1: %\documentstyle[preprint,psfig,pre,multicol,aps]{revtex}
2: \documentstyle[graphicx,multicol,pre,aps]{revtex}
3:
4: %\def\sech{\mbox{sech}}
5: %\def\ds{\displaystyle}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \draft
10:
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: \title{Nonlinearity-induced conformational instability and dynamics
13: of biopolymers}
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15:
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \author{Serge F. Mingaleev$^{1,2,3}$,
18: Yuri B. Gaididei$^{2,3}$, Peter L. Christiansen$^{2}$,
19: and Yuri S. Kivshar$^{1}$}
20: \address{$^{1}$ Nonlinear Physics Group,
21: Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, \\
22: Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia \\
23: $^{2}$ Department of Mathematical Modeling,
24: The Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark \\
25: $^{3}$ Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, 14-B Metrologichna
26: St., 03143 Kiev, Ukraine}
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28:
29: %\date{\today}
30: \maketitle
31:
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We propose a simple phenomenological model for describing the
35: conformational dynamics of biopolymers via the nonlinearity-induced
36: buckling and collapse (i.e. coiling up) instabilities.
37: We describe the buckling instability analytically, and then
38: demonstrate the role of both instabilities
39: in the folding of biopolymers through the
40: numerical simulations of the three-dimensional dynamics of
41: a long semiflexible chain in the aqueous environment.
42: \end{abstract}
43: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
44:
45: \pacs{87.15.-v; 36.20.-r}
46:
47: \begin{multicols}{2}
48: \narrowtext
49:
50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51: %%\section{Introduction}
52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53:
54: Conformational flexibility is a fundamental property of polymers
55: which differentiates them from small molecules and gives rise to
56: their remarkable properties.
57: However, even the properties of polymers seem meagre when compared
58: to the functionality of biopolymers.
59: A distinctive feature of biopolymers is that, on the one hand,
60: they are heterogeneous and, on the other, their elementary sub-units
61: have a complex structure and can carry long-lived nonlinear
62: excitations \cite{myoglobin,peyrard,davydov,dna,scott,cruzeiro}.
63: While the significance of the heterogeneity gained
64: wide recognition as being of fundamental importance
65: for protein folding \cite{Taylor:2001-apr:RPP},
66: the function of nonlinear excitations remains obscured,
67: in spite of a large body of theoretical research
68: \cite{peyrard,davydov,dna,scott}.
69:
70: Here we suggest {\em a new role of nonlinear
71: excitations} in one of the most important functionalities of
72: biopolymers, their {\em conformational dynamics}.
73: For the first time to our knowledge, we demonstrate
74: that nonlinear excitations
75: can facilitate bending or folding of a semiflexible
76: molecular chain via the buckling or collapse
77: instability, and thus provide a
78: possible scenario for the conformational dynamics of
79: biopolymers.
80: We consider a semiflexible chain that models a biopolymer and
81: assume that its mechanical degrees of freedom are coupled to the
82: internal degrees of freedom such as amide-I vibrations
83: in proteins \cite{myoglobin,peyrard,davydov}, base-pair
84: vibrations in DNA \cite{peyrard,dna}, or polarons in
85: proteins \cite{peyrard,davydov}.
86: This coupling provides the energy needed to
87: overcome the potential barriers for folding, thus avoiding the need
88: for stochastic thermal activation.
89: We reveal that such a simple model describes the conformational
90: dynamics as {\em a deterministic controlled process}: when the
91: amplitude of the internal excitation becomes large, the
92: chain displays the buckling or collapse instability that
93: subsequently initiates the chain folding.
94: We believe that such simple physics can also account for the
95: kinetics of conformational phase transitions of semiflexible
96: polymers in solutions \cite{geom}.
97:
98: The importance of nonlinear excitations has already been
99: emphasized in the modeling of biopolymers and conjugated
100: polymers. In particular,
101: it was suggested that solitons may provide a possible physical mechanism
102: for the energy (or charge) transport and storage in proteins
103: \cite{peyrard,davydov}
104: and conducting polymers \cite{polymers}. The concept of nonlinear
105: localized modes was also employed to explain some
106: specific features of the DNA dynamics \cite{peyrard,dna}.
107: However, most of those
108: studies were dealing with nonlinear properties of {\em straight}
109: molecular chains and never discussed changes in their geometrical
110: structure. The study of nonlinear properties of {\em curved chains} has been
111: initiated only recently \cite{curv} and, in particular,
112: it was shown that the bending in a curved chain manifests
113: itself as an effective trap for nonlinear localized modes.
114: In this Letter, we make an important step forward and,
115: taking into account {\em flexibility} of biopolymer chains,
116: demonstrate that nonlinear excitations may act as drivers
117: giving impetus to {\em conformational dynamics} of
118: biopolymers.
119:
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121: %%\section{Model}
122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123:
124: Let us consider a simple phenomenological model of a biopolymer
125: consisting of particles with mass $M$, indexed by $n$, and located at the
126: points
127: $\bbox{r}_n=\{x_n, \, y_n, \, z_n\}$. We assume that each particle
128: represents a complex sub-unit of the biopolymer which,
129: additionally to its position $\bbox{r}_n(t)$,
130: carries an internal excitation which can
131: be characterized, in some approximation
132: \cite{peyrard,davydov,dna,scott,polymers},
133: by the complex amplitude,
134: $\psi_n(t)$. Such an internal mode
135: can represent, for instance, a polaron state
136: (an excess electron accompanied by phonons) or vibrational state
137: (amide-I vibrations in proteins or base-pair vibrations in DNA).
138: The Hamiltonian of such a chain is written as
139: $H= T + U + V$, where
140: $T= (M/2) \sum_{n} (d \bbox{r}_n/dt)^2$ is the kinetic energy,
141: $U(\bbox{r}_n)$ is the potential energy
142: of inter-particle interactions, and
143: \begin{displaymath}
144: V(\psi_n, \bbox{r}_n)= \sum_{n} \left\{ 2|\psi_n|^2 -
145: \sum_{m \neq n} J_{n m} \psi^*_n \psi_{m} -
146: \frac{1}{2} \,\chi\, |\psi_n|^4 \right\}
147: \end{displaymath}
148: is the energy of the internal excitation.
149: Here $\chi$ characterizes on-site self-trapping
150: nonlinearity of the internal excitation, and
151: $J_{nm}$ are the excitation transfer coefficients that
152: depend on the distance in the embedding space between the
153: particles $n$ and $m$:
154: $J_{n m} \equiv J(|\bbox{r}_n -\bbox{r}_m|)= (e^{\alpha}-1)
155: \exp\left(-\alpha |\bbox{r}_n-\bbox{r}_{m}|\right)$
156: \cite{note0}.
157: From the Hamiltonian, we obtain the equations of motion
158: \begin{eqnarray}
159: %%\begin{array}{l}
160: M \frac{d^2 \bbox{r}_n}{dt^2} + \nu \frac{d \bbox{r}_n}{dt} +
161: \frac{d U}{d \bbox{r}_n} - \sum_{k} \sum_{m \neq k}
162: \frac{d J_{k m}}{d \bbox{r}_n} \psi^*_k \psi_{m} = 0 \; ,
163: \nonumber \\
164: i \frac{\partial \psi_n}{\partial t} - 2 \psi_n +
165: \sum_{m \neq n} J_{nm} \psi_m + \chi \, |\psi_n|^2 \psi_n =0 \; ,
166: %%\end{array}
167: \label{eq-mot}
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: where we allowed additionally for a viscous damping $\nu$ of the
170: aqueous environment. We assume that the number of excitations,
171: $\sum_{n} |\psi_n|^2=1$, is conserved by Eq. (\ref{eq-mot}).
172: This approximation is fully justified for polaron states
173: and should be fairly good for vibrational states,
174: taking into account that in the case under study the lifetime
175: of amide I vibrations is greatly inceased as a result of their
176: self-trapping localization \cite{myoglobin,cruzeiro}.
177:
178: We consider the potential energy of inter-particle interactions as a sum,
179: $U(\bbox{r}_n)=U_{S}+U_{B}+U_{R}$, of the stretching energy
180: %%\begin{displaymath}
181: $U_{S} = (\sigma/2) \sum_{n} (|\bbox{r}_n-\bbox{r}_{n-1}|-a)^2$,
182: %%\label{poten-US}
183: %%\end{displaymath}
184: bending energy \cite{note2}
185: \begin{equation}
186: U_{B} = \frac{\kappa}{2} \sum_{n}
187: \frac{\theta_n^2}{1-(\theta_n / \theta_{\rm max})^2} \; ,
188: \label{poten-UB}
189: \end{equation}
190: and (to describe correctly coiling up of the chain) the
191: energy of short-range repulsive interactions between particles
192: (considered as elastic balls of the diameter $d$):
193: \begin{equation}
194: U_{R} = \frac{\delta}{2} \sum_{n} \sum_{m \neq n}
195: (d-|\bbox{r}_n-\bbox{r}_{m}|)^2 \; ,
196: \label{poten-UR}
197: \end{equation}
198: for $|\bbox{r}_n-\bbox{r}_{m}|<d$, and $U_{R} = 0$,
199: otherwise.
200: Here $a$ is the equilibrium lattice spacing (we take $a=1$),
201: $\sigma$ is the elastic modulus of the stretching
202: rigidity of the chain, $\theta_n$ is the angle
203: between neighboring bond vectors,
204: $(\bbox{r}_{n} - \bbox{r}_{n-1})$ and $(\bbox{r}_{n+1} - \bbox{r}_{n})$,
205: that meet at the $n$-th particle [see Fig. \ref{fig:chain}(a)],
206: $\theta_{\rm max}$ is a maximum bending angle, and
207: $\kappa$ is the elastic modulus of the bending rigidity of the chain.
208:
209: First of all, we recall the properties
210: of nonlinear localized modes in a curved chain, when the
211: chain geometry is ``frozen''. Such an analysis has been
212: recently carried out in Ref. \onlinecite{curv}, where it was shown
213: that the chain curvature affects strongly the properties of
214: nonlinear modes, creating an effective double-well potential around
215: the bending point, which
216: is responsible for the symmetry-breaking effect:
217: as the nonlinearity $\chi$ increases above some threshold,
218: a symmetric
219: stationary mode becomes unstable, and it transforms into
220: an energetically more favorable asymmetric stationary mode.
221: In that study, it was also found that the energy of a
222: nonlinear mode decreases as a square-law of the curvature
223: when the curvature is small.
224: Thus, since the bending energy of the chain increases
225: also as the square of the curvature, one can expect that
226: there should exist a converse influence of the internal nonlinear
227: modes on the conformational dynamics of the chain.
228: Below, we confirm this conjecture by straightforward
229: numerical calculations and find that not only the chain tends
230: to bend, for small enough $\kappa$, but it also
231: collapses (i.e. coils up), for smaller $\kappa$.
232:
233: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
234: %%\section{Ground State}
235: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
236:
237: As the first step of our study in this Letter, we analyze
238: the stationary ground-state configurations of
239: the chain described by the model introduced above.
240: We assume that the chain is infinitely long,
241: planar ($z_n = 0$), and inextensible ($\sigma \to \infty$),
242: so that the distance between the neighboring sites of the chain remains
243: constant. In this case, a spatial conformation of the chain is
244: completely defined by the bending angles $\theta_n$.
245:
246: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
247: %\vspace{2mm}
248: \begin{figure}
249: \begin{center}
250: \begin{minipage}{35mm}
251: \includegraphics[width=35mm,angle=0,clip]{bio-fig1a.eps}
252: \centerline{{\large\bf (a)}}
253: \end{minipage}
254: %%\hspace*{1mm}
255: \begin{minipage}{47mm}
256: \includegraphics[width=47mm,angle=0,clip]{bio-fig1b.eps} \\[6mm]
257: %%\vspace*{3mm}
258: \centerline{{\large\bf (b)}}
259: \end{minipage}
260: \end{center}
261: %%\vspace{3mm}
262: \caption{(a) Schematic representation
263: of a buckled chain. The distance between the sites
264: near the bend becomes smaller ($R_2<R_1$) lowering
265: the coupling energy of a nonlinear
266: mode that works against the increased bending energy and lead to
267: a buckling instability. (b) Ground state spatial configurations
268: of a semiflexible chain ($\alpha=2$, $\theta_{\rm max}=\pi/3$,
269: and $\kappa=0.125$) at different values of $\chi$:
270: 2.13~(i), 2.26~(ii), 2.44~(iii), 2.88~(iv), 3.00~(iv),
271: 3.13~(iii), 3.18~(ii), and 3.25~(i). As the nonlinearity $\chi$
272: increases, the chain bending initially increases, reaches its
273: maximum at $\chi\approx 2.96$, and then decreases.}
274: \label{fig:chain}
275: \end{figure}
276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
277:
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
279: %\vspace{2mm}
280: \begin{figure}
281: \centerline{\hbox{
282: \includegraphics[width=70mm,angle=0,clip]{bio-fig2.eps}}}
283: %%\vspace{3mm}
284: \caption{Phase diagram of the
285: ground states of a semiflexible biopolymer chain calculated
286: numerically (solid curves with squares) and analytically
287: from Eqs.~(\protect\ref{kappa-cr})--(\ref{kin}) (dashed curve), at
288: $\alpha=2$, $\theta_{\rm max}=\pi/3$, and $\sigma=\infty$.}
289: \label{fig:kappa-lambda}
290: \end{figure}
291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
292:
293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
294: %%\subsection{Numerical Results}
295: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
296:
297: We find the ground-state configurations of
298: the chain looking for the stationary solutions
299: of Eq. (\ref{eq-mot}) in the form
300: $\psi_n(t) = e^{i \Lambda t} \phi_n$ and
301: $d \bbox{r}_n/dt = 0$. The corresponding
302: system of nonlinear algebraic equations
303: has been solved by the Newton-Raphson iteration scheme.
304: The results of these calculations are presented
305: in Fig. \ref{fig:kappa-lambda}. The most interesting feature of this
306: phase diagram is the existence of {\em three distinct
307: types} of the ground states.
308:
309: A stiff chain (with $\kappa>0.183$) is always straight
310: and, regardless of the value of $\chi$, it cannot
311: be affected by the presence of a nonlinear excitation.
312: However, for $\kappa<0.183$, there appears a finite domain
313: of $\chi$, for which a straight chain becomes unstable
314: in the presence of a nonlinear mode. Inside of this domain,
315: the chain in its ground state {\em curves symmetrically}
316: around the nonlinear excitation, with some finite overall buckling
317: angle $\beta=\sum_n \theta_{n}$ [see Fig. \ref{fig:chain}(b)].
318: In Fig. \ref{fig:beta-lambda}, we plot the dependence of
319: the buckling angle $\beta$ vs. $\chi$ for
320: different values of~$\kappa$. As is seen, for $0.124<\kappa<0.183$ the
321: buckling angle $\beta$ is always finite and
322: reaches its maximum at $\chi \simeq 3$.
323:
324: When the bending rigidity of the chain decreases further,
325: i.e. for $\kappa<0.124$, a new type of the ground state,
326: {\em a collapsed chain}, emerges
327: (see Figs. \ref{fig:kappa-lambda} and
328: \ref{fig:beta-lambda}). In this case, the distance
329: between the complementary particles of the chain
330: [see Fig. \ref{fig:chain}(b)] decreases
331: to an extent that the growing interaction between the tails
332: of the nonlinear excitation turns buckling into collapse
333: causing the coiling up of the chain.
334: The conformation of the chain in the collapsed state
335: (which is usually a three-dimensional compact globule,
336: see Fig. \ref{fig:dyn})
337: is sensitive to the peculiarities of the potentials
338: (\ref{poten-UB})--(\ref{poten-UR}) and initial conditions.
339:
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
341: %\vspace{2mm}
342: \begin{figure}
343: \centerline{\hbox{
344: \includegraphics[width=73mm,angle=0,clip]{bio-fig3.eps}}}
345: %%\vspace{3mm}
346: \caption{Buckling angle
347: $\beta$ vs. the nonlinearity $\chi$ for
348: $\alpha=2$, $\theta_{max}=\pi/3$, $\sigma=\infty$,
349: and varying $\kappa$.}
350: \label{fig:beta-lambda}
351: \end{figure}
352: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
353:
354: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
355: %%\subsection{Variational Approach}
356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
357:
358: To gain a better insight into the physical
359: mechanism of the buckling instability,
360: we have developed a simple variational approach.
361: We assume that the chain bending occurs only at the center of the
362: excitation ($n=0$). In this case, the chain is composed of two
363: semi-infinite lines with the overall buckling angle $\beta \equiv
364: \theta_{0}$
365: between them. Obviously, such a geometry cannot describe the chain collapse
366: because $\beta$ is restricted by the maximum angle $\theta_{\rm
367: max}$, but it should be valid as long as we are not interested in the
368: collapsed
369: phase but study only a threshold between the straight and buckled
370: chain phases.
371:
372: In such a simplified model, the ground state of the chain is determined
373: by the dependence of the system energy on $\beta$.
374: We use a variational ansatz for the localized mode in the form
375: %%\begin{displaymath}
376: %%\label{var-phi}
377: $\phi_n=\sqrt{\tanh \gamma\,} \, \exp(-\gamma \, |n|)$,
378: %%\end{displaymath}
379: which satisfies the constraint $\sum_n \phi_n^2=1$, and we minimize $H$
380: with respect to $\beta$ and $\gamma$.
381: Thus, we can show that the straight configuration of the chain
382: ($\beta=0$) corresponds to the energy maximum (i.e., the straight
383: chain is unstable) for $\kappa\,<\kappa_{\rm cr}$,
384: where the critical value of the bending stiffness
385: is given by the following analytical expression
386: \begin{eqnarray}
387: \label{kappa-cr}
388: \kappa_{\rm cr}=\chi \, \alpha (e^{\alpha}-1)
389: \frac{3\,e^{\alpha+\gamma}-1}{3 \,
390: (e^{\alpha+\gamma}-1)^3} \, \tanh \gamma \; ,
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: and $\gamma$ is determined from the equations
393: \begin{eqnarray}
394: \label{kin}
395: \chi = \frac{8 \cosh^4\gamma}{(4 \cosh^2\gamma-3)}\,
396: \frac{\partial Q(\gamma)}{\partial \gamma} \; ,
397: \nonumber \\
398: Q(\gamma) = \frac{e^{\alpha} \, (e^{\gamma}-1)^2
399: (e^{\alpha+2\gamma} +1)}{(e^{2\gamma}+1) \,
400: (e^{\alpha+\gamma}-1)^2} \; .
401: \end{eqnarray}
402: In Fig. \ref{fig:kappa-lambda}, we compare the
403: threshold curve that separates the phases of the
404: straight and buckled conformations
405: predicted by the analytical formula
406: (\ref{kappa-cr})--(\ref{kin}),
407: with the same dependence calculated numerically.
408: One can see that the variational method provides
409: reasonably fair analytical results for the phase diagram.
410:
411: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
412: %%\section{Dynamical simulations}
413: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
414:
415: An important question is how the buckling and
416: collapse instabilities manifest themselves in the
417: dynamics of semiflexible biopolymer chains. To clarify this issue,
418: we consider a simple (but physically important) case of an
419: initially straight chain of a finite length whose left
420: end is free whereas the right end is fixed.
421: First, we excite a single particle at the left end of the chain, and
422: then keep track of how this excitation propagates along the chain
423: and how it modifies the chain geometry. For small values
424: of $\chi$, such a single-particle excitation disperses and spreads out,
425: whereas for very large values of $\chi$ it does not propagate
426: and remains completely trapped at the end of the chain.
427: However, for the intermediate values of $\chi$ (in our model, for
428: $2.5 < \chi <3.5$), such a single-particle drive applied at the end of
429: the chain generates {\em a moving localized mode}.
430: It is remarkable that this interval of nonlinearity
431: parameter $\chi$ matches closely the region in which
432: the bending capability of the nonlinear mode
433: reaches its maximum.
434:
435:
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437: %%\subsection{Bending of semiflexible polymer chains}
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439:
440: For a stiff biopolymer chain (i.e., for $\kappa > 0.183$),
441: the propagation of the generated nonlinear mode does not produce
442: any conformational change of the chain. However, when $\kappa$
443: decreases, the nonlinear mode generates a local chain bending.
444: In this case the nonlinear mode propagates
445: along the chain {\em being accompanied by a local bending};
446: the amplitude of such a bending decreases as the viscous damping $\nu$
447: increases. Thus, the buckling instability
448: we have described above
449: appears to be physically visible, and it is responsible, in particular,
450: for large-amplitude localized bending waves.
451:
452: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
453: %%\subsection{Collapse of flexible polymer chains}
454: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
455:
456: Let us consider now a flexible biopolymer chain with even
457: smaller $\kappa$, for which the nonlinear mode should produce a collapse
458: instability (see Fig. \ref{fig:kappa-lambda}). In this case, the
459: evolution of the chain
460: clearly demonstrates a collapse dynamics (see Fig.
461: \ref{fig:dyn}), and the chain folds
462: into a compact coil with
463: several loops consisting of 7--10 particles each
464: \cite{note1}.
465: Importantly, even for large values of the damping parameter $\nu$
466: the collapse of the chain is only delayed, but not prevented.
467: For instance, for the parameters used in
468: Fig. \ref{fig:dyn} the collapse-on time $t_c$ grows almost
469: linearly with $\nu$: $t_c \approx 87 + 1290 \nu + 283 \nu^2$
470: for $\nu \leq 1$. Besides, increasing of $\nu$ leads to
471: decreasing of the distance between the place of the collapse
472: nucleation and the left end of the chain.
473:
474: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
475: %%\section{Conclusions}
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477:
478: It should be mentioned that the instability
479: we discuss in this Letter remains latent
480: in a straight infinitely long chain, because the
481: bending of such a chain
482: would require an infinite energy. However, as we have
483: demonstrated above, the instability
484: manifests itself as soon as we consider more realistic cases and
485: take into account a finite length of the chain.
486: In this case, a nonlinear
487: localized mode, once generated at the end of the chain,
488: propagates along the chain
489: {\em accompanied by a local chain bending}, for
490: intermediate values of the bending rigidity $\kappa$,
491: and it {\em causes the chain folding},
492: for smaller $\kappa$.
493:
494: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
495: %\vspace{2mm}
496: \begin{figure}
497: \begin{center}
498: \includegraphics[width=78mm,angle=0,clip]{bio-fig4.eps}
499: \end{center}
500: %%\vspace{3mm}
501: \caption{Dynamics of a semiflexible biopolymer chain due to
502: the collapse instability
503: produced by a moving nonlinear mode generated from the
504: single-particle excitation at the left end of the chain.
505: The chain consists of 30 particles, with the right end fixed.
506: Marked particles indicate location of the moving excitation
507: (for these particles, $|\psi_n|^2>0.25$).
508: The parameters are: $\chi=3.2$, $\kappa=0.06$, $\nu=0.3$,
509: $\sigma=10^3$, $\alpha=2$,
510: $\theta_{\rm max}=\pi/3$, $M=0.5$, $\delta=10^2$, and $d=0.6$.}
511: \label{fig:dyn}
512: \end{figure}
513: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
514:
515: In conclusion, we have predicted analytically
516: and demonstrated numerically a new role played by nonlinear
517: excitations in the conformational
518: dynamics of biopolymers. Taking into account
519: the coupling between the internal and mechanical degrees of freedom of
520: a semiflexible biopolymer chain, we have found that it may produce
521: the buckling and collapse instabilities of an initially straight chain.
522: In the case of collapse instability, the viscous damping of the aqueous
523: environment only slows down the folding (coiling up) of the chain,
524: but does not stop it even for relatively large damping ($\nu \simeq 1$).
525: It should be stressed that these
526: instabilities are most pronounced for {\em intermediate values} of the
527: self-trapping nonlinearity, and they vanish completely
528: in the linear limit (i.e., for $\chi=0$).
529: We find that this effect is only weakly affected by
530: the peculiarities of the interaction potentials \cite{note0,note2},
531: and thus it should be generic for different models of nonlinear
532: semiflexible chains.
533:
534: We believe that the nonlinearity-induced buckling
535: and collapse instabilities may be of a considerable
536: importance in the conformational dynamics of the
537: globular macromolecules
538: with a multitude of quasi-isoenergetic conformations
539: \cite{Taylor:2001-apr:RPP},
540: where nonlinear modes excited even far from the chain ends
541: should cause {\em conformational transitions} between
542: different types of the globular states of the same or similar topology.
543: Presumably, another related problem is the energy
544: transduction in molecular motors, for which it was recently
545: suggested that the free energy
546: from ATP hydrolysis is initially converted into the
547: hinge-bending motion of the motor sub-unit
548: \cite{Wang:1998:Nature}.
549:
550: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
551:
552: The authors are indebted to M.~Peyrard,
553: K.~Rasmussen, S.~Takeno,
554: J.~Tuszynski, and A.~Zolotaryuk for useful and
555: encouraging comments.
556: S.~M. and Yu.~G. acknowledge support from the European
557: Commission RTN project LOCNET (HPRN-CT-1999-00163) and the
558: MIDIT center at the Technical University of Denmark, S.~M.
559: acknowledges supports from the the Performance and Planning
560: Fund of the Institute for Advanced Studies, the Australian
561: National University, and Yu.~G. from the DLR Project No.
562: UKR-002-99 and the SRC ``Vidhuk'' (Kiev).
563:
564: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
565: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
566: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
567:
568: \bibitem{myoglobin}
569: A. Xie, L. Meer, W. Hoff, and R. H. Austin,
570: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 5435 (2000);
571: J. Edlers, P. Hamm, and A. C. Scott,
572: {\em Femtosecond study of self-trapped vibrational excitons
573: in crystalline acetanilide}, submitted for publication.
574:
575: \bibitem{peyrard}
576: {\em Nonlinear Excitations in Biomolecules},
577: Ed.: M. Peyrard (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
578:
579: \bibitem{davydov}
580: A. S. Davydov, {\em Solitons in Molecular Systems}
581: (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985); A.C. Scott,
582: Phys. Rep. {\bf 217}, 1 (1992).
583:
584: \bibitem{dna}
585: L. V. Yakushevich, {\em Nonlinear Physics of DNA}
586: (Wiley, New York, 1998), and references therein.
587:
588: \bibitem{scott}
589: A. Scott, {\em Nonlinear Science: Emergence and Dynamics of
590: Coherent Structures}
591: (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999), and references therein.
592:
593: \bibitem{cruzeiro}
594: L. Cruzeiro-Hansson, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 73}, 2927 (1994).
595:
596: \bibitem{Taylor:2001-apr:RPP}
597: See, e.g.,
598: W. R. Taylor, A. C. W. May, N. P. Brown, and A. Aszodi,
599: Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 64}, 517 (2001).
600:
601: \bibitem{geom}
602: See, e.g.,
603: A. L. Kholodenko and T. A. Vilgis, Phys. Rep. {\bf 298}, 254 (1998),
604: and references therein.
605:
606: \bibitem{polymers}
607: A. J. Heeger {\em et al.}, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 60}, 781 (1988).
608:
609: \bibitem{curv}
610: Yu. B. Gaididei, S. F. Mingaleev, and P. L. Christiansen,
611: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 62}, R53 (2000);
612: P. L. Christiansen, Yu. B. Gaididei, and S. F. Mingaleev,
613: J. Phys.: Cond. Matter {\bf 13}, 1181 (2001).
614:
615: \bibitem{note0}
616: Discussed effects are tolerant to
617: a choice of $J_{nm}$, provided the interaction extends
618: beyond the approximation of the nearest neighbors.
619: We have verified the validity of our predictions for
620: other types of $J_{nm}$, in particular, for the
621: dipole-dipole interaction.
622:
623: \bibitem{note2}
624: We have checked that the use of other types of the
625: bending potential leads to qualitatively same results.
626:
627: \bibitem{note1}
628: We use $\theta_{\rm max}=\pi/3$, so
629: that 7 is a minimum number of particles in such
630: a loop.
631:
632: \bibitem{Wang:1998:Nature}
633: H. Wang and G. Oster, Nature {\bf 396}, 279 (1998).
634:
635: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
636: \end{thebibliography}
637: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
638:
639: \end{multicols}
640: \end{document}
641: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
642:
643: