1: %

2: % RevTeX (version 3.0)                                    March 04, 1993

3: %

4: 

5: \documentstyle[prb,aps,psfig]{revtex}

6: %\documentstyle[aps,preprint,floats,psfig]{revtex}

7: %\documentstyle[prl,aps,psfig]{revtex}

8: %\input psfig

9: %\usepackage{graphics}

10: \begin{document}

11: \newcommand {\be}{\begin{equation}}

12: \newcommand {\ee}{\end{equation}}

13: \newcommand {\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

14: \newcommand {\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

15: \newcommand {\nn}{\nonumber}

16: 

17: \draft

18: %

19: %\twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname @twocolumnfalse\endcsname

20: %

21: %

22: % Title Page

23: %

24: 

25: \title{Phase Diagram and Thermodynamic Properties of the Square

26: Lattice of Antiferromagnetic

27: Spin-1/2 Triangles in $\rm \bf La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$}

28: 

29: \author{Stefan Wessel and Stephan Haas}

30: \address{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern

31: California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0484}

32: 

33: \date{\today}

34: \maketitle

35: 

36: \begin{abstract}

37: The magnetic phase diagram and the thermodynamic properties

38: of a square lattice containing antiferromagnetically coupled 

39: spin-1/2 triangles are studied. 

40: A Heisenberg

41: Hamiltonian with three strong intra-triangle exchange coupling constants

42: and one weak inter-triangle exchange coupling constant is proposed to 

43: model the interacting Cu$^{2+}$ ions of the $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ planes 

44: in $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$. 

45: Depending on the ratio of the intra-triangle coupling constants, various 

46: long-ranged magnetic phases are shown to compete at low temperatures. 

47: A comparison of numerical calculations of thermodynamic properties in the 

48: model Hamiltonian 

49: with recent experiments on $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ suggests that

50: the spins in this material order 

51: antiferromagnetically along the x-direction and 

52: ferromagnetically along the y-direction of the $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ planes.

53: The temperature dependence of the uniform magnetic susceptibility, the

54: heat capacity, and the entropy are calculated and are shown to be in

55: qualitative agreement with the

56: experiments on this compound. 

57: \end{abstract}

58: \pacs{}

59: %\vskip2pc]

60: 

61: It is known that

62: the zero-point fluctuations in two-dimensional (2D) quantum

63: antiferromagnets are responsible for a strong renormalization

64: of their order parameter, causing a substantial correction

65: of the sublattice magnetization in long-ranged antiferromagnets

66: such as $\rm La_2CuO_4$ \cite{214}, or completely suppressing the

67: magnetic moment in short-range-ordered antiferromagnetic (AF) 

68: compounds such as 

69: the structurally frustrated Kagome lattice,

70: containing coupled spin-1/2 triangles.

71: \cite{lecheminant,mila,sindzingre}  

72: In contrast to systems with long-range AF order, this spin liquid

73: is best described within a resonant valence bond picture that 

74: accounts for the degeneracy of the ground state, the singlet-triplet

75: spin gap, and the large number of low-lying singlet states

76: in the thermodynamic limit\cite{lecheminant,mila,sindzingre}.

77: 

78: Recently, thermodynamic 

79: measurements on the triangular cluster compound $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$

80: were reported\cite{azuma}. This system is a layered material, containing

81: planar $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ square lattices of nearly isosceles

82: $\rm Cu^{2+}$ spin-1/2 triangles, as shown in Fig. 1.

83: In contrast to the Kagome antiferromagnet, $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ orders 

84: antiferromagnetically at a N\'eel temperature of 2.6K despite the 

85: structural frustration within the triangles. This indicates that 

86: - unlike the Kagome lattice - the

87: bipartite nature of the square lattice of triangles in this compound is

88: essential for the long-range ordering. 

89: Associated with the antiferromagnetic ordering transition, an entropy change of 

90: 1.56 J/(K mol Cu) was observed. Furthermore, a plateau in the magnetization

91: above a critical field of approximately 20 T was reported.

92: 

93: 

94: \begin{figure}

95: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig1.eps,width=7cm,angle=0}}

96: \vspace{0.5cm}

97: \caption{Square lattice of Cu$^{2+}$ triangles in the

98: $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ planes of $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$.

99: The intra-triangle couplings $J_1,J_2,$ and $J_3$ are strong 

100: compared to the inter-triangle couplings $J'$.

101: }

102: \end{figure}

103: 

104: From the different Cu-O bond lengths within and between the triangles, 

105: \cite{azuma}

106: it can be concluded that the

107: intra-triangle couplings $J_1$, $J_2$, and $J_3$ are much stronger than 

108: the inter-triangle coupling $J'$. 

109: The magnetic moments of the neighboring Cu$^{2+}$ ions within

110: the $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ 

111: planes interact via antiferromagnetic superexchange, mediated by the 

112: filled O$^{2-}$ p-orbitals.

113: This leads us to propose 

114: a planar model Hamiltonian of weakly coupled spin-1/2 trimers

115: for $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$, given by

116: \begin{equation}

117: H=\sum_{\bf r} \left[J_1\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},1}\cdot \mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},2}+

118: J_2\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},2}\cdot \mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},3}+

119: J_3\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},3}\cdot\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},1}+ 

120: J'(\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},3}\cdot\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r}+{{\bf x}},1}+ 

121: \mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},2}\cdot\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r}+{{\bf y}},1} + 

122: \mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},2}\cdot\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r}+{{\bf y}},3})\right],

123: \end{equation}

124: where  $\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r},j}$ represents a spin-1/2 degree of freedom 

125: at site $j$ of the triangle centered at position ${\bf r}$.

126: The underlying 2D square lattice of triangles

127: is spanned by the unit vectors ${{\bf x}}$ and  

128: ${{\bf y}}$. In order to account for deviations from perfect 

129: isosceles triangles, 3 different intra-triangle couplings are

130: considered. From experience, it is rather difficult to derive the precise

131: exchange 

132: constants from first principles.\cite{bloch} An alternative approach 

133: is to determine them by comparing results of model calculations

134: on $H$

135: to experimental data.

136: However, this approach is typically

137: complicated by the fact that various parameter sets may fit the experimental 

138: results equally well.\cite{footnote1}

139: In the following, we will therefore first examine

140: the weak-coupling phase diagram of $H$.

141: Subsequently, the recent    

142: experiments on $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ will be analyzed, 

143: based on numerical calculations for the proposed

144: model Hamiltonian in the relevant parameter regime.

145: 

146: The weak-coupling ($J' \ll J_1, J_2, J_3$) zero-temperature

147: phase diagram of $H$ is determined 

148: by the dominant spin-spin correlation function of the total trimer

149: spins $\mbox{\bf \={S}}_{\bf r}=\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r}1}+\mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r}2}+

150: \mbox{\bf S}_{{\bf r}3}$, defined by

151: $S_{\bf q} = \sum_{\bf r} \exp{(i {\bf q} \cdot {\bf r})} 

152: \langle \mbox{\bf \={S}}_{\bf 0} \cdot \mbox{\bf \={S}}_{\bf r} \rangle$. We have calculated this quantity

153: by exact numerical diagonalization of finite clusters with 

154: periodic boundary conditions  

155: for small inter-triangle coupling strengths $J'$.\cite{footnote2}

156: It is found that the wave vector

157: of the dominant spin-spin correlation function

158: strongly depends on the relative strengths of the 

159: intra-triangle couplings $J_1$, $J_2$, and $J_3$.

160: The resulting zero-temperature phase diagrams for square lattices

161: of weakly coupled triangles are shown in Fig. 2 with (a) $J'=0.01 J_3$,

162: and (b) $J'=0.1 J_3$, where the various

163: phases are labeled by their magnetic ordering 

164: wave vectors ${\bf Q} = (q_x,q_y)$. 

165: 

166: 

167: \begin{figure}

168: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig2a.eps,width=5cm,height=5cm,angle=270}\hspace{1.0cm}\psfig{figure=fig2b.eps,width=5cm,height=5cm,angle=270}}

169: \vspace{0.5cm}\caption{Zero-temperature 

170: magnetic phase diagram of the AF

171: spin-1/2 trimer square lattice with a weak inter-triangle coupling

172: (a) $J'=0.01 J_3$ and (b) $J'=0.1 J_3$. 

173: }

174: \end{figure}

175: 

176: Since the model Hamiltonian $H$ 

177: is invariant under $J_1 \leftrightarrow J_2$, these phase diagrams 

178: have reflection symmetry about the diagonal axis $J_1 = J_2$. 

179: All exchange coupling constants have been scaled by the

180: intra-triangle coupling constant along the x-direction, $J_3$.

181: In Fig 2(a), the phase diagram is shown for the

182: ultra-weak-coupling limit with a small

183: inter-triangle coupling $J' = 0.01 J_3$.

184: At the isotropic point $J_1=J_2=J_3$, the system orders

185: antiferromagnetically in both planar

186: directions, resulting in an ordering wave vector ${\bf Q} = (\pi, \pi)$.

187: For small $J_3$ ($J_3 < J_1,J_2$), the system decouples into

188: spin-1/2 AF chains along the x-direction with weak residual

189: ferromagnetic (FM) couplings along the y-direction,

190: leading to ${\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$. In contrast, in the regimes $J_1 \gg J_2, J_3$ 

191: and $J_2 \gg J_1,J_3$, the model describes effective spin-1/2

192: AF chains along the y-axis with weak residual FM coupling along the 

193: x-direction, and thus ${\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$. The symmetry line 

194: $J_1=J_2$ with ${\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ is found to

195: separate these two ${\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ phases.\cite{footnote3}

196: 

197: As the inter-triangle coupling $J'$ is increased (Fig. 2(b)), a finite

198: region with ${\bf Q} = (\pi, \pi)$ opens up, centered around the isotropic

199: point $J_1=J_2=J_3$. Furthermore, the ${\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ regime is found

200: to extend away from the diagonal $J_1=J_2$ line.

201: It has been proposed that the AF ordered low-temperature

202: phase of $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ may fall into the 

203: ${\bf Q} = (\pi, \pi)$ regime.\cite{azuma}

204: However, as we will discuss in the following,

205: a numerical analysis of the thermodynamic properties of $H$ - in particular the

206: magnetic entropy - suggests that this compound should

207: be placed in the regime of weak $J_3$ with  $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ 

208: rather than in the ${\bf Q} = (\pi, \pi)$ regime close to the isotropic

209: point.  

210: 

211: When analyzing the thermodynamic response functions for the square lattice of 

212: weakly coupled AF spin-1/2 triangles, three temperature regimes can be 

213: identified. At high 

214: temperatures $T>J_1,J_2,J_3$, the system is a paramagnetic ensemble of 

215: thermally decoupled spins. Upon lowering the temperature into the region 

216: $J'<T<J_1,J_2,J_3$, the intra-triangle couplings become relevant, and   

217: spin doublets are formed on each triangle. The properties of the system in this 

218: temperature interval are thus well characterized by a thermodynamic

219: ensemble of decoupled trimers with 

220: effective spin-1/2 degrees of freedom. Below the ordering transition

221: temperature $T_N \approx J'$ the small inter-triangle couplings correlate

222: these spin-1/2 trimers, leading to long-range-ordered magnetic

223: phases with characteristic $\bf Q$ vectors that depend on the ratio of the 

224: intra-triangle coupling constants, as discussed above. 

225: We have determined the

226: temperature dependence of the uniform magnetic susceptibility, 

227: the heat capacity, and the entropy from full numerical diagonalizations 

228: of $H$ on finite clusters with periodic boundary conditions.

229: Results representative for the 

230: the $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ phase with $(J_1,J_2,J_3) = (1.5,1.5,1.0)$, 

231: $ {\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ phase with $(J_1,J_2,J_3) = (0.5,1.0,1.0)$, and the 

232: ${\bf Q} = (\pi, \pi)$ phase with $(J_1,J_2,J_3) = (1.0,1.0,1.0)$

233: are shown in Fig. 3. 

234: 

235: \begin{figure}

236: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig3a.eps,width=5cm,angle=270}

237: \psfig{figure=fig3b.eps,width=5cm,angle=270}}

238: \vspace{0.5cm}\caption{Thermodynamic response in

239: the square lattice of AF spin-1/2 triangles.

240: (a) Temperature-dependent uniform susceptibility

241: in the $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ regime (solid line), the 

242: $ {\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ regime (dot-dashed line), and the 

243: $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,\pi)$ regime (dashed line).

244: The inset shows the intermediate-temperature plateaus of $\chi T$ at

245: $\frac{1}{12}$. (b) Temperature dependence of the specific heat, and

246: (c) the magnetic entropy per site. 

247: }

248: \end{figure}

249: 

250: The three distinct temperature regimes are clearly observed in 

251: the uniform susceptibilities, shown in Fig. 3(a). 

252: At high temperatures the spins are effectively uncorrelated

253: with a Curie constant 

254: $\lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} [\chi T ] = C=\frac{1}{4}$. 

255: At intermediate temperatures there is a plateau in $\chi T$

256: with a reduced effective Curie constant $C'=\frac{1}{12}$,

257: associated with the paramagnetic

258: response of uncorrelated spin-1/2 trimers, containing three

259: spins each. Finally, at low temperatures of order $J'$ these 

260: trimers condense into magnetically ordered phases, leading to

261: an additional reduction in $\chi T$. These trends in the temperature 

262: dependence of the uniform susceptibilities are similar in all 

263: three parameter regimes. Furthermore, the shape of $\chi (T)$

264: is found to be in good qualitative agreement with measurements 

265: on $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ (see Fig. 2 of Ref. \cite{azuma}),

266: which show an onset of magnetic ordering at

267: 2.6 K, two orders of magnitude smaller than the observed threshold

268: temperature for trimer formation at approximately 250 K.

269: 

270: In Figs. 3 (b) and (c) the specific

271: heat and the magnetic entropy per site are shown. 

272: The onset of the intermediate

273: regime in which intra-triangle correlations become relevant is marked

274: by the maxima in the specific heat divided by the temperature, $C/T$,

275: consistent with the onsets of the plateaus in $\chi T$, seen in Fig. 3(a). 

276: For the $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ and the $ {\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ regimes, 

277: the entropies per site exhibit plateaus

278: at $S = \frac{1}{3} \ln 2$, rising up to $\ln 2$ at high temperatures

279: (not shown in the figure). 

280: Hence, only 1/3 of the magnetic entropy is released in the intermediate

281: temperature regime, corresponding to 

282: an ensemble of N/3 trimer doublets with a decreased paramagnetic

283: moment of spin-1/2 per trimer.

284: In contrast, the entropy for the isotropic coupling case with 

285: $ {\bf Q} = (\pi , \pi)$ shows a larger plateau value of

286: $\frac{1}{3} \ln 4$, associated with the degeneracy of two Kramers doublets

287: in this regime. In fact, the same plateau value is  found over the whole ${\bf Q}=(\pi,\pi)$ regime centered around the isotropic coupling point.    At very high temperatures the entropy saturates at 

288: the fully paramagnetic value of $\ln 2$ in all cases. A comparison

289: with the experiments on $\rm \ La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ (Fig. 3 in Ref.

290: \cite{azuma}) clearly favors the

291: smaller intermediate-temperature

292: plateau value of $\frac{1}{3} \ln 2$ over $\frac{1}{3} \ln 4$,

293: suggesting that the 

294: low-temperature magnetic order in this material is characterized by 

295: $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ or $ {\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ rather than by 

296: $ {\bf Q} = (\pi , \pi)$. 

297: 

298: Examining the intra-triangle bond lengths and bond angles in

299: the $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ planes of $\rm  La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ (table 1

300: of Ref. \cite{azuma}), it appears likely that $J_3$ is smaller than 

301: both $J_1$ and $J_2$.\cite{bloch,footnote4} This suggests that

302: the magnetically ordered low-temperature phase

303: in this compound is part of the $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ regime rather

304: than the $ {\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ regime. Neutron scattering

305: studies should help to verify this conjecture.

306: 

307: In summary, we have studied the magnetic phase diagram and the thermodynamic 

308: response of a square lattice containing weakly coupled AF spin-1/2 triangles. 

309: A Heisenberg

310: Hamiltonian with three strong intra-triangle exchange coupling constants

311: and a weak inter-triangle exchange coupling constant is proposed to 

312: model the interacting Cu$^{2+}$ ions of the $\rm Cu_3MoO_4$ planes 

313: in $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$. 

314: Depending on the ratio of the intra-triangle coupling constants, various 

315: long-ranged magnetic phases are possible at low temperatures. 

316: A comparison of numerical calculations of the thermodynamic properties in the 

317: proposed model Hamiltonian 

318: with recent experiments on $\rm La_4Cu_3MoO_{12}$ leads us to suggest that

319: the magnetically ordered phase in this compound belongs to the

320: $ {\bf Q} = (\pi,0)$ regime rather than the $ {\bf Q} = (0,\pi)$ or

321: the  $ {\bf Q} = (\pi ,\pi)$

322: regimes of the model. The ordering wave vector could be determined

323: in a neutron scattering study, giving conclusive information 

324: regarding the nature of the magnetically ordered phase in this material.

325: 

326: We wish to thank M. Azuma, A. Honecker, B. Normand, and M. Takano 

327: for useful discussions.

328: The hospitality of the Los Alamos National Laboratory 

329: and the financial support of the Zumberge foundation are 

330: acknowledged.

331: 

332: \begin{references}

333: 

334: \bibitem{214} E. Manousakis, Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 63, No. 1, 1 (1991) and references therein.

335: 

336: \bibitem{lecheminant} P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier,

337: L. Pierre, and P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 2521 (1997).

338: 

339: \bibitem{mila} F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 2356 (1998).

340: 

341: \bibitem{sindzingre} P. Sindzingre, G. Misguich, C. Lhuillier, 

342: B. Bernu, L. Pierre, C. Waldtmann, and H.-U. Everts,

343: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 2953 (2000).

344: 

345: \bibitem{azuma} M. Azuma, T. Odaka, M. Takano, D. A. Vander Griend, 

346: K. R. Poeppelmeier, Y. Narumi, K. Kindo, Y. Mizuno and S. Maekawa,

347: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 62}, R3588 (2000). 

348: 

349: \bibitem{bloch} D. Bloch, J. Phys. Chem. Solids {\bf 27}, 881 (1966).

350: 

351: \bibitem{footnote1} 

352: An illustrative example for this point

353: is the recent controversy on the correct set of exchange parameters

354: for $\rm CuGeO_3$. 

355: See e.g. T. Barnes and J. Riera,

356: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 50}, 6817 (1994) and G. Castilla, 

357: S. Chakravarty, and V.J. Emery,

358: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 1823 (1995).

359: 

360: \bibitem{footnote2} We have studied lattices with 6, 12, and 18 spins.

361: 

362: \bibitem{footnote3} The phase diagram

363: in Fig. 2(a) is confirmed by lowest-order perturbation theory in the 

364: weak inter-triangle coupling $J'$.

365: In this limit, the model Hamiltonian can be mapped onto

366: a square lattice of spin-1/2 degrees of freedom with effective anisotropic

367: exchange coupling constants along the x- and y-directions. For example in the 

368: limit of small $J_3$ with $J_1=J_2>J_3$ this procedure leads to an effective

369: Heisenberg Hamiltonian with antiferromagnetic exchange

370: couplings along the x-direction

371: and ferromagnetic exchange couplings along the y-direction,

372: $ H_{eff}^{(\pi,0)}=\sum_r\left[ \frac{4}{9}J' \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_r 

373: \cdot \mbox{\bf

374:  \~{ S}}_{r+{\bf x}}- \frac{4}{9} J' \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_r \cdot 

375: \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_{r+{\bf y}}+\frac{1}{4}J_3-J_1\right] $.

376: Similarly, along the line $J_3=J_2>J_1$, one finds

377: $ 

378: H_{eff}^{(0,\pi)}=\sum_r\left[ -\frac{2}{9}J' \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_r 

379: \cdot \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_{r+{\bf x}}+ \frac{2}{9} J' 

380: \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_r \cdot \mbox{\bf \~{ S}}_{r+{\bf y}}-

381: \frac{1}{2}J_3-\frac{1}{4}J_1\right]$.

382: 

383: \bibitem{footnote4}

384: Using $J_{i}\propto 1/d_i^{\alpha}$, with $\alpha>1$ and $d_i$ 

385: the interatomic distance along the bond $J_i$,

386: $J_3<J_1\approx J_2$ follows from $d_3>d_1\approx d_2$.[5]   

387: \end{references}

388: 

389: 

390: \end{document}

391: 

392: 

393: 

394: 

395: 

396: 

397: 

398: