1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%
3: %% lastest version
4: %%
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,seceq]{jpsj}
7: \documentstyle[epsf,float,seceq,twocolumn]{jpsj}
8: %\documentstyle[short,epsf,float,seceq,twocolumn]{jpsj}
9: %\documentstyle[seceq,float,epsf,preprint]{jpsj}
10:
11:
12: \font\eightmib=cmmib10 at 8pt\relax
13: \renewcommand{\mibs}[1]{\mbox{\eightmib #1}}
14:
15:
16: \author{Akihisa {\sc Koga}}
17: \title{
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %Effects of inter-layer coupling for the orthogonal-dimer system
20: Ground-State Phase Diagram for the Three-Dimensional Orthogonal-Dimer System
21: %for the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: }
24: \inst{Department of Applied Physics, Osaka University,
25: Suita, Osaka 565-0871}
26: \recdate{\today}
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \abst{
29: We investigate quantum phase transitions in the three-dimensional
30: orthogonal-dimer system of the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ by means of
31: the series expansion technique.
32: We then discuss the phase diagram where
33: the dimer phase, the Haldane phase,
34: the frustration-induced disordered phase and
35: the magnetically ordered phase compete with each other.
36: It is found that the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ is located
37: in the dimer phase close to the phase boundary.
38: }
39: \kword{$\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$, orthogonal-dimer,
40: Shastry-Sutherland model, series expansion}
41: \def\runtitle{Effects of inter-layer coupling for the orthogonal-dimer system}
42: \def\runauthor{Akihisa {\sc Koga}}
43: \begin{document}
44: \sloppy
45: \maketitle
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: %\section{Introduction}
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49: Two-dimensional (2D) quantum spin systems with a spin gap have been
50: the subject of considerable interest.
51: In particular, the effect of the frustration in these systems
52: plays an important role in stabilizing the disordered ground state.
53: The 2D spin-gap compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ found recently\cite{Kageyama}
54: has strong frustration due to its orthogonal-dimer structure,
55: which has provided a variety of interesting topics.
56: \cite{Onizuka,Nojiri,Room,Lemmens,Zherlitsyn,Kage2}
57: The system can be described by the 2D Heisenberg model on a square lattice with
58: some diagonal bonds,
59: which is referred to as the Shastry-Sutherland model, \cite{Shastry}
60: as reported by Miyahara and Ueda.\cite{Miyahara}
61: In this 2D model, most of the fundamental properties including the ground state
62: as well as the excited states have been clarified by various theoretical
63: approaches.\cite{Shastry,Miyahara,Ueda,3DMiyahara,Koga,Knetter,
64: MagFu,MagMi,MagMo,TwotriMo,Muller,TwotriFu,Mila,Weihong}
65: On the other hand, some recent reports claim that
66: the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ has a large interlayer coupling,
67: which may not be negligible in explaining the experimental findings.
68: \cite{3DMiyahara,Knetter}
69: Therefore it is necessary to study the phase diagram for
70: the three-dimensional (3D) orthogonal-dimer system.
71:
72: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
73: %\section{Model}\label{model}
74: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
75: Motivated by the above findings,
76: we investigate here the quantum phase transitions
77: for the 3D orthogonal-dimer system
78: which was introduced by Ueda and Miyahara. \cite{Ueda}
79: The Hamiltonian is described by
80: \begin{eqnarray}
81: H=J\sum_{(i,j)}{\mib S}_i\cdot{\mib S}_j+
82: J'\sum_{(i,j)}{\mib S}_i\cdot{\mib S}_j+
83: J''\sum_{(i,j)}{\mib S}_i\cdot{\mib S}_j,\label{eq:H}
84: \end{eqnarray}
85: where ${\mib S}_i$ is the $S=1/2$ spin operator at the $i$-th site,
86: and $J$, $J'$ and $J''$ are antiferromagnetic couplings.
87: The structure of this model is shown schematically in Fig. \ref{fig:model}.
88: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
89: \begin{figure}[htb]
90: \vspace{0.1cm}
91: \epsfxsize=6.5cm
92: \centerline{\epsfbox{model.eps}}
93: \caption{The 3D orthogonal-dimer system for the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$.
94: The bold, solid and dashed lines indicate the antiferromagnetic exchange
95: couplings $J$, $J'$ and $J''$, respectively.}
96: \label{fig:model}%-----------------------------------------
97: \end{figure}
98: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
99: In some limiting cases, the 3D model is reduced to
100: interesting orthogonal-dimer systems
101: which have been studied intensively thus far.
102: When $J''=0$, the system is the well-known
103: Shastry-Sutherland model\cite{Shastry} (see Fig. \ref{fig:start1}),
104: for which many groups have theoretically discussed various properties such as
105: plateaus in the magnetization curve,
106: \cite{Miyahara,Muller,MagFu,MagMi,MagMo,TwotriMo}
107: two-magnon excitations, \cite{TwotriFu,Knetter,TwotriMo}
108: and quantum phase transitions.
109: \cite{Mila,Miyahara,Muller,Weihong,Koga,Knetter}
110: In particular, the nontrivial disordered state
111: adiabatically connected to isolated plaquettes\cite{Koga}
112: may be the most probable singlet state, which competes with the dimer state
113: as well as the antiferromagnetically ordered state.
114: In this paper, this phase is referred to as a "plaquette phase",
115: for simplicity.
116: On the other hand, in the case $J'=0$,
117: the system is reduced to the two-leg ladders with the diagonal bonds
118: (see Fig. \ref{fig:start2}),
119: which may be regarded as chains of the tetrahedra with shared edges,
120: as pointed out by Gelfand. \cite{Gelfand}
121: In the ladder system, the dimer phase undergoes a first-order quantum phase
122: transition to another disordered phase, which is exactly formed by
123: the triplet $(S=1)$ on each rung.
124: Note that the singlet on each rung is completely decoupled from
125: the triplet for any value of $J''$, due to the orthogonal-dimer structure.
126: \cite{Gelfand,Kitatani,White,Lin,Honecker}
127: Therefore, this disordered phase is equivalent to the Haldane phase realized
128: in the $S=1$ quantum Heisenberg chain.
129: \cite{Haldane,Hida,Strong,Watanabe,Nishiyama,Narushima,Totsuka}
130: Concerning the first-order transition,
131: it is known that the cusp and jump singularities appear
132: in the excitations\cite{Gelfand,Lin} and
133: the magnetization curve.\cite{Honecker}
134:
135: In this study, we discuss the phase diagram
136: for the 3D system by means of the series expansion method.
137: \cite{series}
138: We observe how the frustration affects the quantum phase transitions.
139: It is also clarified that the spin-gap compound
140: $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ is located in the vicinity of the phase boundary
141: which separates the dimer and the magnetically ordered phases.
142:
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: %\section{Quantum phase transitions}
145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
146: In the series expansion approach,\cite{first,series}
147: we start with isolated clusters of a proper spin-singlet configuration.
148: For this purpose, we divide the original Hamiltonian into
149: two parts as $H=H_0+\lambda H_1$,
150: where $H_0 (H_1)$ represents the unperturbed (perturbed) Hamiltonian and
151: $\lambda$ is an auxiliary parameter.
152: Details of the initial configurations for various phases are given
153: in the following.
154: By turning on the couplings among the clusters perturbatively $(H_1)$,
155: we carry out the series expansion in $\lambda$
156: for the ground state energy and the spin gap.
157: Then the critical point for the first- (second-)order transition
158: is determined by applying the first-order inhomogeneous differential method
159: (Pad\'e approximants) to the obtained series. \cite{Pade}
160: In the following, starting with the Shastry-Sutherland model and
161: the two-leg ladder model with diagonal bonds,
162: we deal with quantum phase transitions for the 3D orthogonal-dimer model.
163:
164: %\subsection{Quasi-2D Shastry-Sutherland model}
165: %Let us first discuss how the inter-layer coupling
166: %on the 2D Shastry-Sutherland model $(J''=0)$
167: %affects the quantum phase transitions.
168:
169: Note that the direct product of the dimer-singlet states
170: formed by the couplings $J$ is always an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian
171: (\ref{eq:H}) with the energy $E=-3/8 NJ$, even in the 3D model, \cite{Ueda}
172: where $N$ is the total number of spins.
173: We then discuss how the interlayer coupling
174: on the 2D Shastry-Sutherland model $(J''=0)$
175: affects the quantum phase transitions.
176: We recall here the scenario in our previous paper\cite{Koga}
177: where the first- (second-)order quantum phase transition in 2D
178: was discussed by calculating the ground state energy (the spin gap)
179: for the plaquette phase.
180: Following this concept, we compute the quantities for the plaquette phase
181: by means of the series expansion technique.
182: We choose the arrangement of plaquettes
183: shown in Fig. \ref{fig:start1} as a starting configuration.
184: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
185: \begin{figure}[htb]
186: \vspace{0.1cm}
187: \epsfxsize=6cm
188: \centerline{\epsfbox{start1.eps}}
189: \caption{The initial configuration of the plaquettes used
190: to treat the frustration-induced disordered phase by means of
191: the series expansion technique.}
192: \label{fig:start1}%-----------------------------------------
193: \end{figure}
194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
195: In this figure, the shaded squares represent the plaquettes formed
196: by the exchange coupling $J'$.
197: The other bold and solid lines indicate
198: the exchange couplings between the plaquettes,
199: $\lambda J$ and $\lambda J'$, respectively.
200: We also set the interlayer coupling as $\lambda J''$,
201: which is not shown in this figure, for simplicity.
202: To discuss the first-order quantum phase transition to the dimer phase,
203: we perform the plaquette expansion for the ground state energy
204: up to the fifth order in $\lambda$ for several values of $J'$ and $J''$.
205: We estimate the ground state energy in the case $\lambda=1$, where
206: the model is reduced to the original orthogonal-dimer model
207: by means of the first-order inhomogeneous differential method.\cite{Pade}
208: Comparing the energies for the dimer and the plaquette phases,
209: we determine the phase boundary shown as the bold line in Fig. \ref{fig:phase},
210: which separates two disordered phases.
211: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
212: \begin{figure}[htb]
213: \vspace{0.1cm}
214: \epsfxsize=8cm
215: \centerline{\epsfbox{phase.eps}}
216: \caption{The phase diagram for the 3D orthogonal-dimer system.
217: The bold and solid lines represent the phase boundaries where the first-
218: and the second-order quantum phase transitions occur, respectively.
219: The open circles indicate the locations of the orthogonal-dimer
220: compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ obtained by
221: Miyahara and Ueda,\protect{\cite{3DMiyahara}}
222: and Knetter et al.\protect{\cite{Knetter}}
223: }
224: \label{fig:phase}%-----------------------------------------
225: \end{figure}
226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
227: When $J''=0$ (Shastry-Sutherland model), the plaquette phase undergoes
228: the first-order quantum phase transition at $(J'/J)_c=0.68$.
229: Since this critical value obtained by the fifth-order expansion is consistent
230: with the result $(J'/J)_c=0.677$ obtained
231: by the seventh-order expansion,\cite{Koga}
232: it is expected that this lower-order expansion with the first-order
233: inhomogeneous differential method may give the phase boundary
234: quantitatively well even in the 3D model.
235: By introducing the interlayer coupling $J''$,
236: the energy for the plaquette phase seems to decrease quadratically,
237: while the energy for the dimer phase is not
238: changed due to its orthogonal-dimer structure.
239: This implies that the phase boundary between the two spin-gap phases
240: is little affected as long as the interlayer couplings are small.
241:
242: In order to completely discuss the interlayer effects,
243: the antiferromagnetically ordered phase stabilized by
244: the interlayer coupling must be properly taken into account.
245: Performing the plaquette expansion for the spin gap up
246: to the fourth order in $\lambda$,
247: we determine the second-order quantum
248: phase transition point by means of the biased Pad\'e approximants
249: with the critical exponent $\nu\sim0.6$.
250: The introduction of the interlayer couplings induces
251: the antiferromagnetic correlation,
252: while it suppresses the frustration which stabilizes the plaquette phase.
253: %It is found that the region of the plaquette phase is very small
254: %in the phase diagram for the 3D model.
255: The multi-critical point can be estimated as
256: $(J'/J, J''/J)\sim(0.67,0.08)$, and
257: it is seen that the plaquette phase induced by the frustration is not
258: stable against the interlayer coupling.
259:
260:
261: %\subsection{Quasi-1D two-leg ladder system}
262: We next consider the present system as the coupled two-leg ladders
263: \cite{Gelfand} $(J'\sim0)$, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:start2}.
264: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
265: \begin{figure}[htb]
266: \vspace{0.1cm}
267: \epsfxsize=6cm
268: \centerline{\epsfbox{start2.eps}}
269: \caption{The two-leg ladder with diagonal bonds,
270: which may be considered to be a chain of tetrahedra with shared edges.
271: \protect{\cite{Gelfand}}}
272: \label{fig:start2}%-----------------------------------------
273: \end{figure}
274: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
275: We discuss how the dimer and the Haldane phases compete
276: with the magnetically ordered phase induced by the inter-ladder coupling $J'$.
277: Since the Haldane phase is formed by the triplet state ($S=1$)
278: on each rung, the dimer expansion starting from the singlet state ($S=0$)
279: is not appropriate to discuss the critical phenomena.
280: Nevertheless, following the concept of the valence bond solid, \cite{VBS}
281: we can choose a suitable initial configuration for the Haldane phase
282: in the framework of the series expansion. \cite{KogaHaldane}
283: Namely, we introduce the unperturbed Hamiltonian $H_0$,
284: by choosing the initial configuration of isolated plaquettes
285: indicated by the shaded rectangles in Fig. \ref{fig:start2}.
286: Considering the other couplings as perturbations,
287: we then discuss the stability of the Haldane phase.
288: To study the first- (second-)order transition,
289: we perform the plaquette expansion for
290: the ground state energy (the spin gap) up to the sixth (fifth) order
291: in $\lambda$.
292: Using the approximation discussed above,
293: we then determine the phase boundaries shown in Fig. \ref{fig:phase}.
294: When $J'=0$, the first-order quantum phase transition
295: from the Haldane phase to
296: the dimer phase occurs at the critical value $(J''/J)_c \sim 0.71$,
297: which is in good agreement with the accurate value
298: $(J''/J)_c = 0.7135(3)$ obtained by Gelfand.\cite{Gelfand}
299: Introducing the interladder coupling $J'$ in the Haldane phase
300: ($J''/J>0.71$), the antiferromagnetic correlation is enhanced and
301: the spin gap decreases rapidly.
302: Finally, the second-order quantum phase transition occurs
303: to the magnetically ordered phase.
304: We estimate the multicritical point $(J'/J, J''/J)\sim(0.015,0.7)$
305: where the dimer, the Haldane and the magnetically ordered phases
306: compete with each other.
307:
308: Finally, to discuss the competition between the dimer and
309: the antiferromagnetically ordered phases,
310: we use the Ising expansion technique.
311: To this end, we divide the original Heisenberg Hamiltonian into
312: two parts as $H=\sum J_{ij} S^z_i S^z_j+ \lambda \sum J_{ij} (S^x_i S^x_j+
313: S^y_i S^y_j)$, where $J_{ij}$ is the exchange coupling for each bond.
314: The ground state energy $E_{\rm AF}$ for the antiferromagnetically
315: ordered phase is given by
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: E_{\rm AF}&=&\frac{1}{2}NJS^2-2NJ'S^2-2NJ''S^2+\epsilon(\lambda),\label{eq:SW}
318: \end{eqnarray}
319: where $\epsilon(\lambda)$ is the quantum correction due to the $XY$ components.
320: Performing the Ising expansion for $\epsilon(\lambda)$
321: up to the fourth order in $\lambda$ and
322: applying the Pad\'e approximants\cite{Pade} to the obtained series,
323: we then deduce the energy $E_{\rm AF}$.
324: By comparing it with the energy for the dimer phase,
325: we can determine the phase boundary,
326: which is shown as the bold line in Fig. \ref{fig:phase}.
327: Near the multicritical points,
328: the energy $E_{\rm AF}$ has not been deduced
329: accurately, and thereby the phase boundary shown as the broken line is
330: to guide the eyes.
331: When $J'=J''=0$, the 3D orthogonal-dimer system belongs to the dimer phase
332: with the exact dimer-singlet state.
333: Note that in the dimer phase the interlayer coupling $J''$ has little effect
334: on the ground state properties due to its orthogonal-dimer structure,
335: which is quite different from the case of the coupling $J'$.\cite{3DMiyahara}
336: Therefore the introduction of the interdimer couplings $J'$ and $J''$
337: enhances the 2D spin-spin correlation, and finally
338: induces the first-order quantum phase transition
339: to the antiferromagnetically ordered phase with the 3D structure,
340: as seen in Fig. \ref{fig:phase}.
341:
342: Recently it was clarified that the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$
343: has a large interlayer coupling.
344: In the reports by Miyahara and Ueda\cite{3DMiyahara}
345: and Knetter et al.\cite{Knetter}, the ratios of the interdimer and
346: interlayer exchange couplings are estimated as $(J'/J, J''/J)=
347: (0.635, 0.09)$ and $(0.603, 0.21)$,
348: which are indicated by open circles in Fig. \ref{fig:phase}.
349: It is found that the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ may be located
350: in the dimer phase close to the phase boundary.
351:
352: Some comments are in order for the possibility of
353: another phase induced by the frustration in the ground state.
354: Recently Knetter et al. have found
355: that the instability of the two-magnon excitation
356: in the Shastry-Sutherland model $(J''=0)$ exists
357: in the dimer phase.\cite{Knetter}
358: It is also claimed that the first-order quantum phase transition occurs
359: to the classical helical ordered phase at the critical point
360: $(J'/J)_c=0.630(5)$.
361: This result appears to contrast with
362: the other results\cite{Miyahara,Koga,Weihong,Muller}
363: except for those obtained by the Schwinger boson approach.\cite{Mila}
364: Although their conclusion of the first-order transition in terms of the
365: analysis of elementary excitations is speculative, it is an interesting
366: open problem to clarify what this instability really implies,
367: which is now under consideration.
368:
369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
370: %\section{Summary}
371: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
372: In summary, we have investigated the quantum phase transitions
373: in the 3D orthogonal-dimer system for the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$
374: by means of the plaquette expansion technique.
375: We have thus determined a phase diagram with a rich structure,
376: in which it is clarified that the frustration-induced disordered phase
377: is unstable against the interlayer couplings.
378: Also it is found that the compound $\rm SrCu_2(BO_3)_2$ is located
379: in the dimer phase close to the phase boundary.
380:
381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
382: %\acknowledgements
383: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
384: We would like to thank N. Kawakami and K. Okunishi
385: for useful discussions.
386: The work is partly supported by a
387: Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports,
388: and Culture.
389: The author is supported by the Japan Society
390: for the Promotion of Science.
391: Some of the numerical computations in this work were carried out
392: at the Yukawa Institute Computer Facility.
393:
394: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
395:
396: \bibitem{Kageyama}
397: H. Kageyama, K. Yoshimura, R. Stern, N. V. Mushnikov, K. Onizuka, M. Kato,
398: K. Kosuge, C. P. Slichter, T. Goto and Y. Ueda:
399: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82} (1999) 3168.
400:
401: %%%%%%% experiment %%%%%%%
402: % 1/3-plateau
403: \bibitem{Onizuka}
404: K. Onizuka, H. Kageyama, Y. Narumi, K. Kindo, Y. Ueda and T. Goto:
405: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 69} (2000) 1016.
406:
407: % ESR
408: \bibitem{Nojiri}
409: H. Nojiri, H. Kageyama, K. Onizuka, Y. Ueda and M. Motokawa:
410: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 68} (1999) 2906.
411:
412: % infrared
413: \bibitem{Room}
414: T. R\~o\~om, U. Nagel, E. Lippmaa, H. Kageyama, K. Onizuka and Y. Ueda:
415: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61} (2000) 14342.
416: %cond-mat/9909284.
417:
418: % Raman
419: \bibitem{Lemmens}
420: P. Lemmens, M. Grove, M. Fischer, G. G\"untherodt, V. N. Kotov,
421: H. Kageyama, K. Onizuka and Y. Ueda:
422: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85} (2000) 2605.
423: %cond-mat/0003094.
424:
425: % sound wave
426: \bibitem{Zherlitsyn}
427: S. Zherlitsyn, S. Schmidt, B. Wolf, H. Schwenk, B. L\"uthi, H. Kageyama,
428: K. Onizuka, Y. Ueda and K. Ueda:
429: Rhys. Rev. B {\bf 62} (2000) R6097.
430: %cond-mat/0005052.
431:
432: % multi-triplet
433: \bibitem{Kage2}
434: H. Kageyama, M. Nishi, N. Aso, K. Onizuka, T. Yosihama, K. Nukui, K. Kodama,
435: K. Kakurai and Y. Ueda: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84} (2000) 5876.
436:
437: \bibitem{Shastry}
438: B. S. Shastry and B. Sutherland: Physica {\bf 108B} (1981) 1069.
439:
440: \bibitem{Miyahara}
441: S. Miyahara and K. Ueda: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82} (1999) 3701.
442:
443: \bibitem{3DMiyahara}
444: S. Miyahara and K. Ueda: cond-mat/0004260.
445: % J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Suppl.
446:
447: \bibitem{Knetter}
448: C. Knetter, A. B\"uhler, E. M\"uller-Hartmann and G. S. Uhrig:
449: cond-mat/0005322.
450:
451: \bibitem{Ueda}
452: K. Ueda and S. Miyahara: J. Phys. Condens. Matter {\bf 11} (1999) L175.
453:
454:
455: \bibitem{MagFu}
456: Y. Fukumoto and A. Oguchi: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 69} (2000) 1286.
457:
458: \bibitem{MagMi}
459: S. Miyahara and K. Ueda: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61} (2000) 3417.
460:
461: \bibitem{MagMo}
462: T. Momoi and K. Totsuka: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61} (2000) 3231.
463:
464: \bibitem{Muller}
465: E. M\"uller-Hartmann, R. R. P. Singh, C. Knetter and G. S. Uhrig:
466: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84} (2000) 1808.
467:
468: \bibitem{TwotriMo}
469: T. Momoi and K. Totsuka: cond-mat/0006020.
470:
471: \bibitem{TwotriFu}
472: Y. Fukumoto: cond-mat/0004111.
473:
474: \bibitem{Mila}
475: M. Albrecht and F. Mila: Europhys. Lett. {\bf 34} (1996) 145.
476:
477: \bibitem{Weihong}
478: Z. Weihong, C. J. Hamer and J. Oitmaa: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 60} (1999) 6608.
479:
480: \bibitem{Koga}
481: A. Koga and N. Kawakami: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84} (2000) 4461.
482:
483:
484:
485: \bibitem{Gelfand}
486: M. P. Gelfand: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 43} (1991) 8644.
487:
488: \bibitem{Kitatani}
489: H. Kitatani and T. Oguchi: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 65} (1996) 1387.
490:
491: \bibitem{White}
492: S. R. White: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53} (1996) 52.
493:
494: \bibitem{Lin}
495: H.-Q. Lin and J. L. Shen: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 69} (2000) 878.
496:
497: \bibitem{Honecker}
498: A. Honecker, F. Mila and M. Troyer:
499: Eur. Phy. J. {\bf B} 15 (2000) 227.
500: %cond-mat/9910438.
501:
502: \bibitem{Haldane}
503: F. D. M. Haldane: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 50} (1983) 1153.
504:
505: \bibitem{Hida}
506: K. Hida: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 60} (1991) 1347; {\bf 60} (1991) 1939;
507: {\bf 64} (1995) 4896.
508:
509: \bibitem{Strong}
510: S. P. Strong and A. J. Millis: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 69} (1992) 2419.
511:
512: \bibitem{Watanabe}
513: H. Watanabe, K. Nomura and S. Takada: J. Phy. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 62} (1993) 2845;
514: H. Watanabe: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 50} (1994) 13442.
515:
516: \bibitem{Nishiyama}
517: Y. Nishiyama, N. Hatano and M. Suzuki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 64} (1995) 1967.
518:
519: \bibitem{Narushima}
520: T. Narushima, T. Nakamura and S. Takada:
521: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 64} (1995) 4322.
522:
523: \bibitem{Totsuka}
524: K. Totsuka and M. Suzuki: J. Phys. Condens. Matter {\bf 7} (1995) 6079.
525:
526: \bibitem{series}
527: M. P. Gelfand and R. R. P. Singh: Adv. Phys. {\bf 49} (2000) 93.
528:
529: \bibitem{first}
530: R. R. P. Singh, M. P. Gelfand and D. A. Huse:
531: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61} (1988) 2484. % first
532:
533: \bibitem{Pade}
534: A. J. Guttmann: {\it Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena},
535: ed. C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz
536: (Academic, New York, 1989) Vol. 13.
537:
538: \bibitem{VBS}
539: I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb and H. Tasaki:
540: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 59} (1987) 799:
541: Commun. Math. Phys. {\bf 115} (1988) 477.
542:
543: \bibitem{KogaHaldane}
544: A. Koga and N. Kawakami: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61} (2000) 6133.
545:
546:
547:
548:
549:
550: \end{thebibliography}
551:
552: \end{document}
553: