1: %****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 3.1 distribution.
4: % Version 3.1 of REVTeX, July 1, 1996.
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 1996 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 3.1 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: %
11: % This is a template for producing files for use with REVTEX 3.1.
12: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
13: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
14: %
15: %\documentstyle[preprint,prl,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
16: \documentstyle[prl,aps,multicol,epsfig]{revtex}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \draft
21: %
22: \title{\lq\lq Barber pole turbulence\rq\rq in large aspect ratio
23: Taylor-Couette flow}
24: \author{A. Prigent and O. Dauchot}
25: %
26: \address{Service de Physique de l'Etat Condens\'e, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif
27: sur Yvette, France}
28: \date{\today}
29: \maketitle
30:
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: Investigations of counter-rotating Taylor-Couette flow (TCF) in the
34: narrow gap limit are conducted in a very large aspect ratio
35: apparatus. The phase diagram is presented and compared to that
36: obtained by Andereck {\it et al.}~\cite{Andereck}. The spiral
37: turbulence regime is studied by varying both internal and external
38: Reynolds numbers. Spiral turbulence is shown to emerge from the fully
39: turbulent regime via a continuous transition appearing first as a {\it
40: modulated} turbulent state, which eventually relaxes locally to the
41: laminar flow. The connection with the intermittent regimes of the
42: plane Couette flow (pCf) is discussed.
43: \end{abstract}
44: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
45:
46: \pacs{ {47.20.Ft} %{Instability of shear flows};
47: {47.20.Ky} %{Nonlinearity (including bifurcation theory)};
48: {47.54.+r} %{Pattern selection; pattern formation}
49: \and {47.27.Cn} %{Transition to turbulence}
50: }
51:
52: \begin{multicols}{2}
53: \narrowtext
54: % body of paper here
55: The \lq\lq barber pole structure of turbulence\rq\rq~\cite{Feyn}
56: between two counter-rotating cylinders, also called spiral turbulence,
57: is commonly described as alternating helical stripes of laminar and
58: turbulent flow. There are few quantitative studies of this puzzling
59: regime, where long range order coexists with small scale turbulence.
60: In early studies Coles and Van Atta~\cite{Coles,VanAtta,Coles-VA}
61: measured the spiral shape in the mid-plane perpendicular to the
62: cylinder axis and the pattern rotation rate. Later Andereck {\it et
63: al.} reported qualitative observations when varying
64: $R_i$~\cite{Andereck}. Hegseth {\it et al.}~\cite{Heg1,Heg2}
65: described spiral turbulence within the framework of phase
66: dynamics. All these studies were limited by their relatively small
67: size. Only one helical turbulent stripe, winding no more than twice
68: along the cylinder axis, could be observed. Altogether, the origin of
69: this flow pattern remains unknown.
70:
71: Performing measurements in large aspect ratio Taylor-Couette flow, we
72: show that the spiral turbulence bifurcates continuously
73: from the turbulent flow, appearing as a modulated turbulent
74: state. After a rapid description of the experimental set up, we
75: present the phase diagram and compare it to the one obtained by
76: Andereck {\it et al.}\cite{Andereck} with a different
77: cylinder radius ratio. Then we describe the successive steps leading
78: to the fully turbulent flow before discussing the origin of spiral
79: turbulence. Finally, we examine its breakdown into a spatio-temporal
80: disordered regime similar to the laminar-turbulent coexistence
81: dynamics observed in plane Couette flow~\cite{DauDav,BottChat}.
82:
83: Let us recall here the characteristics of the experimental set
84: up~\cite{TCvisu}. Our TC apparatus, two coaxial cylinders of radius
85: $r_i=49.09 \pm 0.005$ mm and $r_o=49.95 \pm 0.005$ mm with a useful
86: length $L=380 \pm 0.1$ mm, rotating independently, has a gap size
87: $d=0.863 \pm 0.01$ mm, large aspect ratio $\Gamma_z=L/d=442$ and
88: $\Gamma_{\theta}=\pi(r_i+r_o)/d=362$, and a radius ratio $\eta=0.983$
89: very close to 1. In this paper, length and time units are $d$ and
90: $d^2/\nu$. $\eta$ being fixed, the flow is governed by the inner and
91: outer Reynolds numbers $R_{i,o}=r_{i,o}\Omega_{i,o}d/\nu$, with
92: ${\Omega_{i,o}}$ the angular velocities, and ${\nu}$ the kinematic
93: viscosity. The accuracy of $R_{i,o}$ is better than 3$\%$.
94:
95: We visualize the flow by a \lq\lq fluorescent lighting \rq\rq
96: technique~\cite{TCvisu} developed for this study. The water flow is
97: seeded with Kalliroscope AQ 1000 ($6 \times
98: 30 \times 0.07 \mu m$ platelets). The inner cylinder is covered by a
99: fluorescent film and the entire apparatus is UV-lighted. The
100: fluorescent film re-emits a uniform visible lighting, transmitted
101: through the fluid layer: the more turbulent the flow, the brighter it
102: appears. As the gap is very thin, the Kalliroscope concentration is
103: increased up to $25\%$ by volume to enhance the contrast. A
104: rheological study has shown that the fluid remains Newtonian, so that
105: the only impact is a viscosity increase up to $\nu=1.13~10^{-6}$
106: m$^2$/s at $20^\circ$C. The flow is thermalized by water circulation
107: inside the inner cylinder. At thermal equilibrium
108: the temperature is uniform in space up to $0.1^\circ$C and does not
109: vary more than $0.1^\circ$C/hour. Images and spatio-temporal diagrams
110: (temporal recording of one line along the cylinder
111: axis) are recorded by a CCD camera. Two plane mirrors reflect the two
112: thirds of the flow hidden to the camera so that the whole cylindrical
113: flow can be reconstructed.
114:
115: Coles~\cite{Coles} has stressed the variety of flow structures
116: observed according to the path followed in parameter space. The
117: experimental procedure followed here is the most frequent one. The
118: outer cylinder is slowly accelerated to the desired angular velocity
119: while the inner one is at rest. Then, the inner cylinder is slowly
120: accelerated ($(1/\Omega_i).(\partial{\Omega_i}/{\partial t})=0.03\%$
121: per second) in order to ensure quasi-static transitions. (It was
122: checked that the Taylor vortices threshold is determined with an
123: accuracy better than $1\%$ as soon as the accelaration rate is less
124: than $0.05\%$). Recording the various flow regimes in parameter space
125: $(R_i ,R_o )$, gives the experimental phase diagram
126: (fig.~\ref{fig:phasediag}(a)) to be compared to that given by Andereck
127: {\it et al.}~\cite{Andereck} for a different geometry ($\eta=0.878$
128: and much smaller aspect ratio). The same regimes are observed but
129: their locations in the parameter space change. The linear thresholds
130: increase (at $R_o=0$, the Taylor vortices appear for $R^*_i=320$ instead of
131: $R^*_i=120$). This was expected in regards of the
132: plane Couette flow limit and agrees very well with Snyder's law
133: $R^*_i~=~27[(1-(\eta))\eta]^(-5/3)$~\cite{Snyder}.
134:
135: \begin{figure}
136: \vspace{-1.cm}
137: \begin{center}
138: \hbox{
139: \hspace{-0.35 cm}
140: \psfig{figure=phasediag2.eps, width=9cm, angle=0}
141: }
142: \vspace{-0.2cm}
143: (a)
144: \hbox{
145: \hspace{-0.30 cm}
146: \psfig{figure=phasediagzoom2.eps, width=9cm, angle=0}
147: }
148: \vspace{-0.15cm}
149: (b)
150: \end{center}
151: \vspace{-0.2cm}
152: \caption{Experimental phase diagram ($\eta=0.983$). (b) displays a
153: zoom of the dotted rectangle of (a). The labels stand for
154: AZI~:~azimuthal flow; TVF:~Taylor vortex flow; WVF:~wavy vortex flow;
155: SPI\&IPS:~spiral and interpenetrating spiral vortices; WIS:~wavy
156: interpenetrating spiral vortices; INT:~intermittency; SPT:~spiral
157: turbulence; TUR:~turbulence. The arrow indicates the $R_o$ value below
158: which the AZI flow jumps directly to INT (see text for details). The
159: solid straight lines in (b), show the paths along which measurements
160: are conducted (A:~$R_o=-922$; B:~$R_o=-713$; C:~$R_o=-641$;
161: D:~$R_i=704$).}
162: \label{fig:phasediag}
163: \end{figure}
164:
165: \noindent
166: Accordingly, the other vortex flows (WVF, SPI, IPS...) also appear at
167: higher $R_i$ values. Second, the laminar-turbulent coexistence
168: regions (INT and SPT), extend to higher $R_o$ values. Finally, for
169: $R_o<-725$, the azimuthal flow jumps directly to INT whereas, for
170: $R_o>-725$, it bifurcates first to IPS or SPI.
171:
172: Figure~\ref{fig:deroule}, shows snapshots of the whole flow, along
173: paths A and C. For $R_o=-922$, the boundaries trigger turbulent
174: stripes are at $R_i$ lower than the expected linear instability
175: threshold (fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(a)). In fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(b)
176: periodically organized turbulent stripes have formed: spiral
177: turbulence is established as a regular rotating pattern with uniform
178: pitch angle along the cylinder axis.
179:
180: \begin{figure}
181: \vspace{-0.5cm}
182: \begin{center}
183: \hbox{
184: (d)
185: \psfig{figure=reg900TCF6.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.47cm, angle=0}
186: (h)
187: \psfig{figure=reg650TCF4.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.47cm, angle=0}
188: }
189: \hbox{
190: (c)
191: \psfig{figure=reg900TCF5bis.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.5cm, angle=0}
192: (g)
193: \psfig{figure=reg650TCF3.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.5cm, angle=0}
194: }
195: \hbox{
196: (b)
197: \psfig{figure=reg900TCF3.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.5cm, angle=0}
198: (f)
199: \psfig{figure=reg650TCF2bis.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.5cm, angle=0}
200: }
201: \hbox{
202: (a)
203: \psfig{figure=reg900TCF0.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.5cm, angle=0}
204: (e)
205: \psfig{figure=reg650TCF2.eps, height=5.2cm, width=3.5cm, angle=0}
206: }
207: \end{center}
208: \vspace{-0.5cm}
209: \caption{Turbulent spots and stripes along paths A and C.
210: Left column is path A, $R_o=-922$:~$R_i=$~(a)~580, (b)~600, (c)~697, (d)~784.
211: Right column is path C, $R_o=-641$:~$R_i=$~(e)~649, (f)~668, (g)~695, (h)~717.
212: Each picture displays a 360 $^\circ $ view of the whole flow ($38$ cm
213: high and $31.4$ cm wide.}
214: \label{fig:deroule}
215: \end{figure}
216:
217: \noindent
218: Further increasing $R_i$, the pattern maintains itself and the
219: number of stripes increases (fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(c)). Finally, the
220: pattern disappears smoothly as homogeneous turbulence takes over
221: (fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(d)). In this regime, one notices several domains of opposite pitch spirals.
222: For $R_o=-641$, the azimuthal flow first bifurcates to a vortex flow,
223: within which, further increasing $R_i$, turbulent spots follow an
224: intermittent bursting dynamics (fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(e)). In
225: fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(f), the spots grow, merge and
226: build up the turbulent spiral pattern. For
227: illustration, we show, in fig.~\ref{fig:deroule}(g), two opposite
228: pitch spirals competing and leading to a so-called ``V''-shaped
229: pattern. In figure~\ref{fig:deroule}(h), spiral turbulence turns
230: into uniform turbulence as for $R_o=-922$. Fig.~\ref{fig:dst}
231: displays the spatio-temporal dynamics of a front between two opposite
232: spirals. This front, moving along the cylinder axis, is eventually
233: absorbed at one of the extremities.
234:
235: \begin{figure}
236: \vspace{-0.8cm}
237: \begin{center}
238: \psfig{figure=dstsptu3b.eps, height=5cm, width=8cm, angle=0}
239: \end{center}
240: \vspace{-0.1cm}
241: \caption{Spatio-temporal diagram of spiral turbulence
242: displaying a front between two domains of opposite pitch
243: angle. $R_o=-838$, $R_i=707$. The z-axis display the whole flow height
244: ($38$ cm) and the total recording length is $20.48$ s.}
245: \label{fig:dst}
246: \vspace{-0.2cm}
247: \end{figure}
248:
249: Let us now consider the previous scenario in reverse. Decreasing
250: $R_i$, spiral turbulence appears from homogeneous turbulence. At
251: $R_i=R_{ic}$, a low amplitude modulation, with wave vector $k$ and
252: frequency $\omega$, uniformly emerges from the turbulent flow with no
253: prefered direction. A slow front dynamics occurs between domains of
254: opposite pitch until the $z \rightarrow -z$ symmetry breaks and
255: selects a single uniform spiral. Further decreasing $R_i$, the
256: modulation amplitude increases until a more complex dynamics
257: occurs. The light intensity, which in the first approximation
258: corresponds to the turbulence level, is recorded in spatio-temporal
259: diagrams such as fig.~\ref{fig:dst}. In the following, we obtain the
260: amplitude $A$, the axial component $k_z$ of the wave vector and the
261: frequency $\omega$ of the light intensity modulation by
262: demodulation~\cite{Croq}. Owing to the azimuthal periodicity, the
263: azimuthal component of the wavevector,
264: $k_\theta=2.n_\theta/(r_i+r_o)$, is quantized, $n_{\theta}$ being the
265: number of pattern periods along one perimeter.
266:
267: Four paths in the $(R_o, R_i)$ plan are investigated. We first
268: consider the three vertical paths A, B and C ($R_o=-922$, $R_o=-713$
269: and $R_o=-641$).
270:
271: \begin{figure}
272: \vspace{-0.3cm}
273: \begin{center}
274: \hbox{
275: \psfig{figure=ampli.eps, height=4cm, width=4.25cm, angle=0}
276: \psfig{figure=kz1.eps, height=4cm, width=4.25cm, angle=0}
277: }
278: \vspace{-0.1cm}
279: \hbox{
280: \hspace{1.77cm} (a) \hspace{3.77cm} (b)
281: }
282: \end{center}
283: \vspace{-0.5cm}
284: \caption{The spiral turbulence amplitude (a) and vertical wave
285: number (b) vs. $\epsilon$. ($R_o=-641$ ($\ast$), $R_o=-713$
286: ($\diamond$), $R_o=-900$ ($\bullet$)).}
287: \label{fig:curves}
288: \end{figure}
289:
290: \noindent
291: Fig.~\ref{fig:curves}(a) displays the amplitude of the wave against
292: the threshold distance $\epsilon= \left|R_i-R_{ic}\right|/R_{ic}$.
293: $R^c_i$ is determined by extrapolation, assuming a
294: linear dependence of $A^2$ on $R_i$, as suggested by the
295: general framework of amplitude equations. The resulting values,
296: $R_{ic}=820$ for $R_o=-922$, $R_{ic}=785$ for $R_o=-713$ and
297: $R_{ic}=740$ for $R_o=-641$, agree with the observed thresholds.
298: The axial component $k_z$ of the wavevector
299: decreases linearly with $\epsilon$ from a critical value $k^c_z$
300: close to 0.30 (see fig.~\ref{fig:curves}(b)). As long as the spiral
301: is well defined, the azimuthal wave number $n_\theta$ equals 6 along
302: paths A and B and 5 along path C. $n_\theta$ being constant and
303: $k_z$ decreasing with $\epsilon$, the spiral pitch, $\phi=\arctan
304: (k_\theta / k_z)$, increases with $\epsilon$ from a critical value
305: $\phi^c=18^\circ$ up to $40^\circ$.
306:
307: \begin{figure}
308: \vspace{-0.5cm}
309: \begin{center}
310: \psfig{figure=freq1.eps, width=8cm, angle=0}
311: \end{center}
312: \vspace{-0.5cm}
313: \caption{The angular velocity $\omega_s$ vs.
314: $\Omega_m$, ($R_o=-641$ ($\ast$), $R_o=-713$ ($\diamond$),
315: $R_o=-900$ ($\bullet$) and $R_i=704$ ($+$)).}
316: \label{fig:omega}
317: \vspace{-0.0cm}
318: \end{figure}
319:
320: We now consider the horizontal path D with $R_i=704$. For $R_o>-630$,
321: the flow is fully turbulent. Decreasing $R_o$, spiral turbulence
322: emerges from the fully turbulent regime. The initial azimuthal wave
323: number $n_\theta=5$ increases to $n_\theta=6$ by Eckhaus-like
324: re-arrangements. The axial wave vector component remains constant on
325: the explored values $-950<R_o<-630$. Finally, fig.~\ref{fig:omega}
326: displays $\omega_s=\omega/n_\theta$, the angular velocity of the
327: spiral turbulence pattern, vs.
328: $\Omega_m=\frac{1}{2}(\Omega_i+\Omega_o)$. As seen by Coles and Van
329: Atta~\cite{Coles,VanAtta,Coles-VA}, the pattern rotates with the mean
330: angular velocity of the two cylinders ($\omega_s = \Omega_m$) and not
331: with the outside cylinder as reported by Andereck {\it et
332: al.}~\cite{Andereck} as well as by Goharadzeh and
333: Mutabazi~\cite{GohMut}. In the latter study, the range of variation
334: for $\Omega_i/\Omega_o$ is actually too small to distinguish a
335: dependence on $\Omega_o$ from one on $\Omega_m$.
336:
337: Altogether, the spiral turbulence emerges as a wavy turbulent state
338: pattern, which bifurcates continuously from the homogeneous turbulent flow.
339: This wavy behavior agrees with the idea of a phase
340: dynamics analysis suggested by Hegseth {\it et al.}~\cite{Heg1,Heg2}
341: to describe the pitch variation, they observed.
342: However the present study does not report any pitch variation.
343: In their analysis, Hegseth {\it et al.}, on the basis of
344: the mean flow measurements by Coles and Van~Atta~\cite{Coles-VA},
345: suggest that the spiral turbulence induces a backflow, whose mean
346: axial component is differently modified at both extremities. The
347: resulting different pitches locally imposed in the boundary conditions
348: drive the pitch variation along the axis. In the present study, both
349: the large aspect ratio and the gap thinness considerably reduce the
350: backflow and the influence of the end boundaries.
351:
352: For low values of $R_i$, we observed disconnected turbulent domains
353: surrounded by a laminar flow, which evokes the transitional dynamics
354: observed in the plane Couette flow~\cite{BotDavManDau}, where
355: turbulent domains move, grow, decay, split and merge leading to the
356: so-called spatio-temporal intermittency (STI), a process in which
357: active/turbulent regions may invade absorbing/laminar domains out of
358: which disorder cannot spontaneously
359: emerged~\cite{ChatMan}. Considering the vicinity of the plane Couette
360: flow limit, $\eta=1$, and following Colovas and
361: Andereck~\cite{ColAnd}, one would like to know whether Taylor-Couette
362: flow actually exhibits STI and how the flow evolves from a continuous
363: turbulent state modulated in space and time to two-state
364: coexistence. In a first attempt to answer these questions, we
365: binarized the flow into alternating laminar and turbulent domains as
366: is common in an STI context. This first-order approximation should
367: not influence the results presented below, at least at a qualitative
368: level.
369:
370: \begin{figure}
371: \vspace{-0.5cm}
372: \begin{center}
373: \psfig{figure=lpg.eps, width=8cm, angle=0}
374: \end{center}
375: \vspace{-0.5cm}
376: \caption{$\lambda$ ($R_o=-713$ ($\diamond$) and $R_o=-922$
377: ($\bullet$)), the pattern wavelength and $\zeta$ ($R_o=-713$
378: ($\triangle$) and $R_o=-922$ ($\ast$)), the
379: turbulent stripes width, against $\epsilon$.}
380: \label{fig:lp}
381: \vspace{-0.3cm}
382: \end{figure}
383:
384:
385: \noindent
386: Fig.~\ref{fig:lp} displays the turbulent stripes width,
387: $\zeta$, and the wavelength, $\lambda$ of the spiral pattern, parallel
388: to the wave vector direction. $\lambda$ increases faster than $\zeta$:
389: the minima of the modulation becomes more and more distant from the
390: most active turbulent regions. Simultaneously the modulation amplitude
391: increases and these minima are less and less turbulent. As a result they
392: become areas favorable to local relaxation to the laminar flow and
393: the modulated turbulent state turns into a periodic pattern of
394: alternating turbulent and laminar stripes separated by fronts. This
395: totally different spatio-temporal dynamics rapidly turns into the
396: disordered STI regime.
397:
398: Our very large aspect ratio TC apparatus has allowed, for the first
399: time, to visualize and quantitatively analyse the \lq\lq barber pole
400: turbulence\rq\rq at large scales. First, this study brings quantitative
401: evidence of the spatio-temporal periodicity of the pattern and
402: its dependance on control parameters. Second, it
403: shows that the spiral turbulence, previously described as alternating
404: turbulent and laminar bands, actually appears through a modulation of
405: the homogeneous turbulent state. To our knowledge, it is the first
406: time that the transition from homogeneous turbulence to spiral
407: turbulence is investigated. Finally measurements of the turbulent
408: stripes width relatively to the pattern wavelength have allowed us to
409: describe the relaxation mechanism followed between the modulated
410: turbulent state and the laminar-turbulent coexistence.
411:
412: We thank H. Chat\'e, P. Manneville and I. Mutabazi for
413: fruitful discussions, and C. Gasquet and V. Padilla for technical
414: assistance.
415:
416: \vspace{-0.5cm}
417: \begin{references}
418: \vspace{-1.7cm}
419:
420: \bibitem{Andereck}
421: C. D. Andereck, S. S. Liu and H. L. Swinney, J. Fluid Mech. {\bf 164},
422: 155 (1986).
423:
424: \bibitem{Feyn}
425: R. P. Feynman, {\it Lecture Notes in Physics} (Addison-Wesley Reading,
426: MA, 1964), vol. 2.
427:
428: \bibitem{Coles}
429: D. Coles, J. Fluid Mech., {\bf 21}, 385 (1965).
430:
431: \bibitem{VanAtta}
432: C. Van Atta, J. Fluid Mech., {\bf 25}, 495 (1966).
433:
434: \bibitem{Coles-VA}
435: D. Coles and C. W. Van Atta, Phys. of Fluids Supp., S120 (1967).
436:
437: \bibitem{Heg1}
438: J. Hegseth, C. D. Andereck, F. Hayot and Y Pomeau, Phys. Rev. Letters,
439: {\bf 62}, 257 (1989).
440:
441: \bibitem{Heg2}
442: J. Hegseth, C. D. Andereck, F. Hayot and Y. Pomeau, Eur. J. Mech. B, {\bf 10}, 221 (1991).
443:
444: \bibitem{DauDav}
445: O. Dauchot and F. Daviaud, Phys. of Fluids, {\bf 7}, 335 (1995).
446:
447: \bibitem{BottChat}
448: S. Bottin and H. Chat\'e, Eur. Phys. J. B, {\bf 6}, 143 (1198).
449:
450: \bibitem{TCvisu}
451: A. Prigent and O. Dauchot, submitted to Physics of Fluids (1999).
452:
453: \bibitem{Snyder}
454: H. A. Snyder, The Physics of Fluids, {\bf 11}, 1599 (1968).
455:
456: \bibitem{Croq}
457: V. Croquette and H. Williams, Physica D, {\bf 37}, 300 (1989).
458:
459: \bibitem{GohMut}
460: A. Goharadzeh and I. Mutabazi, in {\it $2^{ième}$ Colloque sur le
461: Chaos temporel et le Chaos spatio-temporel}, Rouen (1998).
462:
463: \bibitem{BotDavManDau}
464: S. Bottin, F. Daviaud, P. Manneville and O. Dauchot, Eur. Phys. Lett.,
465: {\bf 43}, 171 (1998).
466:
467: \bibitem{ChatMan}
468: H. Chat\'e and P. Manneville, in {\it Turbulence, A tentative dictionary},
469: P. Tabeling and O. Cardoso Eds., New York, p 111-116, Plenum Press (1994).
470:
471: \bibitem{ColAnd}
472: P. W. Colovas and C. D. Andereck, Phys. Rev. E, {\bf 55}, 2736 (1997).
473: \end{references}
474:
475: \end{multicols}
476:
477: \end{document}
478: %
479: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
480:
481:
482:
483:
484:
485:
486:
487:
488:
489:
490:
491:
492:
493:
494: