1: %\documentclass[aps,twocolumn]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[aps,preprint]{revtex4}
3: %
4: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
5: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
6: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: \begin{document}
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: %\newcommand{\kv}{\mbox{\boldmath{$k$}}}
11: \newcommand{\Hso}{H_{\rm so}}
12: \newcommand{\Hp}{H'}
13: \newcommand{\sigmav}{\bm{\sigma}}
14: \newcommand{\kv}{{\bf{k}}}
15: \newcommand{\qv}{{\bf{q}}}
16: \newcommand{\Sv}{{\bf{S}}}
17: \newcommand{\Mv}{{\bf{M}}}
18: \newcommand{\Jv}{{\bf{J}}}
19: \newcommand{\Xv}{{\bf{X}}}
20: \newcommand{\xv}{{\bf{x}}}
21: \newcommand{\av}{{\bf{a}}}
22: \newcommand{\bv}{{\bf{b}}}
23: \newcommand{\cv}{{\bf{c}}}
24: \newcommand{\rv}{{\bf{r}}}
25: \newcommand{\nv}{{\bf{n}}}
26: \newcommand{\omegaell}{\omega_{\ell}}
27: \newcommand{\DOS}{\nu}
28: \newcommand{\vimp}{v_{\rm imp}}
29: \newcommand{\nimp}{n_{\rm imp}}
30: \newcommand{\nm}{n_{\rm m}}
31: \newcommand{\azero}{a_0}
32: \newcommand{\chiuni}{\chi_{0}}
33: \newcommand{\chiv}{\bm{C}}
34: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
35: \title{
36: Chirality driven anomalous Hall effect in weak coupling regime
37: }
38: \author{Gen Tatara}
39: \author{Hikaru Kawamura}
40: \affiliation{
41: Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043,
42: Japan
43: }
44: \date{\today}
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46: \begin{abstract}
47: Anomalous Hall effect arising from non-trivial spin configuration
48: (chirality) is studied based on the $s$-$d$ model.
49: Considering a weak coupling case, the interaction is treated perturbatively.
50: Scattering by normal impurities is included.
51: Chirality is shown to drive locally Hall current and leads to overall
52: Hall effect if there is a finite uniform chirality.
53: This contribution is independent of the conventional
54: spin-orbit contribution and shows distinct low temperature
55: behavior.
56: In mesoscopic spin glasses,
57: chirality-induced anomalous Hall effect is
58: expected below the spin-glass transition temperature.
59: Measurement of Hall coefficient would be useful
60: in experimentally confirming the chirality ordering.
61: \end{abstract}
62: \pacs{72.15.-v,75.30.-m,Ê75.50.Lk}
63: %72.15.-vÊÊÊ Electronic conduction in metals and alloys
64: %75.30.-mÊÊ Intrinsic properties of magnetically ordered materials
65: %75.50.LkÊÊ Spin glasses and other random magnetsÊ
66: \maketitle
67:
68: Hall effect in ferromagnetic metals has long been known to have
69: anomalous component which does not vanish at zero external magnetic
70: field.
71: Theories have explained this as due to the spontaneous magnetization
72: and spin-orbit interaction\cite{Karplus54,Smit55,Luttinger58}.
73: It was also shown based on the $s$-$d$ model that the high temperature
74: (close to the critical temperature) behavior of the anomalous Hall
75: effect is understood in terms of the fluctuation of the
76: magnetization coupled with spin-orbit
77: interaction\cite{Kondo62,Maranzana67}.
78:
79: Recently some manganites were found to exhibit at high temperatures
80: abnormal behavior\cite{Snyder96,Asamitsu98}
81: which is not explainable by previous theories.
82: This behavior was explained by Berry phase effect
83: associated with thermally driven non-trivial
84: background spin configuration (chirality)\cite{Ye99,Chun00,Geller01}.
85: Finite chirality results in a finite Berry phase and leads to
86: Hall effect if chirality is non-vanishing as a net.
87: In contrast to manganites, anomalous Hall coefficient in
88: ferromagnetic pyrochlores was found to remain finite at low
89: temperatures\cite{Taguchi99,Katsufuji00}.
90: This behavior was discussed to be due to finite chirality of the
91: ground state, which is originating from geometrical
92: frustration\cite{Ohgushi00,Taguchi01,Shindou01,Onoda01}.
93: Behavior which is not explained solely by chirality
94: theories was reported recently in some Mo-based
95: pyrochlores\cite{Yoshii00,Yasui01,Kageyama01}.
96: These recent
97: theories\cite{Ye99,Chun00,Ohgushi00,Taguchi01,Geller01,Shindou01,Onoda01}
98: have exclusively
99: dealt with a strong Hund-coupling limit, considering a half-metallic
100: nature of the experimental systems.
101: In this limit, the electron spin aligns perfectly to the local
102: spin and feels the same Berry phase as the local spin carries, and
103: Hall conductivity has a topological meaning\cite{Thouless82}.
104: The weak coupling region, which would be the case of most common
105: transition-metal magnets, has never been explored from
106: the viewpoint of chirality.
107:
108: In this paper, we study anomalous Hall effect due to chirality based
109: on the $s$-$d$ model in the weak coupling case.
110: Using Kubo formula and taking account of the impurity scattering,
111: we will demonstrate that the chirality drives
112: local Hall current in the perturbative regime.
113: To compare with experiments, both the chirality mechanism and the
114: conventional one
115: due to the spin-orbit interaction (corresponding to the
116: result by Karplus and Luttinger\cite{Karplus54,Luttinger58}) need to
117: be taken account.
118: We will show that the chirality contribution is independent of the
119: conventional one, and they simply add up at lowest approximation.
120: In order for the chirality contribution to Hall effect to be finite,
121: there needs to be a net uniform component of the chirality.
122: The possible effect of the spin-orbit interaction
123: to induce a uniform component of the chirality in the presence of
124: uniform magnetization, originally
125: claimed to be present in the strong Hund-coupling limit\cite{Ye99},
126: is examined in our weak-coupling scheme.
127: It turns out that the spin-orbit interaction induces a vector
128: chirality if there is a uniform magnetization, and that this indeed
129: results in a Hall effect in the bulk.
130: This effect, however, would depend much on the band structure.
131:
132: Our theory is applicable to a wide class of magnetic systems including
133: canonical spin glasses, in which the
134: conduction electron is only weakly coupled to the local spin.
135: In spin glasses, chirality order develops at low temperature leading
136: to the spin-glass transition\cite{Kawamura92}.
137: Meanwhile, the chirality
138: order there is spatially random without a uniform component, making
139: the experimental detection of the chirality-driven anomalous Hall
140: effect rather difficult due to the inherent cancellation effect.
141: Even in this case, however,
142: average of the squared chirality remains finite in small (mesoscopic)
143: samples\cite{Weissman93,Neuttiens00}, and
144: enhancement of the anomalous Hall coefficient is expected below
145: the spin-glass transition.
146: Thus, measurement of fluctuation of Hall conductivity in mesoscopic
147: samples may be useful
148: in experimental confirmation of the chirality ordering.
149: Depending on the band structure, the chirality-driven Hall effect
150: might be observable even in bulk spin-glass samples if the sample possesses a
151: uniform magnetization, which is induced by applied fields or is
152: generated spontaneously (as in case of reentrant spin
153: glasses\cite{Mydosh93}).
154:
155:
156: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
157: We consider electron on lattice whose Hamiltonian is given by
158: \begin{equation}
159: H=\sum_{\kv\sigma}\epsilon_{\kv\sigma}c^\dagger_{\kv\sigma}c_{\kv\sigma}
160: +\Hp+H_{\rm imp},
161: \label{eq:Hdef}
162: \end{equation}
163: where $\sigma=\pm$ denotes electron spin.
164: Electron energy is
165: $\epsilon_{\kv\sigma}=\kv^2/2m-\sigma\Delta-\epsilon_{F}$, where
166: $m$ is electron mass,
167: $\Delta$ is a uniform polarization of conduction electron
168: due to magnetization or external field, and
169: $\epsilon_{F}$ is the Fermi energy.
170: The interaction with localized spin $\Sv_\Xv$ (treated as classical) is represented
171: by the exchange interaction $\Hp$,
172: \begin{equation}
173: \Hp=\frac{J}{N}\sum_{\kv\kv'} \Sv_{\kv'-\kv} (c^\dagger_{\kv'}\sigmav c_{\kv}),
174: \label{eq:Hp}
175: \end{equation}
176: where $\sigma^\alpha$ ($\alpha=x,y,z$) are Pauli matrices, and $N$ is
177: the total number of lattice sites.
178: The sign of the exchange coupling $J$ depends on the system we consider; it is
179: positive
180: if the interaction is the $s$-$d$ exchange as in case of canonical
181: spin glasses, and is negative if it is the Hund-coupling as in case of
182: manganites.
183: Configuration of $\Sv_{\Xv}=(1/N)\sum_{\qv}e^{i\qv \Xv} \Sv_{\qv}$ is
184: fixed.
185: We note that localized spins $\Sv_{\Xv}$ do not necessarily occupy all $N$
186: sites here: An example is a dilute magnetic alloy such as canonical spin
187: glass\cite{Mydosh93}.
188: $\Hp$ is assumed not to contain uniform component $\Mv\equiv \Sv_{q=0}$,
189: since it is taken into account in $\Delta=JM$ with $M=|\Mv|$.
190: The scattering by normal impurities is represented by
191: $H_{\rm imp}=({\vimp}/{N})\sum \sum_{i}^{\nimp} e^{i(\kv-\kv')X_{i}}
192: c^\dagger_{\kv'}c_{\kv}$, where $\nimp$ is the number of nonmagnetic
193: impurities (at sites $X_{i}$) and $\vimp$ is a constant.
194:
195: The electronic current is given by
196: $\Jv=\frac{e}{m}\sum_{\kv\sigma}\kv c^\dagger_{\kv'\sigma} c_{\kv\sigma}$.
197: Based on Kubo formula, the anomalous Hall conductivity is obtained as
198: $
199: \sigma_{xy}=\lim_{\omega\rightarrow0}\frac{1}{\omega}{\rm Im}
200: \left( Q_{xy}(\omega+i0)-Q_{xy}(i0) \right)
201: $
202: with
203: $ Q_{xy}(i\omegaell)\equiv\frac{1}{\beta V}
204: <J_{x}(i\omegaell)J_{y}(-i\omegaell)>
205: $,
206: where the bracket $<>$ denotes averaging over electrons and
207: impurities,
208: $\omega_{\ell}\equiv 2\pi\ell/\beta$ being the Matsubara frequency.
209: We treat $\Hp$ perturbatively.
210:
211: As is obvious, the first and second order contribution vanish since the spatial
212: asymmetry due to
213: current vertices $J_{x}$ and $J_{y}$ in the correlation function cannot be
214: deleted.
215: The first term which can possibly be finite is the third-order term
216: (Fig. \ref{FIGsigxy});
217: \begin{eqnarray}
218: \sigma_{xy}^{(3)} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi V}
219: \left(\frac{e}{m}\right)^2 \left(\frac{J}{N}\right)^3
220: \sum_{\kv\kv'\kv''}
221: \sum_{\alpha\beta\gamma} k_{x} k'_{y}
222: S^{\alpha}_{\kv''-\kv} S^{\beta}_{\kv'-\kv''} S^{\gamma}_{\kv-\kv'}
223: {\rm tr}[
224: G_{\kv}^R \sigma^\alpha G_{\kv''}^R \sigma^\beta
225: G_{\kv'}^R G_{\kv'}^A \sigma^\gamma G_{\kv}^A ]
226: \nonumber\\ &&
227: +{\rm c.c.},
228: \label{eq:Q03def}
229: \end{eqnarray}
230: where $V$ is the total volume, trace is over spin indices,
231: and $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ runs over $x,y,z$.
232: $G_{\kv\sigma}^R(\equiv [{\frac{i}{2\tau}-\epsilon_{\kv\sigma}}]^{-1})$ and
233: $G_{\kv\sigma}^A(=(G_{\kv\sigma}^R)^*)$ are retarded and advanced Green
234: functions in the $\omega\rightarrow0$ limit,
235: respectively, which include lifetime due to impurities, $\tau\equiv
236: 2\pi\DOS\nimp\vimp^2$, $\DOS$ being the density of states per site.
237: We consider the case where the polarization of conduction electron is small
238: ($\Delta\sim 0$).
239: The summation over spin indices in eq. (\ref{eq:Q03def}) is then
240: carried out as
241: ${\rm tr}[\sigma^\alpha \sigma^\beta \sigma^\gamma]=
242: 2i\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}$, where $\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}$
243: is the totally antisymmetric tensor.
244: By use of the partial derivative, the Hall conductivity reduces to a
245: compact form;
246: \begin{equation}
247: \sigma_{xy}^{(3)} =
248: \frac{N}{\pi V}
249: \left(\frac{e}{m}\right)^2 (2\pi\DOS J)^3\tau^2 \chiuni
250: = (4\pi)^2 \sigma_{0} J^3 \DOS^2 \tau {\chiuni},
251: \label{eq:Q0331}
252: \end{equation}
253: where $\sigma_{0}$ is the Boltzmann conductivity,
254: $\sigma_{0}\equiv \frac{N}{2V}\left(\frac{e}{m}\right)^2\DOS
255: k_{F}^2\tau$ ($k_{F}$ is the Fermi wavenumber).
256: We see that $\sigma_{xy}^{(3)}\propto \tau^2 \propto
257: \rho_{0}^{-2}$ ($\rho_{0}=\sigma_{0}^{-1}$ is the resistivity).
258: The uniform chirality $\chiuni$ is given by
259: \begin{eqnarray}
260: \chiuni &\equiv& \frac{1}{N}\sum_{\Xv_{i}}
261: \Sv_{\Xv_{1}}\cdot(\Sv_{\Xv_{2}}\times\Sv_{\Xv_{3}})
262: \nonumber \\
263: & & \times
264: \left[
265: \frac{(\av\times\bv)_{z}}{ab} I'(a) I'(b) I(c)
266: +\frac{(\bv\times\cv)_{z}}{bc} I(a) I'(b) I'(c)
267: +\frac{(\cv\times\av)_{z}}{ca} I'(a) I(b) I'(c)
268: \right] , \label{chiunidef}
269: \end{eqnarray}
270: where $\Xv_{i}$ runs over all the positions of local spins,
271: while $\av\equiv\Xv_{1}-\Xv_{2}$,
272: $\bv\equiv\Xv_{2}-\Xv_{3}$ and $\cv\equiv \Xv_{3}-\Xv_{1}$ are the
273: vectors representing sides of the triangle
274: ($a\equiv |\av|$ e.t.c.).
275: $I(r)\equiv
276: \frac{1}{2\pi N\DOS\tau} \sum_{\kv}e^{i\kv\cdot\rv} G_{\kv}^R
277: G_{\kv}^A$ and
278: $I'(r)=\frac{d I(r)}{dr}$.
279: It is seen that Hall current is driven by three spins which form
280: a finite solid angle in spin space (i.e., finite local chirality
281: $\chi_{123}\equiv
282: \Sv_{\Xv_{1}} \cdot ( \Sv_{\Xv_{2}} \times \Sv_{\Xv_{3}}) $)
283: spanning a finite area in
284: coordinate space (as seen from $(\av\times\bv)_{z}$ etc.).
285: Note that the factor in the square bracket in the definition of
286: $\chiuni$ specifies the coupling between the spin- and
287: the coordinate-space.
288: In the case three spins ($1,2$ and $3$) align right-handed in
289: spin space
290: ($\chi_{123}>0$), $\chi_{123}$ contributes positively to $\chiuni$
291: if these three spins are
292: located anti-clockwise in real space, and is negative if they are
293: located clockwise.
294: In the case three spins align left-handed in spin space ($\chi_{123}<0$), this
295: assignment is reversed.
296: Noting $I(r)=\frac{\sin k_{F}r}{k_{F} r}e^{-r/2\ell}$,
297: where $\ell$ is elastic mean free path,
298: contribution from largely separated three spins
299: with the scale of $r$ decays rapidly as
300: $\sim e^{-3r/2\ell}/(k_{F}r)^3$, and the Hall
301: effect is dominantly driven by chiralities of spins on small triangles.
302: Note that the large-$r$ behavior of the weight function has
303: resemblance to the RKKY interaction.
304: The expression of the uniform chirality
305: derived in our weak coupling scheme, eq. (\ref{chiunidef}),
306: contains contribution from large triangles, and is a natural
307: extension of the conventional (and naive) definition of the
308: chirality in terms of spins on adjacent sites only.
309: Eqs. (\ref{eq:Q0331}) and (\ref{chiunidef}) are main results of
310: the present paper, which gives a direct relation between the Hall
311: conductivity and the spin configuration.
312:
313: Conventional theories of anomalous Hall effect is based on the
314: spin-orbit interaction,
315: $H_{\rm so}\equiv
316: i\lambda\sum_{\kv\kv'}(\kv'\times\kv)\cdot
317: (c^\dagger_{\kv'}\sigmav c_{\kv})
318: $, where $\lambda$ is the spin-orbit coupling
319: constant\cite{Karplus54,Smit55,Luttinger58}.
320: Thus we have also analyzed the contribution of $H_{\rm so}$ on the same
321: footing as that of $\Hp$ performing a double power series expansion.
322: At the lowest (first) order, the contribution of $H_{\rm so}$
323: is made up of so-called skew scattering and side-jump
324: ones\cite{Berger70}, which are calculated as
325: $\sigma_{xy}^{\rm so}=-\lambda M (A'\tau+B)$\cite{Dugaev01}.
326: Here $A'$ and $B$ are constants independent of $\tau$, each term
327: corresponding to skew scattering and side-jump processes, respectively.
328: We note that $A'$ and $B$ are positive in the present single band
329: approximation, but their signs actually
330: depend on the band structure in real materials.
331: At the lowest order, spin-orbit ($\sigma_{xy}^{\rm so}$) and chirality
332: (eq. (\ref{eq:Q0331})) contributions are
333: independent, and the total Hall conductivity is simply their sum.
334: These can mix as higher order corrections, but we neglect such small
335: contributions.
336: The total Hall resistivity,
337: $\rho_{xy}=\sigma_{xy}\rho_0^2$,
338: then behaves as
339: \begin{equation}
340: \rho_{xy}\simeq -\lambda M(A \rho_{0}+B \rho_{0}^2) +C J^3 \chiuni,
341: \label{rhoxy}
342: \end{equation}
343: where $A=A'\rho_{0}\tau$ is independent of $\tau$, while
344: $C=\frac{1}{e^2}\frac{2V}{N}(\frac{m}{k_{F}})^2>0$ in our single band
345: approximation.
346: The sign of chirality contribution depends
347: on whether the coupling is of the $s$-$d$ type ($J>0$) or of
348: the Hund type ($J<0$).
349: It is seen that the three terms in eq. (\ref{rhoxy})
350: depend differently on the impurity
351: concentration. The chirality contribution is dominant in the
352: clean regime and at low temperatures.
353: It should be noted that the analysis in the strong Hund-coupling
354: case which does not consider impurities yields
355: $\rho_{xy}\propto \rho_{0}^2 \chi$\cite{Ohgushi00}.
356: These different dependences on $\rho_{0}$, which indicate different
357: behavior as a function of temperature, would be useful in interpreting
358: the experimental results.
359:
360: The chirality contribution to Hall coefficient is finite only if
361: there is a net uniform chirality, $\chiuni\neq0$.
362: Finite net chirality, however, may not be very easy to realize on regular
363: lattices with simple nearest-neighbor exchange interaction,
364: since the chirality on adjacent plaquettes usually tends to cancel each
365: other due to symmetry\cite{Ohgushi00,Shindou02}.
366: One possible mechanism to realize a finite net chirality has been
367: proposed in Ref. \cite{Ye99}, where it was argued in the strong
368: coupling case that
369: the spin-orbit interaction induced a net chirality in the
370: presence of magnetization as
371: $\chiuni^{\rm so}=-\alpha\lambda M$ ($\alpha$ is a positive
372: constant).
373: Inspired by this observation,
374: we have examined whether such a mechanism works in the present weak
375: coupling case.
376: To examine the possible coupling between the uniform chirality and the
377: magnetization $M$, we look into the expectation value (effective
378: Hamiltonian) of the spin-orbit
379: interaction, $<H_{\rm so}>$, where $<>$ denotes the thermal averaging over
380: electrons, treating $\Hp$ as perturbation.
381: We identify two types of terms as possible candidates. One is the
382: term linear in $M$ for small $M$ and comes from the third-order
383: contribution in $\Hp$,
384: \begin{eqnarray}
385: H_{\rm so}^{(3)\chi} &=& 2\lambda\left(\frac{J}{N}\right)^3
386: \sum_{\xv\Xv_{i}}
387: \Sv_{\Xv_{1}} \cdot ( \Sv_{\Xv_{2}} \times \Sv_{\Xv_{3}})
388: [(\Xv_{1}-\xv)\times (\Xv_{3}-\xv)]_{z}
389: \nonumber\\
390: && \times \frac{1}{\beta}\sum_{\omega_{n}}
391: g_{\omega_{n}}'(|\xv-\Xv_{1}|)
392: g_{\omega_{n}}(a) g_{\omega_{n}}(b) \Delta'_{\omega_{n}}(|\Xv_{3}-\xv|),
393: \label{eq:Hsoeff2}
394: \end{eqnarray}
395: where $\xv$ denotes the site at which the spin-orbit interaction acts
396: ($a$ and $b$ are defined after eq. (\ref{chiunidef})), and the uniform
397: magnetization is assumed to be in $z$-direction.
398: The thermal Green functions are defined here as
399: $g_{\omega_{n}}(r)\equiv \frac{1}{2}(G_{\omega_{n} +}+G_{\omega_{n} -})$,
400: $\Delta_{\omega_{n}}(r)\equiv (G_{\omega_{n} +}-G_{\omega_{n}-})$, where
401: $G_{\omega_{n}\sigma}(\Xv)=\sum_{\kv}{e^{-i\kv \Xv}}
402: [{i(\omega_{n}+\frac{{\rm
403: sgn}(\omega_{n})}{2\tau})-\epsilon_{\kv}+\Delta\sigma}]^{-1}$, and
404: $G'(r)\equiv\frac{dG}{dr}$.
405: Note that
406: $\Delta_{\omega_{n}}$ is proportional to $\Delta$, and hence to $M$, for
407: $\Delta/\epsilon_{F}\ll1$.
408: It is seen that
409: $H_{\rm so}^{(3)\chi}$ apparently describes the coupling between the uniform
410: magnetization and the local
411: chirality, but without referring to the spatial spin configuration.
412: In fact, since the factor of $((\Xv_{1}-\xv)\times (\Xv_{3}-\xv))_{z}$
413: specifies only the angles between
414: the two spins $S_{\Xv_{1}}$ and $S_{\Xv_{3}}$ when looked from the
415: position $\xv$ irrespective of spatial configuration
416: of $S_{\Xv_{2}}$, $H_{\rm so}^{(3)\chi}$ does not contain the
417: component inducing the uniform chirality $\chiuni$.
418:
419: The other term is quadratic in $M$ for small $M$ and comes from the
420: second-order contribution in $\Hp$, which reads as
421: \begin{eqnarray}
422: H_{\rm so}^{(2)\chi} &=&
423: -2\lambda\left(\frac{J}{N}\right)^2
424: \sum_{\xv\Xv_{i}} (\Sv_{\Xv_{1}}\times \Sv_{\Xv_{2}})_{z}
425: \frac{[(\Xv_{1}-\xv)\times(\Xv_{2}-\xv)]_{z}}
426: {|\Xv_{1}-\xv| |\Xv_{2}-\xv|} \nonumber\\
427: && \times
428: \frac{1}{\beta}\sum_{\omega_{n}}
429: \Delta_{\omega_{n}}'(|\Xv_{1}-\xv|) g_{\omega_{n}}(|\Xv_{1}-\Xv_{2}|)
430: \Delta_{\omega_{n}}'(|\Xv_{2}-\xv|).
431: \label{hso2}
432: \end{eqnarray}
433: In the presence of uniform magnetization $M$,
434: $z$-component of the vector chirality, defined
435: by two spins as $\chiv_{12}\equiv(\Sv_{\Xv_{1}}\times\Sv_{\Xv_{2}})$,
436: plays essentially the same role as the scalar chirality
437: ($\chi_{123}\simeq M\chiv_{12}^{z}$).
438: Then, eq. (\ref{hso2}) above describes the coupling between the vector
439: chirality and the magnetization via the spin-orbit interaction.
440: After summation over the thermal frequency,
441: the Fourier transform of the electron part becomes
442: \begin{equation}
443: \frac{1}{\beta}\sum_{\omega_{n}}
444: \Delta_{\omega_{n}\kv}g_{\omega_{n}\kv'}\Delta_{\omega_{n}\kv''}=
445: \frac{1}{8}\sum_{\sigma\sigma'\sigma''}
446: \frac{\sigma\sigma''}{\epsilon_{\kv\sigma}-\epsilon_{\kv'\sigma'}}
447: \left[
448: \frac{f_{\kv\sigma}-f_{\kv''\sigma''}}
449: {\epsilon_{\kv\sigma}-\epsilon_{\kv''\sigma''}}
450: - \frac{f_{\kv'\sigma'}-f_{\kv''\sigma''}}
451: {\epsilon_{\kv'\sigma'}-\epsilon_{\kv''\sigma''}}
452: \right],
453: \label{eq:sumzero}
454: \end{equation}
455: where $f_{\kv\sigma}$ is the Fermi distribution function.
456: If there is a particle-hole symmetry (invariance under
457: $\epsilon\rightarrow-\epsilon$), which is equivalent to assuming that
458: only excitations close to the Fermi level dominates,
459: eq. (\ref{eq:sumzero}) after summation over $\kv$'s turns out to vanish.
460: This symmetry, however, is not necessarily observed in real material,
461: for instance due to
462: the existence of the bottom of the band, and then, a finite contribution
463: is expected to remain in general.
464: Thus, this term could serve as a ``symmetry-breaking field''
465: ($H_{\rm so}^{(2)\chi}\propto M^2\sum_{\Xv_{i}}\chiv_{12}^{z}
466: \propto M \chiuni$) inducing a uniform chirality, which results
467: in a Hall effect in the bulk.
468:
469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
470: Even in the case the chirality does not contain uniform component,
471: $\chiuni$ could still
472: be finite if the system size is sufficiently small.
473: Let us consider the case of spin glasses in zero external field,
474: in which the chirality is randomly ordered.
475: The number of triangles which contribute to $\sigma_{xy}$
476: is given roughly as
477: $N_{\chi}\simeq N \nm^3 (\ell/\azero)^4$ ($\nm$ is the concentration
478: of localized spins, and $\azero$ is lattice constant).
479: Hence, the sum of random chirality is
480: $\chiuni\propto\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\nm^{3/2} (\ell/\azero)^2$.
481: Although this quantity decays as $\propto 1/\sqrt{N}$,
482: we expect that detection of Hall effect
483: may be possible by high-sensitivity-measurements on mesoscopic samples.
484: This chirality-driven Hall effect of random sign in mesoscopic spin glasses
485: would be measurable\cite{Weissman93,Neuttiens00}
486: by looking at the sample-dependent or
487: thermal-cycle-dependent fluctuations,
488: $\delta\sigma_{xy}\equiv \sigma_{xy}-[{\sigma_{xy}}]_{s}$
489: ($[\;]_{s}$ denotes average over spin configurations),
490: whose squared average is given as
491: $\sqrt{[{ (\delta \sigma_{xy})^2}]_{s}} /\sigma_{0}
492: = (4\pi)^2 J^3 \DOS^2 \tau
493: \sqrt{ [{\chi^2}]_{s} } $,
494: where
495: $\sqrt{[{\chi^2}]_{s}}\equiv
496: { \frac{1}{N} \{ \sum_{ijk}
497: (\chi_{ijk} F_{ijk})^2 }\}^{1/2}
498: \propto\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\nm^3 (\ell/\azero)^4$
499: ($F_{ijk}$ represents the spatial weight given in the square bracket
500: in eq. (\ref{chiunidef})).
501:
502:
503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
504:
505: In the 70's, anomalous Hall effect in spin glasses was experimentally
506: investigated\cite{Mydosh93,McAlister76}.
507: It was found that the Hall resistivity
508: of canonical spin glasses, i.e., dilute magnetic alloys
509: such as AuFe and AgMn, measured in weak
510: applied fields were negative and exhibited a cusp-like anomaly
511: around the spin-glass transition
512: temperature whose behavior was quite similar to that of the
513: magnetic susceptibility, $\chi_{m}$; i.e.,
514: $\rho_{xy}/H\propto-\chi_{m}$\cite{McAlister76}.
515: Although this behavior can be explained by
516: the standard spin-orbit contribution (the first two terms in eq.
517: (\ref{rhoxy})), it could also be explainable
518: by the contribution of a uniform chirality
519: induced by $H_{\rm so}^{(2)\chi}$ described above.
520: In order to experimentally resolve the spin-orbit contribution of
521: Karplus-Luttinger type from the spin-orbit induced chirality
522: contribution, one might possibly examine the dependence on
523: $\rho_{0}$ (Eq. (\ref{rhoxy})), or measure
524: the response to external magnetic fields applied
525: in various directions.
526: In this connection, reentrant spin-glass systems\cite{Mydosh93}, which exhibit
527: successive phase transitions, first from para to ferro
528: and then from ferro to spin glass at lower temperature, would be of
529: much interest. In the ferromagnetic regime, only
530: the conventional spin-orbit mechanism is expected to work, while in
531: reentrant spin-glass regime, the chirality contribution
532: sets in due to the spin canting giving rise to distinct contribution
533: at lower temperatures.
534:
535:
536: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
537:
538: To summarize, we have demonstrated based on the $s$-$d$ model in the weak
539: coupling
540: regime that a topologically nontrivial spin configuration (chirality) induces
541: Hall current.
542: The chirality-driven Hall effect as a bulk appears if uniform component
543: of the chirality is finite.
544: This contribution is independent of the conventional
545: contribution from the spin-orbit
546: coupling exhibiting different dependence on resistivity from the
547: spin-orbit contribution and other predictions based on chirality
548: mechanism.
549: If chirality is ordered randomly, as in spin glasses below the spin-glass
550: transition temperature,
551: sample-to-sample or thermal-cycle-dependent fluctuations of Hall conductivity
552: in mesoscopic samples is expected to show an anomalous enhancement.
553: Without a direct method of magnetic detection of the chirality
554: available so far,
555: measurement of (fluctuation of) Hall conductivity would be powerful tool
556: in experimental confirmation of the chirality ordering.
557:
558: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
559: %\acknowledgements
560: \begin{acknowledgements}
561: The authors are grateful to H. Kohno, R. Shindou, H. Yoshino, S.
562: Yoshii, N. Nagaosa and M. Sato
563: for useful comments and discussion.
564: This work is supported by Priority Areas Grants from the
565: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
566: G. T. thanks The Mitsubishi Foundation for financial support.
567: \end{acknowledgements}
568:
569:
570:
571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
572: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
573: \bibitem{Karplus54} R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev.
574: {\bf 95}, 1154 (1954).
575: \bibitem{Smit55} J. Smit, Physica {\bf 21}, 877 (1955);
576: {\bf 24}, 39 (1958).
577: \bibitem{Luttinger58} J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev.
578: {\bf 112}, 739 (1958).
579: \bibitem{Kondo62} J. Kondo, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 27}, 772 (1962).
580: \bibitem{Maranzana67} F. E. Maranzana, Phys. Rev. {\bf 160}, 421
581: (1967).
582: \bibitem{Snyder96}
583: G. J. Snyder {\it et al}, Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 69}, 4254 (1996).
584: \bibitem{Asamitsu98}
585: A. Asamitsu and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. {\bf B58}, 47 (1998).
586: \bibitem{Ye99} J. Ye {\it et al}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 3737 (1999).
587: \bibitem{Chun00} S. H. Chun {\it et al}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 757
588: (2000).
589: \bibitem{Geller01} Y. Lyanda-Geller {\it et al},
590: Phys. Rev. {\bf B63}, 184426 (2001).
591: \bibitem{Taguchi99} Y. Taguchi and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. {\bf
592: B60}, 10280 (1999).
593: \bibitem{Katsufuji00} T. Katsufuji, H. Y. Hwang and S. -W. Cheong,
594: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 1998 (2000).
595: \bibitem{Ohgushi00} K. Ohgushi, S. Murakami and N. Nagaosa, Phys.
596: Rev. {\bf B62}, R6065 (2000).
597: \bibitem{Taguchi01} Y. Taguchi
598: %, Y. Oohara, H. Yoshizawa, N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura,
599: {\it et al}, Science {\bf 291}, 2573 (2001).
600: \bibitem{Shindou01} R. Shindou and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett.
601: {\bf 87}, 116801 (2001).
602: \bibitem{Onoda01} M. Onoda and N. Nagaosa, J. Phys. Sco. Jpn. {\bf
603: 71} 19 (2002).
604: \bibitem{Yoshii00} S. Yoshii
605: %, S. Iikubo, T. Kageyama, K. Oda, Y.
606: %Kondo, K. Murata and M. Sato,
607: {\it et al}, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 69} 3777 (2000).
608: \bibitem{Yasui01} Y. Yasui
609: %, Y. Kondo, M. Kanada, M. Ito, H.
610: %Hirashina, M. Sato and K. Kakurai,
611: {\it et al}, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 70}, 284 (2001).
612: \bibitem{Kageyama01} T. Kageyama
613: %, S. Iikubo, S. Yoshii, Y. Kondo,
614: %M. Sato and Y. Iye,
615: {\it et al}, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 70}, 3006 (2001).
616: \bibitem{Thouless82} D. J. Thouless
617: %, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale and M. den Nijs,
618: {\it et al}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 49}, 405 (1982).
619: \bibitem{Kawamura92} H. Kawamura, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 68}, 3785
620: (1992); Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 80}, 5421 (1998).
621: \bibitem{Weissman93} M. B. Weissman, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 65}, 829 (1993).
622: \bibitem{Neuttiens00} G. Neuttiens
623: %, C. Strunk, C. Van Haesendononck and Y. Bruynseraede,
624: {\it et al}, Phys. Rev. {\bf B62}, 3905 (2000).
625: \bibitem{Mydosh93} J. A. Mydosh, ``Spin glasses: an experimental
626: introduction'', Tayer \& Francis (1993).
627: \bibitem{Berger70} L. Berger, Phys. Rev. {\bf B2}, 4559 (1970).
628: \bibitem{Dugaev01} V. K. Dugaev, A. Crepieux and P. Bruno,
629: Phys. Rev. {\bf B64}, 104411 (2001).
630: \bibitem{Shindou02} R. Shindou, private communication.
631: \bibitem{McAlister76} S. P. McAlister and C. M. Hurd, Phys. Rev.
632: Lett. {\bf 37}, 1017 (1976).
633: \end{thebibliography}
634:
635: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
636: \begin{figure}[bthp]
637: \includegraphics{sigmaxy.eps}
638: %%
639: \begin{minipage}[t]{70mm}
640: \caption{Three spin contribution to $\sigma_{xy}$. The interaction
641: with the local spin, $\Sv$, is denoted by a shaded small circles.
642: The two processes are complex congugate to each other.
643: Other contributions vanish due to symmetry.
644: \label{FIGsigxy}}
645: \end{minipage}
646: %
647: %
648: \end{figure}
649: %
650: \end{document}