1: %file of diffusion in granular mixtures

2: %final manuscript: March 14, 2000. 

3: %revised manuscript: November, 2000. 

4: %file for PF 

5: %Last version: December 5, 2001.

6: 

7:  

8: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,prb]{revtex} 

9: 

10: \begin{document} 

11: \title{Hydrodynamics for a granular binary mixture at low density} 

12: \author{Vicente Garz\'{o}\footnote[1]{Electronic mail: vicenteg@unex.es}} 

13: \address{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica, Universidad de Extremadura, E-06071 \\ 

14: Badajoz, Spain} 

15: \author{James W. Dufty\footnote[2]{Electronic mail: dufty@phys.ufl.edu}} 

16: \address{Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, \\ 

17: Florida 32611} 

18: \date{\today} 

19: \maketitle 

20: \tighten

21: \begin{abstract} 

22: Hydrodynamic equations for a binary mixture of inelastic hard spheres are 

23: derived from the Boltzmann kinetic theory. A normal solution is 

24: obtained via the Chapman-Enskog method for states near the local homogeneous 

25: cooling state. The mass, heat, and momentum fluxes are determined to first 

26: order in the spatial gradients of the hydrodynamic fields, and the 

27: associated transport coefficients are identified. In the same way as for 

28: binary mixtures with elastic collisions, these coefficients are determined 

29: from a set of coupled linear integral equations. Practical evaluation is 

30: possible using a Sonine polynomial approximation, and is illustrated here by 

31: explicit calculation of the relevant transport coefficients:  the mutual 

32: diffusion, the pressure diffusion, the thermal diffusion, the shear viscosity, the 

33: Dufour coefficient,  the thermal conductivity, and the pressure energy coefficient. 

34: All these coefficients are given in terms of  the restitution coefficients 

35: and the ratios of mass, concentration, and particle sizes. Interesting and 

36: new effects arise from the fact that the reference states for the two 

37: components have different partial temperatures, leading to additional 

38: dependencies of the transport coefficients on the concentration. The results 

39: hold for arbitrary degree of inelasticity and are not limited to specific 

40: values of the parameters of the mixture. Applications of this theory will be 

41: discussed in subsequent papers.  

42: \end{abstract} 

43:  

44: \draft 

45: \pacs{PACS number(s): 45.70.Mg, 05.20.Dd, 51.10.+y} 

46:  

47: \bigskip \narrowtext 

48: %\newpage 

49:  

50: \section{Introduction} 

51:  

52: \label{sec1} 

53:  

54: The qualitative properties of a granular gas whose dynamics is dominated by 

55: pair-wise collisions between the grains can be described by a Boltzmann 

56: equation, suitably modified to describe the more complex two particle 

57: collisions. In the simplest model the grains are taken to be smooth, hard 

58: spheres with inelastic collisions. In recent years, the derivation of 

59: hydrodynamic equations for a one component granular gas from this idealized 

60: Boltzmann description has been worked out in detail to Navier-Stokes order,  

61: \cite{BDKS98} with explicit expressions for the transport coefficients as 

62: a function of the degree of dissipation (the restitution coefficient). These 

63: recent results improve upon earlier studies \cite{JR85,LSJCh84,GS95} by 

64: providing expressions that are accurate even for strong dissipation. As a 

65: consequence, there are now precise predictions from the Boltzmann equation 

66: suitable for detailed comparison with Monte Carlo simulation, molecular 

67: dynamics simulation, and the evolving new class of controlled experiments. 

68: This analysis for the one component system also has been extended to dense 

69: gases described by the Enskog equation. \cite{GD199} Similar studies for 

70: multicomponent granular gases are more scarce. Existing work on 

71: multicomponent transport appears to be based on weak dissipation 

72: approximations. \cite{JM89,Z95,AW98,WA99} Our objective is to 

73: provide a description of hydrodynamics in binary granular mixtures with a 

74: comparable accuracy to that for the one component system, valid over the 

75: broadest parameter range including strong dissipation. The reference 

76: homogeneous cooling state for a binary mixture has been discussed in detail 

77: recently \cite{GD299} to provide the proper basis for analysis of transport 

78: due to spatial inhomogeneities. Those results are used here to describe 

79: mass, heat, and momentum transport. The expressions for the distribution 

80: functions, fluxes, and transport coefficients are exact to Navier-Stokes 

81: order (within the context of the Boltzmann equation). 

82:  

83: The hydrodynamic equations for a binary mixture at low density are derived 

84: from the coupled set of Boltzmann equations for the two species in the same 

85: manner as for a one component system. The solutions for the distribution 

86: functions are expanded about a local homogeneous cooling state that is 

87: analogous to the local equilibrium state for a gas with elastic collisions. 

88: The expansion is in powers of the spatial gradients of the hydrodynamic 

89: fields (e.g., species densities, temperature, and flow velocity) and is an 

90: extension of the familiar Chapman-Enskog procedure for elastic collisions. 

91: The primary technical complication for inelastic collisions is an inherent 

92: time dependence of the reference state due to collisional cooling. In a one 

93: component system this occurs through the time dependence of the temperature 

94: defined in terms of the mean square velocity for the homogeneous cooling 

95: distribution. For a two component system the temperature is defined in terms 

96: of the algebraic average of the mean square velocities for the two 

97: distributions. In the case of elastic collisions the average temperature is 

98: the same as the kinetic temperatures for each species in the local 

99: equilibrium state. However, a surprising result of the study in Ref.\ \onlinecite {GD299} is that these temperatures are all different for 

100: inelastic collisions. This does not mean that there are additional 

101: hydrodynamic degrees of freedom since their cooling rates are the same and 

102: consequently, the partial kinetic temperatures still can be expressed in 

103: terms of the average temperature. But the relationships between these 

104: temperatures are functions of the densities for the two species and lead to 

105: a new dependence of the reference cooling states on these hydrodynamic 

106: variables. The consequences of this effect for the transport coefficients is 

107: significant, as shown below. 

108:  

109: The hydrodynamic equations for a binary mixture are somewhat more 

110: complicated than for the one component case: six coupled equations with 

111: eight transport coefficients. The irreversible (dissipative) parts of the 

112: mass, heat, and momentum fluxes are calculated to leading order in the 

113: spatial gradients of the hydrodynamic fields. For systems with elastic 

114: collisions the specific set of gradients contributing to each flux is 

115: restricted by fluid symmetry, time reversal invariance (Onsager relations), 

116: and the form of the entropy production.\cite{GM84} For inelastic collisions only fluid 

117: symmetry applies so there is greater freedom in representing the fluxes and 

118: identifying associated transport coefficients. This is discussed further in 

119: Section \ref{sec3} where the independent gradients are chosen to be those 

120: for the concentration of species one, the pressure, the temperature and the 

121: components of the flow field, with eight independent scalar transport 

122: coefficients. Using the Chapman-Enskog expansion the solutions to the 

123: Boltzmann equations are obtained to leading order in these gradients, and 

124: the transport coefficients are expressed in terms of the solutions to a set 

125: of coupled linear integral equations. 

126:  

127: The plan of the paper is as follows. In Sec.\ \ref{sec2}, the coupled set of 

128: Boltzmann equations and the corresponding hydrodynamic equations are 

129: recalled. The Chapman-Enskog expansion adapted to the inelastic binary 

130: mixtures is described in Sec.\ \ref{sec3} to construct the distribution 

131: function to linear order in the gradients. This solution is used to 

132: calculate the fluxes and identify associated transport coefficients. A 

133: Sonine polynomial approximation is applied to solve the linear integral 

134: equations defining selected transport coefficients in Sec.\ \ref{sec4}. 

135: We get explicit expressions for these transport coefficients in terms of the 

136: restitution coefficients and the masses, concentrations, and sizes of the 

137: constituents of the mixture.  

138: Finally, the results are summarized and discussed in Sec.\ \ref 

139: {sec5}. 

140:  

141: 

142: \section{Boltzmann equation and conservation laws} 

143:  \label{sec2} 

144:  

145: Consider a binary mixture of smooth hard spheres of masses $m_{1}$ and $% 

146: m_{2} $, and diameters $\sigma _{1}$ and $\sigma _{2}$. The inelasticity of 

147: collisions among all pairs is characterized by three independent constant 

148: coefficients of normal restitution $\alpha _{11}$, $\alpha _{22}$, and $% 

149: \alpha _{12}=\alpha _{21}$, where $\alpha _{ij}$ is the restitution 

150: coefficient for collisions between particles of species $i$ and $j$. In the 

151: low-density regime, the distribution functions $f_{i}({\bf r},{\bf v};t)$ $% 

152: (i=1,2)$ for the two species are determined from the set of nonlinear 

153: Boltzmann equations \cite{BDS97}  

154: \begin{equation} 

155: \left( \partial _{t}+{\bf v}_{1}\cdot \nabla \right) f_{i}({\bf r},{\bf v} 

156: _{1},t)=\sum_{j}J_{ij}\left[ {\bf v}_{1}|f_{i}(t),f_{j}(t)\right] \;. 

157: \label{2.1} 

158: \end{equation} 

159: The Boltzmann collision operator $J_{ij}\left[ {\bf v}_{1}|f_{i},f_{j}\right] 

160: $ describing the scattering of pairs of particles is  

161: \begin{eqnarray} 

162: J_{ij}\left[ {\bf v}_{1}|f_{i},f_{j}\right] &=&\sigma _{ij}^{2}\int d{\bf v} 

163: _{2}\int d\widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}\,\Theta (\widehat{{\bbox {\sigma }}} 

164: \cdot {\bf g}_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})  \nonumber 

165: \\ 

166: &&\times \left[ \alpha _{ij}^{-2}f_{i}({\bf r},{\bf v}_{1}^{\prime 

167: },t)f_{j}( {\bf r},{\bf v}_{2}^{\prime },t)-f_{i}({\bf r},{\bf v}% 

168: _{1},t)f_{j}({\bf r}, {\bf v}_{2},t)\right] \;,  \label{2.2} 

169: \end{eqnarray} 

170: where $\sigma _{ij}=\left( \sigma _{i}+\sigma _{j}\right) /2$, $\widehat{% 

171: \bbox {\sigma}}$ is a unit vector along their line of centers, $\Theta $ is 

172: the Heaviside step function, and ${\bf g}_{12}={\bf v}_{1}-{\bf v}_{2}$. The 

173: primes on the velocities denote the initial values $\{{\bf v}_{1}^{\prime },  

174: {\bf v}_{2}^{\prime }\}$ that lead to $\{{\bf v}_{1},{\bf v}_{2}\}$ 

175: following a binary (restituting) collision:  

176: \begin{equation} 

177: {\bf v}_{1}^{\prime }={\bf v}_{1}-\mu _{ji}\left( 1+\alpha _{ij}^{-1}\right) 

178: (\widehat{{\bbox {\sigma }}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\widehat{{\bbox {\sigma }}} 

179: ,\quad {\bf v}_{2}^{\prime }={\bf v}_{2}+\mu _{ij}\left( 1+\alpha 

180: _{ij}^{-1}\right) (\widehat{{\bbox {\sigma }}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\widehat{% 

181: \bbox {\sigma}}  \label{2.3} 

182: \end{equation} 

183: where $\mu _{ij}=m_{i}/\left( m_{i}+m_{j}\right) $. The relevant 

184: hydrodynamic fields are the number densities $n_{i}$, the flow velocity $% 

185: {\bf u}$, and the temperature $T$. They are defined in terms of moments of 

186: the distributions $f_{i}$ as  

187: \begin{equation} 

188: n_{i}=\int d{\bf v}_{1}f_{i}({\bf v}_{1})\;,\quad \rho {\bf u}=\sum_{i}\int 

189: d {\bf v}_{1}m_{i}{\bf v}_{1}f_{i}({\bf v}_{1})\;,  \label{2.4} 

190: \end{equation} 

191: \begin{equation} 

192: nT=p=\sum_{i}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\frac{m_{i}}{3}V_{1}^{2}f_{i}({\bf v}_{1})\;, 

193: \label{2.5} 

194: \end{equation} 

195: where ${\bf V}_{1}={\bf v}_{1}-{\bf u}$ is the peculiar velocity, $% 

196: n=n_{1}+n_{2}$ is the total number density, $\rho =m_{1}n_{1}+m_{2}n_{2}$ is 

197: the total mass density, and $p$ is the pressure. 

198:  

199: The collision operators conserve the particle number of each species and the 

200: total momentum but the total energy is not conserved:  

201: \begin{equation} 

202: \int d{\bf v}_{1}J_{ij}[{\bf v}_{1}|f_{i},f_{j}]=0\;,  \label{2.6} 

203: \end{equation} 

204: \begin{equation} 

205: \sum_{i,j}\int d{\bf v}_{1}m_{i}{\bf v}_{1}J_{ij}[{\bf v}_{1}|f_{i},f_{j}]=0 

206: \;,  \label{2.7} 

207: \end{equation} 

208: \begin{equation} 

209: \sum_{i,j}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\case{1}{2}m_{i}v_{1}^{2}J_{ij}[{\bf v} 

210: _{1}|f_{i},f_{j}]=-\case{3}{2}nT\zeta \;,  \label{2.8} 

211: \end{equation} 

212: where $\zeta $ is identified as the ``cooling rate'' due to inelastic 

213: collisions among all species. From Eqs.\ (\ref{2.4})--(\ref{2.8}), the 

214: macroscopic balance equations for the mixture can be obtained. They are 

215: given by  

216: \begin{equation} 

217: D_{t}n_{i}+n_{i}\nabla \cdot {\bf u}+\frac{\nabla \cdot {\bf j}_{i}}{m_{i}} 

218: =0\;,  \label{2.9} 

219: \end{equation} 

220: \begin{equation} 

221: D_{t}{\bf u}+\rho ^{-1}\nabla {\sf P}=0\;,  \label{2.10} 

222: \end{equation} 

223: \begin{equation} 

224: D_{t}T-\frac{T}{n}\sum_{i}\frac{\nabla \cdot {\bf j}_{i}}{m_{i}}+\frac{2}{3n} 

225: \left( \nabla \cdot {\bf q}+{\sf P}:\nabla {\bf u}\right) =-\zeta \,T\;. 

226: \label{2.11} 

227: \end{equation} 

228: In the above equations, $D_{t}=\partial _{t}+{\bf u}\cdot \nabla $ is the 

229: material derivative,  

230: \begin{equation} 

231: {\bf j}_{i}=m_{i}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,{\bf V}_{1}\,f_{i}({\bf v}_{1})

232: \label{2.11bb} 

233: \end{equation} 

234: is the mass flux for species $i$ relative to the local flow,  

235: \begin{equation} 

236: {\sf P}=\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,m_{i}{\bf V}_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\,f_{i}({\bf  

237: v}_{1})  \label{2.12} 

238: \end{equation} 

239: is the total pressure tensor, and  

240: \begin{equation} 

241: {\bf q}=\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,\case{1}{2}m_{i}V_{1}^{2}{\bf V} 

242: _{1}\,f_{i}({\bf v}_{1})  \label{2.13} 

243: \end{equation} 

244: is the total heat flux. 

245:  

246: The balance equations become a closed set of hydrodynamic equations for the 

247: fields $n_{i}$, ${\bf u}$ and $T$ once the fluxes (\ref{2.11})--(\ref{2.13}) 

248: and the cooling rate $\zeta $ are obtained in terms of the hydrodynamic 

249: fields and their gradients. The resulting equations constitute the 

250: hydrodynamics for the mixture. Since these fluxes are explicit linear 

251: functionals of $f_{i}$, a \ representation in terms of the fields results 

252: when a solution to the Boltzmann equation can be obtained as a function of 

253: the fields and their gradients. Such a solution is called a ``normal'' 

254: solution, and a practical means to generate it for small spatial gradients 

255: is provided by the Chapman-Enskog method. \cite{FK72} 

256:  

257: 

258: \section{Chapman-Enskog solution of the Boltzmann equations} 

259: \label{sec3} 

260:  

261: The analysis of transport phenomena in fluid mixtures is considerably more 

262: complicated than in the case of a one component system. Not only is the 

263: number of transport coefficients larger but these coefficients also are 

264: functions of more parameters such as the concentrations, mass ratios, size 

265: ratios, and the three coefficients of restitution. It follows from fluid 

266: symmetry that the pressure tensor has the same form to first order in the 

267: gradients as for a one component system. As noted in the Introduction, there 

268: is more flexibility in the representation of the heat and mass fluxes. Even 

269: in the case of elastic collisions, several different (but equivalent) 

270: choices of hdyrodynamic fields are used so some care is required in 

271: comparing transport coefficients in the different representations. The 

272: choice here is to use the concentration of species $1$, defined in terms of 

273: the densities by $x_{1}=n_{1}/\left( n_{1}+n_{2}\right) $, together with the 

274: pressure, the temperature, and the three components of the local flow 

275: velocity. \cite{Zubarev} The fluxes then have the forms  

276: \begin{equation} 

277: {\bf j}_{1}=-\left( \frac{m_{1}m_{2}n}{\rho }\right) D\nabla x_{1}-\frac{% 

278: \rho }{p}D_{p}\nabla p-\frac{\rho }{T}D^{\prime }\nabla T,\hspace{0.3in}{\bf % 

279: j}_{2}=-{\bf j}_{1}  \label{n1} 

280: \end{equation} 

281: \begin{equation} 

282: {\bf q}=-T^{2}D^{\prime \prime }\nabla x_{1}-L\nabla p-\lambda \nabla T, 

283: \label{n2} 

284: \end{equation} 

285: \begin{equation} 

286: P_{\alpha \beta }=p\delta _{\alpha \beta }-\eta \left( \nabla _{\beta 

287: }u_{\alpha }+\nabla _{\alpha }u_{\beta }-\frac{2}{3}\delta _{\alpha \beta }% 

288: {\bf \nabla \cdot u}\right) -\kappa \delta _{\alpha \beta }{\bf \nabla \cdot 

289: u}.  \label{n3} 

290: \end{equation} 

291: The transport coefficients in these equations are  

292: \begin{equation} 

293: \left(  

294: \begin{array}{c} 

295: D \\  

296: D^{\prime } \\  

297: D_{p} \\  

298: D^{\prime \prime } \\  

299: \lambda  \\  

300: L \\  

301: \eta  \\  

302: \kappa  

303: \end{array} 

304: \right) =\left(  

305: \begin{array}{c} 

306: \text{diffusion coefficient} \\  

307: \text{thermal diffusion coefficient} \\  

308: \text{pressure diffusion coefficient} \\  

309: \text{Dufour coefficient} \\  

310: \text{thermal conductivity} \\  

311: \text{pressure energy coefficient} \\  

312: \text{shear viscosity} \\  

313: \text{bulk viscosity} 

314: \end{array} 

315: \right)   \label{n4} 

316: \end{equation} 

317: For systems with elastic collisions, the thermal conductivity in a mixture 

318: is generally measured at ${\bf j}_{1}=$ constant, based on Onsager's 

319: relations between coefficients in ${\bf j}_{1}$ and ${\bf q}$. This is no 

320: longer an experimentally useful choice here. If in addition it is required 

321: that $p=$ constant, then $\nabla x_{1}$ can be eliminated to give ${\bf q}$ 

322: in terms of ${\bf j}_{1}$ and $\nabla T$. The coefficient of $\nabla T$ in 

323: this representation is then the thermal conductivity.\cite{GM84} The bulk viscosity 

324: vanishes at low density, as shown below, just as in the case of elastic 

325: collisions. The objective here is to apply the Chapman-Enskog method for a 

326: solution to the Boltzmann equation to first order in the gradients, confirm 

327: the forms (\ref{n1})--(\ref{n3}), and determine a means to calculate the 

328: transport coefficients as functions of the parameters of the system. 

329:  

330: The Chapman-Enskog method assumes the existence of a ``normal'' solution in 

331: which all space and time dependence of the distribution function occurs 

332: through a functional dependence on the hydrodynamic fields  

333: \begin{equation} 

334: f_{i}({\bf r},{\bf v}_{1},t)=f_{i}\left[ {\bf v}_{1}|x_{1}

335: ({\bf r}, t), p({\bf r}, t), T({\bf r}, t), {\bf u}({\bf r}, t) \right] \;.  

336: \label{3.1} 

337: \end{equation} 

338: For small spatial variations, this functional dependence can be made local 

339: in space and time through an expansion in gradients of the fields. To 

340: generate the expansion $f_{i}$ is written as a series expansion in a formal 

341: parameter $\epsilon $ measuring the uniformity of the system,  

342: \begin{equation} 

343: f_{i}=f_{i}^{(0)}+\epsilon \,f_{i}^{(1)}+\epsilon^2 \,f_{i}^{(2)}+\cdots \;, 

344: \label{3.2} 

345: \end{equation} 

346: where each factor of $\epsilon $ means an implicit gradient of a 

347: hydrodynamic field. The local reference states $f_{i}^{(0)}$ are chosen such 

348: that they have the same moments as in Eqs.\ (\ref{2.4}) and (\ref{2.5}), or 

349: equivalently, the remainder of the expansion must obey the orthogonality 

350: conditions  

351: \begin{equation} 

352: \int d{\bf v}_{1}\left[ f_{i}({\bf v}_{1})-f_{i}^{(0)}({\bf v}_{1})\right] 

353: =0\;,\quad \sum_{i}\int d{\bf v}_{1}m_{i}{\bf v}_{1}\left[ f_{i}({\bf v}

354: _{1})-f_{i}^{(0)}({\bf v}_{1})\right] ={\bf 0}\;,  \label{3a} 

355: \end{equation} 

356: \begin{equation} 

357: \sum_{i}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\frac{m_{i}}{2}v_{1}^{2}\left[ f_{i}({\bf v}

358: _{1})-f_{i}^{(0)}({\bf v}_{1})\right] =0\;,  \label{3b} 

359: \end{equation} 

360: The time derivatives of the fields are also expanded as $\partial 

361: _{t}=\partial _{t}^{(0)}+\epsilon \partial _{t}^{(1)}+\cdots $. The 

362: coefficients of the time derivative expansion are identified from the 

363: balance equations (\ref{2.9})--(\ref{2.11}) with a representation of the 

364: fluxes and the cooling rate in the macroscopic balance equations as a 

365: similar series through their definitions as functionals of the distributions  

366: $f_{i}$. This is the usual Chapman-Enskog method for solving kinetic 

367: equations. \cite{FK72} The main difference in the case of inelastic 

368: collisions is that the reference state has a time dependence 

369: associated with the cooling that is not proportional to a spatial gradient. 

370: Consequently, terms from the time derivative $\partial _{t}^{(0)}$ 

371: are not zero. 

372:  

373: To zeroth order in $\epsilon $, the kinetic equations (\ref{2.1}) become  

374: \begin{equation} 

375: \partial_{t}^{(0)}f_{i}^{(0)}=\sum_{j}\,J_{ij}[f_{i}^{(0)},f_{j}^{(0}]\;. 

376: \label{3.3} 

377: \end{equation} 

378: The mass and energy balance equations to this order give  

379: \begin{equation} 

380: \partial _{t}^{(0)}x_{i}=0\,\;,\quad T^{-1}\partial 

381: _{t}^{(0)}T=p^{-1}\partial _{t}^{(0)}p=-\zeta ^{(0)}\;  \label{3.4} 

382: \end{equation} 

383: where the cooling rate $\zeta ^{(0)}$ is determined by Eq.\ (\ref{2.8}) to 

384: zeroth order  

385: \begin{equation} 

386: \zeta ^{(0)}=-\frac{2}{3p}\sum_{i,j}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,\frac{1}{2}

387: m_{i}\,v_{1}^{2}J_{ij}[{\bf v}_{1}|f_{i}^{(0)},f_{j}^{(0}]\;.  \label{3.5} 

388: \end{equation} 

389: This homogeneous state has been studied recently \cite{GD299} and is 

390: discussed in more detail in the next Section. The time derivative in 

391: Eq.\ (\ref{3.3}) can be represented more usefully as  

392: \begin{equation} 

393: \partial _{t}^{(0)}f_{i}^{(0)}=-\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial 

394: _{p}\right) f_{i}^{(0)}=\frac{1}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\nabla _{v_{1}}\cdot \left(  

395: {\bf V}_{1}f_{i}^{(0)}\right) \;,  \label{3.9} 

396: \end{equation} 

397: where $\nabla _{v_{1}}=\partial /\partial {\bf v}_{1}$. The second equality 

398: follows from dimensional analysis which requires that the temperature 

399: dependence of $f_{i}^{(0)}$ must be of the form  

400: \begin{equation} 

401: f_{i}^{(0)}=x_{i}\frac{p}{T}v_{0}^{-3}\Phi _{i}\left(V_{1}/v_{0}\right) \;, 

402: \label{3.10} 

403: \end{equation} 

404: where $v_{0}^{2}(t)=2T(t)(m_{1}+m_{2})/\left( m_{1}m_{2}\right) $ is a 

405: thermal velocity defined in terms of the temperature $T(t)$ of the mixture. 

406: The dependence on the magnitude of ${\bf V}_{1}$ follows from the 

407: requirement that to zeroth order in gradients $f_{i}$ must be isotropic with 

408: respect to the peculiar velocity. The Boltzmann equations at this order can be 

409: written finally as  

410: \begin{equation} 

411: \frac{1}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\nabla _{v_{1}}\cdot \left( {\bf V}

412: _{1}f_{i}^{(0)}\right) =\sum_{j}\,J_{ij}[f_{i}^{(0)},f_{j}^{(0}]\;. 

413: \label{3.11} 

414: \end{equation} 

415: Since the distribution functions are isotropic, it follows from Eqs.\ (\ref 

416: {2.11bb}) and (\ref{2.13}), that the zeroth order mass and heat fluxes 

417: vanish while, for the same reason, the momentum flux is diagonal with a 

418: coefficient that is just the sum of the partial pressures, i.e.,  

419: \begin{equation} 

420: {\bf j}_{i}^{(0)}={\bf 0,}\,\hspace{0.3in}{\bf q}^{(0)}={\bf 0,}\,\hspace{

421: 0.3in}P_{\alpha \beta }^{(0)}=p\delta _{\alpha \beta }.  \label{3.12} 

422: \end{equation} 

423:  

424: To first order in the gradients, the equation for $f_{i}^{(1)}$ is  

425: \begin{equation} 

426: \left( \partial _{t}^{(0)}+{\cal L}_{i}\right) f_{i}^{(1)}+{\cal M}

427: _{i}f_{j}^{(1)}=-\left( \partial _{t}^{(1)}+{\bf v}_{1}\cdot \nabla \right) 

428: f_{i}^{(0)}\;,  \label{3.13} 

429: \end{equation} 

430: where it is understood that $i\neq j$ and the linear operators ${\cal L}_{i}$ 

431: and ${\cal M}_{i}$ are  

432: \begin{equation} 

433: {\cal L}_{i}f_{i}^{(1)}=-\left( 

434: J_{ii}[f_{i}^{(0)},f_{i}^{(1)}]+J_{ii}[f_{i}^{(1)},f_{i}^{(0)}]+

435: J_{ij}[f_{i}^{(1)},f_{j}^{(0)}]\right) \;, 

436: \label{3..14} 

437: \end{equation} 

438: \begin{equation} 

439: {\cal M}_{i}f_{j}^{(1)}=-J_{ij}[f_{i}^{(0)},f_{j}^{(1)}].  \label{3.15} 

440: \end{equation} 

441: The action of the time derivatives $\partial _{t}^{(1)}$ on the hydrodynamic 

442: fields is  

443: \begin{equation} 

444: D_{t}^{(1)}x_{1}=0,  \label{3.16bis} 

445: \end{equation} 

446: \begin{equation} 

447: D_{t}^{(1)}p=-\frac{5p}{3}\nabla \cdot {\bf u},  \label{3.16} 

448: \end{equation} 

449: \begin{equation} 

450: D_{t}^{(1)}T=-\frac{2T}{3}\nabla \cdot {\bf u},  \label{3.17} 

451: \end{equation} 

452: \begin{equation} 

453: D_{t}^{(1)}{\bf u}=-\rho ^{-1}{\bf \nabla }p,  \label{3.18} 

454: \end{equation} 

455: where $D_{t}^{(1)}=\partial _{t}^{(1)}+{\bf u\cdot \nabla }$ and use has 

456: been made of the results ${\bf j}_{i}^{(0)}={\bf q}^{(0)}=\zeta ^{(1)}=0$. The 

457: last equality follows from the fact that the cooling rate is a scalar, and 

458: corrections to first order in the gradients can arise only from the divergence 

459: of the vector field. However, as is demonstrated  below, there is no 

460: contribution to the distribution function proportional to this divergence. 

461: We note that this is special to the low density Boltzmann equation and 

462: such terms do occur at higher densities.  

463: Evaluating the right side of Eq.\ (\ref{3.13}) gives  

464: \begin{eqnarray} 

465: -\left( \partial _{t}^{(1)}+{\bf v}_1\cdot \nabla \right) f_{i}^{(0)} 

466: &=&-\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial x_{1}}f_{i}^{(0)}\right) _{p,T}{\bf V}_1

467: \cdot \nabla x_{1}-\left[ f_{1}^{(0)}{\bf V}_1+\frac{nT}{\rho }\left( \frac{

468: \partial }{\partial {\bf V}}_1f_{i}^{(0)}\right) \right] \cdot \nabla \ln p  

469: \nonumber \\ 

470: &&+\left[ f_{i}^{(0)}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial {\bf V}_1}\cdot 

471: \left({\bf V}_1f_{i}^{(0)}\right) \right] {\bf V}_1\cdot \nabla \ln T  

472: \nonumber \\ 

473: &&+\left( V_{1\alpha}\frac{\partial}{\partial V_{1\beta 

474: }}f_{i}^{(0)}-\frac{1}{3}\delta _{\alpha \beta }{\bf V}_1\cdot 

475: \frac{\partial}{\partial {\bf V}_1} f_{i}^{(0)}\right) \nabla _{\alpha 

476: }u_{\beta }.  \label{3.19} 

477: \end{eqnarray} 

478: The equation for $f_{i}^{(1)}$ is now  

479: \begin{equation} 

480: \left( \partial _{t}^{(0)}+{\cal L}_{i}\right) f_{i}^{(1)}+{\cal M}

481: _{i}f_{j}^{(1)}={\bf A}_{i}\cdot \nabla x_{1}+{\bf B}_{i}\cdot \nabla p+{\bf 

482: C}_{i}\cdot \nabla T+D_{i,\alpha \beta }\nabla _{\alpha }u_{\beta }. 

483: \label{3.20} 

484: \end{equation} 

485: The coefficients of the field gradients on the right side are functions of $

486: {\bf V}_1$ and the hydrodynamic fields. They are given by  

487: \begin{equation} 

488: {\bf A}_{i}({\bf V}_1)=-\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{1}}

489: f_{i}^{(0)}\right)_{p,T}{\bf V}_1,  \label{3.21} 

490: \end{equation} 

491: \begin{equation} 

492: {\bf B}_{i}({\bf V}_1)=-\frac{1}{p}\left[ f_{i}^{(0)}{\bf 

493: V}_1+\frac{nT}{\rho }

494: \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial {\bf V}_1}f_{i}^{(0)}\right) \right] , 

495: \label{3.22} 

496: \end{equation} 

497: \begin{equation} 

498: {\bf C}_{i}({\bf V}_1)=\frac{1}{T}\left[ 

499: f_{i}^{(0)}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial }{\partial {\bf V}_1}\cdot \left( {\bf 

500: V}_1f_{i}^{(0)}\right) \right] {\bf V}_1, \label{3.23} \end{equation} 

501: \begin{equation} 

502: D_{i,\alpha \beta }({\bf V}_1)=V_{1\alpha }\frac{\partial }{\partial 

503: V_{1\beta }}

504: f_{i}^{(0)}-\frac{1}{3}\delta_{\alpha \beta }{\bf V}_1\cdot \frac{\partial 

505: }{\partial {\bf V}_1}f_{i}^{(0)}.  \label{3.24} 

506: \end{equation} 

507: Note that the trace of $D_{i,\alpha\beta}$ vanishes, confirming that 

508: the distribution function has not contribution from the divergence of the 

509: flow field.  The solutions to Eqs.\ (\ref{3.20}) are of the form  

510: \begin{equation} 

511: f_{i}^{(1)}={\sf {\cal A}}_{i}\cdot \nabla x_{1}+{\sf {\cal B}}_{i}\cdot 

512: \nabla p+{\sf {\cal C}}_{i}\cdot \nabla T+{\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta 

513: }\nabla _{\alpha }u_{\beta }\;.  \label{3.25} 

514: \end{equation} 

515: The coefficients ${\sf {\cal A}}_{i},{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},{\sf {\cal C}}_{i},$ 

516: and ${\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta }$ are functions of the peculiar 

517: velocity ${\bf V}_1$ and the hydrodynamic fields. The cooling rate 

518: depends on space through its dependence on $x_{1}$, $p$, and $T$. The time 

519: derivative $\partial _{t}^{(0)}$ acting on these quantities can be evaluated 

520: by the replacement $\partial _{t}^{(0)}\rightarrow -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( 

521: T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) $. In addition, there are contributions 

522: from $\partial _{t}^{(0)}$ acting on the temperature and pressure gradients 

523: given by  

524: \begin{eqnarray} 

525: \partial _{t}^{(0)}\nabla T &=&-\nabla \left( T\zeta ^{(0)}\right) =-\zeta 

526: ^{(0)}\nabla T-T\nabla \zeta ^{(0)}  \nonumber \\ 

527: &=&-\frac{\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T}\nabla T-T\left[ \left( \frac{\partial \zeta 

528: ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) _{p,T}\nabla x_{1}+\frac{\zeta ^{(0)}}{p}

529: \nabla p\right] ,  \label{3.26} 

530: \end{eqnarray} 

531: \begin{eqnarray} 

532: \partial _{t}^{(0)}\nabla p &=&-\nabla \left( p\zeta ^{(0)}\right) =-\zeta 

533: ^{(0)}\nabla p-p\nabla \zeta ^{(0)}  \nonumber \\ 

534: &=&-2\zeta ^{(0)}\nabla p-p\left[ \left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{

535: \partial x_{1}}\right) _{p,T}\nabla x_{1}-\frac{\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T}\nabla T

536: \right] .  \label{3.27} 

537: \end{eqnarray} 

538: The integral equations for ${\sf {\cal A}}_{i},{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},{\sf {\cal 

539: C}}_{i},$ and ${\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta }$ are identified as 

540: coefficients of the independent gradients in Eq.\ (\ref{3.25}):  

541: \begin{equation} 

542: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) +{\cal L}_{i}

543: \right] {\sf {\cal A}}_{i}+{\cal M}_{i}{\sf {\cal A}}_{j}={\bf A}_{i}+\left(  

544: \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) _{p,T}\left( p{\sf {\cal 

545:  B}}_{i}+T{\sf {\cal C}}_{i}\right) ,  \label{3.28} 

546: \end{equation} 

547: \begin{equation} 

548: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) +{\cal L}

549: _{i}-2\zeta ^{(0)}\right] {\cal B}_{i}+{\cal M}_{i}{\cal B}_{j}={\bf B}_{i}+ 

550: \frac{T\zeta ^{(0)}}{p}{\sf {\cal C}}_{i},  \label{3.29} 

551: \end{equation} 

552: \begin{equation} 

553: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) +{\cal L}

554: _{i}-\frac{1}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\right] {\cal C}_{i}+{\cal M}_{i}{\cal C}_{j}= 

555: {\bf C}_{i}-\frac{p\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T}{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},  \label{3.30} 

556: \end{equation} 

557: \begin{equation} 

558: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) +{\cal 

559: L}_{i}\right] {\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta }+{\cal M}_{i}{\sf {\cal D}}

560: _{j,\alpha \beta }=D_{i,\alpha \beta }.  \label{3.31} 

561: \end{equation} 

562: The solutions to these linear integral equations are made unique by the 

563: orthogonality conditions (\ref{3a}) and (\ref{3b}), i.e.,  

564: \begin{equation} 

565: \int d{\bf v}_{1}\left(  

566: \begin{array}{c} 

567: {\sf {\cal A}}_{i} \\  

568: {\sf {\cal B}}_{i} \\  

569: {\sf {\cal C}}_{i} \\  

570: {\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta } 

571: \end{array} 

572: \right) =0\;,\quad \sum_{i}\int d{\bf v}_{1}m_{i}{\bf V}_{1}\left(  

573: \begin{array}{c} 

574: {\sf {\cal A}}_{i} \\  

575: {\sf {\cal B}}_{i} \\  

576: {\sf {\cal C}}_{i} \\  

577: {\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta } 

578: \end{array} 

579: \right) ={\bf 0}\;,  \label{3.32} 

580: \end{equation} 

581: \begin{equation} 

582: \sum_{i}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\frac{m_{i}}{2}V_{1}^{2}\left(  

583: \begin{array}{c} 

584: {\sf {\cal A}}_{i} \\  

585: {\sf {\cal B}}_{i} \\  

586: {\sf {\cal C}}_{i} \\  

587: {\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta } 

588: \end{array} 

589: \right) =0\;.  \label{3.33} 

590: \end{equation} 

591: With the functions $\left( {\sf {\cal A}}_{i},{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},{\sf {\cal C }}_{i},{\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta }\right) $ determined in this way, the 

592: solutions to the Boltzmann equations are determined by (\ref{3.25}) exactly 

593: to first order in the spatial gradients. 

594:  

595: Use of Eq.\ (\ref{3.25}) in the definitions (\ref{2.11bb})--(\ref{2.13}) 

596: gives the expected forms (\ref{n1})--(\ref{n3}) for the fluxes. The 

597: transport coefficients associated with ${\bf j}_{1}$ are identified as  

598: \begin{equation} 

599: D=-\frac{\rho }{3m_{2}n}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,{\bf V}_{1}{\bf \cdot \,}{\cal A} 

600: _{1},  \label{3.34} 

601: \end{equation} 

602: \begin{equation} 

603: D_{p}=-\frac{m_{1}p}{3\rho}\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,{\bf V}_{1}\,\cdot {\sf {\cal B% 

604: }}_{1} ,  \label{3.35} 

605: \end{equation} 

606: \begin{equation} 

607: D^{\prime }=-\frac{m_{1}T}{3\rho }\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,{\bf V}_{1}\,\cdot {\sf  

608: {\cal C}}_{1} .  \label{3.36} 

609: \end{equation} 

610: The transport coefficients for the heat flux are  

611: \begin{equation} 

612: D^{\prime \prime }=-\frac{1}{3T^{2}}\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,\frac{1}{2} 

613: m_{i}V_{1}^{2}{\bf V}_{1}\,\cdot {\sf {\cal A}}_{i},  \label{3.37} 

614: \end{equation} 

615: \begin{equation} 

616: L=-\frac{1}{3}\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,\frac{1}{2}m_{i}V_{1}^{2}{\bf V} 

617: _{1}\cdot \,{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},  \label{3.38} 

618: \end{equation} 

619: \begin{equation} 

620: \lambda =-\frac{1}{3}\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\,\frac{1}{2}m_{i}V_{1}^{2}  

621: {\bf V}_{1}\,\cdot {\sf {\cal C}}_{i}.  \label{3.39} 

622: \end{equation} 

623: Finally, the shear and bulk viscosities are  

624: \begin{equation} 

625: \eta =-\frac{1}{10}\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\, m_{i}V_{1\alpha}V_{1\beta}

626: {\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha\beta},  \label{3.40} 

627: \end{equation} 

628: \begin{equation} 

629: \kappa =-\frac{1}{9}\sum_{i}\,\int d{\bf v}_{1}\, m_{i}V_{1}^{2}

630: {\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha\alpha}=0.  

631: \label{3.41} 

632: \end{equation} 

633: The bulk viscosity vanishes since the trace of ${\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha 

634: \beta}$ vanishes, as follows from Eq.\ (\ref{3.31}). 

635:  

636: To summarize the results to this point, the solutions to the Boltzmann 

637: equations to first order in the spatial gradients are  

638: \begin{equation} 

639: f_{i}=f_{i}^{(0)}+{\sf {\cal A}}_{i}\cdot \nabla x_{1}+{\sf {\cal B}} 

640: _{i}\cdot \nabla p+{\sf {\cal C}}_{i}\cdot \nabla T+{\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha 

641: \beta }\nabla_{\alpha }u_{\beta }\;.  \label{3.42} 

642: \end{equation} 

643: The solution to zeroth order, $f_{i}^{(0)}$, is obtained from 

644: Eq.\ (\ref{3.31}) while the functions ${\sf {\cal A}}_{i},{\sf {\cal 

645: B}}_{i},{\sf {\cal C}} _{i},$ and ${\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta }$ 

646: characterizing the solution to first order in the gradients are determined 

647: from the integral equations (\ref {3.28})--(\ref{3.31}). Calculating the 

648: mass, heat, and momentum fluxes from this solution one can identify the 

649: transport coefficients in terms of the integrals (\ref{3.34})--(\ref{3.41}). 

650: These fluxes, together with the macroscopic balance equations

651: (\ref{2.9})--(\ref{2.11}), provide the closed set of Navier-Stokes order hydrodynamic 

652: equations for a granular binary mixture.  All of these results are still 

653: exact and valid for arbitrary values of the restitution coefficients. 

654:  

655: 

656: \section{Sonine polynomial approximation} 

657: \label{sec4} 

658:  

659: Accurate approximations to the solutions to the integral equations for $% 

660: f_{i}^{(0)}$ and $\left( {\sf {\cal A}}_{i},{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},{\sf {\cal C}} 

661: _{i},{\sf {\cal D}}_{i,\alpha \beta }\right) $ may be obtained using low 

662: order truncation of expansions in a series of Sonine polynomials. The 

663: determination of $f_{i}^{(0)}$ to leading order in the Sonine expansion has 

664: been analyzed elsewhere \cite{GD299} and only the main result is quoted 

665: here. The polynomials are defined with respect to a Gaussian weight factor. 

666: The parameters of this Gaussian are chosen such that the leading term in the 

667: expansion yields the exact moments of the entire distribution with respect 

668: to $1$, $v_{1}$, and $v_{1}^{2}$. The latter defines the kinetic 

669: temperatures for each species  

670: \begin{equation} 

671: \frac{3}{2}n_{i}T_{i}=\int d{\bf v}_{1}\frac{m_{i}}{2}V_{1}^{2}f_{i}^{(0)}. 

672: \label{4.0} 

673: \end{equation} 

674: For elastic collisions the temperatures $T_{i}$ are the same as the global 

675: temperature $T$ defined in Eq.\ (\ref{2.5}). The condition that $f_{i}^{(0)}$ 

676: is normal implies that $T_{i}$ is a function of $n_{i}$ and $T$, or 

677: equivalently  

678: \begin{equation} 

679: \frac{T_{i}}{T}\equiv \gamma _{i}(x_{1}),  \label{4.01} 

680: \end{equation} 

681: where $\gamma _{i}$ depends on the hydrodynamic state through the 

682: concentration. The determination of this functional dependence is worked out 

683: in Ref.\ \onlinecite{GD299}. The Sonine polynomials used here are defined 

684: with respect to Maxwellians characterized by the temperatures $T_{i}$ rather 

685: than those characterized by $T$ \ for elastic collisions. With this choice 

686: the leading deviation from the Maxwellians is a polynomial of degree $4$  

687: \begin{equation} 

688: f_{i}^{(0)}=n_{i}v_{0}^{-3}\Phi _{i}\left( V_{1}^{\ast}\right) \;, 

689: \label{4.02} 

690: \end{equation} 

691: \begin{equation} 

692: \Phi _{i}(V_{1}^{\ast })\rightarrow \left( \frac{\theta_{i}}{\pi }\right) 

693: ^{3/2}e^{-\theta _{i}V_{1}^{\ast 2}}\left[ 1+\frac{c_{i}}{4}\left( \theta 

694: _{i}^{2}V_{1}^{\ast 4}-5\theta _{i}V_{1}^{\ast 2}+\frac{15}{4}\right) 

695: \right] \;,  \label{4.1} 

696: \end{equation} 

697: where $V_{1}^{\ast }=V_{1}/v_{0}$, and $\theta _{i}=(\mu _{ji}\gamma 

698: _{i})^{-1}$. If polynomials defined in terms of $T$ are used the leading 

699: correction is a polynomial of degree $2$ in $v_{1}^{\ast }$, proportional to  

700: $T-T_{i}$. The choice of polynomials defined in terms of $T_{i}$ effectively 

701: resums an infinite set of terms in this second type of expansion. Since $

702: \gamma _{i}$ is a function of the concentration, a significant new 

703: contribution to the parameters of the integral equations for the transport 

704: coefficients occurs through the additional concentration dependence 

705: associated with temperature difference of the two species. The coefficients 

706: $c_{i}$ in Eq.\ (\ref{4.1}) are determined by substitution of Eq.\ 

707: (\ref{4.02}) into Eq.\ (\ref{3.9}) and retaining all terms linear in $c_{i}$ 

708: for the leading Sonine polynomial approximation. The reader is referred to 

709: Ref.\ \onlinecite{GD299} for further details. 

710:  

711: In the remainder of this section, we will compute the mass flux, the pressure tensor, and the heat flux in the leading Sonine polynomial approximations. Let us consider each one separately. 

712: 

713: 

714: \subsection{Mass flux}

715: \label{sub4.1}

716: 

717: 

718: Here, the lowest order Sonine polynomial 

719: approximations for ${\sf {\cal A}}_{i},{\sf {\cal B}}_{i},$ and ${\sf {\cal 

720: C}}_{i}$ are obtained and applied to the calculation of the transport 

721: coefficients in the mass fluxes, $D$, $D_{p}$, and $D^{\prime }$. The 

722: leading Sonine approximations (lowest degree polynomial) of the quantities $

723: {\sf {\cal A}}_{i}$, ${\sf {\cal B}}_{i}$, and ${\sf {\cal C}}_{i}$ are  

724: \begin{equation} 

725: \left(  

726: \begin{array}{c} 

727: {\sf {\cal A}}_{i} \\  

728: {\sf {\cal B}}_{i} \\  

729: {\sf {\cal C}}_{i} 

730: \end{array} 

731: \right) \rightarrow f_{i,M}{\bf V}_1\left(  

732: \begin{array}{c} 

733: a_{i,1} \\  

734: b_{i,1} \\  

735: c_{i,1} 

736: \end{array} 

737: \right) .  \label{4.2} 

738: \end{equation} 

739: The coefficients $\{a_{i,1},b_{i,1},c_{i,1}\}$ are related to the transport 

740: coefficients in this approximation through (\ref{3.34})--(\ref{3.36})  

741: \begin{equation} 

742: a_{1,1}=-\frac{1}{\delta \gamma }a_{2,1}=-\frac{m_{1}m_{2}n}{\rho n_{1}T_{1}}D, 

743: \label{4.3} 

744: \end{equation} 

745: \begin{equation} 

746: b_{1,1}=-\frac{1}{\delta \gamma }b_{2,1}=-\frac{\rho }{pn_{1}T_{1}}D_{p}, 

747: \label{4.4} 

748: \end{equation} 

749: \begin{equation} 

750: c_{1,1}=-\frac{1}{\delta \gamma }c_{2,1}=-\frac{\rho }{Tn_{1}T_{1}}D^{\prime }. 

751: \label{4.5} 

752: \end{equation} 

753: Here, $\gamma =T_{1}/T_{2}$ and $\delta =n_{1}/n_{2}$. The coefficients $

754: \{a_{1,1};b_{1,1};c_{1,1}\}$ are determined by substitution of Eq.\ (\ref{4.2}) 

755: into the integral equations (\ref{3.28})--(\ref{3.30}). The details are 

756: carried out in Appendix \ref{appA}  with the results  

757: \begin{equation} 

758: a_{1,1}=-\left(\nu -\frac{1}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\right) ^{-1}\left[ \left(\frac{ 

759: \partial }{\partial x_{1}}\ln n_{1}T_{1}\right) _{p,T}-\left( \frac{\partial 

760: \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) _{p,T}\left( pb_{1,1}+Tc_{1,1}\right)  

761: \right] ,  \label{4.6} 

762: \end{equation} 

763: \begin{equation} 

764: b_{1,1}=-\frac{1}{p}\left( 1-\frac{m_{1}nT}{\rho T_{1}}\right) \left( \nu -

765: \frac{3}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}+\frac{\zeta ^{(0)2}}{2\nu }\right)^{-1}, 

766: \label{4.7} 

767: \end{equation} 

768: \begin{equation} 

769: c_{1,1}=-\frac{p\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T\nu }b_{1,1},  \label{4.8} 

770: \end{equation} 

771: where the collision frequency $\nu$ is given by  

772: \begin{equation} 

773: \nu =-\frac{m_{1}}{3n_{1}T_{1}}\int d{\bf v}_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot \left( 

774: J_{12}[{\bf v}_{1}|f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1},f_{2}^{(0)}]-\delta \gamma J_{12}[{\bf 

775: v}_{1}|f_{1}^{(0)},f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{2}]\right) .  \label{4.9} 

776: \end{equation} 

777: This integral is evaluated in Appendix \ref{appB} with the result  

778: \begin{eqnarray} 

779: \frac{\nu}{\nu_{e}} &=&\frac{\left(1+\alpha_{12}\right)}{2}\sqrt{\mu 

780: _{21}\gamma _{1}+\mu _{12}\gamma _{2}}  \nonumber \\ 

781: &&\times \left[ 1-\frac{1}{16\rho }\frac{\rho _{1}\left( m_{2}\gamma 

782: _{1}\right) ^{2}c_{1}+\rho _{2}\left( m_{1}\gamma _{2}\right) ^{2}c_{2}}{

783: (m_{2}\gamma _{1}+m_{1}\gamma _{2})^{2}}\right] ,  \label{4.10} 

784: \end{eqnarray} 

785: where $\nu _{e}$ is the corresponding result for the elastic case  

786: \begin{equation} 

787: \nu _{e}=\frac{8}{3}\sqrt{2\pi }\sigma _{12}^{2}\sqrt{\frac{T}{m_{1}m_{2}}}

788: \frac{\rho }{\sqrt{m_{1}+m_{2}}},  \label{4.11} 

789: \end{equation} 

790: and $\rho _{i}=m_{i}n_{i}$ is the mass density of species $i$. These 

791: results, together with $a_{2,1}=-\delta \gamma a_{1,1},$ $b_{2,1}=-\delta \gamma b_{1,1},$ and $c_{2,1}=-\delta \gamma c_{1,1}$ completely determine the distribution functions to first order in the Sonine polynomial expansion. 

792:  

793: The transport coefficients are identified from (\ref{4.6})--(\ref{4.8}) as  

794: \begin{equation} 

795: D=\frac{\rho }{m_{1}m_{2}n}\left( \nu -\frac{1}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\right) ^{-1}

796: \left[ \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial x_{1}}n_{1}T_{1}\right) _{p,T}+\rho 

797: \left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) _{p,T}\left( 

798: D_{p}+D^{\prime }\right) \right] ,  \label{4.12} 

799: \end{equation} 

800: \begin{equation} 

801: D_{p}=\frac{n_{1}T_{1}}{\rho }\left( 1-\frac{m_{1}nT}{\rho T_{1}}\right) 

802: \left( \nu -\frac{3}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}+\frac{\zeta ^{(0)2}}{2\nu }\right) ^{-1}, 

803: \label{4.13} 

804: \end{equation} 

805: \begin{equation} 

806: D^{\prime }=-\frac{\zeta ^{(0)}}{2\nu }D_{p}.  \label{4.14} 

807: \end{equation} 

808: Since ${\bf j}_{1}=-{\bf j}_{2}$ and $\nabla x_{1}=-\nabla x_{2}$, it is 

809: expected that  $D$ should be symmetric with respect to interchange of 

810: particles $1$ and $2$ while $D_{p}$ and $D^{\prime}$ should be 

811: antisymmetric. This can be verified by noting that 

812: $n_{1}T_{1}+n_{2}T_{2}=nT$. The expression for $\nu$ agrees with the known 

813: result for elastic collisions. \cite{FK72} For the case of mechanically 

814: equivalent particles ($ 

815: m_{1}=m_{2},\alpha _{11}=\alpha _{22}=\alpha _{12}\equiv \alpha ,\sigma 

816: _{11}=\sigma _{22}$) in the dilute concentration limit ($\rho 

817: _{2}\rightarrow 0$), the expression for the diffusion coefficient $D$ 

818: coincides with the one recently derived in the self-diffusion 

819: problem. \cite{BRCG99} 

820:  

821: \subsection{Pressure tensor}

822: \label{sub4.2}

823: 

824: 

825: The leading Sonine approximation for the function ${\cal D}_{i,\alpha \beta }$ is 

826: \begin{equation}

827: \label{4.2:1}

828: {\cal D}_{i,\alpha \beta}\to f_{1,M} d_{i,1} R_{i,\alpha \beta}({\bf V}_1),

829: \end{equation}

830: where 

831: \begin{equation}

832: \label{4.2:2}

833: R_{i,\alpha \beta}({\bf V}_1)=m_i\left( V_{1\alpha}V_{1\beta}-

834: \frac{1}{3}V_1^2\delta_{\alpha\beta}\right),

835: \end{equation}

836: and 

837: \begin{equation}

838: \label{4.2:3}

839: d_{i,1}=\frac{1}{10}\frac{1}{n_iT_i^2}\int d{\bf v}_1 R_{i,\alpha \beta} {\cal 

840: D}_{i,\alpha \beta}.

841: \end{equation}

842: The coefficients $d_{i,1}$ are related to the shear viscosity $\eta$ in this 

843: approximation through Eq.\ (\ref{3.40}) as  

844: \begin{equation}

845: \label{4.2:4}

846: \eta=-T^2\left(n_1\gamma_1^2 d_{1,1}+n_2\gamma_2^2 d_{2,1}\right).

847: \end{equation}

848: 

849: The integral equations for the coefficients $d_{i,1}$ are decoupled from the 

850: remaining transport coefficients.  The two coefficients 

851: $d_{i,1}$ are obtained by multiplying Eqs.\  (\ref{3.31}) with $R_{i,\alpha \beta}$ 

852: and integrating over the velocity to get the coupled set of 

853: equations

854: \begin{equation}

855: \label{4.2:5}

856: \left(

857: \begin{array}{cc}

858: \tau_{11}-\frac{1}{2}\zeta^{(0)}& \tau_{12}\\

859: \tau_{21}&\tau_{22}-\frac{1}{2}\zeta^{(0)}

860: \end{array}

861: \right)

862: \left(

863: \begin{array}{c}

864: d_{1,1}\\

865: d_{2,1}

866: \end{array}

867: \right)

868: =-\left(

869: \begin{array}{c}

870: T_1^{-1}\\

871: T_2^{-1}

872: \end{array}

873: \right).

874: \end{equation}

875: The frequencies $\tau_{ij}$ are given in terms of the collision operator by 

876: \begin{equation}

877: \label{4.2:6}

878: \tau_{ii}=\frac{1}{10}\frac{1}{n_iT_i^2}\int d{\bf v}_1 R_{i,\alpha \beta}

879: {\cal L}_i\left(f_{i,M}R_{i,\alpha \beta}\right), 

880: \end{equation}

881: \begin{equation}

882: \label{4.2:7}

883: \tau_{ij}=\frac{1}{10}\frac{1}{n_iT_i^2}\int d{\bf v}_1 R_{i,\alpha \beta}

884: {\cal M}_i\left(f_{j,M}R_{j,\alpha \beta}\right)

885: , \quad i\neq j.

886: \end{equation}

887: The evaluation of these collision integrals is given in Appendix \ref{appC}. The solution with the 

888: matrix elements known is elementary so that $\eta$ can be calculated directly from 

889: Eq.\ (\ref{4.2:4}). 

890: 

891: 

892: \subsection{Heat flux}

893: \label{sub4.3} 

894: 

895: 

896: 

897: The computation of the heat flux requires going to the second Sonine 

898: approximation. In this case, the quantities ${\sf {\cal A}}_{i}$, ${\sf {\cal 

899: B}}_{i}$ and ${\sf {\cal C}}_{i}$ are taken to be

900: \begin{equation}

901: \label{4.3:1}

902: {\sf {\cal A}}_{1}({\bf V}_1)\to f_{1,M}\left[-\frac{m_1m_2n}{\rho 

903: n_1T_1}D{\bf V}_1+a_{1,2}{\bf S}_1({\bf V}_1)

904: \right] ,\quad

905: {\sf {\cal A}}_{2}({\bf V}_1)\to f_{2,M}\left[\frac{m_1m_2n}{\rho 

906: n_2T_2}D{\bf V}_1+a_{2,2}{\bf S}_2({\bf V}_1)\right] 

907: \end{equation}

908: \begin{equation}

909: \label{4.3:2}

910: {\sf {\cal B}}_{1}({\bf V}_1)\to f_{1,M}\left[-\frac{\rho}{p 

911: n_1T_1}D_p{\bf V}_1+b_{1,2}{\bf S}_1({\bf V}_1)

912: \right] ,\quad

913: {\sf {\cal B}}_{2}({\bf V}_1)\to f_{2,M}\left[\frac{\rho}{p 

914: n_2T_2}D_p{\bf V}_1+b_{2,2}{\bf S}_2({\bf V}_1)\right] 

915: \end{equation}

916: \begin{equation}

917: \label{4.3:4}

918: {\sf {\cal C}}_{1}({\bf V}_1)\to f_{1,M}\left[-\frac{\rho}{T 

919: n_1T_1}D'{\bf V}_1+c_{1,2}{\bf S}_1({\bf V}_1)

920: \right] ,\quad

921: {\sf {\cal C}}_{2}({\bf V}_1)\to f_{2,M}\left[\frac{\rho}{T 

922: n_2T_2}D'{\bf V}_1+c_{2,2}{\bf S}_2({\bf V}_1)\right],  

923: \end{equation}

924: where 

925: \begin{equation}

926: \label{4.3:5}

927: {\bf S}_i({\bf V}_1)=\left(\frac{1}{2}m_iV_1^2-\frac{5}{2}T_i\right){\bf V}_1.

928: \end{equation} 

929: In these equations, it is understood that $D$, $D_p$ and $D'$ 

930: are given by Eqs.\ (\ref{4.12})--(\ref{4.14}), respectively. 

931: The coefficients $a_{i,2}$, $b_{i,2}$ and $c_{i,2}$ are defined as

932: \begin{equation}

933: \left(

934: \begin{array}{c} 

935: a_{i,2} \\  

936: b_{i,2} \\  

937: c_{i,2}

938: \end{array}

939: \right) =\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_i}{n_iT_i^3}

940: \int d{\bf v}_{1}{\bf S}_i({\bf V}_1)\cdot\left(  

941: \begin{array}{c} 

942: {\sf {\cal A}}_{i} \\  

943: {\sf {\cal B}}_{i} \\  

944: {\sf {\cal C}}_{i} 

945: \end{array} 

946: \right)

947: \label{4.3:7} 

948: \end{equation} 

949: Consequently, the transport coefficients appearing in the heat flux, $D''$, $L$ and 

950: $\lambda$ are given by 

951: \begin{equation}

952: \label{4.3:8}

953: D''=-\frac{5}{2}T\left(\frac{n_1\gamma_1^3}{m_1}a_{1,2}+

954: \frac{n_2\gamma_2^3}{m_2}a_{2,2}\right)+\frac{5}{2}\frac{nm_1m_2}{\rho T}

955: \left(\frac{\gamma_1}{m_1}-\frac{\gamma_2}{m_2}\right)D,

956: \end{equation}

957: \begin{equation}

958: \label{4.3:9}

959: L=-\frac{5}{2}T^3\left(\frac{n_1\gamma_1^3}{m_1}b_{1,2}+

960: \frac{n_2\gamma_2^3}{m_2}b_{2,2}\right)+\frac{5}{2}\frac{\rho}{n}

961: \left(\frac{\gamma_1}{m_1}-\frac{\gamma_2}{m_2}\right)D_p,

962: \end{equation}

963: \begin{equation}

964: \label{4.3:10}

965: \lambda=-\frac{5}{2}T^3\left(\frac{n_1\gamma_1^3}{m_1}c_{1,2}+

966: \frac{n_2\gamma_2^3}{m_2}c_{2,2}\right)+\frac{5}{2}\rho

967: \left(\frac{\gamma_1}{m_1}-\frac{\gamma_2}{m_2}\right)D'.

968: \end{equation}

969: 

970: 

971: The computation of the coefficients $D''$, $L$, and $\lambda$ is also carried out in Appendix \ref{appA}.  By using matrix notation, the coupled set of six equations for the unknowns

972: \begin{equation}

973: \label{4.3:11}

974: \{a_{1,2}; a_{2,2}; b_{1,2}; b_{2,2}; c_{1,2}; c_{2,2}\}

975: \end{equation}

976: can be written as 

977: \begin{equation}

978: \label{4.3:12}

979: \Lambda_{\sigma \sigma'}X_{\sigma'}=Y_{\sigma}.

980: \end{equation}

981: Here, $X_{\sigma'}$ is the column matrix defined by the set 

982: (\ref{4.3:11})  and $\Lambda_{\sigma \sigma'}$ is the matrix

983: \begin{equation}

984: \label{4.3:13}

985: \Lambda=\left(

986: \begin{array} {cccccc}

987: \nu_{11}-\frac{3}{2}\zeta^{(0)}& \nu_{12}& 

988: -p\left(\frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right)_{p,T}&0& 

989: -T\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right)_{p,T}&0 \\

990: \nu_{21}&\nu_{22}-\frac{3}{2}\zeta^{(0)}&0&  

991: p\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right)_{p,T}&0& 

992: T\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right)_{p,T}\\

993: 0& 0& \nu_{11}-\frac{5}{2}\zeta^{(0)}& \nu_{12}& 

994: -T\zeta^{(0)}/p&0\\ 

995: 0& 0 & \nu_{21} & \nu_{22}-\frac{5}{2}\zeta^{(0)} & 0 &  

996: -T\zeta^{(0)}/p\\

997: 0& 0& p\zeta^{(0)}/2T&0&\nu_{11}-\zeta^{(0)}& \nu_{12}\\

998: 0& 0& 0&p\zeta^{(0)}/2T&\nu_{21}&\nu_{22}-\zeta^{(0)}

999: \end{array}

1000: \right).

1001: \end{equation}

1002: Here, we have introduced the collision frequencies

1003: \begin{equation}

1004: \label{4.3:13a}

1005: \nu_{ii}=\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_i}{n_iT_i^3}\int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_i

1006: \cdot {\cal L}_i\left(f_{i,M}{\bf S}_i\right), 

1007: \end{equation}

1008: \begin{equation}

1009: \label{4.3:13b}

1010: \nu_{ij}=\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_i}{n_iT_i^3}\int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_i

1011: \cdot {\cal M}_i\left(f_{j,M}{\bf S}_j\right), \quad i\neq j.

1012: \end{equation}

1013: The column matrix ${\bf Y}$ is

1014: \begin{equation}

1015: \label{4.3:14}

1016: {\bf Y}=\left(

1017: \begin{array}{c}

1018: Y_1\\

1019: Y_2\\

1020: Y_3\\

1021: Y_4\\

1022: Y_5\\

1023: Y_6

1024: \end{array}

1025: \right),

1026: \end{equation}

1027: where

1028: \begin{eqnarray}

1029: \label{4.3:15}

1030: Y_1&=& -\frac{\zeta^{(0)}m_1m_2nD}{\rho 

1031: n_1T_1^2}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{T^2}{n_1T_1^3}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1}\left(

1032: n_1\gamma_1^2c_1\right)+\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_1^2m_2nD}{\rho n_1^2T_1^4}

1033: \left[\int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\cal L}_1(f_{1,M}{\bf V}_1) \right.

1034: \nonumber\\

1035: & & \left. -\delta \gamma 

1036: \int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\cal M}_1(f_{2,M}{\bf V}_2)\right],

1037: \end{eqnarray}

1038: \begin{eqnarray}

1039: \label{4.3:16}

1040: Y_3&=&-\frac{\zeta^{(0)}\rho D_p}{p 

1041: n_1T_1^2}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{c_1}{pT_1}

1042: +\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_1\rho D_p}{p n_1^2T_1^4}

1043: \left[\int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\cal L}_1(f_{1,M}{\bf V}_1) \right.

1044: \nonumber\\

1045: & & \left. -\delta \gamma 

1046: \int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\cal M}_1(f_{2,M}{\bf V}_2)\right],

1047: \end{eqnarray}

1048: \begin{eqnarray}

1049: \label{4.3:17}

1050: Y_5&=& -\frac{\zeta^{(0)}\rho D'}{T 

1051: n_1T_1^2}-\frac{2+c_1}{2TT_1}

1052: +\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_1\rho D'}{T n_1^2T_1^4}

1053: \left[\int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\cal L}_1(f_{1,M}{\bf V}_1) \right.

1054: \nonumber\\

1055: & & \left. -\delta \gamma 

1056: \int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\cal M}_1(f_{2,M}{\bf V}_2)\right],

1057: \end{eqnarray}

1058: where 

1059: \begin{equation}

1060: \label{4.3:18}

1061: c_i=\frac{8}{15}\left[\frac{m_i^2}{4n_iT_i^2}\int d{\bf v}_1 V_1^4 

1062: f_i^{(0)}-\frac{15}{4}\right].

1063: \end{equation}

1064: The corresponding expressions of the elements $Y_2$, $Y_4$ and $Y_6$ can be 

1065: deduced from Eqs.\ (\ref{4.3:15}), (\ref{4.3:16}) and (\ref{4.3:17}), respectively, by 

1066: interchanging $1\leftrightarrow2$ and setting $D\to D$, $D_p\to -D_p$ and $D'\to -D'$. 

1067: The evaluation of the collision integrals (\ref{4.3:13a}) and (\ref{4.3:13b}) is given in 

1068: Appendix \ref{appD}. 

1069: 

1070: The solution to Eq.\ (\ref{4.3:12}) is 

1071: \begin{equation}

1072: \label{4.3:19}

1073: X_{\sigma}=\left(\Lambda^{-1}\right)_{\sigma \sigma'}Y_{\sigma'}.

1074: \end{equation}

1075: This relation provides an explicit expression for the coefficients 

1076: $a_{i,2}$, $b_{i,2}$ and $c_{i,2}$ in terms of the restitution coefficients 

1077: and the parameters of the mixture. From these expressions one can easily get 

1078: the transport coefficients $D'$, $L$ and $\lambda$ from 

1079: Eqs.\  (\ref{4.3:8})--(\ref{4.3:10}), respectively.

1080: 

1081:  

1082: 

1083: 

1084: \section{Discussion} 

1085:  \label{sec5} 

1086:  

1087: The primary objective of this work has been to obtain the hydrodynamic 

1088: description of a binary mixture of granular gases from an underlying kinetic 

1089: theory. The derivation of the hydrodynamic equations consists of two steps. 

1090: First, the macroscopic balance equations (\ref{2.9})--(\ref{2.11}) for 

1091: number densities, total momentum and energy are obtained from the 

1092: corresponding kinetic equation. Next, the fluxes and cooling rate in these 

1093: equations are determined from a solution of the coupled Boltzmann equations 

1094: given in terms of the hydrodynamic fields and their spatial gradients. The 

1095: corresponding constitutive equations for the mass, heat and momentum fluxes 

1096: are given to Navier-Stokes order by Eqs.\ (\ref{n1})--(\ref{n3}), and the 

1097: associated transport coefficients are given by Eqs.\ (\ref{3.34})--(\ref 

1098: {3.36}), (\ref{3.37})--(\ref{3.39}), and (\ref{3.40})--(\ref{3.41}), 

1099: respectively. These results are exact within the context of the Boltzmann 

1100: kinetic equation. A practical evaluation of these coefficients is possible by means of a Sonine polynomial approximation and  

1101: the derivation and approximate results are {\em not} limited to weak inelasticity. An 

1102: exploration of the full parameter space (mass ratio, diameters, 

1103: concentrations, inelasticity parameters) is straightforward but beyond the scope of this presentation.  

1104: We intend to create a library of programs for 

1105: calculation of distribution functions and transport coefficients in one and two component granular systems, available to the public on our web site. 

1106:  

1107: The Chapman-Enskog method provides an expansion of the distribution function for

1108: weak spatial inhomogeneity. This means that the relative spatial variation

1109: of all hydrodynamic fields must be small over distances of order of the mean

1110: free path. This encompasses a wide range of interesting phenomena, but

1111: excludes strongly driven systems such as those under steady shear. For such

1112: states it is not profitable to go beyond the order considered here in the

1113: Chapman-Enskog expansion, but rather to use other methods not based on

1114: small gradients. Previous applications of the Chapman-Enskog method have

1115: typically introduced additional assumptions for convenience that are not

1116: internally consistent with constructing a solution to the Boltzmann equation.

1117: In most of these cases the reference state was chosen to be a Maxwellian,

1118: presumed to give accurate results at weak dissipation. This is not the case,

1119: as has been demonstrated in the one component case.\cite{BDKS98} In addition,

1120: the effects of cooling in the lowest order time derivative of the temperature

1121: and pressure were neglected, again under the assumption of weak dissipation.

1122: Here, the reference state has been taken to be an exact solution to the

1123: uniform Boltzmann equation and consequently, there is no limitation

1124: on the parameters of the system

1125: (mass ratio, size ratio, concentrations, restitution coefficients).

1126: An interesting and important result of this exact analysis is that the

1127: temperatures of each species must be different. Furthermore, the time derivatives

1128: are calculated at each order in the gradient expansion without restriction on

1129: the restitution coefficients. This assures that a consistent solution to the Boltzmann

1130: equation is constructed at each order in the gradients, without any restrictions

1131: on the system parameters. This consistency is reflected in the verification

1132: of solubility conditions for the integral equations determining the transport

1133: coefficients. These are the primary new features of this work.

1134: 

1135: The evaluation of the transport coefficients for practical results introduces

1136: a new approximation, truncation of an expansion for the solutions to the

1137: integral equations in polynomials. The leading order truncation is known to

1138: be accurate to approximately five percent in the case of elastic collisions.

1139: Exceptions are extreme mass ratios (e.g., electron-proton systems). Its

1140: validity for inelastic systems has been recently checked by Monte Carlo

1141: simulation for shear viscosity. The accuracy is found to be

1142: similar to that for elastic collisions.

1143: 

1144: Recently, a seemingly similar analysis for granular binary mixtures has been

1145: given in Ref.\ \onlinecite{H00}, also based on a two temperature description.

1146: However, this work is phenomenological with no attempt to solve the kinetic

1147: equation. Instead, it is assumed that the distribution function is a local

1148: Maxwellian. This is reasonably for estimating the dense gas collisional transfer

1149: contributions to the fluxes, but it predicts that all transport coefficients

1150: calculated here at low density should vanish. Clearly, the phenomenology is

1151: flawed. 

1152: 

1153: 

1154: In a next paper, we will evaluate the expressions for the different transport coefficients for a variety of mass and diameter ratios. Here, as an  

1155: illlustration and to give some insight into the influence of dissipation on transport, 

1156: we consider the pressure diffusion coefficient $D_p$ and the 

1157: diffusion coefficient $D$. For the sake of concreteness, consider the case 

1158: $\alpha _{11}=\alpha _{22}=\alpha _{12}\equiv \alpha $. Figure \ref{fig1} 

1159: shows the reduced pressure diffusion coefficient $D_{p}(\alpha )/D(1)$ as a 

1160: function of the restitution coefficient for $\sigma _{11}=\sigma _{22}$, $

1161: n_{1}/n_{2}=0.25$, and for two values of the mass ratio 

1162: ($m_{1}/m_{2}=0.5 \ \text{and}\ 4$). Here, $D_{p}(1)=(n_{1}T/\nu _{e}\rho 

1163: )(1-m_{1}n/\rho )$ is the pressure diffusion coefficient for elastic 

1164: collisions. We see that the deviation from the functional form for elastic 

1165: collisions is quite important even for moderate dissipation (say $\alpha 

1166: \simeq 0.9$). This tendency becomes more significant as the mass of the 

1167: defect particles is larger than that of the excess particles. Also shown for 

1168: comparison in this Fig.\ \ref {fig1} is the result for $m_{1}/m_{2}=4$ with 

1169: $T_{1}=T_{2}=1$, which would be obtained if the differences in the partial 

1170: temperatures were neglected. Clearly, inclusion of this effect makes a 

1171: significant difference over the whole range of dissipation shown (the actual 

1172: value is $\gamma =T_{1}/T_{2}\simeq 1.36$ for $\alpha =0.8$). At the level 

1173: of the mass flux, the main transport coefficient is the diffusion 

1174: coefficient $D$. In Fig.\  \ref{fig2} we plot the dependence of the ratio 

1175: $D(\alpha )/D(1)$ on $\alpha $ for $\sigma _{11}=\sigma _{22}$, 

1176: $n_{1}/n_{2}=0.25$, and for several values of the mass ratio 

1177: ($m_{1}/m_{2}=0.5,1,\text{and }4$). As before, $D(1)=(\rho T/m_{1}m_{2}\nu 

1178: _{e})$ is the diffusion coefficient for elastic collisions. The shape of 

1179: these curves is very similar to those presented for the coefficient $D_{p}$, 

1180: although the influence of dissipation on $D$ is a bit stronger than the one 

1181: observed in the case of $D_{p}$. According to the behavior of $D$ and 

1182: $D_{p}$ one can conclude that the main effect of inelasticity in collisions 

1183: is to enhance the mass transport with respect to the elastic collisions 

1184: case. 

1185:  

1186: 

1187: 

1188: The application of the Chapman-Enskog procedure here follows closely recent 

1189: derivations of hydrodynamics and transport coefficients for one component 

1190: granular gases. \cite{BDKS98,GD199} An important difference in the mixture 

1191: is the need for two different temperatures in the reference local 

1192: homogeneous cooling states, leading to qualitative differences in the 

1193: concentration dependence of the transport coefficients relative to the 

1194: elastic limit. This reference state is discussed in more detail in Ref.\ 

1195: \onlinecite{GD299}. Effectively, the absence of energy conservation for 

1196: granular gases leads to a failure of detailed balance between the velocity 

1197: distributions in the homogeneous state. One consequence is non Maxwellian 

1198: distributions observed already for one component systems. For multicomponent 

1199: systems a second consequence is different covariances of the distributions 

1200: for different species, although the cooling rates are all equal. The latter 

1201: property implies that the different partial temperatures can be expressed in 

1202: terms of the global temperature (as is required for a hydrodynamic 

1203: description) although the functional relationships defining such partial 

1204: temperatures introduce a new dependence on the concentrations. This leads to 

1205: additional spatial gradients at first order in the Chapman-Enskog expansion 

1206: and consequently additional contributions to the transport coefficients. The 

1207: effect of these terms can be significant, as illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig1}. 

1208: Previous work on granular mixtures \cite{JM89,Z95,AW98,WA99} is restricted 

1209: by weak dissipation approximations. In addition, these studies do not 

1210: include contributions from the partial temperature differences which are significant even for weak dissipation. 

1211:  

1212: One interesting question is whether the mixture hydrodynamics is more or less stable than 

1213: that of the one component case, and if such phenomena as phase separation or 

1214: segregation can occur. Another direction of study is the extension of the 

1215: present simple hydrodynamic state to higher densities based on the revised 

1216: Enskog kinetic equation, following recent results for the one component 

1217: fluid. \cite{GD199} In this case the new complexity is due to the 

1218: dependence of the collision operator on concentration through the pair 

1219: correlation functions for the different species. Finally, we hope that the 

1220: present results stimulate the performance of computer simulations (molecular 

1221: dynamics and/or by using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo method 

1222: \cite{Bird}) to study hydrodynamics in granular binary mixtures. 

1223:  

1224: 

1225: \acknowledgements 

1226: We are grateful to Hector S\'anchez-Pajares for helping us in the computation of 

1227: some of the collision integrals. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant PHY 

1228: 9722133. V. G. also acknowledges partial support from the Ministerio de 

1229: Ciencia y Tecnolog\'{\i}a (Spain)  through Grant No. BFM2001-0718.

1230:  

1231: 

1232: 

1233: \appendix 

1234: \section{Leading Sonine Approximations} 

1235: \label{appA} 

1236:  

1237: In this Appendix the coefficients  $\{a_{i,j};b_{i,j};c_{i,j}\}$ in the leading  Sonine approximations are evaluated.  First, let us consider the 

1238: coefficients $\{a_{1,1};b_{1,1};c_{1,1}\}$ determining the mass flux.  

1239: Substitution of Eq.\ (\ref{4.2}) 

1240: into the integral equations (\ref{3.28})--(\ref{3.30}) gives  

1241: \begin{eqnarray} 

1242: -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) a_{1,1}f_{1,M}{\bf V}

1243: _{1} &+&a_{1}\left[ {\cal L}_{1}f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1}-\delta \gamma {\cal M} 

1244: _{1}f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{1}\right]   \nonumber \\ 

1245: &=&{\bf A}_{1}+\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) 

1246: _{p,T}f_{1,M}\left( pb_{1,1}+Tc_{1,1}\right) {\bf V}_{1},  \label{b.1} 

1247: \end{eqnarray} 

1248: \begin{eqnarray} 

1249: \left[-\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) -2\zeta 

1250: ^{(0)}\right] b_{1,1}f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1} &+&b_{1,1}\left[ {\cal L}_{1}f_{1,M}{\bf 

1251: V}_{1}-\delta \gamma {\cal M}_{1}f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{1}\right]   \nonumber \\ 

1252: &=&{\bf B}_{1}+\frac{T\zeta ^{(0)}}{p}f_{1,M}c_{1,1}{\bf V}_{1},  \label{b.2} 

1253: \end{eqnarray} 

1254: \begin{eqnarray} 

1255: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) -\frac{1}{2}

1256: \zeta ^{(0)}\right] c_{1,1}f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1} &+&c_{1,1}\left[ {\cal L}

1257: _{1}f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1}-\delta \gamma {\cal M}_{1}f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{1}\right]   

1258: \nonumber \\ 

1259: &=&{\bf C}_{1}-\frac{p\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T}f_{1,M}b_{1,1}{\bf V}_{1}.  \label{b.3} 

1260: \end{eqnarray} 

1261: Next, multiplication by $m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}$ and integrating over the velocity leads to  

1262: \begin{equation} 

1263: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) +\nu \right]

1264: n_{1}T_{1}a_{1,1}=\frac{1}{3}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot {\bf A}

1265: _{1}+\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) 

1266: _{p,T}n_{1}T_{1}\left( pb_{1,1}+Tc_{1,1}\right) ,  \label{b.4} 

1267: \end{equation} 

1268: \begin{equation} 

1269: \left[ -\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) -2\zeta 

1270: ^{(0)}+\nu \right] n_{1}T_{1}b_{1,1}=\frac{1}{3}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}{\bf V}

1271: _{1}\cdot {\bf B}_{1}+\frac{T\zeta ^{(0)}}{p}n_{1}T_{1}c_{1,1},  \label{b.5} 

1272: \end{equation} 

1273: \begin{equation} 

1274: \left[-\zeta ^{(0)}\left( T\partial _{T}+p\partial _{p}\right) -\frac{1}{2}

1275: \zeta ^{(0)}+\nu \right] n_{1}T_{1}c_{1,1}=\frac{1}{3}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}

1276: {\bf V}_{1}\cdot {\bf C}_{1}-\frac{p\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T}n_{1}T_{1}b_{1,1}. 

1277: \label{b.6} 

1278: \end{equation} 

1279: Here, $\nu $ is a collision frequency defined by  

1280: \begin{eqnarray} 

1281: \nu  &=&\frac{1}{3n_{1}T_{1}}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot \left[  

1282: {\cal L}_{1}f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1}-\delta \gamma {\cal M}_{1}f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{2}

1283: \right]   \nonumber \\ 

1284: &=&-\frac{1}{3n_{1}T_{1}}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot \left( 

1285: J_{12}[{\bf v}_{1}|f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1},f_{2}^{(0)}]-\delta \gamma J_{12}[{\bf

1286: v}_{1}|f_{1}^{(0)},f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{2}]\right) .  \label{b.7} 

1287: \end{eqnarray} 

1288: The self-collision terms of ${\cal L}_{i}$ arising from $J_{11}$ do not 

1289: occur in Eq.\ (\ref{b.7}) since these conserve momentum for species $1$. The 

1290: velocity integrals appearing in Eqs.\ (\ref{b.4})--(\ref{b.6}) can be 

1291: performed using Eqs.\ (\ref{3.21})--(\ref{3.23})  

1292: \begin{equation} 

1293: \frac{1}{3}\int d{\bf V}_1m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot {\bf A}_{1}=-\left( \frac{

1294: \partial }{\partial x_{1}}n_{1}T_{1}\right) _{p,T},  \label{b.8} 

1295: \end{equation} 

1296: \begin{equation} 

1297: \frac{1}{3}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot {\bf B}_{1}=-\frac{

1298: n_{1}T_{1}}{p}\left( 1-\frac{m_{1}nT}{\rho T_{1}}\right) ,  \label{b.9} 

1299: \end{equation} 

1300: \begin{equation} 

1301: \frac{1}{3}\int d{\bf V}_{1}m_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot {\bf C}_{1}=0. 

1302: \label{b.10} 

1303: \end{equation} 

1304: From dimensional analysis $n_{1}T_{1}a_{1,1}\sim T^{1/2}$, $

1305: n_{1}T_{1}b_{1,1}\sim T^{1/2}/p$, and $n_{1}T_{1}c_{1,1}\sim T^{-1/2}$ so the 

1306: temperature derivatives can be performed in Eqs.\ (\ref{b.4})--(\ref{b.6}) 

1307: and the result is  

1308: \begin{equation} 

1309: \left( \nu -\frac{1}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\right) a_{1,1}=-\left( \frac{\partial }{

1310: \partial x_{1}}\ln n_{1}T_{1}\right) _{p,T}+\left( \frac{\partial \zeta 

1311: ^{(0)}}{\partial x_{1}}\right) _{p,T}\left( pb_{1,1}+Tc_{1,1}\right) , 

1312: \label{b.11} 

1313: \end{equation} 

1314: \begin{equation} 

1315: \left( \nu -\frac{3}{2}\zeta ^{(0)}\right) b_{1,1}=-\frac{1}{p}\left( 1-\frac{

1316: m_{1}nT}{\rho T_{1}}\right) +\frac{T\zeta ^{(0)}}{p}c_{1,1},  \label{b.12} 

1317: \end{equation} 

1318: \begin{equation} 

1319: c_{1,1}=-\frac{p\zeta ^{(0)}}{2T\nu }b_{1,1}.  \label{b.13} 

1320: \end{equation} 

1321: The solutions are given by Eqs.\ (\ref{4.6})--(\ref{4.8}) of the text. 

1322:  

1323: The analysis for the coefficients  $\{a_{1,2}; b_{1,2}; c_{1,2}\}$ 

1324: (Dufour coefficient, pressure energy coefficient, 

1325: and thermal conductivity) is similar to that above for the mass flux.

1326: The result is 

1327: \begin{eqnarray}

1328: \label{b.14}

1329: \left[-\zeta^{(0)}\left(T\partial_{T}+p\partial 

1330: _{p}\right)+\nu_{11}\right] 

1331: T^3a_{1,2}&+&T^3\nu_{12}a_{2,2}=\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_1T^3}{n_1T_1^3}\int

1332: d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\bf A}_{12}\nonumber\\

1333: & & 

1334: +T^3\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}

1335: {\partial x_{1}}\right)_{p,T}(pb_{1,2}+Tc_{1,2}),

1336: \end{eqnarray}

1337: \begin{eqnarray}

1338: \label{b.15}

1339: \left[-\zeta^{(0)}\left(T\partial_{T}+p\partial 

1340: _{p}\right)-2\zeta^{(0)}+\nu_{11}\right] 

1341: T^3b_{1,2}&+&T^3\nu_{12}b_{2,2}=\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_1T^3}{n_1T_1^3}\int

1342: d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\bf B}_{12}\nonumber\\

1343: & & 

1344: +\frac{T^4 \zeta^{(0)}}{p}c_{1,2},

1345: \end{eqnarray}

1346: \begin{eqnarray}

1347: \label{b.16}

1348: \left[-\zeta^{(0)}\left(T\partial_{T}+p\partial 

1349: _{p}\right)-\frac{1}{2}\zeta^{(0)}+\nu_{11}\right] 

1350: T^3c_{1,2}&+&T^3\nu_{12}c_{2,2}=\frac{2}{15}\frac{m_1T^3}{n_1T_1^3}\int

1351: d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_1\cdot {\bf C}_{12}\nonumber\\

1352: & & 

1353: -\frac{1}{2}pT^2\zeta^{(0)}c_{1,2}.

1354: \end{eqnarray}

1355: Here, the collision frequencies $\nu_{ii}$ and $\nu_{ij}$ are defined by Eqs.\  (\ref{4.3:13a}), respectively and 

1356: (\ref{4.3:13b}) and  

1357:  \begin{eqnarray}

1358: \label{b.17}

1359: {\bf A}_{12}&=& {\bf 

1360: A}_1-\frac{m_1m_2n}{\rho 

1361: n_1\gamma_1}\zeta^{(0)}\left(T\partial_{T}+p\partial 

1362: _{p}\right)\frac{D}{T}{\bf V}_1f_{1,M}+\frac{m_1m_2n}{\rho n_1T_1}D

1363: \nonumber\\

1364: & & \times \left[{\cal L}_{1}(f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1})-\delta\gamma{\cal 

1365: M}_{1}(f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{1})\right]-\left( \frac{\partial \zeta ^{(0)}}

1366: {\partial x_{1}}\right)_{p,T}\frac{\rho}{n_1T_1}\left(D_p+D'\right)

1367: f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1},

1368: \end{eqnarray}

1369: \begin{eqnarray}

1370: \label{b.18}

1371: {\bf B}_{12}&=& {\bf B}_1-\frac{\rho}{ 

1372: n_1\gamma_1}\zeta^{(0)}\left(T\partial_{T}+p\partial 

1373: _{p}\right)\frac{D_p}{pT}{\bf V}_1f_{1,M}+\frac{\rho}{pn_1T_1}D_p

1374: \nonumber\\

1375: & & \times \left[{\cal L}_{1}(f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1})-\delta\gamma{\cal 

1376: M}_{1}(f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{1})\right]-\zeta^{(0)}

1377: \frac{\rho}{pn_1T_1}\left(D'-2D_p\right)f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1},

1378: \end{eqnarray}

1379: \begin{eqnarray}

1380: \label{b.19}

1381: {\bf C}_{12}&=& {\bf C}_1-\frac{\rho}{ 

1382: n_1\gamma_1}\zeta^{(0)}\left(T\partial_{T}+p\partial 

1383: _{p}\right)\frac{D'}{T^2}{\bf V}_1f_{1,M}+\frac{\rho}{Tn_1T_1}D'

1384: \nonumber\\

1385: & & \times \left[{\cal L}_{1}(f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1})-\delta\gamma{\cal 

1386: M}_{1}(f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{1})\right]-\frac{1}{2}\zeta^{(0)}

1387: \frac{\rho}{Tn_1T_1}\left(D'-D_p\right)f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1},

1388: \end{eqnarray}

1389: where $\gamma_i=T_i/T$. The corresponding integral equations for $a_{2,2}$, 

1390: $b_{2,2}$, and $c_{2,2}$ can be obtained from Eqs.\  (\ref{b.14})--(\ref{b.16}) by 

1391: just making the change $1\leftrightarrow 2$. Dimensional analysis requires that 

1392: $a_{1,2}\sim T^{-3/2}$, $b_{1,2}\sim T^{-3/2}/p$, and $a_{1,2}\sim T^{-5/2}$. When one 

1393: takes into account this dependence and the forms of ${\bf A}_{ij}$,  ${\bf B}_{ij}$, and

1394: ${\bf C}_{ij}$, one finally arrives to Eq.\  (\ref{4.3:12}).    

1395: 

1396:  

1397: 

1398: 

1399: \section{Evaluation of $\protect\nu $} 

1400: \label{appB} 

1401:  

1402: The collision frequency $\nu $ is defined by the collision integrals in Eq.\ 

1403: (\ref{b.7}). To simplify the integrals, a useful identity for an arbitrary 

1404: function $h({\bf v}_{1})$ is given by  

1405: \begin{eqnarray} 

1406: \int d{\bf v}_{1}h({\bf v}_{1})J_{ij}\left[ {\bf v}_{1}|f_{i},f_{j}\right] 

1407: &=&\sigma _{ij}^{2}\int \,d{\bf v}_{1}\,\int \,d{\bf v}_{2}f_{i}({\bf r},  

1408: {\bf v}_{1},t)f_{j}({\bf r},{\bf v}_{2},t)  \nonumber \\ 

1409: &&\times \int d\widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}\,\Theta (\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}} 

1410: \cdot {\bf g}_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\,\left[ h(  

1411: {\bf v}_{1}^{^{\prime \prime }})-h({\bf v}_{1})\right] \;,  \label{a1} 

1412: \end{eqnarray} 

1413: with  

1414: \begin{equation} 

1415: {\bf v}_{1}^{^{\prime \prime }}={\bf v}_{1}-\mu _{ji}(1+\alpha _{ij})(  

1416: \widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\;. 

1417: \label{a2} 

1418: \end{equation} 

1419: This result applies for both $i=j$ and $i\neq j$. Use of this in Eq.\ (\ref {b.7}) gives  

1420: \begin{eqnarray} 

1421: \nu &=&-\frac{m_{1}}{3n_{1}T_{1}}\int d{\bf V}_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\cdot \left( 

1422: J_{12}[f_{1,M}{\bf V}_{1},f_{2}^{(0)}]-\delta \gamma 

1423: J_{12}[f_{1}^{(0)},f_{2,M}{\bf V}_{2}]\right)  \nonumber \\ 

1424: &=&\frac{1}{6}\pi \sigma _{12}^{2}\mu _{21}(1+\alpha _{12})\frac{m_{1}}{ 

1425: n_{1}T_{1}}\int \,d{\bf V}_{1}\,\int \,d{\bf V}_{2}\,g_{12}\left[ f_{1,M}(  

1426: {\bf V}_{1})f_{2}^{(0)}({\bf V}_{2})({\bf V}_{1}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\right.  

1427: \nonumber \\ 

1428: &&\left. -\delta \gamma f_{1}^{(0)}({\bf V}_{1})f_{2,M}({\bf V}_{2})({\bf V} 

1429: _{2}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\right],  \label{a.3} 

1430: \end{eqnarray} 

1431: where $\gamma=T_1/T_2$ and $\delta=n_1/n_2$. Substitution of the 

1432: distribution functions from Eqs.\ (\ref{4.02}) and (\ref{4.1}) gives  

1433: \begin{eqnarray} 

1434: \nu &=&\frac{n_{2}}{3\pi ^{2}\left( 1+\mu \right) }(1+\alpha _{12})\sigma 

1435: _{12}^{2}\theta _{1}^{5/2}\theta _{2}^{3/2}v_{0}\int \,d{\bf V}_{1}^{\ast 

1436: }\,\int \,d{\bf V}_{2}^{\ast }e^{-\theta _{1}V_{1}^{\ast 2}}e^{-\theta 

1437: _{2}V_{2}^{\ast 2}}g_{12}^{\ast }\left\{ \left[ 1+\frac{c_{2}}{4}\right. 

1438: \right.  \nonumber \\ 

1439: &\times &\left. \left. \left( \theta _{2}^{2}V_{2}^{\ast 4}-5\theta 

1440: _{2}V_{2}^{\ast 2}+\frac{15}{4}\right) \right] ({\bf V}_{1}^{\ast}\cdot  

1441: {\bf g}_{12}^{\ast})-\delta \gamma \left[ 1+\frac{c_{1}}{4}\left( \theta 

1442: _{1}^{2}V_{1}^{\ast 4}-5\theta _{1}V_{1}^{\ast 2}+\frac{15}{4}\right) 

1443: \right] ({\bf V}_{2}^{\ast}\cdot {\bf g}_{12}^{\ast })\right\}  \nonumber 

1444: \\ &=&\frac{(1+\alpha _{12})\sigma _{12}^{2}}{3\pi ^{2}\gamma _{1}\gamma 

1445: _{2}} \left( \theta _{1}\theta _{2}\right) ^{3/2}v_{0}\left[ n_{2}\gamma 

1446: _{2}X\left( c_{2},\theta _{1},\theta _{2}\right) +n_{1}\gamma _{1}X\left( 

1447: c_{1},\theta _{2},\theta _{1}\right) \right].  \label{a.4} 

1448: \end{eqnarray} 

1449: Here, $\mu=m_1/m_2$, ${\bf V}_{i}^{\ast }={\bf V}_{i}/v_{0}$, ${\bf g}

1450: _{12}^{\ast }={\bf g}_{12}/v_{0}$, $\theta _{i}=(\mu _{ji}\gamma _{i})^{-1}$, and $v_{0}=\sqrt{2T(m_{1}+m_{2})/m_{1}m_{2}}$. In 

1451: addition, the quantities $X\left(c_{2},\theta _{1},\theta _{2}\right)$ and 

1452: $I\left( \theta _{1},\theta_{2}\right)$ are given by  

1453: \begin{equation} 

1454: X\left( c_{2},\theta _{1},\theta _{2}\right) =\left[ 1+\frac{c_{2}}{4}\left( 

1455: \theta _{2}^{2}\frac{d^{2}}{d\theta _{2}^{2}}+5\theta _{2}\frac{d}{d\theta 

1456: _{2}}+\frac{15}{4}\right) \right] I\left( \theta _{1},\theta _{2}\right) , 

1457: \label{a.5} 

1458: \end{equation} 

1459: \begin{equation} 

1460: I\left( \theta _{1},\theta _{2}\right) =\int \,d{\bf V}_{1}^{\ast}\,\int 

1461: \,d {\bf V}_{2}^{\ast }e^{-\theta _{1}V_{1}^{\ast 2}}e^{-\theta 

1462: _{2}V_{2}^{\ast 2}}g_{12}^{\ast}({\bf V}_{1}^{\ast}\cdot {\bf g}

1463: _{12}^{\ast}).  \label{a.6} 

1464: \end{equation} 

1465: The integral $I\left(\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\right)$ can be performed by the 

1466: change of variables  

1467: \begin{equation} 

1468: {\bf x}={\bf V}_{1}^{\ast}-{\bf V}_{2}^{\ast},\quad {\bf y}=\theta _{1}  

1469: {\bf V}_{1}^{\ast}+\theta _{2}{\bf V}_{2}^{\ast},  \label{a.7} 

1470: \end{equation} 

1471: with the Jacobian $\left( \theta _{1}+\theta _{2}\right) ^{-3}$. The 

1472: integral becomes  

1473: \begin{equation} 

1474: I\left( \theta _{1},\theta _{2}\right) =4\pi ^{5/2}\frac{\left( \theta 

1475: _{1}+\theta _{2}\right) ^{1/2}}{\theta _{2}^{2}\theta _{1}^{3}}.  \label{a.8} 

1476: \end{equation} 

1477: Use of this result in (\ref{a.5}) and (\ref{a.3}) gives the desired result  

1478: \begin{eqnarray} 

1479: \nu &=&\frac{4}{3}\sqrt{\pi }\sigma _{12}^{2}v_{0}\frac{1+\alpha _{12}}{ 

1480: \gamma _{1}\gamma _{2}}\left( \theta _{1}\theta _{2}(\theta _{1}+\theta 

1481: _{2})\right) ^{-3/2}\left[ \left( n_{2}\gamma _{2}\theta _{2}+n_{1}\gamma 

1482: _{1}\theta _{1}\right) \left( \theta _{1}+\theta _{2}\right) ^{2}\right.  

1483: \nonumber \\ 

1484: &&\left. -\frac{1}{16}\left( c_{1}n_{1}\gamma _{1}\theta _{1}\theta 

1485: _{2}^{2}+c_{2}n_{2}\gamma _{2}\theta _{2}\theta _{1}^{2}\right) \right] . 

1486: \label{a.9} 

1487: \end{eqnarray} 

1488: This leads directly to the result given by Eq.\ (\ref{4.11}) in the text. 

1489:  

1490: 

1491: \section{Evaluation of \lowercase{$\tau_{ii}$} and 

1492: \lowercase{$\tau_{ij}$} }

1493: \label{appC} 

1494: 

1495: The collision frequencies $\tau_{ii}$ and $\tau_{ij}$ appearing in the 

1496: evaluation of the shear viscosity are defined by Eqs.\ (\ref{4.2:6}) and 

1497: (\ref{4.2:7}).  All of these have the form 

1498: \begin{eqnarray}

1499: \label{c1}

1500: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1501: {\bf V}_{1}{\bf V}_{1} J_{ij}[{\bf v}_1|f_i,f_j]&=&\sigma_{ij}^2\int\, d{\bf 

1502: v}_1\int\, d{\bf v}_2\, f_i({\bf v}_1) f_j({\bf v}_2)\nonumber\\

1503: & & \times \int d\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\,\Theta (\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}

1504: \cdot {\bf g}_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\,\left[

1505: {\bf V}_1''{\bf V}_{1}''-{\bf V}_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\right],

1506: \end{eqnarray}

1507: where the identity (\ref{a1}) has been used. 

1508: This result applies for both $i=j$ and $i\neq j$. Using the scattering rule (\ref{a2}), the last term on the right hand side can be explicitly computed as

1509: \begin{eqnarray}

1510: \label{c2}

1511: {\bf V}_{1}''{\bf V}_{1}''-{\bf V}_{1}{\bf V}_{1}&=&-\mu_{ji}(1+

1512: \alpha_{ij})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\left[

1513: {\bf G}_{ij}{\bbox{\sigma}}+{\bbox{\sigma}}{\bf G}_{ij}\right.\nonumber\\

1514: & &

1515: \left.+\mu_{ji}({\bf g}_{12}{\bbox{\sigma}}+{\bbox{\sigma}}{\bf g}_{12}) 

1516: -\mu_{ji}(1+\alpha_{ij})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})

1517: {\bbox{\sigma}}{\bbox{\sigma}}\right]

1518: \end{eqnarray}

1519: Here, ${\bf G}_{ij}=\mu_{ij}{\bf V}_1+\mu_{ji}{\bf V}_2$. 

1520: Substitution of (\ref{c2}) into Eq.\ 

1521: (\ref{c1}) allows the angular integral to be performed with the result

1522: \begin{eqnarray}

1523: \label{c3}

1524: \int d\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\,\Theta (\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g

1525: }_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\, &&\left[ 

1526: {\bf V}_{1}''{\bf V}_{1}''-{\bf V}_{1}{\bf V}_{1}\right]= 

1527: -\frac{m_i}{2}\pi \mu_{ji}(1+\alpha _{ij})\left[g_{12}({\bf G}_{ij}{\bf g}_{12}+

1528: {\bf g}_{12}{\bf G}_{ij})\right. \nonumber\\

1529: & &\left.

1530: +\frac{\mu_{ji}}{2}

1531: (3-\alpha_{ij})g_{12}{\bf g}_{12}{\bf g}_{12}-\frac{\mu_{ji}}{6}

1532: (1+\alpha_{ij})g^3\openone\right].

1533: \end{eqnarray}

1534: Notice that the last term in (\ref{c3}) vanishes when is contracted with the traceless tensor ${\sf R}_{i}$. Now, the different collision integrals can be easily calculated by the 

1535: same method as described in Appendix \ref{appB}. After a lengthy calculation, one gets

1536: \begin{eqnarray}

1537: \label{c4}

1538: {\cal A}_{12}&=&\int d{\bf v}_1 

1539: R_{1,\alpha\beta}J_{12}[f_1^{(0)}, f_{2,M}R_{2,\alpha\beta}]\nonumber\\

1540: &=&

1541: -\frac{4}{3}m_1m_2n_1n_2\sqrt{\pi}\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\sigma_{12}^2 

1542: v_0^5 \left(\theta_1\theta_2\right)^{-1/2}\nonumber\\

1543: & & \times 

1544: \left[6 \theta_2^{-2}(\mu_{12}\theta_2-\mu_{21}\theta_1)

1545: \left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-1/2}+\case{3}{2}\mu_{21}

1546: \theta_2^{-2}\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{1/2}(3-\alpha_{12})-

1547: 5\theta_2^{-1}\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-1/2} \right.\nonumber\\

1548: & &\left. +\frac{c_1}{16}\frac{2\theta_1(10-12\mu_{12}-9\mu_{21})+\theta_2

1549: (5-6\mu_{12})-\case{3}{2}\mu_{21}(3-\alpha_{12})\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)}

1550: {\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{5/2}}\right],

1551: \end{eqnarray} 

1552: \begin{eqnarray}

1553: \label{c5}

1554: {\cal B}_{12}&=&

1555: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1556: R_{1,\alpha\beta}J_{12}[f_{1,M}R_{1,\alpha\beta},f_2^{(0)}]\nonumber\\

1557: &=&

1558: -\frac{4}{3}m_1^2n_1n_2\sqrt{\pi}\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\sigma_{12}^2 

1559: v_0^5 \left(\theta_1\theta_2\right)^{-1/2}\nonumber\\

1560: & & \times 

1561: \left[6 \theta_1^{-2}(\mu_{12}\theta_2-\mu_{21}\theta_1)

1562: \left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-1/2}+\case{3}{2}\mu_{21}\theta_1^{-2}

1563: \left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{1/2}(3-\alpha_{12})+

1564: 5\theta_1^{-1}\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-1/2} \right.\nonumber\\

1565: & &\left. +\frac{c_2}{16}\frac{2\theta_2(12\mu_{21}+9\mu_{12}-10)-\theta_1

1566: (5-6\mu_{21})-\case{3}{2}\mu_{21}(3-\alpha_{12})

1567: \left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)}

1568: {\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{5/2}}\right].

1569: \end{eqnarray}

1570: \begin{eqnarray}

1571: \label{c6}

1572: {\cal A}_{11}+{\cal B}_{11}&=&

1573: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1574: R_{1,\alpha\beta}\left\{J_{11}[f_1^{(0)},f_{1,M}R_{1,\alpha\beta}]

1575: +J_{11}[f_{1,M}R_{1,\alpha\beta},f_1^{(0)}]\right\}\nonumber\\

1576: &=&-32m_1^2

1577: n_1^2\sqrt{\pi}(1+\alpha_{11})\sigma_1^2 (T_1/m_1)^{5/2}

1578: \left[1-\frac{1}{4}

1579: (1-\alpha_{11})^2\right](1-\frac{c_1}{64}).

1580: \end{eqnarray}

1581: In the case of mechanically equivalent particles ($m_1=m_2=m$, 

1582: $\sigma_{ij}=\sigma$, $\alpha_{ij}=\alpha$, $c_i=c$), Eqs.\ 

1583: (\ref{c4})--(\ref{c6}) reduce to those previously calculated 

1584: in the single gas case in the determination of the shear viscosity. \cite{BDKS98}

1585: 

1586: 

1587: This completely determines $\tau_{11}$ and $\tau_{12}$. The corresponding 

1588: expressions for $\tau_{22}$ and $\tau_{21}$ can be inferred from Eqs.\ (\ref{c4}), (\ref{c5}), and (\ref{c6}) by interchanging 

1589: $1\leftrightarrow 2$.  

1590: 

1591: \section{Evaluation of $Y$\lowercase{$_{i}$}, 

1592: \lowercase{$\nu_{ii}$} and \lowercase{$\nu_{ij}$}} 

1593: \label{appD} 

1594: 

1595: 

1596: The collision frequencies $\nu_{ii}$, $\nu_{ij}$ and $Y_i$ $(i=1,\ldots 6)$ 

1597: that determine the coefficients $a_{i,2}$, $b_{i,2}$ and $c_{i,2}$ for the heat

1598: flux are defined by the collision integrals (\ref{4.3:13a}), (\ref{4.3:13b}), 

1599: (\ref{4.3:14}), (\ref{4.3:15}), (\ref{4.3:16}), and (\ref{4.3:17}). All of these have the form 

1600: \begin{eqnarray}

1601: \label{d1}

1602: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1603: {\bf S}_{i}({\bf V}_1) J_{ij}[{\bf v}_1|f_i,f_j]&=&\sigma_{ij}^2\int\, d{\bf 

1604: v}_1\int\, d{\bf v}_2\, f_i({\bf v}_1) f_j({\bf v}_2)\nonumber\\

1605: & & \times \int d\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\,\Theta (\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}

1606: \cdot {\bf g}_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\,\left[

1607: {\bf S}_i({\bf V}_{1}'')-{\bf S}_i({\bf V}_{1})\right].

1608: \end{eqnarray}

1609: Using the scattering rule (\ref{a2}), the last term on the right hand 

1610: side can be explicitly computed as

1611: \begin{eqnarray}

1612: \label{d2}

1613: {\bf S}_{i}({\bf V}_{1}^{^{\prime \prime }})-{\bf S}_{i}({\bf V}_{1}) &=&

1614: \frac{m_{i}}{2}(1+\alpha _{ij})\mu_{ji}(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g

1615: }_{12})\left\{ \left[ (1-\alpha_{ij}^{2})\mu_{ji}^{2}(\widehat{\bbox

1616: {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})^{2}-G_{ij}^{2}-\mu_{ji}^{2}g_{12}^{2}\right.

1617: \right.   \nonumber \\

1618: &&\left. -2\mu_{ji}({\bf g}_{12}\cdot {\bf G}_{ij})+2(1+\alpha_{ij})\mu

1619: _{ji}(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}

1620: \cdot {\bf G}_{ij})-\frac{5T_{i}}{m_{i}}\right] \widehat{\bbox {\sigma}} 

1621: \nonumber \\

1622: &&-\left[ (1-\alpha_{ij})\mu_{ji}(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma }}\cdot {\bf g}_{12}

1623: )+2(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf G}_{ij})\right] {\bf G}_{ij}

1624: \nonumber \\

1625: &&\left. -\mu_{ji}\left[(1-\alpha_{ij})\mu_{ji}(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}

1626: \cdot {\bf g}_{12})+2(\widehat{\bbox{\sigma}}\cdot {\bf G}_{ij})

1627: \right] {\bf g}_{12}\right\} \;. 

1628: \end{eqnarray}

1629: Substitution of (\ref{d2}) into (\ref{d1}) allows the angular integral to be performed with 

1630: the result

1631: \begin{eqnarray}

1632: \label{d3}

1633: \int d\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\,\Theta (\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g

1634: }_{12})(\widehat{\bbox {\sigma}}\cdot {\bf g}_{12})\, &&\left[ {\bf S}_{i}(

1635: {\bf V}_{1}^{^{\prime \prime }})-{\bf S}_{i}({\bf V}_{1})\right] =-\frac{

1636: m_{i}}{2}\pi (1+\alpha_{ij})\mu_{ji}\left\{ \left[ \frac{1}{2}

1637: g_{12}G_{ij}^{2}\right. \right.   \nonumber \\

1638: &&\left. +\frac{1}{6}\mu_{ji}^{2}\left( 2\alpha_{ij}^{2}-3\alpha

1639: _{ij}+4\right) g_{12}^{3}-\frac{1}{2}\mu_{ji}\left( \alpha_{ij}-3\right)

1640: g_{12}\left( {\bf g}_{12}\cdot {\bf G}_{ij}\right) -\frac{5T_{i}}{2m_{i}}

1641: g_{12}\right] {\bf g}_{12}  \nonumber \\

1642: &&\left. +\left[ g_{12}\left( {\bf g}_{12}\cdot {\bf G}_{ij}\right) 

1643: -\frac{1}{3}\mu_{ji}\left( 2\alpha_{ij}-1\right) g_{12}^{3}\right] 

1644: {\bf G}_{ij}\right\} \;.  

1645: \end{eqnarray}

1646: Now the different collision integrals can be evaluated. 

1647: 

1648: \subsection{Evaluation of $Y_{i}$}

1649: 

1650: The coefficients $Y_{1,3,5}$  are obtained from Eqs.\ 

1651: (\ref{4.3:15})--(\ref{4.3:17}).  

1652: The collision integrals appearing in these expressions can be evaluated 

1653: directly by using identical mathematical steps as before. After some algebra, 

1654: the result is   

1655: \begin{eqnarray}

1656: \label{d4}

1657: {\cal C}_{12}&=&\int d{\bf v}_1 

1658: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_1^{(0)},f_{2,M}{\bf V}_2] \nonumber\\

1659: &=&

1660: -\frac{1}{2}m_1n_1n_2\sqrt{\pi}\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\sigma_{12}^2 

1661: v_0^5\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-1/2}\left(\theta_1\theta_2

1662: \right)^{-3/2}\nonumber\\

1663: & & \times 

1664: \left\{5(2\beta_{12}-\theta_1)+\mu_{21}(\theta_1+\theta_2)\left[5(1-\alpha_{12})+2

1665: (7\alpha_{12}-11)\beta_{12}\theta_2^{-1}\right]\right.\nonumber\\

1666: & &\left. 

1667: -18\beta_{12}^2\theta_2^{-1}-2\mu_{21}^2\left(2\alpha_{12}^{2}-3\alpha

1668: _{12}+4\right)\theta_2^{-1}(\theta_1+\theta_2)^2+

1669: 5(\theta_1+\theta_2)\right]\nonumber\\

1670: & & -\frac{c_1}{16}\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-2}\theta_2\left\{

1671: 4\theta_1^2\left[-5+36\mu_{12}^2+5\mu_{21}(\alpha_{12}-3)

1672: \right.\right.\nonumber\\

1673: & & \left.

1674: +\mu_{21}^2(25-8\alpha_{12}+3\alpha_{12}^2)-2\mu_{12}(10+\mu_{21}(

1675: 7\alpha_{12}-29))\right]\nonumber\\

1676: & & 

1677: +\theta_2^2\left[5+54\mu_{12}^2+15\mu_{21}(\alpha_{12}-1)

1678: +6\mu_{21}^2(4-3\alpha_{12}+2\alpha_{12}^2)\right.\nonumber\\

1679: & & 

1680: \left. -6\mu_{12}(5+\mu_{21}(7\alpha_{12}-11))\right]-\theta_1\theta_2\left[

1681: -144\mu_{12}^2+2\mu_{12}(40+\mu_{21}(49\alpha_{12}-95))

1682: \right.\nonumber\\

1683: & & \left.\left.\left.

1684: +\mu_{21}(45-35\alpha_{12}-2\mu_{21}(35-25\alpha_{12}+

1685: 12\alpha_{12}^2)\right]\right\}

1686: \right\},

1687: \end{eqnarray} 

1688: \begin{eqnarray}

1689: \label{d5}

1690: {\cal D}_{12}&=&\int d{\bf v}_1 

1691: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_{1,M}{\bf V}_1,f_2^{(0)}]\nonumber\\

1692: &=&-\frac{1}{2}m_1n_1n_2\sqrt{\pi}\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\sigma_{12}^2 

1693: v_0^5\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-1/2}\left(\theta_1\theta_2

1694: \right)^{-3/2}\nonumber\\

1695: & & \times 

1696: \left\{5(2\beta_{12}+\theta_2)+\mu_{21}(\theta_1+\theta_2)

1697: \left[5(1-\alpha_{12})-2

1698: (7\alpha_{12}-11)\beta_{12}\theta_1^{-1}\right]\right.\nonumber\\

1699: & &\left. 

1700: +18\beta_{12}^2\theta_1^{-1}+2\mu_{21}^2\left(2\alpha_{12}^{2}-3\alpha

1701: _{12}+4\right)\theta_1^{-1}(\theta_1+\theta_2)^2-

1702: 5\theta_2\theta_1^{-1}(\theta_1+\theta_2)\right]\nonumber\\

1703: & & +\frac{c_2}{16}\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-2}\theta_1\left\{

1704: 3\theta_1^2\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\left[4\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})-5\right]

1705: \right.\nonumber\\

1706: & &

1707: +\theta_2^2\left[-15+54\mu_{12}^2-20\mu_{21}(3+\alpha_{12})+2\mu_{21}^2(

1708: 40+19\alpha_{12}+6\alpha_{12}^2)\right.\nonumber\\

1709: & & \left.

1710: +2\mu_{12}(-20+\mu_{21}(61+7\alpha_{12}))\right]

1711: +\theta_1\theta_2\left[2\mu_{12}(-5+7\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12}))\right.

1712: \nonumber\\

1713: & &\left.\left.\left. 

1714: +\mu_{21}(-5(9+7\alpha_{12})+\mu_{21}(38+62\alpha_{12}+

1715: 24\alpha_{12}^2)\right]\right\}\right\},

1716: \end{eqnarray}

1717: \begin{eqnarray}

1718: \label{d6}

1719: {\cal C}_{11}+{\cal D}_{11}&=&

1720: \int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_{1}\cdot \left\{J_{11}[f_1^{(0)},f_{1,M}{\bf V}_2]

1721: +J_{11}[f_{1,M}{\bf 

1722: V}_1,f_1^{(0)}]\right\}\nonumber\\

1723: &=&

1724: -10\sqrt{\pi}m_1\sigma_{11}^2n_1^2(T_1/m_1)^{5/2}

1725: (1+\alpha_{11})\left[1-\alpha_{11}+\frac{1}{320}c_1(21\alpha_{11}-53)\right].

1726: \end{eqnarray}

1727: In the above expressions we have introduced the quantity

1728: \begin{equation}

1729: \label{d7}

1730: \beta_{12}=\mu_{12}\theta_2-\mu_{21}\theta_1.

1731: \end{equation}

1732: This completely determines the coefficients $Y_{1,3,5}$. The corresponding 

1733: expressions for $Y_{2,4,6}$ can be inferred from 

1734: Eqs.\  (\ref{d5})--(\ref{d7}) by interchanging  $1\leftrightarrow 2$.

1735: 

1736: 

1737: \subsection{Evaluation of $\nu_{ii}$ and $\nu_{ij}$}

1738: 

1739: The collision frequencies $\nu_{ii}$ and $\nu_{ij}$ are defined

1740: by Eqs.\ (\ref{4.3:13a}) and (\ref{4.3:13b}).

1741: These collision integrals are evaluated in the same manner as

1742: those for $Y_i$. The result is

1743: \begin{equation}

1744: \label{d9}

1745: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1746: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_1^{(0)},f_{2,M}{\bf S}_2]=

1747: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1748: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_1^{(0)},f_{2,M}\frac{m_2}{2}V_2^2{\bf V}_2

1749: -\case{5}{2}T_2{\bf V}_2]={\cal F}_{12}-\frac{5}{2}T_2{\cal C}_{12},

1750: \end{equation}

1751: \begin{eqnarray}

1752: \label{d10}

1753: {\cal F}_{12}&=&\int d{\bf v}_1 

1754: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_1^{(0)},f_{2,M}\frac{m_2}{2}V_2^2{\bf V}_2]\nonumber\\

1755: &=& 

1756: \frac{1}{8}m_1n_1n_2\sqrt{\pi}\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\sigma_{12}^2 

1757: v_0^7\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-3/2}\left(\theta_1\theta_2

1758: \right)^{-3/2}\nonumber\\

1759: & & \times 

1760: \left\{

1761: 2\mu_{21}^2\theta_2^{-2}(\theta_1+\theta_2)^2

1762: \left(2\alpha_{12}^{2}-3\alpha_{12}+4\right)

1763: (8\theta_1+5\theta_2)\right.\nonumber\\

1764: & & 

1765: -\mu_{21}(\theta_1+\theta_2)

1766: \left[2\beta_{12}\theta_2^{-2}(8\theta_1+5\theta_2)(7\alpha_{12}

1767: -11)-2\theta_1\theta_2^{-1}(29\alpha_{12}-37)+25(1-\alpha_{12})\right]

1768: \nonumber\\

1769: & & 

1770: +18\beta_{12}^2\theta_2^{-2}(8\theta_1+5\theta_2)-

1771: 2\beta_{12}\theta_2^{-1}(66\theta_1+25\theta_2)

1772: \nonumber\\

1773: & & 

1774: +5\theta_1\theta_2^{-1}

1775: (6\theta_1+11\theta_2)-5(\theta_1+\theta_2)\theta_2^{-1}(6\theta_1+5\theta_2)

1776: \nonumber\\

1777: & & +\frac{c_1}{16}(\theta_1+\theta_2)^{-2}\left\{16\theta_1^3\left[

1778: 5+72\mu_{12}^2+\mu_{12}(-66+\mu_{21}(137-7\alpha_{12}))

1779: \right.\right.\nonumber\\

1780: & & \left.

1781: -2\mu_{21}(34+\alpha_{12})

1782: +\mu_{21}^2(68-\alpha_{12}+3\alpha_{12}^2)\right]\nonumber\\

1783: & & 

1784: +5\theta_2^3\left[5+54\mu_{12}^2-15\mu_{21}(1-\alpha_{12})+6\mu_{21}^2

1785: (4-3\alpha_{12}+2\alpha_{12}^2)-6\mu_{12}(5+\mu_{21}(7\alpha_{12}-11)\right]

1786: \nonumber\\

1787: & & 

1788: +2\theta_1^2\theta_2\left[-170+504\mu_{12}^2+\mu_{21}(55\alpha_{12}-17)

1789: +2\mu_{21}^2(151-62\alpha_{12}+39\alpha_{12}^2)\right.\nonumber\\

1790: & & \left.

1791: -8\mu_{12}(9+7\mu_{21}

1792: (5\alpha_{12}-13))\right]-\theta_1\theta_2^2

1793: \left[20-936\mu_{12}^2+\mu_{21}(251-217\alpha_{12})

1794: \right.\nonumber\\

1795: & & \left.\left.

1796: +\mu_{21}^2(-446+322\alpha_{12}-168\alpha_{12}^2)

1797: +2\mu_{12}(234+\mu_{21}

1798: (329\alpha_{12}-607))\right]\right\},

1799: \end{eqnarray} 

1800: \begin{equation}

1801: \label{d11}

1802: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1803: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_{1,M}{\bf S}_1,f_2^{(0)}]=

1804: \int d{\bf v}_1 

1805: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_{1,M}\frac{m_1}{2}V_1^2{\bf V}_1

1806: -\case{5}{2}T_1{\bf V}_1, f_2^{(0)}]=

1807: {\cal H}_{12}-\frac{5}{2}T_1{\cal D}_{12},

1808: \end{equation}

1809: \begin{eqnarray}

1810: \label{d12}

1811: {\cal H}_{12}&=&\int d{\bf v}_1 

1812: {\bf S}_{1}\cdot J_{12}[f_{1,M}\frac{m_1}{2}V_1^2{\bf V}_1,f_2^{(0)}]

1813: \nonumber\\

1814: &=& 

1815: -\frac{1}{8}m_1n_1n_2\sqrt{\pi}\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})\sigma_{12}^2 

1816: v_0^7\left(\theta_1+\theta_2\right)^{-3/2}\left(\theta_1\theta_2

1817: \right)^{-3/2}\nonumber\\

1818: & & \times 

1819: \left\{

1820: 2\mu_{21}^2\theta_1^{-2}(\theta_1+\theta_2)^2

1821: \left(2\alpha_{12}^{2}-3\alpha_{12}+4\right)

1822: (5\theta_1+8\theta_2)\right.\nonumber\\

1823: & & 

1824: -\mu_{21}(\theta_1+\theta_2)

1825: \left[2\beta_{12}\theta_1^{-2}(5\theta_1+8\theta_2)(7\alpha_{12}

1826: -11)+2\theta_2\theta_1^{-1}(29\alpha_{12}-37)-25(1-\alpha_{12})\right]

1827: \nonumber\\

1828: & & 

1829: +18\beta_{12}^2\theta_1^{-2}(5\theta_1+8\theta_2)+

1830: 2\beta_{12}\theta_1^{-1}(66\theta_1+25\theta_2)

1831: \nonumber\\

1832: & & 

1833: +5\theta_2\theta_1^{-1}

1834: (11\theta_1+6\theta_2)-5(\theta_1+\theta_2)

1835: \theta_1^{-2}\theta_2(6\theta_1+5\theta_2)

1836: \nonumber\\

1837: & & +\frac{c_2}{16}(\theta_1+\theta_2)^{-2}\left\{15\theta_1^3

1838: \mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})(4\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12})-5)

1839: \right.\nonumber\\

1840: & & +2\theta_2^3\left[45+540\mu_{12}^2+16

1841: \mu_{21}(\alpha_{12}-36)

1842: +4\mu_{21}^2(134+5\alpha_{12}+6\alpha_{12}^2)\right.

1843: \nonumber\\

1844: & & \left.

1845: -4\mu_{12}(148+\mu_{21}(7\alpha_{12}-263))\right]+

1846: \theta_1^2\theta_2\left[-30-\mu_{21}(267+217\alpha_{12})

1847: \right.\nonumber\\

1848: & & \left.

1849: +14\mu_{21}^2

1850: (17+29\alpha_{12}+12\alpha_{12}^2)

1851: +10\mu_{12}(7\mu_{21}(1+\alpha_{12}-5))\right]

1852: \nonumber\\

1853: & & 

1854: +\theta_1\theta_2^2\left[-315+270\mu_{12}^2-2\mu_{21}(55\alpha_{12}+57)

1855: +\mu_{21}^2(440+326\alpha_{12}+156\alpha_{12}^2)\right.\nonumber\\

1856: & & \left.\left.

1857: +2\mu_{12}(-2+\mu_{21}(7\alpha_{12}+277))\right]\right\},

1858: \end{eqnarray}

1859: \begin{eqnarray}

1860: \label{d13}

1861: \int d{\bf v}_1 {\bf S}_{1}\cdot \left\{J_{11}[f_1^{(0)},f_{1,M}{\bf S}_1]

1862: +J_{11}[f_{1,M}{\bf S}_1,f_1^{(0)}]\right\}&=&

1863: -8\sqrt{\pi}n_1^2\sigma_{12}^2m_1T_1(T_1/m_1)^{5/2}(1+\alpha_{11})

1864: \nonumber\\

1865: & \times & 

1866: \left[1+\frac{33}{16}(1-\alpha_{11})+

1867: \frac{1}{1024}c_1(19-3\alpha_{11})\right]. \nonumber\\

1868: \end{eqnarray}

1869: In these expressions, ${\cal C}_{12}$ and ${\cal D}_{12}$ are given by

1870: Eqs.\ (\ref{d4}) and (\ref{d5}), respectively.

1871: 

1872: In the case of mechanically equivalent particles, the expression 

1873: (\ref{d13}) coincides with the one previously obtained in the context of

1874: determining the thermal conductivity in a one component

1875: granular gas. \cite{BDKS98} From Eqs.\ (\ref{d10})--(\ref{d13}), one

1876: easily gets the expressions for $\nu_{22}$ and $\nu_{21}$

1877: by interchanging $1\leftrightarrow 2$.

1878: 

1879: 

1880: 

1881: \begin{references} 

1882: \bibitem{BDKS98}  J. J. Brey, J. W. Dufty, C-S Kim, and A. Santos, 

1883: ``Hydrodynamics for granular flow at low density,'' Phys. Rev. E {\bf 58}, 

1884: 4638 (1998). 

1885:  

1886: \bibitem{JR85}  J. T. Jenkins and M. W. Richman, ``Kinetic theory for plane 

1887: flows of a dense gas of identical, rough, inelastic, circular disks,'' Phys. 

1888: Fluids {\bf 28}, 3485 (1986). 

1889:  

1890: \bibitem{LSJCh84}  C. K. W. Lun, S. B. Savage, D. J. Jeffrey, and N. 

1891: Chepurniy, ``Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in 

1892: Couette flow and sligthly inelastic particles in a general flowfield,'' 

1893: J. Fluid Mech. {\bf 140}, 223 (1984). 

1894:  

1895: \bibitem{GS95}  A. Goldshtein and M. Shapiro, ``Mechanics of collisional motion of granular materials. Part 1. General hydrodynamic equations,'' 

1896: J. Fluid Mech. {\bf 282}, 75 (1995). 

1897:  

1898:  

1899: \bibitem{GD199}  V. Garz\'{o} and J. W. Dufty, ``Dense fluid transport for inelastic hard spheres,'' Phys. Rev. E {\bf 59}, 5895 (1999). 

1900:  

1901: \bibitem{JM89}  J. T. Jenkins and F. Mancini, ``Kinetic theory for binary 

1902: mixtures of smooth, nearly elastic spheres,'' Phys. Fluids A {\bf 1}, 2050 

1903: (1989). 

1904:  

1905: \bibitem{Z95}  P. Zamankhan, ``Kinetic theory for multicomponent dense 

1906: mixtures of slightly inelastic spherical particles,'' Phys. Rev. E {\bf 52}, 

1907: 4877 (1995). 

1908:  

1909: \bibitem{AW98}  B. Arnarson and J. T. Willits, ``Thermal diffusion in 

1910: binary mixtures of smooth, nearly elastic spheres with and without 

1911: gravity,'' Phys. Fluids {\bf 10}, 1324 (1998). 

1912:  

1913: \bibitem{WA99}  J. T. Willits and B. Arnarson, ``Kinetic theory of a 

1914: binary mixture of nearly elastic disks,'' Phys. Fluids {\bf 11}, 3116 

1915: (1999). 

1916:  

1917: \bibitem{GD299}  V. Garz\'{o} and J. W. Dufty, ``Homogeneous cooling 

1918: state for a granular mixture,'' Phys. Rev. E {\bf 60}, 5706 (1999). 

1919:  

1920: \bibitem{GM84}  S. R. de Groot and P. Mazur, {\em Nonequilibrium 

1921: Thermodynamics} (Dover, New York, 1984). 

1922: 

1923: \bibitem{BDS97}  J. J. Brey, J. W. Dufty, and A. Santos, ``Dissipative 

1924: dynamics for hard spheres,'' J. Stat. Phys. {\bf 87}, 1051 (1997). 

1925:  

1926: \bibitem{FK72}  J. Ferziger and H. Kaper, {\em Mathematical Theory of 

1927: Transport Processes in Gases} (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1972). 

1928:  

1929: \bibitem{Zubarev}  D. N. Zubarev, {\em Nonequilibrium Statistical 

1930: Thermodynamics} (Consultants Bureau, NY, 1974). 

1931: 

1932: \bibitem{BRCG99}  J. J. Brey, M. J. Ruiz-Montero, D. Cubero, and R. 

1933: Garc\'{\i}a-Rojo, ``Self-diffusion in freely evolving granular gases,'' Phys. Fluids {\bf 12}, 876 (2000). 

1934: 

1935: %\bibitem{MGSD02} J. M. Montanero, V. Garz\'o, A. Santos, and J. W. Dufty,

1936: %``Shear viscosity for a moderately dense granular gas,'' unpublished. 

1937: 

1938: \bibitem{H00} L. Huilin, L. Wenti, B. Rushan, Y. Lidan, and D. Gidaspow,

1939: ``Kinetic theory of fluidized binary granular mixtures with unequal

1940: temperature,'' Physica A {\bf 284}, 265 (2000).

1941: 

1942: \bibitem{Bird}  G. A. Bird, {\em Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct

1943: Simulation Monte Carlo of Gas Flows} (Clarendon, Oxford, 1994). 

1944: \end{references} 

1945:  

1946: \begin{figure}[tbp] 

1947: \caption{Plot of the reduced pressure diffusion coefficient $D_p(\protect% 

1948: \alpha)/D_p(1)$ as a function of the restitution coefficient $\protect\alpha% 

1949: \equiv \protect\alpha_{11}= \protect\alpha_{22}=\protect\alpha_{12}$ for $% 

1950: \protect\sigma_{11}= \protect\sigma_{22}=\protect\sigma_{12}$, a 

1951: concentration ratio $n_1/n_2=0.25$, and two different values of the mass 

1952: ratio: $m_1/m_2= 0.5$ and $m_1/m_2=4$. The dashed line refers to the case $% 

1953: m_1/m_2=4$ by assuming the equality of the partial temperatures $\protect% 

1954: \gamma=T_1/T_2=1$.} 

1955: \label{fig1} 

1956: \end{figure} 

1957:  

1958: \begin{figure}[tbp] 

1959: \caption{Plot of the reduced diffusion coefficient $D(\protect\alpha)/D(1)$ 

1960: as a function of the restitution coefficient $\protect\alpha\equiv \protect% 

1961: \alpha_{11}= \protect\alpha_{22}=\protect\alpha_{12}$ for $\protect\sigma% 

1962: _{11}= \protect\sigma_{22}=\protect\sigma_{12}$, a concentration ratio $% 

1963: n_1/n_2=0.25$, and three different values of the mass ratio: $m_1/m_2= 0.5$,  

1964: $m_1/m_2=1$, and $m_1/m_2=4$.} 

1965: \label{fig2} 

1966: \end{figure} 

1967:  

1968: \end{document} 

1969: 

1970: 

1971: 

1972:  

1973: 		

1974: 

1975: 

1976: