1: \documentstyle[aps]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[aps,preprint]{revtex}
3: \textheight 23.5cm
4: %\headsep 2.cm
5: \topmargin -2cm
6: \textwidth 16.5cm
7: \oddsidemargin 0.46cm
8: \evensidemargin 0.46cm
9: %\parskip=0.1 true cm
10: %\pagestyle{empty}
11: %\def\theequation{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
12: \newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
13: \newcommand{\dsf}{\ds\frac}
14: \newcommand{\re}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
15: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
16: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
17: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: \sloppy
20: \large
21: %\draft
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: \begin{document}
24: \large
25: \begin{center}
26: \Large\bf
27: Nonlinear Stationary Waves with Transport Current in Superconductors
28: \vskip 0.1cm
29: {\normalsize\bf N.€.\,Taylanov}\\
30: \vskip 0.1cm
31: {\large\em Department of Theoretical Physics,\\
32: Institute of Applied Physics,\\
33: National University of Uzbekistan,\\
34: Vuzgorodok, 800174, Tashkent, Uzbekistan\\
35: e-mail: taylanov@iaph.tkt.uz}
36: \end{center}
37: \begin{center}
38: \bf Abstract
39: \end{center}
40:
41: \begin{center}
42: \mbox{\parbox{14cm}{\small
43: The profile of a nonlinear stationary thermomagnetic wave in the
44: resistive state of superconductors is studied at different transport currents. It is
45: proved that the thermomagnetic wave has an oscillating profile at relatively
46: high values of the transport current in the sample. A shock wave with a
47: monotonic structure corresponds to comparatively weak transport currents.
48: The wave propagation velocity and the wave front width in a superconductor
49: are estimated.
50: }}
51: \end{center}
52: \vskip 0.5cm
53: The problem of thermal suppression of the superconducting state in
54: the presence of transport current is topical in the practical use of
55: superconducting magnetic systems (see[1]). External fluctuations of various
56: physical natures (thermal, magnetic, mechanical, etc.) can lead to the
57: formation of resistive-phase regions in a superconductor. The ohmic heating
58: of these regions under a transport current with density $j_{tr}$ can bring
59: about an increase in the temperature $T$ above the critical point $(T>T_c)$
60: and, hence, the emergence of a vortex electric field $\vec E$
61: in the sample. It was shown earlier [2] that, together with dispersive and
62: nonlinear effects, the dissipative processes induced under ohmic heating
63: in a superconductor lead to the formation of stable structures,
64: thermoelectromagnetic $\vec E$ and $\vec H$ waves, depending on the condition
65: at the sample surface.
66: In the present work, we studied the qualitative pattern of the
67: dynamics of nonlinear thermomagnetic dissipative structures in the resistive
68: state of a superconductor. The dynamics of thermomagnetic waves, which move
69: at a constant velocity $v$ along the $x$ axis in a superconductor, is
70: described in terms of self-simulated variables $\xi(x,t)= x - vt$
71: by the nonlinear heat conduction equation [2-4]
72: \beq
73: -\nu v\dsf{dT}{d\xi}=\dsf{d}{d\xi}\left[\kappa\dsf{dT}{d\xi}\right]+jE,
74: \eeq
75: a set of Maxwell equations
76: \beq
77: \dsf{dE}{d\xi}=-\dsf{4\pi v}{c^2}j,
78: \eeq
79: \beq
80: E=\frac{v}{c}H
81: \eeq
82: and their related equation of the critical state
83: \beq
84: j=j_c(T,H)+j_{r}(E)+ j_{tr}
85: \eeq
86: Here, $\nu$ and $\kappa$ are the heat capacity and thermal conductivity
87: coefficients, respectively;
88: $j_{c}(T)=j_{0}-a(T-T_0)$ is the critical current density in the Bean
89: model $\left(\dsf{dj_{c}}{dH}=0\right)$ [5] (where $T_0$ and $T_c$ are the initial
90: and critical temperatures of the superconductor, respectively, and the
91: quantity $a=\left|\dsf{dj_c}{dT}\right|_{T=T_0}$ describes the thermally
92: activated weakening of the Abrikosov vortex pinning by lattice defects);
93: $j_{r}(E)$ is the resistive current density; and $j_{tr}$ is the transport
94: current density.
95: In the weak-heating approximation $(T-T_0)<<(T_á-T_0)$
96: for the viscous flow region ($E>E_f$, where $E_f$ is the boundary of the
97: linear section in the current-voltage characteristics of hard
98: superconductors [6]), the dependence of the resistive current density $j_r$
99: on the electric field $E$ is linear; i.e., $j_r\approx \sigma_f E$
100: ($\sigma_f$ is the effective conductivity). In weak fields $(E<E_f)$
101: the dependence $j_{r}(E)$ is essentially nonlinear and is most likely
102: determined by the thermally activated motion of the magnetic flux
103: (flux creep [6]). Here, we will consider a perturbation with a sufficiently
104: high amplitude $(E>E_{f})$ and use the linear dependence $j_{r}(E)$.
105: The appropriate thermal and elecrtodynamic boundary conditions
106: for Eqs. (1)-(4) have the form
107: \beq
108: \begin{array}{l}
109: T(\xi\rightarrow+\infty)=T_0, \dsf{dT}{d\xi}(x\rightarrow-\infty)=0,\\
110: \quad\\
111: E(\xi\rightarrow+\infty)=0, E(\xi\rightarrow-\infty)=E_e,\\
112: \end{array}
113: \eeq
114: where $E_e$ is the external electric field.
115:
116: By solving the set of Eqs. (1)-(4) with boundary conditions (5),
117: we obtain the following equation for the ditribution of the nonlinear
118: $E$ wave:
119: \beq
120: \dsf{d^3 E}{dz^3}+\beta(1+\tau)\dsf{d^2 E}{dz^2}+\beta^2\tau
121: \left[\dsf{dE}{dz}+\dsf{E_j}{E_\kappa}E\right]=0.
122: \eeq
123: Here, $z=\dsf{\xi}{L}$,$\beta=\dsf{vt_\kappa}{L}$,$E_j=\dsf{j_{tr}}{\sigma_f}$,
124: $\tau=\dsf{4\pi\kappa\sigma_f}{c^2\nu}$,$E_{\kappa}=\dsf{\kappa}{aL^2}$,
125: $L=\dsf{cH_e}{4\pi j_0}$ is the depth of the magnetic field penetration
126: into the bulk of the superconductor, $t_{\kappa}=\dsf{\nu L^2}{\kappa}$
127: is the thermal time of the problem, and $H_e$ is the external magnetic field.
128:
129: By analyzing the roots of the characteritic equation [7]
130: \beq
131: \lambda(\lambda+\beta)(\lambda+\beta\tau)=-\beta^2\tau\dsf{E_j}{E_\kappa},
132: \eeq
133: we can easily verify that the problem considered has solution that
134: oscillate about the origin of the coordinates $(E_0=0)$
135: of the phase diagram with decreasing and increasing amplitudes. The
136: oscillations appear at $E_j>\dsf{\beta\tau}{2(1+\tau)} E_\kappa$,
137: attenuate at $\beta(1+\tau) E_\kappa >E_j>\dsf{\beta\tau}{2(1+\tau)}
138: E_\kappa$, and increase at $\beta(1+\tau) E_\kappa< E_j$.
139: This means that, at a sufficiently high transport current $j_{tr}$,
140: the roots of the characteristic equation (7) are complex, the integral
141: curves are helical, and the origin $E_0=0$ is a singular point (focus).
142: If the coefficients $\beta$ and $\tau$ are assumed to be universally
143: positive, the representative point approaches the origin of coordinates,
144: which is a stable equilibrium position.
145: In the opposite case, when $\beta(1+\tau)E_\kappa<E_j$,
146: the focus becomes unstable and the representative point goes to infinity.
147: Note that the final value of the transport current $j_{tr}$
148: leads to a displacement of singular points and, correspondingly, of
149: the boundary conditions.
150:
151: At sufficiently weak transport currents, when the condition
152: $\dsf{dE}{dz}>>\beta^2\tau E_{j}$
153: is satisfied (high-amplitude waves), Eq. (6) is an integrable equation
154: and the corresponding model can be considered a damped linear oscillator
155: owing to the friction force, that is,
156: \beq
157: F_t=-\beta(1+\tau)\dsf{dE}{dz}\,,
158: \eeq
159: where $z$ is an analogue of time and $E$ is the coordinate of the
160: "material" point. The potential well equation has the form
161: \beq
162: U(E)=-\dsf{E^3}{6E_\kappa}+\beta^2\tau\dsf{E^2}{2}.
163: \eeq
164:
165: Analysis of the phase plane $(\dsf{dE}{dz},E)$
166: described by Eq. (6) shows that it has two equilibrium points: $E_0$ is
167: a stable node and $E_1=2\beta^2\tau E_\kappa$ is a saddle.
168: The two equilibrium states $(E_0,E_1)$ are separated by the separatrix $AB$
169: in the phase plane (Fig.1). The material point is located at the point
170: $E_1$ at $z\rightarrow \infty$ and goes over into the point $E_0$ at
171: $z\rightarrow -\infty$.
172: The change-over from one equilibrium state to other occurs only
173: monotonically.
174:
175: Within the approximation $\tau<<1$, the solution of Eq. (6)
176: is represented as
177: \beq
178: E(z)=\dsf{E_1}{2}\left[1-th(\dsf{\beta}{2} (z-z_0)\right]
179: \eeq
180: The condition $\tau=\dsf{D_t}{D_m}<<1$ means that the magnetic
181: flux is redistributed much faster than the heat is transferred. Here,
182: $D_t=\dsf{\kappa}{\nu}$ and $D_m=\dsf{c^2}{4\pi \sigma_f}$ are the
183: thermal and magnetic diffusion coefficients, respectivily [6].
184: Hence, the spatial scale $L_E$ for the magnetic flux penetration is
185: substantially greater than the corresponding thermal scale $L_T$.
186: Therefore, the spatial derivatives $\dsf{d^n E}{dz^n}$
187: will contain a small parameter $\left[\dsf{L_T}{L_E}\right]<<1$.
188: We can easily check the validity of this approximation by the direct
189: differentiation of Eq. (6), that is,
190: \beq
191: {\dsf{d^2 E}{dz^2}}\left(\beta{\dsf{dE}{dz}}\right)^{-1}=\tau<<1
192: \eeq
193:
194: The maximum error of this approximation is of the order
195: $\dsf{\tau}{(1+\tau)^2}$ .
196: For example, the error is equal to 25 % at $\tau=1$ and is vanishingly
197: small in the limiting case $\tau\rightarrow 0$. Relationship (10)
198: describes the profile of a shock thermomagnetic wave propogating into
199: the bulk of the superconductor.
200: The wave structure is shown in Fig.2. At the boundary condition
201: $(E(z\rightarrow-\infty)=E_e)$, we can easily determine the velocity
202: $v_E$ of the wave with an amplitude $E_e$ in the form
203: \beq
204: v_E=\dsf{L}{t_\kappa}\left[\dsf{E_e}{2\tau E_\kappa}\right]^{1/2},
205: \eeq
206: and the wave front width $\delta z$
207: \beq
208: \delta z=16\dsf{1+\tau}{\tau^{1/2}}\left[\dsf{E_\kappa}{E_e}\right]^{1/2}.
209: \eeq
210:
211: The numerical estimates yield the values
212: $v_E=1\div 10^2 \dsf{á¬}{ᥪ}$ and $\delta z=10^{-1}\div 10^{-2}$
213: for $\tau=1$.
214:
215: In conclusion, we note that the results obtained make it possible
216: to describe the nonlinear stage of evolution of the thermomagnetic
217: instability in the resistive state of superconductors. In the initial stage,
218: we observe an exponential increase in the perturbations of $T$, $E$, and $H$
219: with the increment $\lambda$ determined from the linear theory (see [8]).
220: The linear stage of the instability evolution lasts for the period
221: $t_j=\dsf{t_\kappa}{\lambda}$.
222: In the latter stage of the instability evolution, the stationary
223: $\vec E$ or $\vec H$ wave (depending on whether the $\vec E$ or $\vec H$
224: quantity is fixed on the sample surface during the wave motion) propagates
225: into the bulk of the sample. The velocity of the wave is determined by
226: formula (12),
227: and the time of its motion in the sample with thickness $2l$ is given by
228: $$
229: \Delta t=\dsf{l}{v_E}
230: $$
231: Hence, it follows that the transition from the superconducting to the
232: normal state can occur through the propagation of a stationary thermomagnetic
233: wave whose structure essentially depends on dispersive and dissipative
234: effects.
235:
236: \begin{center}
237: REFERENCES
238: \end{center}
239: \begin{enumerate}
240: \item
241: V.R.Romanovskii, Dokl. Akad. Nauk 365, (1) 44(1999)
242: [Dokl.Phus. 44, 137 (1999)].
243: \item
244: I.L.Maksimov, Yu.N.Mastakov, and N.A.Taylanov.
245: Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 28 (8), 2323(1986)
246: [Sov. Phys. Solid State 28, 1300 (1986)].
247: \item
248: N.A. Taylanov, Metallofizika (Kiev) 13 (9), 713(1991).
249: \item
250: N.A.Taylanov Superconduct. Science and Technology, 14, 326 (2001).
251: \item
252: Bean C.P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 8,6. 250 (1962).
253: \item
254: R.G. Mints and A.L. Rakhmanov, Instability in Superconductors
255: (Nauka, Moscow, 1984).
256: \item
257: V.I. Karpman, Non-linear Waves in Dispersive Media
258: (Nauka, Moscow, 1973; Pergamon, Oxford, 1975).
259: \item
260: V.A. Al'tov, V.B. Zenkevich, M.G. Kremlev, and V.V. Sychev, Stabilization
261: of Superconducting Magnetic Systems (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1984).
262: \end{enumerate}
263: \end{document}
264:
265: