1: \documentclass[pre]{revtex4b3}
2:
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: %\usepackage{draftcopy}
8: \usepackage{multicol}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \title[Non parametric resonances of parametrically driven kinks]{Anomalies
13: of ac driven solitary waves with internal modes: \\
14: Non-parametric resonances induced by parametric forces}
15:
16: \author{Niurka R.\ Quintero}
17: \email{niurka@euler.us.es}
18:
19: \affiliation{Grupo de F\'\i sica No Lineal,
20: Departamento de F\'{\i}sica Aplicada I,
21: Universidad de Sevilla,\\ Facultad de Inform\'atica,
22: Avenida Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012 Sevilla, Spain}
23:
24: \author{Angel S\'anchez}
25: \homepage{http://gisc.uc3m.es/~anxo}
26:
27: \affiliation{Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complicados (GISC),
28: Departamento de Matem\'aticas,\\ Universidad Carlos III de Madrid,
29: Avda.\ Universidad 30, 28911 Legan\'es, Madrid, Spain}
30:
31: \author{Franz G.\ Mertens}
32: \email{franz.mertens@uni-bayreuth.de}
33:
34: \affiliation{Physikalisches Institut, Universit\"at Bayreuth,
35: D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany}
36:
37: \date{\today}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: We study the dynamics of kinks in the $\phi^4$ model subjected to
41: a parametric
42: ac force, both with and without damping, as a paradigm of solitary
43: waves with internal modes. By using a collective coordinate approach,
44: we find that the parametric force
45: has a non-parametric effect on the kink motion.
46: Specifically, we find that the internal mode
47: leads to a resonance for frequencies of the parametric driving close
48: to its own frequency, in which case the energy of the system
49: grows as well as the width of the kink. These predictions of the
50: collective coordinate theory are verified by numerical simulations of
51: the full partial differential equation. We finally compare
52: this kind of resonance with that obtained for non-parametric ac forces
53: and conclude that the effect of ac drivings on solitary waves with
54: internal modes is exactly the opposite of their character in the
55: partial differential equation.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \pacs{PACS numbers: 05.45.Yv, 02.30.Jr, 03.50.-z, 63.20.Pw}
59:
60: \maketitle
61:
62: %\narrowtext
63: \begin{multicols}{2}
64:
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67: \label{intro}
68:
69: During the last three decades of the 20th century, we have witnessed
70: a great deal of effort devoted to the study of solitons and related
71: nonlinear coherent excitations \cite{Remo,Scott,2a}.
72: All that work notwithstanding, the analysis of
73: systems generally regarded as paradigms of soliton phenomenology
74: still yields unknown, surprising features. One such case is the dynamics
75: of topological solitons or kinks in nonlinear Klein-Gordon systems
76: subjected to ac forces. After several papers that led to contradictory
77: conclusions during the last decade, the problem for the sine-Gordon
78: equation was finally solved in 1998 \cite{EPJBus}. This was the simplest
79: possible scenario for studying the effects of ac forces on topological
80: solitons, in so far as sine-Gordon kinks do not have any internal
81: mode and behave as rigid objects \cite{yurirev}. However, this is a
82: nongeneric situation, because many solitary waves do possess internal
83: degrees of freedom \cite{yurirev,Michel,David}, and even systems like
84: the sine-Gordon model can acquire internal modes due to the influence
85: of perturbations, such as discreteness \cite{Yura2,jones,kap}. Therefore, it was
86: necessary to study the behavior of solitons with internal modes, and
87: subsequently it was found that pure, non-parametric ac forces induced
88: resonances of parametric character: If the frequency of the internal
89: mode is denoted by $\Omega_i$, the resonance appears when the driving
90: frequency is $\Omega_i/2$ \cite{prl}. This anomalous behavior was shown,
91: taking the $\phi^4$ equation as a typical example,
92: to arise from the fact that the driving couples {\em indirectly} to the
93: internal mode, which in turn leads to a parametric influence on its
94: evolution.
95:
96: In view of the above results, it is only natural to pose the following
97: question: If non-parametric drivings act parametrically on $\phi^4$
98: kinks, what is the effect of a parametric driving? To our knowledge,
99: this issue was first addressed in \cite{KivSan}, although the main
100: point of that work was to show how kinks can be effectively anihilated
101: by a fast parametric driving, and no attention was paid to the kink
102: dynamics. More recently, the problem was considered with both parametric
103: and non-parametric forces acting simultaneously in the system \cite{primak},
104: but the approach employed by those researchers was not appropriate and
105: led to incorrect results \cite{Kiv2}. Therefore, the dynamics of
106: kinks in the $\phi^4$ model
107: subjected to parametric drivings is largely unexplored, and this is
108: another reason why we concern ourselves with this problem. This paper
109: presents our conclusions on this question within the following scheme:
110: Section II is devoted to our analytical approach; Section III contains
111: the simulations of the full partial differential equation that verify
112: our analytical predictions, and Section IV summarizes our main results.
113:
114: \section{Resonances induced by parametric periodic forces}
115: \label{colco}
116:
117: As we are interested in the behavior of solitary waves with internal
118: modes, we choose as our working example the $\phi^4$ equation, which
119: is well known to be representative of the generic behavior of those
120: solitary waves. Therefore,
121: we begin by considering the perturbed problem given by
122: \begin{equation}
123: \phi_{tt} - \phi_{xx} = - \frac{dU}{d\phi} - \beta \phi_{t} + f(t,\phi),
124: \label{ecua1}
125: \end{equation}
126: where $U(\phi)=(1-\phi^2)^2/4$ is the $\phi^4$ potential,
127: $f(t,\phi) = \epsilon \sin(\delta t + \delta_{0}) \phi$ represents
128: the parametric ac force,
129: $\epsilon$, $\delta$, and $\delta_0$ are the amplitude, frequency,
130: and phase of the external periodic force, respectively, and $\beta$ is the
131: damping coefficient.
132:
133: In order to obtain analytical results, we resort to the well-known
134: collective coordinate method \cite{yurirev,siam}, which will give us
135: definite predictions on the behavior of the system. However, these
136: being approximate results, we will have to check them by direct
137: numerical simulations of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}); those will be the
138: subject of the following section. To apply the collective coordinate
139: approach to our problem, we choose to employ
140: the so-called generalized
141: traveling wave {\em Ansatz} \cite{franz}
142: or, equivalently, to use the variation of the momentum and the
143: energy (the equivalence
144: of both techniques is proven in the second paper in \cite{prl}). These
145: two quantities are given by
146: \begin{eqnarray}
147: \label{mome}
148: P(t) &\equiv &-\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx\, \phi_{x} \phi_{t},\\
149: E(t) &\equiv &\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx\left\{
150: \frac 12 \phi_t^2+\frac12\phi_x^2+U(\phi)\right\}.
151: \label{hami}
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: In order to evaluate those quantities,
154: we consider the Rice {\em Ansatz} \cite{Rice}
155: and assume that
156: \begin{equation}
157: \phi(x,t) = \phi_0\left[\frac{x-X(t)}{l(t)}\right],
158: \end{equation}
159: where $\phi_0(x)$ is the static kink solution of the
160: unperturbed $\phi^4$ equation, i.e., of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1})
161: with $\beta=\epsilon=0$ zero, centered at $X(t)$ and
162: with width $l(t)$. With this choice, and following the
163: standard procedure \cite{yurirev,siam},
164: we find that the evolution of the momentum,
165: $P(t) \equiv M_{0} l_{0} \dot{X}/l(t)$, and the width of
166: the kink are given by
167: \begin{eqnarray}
168: \frac{dP}{dt} & = & F^{stat}(X) - \beta P + F_{ex},
169: \label{evmo} \\
170: \alpha M_{0} l_{0} \frac{\ddot l}{l} + \frac{P^{2}}{M_{0} l_{0}}
171: & = & K^{int}(l,\dot{l},\dot{X}) - \beta \alpha M_{0} l_{0} \frac{\dot l}{l} + K, \label{evl}
172: \end{eqnarray}
173: with
174: \begin{eqnarray}
175: F_{ex} & = & \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \,\ f(t,\phi)
176: \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial X}, \,\ \,\ F^{stat}= -\frac{\partial E}
177: {\partial X}, \\
178: K & = & \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \,\ f(t,\phi) \,\
179: \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial l}, \,\ \,\
180: K^{int} = -\frac{\partial E}{\partial l}, \\
181: E & = & \frac{1}{2} \frac{l_{0}}{l} M_{0} \dot{X}^{2} +
182: \frac{1}{2} \frac{l_{0}}{l} \alpha M_{0} \dot{l}^{2} +
183: \frac{1}{2} M_{0} \left(\frac{l_{0}}{l} + \frac{l}{l_{0}}\right),
184: \label{ener}
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: where
187: $q=2$, $M_{0}=4/(3 l_{0})$, and $l_{0}=\sqrt{2}$ represent the
188: topological charge, the mass, and the width of the unperturbed kink,
189: respectively, and
190: $\alpha=(\pi^2-6)/12$ is a constant.
191:
192: We now have to evaluate the above quantities. In this respect,
193: it is interesting to compare
194: the equations we have obtained with those found for the
195: case of an ac non-parametric force, i.e. $f(t,\phi)=f(t)$. In that situation
196: we obtain that
197: $F_{ex} = - q f(t)$ and $K=0$, and hence
198: the external force acts directly on the
199: translational mode, whereas the internal mode is excited indirectly
200: due to the coupling between these two modes.
201: Conversely, as we have seen,
202: in the parametrically driven problem, $F_{ex}$ vanishes, while
203: $K = - \epsilon \sin(\delta t + \delta_{0})$. Therefore, Eqs.\
204: (\ref{evmo})-(\ref{evl}) become
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: \frac{dP }{dt} &=& - \beta P(t),
207: \label{ecua23}\\
208: \alpha \left[\dot{l}^{2} - 2 l \ddot{l} - 2 \beta l \dot{l}\right] & = &
209: \frac{l^{2}}{l_{0}^{2}} \left [1 +
210: \frac{P^{2}}{M_{0}^{2}} \right ] \nonumber\\ &-& 1 +
211: 2 \frac{l(t)^2}{M_{0} l_{0}}\, \epsilon \sin(\delta t + \delta_{0}).
212: \label{ecua24}
213: \end{eqnarray}
214: We thus see that, when introduced in a parametric manner,
215: the ac force acts directly on the internal mode and
216: not via the coupling between the translational and internal
217: modes. This result shows the very different role of both drivings
218: at the collective coordinate level.
219:
220: In order to deal with these equations, we choose
221: ${\dot X}(0)=u(0)$, $l(0)\equiv l_{s} = l_{0} \sqrt{1-u^2(0)}$
222: and $\dot{l}(0)$ as the initial conditions for Eqs.\ (\ref{ecua23}) and
223: (\ref{ecua24}).
224: The equation for the momentum is trivial and
225: can be solved exactly, yielding
226: \begin{eqnarray}
227: P(t) & = & P(0) {\rm e}^{-\beta t}.
228: \label{ecua4}
229: \end{eqnarray}
230: We note that for $\beta \ne 0$, the momentum
231: of the kink goes to zero and after some transient time, $t >> 1/\beta$,
232: it effectively vanishes. In the same way,
233: if we start from zero initial velocity, $P(t)=0$, i.e., the
234: center of the
235: kink will not move.
236:
237: Let us now turn to Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}). As a first step, we
238: introduce a change of variables, proposed
239: in \cite{yuri}, given by $l(t)=g^{2}(t)$.
240: This change transforms Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}) into
241: an Ermakov-type equation (or Pinney-type) \cite{Pinney}, which reads
242: \begin{eqnarray}
243: \label{ecua25}
244: \ddot{g} &+& \beta \dot{g} +
245: \Big[ \left( \frac{\Omega}{2} \right)^2 \\ &+&
246: \left( \frac{\Omega}{2 M_{0}} \right)^2 P^2 +
247: \epsilon \frac{\sin(\delta t + \delta_{0})}{2 \alpha M_{0} l_{0}}
248: \Big] g =
249: \frac{1}{4 \alpha g^{3}}, \nonumber \\
250: g(0) &=& \sqrt{l_{s}} \ne 0, \,\ \,\ \,\
251: \dot{g}(0) = \frac{\dot{l}(0)}{2 \sqrt{l_{s}}},
252: \end{eqnarray}
253: where $\Omega = 1/\sqrt{\alpha} l_{0}=1.2452$ is equal to
254: the Rice frequency \cite{Rice} $\Omega_{R} = 1/\sqrt{\alpha} l_{s}$
255: in the case when the kink initially is at rest.
256: It can be shown (see \cite{Rice} and \cite{epjb3}) that when there is
257: not any perturbation in the system (\ref{ecua23})-(\ref{ecua24}),
258: $l(t)$ oscillates with a frequency
259: $\Omega_R$ if we start from any $l(0)\neq l_s$ or $\dot{l}(0)\neq0$. Therefore,
260: $\Omega_R$ is the characteristic frequency of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}) and,
261: since it agrees within $1.7\%$ with
262: $\Omega_i=\sqrt{3/2}=1.2247$,
263: we expect that if we find a resonance related with $\Omega_R$
264: in Eq.\ (\ref{ecua25}) [or Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24})] we should find a similar
265: phenomenon in the full system, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}),
266: associated to the frequency of the internal mode
267: $\Omega_i$.
268:
269: We now
270: proceed to solve the Eq.\ (\ref{ecua25}) analytically for the
271: undamped case, i.e., when $\beta=0$.
272: As we have mentioned, in this case $P(t)=P(0)$ and
273: Eq.\ (\ref{ecua25}) becomes the following Pinney-type
274: equation \cite{Pinney}
275: \begin{equation}
276: \ddot{g} +
277: \left [ \left(\frac{\Omega_{R}}{2}\right)^2 +
278: \epsilon \frac{\sin(\delta t + \delta_{0})}{2 \alpha M_{0} l_{0}}
279: \right ] g =
280: \frac{1}{4 \alpha g^{3}},
281: \label{ecua26}
282: \end{equation}
283: whose solution is
284: \begin{equation}
285: \begin{array}{c}
286: {\displaystyle{
287: g(t) = \sqrt{v_{1}^{2} + \frac{1}{4 \alpha W^{2}} v_{2}^{2}}}},
288: \end{array}
289: \label{ecua27}
290: \end{equation}
291: where $v_{1}(t)$ and $v_{2}(t)$ are two independent solutions of the linear
292: part of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua26}) and $W=\dot{v}_{1} v_{2} - \dot{v}_{2} v_{1}$
293: is the Wronskian. $W(t)$ is actually a constant,
294: and can be calculated from
295: the initial conditions for
296: $v_{i}$ ($i=1,2$), $v_{1}(0)=\sqrt{l_{s}}$, $\dot{v}_{1}(0)
297: = \dot{l}(0)/(2 \sqrt{l_{s}})$,
298: $v_{2}(0) = 0$ and $\dot{v}_{2}(0)$ a nonzero constant.
299:
300: If one denotes $\tau =(\delta t + \delta_{0} + \pi/2)/2$,
301: after some algebraic
302: manipulations we arrive at the following Mathieu
303: equation for the $v_{i}$ functions:
304: \begin{eqnarray}
305: v_{i}'' &+& [a - 2 \theta \cos(2 \tau) ] v_{i} = 0, \nonumber \\
306: a=\left(\frac{\Omega_{R}}{\delta}\right)^2, & &
307: \theta = \frac{\epsilon}{\alpha M_{0} l_{0} \delta^2} \equiv
308: \frac{\epsilon l_{0}}{M_{0} \gamma_{0}^{2}}
309: \left(\frac{\Omega_{R}}{\delta}\right)^{2},
310: \label{ecua28}
311: \end{eqnarray}
312: where prime denotes the derivative with respect to $\tau$,
313: and $\gamma_0=1/\sqrt{1-v(0)^2}$.
314: Notice that the initial conditions, when $\tau \equiv \tau_{0}=
315: (\delta_{0} + \pi/2)/2$ for $v_{i}(\tau)$, become
316: $v_{1}(\tau_0)=\sqrt{l_{s}}$,
317: $v_{1}'(\tau_0)= \dot{l}(0)/(\delta \sqrt{l_{s}})$,
318: $v_{2}(\tau_0) = 0$ and $v_{2}'(\tau_0)= 2 \dot{v}_{2}(0)/\delta$.
319: The solution of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua28}) (see \cite{Mathieu}) for $v_{1}(\tau)$ and
320: $v_{2}(\tau)$ can be expressed as a linear superposition of the two Mathieu
321: functions ${\rm{ce}}_{\nu}$ and ${\rm{se}}_{\nu}$
322: with a non-integer index $\nu$, i.e.,
323: \begin{equation}
324: \begin{array}{l}
325: {\displaystyle{
326: v_{i}(\tau) = A_{i} \, {\rm {ce}}_{\nu}\left(\tau,\theta\right) +
327: B_{i} \, {\rm{se}}_{\nu}\left(\tau,\theta\right), \,\ \,\ i=1,2,}}
328: \end{array}
329: \label{ecua29}
330: \end{equation}
331: where
332: \begin{equation}
333: \begin{array}{l}
334: {\displaystyle{
335: A_{i} \equiv \frac{\Delta_{A_{i}}}{\Delta}, \,\ \,\
336: B_{i} \equiv \frac{\Delta_{B_{i}}}{\Delta}}},
337: \label{ecua30}
338: \end{array}
339: \end{equation}
340: and
341: \[
342: \begin{array}{l}
343: {\displaystyle{
344: \Delta = {\rm {ce}}_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right) \,
345: {\rm {se}}'_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right) \, - \,
346: {\rm {ce}}'_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right) \,
347: {\rm {se}}_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right)}}, \nonumber \\[3mm]
348: {\displaystyle{
349: \Delta_{A_{i}} = v_{i}(\tau_{0}) \,
350: {\rm {se}}'_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right) \, - \,
351: v'_{i}(\tau_{0}) \,
352: {\rm {se}}_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right)}}, \nonumber \\[3mm]
353: {\displaystyle{
354: \Delta_{B_{i}} = v'_{i}(\tau_{0}) \,
355: {\rm {ce}}_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right) \, - \,
356: v_{i}(\tau_{0}) \, {\rm {ce}}'_{\nu}\left(\tau_{0},\theta\right)}}
357: , \nonumber
358: \end{array}
359: \]
360: with the constraint (characteristic curve for Mathieu functions)
361: \begin{equation}
362: \begin{array}{l}
363: {\displaystyle{
364: a = \nu^{2} + \frac{1}{2 (\nu^{2}-1)} \theta^{2} + O(\theta^{4})}}.
365: \end{array}
366: \label{ecua31}
367: \end{equation}
368:
369: {}From Eqs.\ (\ref{ecua27}), (\ref{ecua29}) and (\ref{ecua30}), and taking
370: into account that $\tau = (\delta t + \delta_{0} + \pi/2)/2$
371: we obtain that the kink width $l(t)$
372: is given by
373: \begin{equation}
374: \begin{array}{l}
375: {\displaystyle{
376: l(t) = g^{2} = v_{1}^{2}(t) + \frac{1}{4 \alpha W^{2}} v_{2}^{2}(t)}},
377: \end{array}
378: \label{ecua32}
379: \end{equation}
380: where
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: v_{i}(t) &=& A_{i} \,
383: {\rm {ce}}_{\nu}\left(\delta t/2 + \delta_{0}/2 + \pi/4,\theta\right)
384: \nonumber \\
385: \label{ecua33}
386: &+&B_{i} \, {\rm{se}}_{\nu}\left(\delta t/2 + \delta_{0}/2 + \pi/4,
387: \theta\right), \,\ \,\ i=1,2;\\
388: \label{ecua35}
389: W &=& -\sqrt{l_{s}} \dot{v}_{2}(0),
390: \end{eqnarray}
391: and the characteristic curve, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua31}),
392: for our initial parameters can be written
393: up to order $\epsilon^{2}$ as
394: \begin{equation}
395: \delta = \frac{\Omega_{R}}{\nu} \left(1 -
396: \frac{\nu^{2} l_{0}^{2}}{4 (\nu^2-1) M_{0}^{2} \gamma_{0}^4}
397: \epsilon^{2} \right) + O(\epsilon^{4}).
398: \label{ecua36}
399: \end{equation}
400:
401: Notice that when $\nu=m+p/s$ is rational,
402: with $m$ an integer number and
403: $p/s$ a rational fraction ($0 < p/s < 1$),
404: $v_{1}(t)$ and $v_{2}(t)$ are $2 \pi s$ periodic functions, if $p$ is odd,
405: and $\pi s$-periodic functions, if $p$ is even,
406: whereas for irrational $\nu$ both functions will
407: be non-periodic although bounded \cite{Mathieu}.
408: For instance, if we take in Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}) $\epsilon =0.01$,
409: $\delta_0=\pi/2$, $u(0)=0$,
410: $l(0)=l_s$ and $\delta=0.94$, we can see in Fig.\ \ref{f1}
411: that $l(t)$ is a bounded function. Moreover, taking the Mathieu
412: functions that appear in Eq. (\ref{ecua33}) up to terms of order
413: $\theta$ and substituting the approximate expression
414: of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua33}) in Eq.\ (\ref{ecua32})
415: one can show that the resulting
416: expression for $l(t)$ involves basically the frequencies
417: $\Omega_R$ and $\delta$ (see Fig. \ref{f1}).
418: We have also plotted in Fig.\ \ref{f1} the evolution of
419: the energy, Eq.\ (\ref{ener}),
420: taking $\delta$ not close to $\Omega_R$. For this
421: choice of parameters, $E(t)$
422: is also a bounded function and its spectrum for the above parameters
423: involves chiefly three frequencies: $|\delta-\Omega_{R}|$, $2 \delta$
424: and $\delta + \Omega_{R}$.
425:
426: As we have shown, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua36}) represents
427: the characteristic curve corresponding to stable (either periodic or
428: bounded) solutions of the Mathieu equation (\ref{ecua28}).
429: However, if we try to find a periodic solution when
430: $\delta \approx \Omega_{R}$, we obtain that the integer Mathieu functions
431: ${\rm se}_{1}$ and ${\rm ce}_{1}$ are two independent solutions of two
432: different Mathieu equations since they are related to different
433: characteristic curves:
434: \begin{eqnarray}
435: a &=& 1 - \theta - \frac{\theta^{2}}{8} + \frac{\theta^{3}}{64} -
436: \frac{\theta^{4}}{1536} + \ldots,\\
437: a &=& 1 + \theta - \frac{\theta^{2}}{8} - \frac{\theta^{3}}{64} -
438: \frac{\theta^{4}}{1536} + \ldots
439: \end{eqnarray}
440: respectively. These characteristic curves separate the unstable and
441: stable regions of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua28}).
442: In the unstable regions the solution of this equation, as well as
443: $l(t)$ and $E(t)$, grow with $t$ (see Fig.\ \ref{f2}).
444: This is hence the hint on the existence of a resonance phenomenon,
445: and,
446: as we already pointed out, we expect that it will manifest itself
447: in the full partial differential equation with an increment of
448: the width and the energy of the kink, when $\delta$ is close
449: to $\Omega_i$. This is the aim of the next section, in which we
450: we will check by computing the solution of (\ref{ecua1}) whether
451: there
452: is some resonance at $\delta\approx\Omega_i$. In addition,
453: we will analyze
454: numerically the effect of damping in our resonance picture, as we
455: have not been able to obtain any analytical approximate result
456: in that case.
457:
458: \section{Simulation results}
459:
460: \label{numso}
461:
462: In this section we carry out numerical simulations
463: of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}) by using the Strauss-V\'azquez scheme
464: \cite{stvaz},
465: taking the length of the system $L=100$, $\Delta t=0.01$,
466: $\Delta x=0.1$, the final time $t_f=200$ and free boundary
467: conditions. We fix also the amplitude $\epsilon =0.01$ and the phase
468: $\delta_0=\pi/2$ of the ac force.
469:
470: In order to show the evolution of $l(t)$ and $E(t)$ in the
471: PDE (\ref{ecua1}) we distinguish two cases: In the first case we
472: choose $\delta$ far away from $\Omega_i$, whereas in the second one
473: $\delta\approx\Omega_i$. In Fig.\ \ref{f3} we plot the width and the
474: energy of the kink as functions of $t$ for $\delta=0.94$, i.e.,
475: the parameters of the ac force are the same as in Fig.\ \ref{f1}. If we
476: compare Figs.\ \ref{f1} and \ref{f3} we see that $l(t)$ and
477: $E(t)$ have the same behavior both on the collective coordinate level
478: and in the full system, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}).
479: Naturally, while in
480: the spectrum of $l(t)$ obtained by the collective coordinate approach
481: there appear the frequencies $\delta$ and $\Omega_R$, in the DFT of $l(t)$
482: for the PDE we obtain $\delta$ and $\Omega_i$ as expected. However, in the
483: Fourier transform of $E(t)$ for the full system we find not only frequencies
484: which involve $\delta$ and $\Omega_{i}$ (see Fig.\ \ref{f3}), but also
485: an additional frequency, $\omega_{4}=0.4715 \approx \omega_{0} - \delta$,
486: related with the frequency of the lowest phonon
487: ($\omega_{0} = \sqrt{2}$) of the $\phi^4$ system. This means that the
488: internal mode and the phonons can both appear when the
489: $\phi^4$ system is driven parametrically with an ac force, but since
490: $\Omega_{i}$ and $\omega_{0}$ are separated we expect to be able to
491: excite the internal mode to a larger extent
492: than phonon modes if the frequency of the
493: ac force is closer to $\Omega_{i}$ than to $\omega_0$.
494:
495: Moving now to the second case, i.e., drivings with frequency
496: $\delta$ close to $\Omega_{i}$,
497: Fig.\ \ref{f4} shows that in this situation
498: the width of the kink oscillates with a large amplitude
499: while the energy
500: grows, although not monotonously.
501: It is important to stress at this point
502: that, whereas the collective coordinate analysis predicts that
503: $l(t)$ and $E(t)$
504: should increase indefinitely at resonance,
505: this is not the case in the original system.
506: The reason is that, in our perturbative method, we have not
507: taken into
508: account the phonons, which are present in the system,
509: and therefore part of the
510: energy input from the ac force goes to the phonons.
511: In our simulations we have also
512: seen that the kink does not move, even if we
513: are at resonance, in agreement with our collective
514: coordinate theory.
515:
516: In order to present in a more evident manner
517: the resonance, we have plotted in Fig.\
518: \ref{reso} the values of the mean normalized
519: width and the mean energy as functions
520: of $\delta$. We compute these magnitudes as time averages of
521: $l(t)/l_{0}$ and $E(t)$ for times $100 \le t \le 200$, as
522: to avoid possible transient effects (which are mostly relevant in the
523: damped case discussed below).
524: We see that on the collective coordinate level
525: $\langle l(t)/l_{0} \rangle$ and $\langle E(t) \rangle$
526: have a maximum at $\delta = \Omega_{R}$; correspondingly,
527: in the original system, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}),
528: the resonance takes place at $\delta=1.18$, close to $\Omega_{i}=1.2247$.
529: We have also found that for $1.3 < \delta < \omega_{0}$ (not shown),
530: the energy is an increasing function of $\delta$
531: whereas the width of the kink is practically
532: constant. This implies that the increment of the
533: energy is due to excitation of
534: the phonons, which becomes more efficient as $\delta\to\omega_0$,
535: and is not related with the internal mode.
536:
537: Coming now to the damped case, as we announced in the preceding section,
538: we have not obtained any analytical result.
539: For this reason, in this section we carry out numerical simulations
540: of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}) and also integrate numerically the collective
541: coordinate prediction,
542: Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}), when $\beta \ne 0$. In Fig.\
543: \ref{f7y8} we plot the evolution of the energy at resonance
544: for $\beta=0.05$, as given by the collective coordinates and as
545: obtained from the numerical simulations of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}).
546: For each case, we have chosen a frequency near to
547: $\Omega_{R}$ (for the collective coordinates) and
548: $\Omega_{i}$ [for Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1})].
549: To complete the study of the damped case,
550: we present the result for the resonance as we did for the undamped
551: case, by plotting the mean width and energy vs $\delta$ for
552: $\beta=0.05$ (see Fig.\ \ref{resob}).
553: We can observe that,
554: at resonance, these functions also have maximums, although in the
555: presence of damping they are less peaked than in the undamped case:
556: $\langle l(t)/l_{0} \rangle$ increases around a $7\%$ and the energy
557: around a $10\%$. Interestingly, the resonance for the full system
558: is now much closer to the internal mode than in the undamped case.
559: We believe that the fact that the damping suppresses quite effectively
560: the phonons is the reason why the damped system follows more closely
561: the collective coordinate prediction, which indeed neglects all
562: phonon contributions.
563:
564: \section{Conclusions}
565: \label{conclu}
566:
567: In the present paper we have studed the effect of a parametric
568: ac force on the dynamics of $\phi^4$ kinks
569: with and without damping. By using a
570: collective coordinate approach, we have found
571: resonances related with the excitation of the internal mode
572: when the frequency of the ac force is close to the Rice
573: frequency $\Omega_{R} \approx
574: \Omega_{i}$. We have verified numerically this prediction by
575: computing the solution of the Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}), its corresponding
576: energy and the width of the kink. When this kind of resonance occurs,
577: the energy and the width of the system increase, while for other
578: values of the frequency (except for smaller, secondary resonances)
579: they are
580: bounded (in some cases periodic) functions. Concerning the mobility of
581: the kink, it is very important to point out, at least for the time
582: considered here, that all the input energy
583: goes to the internal and phonon modes and for this reason the kink
584: does not move (neither near nor away from the resonance).
585:
586: Although this work has focused on the $\phi^4$ kink, experience
587: shows that it is very likely that similar phenomenologies will be
588: observed in the dynamics of other solitary waves with internal modes.
589: In this respect, it is important to
590: compare the above results to those obtained for
591: non-parametric ac drivings \cite{prl} in order to give a thorough,
592: coherent picture of the problem. The collective coordinate analysis,
593: confirmed by the direct numerical simulations of the full system,
594: shows that when we drive the
595: $\phi^4$ system parametrically
596: the force acts directly and non-parametrically on the width of the kink,
597: i.e., the internal mode is excited and the phenomenon
598: of resonance takes place and can be observed by monitoring
599: $l(t)$ and $E(t)$. On the contrary, non-parametric drivings affect
600: the internal mode only indirectly through the coupling to the
601: translation mode, which in turn leads to a parametric coupling.
602: We thus see that the internal mode dynamics is responsible for a
603: highly non-trivial behavior: non-parametric drivings on the full
604: system induce parametrical resonances in the kink dynamics, and
605: vice versa. As a final remark, we want to point out that our results
606: indicate a way of exciting internal modes without affecting the
607: translation mode, which can mask the effects one is interested in.
608: As we have seen, the parametric ac force affects only the internal
609: mode, and the kink remains at its original position (or moving
610: uniformly with the same speed if nonzero) at all times. This is
611: not possible with a non-parametric driving and might be a mechanism
612: of interest in situations where the role of internal modes must
613: be elucidated.
614:
615:
616: \section{Acknowledgments}
617:
618: Work at Sevilla has been supported by the EU grant
619: LOCNET HPRN-CT-1999-00163.
620: Work at Legan\'es has been supported by
621: DGI of MCyT (Spain) through grant BFM2000-0006.
622: Travel between Spain and Bayreuth has been
623: supported by the Emil-Warburg-Foundation of
624: Universit\"at Bayreuth.
625:
626: \begin{thebibliography}{88}
627:
628: \bibitem{Remo} M.\ Remoissenet, {\em Waves Called Solitons} (Springer,
629: Berlin, 1996).
630:
631: \bibitem{Scott} A.\ C.\ Scott, {\em Nonlinear Science} (Oxford University,
632: Oxford, 1999).
633:
634: \bibitem{2a} P.\ L.\ Christiansen, M.\ P.\ Sorensen, and A.\ C.\ Scott,
635: eds., {\em Nonlinear Science at the Dawn of the 21st Century}
636: (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
637:
638: \bibitem{EPJBus} N.\ R.\ Quintero and A.\ S\'anchez, Phys.\ Lett.\ A
639: {\bf 247}, 161 (1998); Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ B {\bf 6}, 133 (1998).
640:
641: \bibitem{yurirev} Yu.\ S.\ Kivshar and B.\ A.\ Malomed, Rev.\ Mod.\
642: Phys.\ {\bf 61}, 763 (1989).
643:
644: \bibitem{Michel} M.\ Peyrard and M.\ Remoissenet, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 26},
645: 2886 (1982).
646:
647: \bibitem{David} M.\ Peyrard and D.\ K.\ Campbell, Physica D {\bf 9}, 33 (1983);
648: D.\ K.\ Campbell, J.\ F.\ Schonfeld, and C.\ A.\ Wingate, {\em ibid.} {\bf 9},
649: 1 (1983); D.\ K.\ Campbell, M.\ Peyrard, and P.\ Sodano, {\em ibid.} {\bf 19},
650: 165 (1986).
651:
652: \bibitem{Yura2} Yu.\ S.\ Kivshar, D.\ E.\ Pelinovsky, T.\ Cretegny, and
653: M.\ Peyrard, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 5032 (1998).
654:
655: \bibitem{jones} P.\ G.\ Kevrekidis and C.\ K.\ R.\ T.\ Jones,
656: Phys.\ Rev.\ E {\bf 61}, 3114 (2000).
657:
658: \bibitem{kap} T.\ Kapitula, P.\ G.\ Kevrekidis, and C.\ K.\ R.\ T.\ Jones,
659: Phys.\ Rev.\ E {\bf 63}, 036602 (2001).
660:
661: \bibitem{prl} N.\ R.\ Quintero, A.\ S\'anchez, and F.\ G.\ Mertens,
662: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84}, 871 (2000);
663: Phys.\ Rev.\ E.\ {\bf 62}, 5695 (2000).
664:
665: \bibitem{KivSan} Yu.\ S.\ Kivshar, A.\ S\'anchez, and L.\ V\'azquez,
666: Phys.\ Rev.\ A {\bf 45}, 1207 (1992).
667:
668: \bibitem{primak} A.\ L.\ Sukstanskii and K.\ I.\ Primak,
669: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 3029 (1995).
670:
671: \bibitem{Kiv2} Yu.\ S.\ Kivshar and A.\ S\'anchez,
672: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 582 (1996).
673:
674: \bibitem{siam} A.\ S\'anchez and A.\ R.\ Bishop, SIAM Rev. {\bf 40},
675: 579 (1998).
676:
677: \bibitem{franz} F.\ G.\ Mertens, H.\ J.\ Schnitzer, and A.\ R.\ Bishop,
678: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 56}, 2510 (1997).
679:
680: \bibitem{Rice} M.\ J.\ Rice, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 28},
681: 3587 (1983).
682:
683: \bibitem{yuri} E.\ Majern\'\i kov\'a, Yu.\ B.\ Gaididei, and O.\ M.\ Braun,
684: Phys.\ Rev.\ E {\bf 52},
685: 1241 (1995).
686:
687: \bibitem{Pinney} E.\ Pinney, Proc.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ {\bf 1}, 681, (1950).
688:
689: \bibitem{epjb3} N.\ R.\ Quintero, A.\ S\'anchez and Franz Mertens,
690: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ B {\bf 19}, 107 (2001).
691:
692: \bibitem{Mathieu} N.\ W.\ McLachlan, {\em Theory and Application of Mathieu
693: Functions}
694: (Dover Publications, Inc., 1964).
695:
696: \bibitem{stvaz} W.\ A.\ Strauss and L.\ V\'azquez,
697: J.\ Comput.\ Phys.\ {\bf 28},
698: 271 (1978).
699:
700:
701: \end{thebibliography}
702:
703: \end{multicols}
704:
705: \twocolumn
706:
707: \begin{figure}
708: \epsfig{figure=fig1a.eps, width=2.3in, angle=-90} \\
709: \\
710: \epsfig{file=fig1b.eps,width=2.23in,angle=-90}
711: \caption{Collective coordinates:
712: Evolution of $l(t)$ and $E(t)$ when $\delta=0.94$ for the undamped case,
713: $\beta=0$.
714: Points: Analytical solution [see Eqs.\
715: (\ref{ecua29})-(\ref{ecua35})].
716: Solid lines: Numerical integration of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24})
717: for $\beta=0$, $\epsilon=0.01$, $\delta_{0}=\pi/2$, $u(0)=0$, $X(0)=0$.
718: The DFT (not shown) of $l(t)$ yields two frequencies:
719: $\omega_{1}=0.9434 \approx \delta$
720: and $\omega_{2}=1.25789 \approx \Omega_{R}$, whereas for
721: $E(t)$ it gives
722: three frequencies:
723: $\omega_{1}=0.3144 \approx |\delta - \Omega_{R}|=0.3052$,
724: $\omega_{2}=1.8868 \approx 2 \delta=1.88$ and
725: $\omega_{3}=2.20131 \approx \delta + \Omega_{R}=2.1852$ .
726: The maximum of the
727: DFT appears at $\omega_{1}$.}
728: %crp15, m15.dat
729: \label{f1}
730: \end{figure}
731:
732: \begin{figure}
733: \epsfig{file=fig2a.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90} \\
734: \\
735: \epsfig{file=fig2b.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90}
736: \caption{Collective coordinates:
737: Evolution of $l(t)$ and $E(t)$ when $\delta=1.24\approx \Omega_R$
738: for the undamped case, $\beta=0$.
739: Points: Analytical solution [see Eqs.\
740: (\ref{ecua30})-(\ref{ecua35})].
741: Solid lines: Numerical integration of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}).
742: Parameters are as in the previous figure.
743: }
744: %crp45
745: \label{f2}
746: \end{figure}
747:
748: \begin{figure}
749: \epsfig{figure=fig3a.eps, width=2.3in, angle=-90} \\
750: \\
751: \epsfig{file=fig3b.eps,width=2.22in,angle=-90}
752: \caption{
753: Evolution of $l(t)$ and $E(t)$ as obtained from numerical
754: simulations of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}), when $\delta=0.94$ with
755: $\epsilon=0.01$, $\delta_{0}=\pi/2$, $u(0)=0$, $X(0)=0$.
756: The DFT (not shown) of $l(t)$ yields two frequencies:
757: $\omega_{1}=0.9429 \approx \delta$
758: and $\omega_{2}=1.2258 \approx \Omega_{i}$, whereas for
759: $E(t)$
760: gives four frequencies:
761: $\omega_{1}=0.2887 \approx |\delta - \Omega_{i}|=0.2847$,
762: $\omega_{2}=1.8859 \approx 2 \delta = 1.88$,
763: $\omega_{3}=2.3574 \approx \delta+\Omega_{i}=2.1647$ and
764: $\omega_{4}=0.4715 \approx \omega_{0}-\delta=0.4749$.
765: }
766: %prp15
767: \label{f3}
768: \end{figure}
769:
770: \begin{figure}
771: \epsfig{file=fig4a.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90} \\
772: \\
773: \epsfig{file=fig4b.eps,width=2.22in,angle=-90}
774: \caption{
775: Evolution of $l(t)$ and $E(t)$ as obtained from numerical
776: simulations of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}), when $\delta=1.176$.
777: Other parameters are the same as in the previous figure.
778: }
779: %prp76
780: \label{f4}
781: \end{figure}
782:
783: \begin{figure}
784: \epsfig{figure=fig5a.eps, width=2.3in, angle=-90} \\
785: \epsfig{figure=fig5b.eps, width=2.3in, angle=-90}
786: \caption{
787: $\langle l(t)/l_{0} \rangle$ (points connected by
788: solid line) and
789: $\langle E(t) \rangle$ (dashed line) vs $\delta$.
790: Upper panel: Collective coordinate approach.
791: The resonance is at $\Omega_{R}=1.2452$.
792: Lower panel: Results from the full system, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}).
793: The resonance is at $\delta=1.18$, close to $\Omega_{i}=1.2247$.
794: }
795: \label{reso}
796: \end{figure}
797:
798: \begin{figure}
799: \epsfig{file=fig6a.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90} \\
800: \\
801: \epsfig{file=fig6b.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90}
802: \caption{Damped case, $\beta=0.05$:
803: Evolution of the energy according to the collective coordinate approach,
804: obtained by numerical integration of
805: Eq.\ (\ref{ecua24}), and from the full system, by numerical
806: simulation of Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}),
807: when $\delta=1.245 \approx \Omega_{R}$ and
808: $\delta=1.22 \approx \Omega_{i}$ respectively.
809: %crp66 BET05/CCol
810: %prp43 BET05/PdE
811: }
812: \label{f7y8}
813: \end{figure}
814:
815:
816: \begin{figure}
817: \epsfig{file=fig7a.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90} \\
818: \epsfig{file=fig7b.eps,width=2.3in,angle=-90} \\
819: \caption{Damped case, $\beta=0.05$:
820: $\langle l(t)/l_{0} \rangle$ (points connected by
821: solid line) and
822: $\langle E(t) \rangle$ (dashed line) vs $\delta$.
823: Upper panel: Collective coordinate approach.
824: The width and the energy take their maximum values at $\delta=1.246$ and
825: $\delta=1.245$ respectively.
826: Lower panel: Results from the full system, Eq.\ (\ref{ecua1}).
827: The effective width has its maximum at $\delta=1.22$ and
828: the maximum of the energy occurs at $\delta=1.21$, both
829: of them close to $\Omega_{i}=1.2247$.
830: }
831: \label{resob}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \end{document}
835: