1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%% 12.tex
3: %%% written by Atushi Ishikawa, Tadao Suzuki and Masashi Tomoyose
4: %%% March 20, 2002
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: \documentstyle[11pt,epsf]{article}
7: %\input {colortextl.mac}
8: %\input 2up
9: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2.0}
10:
11: %--------------------------- Latout -------------------------
12: \setlength{\topmargin}{-45pt}
13: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm}
14: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm}
15: \setlength{\textheight}{23.7cm}
16: \setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}
17:
18: %----------------------------- TeX ----------------------------
19: \def\INT{\hbox{\twentyfivepoint $ \displaystyle\int$}}
20: \def\SUM{\hbox{\twentyfivepoint $ \dyesisplaystyle\sum$}}
21: \def\PROD{\hbox{\twentyfivepoint $ \displaystyle\prod$}}
22: \def\Int{\hbox{\seventeenpoint $ \displaystyle\int$}}
23: \def\Sum{\hbox{\seventeenpoint $ \displaystyle\sum$}}
24: \def\Prod{\hbox{\seventeenpoint $ \displaystyle\prod$}}
25:
26:
27: %-------------------------------- LaTeX -------------------------
28: \newcommand{\qed}{\hbox{\rule[-2pt]{3pt}{6pt}}}
29: \newcommand{\qqquad}{$\qquad \quad$}
30: \newfont{\subsub}{cmr6}
31:
32: %%%%%%%%%%%
33: \newcounter{szk}
34: \renewcommand{\theszk}{\Alph{szk}}
35: \newcommand{\szkmark}[1]{$^{\setcounter{szk}{#1} \rm \theszk}$}
36: \newcommand{\tdnmark}{$^{\rm o}$}
37:
38:
39:
40:
41: %---------------------------
42: \begin{document}
43:
44: \title{A New Approach to Personal Income Distribution}
45: \author{
46: \footnote{e-mail address: ishikawa@kanazawa-gu.ac.jp} Atushi Ishikawa$^a$,
47: \footnote{e-mail address: tadao@nanao-c.ac.jp} Tadao Suzuki$^b$ and
48: \footnote{e-mail address: tomoyose@hep.s.kanazawa-u.ac.jp} Masashi Tomoyose$^c$\\ \\
49: $^a$ The Organization of Core Curriculum Studies, Kanazawa Gakuin University\\
50: Kanazawa 920-1392, Japan\\
51: $^b$ Department of Management Information, Nanao Junior College\\
52: Nanao 926-8570, Japan\\
53: $^c$ Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kanazawa University\\
54: Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan}
55: \date{\today}
56: \maketitle
57:
58:
59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
60: %%% ABSTRACT
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62: \begin{abstract}
63: The results of $R^2$ dynamical random surface model
64: (2-dimensional quantum gravity with a $R^2$ term)
65: are applied to explain the personal income distribution.
66: A scale invariance exists if there is not the $R^2$ term in the action.
67: The $R^2$ term provides a typical scale and breaks the scale invariance explicitly
68: in the low and middle income range.
69: A new distribution, Weibull distribution, is deduced from the action analytically
70: in the low income range, and
71: a consistent fitting is obtained in the whole income range.
72: Also, we show that the lognormal distribution
73: in the middle income range can be understood in this framework.
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
77: %%% SECTION
78: %%% INTRODUCTION
79: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
80: \section{Introduction}
81: The analysis of the personal income distribution is one of
82: the important subjects in the econophysics \cite{MS}.
83: The first step concerning this research is almost established.
84: There are some empirical knowledge of it.
85: It is believed that the distribution follows a power law in the high income range
86: and follows a lognormal distribution in the low-middle income range.
87: The purpose of this paper is to explain this behavior
88: from a viewpoint of $R^2$ dynamical random surface (DRS) model.
89:
90: The distribution in the high income range is first discussed
91: by V. Pareto in 1897 \cite{Pareto}.
92: The probability density function of the personal income $x$ is given
93: by the following;
94: \begin{eqnarray}
95: p(x)=Cx^{-(1+\alpha)},
96: \label{eq-pareto}
97: \end{eqnarray}
98: where $C$ is a normalization factor.
99: Also $\alpha$ is the parameter which characterizes
100: the profile of the income distribution, so-called Pareto index,
101: and this power law behavior is known as Pareto law.
102:
103: On the other hand,
104: it is indicated by R. Gibrat in 1931
105: that the probability density function in the low-middle range follows a lognormal
106: distribution as follows \cite{Gibrat};
107: \begin{eqnarray}
108: p(x)=\frac{1}{x\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\exp\biggl[
109: -\frac{\log^2\bigl(\frac{x}{x_0}\bigr)}{2\sigma^2}\biggr],
110: \label{eq-gibrat}
111: \end{eqnarray}
112: where $x_0$ is a geometric mean value of $x$ and $\sigma^2$ is
113: a geometric variance.
114:
115: In the early '80s, the above two knowledge are rediscovered \cite{Badger}.
116: The income distributions in United States 1935-1936 are analyzed
117: in these papers.
118: Most of the data follows the lognormal distribution, while the higher
119: 1\% is governed by the power law.
120: Recently, this fact is reconfirmed \cite{ASNOTT} by using the detailed
121: Japanese data \cite{URL}.
122:
123: The personal income distribution has been an interesting object of study.
124: What seems to be lacking is a model
125: from which we can deduce the features in the whole income range.
126: For example there are models employed a stochastic evolution equation.
127: It is easy to derive a power law, however,
128: it is hard to lead a lognormal distribution by using these models \cite{LS}.
129: Because the basic idea of these models is
130: that they contain no typical scale in the fundamental equations.
131: We should comment an exception.
132: In recent paper \cite{SFA}, the authors employed a concept of
133: complex networks \cite{Watts} and a stochastic evolution
134: equation with some interactions.
135: As a consequence, they succeed to construct a power law and lognormal
136: distribution in the whole range.
137: There is, however, not an analytic consideration for creation of the lognormal
138: distribution but only a phenomenological one by using computer simulations.
139:
140: Our viewpoint is simple as follows.
141: There is no typical scale concerning to money in the high income range.
142: The distribution of it, therefore, should obey a power law.
143: On the contrary, there is a typical scale in the low-middle income range,
144: and it causes the breaking of the power law distribution.
145: As a toy model which can realize above two cases in the same framework,
146: we employ $R^2$ DRS model which is one of the methods for studying
147: 2-dimensional quantum gravity with a typical scale.
148: 2-dimensional gravity without a $R^2$ term has no typical scale,
149: unlike 4-dimensional gravity.
150: Here $R$ means the scalar curvature of a 2-dimensional surface.
151: The dimension of $R$ is (length)$^{-2}$, namely the $R^2$ term
152: is dimensionfull.
153: The $R^2$ term, therefore, provides a typical scale to 2-dimensional gravity.
154: It is well known that this model has two ranges.
155: A fractal and self-similar structure, $i.e.$ a power law, is seen in the range
156: where the typical scale does not affect the theory.
157: On the other hand, the fractal breaks down
158: in the other range where the scale has the sense.
159: This peculiarity is similar to the profile of the personal income distribution.
160:
161: In order to confirm our view in the framework of $R^2$ DRS model,
162: it is straight to adopt the money itself as the fundamental variable of theory
163: not the money possessed by individuals.
164: We have once forgotten the concept of an individual
165: and pay attention only to the connection of the money in a certain unit.
166: This connection forms a 2-dimensional surface in DRS model,
167: and later the money of an individual is formed geometrically.
168:
169: The outline of this paper is as follows.
170: Section \ref{sec-minbu} is a brief review of the formalism upon which
171: our work is based.
172: $R^2$ DRS is explained and MINBU analysis that is one of the methods
173: for studying the property of random surface is described.
174: The aspects of continuum quantum $R^2$ gravity in 2-dimensions
175: and the two asymptotic forms of the partition function are presented
176: in section \ref{sec-R2Gin2D}.
177: These two forms correspond to the distribution functions in the high
178: and the low income ranges, respectively.
179: The interpretation and relation between quantities in $R^2$
180: DRS model and ones in the personal income are discussed
181: in section \ref{sec-map}.
182: In section \ref{sec-fitting}, the practical fitting is shown.
183: The personal income distributions of United States in the year 1935-1936 and
184: Japan in the year 1997-2000 are employed for its purpose.
185: Summary and discussion will be given in section \ref{sec-summary}.
186:
187:
188: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
189: %%% SECTION
190: %%% R^2 RANDOM SURFACE MODEL AND MINBU ANALYSIS
191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
192: %\section{$R^2$ dynamical random surface model and MINBU Analysis}
193: \section{$R^2$ DRS Model and MINBU Analysis}
194: \label{sec-minbu}
195: In this section, we review DRS and explain MINBU analysis which
196: is one of the methods
197: for studying DRS \cite{JM}.
198: DRS model is known as dynamical triangulation (DT) \cite{KAD} in particle
199: physics, and DRS with a $R^2$ term
200: has a fractal and a non-fractal ranges \cite{ITY}.
201: In DRS, we consider a 2-dimensional surface.
202: This surface is constituted
203: by attaching the sides of simplexes (for instance equilateral triangles),
204: and all possible constitutions are statistically averaged.
205:
206: The typical surface is shown in
207: Fig.~\ref{fig:2-dim Random Surface}.
208: This surface has a self-similar structure.
209: A simply connected region of area with one boundary
210: is called a baby universe.
211: In the dynamically triangulated surface,
212: a minimum neck between baby universes is composed of three sides of triangles
213: and can be identified uniquely.
214: The distribution of minimum neck baby universe (MINBU)
215: is, therefore, one of the important observable quantities in DRS (DT).
216: In order to analyze it,
217: we consider the case that a whole universe (area $A$) is divided
218: into two baby universes
219: (area $A-B$, $B$),
220: paying attention to one of minimum necks (Fig.~\ref{fig:Divided MINBs}).
221: We denote that $Z(A+1)$ is the fixed area $A+1$ partition function,
222: and that $Z(A, l)$ is the partition function for surfaces (area $A$)
223: with one boundary (length $l$).
224: MINBU (for minimum boundary loop length $l=3$) can be recognized as a surface
225: from which one triangle is removed from a sphere.
226: We can correlate these two partition functions,
227: by counting ways which triangle is chosen and removed,
228: as follows;
229: \begin{eqnarray}
230: Z(A, 3)\sim (A+1)Z(A+1).
231: \end{eqnarray}
232: The partition functions of two MINBUs in Fig.~\ref{fig:Divided MINBs} are
233: given by
234: \begin{eqnarray}
235: Z(B, 3)&\sim& (B+1)Z(B+1),
236: \label{B}
237: \\
238: Z(A-B, 3)&\sim& (A-B+1)Z(A-B+1).
239: \label{A-B}
240: \end{eqnarray}
241: We define, here, that $n_A (B)$ is the statistical average number of MINBUs
242: of fixed area $B$ on a closed 2-dimensional surface
243: of area $A$.
244: If the 2-dimensional surfaces once divided into two MINBUs
245: are made to be one universe again, the following expression
246: can be obtained;
247: \begin{eqnarray}
248: n_A(B)\sim \frac{Z(B, 3) Z(A-B, 3)}{Z(A)}.
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: This formula works well as long as we treat MINBUs.
251:
252:
253:
254: It is well known that DT is equivalent to the continuum theory \cite{Takusan}.
255: If we take the continuum limit
256: which brings every sides of triangles to the infinitesimal and
257: the number of triangles to the infinity simultaneously
258: keeping the area of a 2-dimensional surface constant,
259: it is thought that this limit becomes equivalent to 2-dimensional gravity
260: defined by the continuous variables.
261: The explicit forms of the partition function $Z$ and $n_A(B)$ is obtained
262: by using the knowledge
263: of 2-dimensional continuum quantum gravity.
264: In next section, we consider it.
265:
266:
267:
268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
269: %%% SECTION
270: %%% CONTINUUM QUANTUM R^2 GRAVITY IN 2-DIMENSIONS
271: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
272: \section{Continuum Quantum $R^2$ Gravity in 2-dimensions}
273: \label{sec-R2Gin2D}
274: 2-dimensional quantum gravity with a $R^2$ term is investigated
275: in the continuum
276: framework in ref.\cite{KN}.
277: The partition function for fixed area $A$ is given by
278: \begin{equation}
279: Z=\int \frac{{\cal D} g %{\cal D} \chi
280: {\cal D} X}{\rm vol(Diff)}
281: {\rm e}^{-S(g) %_{\chi}(\chi; g)
282: -S_M(X^i; g)}
283: \delta \left(\int {\rm d^2}x \sqrt{g}-A \right),
284: \label{partition}
285: \end{equation}
286: where $g_{\mu \nu}(\mu, \nu=0, 1)$ is a metric, $X^i(i=1,2,\cdots ,d)$
287: is a scalar matter field
288: and $d$ is the number of scalar fields.
289: Also $R$ is the scalar curvature of the 2-dimensional surface.
290: The $\delta$-function fixes the area to $A$.
291: The actions are defined as
292: \begin{eqnarray}
293: S(g)&=&\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int {\rm d^2}x \sqrt{g} \left(
294: \frac{1}{4 m^2}R^2 + 4 \mu_0 \right),
295: \label{action chi}
296: \\
297: S_M(X^i;g)&=&\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int {\rm d^2}x \sqrt{g} g^{\mu \nu}
298: \partial_{\mu} X^i \partial_{\nu} X_i,
299: \label{action X}
300: \end{eqnarray}
301: where $\mu_0$ and $m$ are a bare cosmological constant
302: and a coupling constant of length dimension $-1$, respectively.
303: The actions (\ref{action chi}), (\ref{action X}) and the integration measure
304: ${\cal D}g, {\cal D}X$
305: in the partition function (\ref{partition}) are invariant under 2-dimensional
306: diffeomorphisms.
307: The measure, therefore, should be divided by the volume of the diffeomorphisms,
308: which is denoted by $\rm vol(Diff)$.
309: The partition function (\ref{partition}) carried out by an appropriate
310: gauge fixing has the exact expression.
311: The partition function, however, contains
312: infinite excited modes and is difficult to integrate the full functional
313: completely.
314: In Ref.~\cite{KN}, instead of the full integration, the two asymptotic
315: forms are shown:
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: Z(A;m,\mu)&\sim& {\rm const.}~A^{\gamma_{\infty }(d)-3}
318: {\rm e}^{-\frac{\mu A}{2 \pi}}
319: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
320: {\rm for}~ m^2 A\rightarrow \infty,
321: \label{infty}
322: \\
323: &\sim& {\rm const.}~A^{\gamma_0(d, m^2 A)-3} {\rm e}^{-\frac{\mu A}{2 \pi}
324: -\frac{2 \pi}{m^2 A}}
325: ~~~~~~{\rm for}~ m^2 A\rightarrow 0,
326: \label{0}
327: \end{eqnarray}
328: where
329: $\mu$ is a renormalized cosmological constant, and
330: \begin{eqnarray}
331: %\gamma_{\infty }(h, d)&=&\frac{d-25-\sqrt{(25-d)(1-d)}}{12}(1-h)+2,
332: \gamma_{\infty }(d)&=&\frac{d-25-\sqrt{(25-d)(1-d)}}{12}+2,
333: \label{gamma_infty}
334: \\
335: \gamma_0(d, m^2 A)&=&2+\frac{(d-12)}{6},
336: \label{gamma_0}
337: \end{eqnarray}
338: are string susceptibilities of 2-dimensional gravity.
339:
340: As for $m^2 A\rightarrow \infty$,
341: the asymptotic form of the partition function (\ref{infty})
342: represents that the surface is fractal.
343: The similar phenomenon can be seen in 2-dimensional gravity
344: without the $R^2$ term \cite{BIPZ},
345: where no typical length scale exists.
346: In this $A \gg 1/{m^2}$ range, even if the model contains the $R^2$ term,
347: at an area scale much larger than $1/{m^2}$ surfaces are smoothly fractal.
348: On the other hand, as for $m^2 A\rightarrow 0$,
349: the partition function (\ref{0}) is highly suppressed by an exponential factor
350: ${\rm exp}[-\frac{2 \pi}{m^2 A}]$, hence, the fractal structure
351: of 2-dimensional surface is broken.
352: This phenomenon can be understood as follows.
353: In the $A \ll 1/{m^2}$ range,
354: at an area scale much smaller than $1/{m^2}$ surfaces
355: are affected by the typical length scale, and they are not fractal.
356:
357: This is the model for which we were asking, however,
358: the partition function (\ref{infty})
359: cannot be made to correspond to Pareto law (\ref{eq-pareto}) directly.
360: Because area $A$ in Eq.(\ref{infty}) or (\ref{0})
361: should be correspond to the whole money,
362: on the other hand, $x$ in Eq.(\ref{eq-pareto}) or (\ref{eq-gibrat})
363: is the individual income.
364:
365: In order to connect this model to the personal income, we should consider
366: MINBU analysis in the previous section.
367: By substituting the asymptotic forms (\ref{infty}), (\ref{0}) to
368: the partition function (\ref{B}), (\ref{A-B}),
369: We can find the following two asymptotic formulae;
370: \begin{eqnarray}
371: n_A(B)&\sim& {\rm const.}~
372: %A~
373: \biggl[\Bigl(1-\frac{B}{A}\Bigr)B\biggr]^{\gamma _\infty -2}
374: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
375: \mbox{ for $m^2(1-\frac{B}{A})B\rightarrow \infty $},
376: \label{eq-n_A-hight}\\
377: &\sim& {\rm const.}~
378: \biggl[\Bigl(1-\frac{B}{A}\Bigr)B\biggr]^{\gamma_0-2}
379: %\!\!\!
380: \exp\biggl[ -\frac{2\pi}{m^2} \frac{1}{\Bigl(1-\frac{B}{A}\Bigr)B}\biggr]
381: ~~ \mbox{ for $m^2(1-\frac{B}{A})B\rightarrow 0 $}.
382: \label{eq-n_A-low}
383: \end{eqnarray}
384: From these expressions, we can recognize that
385: the distribution of MINBUs obeys a power law in the limit
386: $m^2(1-B/A) B\to\infty$,
387: on the other hand, it does not follow any power law in the limit
388: $m^2(1-B/A) B\to 0$.
389:
390:
391: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
392: %%% SECTION
393: %%% THE MAP BETWEEN R^2 DRS
394: %%% AND THE PERSONAL INCOME
395: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
396: \section{The Map between $R^2$ DRS and the Personal Income}
397: \label{sec-map}
398: In the previous section, we analyze how the 2-dimensional surface
399: (the whole universe)
400: is distributed to MINBUs.
401: Let us consider a relation between the quantities of $R^2$ DRS
402: and those of the personal income.
403: By comparison between Pareto law~(\ref{eq-pareto}) and
404: Eq.~(\ref{eq-n_A-hight}),
405: we propose a correspondence relation;
406: \begin{eqnarray}
407: \Bigl(1-\frac{B}{A}\Bigr)B&\Leftrightarrow & x,
408: \label{eq-map01}\\
409: \frac{n_A(B)}{N}&\Leftrightarrow & p(x),
410: \label{eq-map02}
411: \end{eqnarray}
412: where $N$ is a normalization factor.
413: We should note that MINBU is, in general, defined as the smaller universe
414: when the whole universe is divided into two parts, therefore, $B \le A/2$
415: ($x \le A/4$). From this correspondence,
416: we can correlate the string susceptibility to Pareto index
417: as follows;
418: \begin{eqnarray}
419: \gamma_{\infty}=1-\alpha.
420: \label{eq-map_gamma-pareto}
421: \end{eqnarray}
422: Since Pareto index $\alpha$ is reported as $1.5$ in \cite{MS, Pareto, Badger},
423: we should take the value of $\gamma_{\infty}$ as $-\frac{1}{2}$.
424: This means that we should chose the corresponding 2-dimensional surface
425: as a sphere without any matters ($d=0$),
426: and we can conclude that $\gamma_{0}=0$ by using Eq.~(\ref{gamma_0}).
427: Two asymptotic distributions are, in the end, acquired;
428: \begin{eqnarray}
429: p(x)&\sim& {\rm const.}~x^{-\frac{5}{2}}
430: \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad
431: \mbox{ for $m^2x\rightarrow \infty $},
432: \label{eq-distribution-high}\\
433: &\sim&
434: {\rm const.}~x^{-2}
435: \exp\biggl[-\frac{2\pi}{m^2}\frac{1}{x}\biggr]
436: \qquad\qquad\qquad~ \mbox{ for $m^2x\rightarrow 0 $}.
437: \label{eq-distribution-lowmiddle}
438: \end{eqnarray}
439: Here $m$ is a typical area scale.
440: We should notice that Eq.~(\ref{eq-distribution-lowmiddle}) is known as
441: Weibull distribution.
442:
443: The asymptotic distribution (\ref{eq-distribution-lowmiddle}) is correspond to
444: the low income one, and it is not a
445: lognormal distribution which is offered by many researchers.
446: This fact must be paid attention.
447: The form of Eq.~(\ref{eq-distribution-lowmiddle}) obtained by our argument
448: agrees with the practical data in the low income range.
449: Particularly its fitting is better than the lognormal one
450: in the low income range.
451:
452:
453:
454: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
455: %%% SECTION
456: %%% THE DATA FITTING OF THE INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS
457: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
458: \section{The Data Fitting of the Income Distributions}
459: \label{sec-fitting}
460: In this section, we attempt to fit the personal income distributions of Japan
461: in several years 1997-2000 \cite{ASNOTT, URL},
462: and the United States in the year 1935-1936 \cite{Badger}.
463: For this purpose, we define a cumulative probability
464: %to deal with cumulative number
465: as follows:
466: \begin{eqnarray}
467: P(x\leq)=\int_x^{\infty}dy\ p(y).
468: \end{eqnarray}
469: Substituting Eqs.~(\ref{eq-distribution-high}) and
470: (\ref{eq-distribution-lowmiddle})
471: for this definition,
472: we obtain below formulae:
473: \begin{eqnarray}
474: P(x\leq)&\sim& C_{\infty}~x^{-\frac{3}{2}}
475: \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad~~~~ \mbox{ for $m^2x\rightarrow \infty $},
476: \label{eq-distribution-high-cum}
477: \\
478: &\sim&
479: 1- C_0~ \exp\biggl[-\frac{2\pi}{m^2}\frac{1}{x}\biggr]
480: \qquad\qquad\qquad \mbox{ for $m^2x\rightarrow 0 $},
481: \label{eq-distribution-lowmiddle-cum}
482: \end{eqnarray}
483: where $C_{\infty}$ and $C_{0}$ are normalization factors.
484:
485: Firstly, let us consider the distribution in the high income range.
486: In our model, Pareto index $\alpha$ takes the value of $1.5$.
487: We find that this index is almost consistent with
488: the result of \cite{MS, Pareto, Badger}
489: (see U.S. data in Fig.~\ref{fig:1997-99-japan_1935-36-U.S.}).
490: Also we should notice that this value is little larger than
491: that in Japan for the year 1997-2000 \cite{ASNOTT}
492: (see the Japanese data in
493: Figs.~\ref{fig:2000-japan} and~\ref{fig:1997-99-japan_1935-36-U.S.}).
494:
495: Secondly, the profile in "the low" income range is considered.
496: This paper gives the weight to analyze this distribution.
497: It must be noted that "the low" does not mean the low and middle.
498: This point of view is one of the main differences from previous works.
499: The plots of the data and the best fitting are also presented in
500: Figs.~\ref{fig:2000-japan} and~\ref{fig:1997-99-japan_1935-36-U.S.}.
501: The parameter $2\pi/m^2$ in the figures can be obtained as the slope
502: in the graph
503: where the horizontal axis is taken
504: as $1/x$ and the vertical axis is taken as
505: $\log\bigl(1-P(x\leq)\bigr) $
506: in the limit $m^2x\to 0$.
507:
508: In our model,
509: the parameter $m$ specifies the aspect of the breaking of a power law,
510: and we are able to make a best fitting by changing the value of it.
511: The best fit values of $2\pi/m^2$ in Japan 1997-2000
512: and in U.S. 1935-36 are given as
513: $9.48$, $10.8$, $8.43$, $7.93$,
514: and $2050$, respectively (Figs.~\ref{fig:2000-japan} and
515: \ref{fig:1997-99-japan_1935-36-U.S.}).
516: We have employed the coefficient of determination $r^2$ for the parameter that
517: indicates
518: the appropriateness of practical fitting:
519: \begin{eqnarray}
520: r^2 = \frac{\Sigma(f_i -\langle F\rangle)^2}
521: {\Sigma(F_i - \langle F\rangle)^2}.
522: \end{eqnarray}
523: Here $F_i$ is the $i$th value of data, $f_i$ is the value of
524: the fitting function
525: and $\langle F\rangle$ is the mean value of $F_i$.
526:
527: It remains an unsettled question
528: what distribution function should be employed in the middle income range.
529: We have to inquire, to some extent, into this subject.
530: It is believed that the distribution function is a lognormal one
531: in this range.
532: It is difficult to deduce a lognormal distribution
533: from the partition function (\ref{partition}) analytically.
534: We employed, therefore, a computer simulation of DT with a $R^2$ term
535: $\beta_L \frac{4\pi^2}{3} \sum_{i} \frac{(6-q_i)^2}{q_i}$ \cite{ITY}
536: to investigate a profile in the middle income range,
537: $i.e. x$ is not so high neither low.
538: Here $\beta_L$ is a coupling constant and $q_i$ is the number
539: of links at the vertex in DRS.
540: The result is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Log_simu} as the data of the
541: distribution of MINBUs
542: which is not cumulated.
543: The horizontal and the vertical axes are
544: the logarithm of $(1-A/B)B$ and $n_A(B)$, respectively.
545: As the figure indicates,
546: the profile in the middle range can be well approximated with
547: a secondary curve,
548: and this behavior deduces a lognormal distribution.
549: It seems that we can obtain the whole personal income distribution
550: from the partition function (\ref{partition}).
551:
552: %Fig:: fig:Log_simu
553:
554: %\newpage
555: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
556: %%% SECTION
557: %%% SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
558: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
559: \section{Summary and Discussion}
560: \label{sec-summary}
561:
562: In this paper we have proposed the $R^2$ dynamical random surface (DRS)
563: model as a toy model to explain the profile of the personal income distribution.
564: The money in a certain unit have been identified with a certain unit area
565: (simplex) of a 2-dimensional surface.
566: The connection of the unit money have been corresponded to the attaching
567: of simplexes' sides which forms a 2-dimensional surface.
568: On the basis of this correspondence, we have analyzed the distribution of the
569: 2-dimensional surface statistically as the personal income distribution
570: by using MINBU analysis.
571:
572: The point is that $R^2$ DRS model has a typical scale $1/m^2$,
573: which is the coefficient of the $R^2$ term,
574: and that the distribution of MINBUs exhibits two distinct phases.
575: One is fractal in the large MINBU range where
576: the typical scale does not affect the DRS, and
577: the other is not fractal in the middle-small MINBU range
578: where small MINBUs are suppressed by the effect of the $R^2$ term.
579: On the other hand, this fact could be confirmed by the continuum theory
580: which analytically presented the two asymptotic forms in these two region.
581:
582: Moreover, we have proposed that
583: the personal income $x$ should be corresponded to $(1-B/A)B$,
584: where $A$ is the whole area of a 2-dimensional surface and $B$
585: is the area of a MINBU.
586: From this assumption, the power law distribution has re-obtained in the high
587: income range similarly to Refs.~\cite{Pareto, Badger, ASNOTT, LS, SFA}.
588: In addition, it has deduced directly from the partition function
589: in our method.
590: At the same time, we have identified that Pareto index
591: $\alpha = 1-\gamma_{\infty}$,
592: where $\gamma_{\infty}$ is the parameter which characterizes the profile of
593: the 2-dimensional surface in the limit $x \to \infty$, so called the
594: string susceptibility.
595: We have also concluded that we should chose the corresponding surface
596: as a sphere without any matter fields ($d=0$).
597:
598: We have argued, in particular, the distribution functions in the low and
599: the middle income range in detail.
600: The new distribution function so-called Weibull function has been proposed
601: in the low income limit.
602: This function has well fitted to the data rather than the lognormal
603: distribution.
604: A method of least squares has been employed to evaluate a validity
605: of the data fitting.
606: Also we have employed the computer simulation to discussed
607: the distribution function in the middle income range.
608: Our whole results were displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:2000-japan} and
609: Fig.~\ref{fig:1997-99-japan_1935-36-U.S.}.
610:
611: In our argument, we assume %there was a logical jump
612: that the personal income $x$ was identified with the area $(1-B/A)B$.
613: We try to explain this identification below.
614: In MINBU analysis, a boundary of a MINBU is a minimum neck,
615: where two universes are correlated through only three sides of
616: simplexes each other (See Fig.~\ref{fig:Divided MINBs}).
617: This means that the connection between universes is very weak
618: at that point, therefore,
619: it is natural to consider that the minimum neck separates
620: the money which an individual possesses.
621:
622: We should notice that the area of a small MINBU is double counted
623: as the area of bigger
624: one by definition.
625: This may be because why the income which an individual obtains
626: should be added to the income of those who have obtained more income.
627: The effect $-B/A$ can be neglect when $B$ is much smaller
628: than $A$.
629: We must, however, take into account of it when $B$ is close to $A/2$.
630: In our model, there is the huge mother universe
631: from which all MINBUs are removed (See Fig.~\ref{fig:2-dim Random Surface}).
632: It is hard to find the object corresponding to this mother universe
633: in the real economics, however,
634: the theoretical distribution obtained has well expressed the real data.
635: There may be virtual heat bath of the money in the real world.
636: These arguments are left behind as a future subject.
637:
638:
639: In this paper, we have shown that the distribution of the personal
640: income could be understandable as
641: the geometry of a 2-dimensional surface of a sphere without no matter field.
642: This suggests that the technique developed for the analysis of
643: spacetime structure
644: can be applied also to the analysis of our social structure.
645: In 2-dimensions, above geometry is simplest one and
646: the geometry of a 2-dimensional surface with genus and matter
647: fields is also well understood.
648: There are many fractal objects in the econophysics, for instance
649: the distribution of the company profit,
650: and the extended geometry may suit these objects.
651: We are pleased if this analysis becomes a first step for the research
652: which considers our society geometrically.
653:
654:
655:
656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
657: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
658:
659: \section*{Acknowledgements}
660:
661: The authors would like to express our gratitude to Dr. W. Souma,
662: Dr. Y. Fujiwara and Professor H. Terao for valuable advices and discussions.
663: We are also grateful to Professor H. Kawai for useful comments
664: especially about his work \cite{KN}.
665: Thanks are also due to members of YITP,
666: where one of the authors (A. I.) stayed several times during the completion
667: of this work.
668: One of the author (T. S.) is also grateful to Professor Y. Yamagishi
669: for useful discussions.
670:
671:
672:
673:
674: %------------------------------ Bibliography -------------------------
675: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
676:
677: \bibitem{MS}
678: R.N.~Mategna and H.E.~Stanley, An Introduction to Econophysics,
679: (Cambrige Univ. Press, U. K., 2000).
680: \bibitem{Pareto}
681: V.~Pareto, Cours d'Economique Politique, (Macmillan, London, 1897).
682: %\bibitem{Mandelbort}
683: % B.P.~Mandelbort, The Fractal Geometry of Nature,
684: %(Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
685: \bibitem{Gibrat}
686: R.~Gibrat, Les inegalits economiques (Paris, Sirey, 1931).
687: \bibitem{Badger}
688: W.W.~Badger, Mathematical models as a tool for the social science,
689: ed. B. J. West,
690: (New York, Gordon and Breach, 1980), pp. 87;\\
691: E.W.~Montrll and M.F.~Shlesinger, J. Stat. Phys. 32, 209 (1983).
692: \bibitem{ASNOTT}
693: H.~Aoyama, W.~Souma, Y.~Nagahara, H.P.~Okazaki, H.~Takayasu and
694: M.~Takayasu,
695: Fractals 8, 293 (2000);\\
696: W.~Souma, to be appear in Fractals 9, (2001), cond-mat/0011373.
697: \bibitem{URL}
698: The Japanese Tax Administration, http://www.nta.go.jp.
699: \bibitem{LS}
700: M.~Levy and S.~Solomon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C7, 595 (1997);\\
701: H.~Takayasu, A.H.~Sato and M.~Takayasu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 966 (1997);\\
702: J.~P.~Bouchaud and M.~Mezard, Physica A282, 536 (2000);\\
703: J.P.~Bouchaud, arXiv: cond-mat/0008103;\\
704: D.~Sornette, arXiv: cond-mat/0011088.
705: \bibitem{SFA}
706: W.~Souma, Y.~Fujiwara and H.~Aoyama, cond-mat/0108482, KUCP0189.
707: \bibitem{Watts}
708: D.J.~Watts and S.H.~Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998);\\
709: D.J.~Watts, Samll Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between
710: Order and Randomness. (Princeton
711: University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 1999);\\
712: M.E.~Newman, cond-mat/0001118;\\
713: S.H.~Strogatz, Nature 410, 268 (2001);\\
714: R.Albert and A.-L.~Barabasi, cond-mat/0106096;\\
715: S.N.~Dorogovtsev and J.F.F.~Mendes, cond-mat/0106144.
716: \bibitem{JM}
717: S.~Jain and S.D.~Mathur, Phys. Lett. B286, 239 (1992);\\
718: J.~Ambijorn, S.~Jain and G.~Thorleifsson, Phys. Lett. B307, 34 (1993).
719: \bibitem{KAD}
720: V.A.~Kazakov, I.K.~Kostov and A.A.~Migdal,
721: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2051 (1991);\\
722: J.~Ambjorn, B.~Durhuus and J.~Frohlich, Nucl. Phys. B257, 433 (1985);\\
723: F.~David, Nucl. Phys. B 257, 543 (1985).
724: \bibitem{ITY}
725: S.~Ichinose, N.~Tsuda and T.~Yukawa, Int. Jour. M. Phys. A12, 757 (1997).
726: \bibitem{KN}
727: H.~Kawai and R.~Nakayama, Phys. Lett. B306, 224 (1993).
728: \bibitem{BIPZ}
729: E.~Brezin, C.~Itzykson, G.~Parisi and J.B.~Zuber, Commun.
730: Math. Phys. 59, 35 (1978);\\
731: F.~David, Mod. Phys. Lett. A3, 1651 (1988);\\
732: J.~Distler and H.~Kawai, Nucl. Phys. B321, 509 (1989);\\
733: V.G.~Knizhinik, A.M.~Polyakov and A.B.~Zamolodchikov,
734: Mod. Phys. Lett. A3, 819 (1998).
735: \bibitem{Takusan}
736: E.~Brezin and V.~Kazakov, Phys. Lett. B 236, 144 (1990);\\
737: M.~Douglas and S.~Shenker, Nucl. Phys. B 335, 635 (1990);\\
738: D.J.~Gross and A.~Migdal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 127 (1990);\\
739: M.~Douglas, Phys. Lett. B. 238, 176 (1990);\\
740: M.~Fukuma, H.~Kawai and R.~Nakayama, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6, 1385 (1991);
741: Commun. Math. Phys. 143, 371 (1992); 148, 101 (1992);\\
742: R.~Dijkgraaf, E.~Verlinde and H.~Verlinde, Nucl. Phys. B 348, 435 (1991);\\
743: A.~Jevicki and T.~Yoneya, Mod. Phys. Lett. A5, 1615 (1990);\\
744: P.~Ginsparg, M.~Goulian, M.~Plesser and J.~Zinn-Justin,
745: Nucl. Phys. B342, 539 (1990);\\
746: T.~Yoneya, Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 623 (1992);
747: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7, 4015 (1992);\\
748: J.~Goeree, Nucl. Phys. B358, 737 (1991).
749:
750: %\ma
751: \end{thebibliography}
752:
753: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
754: %%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE ( PLOTS )%%%%%%%%%%%%%
755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
756:
757: \begin{figure}[htb]
758: \begin{minipage}{0.49\textwidth}
759: \begin{center}
760: \epsfysize=50mm
761: \leavevmode
762: \epsfbox{e1.eps}
763: \end{center}
764: \vspace{-5mm}
765: \caption{Fractal 2-dim Random Surface}
766: \label{fig:2-dim Random Surface}
767: \end{minipage}
768: \begin{minipage}{0.49\textwidth}
769: \begin{center}
770: \epsfysize=50mm
771: \leavevmode
772: \epsfbox{e2.eps}
773: \caption{Divided MINBs}
774: \label{fig:Divided MINBs}
775: \end{center}
776: \end{minipage}
777: \end{figure}
778:
779:
780: \begin{figure}[htb]
781: \centerline{\epsfxsize=0.65\textwidth\epsfbox{h12.eps}}
782: \caption{Cumulative Probability for 2000 Japan}
783: \label{fig:2000-japan}
784: \end{figure}
785:
786: %\newpage
787:
788: \begin{figure}[htb]
789: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
790: %%%%%%%% 1st Line (two pictures)%%%%%%%
791: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
792: \begin{minipage}[htb]{0.49\textwidth}
793: \epsfxsize = 1.0\textwidth
794: \epsfbox{h9.eps}
795: \end{minipage}
796: \hfill
797: \begin{minipage}[htb]{0.49\textwidth}
798: \epsfxsize = 1.0\textwidth
799: \epsfbox{h10.eps}
800: \end{minipage}
801: % \caption{1996 and 1997 Japan Income}
802: % \label{1996-97-japan}
803: %\end{figure}
804: %%%%%%%%%%%% End 1st Line %%%%%%%%%%%%%
805: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
806: %%%%%%%% 2nd Line (two pictures)%%%%%%%
807: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
808: %\begin{figure}[htb]
809: \begin{minipage}[htb]{0.49\textwidth}
810: \epsfxsize = 1.0\textwidth
811: \epsfbox{h11.eps}
812: \end{minipage}
813: \hfill
814: \begin{minipage}[htb]{0.49\textwidth}
815: \epsfxsize = 1.0\textwidth
816: \epsfbox{ba.eps}
817: \end{minipage}
818: \caption{Cumulative Probability for 1997-1999 Japan and 1935-36 U.S.}
819: \label{fig:1997-99-japan_1935-36-U.S.}
820: \end{figure}
821: %%%%%%%%%%%% End 2nd Line %%%%%%%%%%%%%
822:
823:
824: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
825: % FIGURE of Simulation
826: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
827: \begin{figure}[htb]
828: \begin{center}
829: \epsfxsize=.8\textwidth
830: \leavevmode
831: \epsfbox{min.eps}
832: \end{center}
833: %\vspace{-5mm}
834: \caption{Lognormal fitting into the simulation of $R^2$ DRS model}
835: \label{fig:Log_simu}
836: \end{figure}
837:
838: %--------------------------------------------------------------
839:
840: \end{document}
841:
842: