1: \documentstyle[prl,amsfonts,epsfig,twocolumn,aps]{revtex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4: \wideabs{
5:
6: \title{Capillary condensation in disordered porous materials:
7: hysteresis versus equilibrium behavior.}
8:
9:
10: \author{E. Kierlik\( ^{1} \), P. Monson\( ^{2} \), M. L. Rosinberg\( ^{1} \), L. Sarkisov\( ^{2} \), and
11: G. Tarjus\( ^{1} \)}
12:
13: \address{ $^{1}$Laboratoire de Physique Th{\'e}orique des Liquides\cite{AAAuth}, Universit{\'e}
14: Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu,\\ 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France \\
15: $ ^{2}$Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachussetts, Amherst,
16: MA 01003, USA}
17:
18:
19: \maketitle
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22: We study the interplay between hysteresis and equilibrium behavior in
23: capillary condensation of fluids in mesoporous disordered materials
24: via a mean-field density functional theory of a disordered lattice-gas
25: model. The approach reproduces all major features observed
26: experimentally. We show that the simple van der Waals picture of
27: metastability fails due to the appearance of a complex free-energy
28: landscape with a large number of metastable states. In particular,
29: hysteresis can occur both with and without an underlying equilibrium
30: transition, thermodynamic consistency is not satisfied along the
31: hysteresis loop, and out-of-equilibrium phase transitions are
32: possible.
33: \end{abstract}
34: \pacs{Pacs numbers: 05.50.+q,75.10.Nr,64.60.-i}}
35:
36:
37:
38: Capillary condensation of a gas inside a mesoporous material
39: refers to the rapid change to a liquid-like state that occurs at a
40: pressure (or chemical potential) lower than the bulk saturation value
41: \cite{1}\cite{2}. This phenomenon is often thought of as a
42: shifted gas-liquid transition. Theoretical studies of fluids confined
43: in single pores of ideal geometry have clarified the mechanism for
44: such a shifted transition and introduced the concept of capillary
45: criticality that describes the fact that the liquid-vapor critical
46: point in a pore occurs at a lower temperature than in the
47: bulk\cite{2}\cite{3}. However, the situation in real mesoporous
48: materials, such as porous glasses and silica gels, that consist of an
49: interconnected network of winding pores of varying shape, curvature
50: and size is not as clear. With the possible exception of fluids in
51: aerogels of very high porosity ($95-98 \%$) for which a {\it bona
52: fide} liquid-gas phase transition has been reported with no sign of
53: hysteresis\cite{4}, there is no direct evidence of a first-order phase
54: transition characterized, say, by a jump in the adsorbed amount of
55: fluid, nor of true criticality signaled by density fluctuations on
56: very large length scales. The typical experimental observation is the
57: presence of a hysteresis loop in the sorption isotherms, a loop that
58: is reproducible and vanishes at a temperature lower than the critical
59: temperature of the bulk fluid\cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{5}. The main
60: questions raised by this phenomenology are: is there a true phase
61: transition associated with capillary condensation in disordered
62: materials? What is the connection between this transition and the
63: observed hysteresis? What are the sources of hysteretic behavior? No
64: satisfactory answers have been provided so far. Indeed, in these
65: systems that are locally heterogeneous, but macroscopically
66: (statistically) homogeneous, the statistical-mechanical methods that
67: have proved very efficient in dealing with bulk fluids and fluids in
68: simple external fields, namely computer simulations, integral-equation
69: theory and density functional theory, are plagued by many
70: difficulties.
71:
72: In this letter, we present a mean-field density functional theory of a
73: disordered lattice-gas model. This model, introduced in a previous
74: work\cite{6}, incorporates the main physical ingredients
75: characterizing fluids in disordered mesoporous media: preferential
76: adsorption of one phase of the fluid, connectivity of the pore space,
77: geometric and energetic disorder, exclusion effect due to the matrix.
78: (Note that the model could also be used to describe the demixing of
79: binary mixtures in mesoporous materials\cite{2}.) The present
80: approach allows us to study for the first time the interplay between
81: out-of-equilibrium (hysteresis) and equilibrium behavior associated
82: with capillary condensation in a disordered matrix. We show that the
83: theory captures the main aspects of the phenomenology of capillary
84: condensation in real systems. The combination of disorder and
85: interconnectivity of the pore network drastically alters the picture
86: of capillary condensation built upon the independent-pore
87: model\cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{7} or the simple van der Waals description
88: of metastability because it generates a complex free-energy landscape
89: characterized by a large number of metastable states. In particular,
90: we show that (i) hysteresis can occur {\it with} or {\it without} an
91: underlying equilibrium phase transition, (ii) the disappearance of the
92: hysteresis loop is not associated with capillary criticality, (iii)
93: thermodynamic consistency is not satisfied along the hysteresis loop,
94: and (iv) collective out-of-equilibrium phenomena such as macroscopic
95: ``avalanches'' are possible.
96:
97: The model is described by the following Hamiltonian,
98:
99: \begin{eqnarray}
100: \label{eq:1}
101: \cal{H}=&-& w_{ff}\sum _{<ij>}\tau _{i}\eta _{i}\tau _{j}\eta _{j}
102: -w_{mf}\sum _{<ij>}[ \tau _{i}\eta _{i}( 1-\eta _{j})\nonumber\\
103: &+&\tau _{j}\eta _{j}( 1-\eta _{i})] ,
104: \end{eqnarray}
105: where \( \tau _{i}=0,1 \) and \( \left( 1-\eta _{i}\right) =0,1 \) denote
106: the fluid and matrix occupancy variables, respectively, and the sums
107: run over distinct pairs of nearest-neighbor (n.n.) sites. Although
108: different disordered microstructures of the matrix could be
109: considered\cite{8}, we choose here the simplest nontrivial case, a
110: random matrix. The model is thus specified by two parameters, the
111: average matrix density \( \rho _{m} \) that fixes the porosity (equal to
112: \( 1-\rho _{m} \)) and the ratio of the matrix-fluid over the
113: fluid-fluid interactions, \( y=w_{mf}/w_{ff} \), that determines the
114: ``wettability'' . In the following we only consider attractive
115: matrix-fluid interactions\cite{9} and we set
116: \( \rho _{m}=0.25 \). We use a $3$D bcc lattice with linear size
117: $L=8,12,16,24,48$ for which we consider many different configurations
118: of the random matrix, from $1400$ for $L=8$ to $5$ for $L=48$. Most
119: of the results are illustrated here for $L=48$ and typical matrix
120: configurations, but when necessary, e.g., to check the existence of
121: phase transitions, we have performed a finite-size analysis after
122: averaging over all matrix configurations.
123:
124: The mean-field density functional theory (or equivalently for a
125: lattice, the local mean-field theory) starts with the formulation of a
126: free-energy functional of the fluid density field for a given matrix
127: realization \( \left\{ \eta _{i}\right\} \):
128:
129: \begin{eqnarray}
130: &F&(\{\rho_i\})=\frac{1}{\beta} \sum_i[\rho_i\ln
131: \rho_i+(\eta_i-\rho_i)\ln(\eta_i-\rho_i)]\nonumber\\ &-&w_{ff}\sum_{<ij>}\rho_i\rho_j
132: - w_{mf}\sum_{<ij>}[\rho_i(1-\eta_j)+\rho_j(1-\eta_i)] \ ,
133: \end{eqnarray}
134: where $\beta=1/(k_BT)$ and $\rho _{i}=<\eta _{i}\tau _{i}>$ is the average
135: fluid density at site \emph{i}. (The overall fluid density is then \(
136: \rho _{f}=\left( 1/N\right) \sum _{i}\rho _{i} \), where $N=2 L^3$ is the
137: total number of sites.) For a given chemical
138: potential
139: \( \mu \), minimization of $\Omega(\{\rho_i\})=F(\{\rho_i\})-\mu \sum_i \rho_i$ w. r. t.
140: the \( \rho _{i} \)'s provides the grand
141: potential $\Omega$ of the adsorbed fluid. The corresponding equations for the
142: fluid density on each site are
143:
144: \begin{equation}
145: \label{eq:3}
146: \rho _{i}=\frac{\eta _{i}}{1+\exp \left[-\beta\left[ \mu +\sum _{j/i}\left( w_{ff}\rho _{j}+w_{mf}\left( 1-\eta _{j}\right) \right) \right]\right] },
147: \end{equation}
148: where the sum is over all n.n. of site \emph{i}. The above set of
149: nonlinear coupled equations has been solved by means of a simple
150: iteration algorithm according to two different protocols: (1) to mimic
151: the experimental procedure, we follow continuously the solutions under
152: small variations of the chemical potential \( \mu \) (typically, $\Delta \mu
153: =10^{-3} $) and (2) to search more exhaustively the solutions of
154: Eq. (3) for a given \( \mu \), we repeat the iteration procedure with a
155: large number of initial conditions (typically, $10^2$) corresponding to
156: uniform fillings of the lattice at different overall fluid densities
157: (i.e., $\rho_{i}^{(0)}=\rho^{(0)}$).
158:
159: We show in Fig. 1 typical isotherms obtained by increasing
160: continuously \( \mu \) from \( -\infty \) (adsorption branch) and
161: decreasing continuously \( \mu \) from \( +\infty \) (desorption
162: branch). They look qualitatively similar to the experimental isotherms
163: of fluids adsorbed in porous glasses and silica
164: gels\cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{5}, with an asymmetric hysteresis loop
165: (corresponding to the H2 shape in the IUPAC classification)
166: characterized by a steep desortion branch
167:
168: \begin{figure}
169: \begin{center}
170: \epsfxsize= 200pt
171: \epsffile{fig1.ps}
172: \vspace{.4cm}
173: \caption{Theoretical sorption isotherms for $y=1.5 $ at $T=0.6,0.8, 0.95, 1.1$ and
174: $1.25$. (The mean-field bulk critical point is at $T=2$.) }
175: \end{center}
176: \end{figure}
177:
178: and a smoothly increasing adsorption branch. The so-called
179: ``hysteresis phase diagrams'' that are constructed from the points at
180: which the loop opens and closes are shifted to lower $T$ and higher
181: $\rho_f$ compared to the bulk-fluid coexistence curve, and their
182: (asymmetric) shape is also quite comparable to what is obtained from
183: experimental data\cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{5}.
184:
185: An important test for the relevance of any model of capillary
186: condensation in disordered porous materials is the shape of the
187: so-called ``scanning curves'', i. e., curves that are obtained by
188: reversing the sign of the evolution of \( \mu \) at different points
189: along the adsorption or the desorption branches\cite{7}. It has been
190: stressed that these curves are not properly reproduced by the widely
191: used independent-pore model\cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{7}. An illustration
192: of the scanning curves on adsorption and desorption obtained within
193: the present theory is shown in Fig. 2. They look strikingly similar to
194: those observed experimentally, with an upward curvature on adsorption
195: and a downward curvature on desorption. When varying the chemical
196: potential up and down along different paths we find a hierarchy of
197: inner scanning curves that display the ``return-point memory'' effect,
198: in close analogy to the hysteretic behavior displayed by a variety of
199: systems\cite{10}\cite{11}\cite{12}.
200:
201: The above results confirm that the present approach reproduces
202: qualitatively the phenomenology associated with capillary condensation
203: in porous glasses and silica gels. This indicates that, despite its
204: simplicity, the model does capture the main physical features of
205: fluids adsorbed in real mesoporous systems and that equilibration via
206: thermally activated processes, processes that are absent in the
207: mean-field description, does not substantially modify the picture.
208: Indeed, the implicit assumption behind
209: \begin{figure}
210: \begin{center}
211: \epsfxsize= 200pt
212: \epsffile{fig2.ps}
213: \vspace{0.4cm}
214: \caption{Theoretical desorption (a) and adsorption (b) scanning curves
215: for \( y=1.5 \) and \( T=0.8 \).}
216: \end{center}
217: \end{figure}
218: the direct comparison
219: of the theoretical sorption curves with the experimental ones is that
220: the system does not have time to equilibrate at constant
221: \( T \) and \( \mu \) and that adsorption/desorption only proceeds
222: under the influence of chemical-potential changes. (This assumption
223: may break down when the perturbation induced by the matrix is small as
224: in very dilute aerogels.)
225:
226: Hysteresis and scanning curves are manifestations of
227: out-of-equilibrium behavior. This is well understood for instance in
228: systems like athermal martensites and low-\( T \) ferromagnetic
229: materials whose transformations are driven by an external field; these
230: systems are well described by the \( T=0 \) limit of models with
231: quenched disorder\cite{10} (models somewhat related to the lattice-gas
232: studied here). On the other hand, in the case of capillary
233: condensation one often assumes that hysteresis is also the signature
234: of a true equilibrium phase transition with two possible metastable
235: states, gas and liquid, as in the standard van der Waals loop for bulk
236: fluids and fluids confined in a single pore. However, this simple van
237: der Waals picture fails for the present system because this latter has (in the
238: region where capillary condensation occurs) a complex free-energy
239: landscape with a large number of metastable states, as can be seen
240: from studying the solutions of the local mean-field equations, Eq.
241: (3). For each $T, \mu$ and each matrix realization, we have
242: investigated $50$ to $100$ different initial conditions to Eq. (3).
243: When plotted as in Fig. 3 on the \( \rho _{f}-\mu \) diagram (for a
244: typical matrix configuration of the $L=48$ system), all solutions fall
245: inside the major hysteresis loop that is found to coincide with the
246: curves of extremal solutions obtained from an initially empty lattice
247: (lower branch) and an initially filled lattice (upper branch). We suspect
248: that this picture corresponds to the situation encountered
249: in real disordered porous materials (a similar behavior
250:
251:
252:
253: \begin{figure}
254: \begin{center}
255: \epsfxsize= 200pt
256: \epsffile{fig3.ps}
257: \vspace{0.4cm}
258: \caption{Multiplicity of local mean-field solutions obtained from solving
259: Eq. (3) with many different initial conditions for each value of $\mu$:
260: (a) \( y=1.5 \) and \( T=0.8
261: \), (b) \( y=1 \) and \( T= 1\). The solid lines represent the
262: equilibrium curves obtained by connecting the states of lowest
263: grand potential.}
264: \end{center}
265: \end{figure}
266: has been observed for other disordered microstructures\cite{8}).
267:
268: The most significant finding of our study is that hysteresis
269: associated with capillary condensation in disordered porous media
270: occurs with as well as without an underlying equilibrium phase
271: transition, the existence of this latter depending on the strength of
272: the perturbation induced by the matrix. We have computed the
273: equilibrium properties of the model by means of the weighted
274: mean-field approach\cite{13}: at each $\mu$ and $T$, densities of
275: extensive quantities such as the fluid density $\rho_f$ are calculated
276: as Boltzmann weighted sums over the different solutions of the
277: mean-field equations (i.e., each solution $\alpha$ is weighted by $e^{-\beta
278: \Omega^{\alpha}}/\sum_{\alpha} e^{-\beta \Omega^{\alpha}}$). The average over the various
279: matrix realizations is taken afterwards. For a large matrix-fluid
280: interaction, e.g., for $y=1.5$, there is no equilibrium phase
281: transition: this is illustrated in Fig. 3a where the equilibrium
282: isotherm at $T=0.8$ is perfectly smooth (it stays so at lower
283: temperatures). On the other hand, for $y=0.5$, the system undergoes a
284: true thermodynamic transition at low $T$ as it becomes isomorphic to
285: the site-diluted Ising model\cite{9} ($\rho_m=0.25$ is above the percolation threshold). For
286: the intermediate value $y=1$, equilibrium isotherms may display steep
287: portions, as illustrated in Fig. 3b for $T=1$ (however, a finite-size
288: scaling analysis of the results for $L=8,12$ and $16$ seems to
289: indicate that this isotherm is still supercritical). The capillary
290: critical point certainly occurs at a \( T\) significantly below the
291: temperature \( T_{hyst} \) at which hysteresis first appears. This
292: result is at odds with the behavior predicted for a fluid confined in
293: a single pore\cite{2}\cite{3} and is a consequence of the quenched
294: disorder; on the other hand, the fact that true capillary criticality
295: may still occur in disordered porous media is at odds with the
296: prediction based on the independent-pore model\cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{7}
297: and results from the connectivity of the void space accessible to the
298: adsorbed fluid.
299:
300: \begin{figure}
301: \begin{center}
302: \epsfxsize= 240pt
303: \epsffile{fig4.ps}
304: \vspace{0.4cm}
305: \caption{Check of thermodynamic consistency (\( \left( \partial \Omega /\partial \mu
306: \right) _{T}=-N\rho _{f} \))\textbf{} along the adsorption (a),
307: desorption (b), and equilibrium (c) isotherms ($y=1.5$,
308: $T=0.8$). Filled symbols: average fluid density obtained from the
309: mean-field solutions. Open symbols: quantity obtained by
310: differentiating the corresponding grand potentials.}
311: \end{center}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: The breakdown of the simple van der Waals picture of metastability in
315: the present problem shows up distinctly when considering thermodynamic
316: consistency along the sorption isotherms. Since the theory provides
317: both the grand potential and the fluid density, one can study the
318: validity of the Gibbs adsorption equation,
319: \( \left( \partial \Omega /\partial \mu \right) _{T}=-N\rho_{f} \), along particular
320: isotherms. As shown in Fig. 4 a,b, the equation is not satisfied,
321: neither along the adsorption isotherm nor along the desorption one.
322: This results from the fact that the system often jumps from a given
323: grand potential minimum to another along these two isotherms and then
324: looses thermodynamic consistency. An important consequence is that
325: the thermodynamic integration procedure used for building equilibrium
326: phase diagrams\cite{2} is no longer valid for this model. For
327: instance, in the case \( y=1.5 \), this latter procedure predicts a
328: capillary phase diagram whereas, as already discussed, no equilibrium
329: phase transition takes place. We believe this may also be true more
330: generally for other models of fluids in disordered porous
331: materials. Note that the Gibbs adsorption equation is obeyed along the
332: equilibrium isotherm, as illustrated in Fig. 4c. (Interestingly, in
333: the cases studied here, the isotherm calculated from the weighted
334: mean-field approach is virtually indistinguishable from that obtained
335: by taking at each $\mu$ the solution with the lowest grand
336: potential.)
337:
338: As a final remark, we mention that the mean-field density functional
339: theory also predicts the occurrence of out-of-equilibrium phase
340: transitions. Similarly to the macroscopic avalanches observed in
341: low-\( T \) ferromagnetic materials\cite{10}, the adsorption and
342: desorption branches of the major hysteresis loop may display sharp
343: jumps. This is illustrated in Fig. 1 where one can see that the
344: desorption isotherm has a discontinuity at the lowest temperature
345: shown. Due to the asymmetry of the random chemical potentials exerted
346: by the matrix on the fluid, the jump always occurs at a higher \( T \)
347: in the desorption branch than in the adsorption branch. Whether or not
348: this out-of-equilibrium transition, with its associated critical
349: behavior\cite{10}, can be observed in capillary condensation of fluids
350: in real mesoporous materials depends on the efficiency of the
351: thermally activated processes.
352:
353: \begin{references}
354: \bibitem[*]{AAAuth} The Laboratoire de Physique Th{\'e}orique des Liquides is the UMR 7600 of the CNRS.
355: \bibitem{1}D. H. Everett, in \emph{The Solid Gas Interface},
356: E. A. Flood Ed. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1967), Vol. 2, p. 1055;
357: S. Gregg and K. Sing, \emph{Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity} (Academic, New York,
358: 1982); C. Burgess \emph{et al.}, Pure and Appl. Chem. \textbf{61},
359: 1845 (1989).
360: \bibitem{2}For a recent review, see L. Gelb \emph{et al.}, Rep. Prog. Phys. \textbf{62},
361: 1573 (1999).
362: \bibitem{3}R. Evans, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter \textbf{2}, 8989 (1990).
363: \bibitem{4}A. Wong and M. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{65}, 2567
364: (1990); A. Wong {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{70}, 954 (1993).
365: \bibitem{5}W. Machin, Langmuir \textbf{10}, 1235 (1994); M. Thommes
366: and G. Findenegg, Langmuir \textbf{10}, 4270 (1994); S. Gross \emph{et
367: al.}, preprint (2000).
368: \bibitem{6}E. Pitard \emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{74}, 4361 (1995); E. Kierlik
369: \emph{et al.}, Mol. Phys. \textbf{95}, 341 (1998).
370: \bibitem{7}P.C. Ball and R. Evans, Langmuir \textbf{5}, 714 (1989).
371: \bibitem{8}L. Sarkisov and P. Monson (in preparation).
372: \bibitem{9} The system has an overall symmetry w.r.t. \( y=1/2 \):
373: this case corresponds to the site-diluted Ising model\cite{6}.
374: \bibitem{10}J. P. Sethna \emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{70},
375: 3347 (1993); O. Dahmen and J. P. Sethna , Phys. Rev. \textbf{B 53},
376: 14872 (1996), and references therein; E. Vives {\it et al.},
377: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{72}, 1694 (1994).
378: \bibitem{11}R. A. Guyer and K. R. McKall, Phys. Rev. \textbf{B 54}, 18
379: (1996)
380: \bibitem{12} M. P. Lilly
381: \emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{71}, 4186 (1993); M. P. Lilly \emph{et
382: al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{77}, 4222 (1996).
383: \bibitem{13} D. Lancaster {\it et al.}, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., {\bf
384: 28}, 3959 (1995).
385:
386: \end{references}
387:
388: \end{document}
389: