1: \documentclass{epl}
2:
3:
4: \title{Comparative study between two quantum spin systems
5: KCuCl$_{3}$ and TlCuCl$_{3}$ }
6:
7: \author{ T. Saha-Dasgupta\inst{1} and Roser Valent\'\i\inst{2}}
8:
9: \institute{
10: \inst{1} S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences,
11: JD Block, Sector 3,
12: Salt Lake City, Kolkata 700098, India.\\
13: \inst{2} Fakult\"at 7, Theoretische Physik,
14: University of the Saarland,
15: 66041 Saarbr\"ucken, Germany.}
16:
17: \pacs{75.10.Jm}{Quantized spin models}
18: \pacs{75.30.Et}{Exchange and superexchange interactions}
19: \pacs{71.20.-b}{Electron density of states and band structure of
20: crystalline solids}
21:
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25:
26: \maketitle
27:
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: We have performed an {\it ab initio} study
31: of the electronic structure of two isostructural
32: quantum spin systems, KCuCl$_{3}$ and TlCuCl$_{3}$,
33: which have recently attracted much attention due to
34: their unconventional magnetic properties. Our first-principles analysis shows
35: unambiguously the role of Tl, as opposed to structural differences
36: between the two compounds, in making TlCuCl$_{3}$ a {\it strongly} coupled
37: s=$\frac{1}{2}$ dimer
38: system compared to KCuCl$_{3}$ which shows a {\it weakly}
39: coupled s=$\frac{1}{2}$ dimer behavior.
40: Good agreement with the existing analysis of
41: inelastic neutron scattering results has been observed.
42:
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45:
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48:
49: %\vspace*{1cm}
50:
51: {\it Introduction.-} The behavior of low-dimensional quantum spin systems is
52: dominated by
53: zero-point spin fluctuations. As a consequence, they show a variety
54: of interesting magnetic properties which are not present in their
55: classical counterparts. In the last years a great amount of effort,
56: both theoretically and experimentally, has been dedicated to
57: the study of these quantum spin systems. An important example
58: of such systems are materials
59: having a singlet ground state with a finite energy
60: gap in the spin excitation spectra like
61: even-leg ladder compounds\cite{lad}, s= $\frac{1}{2}$
62: alternating chain compounds
63: \cite{ac}, spin-Peierls \cite{sp} or
64: spin-dimer compounds \cite{dimer}.
65: In particular, the family of coupled spin-dimer systems
66: ACuCl$_3$ (A = K, Tl) is being currently intensively studied in connection to
67: its magnetic properties. KCuCl$_{3}$ has
68: a spin excitation gap $\Delta$ $\sim$ 2.6 meV
69: and the analysis of inelastic neutron scattering
70: (INS)\cite{cavadini_00,kcucl} data indicate that this system is
71: a spin-dimer system with {\it weak} three-dimensional interdimer
72: couplings. TlCuCl$_3$, though being isostructural to
73: KCuCl$_{3}$, has
74: a spin excitation gap $\Delta$ $\sim$ 0.65meV about four times
75: smaller than that of KCuCl$_{3}$ and a saturation field
76: twice as large as that for KCuCl$_3$. Accordingly,
77: the behavior of this system
78: has been proposed\cite{INS2,INS1}
79: to be that of a three-dimensional {\it strongly} coupled
80: spin-dimer system. The small size of the spin gap makes these
81: compounds very suitable for studying the effects of the application of
82: an external magnetic field on the quantum properties of the system.
83: Recently \cite{mag},
84: magnetic field-induced N\'eel ordering has been observed in
85: TlCuCl$_3$ for magnetic fields $H$ higher than the
86: gap field $H_g$ = $\Delta /g \mu_B$ $\sim$ 6 T
87: and has been interpreted
88: as a Bose-Einstein condensation
89: of excited triplets (magnons) \cite{BEC}. New nuclear magnetic
90: resonance (NMR) investigations\cite{Vyaselev_02}
91: have also shown that this
92: phase transition is accompanied by changes in the crystal
93: lattice parameters,
94: what is an indication of an important spin-phonon coupling in this
95: material. The observation of field-induced phase transition
96: has been also reported in KCuCl$_3$ for a magnetic field
97: $H > H_g$ $\sim$ 22 T \cite{Oosawa_01}.
98: Magnetization measurements\cite{dis} were also performed in
99: the mixed spin system (Tl$_{1-x}$K$_x$)CuCl$_3$ where the $x$ substitution
100: creates bond randomness in the system and the field-induced
101: phase transition was studied as a function of the K concentration.
102: Motivated by the great amount of exotic phenomena
103: observed in these materials, we have carried out first principles study
104: of the electronic properties of these systems
105: in order to give a microscopic foundation
106: to their behavior and analyze
107: the similarities and differences between the two systems.
108:
109:
110:
111:
112: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
113: {\it Crystal Structure.-} Both KCuCl$_{3}$ and TlCuCl$_{3}$ crystallize in the monoclinic $P2_{1}/c$
114: space group\cite{struc} with four formula units per unit cell.
115: The lattice parameters
116: for KCuCl$_{3}$ are given by $a = 4.029 \AA$, $b = 13.785 \AA$, $c= 8.736 \AA$
117: and $\beta = 97.20^{o}$, while those for TlCuCl$_{3}$ are $a = 3.982 \AA$,
118: $b = 14.144 \AA$, $c= 8.890 \AA$ and $\beta = 96.32^{o}$. Therefore, compared
119: to KCuCl$_{3}$, the TlCuCl$_{3}$ lattice is somewhat compressed along
120: the $a$-axis and enlarged in the $bc$ plane. The degree of monoclinicity
121: also varies by some extent. Both structures are formed by edge-sharing
122: CuCl$_{6}$ octahedra which build zig-zag chains running along the $a$-axis
123: (fig. 1). These chains are located at the corners and
124: center of the unit cell in the
125: $bc$
126: plane. K$^{+}$/Tl$^{+}$ ions are distributed in between these chains.
127: The CuCl$_{6}$ octahedra are highly distorted due to
128: the Jahn-Teller active
129: Cu$^{2+}$ ion with large elongation along one direction resulting into
130: nearly planar Cu$_{2}$Cl$_{6}$ dimer clusters which are the basic
131: unities in the structure (marked with the box in fig. \ref{structure}).
132:
133:
134: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
135: {\it Band Structure.-}
136: In panels (a) and (b) of fig.\ \ref{bands}
137: we show the band-structures of KCuCl$_{3}$ and
138: TlCuCl$_{3}$ along various symmetry directions. First-principles Density
139: Functional Theory (DFT)
140: calculations have been carried out within the framework of the
141: state-of-art full-potential
142: linearized augmented plane wave (LAPW)
143: method\cite{lapw} and the
144: linearized muffin tin orbital (LMTO) method\cite{lmto} based on
145: the local-density-approximation (LDA). The
146: band-structures obtained by the two methods are in overall
147: agreement with each other.
148: The predominant features of the band structure are the complex of four
149: narrow bands close to the Fermi level formed by Cu d$_{x^2-y^2}$
150: orbitals (in the local frame of reference) contributed
151: by each Cu atom in the unit cell, admixed with Cl p-states.
152: These bands are half-filled and the insulating groundstate observed
153: in these compounds should be explained by the effect of strong
154: correlations which are not fully considered in the LDA approximation.
155: This set of bands is separated from the low-lying valence bands by a gap of
156: about 0.3 to 0.5 eV \cite{explanation} and from the high-lying
157: excited
158: bands, which are
159: dominated by states from the K/Tl atoms, by another
160: gap of about 3 eV. Concentrating on the low-energy bands close to
161: the Fermi-level, we see that the bands are dispersive along all the symmetry
162: directions suggesting the compounds to be three-dimensionally
163: coupled systems in
164: agreement with the findings of INS measurements
165: \cite{cavadini_00,kcucl,INS2,INS1}.
166: Since the dispersion behavior
167: is similar between KCuCl$_{3}$ and TlCuCl$_{3}$,
168: the predominant interaction pathways should be alike for both
169: compounds.
170: The total bandwidth of the four-band complex close to the
171: Fermi level
172: is somewhat larger for TlCuCl$_{3}$ ($\approx$ 0.5 eV) compared to that
173: of KCuCl$_{3}$ ($\approx$ 0.4 eV) suggesting the intradimer coupling
174: to be stronger in
175: TlCuCl$_{3}$ than in
176: KCuCl$_{3}$.
177: We also observe here that the
178: bands in TlCuCl$_{3}$ are in general more dispersive than in KCuCl$_{3}$
179: what indicates larger interdimer interactions in TlCuCl$_{3}$
180: compared to KCuCl$_{3}$ \cite{explanation_2}.
181:
182:
183:
184:
185: This change in the
186: strength of the intra- and interdimer couplings between the two compounds
187: could be caused by (i)
188: the changes in the structural parameters
189: between the two compounds or by (ii) the role of the Tl$^{+}$ ion compared to
190: that of the K$^{+}$ ion. In order to have an understanding of which of these
191: effects
192: determines predominantly the behavior of these systems,
193: we have carried out model calculations of KCuCl$_{3}$
194: by considering the structural parameters of the Tl-compound and
195: viceversa, we computed TlCuCl$_{3}$
196: by considering the structural parameters of the K-compound.
197: The corresponding
198: band structures are shown in panels (c) and (d) of fig.\ \ref{bands}.
199: As we see, changing
200: the lattice parameters has a minor effect on the band structure (compare
201: fig.\ \ref{bands}(a) and fig.\ \ref{bands}(c))
202: while substituting K$^{+}$ by Tl$^{+}$ in the
203: same lattice has a significant effect making the band dispersions comparable
204: to that of the Tl-compound.
205: This exercise already points unambiguously to the role
206: of the Tl$^+$
207: ion in enhancing the strength of the coupling as compared
208: to that of changes in the structural parameters. In the next section
209: we will make
210: this analysis more quantitative in terms of various hopping
211: integrals.
212:
213:
214: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
215: {\it Low-energy Hamiltonians: Hopping integrals.-}
216: We have used the LMTO-based downfolding method, which has been proposed,
217: implemented\cite{newlmto} and applied to a number of cases\cite{example} in
218: recent years, in order to obtain the low-energy effective Hamiltonians
219: that describe the behavior of a system.
220: This method of deriving the low-energy Hamiltonians by
221: integrating out (downfolding)
222: the high energy degrees of freedom results in
223: Hamiltonians defined in the basis of effective orbitals. The process takes
224: into account the proper effective contribution
225: from the orbitals that are being downfolded.
226: For the present compounds, we have derived the low-energy Hamiltonians
227: defined in the basis of effective Cu d$_{x^2-y^2}$ orbitals, by keeping only
228: the d$_{x^{2}-y^{2}}$ orbital for each Cu atom in the unit cell
229: and integrating
230: out all the rest. The Fourier transform of this
231: few-orbital downfolded Hamiltonian
232: provides the various hopping integrals, $t_{ij}$,
233: between these effective orbitals and the corresponding tight-binding (TB)
234: Hamiltonian can be written as
235: $H = \sum_{(i,j)} t_{ij} (c_i^{\dagger} c_j + h.c.)$
236: where $i$ and $j$ denote a pair of Cu$^{2+}$ ions.
237: These hopping integrals thus, form the first-principles set of parameters
238: obtained without any fitting procedure containing the fingerprint of the
239: pathways involved in the hopping processes.
240:
241:
242:
243:
244:
245:
246: Table I shows the various hopping integrals for KCuCl$_{3}$,
247: TlCuCl$_{3}$ and the two model compounds KCuCl$_{3}$ considering the
248: lattice parameters of
249: TlCuCl$_{3}$ and TlCuCl$_{3}$ in the lattice of KCuCl$_{3}$. The various
250: hopping pathways are marked in fig. 1.
251: The hoppings are named according to the
252: various magnetic couplings shown in fig. 1 of ref. \cite{INS1} i.e.
253: $t(l\ m\ n)$
254: ($t'(l\ m\ n)$)
255: denote the hopping parameters between two equivalent (nonequivalent)
256: sites (in terms of the corresponding spins for magnetic
257: interaction) in dimers separated by a
258: lattice vector $\vec{r} = l a \hat{x} + m b \hat{y} + n c \hat{z}$. In
259: Table I we also show the magnetic couplings obtained in various references
260: by fitting the experimental INS data.
261:
262:
263: Although, due to the complexity of the exchange
264: pathways, there are no
265: simple relationships connecting the hopping and magnetic
266: exchange integrals,
267: the relative strength of the hopping parameters in the
268: K- and Tl-compound can be easily noticed to be
269: in good qualitative agreement with the relative strength
270: shown by the magnetic exchange parameters.
271:
272: Considering first the intradimer coupling,
273: the distortion in the nearest neighbor Cu-Cl-Cu dimer
274: bond (see the marked box in fig. 1)
275: from 90$^o$ towards a linear bonding of 180$^o$ angle increases the
276: importance of the antiferromagnetic (AF) coupling over the ferromagnetic
277: (FM) coupling. The Cu-Cl-Cu bond angles in these compounds are
278: $\approx$ 96$^{o}$ which is larger
279: than 94$^{o}$, the {\it upper bound} angle given in the
280: edge-shared cuprates\cite{af+fm}
281: for a
282: possible ferromagnetic coupling, thereby providing the intradimer
283: exchange coupling J
284: of AF nature. Considering the superexchange mechanism to be
285: the effective mechanism of exchange in the dimer, and therefore
286: relating the magnetic exchange integral J with the hopping
287: integral $t$ through J=$4t^2/U$ where $U$ is the effective on-site
288: Coulomb repulsion, we observe that the ratio
289: t$^{2}_{kcucl_3}$/t$^{2}_{tlcucl_3}$ $\sim$ 0.75 obtained from the
290: {\it ab initio} analysis compares very well with the ratio of
291: J's obtained by fitting the INS data, 0.76 in ref. \cite{INS1}
292: and 0.79 in ref. \cite{INS2}.
293:
294: Focusing now on the interdimer interactions,
295: note that
296: the values of the hopping matrix elements in
297: TlCuCl$_{3}$ are larger than those for KCuCl$_{3}$, thus concluding
298: that TlCuCl$_{3}$ will be a strongly coupled dimer system compared to
299: KCuCl$_{3}$ which can
300: be characterized as a weakly coupled dimer system in agreement with
301: the conclusions drawn from INS data and already conjectured from
302: band dispersions. Quantitatively, the largest enhancement of the
303: interdimer coupling between TlCuCl$_{3}$ and KCuCl$_{3}$ occurs
304: for neighboring dimers in the (1,0,-2) plane, i.e.
305: $(l\ m\ n) = (2\ 0\ 1)$. The other
306: dominant interdimer hoppings are $t(1\ 1/2\ 1/2)$ and $t(1\ -1/2\
307: 1/2)$\cite{explanation_3}, the last one
308: being
309: significantly enhanced in the TlCuCl$_{3}$ system compared to that of
310: KCuCl$_{3}$. The LDA band dispersions of the four-band complex
311: are reproduced reasonably well by considering the intradimer hopping
312: matrix element
313: and the following interdimer hoppings $t^{'}(2\ 0\ 1)$ and $t(1\ 1/2\ 1/2)$ for
314: KCuCl$_{3}$ and the additional hopping of $t(1\ -1/2\ 1/2)$
315: for TlCuCl$_{3}$.
316:
317:
318:
319: The analysis of the two model calculations (panel (c) and (d) of
320: fig.\ \ref{bands}) shows
321: the evident role of the Tl$^+$ ion in enhancing
322: the hopping matrix elements between the Cu$^{2+}$ ions. Comparing the 2nd and 5th column
323: of Table I, the hopping matrix elements turn out to be similar
324: between KCuCl$_{3}$ and the model system KCuCl$_{3}$ in the lattice
325: of TlCuCl$_{3}$, while keeping the lattice parameters fixed
326: and substituting K by Tl, the hoppings are affected
327: significantly (4th column) with larger intra- and interdimer
328: hoppings \footnote{Considering the model calculation of TlCuCl$_{3}$ in
329: the lattice of KCuCl$_{3}$, the lattice shrinks along the $b-$axis and
330: expands along the $a-$axis (by a factor 8 smaller
331: than the shrinkage along the $b-$axis)
332: which is a distorsion similar to the recently
333: observed changes in the crystal lattice when the system undergoes
334: a phase transition to a N\'eel state induced by the application
335: of an external magnetic field\cite{Vyaselev_02}. Although the relative
336: change in the $b-$parameter for this model calculation is much larger
337: than that reported for the field-induced transition, this study may
338: provide indications of the changes in the couplings caused by this
339: strain effect. }. In order to quantify the action of Tl$^+$, we
340: show
341: in fig. 3 the Tl and K partial density
342: of states (PDOS) in TlCuCl$_{3}$ and KCuCl$_{3}$ respectively. As one sees,
343: the contribution of Tl in the four narrow low energy bands is much
344: larger compared to that of K which implies larger hybridization of
345: Tl with the Cu d$_{x^2-y^2}$ orbitals in TlCuCl$_{3}$ compared to that
346: of K in KCuCl$_{3}$. This relatively large hybridization effect
347: from the Tl atoms
348: situated in between the double chains can be understood in
349: terms of the proximity of
350: the Cu d$_{x^2-y^2}$ and the Tl 6$s$, 6$p$ energy states as well as the
351: extended nature of these orbitals in comparison to K 4$s$. This behavior
352: leads to a
353: strongly coupled
354: network of Cu-dimers in TlCuCl$_{3}$, while KCuCl$_{3}$
355: behaves as a collection of Cu-dimers
356: weakly interacting in three-dimensions. This description is
357: also supported by electron density analysis of the LDA results.
358: Interestingly, this conclusion is opposite to the case of CaV$_{2}$O$_{5}$ and
359: MgV$_{2}$O$_{5}$ where the subtlety in structural differences turn
360: out to be responsible for the differences in the
361: behavior of the two systems\cite{cavo+mgvo}.
362:
363:
364:
365:
366:
367: %\vspace*{0.5cm}
368: {\it Conclusions.-}
369: We have presented a comparative {\it ab initio} study of the electronic
370: properties of KCuCl$_3$ and TlCuCl$_3$, two isostructural
371: quantum spin systems which have been the subject of recent interest
372: due to their unconventional magnetic properties.
373: It has been the purpose of this study: (i) to obtain a microscopic
374: description
375: of the properties of these systems and its comparison with the behavior
376: predicted from INS.
377: (ii) to understand the microscopic origin of the different behavior
378: between these two compounds.
379:
380: By means of the downfolding-TB analysis which reduces the
381: information provided by LDA to an effective low-energy Hamiltonian
382: in tight-binding basis,
383: we could succesfully corroborate the coupled dimer behavior predicted
384: for these systems by INS. In agreement with the predictions from
385: the INS data analysis, we found in KCuCl$_3$ the interdimer couplings
386: to be weak, while TlCuCl$_3$ manifests itself as a strongly coupled
387: dimer system.
388: We also showed that the origin of the differences in the interdimer
389: coupling between the two systems is related to
390: the relative contribution of Tl compared to that of K to
391: the chemical bonding between two Cu$^{2+}$ ions.
392: Our study is also indicative of possible changes thay may occur
393: in the coupling constants due to lattice changes caused by strain
394: effects\cite{Vyaselev_02}.
395:
396:
397:
398:
399:
400: \acknowledgments
401:
402:
403:
404:
405:
406: We acknowledge useful discussions with Peter Lemmens and H. Tanaka
407: and R.V. thanks
408: the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for finantial support through
409: a Heisenberg fellowship.
410:
411:
412:
413: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
414: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
415: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
416:
417: \bibitem{lad} Dagotto E. and Rice T. M., Science {\bf 271}, (1996) 618.
418:
419: \bibitem{ac} Garrett A. W., Nagler S. E., Tennant D. A.,
420: Sales B. C. and Banes T., Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 79} (1997)
421: 745.
422:
423: \bibitem{sp} Hase M., Terasaki I. and Uchinokura K.,
424: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 70} (1993) 3651.
425:
426: \bibitem{dimer} Tennant D. A., Nagler S. E., Garrett A. W., Barnes T.,
427: Torardi C. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 745 (1997).
428:
429: \bibitem{cavadini_00} Cavadini N., Heigold G., Henggeler W., Furrer A.,
430: G\"udel H. -U., Kr\"amer K., Mutka H.,
431: J. Phys.:Condens. Matter {\bf 12} (2000) 5463.
432:
433: \bibitem{kcucl} M\"uller M. and Mikesha H. -J., J. Phys.:
434: Condens. Matter {\bf 12}, (2000) 7633.
435:
436: \bibitem{INS2} Cavadini N., Heigold G., Henggeler W., Furrer A.,
437: G\"udel H. -U., Kr\"amer K., Mutka H., Phys. Rev
438: B {\bf 63} (2001) 172414.
439:
440:
441:
442: \bibitem{INS1} Oosawa A., Kato T., Tanaka H., Kakurai K.,
443: M\"uller M. and Mikesha H. -J., Phys. Rev. B
444: {\bf 65} (2002) 094426.
445:
446:
447:
448:
449: \bibitem{mag} Oosawa A., Ishii M. and Tanaka H., J. Phys.:
450: Condens. Matter {\bf 11}, (1999) 265.
451:
452: \bibitem{BEC} T. Nikuni, M. Oshikawa, A. Oosawa and H. Tanaka,
453: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 84}, 5868 (2000); M. Matsumoto,
454: B. Normand, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, to appear in
455: Phys. Rev. Lett (2002)
456:
457: \bibitem{Vyaselev_02} Vyaselev O., Takigawa M., Vasiliev A.,
458: Oosawa A., and Tanaka H.
459: {\it to be published}.
460:
461:
462: \bibitem{Oosawa_01} Oosawa A., Tanaka H., Takamasu T.,
463: Abe H., Tsujii N., and Kido G.,
464: Physica B {\bf 294-295}, (2001) 34.
465:
466: \bibitem{dis} Oosawa A. and Tanaka H., {\it cond-mat/0203293}, to
467: appear in Phys. Rev. B (2002).
468:
469: \bibitem{struc} Willett R. D., Dwinggins C., Kruh R. F. and
470: Rundle R. E., J. Chem. Phys.,{\bf 38}, (1963) 2429;
471: Tanaka H., Oosawa A., Kato T., Uekusa H., Ohashi Y.,
472: Kakurai K. and Hoser A., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 70}
473: (2001) 939.
474:
475: \bibitem{lapw} Blaha P., Schwarz K. and Luitz J., WIEN97,
476: {\it A Full Potential Linearized Augmented Plane
477: Wave Package for Calculating Crystal Properties}, (Karlheinz
478: Schwarz, Techn. Univ. Wien, Vienna 1999). ISBN 3-9501031-0-4.
479: [Updated version of Blaha P., Schwarz K., Sorantin P.,
480: and Trickey S. B., Comp. Phys. Commun. {\bf 59}, (1990) 399].
481:
482: \bibitem{lmto} Andersen O. K., Phys. Rev. B {\bf 12}, (1975) 3060.
483:
484: \bibitem{explanation} The gap between the occupied valence states
485: and the four-band complex at the Fermi level is underestimated in the LMTO
486: method compared to the LAPW method, what can be attributed to the
487: atomic sphere approximation invoked in LMTO. This discrepancy
488: however does not affect the low-energy physics at the Fermi level
489: that we will be
490: concerned with.
491:
492: \bibitem{explanation_2} This interpretation can be understood by the
493: fact that the bandstructure of an isolated dimer system ({\it i.e.}
494: systems having only non-zero
495: intradimer interaction) is formed by two dispersionless bands, the separation
496: of which is proportional to the strength of the intradimer
497: interaction. Switching on the interactions between isolated dimers
498: (inter-dimer interactions) brings in dispersion to the otherwise
499: dispersionless band structure. Therefore, the bandwidth of the
500: four-band complex in the present case gives us
501: an estimate of the intradimer coupling-strength while the
502: degree of dispersion
503: of these bands can be related to the interdimer couplings.
504:
505: \bibitem{newlmto} Andersen O. K. and Saha-Dasgupta T.,
506: Phys. Rev. {\bf B62}, R16219 (2000) and references there in.
507:
508: \bibitem{example} Pavarini E., Dasgupta I., Saha-Dasgupta T.,
509: Jepsen O.,
510: Andersen O. K.,
511: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} (2001) 047003; Valent\'\i~ R.,
512: Saha-Dasgupta T.,
513: Alvarez J. V., Pozgajcic K., Gros C.,
514: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, (2001) 5381; M\"uller T.,
515: Anisimov V.I., Rice T. M., Dasgupta I., Saha-Dasgupta T.,
516: Phys. Rev. {\bf B57}, (1998) R12655.
517:
518:
519: \bibitem{af+fm} Mizuno Y., Tohyama T., Maekawa S., Osafune T.,
520: Motoyama N., Eisaki H. and Uchida S., Phys. Rev. {\bf B57}, (1998) 5326 .
521:
522:
523:
524: \bibitem{explanation_3} While the interdimer distances $t^{'}(1\
525: 1/2\ 1/2)$ and $t^{'}(1\ -1/2\ 1/2)$, $t^{'}(0\
526: 1/2\ 1/2)$ and $t^{'}(0\ -1/2\ 1/2)$ are all equivalent, $t(1\
527: 1/2\ 1/2)$ and $t(1\ -1/2\ 1/2)$ are not equivalent since
528: they involve different
529: pathways.
530:
531:
532:
533: \bibitem{cavo+mgvo} Korotin M. A.,
534: Anisimov V. I., Saha-Dasgupta T. and Dasgupta I.,
535: J. Phys. (Condens. Matter) {\bf 12} (2000) 113.
536:
537: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
538: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
539:
540:
541: \end{thebibliography}
542:
543: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
544: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
545:
546:
547: \newpage
548:
549: {\bf FIGURE CAPTIONS} \\ \\
550:
551:
552: \noindent
553: {1. Structure of KCuCl$_3$ (TlCuCl$_{3}$). Small black and white atoms
554: represent Cu and Cl respectively while the large gray atoms
555: represent K(Tl). The middle double chain is shifted with respect
556: to other two double chains along $b-$direction by half a lattice
557: constant. Various hoppings are marked (see text for details).}\\ \\
558:
559: \noindent
560: {2. Band structure of KCuCl$_{3}$ (panel (a)), TlCuCl$_{3}$
561: (panel (b)), KCuCl$_{3}$ in the lattice of TlCuCl$_{3}$ (panel(c))
562: and TlCuCl$_{3}$ in the lattice of KCuCl$_{3}$ (panel(d)) along
563: the symmetry directions $\Gamma$ = (0 0 0), B=(-$\pi$,0,0),
564: D=(-$\pi$,0,$\pi$),
565: Z=(0,0,$\pi$), $\Gamma$,
566: Y=(0,$\pi$,0), A = (-$\pi$,$\pi$,0),
567: E=(-$\pi$,$\pi$,$\pi$).
568: }\\ \\
569:
570: \noindent
571: {3. Tl(solid) and K(dotted) contributions to
572: the density of states of TlCuCl$_{3}$ and KCuCl$_{3}$ respectively.
573: }\\
574:
575: {\bf TABLE CAPTIONS} \\ \\
576:
577:
578: %\noindent
579: {\it I. Hopping integrals obtained from our ab initio analysis
580: for TlCuCl$_{3}$,
581: KCuCl$_{3}$ and the two model systems considered in the text and magnetic interactions from ref.\ \cite{INS2} and ref.\ \cite{INS1}
582: for TlCuCl$_{3}$ and
583: KCuCl$_{3}$.
584: The negative sign denotes a ferromagnetic coupling.}
585:
586: \newpage
587:
588: %%%%%%%%%% FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
589:
590: \begin{figure}
591: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig_ac1.eps}
592: %\onefigure{fig_ac1.eps}
593: \caption{.
594: }
595: \label{structure}
596: \end{figure}
597:
598:
599:
600: \begin{figure}
601: \includegraphics[width=16cm]{bands.eps}
602: %\onefigure{fig_ac1.eps}
603: \caption{ }
604: \label{bands}
605: \end{figure}
606:
607:
608: \begin{figure}
609: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{pdos.eps}
610: %\onefigure{fig_ac1.eps}
611: \caption{ }
612: \label{dos}
613: \end{figure}
614:
615:
616: \begin{table}
617: \caption{ }
618: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
619: t's and J's & KCuCl$_{3}$ & TlCuCl$_{3}$ & TlCuCl$_{3}$ in & KCuCl$_{3}$ in \\
620: in meV & & & KCuCl$_{3}$
621: & TlCuCl$_{3}$ \\
622: & & & lattice & lattice \\ \hline
623: t & 116 & 134 & 144 & 117 \\
624: J & 4.34 ref\cite{INS1} & 5.68 ref\cite{INS1} & & \\
625: & 4.29 ref\cite{INS2} & 5.42 ref\cite{INS2} & & \\\hline
626: t(100) & 2.72 & 6.81 & 4.08 & 1.00 \\
627: t'(100) & 9.52 & 21.76 & 24.49 & 5.40 \\
628: J$_{eff}$(100)= & -0.21 ref\cite{INS1} & -0.46 ref\cite{INS1} & & \\
629: 1/2[2J(100) - J'(100)] & -0.21 ref\cite{INS2} & -0.47 ref\cite{INS2} & & \\\hline
630: t'(201) & 36.73 & 65.31 & 72.11 & 35.37 \\
631: J$_{eff}$(201) = & -0.45 ref\cite{INS1} & -1.53 ref\cite{INS1} & & \\
632: -1/2J'(201) & -0.34 ref\cite{INS2} & -1.43 ref\cite{INS2} & & \\\hline
633: t(1 1/2 1/2) & 40.82 & 36.73 & 42.17 & 35.40 \\
634: t(1 -1/2 1/2) & 4.08 & 32.18 & 40.50 & 2.72 \\
635: t'(1 1/2 1/2) & 5.19 & 12.24 & 10.88 & 8.16 \\
636: J$_{eff}$(1 1/2 1/2)= & 0.28 ref\cite{INS1} & 0.49 ref\cite{INS1} & & \\
637: 1/2[J(1 1/2 1/2) - J'(1 1/2 1/2)] & 0.37 ref\cite{INS2} & 0.62 ref\cite{INS2} & & \\\hline
638: t(0 1/2 1/2) & 5.44 & 8.16 & 6.80 & 8.01 \\
639: t'(0 1/2 1/2) & 14.97 & 19.05 & 16.33 & 17.63 \\
640: J$_{eff}$(0 1/2 1/2)= & -0.003 ref\cite{INS1} & -0.06 ref\cite{INS1} & & \\
641: 1/2[J(0 1/2 1/2) - J'(0 1/2 1/2)] & & & & \\\hline
642: \end{tabular}
643: \end{table}
644:
645:
646:
647:
648: \end{document}
649:
650: