
1069: There is another approach based on the modified spin wave theory,
1070: which is similar to the SBMFT in many respects. For mixed-spin systems,
1071: however, the latter possesses some ambiguity for imposing the constraint
1072: to incorporate non-linear effects (see ref. 16), whereas the
1073: constraint in the SBMFT is unambiguously introduced by preserving the
1074: number of bosons at each site, making the SBMFT more tractable in
1075: our case.
1076: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1077: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1078:
1079: %T Schwinger boson(T=0) %%
1080: \bibitem{Sar}
1081: S. Sarker, C. Jayaprakash, H. R. Krishnamurthy,
1082: and M. Ma,
1083: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 40}, 5028 (1989).
1084:
1085:
1086: %SBMFT bilayer %%
1087: \bibitem{bil}
1088: K. K. Ng, F. C. Zhang, and M. Ma,
1089: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53}, 12196 (1996)
1090:
1091: %SBMFT double exchange %%
1092: \bibitem{Sar1}
1093: S. K. Sarker,
1094: J. Phys. Condens. Matter {\bf 8}, L515 (1996);
1095: D. P. Arovas and F. Guinea,
1096: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58}, 9150 (1998)
1097:
1098: %%\bibitem{comment}
1099: %%When $J_1$ takes too small value, for which the system is almost
1100: %%decoupled into independent $s=1$ and $s=1/2$ chains,
1101: %%the SBMFT may lead to a pathological result:
1102: %%although the Haldane gap for the
1103: %%$s=1$ chain is well described by the SBMT, it is not the case for
1104: %%the gapless $s=1/2$ chains, for which we are
1105: %%left with a gapful phase.\cite{DPAro}
1106: %%However, we find that the correct behavior is obtained, except
1107: %%for this parameter region with very small $J_1$.
1108:
1109: %% string order %%%
1110:
1111: \bibitem{Stri}
1112: M. den Nijs and K. Rommelse,
1113: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 40}, 4709 (1989).
1114:
1115:
1116:
1117: \end{thebibliography}
1118:
1119:
1120: %\end{multicols}
1121:
1122: \end{document}
1123:
1124:
1125:
1126: