1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentstyle[aps]{revtex}
3: %----------------------------------------------------------------
4: \begin{document}
5: \draft
6: \title{
7: Kolmogorov Scaling for the $\epsilon$-entropy
8: in a Forced Turbulence Simulation
9: \cite{N}}
10: \author{
11: W. Sakikawa and O. Narikiyo}
12: \address{
13: Department of Physics,
14: Kyushu University,
15: Fukuoka 810-8560,
16: Japan}
17: \date{
18: August, 2002}
19: \maketitle
20: %----------------------------------------------------------------
21: \begin{abstract}
22: We have shown that
23: the $\epsilon$-entropy determined from the time-series
24: of the velocity fluctuation in a forced turbulence
25: simulated by the lattice Boltzmann method
26: obeys the Kolmogorov scaling.
27: \vskip 8pt
28: \noindent
29: {\it Keywords:}
30: forced turbulence,
31: Kolmogorov scaling,
32: $\epsilon$-entropy,
33: lattice Boltzmann method
34: \end{abstract}
35: %----------------------------------------------------------------
36: \vskip 18pt
37: Turbulence is one of the typical phenomena
38: with multiscale motions.
39: Each phenomena of a scale strongly couples with
40: all the other scales of turbulent motion.
41: In order to analyze such a system
42: a scale-dependent entropy, the so-called $\epsilon$-entropy,
43: works well.\cite{Vul}
44: For example, the time series of the velocity fluctuation in turbulence
45: leads to a non-trivial scaling relation of the $\epsilon$-entropy,
46: $ h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3} $,
47: expected from the Kolmogorov scaling.\cite{Vul}
48: The existing experimental data are consistent with this scaling.\cite{Vul}
49: In this Short Note we try to show the consistency of the scaling
50: with the simulation on the basis of the lattice Boltzmann method
51: which is one of the easiest ways to simulate turbulence.
52:
53: The distribution function $f_i({\vec r},t)$
54: of the particle with the velocity ${\vec c}_i$
55: at position ${\vec r}$ and time $t$
56: obeys the lattice Boltzmann equation\cite{S,WG}
57: %----------------------------------------------------------------
58: \begin{equation}
59: f_i({\vec r}+{\vec c}_i,t+1) - f_i({\vec r},t)
60: = - \omega [ f_i({\vec r},t) - f_i^0({\vec r},t) ],
61: \end{equation}
62: %----------------------------------------------------------------
63: where we have adopted the Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) model
64: for the collision term
65: and the time step has been chosen as unity.
66: The position ${\vec r}$ of the particle
67: is restricted on the cubic lattice
68: and the lattice spacing is chosen as unity.
69: The local equilibrium distribution $f_i^0({\vec r},t)$ is assumed
70: to be given as
71: %----------------------------------------------------------------
72: \begin{equation}
73: f_i^0({\vec r},t)
74: = w_i \rho [ 1 + 3 ({\vec c}_i\cdot{\vec u})
75: + {9 \over 2} ({\vec c}_i\cdot{\vec u})^2
76: - {3 \over 2} ({\vec u}\cdot{\vec u}) ].
77: \end{equation}
78: %----------------------------------------------------------------
79: The density $\rho$ and the velocity ${\vec u}$ of the fluid
80: are given by the sum of the contributions of the particles as
81: $\rho = \sum_i f_i({\vec r},t)$ and
82: $\rho {\vec u} = \sum_i f_i({\vec r},t) {\vec c}_i$, respectively.
83: Using the multiscale analysis
84: the Navier-Stokes equation,
85: which is supposed to be able to describe turbulence,
86: is derived from the present BGK lattice Boltzmann equation
87: and the corresponding viscosity $\nu = (1/\omega - 1/2)/3$.
88:
89: In the following
90: we use a 15-velocity model and ${\vec c}_i$ is chosen as
91: ${\vec c}_1 = (0,0,0)$,
92: ${\vec c}_i = (\pm1,0,0),(0,\pm1,0),(0,0,\pm1)$ for $i=2,3,\cdot\cdot\cdot,7$
93: and
94: ${\vec c}_i = (\pm1,\pm1,\pm1)$ for $i=8,9,\cdot\cdot\cdot,15$.
95: Then the weight factor $w_i$ for the local equilibrium distribution
96: is determined as
97: $w_1 = 2/9$,
98: $w_i = 1/9$ for $i=2,3,\cdot\cdot\cdot,7$ and
99: $w_i = 1/72$ for $i=8,9,\cdot\cdot\cdot,15$.
100: The relaxation frequency $\omega$ is chosen as $\omega=1.94$.
101:
102: In order to simulate forced turbulence
103: we add the forcing term ${\vec g}_i\cdot{\vec F}({\vec r},t)$
104: due to an applied body force ${\vec F}({\vec r},t)$
105: to the right hand side of eq.\ (1).
106: In order to reproduce the Navier-Stokes equation
107: we should choose as ${\vec g}_i = {\vec c}_i/10$
108: for the present 15-velocity model.\cite{WG}
109: For simplicity we apply a solenoidal force in $y$-direction,\cite{S}
110: ${\vec F}=(0,F_y(z,t),0)$, and $F_y(z,t)$ is a Gaussian white noise
111: whose variance $\sigma$ is a function of the lattice coordinate
112: in $z$-direction,
113: $\sigma = |0.01 \times \sin(2\pi k_f z / L)|$,
114: where $L$ is the linear dimension of the simulation region
115: of cubic box and $L=100$ ($1 \leq x,y,z \leq 100$).
116: We have adopted the periodic boundary condition.
117: Although we have chosen as $k_f = 4$,
118: the results of the simulation is insensitive to the choice.
119:
120: In the initial state of the simulation
121: the fluid density is uniform, $\rho = 1$, and
122: the spatial distribution of the fluid velocity ${\vec u}$ is Gaussian
123: with the variance $\sigma = \sqrt{0.0075}$.
124:
125: The Reynolds number $R$ for our simulation\cite{S,WG} is
126: estimated as $R = \sqrt{ \langle {\vec u}^2 \rangle } L / 2\pi\nu$
127: and time-dependent as shown in Fig.\ 1.
128: Here $\langle \cdot\cdot\cdot \rangle$ represents the spatial average.
129: In our simulation
130: we can realize a turbulent state for relatively small Reynolds number,
131: since we add random force.
132:
133: We focus our attention to the time series of
134: the $y$-component $u_y({\vec r},t)$ of
135: the fluid velocity ${\vec u}({\vec r},t)$
136: as shown in Fig.\ 2,
137: since our system is anisotropic due to the forcing.
138: This turbulent signal is characterized by the exit-time
139: $\tau(\epsilon;{\vec r})$ at position ${\vec r}$.
140: At the exit-time $t=\tau(\epsilon;{\vec r})$
141: the first exit satisfying the condition,
142: $|u_y({\vec r},t_0+t) - u_y({\vec r},t_0)| > \epsilon/2$,
143: occurs.
144: The time $t$ is measured from $t_0$ and $t_0=1000$ in our simulation
145: regarding the states at the first 1000 time-steps as transitional.
146:
147: The mean of the exit-time,
148: $\tau(\epsilon) \equiv \langle \tau(\epsilon;{\vec r}) \rangle$,
149: is related to the $\epsilon$-entropy, $h(\epsilon)$, as\cite{Vul}
150: %----------------------------------------------------------------
151: \begin{equation}
152: h(\epsilon) \propto {1 \over \tau(\epsilon)}.
153: \end{equation}
154: %----------------------------------------------------------------
155: In the region where Kolmogorov's 4/5 law holds\cite{Vul,F}
156: the velocity difference between two points behaves as
157: $\langle|{\vec u}({\vec r}+{\vec R},t_0)-{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0)|\rangle
158: \propto |{\vec R}|^{1/3}$.
159: Under the assumption of Taylor's hypothesis,\cite{Vul,F}
160: $[{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0+t)-{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0)]
161: \sim [{\vec u}({\vec r}+{\vec R},t_0)-{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0)]$,
162: with $|{\vec R}|=Ut$,
163: where $U$ is the mean velocity for large scale sweeping,
164: we obtain
165: %----------------------------------------------------------------
166: \begin{equation}
167: \langle|{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0+t)-{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0)|\rangle
168: \propto t^{1/3},
169: \end{equation}
170: %----------------------------------------------------------------
171: as a mean-field description.
172: Thus the definition of the exit-time leads to
173: $\tau(\epsilon)^{1/3} \propto \epsilon$.
174: From eq.\ (3) we can conclude
175: that $h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3}$
176: in the above mean-field sense.\cite{Vul}
177:
178: In accordance with the above scaling analysis
179: our simulation data for $1/\tau(\epsilon)$ shown in Fig.\ 3
180: have the scaling region for $\epsilon > \epsilon_0$
181: where $\epsilon_0 \sim 0.04$.
182: Thus by simulation we have established
183: that $h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3}$.
184: For $\epsilon < \epsilon_0$, namely for short-time events,
185: we can not expect the scaling,
186: since the mean-field assumption for large scale sweeping
187: is valid for the average of many events and
188: not applicable to a few events at short time-interval.
189: These behaviors are consistent with the experimantal data.\cite{Vul}
190: For $\epsilon \ll \epsilon_0$
191: the exit in the simulation occurs within the time step.
192:
193: In summary
194: we have shown that the velocity fluctuation in a forced turbulence
195: simulated by the lattice Boltzmann method
196: leads to the $\epsilon$-entropy scaling,
197: $ h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3} $,
198: expected from the Kolmogorov scaling.
199: Although the scaling relation is a robust result
200: of the mean-field description,
201: the intermittent aspects of turbulence
202: are beyond the scope of the present study.
203:
204: This work was supported in part
205: by a Grand-in-Aid for Scientific Research
206: from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
207: and Technology of Japan.
208:
209: %----------------------------------------------------------------
210: \begin{references}
211:
212: \bibitem{N}
213: This paper has been submitted to the Short Note section
214: of J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
215:
216: \bibitem{Vul}
217: M.\ Abel, L.\ Biferale, M.\ Cencini, M.\ Falcioni, D.\ Vergni
218: and A.\ Vulpiani:
219: Physica D {\bf 147} (2000) 12.
220:
221: \bibitem{S}
222: S.\ Succi:
223: {\it The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond}
224: (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001).
225:
226: \bibitem{WG}
227: D.\ A.\ Wolf-Gladrow:
228: {\it Lattice-Gas Cellular Automata and Lattice Boltzmann Models}
229: (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).
230:
231: \bibitem{F}
232: U.\ Frisch:
233: {\it Turbulence}
234: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
235:
236: \end{references}
237:
238: \vskip 15pt
239: %----------------------------------------------------------------
240: \begin{figure}
241: \caption{
242: The Reynolds number as a function of time. }
243: \label{fig:1}
244: \end{figure}
245:
246: \vskip -15pt
247:
248: \begin{figure}
249: \caption{
250: The $y$-component of the fluid velocity $u_y$
251: as a function of time at ${\vec r}=(50,50,50)$. }
252: \label{fig:2}
253: \end{figure}
254:
255: \vskip -15pt
256:
257: \begin{figure}
258: \caption{
259: The inverse of the mean exit-time $\tau(\epsilon)$.
260: Here the dots and straight line represent the simulation data
261: and $\epsilon^{-3}$ law, respectively. }
262: \label{fig:3}
263: \end{figure}
264: %----------------------------------------------------------------
265: \end{document}
266: %----------------------------------------------------------------
267: \bye
268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
269: