1: \documentstyle[prl,twocolumn,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
3: %\tighten
4:
5: %prl format (two column):
6: % \documentstyle[aps,prl,twocolumn]{revtex}
7:
8: % paper format :
9: %\documentstyle[aps]{revtex}
10:
11: \draft
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15:
16: \title{ Collective oscillations of a 1D trapped Bose gas}
17:
18: \author{Chiara Menotti$^{1,2}$ and Sandro Stringari$^1$}
19: \address{$^1$ Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`{a} di Trento,}
20: \address{and Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia,}
21: \address{I-38050 Povo, Italy}
22: \address{$^2$ Universit\`{a} Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,}
23: \address{I-25121 Brescia, Italy}
24:
25:
26:
27: \date{\today}
28:
29: \maketitle
30: \begin{abstract}
31: \noindent
32: Starting from the hydrodynamic equations of superfluids,
33: we calculate the frequencies of the collective oscillations of a harmonically
34: trapped Bose gas for various 1D configurations. These include the
35: mean field regime described by Gross-Pitaevskii theory and the beyond mean
36: field regime at small densities described by Lieb-Liniger theory.
37: The relevant combinations of the physical parameters governing
38: the transition between the different regimes are discussed.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \pacs{PACS numbers: 03.75.Fi, 05.30.Jp, 32.80.Pj, 67.40.-w}
43:
44: \narrowtext
45:
46: Recent experiments on trapped Bose gases at low temperature have pointed out
47: the occurrence of characteristic 1D features. These include deviations of the
48: aspect ratio and of the release energy \cite{mit01,salomon} from the
49: 3D behaviour as well as the appearence of thermal fluctuations of the
50: phase, peculiar of 1D configurations \cite{hannover}.
51: Interest in 1D interacting Bose gases arises from the occurrence of
52: quantum features which are not encountered in 2D and 3D. For example
53: in 1D the fluctuations of the phase of the order parameter
54: rule out the occurrence of long range order even at zero
55: temperature \cite{PS}.
56: Such systems cannot be in general described using traditional
57: mean field theories and require the development of a
58: more advanced many-body approach.
59: In the case of 1D Bose gases interacting with repulsive zero-range
60: forces, this has been implemented by Lieb and Liniger \cite{lieb} who
61: studied both the equation of state and the spectrum of elementary
62: excitations of a uniform gas. In the presence of harmonic trapping,
63: 1D Bose gases exhibit new interesting features. The corresponding
64: equilibrium properties have been already discussed in a recent series
65: of theoretical papers (see \cite{gora,olshanii,gir} and references therein).
66: In the present work we investigate the consequences of harmonic trapping
67: on the collective oscillations of an interacting 1D Bose gas at zero
68: temperature.
69: We will consider various configurations, ranging from the mean field
70: regime \cite{rmp} where the healing length is larger than the average
71: interparticle distance, to the Tonks-Girardeau limit \cite{tonks} where
72: the gas acquires Fermi like properties.
73: We will show that the frequency of the lowest compression mode provides
74: a useful indicator of the different regimes.
75:
76: We start our discussion from the hydrodynamic equations of superfluids in 1D
77: %
78: \begin{eqnarray}
79: \label{HD1}
80: &&\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\delta n_1 +
81: \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \left(n_1 v \right) =0 \;, \\
82: &&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} v +
83: \nabla_z \left(\mu_{\ell e}(n_1) +V_{ext}+\frac{1}{2}mv^2 \right) =0 \;,
84: \label{HD2}
85: \end{eqnarray}
86: %
87: which decribe the dynamic behaviour of such systems at zero temperature.
88: In these equations $n_1(z,t)$ is the 1D density of the gas, $v(z,t)$ is the
89: velocity field, while $V_{ext}(z)$ is the external trapping potential
90: which in the following will be assumed to be harmonic:
91: $V_{ext}(z) = m\omega_z^2z^2/2$.
92: The hydrodynamic equations of superfluids have been already
93: successfully employed to predict the collective frequencies
94: of 3D trapped Bose-Einstein condensates \cite{sandro96}.
95: A crucial ingredient of these equations is the local equilibrium
96: ($\ell e$) chemical potential $\mu_{\ell e}$, which should be
97: evaluated for a uniform 1D gas
98: ($V_{ext}=0$) at the density $n_1$.
99: The applicability of the above equations
100: requires the validity of the local density approximation along the
101: $z$-th direction. This is expected to be accurate for
102: sufficiently large systems.
103: Furthermore, Eqs.(\ref{HD1},\ref{HD2})
104: should be limited to the study of macroscopic
105: phenomena where variations in space take place over distances
106: larger than the average distance between particles.
107: From Eq.(\ref{HD2}) one can easily calculate
108: the ground state profile through the equation
109: %
110: \begin{equation}
111: \mu_{\ell e}(n_1(z)) + V_{ext}(z) = \mu \; .
112: \label{n0}
113: \end{equation}
114: %
115: The collective oscillations are instead
116: determined by writing
117: the density in the form $n_1(z,t) = n_1(z) + e^{-i\omega t}\delta n_1(z)$,
118: with the function $\delta n_1(z)$ obeying the
119: linearized equation
120: %
121: \begin{equation}
122: \omega^2 \delta n_1(z) =
123: \frac{1}{m}\nabla_z \left[ n_1(z) \nabla_z \left(
124: \frac{\partial \mu_{\ell e}}{\partial n_1} \delta n_1(z) \right)
125: \right] \;,
126: \label{deltan}
127: \end{equation}
128: %
129: which immediately follows from Eqs.(\ref{HD1},\ref{HD2}).
130: %
131: In the case of uniform systems ($V_{ext}=0$) one has
132: plane wave solutions $\delta n_1 = \exp(iqz)$ with $\omega^2 = c^2q^2$,
133: where $q$ is the wave vector of the excitation and
134: $c^2 =n_1 (\partial \mu_{\ell e} /\partial n_1) /m$
135: is the square of the sound velocity. It is worth reminding that
136: the applicability of the hydrodynamic equations is not limited
137: to the mean field scenario. Actually in \cite{lieb} it has been proven
138: that in 1D Bose gases the velocity of sound,
139: derived from the macroscopic compressibility, coincides with the one derived
140: from the microscopic calculation of the phonon excitation spectrum
141: also in regimes far from mean field.
142:
143: In the first part of the work we evaluate $\mu_{\ell e}(n_1)$ and the
144: corresponding solutions for the collective oscillations in the framework
145: of the mean field Gross-Pitaevskii theory.
146: Even in this regime one can
147: explore a rich variety of situations ranging from the Thomas-Fermi regime
148: in the radial direction to the one of tight confinement where the motion
149: in the radial direction is frozen.
150: In the second part we extend the analysis to
151: regimes beyond mean field, including the limit of the Tonks-Girardeau gas.
152:
153: Let us consider a uniform system of length $L$ in the $z$-th direction
154: and confined by a harmonic potential
155: $V(r_{\perp})=m\omega_{\perp}^2 r_{\perp}^2/2$ in the radial direction.
156: By writing the order parameter in the form
157: $\Psi=\sqrt{n_1}f(\rho_{\perp})/a_{\perp}$, where $n_1 =N/L$ is the 1D
158: density, $a_{\perp}=\sqrt{\hbar / m\omega_{\perp}}$ is the
159: oscillator length in the radial direction and
160: $\rho_{\perp}=r_{\perp}/a_{\perp}$ is the dimensionless radial
161: coordinate, the 3D Gross-Pitaevskii equation yields the dimensionless
162: equation
163: %
164: \begin{equation}
165: \left(-\frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \rho_{\perp}^2}
166: -\frac{1}{2\rho_{\perp}} \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho_{\perp}}
167: + \frac{1}{2} \rho_{\perp}^2 + 4 \pi a n_{1} f^2 \right) f =
168: \frac{ \mu_{\ell e}}{\hbar \omega_{\perp}} f
169: \label{f}
170: \end{equation}
171: %
172: for the function $f$ obeying the normalization
173: condition $2\pi \int |f(\rho_{\perp})|^2 \rho_{\perp} d \rho_{\perp} =1$.
174: In Eq.(\ref{f}),
175: $\mu_{\ell e} /\hbar \omega_{\perp}$ is the chemical
176: potential in units of the radial quantum oscillator energy.
177: Eq. (\ref{f}) shows that the relevant dimensionless parameter of
178: the problem is $an_1$.
179: It is worth considering two important limits.
180: If $a n_1 \gg 1$, one enters the radial Thomas-Fermi regime
181: (hereafter called 3D cigar), where many configurations
182: of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian are excited in the radial
183: direction and the equation of state takes the analytic form
184: %
185: \begin{equation}
186: {\mu_{\ell e} \over \hbar \omega_{\perp}} = 2 (a n_1)^{1/2}.
187: \label{mu3D}
188: \end{equation}
189: %
190: Notice that in this limit the chemical potential is not linear
191: in the density. This implies, in particular, that the sound velocity
192: is related to the chemical potential by the law
193: $c^2 =\mu_{\ell e}/2m$ \cite{zaremba} rather then by the
194: Bogoliubov relation $c^2 =\mu_{\ell e}/m$.
195: A second important case is the perturbative regime where $a n_1 \ll 1$
196: (hereafter called 1D mean field).
197: In this case the solution of (\ref{f}) approaches the Gaussian ground
198: state of the radial harmonic oscillator and one finds the linear
199: law
200: %
201: \begin{equation}
202: {\mu_{\ell e} \over \hbar \omega_{\perp}} = 1 + 2 a n_1
203: \label{mu1D}
204: \end{equation}
205: for the chemical potential.
206:
207: If the gas is harmonically trapped also along the $z$-th direction,
208: the density $n_1$ exhibits a $z$-th dependence which is worth calculating
209: as a function of the
210: relevant parameters of the problem: the scattering length $a$, the
211: number $N$ of atoms and the trapping frequencies
212: $\omega_{\perp}$ and $\omega_z$.
213: To this purpose one has to solve Eq.(\ref{n0}) by imposing the normalization
214: condition $\int n_1(z) dz=N$.
215: A useful quantity is the Thomas-Fermi radius $Z$ defined by the value of $z$
216: at which the equilibrium density $n_1(z)$ vanishes.
217: According to Eq.(\ref{n0}), one has
218: $\mu-\mu_{\ell e}(an_1=0) = (1/2)m\omega_z^2Z^2$.
219: In terms of $Z$, Eq.(\ref{n0}) can be rewritten as
220: ${\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}(an_1(z)) =
221: (m\omega_z^2 Z^2/2\hbar\omega_{\perp})(1-z^2/Z^2)$,
222: where we have defined the dimensionless quantity
223: $ {\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}(an_1(z))=
224: \left[\mu_{\ell e}(an_1(z))- \mu_{\ell e}(an_1=0)\right]/\hbar \omega_{\perp}$.
225: This function is fixed by the solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation
226: (\ref{f}).
227: Its inverse ${\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}^{-1}$ gives
228: the value of $a n_1$ as a a function of $z$, so that the normalization
229: condition obeyed by the density can be written as
230: %
231: %
232: \begin{equation}
233: \frac{Za_{\perp}}{a_z^2}
234: \int_{-1}^{1} {\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}^{-1}
235: \left[ \frac{1}{2}
236: \left( \frac{Za_{\perp}}{a_z^2} \right)^{2} (1-t^2) \right] dt=
237: \frac{N a a_{\perp}}{a_z^2} ,
238: \label{s5}
239: \end{equation}
240: %
241: with $t=z/Z$.
242: Eq. (\ref{s5}) explicitly points out the relevance of
243: the dimensionless combination $Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z$ where
244: $a_z =\sqrt{\hbar / m\omega_z}$ is the oscillator length in the
245: axial directions.
246: From Eq.(\ref{s5}) one can calculate, for a given choice of
247: the parameters, the radius $Z$ and hence the $1D$ density profile.
248: In the 3D cigar limit $Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z\gg 1$, one has
249: $Z = (a^2_z/a_{\perp})(15 Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z)^{1/5}$ and
250:
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: n_1(z) = \frac{1}{16 a}
253: \left( \frac{15 Naa_{\perp}}{a^2_z}\right)^{4/5}
254: \left(1-\frac{z^2}{Z^2}\right)^2.
255: \end{eqnarray}
256: %
257: %
258: In the 1D mean field limit $Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z\ll 1$,
259: one instead finds \cite{olshanii}
260: $Z= (a^2_z/a_{\perp})(3Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z)^{1/3}$ and
261:
262: \begin{eqnarray}
263: n_1(z) = \frac{1}{4a}
264: \left(\frac{3Naa_{\perp}}{a^2_z}\right)^{2/3}
265: \left(1-\frac{z^2}{Z^2}\right).
266: \label{n1MF}
267: \end{eqnarray}
268: %
269: The density profiles are
270: different in the two regimes, reflecting the different behaviour of
271: the equation of state.
272: %
273: The conditions of applicability of the local density approximation
274: employed above are determined by requiring that $Z \gg a_z$. In the
275: 1D mean field regime this implies the non trivial condition
276: $(a_z/a_{\perp}) (N a a_{\perp}/a_z^2)^{1/3} \gg 1$.
277:
278: Let us now discuss the behaviour of the collective oscillations.
279: The hydrodynamic equation (\ref{deltan}) has simple analytic solutions if
280: the density derivative of the chemical potential is a power law function:
281: $\partial \mu_{\ell e} /\partial n_1 \propto n_1^{\gamma-1}$.
282: The Thomas-Fermi and the 1D mean field regimes belong to this class
283: of solutions with $\gamma =1/2$ and $\gamma =1$ respectively.
284: Also the Tonks-Girardeau limit (see Eq.(\ref{muT}) below) belongs to
285: the same class with
286: $\gamma = 2$. Hence in these three relevant limits the dipersion relation
287: for the collective frequencies can be obtained analytically. By looking
288: for solutions of the form
289: $n_1^{\gamma -1}\delta n_1(z) = z^k + a z^{k-2} \dots$, where
290: $k \le 1$ and only positive powers of $z$ are included in the
291: polynomial, one finds the result
292: %
293: \begin{equation}
294: \omega^2 = \omega^2_z {k \over 2} [2 +\gamma (k-1)].
295: \label{omegagamma}
296: \end{equation}
297: %
298: The case $k=1$ corresponds to the center of mass motion whose frequency
299: is given by $\omega=\omega_z$ independent of the value of $\gamma$.
300: The most interesting $k=2$ case (lowest compressional mode) is instead
301: sensitive to the regime considered.
302: One finds $\omega^2 = (5/2)\omega_z^2$, $\omega^2 = 3\omega_z^2$ and
303: $\omega^2 = 4\omega_z^2$ for the 3D cigar, 1D mean field and Tonks-Girardeau
304: regimes respectively. The result $\omega^2 = (5/2)\omega_z^2$
305: was first derived in \cite{sandro96} by solving the hydrodynamic
306: equations for a trapped 3D system in the limit of a highly elongated
307: trap ($\omega_z \ll \omega_{\perp}$).
308: This prediction has been confirmed experimentally with high precision
309: \cite{mit96}.
310: The result $\omega^2 = 3 \omega^2_z$ was derived in
311: \cite{csordas,sandro98,ho},
312: while the result $\omega^2 = 4\omega^2_z$ for the Tonks-Girardeau gas
313: is simply understood by recalling that, in this limit, there is an exact
314: mapping with the 1D ideal Fermi gas \cite{tonks} where the excitation
315: spectrum, in the presence of harmonic confinement, is $\omega = k \omega_z$.
316: The same result has been recently derived in
317: \cite{Minguzzi} using the
318: mean field equations of Kolomeisky et al. \cite{kol}.
319:
320:
321: \begin{center}
322: \begin{figure}
323: \includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figure1.eps}
324: \caption{Transition between the 1D mean field and the 3D cigar regimes:
325: $\omega^2/\omega_z^2$ as a function of the parameter
326: $Naa_{\perp}/a_z^2$ (full line). Transition to the Tonks-Girardeau regime for
327: $a_{\perp}/a=100$ (dashed line)
328: and $10$ (dotted line).}
329: \label{fig1}
330: \end{figure}
331: \end{center}
332: %
333:
334: In order to evaluate the collective frequencies in the intermediate
335: regimes where
336: the hydrodynamic equations are not analytically soluble,
337: we have developed a sum rule approach \cite{sandro96}, based on the
338: evaluation of the ratio $\hbar^2 \omega^2 = m_1/m_{-1}$ between the
339: energy weighted and inverse energy weighted sum rules. In the following
340: we will limit the discussion to the lowest compression mode which is
341: naturally excited by the operator $\sum_{i=1}^N z_i^2$.
342: The energy weighted moment is given by
343: $m_1= (1/2)\langle [\sum_{i=1}^N z_i^2,[H,\sum_{i=1}^N z_i^2]]\rangle=
344: (2N\hbar^2/m)\langle z^2\rangle$
345: where $\langle z^2\rangle = \int n_1(z)z^2dz/N$ is the average square
346: radius fixed by the ground state solution $n_1(z)$.
347: The inverse energy weighted moment $m_{-1}$ is related to the static
348: polarizability $\alpha$ by $m_{-1}= (1/2) \alpha$.
349: This is evaluated by adding the pertubation $-\epsilon z^2$
350: to the Hamiltonian and calculating the corresponding changes
351: $\delta \langle z^2\rangle $ of the expectation value of the
352: square radius:
353: $\alpha = N\delta\langle z^2\rangle /\epsilon$.
354: Adding the perturbation $-\epsilon z^2$ is equivalent
355: to changing the frequency $\omega_z$ of the harmonic confinement, so
356: that the result for the collective frequency takes the compact
357: form \cite{note}
358: %
359: \begin{equation}
360: \omega^2 = -2 {\langle z^2\rangle \over
361: d\langle z^2\rangle /d\omega^2_z}.
362: \label{omega1-1}
363: \end{equation}
364: %
365: We have calculated the ratio $\omega^2/\omega_z^2$ as a function of the
366: dimensionless parameter $Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z$, thereby exploring the
367: transition between the 3D cigar and the
368: 1D mean field regimes.
369: The results are reported in Fig.~\ref{fig1}. For the experimental
370: conditions of \cite{mit01,salomon} where
371: $Naa_{\perp}/a^2_z=0.24$ and $0.08$, we
372: predict $\omega^2/\omega^2_z=2.85$ and $2.91$ respectively,
373: confirming that those experiments are actually touching
374: the transition between the two mean field regimes.
375:
376: It is worth noticing that result (\ref{omega1-1}) for the collective
377: frequency, being based on general sum rule arguments, applies also
378: to regimes beyond mean field where the density profile
379: $n_1(z)$ and hence the value of $\langle z^2\rangle$ cannot be evaluated
380: starting from the Gross-Pitaevskii equation of state.
381: Deviations from the mean field regime become important when the
382: healing length $\xi =(8\pi an)^{-1/2}$ is comparable to the average
383: distance $d$ between particles.
384: In the presence of tight radial confinement one can use the
385: relationship $n=n_1/\pi a_{\perp}^2$ between the 3D density evaluated
386: at $r_{\perp}=0$ and the 1D density
387: $n_1=\int n(r_{\perp}) d{\vec r}_{\perp}$.
388: When $a$ becomes smaller than $d$, one can write $d=1/n_1$.
389: One then obtains the result
390: %
391: $\xi / d = \sqrt{a^2_{\perp}n_1/8a }$
392: %
393: which becomes smaller and smaller
394: as the 1D density decreases, thereby suggesting the occurrence
395: of important deviations from
396: the mean field behaviour for very dilute 1D samples. This
397: should be contrasted with the 3D case
398: where the mean field condition ($\xi > d$) is better
399: and better satisfied as the density decreases.
400: The combination $a_{\perp}^2n_1/a$ can then be used as an indicator
401: of the applicability of the mean field approach. When its value
402: becomes of the order of $1$ or smaller, one enters a new regime
403: characterized by important quantum correlations.
404: The corresponding many-body problem was investigated by
405: Lieb and Liniger \cite{lieb} who considered 1D repulsive zero-range
406: potentials of the form $g_{1D}\delta(z)$.
407: The interaction parameter $g_{1D}$ can be also written as
408: $g_{1D}=\hbar^2/(ma_{1D}) $ where
409: $a_{1D}$ is the one-dimensional scattering length \cite{olshanii2}.
410: By averaging the 3D interaction $4\pi^2\hbar^2a \delta({\bf r})/m$
411: over the radial density profile, one obtains the simple identification
412: $a_{1D}=a^2_{\perp}/a$ \cite{noteolshanii}.
413: The comparison with the expression for $\xi/d$ shows that the
414: deviations from the mean field increase
415: by decreasing $a_{1D}n_1$.
416:
417: In the Lieb-Liniger scenario the
418: energy per particle $\epsilon(n_1)$,
419: when expressed in units of the energy $\hbar^2 /2ma^2_{1D}$,
420: turns out to be a universal function of the dimensionless parameter
421: $ a_{1D}n_1$.
422: Important limits are the high density limit $a_{1D}n_1\gg 1$, where
423: one finds $\epsilon(n_1) = \hbar^2 n_1/ma_{1D}$ and hence
424: the mean field result (\ref{mu1D}) for the chemical potential
425: $\mu_{\ell e}= \partial (n_1 \epsilon(n_1))/\partial n_1$
426: (a part from the constant term arising from the radial external
427: force).
428: Note that under the assumption $a_{\perp} \ll a$, the two conditions
429: $an_1 \ll 1$ and $a_{1D}n_1 \gg 1$ required to realise the 1D mean
430: field regime can be simultaneously satisfied.
431: %
432: The other important limit is the low density
433: Tonks-Girardeau limit $a_{1D}n_1\ll 1$,
434: where the chemical potential takes the value
435:
436: \begin{eqnarray}
437: \mu_{\ell e} = \pi^2 \hbar^2 n_1^2 /2m.
438: \label{muT}
439: \end{eqnarray}
440: %
441: Here the chemical potential no longer depends
442: on the interaction coupling constant and reveals a typical
443: Fermi-like behaviour \cite{tonks}.
444:
445:
446: In the presence of axial harmonic
447: trapping the ground state density profile has been evaluated
448: in \cite{olshanii} using the local density approximation
449: (\ref{n0}). In this case the normalization condition
450: $\int n_1(z) dz=N$ takes the form
451:
452:
453: %
454: \begin{equation}
455: \frac{Za_{1D}}{a_z^2}
456: \int_{-1}^{1} {\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}^{-1}
457: \left[ \left( \frac{Za_{1D}}{a_z^2} \right)^{2} (1-t^2) \right] dt=
458: \frac{N a_{1D}^2}{a_z^2}.
459: \label{T5}
460: \end{equation}
461: %
462: Similarly to Eq.(\ref{s5}),
463: we have introduced the radius $Z$ at which the density vanishes and the
464: inverse of the function ${\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}(n_{1D}a_{1D})$,
465: where ${\tilde \mu}_{\ell e}$ is now the chemical potential
466: expressed in units of $\hbar^2 /2ma^2_{1D}$.
467: Eq.(\ref{T5}) shows that the relevant combination of parameters
468: is given by $N a_{1D}^2/a_z^2$.
469: This differs by the factor $(a_{\perp}/a)^3$ from the combination
470: $N a a_{\perp}^2/a_z^2$
471: characterizing the transition between the
472: mean field regimes discussed in the first part of this work.
473:
474:
475: \begin{center}
476: \begin{figure}
477: \includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{figure2.eps}
478: \caption{ Transition between the Tonks-Girardeau and the 1D mean field
479: regimes: $\omega^2/\omega_z^2$ as a function of the parameter
480: $Na_{1D}^2/a_z^2$.}
481: \label{fig2}
482: \end{figure}
483: \end{center}
484: %
485: Analytic solutions are obtained in the two limits $N a_{1D}^2/a_z^2 \gg 1$
486: and $N a_{1D}^2/a_z^2 \ll 1$. In the first case, one recovers the mean field
487: result (\ref{n1MF}). In the second one, we find the profile \cite{gir,kol}
488:
489: \begin{eqnarray}
490: n_1(z) = \frac{\sqrt{2N}}{\pi a_z}
491: \left(1-\frac{z^2}{Z^2}\right)^{1/2},
492: \end{eqnarray}
493: %
494: with $Z=\sqrt{2N}a_z$.
495: In this case the applicability of the local density approximation simply
496: requires $N \gg 1$.
497:
498:
499: By determining numerically the density profiles
500: in the intermediate regimes we have calculated the frequency
501: of the lowest compressional mode using the sum rule formula
502: (\ref{omega1-1}).
503: The results are reported in Fig.~\ref{fig2} as a function of
504: $Na_{1D}^2/a_z^2$.
505: Fig.~\ref{fig1} shows the evolution of the collective frequency
506: as a function of the parameter $Naa_{\perp}/a_z^2$ for two different
507: choices of the ratio $a_{\perp}/a$.
508: The corresponding curves reveal the transition between 3D cigar,
509: 1D mean field and Tonks-Giradeau regimes.
510: It is however worth pointing out that if the condition
511: $a_{\perp} \gg a$ is not well satisfied, the 1D mean field regime
512: is not clearly identifiable
513: (see for example the dotted line in Fig.~\ref{fig1}).
514: In this case the determination of the collective
515: frequencies requires
516: the simultaneous inclusion of 3D and beyond mean field effects.
517:
518:
519: This research is supported
520: by the Ministero della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST).
521:
522: \begin{references}
523:
524:
525: \bibitem{mit01} A.~G\"orlitz et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 87},
526: 130402 (2001)
527:
528: \bibitem{salomon} F.~Schreck, et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett {\bf 87}, 080403 (2001)
529:
530: \bibitem{hannover} S.~Dettmer et al, Phys.~Rev.~Lett {\bf 87}, 160406 (2001)
531:
532: \bibitem{PS} M.~Schwartz, Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 15}, 1399 (1977),
533: F.D.M.~Haldane, Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 47}, 1840 (1981),
534: L.P.~Pitaevskii and S.~Stringari, J.~Low~Temp.~Phys. {\bf 85}, 377 (1991)
535:
536:
537: \bibitem{lieb} E.H.~Lieb and W.~Liniger, Phys.~Rev. {\bf 130},
538: 1605 (1963); E.H.~Lieb, Phys.~Rev. {\bf 130}.
539:
540:
541: \bibitem{gora} D.S.~Petrov, G.V.~Shlyapnikov and J.T.M.~Walraven,
542: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 3745 (2000);
543:
544: \bibitem{olshanii} V.~Dunjko, V.~Lorent, and M.~Olshanii,
545: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 86}, 5413 (2001)
546:
547: \bibitem{gir} \mbox{M.D.~Girardeau,
548: E.M.~Wright,
549: and J.M.~Triscari,}
550: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 63}, 033601 (2001)
551:
552: \bibitem{rmp} F.~Dalfovo, S.~Giorgini, L.P.~Pitaevskii and S.~Stringari,
553: Rev.~Mod.~Phys. {\bf 71}, 463 (1999).
554:
555: \bibitem{tonks} L.~Tonks, Phys.~Rev. {\bf 50}, 955 (1936); M.~Girardeau,
556: J.~Math.~Phys. (N.Y.) {\bf 1}, 516 (1960)
557:
558: \bibitem{sandro96}
559: S.~Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 2360 (1996);
560:
561: \bibitem{zaremba} E.~Zaremba, Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 57}, 518 (1998)
562:
563: \bibitem{mit96} M.-O.~Mewes, et al.,
564: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 77}, 988 (1996);
565: M.R.~Andrews, et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 79, 553 (1997)
566:
567: \bibitem{csordas} A.~Csordas, R.~Graham,
568: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 59}, 1477 (1999)
569:
570: \bibitem{sandro98} S.~Stringari, Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 57}, 2385 (1998)
571:
572:
573: \bibitem{ho} T.-L.~Ho and M.~Ma, J. Low Temp. Phys. {\bf 115}, 61 (1999)
574:
575: \bibitem{Minguzzi} A.~Minguzzi, P.~Vignolo, M.L.~Chiofalo, and M.P.~Tosi,
576: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 64}, 033605 (2001)
577:
578: \bibitem{kol} E.B.~Kolomeisky, T.J.~Newman,
579: J.~P.~Straley, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 1146 (2000)
580:
581: \bibitem{note} Result (\ref{omega1-1}) provides in general an upper
582: bound to the frequecy of the
583: lowest state excited by $z^2$. This bound coincides with
584: the exact frequency in the three relevant limits discussed
585: in the paper (3D cigar, 1D mean field and Tonks-Girardeau)
586:
587:
588: \bibitem{olshanii2} M.~Olshanii, Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 81}, 938 (1998)
589:
590: \bibitem{noteolshanii} The averaging procedure and the consequent
591: identification of the 1D coup
592: ling constant is justified only if
593: $a_{\perp} \gg a$ \cite{olshanii2}.
594:
595:
596: \end{references}
597:
598:
599:
600: \noindent
601: %FIGURE CAPTION:
602:
603: \noindent
604:
605: \end{document}
606:
607:
608:
609:
610:
611:
612:
613:
614:
615:
616:
617:
618: