1: \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb,graphicx,bezier,citesort}

3: %

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: \newcommand{\nc}{\newcommand}

6: \nc{\rnc}{\renewcommand}

7: \nc{\nn}{\nonumber}

8: \nc{\ch}{{\rm{ch}}}

9: \nc{\sh}{{\rm{sh}}}

10: %

11: %

12: \rnc{\Im}{{\rm{Im}\,}}

13: \rnc{\Re}{{\rm{Re}\,}}

14: \nc{\tnh}{{\rm{th}}}

15: \nc{\mfa}{{\mathfrak{a}}}

16: \nc{\mfab}{\overline{\mfa}}

17: \nc{\mfA}{{\mathfrak{A}}}

18: \nc{\mfAb}{\overline{\mfA}}

19: \nc{\thetab}{\overline{\theta}}

20: \nc{\mfsl}{{\mathfrak{sl}}}

21: \nc{\db}{\displaybreak[0]\\}

22: \nc{\sotimes}{\mathop{\otimes}_{s}}

23: %\nc{\cl}{{\cal{L}}}

24: \nc{\cl}{{C}}

25: \nc{\mcl}{C}

26: \numberwithin{equation}{section}

27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

28: %

29: \textwidth=15.7cm

30: \textheight=23.8cm

31: \hoffset -10mm

32: \topmargin -2.2cm

33: %

34: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.8mm}

35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

36: %Picture of Contour for Green

37: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

38: \def\contourgr{

39:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

40:  \put(5,58){(a)}

41:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

42:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

43:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

44:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

45:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

46:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

47:  \put(5.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

48:  \put(81,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

49:  \put(20,20){\circle*{1.5}}

50:  \put(25,25){\circle{1.5}}

51:  \thicklines

52:  %

53:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

54:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

55:  \put(25,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

56:  \put(27.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

57:  \put(27.5,30){\vector(1,0){55}}

58:  %

59:  \put(7.5,15){\line(1,0){10}}

60:  \put(17.5,15){\line(0,1){5}}

61:  \put(20,20){\oval(5,5)[t]}

62:  \put(22.5,20){\line(0,-1){5}}

63:  \put(22.5,15){\vector(1,0){60}}

64:  %

65:  \put(7.5,45){\vector(1,0){75}}

66:  %

67:  \put(77,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

68:  \put(77,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

69:  %

70:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

71:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

72:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

73:  \end{picture}}

74: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

75: %Picture of Contour for SpinT

76: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

77: \def\contourst{

78:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

79:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

80:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

81:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

82:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

83:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

84:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

85:  \put(5.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

86:  \put(81,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

87:  %

88:  \put(20,40){\makebox(0,0){\rule{1.2mm}{1.2mm}}}

89:  \put(24.25,34.25){\framebox(1.5,1.5){}}

90:  \put(70,20){\circle*{1.5}}

91:  \put(65,25){\circle{1.5}}

92:  \thicklines

93:  %

94:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

95:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,1){5}}

96:  \put(25,35){\oval(5,5)[t]}

97:  \put(27.5,30){\line(0,1){5}}

98:  \put(27.5,30){\line(1,0){35}}

99:  \put(65,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

100:  \put(62.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

101:  \put(67.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

102:  \put(67.5,30){\vector(1,0){15}}

103:  %

104:  \put(7.5,15){\line(1,0){60}}

105:  \put(67.5,15){\line(0,1){5}}

106:  \put(70,20){\oval(5,5)[t]}

107:  \put(72.5,20){\line(0,-1){5}}

108:  \put(72.5,15){\vector(1,0){10}}

109:  %

110:  \put(7.5,45){\line(1,0){10}}

111:  \put(17.5,45){\line(0,-1){5}}

112:  \put(20,40){\oval(5,5)[b]}

113:  \put(22.5,40){\line(0,1){5}}

114:  \put(22.5,45){\vector(1,0){60}}

115:  %

116:  \put(61,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

117:  \put(61,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

118:  \put(72,6.9){\scriptsize{$\square$: $-\theta_1$}}

119:  \put(72,2.0){\scriptsize{$\blacksquare$: $-\theta_0$}}

120:  %

121:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

122:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

123:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

124:  \end{picture}}

125: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

126: %Picture of Contour for Dens

127: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

128: \def\contourdd{

129:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

130:  \put(5,58){(a)}

131:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

132:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

133:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

134:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

135:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

136:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

137:  \put(5.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

138:  \put(81,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

139:  %

140:  \put(20,40){\makebox(0,0){\rule{1.2mm}{1.2mm}}}

141:  \put(24.25,34.25){\framebox(1.5,1.5){}}

142:  \put(70,20){\circle*{1.5}}

143:  \put(65,25){\circle{1.5}}

144:  %\put(78,32.5){$\star$}

145:  \thicklines

146:  %

147:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

148:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,1){5}}

149:  \put(25,35){\oval(5,5)[t]}

150:  \put(27.5,30){\line(0,1){5}}

151:  \put(27.5,30){\line(1,0){35}}

152:  \put(65,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

153:  \put(62.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

154:  \put(67.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

155:  \put(67.5,30){\vector(1,0){15}}

156:  %

157:  \put(7.5,15){\vector(1,0){75}}

158:  %

159:  \put(7.5,45){\vector(1,0){75}}

160:  %

161:  \put(51,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

162:  \put(51,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

163:  \put(62,6.9){\scriptsize{$\square$: $-\theta_1$}}

164:  \put(62,2.0){\scriptsize{$\blacksquare$: $-\theta_0$}}

165:  %\put(75,6.9){\scriptsize{$\star$: $\theta^{\prime}_0$}}

166:  %

167:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

168:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

169:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

170:  \end{picture}}

171: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

172: %Picture of Contour for SPT

173: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

174: \def\contourspt{

175:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

176:  \put(5,58){(b)}

177:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

178:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

179:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

180:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

181:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

182:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

183:  \put(5.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

184:  \put(81,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

185:  %

186:  \put(20,20){\makebox(0,0){\rule{1.2mm}{1.2mm}}}

187:  \put(24.25,24.25){\framebox(1.5,1.5){}}

188:  \put(70,20){\circle*{1.5}}

189:  \put(65,25){\circle{1.5}}

190:  \thicklines

191:  %

192:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

193:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

194:  \put(25,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

195:  \put(27.5,25){\line(0,1){5}}

196:  \put(27.5,30){\line(1,0){35}}

197:  \put(65,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

198:  \put(62.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

199:  \put(67.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

200:  \put(67.5,30){\vector(1,0){15}}

201:  %

202:  \put(7.5,15){\line(1,0){10}}

203:  \put(17.5,15){\line(0,1){5}}

204:  \put(20,20){\oval(5,5)[t]}

205:  \put(22.5,20){\line(0,-1){5}}

206:  \put(22.5,15){\line(1,0){45}}

207:  \put(67.5,15){\line(0,1){5}}

208:  \put(70,20){\oval(5,5)[t]}

209:  \put(72.5,20){\line(0,-1){5}}

210:  \put(72.5,15){\vector(1,0){10}}

211:  %

212:  \put(7.5,45){\vector(1,0){75}}

213:  %

214:  \put(61,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

215:  \put(61,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

216:  \put(72,6.9){\scriptsize{$\square$: $-\theta^{\ast}_1$}}

217:  \put(72,2.0){\scriptsize{$\blacksquare$: $-\theta^{\ast}_0$}}

218:  %

219:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

220:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

221:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

222:  \end{picture}}

223: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

224: %Picture of Contour for SpinL

225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

226: \def\contoursl{

227:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

228:  \put(5,58){(b)}

229:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

230:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

231:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

232:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

233:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

234:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

235:  \put(5.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

236:  \put(81,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

237:  %

238:  \put(20,40){\makebox(0,0){\rule{1.2mm}{1.2mm}}}

239:  \put(24.25,34.25){\framebox(1.5,1.5){}}

240:  \put(20,20){\circle*{1.5}}

241:  \put(25,25){\circle{1.5}}

242:  \thicklines

243:  %

244:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

245:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

246:  \put(25,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

247:  \put(27.5,25){\line(-1,2){5}}

248:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

249:  \put(25,35){\oval(5,5)[t]}

250:  \put(27.5,30){\line(0,1){5}}

251:  \put(27.5,30){\vector(1,0){55}}

252:  %

253:  \put(7.5,15){\vector(1,0){75}}

254:  %

255:  \put(7.5,45){\vector(1,0){75}}

256:  %

257:  \put(61,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

258:  \put(61,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

259:  \put(72,6.9){\scriptsize{$\square$: $\theta^{\ast}_1$}}

260:  \put(72,2.0){\scriptsize{$\blacksquare$: $\theta^{\ast}_0$}}

261:  %

262:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

263:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

264:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

265:  \end{picture}}

266: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

267: %Picture of Contour for SPSH

268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

269: \def\contourspsh{

270:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

271:  \put(5,58){(a)}

272:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

273:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

274:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

275:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

276:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

277:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

278:  \put(0.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

279:  \put(83,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

280:  %

281:  \multiput(7.5,5)(0,1){50}{\line(0,1){0.5}}

282:  \multiput(82.5,5)(0,1){50}{\line(0,1){0.5}}

283:  %

284:  \put(20,20){\makebox(0,0){\rule{1.2mm}{1.2mm}}}

285:  \put(24.25,24.25){\framebox(1.5,1.5){}}

286:  \put(70,20){\circle*{1.5}}

287:  \put(65,25){\circle{1.5}}

288:  \put(6.4,7){$\star$}

289:  \put(6.4,33){$\ast$}

290:  \thicklines

291:  %

292:  \put(7.5,30){\line(1,0){15}}

293:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

294:  \put(25,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

295:  \put(27.5,25){\line(0,1){5}}

296:  \put(27.5,30){\line(1,0){35}}

297:  \put(65,25){\oval(5,5)[b]}

298:  \put(62.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

299:  \put(67.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

300:  \put(67.5,30){\vector(1,0){15}}

301:  %

302:  \put(10,15){\line(1,0){7.5}}

303:  \put(10,15){\line(0,-1){6}}

304:  \put(7.5,9){\oval(5,5)[br]}

305:  \put(17.5,15){\line(0,1){5}}

306:  \put(20,20){\oval(5,5)[t]}

307:  \put(22.5,20){\line(0,-1){5}}

308:  \put(22.5,15){\line(1,0){45}}

309:  \put(67.5,15){\line(0,1){5}}

310:  \put(70,20){\oval(5,5)[t]}

311:  \put(72.5,20){\line(0,-1){5}}

312:  \put(72.5,15){\line(1,0){7.5}}

313:  \put(80,15){\vector(0,-1){6}}

314:  \put(82.5,9){\oval(5,5)[bl]}

315:  %

316:  \put(10,45){\line(1,0){70}}

317:  \put(10,45){\line(0,-1){10}}

318:  \put(7.5,35){\oval(5,5)[br]}

319:  \put(80,45){\vector(0,-1){10}}

320:  \put(82.5,35){\oval(5,5)[bl]}

321:  %

322:  \put(18,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

323:  \put(18,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

324:  \put(28,6.9){\scriptsize{$\square$: $-\theta^{\ast}_1$}}

325:  \put(28,2.0){\scriptsize{$\blacksquare$: $-\theta^{\ast}_0$}}

326:  \put(48,6.9){\scriptsize{$\star$: $\widetilde{\theta}_0$}}

327:  \put(48,2.0){\scriptsize{$\ast$: $\widetilde{\theta}_0+i\gamma$}}

328:  %

329:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

330:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

331:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

332:  \end{picture}}

333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

334: %Picture of Contour for SPSL

335: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

336: \def\contourspsl{

337:  \begin{picture}(95,70)

338:  \put(5,58){(b)}

339:  \put(5,30){\vector(1,0){80}}

340:  \put(45,5){\vector(0,1){50}}

341:  \put(7.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

342:  \put(82.5,29){\line(0,1){2}}

343:  \put(86,30){{\small $\Re v$}}

344:  \put(42,57){{\small $\Im v$}}

345:  \put(0.,24){{\small $-\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

346:  \put(83,24){{\small $\frac{\pi}{2}$}}

347:  %

348:  \multiput(7.5,5)(0,1){50}{\line(0,1){0.5}}

349:  \multiput(82.5,5)(0,1){50}{\line(0,1){0.5}}

350:  %

351:  \put(7.5,25){\makebox(0,0){\rule{1.2mm}{1.2mm}}}

352:  \put(24.25,27.25){\framebox(1.5,1.5){}}

353:  \put(7.5,7){\circle*{1.5}}

354:  \put(65,28){\circle{1.5}}

355:  \put(6.4,17){$\star$}

356:  \put(6.4,41){$\ast$}

357:  \thicklines

358:  %

359:  

360:  \put(12.5,30){\line(0,-1){5}}

361:  \put(7.5,25){\oval(10,10)[br]}

362:  \put(80,45){\vector(0,-1){20}}

363:  \put(82.5,25){\oval(5,5)[bl]}

364: 

365:  \put(12.5,30){\line(1,0){10}}

366:  \put(22.5,30){\line(0,-1){2}}

367:  \put(25,28){\oval(5,5)[b]}

368:  \put(27.5,28){\line(0,1){2}}

369:  \put(27.5,30){\line(1,0){35}}

370:  \put(65,28){\oval(5,5)[b]}

371:  \put(62.5,30){\line(0,-1){2}}

372:  \put(67.5,30){\line(0,-1){2}}

373:  \put(67.5,30){\line(1,0){10}}

374:  \put(77.5,30){\vector(0,-1){5}}

375:  \put(82.5,25){\oval(10,10)[bl]}

376:  %

377:  \put(7.5,15){\vector(1,0){75}}

378:  %

379:  \put(10,45){\line(1,0){70}}

380:  \put(10,45){\line(0,-1){20}}

381:  \put(7.5,25){\oval(5,5)[br]}

382:  \put(80,45){\vector(0,-1){20}}

383:  \put(82.5,25){\oval(5,5)[bl]}

384:  %

385:  \put(18,6.9){\scriptsize{$\circ$: $\theta_1$}}

386:  \put(18,2.0){\scriptsize{$\bullet$: $\theta_0$}}

387:  \put(28,6.9){\scriptsize{$\square$: $-\theta^{\ast}_1$}}

388:  \put(28,2.0){\scriptsize{$\blacksquare$: $\overline{\theta}_0$}}

389:  \put(48,6.9){\scriptsize{$\star$: $\widetilde{\theta}_0$}}

390:  \put(48,2.0){\scriptsize{$\ast$: $\widetilde{\theta}_0+i\gamma$}}

391:  %

392:  \put(50,17){\tiny{$\cl_0$}}

393:  \put(50,32){\tiny{$\cl_1$}}

394:  \put(50,47){\tiny{$\overline{\cl}_0$}}

395:  \end{picture}}

396: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

397: %

398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

399: \begin{document}

400: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

401: %TITLE

402: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

403: %

404: \title{Finite temperature

405: correlations for the\\

406: $U_q(\mfsl(2|1))$-invariant

407: generalized Hubbard model\footnote{Dedicated to 

408: E.~M\"uller-Hartmann on the occasion of his 60th birthday}}

409: %

410: \author{

411: %

412: Andreas Kl\"umper\thanks{E-mail address:

413: kluemper@printfix.physik.uni-dortmund.de}\ \ and 

414: %

415: Kazumitsu Sakai\thanks{E-mail address:

416: sakai@printfix.physik.uni-dortmund.de}\\\\

417: %

418: \emph{Theoretische Physik I, Universit\"at Dortmund,} \\ 

419: \emph{Otto-Hahn-Str. 4, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany}} 

420: \date{May 21, 2001}

421: \maketitle

422: %

423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

424: %ABSTRACT

425: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

426: %

427: \begin{abstract}

428: %

429: We study an integrable model of one-dimensional

430: strongly correlated electrons at finite 

431: temperature by explicit calculation of the correlation lengths

432: of various correlation functions. 

433: %

434: The model is invariant with respect to the

435: quantum superalgebra $U_q(\mfsl(2|1))$ and 

436: characterized by the Hubbard interaction, correlated 

437: hopping and pair-hopping terms.

438: %

439: Using the integrability,

440: the graded quantum transfer matrix is constructed.

441: %

442: {}From the analyticity of its eigenvalues, 

443: a closed set of non-linear integral equations is derived

444: which describe the thermodynamical quantities and 

445: the finite temperature correlations.

446: %

447: The results show a crossover from a regime with dominating

448: density-density correlations to a regime with dominating 

449: superconducting pair correlations.

450: %

451: Analytical calculations in the low temperature limit are

452: also discussed.\\\\

453: %

454: {\it PACS:} 75.10.Jm, 05.50+q\\

455: {\it Keywords:} 

456: Strongly correlated electron systems;

457: Integrable models;

458: Correlation functions; 

459: Quantum transfer matrix;

460: Quantum superalgebra; 

461: Conformal field theory

462: \end{abstract}

463: %

464: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

465: %MAIN TEXT

466: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

467: %

468: %

469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

470: \section{Introduction}

471: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

472: %

473: In recent decades, integrable models in one-dimensional 

474: strongly correlated electron systems have attracted 

475: considerable attention in relation to high-$T_c$ 

476: superconductivity.

477: %

478: In general, integrable models are solvable by means of the 

479: Bethe ansatz. 

480: %

481: The critical exponents of the 

482: correlation functions depend only on the 

483: $R$-matrix of the underlying infinite 

484: dimensional symmetry and the geometry of the Fermi sea 

485: of the ground state

486: (see the book~\cite{KBIbook} and

487: references therein). 

488: %

489: This important fact shows that all integrable models

490: with a given $R$-matrix exhibit the same 

491: universal critical behavior.

492: %

493: 

494: On the other hand (1+1)-dimensional critical 

495: phenomena are connected with  conformal 

496: field theory (CFT)~\cite{BPZ}. 

497: %

498: The central charge and conformal dimensions 

499: are calculated by the scaling behavior of 

500: the ground state and the low-lying excitations~\cite{Card}. 

501: %

502: The conformal dimensions determine the long distance asymptotics of

503: all correlation functions of any local operators.

504: %

505: For integrable models, one obtains the conformal dimensions by use of

506: the Bethe ansatz in terms of the so called dressed charge function

507: satisfying a linear integral equation.

508: %

509: Thus the Bethe ansatz together with CFT

510: provide a powerful tool to study 

511: the correlation functions especially at 

512: the critical point $T=0$~\cite{KY,FK}.

513: %

514: 

515: For finite temperatures however, one encounters technical difficulties.

516: Despite the fact that the models are still solvable even

517: off criticality, the above powerful methods lose 

518: effect due to the collapse of conformal invariance.

519: %

520: Qualitatively, we see the long-distance behavior of the correlation

521: functions show exponential decay 

522: and calculate the low temperature asymptotics by 

523: extension of the conformal mapping (see for example~\cite{KBIbook}).

524: %

525: However we need another approach for the {\it quantitative} 

526: understanding of the correlation functions at finite temperatures.

527: %

528: 

529: As a totally different approach, the quantum 

530: transfer matrix (QTM) has been proposed 

531: recently to overcome such 

532: difficulties~\cite{MSuzPB,InSuz,InSuz2,Koma,SAW,SNW,DdV,TakQT,Mizu,Klu,KZeit}. 

533: %

534: Originally the QTM method has been developed 

535: as an alternative method to the traditional

536: thermodynamical studies~\cite{YY,G,Tak}.

537: %

538: Utilizing the Trotter mapping, one deals with a

539: two-dimensional classical system instead of 

540: the original one-dimensional quantum system. 

541: %

542: Using the underlying integrability,

543: one constructs a family of {\it commuting} QTMs~\cite{Klu,KZeit}.

544: %

545: The commuting QTMs are diagonalized by 

546: means of the Bethe ansatz.

547: %

548: Thermodynamical quantities are expressed

549: in terms of the sole largest eigenvalue.

550: %

551: Also, this procedure has remarkable advantages

552: for the studies of correlation 

553: functions, which is the main topic of our

554: paper. 

555: %

556: Explicitly, the correlation lengths can be calculated by taking ratios

557: of the largest eigenvalue and the sub-leading

558: ones~\cite{InSuz2,TakQT,KZeit,Mizu,KZeit,KSS,S3U,Sak,KCMS}.

559: %

560: 

561: In this paper we study a strongly correlated electron system

562: using the approach sketched above.

563: %

564: As a result, we evaluate the six crucial 

565: correlation lengths for arbitrary particle densities and

566: finite temperatures: 

567: (i) the longitudinal and (ii) transversal spin-spin 

568: correlations, (iii) the density-density correlations,

569: (iv) the one-particle Green function,

570: (v) the singlet and (vi) triplet superconducting pair

571: correlations.

572: %

573: These are the first quantitative

574: calculations for 

575: correlation functions of strongly correlated 

576: electron systems off criticality.

577: %

578: 

579: The Hamiltonian of the model~\cite{BKZ} on a periodic lattice of

580: size $L$ is defined by

581: %

582: \begin{align}

583: %

584: \mathcal{H}&=-\sum_{j=1}^{L}\sum_{\sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow}

585:        (c^{\dagger}_{j,\sigma}c_{j+1,\sigma}+

586:          c^{\dagger}_{j+1,\sigma}c_{j,\sigma})

587:         \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}(\eta-\sigma \gamma)n_{j,\sigma}

588:        -\frac{1}{2}(\eta+\sigma\gamma)n_{j+1,-\sigma}\right) \nn \\

589: %

590: & \quad     +U\sum_{j=1}^{L}n_{j,\uparrow}n_{j,\downarrow}+

591:        t_p\sum_{j=1}^{L}(

592:         c^{\dagger}_{j+1,\uparrow}

593:         c^{\dagger}_{j+1,\downarrow}c_{j,\uparrow}c_{j,\downarrow}+

594:         c^{\dagger}_{j,\uparrow}

595:         c^{\dagger}_{j,\downarrow}c_{j+1,\uparrow}c_{j+1,\downarrow}),

596: \label{hamiltonian}

597: \end{align}

598: %

599: where $c_{j,\sigma}^{\dagger}$ ($c_{j,\sigma}$) denotes the fermion

600: creation (annihilation) operator at $j$th site satisfying the

601: canonical aniticommutation relations

602: %

603: \begin{equation}

604: \{c^{\dagger}_{j,\sigma},c^{\dagger}_{k,\tau}\}=

605: \{c_{j,\sigma},c_{k,\tau}\}=0,\quad

606: \{c^{\dagger}_{j,\sigma},c_{k,\tau}\}=\delta_{jk}\delta_{\sigma\tau},

607: \end{equation}

608: %

609: and $n_{j,\sigma}$ is the number operator, i.e. $n_{j,\sigma}=

610: c^{\dagger}_{j,\sigma}c_{j,\sigma}$.

611: %

612: The ground state properties and the long-distance

613: behavior of the correlation functions have been 

614: studied in~\cite{BKZ} by the Bethe ansatz and CFT.

615: %

616: Due to the massive spin excitations ($\gamma\not=0$), the ground state

617: properties are described by a one-component Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid

618: (Luther-Emery liquid). For this system the one-particle Green function

619: decays exponentially fast, the density-density and certain pair

620: correlations are quasi-longranged with algebraic decay.

621: %

622: As the model is one-dimensional it does not exhibit off-diagonal

623: long-range order. However, the crossover behavior from dominant density-density

624: correlations to dominant (singlet) pair correlations driven by the

625: density of particles manifests superconducting properties.  More

626: quantitatively, on the basis of scaling arguments and RG concepts we

627: would expect that higher dimensional interactions such as interchain

628: couplings are relevant and may lead to true condensation of Cooper

629: pairs.

630: 

631: %

632: The model is related to a trigonometric

633: $R$-matrix which is a solution to the graded YBE~\cite{KulSk}

634: associated with the four-dimensional irreducible

635: representation of the quantum superalgebra 

636: $U_q(\mfsl(2|1))$~\cite{GHLZ} (see also~\cite{BGLZ} for 

637: the rational case $\gamma=0$).

638: %

639: The diagonalization of the Hamiltonian for general $\eta$ and $\gamma$

640: was done in~\cite{BKZ} and the diagonalization of the 

641: associated row-to-row transfer 

642: matrix was done for the rational case $\gamma=0$ in~\cite{RamMar,PM}.

643: %

644: The thermodynamics have been investigated

645: by the traditional 

646: thermodynamic Bethe ansatz based on the

647: string hypothesis in~\cite{BF} and the present 

648: approach in~\cite{JKS}.

649: %

650: 

651: %!! Major amendment

652: %

653: The asymptotic behavior of correlation functions of this model have

654: been studied so far only for the ground state where a crossover was

655: established from a normal to a ``superconducting'' regime driven by

656: the particle density. Here we want to extend this study to finite

657: temperatures where we are especially interested in the extension of the

658: ``superconducting regime'' in the density-temperature phase diagram.

659: %

660: For this purpose we define the QTM acting on a

661: $\mathbb{Z}_2$-graded vector space.

662: %

663: As a consequence, the genuine fermionic 

664: statistics are built into 

665: the QTM algebraically 

666: through the Grassmann parity $p[j]$ 

667: (see eq.~\eqref{defQTM2}).

668: %

669: Regarding the thermodynamical quantities,

670: one might content oneself with 

671: the corresponding null Grassmann 

672: parity model\footnote

673: %

674: {

675: We obtain the null-parity model 

676: satisfying the ordinary Yang-Baxter

677: equation by multiplying the original 

678: graded $R$-matrix by suitable minus signs. 

679: },

680: because

681: the fermionic statistics does not 

682: affect the thermodynamical quantities directly.

683: %

684: However, one must be careful to keep track 

685: of the fermionic statistics when

686: considering the physical quantities 

687: changing the particle number.

688: %

689: As the auxiliary and quantum

690: space are the same graded vector space,

691: we easily obtain the eigenvalues

692: of the QTM by using the results from 

693: the algebraic Bethe ansatz for the 

694: row-to-row transfer matrix.

695: %

696: The resultant eigenvalues can be

697: expressed  in the dressed vacuum form (DVF)

698: via the Bethe ansatz equation (BAE).

699: %

700: The difference between the DVF of the 

701: QTM and the one of the row-to-row transfer

702: matrix consists only of their vacuum parts.

703: % 

704: Hence, in the actual calculation to 

705: the DVF, one utilizes the methods

706: developed in the finite-size correction

707: problem \cite{KBP}.

708: %

709: In consequence, all information of the 

710: BAE is contained in three 

711: non-linear integral equations (NLIEs),

712: which are valid for a system with any Trotter number $N$.

713: %

714: In this approach, the limit $N\to\infty$

715: can be taken {\it analytically}.

716: %

717: This finite set of NLIEs allows for highly accurate

718: numerical calculations of physical quantities

719: such as the above mentioned correlation lengths.

720: %

721: In particular, we observe temperature dependent

722: crossover phenomena between regimes dominated by density-density

723: or (singlet) superconducting pair correlations, respectively.

724: %

725: 

726: At low temperatures, the three NLIEs are reduced to 

727: only one {\it linear} integral equation, 

728: which reflects the one-component Tomonaga-Luttinger 

729: (Luther-Emery) liquid properties.

730: %

731: This linear equation is evaluated analytically 

732: and reproduces the predictions from CFT.

733: %

734: The formulations in this paper are applicable

735: to various kinds of strongly correlated electron 

736: systems which have superalgebra invariance,

737: for example the supersymmetric extended Hubbard model

738: ($\mfsl(2|2)$-invariance)~\cite{EKS1,EKS2}. 

739: %

740: 

741: The layout of this paper is as follows. 

742: In section~2 we define the commuting 

743: QTM  constructed by the graded $R$-matrix.

744: %

745: The QTM is diagonalized by 

746: the algebraic Bethe ansatz 

747: in analogy to the ordinary row-to-row transfer 

748: matrix.

749: %

750: In section~3 we study the eigenvalues 

751: by introducing certain auxiliary functions.

752: %

753: Investigating their analyticity,

754: we determine the NLIE for 

755: the largest and sub-leading

756: eigenvalues.

757: %

758: We obtain six sets of NLIEs

759: characterizing the above mentioned correlations.

760: %

761: The numerical results for these NLIE are discussed.

762: %

763: Section~4 is devoted to the analytical 

764: calculation of the low temperature asymptotics

765: of the correlations characterized

766: by gapless excitations.

767: %

768: Section 5 contains our conclusions. 

769: %

770: Details of technical calculations are summarized in

771: various appendices. 

772: %

773: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

774: \section{The graded quantum transfer matrix}

775: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

776: %

777: The model~\eqref{hamiltonian} is solvable under the conditions

778: %

779: \begin{equation}

780: t_p=\frac{U}{2}=\frac{\sh\gamma}{\sh\alpha\gamma},\quad

781: \exp(-\eta)=\frac{\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}{\sh\alpha\gamma}. 

782: \label{inteqcond}

783: \end{equation} 

784: %

785: Here the physical region of the two parameters $\alpha$ and $\gamma$

786: is restricted to $\gamma\ge 0$ and $\alpha>0$ (repulsive) or

787: $\alpha<-1$ (attractive). [This does not include the pure Hubbard

788: model which corresponds to $\eta=\gamma=t_p=0$ and $U\not=0$ violating

789: \eqref{inteqcond}.  Note however, that a unified treatment of the

790: $U_q(\mfsl(2|1))$-invariant generalized Hubbard model and the standard

791: Hubbard model might be possible on the basis of the work in

792: \cite{BaAlc}.]

793: %

794: 

795: Several prominent models are comprised

796: as  special cases:

797: the supersymmetric $t-J$ model ($\gamma=0,\alpha\to 0$),

798: the pure correlated-hopping model ($|\alpha|\to\infty$)

799: and a model of hard core particles of three species

800: (doubly occupied site, single electron with spin pointing either up or

801: down) ($\alpha\to -1$).

802: %

803: %

804: For any finite $\gamma$ the spinon excitations 

805: have a mass gap and so do single particle excitations. 

806: The pair excitations (singlet) 

807: and the particle-hole type excitations are massless. 

808: %

809: The former excitations become gapless for the 

810: repulsive case ($\alpha>0$) in the rational limit 

811: $\gamma=0$. 

812: %

813: Consequently for $\gamma>0$ the one-particle Green

814: function shows exponential decay and hence 

815: the momentum distribution function has no singularity  

816: at the Fermi point.

817: 

818: The classical counterpart of this model is given by

819: a trigonometric $R$-matrix which is associated with

820: the one parameter family of the 4-dimensional irreducible

821: representation of the 

822: quantum superalgebra $U_q(\mfsl(2|1))$~\cite{GHLZ}

823: (see also ref.~\cite{BGLZ} for the rational case $\gamma=0$).

824: %

825: Choosing the following basis 

826: %

827: \begin{equation}

828: |1\rangle\equiv|\uparrow\downarrow\rangle=

829:        c^{\dagger}_{\downarrow}

830:        c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow}|0\rangle,\quad

831: |2\rangle\equiv|\downarrow\rangle=c^{\dagger}_{\downarrow}|

832:                 0\rangle,\quad

833: |3\rangle\equiv|\uparrow\rangle=c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow}|

834:                 0\rangle,\quad

835: |4\rangle\equiv|0\rangle,

836: \end{equation}

837: %

838: with grading $|1\rangle$, $|4\rangle$ even

839: (bosonic) and $|2\rangle$, $|3\rangle$ odd (fermionic),

840: one determines the following 

841: 36 non-zero matrix elements as

842: %

843: \begin{align}

844: R_{11}^{11}(v)&=\frac{[2\alpha-v]}{[2\alpha+v]},\quad

845: R_{22}^{22}(v)=R_{33}^{33}(v)=-1, \quad

846: R_{44}^{44}(v)=\frac{[2\alpha+2+v]}{[2\alpha+2-v]},  \nn \db

847: %

848: R_{12}^{12}(v)&=R_{13}^{13}(v)=R_{21}^{21}(v)=R_{31}^{31}(v)=

849:                  -\frac{[v]}{[2\alpha+v]},          \nn \db

850: %

851: R_{24}^{24}(v)&=R_{34}^{34}(v)=R_{42}^{42}(v)=R_{43}^{43}(v)=

852:                  \frac{[v]}{[2\alpha+2-v]},       \nn \db

853: %

854: R_{14}^{14}(v)&=R_{41}^{41}(v)=

855:           \frac{[v][v-2]}{[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},\quad

856: R_{23}^{23}(v)=R_{32}^{32}(v)=\frac{[v]^2}{[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},\nn \db

857: %

858: R_{12}^{21}(v)&=R_{13}^{31}(v)=\frac{e^{-\gamma/2}[2\alpha]}

859:                                 {[2\alpha+v]},   \quad

860: R_{21}^{12}(v)=R_{31}^{13}(v)=\frac{e^{\gamma/2}[2\alpha]}

861:                                     {[2\alpha+v]},\nn \db

862: %

863: R_{14}^{41}(v)&=\frac{e^{-\gamma v}[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}

864:                      {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},   \quad

865: R_{41}^{14}(v)=\frac{e^{\gamma v}[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}

866:                      {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},\nn \db

867: %

868: R_{23}^{32}(v)&=\frac{-e^{\gamma v/2}[2][v]-[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}

869:                      {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},   \quad

870: R_{32}^{23}(v)=\frac{-e^{-\gamma v/2}[2][v]-[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}

871:                      {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},\nn \db

872: %

873: R_{24}^{42}(v)&=R_{34}^{43}(v)=\frac{e^{-\gamma v/2}[2\alpha+2]}

874:                      {[2\alpha+2-v]},            \quad   

875: R_{42}^{24}(v)=R_{43}^{34}(v)=\frac{e^{\gamma v/2}[2\alpha+2]}

876:                      {[2\alpha+2-v]},\nn \db

877: %

878: R_{14}^{23}(v)&=-R_{32}^{41}(v)=

879: -\frac{\sqrt{[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}e^{-\gamma(1+v)/2}[v]}

880:                    {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]}, \nn \db

881: %

882: R_{14}^{32}(v)&=-R_{23}^{41}(v)=

883: \frac{\sqrt{[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}e^{\gamma(1-v)/2}[v]}

884:                    {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]}, \nn \db

885: %

886: R_{23}^{14}(v)&=-R_{41}^{32}(v)=

887: -\frac{\sqrt{[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}e^{\gamma(1+v)/2}[v]}

888:                    {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]}, \nn \db

889: %

890: R_{32}^{14}(v)&=-R_{41}^{23}(v)=

891: \frac{\sqrt{[2\alpha][2\alpha+2]}e^{-\gamma(1-v)/2}[v]}

892:                    {[2\alpha+v][2\alpha+2-v]},

893: \label{bw}

894: \end{align}

895: where $R_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}(v)$

896: are defined by

897: %

898: \begin{equation}

899: R(v)|\alpha\rangle\sotimes|\beta\rangle=

900:     |\gamma\rangle\sotimes|\delta\rangle R_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}(v)

901: \end{equation}

902: %

903: with $[v]:=\sh(\gamma v/2)$ and the graded tensor product satisfies

904: $P|\alpha\rangle\sotimes|\beta\rangle:=

905: (-)^{p[\alpha]p[\beta]}|\beta\rangle\sotimes|\alpha\rangle$ where

906: $P$ denotes permutation.

907: %

908: This $R$-matrix is known to satisfy the graded Yang-Baxter

909: equation (GYBE) \cite{KulSk}

910: %

911: \begin{equation}

912: R_{12}(u-v)R_{13}(u)R_{23}(v)=R_{23}(v)R_{13}(u)R_{12}(u-v),

913: \label{gybe}

914: \end{equation}

915: %

916: which explicitly reads in terms of the matrix elements

917: %

918: \begin{multline}

919: R_{\gamma_1\gamma_2}^{\beta_1\beta_2}(u-v)

920: R_{\alpha_1\gamma_3}^{\gamma_1\beta_3}(u)

921: R_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}^{\gamma_2\gamma_3}(v)

922:                (-)^{(p[\alpha_1]+p[\gamma_1])p[\gamma_2]}  \\

923: =

924: R_{\gamma_2\gamma_3}^{\beta_2\beta_3}(v)

925: R_{\gamma_1\alpha_3}^{\beta_1\gamma_3}(u)

926: R_{\alpha_1\alpha_2}^{\gamma_1\gamma_2}(u-v)

927:                (-)^{(p[\beta_1]+p[\gamma_1])p[\gamma_2]},

928: \label{YBE2}

929: \end{multline}

930: %

931: where the Grassmann parity $p[j]$ 

932: is defined by $p[1]=p[4]=0$ (bosonic) $p[2]=p[3]=1$ (fermionic).

933: %

934: In eq.~\eqref{YBE2} and later we sum over repeated

935: indices.

936: %

937: Note that the parity of the $R$-matrix is even, i.e.

938: %

939: \begin{equation} 

940: p[R]\equiv p[\alpha]+p[\beta]+p[\gamma]+p[\delta]\equiv 0 \mod 2.

941: \label{parity}

942: \end{equation}

943: %

944: To relate the model~\eqref{hamiltonian} to the above

945: classical model, we construct the graded transfer matrix 

946: %

947: \begin{equation}

948: T(v)={\rm Str}_{a}\{R_{aL}(v)\dots R_{a2}(v)R_{a1}(v)\}.

949: \end{equation}

950: %

951: Using the $R$-matrix parity~\eqref{parity},

952: one writes explicitly the transfer matrix

953: by means of the matrix elements \eqref{bw}

954: %

955: \begin{equation}

956: T_{\alpha_1\alpha_2\dots\alpha_L}^{\beta_1\beta_2\dots\beta_L}(v)

957: =(-)^{p[a]+\sum_{j=2}^{L}(p[\alpha_j]+p[\beta_j])\sum_{k=1}^{j-1}p[\beta_k]}

958:  R_{\gamma_{L-1}\alpha_L}^{a\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,

959:  \beta_L}(v)\dots

960:  R_{\gamma_{1}\alpha_2}^{\gamma_2\beta_2}(v)

961:  R_{a\,\,\alpha_1}^{\gamma_1\beta_1}(v).

962: \end{equation}

963: %

964: Due to the GYBE \eqref{gybe}, the transfer matrices $T(v)$

965: commute for different spectral 

966: parameters $v$ and $v^{\prime}$ 

967: %

968: \begin{equation}

969: [T(v),T(v^{\prime})]=0.

970: \end{equation}

971: %

972: Using the fact that the local Hamiltonian $\mathcal{H}_{j j+1}$

973: can be expressed as the  derivative of $R_{j j+1}(v)$ 

974: %

975: \begin{align}

976: H_{j j+1}&=-\frac{2\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}{\gamma}

977:           P_{j j+1}\frac{d}{dv}R_{j j+1}(v) \biggl|_{v=0} \nn \\

978:          &\quad+

979:           2\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma-2(n_{j,\uparrow}+n_{j,\downarrow}+

980:            n_{j+1,\uparrow}+n_{j+1,\downarrow})\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma,

981: \end{align}

982: %

983: we can expand the transfer matrix $T(v)$ with respect to $v$ as

984: %

985: \begin{equation}

986: T(v)=T(0)\left(1-\frac{\gamma v}{2\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}

987:               \mathcal{H}^{\prime}+O(v^2)\right).

988: \label{rT}

989: \end{equation}

990: %

991: Here we introduced the superpermutation operator $P_{j j+1}$

992: whose matrix elements are

993: %

994: \begin{equation}

995: [P_{j j+1}]_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}=

996: [R_{j j+1}(0)]_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}=

997:             (-)^{p[\alpha]p[\beta]}

998:                 \delta_{\alpha\delta}\delta_{\beta\gamma}.

999: \label{permutation}

1000: \end{equation}

1001: %

1002: Note that $\mathcal{H}^{\prime}$ denotes 

1003: the Hamiltonian~\eqref{hamiltonian} 

1004: with shifted chemical potential and 

1005: ground state energy 

1006: %

1007: \begin{equation}

1008: \mathcal{H}^{\prime}=\mathcal{H}-

1009:                      2L\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma+2\mathcal{N}_{\rm e}

1010:                        \ch(\alpha+1)\gamma,

1011: \end{equation}

1012: %

1013: where $\mathcal{N}_{\rm e}$ is the electron number operator.

1014: %

1015: 

1016: In order to treat the finite temperature case,

1017: we consider another $R$-matrix defined by

1018: %

1019: \begin{equation}

1020: \overline{R}_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}(v)=

1021: (-)^{p[\beta](p[\alpha]+p[\gamma])}R_{\beta\gamma}^{\delta\alpha}(v).

1022: \label{bw2}

1023: \end{equation}

1024: %

1025: This matrix $\overline{R}$ satisfies the following type 

1026: of GYBE

1027: %

1028: \begin{equation}

1029: \overline{R}_{12}(v-u)\overline{R}_{13}(-u)R_{23}(v)

1030: =R_{23}(v)\overline{R}_{13}(-u)\overline{R}_{12}(v-u),

1031: \label{gybe2}

1032: \end{equation}

1033: %

1034: which reads explicitly

1035: %

1036: \begin{multline}

1037: \overline{R}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2}^{\beta_1\beta_2}(v-u)

1038: \overline{R}_{\alpha_1\gamma_3}^{\gamma_1\beta_3}(-u)

1039: R_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}^{\gamma_2\gamma_3}(v)

1040:                (-)^{(p[\alpha_1]+p[\gamma_1])p[\gamma_2]}  \\

1041: =

1042: R_{\gamma_2\gamma_3}^{\beta_2\beta_3}(v)

1043: \overline{R}_{\gamma_1\alpha_3}^{\beta_1\gamma_3}(-u)

1044: \overline{R}_{\alpha_1\alpha_2}^{\gamma_1\gamma_2}(v-u)

1045:                (-)^{(p[\beta_1]+p[\gamma_1])p[\gamma_2]}.

1046: \label{MYBE2}

1047: \end{multline}

1048: Using this, one constructs the transfer matrix

1049: %

1050: \begin{equation}

1051: \overline{T}(v)={\rm Str}_{a}\{\overline{R}_{aL}(v)\dots 

1052:                \overline{R}_{a2}(v)\overline{R}_{a1}(v)\},

1053: \end{equation}

1054: %

1055: explicitly reading

1056: %

1057: \begin{equation}

1058: \overline{T}_{\alpha_1\alpha_2\dots\alpha_L}^{\beta_1\beta_2\dots\beta_L}(v)

1059: =(-)^{p[a]+\sum_{j=2}^{L}(p[\alpha_j]+p[\beta_j])\sum_{k=1}^{j-1}p[\beta_k]}

1060:  \overline{R}_{\gamma_{L-1}\alpha_L}^{a\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,

1061:  \beta_L}(v)\dots

1062:  \overline{R}_{\gamma_{1}\alpha_2}^{\gamma_2\beta_2}(v)

1063:  \overline{R}_{a\,\,\alpha_1}^{\gamma_1\beta_1}(v).

1064: \end{equation}

1065: %

1066: We expand this transfer matrix in the same manner

1067: as \eqref{rT},

1068: %

1069: \begin{equation}

1070: \overline{T}(v)=

1071: \overline{T}(0)\left(1-\frac{\gamma v}{2\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}

1072:               \mathcal{H}^{\prime}+O(v^2)\right).

1073: \label{lT}

1074: \end{equation}

1075: %

1076: Combining the above relations and

1077: using $\overline{T}(0)T(0)=1$ 

1078: (note that $T(0)$ and

1079: $\overline{T}(0)$ denote the right and left

1080: shift operators, respectively), one obtains

1081: %

1082: \begin{equation}

1083: \overline{T}(u)T(u)=1-\frac{\gamma u}{\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}

1084:               \mathcal{H}^{\prime}+O(v^2).

1085: \end{equation}

1086: %

1087: {}From the above equation, it follows that

1088: %

1089: \begin{equation}

1090: \exp(-\beta\mathcal{H}^{\prime})=\lim_{N\to\infty}\bigl[

1091: \overline{T}(u_N)T(u_N)\bigr]^{N/2},\quad

1092: u_{N}=\frac{2\beta\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}{N \gamma}.

1093: \end{equation}

1094: %

1095: Here $\beta$ is the reciprocal temperature; $\beta=1/T$

1096: and the height $N$ of the

1097: fictitious underlying square lattice is even and

1098: referred to as the Trotter number.

1099: %

1100: Hence the free energy $f$ of the 

1101: original quantum system~\eqref{hamiltonian} is given by

1102: %

1103: \begin{equation}

1104: f=-\lim_{L\to \infty}\lim_{N\to \infty}

1105:  \frac{1}{L \beta}\ln\left({\rm Tr}

1106:              \bigl[\overline{T}(u_N)T(u_N)\bigr]^{N/2}

1107:              \right)+

1108:  2(1-n_{\rm e})\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma,

1109: \label{freepre}

1110: \end{equation}

1111: where $n_{\rm e}$ denotes the particle density of the

1112: system.

1113: %

1114: Calculating  

1115: ${\rm Tr}\bigl[\overline{T}(u_N)T(u_N)\bigr]^{N/2}$ from the

1116: eigenvalues of $\overline{T}(u_N)T(u_N)$ is a 

1117: serious problem, because the spectrum is infinitely degenerate

1118: in the limit of infinite Trotter number

1119: $u_{N}{\rightarrow} 0$ (for ${N\to\infty}$).

1120: %

1121: To avoid this difficulty, we transform 

1122: ${\rm Tr}[\overline{T}(u_N)T(u_N)]^{N/2}$ as

1123: %

1124: \begin{align}

1125: {\rm Tr}&\prod_{k=1}^{N/2}

1126: {\rm Str}_{a_{2k} a_{2k-1}}\{\overline{R}_{a_{2k} L}(u_N)

1127: \dots\overline{R}_{a_{2k} 1}(u_N) 

1128: R_{a_{2k-1} L}(u_N)\dots R_{a_{2k-1} 1}(u_N)\}   \nn \\

1129: &\quad={\rm Str}\prod_{j=1}^{L}{\rm Tr}_j

1130:   \prod_{k=1}^{N/2}\overline{R}_{a_{2k} j}(u_N)R_{a_{2k-1} j}(u_N).

1131: \end{align}

1132: %

1133: Now we introduce the QTM,

1134: %

1135: \begin{equation}

1136: T_{Q}(v)={\rm Tr}_j\prod_{k=1}^{N/2}

1137:          \overline{R}_{a_{2k} j}(u_N+v)R_{a_{2k-1} j}(u_N-v),

1138: \end{equation}

1139: explicitly

1140: %

1141: \begin{align}

1142: {T_{Q}^{}}_{\alpha_1\alpha_2\dots\alpha_N}^{\beta_1\beta_2\dots\beta_N}(v)

1143: &=(-)^{\sum_{j=2}^{N}(p[\alpha_j]+p[\beta_j])\sum_{k=1}^{j-1}p[\beta_k]} \nn \\

1144: &\quad \times

1145:  \overline{R}_{\alpha_N\gamma_{N-1}}^{\beta_N a}(u_N+v)

1146:  R_{\alpha_{N-1}\gamma_{N-2}}^{\beta_{N-1}\gamma_{N-1}}(u_N-v)\dots

1147:  \overline{R}_{\alpha_2\gamma_{1}}^{\beta_2\gamma_2}(u_N+v)

1148:  R_{\alpha_1 a}^{\beta_1\gamma_1}(u_N-v).

1149: \label{defQTM2}

1150: \end{align}

1151: %

1152: Due to the GYBE~\eqref{gybe} and~\eqref{gybe2},

1153: the QTM is commutative, i.e.

1154: %

1155: \begin{equation}

1156: [T_Q(u_N,v),T_Q(u_N,v^{\prime})]=0.

1157: \end{equation}

1158: %

1159: We will see that the largest eigenvalue is separated by a gap from the rest

1160: of the spectrum for any $N$ persisting in the limit

1161: $N\to\infty$ as long as $T>0$.

1162: Since the two limits in eq.~\eqref{freepre} can be

1163: interchanged, for a proof cf.~\cite{MSuzPB,InSuz}, we take the limit

1164: $L\to\infty$ first.

1165: %

1166: As there exists a finite gap

1167: between the largest eigenvalue $\Lambda^{\rm max}(0)$ and

1168: the sub-leading eigenvalues $\Lambda^{\rm sub}(0)$,

1169: we can write 

1170: %

1171: \begin{equation}

1172: f=-\lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{1}{\beta}\ln\Lambda^{\rm max}(0)

1173:   +2(n_{\rm e}-1)\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma.

1174: \label{free}

1175: \end{equation}

1176: %

1177: In this approach, the thermodynamical completeness 

1178: $-\lim_{\beta\to 0}\beta f=\ln 4$ follows easily

1179: from $\lim_{N\to\infty}\Lambda^{\rm max}(0)=4$ which is obvious from

1180: the definition of $R(v)$~\eqref{bw} 

1181: and $\overline{R}(v)$~\eqref{bw2}.

1182: %

1183: 

1184: Most significantly the present method makes it

1185: possible to calculate various correlation lengths at

1186: finite temperature through the relation

1187: %

1188: \begin{equation}

1189: \frac{1}{\xi}=-\lim_{N\to\infty}

1190: \ln\biggr|\frac{\Lambda^{\rm sub}(0)}

1191:           {\Lambda^{\rm max}(0)} \biggr|.

1192: \label{correlation}

1193: \end{equation}

1194: %

1195: 

1196: The QTM can be diagonalized by means of the algebraic 

1197: Bethe ansatz method. 

1198: %

1199: Due to the fact that auxiliary and quantum space

1200: are the same $\mathbb{Z}_2$-graded vector space, one

1201: can utilize the results for the algebraic Bethe ansatz for

1202: the row-to-row transfer matrix case~\cite{RamMar,PM}\footnote{

1203: %

1204: %

1205: We remark that the formulation in~\cite{RamMar} is based on the

1206: non-graded rational ($\gamma=0$) 

1207: $R$-matrix which is 

1208: connected to our graded case by 

1209: $R_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}\to

1210: (-)^{p[\gamma]p[\delta]}R_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}$. 

1211: The basic difference between the standard and

1212: graded formulation lies in the existence of 

1213: extra phase factors in the dressed vacuum form and 

1214: the Bethe ansatz equation.}. 

1215: %

1216: Replacing the  parameters 

1217: $u_N$ and $v$ by

1218: %

1219: \begin{equation}

1220: \frac{\gamma}{2}v\to iv,\quad \frac{\gamma}{2}u_N\to

1221: u_N=\frac{\beta\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}{N},

1222: \end{equation}

1223: %

1224: and choosing the state $(|1\rangle\sotimes |4\rangle)^{\sotimes N/2}$

1225: as the pseudo vacuum state (reference state),

1226: %

1227: one  writes the eigenvalue $\Lambda(v)$ of the QTM 

1228: in the dressed vacuum form (DVF)  

1229: %

1230: \begin{align}

1231: %

1232: \Lambda(v)&=\phi_1(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

1233:                            {q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}e^{2\mu\beta}+

1234:             \phi_2(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

1235:                            {q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}

1236:                       \frac{q_2(v+i \gamma)}{q_2(v)}e^{\mu\beta} \nn \\

1237: %

1238:         &\quad+\phi_2(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

1239:                            {q_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}

1240:                       \frac{q_2(v-i \gamma)}{q_2(v)}e^{\mu\beta}+

1241:           \phi_3(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

1242:                            {q_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma)},

1243: %

1244: \label{DVF}

1245: \end{align}

1246: %

1247: where the functions $\phi_1(v)$, $\phi_2(v)$ and $\phi_3(v)$ are

1248: defined by

1249: %

1250: \begin{align}

1251: \phi_1(v)&=\left(\frac{\sh(iv+u_N)\sh(iv+u_N-\gamma)

1252:                        \sh(iv-u_N+\alpha\gamma)}

1253:                      {\sh(iv+u_N-(\alpha+1)\gamma)

1254:                       \sh(iv+u_N+\alpha\gamma)

1255:                       \sh(iv-u_N-\alpha\gamma)}\right)^{\frac{N}{2}}, \nn \\

1256: \phi_2(v)&=\left(\frac{\sh(iv-u_N)\sh(iv+u_N)}

1257:                        {\sh(iv-u_N-\alpha\gamma)

1258:                         \sh(iv+u_N-(\alpha+1)\gamma)}

1259:                         \right)^{\frac{N}{2}},  \\

1260: \phi_3(v)&=\phi_1(-v)|_{\alpha\to-\alpha-1}, \nn

1261: \end{align}

1262: %

1263: and the chemical potential $\mu$ (shifted by

1264: $\mu+2\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma\to \mu$, see Appendix~A)

1265: have been introduced.

1266: %

1267: The functions $q_1(v)$ and $q_2(v)$ are written in the form

1268: %

1269: \begin{equation}

1270: q_1(v)=\prod_{j=1}^{n}\sin(v-v_j^{(1)}), \,\,\,\,

1271: q_2(v)=\prod_{j=1}^{m}\sin(v-v_j^{(2)}),    

1272: \end{equation}

1273: %

1274: where the unknown parameters $\{v_j^{(1)}\}_{j\in\{1,2,\cdots, n\}}$ 

1275: and  $\{v_j^{(2)}\}_{j\in\{1,2,\cdots, m\}}$  are the

1276: Bethe ansatz rapidities determined from the Bethe ansatz equation (BAE)

1277: %

1278: \begin{equation}

1279: \frac{q_2(v_j^{(1)}+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}

1280:      {q_2(v_j^{(1)}-\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}=

1281: -\frac{\phi_1(v_j^{(1)}-\frac{i}{2} \gamma)}

1282:             {\phi_2(v_j^{(1)}-\frac{i}{2} \gamma)} e^{\beta \mu},\quad

1283: \frac{q_1(v_j^{(2)}+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}

1284:      {q_1(v_j^{(2)}-\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}=

1285: -\frac{q_2(v_j^{(2)}+i \gamma)}

1286:       {q_2(v_j^{(2)}-i\gamma)}.

1287: \label{BAE}

1288: \end{equation}

1289: %

1290: 

1291: At the end of this section, we emphasize that

1292: our QTM is based on the {\it graded} formulations,

1293: which means the genuine fermionic statistics of the 

1294: model are properly built into the algebraic structure 

1295: of the QTM through the Grassmann parity $p[j]$ 

1296: (see~\eqref{defQTM2}). 

1297: %

1298: Nevertheless the DVF and the BAE have quite 

1299: simple forms.

1300: %

1301: This indicates that the differences between

1302: the null and non-null Grassmann parity models

1303: in one dimension are embedded into 

1304: differences of boundary conditions.

1305: %

1306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1307: \section{Non-linear integral equations}

1308: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1309: %

1310: In this section we analyze the eigenvalue $\Lambda(v)$ in DVF 

1311: form~\eqref{DVF} by

1312: selecting certain auxiliary functions including

1313: the information of the BAE. 

1314: %

1315: {}From now on we consider the repulsive case $\alpha>0$.

1316: %

1317: For the largest eigenvalue,

1318: the auxiliary functions and 

1319: NLIE have been introduced in~\cite{JKS}.

1320: %

1321: For some special eigenvalues with certain symmetries including the

1322: largest eigenvalue, one needs only two auxiliary functions~\cite{JKS}.

1323: %

1324: 

1325: In order to treat the general case,

1326: we introduce the following 

1327: three auxiliary functions.

1328: %

1329: %

1330: \begin{alignat}{3}

1331: &\mfa_0(v)=\frac{\lambda_1(x)(\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x))}

1332:                {\lambda_2(x)(\lambda_1(x)+\lambda_2(x)+\lambda_3(x)+

1333:                 \lambda_4(x))}\Biggr|_{x=v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma}, &\quad&

1334: &\mfA_0(v)=1+\mfa_0(v), \nn \db

1335: %

1336: &\mfab_0(v)=\frac{\lambda_2(x)}{\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)}

1337:                               \Biggr|_{x=v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma}, &\quad&

1338: &\mfAb_0(v)=1+\mfab_0(v), \nn \db

1339: &\mfa_1(v)=\frac{\lambda_1(x)}{\lambda_2(x)+\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)}

1340:                               \Biggr|_{x=v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma}, &\quad&

1341: &\mfA_1(v)=1+\mfa_1(v).

1342: \label{aux}

1343: \end{alignat}

1344: %

1345: where the functions $\lambda_j(x)$ denote the $j$th term on the

1346: right hand side in the DVF \eqref{DVF}.

1347: %

1348: 

1349: These auxiliary functions satisfy certain 

1350: functional relations.

1351: %

1352: Exploring their analyticity,

1353: one transforms these functional relations into

1354: a closed set of NLIE.

1355: %

1356: Here we consider the NLIE for the largest eigenvalue

1357: and some sub-leading ones which describe the

1358: correlations.

1359: %

1360: The details of the calculations are deferred to

1361: Appendices~B and C.

1362: %

1363: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1364: \subsection{Largest eigenvalues}

1365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1366: %

1367: First we consider the largest eigenvalue.

1368: %

1369: As described above, one finds the NLIE for this

1370: eigenvalue in~\cite{JKS}.

1371: %

1372: For completeness we study this case by 

1373: using the above three auxiliary functions.

1374: %

1375: 

1376: The largest eigenvalue belongs to the sector 

1377: $n=N$ and $m=N/2$ in the BAE~\eqref{BAE}.

1378: %

1379: {}From numerical calculations with finite Trotter

1380: number $N$, we observe the above

1381: auxiliary functions have the following analytical 

1382: properties:

1383: %

1384: The function $\mfA_0(v)$ ($\mfAb_0(v)$) is 

1385: analytic and non-zero in a finite strip

1386: in the lower (upper) half plane

1387: $-\gamma/2<\Im v<0$ ($0<\Im v<\gamma/2$)\footnote{

1388: %

1389: In fact these auxiliary functions have

1390: trivial zeros and poles of order $N/2$

1391: which come from the vacuum parts in the DVF.

1392: %

1393: These zeros and poles partly appear in the above ``analyticity

1394: strips'' and result into the

1395: leading terms of the NLIEs.

1396: }, 

1397: and the function $\mfA_1(v)$ is 

1398: analytic and non-zero along the real axis.

1399: %

1400: Hereafter we call the region $-\gamma/2<\Im v<\gamma/2$

1401: ``physical strip".

1402: %

1403: Due to this analyticity, we can transform the

1404: functional relations satisfied by the above

1405: auxiliary functions into NLIEs by using the

1406: Fourier transform together with Cauchy's

1407: theorem. In this procedure one takes the

1408: Trotter limit $N\to\infty$ analytically

1409: (see Appendix~B). 

1410: %

1411: Consequently, we obtain the following closed set

1412: of NLIE.

1413: %

1414: \begin{align}

1415: \ln\mfa_0(v)&=\beta\psi(v)+k\ast\ln\mfAb_0(v)+

1416:                k\ast\ln\mfA_1(v)+\beta \mu,\nn\\

1417: \ln\mfab_0(v)&=\beta\psi(-v)+\overline{k}\ast

1418:                \ln\mfA_0(v)+

1419:                \overline{k}\ast\ln\mfA_1(v)+\beta \mu,

1420: \label{nlielgst}     \\

1421: \ln\mfa_1(v)&=\beta(\psi(v)+\psi(-v))+\bar{k}\ast

1422:                \ln\mfA_0(v)+k\ast\ln\mfAb_0(v)+k_1

1423:                \ast\ln\mfA_1(v)+2\beta\mu, \nn

1424: \end{align}

1425: %

1426: with the kernels and leading terms

1427: %

1428: \begin{align}

1429: &k(v)=\frac{\sh\gamma}{2\sh(i v)\sh(i v-\gamma)},\quad

1430: \overline{k}(v)=k(-v),\quad k_1(v)=k(v)+\overline{k}(v), \nn \\

1431: &\psi(v)=\frac{\sh^2(\alpha+1)\gamma}

1432:         {\sh(i v+\frac{1}{2}\alpha\gamma)

1433:          \sh(i v-\frac{1}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))},

1434: \end{align}

1435: %

1436: where the symbol $*$ denotes the convolution defined by

1437: %

1438: \begin{equation}

1439: f\ast g(v)

1440: =\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\cl}f(v-x)g(x) dx

1441: =\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{v-{\cl}}f(x)g(v-x) dx.

1442: \end{equation}

1443: %

1444: The integration contours $\cl$ for convolutions with $\ln\mfA_0$,

1445: $\ln\mfAb_0$ and $\ln\mfA_1$ in~\eqref{nlielgst} should be taken by a

1446: straight line ranging over a full period $\pi$ with imaginary part

1447: $-\delta$, $+\delta$ and $0$ ($\delta$ is arbitrary but fixed in the

1448: range $0<\delta<\gamma/2$), respectively.

1449: %

1450: %

1451: Through the solution to the above NLIE, the largest eigenvalue is

1452: expressed by

1453: %

1454: \begin{equation}

1455: \ln\Lambda^{\rm max}(v)=

1456: \Psi(v)+\zeta*\ln\mfA_0(v)+\overline{\zeta}*\ln\mfAb_0(v)

1457: +(\zeta+\overline{\zeta})*\ln\mfA_1(v),

1458: \label{largest}

1459: \end{equation}

1460: %

1461: where the kernels $\zeta(v)$, $\overline{\zeta}(v)$ and

1462: the leading term $\Psi(v)$ are defined by

1463: \begin{equation}

1464: \Psi(v)=\frac{-2\beta\sh^2((\alpha+1)\gamma)\ch((\alpha+1)\gamma)}

1465:                {\sh(iv+(\alpha+1)\gamma)

1466:                 \sh(iv-(\alpha+1)\gamma)},   \quad

1467: \zeta(v)=\frac{-\psi(-v)}{2\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma},

1468: \quad \overline{\zeta}(v)=\zeta(-v).

1469: \end{equation}

1470: %

1471: {}From eq.~\eqref{nlielgst}, we find

1472: $\mfab_0(v)=\mfa_0(-v)$ and

1473: the real function $\mfa_1(v)$ is symmetric

1474: with respect to both real and imaginary axis.

1475: %

1476: Hence the threefold set of NLIEs~\eqref{nlielgst} 

1477: can be reduced to only two NLIEs which

1478: are identical to the ones in~\cite{JKS}.

1479: %

1480: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1481: \subsection{General NLIE for arbitrary eigenvalues}

1482: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1483: %

1484: The sub-leading eigenvalues of 

1485: the QTM~\eqref{DVF} are treated in a way

1486: similar to the largest eigenvalue.

1487: %

1488: The main difference lies in the

1489: existence of additional zeros and

1490: poles of the auxiliary functions.

1491: %

1492: Therefore one observes additional terms

1493: in the NLIE (``sin''-terms).

1494: Consequently all correlation functions

1495: are characterized by the distribution patterns

1496: of these additional zeros or poles.

1497: %

1498: 

1499: Often in the case of excited

1500: states the second factors in the convolutions are logarithms of 

1501: periodic functions,

1502: however with non-zero winding numbers, $\ln\mfA(\pi/2)-

1503: \ln\mfA(-\pi/2)=2n\pi i$ ($n\in{\mathbb{Z}}$). This gives rise to a

1504: second set of additional terms in the NLIE (``cos''-terms).

1505: 

1506: %

1507: Thus we obtain the following general NLIE 

1508: with additional terms $\ln\varphi_0(v)$, 

1509: $\ln\varphi_1(v)$ and $\ln\overline{\varphi}_0(v)$.

1510: %

1511: \begin{align}

1512: \ln\mfa_0(v)&=\beta\psi(v)+k\ast\ln\mfAb_0(v)+

1513:                k\ast\ln\mfA_1(v)+\ln\varphi_0(v)+\beta \mu,\nn\\

1514: \ln\mfab_0(v)&=\beta\psi(-v)+\overline{k}\ast

1515:                \ln\mfA_0(v)+

1516:                \overline{k}\ast\ln\mfA_1(v)

1517:                +\ln\overline{\varphi}_0(v)+\beta \mu,

1518: \label{nliegeneral}     \\

1519: \ln\mfa_1(v)&=\beta(\psi(v)+\psi(-v))+\bar{k}\ast

1520:                \ln\mfA_0(v)+k\ast\ln\mfAb_0(v)+k_1

1521:                \ast\ln\mfA_1(v)+\ln\varphi_1(v)+2\beta\mu, \nn

1522: \end{align}

1523: %

1524: %

1525: 

1526: The additional terms in the above general NLIE must be

1527: determined for each eigenvalue separately.

1528: %

1529: Note that the relation 

1530: $\varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v)$

1531: is always valid due to certain algebraic structures of the

1532: auxiliary functions (see Appendices B and C).

1533: %

1534: In~\eqref{nliegeneral} and later,

1535: we take the same integration contours as in the case of the largest

1536: eigenvalue.

1537: %

1538: Thus the corresponding NLIE for arbitrary eigenvalues

1539: (including the largest eigenvalue) are written in the

1540: following general form:

1541: %

1542: %

1543: \begin{equation}

1544: \ln\Lambda(v)=

1545: \Psi(v)+\zeta*\ln\mfA_0(v)+\overline{\zeta}*\ln\mfAb_0(v)+(\zeta+\overline{\zeta})*\ln\mfA_1(v)+

1546:         \ln\chi(v),

1547: \label{eigengeneral}

1548: \end{equation}

1549: %

1550: where the term $\ln\chi(v)$ is also determined

1551: from the distribution pattern of the additional

1552: zeros and poles.

1553: %

1554: 

1555: As concrete examples,

1556: we determine the additional terms for the eigenvalues corresponding to

1557: the asymptotics of the:

1558: %

1559: (i) one-particle Green function,

1560: %

1561: (ii) transversal spin-spin correlations,

1562: %

1563: %

1564: (iii) density-density correlations 

1565: or longitudinal spin-spin correlations,

1566: %

1567: (iv) sub-dominant correlations of case (iii),

1568: %

1569: (v) singlet and (vi) triplet superconducting

1570: correlations (see Appendix~C.).\\\\

1571: %

1572: %

1573: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1574: \subsection{Numerical analysis of the NLIE}

1575: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1576: %

1577: Here we evaluate the above NLIE numerically.

1578: %

1579: As seen in the above section, the NLIEs are exact

1580: expressions for the thermodynamical quantities 

1581: and various correlations at any finite temperature.

1582: %

1583: In contrast to the standard TBA they close at a finite level.

1584: %

1585: Hence one obtains physical quantities 

1586: explicitly by a highly accurate numerical 

1587: analysis.

1588: %

1589: To keep the electron density constant,

1590: we adopt temperature dependent chemical potentials

1591: $\mu(T)$ determined from

1592: %

1593: \begin{equation}

1594: \frac{d\langle n_{\rm e}(T,\mu(T))\rangle}{dT}

1595: =\frac{d}{dT}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \mu}\right)_{T}=0.

1596: \end{equation}

1597: %

1598: %

1599: In Fig.~\ref{graphchem} we depict $\mu(T)$ for $\alpha=1$, $\gamma=1$ 

1600: and various particle densities. 

1601: %

1602: We solve the NLIE by the iteration method.

1603: %

1604: In each step, convolution parts are calculated

1605: by making use of the Fast Fourier transform.

1606: %

1607: The subsidiary conditions which determine the zeros 

1608: $\theta_0$, $\theta_1$, etc. (see, for example, 

1609: eq.~\eqref{subgr}) are solved by the Newton

1610: method.

1611: %

1612: %

1613: %

1614: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1615: \begin{figure}[hbt]

1616: \begin{center}

1617: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{mu.eps}

1618: \end{center}

1619: \caption{Temperature dependence of the chemical potentials for

1620: interaction parameters $\alpha=1$, $\gamma=1$ and various particle

1621: densities. The symbol $\ast$ denotes the zero temperature chemical

1622: potentials derived by~\eqref{defdens} and~\eqref{defchem} in

1623: Appendix~A. In our units the Boltzmann constant is $k_B=1$.}

1624: \label{graphchem}

1625: \end{figure}%

1626: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1627: %

1628: %

1629: 

1630: Let us consider the NLIE characterizing the 

1631: correlation lengths via  formula~\eqref{correlation}.

1632: %

1633: Fig.~\ref{graphgr}a shows the temperature dependent

1634: correlation lengths (multiplied by $T$) 

1635: of the one-particle Green functions for

1636: various particle densities.

1637: %

1638: The case $\alpha=\gamma=1$ 

1639: is used as a concrete example throughout this paper and is

1640: equivalent to $U/2=t_p=1$ in~\eqref{hamiltonian}.

1641: %

1642: Due to the finite gap of single particle excitations, we observe that the

1643: correlation length multiplied by temperature 

1644: shows monotonous decay with decreasing temperature 

1645: with zero limit for zero temperature.

1646: %

1647: We observe a crossover behavior of the

1648: correlation lengths at low

1649: %%

1650: %%

1651: temperature close to particle density $n_{\rm e}=1.5$: for 

1652: $n_{\rm e}<1.5$ ($n_{\rm e}>1.5$) the values of $\xi$ increase (decrease)

1653: with $n$.

1654: %

1655: A similar behavior is observed in other correlations 

1656: described by massive excitations.

1657: %

1658: The transversal spin-spin 

1659: correlations, the triplet

1660: superconducting pair correlations

1661: are depicted in Fig.~\ref{graphst}a and

1662: in Fig.~\ref{graphph}b, respectively.

1663: %

1664: %

1665: %

1666: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1667: \begin{figure}

1668: \begin{center}

1669: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtgr.eps}

1670: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{kFgr.eps}

1671: \end{center}

1672: \caption{(a): Temperature dependence of the scaled correlation

1673: lengths $T\cdot\xi(T)$ for the one-particle Green function.

1674: %

1675: (b): Temperature dependence of the wave vector of the oscillation terms. 

1676: At zero temperature

1677: one observes the $k_{\rm F}$--oscillation 

1678: ($k_{\rm F}=\pi n_{\rm e}/2$ depicted by the symbol $\ast$)

1679: characteristic for the one-particle Green function.}

1680: \label{graphgr}

1681: \end{figure}%

1682: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1683: %

1684: %

1685: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1686: %

1687: \begin{figure}

1688: \begin{center}

1689: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtst.eps}

1690: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{kFst.eps}

1691: \end{center}

1692: \caption{(a): Temperature dependence of the correlation lengths

1693: of the transversal spin-spin correlations.

1694: (b): The wave vector $2k_{\rm F}$ of the oscillations

1695: which is characteristic for the spin-spin correlations. 

1696: At zero temperature one

1697: observes the strict relation of wave vector with particle density

1698: $2k_{\rm F}=\pi n_{\rm e}$ 

1699: (analytical values are depicted by the symbol $\ast$).}

1700: \label{graphst}

1701: \end{figure}%

1702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1703: %

1704: %

1705: %

1706: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1707: \begin{figure}

1708: \begin{center}

1709: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtphs.eps}

1710: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtpht.eps}

1711: \end{center}

1712: \caption{Temperature dependence of the correlation lengths for

1713: singlet superconducting pair correlations (a) and triplet

1714: pair correlations (b). The symbol $\ast$ in (a) denotes results

1715: of the analytical calculation in the low temperature limit

1716: presented in section~4 confirming the predictions from CFT in Appendix~A.}

1717: \label{graphph}

1718: \end{figure}%

1719: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1720: %

1721: %

1722: We also depict the temperature dependent  

1723: oscillatory terms of the one-particle

1724: Green functions, transversal spin-spin correlations,

1725: and density-density correlations in Fig.~\ref{graphgr}b,

1726: Fig.~\ref{graphst}b and Fig.~\ref{graphdd}b, respectively.

1727: %

1728: Regarding the one-particle Green functions,

1729: one observes clearly a temperature dependence of 

1730: the ``Fermi momentum" $k_{\rm F}$.

1731: %

1732: In the low temperature limit $T\to0$, the wave vector converges to

1733: the expected value $k_{\rm F}=\pi n_{\rm e}/2$ which

1734: indicates the significance of the Fermi surface for

1735: one-particle excitations in the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid at $T=0$.

1736: %

1737: %

1738: %

1739: As seen in Fig.\ref{graphchem} (and also expected) the chemical

1740: potential grows to $+\infty$ ($-\infty$) for $T\to\infty$ if the

1741: particle density is kept fixed at a high (low) value.  This indicates

1742: a broadening of the momentum distribution at finite and in particular

1743: at high temperatures. Hence, processes of particle-hole type closer to

1744: the middle of the band become statistically dominant. Consequently,

1745: the wave vector $k_{\rm F}$ decreases (increases) with increasing $T$

1746: if the $T=0$ value was large (small).

1747: %

1748: As shown in Fig.~\ref{graphdd}b and Fig.~\ref{graphst}b,

1749: oscillatory terms of the

1750: density-density and transversal spin-spin correlations

1751: converge to $2k_{\rm F}\to \pi n_{\rm e}$.

1752: %

1753: This behavior corresponds to the excitations 

1754: carrying a $2k_{\rm F}$ momentum.

1755: %

1756: For the same reason as mentioned in the case of the one-particle 

1757: Green function, this $2k_{\rm F}$  is

1758: shifted with increasing temperature.

1759: %

1760: The quantitative difference of the 

1761: oscillation terms for the transversal 

1762: spin-spin correlations and the density-density 

1763: correlations lies in the different nature of these excitations.

1764: %

1765: The density-density correlations 

1766: are described by particle-hole excitations from 

1767: the left to the right Fermi point without

1768: changing the electron and spin numbers.

1769: %

1770: On the other hand, the transversal spin-spin 

1771: correlations are characterized by massive excitations

1772: changing the spin number.

1773: % 

1774: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1775: \begin{figure}

1776: \begin{center}

1777: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtdd.eps}

1778: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{kFdd.eps}

1779: \end{center}

1780: \caption{(a): Temperature dependence of the correlation lengths

1781: for the density-density correlations. The wave vector of the oscillation

1782: term is depicted in (b). The symbol $\ast$ denotes

1783: results of the analytical calculation in section~4 in 

1784: the low temperature limit and the predictions from CFT in Appendix~A.}

1785: \label{graphdd}

1786: \end{figure}%

1787: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1788: %

1789: 

1790: Fig.~\ref{graphdd}a and Fig.~\ref{graphph}a show

1791: the density-density and the singlet

1792: superconducting pair correlation lengths, respectively.

1793: %

1794: Due to massless excitations, the scaled correlation lengths $T\xi(T)$ 

1795: are finite at zero temperature. 

1796: %

1797: The low temperature asymptotics agree with

1798: the analytic calculations in  section~4

1799: and the prediction from CFT in Appendix~A

1800: (see Fig.~\ref{lowtemp}).

1801: %

1802: At low temperatures one observes a crossover

1803: from dominant density-density correlations

1804: to dominant singlet superconducting

1805: pair correlations driven by the

1806: particle density 

1807: (see also Fig.~\ref{lowtemp} in Appendix~A):

1808: %

1809: below (above) a certain critical density $\rho_c$, 

1810: the dynamics is dominated by singlet superconducting

1811: pair correlations (density-density correlations).

1812: %

1813: This behavior is changed at higher temperatures. Here at

1814: low (high) density $\rho$ the density-density correlations

1815: (singlet superconducting pair correlations) dominate,

1816: see Fig.~\ref{graphcross}.

1817: %

1818: Of course, these findings for high particle density and temperature 

1819: do not imply any tendency towards superconductivity. It should be born 

1820: in mind that the overall length scale of the density-density and

1821: singlet superconducting pair correlations is rather short in comparison

1822: to the lattice constant. Furthermore, neither of these correlations

1823: dominate the dynamics with increasing temperature as the one-particle 

1824: Green function takes over. This implies a picture of rather uncorrelated

1825: one-particle dynamics at higher temperature.

1826: %

1827: %

1828: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1829: \begin{figure}[h]

1830: \begin{center}

1831: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtddphl.eps}

1832: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtddphh.eps}

1833: \end{center}

1834: \caption{(a) Low particle density: crossover from dominant 

1835: (superconducting) singlet pair correlations at low temperature

1836: to dominant density-density correlations at high temperature. (b)

1837: High particle density: opposite to scenario in (a) for density $n=1.25$

1838: (upper two curves). For $n=1.0$ the crossing lies outside the shown

1839: temperature window.}

1840: \label{graphcross}

1841: \end{figure}%

1842: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1843: %

1844: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1845: \begin{figure}

1846: \begin{center}

1847: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtsl.eps}

1848: \end{center}

1849: \caption{Temperature dependence of the sub-dominant

1850: density-density (longitudinal spin-spin) correlation lengths.

1851: %

1852: At low temperature there is convergence to the Fermi

1853: velocity $v_{\rm F}/(2\pi)$ (denoted by the symbol $\ast$).}

1854: \label{graphsl}

1855: \end{figure}%

1856: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1857: %

1858: %

1859: 

1860: Finally we comment on the sub-dominant density-density

1861: (longitudinal spin-spin) correlations in Fig.~\ref{graphsl}.

1862: %

1863: The correlations are characterized by simple

1864: particle-hole excitations at each Fermi point.

1865: %

1866: Correspondingly,

1867: the correlation lengths (multiplied by 

1868: temperature $T$) approach the Fermi velocities

1869: $v_{\rm F}/(2\pi)$ in the low temperature limit.

1870: %

1871: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1872: \section{Low-temperature asymptotics}

1873: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1874: %

1875: In this section we consider the model at low temperatures.

1876: %

1877: The largest eigenvalue and 

1878: those sub-leading ones described by massless excitations

1879: are calculated approximately up to order $O(1/\beta)$.

1880: %

1881: As a consequence, the NLIEs are reduced to only one 

1882: linear integral equation and

1883: %

1884: this linear integral equation is connected directly with

1885: the dressed functions (see Appendix~A). 

1886: %

1887: 

1888: Due to the massive spin excitations,

1889: the two auxiliary functions $\ln\mfa_0(v)$ and $\ln\mfab_0(v)$

1890: can be neglected as $\mfa_0, \mfab_0 \sim e^{-\epsilon\beta}$ 

1891: ($\epsilon>0$).

1892: %

1893: Hence the three NLIEs characterizing the grand potential 

1894: and correlation functions 

1895: %

1896: %!!!! are described by 

1897: reduce to the single integral equation

1898: %

1899: %!!!  slightly changed.

1900: %

1901: \begin{equation}

1902: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta \varepsilon^{(0)}(v)+k_1

1903: \stackrel{C_1}{*}\ln\mfA_1(v)

1904: +\ln\tilde\varphi_1(v),

1905: \label{asympt:nlie}

1906: \end{equation}

1907: %

1908: where 

1909: %

1910: \begin{equation}

1911: \varepsilon^{(0)}(v)=-\psi(v)-\psi(-v)-2\mu.

1912: \end{equation}

1913: %

1914: %!!!

1915: %

1916: and $\widetilde\varphi_1$ is a collection of only the ``cos''-terms 

1917: of the function $\varphi_1$ listed 

1918: in Appendix~C. The ``sin''-terms do not show up explicitly as they

1919: are taken care of by the modified contour $\mcl_1$ (see Appendix~C). 

1920: Throughout this section the convolution

1921: $f*g(v)$ is understood in the manner

1922: %

1923: \begin{equation}

1924: f*g(v):=\frac{1}{\pi}

1925: \int_{\cl}f(v-x)g(x) dx.

1926: \end{equation}

1927: %

1928: %

1929: Numerically, one observes that the function $\mfa_1(v)$ has

1930: a crossover behavior from $\mfa_1(v)\ll 1$ to $\mfa_1(v)\gg1$

1931: (see Fig.~\ref{cross}).

1932: %

1933: %!!!

1934: %

1935: The Fermi point $\Lambda_{\rm F}$ can be defined by

1936: the following conditions satisfied by 

1937: $\ln\mfa_1(v)$ for the largest eigenvalue 

1938: ($\mcl_1$ is taken by a straight line

1939: on the real axis),

1940: %

1941: \begin{equation}

1942: \ln\mfa_1(\pm \Lambda_{\rm F})=0 \qquad (1/\beta\ll 1),

1943: \label{fermip}

1944: \end{equation}

1945: and for the excited states we demand $\Re \ln\mfa_1(\pm \Lambda_{\rm F})=0$

1946: for $\pm \Lambda_{\rm F}$ on the real axis.

1947: %

1948: \subsection{$O(\beta)$ and $O(1)$ approximation}

1949: %

1950: First we calculate order $O(\beta)$ and $O(1)$ approximations

1951: for the largest and those sub-leading ones 

1952: characterized by gapless excitations:

1953: %

1954: (i) particle-hole excitations at each of the left and 

1955: right Fermi points

1956: (define $n^{+}$ and $n^{-}$ as corresponding quantum numbers),

1957: % 

1958: (ii) particle-hole excitations of $d_{\rm c}$

1959: charges from the left to right Fermi point, but no change

1960: of the total charge number and total spin number, and

1961: %

1962: (iii) singlet pair excitations near the Fermi points;

1963: annihilate or create 

1964: $\varDelta N_c=2 n_{c}$ ($n_{\rm c}\in{\mathbb{Z}}$)

1965: charges in a symmetric way near the Fermi points.

1966: %

1967: The longitudinal spin-spin correlations

1968: $\langle \sigma_j^{z}\sigma_i^{z}\rangle$ and the density-density 

1969: correlations $\langle n_j n_i \rangle$ are characterized 

1970: by excitations (i) and (ii). 

1971: %

1972: On the other hand, the singlet superconducting pair 

1973: correlations $\langle c_{j+1,\uparrow}c_{j,\downarrow}

1974:  c_{i+1,\uparrow}c_{i,\downarrow}\rangle$

1975: is described by (iii).\\\\

1976: %

1977: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1978: {\bf (1) The largest eigenvalue}\\\\

1979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1980: %

1981: In the low temperature limit, the function $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ 

1982: can be written in terms of  $\mfa_1(v)$ as

1983: $\ln\mfA_1(v)\simeq \ln\mfa_1(v)$ for $|v|>\Lambda_{\rm F}$

1984: and $\ln\mfA_1(v)\simeq 0$ for $|v|<\Lambda_{\rm F}$

1985: (Fig.~\ref{cross}). 

1986: %

1987: Hence we have

1988: \begin{equation}

1989: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta\varepsilon^{(0)}(v)+k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}\ln\mfa_1(v)

1990:               +O(1/\beta),

1991: \end{equation}

1992: %

1993: where the symbol $\stackrel{C_1}{*}$ for the

1994: case of the largest eigenvalue denotes

1995: %

1996: \begin{align}

1997: &k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}\ln\mfa_1(v)=\frac{1}{\pi}

1998: \int_{C_1} k_1(x)\ln\mfa_1(v-x)d x\nn \\

1999: &\quad=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{-\Lambda_{\rm F}}+

2000:  \int_{\Lambda_{\rm F}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\right)k_1(x)\ln\mfa_1(v-x)d x.

2001: \end{align}

2002: Using the definition of the dressed energy $\varepsilon(v)$

2003: \eqref{d-energy}, we find a solution to the above equation

2004: %

2005: \begin{equation}

2006: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta \varepsilon(v)+O(1/\beta).

2007: \end{equation}

2008: %

2009: Then we have an approximate value for $\ln \mfa_1(v)$ 

2010: at the Fermi points

2011: %

2012: \begin{equation}

2013: \ln\mfa_1(\pm \Lambda_{\rm F})=0+O(1/\beta).

2014: \label{ap1}

2015: \end{equation}

2016: %

2017: %

2018: %

2019: \begin{figure}[t]

2020: \begin{center}

2021: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{reala1.eps}

2022: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{realA.eps}

2023: \end{center}

2024: \caption{Crossover behavior of the functions 

2025: $\ln\mfa_1(v)$ and $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ (real parts)

2026: for $\alpha=\gamma=1$, $n_{\rm e}=1.00$ and 

2027: $\beta=50$. 

2028: %

2029: The Fermi point 

2030: $\Lambda_{\rm F}$ defined by~\eqref{fermip}

2031: is found to be  $\Lambda_{\rm F}=\pm0.748$.}

2032: \label{cross}

2033: \end{figure}%

2034: %

2035: %

2036: %

2037: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2038: {\bf (2) Particle-hole excitations at each of left

2039:  and right Fermi points}\\\\

2040: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2041: This excitation is characterized by excited charges at the left

2042: (right) Fermi points $-\Lambda_{\rm F}$ ($\Lambda_{\rm F}$).

2043: %

2044: In the simplest, still characteristic case, one zero is separated by

2045: $n^-$ ($n^+$) holes from the Fermi sea of zeros at the Fermi point

2046: $\mp\Lambda_{\rm F}$.

2047: %

2048: The holes (zeros) are to be circumvented by the deformed contour in

2049: anti-clockwise (clockwise) manner (see Appendix~C).

2050: % 

2051: The function $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ can be approximated in terms of $\mfa_1(v)$

2052: in the same manner as case (1). Hence we obtain the

2053: same approximate value as in~\eqref{ap1}.\\\\

2054: %

2055: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2056: {\bf (3) Particle-hole excitations from left to

2057:                      right Fermi points}\\\\

2058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2059: %

2060: %

2061: These excitations are described by $d_{\rm c}$ charges

2062: moved from the  left (right) Fermi point

2063: to right (left) one.

2064: %

2065: This excitation entails a change of momentum $2k_{\rm F} d_{\rm c}$.

2066: %

2067: Correspondingly, the auxiliary function $\mfA_1(v)$ has $2 d_{\rm c}$

2068: zeros near the Fermi points with behavior different from those in 

2069: the largest eigenvalue case: $d_{\rm c}$ zeros (of

2070: %!!

2071: ``particle type'') are distributed in the upper half plane near the

2072: left Fermi point and the remaining $d_{\rm c}$ zeros (of ``hole type'')

2073: are located in

2074: the lower half plane near the right Fermi point, and vice versa.

2075: %

2076: \begin{figure}[t]

2077: \begin{center}

2078: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{imaga1dd.eps}

2079: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{imagAdd.eps}

2080: \end{center}

2081: \caption{Numerical results for the functions 

2082: $\Im\ln\mfa_1(v)$ (a) and $\Im\ln\mfA_1(v)$ (b) for $\alpha=\gamma=1$, 

2083: $n_{\rm e}=1.00$, $\beta=50$ and $d_{\rm c}=1$.

2084: Due to the additional zeros (circumvented by the

2085: modified integration contour $\mcl_1$), 

2086: $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ is discontinuous

2087: near the Fermi points $\Lambda_{\rm F}=\pm 0.748$.}

2088: \label{crossd}

2089: \end{figure}%

2090: %

2091: %

2092: 

2093: These zeros should be circumvented by the deformed

2094: contours in  clockwise manner at the left Fermi 

2095: point and anti-clockwise manner at the right Fermi point

2096: (see Appendix~C).

2097: %

2098: At low temperatures, $\ln \mfA_1(v)$ is replaced by 

2099: $\ln \mfA_1(v)\simeq 0$ for $|v|<\Lambda_{\rm F}$

2100: and $\ln \mfA_1(v)\simeq \ln\mfa_1(v)+2\pi i d_{\rm c}$ for 

2101: $|v|>\Lambda_{\rm F}$ (see Fig.~\ref{crossd} for $d_{\rm c}=1$).

2102: %

2103: Thus we have the linear integral equation characterizing

2104: the excitation.

2105: %

2106: \begin{equation}

2107: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta\varepsilon^{(0)}(v)+

2108:               k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}\ln(\mfa_1(v)+2\pi i d_{\rm c})+

2109:                                     O(1/\beta),

2110: \end{equation}

2111: %

2112: where $C_1$ denotes the integration in the region

2113: $|v|>\Lambda_{\rm F}$ along with the modified 

2114: contours $\mcl_1$

2115: defined in Appendix~C.

2116: %

2117: {}From the definition of the dressed energy 

2118: $\varepsilon(v)$~\eqref{d-energy}

2119: and the dressed charge $Z(v)$~\eqref{d-charge}, 

2120: we have a solution to 

2121: the above equation,

2122: %

2123: \begin{equation}

2124: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta \varepsilon(v)+

2125:               \left(\frac{Z(v)}{2}-1\right)\cdot

2126:                2\pi i d_{\rm c}+O(1/\beta).

2127: \end{equation}

2128: %

2129: Thus we obtain the value

2130: %

2131: \begin{equation}

2132: \ln\mfa_1(\Lambda_{\rm F})=\left(\frac{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}{2}-1

2133:                    \right)\cdot 2\pi i d_{\rm c} +O(1/\beta).

2134: \end{equation}

2135: %

2136: %

2137: %

2138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2139: {\bf (4) Singlet pair excitations} \\\\

2140: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2141: %

2142: As mentioned above, singlet pair excitations are

2143: characterized by annihilated $2 n_{\rm c}$ charges.

2144: %

2145: Correspondingly, one observes the function $\mfA_1(v)$ has

2146: $2n_{\rm c}$ additional zeros near the Fermi points, i.e.

2147: $n_{\rm c}$ zeros are located near the left Fermi point 

2148: and remaining $n_{\rm c}$ zeros are located near the right

2149: Fermi point.

2150: %

2151: All these additional zeros are distributed in the 

2152: lower half plane and are circumvented by the deformed

2153: contour in a manner different from case~(3),

2154: in counter-clockwise manner 

2155: at both Fermi points (see Appendix~C).

2156: %

2157: Simultaneously, $n_{\rm c}$ additional poles appear in the 

2158: upper half plane and are located on the $\pi/2$-axis.

2159: %

2160: Though these poles do not appear explicitly in the NLIE,

2161: they lead to a non-vanishing winding number of $\mfa_1(v)$, i.e.

2162: $\ln\mfa_1(v)$ is not periodic (see Fig.~\ref{crossp})

2163: %

2164: \begin{equation}

2165: \Im[\ln\mfa_1(\pm \pi/2)]=\mp  n_{\rm c} \pi.

2166: \end{equation}

2167: %

2168: %

2169: %

2170: In the  low temperature limit, 

2171: $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ can be replaced by 

2172: $\ln\mfA_1(v)\simeq 0$ for $|v|<\Lambda_{\rm F}$, 

2173: $\ln\mfA_1(v)\simeq \ln\mfa_1(v)-2\pi i n_{\rm c}$ 

2174: for $-\pi/2<v<-\Lambda_{\rm F}$

2175: and

2176: $\ln\mfA_1(v)\simeq \ln\mfa_1(v)+2\pi i n_{\rm c}$ 

2177: for $\Lambda_{\rm F}<v<\pi/2$ (see Fig.~\ref{crossp}).

2178: %

2179: %

2180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2181: \begin{figure}[t]

2182: \begin{center}

2183: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{imaga1ph.eps}

2184: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{imagAph.eps}

2185: \end{center}

2186: \caption{

2187: %

2188: Numerical results for the functions 

2189: $\Im\ln\mfa_1(v)$ (a) and $\Im\ln\mfA_1(v)$ (b) 

2190: for $\alpha=\gamma=1$, 

2191: $n_{\rm e}=1.00$, $\beta=50$ and $n_{\rm c}=1$.

2192: %

2193: %!! slight change

2194: %

2195: One observes that the function $\ln\mfa_1(v)$ is a superposition

2196: of a periodic function and a linearly increasing term.

2197: %

2198: The function $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ is 

2199: discontinuous at the Fermi points 

2200: $\Lambda_{\rm F}=\pm 0.748$.

2201: %

2202: The discontinuity derives from the additional

2203: zeros (circumvented by the contour)

2204: at the Fermi points.

2205: %

2206: }

2207: \label{crossp}

2208: \end{figure}%

2209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2210: %

2211: %

2212: %

2213: Thus we obtain the integral equation 

2214: %

2215: \begin{equation}

2216: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta\varepsilon_0(v)+

2217: k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}S[\ln\mfa_1](v)+O(1/\beta),

2218: \label{ap4}

2219: \end{equation}

2220: %

2221: %!!!

2222: %

2223: where the symbol $\stackrel{C_1}{*}$ denotes the convolution

2224: %

2225: and the functional $S[g]$ applied to an analytic function

2226: $g(v)$ is defined stepwise by

2227: %

2228: \begin{equation}

2229: S[g](v)=\begin{cases}

2230:           g(v)-2\pi i n_{\rm c} & \text{for $-\pi/2<v<-\Lambda_{\rm F}$}\\

2231:            0   & \text{for $-\Lambda_{\rm F}<v<\Lambda_{\rm F}$}\\

2232:            g(v) + 2\pi i n_{\rm c}   & \text{for $\Lambda_{\rm F}<v<\pi/2$}

2233:           \end{cases},

2234: \end{equation}

2235: %

2236: with ``analytic continuation'' out of the interval $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$

2237: by the description $S[g](v+\pi)=S[g](v)+4\pi i n_c$.

2238: We directly see that the real part of the solution to \eqref{ap4} is given 

2239: by the dressed energy~\eqref{d-energy}

2240: %

2241: \begin{equation}

2242: \ln\mfa_1(v)=-\beta \varepsilon(v)+i f(v),

2243: \label{asympt:a}

2244: \end{equation}

2245: %

2246: and the imaginary part $f$ has to satisfy the linear integral equation

2247: %

2248: \begin{align}

2249: i f(v)=k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}S[i f](v).

2250: \label{f}

2251: \end{align}

2252: %

2253: Obviously, the solution is unique and odd. Taking the derivative of 

2254: \eqref{f} we find

2255: %

2256: \begin{align}

2257: f^{\prime}(v)&=f_0^{\prime}(v)+k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}

2258: f^{\prime}(v), \nn \db

2259: f_0^{\prime}(v)&=\frac{1}{\pi}\Big\{

2260:          k_1(v-\Lambda_{\rm F})(f(\Lambda_{\rm F})+2n_{\rm c}\pi) 

2261: +k_1(v+\Lambda_{\rm F})(-f(-\Lambda_{\rm F})+2n_{\rm c}\pi)

2262:                 \Bigr\}.      

2263: \label{f0}  

2264: \end{align}

2265: %

2266: The symbol $C_1$ denotes the integration 

2267: contour 

2268: $[-\pi/2,-\Lambda_{\rm F}]\bigcup [\Lambda_{\rm F},\pi/2]$. 

2269: %

2270: %

2271: {}From the relation $f(-\pi/2)=-f(\pi/2)=n_{\rm c}\pi$, we find

2272: for the odd function $f(v)$ 

2273: %

2274: \begin{equation}

2275: 2f(\Lambda_{\rm F})+2n_{\rm c}\pi=

2276: -\int_{C_1}f^{\prime}(v) dv=

2277: %-\int_{C_1}f^{\prime}(v)\cdot 1 dv=

2278: -\int_{C_1}\frac{Z(v)f_0^{\prime}(v)}{2} dv.

2279: \end{equation}

2280: %

2281: Substituting \eqref{f0} and using the definition of 

2282: the dressed charge $Z(v)$~\eqref{d-charge}, 

2283: we arrive at

2284: %

2285: \begin{equation}

2286: f(\Lambda_{\rm F})=\left(\frac{1}{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}-1\right)

2287: \cdot2\pi  n_{\rm c}.

2288: \end{equation}

2289: %

2290: {}From eq.~\eqref{asympt:a} and the above result, 

2291: $\ln\mfa_1(\Lambda_{\rm F})$ is expressed by 

2292: %

2293: \begin{equation}

2294: \ln\mfa_1(\Lambda_{\rm F})=

2295: \left(\frac{1}{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}-1\right)\cdot 2\pi i n_{\rm c} .

2296: \end{equation}

2297: %

2298: \\

2299: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2300: {\bf (5) General cases} \\\\

2301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2302: %

2303: Due to linearity and the results in (1)--(4),

2304: one finds 

2305: %

2306: \begin{equation}

2307: \ln\mfa_1(\Lambda_{\rm F})=\left(\frac{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}{2}-1

2308:           \right)\cdot 2\pi i d_{\rm c}+

2309: \left(\frac{1}{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}-1\right)\cdot 2\pi i n_{\rm c}.

2310: \end{equation}

2311: %

2312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2313: \subsection{$O(1/\beta)$ corrections for the NLIEs}

2314: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2315: To evaluate the $O(1/\beta)$ corrections for the non-linear

2316: integral equations \eqref{asympt:nlie}, we must calculate 

2317: the integral term, taking into account its behavior 

2318: near the Fermi points $\pm \Lambda_{\rm F}$.

2319: %

2320: To achieve this, we divide the integration term into three 

2321: parts as

2322: %

2323: %!! here we have to clarify the whereabouts of the cos-terms

2324: %

2325: %!!!slight change

2326: %

2327: \begin{align}

2328: \frac{1}{\pi}&\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}

2329: k_1(x)\ln\mfA_1(v-x)dx=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}

2330: k_1(v-x)\ln\mfA_1(x)dx+n_c\ln\frac{\cos(v+i\gamma)}{\cos(v-i\gamma)}\nn \db

2331: &\rightarrow\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{C_1}k_1(v-x)

2332: (\ln\mfa_1(x)+2\pi i d_{\rm c}+2\pi i\sigma(x))d x+

2333: n_c\ln\frac{\cos(v+i\gamma)}{\cos(v-i\gamma)}\nn \\

2334: &\quad+\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{C_1}k_1(v-x)

2335: \ln\left(1+\frac{1}{\mfa_1(x)}\right)d x 

2336: +\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{|v|<\Lambda_{\rm F}}k_1(v-x)

2337: \ln(1+\mfa_1(x))d x,

2338: \label{int1}

2339: \end{align}

2340: %

2341: %!! slight amendment

2342: %

2343: with $\sigma(x)=-n_c, 0, n_c$ for $x\in

2344: [-\pi/2,-\Lambda_{\rm F}],

2345: [-\Lambda_{\rm F},\Lambda_{\rm F}],

2346: [\Lambda_{\rm F},\pi/2]$.

2347: %

2348: Note that 

2349: the additional ``cos"-term which depends on

2350: the definition of the convolution (see Appendix~C)

2351: appears in the above equation.

2352: As we have already treated the first linear 

2353: term in eq.~\eqref{int1}, we concentrate on the last 

2354: two non-linear terms.

2355: %

2356: Let us split the integration intervals into two parts;

2357: $[-\pi/2,0]\bigcup[0,\pi/2]$.

2358: %

2359: The integrations over the negative interval read

2360: %

2361: \begin{equation}

2362: \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi/2}^{-\Lambda_{\rm F}}k_1(v-x)

2363:                  \ln\left(1+\frac{1}{\mfa_1(x)}\right) dx+

2364: \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\Lambda_{\rm F}}^{0}k_1(v-x)

2365:                                  \ln(1+\mfa_1(x)) dx.

2366: \label{negInt}

2367: \end{equation}

2368: %

2369: Changing the variable to $z=-\ln\mfa_1(v)$

2370: and using the fact that the derivative of $\ln\mfa_1(v)$

2371: is dominated by the one of $-\beta\varepsilon(v)$, i.e.

2372: $dz/dv\simeq-\ln^{\prime}\mfa_1(-\Lambda_{\rm F})=

2373: \beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(-\Lambda_{\rm F})=

2374: -\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})$,

2375: one obtains

2376: %

2377: \begin{equation}

2378: \eqref{negInt}=-\frac{k_1(v+\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2379:    {\pi\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2380: \left(\int_{-\ln\mfa_1(-\Lambda_{\rm F})}^{\infty}\ln(1+e^{-z}) dz+

2381: \int_{-\infty}^{-\ln\mfa_1(-\Lambda_{\rm F})}\ln(1+e^{z}) dz\right).

2382: \end{equation}

2383: %

2384: The integration contours should be taken to circumvent

2385: the singularities (see Appendix~C).

2386: %

2387: The resultant integration is expressed as 

2388: %

2389: %%

2390: \begin{equation}

2391: \rightarrow -\frac{k_1(v+\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2392:    {\pi\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})} 

2393: \left(\frac{\pi^2}{6}+\frac{1}{2}[\ln\mfa_1(-\Lambda_{\rm F})+

2394:                       2\pi i(d_{\rm c}-n_{\rm c})]^2-

2395:                       4\pi^2  n^{-}\right).

2396: \end{equation}

2397: %

2398: Adding the results of the positive real axis, we obtain

2399: %

2400: \begin{align}

2401: &\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{C_1}k_1(v-x)

2402: \ln\left(1+\frac{1}{\mfa_1(x)}\right)d x 

2403: +\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{|v|<\Lambda_{\rm F}}k_1(v-x)

2404: \ln(1+\mfa_1(x))d x \nn \\

2405: &\quad=\frac{-\pi}

2406:    {\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2407: \left\{

2408: \left(\frac{1}{6}-4\varDelta^{+}\right)k_1(v-\Lambda_{\rm F})+

2409: \left(\frac{1}{6}-4\varDelta^{-}\right)

2410:               k_1(v+\Lambda_{\rm F})\right\},\nn \db

2411: &\varDelta^{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{n_{\rm c}}{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}\pm

2412:                  \frac{d_{\rm c}}{2}Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})\right)^2+n^{\pm}.

2413: \end{align}

2414: %

2415: %

2416: %

2417: Here $\varDelta^{\pm}$ is nothing but the conformal dimensions

2418: defined in~\eqref{conformald}.

2419: %

2420: Hence we obtain the NLIE up to $O(1/\beta)$,

2421: %

2422: %

2423: %

2424: \begin{align}

2425: \ln\mfa_1(v)&=-\beta\varepsilon^{(0)}(v)+k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}

2426: (\ln\mfa_1+2\pi i d_{\rm c}+2\pi i \sigma)(v)+

2427: n_c\ln\frac{\cos(v+i\gamma)}{\cos(v-i\gamma)} \nn \\

2428: &\qquad-\frac{\pi}{\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2429: \left\{\left(\frac{1}{6}-4\varDelta^{+}\right)k_1(v-\Lambda_{\rm F})+

2430:               \left(\frac{1}{6}-4\varDelta^{-}\right)

2431:               k_1(v+\Lambda_{\rm F})\right\}.

2432: \label{asympt:a2}

2433: \end{align}

2434: %

2435: %

2436: %

2437: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2438: \subsection{$O(1/\beta)$ corrections to the eigenvalues}

2439: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2440: %

2441: Repeating the same argument for the eigenvalues, we obtain

2442: %

2443: \begin{align}

2444: \ln\Lambda(0)&=2\beta\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma-\int_{C_1}

2445:              \frac{\psi(v)+\psi(-v)}{2\pi\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}

2446:                 (\ln\mfa_1(v)+2\pi i d_{\rm c}) d v \nn \\

2447: &\quad+\frac{2\pi\psi(\Lambda_{\rm F})

2448:                       (1/6-2\varDelta^{+}-2\varDelta^{-})}

2449:         {\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})

2450:                 \sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}.

2451: \label{loweigen}

2452: \end{align}

2453: %

2454: %!! additional explanations

2455: %

2456: Next we apply the integral identity for bare ($a_0$, $b_0$) and

2457: dressed functions ($a$, $b$), i.e. if $a=a_0+k\ast a$, and

2458: $b=b_0+k\ast b$ then we have $\int a b_0=\int a_0 b$.  Applying this

2459: to eq.~\eqref{asympt:a2} (``$a=\ln\mfa_1+2\pi i d_{\rm c}+2\pi i

2460: \sigma$'') and the density function (``$b=\varrho$'') defined in

2461: \eqref{density}, we obtain

2462: %

2463: \begin{align}

2464: &-\int_{C_1}

2465:              \frac{\psi(v)+\psi(-v)}{2\pi\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}

2466:                 (\ln\mfa_1(v)+2\pi i d_{\rm c}) d v 

2467: =(\beta\mu+\pi i d_{\rm c}) n_{\rm e}+

2468:      \frac{\beta}{2} \int_{C_1}

2469:      (\psi(v)+\psi(-v))\rho(v)dv    \nn \db

2470: &\quad-\frac{\pi}{2\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})} 

2471: \left\{\left(\frac{1}{6}-4\varDelta^{+}\right)

2472:       \int_{C_1}

2473:       k_1(v-\Lambda_{\rm F})\varrho(v) dv 

2474: +\left(\frac{1}{6}-4\varDelta^{-}\right)

2475:         \int_{C_1}

2476:       k_1(v+\Lambda_{\rm F})\varrho(v) dv\right\}. 

2477: \label{int}

2478: \end{align}

2479: %

2480: Substituting~\eqref{int} for \eqref{loweigen} and

2481: using~\eqref{density}, we arrive at

2482: %

2483: \begin{align}

2484: \ln\Lambda(0)&=-\beta\bigl\{\varepsilon_0+

2485:              2(n_{\rm e}-1)\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma-

2486:                    \mu n_{\rm e}\bigr\}

2487:   -\frac{\pi^2 \varrho(\Lambda_{\rm F}) 

2488:         (1/6-2\varDelta^{+}-2\varDelta^{-})}

2489:         {\beta\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})}+

2490:         \pi i d_{\rm c} n_{\rm e} \nn \\

2491: %

2492: &=-\beta\bigl\{\varepsilon_0+2(n_{\rm e}-1)\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma-

2493:                    \mu n_{\rm e}\bigr\}

2494:    +\frac{\pi(1/6-2\varDelta^{+}-2\varDelta^{-})}

2495:         {\beta v_{\rm F}}+\pi i d_{\rm c} n_{\rm e},

2496: \label{asympteigen}

2497: \end{align}

2498: %

2499: %

2500: where $\varepsilon_0$ and $v_{\rm F}$ denote

2501: the ground state energy per site~\eqref{gs} and 

2502: the Fermi velocity~\eqref{fermiv}, respectively.

2503: %

2504: Using~\eqref{asympteigen} and~\eqref{correlation}, 

2505: one obtains the low temperature asymptotics of the correlation

2506: lengths:

2507: %

2508: \begin{equation}

2509: \xi=\frac{\beta v_{\rm F}}{2\pi(\varDelta^{+}+\varDelta^{-})}.

2510: \label{asymptcor1}

2511: \end{equation}

2512: %

2513: %

2514: 

2515: {}From the above calculation and the numerical 

2516: observation, we can describe the low temperature behavior 

2517: of the grand potential~\eqref{free}

2518: and the correlation lengths~\eqref{correlation} 

2519: by selecting the ``quantum numbers" 

2520: $(n_{\rm c},d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})$.\\\\

2521: %

2522: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2523: {\bf (a) Free energy} \\\\

2524: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2525: %

2526: Selecting the quantum numbers  

2527: $(n_{\rm c},d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})

2528: =(0,0,0,0)$, we obtain the $O(1/\beta)$ correction 

2529: for the grand potential per site~\eqref{free},

2530: %

2531: \begin{equation}

2532: f=\bigl\{\varepsilon_0+2(n_{\rm e}-1)\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma+

2533:                    \mu n_{\rm e}\bigr\}

2534:    -\frac{\pi}{6 \beta^2 v_{\rm F}}.

2535: \end{equation}

2536: %

2537: This asymptotics agrees with CFT with 

2538: central charge $c=1$.

2539: \\

2540: %

2541: \\\\

2542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2543: {\bf (b) Density-density and longitudinal spin 

2544:          correlations} \\\\

2545: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2546: %

2547: To obtain the low temperature asymptotics

2548: of the correlation lengths $\xi_{\rm d}$ 

2549: for the density-density correlations 

2550: $\langle n_j n_i \rangle$, the selection rules require to 

2551: set the quantum numbers to

2552: %

2553: $(n_{\rm c},d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})

2554: =(0,\pm 1,0,0)$.

2555: %

2556: Thus we obtain

2557: %

2558: \begin{equation}

2559: \xi_{\rm d}=\frac{2\beta v_{\rm F}}{\pi Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})^2}.

2560: \end{equation}

2561: %

2562: In addition to the above correlation lengths, one observes a 

2563: $2k_{\rm F}$ oscillation term in the correlation functions

2564: %

2565: \begin{equation}

2566: 2k_{\rm F}=\pi n_{\rm e}.

2567: \end{equation}

2568: %

2569: In the case of the correlation lengths of the

2570: longitudinal spin-spin correlations $\xi_{\rm sl}$,

2571: we have to choose the same quantum numbers as for 

2572: the density-density correlations.

2573: %

2574: Hence we have

2575: \begin{equation}

2576: \xi_{\rm sl}=\xi_{\rm d}

2577: \end{equation}

2578: %

2579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2580: {\bf (b) Sub-dominant density-density

2581: (longitudinal spin) correlations} \\\\

2582: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2583: %

2584: One also obtains the sub-dominant correlation 

2585: lengths for the density-density or longitudinal spin-spin 

2586: correlations which are described by the quantum numbers

2587: $(n_{\rm c},d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})

2588: =(0,0,1,0)$ or $(0,0,0,1)$. 

2589: %

2590: %

2591: The resultant asymptotics of the correlation lengths

2592: are given by

2593: %

2594: \begin{equation}

2595: \xi^{\rm sub}_{\rm d}=\xi^{\rm sub}_{\rm sl}=

2596: \frac{\beta v_{\rm F}}{2\pi}.

2597: \end{equation}

2598: \\

2599: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2600: {\bf (d) Singlet superconducting pair correlations} \\\\

2601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2602: %

2603: Finally, we consider the low temperature behavior

2604: of the correlation lengths $\xi_{\rm sp}$ for 

2605: the singlet superconducting pair correlations

2606: $\langle c_{j+1,\uparrow}^{\dagger}c_{j,\downarrow}^{\dagger}

2607: c_{i+1,\uparrow}c_{i,\downarrow}\rangle$ determined from

2608: the quantum numbers

2609: $(n_{\rm c},d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})

2610: =(\pm 1,0,0,0)$. 

2611: %

2612: The result reads

2613: %

2614: \begin{equation}

2615: \xi_{\rm s p}=\frac{\beta v_{\rm F}Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})^2}{2 \pi}.

2616: \end{equation}

2617: %

2618: 

2619: All these analytical calculations of 

2620: the low temperature properties are 

2621: consistent with the numerical results in the previous

2622: section and the predictions from CFT in Appendix~A.

2623: %

2624: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2625: \section{Summary and discussion}

2626: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2627: %

2628: In this paper we have investigated  the finite temperature 

2629: correlations of the strongly correlated electron system in

2630: %

2631: %!! amendments

2632: %

2633: one dimension with $U_q(\mfsl(2|1))$-invariance

2634: and

2635: various types of interaction such as Hubbard

2636: and correlating hopping terms. 

2637: As a consequence we observe 

2638: a competition of normal versus ``superconducting'' correlations.

2639: By concrete calculations of the corresponding correlation 

2640: lengths we have found dominant pair correlations for low particle

2641: densities $n$ and temperatures $T$. In detail, we have found that singlet pair

2642: correlation lengths dominate over density-density correlation lengths 

2643: for low $n_{\rm e}$ and $T$, but also for high $n$ and $T$. In the latter case,

2644: however, the one-particle Green function dominates over all other correlations.

2645: 

2646: The computational task was achieved by a first principles approach based on

2647: a lattice path integral formulation of the Hamiltonian at finite temperature

2648: and the subsequent diagonalization of a suitably defined

2649: quantum transfer matrix

2650: describing transfer in chain direction. The Bethe ansatz equations for

2651: the leading and next-leading eigenvalues were reformulated in terms

2652: of a finite set of non-linear integral equations where the limit

2653: of infinite Trotter number could be taken analytically. The NLIEs

2654: were solved numerically for arbitrary finite temperature and various 

2655: particle densities. In the low-temperature limit the analytic investigation

2656: confirmed the CFT picture and reproduced the dressed energy and dressed

2657: charge formalism known from the finite size analysis of the $T=0$

2658: problem.

2659: 

2660: %

2661: The QTM was based on ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$-grading

2662: formulations, which reflect the proper fermionic

2663: statistics.

2664: %

2665: The formulations are applicable directly to

2666: other strongly correlated electron systems.

2667: %

2668: 

2669: It is an interesting problem to compare our results

2670: for the fermionic

2671: system with the ones of the corresponding spin system.

2672: %

2673: The eigenvalues of the QTM constructed by the (null 

2674: Grassmann parity) $R$-matrix which satisfies the ordinary 

2675: YBE are written as

2676: %

2677: \begin{align}

2678: %

2679: \Lambda^{\rm spin}(v)&=\phi_1(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

2680:                            {q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}e^{2\mu\beta} 

2681: +(-)^{N-n}\phi_2(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

2682:                            {q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)} 

2683:                       \frac{q_2(v+i \gamma)}{q_2(v)}e^{\mu\beta} \nn \\

2684: &\quad+(-)^{N-n}\phi_2(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

2685:                            {q_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}

2686:                       \frac{q_2(v-i \gamma)}{q_2(v)}e^{\mu\beta}

2687: +\phi_3(v)\frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

2688:                            {q_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}.

2689: %

2690: \end{align}

2691: %

2692: Due to the extra factor $(-)^{N-n}$ ($N$ denotes the

2693: Trotter number and $n$ is the number of eloctrons), 

2694: the one-particle Green

2695: function for the original system no longer corresponds 

2696: to the one for the spin system.

2697: % 

2698: Consequently the characteristic $k_{\rm F}$-oscillations

2699: for the one-particle Green function disappear and 

2700: instead $2k_{\rm F}$ 

2701: oscillations will enter the corresponding correlation 

2702: function in the spin system.

2703: %

2704: 

2705: In our work we have provided the framework for a systematic

2706: investigation of the correlation lengths at finite temperature

2707: with an application to a characteristic set of interaction parameters. 

2708: We have not yet

2709: performed a comprehensive study of the phase diagrams for a wider

2710: range of parameters. This remains to be done in a future publication. 

2711: Also, the effect of a non-vanishing magnetic field remains to be explored.

2712: We expect that for the isotropic limit, i.e. $\gamma\to 0$, the 

2713: ``superconducting regime" in the density-temperature phase diagram

2714: will shrink to a point. Also the effect of a magnetic field will lead

2715: to similar NLIEs where the chemical potential terms $\beta\mu$ have to be

2716: replaced by $\beta(\mu\pm h/2)$ and $2\beta\mu$ remains fixed. The solutions 

2717: to these NLIEs are expected to break the symmetries of the Bethe 

2718: ansatz patterns with respect to reflections at the imaginary and/or real axis

2719: leading to independent Fermi momenta of spin up and spin down electrons.

2720: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2721: \section*{Acknowledgment}

2722: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2723: The authors acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche 

2724: Forschungsgemeinschaft under grant No.~Kl 645/3-3.

2725: The authors would like to thank F. G\"ohmann, N. Kawakami,

2726: C. Scheeren,

2727: M. Shiroishi and J. Suzuki for useful discussions. 

2728: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2729: %Appendix A

2730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2731: %

2732: \rnc{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}\setcounter{equation}{0}

2733: %

2734: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2735: \section*{Appendix A\,\, Low temperature behavior from CFT}

2736: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2737: %

2738: The ground state properties and the long-distance

2739: behavior of some correlation functions have 

2740: already been investigated in~\cite{BKZ} with the aid of

2741: the root density method and conformal field theory.

2742: %

2743: Here we slightly modify the formulation of~\cite{BKZ} 

2744: for direct comparison of our results with 

2745: the prediction from CFT.

2746: %

2747: The ground state properties and low-lying excitations

2748: considered here are characterized by the BAE 

2749: %

2750: \begin{align}

2751: &\Biggl[\frac{\sin(\lambda_j+(\frac{\alpha}{2}+1)\gamma i)

2752:              \sin(\lambda_j+\frac{\alpha}{2}\gamma i)}

2753:             {\sin(\lambda_j-(\frac{\alpha}{2}+1)\gamma i)

2754:              \sin(\lambda_j-\frac{\alpha}{2}\gamma i)}

2755:              \Biggr]^L =\prod_{k=1}^{N_{\downarrow}}

2756:             \frac{\sin(\lambda_j-\Lambda_k+i \gamma)}

2757:                  {\sin(\lambda_j-\Lambda_k-i \gamma)}, \nn \\

2758: &\prod_{j=1}^{N_{\rm e}/2}

2759:             \frac{\sin(\Lambda_k-\lambda_j+i \gamma)}

2760:                  {\sin(\Lambda_k-\lambda_j-i \gamma)}=

2761: -\prod_{l=1}^{N_{\downarrow}}

2762:             \frac{\sin(\Lambda_k-\Lambda_l+i \gamma)}

2763:                  {\sin(\Lambda_k-\Lambda_l-i \gamma)},

2764: \label{RBAE}

2765: \end{align}

2766: %

2767: where $N_{\rm e}$ and $N_{\downarrow}$ denote the

2768: total number of electrons and the number of

2769: down-spin electrons, respectively.

2770: % 

2771: We derive directly the above equation

2772: from the fact that the ground state energy is described

2773: by 2-string electron rapidities, and hence

2774: shifting the rapidities $\lambda_j\to\lambda_j+ i \gamma/2$,

2775: $\lambda_{j+1}\to\lambda_j-i\gamma/2$ in eq.(6) in~\cite{BKZ}.

2776: %

2777: The  ground state energy can be written as

2778: %

2779: \begin{align}

2780: E_0&=-2\sum_{j=1}^{N_{\rm e}/2}[\cos(k(\lambda_{j}+i \gamma/2))+

2781:                              \cos(k(\lambda_{j}-i \gamma/2))] \nn \\

2782:  &=-2\sum_{j=1}^{N_{\rm e}/2}

2783:  \Biggl[2\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma+\frac{\psi(\lambda_j)+

2784:         \psi(-\lambda_j)}{2}\Biggr],  

2785: %P&=\sum_{j=1}^{N_{\rm e}/2}[k(\lambda_j+i\gamma/2)+

2786: %                           k(\lambda_j-i\gamma/2)], \nn

2787: \end{align}

2788: %

2789: where

2790: %

2791: \begin{equation}

2792: k(v)=\pi-2 \arctan\left(\frac{\tan v}

2793:                   {\tnh((\alpha+1)\gamma/2)}\right).

2794: \end{equation}

2795: %

2796: By solving the spin rapidities $\Lambda_{k}$ in terms

2797: of the charge rapidities $\lambda_j$, we obtain the

2798: density function $\varrho(v)$ in the thermodynamic limit,

2799: %

2800: \begin{equation}

2801: \varrho(v)=-\frac{\psi(v)+\psi(-v)}{\pi\sh(\alpha+1)\gamma}+

2802:          \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{C_1}k_1(v-x)\varrho(x)dx,

2803: \label{density}

2804: \end{equation}

2805: %

2806: where the Fermi points $\pm \Lambda_{\rm F}$ are

2807: determined from the subsidiary condition for 

2808: the total electron density $n_{\rm e}$

2809: %

2810: \begin{equation}

2811: \int_{C_1}\varrho(x) dx=n_{\rm e}.

2812: \label{defdens}

2813: \end{equation}

2814: %

2815: Hence the ground state energy per site $\varepsilon_0$ 

2816: is expressed in terms of the density function

2817: %

2818: \begin{equation}

2819: \varepsilon_0=-\int_{C_1}

2820: \left(2\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma+\frac{\psi(x)+\psi(-x)}{2}

2821: \right)\varrho(x) dx.

2822: \label{gs}

2823: \end{equation}

2824: %

2825: %

2826: The dressed energy $\varepsilon(v)$

2827: %

2828: \begin{equation}

2829: \varepsilon(v)=\varepsilon^{(0)}(v)+

2830: \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{C_1}k_1(v-x)\varepsilon(x)dx,

2831: \label{d-energy}

2832: \end{equation}

2833: characterizes the low-lying excitations.

2834: %

2835: Here the bare energy function $\varepsilon^{(0)}(v)$ is

2836: defined by (as in \eqref{bareenerg})

2837: %

2838: \begin{equation}

2839: \varepsilon^{(0)}(v)=-\psi(v)-\psi(-v)-2\mu.

2840: \label{bareenerg}

2841: \end{equation}

2842: %

2843: Note that the chemical potential is shifted by

2844: $\mu+2\ch(\alpha+1)\gamma\to\mu$.

2845: %

2846: The condition

2847: %

2848: \begin{equation}

2849: \varepsilon(\pm \Lambda_{\rm F})=0,

2850: \label{defchem}

2851: \end{equation}

2852: %

2853: provides another way to define 

2854: the Fermi points $\pm \Lambda_{\rm F}$ for given

2855: chemical potential $\mu$.

2856: %

2857: %

2858: \begin{figure}[htb]

2859: \begin{center}

2860: \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{Correlationtlow.eps}

2861: \end{center}

2862: \caption{Numerical results for the correlations 

2863: based on CFT ($T\ll1$).

2864: The density-density correlations, singlet superconducting

2865: pair correlations and the sub-dominant density-density

2866: correlations correspond to the quantum numbers

2867: $(n_{\rm c}, d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})=(0,\pm1,0,0)$, 

2868: $(\pm1,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0)$ ($(0,0,0.1)$), respectively.}

2869: \label{lowtemp}

2870: \end{figure}%

2871: %

2872: 

2873: 

2874: As mentioned in section~4, 

2875: we observe massless excitations described

2876: by quantum numbers $(n_{\rm c},d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})$.

2877: %

2878: Using the concept of CFT,

2879: one obtains the correlation functions for 

2880: primary fields as

2881: %

2882: \begin{equation}

2883: \langle\phi_{\varDelta^{\pm}}(x)\phi_{\varDelta^{\pm}}(0)

2884: \rangle=\frac{\exp(-2i d_{\rm c}k_{\rm F})}

2885: {x^{2({\varDelta^{+}+\varDelta^{-}})}},

2886: \label{algdecay}

2887: \end{equation}

2888: %

2889: where $\varDelta^{\pm}$ are the conformal dimensions

2890: of the primary operators

2891: %

2892: \begin{equation}

2893: \varDelta^{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{n_{\rm c}}{Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})}\pm

2894:                  \frac{d_{\rm c}}{2}Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})\right)^2+n^{\pm}.

2895: \label{conformald}

2896: \end{equation}

2897: %

2898: Here the function $Z(\Lambda_{\rm F})$ denotes the dressed charge

2899: determined from the integral equation

2900: %

2901: \begin{equation}

2902: Z(v)=2+\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{C_1}k_1(v-x)Z(x)dx.

2903: \label{d-charge}

2904: \end{equation}

2905: %

2906: 

2907: For finite temperatures in the scaling limit ($0<T\ll1$), where conformal 

2908: invariance is valid, the correlation functions  are obtained from

2909: the $T=0$ case by 

2910: the following replacement~\cite{FK} in~\eqref{algdecay},

2911: %

2912: \begin{equation}

2913: x\to\frac{v_{\rm F}\beta}{\pi}\sh\frac{\pi  x}{\beta v_{\rm F}},

2914: \end{equation}

2915: %

2916: where $v_{\rm F}$ is the Fermi velocity 

2917: defined by  

2918: %

2919: \begin{equation}

2920: v_{\rm F}=\frac{\varepsilon^{\prime}(-\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2921:              {\pi \varrho(v)}

2922:            =-\frac{\varepsilon^{\prime}(\Lambda_{\rm F})}

2923:              {\pi \varrho(v)}.

2924: \label{fermiv}

2925: \end{equation}

2926: %

2927: %

2928: Thus the long-distance behavior of the correlation 

2929: functions $G(x)$ is given by

2930: %

2931: \begin{equation}

2932: G(x)\sim \cos(2k_{\rm F}d_{\rm c}x)\exp

2933: \left(-\frac{2\pi (\varDelta^{+}+\varDelta^{-}) x}

2934:      {\beta v_{\rm F}}\right),

2935: \end{equation}

2936: %

2937: Fitting this with $G(x)\sim\exp(-x/\xi)$, one obtains

2938: the correlation lengths $\xi$ at $T\ll 1$

2939: %

2940: \begin{equation}

2941: \xi=\frac{\beta v_{\rm F}}{2\pi(\varDelta^{+}+\varDelta^{-})}.

2942: \label{asymptcor2}

2943: \end{equation}

2944: %

2945: The numerical results of~\eqref{asymptcor2} 

2946: are shown in Fig.~\ref{lowtemp} for 

2947: $(n_{\rm c}, d_{\rm c},n^{+},n^{-})=(0,\pm1,0,0)$, 

2948: $(\pm1,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0)$ ($(0,0,0,1)$). 

2949: %

2950: These low temperature asymptotics of the correlation

2951: lengths are consistent with~\eqref{asymptcor1}.

2952: %

2953: %

2954: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2955: %Appendix B

2956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2957: %

2958: \rnc{\theequation}{B.\arabic{equation}}\setcounter{equation}{0}

2959: %

2960: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2961: \section*{Appendix B\,\, Derivation of  NLIE for 

2962: largest eigenvalue}

2963: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2964: %

2965: Here we derive the NLIE for the largest eigenvalue

2966: by using the auxiliary functions defined by~\eqref{aux}.

2967: %

2968: The derivation is applicable to the general

2969: eigenvalues after a simple modification of the integration

2970: contours.

2971: %

2972: 

2973: The auxiliary functions are defined by certain 

2974: combinations of $\lambda_j(x)$ ($1\le j\le4$):

2975: %

2976: \begin{alignat}{3}

2977: &\mfa_0(v)=\frac{\lambda_1(x)(\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x))}

2978:                {\lambda_2(x)\Lambda(x)}, &\quad&

2979: &\mfA_0(v)=\frac{(\lambda_1(x)+\lambda_2(x))

2980:                         (\lambda_2(x)+\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x))}

2981:                {\lambda_2(x)\Lambda(x)}, \nn \db

2982: &\mfab_0(v)=\frac{\lambda_2(x)}{\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)}, &\quad&

2983: &\mfAb_0(v)=\frac{\lambda_2(x)+\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)}

2984:                               {\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)}, \nn \db

2985: &\mfa_1(v)=\frac{\lambda_1(x)}{\lambda_2(x)+\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)}, 

2986: &\quad&

2987: &\mfA_1(v)=\frac{\Lambda(x)}

2988:                            {\lambda_2(x)+\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)},

2989: \label{aux2}

2990: \end{alignat}

2991: where $x=v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma$.

2992: %

2993: Note that the eigenvalues are written in the following form

2994: %

2995: \begin{equation}

2996: \Lambda(v)=\lambda_1(v)+\lambda_2(v)+\lambda_3(v)+\lambda_4(v).

2997: \label{eigenlam}

2998: \end{equation}

2999: %

3000: Using the definition of $\lambda_j(x)$, we can write

3001: %

3002: \begin{equation}

3003: \lambda_1(x)+\lambda_2(x)=

3004: \frac{q_1(x+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))}

3005:      {q_1(x+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)}\left\{

3006:      \phi_1(x)e^{2\mu\beta}+\phi_2(v)

3007:      \frac{q_2(x+i\gamma)}{q_2(x)}e^{\mu\beta}\right\}.

3008: \label{lam1}

3009: \end{equation}

3010: %

3011: One finds that function~\eqref{lam1} has poles stemming from

3012: $q_2(x)$.

3013: %

3014: Due to the BAE~\eqref{BAE}, the poles from $q_1(x+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)$

3015: must be canceled out.

3016: %

3017: Hence the second factor in~\eqref{lam1}

3018: must take the following form

3019: %

3020: \begin{align}

3021: &\phi_1(x)e^{2\mu\beta}+\phi_2(v)

3022:      \frac{q_2(x+i\gamma)}{q_2(x)}e^{\mu\beta} \propto 

3023:  \frac{\sh^{\frac{N}{2}}(ix+u_N)q_1(x+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)

3024:        q_2^{h}(x)}{\phi_{+}(x)

3025:        \sh^{\frac{N}{2}}(ix-u_N-\alpha\gamma)q_2(x)}, \nn \db

3026: &\phi_{+}(x)=[\sh(ix+u_N+\alpha\gamma)

3027:           \sh(ix+u_N-(\alpha+1)\gamma)]^{\frac{N}{2}}.

3028: \label{lam2}

3029: \end{align}

3030: where the function $q^{h}_2(x)$ is a certain 

3031: analytic function which has $N+m-n$ zeros for the

3032: largest eigenvalue case.

3033: %

3034: Substituting~\eqref{lam2} for~\eqref{lam1}, 

3035: we obtain

3036: \begin{equation}

3037: \lambda_1(x)+\lambda_2(x) 

3038: \propto \frac{\sh^{\frac{N}{2}}(ix+u_N)q_1(x+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))

3039:        q_2^{h}(x)}

3040:  {\phi_{+}(x)\sh^{\frac{N}{2}}(ix-u_N-\alpha\gamma)

3041:   q_2(x)}.

3042: \label{lam3}

3043: \end{equation}

3044: %

3045: Similarly we find $\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x)$ can be

3046: written as

3047: %

3048: \begin{align}

3049: &\lambda_3(x)+\lambda_4(x) 

3050: \propto \frac{\sh^{\frac{N}{2}}(ix-u_N)q_1(x+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))

3051:        q_2^{h}(x-i\gamma)}

3052:  {\phi_{-}(x)\sh^{\frac{N}{2}}(ix+u_N-(\alpha+1)\gamma)q_2(x)}, \nn \db

3053: &\phi_{-}(x)=[\sh(ix-u_N-\alpha\gamma)

3054:               \sh(ix-u_N+(\alpha+1)\gamma)]^{\frac{N}{2}}.

3055: \end{align}

3056: %

3057: Thanks to the BAE~\eqref{BAE}, the eigenvalues~\eqref{eigenlam}

3058: are analytic functions (except for the trivial poles

3059: which derive from the vacuum functions in~\eqref{DVF}).

3060: %

3061: Thus the eigenvalues~\eqref{eigenlam} must take the form

3062: %

3063: \begin{equation}

3064: \Lambda(x)\propto

3065: \frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(2\alpha+1))q_1^{h}(x)}

3066: {\phi_{+}(x)\phi_{-}(x)},

3067: \label{auxeigen}

3068: \end{equation}

3069: %

3070: where $q_1^{h}(x)$ is an analytic function having

3071: $2N-n$ zeros for the largest eigenvalue case.

3072: %

3073: After shifting the parameter $x\to v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma$,

3074: we obtain the functional relations to be satisfied

3075: by certain combinations of the auxiliary functions

3076: %

3077: %

3078: \begin{align}

3079: &\mfa_0(v)\propto\frac{[\sh(iv-u_N+\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)

3080:                   \sh(iv+u_N-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2))]^{\frac{N}{2}}

3081:                  q_2^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha-2))}

3082:                  {q^{h}_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

3083:                   q_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))}, \nn \db

3084: &\mfab_0(v)\propto\frac{[\sh(iv+u_N-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)

3085:                   \sh(iv-u_N+\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2))]^{\frac{N}{2}}

3086:                  q_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))}

3087:                  {q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1))

3088:                   q_2^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha-2))}, \nn \db

3089: &\frac{\mfA_1(v)}{\mfa_1(v)}\propto

3090:                 \frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1))

3091:                       q_1^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha \gamma)}

3092:                      {\phi_{+}(v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha \gamma)

3093:                       \phi_{-}(v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha \gamma)},  

3094: \label{fr} \db

3095: &\mfA_0(v)\mfA_1(v)\propto

3096:       \frac{q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1))

3097:             q^{h}_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)}

3098:            {[\sh(iv+u_N+\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)

3099:                   \sh(iv-u_N-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)]^{\frac{N}{2}}

3100:             q_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))},\nn\db

3101: &\mfAb_0(v)\mfA_1(v)\propto

3102:         \frac{q^{h}_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)

3103:             q_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)}

3104:            {[\sh(iv+u_N+\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)

3105:                   \sh(iv-u_N-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)]^{\frac{N}{2}}

3106:             q^{h}_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))}.\nn

3107: \end{align}

3108: %

3109: %

3110: For the largest eigenvalue,

3111: we find  numerically the following analyticity properties:

3112: $q_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1))$, 

3113: $q_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)$ 

3114: ($q_1^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)$, 

3115: $q_2^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha-2))$)

3116: are analytic and non-zero in the upper (lower) half plane\footnote{

3117: In fact we also observe that $q_1^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)=

3118: q_1(-v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1))$ and 

3119: $q_2^{h}(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha-2))=q_2(-v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))$

3120: are valid in the largest eigenvalue case and some special 

3121: sub-leading ones.

3122: }, and $\lambda_2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)+\lambda_3(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)+

3123: \lambda_4(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma)$ is analytic and non-zero

3124: in the physical strip $-\frac{\gamma}{2}<\Im v<\frac{\gamma}{2}$.

3125: 

3126: %

3127: Because of these analyticity properties, we can take the logarithmic

3128: derivative and perform the Fourier transform on both sides

3129: of~\eqref{fr}.

3130: %

3131: Explicitly we find

3132: %

3133: %

3134: \begin{align}

3135: \widehat{\mfa}_0&=

3136:    \begin{cases}

3137:       -\widehat{q}_1^{h}e^{-k\gamma\alpha}+

3138:        \widehat{q}_2^{h}e^{-k\gamma(\alpha-2)}+

3139:        E(\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha-u_N)

3140:        &\text{for $k>0$} \\

3141: %

3142:        -\widehat{q}_2e^{k\gamma(\alpha+2)}

3143:        -E(-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)+u_N)

3144:         &\text{for $k<0$} \\

3145: %

3146:       -\widehat{q}_1^{h}

3147:       +\widehat{q}_2^{h}

3148:       -\widehat{q}_2

3149:        &\text{for $k=0$}

3150:    \end{cases},                         \nn \db

3151: %

3152: \widehat{\mfab}_0&=

3153:    \begin{cases}

3154:       -\widehat{q}_2^{h}e^{-k\gamma(\alpha-2)}+

3155:        E(\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)-u_N)

3156:        &\text{for $k>0$} \\

3157: %

3158:        -\widehat{q}_1e^{k\gamma(\alpha+1)}+

3159:         \widehat{q}_2e^{k\gamma(\alpha+2)}-

3160:         E(-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha+u_N)

3161:         &\text{for $k<0$} \\

3162: %

3163:       -\widehat{q}_2^{h}

3164:       -\widehat{q}_1

3165:       +\widehat{q}_2

3166:        &\text{for $k=0$}

3167:    \end{cases},                         \nn \db

3168: %

3169: \widehat{\mfA}_1-\widehat{\mfa}_1&= 

3170:     \begin{cases}

3171:        \widehat{q}_1^{h}e^{-k\gamma\alpha}-

3172:        E(\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha-u_N)-

3173:        E(\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)-u_N)

3174:        &\text{for $k>0$} \\

3175: %

3176:        \widehat{q}_1e^{k\gamma(\alpha+1)}+

3177:        E(-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha+u_N)+

3178:        E(-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)+u_N)

3179:         &\text{for $k<0$} \\

3180: %

3181:        \widehat{q}_1^{h}

3182:       +\widehat{q}_1

3183:        &\text{for $k=0$}

3184:    \end{cases},                         \nn \db

3185: %

3186: \widehat{\mfA}_0+\widehat{\mfA}_1&=     

3187:      \begin{cases}

3188:        \widehat{q}_2^{h}e^{-k\gamma\alpha}-

3189:        E(\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha+u_N)

3190:        &\text{for $k>0$} \\

3191: %

3192:         \widehat{q}_1e^{k\gamma(\alpha+1)}-

3193:         \widehat{q}_2e^{k\gamma(\alpha+2)}+

3194:         E(-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha-u_N)

3195:         &\text{for $k<0$} \\

3196: %

3197:        \widehat{q}_2^{h}

3198:       +\widehat{q}_1

3199:       -\widehat{q}_2

3200:        &\text{for $k=0$}

3201:    \end{cases},                         \nn \db

3202: %

3203: \widehat{\mfAb}_0+\widehat{\mfA}_1&=    

3204:    \begin{cases}

3205:        \widehat{q}_1^{h}e^{-k\gamma\alpha}-

3206:         \widehat{q}_2^{h}e^{-k\gamma(\alpha+2)}-

3207:        E(\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha+u_N)

3208:        &\text{for $k>0$} \\

3209: %

3210:         \widehat{q}_2e^{k\gamma\alpha}+

3211:         E(-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha-u_N)

3212:         &\text{for $k<0$} \\

3213: %

3214:        \widehat{q}_1^{h}-

3215:        \widehat{q}_2^{h}+

3216:        \widehat{q}_2

3217:        &\text{for $k=0$}

3218:    \end{cases},                

3219: \label{fourier1}       

3220: \end{align}

3221: %

3222: where we have adopted the notation $\hat f$ for the Fourier transform

3223: of the logarithmic derivative of a function $f(v)$, 

3224: %

3225: \begin{equation}

3226: \widehat{f}=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}

3227:           \left\{\frac{\partial}{\partial v} \ln f(v)\right\}e^{2i k v}dv,

3228: \qquad

3229: \frac{\partial}{\partial v} \ln f(v)=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}

3230:                        \widehat{f}e^{-2 i k v},

3231: \label{deffourier}

3232: \end{equation}

3233: %

3234: and $E(x):=i N e^{-2 k x}$.

3235: %

3236: Applying this procedure to the eigenvalue~\eqref{eigenlam},

3237: we have

3238: %

3239: \begin{equation}

3240: \widehat{\Lambda}=

3241:    \begin{cases}

3242:        \widehat{q}_1^{h}-

3243:        E((\alpha+1)\gamma-u_N)-

3244:        E(\alpha\gamma+u_N)

3245:        &\text{for $k>0$} \\

3246: %

3247:        \widehat{q}_1e^{k\gamma(2\alpha+1)}+

3248:        E(-(\alpha+1)\gamma+u_N)+

3249:        E(-\alpha\gamma-u_N)

3250:         &\text{for $k<0$} \\

3251: %

3252:       \widehat{q}_1^{h}

3253:       +\widehat{q}_1^{h}

3254:        &\text{for $k=0$}

3255:    \end{cases}.

3256: \end{equation}

3257: %

3258: %

3259: %

3260: {}From the last two equations in~\eqref{fourier1},

3261: we find the Fourier modes  $\widehat{q}_1$, $\widehat{q}_2$, 

3262: $\widehat{q}_1^{h}$ and $\widehat{q}_2^{h}$ 

3263: can be expressed in terms of $\widehat{\mfA}_0$,

3264: $\widehat{\mfAb}_0$ and $\widehat{\mfA}_1$.

3265: %

3266: Substituting them for the first three equations 

3267: in~\eqref{fourier1} and integrating over $v$

3268: after performing the inverse

3269: Fourier transform~\eqref{deffourier},

3270: we arrive at

3271: %

3272: %

3273: %

3274: \begin{align}

3275: %

3276: \ln\mfa_0(v)&=

3277: \psi_N(v)+k_0*\ln\mfAb_0(v)+k_0*\ln\mfA_1(v)+\beta\mu, 

3278:                             \nn \db           

3279: %

3280: \ln\mfab_0(v)&=

3281: \psi_N(-v)+\overline{k}_0*\ln\mfA_0(v)+

3282:               \overline{k}_0*\ln\mfA_1(v)+\beta\mu, \nn \db

3283: %

3284: \ln\mfa_1(v)&=\psi_N(v)+

3285: \psi_N(-v)+\overline{k}_0*\ln\mfA_0(v)+

3286:              k_0*\ln\mfAb_0(v)+

3287:               k_1*\ln\mfA_1(v)+2\beta\mu, \nn\db

3288: \psi_N(v)&=\frac{N}{2}

3289:         \ln\frac{\sh(iv-u_N+\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)

3290:                  \sh(iv+u_N-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2))}

3291:                 {\sh(iv+u_N+\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha)

3292:                  \sh(iv-u_N-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2))}.

3293: \label{nlief}

3294: \end{align}

3295: %

3296: %

3297: where the integration contours for the convolutions 

3298: with $\ln\mfA_0$, $\ln\mfAb_0$ and $\ln\mfA_1$

3299: are taken by the straight line

3300: with the imaginary part $-\delta$, 

3301: $+\delta$ and $0$

3302: ($\delta$ is arbitrary but fixed

3303: in the range $0<\delta<\gamma/2$), 

3304: respectively. 

3305: %

3306: In the same way, we obtain

3307: %

3308: %

3309: %

3310: \begin{align}

3311: &\ln\Lambda^{\rm max}(v)=\Psi_N(v)+

3312:                  \zeta*\ln\mfA_0(v)+

3313:                \overline{\zeta}*\ln\mfAb_0(v)+

3314:               (\zeta+\overline{\zeta})*\ln\mfA_1(v), \nn \db

3315: &\Psi_N(v)=\frac{N}{2}

3316:         \ln\frac{\sh(iv+u_N+\gamma(\alpha+1))

3317:                  \sh(iv-u_N-\gamma(\alpha+1))}

3318:                 {\sh(iv-u_N+\gamma(\alpha+1))

3319:                  \sh(iv+u_N-\gamma(\alpha+1))}.

3320: \label{eignf}

3321: \end{align}

3322: %

3323: %

3324: %

3325: In these NLIE, we can take the Trotter limit $N\to\infty$

3326: analytically.

3327: \begin{equation}

3328: \lim_{N\to\infty}\psi_N(v)=\psi(v),\qquad

3329: \lim_{N\to\infty}\Psi_N(v)=\Psi(v).

3330: \end{equation}

3331: %

3332: We have determined the integration constants 

3333: $\beta \mu$, $2\beta\mu$ in~\eqref{nlielgst} 

3334: and 0 in~\eqref{largest} by taking

3335: the limit $|iv|\to\infty$~\footnote{

3336: Note that we take this limit by making use of 

3337: analytic continuation of the NLIEs (see Appendix D).

3338: } and comparing the results with

3339: %

3340: \begin{equation}

3341: \mfa_0\to\frac{e^{\beta\mu}}{e^{\beta \mu}+1},\quad

3342: \mfab_0\to\frac{e^{\beta\mu}}{e^{\beta \mu}+1}, \quad

3343: \mfa_1\to\frac{e^{2\beta\mu}}{2e^{\beta\mu}+1},

3344: \qquad \Lambda\to (e^{\beta\mu}+1)^2.

3345: \end{equation}

3346: %

3347: 

3348: %

3349: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3350: %Appendix C

3351: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3352: %

3353: \rnc{\theequation}{C.\arabic{equation}}\setcounter{equation}{0}

3354: %

3355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3356: \section*{Appendix C\,\, Derivation of  NLIE for excited

3357: states}

3358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3359: %

3360: %

3361: %

3362: Here we consider the excited states 

3363: characterizing the correlations

3364: which are discussed in the main text.

3365: %

3366: As mentioned in section~3, the excited 

3367: states are described by certain 

3368: distribution patterns of additional 

3369: zeros and poles which enter the physical strip.

3370: %

3371: To derive the NLIEs, we must

3372: explore these zeros and poles.

3373: %

3374: By taking the integration contours 

3375: in a way that they circumvent the zeros

3376: in the physical strip,

3377: we can derive the NLIEs directly by 

3378: utilizing the above results for the 

3379: largest eigenvalue. 

3380: 

3381: Taking the integration contours of the 

3382: convolutions in~\eqref{nlief} as in

3383: Fig.~\ref{contourgrpht} (and subsequent figures), we have the same 

3384: algebraic structure of NLIEs as in~\eqref{nlief} without 

3385: additive terms.

3386: %

3387: This is true at least in the case of the intermediate (differentiated)

3388: version of \eqref{nlief} where $\ln\mfa$, $\ln\mfA$, $\psi_N$ are

3389: replaced by $(\ln\mfa)'$, $(\ln\mfA)'$, $\psi'_N$. 

3390: 

3391: When integrating

3392: the NLIEs with respect to the argument we want to make sure that the

3393: convolutions are understood in the manner

3394: $k\ast(\ln\mfA)'(v):=\int_{\cl}k(x)(\ln\mfA)'(v-x)dx$ with a

3395: $v$-independent path $\cl$. This can always be achieved with $\cl$ 

3396: starting (ending) at $-\pi/2$ ($+\pi/2$) and suitable deformations

3397: in order to avoid the singularities. The integration with respect to

3398: $v$ and up to an integration constant yields a set of NLIEs which has

3399: the same algebraic structure as in the case of the largest eigenvalue

3400: where now terms 

3401: $k\ast\ln\mfA(v)=\int_{\cl}k(x)\ln\mfA(v-x)dx$ appear with deformed

3402: contours. Alternatively, we can straighten the contours 

3403: and due to Cauchy's theorem obtain additional terms from the singularities 

3404: of the auxiliary functions (these are the ``$\sin$''-terms below).

3405: 

3406: On top of these terms we obtain a second set of additional terms.

3407: Note that the functions $\ln\mfA_0(v)$ and

3408: $\ln\mfA_1(v)$ are not periodic:

3409: $\ln\mfA_0(\pi/2)-\ln\mfA_0(-\pi/2)=2\pi i$ and

3410: $\ln\mfA_1(\pi/2)-\ln\mfA_1(-\pi/2)=2\pi i$ for

3411: the one-particle Green functions and

3412: $\ln\mfA_0(\pi/2)-\ln\mfA_0(-\pi/2)=4\pi i$ and

3413: $\ln\mfA_1(\pi/2)-\ln\mfA_1(-\pi/2)=4\pi i$ for

3414: the triplet superconducting pair correlations.

3415: Further note that

3416: $k\ast\ln\mfA(v)=\int_{\cl}k(x)\ln\mfA(v-x)dx =\int_{v-\cl}k(v-x)\ln\mfA(x)dx$ which in the general case (non-periodic

3417: $\ln\mfA$) is different from $\int_{-\cl}k(v-x)\ln\mfA(x)dx$. 

3418: For many numerical applications

3419: we actually like to have convolutions of the last type where the auxiliary 

3420: functions are evaluated on fixed (straight) contours. The difference 

3421: of the two versions of convolution integrals can be worked out and

3422: gives rise to the ``$\cos$''-terms below.

3423: %

3424: 

3425: %

3426: By use of

3427: the analytic continuation of the NLIE (see Appendix~D),

3428: one determines the integration constants in a manner similar

3429: to the largest eigenvalue case.

3430: 

3431: %

3432: We want to categorize the additional zeros and poles of the

3433: auxiliary functions 

3434: in the following four cases of excitations:

3435: (1)~the one-particle Green functions

3436: and the triplet superconducting pair correlations,

3437: (2)~the density-density (longitudinal)

3438: correlations,

3439: (3)~the transversal spin-spin correlations

3440: and (4)~the singlet superconducting 

3441: pair correlations.

3442: \\\\

3443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3444: {\bf(1) One-particle Green function and

3445: triplet superconducting pair correlations}\\\\

3446: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3447: %

3448: %

3449: First we consider the NLIE for the

3450: one-particle Green functions 

3451: $\langle c_{j,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{i,\sigma}\rangle$.

3452: In this case, the eigenvalues~\eqref{DVF}

3453: belong to the sector $n=N-1$ and $m=N/2-1$.

3454: %

3455: {}From the numerical calculations with

3456: finite Trotter number $N$, we observe 

3457: additional zeros, namely a zero

3458:  $\theta_0$ of the auxiliary function

3459: $\mfA_0(v)$ and a  zero $\theta_1$ of

3460: $\mfA_1(v)$ located in the lower half plane.

3461: %

3462: %

3463: The zeros $\theta_0$ and $\theta_1$

3464: are derived from 

3465: %

3466: \begin{equation}

3467: \lambda_2\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3468: \lambda_3\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3469: \lambda_4\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,

3470: \quad q^h_1\left(\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0.

3471: \label{zgrpht}

3472: \end{equation}

3473: %

3474: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3475: \begin{figure}[t]

3476: \begin{center}

3477: \contourgr

3478: \contourspt

3479: \end{center}

3480: \caption{Integration contours for (a) the one-particle Green

3481: function

3482: and  (b) the triplet superconducting pair correlations.

3483: Here $\cl_0$, $\overline{\cl}_0$ and $\cl_1$ denote the

3484: contours for $\mfA_0$, $\mfAb_0$ and $\mfA_1$, respectively.}

3485: \label{contourgrpht}

3486: \end{figure}

3487: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3488: %

3489: %

3490: %

3491: %

3492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3493: \begin{figure}[h]

3494: \begin{center}

3495: \contourdd

3496: \contoursl

3497: \end{center}

3498: \caption{Integration contours of the NLIE for

3499: (a) the dominant and (b) sub-dominant contributions to

3500: the density-density correlations.}

3501: \label{contourdd}

3502: \end{figure}

3503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3504: %

3505: %!! Here and after the c,d,e,f in the figures should be replaced by a,b

3506: %

3507: 

3508: In the case for the triplet superconducting

3509: pair correlations 

3510: $\langle c_{j+1,\uparrow}^{\dagger}c_{j,\uparrow}^{\dagger}

3511: c_{i+1,\downarrow}c_{i,\downarrow}\rangle$, the corresponding

3512: eigenvalues~\eqref{DVF} describing these

3513: correlations belong to the sector $n=N-2$ and $m=N/2-2$.

3514: Numerically we observe additional parameters:

3515: %

3516: zeros $\theta_0$, $-\theta^{\ast}_0$ for the 

3517: function $\mfA_0(v)$ and zeros

3518: $\theta_1$, $-\theta^{\ast}_1$

3519: function $\mfA_1(v)$

3520: appear in the lower half plane

3521: (the symbol $*$ denotes complex conjugation).

3522: %

3523: As for the one-particle Green function,

3524: the zeros $\theta_0$ ($-\theta^{\ast}_0$)

3525: and $\theta_1$ ($\theta^{\ast}_1$)

3526:  satisfy the first

3527: and the second equation in~\eqref{zgrpht},

3528: respectively.

3529: \\\\

3530: %

3531: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3532: {\bf(2) Density-density correlations }\\\\

3533: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3534: %

3535: %

3536: Let us consider the NLIEs for the density-density

3537: correlations $\langle n_j n_i\rangle$.

3538: %

3539: The eigenvalues~\eqref{DVF} belong

3540: to the sector $n=N$ and $m=N/2$ which is the

3541: same sector as for the largest eigenvalue.

3542: %

3543: %

3544: These correlations are described by the distribution

3545: patterns of a zero $\theta_0$ ($-\theta_0$) and 

3546: a pole $\theta_1$ ($-\theta_1$) of the auxiliary function

3547: $\mfA_0(v)$ ($\mfAb_0(v)$) appearing in the physical

3548: strip.

3549: %

3550: In this case, these zeros  and poles are derived from 

3551: %

3552: \begin{align}

3553: &q_2^{h}\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\quad

3554: q_2\left(-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\nn \db

3555: &q^h_1\left(\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\quad

3556: q_1\left(-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1)\right)=0.

3557: \label{zdd}

3558: \end{align}

3559: %

3560: %

3561: In addition,

3562: we can consider the 

3563: sub-dominant terms described by simple 

3564: particle-hole excitations at each Fermi 

3565: point (see section~4).

3566: %

3567: These sub-dominant terms are determined from

3568: zeros $\theta_0$ ($\theta^{\ast}_0$)  

3569: for $\mfA_0(v)$ ($\mfAb_0(v)$) and

3570: $\theta_1$, $\theta_1^{\ast}$ for 

3571: $\mfA_1(v)$, respectively.

3572: %

3573: These zeros and poles satisfy eq.~\eqref{zdd} 

3574: (replace  $-\theta_1$ and $-\theta_0$ by

3575: $-\theta_1\to\theta^{\ast}_1$ and $-\theta_0\to\theta^{\ast}_0$,

3576: respectively).

3577: %

3578: Taking the integration contours as in

3579: Fig.~\ref{contourdd}, we arrive at NLIEs

3580: which have the same form as in~\eqref{nlief}.

3581: %

3582: For both cases, we take the convolutions

3583: in the ordinary way, i.e. as for the 

3584: largest eigenvalue.\\\\

3585: %

3586: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3587: {\bf(3) Transversal spin-spin correlations}\\\\

3588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3589: %

3590: %

3591: %

3592: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3593: \begin{figure}[t]

3594: \begin{center}

3595: \contourst

3596: \end{center}

3597: \caption{Integration contours of the NLIE for

3598: the transversal spin-spin correlations.}

3599: \label{contourst}

3600: \end{figure}%

3601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3602: %

3603: %

3604: Let us consider the eigenvalues which

3605: describe the transversal spin-spin correlations 

3606: $\langle\sigma_j^{+}\sigma_i^{-}\rangle$.

3607: %

3608: The eigenvalues~\eqref{DVF} belong to the

3609: sector $n=N$ and $m=N/2-1$.

3610: %

3611: Making use of numerical calculations,

3612: we observe  additional zeros $\theta_0$

3613: ($-\theta_0$) and poles $\theta_1$ 

3614: ($-\theta_1$) of the auxiliary function

3615: $\mfA_0(v)$ ($\mfAb_0(v)$) appear in  the

3616: lower (upper) half plane.

3617: %

3618: As in case~(1), these zeros and poles get 

3619: close to but never 

3620: cross the real axis in the low temperature limit.

3621: %

3622: These additional zeros (poles) are derived from

3623: %

3624: %

3625: \begin{align}

3626: &\lambda_2\left(\pm\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3627: \lambda_3\left(\pm\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3628: \lambda_4\left(\pm\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\nn\db

3629: &q^h_1\left(\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\qquad

3630: q_1\left(-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1)\right)=0.

3631: \label{zst}

3632: \end{align}

3633: %

3634: %

3635: %

3636: %

3637: We derive the NLIEs by taking the contours as

3638: in Fig.~\ref{contourst}.

3639: %

3640: %

3641: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3642: \begin{figure}[t]

3643: \begin{center}

3644: \contourspsh

3645: \contourspsl

3646: \end{center}

3647: \caption{Integration contours of the NLIE for

3648: the singlet superconducting pair correlations

3649: for $T>T_c$ (a) and for $T<T_c$ (b).}

3650: \label{contoursps}

3651: \end{figure}%

3652: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3653: %

3654: %%

3655: %

3656: \\\\

3657: %

3658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3659: {\bf(4) Singlet superconducting pair correlations}\\\\

3660: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3661: %

3662: We consider 

3663: the singlet superconducting pair correlations

3664: $\langle c_{j+1,\uparrow}^{\dagger}c_{j,\downarrow}^{\dagger}

3665: c_{i+1,\uparrow}c_{i,\downarrow}\rangle$.

3666: %

3667: In this case,

3668: the eigenvalues written as~\eqref{DVF} belong

3669: to the sector $n=N-2$ and $m=N/2-1$.

3670: %

3671: These correlations are described by the distribution

3672: patterns of zeros $\theta_0$, $\overline{\theta}_0$, 

3673: $\widetilde{\theta}_0$ and poles

3674: $\theta_1$, $-\theta^{\ast}_1$ of the auxiliary function

3675: $\mfA_0(v)$.

3676: %

3677: Numerically we observe that the zero $\widetilde{\theta}_0$ is

3678: located on the $\pm\pi/2$--axis ($\Re v=\pm \pi/2$) and 

3679: moves to the real axis with decreasing temperature. 

3680: %

3681: At sufficiently high temperatures, the zeros $\theta_0$ and $\thetab_0$ 

3682: are related by $\thetab_0=-\theta^{\ast}_0$ and 

3683: get close to the boundary ($\pm\pi/2$--axis)

3684: with decreasing temperature.

3685: %

3686: At a certain temperature $T_c$, the zeros $\theta_0$,

3687: $\thetab_0$ and $\theta^{\ast}_0$ satisfy

3688: $\theta_0=\thetab_0=\theta^{\ast}_0$.

3689: %

3690: Below $T_c$, the relation $\thetab_0=-\theta^{\ast}_0$

3691: is no longer valid, and these zeros are located on

3692: the $\pi/2$--axis  satisfying

3693: the relation $\Im \thetab_0<\Im \widetilde{\theta}_0<\Im \theta_0$.

3694: %

3695: $\widetilde{\theta}_0$ and $\theta_0$ move upwards (into

3696: $+i$ direction along the $\pi/2$--axis), 

3697: opposite to this $\thetab_0$ moves into $-i$ direction.

3698: %

3699: In the low temperature limit, $\widetilde{\theta}_0$ comes near

3700: to the real axis but never crosses it.

3701: %

3702: On the other hand $\theta_0$ enters  the

3703: upper half plane and finally leaves the physical strip.

3704: %

3705: $\thetab_0$ also leaves the physical strip in the

3706: lower half plane.

3707: %

3708: Consequently at low temperature, only $\theta_1$ and $-\theta^{\ast}_1$ 

3709: (zeros of $\mfA_1(v)$) are circumvented by the integration contour 

3710: of $\mfA_1(v)$

3711: and these zeros characterize 

3712: the massless pair-excitations (see section~4).

3713: %

3714: 

3715: Due to this behavior, we must take different integration contours

3716: for the different regimes $T>T_c$ and $T<T_c$.

3717: %

3718: %

3719: %

3720: %

3721: These zeros are derived from

3722: %

3723: \begin{align}

3724: &\lambda_2\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3725: \lambda_3\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3726: \lambda_4\left(\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\nn \db

3727: &\lambda_2\left(\thetab_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3728: \lambda_3\left(\thetab_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)+

3729: \lambda_4\left(\thetab_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\nn \db

3730: &q^{h}_2(\widetilde{\theta_0})=0, \quad

3731: q^h_1\left(\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha\right)=0,\quad

3732: q_1\left(-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+1)\right)=0.

3733: \label{zsps}

3734: \end{align}

3735: %

3736: We derive the NLIEs by taking the integration contours

3737: as in Fig.~\ref{contoursps}a  for the case $T>T_c$

3738: and as in Fig.~\ref{contoursps}b for the case $T<T_c$ .\\\\

3739: %

3740: {\bf Additional terms in the NLIEs}\\\\

3741: % 

3742: As mentioned above, we obtain the same structure of NLIEs as

3743: in the case of the largest eigenvalue by taking the integration

3744: contours of the convolutions in a way that they circumvent

3745: the zeros.

3746: %

3747: %!! Did I write what you meant?

3748: %

3749: To solve the NLIEs numerically, we are forced to use straight

3750: integration contours. Due to Cauchy's theorem in this

3751: formulation we obtain certain additional terms in the NLIEs.

3752: %

3753: In the remainder we list the additional contributions to the driving

3754: terms in \eqref{nliegeneral} and \eqref{eigengeneral}.\\\\

3755: %

3756: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3757: {\bf (i) One-particle Green function}\\\\

3758: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3759: %

3760: %

3761: First we consider the one-particle Green function.

3762: %

3763: The corresponding NLIEs are characterized by the zeros

3764: $\theta_0$ and $\theta_1$.

3765: %

3766: In the low temperature limit, these parameters come near to the

3767: real axis but never enter the upper half plane.

3768: %

3769: {}From \eqref{zgrpht}, 

3770: we find that these parameters satisfy the subsidiary conditions

3771: %

3772: \begin{alignat}{3}

3773: \mfA_0(\theta_0)&=\mfAb_0(\theta_0)=0,

3774: &\qquad& \mfA_0(\theta_1)&=\infty, \nn \\

3775: \mfA_1(\theta_1)&=0,&\qquad& \mfA_1(\theta_0)&=\infty.

3776: \label{subgr}

3777: \end{alignat}

3778: %

3779: 

3780: Performing the Fourier transform and employing

3781: Cauchy's theorem, we determine the NLIE~\eqref{nliegeneral} with

3782: the following additional terms 

3783: %

3784: %

3785: \begin{align}

3786: &\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)=

3787:                \begin{cases}

3788:                      \frac{\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

3789:                      {\cos(v+i\delta)}

3790:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$}\\[2.5mm]

3791:                  \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-i \gamma)}

3792:                      {\sin(v-\theta_0)}

3793:                 & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$} 

3794:                 \end{cases}, \nn\db

3795: &\overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v)=

3796:                \begin{cases}

3797:                  \frac{\cos(v+i\delta)}

3798:                      {\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

3799:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3800:                    \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1)}

3801:                      {\sin(v-\theta_1-i\gamma)}

3802:                 & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}   

3803:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

3804: &\overline{\varphi}_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)

3805:                          \overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v), \quad

3806: \varphi_0(v)=\frac{\sin(v-\theta_1+i\gamma)}{\sin(v-\theta_1)},\quad

3807: \varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v).

3808: \label{addgr}

3809: \end{align}

3810: %

3811: The corresponding eigenvalues $\Lambda(v)$ are written 

3812: as~\eqref{eigengeneral} with the term $\chi(v)$

3813: (split into two terms $\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(1)}(v)$),

3814: %

3815: \begin{align}

3816: &\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(1)}(v), \nn \db

3817: &\chi^{(0)}(v)=\begin{cases}

3818:     \frac{\cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)}

3819:            {\cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)}

3820:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3821:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)}

3822:        {\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

3823:        &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$}              

3824: \end{cases}, \nn \db

3825: &\chi^{(1)}(v)= \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

3826:      {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))} \times

3827:      \begin{cases}

3828:        \frac{ \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)}

3829:         {\cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)}

3830:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3831:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

3832:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

3833:       &\text{for  $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}               

3834: \end{cases}.

3835: \label{addeigengr}

3836: \end{align}

3837: %

3838: In fact the NLIE~\eqref{nliegeneral} with the additional

3839: terms~\eqref{addgr} have two solutions. These two

3840: solutions are related to each other by taking the

3841: mirror image with respect to the imaginary axis.

3842: %

3843: Correspondingly, the eigenvalues $\Lambda(0)$ are

3844: doubly degenerate in magnitude and they are complex

3845: conjugate to each other.

3846: %

3847: The oscillatory behavior of the one-particle

3848: Green function (referred to as $k_{\rm F}$--oscillation

3849: at zero temperature) derives from this degeneracy.

3850: %

3851: The correlation length for the one-particle

3852: Green function is given 

3853: through formula~\eqref{correlation}.

3854: \\\\

3855: %

3856: %

3857: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3858: {\bf (ii) Triplet superconducting pair correlations}\\\\

3859: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3860: %

3861: We determine the additional terms for 

3862: the triplet superconducting pair correlations.

3863: %

3864: As mentioned above, these correlations are characterized 

3865: by the additional zeros $\theta_0$ and $\theta_1$.

3866: %

3867: In the low temperature limit,

3868: these zeros come near the real axis

3869: but never enter the upper half plane.

3870: %

3871: {}From \eqref{zgrpht}, one finds that these zeros satisfy

3872: %

3873: \begin{alignat}{3}

3874: \mfA_0(\theta_0)&=\mfA_0(-\theta^{\ast}_0)=

3875: \mfAb_0(\theta_0)=\mfAb_0(-\theta^{\ast}_0)=0,&\quad&

3876: \mfA_0(\theta_1)&=\mfA_0(-\theta^{\ast}_1)=\infty, \nn \db

3877: \mfA_1(\theta_1)&=\mfA_1(-\theta^{\ast}_1)=0,&\quad&

3878: \mfA_1(\theta_0)&=\mfA_1(-\theta^{\ast}_0)=\infty.

3879: \end{alignat}

3880: %

3881: 

3882: Performing the Fourier transform and employing

3883: Cauchy's theorem, we determine the NLIE~\eqref{nliegeneral} with

3884: the following additional terms

3885: %

3886: %

3887: \begin{align}

3888: &\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)=

3889:                \begin{cases}

3890:                      \frac{\cos^2(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

3891:                      {\cos^2(v+i\delta)}

3892:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3893:                    \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-i \gamma)

3894:                      \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_0-i \gamma)}

3895:                      {\sin(v-\theta_0)

3896:                       \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_0)}

3897:                 & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$}

3898:                  \end{cases}, \nn \db

3899: &\overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v)=

3900:                \begin{cases}

3901:                     \frac{\cos^2(v+i\delta)}

3902:                      {\cos^2(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

3903:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3904:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1)

3905:                           \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1)}

3906:                      {\sin(v-\theta_1-i\gamma)

3907:                       \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1-i\gamma)}

3908:                 & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$} 

3909:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

3910: %

3911: &\overline{\varphi}_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)

3912:                          \overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v), \quad

3913: \varphi_0(v)=\frac{\sin(v-\theta_1+i\gamma)

3914:                    \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1+i\gamma)}

3915:                   {\sin(v-\theta_1)\sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1)}, \nn \db

3916: &\varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v).

3917: \label{addpt}

3918: \end{align}

3919: %

3920: The corresponding eigenvalues $\Lambda(v)$ are written 

3921: as~\eqref{eigengeneral} with the term $\chi(v)$,

3922: %

3923: %

3924: \begin{align}

3925: &\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(1)}(v), \nn \db

3926: &\chi^{(0)}(v)=\begin{cases}

3927:     \frac{\cos^2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)}

3928:            {\cos^2(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)}

3929:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3930:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

3931:         \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)}

3932:        {\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

3933:         \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

3934:        &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$}              

3935: \end{cases},\db

3936: &\chi^{(1)}(v)=\frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

3937:       \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

3938:      {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

3939:       \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))} \nn \\

3940:    & \qquad\quad \times

3941:      \begin{cases}

3942:       \frac{ \cos^2(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)}

3943:         {\cos^2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)}

3944:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3945:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

3946:         \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

3947:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

3948:        \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}       

3949:       &\text{for  $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}               

3950: \end{cases}.

3951: \label{addeigenpt}

3952: \end{align}

3953: %

3954: \\\\

3955: %

3956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3957: {\bf (iii) Density-density (longitudinal spin-spin)

3958: correlations}\\\\

3959: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3960: %

3961: Next we determine the NLIE for the density-density 

3962: correlations.

3963: %

3964: As the critical exponents of the density-density correlation 

3965: functions are identical to those of the longitudinal

3966: spin-spin correlations $\langle\sigma_j^{z}\sigma_i^{z}\rangle$,

3967: the resultant NLIEs are also identical.

3968: %

3969: {}From~\eqref{zdd},

3970: we find these zeros satisfy the subsidiary

3971: conditions~\eqref{subdd1}.

3972: %

3973: \begin{equation}

3974: \mfA_0(\theta_0)=\mfAb_0(-\theta_0)=0,\quad

3975: \mfA_0(\theta_1)=\mfAb_0(-\theta_1)=\infty,\quad

3976: \mfA_1(\pm \theta_1)=0.

3977: \label{subdd1}

3978: \end{equation}

3979: %

3980: 

3981: Correspondingly, the additional terms in the 

3982: NLIE~\eqref{nliegeneral} read

3983: %

3984: \begin{align}

3985: &\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)=

3986:                \begin{cases}

3987:                    \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0)\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

3988:                     {\sin(v-\theta_0-i \gamma)\cos(v+i\delta)}

3989:                 & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3990:                    1

3991:                  & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0$}

3992:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

3993: &\overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v)= \frac{\sin(v+\theta_1-i \gamma)}

3994:                      {\sin(v+\theta_1)} \times

3995:                \begin{cases}

3996:                    \frac{\cos(v+i\delta)}

3997:                          {\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

3998:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

3999:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1)}

4000:                      {\sin(v-\theta_1-i\gamma)}

4001:                   & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}          

4002:                 \end{cases}. \nn \db

4003: %

4004: &\overline{\varphi}_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)

4005:                         \overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v), \quad

4006: \varphi_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}_0(-v),\quad

4007: \varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v).

4008: \label{adddd}

4009: \end{align}

4010: %

4011: The additional term $\chi(v)$ in~\eqref{eigengeneral}

4012: is determined from

4013: %

4014: %

4015: %

4016: \begin{align}

4017: &\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(1)}(v), \nn \db

4018: &\chi^{(0)}(v)=\begin{cases}

4019:       \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4020:         \sin(v+\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4021:         \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)

4022:         \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)}

4023:       {\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4024:       \sin(v+\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4025:       \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)

4026:         \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)}

4027:       &\text{for  $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$}         \\[2.5mm]    

4028:       1

4029:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0$}

4030: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4031: %

4032: &\chi^{(1)}(v)= \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4033:         \sin(v+\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4034:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4035:        \sin(v+\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))} \nn \\

4036:      &\qquad\quad\times

4037:       \begin{cases}

4038:       \frac{ \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)

4039:              \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)}

4040:            { \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)

4041:              \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)}

4042:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$}       \\[2.5mm]        

4043:   \frac{ \sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4044:          \sin(v+\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

4045:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4046:        \sin(v+\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4047:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$} 

4048: \end{cases}. 

4049: \label{addeignedd}

4050: \end{align}

4051: %

4052: %

4053: %

4054: In the low temperature limit,

4055: $\theta_1$ 

4056: gets close to the real axis but does not 

4057: cross it.

4058: %

4059: In contrast, $\theta_0$ crosses the real axis

4060: and enters the upper half

4061: plane.

4062: %

4063: Hence only one additional zero $\theta_1$

4064: appears explicitly in the above NLIE,

4065: which is characteristic of massless excitations 

4066: (see section~4). 

4067: %

4068: The solutions to the above NLIE have the 

4069: symmetry: $\mfab_0(v)=\mfa_0(-v)$ and

4070: $\mfa_1(v)$ is symmetric with respect

4071: to the imaginary axis.

4072: %

4073: %

4074: The NLIEs~\eqref{adddd} have two solutions which are

4075: connected with each other by taking the mirror image

4076: with respect to the imaginary axis.

4077: %

4078: %

4079: Hence the  corresponding eigenvalues $\Lambda(0)$

4080: are degenerate in magnitude; they are complex conjugate

4081: to each other.

4082: %

4083: {}Due to this degeneracy, the correlations have an

4084: oscillation factor. 

4085: %

4086: At zero temperature,

4087: this oscillatory behavior is the characteristic

4088: $2k_{\rm F}$-oscillation in the density-density correlations.

4089: 

4090: %

4091: The sub-dominant terms discussed above

4092: are characterized by another distribution pattern

4093: of zeros and poles.

4094: %

4095: Consequently, a zero $\theta_0$ ($\theta^{\ast}_0$)

4096: and a pole $\theta_1$ ($\theta^{\ast}_1$) of the 

4097: functions $\mfa_0(v)$ ($\mfab_0(v)$) appear in the 

4098: physical strip. 

4099: %

4100: {}From~\eqref{zdd} (replace  $-\theta_1$ and $-\theta_0$ by

4101: $-\theta_1\to\theta^{\ast}_1$ and $-\theta_0\to\theta^{\ast}_0$,

4102: respectively), 

4103: we find that these zeros and poles satisfy

4104: the subsidiary conditions

4105: %

4106: %

4107: \begin{equation}

4108: \mfA_0(\theta_0)=\mfAb_0(\theta^{\ast}_0)=0,\quad

4109: \mfA_0(\theta_1)=\mfAb_0(\theta^{\ast}_1)=\infty,\quad

4110: \mfA_1(\theta_1)=\mfA_1(\theta^{\ast}_1)=0.

4111: \label{subdd2}

4112: \end{equation}

4113: %

4114: In the same way as before

4115: one obtains the NLIEs characterized by the following

4116: additional terms 

4117: %

4118: \begin{align}

4119: &\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)=

4120:                \begin{cases}

4121:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0)\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4122:                      {\sin(v-\theta_0-i\gamma)\cos(v+i\delta)}

4123:                 & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4124:                    1

4125:                  & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0$}

4126:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4127: &\overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v)=\frac{\sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_1-i\gamma)}

4128:                      {\sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_1)}\times

4129:                \begin{cases}

4130:                      \frac{\cos(v+i\delta)}

4131:                          {\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4132:                   & \text{$\Im\theta_1<-\delta$}     \\[2.5mm]

4133:                    \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1)}

4134:                      {\sin(v-\theta_1-i\gamma)}

4135:                  & \text{for for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$} 

4136:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4137: %

4138: &\overline{\varphi}_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)

4139:                          \overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v), \quad

4140: \varphi_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{\ast}_0(v), \quad

4141: \varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v).

4142: \label{addsl}

4143: \end{align}

4144: %

4145: The term $\chi(v)$ in the eigenvalues~\eqref{eigengeneral}

4146: is written as

4147: %

4148: %

4149: %

4150: \begin{align}

4151: &\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(1)}(v), \nn \db

4152: &\chi^{(0)}(v)=\begin{cases}

4153:      \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4154:         \sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4155:          \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)

4156:         \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)}

4157:        {\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4158:         \sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4159:         \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)

4160:         \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)}

4161:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$}       \\[2.5mm]        

4162:       1

4163:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0$}

4164: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4165: %

4166: &\chi^{(1)}(v)= \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4167:         \sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4168:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

4169:        \sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))} \nn \\

4170:    &\qquad\quad  \times

4171:      \begin{cases}

4172:         \frac{ \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)

4173:              \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)}

4174:            { \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)

4175:              \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)}

4176:      &\text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$}    \\[2.5mm]

4177:      \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4178:         \sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

4179:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4180:        \sin(v-\theta^{\ast}_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4181:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}

4182: \end{cases}.

4183: \label{addeigensl}

4184: \end{align}

4185: %

4186: %

4187: At low temperatures, the parameter $\theta_1$

4188: (zero of the function $\mfA_1(v)$) 

4189: moves toward the real axis but never crosses it,

4190: whereas $\theta_0$ (zero of the function $\mfA_0(v)$) 

4191: crosses the real axis and enters the

4192: upper half plane.

4193: %

4194: In this limit, the NLIEs depend only 

4195: on the two zeros (of $\mfA_1(v)$) $\theta_1$

4196: and $\theta_1^{\ast}$, which characterize

4197: the particle-hole excitations 

4198: (see section~4).

4199: 

4200: Note that the solutions to the above NLIEs 

4201: satisfy $\mfa^{\ast}_0(v)=\mfab_0(v)$ and

4202: $\mfa_1(v)$ is symmetric with respect to

4203: the real axis but not to the imaginary axis.

4204: %

4205: Therefore $\mfa_1(v)$ is real for $v\in{\mathbb{R}}$.

4206: %

4207: The three NLIE are also reducible as in the dominant

4208: case.

4209: %

4210: The NLIE with~\eqref{addsl} admits two solutions.

4211: %

4212: In contrast to the above dominant case, they are

4213: related to each other by taking the mirror image with

4214: respect to the real axis.

4215: %

4216: The corresponding eigenvalues $\Lambda(0)$ 

4217: are degenerate and are real.

4218: %

4219: Hence

4220: one finds that the corresponding correlations do not

4221: have oscillatory terms.\\\\

4222: %

4223: %

4224: %

4225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4226: {\bf (iv) Transversal spin-spin correlations}\\\\

4227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4228: %

4229: Let us determine the additional terms of the NLIEs

4230: describing the transversal spin-spin correlations.

4231: %

4232: As mentioned above, these correlations are characterized by

4233: the zeros and poles satisfying eq.~\eqref{zst}.

4234: %

4235: Hence we find that these zeros (poles) 

4236: satisfy the following subsidiary conditions.

4237: %

4238: \begin{alignat}{3}

4239: &\mfA_0(\pm\theta_0)=\mfAb_0(\pm\theta_0)=0,&\qquad&

4240: &&\mfA_0(\theta_1)=\mfAb_0(-\theta_1)=\infty, \nn \\

4241: &\mfA_1(\pm \theta_1)=0,&\qquad&

4242: &&\mfA_1(\pm \theta_0)=\infty.

4243: \label{subst}

4244: \end{alignat}

4245: %

4246: Consequently, the additional terms are written as follows:

4247: %

4248: \begin{align}

4249: &\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)=

4250:                \begin{cases}

4251:                    \frac{\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4252:                         {\cos(v+i\delta)}

4253:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$}\\[2.5mm]

4254:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-i\gamma)}

4255:                      {\sin(v-\theta_0)}

4256:                 & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$} 

4257:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4258: &\overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v)= 

4259:                      \frac{\sin(v+\theta_1-i \gamma)}

4260:                      {\sin(v+\theta_1)}\times

4261:                \begin{cases}

4262:                    \frac{\cos(v+i\delta)}

4263:                         {\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4264:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$}  \\[2.5mm]

4265:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1)}

4266:                      {\sin(v-\theta_1-i\gamma)}

4267:                   & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}         

4268:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4269: %

4270: &\overline{\varphi}_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)

4271:                          \overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v), \quad

4272: \varphi_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}_0(-v), \quad

4273: \varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v).

4274: \label{addst}

4275: \end{align}

4276: %

4277: %

4278: The term $\chi(v)$ in the eigenvalue~\eqref{eigengeneral}

4279: is written as

4280: %

4281: %

4282: \begin{align}

4283: &\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(1)}(v) \nn \db

4284: &\chi^{(0)}(v)=\begin{cases}

4285:   \frac{\cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)

4286:         \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)}

4287:        {\cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)

4288:         \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)}

4289:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$}    \\[2.5mm]

4290:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4291:         \sin(v+\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)}

4292:        {\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4293:         \sin(v+\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

4294:       &\text{for  $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$}              

4295: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4296: %

4297: &\chi^{(1)}(v)= \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4298:       \sin(v+\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4299:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

4300:        \sin(v+\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))}\nn \\

4301: &\qquad\quad\times

4302:       \begin{cases}

4303:       \frac{ \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)+i\delta)

4304:              \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)}

4305:            { \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha+i\delta)

4306:              \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)}

4307:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$}   \\[2.5mm]

4308:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4309:         \sin(v+\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))}

4310:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4311:        \sin(v+\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4312:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}              

4313: \end{cases}.

4314: \label{addeigenst}

4315: \end{align}

4316: 

4317: %

4318: As in the largest eigenvalue case,

4319: the solutions $\mfa_0(v)$ and $\mfab_0(v)$

4320: have the symmetry $\mfab_0(v)=\mfa_0(-v)$.

4321: %

4322: Therefore one reduces the above set of 

4323: three NLIEs to the set of only two NLIEs.

4324: %

4325: In addition,

4326: one finds that the NLIEs~\eqref{addst} admit two

4327: solutions which are related to each other by taking

4328: the mirror image with respect to the

4329: imaginary axis.

4330: % 

4331: Thus the corresponding eigenvalues $\Lambda(0)$ 

4332: are degenerate in magnitude

4333: and are complex conjugate.

4334: %

4335: Hence, oscillatory behavior of the correlation 

4336: functions  is observed,

4337: referred to as $2k_{\rm F}$--oscillation for zero temperature.

4338: \\\\

4339: %

4340: %

4341: \\

4342: %

4343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4344: {\bf (v) Singlet superconducting pair correlations}\\\\

4345: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4346: %

4347: Finally we consider the NLIE for the singlet superconducting

4348: pair correlations characterizing the above mentioned additional

4349: zeros (poles).

4350: %

4351: %

4352: %

4353: {}From~\eqref{zsps},

4354: one sees that these zeros and poles satisfy the subsidiary conditions

4355: %

4356: \begin{align}

4357: \mfA_0(\theta_0)&=\mfA_0(\overline{\theta}_0)=

4358: \mfA_0(\widetilde{\theta}_0)=\mfAb_0(\theta_0)=

4359: \mfAb_0(\overline{\theta}_0)=0,\nn \db

4360: \mfA_0(\theta_1)&=\mfA_0(-\theta^{\ast}_1)=

4361: \mfAb_0(\theta_1) =\mfAb_0(-\theta^{\ast}_1)=

4362: \mfAb_0(\widetilde{\theta}_0+i\gamma)=\infty, \nn \db

4363: \mfA_1(\theta_1)&=\mfA_1(-\theta^{\ast}_1)=0,\qquad

4364: \mfA_1(\theta_0)=\mfA_1(\overline{\theta}_0)=\infty.

4365: \end{align}

4366: %

4367: %

4368: The additional terms in 

4369: the NLIE~\eqref{nliegeneral} read explicitly,

4370: \begin{align}

4371: &\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)=

4372:                \begin{cases}

4373:                    1

4374:                 & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4375:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-i \gamma)\cos(v+i\delta)}

4376:                     {\sin(v-\theta_0)\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4377:                  & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$}\\[2.5mm]

4378:                    \frac{\cos(v+i\delta)\cos(v-i\gamma)}

4379:                     {\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)\cos(v)}

4380:                 & \text{for $0<\Im\theta_0$}

4381:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4382: &\overline{\varphi}^{(\overline{0})}_0(v)=

4383:                \begin{cases}

4384:                   1

4385:                 & \text{for $\Im\overline{\theta}_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4386:                     \frac{\sin(v-\thetab_0-i \gamma)\cos(v+i\delta)}

4387:                          {\sin(v-\thetab_0)\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4388:                  & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\overline{\theta}_0<0$}

4389:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4390: &\overline{\varphi}^{(\widetilde{0})}_0(v)=

4391:                \begin{cases}

4392:                      \frac{\sin(v-\widetilde{\theta}_0)}

4393:                     {\sin(v-\widetilde{\theta}_0-i\gamma)}

4394:                  &  \text{for $\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4395:                      \frac{\cos(v+i\delta)}

4396:                     {\cos(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4397:                 &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0<0$}

4398:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4399: &\overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v)=

4400:                \begin{cases}

4401:                   1

4402:                  & \text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4403:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1)\sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1)

4404:                           \cos^2(v-i\gamma+i\delta)}

4405:                      {\sin(v-\theta_1-i\gamma)

4406:                       \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1-i\gamma)

4407:                       \cos^2(v+i\delta)}

4408:                   & \text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}           

4409:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4410: &\varphi^{(0)}_0(v)=

4411:                \begin{cases}

4412:                    1

4413:                 & \text{for $\Im\theta_0<0$} \\[2.5mm]

4414:                     \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0+i \gamma)

4415:                           \cos(v)}

4416:                     {\sin(v-\theta_0)\cos(v+i\gamma)}

4417:                  & \text{for $0<\Im\theta_0<\delta$}\\[2.5mm]

4418:                    \frac{\cos(v)\cos(v+i\gamma-i\delta)}

4419:  {\cos(v+i\gamma)\cos(v-i\delta)}                    

4420:                 & \text{for $\delta<\Im\theta_0$}

4421:                 \end{cases}, \nn\db

4422: &\varphi^{(\widetilde{0})}_0(v)=

4423:                \begin{cases}

4424:                    \frac {\sin(v-\widetilde{\theta}_0-i\gamma)}

4425:                          {\sin(v-\widetilde{\theta}_0)}

4426:                 & \text{for $\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0+\gamma<\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4427:                     \frac{\cos(v-i\delta)}

4428:                         {\cos(v+i\gamma-i\delta)}

4429:                  & \text{for $\delta<\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0+\gamma$}

4430:                 \end{cases}, \nn \db

4431: %

4432: &\varphi^{(1)}_0(v)=\frac{\sin(v-\theta_1+i\gamma)

4433:                       \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1+i\gamma)}

4434:                        {\sin(v-\theta_1)\sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1)}, \quad

4435: %

4436: \overline{\varphi}_0(v)=\overline{\varphi}^{(0)}_0(v)

4437:                         \overline{\varphi}^{(\overline{0})}_0(v)

4438:                         \overline{\varphi}^{(\widetilde{0})}_0(v)

4439:                         \overline{\varphi}^{(1)}_0(v), \nn \db

4440: &\varphi_0(v)=\varphi^{(0)}_0(v)

4441:              \varphi^{(\widetilde{0})}_0(v)\varphi_0^{(1)}(v),

4442:  \quad

4443: \varphi_1(v)=\varphi_0(v)\overline{\varphi}_0(v).

4444: \label{addphs2}

4445: \end{align}

4446: %

4447: The additional term $\chi(v)$ in~\eqref{eigengeneral}

4448: is determined from

4449: %

4450: %

4451: %

4452: %

4453: \begin{align}

4454: &\chi(v)=\chi^{(0)}(v)\chi^{(\overline{0})}(v)\chi^{(\widetilde{0})}(v)

4455:          \chi^{(1)}(v), \nn \db

4456: &\chi^{(0)}(v)=\begin{cases}

4457:       1

4458:       &\text{for  $\Im\theta_0<-\delta$}      \\[2.5mm]

4459:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha) 

4460:         \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)+i\delta)}

4461:        {\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4462:         \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha+i\delta)}

4463:        &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_0<0$} \\[2.5mm]

4464:        \frac{\sin(v-\theta_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4465:               \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)+i\delta)

4466:               \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)

4467:                \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))}

4468:        {\sin(v-\theta_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4469:          \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha+i\delta)

4470:          \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

4471:          \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)}

4472:         &\text{for $0<\Im\theta_0<\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4473:         \frac{\cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha-i\delta)

4474:               \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)+i\delta)

4475:               \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)

4476:             \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))}

4477:        {\cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2)-i\delta)

4478:          \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha+i\delta)

4479:          \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

4480:           \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)}

4481:         &\text{for $\delta<\Im\theta_0$}

4482: \end{cases}, \nn\db

4483: %

4484: &\chi^{(\overline{0})}(v)=\begin{cases}

4485:    1

4486:       &\text{for  $\Im\thetab_0<-\delta$} \\[2.5mm]

4487:    \frac{\sin(v-\thetab_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4488:          \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)+i\delta)}

4489:        {\sin(v-\thetab_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4490:         \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha+i\delta)}

4491:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\thetab_0<0$}              

4492: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4493: %

4494: &\chi^{(\widetilde{0})}(v)=\begin{cases}

4495:       1

4496:       &\text{for  $0<\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0+\gamma<\delta$}      \\[2.5mm]

4497:        \frac{\sin(v-\widetilde{\theta}_0-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4498:             \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)-i\delta)}

4499:          {\sin(v-\widetilde{\theta}_0+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4500:              \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha-i\delta)}

4501:       &\text{for $\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0<-\delta$,

4502:                 $\delta<\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0+\gamma$} \\[2.5mm]

4503:        \frac{ \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)+i\delta)

4504:               \cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)-i\delta)}

4505:             {\cos(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha+i\delta)

4506:              \cos(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha-i\delta)}

4507:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\widetilde{\theta}_0<0$} \\[2.5mm]

4508: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4509: %

4510: &\chi^{(1)}(v)= \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4511:         \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1-\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)}

4512:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4513:        \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))} \nn \\

4514:  &\qquad\quad \times

4515:       \begin{cases}

4516:   1

4517:       &\text{for $\Im\theta_1<-\delta$}      \\[2.5mm]

4518:   \frac{\sin(v-\theta_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4519:          \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha + 2))

4520:         \cos^2(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha+i\delta)}

4521:       {\sin(v-\theta_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4522:        \sin(v+\theta^{\ast}_1+\frac{i}{2}\alpha\gamma)

4523:        \cos^2(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2)+i\delta)}

4524:       &\text{for $-\delta<\Im\theta_1<0$}        

4525: \end{cases}.

4526: \label{addeignephs}

4527: \end{align}

4528: %

4529: %

4530: %

4531: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4532: %

4533: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4534: %Appendix D

4535: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4536: %

4537: \rnc{\theequation}{D.\arabic{equation}}\setcounter{equation}{0}

4538: %

4539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4540: \section*{Appendix D\,\, Analytic continuation for NLIE}

4541: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4542: %

4543: The above derived NLIEs are well-defined only

4544: in the region $-\gamma+\delta<\Im v<0$ for $\ln\mfa_0(v)$,

4545: $0<\Im v<\gamma-\delta$ for $\ln\mfab_0(v)$ and

4546: $-\delta<\Im v<\delta$ for $\ln\mfa_1(v)$.

4547: %

4548: To determine the integration constants (which should be

4549: determined from the limit $i|v|\to\infty$)

4550: and the additional zeros for the excited states,

4551: we must extend the region by using the analytic 

4552: continuation.

4553: %

4554: We can achieve this by applying Cauchy's theorem to

4555: the convolutions.

4556: %

4557: As a consequence, the additional terms appear due to

4558: the residues of the kernels.

4559: %

4560: The resultant equations can be written explicitly as follows.

4561: %

4562: %

4563: \begin{align}

4564: %

4565: \ln\mfa_0(v)&=

4566: \psi(v)+k_0\stackrel{\overline{C}_0}{*}

4567:            \ln\mfAb_0(v)+k_0\stackrel{C_1}{*}

4568:                            \ln\mfA_1(v)+\beta\mu-

4569:                            \varphi^{\rm c}_0(v), 

4570:                             \nn \db           

4571: %

4572: \ln\mfab_0(v)&=

4573: \psi(-v)+\overline{k}_0\stackrel{C_0}{*}\ln\mfA_0(v)+

4574:               \overline{k}_0\stackrel{C_1}{*}

4575:                           \ln\mfA_1(v)+\beta\mu-

4576:                            \overline{\varphi}^{\rm c}_0, \nn \db

4577: %

4578: \ln\mfa_1(v)&=\psi(v)+\psi(-v)+

4579:             \overline{k}_0\stackrel{C_0}{*}\ln\mfA_0(v)+

4580:              k_0\stackrel{\overline{C}_0}{*}

4581:               \ln\mfAb_0(v)+

4582:               k_1\stackrel{C_1}{*}

4583:                \ln\mfA_1(v)+2\beta\mu-\varphi^{\rm c}_1(v), 

4584: \end{align}

4585: %

4586: %

4587: where

4588: \begin{align}

4589: &\varphi^{\rm c}_0(v)=

4590: \begin{cases}

4591: \ln\mfAb_0(v+i\gamma)+\ln\mfA_1(v+i\gamma)

4592: &\text{for $\Im v<-\gamma$} \\

4593: %

4594: \ln\mfAb_0(v+i\gamma)

4595: &\text{for $-\gamma<\Im v<-\gamma+\delta$} \\

4596: %

4597: 0

4598: &\text{for $-\gamma+\delta<\Im v<0$} \\

4599: %

4600: \ln\mfA_1(v)

4601: &\text{for $0<\Im v<\delta$} \\

4602: %

4603: \ln\mfAb_0(v)+\ln\mfA_1(v)

4604: &\text{for $\delta<\Im v$} 

4605: %

4606: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4607: %

4608: &\overline{\varphi}^{\rm c}_0(v)=

4609: \begin{cases}

4610: \ln\mfA_0(v)+\ln\mfA_1(v)

4611: &\text{for $\Im v<-\delta$} \\

4612: %

4613: \ln\mfA1(v)

4614: &\text{for $-\delta<\Im v<0$} \\

4615: %

4616: 0

4617: &\text{for $0<\Im v<\gamma-\delta$} \\

4618: %

4619: \ln\mfA_0(v-i\gamma)

4620: &\text{for $\gamma-\delta<\Im v<\gamma$} \\

4621: %

4622: \ln\mfA_0(v-i\gamma)+\ln\mfA_1(v-i\gamma)

4623: &\text{for $\gamma<\Im v$} 

4624: %

4625: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4626: %

4627: &\varphi^{\rm c}_1(v)=

4628: \begin{cases}

4629: %

4630: \ln\mfA_0(v)+\ln\mfAb_0(v+i\gamma)+\ln\mfA_1(v+i\gamma)

4631: &\text{for $\Im v<-\gamma$} \\

4632: %

4633: \ln\mfA_0(v)+\ln\mfAb_0(v+i\gamma)

4634: &\text{for $-\gamma<\Im v<-\gamma+\delta$} \\

4635: %

4636: \ln\mfA_0(v)

4637: &\text{for $-\gamma+\delta<\Im v<-\delta$} \\

4638: %

4639: 0

4640: &\text{for $-\delta<\Im v<\delta$} \\

4641: %

4642: \ln\mfAb_0(v)

4643: &\text{for $\delta<\Im v<\gamma-\delta$} \\

4644: %

4645: \ln\mfAb_0(v)+\ln\mfA_0(v-i\gamma)

4646: &\text{for $\gamma-\delta<\Im v<\gamma$} \\

4647: %

4648: \ln\mfAb_0(v)+\ln\mfA_0(v-i\gamma)+\ln\mfA_1(v-i\gamma)

4649: &\text{for $\gamma<\Im v$} 

4650: %

4651: \end{cases}.

4652: \end{align}

4653: %

4654: Similarly, the NLIE for the eigenvalue can be written as 

4655: follows.

4656: %

4657: \begin{equation}

4658: \ln\Lambda(v)=\Psi(v)+

4659:                  \zeta*\ln\mfA_0(v)+

4660:                \overline{\zeta}*\ln\mfAb_0(v)+

4661:               (\zeta+\overline{\zeta})*\ln\mfA_1(v)+\chi_0^{\rm c}(v)

4662:               +\overline{\chi}_0^{\rm c}(v)+\chi_1^{\rm c}(v),

4663: \end{equation}

4664: where

4665: \begin{align}

4666: &\chi^{\rm c}_0(v)=

4667: \begin{cases}

4668: \ln\mfA_0(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4669: &\text{for $\Im v<-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha-\delta$} \\

4670: %

4671: 0

4672: &\text{for $-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha-\delta<

4673:              \Im v<\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)-\delta$} \\

4674: %

4675: \ln\mfA_0(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma (\alpha+2))

4676: &\text{for $\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)-\delta<\Im v$},

4677: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4678: %

4679: &\overline{\chi}^{\rm c}_0(v)=

4680: \begin{cases}

4681: \ln\mfAb_0(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

4682: &\text{for $\Im v<-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)+\delta$} \\

4683: %

4684: 0

4685: &\text{for $-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)+\delta<

4686:              \Im v<\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha+\delta$} \\

4687: %

4688: \ln\mfAb_0(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma\alpha)

4689: &\text{for $\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha+\delta<\Im v$},

4690: \end{cases}, \nn \db

4691: %

4692: &\chi^{\rm c}_1(v)=

4693: \begin{cases}

4694: \ln\mfA_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)+

4695: \ln\mfA_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma(\alpha+2))

4696: &\text{for $\Im v<-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)$} \\

4697: %

4698: \ln\mfA_1(v+\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4699: &\text{for $-\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)<

4700:              \Im v<-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha$} \\

4701: %

4702: 0

4703: &\text{for $-\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha<

4704:              \Im v<\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha$} \\

4705: %

4706: \ln\mfA_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)

4707: &\text{for $\frac{\gamma}{2}\alpha<

4708:              \Im v<\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)$} \\

4709: %

4710: \ln\mfA_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma \alpha)+

4711: \ln\mfA_1(v-\frac{i}{2}\gamma (\alpha+2))

4712: &\text{for $\frac{\gamma}{2}(\alpha+2)<\Im v$}.

4713: \end{cases}.

4714: \end{align}

4715: %

4716: %

4717: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4718: %Bibliography

4719: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4720: \begin{thebibliography}{}

4721: %

4722: \bibitem{KBIbook} V.~E.~Korepin, N.~M.~Bogoliubov and A.~G.~Izergin,

4723: {\it Quantum inverse scattering method and correlation functions},

4724: Cambridge Univ. Press (1993).

4725: %

4726: \bibitem{BPZ} A.~A.~Belavin, A.~M.~Polyakov and A.~B.~Zamolodchikov, 

4727:              Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 241} (1984) 333.

4728: %

4729: \bibitem{Card} J.~L.~Cardy, 

4730:              Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 270} (1986) 186.

4731: 

4732: %

4733: \bibitem{KY} N.~Kawakami and S.~-K.~Yang, 

4734:              Phys. Lett. {\bf A 148} (1990) 359.

4735: %

4736: \bibitem{FK} H.~Frahm and V.~E.~Korepin,

4737:              Phys. Rev. {\bf B 42} (1990) 10553. 

4738: %

4739: \bibitem{MSuzPB}   M.~Suzuki, 

4740:                    Phys. Rev. {\bf B 31} (1985) 2957.

4741: %

4742: \bibitem{InSuz} M.~Suzuki and M.~Inoue, 

4743:                 Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 78} (1987) 787.

4744: %

4745: \bibitem{InSuz2}  M.~Inoue and M.~Suzuki, 

4746:                  Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 79} (1988) 645.

4747: %

4748: \bibitem{Koma}    T.~Koma, 

4749:                 Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 78} (1987) 1213.

4750: %

4751: \bibitem{SAW}    J.~Suzuki, Y.~Akutsu and M.~Wadati, 

4752:               J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 59} (1990) 2667.

4753: %

4754: \bibitem{SNW}     J.~Suzuki, T.~Nagao and M.~Wadati, 

4755:           Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf B 6} (1992) 1119-1180.

4756: %

4757: \bibitem{DdV}    C.~Destri and H.J. de~Vega, Phys. Rev. Lett. 

4758:                  {\bf 69} (1992) 2313.

4759: %

4760: \bibitem{TakQT} M.~Takahashi, 

4761:                 Phys. Rev. {\bf B 43} (1991) 5788.

4762: %

4763: \bibitem{Mizu}   H.~Mizuta, T.~Nagao and M.~Wadati,

4764:                  J. Phys. Soc. Japan {\bf 63} (1994) 3951.

4765: %

4766: \bibitem{Klu}    A.~Kl\"umper, Ann. Physik {\bf 1 }(1992) 540.

4767: %

4768: \bibitem{KZeit}   A.~Kl\"umper, Z. Phys. {\bf B 91} (1993) 507.

4769: %

4770: %

4771: \bibitem{YY}  C.N.~Yang and C.P.~Yang, 

4772:             J. Math. Phys. {\bf 10} (1969) 1115 .

4773: %

4774: \bibitem{G} M. ~Gaudin, 

4775:                Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 26} (1971) 1301.

4776: %

4777: %

4778: \bibitem{Tak} M.~Takahashi,

4779:                Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 46} (1971) 401.

4780: %

4781: \bibitem{KSS} A.~Kuniba, K.~Sakai and J.~Suzuki,

4782:               Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 525} (1998) 597.

4783: %

4784: \bibitem{S3U} K.~Sakai, M.~Shiroishi, J.~Suzuki and Y.~Umeno,

4785:              Phys. Rev. {\bf B 60} (1999) 5186.

4786: %

4787: \bibitem{Sak} K.~Sakai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 68} (1999) 1789.

4788: %

4789: \bibitem{KCMS} A.~Kl\"umper, J.~R.~R.~Mart\'{\i}nez, C.~Scheeren and

4790:                M.~Shiroishi, {\it 

4791:                The 1/2-XXZ spin-chain at finite magnetic field: 

4792:                Crossover phenomena driven by temperature}, 

4793:                cond-mat/0004379.

4794: %

4795: %

4796: \bibitem{BKZ}  R.~Z.~Bariev, A.~Kl\"umper, J.~Zittartz, 

4797:                Europhys. Lett. {\bf 32} (1995) 85.

4798: %

4799: %

4800: \bibitem{KulSk} P.~P.~Kulish and E.~K.~Sklyanin, 

4801:                  J. Sov. Math. {\bf 19} (1982) 1596.

4802: %

4803: %

4804: \bibitem{GHLZ}  M.~D.~Gould, K.~E.~Hibberd, J.~R.~Links and Y.~-Z.~Zhang, 

4805:                 Phys. Lett. {\bf A 212} (1996) 156.

4806: %

4807: \bibitem{BGLZ} A.~J.~Bracken,  M.~D.~Gould, J.~R.~Links and Y.~-Z.~Zhang, 

4808:                 Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74} (1995) 2768.

4809: %

4810: \bibitem{RamMar} P.~B.~Ramos and M.~J,~Martins, 

4811: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 474} (1996) 678.

4812: %

4813: \bibitem{PM} M.~P.~Pfannm\"uller and H.~Frahm,

4814: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 479} (1996) 575.

4815: %

4816: \bibitem{BF} G.~Bed\"urftig and H.~Frahm,

4817: J. Phys. {\bf A 28} (1995) 4453.

4818: %

4819: \bibitem{JKS} G.~J\"uttener, A.~Kl\"umper and J.~Suzuki,

4820:              J. Phys. {\bf A 30} (1997) 1881.

4821: %

4822: \bibitem{KBP} A.~Kl\"umper, M.~T.~Batchelor and P.~A~.Pearce,

4823:               J. Phys. {\bf A 24} (1991) 3111.

4824: %

4825: \bibitem{EKS1} F.~H.~L.~E\ss ler, V.~E.~Korepin and K.~Schoutens,

4826:            Phys. Rev. Lett.{\bf 68} (1992) 2960.

4827: %

4828: \bibitem{EKS2} F.~H.~L.~E\ss ler, V.~E.~Korepin and K.~Schoutens,

4829:            Phys. Rev. Lett.{\bf 70} (1993) 73.

4830: %

4831: %

4832: \bibitem{BaAlc}

4833: F.~C.~Alcaraz, R.~Z.~Bariev,

4834: J. Phys. {\bf A 32} (1999) 483.

4835: %

4836: \bibitem{RamMar2} P.~B.~Ramos and M.~J,~Martins, 

4837: J. Phys. {\bf A 30} (1997) L195.

4838: %

4839: %\bibitem{Umeno} Y.~Umeno, {\it  Fermionic R-Operator and Algebraic Structure of% 1D Hubbard Model: Its application to quantum transfer matrix},

4840: %                cond-mat/0012374

4841: %

4842: %\bibitem{KCMS2} 

4843: %

4844: %A.~Kl\"umper, J.~R.~R.~Mart\'{\i}nez, C.~Scheeren and

4845: %               M.~Shiroishi, in preparation.

4846: %

4847: 

4848: \end{thebibliography}

4849: %

4850: \end{document}

4851: