1: \documentstyle[multicol,aps,epsf,here]{revtex}

2: \tighten

3: \newcommand{\PostScript}[7]{

4: \begin{figure}[H]

5: \begin{center}

6: \leavevmode

7: \epsfysize=#1cm

8: \vspace{#2cm}

9: \epsfbox{#3}

10: \par

11: \parbox{#5cm}{

12: \vspace{#4cm}

13: \caption[figure]{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1} \small \normalsize #6}

14: \label{#7}}

15: \end{center}

16: \end{figure}

17: }

18: 

19: \begin{document}

20: 

21: \newcommand{\half}{\frac {1}{2} }

22: \newcommand{\eg}{{\em e.g.} }

23: \newcommand{\ie}{{\em i.e.} }

24: \newcommand{\etc}{{\em etc.}}

25: \newcommand{\si}{\simeq}

26: \newcommand{\etal}{{\em et al.\ }}

27: \newcommand{\cf}{{\em cf. }}

28: 

29: \newcommand{\dd}[2]{{\rmd{#1}\over\rmd{#2}}}

30: \newcommand{\pdd}[2]{{\partial{#1}\over\partial{#2}}}

31: \newcommand{\pa}[1]{\partial_{#1}}

32: \newcommand{\pref}[1]{(\ref{#1})}

33: 

34: \newcommand {\be}[1]{

35: %%      For draft    %%%%%%%%

36: %{\marginpar{{\scriptsize\ \\ \ #1}}}

37:       \begin{eqnarray} \mbox{$\label{#1}$}}

38: 

39: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}

40: 

41: \def\rdown{\rho_{\downarrow}}

42: \def\pa{\partial}

43: \def\th{\theta}

44: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

45: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

46: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

47: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

48: \def\pa{\partial}

49: \def\eps{\epsilon}

50: \def\th{\theta}

51: \def\na{\nabla}

52: \def\nn{\nonumber}

53: \def\lan{\langle}

54: \def\ran{\rangle}

55: \def\pr{\prime}

56: \def\rarrow{\rightarrow}

57: \def\larrow{\leftarrow}

58: 

59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

60: %\vspace* {-21 mm}

61: %\begin{flushright}

62: %  NORDITA-2000/XX CM \\

63: %  April-2000 \\

64: %\end{flushright}

65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

66: 

67: \title{Scattering phase shifts in quasi-one-dimension}

68: \vskip 20 mm

69: \author{P. Singha Deo and Swarnali Bandopadhyay}

70: \address{S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences,

71:          J.D.Block, Sector III, Salt Lake City, Calcutta 700098, India}

72: \author{Sourin Das}

73: \address{Harish Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhusi,

74:      Allahabad 211019, India }

75: \date{\today}

76: 

77: \maketitle

78: 

79: \begin{abstract}

80: 

81: Scattering of an electron in quasi-one dimensional quantum wires have many

82: unusual features, not found in one, two or three dimensions. In this work

83: we analyze the scattering phase shifts due to

84: an impurity in a multi-channel quantum wire

85: with special emphasis on negative slopes in the scattering phase shift

86: versus incident energy curves and the Wigner delay time.

87: Although at first sight, the large number

88: of scattering matrix elements show phase shifts of different character and

89: nature, it is possible to see some pattern and understand these features.

90: The behavior of scattering phase shifts in one-dimension can be seen as a

91: special case of these features observed in quasi-one-dimensions.

92: The negative slopes can occur at any arbitrary energy and

93: Friedel sum rule is completely violated in

94: quasi-one-dimension at any arbitrary energy and any arbitrary regime.

95: This is in contrast to one, two or

96: three dimensions where such negative slopes and violation of

97: Friedel sum rule happen only at low energy where

98: the incident electron feels the potential very strongly (i.e.,

99: there is a very well defined regime, the WKB regime, where

100: FSR works very well).

101: There are some novel

102: behavior of scattering phase shifts at the critical energies where

103: $S$-matrix changes dimension.\\

104: 

105: \hfill\\

106: PACS: 73.23.-b, 72.10.-d, 72.10.Bg

107: \end{abstract}

108: \begin{multicols}{2}

109: 

110: \narrowtext

111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

112: \section{Introduction}

113: \label{s1}

114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

115: 

116: Elastic scattering in one, two and three dimensions is well understood

117: \cite{new82}. In a scattering process there are some important physical

118: quantities like scattering amplitude and scattering phase shift. While the

119: scattering intensity is directly related to the scattering amplitude, the

120: scattering phase shifts are also very important physical quantities and

121: the Friedel-sum-rule (FSR) relates them to the density of states (DOS).

122: 

123: %%%

124: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig1.ps}{0.5}{14}{

125: \hspace{-.5cm}

126: A rectangular quantum biliard or quantum dot, weakly coupled to leads.

127: The dotted line is along the x-axis and the dashed line is along

128: the y-axis.

129: }{f2}

130: %%%

131: 

132: At low temperatures, inelastic collisions are greatly suppressed.  As a

133: result the phase coherence length of an electron can become a few microns.

134: Mesoscopic systems are defined as systems in which the phase coherence

135: length exceeds the sample size. In such a system elastic scattering is the

136: dominant feature and such mesoscopic samples can be understood as phase

137: coherent elastic scatterers.  With the experimental realizations of

138: mesoscopic systems and their possibility of being applied in

139: nano-technology and quantum computing, understanding scattering effects in

140: quasi-one dimensions (Q1D) has also become important at present. This is

141: also essential because the Landauer conductance formula relates the

142: conductance to partial scattering intensities and also one can now probe

143: scattering phase shift directly in an experiment \cite{yac95,sch97,CER97}.

144: Mesoscopic samples are normally made up of metals or semiconductors, and

145: the defects in them are generally point defects. Hence we will restrict

146: our analysis to delta function potential impurities.

147: 

148: Recently a new kind of scattering phase shift was discussed in Q1D, in

149: connection with the violation of the parity effect \cite{deo96}. To

150: explain this phase shift and the violation of parity effect, here we

151: elaborate some portions of Ref. \cite{deo96} and explain what are symmetry

152: dictated nodes (SDN) and non-symmetry dictated nodes (NSDN) that can arise

153: in a Q1D system. For example let us consider a rectangular quantum

154: biliard or dot connected to leads by quantum mechanical tunneling as

155: shown in Fig.1.  The system has reflection symmetry across the x-axis as

156: well as the y-axis. Also the x-y components separate and spanning nodes

157: (nodes that span across the direction of propagation and shown by dashed

158: line in Fig.1) as well as non-spanning nodes (shown by dotted line in

159: Fig.1)  develop in the geometry, dictated by the reflection symmetries.

160: There are various symmetries that give rise to nodes in the wave-function

161: and we call them SDN (for example the antisymmetric property of the many

162: body wave function result in nodes). But if quantum coherence extends to

163: some distance inside the leads then one can model the phase coherent

164: quantum dot as shown in Fig.2.

165: 

166: %%%

167: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig2.ps}{0.5}{14}{

168: \hspace{-.5cm}

169: A more realistic model of the quantum dot of Fig.1.

170: }{f2}

171: %%%

172: 

173: %%%

174: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig3.ps}{0.5}{14}{

175: \hspace{-.5cm}

176: Two one dimensional quantum wires of equal lengths, AB and CD, shown by solid lines,

177: placed along x and y directions, respectively. The origin (x=0, y=0) is

178: at the mid-point of AB. (a) CD is not connected to AB. (b) CD is connected

179: to AB.

180: }{f2}

181: %%%

182: 

183: Note that in this case also reflection-symmetry holds in the x-direction

184: as well as in the y-direction, but x-y components do not separate. So by

185: tuning the boundary condition in y-direction by a gate voltage one can

186: develop nodes that try to develop across y-direction but also act across

187: x-direction and change the phase of the wave function in x-direction by

188: $\pi$.  We call them NSDN because they do not originate due to the

189: symmetry of the Hamiltonian. There are many configurations of such NSDN

190: \cite{comment}, the simplest one was discussed for the stub geometry

191: (shown in Fig.3) in ref.  \cite{deo96}.

192: 

193: Consider for example two finite one dimensional quantum wires of equal

194: length, AB and CD placed perpendicular to each other as shown in Fig.3 by

195: the solid lines.  When CD is completely detached from AB as shown in

196: Fig.3(a), then the quantum mechanical wave function in AB and CD in the

197: ground state is shown by the dotted lines. They are basically the ground

198: state wave function in an infinite potential well in one dimension (1D).

199: As is known to us, the ground state wave functions are by symmetry, even

200: parity states without any nodes, except at the boundary. But when CD is

201: attached to AB to give a T-shaped stub structure as shown in Fig.3(b),

202: then CD forms a node at C, which is also the midpoint of AB. The wave

203: function in this case is again shown by dotted lines and the wave function

204: between A and B is no longer an even parity state but an odd parity state.

205: The node at C between A and B does not originate from the symmetry of the

206: Hamiltonian and is not a symmetry dictated node (SDN). It is rather forced

207: by the boundary condition in the y-direction and is a NSDN. An

208: infinitesimal change in the length CD makes this node disappear and then

209: we have no node between A and B.  The node at C induces a phase change by

210: $\pi$ and when we join A and B together to form a ring-stub system, we

211: also get persistent currents without parity effect, as parity of the

212: persistent currents is sensitive to the number of nodes in the wave

213: function \cite{leg91}.

214: 

215: Fano resonances \cite{fan} are a very general feature of Q1D

216: \cite{bag90,tek93,deo98} systems in the presence of defects and the Fano

217: resonances are characterized by a zero-pole pair of the transmission

218: amplitude in the complex energy plane. When semi infinite leads are

219: attached to A and B in Fig.3(b)  then the transmission amplitude of the

220: stub structure also has zero-pole pair and one gets Fano resonances

221: \cite{tek93}. At the energy corresponding to the pole a charge gets

222: trapped by the scatterer and there is also an energy when there is a zero

223: transmission across the scatterer.  At the energy corresponding to the

224: zero, scattering phase shift discontinuously changes by $\pi$ due to the

225: NSDN \cite{deo96}.

226: 

227: It seems at present that this phase due to NSDN is necessary to understand

228: the experimental results of Refs. \cite{yac95,sch97,CER97}. Initial

229: analysis of the experiments in terms of Friedel-sum-rule\cite{yey95}

230: revealed the shortcomings of applying Friedel-sum-rule to the quantum dot.

231: The phase change due to NSDN can explain the experimental data was first

232: proposed in Ref.\cite{jay96} and later discussed in

233: Refs.\cite{deo98,cho98,xu98,lee99,tan99,yeycm}.

234: 

235: The Friedel-sum-rule (FSR) can be stated as \cite{fri52}

236: \begin{equation}

237: \th (E_{2})-\th (E_{1}) \approx \pi N(E_{2},E_{1}) .

238: \end{equation}

239: In 1D, 2D and 3D, the equality is known to be approximate,

240: and is almost exact in the WKB regime where generally transport

241: occurs.

242: Here \hspace{.1cm} $N(E_{2},E_{1})$ is the variation

243: in the number of states

244: in the energy interval $[E_{1},E_{2}]$ due to the

245: scatterer and \cite{lan61}

246: \be

247: \th  = \frac{1}{2} \sum \xi_{i} = \frac{1}{2i}

248: ln (det [S] ) ,

249: \ee

250: $S$ being an n$\times$n scattering matrix and $e^{i\xi_{i}}$,

251: i=1,2,....n are

252: the n eigenvalues of the unitary matrix $S$.

253: In differential form the FSR can also be stated as

254: \begin{equation}

255: \frac{\pa \th }{\pa E} = \frac{1}{2i} \frac{\pa}{\pa E} ln (det [S] )

256: \approx \pi (\rho(E) - \rho_0(E))  ,

257: \end{equation}

258: 

259: \noindent where $(\rho(E) - \rho_0(E))$ is the variation of the DOS or the

260: difference in the DOS due to the presence of the potential. $\rho(E)$ and

261: $\rho_0(E)$ can be found by integrating the local DOS $\rho(x, y, z, E)$

262: and $\rho_0(x, y, z, E))$ which are related to the electron probability.

263: However, if FSR is to be useful in mesoscopic systems where scattering

264: phase shifts can be accurately measured, and where we are always

265: interested to study a finite region of space, then we must see to what

266: extent it can give the local DOS. In fact in 1D, 2D or 3D it does so

267: extremely well and so we ask the question that how good it is in Q1D. We

268: shall show that in Q1D, FSR will fail to give the local DOS as well as the

269: global DOS at all energy regimes.

270: 

271: For a symmetric scatterer in a strictly 1D system when transmission and

272: reflection amplitudes are denoted by $t$ and $r$, respectively,

273:  \[ S = \left(\begin{array}{cc}

274: \displaystyle r & \displaystyle t \\

275: \displaystyle t & \displaystyle r

276: \end{array}\right) .\]

277: In this case, one can show \cite{tan99}

278: \be

279: \frac{\pa \th }{\pa E} = \frac{\pa arg(t)}{\pa E}  ,

280: \ee

281: which means sum of the phases of the eigen values of S

282: is equal to the phase of some particular matrix element of S.

283: 

284: But now we know that in systems that are not strictly 1D, one can have

285: zero-pole pairs and then Eq.(4) is not valid because of the $\pi$ phase

286: shifts induced by NSDN. Note that for the system in Fig.3(b), although the

287: scattering matrix is $2\times 2$, the point C is connected to 3 directions

288: and is hence a Q1D system. A quantum wire with a finite width and only one

289: propagating channel \cite{deo98} also is a Q1D system with a $2 \times 2$

290: scattering matrix. For such systems, that are not strictly one dimensional

291: but has a $2\times 2$ scattering matrix

292:  \bea

293: \frac{\pa \th }{\pa E} \ne \frac{\pa arg(t)}{\pa E} \\

294: \mbox{but} \hspace{1cm} \frac{\pa \th }{\pa E} \approx \pi (\rho (E)

295: - \rho_0 (E)) ,

296:  \eea

297:  i.e., when we go from 1D (with 2x2 S matrix)  to Q1D (also with 2x2 S

298: matrix) then Eq. (3) holds but Eq. (4) does not hold.  This analysis was

299: presented by Lee \cite{lee99} and by B{\"u}ttiker and

300: Taniguchi\cite{tan99}. Their analysis is restricted to the system in

301: Fig.3(b) and $S$-matrices that are 2$\times$2.  Eq.(3) is not violated in

302: the presence of NSDN and $\pi$ phase slips because $det[S]=r^2-t^2$ and if

303: $arg(t)$ changes by $\pi$ then $[arg(t^2)]$ changes by $2\pi$ or $0$ and

304: hence $det[S]$ is unaffected by the $\pi$ phase slips. Thus for such a

305: single propagating channel this phase shift is well understood by now.  It

306: has been emphasized that the multi-channel case also needs to be studied

307: \cite{yeycm}, specially since scattering phase shifts can now be probed

308: experimentally in the single channel case \cite{yac95,sch97} as well as in

309: the multi-channel case \cite{CER97}, but no such study has been reported

310: so far.

311: 

312: In particular, the FSR is very important in condensed matter Physics,

313: because from the scattering phase shift (that can be determined

314: experimentally) one can know the local DOS inside a disordered sample

315: without knowing its internal details.  Even theoretically, except in very

316: simple situations, the wave function inside the scatterer has infinite

317: degrees of freedom and exact calculation of local DOS from the exact wave

318: function inside the scatterer may be non-trivial. While a good estimate of

319: local DOS from the S-matrix, which is on its own a very useful quantity,

320: can greatly reduce the complexities.  In this work we will study the $n$

321: channel scattering problem in a Q1D quantum wire, with special emphasis on

322: FSR and Wigner delay time \cite{smi59,kumar}.  Refs. \cite{lee99} and

323: \cite{tan99} parameterize the $S$-matrix in a particular way (there are in

324: fact many different ways of parameterizing the $S$-matrix ) in which the

325: scattering matrix elements become independent of energy. We will show that

326: this energy dependence, that are not important in 1D play a very crucial

327: role in Q1D multi-channel scattering. Hence in section II we will

328: generalize the work of Refs.\cite{lee99} and \cite{tan99} for real energy

329: dependent 2$\times$2 scattering matrices. The $n$ channel case will be

330: analyzed in section III and IV. In section V we will show some novel phase

331: shifts at critical energies where $S$ matrix changes dimensions. Section

332: VI is devoted to conclusions.

333: 

334: 

335: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

336: \section{Scattering in one-dimension and negative values of $d \th /dE$}

337: \label{s2}

338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

339: 

340: In Fig.4 we consider a potential that is described in details in the

341: figure caption. The quantum mechanical wave function or the solution to

342: the Schr{\"o}dinger equation in different regions is also shown and

343: explained in the figure and its caption. We will always normalize the

344: incoming wave-function such that its amplitude is 1. Griffiths boundary

345: conditions for this system gives the following equations \cite{gri,deo93}

346: (we use $2m=1$ and $\hbar=1$).

347: \begin{equation}

348: 1 + r = a + b ,

349: \end{equation}

350: \begin{equation}

351: a e^{ikl} + b e^{-ikl} = t ,

352: \end{equation}

353: \begin{equation}

354: ik(1-r) - ik(a-b) = - V (1 + r)\hspace{.5cm}\mbox{and}

355: \end{equation}

356: \begin{equation}

357: ik(a e^{ikl} - b e^{-ikl}) -ikt = - V(a e^{ikl} + b

358: e^{-ikl}) .

359: \end{equation}

360: %%%

361: \PostScript{6}{0.5}{fig4.eps}{0.5}{14}{

362: \hspace{-.5cm}

363:   Two identical delta function potentials separated by a length $l$.

364: Strength of each potential is $V$. The thick vertical lines denote the

365: positions of the potentials and the thin horizontal line is the direction

366: of propagation.  A plane wave of unit amplitude is incident from the left

367: and wave function in different regions (marked as I, II and III) is

368: written down in the figure. $r$ and $t$ are the reflection and

369: transmission amplitudes, respectively, of the entire system and $ k=\sqrt

370: {E} $ is the incident wave vector.

371: The origin of coordinates is shown in the figure.

372: }{f1}

373: %%%

374:  \noindent We will first analyze this system in detail and generalize the

375: results of Refs. \cite{lee99,tan99} further by considering realistic

376: energy dependent $r$ and $t$, that will later help us to accentuate the

377: new features that can be observed in a multi-channel disordered quantum

378: wire.

379: 

380: First of all let us calculate the local DOS and

381: global DOS to see how much it agrees

382: with $d \theta /dE$. Although the basic facts

383: discussed in this section is known in the Greens

384: function formalism, to the best

385: of our knowledge, quantitative disagreement (or agreement)

386: has not been shown so far.  

387: Using

388: quantum mechanical expression for the local DOS integrated over the region

389: II in Fig.~4, i.e.,

390:  $$ \rho_R = {2 \over hv} \int ^l_0 \mid a e^{ikx} + b

391: e^{-ikx} \mid ^2 dx, $$

392:  it is easy to show from Eq. 3 that (the Eq. below

393: is consistent with Ref. \cite{tan99} and some hints on its derivation

394: is given in Ref \cite{com})

395:  \be

396: {d \theta \over d (kl)} \approx {

397: \bar \rho } + {\rho _q \over l} = \rho '\hspace{.5cm} \mbox{(say)},

398: \ee

399: \be

400: \mbox{where}\hspace{.5cm} { \bar \rho } = \mid a \mid ^{2} + \mid b

401: \mid ^{2} \hspace{.1cm}\mbox{and}

402: \ee

403: \be \rho_{q} = \int ^{l}_{0}

404: \left(ab^* e^{2ikx} +ba^* e^{-2ikx} \right) dx .

405: \ee

406:  Here $\frac{\rho_{q}}{l}$ is a term that arises because of quantum

407: mechanical interference and it can be seen that the integrand in Eq.(13)

408: oscillates with $x$. For $|\frac{E}{V}|>1$ (this is the WKB regime

409: when the electron does not feel the potential strongly and is

410: almost entirely transmitted) $\frac{\rho_{q}} {l}$ is

411: negligibly small. This is shown in Fig.5, where we plot $\rho^{'}$ (the

412: dashed curve) and ${\bar \rho }$ (the dotted curve). The two curves are

413: almost the same for $|{E \over V}|>1$, which means ${\rho_q \over l}$,

414: being the difference between the dashed and dotted curves is vanishingly

415: small above this energy.  It is known that to get the equality between the

416: LHS and RHS of Eq. 11, it is necessary to drop the term ${\rho_q \over

417: l}$ \cite{gas}.  

418: It is also known that this deviation arises because we are

419: considering the local DOS rather than the global DOS.

420: If we consider the global DOS, i.e.,

421: $$\rho(E)={2 \over hv} \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx$$

422: where $\psi(x)$ is the quantum mechanical wavefunction at x,

423: then instead of Eq. (11) we get

424: $${d \theta \over d(kl)} \approx

425: Lt_{l \rightarrow \infty} (|a|^2 + |b|^2).$$

426: The equality is still approximate although almost exact in the WKB

427: regime because the RHS is positive definite, while it is well known

428: that the LHS can become negative at low energy (non-WKB regime)

429: as will be demonstrated below.

430: To get the equality it is

431: necessary to neglect something else as we shall soon see.  This second thing

432: that we shall drop is however not due to the fact that we are considering

433: the local DOS. It is an inherent approximation of the FSR even when we are

434: considering the global DOS and hence also when we are considering the

435: local DOS.  The $\rho_q/l$ term or the interference term inside the

436: scatterer does not arise in the case when $l \rightarrow 0$ as in the case

437: to be considered in section IV.  All the deviation to be observed there is

438: due to this inherent weakness of the FSR. We shall also see below that

439: this inherent weakness of the FSR is negligible in 1D, 2D or 3D but

440: becomes very formidable in quasi 1D.

441: 

442: %%%

443: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig5.ps}{0.5}{14}{

444: \hspace{-.75cm}

445:  The system under consideration is shown in Fig.4. The solid curve gives

446: the exact $d \theta/d(kl)$, the dashed curve gives the $\rho^{'}$ and the

447: dotted curve gives ${\bar \rho}$.  This plot is done for $Vl^2=-5,\hbar=1,

448: 2m=1$.

449:  }{f2}

450: %%%

451: 

452: %%%

453: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig6.ps}{0.5}{14}{

454: \hspace{-.5cm}

455:  The system under consideration is shown in Fig.4.  The plot is of $d

456: \theta/d(kl)$ versus $kl$ for the system for different values of $Vl^2$.

457: The dotted curve is for $Vl^2=-2 $, the dashed curve is for $Vl^2=-2.1$,

458: the solid curve is for $Vl^2=-5$, the long dashed curve for $Vl^2=-8$. We

459: use $\hbar=1, 2m=1$.

460:  }{f2}

461: %%%

462:  One can prove that \[{ \bar \rho } = \mid a \mid^{2} + \mid b \mid^{2} =

463: \frac{1-\mid r^{'}\mid^{4}}{\mid 1-{r^{'}}^{2}\tau^{2}\mid^{2}} ,\] for

464: any energy dependent reflection amplitude $r^{'}$ of one of the two

465: identical scatterers in Fig.4, where, $\tau=e^{ikl}$.

466: Hence as indicated by Eq. 11, it would be

467: interesting if we can obtain a good estimate of ${\bar \rho}$ or $\rho'$

468: from $\th$.  In the appendix I it is explained that if $\frac{d

469: r'}{dE}=\frac{d t'}{dE} \rightarrow 0$ (which means the

470: scatterers are non-dispersive and that

471: only happens at high

472: energy in 1D, 2D and 3D)  then, $\frac{d \theta}{d (kl)}$ reduces to the

473: expression $\frac{1-\mid r^{'}\mid^{4}}{\mid

474: 1-{r^{'}}^{2}\tau^{2}\mid^{2}}$, and then therefore, ${d \th \over d(kl)}

475: = {\bar \rho}$. It is shown in section III of Ref. \cite{yeycm} (see Eq. 6

476: and 7 therein), that to relate ${d \theta \over dE}$ to the global DOS, one

477: has to neglect the energy dependence of the self energy, that depends on

478: the coupling of the system to the leads, i.e., $r'$ and $t'$. Thus our

479: results are consistent with that. The exact

480: $\frac{d\th}{d(kl)}$ is shown in Fig.5 by the solid curve.  Note that in

481: the relevant energy regime ($|\frac{E}{V}|>1$),

482: the solid curve is very close to the dashed and dotted curves,

483: which means FSR works very well for the local DOS

484: as well as for the global DOS. But for

485: $|\frac{E}{V}|<1$, $\frac{d\th}{d(kl)}$ deviates from ${\bar \rho}$.  But

486: since transport effects in weak localization or diffusive or ballistic

487: regime occur at Fermi energies, that is normally higher in semiconductors

488: as well as metals in comparison to the energy where the two curves deviate

489: substantially from each other, Friedel sum rule is often useful in

490: condensed matter to obtain a good estimate of local DOS as well as global

491: DOS.

492: 

493: $d \th / dE$ is also well known as Wigner delay time \cite{smi59,kumar}.

494: In the stationary phase approximation, it gives the time spent by the

495: scattered particle at the impurity site.  In the low energy regime, where

496: dispersion becomes significant, the stationary phase approximation is

497: not valid and $d \th /dE$ can become negative and does not give a

498: meaningful particle

499: delay time.  In this regime $d \th / dE$ becomes negative as

500: the phase velocity becomes larger than the group velocity and even larger

501: than the velocity of light, and although such super-luminous particles can

502: be detected experimentally they cannot carry any signal or information.  In

503: Fig.6 we show the negative behavior of $d \theta/d(kl)$.  We find that as

504: the strength of the impurities is varied, $d \theta /d(kl)$ can become

505: more or less negative (see Fig.6), maximizing at $Vl^2=-2.1$ for the

506: symmetric delta potentials. The energy

507: regime, where $d \theta /d(kl)$ can be negative remains the same for all

508: $V$ and always $|\frac{E}{V}|<1$. We have checked for all these values of

509: $V$ that apart from this insignificant energy range, FSR works very well.

510: FSR has a close counterpart in quantum mechanics called Levinson's

511: theorem.  It is known that Levinson's theorem also breaks down in the

512: presence of zero energy bound states \cite{new82} that can be degenerate

513: with scattering states.

514: 

515: 

516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

517: \section{ Wigner delay time in quasi-one-dimensions}

518: \label{s3}

519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

520: 

521: %%%

522: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig7.ps}{0.5}{14}{

523: \hspace{-.5cm}

524:  Here we show a quantum wire of width $W$. The dash-dotted curve is a line

525: through the middle of the quantum wire, and it is also taken to be the

526: x-axis. The origin of the coordinates is shown in the figure. A delta

527: function potential $V(x,y)=\gamma \delta(x)  \delta(y-y_{i})$ is situated

528: at $x=0$ and $y=y_{i}$ and marked as $\times$. We consider scattering

529: effects when the incident electron is from the left. The sub-bands on the

530: left of the impurity is denoted as 1 for the first mode (i.e., its wave

531: function can be obtained by putting $n$=1 in Eq.(14) with appropriate sign

532: for $k_n$) and 2 for the second mode (i.e., its wave function can be

533: obtained by putting $n$=2 in Eq.(14)  with appropriate sign for $k_n$).

534: Similarly the sub-bands on the right of the impurity is denoted as 3 for

535: the first mode (i.e., its wave function can be obtained by putting $n$=1

536: in Eq.(14) with appropriate sign for $k_n$)  and 4 for the second mode

537: (i.e., its wave function can be obtained by putting $n$=2 in Eq.(14) with

538: appropriate sign for $k_n$).  The impurity at $\times$ mixes these wave

539: functions to give a scattering matrix element $t'_{mn}$ from mode $m$ to

540: mode $n$.

541:  }{f2}

542: %%%

543: 

544: In Fig.7 we consider a quasi-one-dimensional quantum wire with an

545: attractive impurity at (0, $y_i$), having electrons confined along the

546: y-direction but free to move along the x-direction.  While the states far

547: away from the impurity are good momentum states, the impurity can mix the

548: different modes and in this region of mode mixing, the wave function is

549: $\psi (x,y)= \Sigma_n c_n(x) \chi_n(y)$, where $\chi_n(y)$ are the

550: transverse wave functions in the absence of the impurity and $c_n(x)$ are

551: position dependent coefficients that has to be determined by mode

552: matching. The confining potential in the y-direction or the transverse

553: direction is taken to be hard wall. Thus the transverse wave-function is

554: of the form $\chi_n(y)=Sin \frac{n\pi}{W}(y+\frac{W}{2})$.  For a given

555: width $W$ of the quantum wire one can choose the energy range of the

556: incident electron such that only two modes are propagating, although, all

557: the other modes (infinite in number, showing that the internal wave

558: function can have infinite degrees of freedom, which makes it difficult to

559: calculate the exact local

560: DOS from the internal wave function) will be present

561: but as evanescent modes.  For example, if the energy of the electron be

562: $E$ then for propagation in the n-th transverse mode (in short we will

563: refer this as n-th mode) the wave-function is of the form

564: \be

565: Sin \frac{n\pi}{W}(y+\frac{W}{2})\hspace{.2cm}e^{ik_{n}x}

566: \ee

567: where  $k_{n}= \sqrt{E-E_n}$, $E_n$ being

568: $\frac{n^2\pi^2}{W^2}$ \hspace{.2cm} and \hspace{.2cm} $n=1,2,3,

569: \cdots$ $\infty $. Here we have used $\hbar=2m=1$.

570: To have the n-th mode to be propagating it is necessary that

571: $k_{n}^2 > 0 $ or

572: \be

573: n < \frac{W}{\pi} \sqrt{E}.

574: \ee Thus we can choose the energy range where there

575: will be two propagating modes, i.e., $n=1$ and $n=2$ satisfy condition (15).

576: The rest of the modes ($n>\frac{W}{\pi}\sqrt{E}$) will be evanescent, whose

577: wave functions are of the form

578: \be

579: Sin \frac{n\pi}{W}(y+\frac{W}{2})\hspace{.2cm}e^{- \kappa_{n}x} ,

580: \ee

581: where $\kappa_n=\sqrt{E_n-E}$. These evanescent modes just renormalize the

582: scattering matrix elements and drop out of the problem.

583: The transmission amplitude from m-th incident mode to n-th

584: scattered mode is given by \cite{bag90}

585: \bea

586: t_{mn}^{'}  =

587: -\frac{i\Gamma_{mn}}{2d\sqrt{k_{m}k_{n}}},\\

588: \mbox{where} \hspace{.5cm} d = 1+\sum ^{e}\frac{\Gamma_{nn}}{2\kappa_{n}}+

589: i\sum ^{p}\frac{\Gamma_{nn}}{2k_{n}}.

590: \eea

591: Here $\sum ^{e}$ denotes the sum over all evanescent modes and $\sum ^{p}$

592: denotes the sum over all propagating modes. Eq.(17)  holds only for

593: inter-subband transmission amplitudes and all reflection amplitudes.  When

594: we say reflection amplitude we mean the following. For an electron

595: incident from the left, all outgoing channels to the left are reflection

596: channels.  According to this convention $t_{11}^{'}$, $t_{22}^{'}$,

597: $t_{21}^{'}$ and $t_{12}^{'}$ are reflection amplitudes. Inter-subband

598: transmission amplitude are then obviously $t_{14}^{'}$ and $t_{23}^{'}$.

599: The intra-subband transmission amplitudes $t_{13}^{'}$ and $t_{24}^{'}$

600: (according to numbering of channels explained in Fig.7) are given by

601: \be

602: t_{13}^{'} = 1+t_{11}^{'}

603:  \hspace{.5cm}\mbox{and}\hspace{.5cm}

604:  t_{24}^{'} = 1+t_{22}^{'}.

605: \ee

606: Here $ \Gamma_{nm} $ is the strength of coupling between the n-th mode and

607: the m-th mode. If we take the impurity to be a delta function potential

608: i.e., $V(x,y)= \gamma \delta(x) \delta(y-y_i)$, and the confining

609: potential in the y-direction to be hard wall ($V=\infty$ for

610: $-\frac{W}{2}\ge y\ge \frac{W}{2}$, and $0$ everywhere else except the

611: impurity site $\times$ ) (see Fig.7) then

612: \[  \Gamma_{nm} = \gamma Sin \frac{n \pi}{W}(y_{i}+\frac{W}

613: {2})

614: Sin \frac{m \pi}{W}(y_{i}+\frac{W}{2}). \]

615: 

616: Apart from the two propagating modes we consider two evanescent modes and

617: truncate the infinite series of evanescent modes (note that although the

618: series is strongly converging, the reason for truncating is different,

619: stronger and explained in more detail after Fig. 12) in Eq. (18) and so

620: Eq. (18) becomes \\

621: \be

622: 1+ \frac{\Gamma_{33}}{2\kappa_{3}}+\frac{\Gamma_{44}}{2\kappa_{4}}

623: +i\left( \frac{\Gamma_{11}}{2k_{1}}+\frac{\Gamma_{22}}{2k_{2}}\right)=d_2

624: \hspace{.2cm} \mbox{(say)}.

625: \ee

626: The lowest evanescent mode (putting $n$=3 in Eq.  (16) gives its wave

627: function)  has even parity in the transverse direction. For a negative

628: impurity potential $i.e.$, $\gamma < 0$, it also has a bound state at

629: $E=E_{3b}$, where $E_{3b}$ is given by the solution of

630: \be

631: 1+\frac{\Gamma_{33}}{2\kappa_{3}}+\frac{\Gamma_{44}}{2\kappa_{4}}=0.

632: \ee

633: Since $E_{3b}<{9 \pi^2 \over W^2}$, $E_{3b}$ can be degenerate with

634: scattering states (the $n$=1 and $n$=2 modes are the scattering states).

635: The higher evanescent mode (putting $n$=4 in Eq. (16) gives its wave

636: function) has odd parity in the transverse direction and this too has a

637: bound state at $E=E_{4b}$, where $E_{4b}$ is given by the solution of \be

638: 1+ \frac{\Gamma_{44}}{2\kappa_{4}}=0.  \ee Once again depending on

639: $\gamma$, $E_{4b}$ can be degenerate with the scattering states.  The

640: effect of including more evanescent modes is just to renormalize the

641: strength of the impurity potential and does not give anything new

642: \cite{bag90}.

643: 

644: The scattering matrix in this case is

645: \be

646: S = \left[ \begin{array}{llcl}

647: t_{11}^{'} & t_{12}^{'} & t_{13}^{'} & t_{14}^{'} \\

648: t_{21}^{'} & t_{22}^{'} & t_{23}^{'} & t_{24}^{'} \\

649: t_{31}^{'} & t_{32}^{'} & t_{33}^{'} & t_{34}^{'} \\

650: t_{41}^{'} & t_{42}^{'} & t_{43}^{'} & t_{44}^{'}

651: \end{array} \right]

652: =

653: \left[ \begin{array}{cc}

654: r_{2c} & t_{2c} \\

655: \hat{t}_{2c} & \hat{r}_{2c}

656: \end{array} \right] ,

657: \ee

658: \[ \mbox{where}\hspace{.5cm} r_{2c} =

659: \left[ \begin{array}{cc}

660: t_{11}^{'} & t_{12}^{'} \\

661: t_{21}^{'} & t_{22}^{'}

662: \end{array} \right]

663: \]

664: \[\mbox{and} \hspace{.5cm} t_{2c} =

665: \left[ \begin{array}{cc}

666: t_{13}^{'} & t_{14}^{'} \\

667: t_{23}^{'} & t_{24}^{'}

668: \end{array} \right] .

669: \]

670: $\hat{t}_{2c} = t_{2c}$ due to time reversal symmetry and $\hat{r}_{2c} =

671: r_{2c}$ for a symmetric scatterer as that considered here.  Now once again

672: due to micro-reversebility $t_{12}^{'} = t_{21}^{'}$. Also $t_{12}^{'} =

673: t_{14}^{'}$ because in both $t_{12}^{'}$ and $t_{14}^{'}$ the density of

674: states in the input as well as the output channel is the same, and also

675: the incident channel momenta and the outgoing channel momenta are the same

676: in the transverse as well as in the propagating direction.  Also

677: $t_{23}^{'} = t_{41}^{'}$ because transmission amplitude should be

678: independent of the position of the observer i.e., whether the observer is

679: looking into the plane of the paper or out of the plane of the paper. Thus

680: among the 16 matrix elements in Eq. (23) we are left with only 5 that are

681: distinct. They are $t_{11}^{'},t_{12}^{'},t_{22}^{'},t_{13}^{'}$ and

682: $t_{24}^{'}$.\\ From Eq. (17) and (19),

683: \bea

684: t_{11}^{'}  = -\frac{i\Gamma_{11}}{2d_2k_{1}},\\

685:  t_{12}^{'}  = -\frac{i\Gamma_{12}}{2d_2\sqrt{k_{1}k_{2}}},\\

686:  t_{22}^{'}  = -\frac{i\Gamma_{22}}{2d_2k_{2}}, \\

687:  t_{13}^{'}  = \frac{1+ \frac{\Gamma_{33}}{2\kappa_{3}}+\frac{\Gamma_{44}}

688: {2\kappa_{4}}+i\frac{\Gamma_{22}}{2k_{2}}}

689: {d_2} \hspace{.5cm}\mbox{and}\\

690: t_{24}^{'}  = \frac{1+ \frac{\Gamma_{33}}{2\kappa_{3}}+\frac{\Gamma_{44}}

691: {2\kappa_{4}}+i\frac{\Gamma_{11}}{2k_{1}}}

692: {d_2}\hspace{.2cm}.

693: \eea

694: Knowing these matrix elements, the scattering matrix is completely known

695: and $\th $ can also be calculated.

696: 

697: We find some further relationships between the scattering phase shifts as

698: follows. First of all

699: \be

700: arg(t_{11}^{'}) = arg(t_{22}^{'}) =tan^{-1}\frac{Re(d)}{Im(d)}  .

701: \ee

702: Secondly, when $\frac{4\pi^2}{W^2} <E_{3b}<\frac{9\pi^2}{W^2}$, i.e., the

703: bound state of the 3rd subband lies in the energy range where one can have

704: two propagating subbands, then the bound state $E_{3b}$ drastically

705: changes the scattering matrix elements in that energy range.  So in this

706: energy range $\frac{4\pi^2}{W^2}$ to $\frac{9\pi^2}{W^2}$ we find

707: \be

708: arg(t_{12}^{'}) \mp \frac{\pi}{2} = \th + \pi  .

709: \ee

710: Here negative sign is to be taken when $E_{3b}$ lies in this energy range.

711: Otherwise the positive sign has to be taken. $\th$ is to be calculated

712: from Eq.  (2) using Eq. (23). Thirdly we find

713:  \be

714: arg(t_{11}^{'}) \pm \pi = arg(t_{12}^{'})  .

715:  \ee

716:  Note that

717: in contrast to Eq. (30) here the

718: choice of $\pm$

719: sign is arbitrary. However consistent with this choice is the

720: following

721:  \be

722: arg(t_{11}^{'}) \pm \frac{\pi}{2} = \th + \pi ,

723:  \ee

724:  where once again + sign is to be

725: taken when $E_{3b}$ is present in this energy

726: range and - sign is to be taken when absent.

727: 

728: We thus find very simple analytical expressions for $\th$ in the sense

729: that one need not calculate it from a $4\times4$ scattering matrix but can

730: calculate it from the argument of a single matrix element like

731: $t_{11}^{'}$ or $t_{12}^{'}$ or $t_{22}^{'}$. These relations are

732: analogous to Eq. (4) in section I obtained for purely one dimensional

733: case, i.e., one need not calculate $\th$ from 2$\times$2 matrix but one

734: can find it from the argument of a single matrix element.

735: 

736: %%%

737: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig8.ps}{0.5}{14}{

738: \hspace{-.5cm} The system under consideration is shown

739: in Fig. 7. The plot is of the argument of various transmission amplitudes

740: ($arg(t_{mn}^{'})$ in radians)

741: from incident channel $m$ to propagating channel $n$ versus

742: E$W^2$ . The solid curve gives $arg(t_{11}^{'})$,

743: the long dashed curve gives $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ and

744: the dotted curve gives $arg(t_{24}^{'})$.

745: We use $\gamma=-10$, $y_{i}=.21 W$

746: and $x_i = 0$

747: }{f2}

748: %%%

749: 

750: 

751: In Fig.~8, we plot only the distinct arguments of the scattering

752: amplitudes versus energy of the incident electron. We find that all of

753: them show negative slopes over a very large range of energy and as already

754: discussed, such negative slopes give rise to fundamental questions in

755: quantum mechanics \cite{smi59,kumar}.  Now in Q1D we find that

756: this negative slope is not restricted to low energy but can occur at any

757: arbitrary energy.  Notice for example, $arg(t'_{13})$ and $arg(t'_{24})$

758: show larger negative slopes at the highest possible energies for two

759: channel propagation.  The rest of this section will be devoted to

760: understanding these negative slopes that at first sight looks very

761: different in nature and character in the three curves in Fig.~8,

762: and also to understanding what will happen when there are more

763: than two propagating modes. We will

764: address the FSR in the next section.

765: 

766: It is to be noted that among all these scattering matrix elements

767: $t_{11}^{'}$ and $t_{13}^{'}$ exist in the single channel regime

768: (i.e., $ \pi^2< EW^2 < 4\pi^2$) where

769: $t_{11}^{'} $ is the reflection amplitude and $t_{13}^{'} $ is the

770: transmission amplitude. The phase of $t_{13}'$ in the single channel

771: regime is known to change discontinuously by

772: $\pi$ when $t_{13}'$ is 0, i.e., $t_{13}'$ has a zero

773: in real energy. In the two channel

774: regime if we write from simplifying Eq. (27)

775: \be

776: t_{13}^{'} =\frac{k_2(2\kappa_3+g_3)+i\kappa_3

777: g_2}{k_2(2\kappa_3+g_3)+i\kappa_3(g_2+\alpha

778: g_1)},

779: \ee

780: where $\alpha=\frac{k_2}{k_1}$ and

781: $ g_s = \frac{2\kappa_4}{\Gamma_{44}+2\kappa_4}\hspace{.2cm}

782: \Gamma_{ss}$; with $s$=1,2,3.

783: then interestingly, we see that it has a zero

784: in complex energy and not in real energy.

785: 

786: If we modify the Breit-Wigner line shape formula of 1D to

787: include complex zeroes and write

788: \be

789: t_{mbw}(E) = A\hspace{.1cm}\frac{E-E_0+i\Gamma _0}{E-E_p+i\Gamma _p}

790: \hspace{.1cm},

791: \ee

792: where A is a

793: normalization factor, then just as $\Gamma_p$ gives the scale over

794: which $arg[t_{mbw}(E)]$ increase at $E=E_p$, $\Gamma _0$ gives a scale

795: over which $arg[t_{mbw}(E)]$

796: decrease at $E=E_0$ where $|t_{mbw}(E)|^2$ also shows a minimum

797: at $E=E_0$ (but not zero).

798: One can check this very easily (let us say, when

799: $E_0$=2, $E_p$=1 and $\Gamma_0=\Gamma_p=0.5$) and so we do not

800: demonstrate it here. Now from Eq. (33) we

801: see that at an energy which satisfies the condition

802: \be

803: 2\kappa_3+g_3=0 ,

804: \ee

805: the real part of the numerator in Eq. (33) is zero. Condition (35)

806: is the same as the condition (21) for a

807: bound state $E_{3b}$ coming from the 3rd subband

808: that is degenerate with scattering states.

809: So, around this energy where Eq.(35) is satisfied (lets say at $E=

810: E_{3b} \equiv E_0$)

811: $arg(t_{13}')$ will undergo a drop over an energy scale

812: determined by the imaginary part, $\kappa_3 g_2 $, i.e.,

813: $\Gamma _0\equiv\kappa_3 g_2$.

814: 

815: It can be seen in Fig.9 that $|t_{13}^{'}|^2$ (dotted curve)  shows a

816: narrow minimum around an energy E$W^2\simeq 84$ (which is the solution of

817: Eq. (35) or Eq. (21))  and at this energy $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ shows a very

818: sharp drop over a narrow energy range determined by $\kappa_3 g_2$.  Hence

819: by decreasing/increasing this quantity $\kappa_3 g_2$ we can make the

820: phase drop sharper/broader.  $g_2$ can be made smaller in two ways, first

821: by decreasing $\gamma$ and second by taking the impurity closer to a node

822: in the transverse wave function. The plot for a decreased value of

823: $\gamma$ is shown in Fig.10 and it confirms this.

824: 

825: %%%

826: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig9.ps}{0.5}{14}{

827: \hspace{-.5cm}

828: The system under consideration is shown in Fig.7.

829: The solid curve gives $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ in radians shifted by

830: $\frac{\pi}{4}$ radians in the

831: y-direction and the dotted curve gives $|t_{13}^{'}|^2$.

832: Both the functions are plotted versus

833: $EW^2$ using $x_i=0$, $y_i=.45W$ and $\gamma=-15$.

834: }{f2}

835: %%%

836: 

837: Note that the quantity $\kappa_3 g_2$ is actually energy dependent.  But

838: in Fig.9 and Fig.10 $\kappa_3 g_2$ is so small that the drop occurs over a

839: scale in which $\kappa_3 g_2$ is roughly constant. For larger values of

840: $\kappa_3 g_2$, the phase drop will be determined by a complex competition

841: between $\kappa_3$ and $g_2$. This is shown in Fig.11.  First of all the

842: scale of the phase drop becomes so large that any sensitivity to the

843: position of the bound state can not be seen. Secondly, $\kappa_3 g_2$ can

844: not be taken to be a constant over this large scale and the enhancement of

845: the negative slope for $EW^2 > 79$ is a signature of the fact that here

846: $\kappa_3 \rightarrow 0$ and so $\kappa_3 g_2 \rightarrow 0$ as $EW^2$

847: increases.

848: 

849: %%%

850: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig10.ps}{0.5}{14}{

851: \hspace{-.5cm}

852:  The system under consideration is shown in Fig.7.  The solid curve gives

853: $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ in radians shifted by $\frac{\pi}{4}$ radians in the

854: y-direction and the dotted curve gives $|t_{13}^{'}|^2$.  Both the

855: functions are plotted

856:  versus $EW^2$ using $x_i=0$, $y_i=.45W$ and $\gamma=-10$

857: }{f2}

858: %%%

859:  \noindent Similarly if we rewrite Eq.(28) as

860:  \[ t_{24}^{'} = \frac{k_1(2\kappa_3+ g_3)+i\kappa_3 g_1}

861: {k_1(2\kappa_3+ g_3)+i\kappa_3(g_1+\beta g_2)}, \]

862:  where $\beta=\frac{k_1}{k_2}$;  then it is clear that the behavior of

863: $arg(t_{24}^{'})$ will be qualitatively the same.  It is indeed found in

864: Fig.8 that the behavior of $arg(t_{24}^{'})$ is similar to that of

865: $arg(t_{13}^{'})$.

866: 

867: $\th = \frac{1}{2i}ln[det[S]]$ is shown in Fig.12 as a function of energy,

868: for different values of $\gamma$. The minimum in $\th$ follows the

869: $E_{3b}$ and so the energy range where the slope of $\th$ versus E is

870: negative is determined by the $E_{3b}$. Note that when $E_{3b}$ goes out

871: of this energy range the $\th$ versus E has a positive slope everywhere.

872: So in Fig.12, the negative slope arises whenever a bound state $E_{3b}$ is

873: degenerate with the scattering states ($n$=1 and $n$=2), and

874: non-monotonously scatter and disperse the scattering states.

875: For weaker impurities in Q1D, the negative slope

876: occur at higher energies and also are steeper as demonstrated in Fig.12.

877: This is in contrast to what happens in 1D and demonstarted in Fig. 6,

878: that the energy where the negative slopes occur is always for

879: $E/V<1$.

880:  %%%

881: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig11.ps}{0.5}{14}{

882: \hspace{-.5cm}

883: The system under consideration is shown in Fig.7.

884: The solid curve gives $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ in radians

885: shifted by $2\pi$ radians in the

886: negative y-direction versus $EW^2$ for

887: $\gamma=-47.1371$. The dashed curve is for $\gamma=-25.197$. We

888: use $x_i=0$ and $y_i=.21W$.

889: }{f2}

890:  %%%

891: 

892: %%

893: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig12.ps}{0.5}{14}{

894:  The system under consideration is shown in Fig.7.  The plot is of $\th$

895: in radians versus $EW^2 $ for different $\gamma $. The dot-dashed curve is

896: shifted by $\pi$ radians in y-direction for $\gamma = -47.1371$,

897: corresponding $E_{3b}$ is at $EW^2=35$ which is less than the propagating

898: threshold $EW^2 \si 39$ of the second transverse mode.  The dashed curve

899: is for $\gamma = -25.197 $, corresponding $E_{3b}$ is at $EW^2=80$.  The

900: dotted curve is for $\gamma = -15$, corresponding $E_{3b}$ is at

901: $EW^2=86.606$.  The solid curve is for $\gamma = -10 $, corresponding

902: $E_{3b}$ is at $EW^2=87.982$. We use $ y_{i}=.21W$ and $x_i=0$. The arrows

903: accentuate the positions of the minima that is shifting towards higher

904: energies for weaker impurities.

905:  }{f2}

906: %%%

907: 

908: We have used two evanescent modes in our calculations because one can

909: include as many evanescent modes without changing the nature of the

910: negative slopes as long as the positions of the bound states $E_{3b}$ and

911: $E_{4b}$ remain the same. One can check this that with four evanescent

912: modes and $\gamma =-6.46584$, the negative slopes are the same as in Fig.

913: 8, which means that the third and the fourth evanescent modes just

914: renormalizes $\gamma$ from -6.46584 to -10. The exact renormalization

915: takes place according to a formula $\gamma^h=\gamma^n/d$, where $\gamma^h$

916: is the $\gamma$ value used here and $\gamma^n$ is the renormalized value

917: of $\gamma$ when we use $m$ evanescent modes instead of two. $d=

918: (1+\Gamma_{55}^n/(2 \kappa_5) + \Gamma_{66}^n/(2 \kappa_6)....

919: \Gamma_{mm}^n/(2 \kappa_m)$, where $\Gamma_{mm}^n= =

920: \gamma^n Sin \frac{m \pi}{W}(y_{i}+\frac{W} {2})^2$.

921: Solving this one can find the renormalized value of $\gamma$ i.e.,

922: $\gamma^n$ that keep the minimum of any of the curves for the scattering

923: phase shifts considered here unchanged.  It is worthwhile mentioning that

924: at the band edges (i.e., $E \approx 39$ and 89, in the figures considered

925: in this section), the value of any curve is independent of the number of

926: evanescent modes, as all the modes get decoupled there.  In other words,

927: number of evanescent modes considered does not change the nature of the

928: negative slopes. Only the positions of the bound states are important.

929: 

930: In order to generalize to arbitrary number of propagating channels we

931: change our notations slightly.  For electrons incident from the

932: left/right, we call the scattered channels towards the left/right as

933: reflection channels (the rest being transmission channels) and change our

934: notation to

935:  \bea

936: {\tilde r_{11}} = t_{11}^{'}\hspace{.2cm}, \\

937: {\tilde  r_{22}} = t_{22}^{'}\hspace{.2cm}, \\

938: {\tilde r_{12}} = t_{12}^{'} .

939: \eea

940:  Thus all possible reflection channels are distinct. All the intra-subband

941: transmission channels are also distinct and they are denoted as ${\tilde

942: t_{11}}$ and ${\tilde t_{22}}$ where

943:  \bea

944: {\tilde t_{11}} = t_{13}^{'} \\

945: \mbox{and} \hspace{.5cm} {\tilde t_{22}} = t_{24}^{'} .

946: \eea

947:  All other scattering matrix elements are equal to one of these 5

948: elements.  In this notation the only difference is that the lowest channel

949: ($n$=1)  on the transmission side is marked 1 instead of 3. So when we say

950: ${\tilde t_{11}}$ we mean transmission amplitude from the $n$=1 channel on

951: the left to the $n$=1 channel on the right.  We find from Eqs. (29), (30),

952: (31) and (32)

953:  \be

954: \frac{d}{dE}\hspace{.1cm} arg({\tilde r_{mn}}) = \frac{d}{dE}

955: \hspace{.1cm}(\frac{1}{2i}

956: ln[det[S]])

957: \ee

958:  We find the above relation to be true for any number of propagating

959: modes.  So $m$ and $n$ can take any integer value less than or equal to

960: $p$, where $p$ is the total number of propagating modes. For two

961: propagating modes $p$=2, for three propagating modes $p$=3 and so on.  So

962: Eq.(41) is analogous to the 1D case given in Eq.(4).  That is when the

963: dimension of the matrix $S$ becomes very large, then it is sufficient to

964: consider the argument of a single matrix element in order to calculate the

965: complicated quantity on the RHS of Eq. 41.  In the energy regime where

966: there are two propagating channels, the negative slopes in $\th$ versus

967: incident energy curves are determined by $E_{3b}$, and when there are 3

968: propagating channels then the negative slopes are determined by $E_{4b}$

969: and so on.

970: 

971: The scattering phase shifts of transmission channels i.e. $arg({\tilde

972: t_{mn}})$, where again $m$ and $n$ can take all possible integer values

973: less than or equal to $p$, show sharp or gentle phase drops when the

974: scattering states are degenerate with a bound state, depending on the

975: value of the imaginary part in the numerator of ${\tilde t}_{mn}$. In the

976: single channel regime the imaginary part in the numerator is zero and

977: phase drops take the limiting value when the phase drops are absolutely

978: discontinuous by $\pi$. Just as the discontinuous phase drop in single

979: channel case do not affect $\th$ in any way, the phase drops of the

980: $arg({\tilde t}_{mn})$ also do not affect $\th$ in any way and $\th$

981: behaves similarly as $arg({\tilde r_{mn}})$.

982: 

983: \section{density of states and Friedel sum rule in quasi-one-dimension}

984: 

985: The local DOS is given by the following expression \cite{bag90}

986: \be

987: \rho_R = \int_{R} dx \int^{\frac{W}{2}}_{\frac{-W}{2}} dy

988: \sum_{m,k_m} \delta(E-E_{m,k_m}) \mid \psi_{m,k_m}(x,y)\mid ^2

989: \ee

990:  Here $E$ is the incident energy and R is the integration region where

991: modes are mixed. $m$ and $k_m$ are the two quantum numbers that define an

992: incident electron wavefunction, $A_me^{ik_mx}Sin

993: \frac{m\pi}{W}(y+\frac{W}{2})$ whose energy is $E_{m,k_m}$, where we have

994: taken that the electron is incident from the left i.e., $x<0$.

995: $\psi_{m,k_m}(x,y)$ is the wavefunction in the region of mode mixing and

996: $\psi_{m,k_m}(x,y)= \sum_n c_n^{(m)}

997: (x,k_n)Sin \frac{n\pi}{W}(y+\frac{W}{2})$.

998: Here $c_n^{(m)} (x,k_n)=C_ne^{ik_nx}$ for $n=1$ and $n=2$ and

999: $c_n^{(m)}(x,k_n)=C_ne^{-\kappa_nx}$ for $n > 2$; $x$ being greater than or

1000: equal to 0.  The coefficients $C_n$ can be determined by using the mode

1001: matching technique.  The mode matching has been done in details

1002: by Bagwell \cite{bag90}. Here the delta function potential is taken to be

1003: extending from $-\eps$ to $+\eps$ which has to be set to be tending to 0

1004: in the end.  $\rho_{0R}$ can be determined by replacing

1005: $\psi_{n,k_n}(x,y)$ by the plane wave states in absence of the scatterer

1006: and doing the integration again.

1007: 

1008: Thus we find that for any non-zero incident energy

1009: $$(\rho -\rho_0)_R =

1010: \frac{2}{hv_1}[|t_{13}|^2+|t_{14}|^2+|t_{15}|^2+\cdots  ]$$

1011: \be

1012: +\frac{2}{hv_2}[|t_{23}|^2+|t_{24}|^2+|t_{25}|^2+\cdots  ].

1013: \ee

1014:  Here $v_1=\frac{\hbar k_1}{m}, v_2=\frac{\hbar k_2}{m}$ and

1015: $t_{mn}=\frac{C_n}{A_m}$.  $t_{mn}$ can be obtained by solving the matrix

1016: Eqs. given in Ref. \cite{bag90} (see Eq. 23 therein and we have used the

1017: same notation i.e., $t_{mn}$ here is the same as $t_{mn}$ in Eq. (23)

1018: of Ref. \cite{bag90}).

1019: As can be seen in Fig.12 that

1020: $\frac{d\th}{dE}$ is negative over a very large energy range

1021: while $(\rho - \rho_0)_R$ as given by

1022: Eq.43 is positive.

1023: 

1024: %%

1025: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig13.eps}{0.5}{14}{

1026:  The system under consideration is shown in Fig.7

1027: with $\gamma = 1 $. The Fig. shows some important scattering

1028: probabilities. The solid curve gives $|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2$

1029: and it shows that

1030: for $EW^2>50$, a particle incident in the first propagating

1031: mode does not feel the scatterer at all, and is almost entirely

1032: transmitted intra-channel, $|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2$ being close to unity.

1033: The dotted curve gives $|{\tilde t_{22}}|^2$ and once again for

1034: $EW^2>50$, it is close to unity signifying that a particle incident

1035: in the second propagating channel is almost entirely transmitted

1036: intra-channel. So $EW^2>50$ is the WKB regime where the potential

1037: scatters the incident electron very weakly.

1038: The dashed curve gives 30 times $|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2$

1039: and shows strong energy dependence not only for $EW^2<50$ but also

1040: around the highest energy ($EW^2 \approx 89$)

1041: or in the extreme WKB limit, its

1042: absolute value being extremely small there signifying extremely low

1043: inter-channel transmission i.e., the incoming particle does not

1044: feel the scatterer.

1045:  }{f2}

1046: %%%

1047: 

1048: %%

1049: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig14.eps}{0.5}{14}{

1050:  The system under consideration is shown in Fig.7 with $\gamma=1$.

1051: The solid curve gives $\pi (\rho(E) - \rho_0(E))$ and the dashed

1052: curve gives -0.5$i {d \over dE} ln(det[S])$. The two curves

1053: deviate from each other, where ever the curves in Fig. 13 are

1054: strongly energy dependent. Otherwise they agree.

1055:  }{f2}

1056: %%%

1057: 

1058: 

1059: Note that if we calculate the global DOS by taking the integration

1060: region to be from $-\infty$ to $\infty$ instead of just the region

1061: R where the modes are mixed then Eq. 43 remain the same. One will

1062: get some extra integrals that are indefinite integrals but using

1063: the current conservation condition it can be analytically proved

1064: (see appendix II)

1065: that they cancel each other. This means the contribution to $\rho(E)$

1066: and that to $\rho_0(E)$ coming from outside the region R cancel each

1067: other in the absence of a term like $\rho_q/l$ as in section II.

1068: Thus in this case (the proof is given in appendix II)

1069:  $$\rho(E)-\rho_0(E)=(\rho-\rho_0)_R$$

1070:  and both of them deviate identically from ${1 \over \pi}{d \theta \over

1071: dE}$ due to strong dispersion, at any arbitrary energy.

1072: 

1073: Since the negative slopes are due to the bound states supported

1074: by the negative delta function potential, one may ask what happens for

1075: a positive delta function potential that does not support any bound

1076: state. This situation is discussed below and it

1077: also elaborates the uniqueness of the Q1D,

1078: with respect to the violation of Friedel sum rule and shows that

1079: large violation can occur in the extreme WKB limit. Fig 13 shows

1080: the energy dependence of some important scattering probabilities.

1081: As in 1D the scattering probabilities are strongly energy dependent

1082: for $EW^2<50$. For $EW^2>50$ all

1083: the curves vary slowly with energy (non-dispersive scattering).

1084: However,

1085: one scattering probability $|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2$ is also very

1086: strongly energy dependent at the highest energy of $EW^2 \approx 89$.

1087: ($k_m^2/V>>1$). In this regime scattering is almost entirely intra-channel

1088: as can be seen that $|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2$ and $|{\tilde t_{22}}|^2$ are

1089: both almost unity. All other scattering probabilities like reflection

1090: probabilities and inter-channel scattering probabilities like

1091: $|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2$ are extremely small. There are several other

1092: scattering matrix elements that are identical to ${\tilde t_{12}}$.

1093: Although being small,

1094: they can have strong energy dependence, or their energy derivative

1095: can be very large. As can be seen in Fig. 13 that the dashed curve

1096: bends down with a steep slope at $EW^2 \approx 89$.

1097: It is found in Fig. 14 that there is a strong violation

1098: of Friedel sum rule in the non-WKB regime as in 1D and also in the

1099: extreme WKB regime ($EW^2 \approx 89$ where $k^2/V>>1$ and scattering

1100: is almost completely intra-channel)

1101: quite unlike that in 1D. It can be seen in Fig. 13

1102: that in the mid-energy range, the scattering probabilities are

1103: not very energy dependent and the Friedel sum rule holds in this

1104: mid-energy range as can be seen in Fig. 14. But at regimes

1105: where the scattering leads to strong dispersion, FSR is violated.

1106: As the strength of the

1107: positive delta function potential is increased, this regime where

1108: the scattering probabilities are not strongly energy dependent becomes

1109: narrower and Friedel sum rule is violated at all energies.

1110: 

1111: 

1112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1113: \section{ phase behavior at critical energies }

1114: \label{s4}

1115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1116: 

1117: Very interesting phase behaviors can be seen at energies where the

1118: $S$-matrix changes dimension. For example for $E\le \frac{4\pi ^2}{W^2}$

1119: there is only one propagating mode and the $S$-matrix is 2$\times$2. But

1120: for $E > \frac{4\pi ^2}{W^2}$, there are two propagating modes and the

1121: $S$-matrix is 4$\times$4. The matrix element $t_{11}^{'}$ exists on either

1122: side of the energy $\frac{4\pi ^2}{W^2}$ and in Fig.15 we show the

1123: behavior of $arg(t_{11}^{'})$ in the energy range that includes $EW^2 =

1124: 4\pi ^2 $.  Note that it exhibits a discontinuous phase drop by

1125: $\frac{\pi}{2}$ at $EW^2 = 4\pi ^2 $. So far only discontinuous phase

1126: drops of $\pi$ has been observed but never $\frac{\pi}{2}$.

1127:  From the properties of a 2$\times$2 $S$-matrix it follows that if there

1128: is a discontinuous phase change then it can only be of $\pi$ \cite

1129: {lee99,tan99}. So had the $S$-matrix been 2$\times$2 on either side of

1130: $EW^2 = 4\pi ^2$ the phase drop would have been $\pi$. But since the

1131: $S$-matrix is 2$\times$2 only on one side, including $EW^2 = 4\pi ^2$,

1132: i.e., $E\le \frac{4\pi ^2}{W^2}$, the phase drop is also one half of

1133: $\pi$. $|t_{11}^{'}|^2$ also has a zero at $EW^2 = 4\pi ^2$ for all

1134: possible choice of parameters \cite{bag90}, and this zero is associated

1135: with a $\frac{\pi}{2}$ phase jump instead of a $\pi$ phase jump.

1136: 

1137: %%%

1138: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig15.ps}{0.5}{14}{

1139: \hspace{-.5cm}

1140:  The system under consideration is shown in the Fig.7.  The plot is of

1141: $arg(t_{11}^{'})$ in radians versus E$W^2$.  This plot is for

1142: $\gamma=-25.197$, $x_i=0$ and $y_i=.45W$.

1143:  }{f2}

1144: %%%

1145: 

1146: %%%

1147: \PostScript{6}{0}{fig16.ps}{0.5}{14}{

1148: \hspace{-.5cm}

1149:  The system under consideration is shown in the Fig.7.  The solid curve

1150: gives $|t_{13}^{'}|^2$. The dashed curve is after subtracting 5.27183

1151: radians from $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ in radians.  We use $\gamma=+25.197$,

1152: $x_i=0$ and $y_i=.45W$.

1153:  }{f2}

1154: %%%

1155: 

1156: Next we take a repulsive $\delta$ function potential. It is known

1157: \cite{bag90} that at critical energies like $EW^2=4\pi^2$,

1158: $|t_{13}^{'}|^2$ shows discontinuities.  Here $|t_{13}^{'}|^2$ does not

1159: have a zero but exhibits a discontinuous jump.  At these points

1160: $arg(t_{13}^{'})$ also shows non-analytic behavior as demonstrated in

1161: Fig.16. In this case $\frac{d}{dE} arg(t_{13}^{'})$ is discontinuous.

1162: 

1163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1164: \section{Conclusions}

1165: \label{s5}

1166: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1167: 

1168: In a multichannel quantum wire with attractive impurities, negative slopes

1169: in the scattering phase shift versus incident energy curves can occur at

1170: all possible energies. For weaker defects it happens at higher energies

1171: and the negative slopes are more pronounced.

1172: Such negative slopes

1173: mean super luminescence \cite{smi59,kumar} that can be observed

1174: experimentally. Although such a super luminescent particle will not give

1175: any information about the particle delay or information delay, they are of

1176: interest because they demonstrate fundamental principles in quantum

1177: mechanics.  Hence Eq. (41) derived in this paper may be of use to

1178: experimentalists and theoreticians.  Calculations of variation of DOS due

1179: to the presence of the scatterer show that FSR can be violated at any

1180: arbitrary energy. That is violation of FSR is not restricted to 

1181: non-WKB regime (the regime where anyway transport does not occur)

1182: as in 1D, 2D or 3D.

1183: Rather the violation is related to strong energy dependence of the

1184: scattering matrix elements (dispersive behavior). 

1185: While in 1D, 2D and 3D the strong

1186: energy dependence of scattering occur only in the non-WKB regime,

1187: in Q1D there is no systematics. A Q1D system in the extreme

1188: WKB limit can also exhibit strongly energy dependent scattering

1189: and there is no definable regime where the FSR will work and

1190: hence it may not work even in regimes where transport occurs.

1191: For attractive impurities, weaker the impurity, stronger the

1192: violation of FSR while for repulsive impurities, stronger the

1193: impurity, stronger the violation of FSR.

1194: We also show that the discontinuous phase drops in the

1195: single channel case have a counterpart in the multichannel case wherein

1196: the drops can be continuous and we propose a line shape formula for them

1197: in Eq. 34. When there is a third channel of escape

1198: for the electron, apart from the channel along which

1199: it is incident and the channel where its scattering

1200: phase shift is measured, the phase drop becomes

1201: continuous. However, these phase drops do not

1202: affect ${1 \over 2i} ln Det [S]$ and hence Friedel sum rule.

1203: Finally, we discuss some novel scattering phase shifts at

1204: energies where the $S$ matrix changes dimension.

1205: 

1206: \section{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}

1207: 

1208: We thank Dr. A. M. Jayannavar for useful discussions.

1209: 

1210: 

1211: \section{APPENDIX I}

1212: 

1213: Considering the symmetric scattering potential in Fig.4, the scattering

1214: matrix $ S $ of the structure can be found by cascading the scattering

1215: matrices of different parts, i.e.,\\

1216:  \[ S =  \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1217: \displaystyle r & \displaystyle t \\

1218: \displaystyle t & \displaystyle r

1219: \end{array}\right) =S_{1} \otimes  S_{2} \otimes  S_{3} ,\]

1220: \[ \mbox{where} \hspace{.4cm} S_{1} = S_{3} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1221: \displaystyle r' & \displaystyle t' \\

1222: \displaystyle t' & \displaystyle r'

1223: \end{array}\right) \]

1224: \hfill\\

1225: \[ \mbox{and} \hspace{.4cm} S_{2} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1226: 0 & \displaystyle \tau \\

1227: \displaystyle \tau & 0

1228: \end{array}\right)\hspace{.1cm}.\]

1229:  Here $\tau = e^{i \phi}$, $\phi = kl$ and $k = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^{2}}

1230: E }$.  $S_{2}$ is the scattering matrix for the free region II of length

1231: $l$ between the two scatterers. $ r' $ \& $ t' $ are the reflection \&

1232: transmission amplitudes due to one of the two potentials when isolated.

1233: 

1234: After cascading these three matrices the resultant scattering matrix of

1235: our system becomes

1236:  \[  S = \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1237: \displaystyle r'+\frac{t'^{2}{\tau}^{2}r'}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}} &

1238: \displaystyle \frac{t'^{2}{\tau}}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\\

1239: \displaystyle \frac{t'^{2}{\tau}}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}} &

1240: \displaystyle r'+\frac{t'^{2}{\tau}^{2}r'}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}

1241: \end{array}\right) \hspace{.1cm}. \]

1242: And so,

1243: \[ det [S] = \left(\displaystyle r'+\frac{t'^{2}{\tau}^{2}r'}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}

1244: ^{2}}\right)^{2} - \left(\displaystyle \frac{t'^{2}{\tau}}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}

1245: \right)^{2} \hspace{.5cm} \mbox{(i)}\]

1246: \[   \hspace{1cm}= \frac{1}{(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^2} \hspace{.1cm} (M+N)

1247: \hspace{.1cm},\hspace{2.5cm} \mbox{(ii)}\]

1248: \[ \mbox{where}\hspace{1cm}M = r'^{2}(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^2 \hspace{2.0cm}

1249: \mbox{(iii)} \]

1250: \[ \mbox{and} \hspace{.5cm} N = (1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})\hspace{.1cm} (2t'^{2}r'^{2}

1251: {\tau}^{2}-t'^{4}{\tau}

1252: ^{2}) . \hspace{1cm} \mbox{(iv)}  \]

1253: From (i),

1254: \[ \frac{\pa det [S] }{\pa \phi} = 2\left( A \frac{\pa A}{\pa \phi} -B

1255: \frac{\pa B}{\pa \phi} \right) , \hspace{2.0cm}\mbox{(v)}\]

1256: \[ \mbox{where}\hspace{1cm} A = r'+\frac{t'^{2}

1257: {\tau}^{2}r'}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}} \hspace{2cm}\mbox{(vi)}\]

1258: \[ \mbox{and} \hspace{.5cm} B =

1259: \frac{t'^{2}{\tau}}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\hspace{.5cm}

1260: .\hspace{2cm}\mbox{(vii)}\]

1261: Using (v), (vi) and (vii) we find

1262: $$  \hspace{-5cm}\frac{\pa det [S] }{\pa \phi} = $$

1263: \[  \hspace{1.0cm} 2\left[A

1264: \left(2r'B+\frac{2r'^{3}{\tau}^{2}

1265: B}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\right) -

1266: B\left(\frac{t'^{2}+r'^{2}t'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}

1267: {(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^2}\right)\right] \frac{\pa \tau }{\pa \phi} \]

1268: \[ \hspace{1cm} + 2\left[A

1269: \left(1+B{\tau}+\frac{2r'^{2}

1270: {\tau}^{3}B}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\right)-B

1271: \left(\frac{2r'{\tau}^{2}B}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\right)\right] \frac{\pa r'}{\pa \phi} \]

1272: \[ \hspace{1cm} + 2\left[2r'{\tau}AB

1273: -B\left(\frac{2{\tau}t'}

1274: {1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\right)\right] \frac{\pa t'}{\pa \phi} .\hspace{1.5cm} \mbox

1275: {(viii)} \]

1276: 

1277: We will neglect the last two terms in comparison to the 1st term in

1278: Eq.(viii) but we will retain the energy dependence of $ r' $ and $ t' $

1279: and the 1st term in Eq.(viii) is actually varying with energy very

1280: strongly. Hence our results correspond to real potentials and we do not

1281: parameterize the $ S $ matrix in a special way. We apply this result to

1282: the case of double delta function potential in Fig.5 and illustrate the

1283: significance of the last two terms in comparison with the 1st one. We

1284: stress that this calculation in this appendix holds even if the $\delta

1285: $-function potential is replaced by the square-well or any arbitrary

1286: potential.  Thus in the regime where $ \frac{\pa r'}{\pa \phi} \to 0 $ and

1287: $\frac{\pa t'}{\pa

1288:  \phi} \to 0 $ and using $\frac{\pa \tau }{\pa \phi} = i\tau$,

1289:  $$ \hspace{-7cm} \frac{\pa det [S] }{\pa \phi} $$

1290: \[ = 2\left[A\left(2r'B+\frac{2r'^{3}{\tau}^{2}

1291: B}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\right) -

1292: B\left(\frac{t'^{2}+r'^{2}t'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}

1293: {(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^2}\right)\right] i\tau  \hspace{.2cm}. \]

1294: At this point we substitute the values of $A$ and $B$ from (vi) and (vii)

1295: to get

1296: \[ \frac{\pa det [S] }{\pa \phi} = 2i\hspace{.2cm}

1297: \frac{1}{(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^3}\hspace{.2cm}N \hspace{.2cm}. \hspace{1.5cm}

1298: \mbox{(ix)}\]

1299: \[ \mbox{Now},\hspace{.2cm} \th = \frac{1}{2i} ln (det [S] )\hspace{4cm}

1300: \mbox{(x)} \]

1301: \[ \mbox{and so} \hspace{.4cm} \frac{\pa \th}{\pa E} = \frac{\pa \th}{\pa

1302: \phi} \hspace{.2cm}

1303: \frac{\pa \phi}{\pa E} . \]

1304: From (x), (ii) and (ix)\\

1305: \[ \frac{\pa \th}{\pa \phi} = \frac{1}{2i} \hspace{.2cm} \frac{1}{det [S] }

1306: \hspace{.2cm} \frac{\pa det [S] }{\pa \phi} \]

1307: \[  \hspace{1.5cm} = \frac{1}{1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2}}\hspace{.2cm}\frac{1}

1308: {\frac{M}{N}+1} \hspace{.2cm}. \]

1309: Multiplying the numerator and denominator by $\frac{(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^{*}}

1310: {1-\mid r^{'} \mid^{4}}$, we get

1311: \[  \hspace{.2cm}  \frac{\pa \th}{\pa \phi} = \frac{1-\mid r' \mid ^{4}}

1312: {\mid 1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2} \mid

1313: ^{2}} \hspace{.2cm} \frac{(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^{*}}{1-\mid r' \mid ^{4}}

1314: \hspace{.2cm}\frac{1}{\frac{M}{N}+1} \]

1315: \[  \hspace{.2cm}  = \frac{1-\mid r' \mid ^{4}}{\mid 1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2} \mid

1316: ^{2}} \hspace{.2cm}Q \hspace{.2cm},\hspace{4cm}\mbox{(xi)}\]

1317: \[ \mbox{where,}  \hspace{.5cm} Q=\frac{(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})^{*}}{1-\mid r'

1318: \mid ^{4}}

1319: \hspace{.2cm}\frac{1}{\frac{M}{N}+1} \hspace{2cm} \mbox{(xii)}\]

1320: \[ \hspace{.2cm} =\left[\frac{(1-{r'^{*}}^{2}{{\tau}^{*}}^{2})-1+\mid

1321: r'\mid^{4}\mid

1322: \tau \mid^{4}}{1-\mid r' \mid^{4}}+1\right]\hspace{.2cm}

1323: \frac{1}{\frac{M}{N}+1} \hspace{.2cm},\]

1324: \[ \hspace{5cm} \mbox{as}\hspace{.4cm} |\tau |^4 = 1\hspace{.2cm}. \]

1325: As \hspace{.5cm} $1-|r'|^2=|t'|^2$

1326: \[ \hspace{.2cm} Q =\left[\frac{-{r'^{*}}^{2}{{\tau}^{*}}^{2}+\mid r'\mid^{4}

1327: \mid \tau \mid^{4}}{(1+\mid r' \mid^{2})|t'|^2}+1\right]\hspace{.2cm}\frac{1}

1328: {\frac{M}{N}+1}  \hspace{.2cm}.\]

1329: Now substituting the values of $M$ and $N$ from (iii) and (iv)

1330: \[ Q = \frac{\frac{-{r'^{*}}^2{{\tau}^{*}}^2(1-r'^{2}

1331: {\tau}^{2})+\mid t' \mid ^{2}(1+\mid r' \mid ^{2})}{\mid t' \mid ^{2}

1332: (1+\mid r' \mid ^{2})}}{

1333: \frac{r'^{2}(1-r'^{2}{\tau}^{2})-t'^{2}{\tau}^{2}(t'^{2}-2r'^{2})}{-t'^{2}

1334: {\tau}^{2}(t'^{2}-2r'^{2})}} \hspace{.2cm}.\]

1335: \hfill\\

1336: Using, \hspace{.4cm} $  r' = \mid r' \mid e^{i\th _{r}} $ \hspace{.4cm} and

1337: \hspace{.4cm} $ t'= \mid t' \mid e^{i\th _{t}} $,

1338: $$Q=[|r'|^2|t'|^2|\tau |^4e^{2i\th _{t}}e^{2i(\th _{t}-\th _{r})}

1339: -|r'|^4|t'|^2|\tau

1340: |^4\tau ^2e^{4i\th _{t}}$$

1341: $$-|t'|^4\tau^2e^{4i\th _{t}}

1342: -|t'|^4|r'|^2\tau^2e^{4i

1343: \th _{t}}$$

1344: $$-2|r'|^4|\tau |^4e^{2i\th _{t}}

1345: +2|r'|^6|\tau |^4\tau^2e^{2i(\th _{t}

1346: +\th _{r})}$$

1347: $$+2|r'|^2|t'|^2\tau^2e^{2i(\th _{t}+\th _{r})}+2|r'|^4||t'|^2\tau^2

1348: e^{2i(\th _{t}+\th _{r})}]/D ,$$

1349: \[\mbox{where},\hspace{.2cm} D = (1+\mid r' \mid^{2})(-\mid t' \mid ^{4}{\tau}

1350: ^{2}e^{4i\th _{t}}-\mid r' \mid ^{4}{\tau}^{2}e^{4i\th _{r}}\]

1351: \[ \hspace{.2cm} +2\mid t' \mid ^{2}\mid r' \mid ^{2}\tau ^2 e^{2i

1352: (\th _{r}+\th _{t})}+\mid r' \mid ^{2}e^{2i\th _{r}}) . \hspace{1cm}

1353: \mbox{(xiii)}\]

1354: \hfill\\

1355: Now it follows from unitarity that

1356: $e^{2i(\th _t - \th _r)}  =  e^{i \pi} = -1$ and

1357: $|\tau |^4 = 1$ and so

1358: \hfill\\

1359: \[ Q = [-|r'|^2 |t'|^2  e^{2i \th _t } - |r'|^4 |t'|^2 \tau ^2 e^{4i \th _t }

1360: -|t'|^4 \tau ^2 e^{4i \th _t } \]

1361: \[ - |t'|^4 |r'|^2 \tau ^2 e^{4i \th _t } - 2

1362: |r'|^4 e^{2i \th _t } + 2 |r'|^6 \tau ^2  e^{2i ( \th _t +  \th _r)} \]

1363: \[ + 2 |r'|^2 |t'|^2 \tau ^2  e^{2i ( \th _t +  \th _r)} +  2 |r'|^4 |t'|^2

1364: \tau ^2  e^{2i ( \th _t +  \th _r)}]/D \]

1365: \[\hspace{1cm} = [- e^{2i \th _t } |r'|^2 \{|t'|^2 + 2 |r'|^2 \} - (|t'|^2 +

1366: |r'|^2 \{|r'|^2 + |t'|^2\}) \]

1367: \[ (e^{4i \th _t } |t'|^2  \tau ^2 -  e^{2i ( \th _t +

1368: \th _r)} 2 |r'|^2 \tau ^2 )]/D \hspace{.2cm}.\]

1369: Now inside the $\{  \} $ brackets if we use the fact that $ \mid r' \mid ^{2}+

1370: \mid t' \mid ^{2}=1$, then\\

1371: \[ Q = [- e^{2i \th _t } |r'|^2 (1+|r'|^2) - e^{4i \th _t }|t'|^2 \tau ^2

1372: + 2 e^{2i (\th _t + \th _r)}  |r'|^2 \tau ^2]/D .\]

1373: Multiplying numerator and denominator above by $e^{-2i(\th _{r}+\th _{t})}$ and

1374: putting $ e^{2i (\th _t - \th _r)} = e^{i \pi} = -1$, we get

1375: \[ Q = \frac{-e^{-2i \th _{r}} |r'|^2 (1+|r'|^2 )+\tau ^2 (|t'|^2 +|r'|^2)+

1376: |r'|^2

1377: \tau ^2}{D'} ,\]

1378: \[ \mbox{where,}\hspace{.1cm} D'= De^{-2i(\th _{r}+\th _{t})} .\hspace{2cm}

1379: \mbox{(xiv)} \]

1380: Again using $|r'|^2 + |t'|^2 =1$,

1381: \[ Q = \frac{(1+|r'|^2 ) (\tau ^2 - |r'|^2 e^{-2i\th _{r}})}{D'} . \hspace{1cm}

1382: \mbox{(xv)} \]

1383: Now from (xiv) and (xiii)

1384: \[ D' = (1+|r'|^2)[|r'|^2  e^{-2i  \th _t} - |r'|^4 \tau ^2  e^{-2i(\th _t -

1385: \th _r)}  \]

1386: \[-|t'|^4 \tau ^2 e^{2i(\th _t - \th _r)} + 2|t'|^2 |r'|^2 \tau ^2] . \]

1387: As $\th _t - \th _r = \frac{\pi}{2}$,

1388: \[ \hspace{2cm} D' = (1+|r'|^2)[|r'|^2  e^{-2i  \th _t} + \tau ^2 (|r'|^2 +

1389:  |t'|^2 )^2 ] \]

1390: where of course $\mid r' \mid^{2}+\mid t' \mid ^{2}=1$.

1391: Substituting $D'$ in Eq.(xv),

1392: \[ Q = \frac{{\tau}^{2} - \mid r' \mid ^{2}e^{-2i\th _{r}}}{{\tau}^{2}+\mid

1393: r' \mid ^{2}e^{-2i\th _{t}}} .\]

1394: Multiplying numerator and denominator of $Q$ by

1395: $e^{2i\th_{t}}$ and using $e^{2i

1396: (\th _t - \th _r)} = e^{i \pi} = -1$,

1397: we get from (xi)

1398: \[  \frac{\pa \th}{\pa \phi}  =\frac{1-\mid r' \mid ^{4}}{\mid 1-r'^{2}{\tau}

1399: ^{2} \mid

1400: ^{2}} \]

1401: 

1402: 

1403: \section{APPENDIX II}

1404: 

1405: The global density of states is given by

1406: \bea

1407: \rho(E)&=&\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \int_{\frac{-W}{2}}^{\frac{W}{2}}dy\nn\\

1408: && \sum_{m,k_m}\left|\psi_{m,k_m}(x,y)\right|^2 \delta (E-E_{m,k_m})

1409: \hspace{1.6cm}\mbox{(i)}\nn

1410: \eea

1411: where \hspace{0.2cm} $\psi_{m,k_m}(x,y) = \sum_n c_n^{(m)}(x)\chi_n(y)$

1412: and $E_{m,k_m}$ is the energy of an electron in the leads.\\

1413: \hfill\\

1414: $E_{m,k_m}=\displaystyle \frac{m^2\pi^2\hbar ^2}{2m_eW^2}+ \frac{\hbar ^2k_m^2}{2m_e},\hspace{0.2cm}\mbox{where}\hspace{0.2cm}m=\pm 1, \pm 2,$

1415: as there are two propagating modes in the leads.\\

1416: \hfill\\

1417: As $\chi_n(y)$'s form an orthonormal set,

1418: $$

1419: \rho(E)=\sum_{m,k_m}\delta (E-E_{m,k_m})\int_{-\infty}^\infty

1420: dx \sum_n \left|c_n^{(m)}(x)\right|^2$$

1421: \bea

1422: \rho(E)&=&\frac{2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx

1423: \sum_n \left|c_n^{(1)}(x)\right|^2\nn\\

1424: &+& \frac{2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \sum_n \left|c_n^{(2)}(x)\right|^2

1425: \hspace{2.5cm}\mbox{(ii)}\nn

1426: \eea

1427: Here, $v_1 = \displaystyle \frac{\hbar k_1}{m_e}$ and $v_2 =

1428: \displaystyle \frac{\hbar k_2}{m_e}$.\\

1429: \hfill\\

1430: Now,

1431: \bea

1432: \int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \sum_n \left|c_n^{(1)}(x)

1433: \right|^2 &=& \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left|c_1^{(1)}(x)\right|^2 dx \nn\\

1434: &+& \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left|c_2^{(1)}

1435: (x)\right|^2 dx\nn\\

1436: &+& \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left|c_3^{(1)}(x)\right|^2 dx +

1437: \cdots  \nn\\

1438: &=& T1 \mbox{(say)},\nn

1439: \eea

1440: where electron is incident in the fundamental mode,

1441: \bea

1442: c_1^{(1)}(x) &=& e^{ik_1x} +

1443: {\tilde r_{11}}  e^{-ik_1x}

1444: \hspace{.2cm}\mbox{for}\hspace{.2cm} x < 0 \nn\\

1445: &=& {\tilde t_{11}} \hspace{.2cm}e^{ik_1x}

1446: \hspace{.2cm}\mbox{for}\hspace{.2cm}

1447: x > 0 \nn\\

1448: c_2^{(1)}(x) &=& {\tilde r_{12}}

1449: \hspace{.2cm}e^{-ik_2x}

1450: \hspace{.2cm}\mbox{for}\hspace{.2cm} x < 0 \nn\\

1451: &=& {\tilde t_{12}} \hspace{.2cm}e^{ik_2x}

1452: \hspace{.2cm}\mbox{for}\hspace{.2cm}

1453: x > 0 \nn

1454: \eea

1455: and for $n > 2$,

1456: \bea

1457: c_n^{(1)}(x) &=& t_{1n} \hspace{.2cm}e^{\kappa_n x}\hspace{.2cm}

1458: \mbox{for}\hspace{.2cm}x < 0 \nn\\

1459: &=&  t_{1n} \hspace{.2cm}e^{-\kappa_n x}\hspace{.2cm}\mbox{for}

1460: \hspace{.2cm}x >

1461: 0 \nn

1462: \eea

1463: \bea

1464: T1 &=& \int_{-\infty}^0 dx

1465: \left[1+|{\tilde r_{11}}|^2+2|{\tilde r_{11}}| \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_1x+\eta_1)

1466: \right] \nn\\

1467:  &+& \int_0^\infty dx|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2

1468: + \int_{-\infty}^0 dx|{\tilde r_{12}}|^2 +

1469: \int_0^\infty dx|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2\nn\\

1470: &+&|t_{13}|^2 + |t_{14}|^2 + \cdots \cdots \nn

1471: \eea

1472: Here,\hspace{.3cm}$\eta_1$ is defined as $\displaystyle{\tilde r_{11}}=|{\tilde r_{11}}|e^{-i\eta_1}$\\

1473: \hfill\\

1474: Similarly, for electron incident in the first excited mode,\\

1475: \bea

1476: T2 &=& \int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \sum_n \left|c_n^{(2)}(x)\right|^2\nn\\

1477: &=& \int_{-\infty}^0 dx \left[1+|{\tilde r_{22 }}|^2+2|{\tilde r_{22}}| \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_2x+\eta_2)\right]\nn\\

1478: &+& \int_0^\infty dx|{\tilde t_{22}}|^2 + \int_{-\infty}^0 dx|{\tilde r_{21}}|

1479: ^2 + \int_0^\infty dx|{\tilde t_{21}}|^2\nn\\

1480: &+&|t_{23}|^2 + |t_{24}|^2 + \cdots \cdots  ,\nn

1481: \eea

1482: Here,\hspace{.3cm}$\eta_2$ is defined as $\displaystyle{\tilde r_{22 }}= |{\tilde r_{22 }}| e^{-i\eta_2}$\\

1483: \bea

1484: \mbox{Therefore,}\nn\\

1485: \rho (E)&=& 2\left[\frac{1+|{\tilde r_{11}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm} \frac{1+|{\tilde r_{22}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \right.\nn\\

1486: &+& \left. \frac{|{\tilde r_{12}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx +

1487: \hspace{.02cm}\frac{|{\tilde r_{21}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \right.\nn\\

1488:  &+& \left. \frac{2|{\tilde r_{11}}|}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_1x+\eta_1)\right. \nn \\

1489: & + & \left. \hspace{.02cm}\frac{2|{\tilde r_{22}}|}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_2x+\eta_2)\right. \nn \\

1490: &+& \left. \frac{|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2+|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_0^{\infty}dx + \frac{|{\tilde t_{22}}|^2+|{\tilde t_{21}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_0^{\infty}dx \right. \nn \\

1491: &+& \left.\frac{1}{h v_1}\left(|t_{13}|^2+|t_{14}|^2+ \cdots \right)\right. \nn \\

1492: &+& \left.\frac{1}{h v_2}\left(|t_{23}|^2+|t_{24}|^2+ \cdots \right) \right] \nn

1493: \eea

1494: Due to time reversal symmetry, ${\tilde r_{12}}={\tilde r_{21}}$ \& ${\tilde t_{12}}={\tilde t_{21}}$.\\

1495: Inside the square bracket $\displaystyle[\hspace{.2cm}]$,\\

1496: in the 3rd term we put ${\tilde r_{12}}={\tilde r_{21}}$, \\

1497: in the 4th term we put ${\tilde r_{21}}= {\tilde r_{12}}$,\\

1498: in the 7th term we put ${\tilde t_{12}}={\tilde t_{21}}$, \\

1499: in the 8th term we put ${\tilde t_{21}}= {\tilde t_{12}}$.

1500: \bea

1501: \mbox{Therefore},\nn\\

1502: \rho (E) &=& 2\left[\frac{1+|{\tilde r_{11}}|^2+|{\tilde r_{21}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \right.\nn\\

1503: &+&\left. \frac{1+|{\tilde r_{12}}|^2+|{\tilde

1504: r_{22}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \right.\nn \\

1505: & + &\frac{|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2+|{\tilde t_{21}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_0^{\infty}dx

1506: \hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}\frac{|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2+|{\tilde t_{22}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_0^{\infty}dx\nn \\

1507: & + &\frac{2|{\tilde r_{11}}|}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_1x+\eta_1)\nn \\

1508: &+&\frac{2|{\tilde r_{22}}|}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_2x+\eta_2)\nn \\

1509: & + & \frac{1}{h v_1}\left(|t_{13}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}|t_{14}|^2 \hspace{.02cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn \\

1510: & + &\left. \frac{1}{h v_2}\left(|t_{23}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}|t_{24}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+ \cdots \right)\right]\nn

1511: \eea

1512: Now adding and subtracting the following terms inside $\displaystyle[\hspace{.2cm}]$,\\

1513: \hfill\\

1514: $\displaystyle{\frac{|{\tilde t_{11}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx}$, 

1515: $\displaystyle{\frac{|{\tilde t_{21}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx}$, 

1516: $\displaystyle{\frac{|{\tilde t_{22}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx}$, 

1517: $\displaystyle{\frac{|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx}$,

1518: \bea

1519: \mbox{we get},\nn\\

1520: \rho (E) &=& 2\left[\frac{1 + |{\tilde r_{11}}|^2 + |{\tilde r_{21}}|^2 + |{\tilde t_{11}}|^2 + |{\tilde t_{21}}|^2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \right. \nn\\

1521: & + & \frac{1+|{\tilde r_{12}}|^2+|{\tilde r_{22}}|^2+|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2+

1522: |{\tilde t_{21}}|^2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx\nn\\

1523: & + &\frac{2|{\tilde r_{11}}|}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_1x+\eta_1)\nn\\

1524: & + &\frac{2|{\tilde r_{22}}|}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^0 dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_2x+\eta_2)\nn \\

1525: & + & \frac{1}{h v_1}\left(|t_{13}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}|t_{14}|^2 \hspace{.02cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn \\

1526: & + & \left. \frac{1}{h v_2}\left(| t_{23}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}|t_{24}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+ \cdots \right) \right]\nn

1527: \eea

1528: 

1529: Now \hspace{.2cm}$|{\tilde r_{11}}|^2 + |{\tilde r_{21}}|^2 + |{\tilde t_{11}}|^2 + |{\tilde t_{21}}|^2=1$ \\

1530: 

1531: and \hspace{.2cm}$|{\tilde r_{12}}|^2+|{\tilde r_{22}}|^2+|{\tilde t_{12}}|^2+

1532: |{\tilde t_{21}}|^2=1$ \\

1533: \bea

1534: \mbox{Thus},\nn\\

1535: \rho (E) & = & \frac{2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \hspace{.2cm} + \hspace{.2cm}\frac{2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\nn\\

1536: & + &\frac{2|{\tilde r_{11}}|}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx

1537: \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_1x+\eta_1)\nn\\

1538: & + &\frac{2|{\tilde r_{22}}|}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \hspace{.2cm}Cos(2k_2x+\eta_2)\nn \\

1539: & + &\frac{2}{h v_1}\left(|t_{13}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}| t_{14}|^2 \hspace{.02cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn \\

1540: & + &\frac{2}{h v_2}\left(t_{23}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+\hspace{.02cm}|t_{24}|^2\hspace{.02cm}+ \cdots \right)\hspace{2.0cm}\mbox{(iii)}\nn

1541: \eea

1542: Now $\displaystyle \frac{2}{h v_1}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx + \frac{2}{h v_2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx = \rho_0 (E)$ i.e. DOS in the absence of scatterer. 

1543: Also according to some text books \cite{gha},

1544: for plane wave states the current conservation condition

1545: $$\frac{\pa}{\pa t}\int_{\Omega} \psi^*\psi \hspace{.2cm}d\tau \hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm}\int_{S} \vec J.\hat n \hspace{.2cm}ds \hspace{.2cm}=\hspace{.2cm}0$$

1546: can be satisfied if and only if the wave function vanishes at $\pm \infty$ for

1547: all energy. Thus the 3rd and 4th term of Eq.(iii) of this 

1548: section is $0$. Besides, neglecting these oscillatory

1549: terms in the leads is very standard in the derivation of Friedel

1550: sum rule \cite{yeycm}, where it is assumed that the carrier

1551: concentration is so high in the leads that the leads

1552: are non-polarizable. However, assuming non-polarizable leads

1553: alone does not eradicate all energy dependence of the self energy

1554: as thought in Ref. \cite{yeycm} (see Eqs. 2 and 6 therein, the

1555: parameter $t_\alpha$ can be strongly energy dependent, which

1556: is dispersive behavior). 

1557: So we get\\

1558: \bea

1559: \rho (E) & = &\rho_0 (E)\hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm}\frac{2}{h v_1}\left(|t_{13}|^2\hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm}|t_{14}|^2 \hspace{.2cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn\\

1560: &+&\frac{2}{h v_2}\left(|t_{23}|^2\hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm t_{24}}|^2\hspace{.2cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn

1561: \eea

1562: \bea

1563: \mbox{Thus} \hspace{.4cm} \rho(E)-\rho_0(E)&=& \frac{2}{h v_1}\left(|t_{13}|^2\hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm}|t_{14}|^2 \hspace{.2cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn\\

1564: &+&\frac{2}{h v_2}\left(|t_{23}|^2\hspace{.2cm}+\hspace{.2cm t_{24}}|^2\hspace{.2cm}+ \cdots \right)\nn\\

1565: &=& \left(\rho-\rho_0\right)_R\nn

1566: \eea

1567: 

1568: 

1569: 

1570: 

1571: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1572: \bibitem{new82}  R.G.Newton, Scattering theory of

1573: wave and particles (Springer -

1574:                  Verlag, New York, 1966), pg. 440.

1575: \bibitem{yac95}  A.Yacoby et al.,

1576:  Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 4047 (1995)

1577: \bibitem{sch97}  R. Schuster et al.,

1578:  Nature(London) {\bf 385}, 417 (1997)

1579: \bibitem{CER97}  Cernicchiaro et. al, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 273 (1997)

1580: \bibitem{deo96}  P. Singha Deo,

1581:                  Phys. Rev.B {\bf 53}, 15447 (1996)

1582: \bibitem{comment} In some cases these NSDN can lead to a spontaneously

1583: broken discrete symmetry like parity. P.Singha Deo et al., (to be published)

1584: \bibitem{leg91}  A.J. Leggett, in Granular Nano-Electronics, Vol.251 of NATO

1585:                  Advanced Studies Institute, Series B: Physics, edited

1586:                  by D.K. Ferry, J.R. Barker and C. Jacoboni (Plenum, New York,

1587:                  1991), p.297

1588: \bibitem{fan}  U.Fano

1589:  Phys. Rev. {\bf 124}, 1866 (1961)

1590: \bibitem{bag90}  P.F.Bagwell,

1591:                Phys. Rev.B {\bf 41}, 10354(1990)

1592: \bibitem{tek93}  E.Tekman and P.F.Bagwell

1593:                 Phys. Rev.B {\bf 48}, 2553 (1993);

1594: W. Porod, Z. Shao and C.S. Lent, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 48}, 8495 (1993).

1595: \bibitem{deo98}  P. Singha Deo,

1596:                  Solid State Commun. {\bf 107}, 69 (1998)

1597: \bibitem{yey95}  L.Yeyati and M.B{\"u}ttiker,

1598:          Phys. Rev.B {\bf 52}, R14360 (1995)

1599: \bibitem{jay96} P. Singha Deo and A.M.Jayannavar

1600:                  Mod. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 10}, 787 (1996)

1601: \bibitem{cho98} C.-Mo Ryu and S.Y.Cho,

1602:                  Phys. Rev.B {\bf 58}, 3587 (1998)

1603: \bibitem{xu98}   H.Xu  and W.Sheng,

1604:                  Phys. Rev.B {\bf 57}, 11903 (1998)

1605: \bibitem{lee99} H.W.Lee,

1606:  Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 2358 (1999)

1607: \bibitem{tan99}  T.Taniguchi and M.Buttiker,

1608: Phys. Rev.B {\bf 60}, 13814 (1999)

1609: \bibitem{yeycm}  A.L.Yeyati and M.B{\"u}ttiker, Phys. Rev. B

1610: {\bf 62}, 7307 (2000).

1611: \bibitem{fri52}  J.Friedel, Philos. Mag. {\bf 43}, 153 (1952);

1612: J.M. Ziman, Principles of the Theory of Solids, 2nd ed.,

1613: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

1614: \bibitem{lan61}  J.S.Langer and V.Ambegaokar, Phys. Rev. {\bf 121}, 1090

1615: (1961)

1616: \bibitem{smi59}  F.T.Smith Phys. Rev. {\bf 113}, 349 (1960)

1617: \bibitem{kumar} R. Landauer and T. Martin, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 66},

1618: 217 (1994).

1619: \bibitem{gri}  S.Griffith

1620:  Trans. Faraday Soc. {\bf 49}, 650 (1953)

1621: \bibitem{deo93}  P.S.Deo and A.M.Jayannavar

1622:  Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf B 7}, 1045 (1993);

1623: %\bibitem{jay}

1624: P. Singha Deo and A. M. Jayannavar, cond-mat/0006035 and

1625: references therein.

1626: \bibitem{com} From the derivation of the FSR (one can see the book by Ziman

1627: in Ref. \cite{fri52}), that the scattering phase shift is defined such

1628: that when we set the scattering potential to 0 the scattering

1629: phase shift is also 0. However, in the double delta function potential

1630: the $arg(t)=kl$ when the strength of the delta function potentials

1631: are set to zero. Hence the scattering phase shift is $arg(t)-kl$.

1632: However, the term coming from the derivative of $kl$ cancels with the

1633: term coming from $\rho_0$, leading to the Eq. in (11).

1634: \bibitem{gas}  V. Gasperin, T. Christen and M. B{\"u}ttiker, Phys.

1635: Rev. A {\bf 54}, 4022 (1996).

1636: \bibitem{gha} Quantum Mechanics by A.K. Ghatak and S. Loknathan,

1637: third edition, Macmillan India Ltd., pg. 57.

1638: \end{thebibliography}

1639: \end{multicols}

1640: 

1641: \end{document}

1642: 

1643: 

1644: 

1645: