1: %*************************************************************************
2: \documentstyle[aps,eqsecnum,preprint,psfig]{revtex}
3: \textwidth 6.6in
4: \textheight 9.2in
5: \begin{document}
6: \draft
7: \title{Collapsed and adsorbed states of a directed polymer chain in
8: two-dimensions.}
9: \author{Pramod K Mishra and Yashwant Singh }
10: \address{ Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, \\
11: Varanasi 221 005, India }
12: \date{\today}
13: \maketitle
14: \begin{abstract}
15: A phase diagram for a surface interacting long flexible partially
16: directed polymer chain in a two-dimensional poor solvent where the
17: possibility of collapse in the bulk exists is determined using exact
18: enumeration method. We used a model of self attracting self-avoiding
19: walk and evaluated $30$ steps in series. An intermediate phase in
20: between the desorbed collapsed and adsorbed expanded phases having
21: the conformation of a surface attached globule is found. The four
22: phases, viz. $ (i)$ desorbed expanded, $(ii)$ desorbed collapsed,
23: $(iii)$ adsorbed expanded, $(iv)$ surface attached globule are found
24: to meet at a multicritical point. These features are in agreement
25: with those of an isotropic (or non directed) polymer chain.
26: \end{abstract}
27:
28: \pacs{61.30 Cz, 62.20 Di, 61.30Jf}
29: \narrowtext
30:
31: \section{Introduction}
32: The subject of adsorption of a long flexible polymer chain immersed
33: in a poor solvent on an impenetrable surface with an attractive
34: short-range attraction has received considerable attention in recent
35: years \cite{1,2,3,4}. This is because an attractive surface may lead
36: to adsorption-desorption transition from the state when the chain is
37: mostly attached to the surface to the state of detachment when the
38: temperature is increased. This behaviour finds applications in
39: lubrication, adhesion, surface protection, etc.
40:
41: It is known that when a chain interacts with a surface its
42: conformational properties get modified in comparison with its bulk
43: properties \cite{1,2}. This is because of a subtle competition
44: between the gain of internal energy and the corresponding loss of
45: entropy due to the constraint imposed on the chain by the impenetrable
46: surface. This competition leads to the possibility of co-existence
47: of different regimes and multicritical behaviour.
48:
49: The essential physics associated with the behaviour of a surface
50: interacting polymer chain in a good solvent is derived
51: from a model of self-avoiding walk (SAW) on a semi-infinite lattice.
52: If the surface is attractive, it contributes an energy $\epsilon_s$
53: ($< 0$) for each step of the walk on the surface. This leads
54: to an increased probability characterized by the Boltzmann factor
55: $\omega = \exp(-\epsilon_s/k_{\beta}T)$ of making a step along the surface,
56: since for $\epsilon_s < 0$, $\omega > 1$ for any finite temperature $T$
57: ($k_{\beta}$ is the Boltzmann constant). Because of this the polymer
58: chain get adsorbed at low temperatures on the surface while at
59: high temperatures all polymer conformations have almost same weight
60: and non adsorbed (or desorbed) behaviour prevails. The transition
61: between these two regimes is marked by a critical adsorption
62: temperature $T_a$, with a desorbed phase for $T > T_a$ and adsorbed
63: phase for $T < T_a$ as shown in Fig. $1$. At $T < T_a$ the chain acquires
64: a conformation such that a fraction of monomers get attached to the
65: surface and others form a layer of finite thickness parallel to the
66: surface. The thickness of the layer diverges at $T=T_a$. One may
67: define the crossover exponent $\phi$, at $T=T_a$ as
68: $N_s \sim N^{\phi}$ where $N$ is the total number of monomers
69: and $N_s$ the number of monomers on the surface. The transition point
70: $T_a$ is a tricritical point \cite{2}. Both the surface and the bulk
71: critical exponents have been calculated using renormalization group
72: methods \cite {5}, transfer matrix methods \cite{6,7},
73: exact enumeration method \cite {8} and Monte Carlo methods \cite {9}.
74: For a two dimensional system exact values of the exponents
75: have been found by using conformal invariance \cite {10}.
76:
77: \vspace {.4in}
78:
79: \psfig{figure=fig1.ps,height=3in,width=6.6in}
80: \vspace {.1in}
81: {\bf Fig. 1; \small Schematic representation of polymer conformations in
82: (a) desorbed and (b) adsorbed states.}
83: \vspace {.2in}
84:
85: The situation is, however, different when the surface interacting
86: polymer is a in compact globule state. In the vicinity of an
87: impenetrable attracting surface the monomer-monomer attraction which
88: is responsible for the collapsed state of the chain and the
89: surface-monomer attraction responsible for the adsorption
90: will compete. This competition may give rise new features in the
91: conformational behaviour of the chain. For instance, a globule can
92: get attached to the surface at some value of monomer-surface
93: attraction without any significant modification in its structure as
94: shown in Fig. $2$. Such a phase has been shown to exist in between
95: the bulk collapsed and adsorbed phases in both two and three dimensions
96: for isotropic ${i. e.}$ non-directed) polymer chain and
97: is called surface attached globule (SAG) phase \cite{11,12}. In an
98: adsorbed phase the number of monomers on the surface are proportional
99: to $N$ and the thickness of the layer formed by the chain
100: parallel to the surface proportional to $N^0$. On the other hand the
101: bulk globule has one correlation length (the radius of gyration) which
102: scales with $N$ as $R \propto N^{1/d}$ where d is the dimensionality
103: of the space. In the SAG phase we have two correlation lengths, one
104: parallel and another perpendicular to the surface. They may scale with
105: $N$ as $R_{\parallel} \propto N^{{x}_{\parallel}}$ and $R_{\perp}
106: \propto N^{{x}_{\perp}}$ where $\frac {1}{d} \le {x}_{\parallel} \le
107: \frac {1}{d-1}$ and $0 < {x}_{\perp} \le \frac {1} {d}$.
108:
109: \vspace {.4in}
110:
111: \psfig{figure=fig2.ps,height=4in,width=5.6in}
112: \vspace {.2in}
113: {\bf Fig. 2; \small Schematic representation of adsorption of a compact
114: globule; (a) shows a desorbed globule, (b) and (c) surface attached
115: globule and (d) the adsorbed state.}
116: \vspace {.4in}
117:
118: In this article we investigate the surface adsorption and collapsed
119: of a directed polymer chain on a square lattice. Since for two
120: dimensional system surface is a line, it can have only one adsorbed
121: phase which we refer to as adsorbed expanded (AE) phase. The problem
122: of adsorption and collapse of directed polymer has been studied
123: using transfer matrix technique \cite {13}. The phase boundary of
124: the collapsed phase separating it from the adsorbed expanded and
125: the bulk expanded has been obtained exactly \cite {14} as well as
126: numerically \cite {15}. These calculations show that there are three
127: phases, viz. desorbed expanded (DE), desorbed collapsed (DC) and
128: adsorbed expanded (AE). These three phases meet at a multicritical
129: point. In these calculations a condition $xu = 1$ (where $x$ is the
130: step fugacity and $u$ the Boltzmann factor for the monomer-monomer
131: attraction) is used. This condition is valid only at the collapsed
132: phase boundary. Therefore only the phase boundaries separating the
133: DC phase from the AE and DE phases were obtained by these calculations.
134: The phase boundary separating the DE phase from the AE phase has been
135: obtained numerically by Veal ${\it et\; al}$ \cite {15}. Since
136: the transition from the DC phase to the SAG phase takes place in the
137: region where $xu > 1$ the calculations based on the transfer matrix
138: could not show this transition.
139:
140: \section { Calculational details }
141: We consider partially directed self-attracting self-avoiding
142: walks (PDSASAWs) on a square
143: lattice restricted to quarter space. Walk starts from the corner
144: of the surface. Let $C_{N,N_s,N_p}$ be the number of PDSAWs with
145: $N$ steps, having $N_s$ $(\le N)$ steps on the surface and $N_p$
146: nearest neighbours. We have obtained $C_{N,N_s,N_p}$ for $N \le 30$
147: for square lattice by exact enumeration method. We prefer this
148: technique because in this case the scaling corrections are
149: correctly taken into account by a suitable extrapolation scheme \cite{9}.
150:
151: We associate energy $\epsilon_s$ with each monomer on the surface
152: and $\epsilon_p$ for the monomer-monomer interaction. Partition
153: function of the attached chain is
154: \begin{equation}
155: Z_N (\omega, u) = \sum_{N_s,N_p} C_{N,N_s,N_p} \omega^{N_s}
156: u^{N_p}
157: \end{equation}
158: where $\omega = e^{-\epsilon_s/kT}$ and $u = e^{- \epsilon_p/kT}$.
159: $\omega > 1$ and $u >1$ for attractive force. Reduced free
160: energy for the chain can be written as
161: \begin{equation}
162: G (\omega, u) = \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{N} \log
163: Z_N(\omega,u)
164: \end{equation}
165: In general it is appropriate to assume that as $N\rightarrow \infty$
166: \begin{equation}
167: Z_{N}(\omega,u) \sim N^{\gamma - 1} \mu(\omega,u)^{N}
168: \end{equation}
169: where $\mu(\omega,u)$ is the effective coordination number and
170: $\gamma$ is the universal configurational exponents for walks
171: with one end attached to the surface. The value of
172: $\mu(\omega,u)$ can be estimated using ratio method \cite {16}
173: with associated Neville table or any other method such as Pade
174: analysis \cite {17} or differential approximants \cite{18,19}.
175:
176: From equations (2.2) and (2.3) we can write
177: \begin{equation}
178: \log \mu(\omega, u) = \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{N} \log
179: Z_N(\omega,u) = G (\omega, u)
180: \end{equation}
181:
182: $Z_N(\omega,u)$ is calculated from the data of $C_{N,N_s,N_p}$
183: using equation (2.1) for a given $\omega$ and $u$. From this we
184: construct linear and quadratic extrapolants of the ratio of
185: $Z_N(\omega,u)$ for the adjacent values of $N$ as well as the
186: alternate one. Results for alternate $N$ give better
187: convergence. When $u = 1$ and $\omega = 1$ the value of $\mu$ is
188: found to be 2.39.
189:
190: The surface critical exponent $\gamma_1$ can be calculated using
191: the relation \cite {8}
192: \begin{equation}
193: \gamma^0 - \gamma_1 = \frac{\log(Z_N^0 Z_{N-2} / Z_{N-2}^0
194: Z_N)}{\log(N/N-2)}
195: \end{equation}
196: and the end-to-end distance exponent $\nu$ using the relation
197: \begin{equation}
198: \nu = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\log(R_N^2 / R_{N-2}^2)}{\log(N/N-2)}
199: \end{equation}
200: where the superscript ``0" indicates that the quantities
201: correspond to the bulk without the surface and $R_N$ is
202: the end-to-end distance of a chain of $N$ monomers.
203:
204:
205: The value of $\omega_c (u)$ at which polymer gets adsorbed/attached
206: to the surface for a given value of $u$ is found from the $(i)$ plot
207: of $G_s(\omega,u)=G(\omega,u)-G(u,\omega=1)$
208: which remains equal to zero until $\omega = \omega_c$ and
209: increases consistently as a function of $\omega$ for
210: $\omega \ge \omega_c, $ $(ii)$ from the plot of
211: $\partial^2 G_s(\omega,u) / \partial {\epsilon_s}^2$ at constant
212: $u$ and
213: $(iii)$ from the plot of $\gamma^0 - \gamma_1$ as a function of
214: $\omega$ for different $N$. The value of $\omega_c$ found from the
215: plot of $G_s(\omega,u)$ is slightly lower than the peak value of
216: $\partial^2 G_s/ \partial {\epsilon_s}^2$. It is, however, observed
217: that as $N$ is increased from $22$ to $30$ the peak value shifts
218: to smaller $\omega$ and appears to converge on the value of
219: $\omega$ found from $G_s(\omega,u)$ plot.
220: We therefore choose the value of $\omega_c$ found from the plot
221: of $G_s(\omega,u) $ and determine lines $\omega_c(u)$ and
222: $\omega_{c1} (u)$ (see Fig. 3) by this method.
223: For $u = 1$, the value of $\omega_c$ is = $1.70$ which is in very
224: good agreement with the value $1.707$ reported in ref.
225: \cite {6}. In another approach equation (2.5) is used to calculate
226: $\gamma^0 - \gamma_1$ for different $N$ and the values are plotted
227: as a function of $\omega$. The value of $\omega_c$ is found from
228: the intersection of successive approximation to $\gamma^0 - \gamma_1$
229: in the limit $N \rightarrow \infty$. This method, however, fails
230: for $u$ values above the $\theta$-point, {\it i. e.} where the
231: desorbed phase is in a collapsed globule state. Below the $\theta$-point
232: both the methods yield same values of $\omega_c$ which are in very good
233: agreement.
234:
235: The phase boundary separating the expanded and collapsed phases is
236: calculated from the plot of $G_b(\omega,u)=G(\omega,u)-G(\omega,u=1)$
237: as a function of $u$ for a given $\omega$. Here $G_b$ measures the
238: energy arising due to monomer-monomer attractions. This is however,
239: not zero in the expanded phase and, therefore, cannot be used as an
240: order parameter for the expanded and collapsed transition. We, however,
241: find that the value of $G_b(\omega,u)$ as a function of $u$ shows
242: sudden rise at certain value of $u$. We locate this point from the peak
243: of $\partial^2 G_b/\partial \epsilon_p^2$ which corresponds to a specific
244: heat peak and shows divergence as $N \rightarrow \infty$.
245: For $\omega = 1$, the value of $u_c$ is 3.30 which is in good agreement
246: with the value 3.38 found by exact calculation. The method is found
247: to work for all values of $\omega$ {\it i.e} in both the bulk and the
248: adsorbed regimes. However, as $\omega$ is increased the values of
249: $G_b (\omega,u)$ do not remain as smooth as at lower values of $\omega$,
250: therefore introducing some inaccuracy in the values of $u_c$.
251: The values of $(\omega_c,u_c)$ at the multicritical point found by us
252: are $(2.16,3.30)$ which are in good agreement with exactly known values
253: $(2.19,3.38)$. As $\omega$ and $u$ becomes larger, higher order terms
254: in equation (2.1) become significant and therefore to have proper
255: convergence more terms must be considered. This explains the difference
256: in $\omega_{c2}$ line found by exact calculation \cite {14} and the
257: present calculation (see fig. 3).
258:
259: \section{Results}
260: The phase diagram shown in Fig. 3 has four phase boundaries instead
261: of three as reported in earlier work \cite{14,15}. The line $u_c$
262: separates the expanded and collapsed phases.
263:
264: \vspace {.3in}
265:
266: \psfig{figure=fig3.ps,height=4.0in,width=4.0in}
267:
268: \vspace {.1in}
269:
270: {\bf Fig. 3; \small Phase digram of a directed linear
271: polymer chain in 2-D space. The $\omega$ and $u$ axes represents, the
272: Boltzmann factor of surface attraction and monomer-monomer attraction
273: respectively. Solid line curve corresponds to present calculation and
274: the dotted line to ref. \cite{14}.}
275:
276: \vspace {.3in}
277:
278: The special adsorption line $\omega_c$ separates adsorbed expanded (AE)
279: phase from that of desorbed expanded (DE). Beyond $\theta$-point we have
280: two boundaries $\omega_{c1}$ and $\omega_{c2}$. The line $\omega_{c1}$
281: separates the desorbed collapsed (DC) bulk phase from that of a surface
282: attached globule (SAG) state, whereas the boundary $\omega_{c2}$ separates
283: the SAG phase from the AE phase. The point where $u_c$ line meets the
284: special adsorption line $\omega_c$, all four phases AE, DE, DC and SAG
285: coexist. The SAG phase which exists between the boundaries $\omega_{c1}$
286: and $\omega_{c2}$ for $u > u_c$ is essentially a two-dimensional globule
287: sticking to the surface in the same way as a liquid droplet may lie on
288: a partially wet surface. These features are in agreement with those of
289: isotropic (non directed) polymer chain. The average fraction of monomer
290: on the surface and the average number of pairs are calculated using the
291: relations.
292: \begin{displaymath}
293: <n_s> = \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} w\frac{\partial G}{\partial\omega}
294: \mid_{u}, \;\; \;
295: and
296: <n_p> = \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} u\frac{\partial G}{\partial u}
297: \mid_{\omega}
298: \end{displaymath}
299:
300:
301: The results are shown in Figs. $4$ and $5$. The transition points on
302: each curve is marked by dots. The dot on a curve of $<n_s>$ (in Fig. 4)
303: indicates adsorption or polymer chain getting attached to the surface
304: ({\it i.e} $\omega_c$ and $\omega_{c1}$ lines depending on the values
305: of $u$), the dot on a curve $<n_p>$ (in Fig. 5) indicates the
306: collapsed-expanded states transition ({\it i. e.} point on line $u_c$
307: and $\omega_{c2}$ depending on the values of $\omega$). We may note
308: that the value of $<n_p>$ for SAG phase is comparable to that in the
309: DC phase.
310:
311: \vspace {.3in}
312:
313: \psfig{figure=fig4.ps,height=4.0in,width=4.0in}
314:
315: \vspace {.1in}
316:
317: {\bf Fig.4; \small Average fraction of monomers on the surface $<n_s>$
318: as a function of $\omega$. Dot on the curve represents transition
319: point.}
320:
321: \vspace {.2in}
322:
323: We have found that along the line $\omega_c$ and $\omega_{c1}$,
324: $<n_s> = 0.04 \pm 0.01$ and along
325: the line $u_c$ and $\omega_{c2}$, $<n_p> = 0.54 \pm 0.06$.
326:
327: \vspace {.3in}
328:
329: \psfig{figure=fig5.ps,height=4.0in,width=4.0in}
330:
331: \vspace {.1in}
332:
333: {\bf Fig.5; \small Average number of pairs $<n_p>$ as a function of $u$.
334: Dot on the curve represents the transition point.}
335:
336: \vspace {.2in}
337:
338: \section{Conclusions}
339: It is obvious from these results that when the chain gets adsorbed
340: from the expanded bulk state ({\it i.e} for $u < u_c$), it acquires
341: a conformation at $\omega \simeq \omega_c (u)$ such that a small
342: fraction of monomers get attached to the surface and others forms
343: a layer parallel to the surface. This affects the free energy of
344: the system. At the transition point the polymer chain fluctuates
345: between adsorbed and desorbed conformations. Therefore one may get
346: peak in $<N_s^2>-<N_s>^2$ at $\omega=\omega_c$ which shows divergence
347: as $N \rightarrow \infty$. As $\omega$ is increased for the same
348: value of $u$, the fluctuations along the normal to the surface get
349: suppressed and at large $\omega (>> \omega_c)$ the chain lies on
350: the surface with very little fluctuations. On the other hand,
351: when the adsorbing chain was in collapsed bulk state, then at
352: $\omega = \omega_{c1}$ the collapsed chain gets attached to the
353: surface. Here again the number of monomers getting attached to the
354: surface are small. Since for $\omega \leq \omega_{c1}$ the globule
355: may be any where in the available space and get attached to the surface
356: at $\omega=\omega_{c1}$, there is a breaking of translational invariance
357: at $\omega=\omega_{c1}$ For $\omega_{c1} \leq \omega \leq \omega_{c2} (u)$
358: the chain remains in the form of a globule attached to the surface.
359: In this range the monomer-monomer attraction remains effective in holding
360: the monomers in the neighbourhood of each other than the surface-monomer
361: attraction whose tendency is to spread the chain on the surface. Since
362: at $\omega=\omega_{c1}$ the globule retains its shape there is no change
363: in the bulk free energy. Only the surface contribution to the free energy
364: which was zero for $\omega\leq\omega_{c1}$ starts contributing.
365: Therefore, in this case we may therefore not see divergence in the bulk
366: specific heat peak in the $N \rightarrow \infty$ limit. For $\omega >
367: \omega_{c2} (u)$ the globule conformation becomes unstable as
368: surface-monomer attraction becomes more effective than the
369: monomer-monomer attraction and therefore the chain spreads over the
370: surface (just like a liquid droplet spreads over a wetting surface).
371:
372: Summarizing we studied a polymer chain immersed in a poor solvent
373: in the presence of an attracting impenetrable wall and obtained the
374: phase boundaries separating different phases of the polymer chain
375: from data obtained by exact enumerations. We report a state in
376: between the desorbed collapsed and adsorbed phases which has
377: conformation of a compact globule sticking to a surface in same
378: way as a droplet may lie on a partially wet surface. A similar
379: phase also been found in case of isotropic (non directed) polymer
380: chain in both two and three dimensions \cite {11,12}. The
381: number of monomers on the surface and the number of nearest
382: neighbors in different regimes of the phase diagram are obtained.
383:
384: \section { Acknowledgements }
385:
386: We are thankful to Dr. S. Kumar and Dr. D. Giri for many
387: fruitful discussions. The work was supported by the Department of
388: Science and Technology (India) through project grant.
389:
390: \newpage
391:
392: \begin{references}
393:
394:
395: \bibitem{1} E. Eisenriegler, {\it Polymers Near Surfaces}
396: (World Scientific, Singapore) (1993).
397: \bibitem{2} K. D\'{e} Bell and T. Lookman, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 65},
398: 87 (1993).
399: \bibitem{3} T. Vrbov{\'a} and S. G. Whittington, J. Phys. A:
400: Math Gen. {\bf 31}, 3989 (1998).
401: \bibitem{4} Y. Singh, S. Kumar and D. Giri J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
402: {\bf 25}, L1211(1992)
403: \bibitem{5} B. Derrida, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. {\bf 14}, L5-L9 (1981);
404: K. Kremer, J. Phys. A, {\bf 16}, 4333 (1983); H. W. Diehl,
405: {\it Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena}, {\bf Vol. 10} edited by
406: C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic, New York), 76 (1986); E. Bouchaud E
407: and J. Vannimenus, J. Physique {\bf 50}, 2931 (1989).
408: \bibitem{6} V. Privman, G. Forgacs and H. L. Frisch, Phys.
409: Rev. B {\bf 37} 9897 (1988); V. Privman and H. L. Frisch J. Chem. Phys.
410: {\bf 88}, 469 (1988).
411: \bibitem{7} V. Privman and N. M. Svrakic, {\it Directed Models of
412: Polymers, Interfaces, and Clusters: Scaling and Finite-Size Properties.}
413: (Springer, Berlin, 1989); G. Forgacs, V. Privman and H. L. Frisch J. Chem.
414: Phys. {\bf 90}, 3339 (1989).
415: \bibitem{8} D. P. Foster, E. Orlandini and M. C. Tesi, J. Phys. A:Math.
416: Gen. {\bf 25}, L1211 (1992).
417: \bibitem{9} P. Grassberger and R. Hegger, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 51}, 2674 (1995);
418: P. Grassberger and R. Hegger, J. Phys. I. France {\bf 5}, 597 (1995).
419: \bibitem{10} M. T. Batchelor and C. M. Yung, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74},
420: 2026 (1995).
421: \bibitem{11} Y. Singh, D. Giri and S. Kumar, (cond-mat/0005493).
422: \bibitem{12} Y. Singh, S. Kumar and D. Giri, (to be published).
423: \bibitem{13} P-M Binder, A. L. Owczarek, A. R. Veal and
424: J. M. Yeomans, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. {\bf 23}, L975-L979 (1990).
425: \bibitem{14} D. P. Foster and J. Yeomans, Physica A {\bf 177} 443 (1991);
426: F. Igloi, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 43}, 3194 (1991).
427: \bibitem{15} A. R. Veal, J. M. Yeomans and G. Jug, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
428: {\bf 23}, L109-L115(1990).
429: \bibitem{16} D. S. Gaunt and A. J. Guttmann, {\it Phase Transitions and
430: Critical Phenomena}, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic, London),
431: Vol. {\bf 3} (1974).
432: \bibitem{17} D. L. Hunter and G. A. Baker, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 7}, 3346 (1975).
433: \bibitem{18} D. L. Hunter and G. A. Baker, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 19}, 3808 (1979).
434: \bibitem{19} A. J. Guttmann, {\it Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena},
435: edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, New York), {\it Vol {\bf 13}}
436: (1989).
437: \end{references}
438: \end{document}
439: %*************************************************************************
440: