1: %% LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: \documentclass[aps,preprint,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
5: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
6: \usepackage{graphics}
7: \usepackage{setspace}
8: %%\doublespacing
9:
10: \makeatletter
11:
12:
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
14: \providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
15:
16: \makeatother
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20:
21: \title{Theoretical Study of Magnetism and Superconductivity in \protect\( 3d\protect \)
22: Transition -Metal-\protect\( MgB_{2}\protect \) Alloys}
23:
24:
25: \author{Prabhakar P. Singh and P. Jiji Thomas Joseph }
26:
27:
28: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai- 400076,
29: India}
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32: We have studied the electronic structure of \( 3d \) transition-metal-\( MgB_{2} \)
33: alloys, \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \), \( (TM\equiv Sc,\, Ti,\, V,\, Cr\, Mn,\, Fe,\, Co,\, Ni,\, Cu,\, Zn) \)
34: using \emph{}Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker coherent-potential approximation (KKR-CPA)
35: method in the atomic-sphere approximation (ASA). For \emph{unpolarized} calculations,
36: our results for \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys are similar to that of
37: \( 3d \) impurities in other \( s \) and \( s-p \) metals. In particular,
38: the local densities of states (DOS) associated with the \( 3d \) impurities
39: are similar to our earlier work on \( 3d \) impurities in bulk \( Al \) {[}P.
40: P. Singh, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{43}, 3975 (1991), P. P. Singh, J. Phys.: Condens.
41: Matter \textbf{3}, 3285 (1991){]}. For \emph{spin-polarized} calculations, we
42: find only the alloys of \( V,\, Cr,\, Mn,\, Fe \) and \( Co \) with \( MgB_{2} \)
43: to be magnetic of all the \( 3d \) elements. We also find that \( Cr \) and
44: \( Mn \) in \( MgB_{2} \) have a relatively large local magnetic moment of
45: \( 2.43\, \mu _{B} \) and \( 2.87\, \mu _{B} \), respectively. We have used
46: the \emph{unpolarized}, self-consistent potentials of \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \)
47: alloys, obtained within the coherent-potential approximation, to calculate the
48: electron-phonon coupling constant \( \lambda \) using the Gaspari-Georffy
49: formalism and the superconducting transition temperature \( T_{c} \) using
50: the Allen-Dynes equation. We find that the calculated \( T_{c} \) is the lowest
51: for \( Mg_{0.97}Cr_{0.03}B_{2} \) and the highest for \( Mg_{0.97}Zn_{0.03}B_{2} \),
52: in qualitative agreement with experiment. The calculated trend in variation
53: of \( T_{c} \) from \( Mn \) to \( Zn \) is also similar to the available
54: experimental data. Our analysis of the variation in \( T_{c} \), in terms of
55: the DOS and the spectral function along \( \Gamma \)to \( A \) direction,
56: shows the variation to be an interplay between the total DOS at the Fermi energy
57: and the creation/removal of states along \( \Gamma \) to \( A \) direction
58: {[}P. P. Singh, cond-mat/0201093{]}.
59: \end{abstract}
60: \pacs{74.25.Jb, 74.70.Ad}
61: \maketitle
62:
63: \section*{I. Introduction}
64:
65: The nature of interaction responsible for superconductivity in \( MgB_{2} \)
66: \cite{nag,bud,hin,tak,rev,yil,kor,an1,kon,boh,pps1,med,sat,bel,liu,cho} suggests
67: a gradual decrease in the superconducting transition temperature, \( T_{c} \),
68: upon addition of impurities \cite{xia,zha,kaz,mor} with increasing \emph{electron/atom}
69: ratio. A systematic increase in the number of available electrons is expected
70: to fill up the \( \sigma \) holes in \( MgB_{2} \), which are coupled strongly
71: to the in-plane bond-stretching mode of \( B \), and thereby reduce the strength
72: of the electron-phonon coupling resulting in a decrease in \( T_{c} \). The
73: observed variation in \( T_{c} \) of alloys of \( Al \) with \( MgB_{2} \)
74: and its understanding in terms of a gradual filling up of \( \sigma \) holes
75: provides a good example of this picture \cite{pps2,bar}.
76:
77: Since the \emph{electron/atom} ratio increases as one goes from \( Sc \) to
78: \( Zn, \) based upon the above argument one expects the \( T_{c} \) to systematically
79: decrease as the different elements from the \( 3d \) row are added to \( MgB_{2}. \)
80: However, the experimentally observed changes in \( T_{c} \) of \( 3d \) transition-metal-\( MgB_{2} \)
81: alloys \cite{mor} do not seem to follow the expected trend of a systematic
82: decrease in \( T_{c} \) as one goes from \( Sc \) to \( Zn. \) For example,
83: a \( 3\% \) \( Mn \)-doped \( MgB_{2} \) \( (Mg_{0.97}Mn_{0.03}B_{2}) \)
84: has a \( T_{c} \) of only \( 33.1\, K, \) while \( MgB_{2} \) doped similarly
85: with \( Fe,\, Co \) and \( Ni \) show \( T_{c} \)'s of \( 37.8,\, 35.7 \)
86: and \( 37.8\, K, \) respectively \cite{mor}. Surprisingly, \( Zn- \)doped
87: \( MgB_{2} \) shows the highest \( T_{c} \) \( (=38.4\, K) \) of all the
88: transition-metal-\( MgB_{2} \) alloys investigated so far \cite{kaz,mor}.
89: The observed changes in \( T_{c} \) of transition-metal-doped \( MgB_{2} \)
90: alloys, especially as one goes from \( Fe \) to \( Zn, \) are unexpected even
91: after making allowances for magnetic effects \cite{all1,all2}.
92:
93: To understand the changes in the electronic structure and the superconducting
94: properties of \( MgB_{2} \) alloys upon addition of \( 3d \) transition-metal
95: impurities, we have carried out \( ab\, initio \) studies of \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \)
96: \( (TM\equiv Sc,\, Ti,\, V,\, Cr\, Mn,\, Fe,\, Co,\, Ni,\, Cu,\, Zn) \) alloys
97: using density-functional-based methods. We have used Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker
98: coherent-potential approximation method \cite{fau} in the atomic-sphere approximation
99: (KKR-ASA CPA) \cite{pps_cpa} for taking into account the effects of disorder,
100: Gaspari-Gyorffy formalism \cite{gas} for calculating the electron-phonon coupling
101: constant \( \lambda \), and Allen-Dynes equation \cite{all1,all2} for calculating
102: \( T_{c} \) in \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys. For understanding the
103: variation in \( T_{c} \) as one goes from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \), we have analyzed
104: our results in terms of the changes in the spectral function \cite{fau} along
105: \( \Gamma \) to \( A \) \cite{pps2,pps_high} and the densities of states
106: (DOS), in particular, the changes in the \( B \) \( p \) and the transition-metal
107: \( d \) contributions to the total DOS. The changes in the magnetic alloys
108: are described in terms of spin-resolved densities of states and the local magnetic
109: moments. Before we describe our results, we outline some of the computational
110: details of our calculation.
111:
112:
113: \section*{II. Computational Details}
114:
115: The charge self-consistent electronic structure of unpolarized as well as spin-polarized
116: \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys has been calculated using the KKR-ASA
117: CPA method. We have used the CPA successfully to describe the electronic structure
118: of \( Al- \)doped \( MgB_{2} \) alloys \cite{pps2}. We parametrized the exchange-correlation
119: potential as suggested by Perdew-Wang within the generalized gradient approximation
120: \cite{perdew}. The Brillouin zone (BZ) integration was carried out using \( 1215 \)
121: \textbf{k}-points in the irreducible part of the BZ. For DOS calculations, we
122: added a small imaginary component of \( 1 \) \( mRy \) to the energy and used
123: \( 4900 \) \textbf{k}-points in the irreducible part of the BZ. The lattice
124: constants for \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) were fixed at the \( MgB_{2} \)
125: values. The Wigner-Seitz radius for \( Mg \) was slightly larger than that
126: of \( B \), while the Wigner-Seitz radii of the impurities were equal to their
127: bulk value as given in Ref. \cite{skriver}. The maximum \( l \) used was \( l_{max} \)
128: = \( 3 \).
129:
130: As indicated above, the electron-phonon coupling constant \( \lambda \) was
131: calculated using Gaspari-Gyorffy formalism with the charge self-consistent potentials
132: of unpolarized \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys obtained with the KKR-ASA
133: CPA method. Subsequently, the variation of \( T_{c} \) was calculated using
134: Allen-Dynes equation. The average value of phonon frequency\( \omega _{ln} \)
135: for \( MgB_{2} \) was taken from Ref. \cite{kon} and \( \mu ^{*}=0.09 \).
136:
137:
138: \section*{III. Results and Discussion}
139:
140: In this section we present the results of our self-consistent electronic structure
141: calculations for \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys. We first describe the
142: results of the \emph{unpolarized} calculations in terms of the total and the
143: sub-lattice resolved DOS, including the local DOS due to the \( 3d \) transition-metal
144: impurity. From our \emph{spin-polarized} calculations, described next, we find
145: only the alloys of \( V,\, Cr,\, Mn,\, Fe \) and \( Co \) with \( MgB_{2} \)
146: to be magnetic of all the \( 3d \) elements. These results are discussed using
147: the spin-resolved DOS and the local moments. Finally, the calculated variation
148: in \( T_{c} \) for \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys is compared with the
149: available experimental data, and analyzed in terms of the DOS and the spectral
150: function along \( \Gamma \) to \( A \).
151:
152:
153: \subsection*{\emph{A. Unpolarized Total and Local Densities of States}}
154:
155: In Fig. 1 we show the calculated densities of states of \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \)
156: alloys from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \), including the total DOS, \( N(E), \) and
157: the concentration-weighted, sub-lattice resolved DOS for the two inequivalent
158: sub-lattices \( (N^{sub}(E)) \) in \( MgB_{2} \). The two inequivalent sub-lattices
159: consist of the \( Mg \) and the transition-metal on one sub-lattice \( (N^{sub}_{1}(E)=0.97N^{sub}_{Mg}(E)+0.03N^{sub}_{TM}(E)) \)
160: and \( B \) on the other two sub-lattices \( (N^{sub}_{2}(E)=2N^{sub}_{B}(E)) \).
161: As we go from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \), the increase in the \emph{electron/atom}
162: ratio moves the Fermi energy, \( E_{F} \), as well as increases the hybridization
163: of the host \( s-p \) bands with the impurity \( d- \)band. The change in
164: \( E_{F} \) has important consequences for the superconducting properties of
165: these alloys, as discussed later. The inward movement of the \( d \)-band as
166: we go from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \) is clearly manifested in the total DOS as
167: well as the concentration-weighted DOS of \( Mg \) sub-lattice. However, we
168: find that the DOS at the \( B \) sub-lattice remains largely unaffected due
169: to the transition-metal impurity, although the movement of \( E_{F} \) changes
170: the \( B \) contribution to the total DOS at \( E_{F} \).
171:
172: \begin{figure*}
173: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig1.ps}}} \par}
174:
175:
176: \caption{The calculated total density of states (solid line) for \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \)
177: alloys. The contributions to the total DOS from the \protect\( Mg\protect \)
178: sub-lattice (dashed line) and the \protect\( B\protect \) sub-lattice (dotted
179: line) are also shown. Note that the \protect\( Mg\protect \) sub-lattice contains
180: both \protect\( Mg\protect \) and the transition-metal \protect\( (TM)\protect \)
181: impurity atoms. The vertical dashed line indicates the Fermi energy.}
182: \end{figure*}
183:
184:
185: \begin{figure*}
186: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig2.ps}}} \par}
187:
188:
189: \caption{The calculated total local density of states (solid line) for transition-metal
190: impurity in \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \) alloys. The vertical
191: dashed line indicates the Fermi energy.}
192: \end{figure*}
193:
194:
195:
196:
197: To be able to examine the changes in the DOS of the transition-metal impurities
198: and to show the movement of the \( d- \)band as we go from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \),
199: we show in Fig. 2 the DOS of the transition metal impurity \( N^{sub}_{TM}(E) \)
200: on the \( Mg \) sub-lattice in \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys. We find
201: that the \( d- \)level crosses \( E_{F} \) between \( Cr \) and \( Mn \),
202: resulting in a very high density of states at \( E_{F} \) for these alloys.
203: The relatively high DOS for \( N^{sub}_{Cr}(E_{F}) \) and \( N^{sub}_{Mn}(E_{F}) \)
204: points to the possibility of local magnetic moment formation at the impurity
205: sites. By the time we come to \( Zn \) impurity, the \( d- \)level is well
206: inside \( E_{F} \) and the impurity contribution to the total DOS has reduced
207: significantly. We also find that the lowering of \( d- \)level with increasing
208: \( d- \)electrons is accompanied by the narrowing of the \( d- \)band. For
209: example, in the case of \( Zn \) impurity the width of the \( d- \)band is
210: the narrowest, indicating almost an atomic-like behavior of these \( d- \)electrons.
211: It is interesting to note that these results are qualitatively similar to our
212: results on \( 3d \) transition-metal impurities in \( Al \) \cite{pps_rec,pps_dil}
213:
214:
215: \subsection*{B. Spin-Polarized Total and Local Densities of States}
216:
217: The results of our spin-polarized calculations for \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \)
218: alloys are shown in Figs. 3-5. Our calculations show that the alloys of \( V,\, Cr,\, Mn,\, Fe \)
219: and \( Co \) in \( MgB_{2} \) are exchange-split, as can be seen in Fig. 3
220: where we have plotted the spin-polarized total and the concentration-weighted,
221: sub-lattice resolved DOS for \( V,\, Cr,\, Mn,\, Fe \) and \( Co \) in \( MgB_{2} \).
222: Once again, we find that the \( B \) sub-lattice remains unaffected due to
223: magnetic moment formation at the impurity site on the \( Mg \) sub-lattice.
224: To clearly show the changes in the majority and the minority spin DOS of the
225: \( Mg \) sub-lattice due to exchange-splitting in the DOS of the impurity atom,
226: we show in Fig. 4 the spin-resolved total DOS due to the impurity atom. As expected
227: from the unpolarized calculations, the exchange splitting is the largest for
228: \( Cr \) and \( Mn \) alloys. The exchange-splitting in the DOS due to the
229: impurity atom leads to local moment formation at these sites with \( Cr \)
230: and \( Mn \) having local moments of \( 2.43\, \mu _{B} \) and \( 2.87\, \mu _{B} \),
231: respectively. The local moment on \( Co \) is very small (\( 0.01\, \mu _{B} \)).
232: Note that the total DOS of the impurity is dominated by the \( d \) contribution
233: and the local moments arise almost entirely due to the impurity \( d \) electrons.
234:
235: \begin{figure*}
236: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig3.ps}}} \par}
237:
238:
239: \caption{The calculated total density of states (solid line) for \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \)
240: alloys with majority (upper panel) and minority spins (lower panel). The majority
241: and minority spins contributions to the total DOS from the \protect\( Mg\protect \)
242: sub-lattice (dashed line) and the \protect\( B\protect \) sub-lattice (dotted
243: line) are shown in their respective panels. The vertical dashed line indicates
244: the Fermi energy.}
245: \end{figure*}
246:
247:
248: \begin{figure*}
249: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig4.ps}}} \par}
250:
251:
252: \caption{The calculated total local density of states (solid line) for transition-metal
253: impurity in \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \) alloys with majority
254: (upper panel) and minority spins (lower panel). The vertical dashed line indicates
255: the Fermi energy.}
256: \end{figure*}
257:
258:
259: \begin{figure}
260: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig5.ps}}} \par}
261:
262:
263: \caption{The calculated local magnetic moment (filled circle) of the transition-metal
264: impurity in \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \) alloys.}
265: \end{figure}
266:
267:
268: It must be pointed out that the calculation of local moments in alloys is sensitive
269: to the volume that one associates with the impurity atom. Given the availability
270: of electrons around \( Mg \) sub-lattice in \( MgB_{2} \) alloys, a judicious
271: choice of the impurity-atom volume is essential for a reliable description of
272: the local moments. In our calculations, we have chosen the impurity atomic volume
273: to be equal to the observed bulk value as given in Ref. {[}\cite{skriver}{]}.
274: However, it is clear that \( Cr \) and \( Mn \) will show large local moments
275: in \( MgB_{2} \).
276:
277: \begin{figure}
278: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig6.ps}}} \par}
279:
280:
281: \caption{The calculated (filled circle) and the experimental (filled square) variation
282: of \protect\( T_{c}\protect \) in \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \)
283: alloys.}
284: \end{figure}
285:
286:
287:
288: \subsection*{C. Superconducting Transition Temperature}
289:
290: We have studied the electronic structure of \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys
291: as a prelude to understanding the superconducting properties, especially the
292: superconducting transition temperature \( T_{c} \), of these alloys. In Fig.
293: 6 we show our calculated \( T_{c} \) as well as the observed \( T_{c} \) \cite{kaz,mor}
294: for \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys. The calculated variation in \( T_{c} \)
295: across the \( 3d \) row is similar to the one observed experimentally for \( Mn \)
296: to \( Zn \) in \( MgB_{2} \) \cite{kaz,mor}. Note that our calculated \( T_{c} \)
297: for \( MgB_{2} \) is equal to \( \sim 30\, K \), which is consistent with
298: the results of other works \cite{kor,kon,boh} with similar approximations.
299:
300: The total DOS and the spectral function along \( \Gamma \) to \( A \) at
301: \( E_{F} \) are expected to play an important role in deciding the \( T_{c} \)
302: of \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys. Thus, in the following we examine
303: the changes in these two quantities in \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys
304: as we go from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \). In Fig. 7 we show the total DOS, \( N(E_{F}) \),
305: the \( B\, p \) contribution to \( N^{sub}_{B}(E_{F}) \) and the impurity
306: \( d \) contribution to \( N^{sub}_{TM}(E_{F}) \) at the Fermi energy. Our
307: calculations show \( Mg_{0.097}Cr_{0.03}B_{2} \) to have the lowest \( T_{c} \)
308: of all the \( 3d \) alloys, which coincides with the highest \( N(E_{F}) \)
309: of \( 11.93\, st/(Ry\, cell) \) as well as the highest \( d \) contribution
310: to the \( N^{sub}_{Cr}(E_{F}) \) of \( 66.15\, st/(Ry\, atom) \), as can be
311: seen in Fig. 7. In contrast, the \( B\, p \) contribution is not enhanced resulting
312: in the lowest \( T_{c} \) for \( Mg_{0.97}Cr_{0.03}B_{2} \) within our approach.
313: Similarly, the \( T_{c} \) for \( Mg_{0.97}Mn_{0.03}B_{2} \) is also small
314: in comparison with other alloys. Here, we like to point out that the exchange-splitting
315: will reduce \( N^{sub}_{TM}(E_{F}) \), leading to a smaller \( N(E_{F}) \)
316: in the case of magnetic alloys. Thus, within our approach, it would have led
317: to an increase in \( T_{c} \). However, the inclusion of magnetism with its
318: pair-breaking effects \cite{all1,all2} will further reduce the \( T_{c} \).
319: The gradual increase in \( T_{c} \) from \( Mn \) to \( Zn \) is due to enhanced
320: \( B\, p \) contribution to \( N^{sub}_{B}(E_{F}) \) as well as a substantial
321: decrease in the impurity \( d \) contribution to \( N^{sub}_{TM}(E_{F}) \)
322: as shown in Fig. 7.
323:
324: \begin{figure}
325: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig7.ps}}} \par}
326:
327:
328: \caption{The calculated total density of states at the Fermi energy (filled circle,
329: upper panel), \protect\( B\, p\protect \) contribution (filled circle, middle
330: panel) and the transition-metal \protect\( (TM)\protect \) \protect\( d\protect \)
331: contribution (filled circle, lower panel) to the total DOS in \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \)
332: alloys. }
333: \end{figure}
334:
335:
336: To further clarify the reasons for the changes in \( T_{c} \) in \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \)
337: alloys, as we go from \( Sc \) to \( Zn \), we show in Fig. 8(a)-(d) the spectral
338: function, \( A( \)\textbf{k},\( E_{F}) \), calculated along \( \Gamma \)
339: to \( A \) direction in \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys. For comparison
340: we have also plotted \( A( \)\textbf{k},\( E_{F}) \) for \( MgB_{2} \) in
341: Figs. 8(a) and (d). As described in Ref. \cite{pps2}, the additional states
342: created along \( \Gamma \) to \( A \) direction reduce the coupling between
343: the hole-like cylindrical Fermi sheets with the phonons which, in turn, reduces
344: the \( T_{c} \). Thus an alloy with \( A( \)\textbf{k},\( E_{F}) \) similar
345: to that of \( MgB_{2} \) will show a \( T_{c} \) close to that of \( MgB_{2} \).
346: Carrying out such a comparison in Fig. 8, we find that \( Mg_{0.97}Zn_{0.03}B_{2} \)
347: will have a \( T_{c} \) close to that of \( MgB_{2} \), while \( Mg_{0.97}V_{0.03}B_{2} \)
348: will show the lowest \( T_{c} \) of them all. The fact that our calculation
349: shows \( Mg_{0.97}Cr_{0.03}B_{2} \) to have a lower \( T_{c} \) than \( Mg_{0.97}V_{0.03}B_{2} \)
350: is due to the relatively high impurity DOS at \( E_{F} \). In addition, in
351: the case of \( Cr \) and \( Mn \) impurity in \( MgB_{2} \), the magnetic
352: effects will further reduce the \( T_{c} \) \cite{all2}. These results reinforce
353: the observation made in Ref. \cite{pps2} that the way \( T_{c} \) changes
354: in \( MgB_{2} \) upon alloying depends dramatically on the location of the
355: added/modified \textbf{k}-resolved states on the Fermi surface.
356: \begin{figure}
357: {\par\centering \resizebox*{!}{8.6cm}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{fig8.ps}}} \par}
358:
359:
360: \caption{The calculated spectral function along \protect\( \Gamma \protect \) to \protect\( A\protect \),
361: evaluated at the Fermi energy in \protect\( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2}\protect \)
362: alloys. In figures \protect\( (a)\protect \)-\protect\( (d)\protect \) the
363: solid, dashed and dotted lines correspond to \protect\( (a)\protect \) \protect\( Sc,\protect \)
364: \protect\( Ti\protect \) and \protect\( MgB_{2}\protect \), \protect\( (b)\protect \)
365: \protect\( V,\protect \) \protect\( Cr\protect \) and \protect\( Mn\protect \),
366: \protect\( (c)\protect \) \protect\( Fe,\protect \) \protect\( Co\protect \)
367: and \protect\( Ni\protect \), and \protect\( (d)\protect \) \protect\( Cu,\protect \)
368: \protect\( Zn\protect \) and \protect\( MgB_{2}\protect \) alloys, respectively.
369: Note the change in the vertical scale in \protect\( (b)\protect \).}
370: \end{figure}
371:
372:
373:
374: \section*{IV. Summary}
375:
376: We have studied the electronic structure of \( 3d \) transition-metal-\( MgB_{2} \)
377: alloys using \emph{}Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker coherent-potential approximation
378: method in the atomic-sphere approximation. Our results for the \emph{unpolarized}
379: calculations are similar to that of \( 3d \) impurities in other \( s \) and
380: \( s-p \) metals. From \emph{spin-polarized} calculations we find that only
381: alloys of \( V,\, Cr,\, Mn,\, Fe \) and \( Co \) in \( MgB_{2} \) are magnetic,
382: with \( Cr \) and \( Mn \) having the largest local magnetic moment of \( 2.43\, \mu _{B} \)
383: and \( 2.87\, \mu _{B} \), respectively. We have used the \emph{unpolarized},
384: self-consistent potentials of \( Mg_{0.97}TM_{0.03}B_{2} \) alloys, obtained
385: within the coherent-potential approximation, to calculate the electron-phonon
386: coupling constant \( \lambda \) using the Gaspari-Georffy formalism. Then,
387: with the help of Allen-Dynes equation we have calculated the superconducting
388: transition temperature \( T_{c} \) of these alloys. We find that the calculated
389: \( T_{c} \) is the lowest for \( Mg_{0.97}Cr_{0.03}B_{2} \) and the highest
390: for \( Mg_{0.97}Zn_{0.03}B_{2} \), in qualitative agreement with experiment.
391: The trend in variation of \( T_{c} \) from \( Mn \) to \( Zn \) is also similar
392: to the available experimental data.
393:
394: \begin{references}
395:
396: \bibitem{nag}J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani, and J. Akimitsu, Nature, {\bf 410}, 63 (2001).
397:
398: \bibitem{bud}S. L. Bud'ko, G. Lapertot, C. Petrovic, C. E. Cunningham, N. Anderson, and P. C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 1877 (2001).
399:
400: \bibitem{hin}D. G. Hinks and J. D. Jorgensen, Nature {\bf 411}, 457 (2001).
401:
402: \bibitem{tak}T. Takahashi, T. Sato, S. Souma, T. Muranaka, and J. Akimitsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 4915 (2001).
403:
404: \bibitem{rev}Cristina Buzea and Tsutomu Yamashita, cond-mat/ 0108265; and references therein.
405:
406: \bibitem{yil} T. Yildirim, O. Gulseren, J. W. Lynn, C. M. Brown, T. J. Udovic, Q. Huang, N. Rogado, K. A. Regan, M. A. Hayward, J. S. Slusky, T. He, M. K. Haas, P. Khalifah, K. Inimaru, and R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 5771 (2001).
407:
408: \bibitem{kor} J. Kortus, I. I. Mazin, K. D. Belashchenko, V. P. Antropov, and L. L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 4656 (2001).
409:
410: \bibitem{an1}M. An and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 4366 (2001).
411:
412: \bibitem{kon} Y. Kong, O. V. Dolgov, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 64}, 020501 (2001).
413:
414: \bibitem{boh} K.-P. Bohnen, R. Heid, and B. Renker, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 5771 (2001).
415:
416: \bibitem{pps1} Prabhakar P. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087004 (2001).
417:
418: \bibitem{med} N. I. Medvedeva, A. L. Ivanovskii, J. E. Medvedeva, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 64}, 020502 (2001).
419:
420: \bibitem{sat} G. Satta, G. Profeta, F. Bernardini, A. Continenza, and S. Massidda, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 64}, 104507 (2001).
421:
422: \bibitem{bel} K. D. Belaschenko, M. van Schilfgaarde, and V. P. Antropov, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 64}, 092503 (2001).
423:
424: \bibitem{liu} A. Y. Liu, I. I. Mazin, and J. Kortus, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 87005 (2001).
425:
426: \bibitem{cho} H. J. Choi, D. Roundy, H. Sun, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, cond-mat/0111182 and cond-mat/0111183 (2001).
427:
428: \bibitem{xia} J. Y. Xiang, D. N. Zheng, J. Q. Li, L. Li, P. L. Lang, H. Chen, C. Dong, G. C. Che, Z. A. Ren, H. H. Qi, H. Y. Tian, Y. M. Ni, and X. Z. Zhao, cond-mat/0104366 (2001).
429:
430: \bibitem{zha} Y. G. Zhao, X. P. Zhang, P. T. Qiao, H. T. Zhang, S. L. Jia, B. S. Cao, M. H. Zhu, Z. H. Han, X. L. Wang, and B. L. Gu, Phys. C {\bf 361}, 91 (2001).
431:
432: \bibitem{kaz} S. M. Kazakov, M. Angst, and J. Karpinski , cond-mat/0103350 (2001).
433:
434: \bibitem{mor} Y. Moritomo and S. Xu, cond-mat/0104568 (2001).
435:
436: \bibitem{pps2} Prabhakar P. Singh, cond-mat/0201093 (2002).
437:
438: \bibitem{bar} S. V. Barabash and D. Stroud, cond-mat/0111392 (2001).
439:
440: \bibitem{all1}P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 12}, 905 (1975).
441:
442: \bibitem{all2}P. B. Allen and B. Mitrovic, in {\it Solid State Physics}, edited by H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turnbull (Academic, New York 1982), Vol. 37, p. 1.
443:
444: \bibitem{fau} J. S. Faulkner, Prog. Mat. Sci {\bf 27}, 1 (1982); and references therein.
445:
446: \bibitem{pps_cpa}Prabhakar P. Singh and A. Gonis, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 49}, 1642 (1994).
447:
448: \bibitem{gas}G. D. Gaspari and B. L. Gyorffy, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 28}, 801 (1972).
449:
450: \bibitem{pps_high} Prabhakar P. Singh, cond-mat/0201126 (2002).
451:
452: \bibitem{perdew} J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45}, 13244 (1992); J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof , Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 3865 (1996).
453:
454: \bibitem{skriver} H. L. Skriver, {\it The LMTO Method} (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
455:
456: \bibitem{pps_rec}Prabhakar P. Singh, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 43}, 3975 (1991).
457:
458: \bibitem{pps_dil}Prabhakar P. Singh, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter {\bf 3}, 3285 (1991).
459:
460: \end{references}
461:
462: \end{document}
463: