1: \documentclass[aps,twocolumn,groupedaddress,showpacs,%
2: eqsecnum,secnumarabic,amssymb]{revtex4}
3:
4: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: \usepackage{amsmath}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
10:
11: \title{The calculation of parameters for Stevens Hamiltonian
12: in a crystalline field generated by the electric charge
13: uniformly extended in one direction}
14: \author{V. Bobrovskii}
15: \email[Electronic address:]{bobrovskii@imp.uran.ru}
16: \author{A. Mirmelstein}
17: \author{A. Podlesnyak}
18: \author{I. Zhdakhin}
19: \affiliation{Institute for Metal Physics,
20: Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences \\
21: 620219 Ekaterinburg, Russia }
22: \date{\today}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: Exact expressions for the parameters of Stevens Hamiltonian are
26: derived within the framework of a specific model that assumes
27: uniform character of charge density distribution in a certain
28: direction over crystalline lattice.
29: \end{abstract}
30: \pacs{}
31: \maketitle
32:
33: \section{Formulation of the model}
34:
35: The well-known point charge model is widely used both
36: for description of crystal electric field (CEF) effects
37: and for analysis of the related experimental results.
38: A standard form of its application is based
39: on the so-called equivalent Stevens Hamiltonian
40: (ESH)~\cite{Hutchings,Bleaney,Wallace,Lea}.
41: The respective coefficients for the Hamiltonian have been
42: tabulated already for many crystal structures. It should be
43: noted that this Hamiltonian is not directly relevant
44: to the point character of the electric charges forming CEF.
45: Therefore, methods to calculate the Hamiltonian coefficients
46: can be generalized for a more complicated case.
47: For instance, in~\cite{Bobrovskii} they are determined
48: with taking into
49: account of screening effects by using of ligand electrostatic
50: potential in the form of Yukawa.
51: The numerical methods for calculation of the ESH parameters
52: are also in use. In particular, it is possible to advance
53: point charge model for more realistic assuming about
54: electron density distribution by introducing
55: a net of negatively charged points in interion
56: space~\cite{Podlesnyak}.
57: (This approach will be described in details in item 6 of the
58: present paper.)
59:
60: The perovskite-related compounds comprising
61: CuO$_2$-planes in the structure were a
62: subject of intence studies during the last decade.
63: It is of a general believement that the charge state of these
64: planes is responsible for the unusual properties of the
65: layered copper perovskites as, for instance, the
66: high-temperature superconductivity is.
67: The inelastic neutron scattering has proved to be a powerful
68: tool for studying the charge states in the
69: high-temperature superconductors containing rare-earth
70: elements with f-shells~\cite{Mirmelstein88,Mesot,Mirmelstein97}.
71: A numerical analysis of the data collected in
72: the scattering experiments enabled us to obtain earlier some
73: evidences in proof of extended,
74: stripe-like charge structures in the
75: CuO$_2$-planes~\cite{Mirmelstein00}.
76: When analyzing these data we have found rather general
77: method to obtain exact solutions for ESH
78: parameters of a crystal field generated by the charge system
79: with density being uniform in one direction.
80:
81: The specific goal of this paper is the systematic description
82: of the mathematical apparatus developed for analytical
83: calculation of ESH parameters for this geometry of charge
84: distribution and also the analysis of the consequences resulted
85: from the model.
86:
87: Since the charge systems described by our theory are assumed
88: to have sufficiently high symmetry (at least orthorhombic)
89: it is convenient to use the local coordinate
90: system $(\tilde x, \tilde y, \tilde z)$
91: shown at Fig.~\ref{fig:1} with the origin at the rare
92: earth ion and the electric charges situated within two
93: parallel planes $\tilde z = \pm H$.
94: The density of the uniformly extended in $\tilde x$ direction
95: charge can be described by the function $f(L)$
96: where $L$ is the distance in $\tilde y$-direction between
97: $\tilde z$-axis and the partial charge
98: filament \footnote{Traditially notations $X,Y,Z$ are
99: used for coordinates of the ligands but
100: we would like to reserve $Y$ and
101: $Z$ for spherical and tesseral harmonics. To avoid a mishmach
102: we'll use for coordinates of the crystal electric field sources
103: in $(\tilde x, \tilde y, \tilde z)$-system the capital letters
104: $D,L,H$ respectively.}.
105:
106: At first let us consider the electrostatic potential generated
107: by the infinite uniformly charged filament oriented
108: along $\tilde x$-axis. If the rare-earth ion has
109: f-electron at $\tilde x, \tilde y, \tilde z$
110: then the perturbing crystalline potential
111: generated by the filament will be:
112: \begin{equation}
113: U(\tilde x, \tilde y, \tilde z)= U(\tilde y, \tilde z) =
114: \xi \ln \frac{H^2 + L^2}{(L - \tilde y)^2 + (H - \tilde z)^2};
115: \label{eq:1.1}
116: \end{equation}
117: where $\xi$ is the linear charge density.
118:
119: Taking into account that due to the small radii of the f-shell
120: the inequalities $|\tilde y|;|\tilde z| \ll \sqrt{L^2 + H^2}$
121: are satisfied and introducing the notations:
122: \begin{eqnarray}
123: \alpha & = & \frac{\tilde y}{\sqrt{L^2 + H^2}}; \quad
124: \beta = \frac{\tilde z}{\sqrt{L^2 + H^2}}; \nonumber \\
125: M & = & - \frac{2L}{\sqrt{L^2 + H^2}}; \quad
126: N = - \frac{2H}{\sqrt{L^2 + H^2}};
127: \label{eq:1.2}
128: \end{eqnarray}
129: one can present the expression (\ref{eq:1.1}) as a polynomial
130: expansion:
131: \begin{equation}
132: U(\tilde y, \tilde z) = \xi \sum_{p,q} F_{p,q} \alpha^p \beta^q.
133: \label{eq:1.3}
134: \end{equation}
135: As a consequence of the selection rules for the ESH matrix
136: elements \cite{Hutchings}, the non-zero contribution into
137: ESH is produced only by the members of expansion
138: (\ref{eq:1.3}) with $p+q=2$, $p+q=4$ and $p+q=6$, for which
139: after calculations one obtains:
140: \begin{eqnarray}
141: F_{20} & = & 1 - \frac12 M^2, \nonumber \\
142: F_{02} & = & 1 - \frac12 N^2, \nonumber \\
143: F_{11} & = & - MN, \nonumber \\
144: F_{40} & = & - \frac12 + M^2 - \frac14 M^4, \nonumber \\
145: F_{04} & = & - \frac12 + N^2 - \frac14 N^4, \nonumber \\
146: F_{31} & = & 2MN - M^3N, \nonumber \\
147: F_{13} & = & 2MN - MN^3, \nonumber \\
148: F_{22} & = & -1 +M^2 + N^2 - \frac32 M^2N^2, \nonumber \\
149: F_{60} & = & \frac13 - \frac32 M^2 + M^4 -\frac16 M^6,
150: \nonumber \\
151: F_{06} & = & \frac13 - \frac32 N^2 + N^4 -\frac16 N^6,
152: \nonumber \\
153: F_{51} & = & - 3MN + 4 M^3N - M^5N, \nonumber \\
154: F_{15} & = & - 3MN + 4MN^3 - MN^5, \nonumber \\
155: F_{33} & = & - 6MN + 4MN^3 + 4M^3N - \frac{10}{3} M^3N^3,
156: \nonumber \\
157: F_{42} & = & 1 - \frac32 N^2 -3M^2 + M^4 + 6M^2N^2 -
158: \frac52 M^4N^2, \nonumber \\
159: F_{24} & = & 1 - \frac32 M^2 -3N^2
160: + N^4 + 6M^2N^2 - \frac52 M^2N^4. \nonumber \\
161: \label{eq:1.4}
162: \end{eqnarray}
163: To obtain the potential generated by the whole system of the
164: equally oriented filaments it is necessary to sum partial
165: contributions (\ref{eq:1.3}) with their corresponding
166: coordinates $L, H$.
167: Below we restrict our consideration by the charge systems
168: constructed on the basis of the pair of parallel filaments
169: symmetrically situated relatively the plane $\tilde y=0$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:1}).
170: In particular, it includes such important cases as the
171: crystals with orthorhombic and tetragonal symmetry.
172: In the local coordinate system
173: presented at Fig.~\ref{fig:1} our pair has the coordinates as
174: $(L,H)$ and $(-L,H)$. It is obvious that the summation
175: of the contributions (\ref{eq:1.3}) for this pair results in
176: vanishing of the terms in which $M$ occurs to an odd power.
177: As a result, the relevant part of the electric potential
178: generated by the pair of the uniformly charged parallel
179: filaments will be:\footnote{Naturally, the same result takes
180: place for the pair $(L,H)$, $(L,-H)$.}
181: \begin{equation}
182: U(\tilde y, \tilde z) = U_2 (\tilde y, \tilde z) +
183: U_4 (\tilde y, \tilde z) + U_6 (\tilde y, \tilde z),
184: \label{eq:1.5}
185: \end{equation}
186: where
187: \begin{eqnarray}
188: U_2 (\tilde y, \tilde z)& = & 2\xi g_2 (L,H)(\tilde z^2 -
189: \tilde y^2),
190: \label{eq:1.6} \\
191: U_4 (\tilde y, \tilde z)& = & 2\xi g_4 (L,H)(\tilde y^4 -
192: 6\tilde y^2 \tilde z^2 + \tilde z^4),
193: \label{eq:1.7} \\
194: U_6 (\tilde y, \tilde z)& = & 2\xi g_6 (L,H)\{(\tilde z^6 -
195: \tilde y^6) \nonumber \\
196: & & - 15 \tilde y^2 \tilde z^2 (\tilde z^2 - \tilde y^2)\},
197: \label{eq:1.8} \\
198: g_2 (L,H) & = & \frac{H^2 - L^2}{(H^2 + L^2)^2},
199: \label{eq:1.9} \\
200: g_4 (L,H) & = & \frac12 \frac{H^4-6H^2L^2 + L^4}{(H^2 + L^2)^4},
201: \label{eq:1.10} \\
202: g_6 (L,H) & = & \frac13
203: \frac{(H^6-L^6) -15H^2L^2(H^2 - L^2)}{(H^2 + L^2)^6}. \nonumber \\
204: & &
205: \label{eq:1.11}
206: \end{eqnarray}
207: The coefficient 2 is introduced into expressions (\ref{eq:1.6})%
208: -(\ref{eq:1.8}) to emphasize that the field in question is
209: assumed to be generated by the pair of the charged filaments.
210: Thus, the factors $g_2$, $g_4$, $g_6$ describe the contribution
211: from the one charged filament in given symmetric configuration.
212: For the system of the charged filaments with the coordinates
213: $(L,H)$, $(-L,H)$, $(L,-H)$, $(-L,-H)$ the coefficient 2
214: in (\ref{eq:1.6})-(\ref{eq:1.8}) is replaced by the factor of 4.
215:
216: The results (\ref{eq:1.6})-(\ref{eq:1.11}) can be generalized
217: for the charge distributed in the plane
218: $\tilde z =H$ with the surface
219: density $f(L)$ which is a constant in $\tilde x$-direction
220: and $f(L)=f(-L)$.
221: Then in the formula (\ref{eq:1.6})-(\ref{eq:1.7}) the linear
222: charge density $\xi$ will be replaced by $f(L)dL$.
223: As a result, the final expressions for the summary
224: contribution from this charged plane in the crystalline field
225: potential in the point $(\tilde x, \tilde y, \tilde z)$ look as:
226: \begin{equation}
227: U_2 (\tilde y, \tilde z) = 2G_2 \cdot (\tilde z^2 - \tilde y^2),
228: \label{eq:1.12}
229: \end{equation}
230: \begin{equation}
231: U_4 (\tilde y, \tilde z) = 2G_4 \cdot (\tilde y^4 - 6\tilde y^2
232: \tilde z^2 + \tilde z^4),
233: \label{eq:1.13}
234: \end{equation}
235: \begin{equation}
236: U_6 (\tilde y, \tilde z) = 2G_6 \cdot \{ (\tilde z^6 - \tilde y^6)
237: - 15 \tilde y^2 \tilde z^2 (\tilde z^2 - \tilde y^2) \},
238: \label{eq:1.14}
239: \end{equation}
240: where
241: \begin{equation}
242: G_n = G_n (H) = \int_0^\infty dL f(L) \cdot g_n (L,H).
243: \label{eq:1.15}
244: \end{equation}
245: In the case of two parallel identically charged planes situated
246: at $\tilde{z}=H$ and $\tilde{z} =-H$, the coefficient 2
247: in (\ref{eq:1.12})-(\ref{eq:1.14}) is replaced by 4.
248: The expressions (\ref{eq:1.12})-(\ref{eq:1.14}) stay formally
249: valid not only for two dimension
250: charge but for the volume one too if its distribution described
251: by the density $f(L,H)$, i.e. if it does not depend of
252: the $\tilde{x}$ -coordinate and $f(L,H)=f(-L,H)$.
253: For instance, it takes place when the electric field is
254: generated by two cords of arbitrary cross section form.
255: For such a case:
256: \begin{equation}
257: G_n = \int_0^\infty dL \int dH f(L,H) \cdot g_n (L,H)
258: \label{eq:1.16}
259: \end{equation}
260: and again if the charge distribution is symmetric relatively
261: not only $\tilde{y}=0$ plane but also $\tilde{z}=0$ plane,
262: the coefficient 2 in (\ref{eq:1.12})-(\ref{eq:1.14})
263: should be substituted by 4 and
264: \begin{equation}
265: G_n = \int_0^\infty dL \int_o^\infty dH f(L,H) g_n (L,H).
266: \label{eq:1.17}
267: \end{equation}
268: As in the case of the point-charge model the determination
269: of the perturbing Hamiltonian is the evaluation of the
270: appropriate electrostatic potential.
271: One-particle Hamiltonian for the f-electron in a crystalline
272: electric field:
273: \begin{equation}
274: \hat{h} = e U(\tilde y, \tilde z).
275: \label{eq:1.18}
276: \end{equation}
277: The calculation of the ESH parameters becomes much more
278: convenient when using the spherical coordinates $r, \tilde{\vartheta},
279: \tilde{\varphi}$ in
280: expression for $U(\tilde{y},\tilde{z})$ instead of the
281: rectangular coordinates $x,y,z$:
282: \begin{equation}
283: \tilde x = r \sin \tilde{\vartheta} \cos \tilde{\varphi},
284: \quad
285: \tilde y = r \sin \tilde{\vartheta} \sin \tilde{\varphi},
286: \quad
287: \tilde z = r \cos \tilde{\vartheta}.
288: \label{eq:1.19}
289: \end{equation}
290: On proceeding of this substitution in (\ref{eq:1.5}),
291: (\ref{eq:1.12})-(\ref{eq:1.14}) one can obtain after
292: algebraic transformations the following expression for
293: the electrostatic potential:
294: \begin{equation}
295: U (\tilde y, \tilde z) = \sum_{n,m} \tilde{A}_{nm} r^n
296: Y_n^m (\tilde{\vartheta}, \tilde{\varphi}),
297: \label{eq:1.20}
298: \end{equation}
299: where $n=2, 4, 6$; $m=0, \pm2, \pm4, ...\pm n$ and the
300: coefficients $\tilde{A}_n^m$ are equal:
301: \begin{eqnarray}
302: \tilde{A}_2^0 & = & 2G_2 \cdot 2\left ( \frac{\pi}{5} \right )^{1/2},
303: \nonumber \\
304: \tilde{A}_2^{\pm 2} & = & 2G_2 \cdot \left ( \frac{2\pi}{15}
305: \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
306: \tilde{A}_4^0 & = & 2G_4 \cdot \frac23 (\pi)^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
307: \tilde{A}_4^{\pm 2} & = & 2G_4 \cdot \frac23 \left ( \frac{2\pi}{5}
308: \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
309: \tilde{A}_4^{\pm 4} & = & 2G_4 \cdot \frac13 \left ( \frac{2\pi}{35}
310: \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
311: \tilde{A}_6^0 & = & 2G_6 \cdot 2\left ( \frac{\pi}{13}
312: \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
313: \tilde{A}_6^{\pm 2}& = & 2G_6 \cdot 15\left ( \frac{2\pi}{2730}
314: \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
315: \tilde{A}_6^{\pm 4} & = & 2G_6 \cdot \frac17 \left ( \frac{14\pi}{13}
316: \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
317: \tilde{A}_6^{\pm 6} & = & 2G_6 \cdot \frac{1}{231} \left (
318: \frac{231\pi}{13} \right )^{1/2}, \nonumber \\
319: \label{eq:1.21}
320: \end{eqnarray}
321: It should be noted that during these manipulations we used
322: the notations for the spherical harmonics from~\cite{Hutchings}.
323:
324: In real crystalline structures the potential
325: of electric field are
326: formed simultaneously by the ligand charges (described, for
327: instance, in framework of the point-charge model)
328: and by the extended charge structures described by the
329: expressions (\ref{eq:1.20})-(\ref{eq:1.21}).
330: The calculation of a such superposition potential and
331: analysis of summary system properties can be carried out
332: with the most convenience using the coordinate system associated
333: with the crystallographic symmetry axes.
334: Let us consider the case when the local coordinate system $\tilde{x},\tilde{y},\tilde{z}$
335: is oriented relatively the crystallographic system $x,y,z$
336: as at the Fig.~\ref{fig:1}.
337: It is the orientation that is of the most importance for
338: description of orthorhombic and tetragonal systems.
339: In the spherical coordinate system connected with the
340: crystallographic axes:
341: \begin{equation}
342: x = r \sin \vartheta \cos \varphi, \quad
343: y = r \sin \vartheta \sin \varphi, \quad
344: z = r \cos \vartheta.
345: \label{eq:1.22}
346: \end{equation}
347: Correspondingly in the local coordinate system
348: (see (\ref{eq:1.19}))we have:
349: \begin{equation}
350: \tilde \vartheta = \vartheta, \quad \tilde \varphi = \varphi - \Delta.
351: \label{eq:1.23}
352: \end{equation}
353: As a result, in (\ref{eq:1.20}) the replacement arises:
354: \[\tilde{A}_n^m \to A_n^m = \tilde{A}_n^m e^{- \mathrm{i} m\Delta}.\]
355: Then
356: \begin{eqnarray}
357: U (r,\vartheta, \varphi ) & = & \sum_{n,m} A_n^m r^n
358: Y_n^m(\vartheta, \varphi) \nonumber \\
359: & = & \sum_{n,m} \tilde{A}_n^m \cdot e^{-\mathrm{i} m\Delta} \cdot
360: r^n \cdot Y_n^m(\vartheta, \varphi),
361: \label{eq:1.24}
362: \end{eqnarray}
363: where the potential $U(r, \vartheta, \varphi)$ is assumed to be notated in the
364: crystallographic coordinates whereas the coefficients $\tilde{A}_n^m$
365: are calculated in the local one.
366: Three charge configurations with different symmetry are
367: shown at the Fig.~\ref{fig:2}.
368: Corresponding set of the $A_n^m$-coefficients are presented in
369: the Table~\ref{table:1}.
370: \begin{table}
371: \caption{The set of the coefficients $A_n^m$ corresponding
372: to the charge distribution configurations shown at
373: the Fig.~\ref{fig:2}.}
374: \label{table:1}
375: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
376: \toprule
377: & (a) & (b) & (c) \\
378: \colrule
379: $A_2^0$
380: & $4G_2 2\left (\frac{\pi}{5}\right )^{1/2}$
381: & $4G_2 2 \left (\frac{\pi}{5} \right )^{1/2}$
382: & $8G_2 2 \left (\frac{\pi}{5} \right )^{1/2}$ \\
383: $A_2^{\pm 2}$
384: & $4G_2 \left (\frac{2\pi}{15}\right )^{1/2}$
385: & 0
386: & 0 \\
387: $A_4^0$
388: & $4G_4 \frac23 (\pi)^{1/2}$
389: & $4G_4 \frac23 (\pi)^{1/2}$
390: & $8G_4 \frac23 (\pi)^{1/2}$ \\
391: $A_4^{\pm 2}$
392: & $4G_4 \frac23 \left (\frac{2\pi}{5}\right )^{1/2}$
393: & 0
394: & 0 \\
395: $A_4^{\pm 4}$
396: & $4G_4 \frac13 \left (\frac{2\pi}{35}\right )^{1/2}$
397: & $4G_4 \frac13 \left (\frac{2\pi}{35}\right )^{1/2}$
398: & $8G_4 \frac13 \left (\frac{2\pi}{35}\right )^{1/2}$ \\
399: $A_6^0$
400: & $4G_6 2 \left (\frac{\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$
401: & $4G_6 2 \left (\frac{\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$
402: & $8G_6 2 \left (\frac{\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$ \\
403: $A_6^{\pm 2}$
404: & $4G_6 15 \left (\frac{2\pi}{2730}\right )^{1/2}$
405: & 0
406: & 0 \\
407: $A_6^{\pm 4}$
408: & $4G_6 \frac17 \left (\frac{14\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$
409: & $4G_6 \frac17 \left (\frac{14\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$
410: & $8G_6 \frac17 \left (\frac{14\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$ \\
411: $A_6^{\pm 6}$
412: & $4G_6 \frac{1}{231} \left (\frac{231\pi}{13}\right )^{1/2}$
413: & 0
414: & 0 \\
415: \botrule
416: \end{tabular}
417: \end{table}
418: It should be noted that at $\Delta \not= 0, \frac{\pi}{2}$ the coefficients $A_n^m$ have
419: imaginary parts.
420:
421: \section{Calculation of the ESH parameters}
422:
423: Following the procedure proposed in~\cite{Bleaney}
424: for determination of the ESH parameters we shall turn
425: to tesseral harmonics from spherical ones in (\ref{eq:1.24}).
426: Accordingly~\cite{Hutchings} for even $m$ the tesseral
427: harmonics can be expressed via spherical harmonics as:
428: \begin{eqnarray}
429: Z_{n0} & = & Y_n^0, \nonumber \\
430: Z_{nm}^c & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \{ Y_n^m + Y_n^{-m} \},
431: \nonumber \\
432: Z_{nm}^s & = & \frac{1}{\mathrm{i} \sqrt{2}} \{ Y_n^m -
433: Y_n^{-m} \},
434: \label{eq:2.1}
435: \end{eqnarray}
436: where $m$=2,4,6 ¨ $m \leq n$.
437: Accordingly:
438: \begin{eqnarray}
439: Y_n^m & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \{Z_{nm}^c + \mathrm{i}
440: Z_{nm}^s \}, \nonumber \\
441: Y_n^{-m} & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \{Z_{nm}^c - \mathrm{i}
442: Z_{nm}^s \}.
443: \label{eq:2.2}
444: \end{eqnarray}
445: Taking into account (\ref{eq:2.1})-(\ref{eq:2.2}), one can
446: obtain from (\ref{eq:1.24}):
447: \begin{equation}
448: U(r,\vartheta ,\varphi ) = \sum_n r^n \sum_{m \geq 0}
449: \sum_\alpha \gamma_{nm}^\alpha Z_{nm}^\alpha,
450: \label{eq:2.3}
451: \end{equation}
452: where $\alpha=0,c,s.$
453:
454: Then for the charge system formed on the basis of the set of
455: parallel filaments (i.e. with the potential described in the
456: local coordinate system by the expressions (\ref{eq:1.21})),
457: we have in the crystallographic coordinate system:
458: \begin{eqnarray}
459: \gamma_{nm}^0 & = & \tilde{A}_n^0 \cdot \delta_{m0}, \nonumber \\
460: \gamma_{nm}^c & = & \sqrt{2} \tilde{A}_n^m \cos (m\Delta) \cdot (1-\delta_{m0}),
461: \nonumber \\
462: \gamma_{nm}^s & = & \sqrt{2} \tilde{A}_n^m \sin (m\Delta) \cdot (1-\delta_{m0}).
463: \label{eq:2.4}
464: \end{eqnarray}
465: There exists the universally adopted method for getting rid
466: of $s$-harmonics $Z_{nm}^s$ by the corresponding choice of the coordinate
467: system where $\gamma_{nm}^s=0$.
468: However, aiming to derive formulas suitable for calculation
469: of superposition potentials we shall not restrict extension
470: of our expressions.
471: The collection of formulas~\cite{Hutchings} expressing
472: the tesseral harmonics as a functions of the rectangular
473: coordinates is completed below with the $s$-harmonics.
474: Using the notations:
475: \begin{eqnarray}
476: Z_{nm}^c & = & K_{nm} \frac{f_{nm}^c}{r^n}, \nonumber \\
477: Z_{nm}^s & = & K_{nm} \frac{f_{nm}^s}{r^n}, \nonumber \\
478: Z_{nm}^0 & = & K_{n0} \frac{f_{n0}^0}{r^n},
479: \label{eq:2.5}
480: \end{eqnarray}
481: and the expressions (\ref{eq:1.22}), (\ref{eq:2.1}) and also
482: the spherical harmonics from~\cite{Hutchings}, we have obtained
483: the formulas for the $f_{nm}^c; f_{nm}^s$ listed in the Table~\ref{table:2}.
484: \begin{table*}
485: \caption{Components of the tesseral harmomics expressed in
486: Cartesian coordinates.}
487: \label{table:2}
488: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
489: \toprule
490: n,m
491: &$K_{nm}$
492: &$f_{nm}^c$
493: &$f_{nm}^s$ \\
494: \colrule
495: \multicolumn{1}{l} {2,0}
496: &\multicolumn{1}{c} {$\frac14 \left ( \frac{5}{\pi}
497: \right )^{1/2}$}
498: &\multicolumn{2}{c} {$3z^2 - r^2$} \\
499: 2,2
500: &$\frac14 \left ( \frac{15}{\pi} \right )^{1/2}$
501: &$x^2 - y^2$
502: &$2xy$ \\
503: \multicolumn{1}{l} {4,0}
504: &\multicolumn{1}{c} {$\frac{3}{16} \left ( \frac{1}{\pi}
505: \right )^{1/2}$}
506: &\multicolumn{2}{c} {$35z^4 - 30z^2r^2 + 3r^4$} \\
507: 4,2
508: &$\frac38 \left ( \frac{5}{\pi} \right )^{1/2}$
509: &$(7z^2 -r^2)(x^2 - y^2)$
510: &$(7z^2 - r^2)2xy$ \\
511: 4,4
512: &$\frac{3}{16} \left ( \frac{35}{\pi} \right )^{1/2}$
513: &$x^4 - 6x^2y^2 + y^4$
514: &$4xy(x^2 - y^2)$ \\
515: \multicolumn{1}{l} {6,0}
516: &\multicolumn{1}{c} {$\frac{1}{32} \left ( \frac{13}{\pi}
517: \right )^{1/2}$}
518: &\multicolumn{2}{c} {$231z^6 - 315z^4r^2 + 105z^2r^4 -
519: 5r^6$} \\
520: 6,2
521: &$\frac{1}{64} \left ( \frac{2730}{\pi}\right )^{1/2}$
522: &$\{ 16z^4 -16(x^2 + y^2)z^2 + (x^2 + y^2)^2\} (x^2 - y^2);$
523: &$\{ 16z^4 -16(x^2 + y^2)z^2 + (x^2 + y^2)^2\} 2xy$ \\
524: 6,4
525: &$\frac{21}{32} \left ( \frac{13}{7\pi}\right )^{1/2}$
526: &$(11z^2 - r^2)(x^4 - 6x^2y^2 + y^4)$
527: &$(11z^2 - r^2)4xy(x^2 - y^2)$ \\
528: 6,6
529: &$\frac{231}{64} \left ( \frac{26}{231\pi}\right )^{1/2}$
530: &$x^6 - 15x^4y^2 + 15x^2y^4 - y^6$
531: &$2xy\{4(x^2 - y^2)^2 - (x^2 + y^2)^2\}$ \\
532: \botrule
533: \end{tabular}
534: \end{table*}
535:
536: The Hamiltonian of the f-shell in the CEF is as follows:
537: \begin{equation}
538: \hat{H}_{\text{cf}} = -|e| \sum_i U(x_i;y_i;z_i),
539: \label{eq:2.6}
540: \end{equation}
541: where we are normally concerned with the summation over the
542: f-electrons.
543: Thus:
544: \begin{equation}
545: \hat{H}_{\text{cf}}=-|e| \sum_n \sum_{m \geq 0} \sum_{\alpha}
546: \gamma_{nm}^{\alpha} \cdot K_{nm} \cdot \sum_i f_{nm}^{\alpha}(x_i;y_i;z_i),
547: \label{eq:2.7}
548: \end{equation}
549:
550: Using Wigner-Eckart theorem \cite{Hutchings,Bleaney} one can
551: replace:
552: \begin{equation}
553: \sum_i f_{nm}^\alpha (x_i;y_i;z_i)=\Theta_n \langle r^n
554: \rangle \hat{O}_{nm}^\alpha,
555: \label{eq:2.8}
556: \end{equation}
557: Then:
558: \begin{equation}
559: \hat{H}_{\text{cf}} = \sum_n \sum_{m \geq 0} \sum_{\alpha}
560: B_{nm}^{\alpha} \hat{O}_{nm}^{\alpha},
561: \label{eq:2.9}
562: \end{equation}
563: where $\hat{O}_{nm}^{\alpha}$ - operator equivalents
564: introduced by Stevens \cite{Bleaney} and
565: \begin{equation}
566: B_{nm}^{\alpha}=-|e| \gamma_{nm}^{\alpha} K_{nm}\Theta_n
567: \langle r^n \rangle,
568: \label{eq:2.10}
569: \end{equation}
570:
571: The so-called irreducible matrix elements $\Theta_n$ are
572: listed in \cite{Hutchings}. They are often denoted as
573: $\Theta_n = \alpha_J; \beta_J; \gamma_J$ for n=2, 4, 6,
574: respectively. The averaged value for the $n$th-power of the
575: f-shell radii is
576: denoted as $\langle r^n \rangle$ \cite{Taylor}.
577: Taking into account (\ref{eq:2.4}), (\ref{eq:2.10})
578: let us write down now the expressions for the
579: $B_{nm}^{\alpha}$ for the charge
580: system characterized by the angle of rotation $\Delta$
581: relatively crystallographic coordinate system as at
582: Fig.~\ref{fig:1}:
583: \begin{eqnarray}
584: B_{20} &=& \frac12 b_2, \nonumber \\
585: B_{22}^c &=& \frac12 \cos (2\Delta) b_2, \nonumber \\
586: B_{22}^s &=& \frac12 \sin (2\Delta) b_2, \nonumber \\
587: B_{40} &=& \frac18 b_4, \nonumber \\
588: B_{42}^c &=& \frac12 \cos (2\Delta) b_4, \nonumber \\
589: B_{42}^s &=& \frac12 \sin (2\Delta) b_4, \nonumber \\
590: B_{44}^c &=& \frac18 \cos (4\Delta) b_4, \nonumber \\
591: B_{44}^s &=& \frac18 \sin (4\Delta) b_4, \nonumber \\
592: B_{60} &=& \frac{1}{16} b_6, \nonumber \\
593: B_{62}^c &=& \frac{15}{32} \cos (2\Delta) b_6, \nonumber \\
594: B_{62}^s &=& \frac{15}{32} \sin (2\Delta) b_6, \nonumber \\
595: B_{64}^c &=& \frac{3}{16} \cos (4\Delta) b_6, \nonumber \\
596: B_{64}^s &=& \frac{3}{16} \sin (4\Delta) b_6, \nonumber \\
597: B_{66}^c &=& \frac{1}{32} \cos (6\Delta) b_6, \nonumber \\
598: B_{66}^s &=& \frac{1}{32} \sin (6\Delta) b_6,
599: \label{eq:2.11}
600: \end{eqnarray}
601: where:
602: \begin{equation}
603: b_n = - \tilde C |e| G_n \Theta_n \langle r^n \rangle,
604: \label{eq:2.12}
605: \end{equation}
606: and the coordination number $\tilde C$ is equal 2
607: for the charge distributed within the $z=H$ plane with the
608: density $f(L)=f(-L)$, and $\tilde C =4$ when the charge is placed within
609: the $z= \pm H$ planes with the density
610: $f(L,H)=f(-L,H)=f(L,-H)=f(-L,-H)$.
611: Naturally, the coefficient $\tilde C$ takes the same values
612: for the cases described by the formulas (\ref{eq:1.15}),
613: (\ref{eq:1.16}) respectively.
614:
615: The Stevens operator equivalents are listed for $\alpha=0;c$
616: in \cite{Hutchings}. The expressions for the
617: operators with $\alpha=s$ can be derived by means of well-known
618: procedure consisting of the
619: replacement of the coordinates $x, y, z$ in the expressions
620: for $f_{nm}^{\alpha}$ by the corresponding components
621: $J_x;J_y;J_z$ of the angular momentum operator $J$.
622: It is the reason why the formulas for the tesseral
623: harmonics in CEF-formalism are transformed back to Cartesian
624: coordinates. It should be noted that
625: it is conventional in Stevens formalism to use the operators
626: $\hat{J}_{\alpha}$ without $\hbar$ in the commutation rules,i.e.:
627: \begin{eqnarray}
628: \left[\hat{J}_x;\hat{J}_y \right]=\mathrm{i} \hat{J}_z,
629: \nonumber \\
630: \left[\hat{J}_y;\hat{J}_z \right]=\mathrm{i} \hat{J}_x,
631: \nonumber \\
632: \left[\hat{J}_z;\hat{J}_x \right]=\mathrm{i} \hat{J}_y,
633: \label{eq:2.13}
634: \end{eqnarray}
635: For the operators $\hat{J}_{\pm}$ defined as:
636: \begin{equation}
637: \hat{J}_{\pm}=\hat{J}_x \pm \mathrm{i} \hat{J}_y,
638: \label{eq:2.14}
639: \end{equation}
640: we have:
641: \begin{equation}
642: \hat{J}_{\pm}|J,M\rangle = \sqrt{J(J+1)-M(M \pm 1)} \cdot
643: |J,M \pm 1 \rangle ,
644: \label{eq:2.15}
645: \end{equation}
646:
647: However, as long as the commutation rules for the operators
648: $\hat{x}; \hat{y}; \hat{z}$ and
649: $\hat{J}_x; \hat{J}_y; \hat{J}_z$ are different, the
650: replacement procedure demands preliminary symmetrization of
651: $f_{nm}^\alpha$ over all possible permutations of
652: the coordinates $x, y,
653: z$. For $f_{22}^s, f_{44}^s, f_{66}^s$ this manipulation
654: is trivial. For example:
655: \begin{equation}
656: f_{22}^s=2xy=\frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}}\left\{(x+\mathrm{i} y)^2-
657: (x-\mathrm{i} y )^2 \right\},
658: \label{eq:2.16}
659: \end{equation}
660: Correspondingly:
661: \begin{equation}
662: \hat{O}_{22}^s=\frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}} \left\{\hat{J}_{+}^2 -
663: \hat{J}_{-}^2 \right\},
664: \label{eq:2.17}
665: \end{equation}
666: And:
667: \begin{equation}
668: f_{44}^s=\frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}} \left\{(x+\mathrm{i} y)^4 -
669: (x-\mathrm{i} y)^4 \right\},
670: \label{eq:2.18}
671: \end{equation}
672: \begin{equation}
673: \hat{O}_{44}^s=\frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}}\left\{\hat{J}_{+}^4 -
674: \hat{J}_{-}^4 \right\},
675: \label{eq:2.19}
676: \end{equation}
677: \begin{equation}
678: f_{66}^s=\frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}}\left\{(x+\mathrm{i} y)^6 -
679: (x-\mathrm{i} y)^6 \right\},
680: \label{eq:2.20}
681: \end{equation}
682: \begin{equation}
683: \hat{O}_{66}^s=\frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}}\left\{\hat{J}_{+}^6 -
684: \hat{J}_{-}^6 \right\},
685: \label{eq:2.21}
686: \end{equation}
687:
688: However, the method that requires less tedious algebraic
689: manipulations than the universally adopted
690: one, may be applied to obtain the expressions for arbitrary
691: operators $\hat{O}_{nm}^{\alpha}$. Let us take into account
692: that:
693: \begin{equation}
694: f_{nm}^s=\frac{1}{K_{nm}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}\mathrm{i}}
695: \left(r^n Y_n^m-r^nY_n^{-m}\right),
696: \label{eq:2.22}
697: \end{equation}
698: The functions $Y_n^n;Y_n^{n-1};...Y_n^{-n}$ themselves
699: form the full set of the irreducible tensor operators.
700: Thus, accordingly Wigner-Eckart theorem the combinations
701: $\sum_i r_i Y_n^m$ may be directly (i.e. without
702: using of rectangular coordinates) substituted by the set
703: of the equivalent tensor operators of the same rank:
704: \begin{equation}
705: \sum_i r_i^n Y_n^m(\vartheta_i, \varphi_i)=\Theta_n \langle r^n
706: \rangle \hat{W}_n^m,
707: \label{eq:2.23}
708: \end{equation}
709:
710: Accordingly the algorithm proposed in \cite{Watanabe},
711: one can choose the operator proportional to $\hat{J}_{+}^n$
712: as the equivalent tensor operator $\hat{W}_n^n$.
713: Other operators of the full set can be obtained with using the
714: recurrent formula:
715: \begin{equation}
716: \left[\hat{J}_{-};\hat{W}_n^m \right]=\sqrt{n(n+1)-m(m-1)}
717: \hat{W}_n^{m-1},
718: \label{eq:2.24}
719: \end{equation}
720: It is easy to see that by accepting the definition
721: $\hat{W}_n^n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}K_{nn} \hat{J}_{+}^n$
722: we completely match this procedure with the formulas
723: (\ref{eq:2.17}), (\ref{eq:2.19}), (\ref{eq:2.21}) so that:
724: \begin{eqnarray}
725: \hat{O}_{nm}^c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}K_{nm}} \left(\hat{W}_n^m +
726: \hat{W}_n^{-m}\right), \nonumber \\
727: \hat{O}_{nm}^s=\frac{1}{\mathrm{i} \sqrt{2}K_{nm}}
728: \left(\hat{W}_n^m - \hat{W}_n^{-m}\right),
729: \label{eq:2.25}
730: \end{eqnarray}
731: The calculations for the $\hat{O}_{nm}^s$ yields:
732: %\begin{widetext}
733: \begin{eqnarray}
734: \hat{O}_{42}^s & = & \frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}} \bigl \{ \hat{J}_{+}^2
735: \bigl [ 7\hat{J}_z^2+14 \hat{J}_z-J(J+1)+9 \bigl ] - \nonumber \\
736: & & \hat{J}_{-}^2 \bigl [7\hat{J}_z^2-14\hat{J}_z-J(J+1)+9 \bigr ]
737: \bigr \},
738: \label{eq:2.26}
739: \end{eqnarray}
740: \begin{eqnarray}
741: \hat{O}_{62}^s & = & \frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}} \bigl \{ \hat{J}_{+}^2
742: \bigl [ 33\hat{J}_z^4+132 \hat{J}_z^3 - 18J(J+1) \hat{J}_z^2 +
743: \nonumber \\
744: & & 273 \hat{J}_z^2 -
745: 36J(J+1) \hat{J}_z+282 \hat{J}_z + J^2(J+1)^2 - \nonumber \\
746: & & 26J(J+1)+120 \bigr ] -
747: \hat{J}_{-}^2 \bigl [ 33\hat{J}_z^4-132 \hat{J}_z^3- \nonumber \\
748: & & 18J(J+1) \hat{J}_z^2 + 273 \hat{J}_z^2 + 36J(J+1) \hat{J}_z -
749: \nonumber \\
750: & & 282\hat{J}_z+J^2(J+1)^2-26J(J+1)+ \nonumber \\
751: & & 120 \bigr ] \bigr \},
752: \label{eq:2.27}
753: \end{eqnarray}
754: \begin{eqnarray}
755: \hat{O}_{64}^s & = & \frac{1}{2\mathrm{i}} \bigl \{\hat{J}_{+}^4
756: \bigl [11\hat{J}_z^2+44\hat{J}_z-J(J+1)+50 \bigr ] - \nonumber \\
757: & &\hat{J}_{-}^4
758: \bigl [11\hat{J}_z^2-44\hat{J}_z-J(J+1)+50 \bigr ] \bigr \},
759: \label{eq:2.28}
760: \end{eqnarray}
761: %\end{widetext}
762: Jointly with the formulas listed in \cite{Hutchings},
763: the expressions (\ref{eq:2.17}), (\ref{eq:2.19}),
764: (\ref{eq:2.21}) and (\ref{eq:2.26})-(\ref{eq:2.28}) give
765: the full set of Stevens operators for $n$=2, 4, 6 and even $m$.
766: It should be noted that our expressions (\ref{eq:2.26})
767: - (\ref{eq:2.28}) contain the difference of two members
768: corresponding to the operators $\hat{W}_n^m$ and $\hat{W}_n^{-m}$
769: in (\ref{eq:2.25}) respectively.
770: Replacing this difference by sum and the factor $1/2\mathrm{i}$
771: by $1/2$, one can obtain, as
772: it is clear from the algorithm used, the expressions for the
773: corresponding $\hat{O}_{nm}^c$. It is easy to make
774: sure after simple transformations that these coincide
775: with the formulas from~\cite{Hutchings}.
776:
777: \section{The details of the charge distribution}
778:
779: Main distinctive feature of the charge systems studied in
780: this paper is their extended (``filament-like'')
781: character, i.e. the absence of dependence for charge density
782: distribution in the $\tilde x$ direction. As it can
783: be seen from (\ref{eq:2.11}), this fact has already estated
784: the strong interrelations between the coefficients
785: $B_{nm}^{\alpha}$ at given $n$.
786: For instance, $B_{22}^c=\cos (2\Delta)
787: B_{20}$.
788:
789: It should be stressed that these relations are
790: independent of the
791: other details of the charge
792: distribution. The similar relations between the
793: coefficients for more complex superposition systems
794: are demonstrated in the~\ref{table:1}.
795:
796: Let us consider more closely the case when the
797: electric charge is distributed within the $\hat{z}=H$
798: plane with the surface
799: density $f(L)=f(-L)$, i.e. when the coefficients $G_n$
800: are determined by (\ref{eq:1.15}).
801: Introducing the parameter $\lambda=L/H$, one can obtain from
802: (\ref{eq:1.9})-(\ref{eq:1.11}), (\ref{eq:1.15}):
803: \begin{equation}
804: G_n=C_n\int_{0}^{\infty}d\lambda \, f(H\lambda) \,
805: \chi_n(\lambda),
806: \label{eq:3.1}
807: \end{equation}
808: where:
809: \begin{equation}
810: C_2=\frac{1}{H}, \qquad C_4=\frac{1}{2H^3}, \qquad
811: C_6=\frac{1}{3H^5},
812: \label{eq:3.2}
813: \end{equation}
814: \begin{eqnarray}
815: \chi_2(\lambda) & = & \frac{1-\lambda^2}{(1+\lambda^2)^2},
816: \nonumber \\
817: \chi_4(\lambda) & = & \frac{1 - 6\lambda^2 + \lambda^4}{(1 +
818: \lambda^2)^4},
819: \nonumber \\
820: \chi_6(\lambda)& = & \frac{1 - \lambda^6 - 15\lambda^2(1 -
821: \lambda^2)}{(1 + \lambda^2)^6},
822: \label{eq:3.3}
823: \end{eqnarray}
824:
825: The formulas (\ref{eq:3.1})-(\ref{eq:3.3})) describe the
826: contributions of the ``partial filaments'' with the coordinates
827: $L=H\lambda$ into the potentials of the 2-nd, 4-th and 6-th
828: orders respectively. The functions $\chi_n(\lambda)$ play
829: the role of the weighting factors.
830: It is clear from Fig.\ref{fig:3}
831: that these contributions oscillate with $\lambda$ not
832: synchronously. Moreover, the rates of their damping are also
833: sufficiently different.
834:
835: At last for a certain practical calculations it is
836: rather convenient to define the parameter $t$ as follows:
837: \begin{equation}
838: L=H \tan (\frac{t}{2}),
839: \label{eq:3.4}
840: \end{equation}
841: Then:
842: \begin{equation}
843: G_n=C_n \int_0^{\pi}dt \, f(H \tan(\frac{t}{2})) \cdot \Omega_n(t),
844: \label{eq:3.5}
845: \end{equation}
846: \begin{equation}
847: \Omega_2(t)=\cos (t),
848: \label{eq:3.6}
849: \end{equation}
850: \begin{equation}
851: \Omega_4(t)=\frac14 \left \{\cos (3t) + 2\cos (2t) +
852: cos (t) \right \},
853: \label{eq:3.7}
854: \end{equation}
855: \begin{eqnarray}
856: \Omega_6(t) & = & \frac{1}{16} \{\cos (5t) + 4\cos (4t) +
857: 6\cos (3t) + \nonumber \\
858: & & 4\cos(2t) + \cos (t) \},
859: \label{eq:3.8}
860: \end{eqnarray}
861: The plots for the functions $\Omega_n(t)$ are shown at
862: Fig.~\ref{fig:4}.
863:
864: \section{The Model of the charged stripes}
865:
866: Let us consider the case when the electric charge is
867: distributed
868: along the plane $\tilde z=H$ within
869: the system of the parallel stripes uniformly charged with the
870: surface density $F_0$. As usual, it is
871: assumed that $f(L)=f(-L)$.
872: The contribution into $G_n$ from the stripe situated
873: in the range
874: $L_N \, \leq L \, \leq (L_N+W_N)$ can be calculated using
875: (\ref{eq:3.1}) or (\ref{eq:3.5}). As a result one obtains:
876: \begin{equation}
877: G_n^{(N)}=F_0 C_n \left \{\nu_n(\beta_N)-\nu_n(\alpha_N) \right \},
878: \label{eq:4.1}
879: \end{equation}
880: \begin{eqnarray}
881: \nu_2(\lambda) & = & \frac{\lambda}{1+\lambda^2}, \nonumber \\
882: \nu_4(\lambda)& = & \frac{\lambda (3 - \lambda^2)}{3(1 +
883: \lambda^2)^3}, \nonumber \\
884: \nu_6(\lambda) & = & \frac{\lambda (5 - 10 \lambda^2 +
885: \lambda^4)}{5(1 + \lambda^2)^5},
886: \label{eq:4.2}
887: \end{eqnarray}
888: where the variables
889: \begin{equation}
890: \alpha_N=\frac{L_N}{H}, \qquad \beta_N=\frac{L_N+W_N}{H},
891: \label{eq:4.3}
892: \end{equation}
893: are the values of the parameter $\lambda$
894: corresponding to the stripe left and right edges.
895: The summary contribution from the total system of
896: the charged stripes can be calculated accordingly:
897: \begin{equation}
898: G_n=\sum_N G_n^{(N)},
899: \label{eq:4.4}
900: \end{equation}
901: At last it is useful to write down the final formula for
902: the coefficients $b_n$ taking into account the
903: contribution from the N-th stripe.
904: From (\ref{eq:2.12}) and (\ref{eq:4.1}) it follows:
905: \begin{equation}
906: b_n^{(N)}=-\tilde C e^2 \sigma \langle r^n \rangle \Theta_n C_n
907: \left \{\nu_n(\beta_N)-\nu_n(\alpha_N) \right \},
908: \label{eq:4.5}
909: \end{equation}
910:
911: The symbol $\sigma$ here means the surface concentration
912: of the carriers generating the stripe charge, so that:
913: \begin{equation}
914: F_0=\sigma |e|,
915: \label{eq:4.6}
916: \end{equation}
917: where $e$ is the elementary charge and the variable $\sigma$
918: is positive for the holes and negative for the
919: electrons. It is convenient during the practical calculations
920: to replace in (\ref{eq:4.6}) the value $e^2$ by
921: $e^2=14400$ meV $\cdot$ 1 \AA, simultaneously expressing all the
922: lengths in Angstroms.
923: The coefficient $\tilde C$ in (\ref{eq:4.5}) is of the same
924: sense as in (\ref{eq:2.12}).
925: Carrying out summation of the expression (\ref{eq:4.5}) over
926: N with corresponding values of the angle $\Delta$ in
927: (\ref{eq:2.11}), one can obtain the formulas for the ESH
928: parameters in the cases of rather complex superposition
929: systems.
930:
931: \section{Periodical two dimensional lattices of the charged
932: stripes}
933:
934: Now we consider the case when the surface charge density
935: $f(L)$ in (\ref{eq:1.15}) is a periodic
936: function with the period $T$.
937: \begin{equation}
938: f(L+T)=f(L).
939: \label{eq:5.1}
940: \end{equation}
941: Introducing the surface density $\sigma(L)$ of the number
942: of the carriers:
943: \begin{equation}
944: f(L)=|e| \sigma(L).
945: \label{eq:5.2}
946: \end{equation}
947: Expanding $\sigma(L)$ to Fourier series results in:
948: \begin{equation}
949: \sigma (L)=\sigma_0+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \sigma_k
950: \cos (\frac{2\pi k}{T}L).
951: \label{eq:5.3}
952: \end{equation}
953:
954: The term $\sigma_0$ in (\ref{eq:5.3}) corresponds to the
955: uniformly charged plane. This part of the charge density
956: generates only the uniform electric field with the constant
957: gradient and naturally with the zero
958: contributions of the 2-nd, 4-th and 6-th orders into the
959: potential. It is easy to see from (\ref{eq:3.5})-(\ref{eq:3.7})
960: that our results satisfy to this condition.
961: Then combining (\ref{eq:3.1}) and (\ref{eq:5.3}):
962: \begin{equation}
963: G_n=|e| C_n \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} E_{nk} \sigma_k,
964: \label{eq:5.4}
965: \end{equation}
966: where the coefficients
967: \begin{equation}
968: E_{nk}=\int_0^{\infty}d\lambda \, \chi_n(\lambda)
969: \cos (2 \pi k \frac{H}{T} \lambda)
970: \label{eq:5.5}
971: \end{equation}
972: depend only on the relation $H/T$ and are not connected
973: with the other details of the charge
974: distribution described by the coefficients $\sigma_k$.
975: The formulas (\ref{eq:4.5}) stay to be valid for the system
976: in question but now they look as:
977: \begin{equation}
978: b_n=-\tilde C e^2 C_n \Theta_n \langle r^n \rangle
979: \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} E_{nk} \sigma_k,
980: \label{eq:5.6}
981: \end{equation}
982: As it is clear from (\ref{eq:4.5}), the full set of the
983: coefficients $B_{nm}^{\alpha}$ within the framework of the
984: model developed is completely defined by the values of
985: the three parameters $b_2, \, b_4, \, b_6$, which can be
986: obtained, for example, by fitting of the experimental and
987: calculated neutron spectra. Thus, the
988: experimental information can be a tool for verification both
989: of the microscopic and of the
990: phenomenological models of the charge distribution with
991: three arbitrary parameters.
992: It should be noted that the expressions (\ref{eq:5.4}) -
993: (\ref{eq:5.6}) describe the contributions from one or two
994: charged planes dependingly of the coefficient $\tilde C$
995: ($\tilde C=2 $ or $4$, respectively).
996: But they can be easily
997: generalized for more complicate configurations.
998: For instance, in the case of a stack of identically
999: charged planes, in (\ref{eq:5.6}) one should estate
1000: $\tilde C=4$ and substitute the coefficients $E_{nk}$ by
1001: the $\tilde E_{nk}$:
1002: \begin{equation}
1003: \tilde E_{nk}=\sum_H E_{nk},
1004: \label{eq:5.7}
1005: \end{equation}
1006: where the summation of (\ref{eq:5.5}) is carried out over the
1007: plane coordinates $H>0$.
1008:
1009: Now a few words about the periodicity of the charge
1010: distribution. Well-defined character of
1011: the experimental neutron spectra gives us the evidence of the
1012: fact that the crystal lattice and charge
1013: distribution periods are commensurate.
1014: In other case the spectrum would be smoothed.
1015: Moreover, the coefficient interrelating these periods should
1016: be not large due to the same reasons.
1017: There are three examples shown at the Fig.\ref{fig:5}.
1018: \begin{itemize}
1019: \item The period of the charge distribution is equal to the
1020: lattice one. In such a case we have identical
1021: positions for every Rare-Earth ion and only one set of the
1022: crystalline electric field parameters.
1023: \item If $T=2a$, the situation is different.
1024: We have two types of the REI positions with their own crystal
1025: field. If the condition $f(L)=f(-L)$ is satisfied then both
1026: positions are symmetric.
1027: \item If $T=3a$ there exist three types of positions.
1028: But if we deal with the systems with at least
1029: orthorhombic symmetry then the charge distribution in the
1030: elementary cell should be rather symmetric too.
1031: In other case the distortions seem to be
1032: inevitable. The condition $f(L)=f(-L)$
1033: guaranties, at least, the symmetry of distribution for one
1034: type of positions. Then immediately we get
1035: rather interesting thing: there are two different positions
1036: ("1" and "2") for the REI in such a system. But the "1"
1037: position is asymmetric. As a consequence there must be the
1038: $B_{nm}$ coefficients with both even and odd $m$.
1039: \end{itemize}
1040:
1041: As a rather general example, let us consider the model of
1042: two parabolas (Fig.\ref{fig:6}) when the
1043: period $T=a$ and the function $\sigma (L)$ in the range of
1044: $(0, \, \frac{a}{2})$ is assumed to be equal to:
1045: \begin{equation}
1046: \sigma (L)=\sigma_0 + \kappa L^2 + \Theta (L-L_0)
1047: \frac{\mu}{\delta} \left \{\delta^2 - (L-\frac{a}{2})^2
1048: \right \},
1049: \label{eq:5.8}
1050: \end{equation}
1051: where $L_0=\frac{a}{2}-\delta$; $\sigma_0$ is the constant
1052: that does not affect $b_2, \, b_4, \, b_6$ and should be
1053: obtained by
1054: means of a certain additional speculations
1055: \[
1056: \Theta (L -L_0) = \left \{
1057: \begin{array}{ll}
1058: 1, \quad L \geq L_0, \\
1059: 0, \quad L < L_0.
1060: \end{array}
1061: \right.
1062: \]
1063: Thus, accordingly this model the function $\sigma(L)$ in
1064: the range of $(0,\frac{a}{2})$ is a superposition of the two
1065: parabolas with the extremums in the points $L=0$ and
1066: $L=a/2$ respectively.
1067: The coefficients $\kappa$ and $\mu$ can
1068: be of arbitrary signs. Also taking into account the
1069: possibility of adding of an arbitrary constant to
1070: (\ref{eq:5.8}), one can see that this formula describes
1071: rather wide set of the charge distributions.
1072: After calculation of the Fourier coefficients for the
1073: function (\ref{eq:5.8}) we obtain:
1074: \begin{eqnarray}
1075: \sigma_k & = & (-1)^k \frac{a}{\pi^2 k^2} \left \{a \kappa +
1076: 2 \mu \left [\frac{a}{2\pi k \delta} \sin (\frac{2\pi k
1077: \delta}{a}) - \right . \right . \nonumber \\
1078: & & \left . \left . \cos (\frac{2\pi k \delta}{a}) \right ]
1079: \right \},
1080: \label{eq:5.9}
1081: \end{eqnarray}
1082: As a result, the system of the three equations
1083: (at $n=2, \, 4, \, 6$) interrelating the variables
1084: $\kappa, \mu, \delta$ may be
1085: derived from (\ref{eq:5.6}), (\ref{eq:5.9}):
1086: \begin{equation}
1087: P_n=\kappa Q_n + \mu S_n(\delta),
1088: \label{eq:5.10}
1089: \end{equation}
1090: where:
1091: \begin{equation}
1092: P_n=-\frac{b_n \pi^2}{\tilde C e^2 \Theta_n \langle r^n
1093: \rangle C_n a},
1094: \label{eq:5.11}
1095: \end{equation}
1096: \begin{equation}
1097: Q_n=a \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} E_{nk} \frac{(-1)^k}{k^2},
1098: \label{eq:5.12}
1099: \end{equation}
1100: \begin{equation}
1101: S_n(\delta)=2 \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} E_{nk} \frac{(-1)^k}{k^2}
1102: \left [\frac{a}{2\pi k \delta} \sin (\frac{2\pi k \delta}{a}) -
1103: \cos (\frac{2\pi k \delta}{a}) \right ].
1104: \label{eq:5.13}
1105: \end{equation}
1106: The equations (\ref{eq:5.10}) are linear relatively the
1107: variables $\kappa, \mu$. The solution of this system easily
1108: can be
1109: reduced to determination of $\delta$ from the following
1110: transcendent equation:
1111: \begin{eqnarray}
1112: & & (Q_2 P_4 - Q_4 P_2) S_6(\delta) + (Q_6 P_2 - Q_2 P_6)
1113: S_4(\delta) + \nonumber \\
1114: & & (Q_4 P_6 - Q_6 P_4) S_2(\delta) = 0.
1115: \label{eq:5.14}
1116: \end{eqnarray}
1117: After solving of (\ref{eq:5.14}), other parameters will
1118: be determined immediately:
1119: \begin{eqnarray}
1120: \mu=\frac{Q_2 P_4 - Q_4 P_2}{Q_2 S_4(\delta)-
1121: Q_4 S_2(\delta)}, \nonumber \\
1122: \kappa=\frac{P_2 S_4(\delta) - P_4 S_2(\delta)}{Q_2 S_4(\delta)
1123: - Q_4 S_2(\delta)},
1124: \label{eq:5.15}
1125: \end{eqnarray}
1126:
1127: Sometimes from certain additional speculations (for example,
1128: concerning the concentration of
1129: dopants in the crystalline lattice) one can independently
1130: indicate the concentration of the carriers
1131: injected into the plane $z=H$. Let us denote the total number
1132: of these carriers per the element $a \times d$ of
1133: the charged plane shown at the Fig.\ref{fig:6} as $N_0$.
1134: In such a case the expressions (\ref{eq:5.14}) -
1135: (\ref{eq:5.15}) can be
1136: completed by the formulas for determination of the
1137: $\sigma_0$ term from (\ref{eq:5.8}). Really:
1138: \begin{equation}
1139: N_0 = 2d \int_{0}^{\frac{a}{2}} dL \sigma (L),
1140: \label{eq:5.16}
1141: \end{equation}
1142: Substituting (\ref{eq:5.8}) into (\ref{eq:5.16}) yields:
1143: \begin{equation}
1144: \sigma_0 = \frac{N_0}{ad} - \frac{1}{12}a^2 \kappa -
1145: \frac{8}{3a} \mu \delta^2,
1146: \label{eq:5.17}
1147: \end{equation}
1148: Sometimes the calculation of $b_n$ is convenient not making
1149: use of Fourier expansions. For example,
1150: direct summation of the expressions (\ref{eq:4.5}) over $N$
1151: is possible for the model of the charged stripes.
1152: Accordingly (\ref{eq:2.12}):
1153: \begin{equation}
1154: b_n = - \tilde C \cdot |e| \cdot \Theta_n \cdot \langle r^n \rangle
1155: \sum_{N=1}^{\infty} G_n^{(N)},
1156: \label{eq:5.18}
1157: \end{equation}
1158: For the periodical lattice of the stripes charged with
1159: the surface density $F_0=\sigma |e|$ we have:
1160: $f(H\lambda)=F_0$ at $\lambda \in (\alpha_N; \beta_N)$
1161: and $f(H\lambda)=0$ at $\lambda \not\subset (\alpha_N;
1162: \beta_N)$,
1163: where
1164: \begin{eqnarray}
1165: \alpha_N = (Na - \frac{a+W}{2})/H \nonumber \\
1166: \beta_N = (Na - \frac{a-W}{2})/H,
1167: \label{eq:5.19}
1168: \end{eqnarray}
1169: $W$ is the width of a stripe.
1170:
1171: It is possible to accelerate the convergence of the series
1172: in (\ref{eq:5.18}) using the fact that one can add an
1173: arbitrary constant to the charge density in the expression
1174: (\ref{eq:3.1}). For example:
1175: \begin{equation}
1176: G_n=C_n \int_0^{\infty} d\lambda \cdot \left [f(H \lambda)-
1177: \frac{F_0 W}{a} \right ] \cdot \chi_n(\lambda),
1178: \label{eq:5.20}
1179: \end{equation}
1180: where we have extracted from the charge density its average
1181: value.
1182: In practice, the summation in (\ref{eq:5.18}) is carried out
1183: up to a certain maximal stripe number $N=M$.
1184: Representing (\ref{eq:5.20}) as:
1185: \begin{eqnarray}
1186: G_n &=& C_n \cdot \int_0^{\beta_M} d\lambda \cdot \left [
1187: f(H\lambda)
1188: - \frac{F_0 W}{a} \right ] \cdot \chi_n(\lambda) + \nonumber \\
1189: &+& C_n \cdot \int_{\beta_M}^{\infty} d\lambda \cdot \left [
1190: f(H\lambda)
1191: - \frac{F_0 W}{a} \right ] \cdot \chi_n(\lambda),
1192: \label{eq:5.21}
1193: \end{eqnarray}
1194: we then take into account that at large $\beta_M$ , as it
1195: can be seen from the Fig.\ref{fig:3}, the second integral
1196: contains the product of a slow varying function and the
1197: function
1198: oscillating around the zero average
1199: value. It gives us the possibility to neglect the second
1200: integral (from the physical point of view it
1201: corresponds to the mutual compensation of the two neighboring
1202: stripes
1203: carrying the charges of the
1204: equal value but of the opposite signs).
1205: Then calculating the first integral we obtain:
1206: \begin{equation}
1207: G_n \approx C_n F_0 \left [\sum_{N=1}^M \{\nu_n(\beta_N)-
1208: \nu_n(\alpha_N) \}
1209: - \frac{W}{a} \nu_n(\beta_M) \right ].
1210: \label{eq:5.22}
1211: \end{equation}
1212:
1213: Correspondingly:
1214: \begin{eqnarray}
1215: b_n & = & -\tilde C e^2 \sigma \Theta_n \langle r^n \rangle C_n
1216: \left [\sum_{N=1}^M \{\nu_n(\beta_N)- \right .\nonumber \\
1217: & & \left . \nu_n(\alpha_N) \} -
1218: \frac{W}{a}
1219: \nu_n(\beta_M) \right ].
1220: \label{eq:5.23}
1221: \end{eqnarray}
1222:
1223:
1224: \section{Point Charge Model Calculation of the ESH Parameters
1225: for the Complex Charge Configurations}
1226:
1227: Below we list the formulas adopted for numerical calculation
1228: of the coefficients $B_{nm}^{\alpha}$
1229: generated by the clouds of charged points.
1230: Then we use the results obtained for evaluation of an
1231: applicability of the charged filaments model to description
1232: of real systems.
1233: In the point-charge model the coefficients
1234: $\gamma_{nm}^{\alpha}$ are expressed via the spherical
1235: coordinates
1236: $R_j, \vartheta_j, \varphi_j$ of the charges generating the
1237: crystalline electric field as \cite{Hutchings}:
1238: \begin{equation}
1239: \gamma_{nm}^{\alpha}=\sum_j \frac{4\pi q_j}{2n+1}
1240: \frac{Z_{nm}^{\alpha}(\vartheta_j;\varphi_j)}{R_j^{n+1}}.
1241: \label{eq:6.1}
1242: \end{equation}
1243:
1244: The necessary expressions for the tesseral harmonics are
1245: listed in Table \ref{table:2}. In this section we use for
1246: the Cartesian coordinates of the charges the traditional
1247: capital letters $X_j, Y_j, Z_j$ instead of $D_j, L_j, H_j$
1248: that are reserved only for filaments. As a result, one can
1249: obtain from (\ref{eq:2.10}) and Table \ref{table:2} the
1250: following list of the formulas:
1251: \begin{widetext}
1252:
1253: \[ B_{20} =-|e| \frac14 \Theta_2 \langle r^2 \rangle \sum_j q_j
1254: \frac{3Z_j^2-R_j^2}{R_j^5}, \]
1255: \[
1256: B_{22}^c=-|e| \frac34 \Theta_2 \langle r^2 \rangle \sum_j q_j
1257: \frac{X_j^2-Y_j^2}{R_j^5}, \]
1258: \[B_{22}^s=-|e| \frac34 \Theta_2 \langle r^2 \rangle \sum_j q_j
1259: \frac{2X_jY_j}{R_j^5}, \]
1260: \[B_{40} =-|e| \frac{1}{64} \Theta_4 \langle r^4 \rangle
1261: \sum_j q_j \frac{35Z_j^4-30Z_j^2R_j^2+3R_j^4}{R_j^9},
1262: \]
1263: \[B_{42}^c=-|e| \frac{5}{16} \Theta_4 \langle r^4 \rangle
1264: \sum_j q_j \frac{(7Z_j^2-R_j^2)(X_j^2-Y_j^2)}{R_j^9},\]
1265: \[B_{42}^s=-|e| \frac{5}{16} \Theta_4 \langle r^4 \rangle
1266: \sum_j q_j \frac{(7Z_j^2-R_j^2)2X_jY_j}{R_j^9}, \]
1267: \[B_{44}^c=-|e| \frac{35}{64} \Theta_4 \langle r^4 \rangle
1268: \sum_j q_j \frac{X_j^4-6X_j^2Y_j^2+Y_j^4}{R_j^9}, \]
1269: \[B_{44}^s=-|e| \frac{35}{64} \Theta_4 \langle r^4 \rangle
1270: \sum_j q_j \frac{4X_jY_j(X_j^2-Y_j^2)}{R_j^9}, \]
1271: \[B_{60} =-|e| \frac{1}{256} \Theta_6 \langle r^6 \rangle
1272: \sum_j q_j \frac{231Z_j^6-315Z_j^4R_j^2+105Z_j^2R_j^4-
1273: 5R_j^6}{R_j^{13}}, \]
1274: \[B_{62}^c=-|e| \frac{105}{512} \Theta_6 \langle r^6 \rangle
1275: \sum_j q_j \frac{\left [16Z_j^4-16(X_j^2+Y_j^2)Z_j^2+(X_j^2+
1276: Y_j^2)^2 \right ](X_j^2-Y_j^2)}{R_j^{13}}, \]
1277: \[B_{62}^s=-|e| \frac{105}{512} \Theta_6 \langle r^6 \rangle
1278: \sum_j q_j \frac{\left [16Z_j^4-16(X_j^2+Y_j^2)Z_j^2+(X_j^2+
1279: Y_j^2)^2 \right ]2X_jY_j}{R_j^{13}}, \]
1280: \[B_{64}^c=-|e| \frac{63}{256} \Theta_6 \langle r^6 \rangle
1281: \sum_j q_j \frac{(11Z_j^2-R_j^2)(X_j^4-6X_j^2Y_j^2+Y_j^4)}
1282: {R_j^{13}}, \]
1283: \[B_{64}^s=-|e| \frac{63}{256} \Theta_6 \langle r^6 \rangle
1284: \sum_j q_j \frac{(11Z_j^2-R_j^2)4X_jY_j(X_j^2-Y_j^2)}{R_j^{13}},
1285: \]
1286: \[B_{66}^c=-|e| \frac{231}{512} \Theta_6 \langle r^6 \rangle
1287: \sum_j q_j \frac{X_j^6-15X_j^4Y_j^2+15X_j^2Y_j^4-
1288: Y_j^6}{R_j^{13}}, \]
1289: \begin{equation}B_{66}^s=-|e| \frac{231}{512} \Theta_6
1290: \langle r^6
1291: \rangle \sum_j q_j \frac{2X_jY_j \left [4(X_j^2-Y_j^2)^2-(X_j^2
1292: +Y_j^2)^2 \right ] }{R_j^{13}}.
1293: \label{eq:6.2}
1294: \end{equation}
1295: \end{widetext}
1296:
1297: The expressions (\ref{eq:6.2}) are convenient for numerical
1298: calculations in the models representing the
1299: electric charge distributed in the lattice as a net of the
1300: charged points.
1301: Let us use this formulas for evaluation of the inaccuracy
1302: induced by the replacement of a finite
1303: filament by an infinite one.
1304: As it can be seen from (\ref{eq:6.2}), the coefficients
1305: $B_{nm}^{\alpha}$ decrease with a distance
1306: as:
1307: \begin{equation}
1308: B_{2m}^{\alpha} \sim R_j^{-3}, \quad B_{4m}^{\alpha}
1309: \sim R_j^{-5}, \quad B_{6m}^{\alpha} \sim R_j^{-7}.
1310: \label{eq:6.3}
1311: \end{equation}
1312:
1313: Thus, it is obvious that the replacement in question
1314: contributes the maximal error at $n=2$. So, it is
1315: reasonable for our evaluation to calculate the coefficients
1316: $B_{20}$ and $B_{22}^c$ for the finite charged filament
1317: (exactly speaking, belonging to the configuration of the
1318: filaments in the sense of the formulas
1319: (\ref{eq:2.12}) oriented along the x-axis in the range
1320: $(-D; +D)$ and characterized by the coordinates $Y=L$,
1321: $Z=H$. Such a configuration automatically gives $B_{nm}^s=0$.
1322: Replacing $q_j \rightarrow \xi dx$ and transforming
1323: (\ref{eq:6.2}) from the sum to the integral yield:
1324: \begin{eqnarray}
1325: B_{20} & = & -|e| \cdot \xi \cdot \Theta_2 \cdot \langle r^2 \rangle \cdot \frac12 \cdot
1326: \frac{\sin (\varphi_0)}{(H^2+L^2)^2} \left \{(H^2-L^2)+
1327: \right . \nonumber \\
1328: & & \left . H^2 \cos^2 (\varphi_0) \right \},
1329: \label{eq:6.4}
1330: \end{eqnarray}
1331: \begin{eqnarray}
1332: B_{22}^c & = & -|e| \cdot \xi \cdot \Theta_2 \cdot \langle r^2 \rangle \cdot \frac14 \cdot
1333: \frac23 \cdot \frac{\sin (\varphi_0)}{(H^2+L^2)} \left \{\sin^2 (\varphi_0)
1334: \right . \nonumber \\
1335: & & \left . - \frac{L^2}{L^2+H^2} (3- \sin^2 (\varphi_0)) \right \},
1336: \label{eq:6.5}
1337: \end{eqnarray}
1338: \begin{equation}
1339: \varphi_0=\arctan (\frac{D}{\sqrt{H^2+L^2}}).
1340: \label{eq:6.6}
1341: \end{equation}
1342:
1343: For the infinite filament $\varphi_0=\frac{\pi}{2}$.
1344: Assuming $\sqrt{H^2+L^2} \ll D$, let us expand the
1345: expressions (\ref{eq:6.4})-(\ref{eq:6.5}) over this parameter.
1346: As a
1347: result, the following convenient formulas for evaluation of
1348: relative inaccuracy appear:
1349: \begin{equation}
1350: B_{20}=B_{20}(\infty) \cdot \left \{1-\frac12 \cdot
1351: \frac{H^2+L^2}{L^2-H^2} \cdot \frac{H^2+L^2}{D^2} \right \},
1352: \label{eq:6.7}
1353: \end{equation}
1354: \begin{equation}
1355: B_{22}^c=B_{22}^c(\infty) \cdot \left \{1+\frac32 \cdot
1356: \frac{H^2+L^2}{L^2-H^2} \cdot \frac{H^2+L^2}{D^2} \right \}.
1357: \label{eq:6.8}
1358: \end{equation}
1359: where $B_{20}(\infty),B_{22}^c(\infty)$ - are the corresponding
1360: expressions for the infinite filament. Naturally the
1361: formulas (\ref{eq:6.7})-(\ref{eq:6.8}) are not applicable for
1362: the case $L=H$ when $B_{20}(\infty),B_{22}^c(\infty)$ are equal
1363: to zero. In
1364: the latest case only absolute evaluations on the basis of the
1365: expressions (\ref{eq:6.4})-(\ref{eq:6.5}) are possible.
1366: At $L=0$ the value of the ratio $D/H=10$ is follows from
1367: (\ref{eq:6.7})-(\ref{eq:6.8}) to be enough to provide the
1368: accuracy of 1\% for the model of the infinite filament.
1369: To achieve the same accuracy at $L \sim 5H$ one
1370: needs of the ratio $D/H \sim 50$.
1371: However, when the lattice of the stripes is described,
1372: such an increase
1373: concerns only the relative error of the far stripes input
1374: whereas the main contribution to the potential
1375: is generated by the nearby ones.
1376:
1377: \section{Conclusion}
1378:
1379: The new model is developed to strengthen the possibilities
1380: for analysis of experimental data
1381: obtained by inelastic neutron scattering.
1382: It is particularly valuable for studying the charge
1383: distribution in the layered perovskite-like compounds doped
1384: with the rare-earth ions being used as a
1385: local probe.
1386: In contrast to the widely adopted point-charge model, the
1387: new approach directly takes into
1388: account the extended character of the charge distribution
1389: in one direction.
1390: The model provides clear analytical expressions for the
1391: crystalline electric field parameters,
1392: which may be used efficiently in further evaluations.
1393: As a result, the strong interrelations between
1394: these parameters were found to originate from the specific
1395: charge distribution topology. The similar
1396: relations may easily be established for more complicated,
1397: superpositional systems.
1398: The model enabled us to develop methods of the charge profile
1399: reconstruction from the experimental
1400: data.
1401:
1402: \begin{acknowledgments}
1403: Financial support by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
1404: (project No 00-02-17370), INTAS project No 99-00256,
1405: and the State Contract No 107-19(00)-P is gratefully acknowledged.
1406: \end{acknowledgments}
1407:
1408: %\bibliography{cfe}
1409: %\end{document}
1410: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
1411: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
1412: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
1413: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
1414: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
1415: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
1416: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
1417: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
1418: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibinfo\endcsname\relax \def\bibinfo#1#2{#2}\fi
1419: \expandafter\ifx\csname eprint\endcsname\relax \def\eprint#1{#1}\fi
1420:
1421: \bibitem{Hutchings}
1422: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~T.} \bibnamefont{Hutchings}},
1423: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Point-charge calculations of energy levels of magnetic
1424: ions in crystalline electric fields}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic Press},
1425: \bibinfo{address}{New York}, \bibinfo{year}{1964}), vol.~\bibinfo{volume}{16}
1426: of \emph{\bibinfo{series}{Solid State Physics}}, p. \bibinfo{pages}{227}.
1427:
1428: \bibitem{Bleaney}
1429: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Bleaney}} \bibnamefont{and}
1430: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~W.~H.} \bibnamefont{Stevens}},
1431: \bibinfo{journal}{Rept. Progr. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{16}},
1432: \bibinfo{pages}{108} (\bibinfo{year}{1953}).
1433:
1434: \bibitem{Wallace}
1435: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~E.} \bibnamefont{Wallace}},
1436: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Rare Earth Intermetallics}}
1437: (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic Press}, \bibinfo{address}{New York},
1438: \bibinfo{year}{1973}).
1439:
1440: \bibitem{Lea}
1441: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~R.} \bibnamefont{Lea}},
1442: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~J.~M.} \bibnamefont{Leask}},
1443: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~P.} \bibnamefont{Wolf}},
1444: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Chem. Solids} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{23}},
1445: \bibinfo{pages}{1381} (\bibinfo{year}{1962}).
1446:
1447: \bibitem{Bobrovskii}
1448: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~I.} \bibnamefont{Bobrovskii}},
1449: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.~L.} \bibnamefont{Zhdakhin}},
1450: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~V.}
1451: \bibnamefont{Mirmelstein}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Met. Metallogr.}
1452: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{76}}, \bibinfo{pages}{203} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}).
1453:
1454: \bibitem{Podlesnyak}
1455: \bibinfo{author}{\bibnamefont{{A. A. Podlesnyak et al.}}},
1456: \bibinfo{journal}{Int. J. Mod. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{5}},
1457: \bibinfo{pages}{1233} (\bibinfo{year}{1991}).
1458:
1459: \bibitem{Mirmelstein88}
1460: \bibinfo{author}{\bibnamefont{{A. V. Mirmelstein, A. A. Podlesnyak, V. I.
1461: Bobrovskii et al.}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Physica C}
1462: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{153-155}}, \bibinfo{pages}{176}
1463: (\bibinfo{year}{1988}).
1464:
1465: \bibitem{Mesot}
1466: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Mesot}} \bibnamefont{and}
1467: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Furrer}},
1468: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Superconductivity} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{10}},
1469: \bibinfo{pages}{623} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
1470:
1471: \bibitem{Mirmelstein97}
1472: \bibinfo{author}{\bibnamefont{{A. V. Mirmelstein, A. A. Podlesnyak, V. I.
1473: Bobrovskii et al.}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Physica C}
1474: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{282-287}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1335}
1475: (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
1476:
1477: \bibitem{Mirmelstein00}
1478: \bibinfo{author}{\bibnamefont{{A. Mirmelstein et al.}}},
1479: \bibinfo{journal}{J.Phys.:Condens. Matter}
1480: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{11}}, \bibinfo{pages}{7155-7173}
1481: (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
1482:
1483: \bibitem{Taylor}
1484: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~N.~R.} \bibnamefont{Taylor}}
1485: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~I.} \bibnamefont{Darby}},
1486: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Physics of Rare Earth Solids}}
1487: (\bibinfo{publisher}{London Chapman}, \bibinfo{year}{1973}).
1488:
1489: \bibitem{Watanabe}
1490: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Watanabe}},
1491: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Operator methods in ligand field theory}}
1492: (\bibinfo{publisher}{Prentice-Hall, Inc.}, \bibinfo{address}{Englewood
1493: Cliffs, N.J.}, \bibinfo{year}{1966}).
1494:
1495: \end{thebibliography}
1496:
1497: \begin{figure}
1498: %\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=8cm]{fig1.ps}
1499: \caption{The local $\tilde x; \tilde y; \tilde z$ and
1500: crystallographic $x; y; z$ coordinate systems for description
1501: of the field generated in the point $\mathbf{r}$ by the charged
1502: filaments $AB$ and $A\prime B\prime$.}
1503: \label{fig:1}
1504: \end{figure}
1505:
1506: \begin{figure}
1507: %\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=8cm]{fig2.ps}
1508: \caption{ Superpositional charged systems characterized
1509: by three parameters: (a) - symmetry $mmm (D_{2h})$;
1510: (b) - symmetry $\overline{4}2m (D_{2d})$;
1511: (c) - symmetry $4/mmm (D_{4h}$.}
1512: \label{fig:2}
1513: \end{figure}
1514:
1515: \begin{figure}
1516: %\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=8cm]{fig3.ps}
1517: \caption{Weighting functions $\chi_n(\lambda)$ for the
1518: contributions to the crystalline field potential of the
1519: 2, 4 and 6 orders, respectively.}
1520: \label{fig:3}
1521: \end{figure}
1522:
1523: \begin{figure}
1524: %\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=8cm]{fig4.ps}
1525: \caption{Weighting functions $\Omega_n(t)$ for the contributions to the
1526: crystalline field potential of the 2, 4 and 6 orders, respectively.}
1527: \label{fig:4}
1528: \end{figure}
1529:
1530: \begin{figure}
1531: %\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=8cm]{fig5.ps}
1532: \caption{Schematic charge distribution profiles with
1533: different periodicity.}
1534: \label{fig:5}
1535: \end{figure}
1536:
1537: \begin{figure}
1538: %\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=8cm]{fig6.ps}
1539: \caption{The model of two parabolas. The summary carrier
1540: concentration $\sigma (L)$ consists of the two prabolic
1541: contributions $\sigma_1(L)$ and $\sigma_2(L)$ and may
1542: be added by the constant $\sigma_0$.}
1543: \label{fig:6}
1544: \end{figure}
1545:
1546: \end{document}