1: %\documentstyle[aps,preprint]{revtex}
2:
3:
4: \documentstyle[aps,psfig]{revtex}
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL}
7: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Sat Feb 09 09:54:53 2002}
8: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
9: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
10: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=REVTEX.cst}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13: \draft
14: \title{Microcanonical Approach for the OLA model}
15: \author{L. Velazquez\thanks{%
16: luisberis@geo.upr.edu.cu}}
17: \address{Departamento de F\'{i}sica, Universidad de Pinar del R\'{i}o\\
18: Mart\'{i} 270, esq. 27 de Noviembre, Pinar del R\'{i}o, Cuba. }
19: \author{F. Guzm\'{a}n\thanks{%
20: guzman@info.isctn.edu.cu}}
21: \address{Departamento de F\'{i}sica Nuclear\\
22: Instituto Superior de Ciencias y Tecnolog\'{i}as Nucleares\\
23: Quinta de los Molinos. Ave Carlos III y Luaces, Plaza\\
24: Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba.}
25: \date{\today}
26: \maketitle
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: In the present paper it is analyzed a very simple example of pseudoextensive
30: system, the tridimensional system of Linear Coupled Oscillators{\bf \ (OLA
31: Model). }The same one constitutes a classical tridimensional system of
32: identical interacting particles by means of harmonic oscillators. This
33: academic problem possesses a complete analytical solution allowing this way
34: that it can find application in modeling some properties of the
35: self-gravitating systems. It is shown that although this is a nonextensive
36: system in the usual sense, it can be dealt in the thermodynamic limit with
37: the usual Boltzmann-Gibbs' Statistics with an appropriate selection of the
38: representation of the space of the integrals of motion.
39:
40: Keywords: microcanonical ensemble, nonextensive systems
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \pacs{PACS numbers: 05.20.Gg; 05.20.-y}
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46:
47: In our previous works it was established a general methodology to deal with
48: some nonextensive systems. In the ref.\cite{vel1} it was addressed the
49: problem of generalizing the extensive postulates of the traditional
50: Thermodynamics in order to extend the application of this theory to the
51: study of some Hamiltonian nonextensive systems. According to our
52: proposition, This can be performed taking into account the self-similarity
53: scaling properties of the systems with the realization of the thermodynamic
54: limit, the limit of many particles, and analyzing the necessary condition
55: for the equivalence of the microcanonical ensemble with the generalized
56: canonical one. In the ref.\cite{vel2} it was analyzed the most familiar
57: self-similarity scaling laws of the systems,{\em \ the exponential scaling}.
58: Systems with this kind of scaling behavior in the thermodynamic limit can be
59: dealt with the usual Boltzmann-Gibbs' Statistics if an appropriate selection
60: of the representation of the space of the integrals of movement, $\Im _{N}$,
61: is taken. That is the reason why we refer those systems as pseudoextensive.
62: The extensive systems are just a particular case of the pseudoextensive
63: systems. It is easy to show that it is sufficient the presence of an
64: additive kinetic part in the system Hamiltonian for the consideration of
65: that system as pseudoextensive.
66:
67: The present paper will be devoted to the microcanonical analysis of a very
68: simple nonextensive system that allows us a complete analytical study: {\bf %
69: the tridimensional system of Linear Coupled Oscillators (OLA model)}. This
70: academic model has been used in the modelation of many systems, and although
71: it is very well-known from the begining of Mechanics, nowadays it is still
72: considered in the description of some real system, e.i.: quantum dots (see
73: for example in refs.\cite{LBDL98,LBDL98b,KAS93,HEI93,JAC97,MEU92}). In spite
74: of its simplicity, this model possesses a nonextensive character: it is
75: inhomogeneous, the total energy does not scale with the particle number of
76: the system, etc. We will analyze the scaling properties of its asymptotic
77: accessible volume in order to precise which is its correspondent asymptotic
78: canonical description in the ThL.
79:
80: \section{The OLA Model}
81:
82: The Hamiltonian of this system is given by:
83:
84: \begin{equation}
85: H=\stackrel{N}{%
86: %TCIMACRO{\underset{j=1}{\sum }}%
87: %BeginExpansion
88: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{j=1}}%
89: %EndExpansion
90: }\frac{1}{2m}{\bf p}_{j}^{2}+\stackrel{N}{%
91: %TCIMACRO{\underset{j,k=1}{\sum }}%
92: %BeginExpansion
93: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{j,k=1}}%
94: %EndExpansion
95: }\frac{m\omega ^{2}}{4}\left( {\bf r}_{j}-{\bf r}_{k}\right) ^{2}\text{.}
96: \label{h}
97: \end{equation}
98: This is an example very simple of a {\em self-gravitating small system}{\it %
99: \ }that allows us a complete analytical study. It will develop its
100: microcanonical analysis taking also into account the fallowing integrals of
101: motion:
102:
103: \begin{equation}
104: {\bf M}=%
105: %TCIMACRO{\underset{j=1}{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}}%
106: %BeginExpansion
107: \mathrel{\mathop{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}\limits_{j=1}}%
108: %EndExpansion
109: {\bf r}_{j}\times {\bf p}_{j}\text{ (angular momentum)},\text{\ \ and\ \ \ }%
110: {\bf P}_{0}=%
111: %TCIMACRO{\underset{j=1}{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}}%
112: %BeginExpansion
113: \mathrel{\mathop{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}\limits_{j=1}}%
114: %EndExpansion
115: {\bf p}_{j}\text{ \ (lineal momentum).} \label{m}
116: \end{equation}
117: In order to eliminate the divergence in the accessible states density of
118: this model due to the unbound movement of the system mass center, it is also
119: demand the following additional constrains:
120:
121: \begin{equation}
122: {\bf P}_{0}=%
123: %TCIMACRO{\underset{j=1}{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}}%
124: %BeginExpansion
125: \mathrel{\mathop{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}\limits_{j=1}}%
126: %EndExpansion
127: {\bf p}_{j}=0\text{\ \ and \ \ }{\bf R}_{0}=%
128: %TCIMACRO{\underset{j=1}{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}}%
129: %BeginExpansion
130: \mathrel{\mathop{\stackrel{N}{\sum }}\limits_{j=1}}%
131: %EndExpansion
132: {\bf r}_{j}=0\text{,} \label{e3}
133: \end{equation}
134: which are consistent with the energy and angular momentum conservation. It
135: is convenient to work with dimensionless variables, so that, it is
136: introduced the following units:
137:
138: \begin{equation}
139: \left[ E\right] =\hbar \omega \text{,}\qquad \left[ M\right] =\hbar \text{,}%
140: \qquad \left[ R\right] =\left( \frac{\hbar }{m\omega }\right) ^{\frac{1}{2}}%
141: \text{ and \ }\left[ P\right] =\left( m\hbar \omega \right) ^{\frac{1}{2}}%
142: \text{.}
143: \end{equation}
144:
145: The calculations will be facilitated using the {\em vectorial} {\em %
146: convention} for the ${\bf R}^{3N}$ vectorial space, which appears in the
147: appendices. It is easy to see that the equations Eq.(\ref{h}), Eq.(\ref{m})
148: and Eq.(\ref{e3}) are rewritten as:
149:
150: \begin{equation}
151: H=\frac{1}{2}P^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\left( B^{2}R^{2}-\left( B\cdot R\right)
152: ^{2}\right) \text{,}\ \text{\ \ }\ {\bf M}=R\otimes P\ \text{,}\
153: \end{equation}
154:
155: \begin{equation}
156: {\bf R}_{0}=B\cdot R=0\ \ \text{and}\ \ {\bf P}_{0}=B\cdot P=0\text{ ,}
157: \end{equation}
158: where $R,P\in {\bf R}^{3N}$ are the extended system coordinates and linear
159: momentum that together conform the {\it N-}body phase space of the system,
160: and $B\in {\bf R}^{N}$ $\ $with $B=\left( 1,1,\ldots 1\right) $.\ The
161: solution of this problem can be easily found through of the {\em generating
162: functional} of the distribution:
163:
164: \begin{equation}
165: K\left( \chi ,\upsilon ;I,N\right) =\frac{1}{\hbar ^{7}\omega }\int \frac{%
166: d^{3N}Rd^{3N}P}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3N}}\exp \left[ i\left( \chi \cdot
167: R+\upsilon \cdot P\right) \right] \delta \left[ I-I_{N}\left( R,P\right) %
168: \right] \text{,} \label{e5}
169: \end{equation}
170: where $I=\left( E,{\bf M},{\bf R}_{o},{\bf P}_{o}\right) $, $\chi $ and $%
171: \upsilon $ are {\em 3N-}dimensional vectors belonging to ${\bf R}^{3N}$ . It
172: is convenient to use the Fourier's representation of the delta function:
173:
174: \begin{equation}
175: \delta \left( x_{o}-x\right) =\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\frac{dk}{2\pi }\exp %
176: \left[ z(x_{o}-x)\right] \text{,}
177: \end{equation}
178: where $z=\varepsilon +ik$ with $\varepsilon >0$, to rewrite the Eq.(\ref{e5}%
179: ) as follow:
180:
181: \begin{equation}
182: K\left( \chi ,\upsilon ;I,N\right) =\frac{1}{\hbar ^{7}\omega }\int \frac{%
183: d^{10}{\bf k}}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^{10}}\exp \left( {\bf z}\cdot I\right)
184: \aleph \left( {\bf z};\chi ,\upsilon \right) \text{,} \label{e6}
185: \end{equation}
186: \ where ${\bf k}=\left( k_{1},{\bf k}_{2}{\bf ,}i{\bf \rho ,}i{\bf \eta }%
187: \right) $, and ${\bf z}=\left( z_{1},{\bf z}_{2}{\bf ,}i{\bf \rho ,}i{\bf %
188: \eta }\right) $, with $z_{1}=\beta +ik_{1}$, ${\bf z}_{2}={\bf \gamma }%
189: +ik_{2}$. The function $\aleph \left( {\bf z};\chi ,\upsilon \right) $ is
190: defined by:
191:
192: \begin{equation}
193: \aleph \left( {\bf z};\chi ,\upsilon \right) =\int \frac{d^{3N}Rd^{3N}P}{%
194: \left( 2\pi \right) ^{3N}}\exp \left\{ -\left[ {\bf z}\cdot I_{N}\left(
195: R,P\right) -i\chi \cdot R-i\upsilon \cdot P\right] \right\} \text{.}
196: \label{e7}
197: \end{equation}
198: \
199:
200: The above integral is very easy to calculate because it can be reduced to
201: gaussian integrals. The calculations yield:
202:
203: \[
204: K\left( \chi ,\upsilon ;E,{\bf M},N\right) =\frac{1}{\left( 2\pi \right)
205: ^{3}B^{6}\hbar ^{7}\omega }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
206: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
207: %BeginExpansion
208: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
209: %EndExpansion
210: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
211: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
212: %BeginExpansion
213: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
214: %EndExpansion
215: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
216: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
217: %BeginExpansion
218: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
219: %EndExpansion
220: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
221: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
222: %BeginExpansion
223: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
224: %EndExpansion
225: }\frac{dk_{1}d^{3}{\bf k}_{2}}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^{4}}\frac{\exp \left(
226: z_{1}E\right) \exp \left( {\bf z}_{2}\cdot {\bf M}\right) }{\left(
227: Bz_{1}\right) ^{N-1}\left( B^{2}z_{1}^{2}-z_{2}^{2}\right) ^{N-1}}
228: \]
229:
230: \begin{equation}
231: \times \exp \left( -\frac{B^{2}\upsilon ^{2}-\left( B\cdot \upsilon \right)
232: ^{2}}{2B^{2}z_{1}}\right) \exp \left( -\frac{B^{2}{\bf z}_{2}^{2}\lambda
233: ^{2}-\left( B{\bf z}_{2}\cdot \lambda \right) ^{2}}{2B^{4}{\bf z}%
234: _{2}^{2}z_{1}}\right) \exp \left( -\frac{B^{2}\left( {\bf z}_{2}\times
235: \lambda \right) ^{2}-\left( B{\bf z}_{2}\otimes \lambda \right) ^{2}}{2B^{2}%
236: {\bf z}_{2}^{2}\left( B^{2}z_{1}^{2}-z_{2}^{2}\right) }z_{1}\right)
237: \label{e8}
238: \end{equation}
239: where:
240:
241: \begin{equation}
242: \lambda =\chi +\frac{{\bf z}_{2}\times \upsilon }{z_{1}}
243: \end{equation}
244:
245: The above expression must be used in the obtaining of the physical
246: observables. The accessible states density is expressed as:
247:
248: \begin{equation}
249: \Omega \left( E,{\bf M},N\right) =\frac{1}{\left( 2\pi \right)
250: ^{3}B^{6}\hbar ^{7}\omega }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
251: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
252: %BeginExpansion
253: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
254: %EndExpansion
255: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
256: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
257: %BeginExpansion
258: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
259: %EndExpansion
260: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
261: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
262: %BeginExpansion
263: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
264: %EndExpansion
265: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
266: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
267: %BeginExpansion
268: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
269: %EndExpansion
270: }\frac{dk_{1}d^{3}{\bf k}_{2}}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^{4}}\frac{\exp \left(
271: z_{1}E\right) \exp \left( {\bf z}_{2}\cdot {\bf M}\right) }{\left(
272: Bz_{1}\right) ^{N-1}\left( B^{2}z_{1}^{2}-z_{2}^{2}\right) ^{N-1}}
273: \label{sd}
274: \end{equation}
275: whose integration yields:
276:
277: \begin{equation}
278: \Omega \left( E,{\bf M},N\right) =\frac{1}{\left( 2\pi \hbar B\right)
279: ^{7}\omega }M^{3N-7}H_{N}\left( \frac{E}{BM}\right) \text{. }
280: \end{equation}
281: The function $H_{N}\left( x\right) $ is given by:
282:
283: \begin{equation}
284: H_{N}\left( x\right) =\left( 1-x\right) ^{2N-4}P_{N-2}\left( 1-x\right)
285: \sigma \left( x-1\right) ,\text{ where\ }\sigma \left( x\right) =\left\{
286: \begin{array}{c}
287: 1\text{ if }x>0 \\
288: 0\text{ if }x<0
289: \end{array}
290: \right. \text{ is the Heaviside function,}
291: \end{equation}
292: \begin{equation}
293: \text{and }P_{N-2}(z)=\stackrel{N-2}{%
294: %TCIMACRO{\underset{n=0}{\sum }}%
295: %BeginExpansion
296: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{n=0}}%
297: %EndExpansion
298: }a_{n}z^{n}\text{, \ with \ \ }a_{n}=\frac{\left( N-1+n\right) !}{\left(
299: N-2-n\right) !\left( 2N-4+n\right) !\left( N-1\right) !}\frac{\left(
300: -1\right) ^{n}}{2^{n}n!}\text{.\ } \label{pd}
301: \end{equation}
302:
303: The accessible volume is obtained multiplying the state density by an
304: appropriate element volume constant $\delta I$. A reasonable choice for the
305: tridimensional OLA model is:
306:
307: \begin{equation}
308: \delta I=\hbar ^{7}\omega \text{,}
309: \end{equation}
310: and therefore:
311:
312: \[
313: W\left( E,{\bf M},N\right) =\frac{1}{\left( 2\pi B\right) ^{7}}%
314: M^{3N-7}H_{N}\left( \frac{E}{BM}\right) \text{.}
315: \]
316: The integrals of motion space, $\Im _{N}$, in the ${\cal R}_{\left( E,{\bf M,%
317: }N\right) }$ representation is the ${\bf R}^{4}$ cone for a given $N$:
318:
319: \begin{equation}
320: E^{2}-N{\bf M}^{2}\geq 0\text{.}
321: \end{equation}
322:
323: In order to access to the scaling laws, it must be obtained the asymptotic
324: dependency of the polynomials coefficients in the Eq.(\ref{pd}). It is easy
325: to show the following asymptotic behavior:
326:
327: \begin{equation}
328: %TCIMACRO{\underset{N\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }}%
329: %BeginExpansion
330: \mathrel{\mathop{\lim }\limits_{N\rightarrow \infty }}%
331: %EndExpansion
332: a_{n}\simeq \frac{1}{2^{2N}N^{3N}}\frac{\left( -1\right) ^{n}N^{n}}{4^{n}n!}%
333: \text{.}
334: \end{equation}
335: Therefore, the asymptotic accessible volume is given by the expression:
336:
337: \begin{equation}
338: W_{asym}\left( E,{\bf M},N\right) \propto \left( \frac{E}{2\left( N\right) ^{%
339: \frac{3}{2}}}\right) ^{3N}Q_{N}\left( \frac{\sqrt{N}M}{E}\right) \text{,}
340: \label{aw}
341: \end{equation}
342: where the function $Q_{N}\left( x\right) $ is expressed as:
343:
344: \begin{equation}
345: Q_{N}\left( x\right) =\left( 1-x\right) ^{2N}\exp \left( N\frac{1-x}{4}%
346: \right) \text{, \ with \ }x\in \left[ 0,1\right] \text{.}
347: \end{equation}
348:
349: It is very easy to see that the tridimensional OLA model possesses an {\em %
350: exponential self-similarity scaling laws }\cite{vel1,vel2}:
351:
352: \begin{equation}
353: \left.
354: \begin{array}{c}
355: N_{o}\rightarrow N\left( \alpha \right) =\alpha N_{o} \\
356: E_{o}\rightarrow E\left( \alpha \right) =\alpha ^{\frac{3}{2}}E_{o} \\
357: {\bf M}_{o}\rightarrow {\bf M}\left( \alpha \right) =\alpha {\bf M}_{o}
358: \end{array}
359: \right\} \Rightarrow W_{asym}\left( \alpha \right) ={\cal F}\left[
360: W_{o},\alpha \right] \text{,}
361: \end{equation}
362: where the functional ${\cal F}\left[ W_{o},\alpha \right] $ is given by:
363:
364: \begin{equation}
365: {\cal F}\left[ W_{o},\alpha \right] \equiv \exp \left[ \alpha \ln W_{o}%
366: \right] \text{.}
367: \end{equation}
368: where $\alpha $ is the scaling parameter and $W_{o}$ is given by:
369:
370: \begin{equation}
371: W_{o}=W_{asym}\left( E_{o},{\bf M}_{o},N_{o}\right) \text{.}
372: \end{equation}
373: Thus, the tridimensional OLA model is not extensive, but {\em %
374: pseudoextensive }\cite{vel2}. In the present case, the generalized
375: Boltzmann's Principle \cite{vel1} adopts its ordinary form:
376:
377: \begin{equation}
378: \begin{tabular}{|l|}
379: \hline
380: $S_{B}=\ln W,$ \\ \hline
381: \end{tabular}
382: \end{equation}
383: his celebrated gravestone epitaph in Vienna. To this entropy form
384: corresponds the usual Shannon-Boltzmann-Gibbs' extensive entropy:
385:
386: \begin{equation}
387: S_{SBG}=-%
388: %TCIMACRO{\underset{k}{\sum }}%
389: %BeginExpansion
390: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{k}}%
391: %EndExpansion
392: p_{k}\ln p_{k}\text{,}
393: \end{equation}
394: and therefore, in the thermodynamic limit, the microcanonical description
395: could be substituted equivalently by the usual Boltzmann-Gibbs' Distribution
396: {\em with a appropriate selection of the representation of the integrals of
397: motion space}. This can be performed changing the representation from ${\cal %
398: R}_{\left( E,{\bf M},N\right) }$ to ${\cal R}_{\left( {\cal E},{\bf M}%
399: ,N\right) }$, where:
400:
401: \begin{equation}
402: {\cal E}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}E\text{.}
403: \end{equation}
404:
405: In the thermodynamic limit the microcanonical description of this system
406: should be substituted equivalently by the canonical one. In this case the
407: Boltzmann-Gibbs' Distribution is:
408:
409: \begin{equation}
410: \omega _{c}\left( X;\beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =\frac{1}{Z\left( \beta ,%
411: {\bf \gamma },N\right) }\exp \left[ -\beta {\cal E}_{N}\left( X\right) -{\bf %
412: \gamma }\cdot {\bf M}_{N}\left( X\right) \right] \text{.} \label{bgd1}
413: \end{equation}
414:
415: Through the Laplace's Transformation:
416:
417: \begin{equation}
418: Z\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =\int \exp \left( -\beta {\cal E}-{\bf %
419: \gamma }\cdot {\bf M}\right) W\left( {\cal E},{\bf M},N\right) \frac{d{\cal E%
420: }d^{3}{\bf M}}{\delta I}\text{,} \label{tl}
421: \end{equation}
422: it is easy to show that in the thermodynamic limit both descriptions are
423: equivalent, that is, the {\em Legendre's Transformation} between the
424: thermodynamic potentials of the ensembles is valid:
425:
426: \begin{equation}
427: P\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) \simeq \beta {\cal E}+{\bf \gamma }%
428: \cdot {\bf M}-S_{B}\left( {\cal E},{\bf M},N\right) \text{,}
429: \end{equation}
430: where $P\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) $ is the {\em Planck's Potential%
431: }:
432:
433: \begin{equation}
434: P\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =-\ln Z\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma }%
435: ,N\right) \text{,}
436: \end{equation}
437: when exists {\em a unique sharp maximum} in the integral argument of the Eq.(%
438: \ref{tl}). In this maximum, $\left( {\cal E}_{m},{\bf M}_{m}\right) $, it
439: will be satisfied the following conditions:
440:
441: \begin{equation}
442: \beta =\frac{\partial }{\partial {\cal E}}S_{B}\left( {\cal E}_{m},{\bf M}%
443: _{m},N\right) \text{, }{\bf \gamma =}\frac{\partial }{\partial {\bf M}}%
444: S_{B}\left( {\cal E}_{m},{\bf M}_{m},N\right) \text{,}
445: \end{equation}
446: and all the eingenvalues of the {\em curvature tensor }\cite{gro1,gro2}:
447:
448: \begin{equation}
449: K_{\mu \nu }=\partial _{\mu }\partial _{\nu }S_{B}\left( {\cal E}_{m},{\bf M}%
450: _{m},N\right) \text{,} \label{ct}
451: \end{equation}
452: are negatives [in the Eq.(\ref{ct}) $\partial _{\mu }\equiv \frac{\partial }{%
453: \partial I^{\mu }}$, where $I^{\mu }=\left( {\cal E},{\bf M}\right) $].
454: Similarly, the generalized Duhem-Gibbs' relation is also valid in the
455: thermodynamic limit:
456:
457: \begin{equation}
458: S_{B}\left( {\cal E},{\bf M},N\right) =\beta {\cal E}+{\bf \gamma }\cdot
459: {\bf M+}\mu N\text{,}
460: \end{equation}
461: where $\mu $ is the chemical potential:
462:
463: \begin{equation}
464: \mu \left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma }\right) =\frac{\partial }{\partial N}%
465: S_{B}\left( {\cal E}_{m},{\bf M}_{m},N\right) .
466: \end{equation}
467: From the Duhem-Gibbs' relation is easily deduced the following relationship:
468:
469: \begin{equation}
470: P\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =-\mu \left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma }%
471: \right) N\text{.}
472: \end{equation}
473:
474: The Boltzmann's entropy of the tridimensional OLA model in the asymptotic
475: region is given by:
476:
477: \begin{equation}
478: S_{B}\simeq 3N\ln \left( \frac{{\cal E}}{2N}\right) +2N\ln \left( 1-\frac{M}{%
479: {\cal E}}\right) +\frac{1}{4}N\left( 1-\frac{M}{{\cal E}}\right) +O\left(
480: \frac{1}{N}\right) \text{,}
481: \end{equation}
482: and therefore, the canonical parameters $\beta \ $and $\gamma $, and the
483: chemical potential $\mu $, are given by:
484:
485: \begin{equation}
486: \beta =\frac{1}{4}N\frac{12{\cal E}^{2}-3{\cal E}M-M^{2}}{{\cal E}^{2}\left(
487: {\cal E}-M\right) },\text{ }{\bf \gamma }=\allowbreak -\frac{1}{4}N\frac{9%
488: {\cal E}-M}{{\cal E}\left( {\cal E}-M\right) }\frac{{\bf M}}{M},\text{ }\mu =%
489: \frac{S_{B}\left( {\cal E},{\bf M},N\right) }{N}-3.
490: \end{equation}
491: To validate the previous results it must be demanded the concavity of the
492: Boltzmann's entropy, that is to say, the non-negativity of the $4\times 4$
493: curvature tensor:
494:
495: \begin{equation}
496: K_{\mu \nu }=\left(
497: \begin{tabular}{ll}
498: $-\frac{1}{2}N\frac{6{\cal E}^{3}-3{\cal E}^{2}M+M^{3}}{{\cal E}^{3}\left(
499: {\cal E}-M\right) ^{2}}$ & $\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \frac{1}{4}N\frac{9%
500: {\cal E}^{2}-2{\cal E}M+M^{2}}{{\cal E}^{2}\left( {\cal E}-M\right) ^{2}}%
501: \frac{{\bf M}_{3\times 1}}{M}$ \\
502: $\frac{1}{4}N\frac{9{\cal E}^{2}-2{\cal E}M+M^{2}}{{\cal E}^{2}\left( {\cal E%
503: }-M\right) ^{2}}\frac{{\bf M}_{3\times 1}}{M}$ & $\ \ \ -N\frac{2}{\left(
504: {\cal E}-M\right) ^{2}}\frac{{\bf M}_{3\times 1}}{M}\frac{{\bf M}_{1\times 3}%
505: }{M}-\frac{1}{4}N\frac{9{\cal E}-M}{{\cal E}\left( {\cal E}-M\right) M}%
506: \left( {\bf I}_{tr}\right) _{3\times 3}$%
507: \end{tabular}
508: \right)
509: \end{equation}
510: where ${\bf M}_{1\times 3}=\left( {\bf M}_{3\times 1}\right) ^{T}=\left(
511: M_{x},M_{y},M_{z}\right) $, and ${\bf I}_{tr}$ is the $3\times 3$ transverse
512: unitary matrix:
513:
514: \begin{equation}
515: \left( {\bf I}_{tr}\right) _{\mu \nu }=\delta _{\mu \nu }-\frac{M_{\mu }}{M}%
516: \frac{M_{\nu }}{M}\text{.}
517: \end{equation}
518: The determinant of the curvature tensor is given by:
519:
520: \begin{equation}
521: \det K=\frac{1}{256}N^{4}\frac{15{\cal E}^{2}+18{\cal E}M-M^{2}}{\left(
522: {\cal E}-M\right) ^{4}{\cal E}^{6}M^{2}}\left( 9{\cal E}-M\right) ^{2}>0.
523: \label{det}
524: \end{equation}
525:
526: From the above result is derived that all the accessible space is
527: appropriately described by the canonical ensemble in the ${\cal R}_{\left(
528: {\cal E},{\bf M},N\right) }$ representation: in the Laplace's
529: Transformation, Eq.(\ref{tl}), there is only one sharp peak. Thus, in the
530: thermodynamic limit \ both descriptions are identical: all the system
531: accessible space can be deal with the canonical description. This result
532: facilitates so much the analysis of this system. In the canonical
533: description, the Planck's potential is obtained from the Eq.(\ref{e8})
534: replacing $Bz_{1}\rightarrow \beta $ and ${\bf z}_{2}\rightarrow {\bf \gamma
535: }$:
536:
537: \begin{equation}
538: P\left( \beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =N\ln \left[ \beta \left( \beta
539: ^{2}-\gamma ^{2}\right) \right] \text{.}
540: \end{equation}
541:
542: The generating functional in the canonical description:
543:
544: \begin{equation}
545: G_{c}\left( \chi ,\upsilon ;\beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =\int \frac{%
546: d^{3N}Qd^{3N}P}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3N}}\omega _{c}\left( Q,P;\beta ,{\bf %
547: \gamma },N\right) \exp \left( i\chi \cdot Q+i\upsilon \cdot P\right) \text{,}
548: \end{equation}
549: is also obtained from the Eq.(\ref{e8}):
550:
551: \begin{equation}
552: G_{c}\left( \chi ,\upsilon ;\beta ,{\bf \gamma },N\right) =\exp \left( -%
553: \frac{B^{2}\upsilon ^{2}-\left( B\cdot \upsilon \right) ^{2}}{2B\beta }%
554: \right) \exp \left( -\frac{B^{2}{\bf \gamma }^{2}\lambda ^{2}-\left( B{\bf %
555: \gamma }\cdot \lambda \right) ^{2}}{2B^{3}{\bf \gamma }^{2}\beta }\right)
556: \exp \left( -\frac{B^{2}\left( {\bf \gamma }\times \lambda \right)
557: ^{2}-\left( B{\bf \gamma }\otimes \lambda \right) ^{2}}{2B^{3}{\bf \gamma }%
558: ^{2}\left( \beta ^{2}-{\bf \gamma }^{2}\right) }\beta \right) \text{.}
559: \end{equation}
560:
561: It is very interesting to known the particle distribution in the space. This
562: observable is easily obtained from the generating functional as follow:
563: setting zero all the components of the vectors $\upsilon $ and leaving only
564: one vectorial component in the vector $\chi $, $\chi =({\bf q},0,....,0)$,
565: and performing the following integration:
566: \begin{equation}
567: \rho \left( {\bf r}\right) =N\stackrel{+\infty }{%
568: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
569: %BeginExpansion
570: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
571: %EndExpansion
572: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
573: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
574: %BeginExpansion
575: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
576: %EndExpansion
577: }\stackrel{+\infty }{%
578: %TCIMACRO{\underset{-\infty }{\int }}%
579: %BeginExpansion
580: \mathrel{\mathop{\int }\limits_{-\infty }}%
581: %EndExpansion
582: }\frac{dq_{l}d^{2}{\bf q}_{t}}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^{3}}\exp \left(
583: -ir_{l}q_{l}\right) \exp \left( -i{\bf r}_{t}\cdot {\bf q}_{t}\right) \exp
584: \left( -\frac{B^{2}-1}{2B^{3}\beta }q_{l}^{2}\right) \exp \left( -\frac{%
585: B^{2}-1}{2B^{3}\left( \beta ^{2}-{\bf \gamma }^{2}\right) }\beta {\bf q}%
586: _{t}^{2}\right) \text{,}
587: \end{equation}
588: where $q_{l}$ and ${\bf q}_{t}$ are the longitudinal and the transverse
589: components of the vector ${\bf q}$ with respect to the vector ${\bf \gamma }$%
590: . The integration yields:
591:
592: \begin{equation}
593: \rho \left( {\bf r}\right) =\frac{N}{\sqrt{8\pi ^{3}\sigma _{l}\sigma
594: _{t}^{2}}}\exp \left( -\frac{r_{l}^{2}}{2\sigma _{l}}-\frac{{\bf r}_{t}^{2}}{%
595: 2\sigma _{t}}\right) ,
596: \end{equation}
597: showing that the particle distribution possesses a gaussian shape where the
598: parameters $\sigma _{l}$ and $\sigma _{t}$ are given by:
599:
600: \begin{equation}
601: \sigma _{l}=\frac{B^{2}-1}{B^{3}\beta }\text{ , }\sigma _{t}=\frac{B^{2}-1}{%
602: B^{3}\left( \beta ^{2}-{\bf \gamma }^{2}\right) }\beta \text{.} \label{sp}
603: \end{equation}
604:
605: Let the parameter $s$ be introduced as follow:
606:
607: \begin{equation}
608: \frac{r_{l}^{2}}{\left( \frac{\sigma _{l}}{\sigma }\right) s^{2}}+\frac{{\bf %
609: r}_{t}^{2}}{\left( \frac{\sigma _{t}}{\sigma }\right) s^{2}}=1,
610: \end{equation}
611: parametrizing a family of ellipsoids of revolution which characterizing the
612: surfaces of equal density:
613:
614: \begin{equation}
615: \rho \left( s\right) =\frac{N}{\sqrt{8\pi ^{3}\sigma ^{3}}}\exp \left( -%
616: \frac{s^{2}}{2\sigma }\right) ,
617: \end{equation}
618: where $\sigma $ is defined by the relation:
619:
620: \begin{equation}
621: \sigma =\sqrt[3]{\sigma _{l}\sigma _{t}^{2}}.
622: \end{equation}
623: The eccentricity of ellipsoids family is constant and given by:
624:
625: \begin{equation}
626: e=\sqrt{1-\frac{\sigma _{l}}{\sigma _{t}}}=\frac{\gamma }{\beta }=\frac{M}{%
627: {\cal E}}\text{.}
628: \end{equation}
629:
630: As it can be seen, the rotation deforms the spherical shape of the
631: distribution. The characteristic size of the distribution is the given by:
632:
633: \begin{equation}
634: l_{c}=\sqrt{\sigma }.
635: \end{equation}
636: From the Eq.(\ref{sp}) it is deduced that the characteristic size decreases
637: with the increasing of the particle number $N$:
638:
639: \begin{equation}
640: l_{c}\sim 1/\sqrt[4]{N}\text{.}
641: \end{equation}
642: This kind of scaling law is not typical in the extensive systems, which are
643: usually scaled proportional to the systems size. In the FIG.1. it is shown
644: different profiles for the particle distributions.
645:
646: \section{Conclusions}
647:
648: In the present paper we applied the results of our previous works on study
649: of a very simple model of self-gravitating small system, the tridimensional
650: OLA model. The microcanonical analysis showed that the OLA model is a
651: pseudoextensive system \cite{vel2}, since it possesses a exponential
652: self-similarity scaling laws in the thermodynamic limit. Systems with this
653: kind of scaling laws could be dealt with the usual Boltzmann-Gibbs'
654: statistics if an appropriate representation of the system integrals of
655: motion space is selected. Although the model presented before is very
656: simple, the analysis shown that it is necessary the consideration of
657: self-similarity scaling postulates for the analysis of this system, since
658: the same is not extensive.
659:
660: \section{Appendix: The vectorial convention.}
661:
662: Let ${\bf R}^{3N}$\ be the $3N$-dimensional vectorial space, which is the
663: external product of the spaces ${\bf R}^{3}$, ${\bf R}^{N}$. The bases of \ $%
664: {\bf R}^{3N}$\ are represented by means of the product of the bases of the
665: respective spaces, ${\bf R}^{3}$\ and ${\bf R}^{N}$:
666: \begin{equation}
667: \overrightarrow{E}_{k,s}=\overrightarrow{e}_{s}\overrightarrow{E}_{k}\text{ }%
668: .
669: \end{equation}
670: \ It will be only considered those transformations preserving this property,
671: that is, those transformations which acts in the spaces ${\bf R}^{3}$\ and $%
672: {\bf R}^{N}$\ separately. The vectors of this space can be represented as:
673: \begin{equation}
674: V=\stackrel{N}{%
675: %TCIMACRO{\underset{k=1}{\sum }}%
676: %BeginExpansion
677: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{k=1}}%
678: %EndExpansion
679: }\stackrel{3}{%
680: %TCIMACRO{\underset{s=1}{\sum }}%
681: %BeginExpansion
682: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{s=1}}%
683: %EndExpansion
684: }X_{k,s}\overrightarrow{e}_{s}\overrightarrow{E}_{k}=\stackrel{N}{%
685: %TCIMACRO{\underset{k=1}{\sum }}%
686: %BeginExpansion
687: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{k=1}}%
688: %EndExpansion
689: }\overrightarrow{x}_{k}\overrightarrow{E}_{k}=\stackrel{3}{%
690: %TCIMACRO{\underset{s=1}{\sum }}%
691: %BeginExpansion
692: \mathrel{\mathop{\sum }\limits_{s=1}}%
693: %EndExpansion
694: }\overrightarrow{X}_{s}\overrightarrow{e}_{s}\text{ \ \ where \ }%
695: \overrightarrow{x}_{k}\in {\bf R}^{3};\overrightarrow{X}_{s}\in {\bf R}^{N}%
696: \text{ \ }.
697: \end{equation}
698:
699: From here and after, it will be adopted the tensorial summation convention.
700: Using the above representation, it can be defined the following external
701: operations:
702:
703: Let be the vectors: $\overrightarrow{a}\in {\bf R}^{3};\overrightarrow{A}\in
704: {\bf R}^{N};\overrightarrow{V}_{1},\overrightarrow{V}_{2},\overrightarrow{V}%
705: _{3}\in {\bf R}^{3N}$.
706:
707: \begin{center}
708: {\bf Partial and Total Inner Operations:}
709: \begin{equation}
710: R^{3}\times R^{3N}\rightarrow R^{N}:\overrightarrow{a}\cdot \overrightarrow{V%
711: }=\left( \overrightarrow{a}\cdot \overrightarrow{v}_{k}\right)
712: \overrightarrow{E}_{k},
713: \end{equation}
714: \begin{equation}
715: {\bf R}^{N}\times {\bf R}^{3N}\rightarrow {\bf R}^{3}:\overrightarrow{A}%
716: \cdot \overrightarrow{V}=\left( \overrightarrow{A}\cdot \overrightarrow{V}%
717: _{s}\right) \overrightarrow{e}_{s},
718: \end{equation}
719: \begin{equation}
720: {\bf R}^{3}\times {\bf R}^{3N}\rightarrow {\bf R}^{N}:\overrightarrow{V}%
721: \cdot \overrightarrow{W}=\left( \overrightarrow{v_{k}}\cdot \overrightarrow{w%
722: }_{k}\right) =\left( \overrightarrow{V_{s}}\cdot \overrightarrow{W}%
723: _{s}\right) \text{.}
724: \end{equation}
725:
726: {\bf Partial Vectorial Product:}
727: \begin{equation}
728: {\bf R}^{3}\times {\bf R}^{3N}\rightarrow {\bf R}^{3N}:\overrightarrow{a}%
729: \times \overrightarrow{V}=\left( \overrightarrow{a}\times \overrightarrow{v}%
730: _{k}\right) \overrightarrow{E}_{k}\text{ .}
731: \end{equation}
732:
733: {\bf Vectorial-Scalar Product:}
734: \begin{equation}
735: {\bf R}^{3N}\otimes {\bf R}^{3N}\rightarrow {\bf R}^{3}:\overrightarrow{V}%
736: \otimes \overrightarrow{W}=\left( \overrightarrow{v_{k}}\times
737: \overrightarrow{w}_{k}\right) \text{.}
738: \end{equation}
739: \end{center}
740:
741: From the previous definitions is derived the following identity:
742:
743: \begin{equation}
744: \overrightarrow{a}\cdot \overrightarrow{V}\otimes \overrightarrow{W}=\left(
745: \overrightarrow{a}\times \overrightarrow{V}\right) \cdot \overrightarrow{W}\
746: .
747: \end{equation}
748:
749: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
750:
751: \begin{references}
752: \bibitem{vel1} L. Velazquez and F. Guzman, Generalizing the Extensive
753: Postulates, preprint (2001) [cond-mat/0107214].
754:
755: \bibitem{vel2} L. Velazquez and F. Guzman, Microcanonical theory and the
756: pseudoextensive systems; preprint (2001) [cond-mat/0107439].
757:
758: \bibitem{gro1} D. H. E Gross, {\it Microcanonical thermodynamics: Phase
759: transitions in Small systems}, {\it 66 Lectures Notes in Physics}, (World
760: scientific, Singapore, 2001) and refs. therein.
761:
762: \bibitem{gro2} D. H. E. Gross, Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals13 (2001);
763: preprint (2000) [cond-mat/0004268].
764:
765: \bibitem{LBDL98} F. Luczak, F. Brosens, J. T. Devreese, and L. F. Lemmens,
766: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 57}, 2411 (1998).
767:
768: \bibitem{LBDL98b} F. Luczak, F. Brosens, J. T. Devreese, and L. F. Lemmens,
769: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C., {\bf 10,}1(1999).
770:
771: \bibitem{KAS93} M. A. Kastner, Physics Today, January 1993.
772:
773: \bibitem{HEI93} D. Heitmann, and J. P. Kotthaus, Physics Today, June 1993.
774:
775: \bibitem{JAC97} L. Jacak, P. Hawrylak, and A. Wojs, {\sl Quantum Dots},
776: Springer 1997.
777:
778: \bibitem{MEU92} B. Meurer, D. Heitmann, and K. Ploog, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf %
779: \ 68}, 1371 (1992); Phys. Rev. B {\bf 48}, 11488 (1993).
780: \end{references}
781:
782: \begin{center}
783: \bigskip
784: \end{center}
785:
786: \end{document}
787: