1: \documentclass{elsart}
2:
3: \def\ggs{\buildrel\textstyle > \over {\hbox{\raise0.05ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
4: \def\lls{\buildrel\textstyle < \over {\hbox{\raise0.05ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
5: \def\gsim{\,\lower0.95ex\hbox{$\ggs$}\,}
6: \def\lsim{\,\lower0.95ex\hbox{$\lls$}\,}
7:
8: \usepackage{graphicx}
9: \usepackage{amssymb}
10:
11: \topmargin=-1.cm
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \begin{frontmatter}
15:
16: \title{Ising transition in a one-dimensional
17: quarter-filled electron system with dimerization}
18:
19: \author[label1]{M.~Tsuchiizu}\ead{tsuchiiz@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp},
20: \author[label2]{E.~Orignac}
21: \address[label1]{Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics,
22: Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
23: \address[label2]{Laboratoire de Physique Th\'eorique, CNRS UMR 8549
24: Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure, 24 Rue Lhomond 75005 Paris, France}
25:
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: We examine critical properties of the
29: quarter-filled one-dimensional Hubbard model with dimerization and
30: with the onsite and nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion $U$ and $V$.
31: By utilizing the bosonization method,
32: it is shown that the system exhibits an Ising quantum phase
33: transition from the Mott insulating state
34: to the charge-ordered insulating state.
35: It is also shown that
36: the dielectric permittivity exhibits a strong enhancement
37: as decreasing temperature with power-law dependence
38: at the Ising critical point.
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \begin{keyword}
42: A. organic compounds \sep D. electronic structure
43: \sep D. phase transitions
44: \end{keyword}
45: \end{frontmatter}
46:
47:
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49:
50: The Bechgaard salts (TMTSF)$_2$X and the Fabre salts
51: (TMTTF)$_2$X form a family of organic conductors with
52: quasi-one-dimensional band structure,
53: with a long history of both theoretical
54: and experimental research.
55: These materials have a 3/4-filled electron (i.e., quarter-filled hole)
56: band due to
57: a charge transfer from two organic
58: molecules to one counterion X.
59: Since the
60: transfer integral is slightly dimerized along the chain axis,
61: the system becomes effectively half-filling.
62: Optical and photoemission experiments on the normal states
63: have shown evidences of a
64: charge gap for both TMTTF salts and TMTSF salts
65: \cite{Gruner_ICSM,Gruner_science}. This charge gap is believed to
66: be related to the formation of a uniform insulating state.
67: Recently, a charge ordered (CO) insulating state
68: have been discovered by NMR measurements
69: in the (TMTTF)$_2$AsF$_6$ and (TMTTF)$_2$PF$_6$ salts \cite{Chow}
70: and by dielectric permittivity measurements
71: in the (TMTTF)$_2$PF$_6$ salt \cite{Monceau}.
72:
73:
74:
75: In order to describe theoretically the insulator,
76: one has to take into account the commensurability effect
77: of both half-filling and quarter-filling
78: \cite{Giamarchi_physica}.
79: As a simplified model,
80: the quarter-filled one-dimensional (1D)
81: extended Hubbard model with dimerization and
82: with the onsite and nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion
83: has been proposed
84: and it is shown in a mean-field approach that
85: a transition from the
86: state with a uniform charge distribution
87: to the CO state takes place
88: by increasing the intersite Coulomb repulsion \cite{Seo}.
89: In order to obtain the characteristics of such a transition,
90: the effect of quantum fluctuations must be taken into account.
91: For this purpose, the bosonization method is applied to this
92: system \cite{Bourbonnais,Tsuchiiz}.
93: The model reduces to the
94: double-frequency sine-Gordon (DSG) model
95: for the charge degrees of freedom
96: where two kinds of non-linear terms
97: appear due to the half-filled and quarter-filled
98: umklapp scattering.
99: The DSG model has been analyzed classically \cite{classical_DSG},
100: and quantum field theoretically
101: \cite{Delfino,Fabrizio_PRL,Fabrizio,Tsuchiiz}.
102: In terms of the renormalization group (RG) method,
103: it is shown that there are two-kinds of different
104: fixed points corresponding to the
105: Mott insulator and the CO insulator
106: \cite{Tsuchiiz}.
107: However, in the perturbative RG scheme
108: the both fixed points are strong coupling
109: where the perturbative RG treatment breaks down, thus
110: the low energy states behavior and
111: the critical behavior of the transition
112: cannot be captured correctly.
113:
114: Recently, it has been established
115: that
116: the critical properties of the DSG model is described as a quantum
117: Ising transition, i.e.,
118: $c=1/2$ CFT \cite{Delfino,Fabrizio_PRL,Fabrizio}.
119: By expanding the previous analysis of the DSG model, we examine
120: the critical properties of the
121: quarter-filled 1D extended Hubbard model with dimerization,
122: and also examine
123: the physical quantities, such as dielectric response and
124: optical conductivity, in the present study. Note that in
125: \cite{Fabrizio_PRL,Fabrizio}, the related problem of the conductivity
126: in a 1D Hubbard model with a {\it staggered} potential has been
127: considered.
128: We also discuss the experimental results on the
129: huge enhancement of the dielectric permittivity
130: obtained in the
131: (TMTTF)$_2$X salts \cite{Monceau}.
132:
133:
134:
135: We consider a 1D extended Hubbard model with
136: quarter-filling, where the corresponding Hamiltonian is given by
137: %==========================================================
138: \begin{eqnarray}
139: H &=& - \sum_{j,\sigma,l}
140: \left[ t + (-1)^{j} t_d\right]
141: \left( c_{j, \sigma}^{\dagger}
142: \, c_{j+1,\sigma} + \mbox{\rm h.c.} \right)
143: \nonumber \\ &&{}
144: + U \sum_{j} \, n_{j, \uparrow} \, n_{j, \downarrow}
145: + V \sum_{j} \, n_{j} \, n_{j+1}
146: \label{eq:H}
147: \end{eqnarray}
148: %==========================================================
149: where
150: $n_{j, \sigma} = c_{j, \sigma}^\dagger c_{j, \sigma}$ and
151: $c_{j, \sigma}$ denotes the annihilation operator of the electron
152: at the $j$-th site with spin
153: $\sigma$($=\uparrow,\downarrow$), and
154: $t_d(>0)$
155: denotes dimerization along the chain.
156: The onsite and nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsions
157: are denoted by $U$ and $V$, respectively.
158: By utilizing the bosonization method,
159: the phase Hamiltonian is given by $H=H_c+H_s$ with
160: \cite{Tsuchiiz}
161: %===================================================================
162: \begin{eqnarray}
163: H_c &=&
164: \frac{v_\rho}{4\pi} \int {\rm d}x
165: \left[\frac{1}{K_\rho} \left(\partial_x \theta_+ \right)^2
166: + K_\rho \left(\partial_x \theta_- \right)^2
167: \right]
168: \nonumber \\
169: && {}
170: - \frac{g_{1/2}}{2 \pi^2 \alpha^2} \int {\rm d}x \, \sin 2 \theta_+
171: + \frac{g_{1/4}}{2 \pi^2 \alpha^2} \int {\rm d}x \, \cos 4 \theta_+
172: ,
173: \label{eq:phaseHamiltonian}
174: \\
175: H_s &=&
176: \frac{v_\sigma}{4\pi} \int {\rm d}x
177: \left[\frac{1}{K_\sigma} \left(\partial_x \phi_+ \right)^2
178: + K_\sigma \left(\partial_x \phi_- \right)^2
179: \right]
180: \nonumber \\
181: && {}
182: + \frac{g_{s}}{2 \pi^2 \alpha^2} \int {\rm d}x \, \cos 2 \phi_+
183: ,
184: \label{eq:phaseHamiltonian_spin}
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: %===================================================================
187: where $\theta_\pm$ and $\phi_\pm$ are charge and spin
188: phase variables \cite{Tsuchiiz} and
189: $\alpha$ is a cutoff
190: of the order of the lattice constant.
191: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:phaseHamiltonian}),
192: the velocity and the Tomonaga-Luttinger exponent are
193: given by
194: $v_\rho = v_{\rm F}
195: [(1+g_{4\rho}/2\pi v_{\rm F})^2-(g_\rho/2\pi v_{\rm F})^2]^{1/2}$,
196: $v_\sigma = v_{\rm F}
197: [(1+g_{4\sigma}/2\pi v_{\rm F})^2
198: -(g_\sigma/2\pi v_{\rm F})^2]^{1/2}$,
199: $K_\rho =
200: [(2\pi v_{\rm F}+g_{4\rho}-g_\rho)/
201: (2\pi v_{\rm F}+g_{4\rho}+g_\rho)]^{1/2}$
202: and
203: $K_\sigma =
204: [(2\pi v_{\rm F}+g_{4\sigma}-g_\sigma)
205: /(2\pi v_{\rm F}+g_{4\sigma}+g_\sigma)]^{1/2}$.
206: The constants $g_\rho$, $g_{4\rho}$, $g_\sigma$ and $g_{4\sigma}$
207: are given by
208: $g_{\rho} =g_{4\rho} = (U + 4V)a$ and
209: $g_{\sigma} =g_{4\sigma} = Ua$
210: in the lowest order of the interaction, where
211: $a$ is the lattice constant.
212: The magnitude of half-filled umklapp scattering, $g_{1/2}$,
213: and that of quarter-filled one, $g_{1/4}$,
214: are given by \cite{Tsuchiiz}
215: %===================================================================
216: \begin{eqnarray}
217: g_{1/4} &=& \frac{1}{(2\pi\alpha)^2} \,
218: \frac{A^4 \, a^5}{v_{\rm F}^2} \, U^2 (U-4V)
219: ,
220: \label{eq:g1/4}
221: \end{eqnarray}
222: %===================================================================
223: and $g_{1/2} =B Ua $ in the lowest order where
224: $A \equiv [1-(t_d/t)^2]/[1+(t_d/t)^2]$ and
225: $B \equiv [2t_d/t]/[1+(t_d/t)^2]$.
226: We neglect the spin-charge coupling term
227: $U^3 \cos 4\theta_+ \cos 2\phi_+$ due to
228: its large scaling dimension \cite{Yoshioka}.
229: The order parameters
230: of the $4k_{\rm F}$ charge density wave (CDW) state and
231: the $4k_{\rm F}$ bond ordered wave (BOW) state
232: are given by\cite{Yoshioka}
233: %===================================================================
234: \begin{eqnarray}
235: \mathcal{O}_{4k_{\rm F}\mbox{-}\rm CDW}(x)
236: &\propto&
237: (-1)^{x/a}
238: \cos 2\theta_+(x)
239: ,
240: \\
241: \mathcal{O}_{4k_{\rm F}\mbox{-}\rm BOW} (x)
242: &\propto&
243: (-1)^{x/a}
244: \sin 2\theta_+(x)
245: ,
246: \end{eqnarray}
247: %===================================================================
248: where $k_{\rm F}=\pi/4a$.
249:
250:
251: The spin degrees of freedom becomes gapless due to the
252: marginally irrelevance of the $g_{s}$-term.
253: Therefore we focus hereafter on the charge degrees of freedom only.
254: In the case of $t_d=0$ (i.e., $g_{1/2}=0$),
255: it has been shown by the RG analysis that
256: the system undergoes the
257: Kosterlitz-Thouless transition by increasing the
258: nearest-neighbor repulsion \cite{Yoshioka} where
259: the gapped phase corresponds to
260: the CO insulator.
261: In the case of $t_d\neq 0$,
262: the Hamiltonian $H_c$ has two possible ground states with $\langle
263: \theta_+\rangle = 0,\pi/2$ ($4k_F$-CDW, dominated by $g_{1/4}<0$)
264: or $\langle \theta_+\rangle = \pi/4$ ($4k_F$-BOW, dominated by
265: $g_{1/2}$). These two ground states are incompatible, so we expect a
266: phase transition of the Ising type, as discussed in \cite{Fabrizio}.
267:
268:
269:
270: By following the method of Ref.~\cite{Fabrizio},
271: we analyze the DSG model
272: Eq.~(\ref{eq:phaseHamiltonian}).
273: By using the Jordan-Wigner transformation,
274: the vertex operators
275: are expressed in terms of the order ($\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$)
276: and disorder ($\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$) parameters of the
277: two Ising models as follows \cite{Gogolin_1d_book,Fabrizio}:
278: %==========================================================
279: \begin{eqnarray}
280: \sin 2\theta_+ &=& \sigma_1^z \, \sigma_2^z
281: ,
282: \label{eq:sin2theta}
283: \\
284: \cos 2\theta_+ &=& \mu_1^z \, \mu_2^z
285: ,
286: \\
287: \cos 4\theta_+ &=& \frac{1}{2} (\sigma_1^x + \sigma_2^x)
288: .
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: %==========================================================
291: The charge part of the Hamiltonian $H_c$ can be expressed in
292: terms of the quantum Ashkin-Teller model which
293: consists of two quantum Ising spin chains
294: coupled by a four-spin interaction term \cite{Fabrizio}:
295: %===================================================================
296: \begin{eqnarray}
297: H_c &=&
298: H_{\rm QI}[\sigma_1,\sigma_2]
299: + H_{\rm AT} [\sigma_1,\sigma_2]
300: + H_h [\sigma_1,\sigma_2]
301: ,
302: \label{eq:DQAT}
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: %===================================================================
305: where
306: $\sigma_l$ are the Pauli matrices of $l$-th chain $(l=1,2)$.
307: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:DQAT}),
308: $H_{\rm QI}$ is given by
309: %===================================================================
310: \begin{eqnarray}
311: H_{\rm QI}
312: &=&
313: -\sum_{l=1,2} \sum_n
314: \Bigl[
315: J \, \sigma_l^z(n) \, \sigma_l^z(n+1) + \Delta \, \sigma_l^x(n)
316: \Bigr]
317: ,
318: \label{eq:Hqi}
319: \end{eqnarray}
320: %===================================================================
321: where $n$ denotes the lattice site on the respective chain.
322: This Hamiltonian describes two independent
323: quantum Ising
324: (QI) chains in a transverse magnetic field ($\Delta$).
325: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:DQAT}),
326: $H_{\rm AT}$ is the Ashkin-Teller interaction term given by
327: %===================================================================
328: \begin{eqnarray}
329: H_{\rm AT}
330: &=&
331: J' \sum_n
332: \Bigl[
333: \sigma_1^z(n) \, \sigma_1^z(n+1) \,
334: \sigma_2^z(n) \, \sigma_2^z(n+1)
335: \nonumber \\ && \hspace*{1cm} {}
336: + \sigma_1^x(n) \, \sigma_2^x(n)
337: \Bigr]
338: ,
339: \end{eqnarray}
340: %===================================================================
341: where this term describes a four-spin interaction.
342: It is noted that this interaction term takes a {\it self-dual} form,
343: thus this term does not make the system non-critical.
344: Finally,
345: $H_h$ is a ``magnetic field''-type coupling, given by
346: %===================================================================
347: \begin{eqnarray}
348: H_h
349: &=&
350: -h \sum_n
351: \sigma_1^z(n) \,
352: \sigma_2^z(n)
353: .
354: \end{eqnarray}
355: %===================================================================
356: By using the Jordan-Wigner transformation,
357: the parameters in Eq.~(\ref{eq:phaseHamiltonian}) and
358: those in Eq.~(\ref{eq:DQAT}) can be related as
359: $v_\rho = 2J a [ 1- \left(2J'/\pi J \right)^2 ]^{1/2}$,
360: $K_\rho = (1/8)
361: [ \{1+(2J'/\pi J)\}/\{1-(2J'/\pi J)\} ]^{1/2}$,
362: $g_{1/2}= 2a h$ and
363: $g_{1/4} = - 4a (\Delta-J ) $.
364: Note that the sine-Gordon model, Eq.~(\ref{eq:phaseHamiltonian}),
365: with $K_\rho=1/8$, $g_{1/2}= 0$ and $g_{1/4} \neq 0$, is equivalent
366: to a model of two degenerate massive Majorana fermions,
367: i.e., two decoupled non-critical Ising models \cite{Gogolin_1d_book},
368: and, when the nonlinear term vanishes ($g_{1/4}\to0$),
369: two Ising models
370: become critical simultaneously, i.e., critical properties
371: are described by $c=1$ CFT.
372:
373:
374: The origin of the Ising criticality ($c=1/2$ CFT) in the case
375: of $g_{1/2}\neq 0$
376: can be captured easily
377: by considering the limit of large $h$ \cite{Fabrizio}.
378: In this case, the Ising spins are
379: locked as $(\sigma_1,\sigma_2)=(1,1)$ or $(-1,-1)$
380: where $\sigma_i$ is the eigenvalue of $\sigma^z_i$.
381: This fact implies that
382: the ``relative'' degrees of freedom
383: becomes locked (i.e., this freedom is always non-critical)
384: while the ``total'' degrees of freedom
385: asymptotically decouples and
386: the system can become
387: critical where the critical properties are described by $c=1/2$ CFT.
388: In order to analyze the physical quantities on and near
389: the criticality,
390: we change the basis into ``total''-``relative'' representation,
391: where the relative Ising mode is described by
392: $\tau=\sigma_1\, \sigma_2$, while the total mode
393: by e.g., $\sigma=\sigma_1$.
394: The operator identities are given by \cite{Fabrizio}
395: %================================================================
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: \begin{array}{ll}
398: \sigma^z = \sigma_1^z ,
399: &
400: \tau^z = \sigma_1^z \, \sigma_2^z ,
401: \\
402: \sigma^x=\sigma_1^x \, \sigma_2^x , \hspace*{.2cm}
403: &
404: \tau^x=\sigma_2^x .
405: \end{array}
406: \end{eqnarray}
407: %===================================================================
408: In terms of these spin variables,
409: Eq.~(\ref{eq:DQAT}) is rewritten as
410: $H_c = H_\sigma + H_\tau + H_{\sigma \tau}$ where
411: %===================================================================
412: \begin{eqnarray}
413: H_\sigma
414: &=& \sum_n
415: \Bigl[
416: -J \, \sigma^z(n) \, \sigma^z(n+1)
417: +J' \, \sigma^x(n)
418: \Bigr]
419: ,
420: \\
421: H_\tau
422: &=& \sum_n
423: \Bigl[
424: J' \, \tau^z(n) \, \tau^z(n+1)
425: -\Delta \, \tau^x(n)
426: -h \, \tau^z(n)
427: \Bigr]
428: ,
429: \\
430: H_{\sigma \tau}
431: &=& -\sum_n
432: \Bigl[
433: J \, \sigma^z(n) \, \sigma^z(n+1) \, \tau^z(n) \, \tau^z(n+1)
434: \nonumber \\ && \hspace*{1.5cm} {}
435: + \Delta \, \sigma^x(n) \, \tau^x(n)
436: \Bigr]
437: .
438: \end{eqnarray}
439: %===================================================================
440: The Ising transition corresponds the situation
441: when the $\sigma$-degrees of freedom go massless
442: at $\Delta \approx \sqrt{h(2J+J')}$ \cite{Fabrizio}.
443: With no regard to the Ising transition in the $\sigma$-chain,
444: the $\tau$-chain remains frozen in a
445: configuration with both $\langle \tau^z \rangle$ and
446: $\langle \tau^x \rangle$
447: nonzero.
448: Here we introduce the spin variables $\mu$ and $\nu$
449: which are dual to
450: $\sigma$ and $\tau$, respectively, by
451: the Kramers-Wannier transformation:
452: $\mu^z(n+1/2) \equiv \prod_{m=1}^n \sigma^x(m)$,
453: $\mu^x(n+1/2) \equiv \sigma^z(n) \sigma^z(n+1)$,
454: $\nu^z(n+1/2) \equiv \prod_{m=1}^n \tau^x(m)$ and
455: $\nu^x(n+1/2) \equiv \tau^z(n) \tau^z(n+1)$.
456: The spin variables $\mu$ and $\nu$ can be related with
457: $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$ by
458: $\mu^z=\mu_1^z \, \mu_2^z$,
459: $\mu^x=\mu_1^x$,
460: $\nu^z=\mu_2^z$ and
461: $\nu^x=\mu_1^x \, \mu_2^x$.
462: The expectation value of $\mu^z$
463: becomes finite ($\langle \mu^z\rangle\neq 0$) in the case that
464: $\sigma$-chain is in the disordered phase
465: ($\langle \sigma^z\rangle=0$),
466: while becomes zero ($\langle\mu^z\rangle= 0$) in the ordered phase
467: ($\langle \sigma^z\rangle \neq 0$).
468: The order parameter of $4k_{\rm F}$-CDW
469: is given in terms of the spin variable by
470: $\mathcal{O}_{4k_{\rm F}\mbox{-}\rm CDW}
471: \propto \cos 2\theta_+ = \mu_1^z \, \mu_2^z=\mu^z$, and then
472: one finds $\langle \mathcal{O}_{4k_{\rm F}\mbox{-}\rm CDW} \rangle
473: \propto \langle \mu^z \rangle \neq 0$ in the disorder phase only.
474: Therefore
475: the transition from the Mott insulator to the
476: CO insulator corresponds to this order-disorder
477: Ising quantum phase transition
478: of the $\sigma$ Ising chain,
479: where the disordered phase of the Ising system
480: corresponds to the CO insulating state.
481: Note that the quantity $\langle \mathcal{O}_{4k_{\rm F}\mbox{-}\rm BOW}\rangle$
482: takes a finite value
483: and shows no anomaly at the transition point,
484: since the order parameter of $4k_{\rm F}$-BOW is given in terms
485: of the noncritical Ising field:
486: $\mathcal{O}_{4k_{\rm F}\mbox{-}\rm BOW}\propto \sin 2\theta_+
487: =\sigma_1^z\, \sigma_2^z = \tau^z$.
488:
489:
490:
491: Now we examine the dielectric permittivity and the
492: optical conductivity at finite temperature.
493: In the energy scale higher than the
494: gap in the $\tau$-chain, the perturbative analysis
495: in terms of renormalization group method
496: works well \cite{Tsuchiiz}.
497: The complex conductivity
498: $\sigma(\omega)=\sigma_1(\omega)+i\, \sigma_2(\omega)$
499: ($\sigma_1\equiv {\rm Re} \, \sigma$ and
500: $\sigma_2\equiv {\rm Im} \, \sigma$)
501: can be calculated from
502: $\sigma(\omega)=i[\chi(\omega)-\chi(0)]/\omega$,
503: where $\chi$ is the retarded current-current correlation
504: function: $\chi(\omega)=-i\int dx \int_0^\infty dt
505: \langle [j(x,t),j(0,0)]\rangle$ $ e^{i\omega t-\delta t}$.
506: In terms of the complex conductivity,
507: the dielectric permittivity is given by
508: $\epsilon(\omega)=\epsilon_1(\omega)+i \, \epsilon_2(\omega)
509: =1+(4\pi i/\omega)\, \sigma(\omega)$,
510: where $\epsilon_1\equiv {\rm Re} \, \epsilon$ and
511: $\epsilon_2\equiv {\rm Im} \, \epsilon$.
512: By utilizing the RG method,
513: it can be shown that
514: the resistivity $\rho(T)$ and the dielectric permittivity
515: $\epsilon_1(T)$
516: behaves as $\rho(T)=1/\sigma_1(T)\propto T^{16K_\rho-3}$
517: and $\epsilon_1(T)\propto T^{2-16K_\rho}$
518: in the case that the quarter-filled umklapp scattering
519: is dominant \cite{Tsuchiiz}.
520: This analysis, however, only holds in the high temperature region.
521: In the energy scale lower than the gap in the $\tau$-chain,
522: we analyze these physical quantities in the
523: quantum Ising model scheme.
524: By using the spin variable $\mu$,
525: the current operator are given by
526: \cite{Fabrizio}
527: %================================================================
528: \begin{eqnarray}
529: j(x) &=& -\frac{1}{\pi} \, \partial_t \theta_+
530: \, \to -C \, \partial_t \, \mu(x)
531: ,
532: \label{eq:current}
533: \end{eqnarray}
534: %===================================================================
535: where $\mu(x)$ is a continuum variable of $\mu^z(n)$ and
536: and $C(\propto \langle \tau^z \rangle)$ is a non-universal
537: numerical constant.
538: Here we have used the fact that the $\tau$-field is
539: always non-critical
540: and has nonzero expectation value.
541: We introduce the response function of the
542: Ising disorder parameter:
543: %================================================================
544: \begin{eqnarray}
545: D^{(R)}(k,\omega) &=& -i \int dx \, \int_0^\infty dt \,
546: e^{-ikx+i\omega t}
547: \left\langle
548: \left[ \mu(x,t) , \, \mu(0,0)\right]
549: \right\rangle .
550: \label{eq:responseIsing}
551: \end{eqnarray}
552: %===================================================================
553: By using Eq.~(\ref{eq:current}),
554: the current-current correlation function is given
555: by
556: $\chi(\omega)=C^2\omega^2 D^{(R)}(0,\omega)$.
557: Then the real and imaginary parts of the conductivity $\sigma_1$ and
558: $\sigma_2$ are given by
559: $\sigma_1(\omega) = -C^2 \, \omega \, {\rm Im}
560: D^{(R)}(0,\omega)$ and
561: $\sigma_2(\omega) = C^2 \, \omega \, {\rm Re}
562: D^{(R)}(0,\omega)$.
563: On the Ising criticality, it is known that
564: the response function
565: is given by
566: $D_{\rm crit}(r) \propto 1/r^{1/4}$
567: where $r=(x^2+\tau^2)^{1/2}$
568: with the velocity being set to unity.
569: This power-law behavior is still valid away from
570: the criticality in the short range region $r\ll 1/\Delta_\sigma$,
571: where $\Delta_\sigma$ is the gap in the $\sigma$-part of
572: the Ising chain.
573: By using this asymptotic behavior,
574: the retarded response functions is given by \cite{Gogolin_1d_book}
575: %================================================================
576: \begin{eqnarray}
577: D_{\rm crit}^{(R)}(0,\omega)
578: &=&
579: -\frac{\sin(2\pi \Delta)}{(2\pi T)^{2-4\Delta}}
580: B^2\left(\Delta-i S, 1-2 \Delta \right)
581: ,
582: \end{eqnarray}
583: %===================================================================
584: where $S=\omega/4\pi T$,
585: the conformal dimension is $\Delta(=\bar{\Delta})=1/16$ and
586: $B(x,y)$ is the beta function given by
587: $B(x,y)=\Gamma(x)\Gamma(y)/\Gamma(x+y)$.
588: The temperature dependence of the dielectric permittivity
589: $\epsilon_1(\omega,T)$ with
590: zero and finite frequency is shown in Fig.~1, where $W$ denotes
591: the cutoff of the order of the bandwidth and
592: for simplicity we have set $C=1$.
593: The frequency dependence of $\epsilon_1(\omega,T)$ is also shown
594: in the inset.
595: The dielectric permittivity shows strong temperature dependence.
596: In high temperature limit, the dielectric permittivity $\epsilon_1$
597: becomes unity independent of $\omega$,
598: but as decreasing temperature
599: the huge enhancement can be obtained and
600: $\epsilon_1$ takes a maximum
601: at $T\approx \omega$.
602: At low temperature ($T \lsim \omega$), $\epsilon_1$
603: decreases and changes its sign, and finally saturates to a value
604: that depends on $\omega$.
605: The optical conductivity also increases as decreasing temperature, and
606: exhibits a maximum at $T\approx \omega$.
607: The limiting behaviors of $\epsilon_1$ and $\sigma_1$
608: are given by
609: $\epsilon_1(\omega,T)= 1+ {\rm const.}/T^{7/4}$ and
610: $\sigma_1(\omega,T)\propto \omega^2/T^{11/4}$
611: for high temperature ($T \gg \omega$),
612: and
613: $\epsilon_1(\omega,T)\propto - 1/\omega^{7/4}$ and
614: $\sigma_1(\omega,T)\propto 1/\omega^{3/4}$
615: for low temperature ($T \ll \omega$).
616:
617:
618: %====================================================================
619: \begin{figure}
620: \begin{center}
621: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig1}
622: \end{center}
623: \caption{
624: The temperature dependence of the dielectric permittivity
625: $\varepsilon_1(\omega,T)$
626: for $\omega/W=0$, 0.0005 and 0.001.
627: The inset shows the frequency dependence
628: of $\varepsilon_1(\omega,T)$ with fixed temperature
629: $T/W=0.001$, 0.005 and 0.01.
630: }
631: \end{figure}
632: %======================================================================
633:
634:
635:
636: Finally we discuss the experimental observation
637: of the (TMTTF)$_2$X salts.
638: Recent analysis of the dielectric response
639: exhibits a strong temperature dependence and a huge enhancement
640: of the dielectric permittivity as decreasing temperature
641: \cite{Monceau}.
642: In our analysis of the temperature dependence of the
643: dielectric permittivity,
644: we have restricted ourselves to the case on the Ising
645: critical point.
646: However, the results would be valid
647: in the vicinity of the transition point in the energy region
648: above $\Delta_\sigma$.
649: Therefore the huge enhancement could be interpreted by
650: considering that the system is in the vicinity of the
651: transition point from the Mott insulator to the CO insulator.
652:
653:
654:
655:
656: In summary, we examined the properties of the
657: dimerized extended Hubbard model at quarter-filling
658: in one dimension.
659: It was shown that the phase transition
660: from Mott insulating state to the CO insulating state
661: in this system
662: corresponds to the Ising quantum phase transition described by
663: $c=1/2$ CFT.
664: We have also show that
665: the dielectric permittivity exhibits a strong enhancement
666: as decreasing temperature with power-law dependence
667: at the Ising critical point.
668:
669:
670:
671: One of the authors (M.T.) thanks A.~Furusaki, T.~Hikihara, H.~Seo,
672: Y.~Suzumura and H.~Yoshioka for helpful discussions.
673:
674:
675: %===============================================================
676: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
677: \def\jo #1#2#3#4{#1 {\bf #2} (#3) #4}
678: %----------------------------
679: \bibitem{Gruner_ICSM}
680: A. Schwartz,
681: S. Donovan, M. Dressel, L. Degiorgi, G. Gr\"uner,
682: \jo{Synth. Met.}{86}{1997}{2129}.
683: %----------------------------
684: \bibitem{Gruner_science}
685: V. Vescoli, L. Degiorgi, W. Henderson, G. Gr\"uner,
686: K. P. Sarkey, L. K. Montgomery,
687: Science {\bf 281} (1998) 1181.
688: %----------------------------
689: \bibitem{Chow}
690: D.S.~Chow, F.~Zamborszky, B.~Alavi, D.J.~Tanillo, A.~Baur,
691: C.A.~Merlic, S.E.~Brown,
692: \jo{Phys. Rev. Lett.}{85}{2000}{1698}.
693: %----------------------------
694: \bibitem{Monceau}
695: F.~Nad, P.~Monceau, C.~Carcel, J.M.~Fabre,
696: \jo{Phys. Rev. B}{62}{2000}{1753}.
697: %----------------------------
698: \bibitem{Giamarchi_physica}
699: T. Giamarchi,
700: \jo{Physica B}{230-232}{1997}{975}.
701: %----------------------------
702: \bibitem{Seo}
703: H.~Seo, H.~Fukuyama,
704: \jo{J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.}{66}{1997}{1249}.
705: %----------------------------
706: \bibitem{Bourbonnais}
707: C.~Bourbonnais, D.~J\'erome,
708: {\it Advances in Synthetic Metals, Twenty years of Progress
709: in Science and Technology}, Eds.
710: P. Bernier, S. Lefrant, G. Bidan (Elsevier, New York, 1999),
711: P.~206-261.
712: %----------------------------
713: \bibitem{Tsuchiiz}
714: M.~Tsuchiizu, H.~Yoshioka, Y.~Suzumura,
715: J.~Phys.~Soc.~Jpn. {\bf 70} (2001) 1460.
716: %----------------------------
717: \bibitem{classical_DSG}
718: C.A.~Condat, R.A.~Guyer, M.D.~Miller,
719: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 27} (1983) 474.
720: %--------------------------
721: \bibitem{Delfino}
722: G. Delfino, G. Mussardo,
723: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 516} (1998) 675.
724: %----------------------------
725: \bibitem{Fabrizio_PRL}
726: M.~Fabrizio, A.O.~Gogolin, A.A.~Nersesyan,
727: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 83} (1999) 2014.
728: %----------------------------
729: \bibitem{Fabrizio}
730: M.~Fabrizio, A.O.~Gogolin, A.A.~Nersesyan,
731: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 580} (2000) 647.
732: %----------------------------
733: \bibitem{Yoshioka}
734: H.~Yoshioka, M.Tsuchiizu, Y.~Suzumura,
735: J.~Phys.~Soc.~Jpn. {\bf 70} (2001) 762, and references therein.
736: %----------------------------
737: \bibitem{Gogolin_1d_book}
738: A.O.~Gogolin, A.A.~Nersesyan, A.M.~Tsvelik,
739: {\it Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems}
740: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
741: %--------------------------
742:
743: \end{thebibliography}
744:
745:
746: \end{document}
747:
748: