1: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,psfig]{revtex}
2: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
3: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
4: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
5: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
6: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}
7: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \draft
11:
12: \widetext
13: \title{Parametric Resonant Phenomena in Bose-Einstein Condensates: \\
14: Breaking of Macroscopic Quantum Self-Trapping}
15: \author{Luca Salasnich}
16: \address{Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia,
17: Unit\`a di Milano, \\
18: Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Milano, \\
19: Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy \\
20: E-mail: salasnich@mi.infm.it}
21: \maketitle
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We analyze the periodic tunneling of a Bose-Einstein
24: condensate in a double-well potential which has an oscillating
25: energy barrier. We show that the dynamics of the Bose condensate critically
26: depends on the frequency $\omega$ of the oscillating energy barrier.
27: In the regime of periodic macroscopic quantum tunneling (PMQT)
28: with frequency $\omega_J$, the population imbalance of the condensate in the
29: two wells can be enhanced
30: under the condition of parametric resonance $\omega = 2 \omega_J$.
31: Instead, in the regime of macroscopic quantum self-trapping (MQST),
32: we find that MQST can be reduced or suppressed under the condition
33: of parametric resonance between
34: the frequency $\omega$ of the energy barrier and the frequency $\omega_{ST}$
35: of oscillation through the barrier of the very small
36: fraction of particles which remain untrapped during MQST.
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: \vskip 1. truecm
40:
41: \narrowtext
42:
43: \newpage
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46:
47: Macroscopic quantum tunneling
48: with dilute Bose-Einstein condensates of alkali-metal atoms
49: has been the subject of many theoretical [1-4] and experimental
50: [5-7] studies.
51: Here we consider the problem of trapped Bosons
52: in a double-well potential and investigate the effect of
53: a periodically varying barrier in the tunneling of the Bose condensate.
54: We study the problem using the two-mode classical-like
55: equations [1,2] and find that remarkable effects are related to
56: parametric resonance [8] both in the periodic macroscopic quantum
57: tunneling regime and in the macroscopic quantum self-trapping regime.
58:
59: \section{Tunneling in a double-well potential}
60:
61: In a dilute gas of $N$ Bosons at zero temperature practically
62: all particles are in the same single-particle state of the
63: density matrix $\rho({\bf r},{\bf r}';t)$ [9]. This macroscopically occupied
64: single-particle state is called Bose-Einstein condensate and
65: its wavefunction $\psi({\bf r},t)$ is well described by the
66: Gross-Pitaevskii equation
67: \beq
68: i\hbar {\partial \over \partial t}\psi({\bf r},t) =
69: \left[ -{\hbar^2\over 2m} \nabla^2
70: + U({\bf r}) + g |\psi({\bf r},t)|^2 \right] \psi({\bf r},t) \; ,
71: \eeq
72: where $U({\bf r})$ is the external potential, $g=4\pi\hbar^2a_s/m$
73: is the inter-atomic strength with $a_s$ the s-wave
74: scattering length, and the wavefunction is normalized to $N$ [10].
75: \par
76: Let us consider a double-well external potential $U({\bf r})$.
77: In the tunneling regime, the wavefunction of the Bose-condensate
78: can be approximated in the following way
79: \beq
80: \psi({\bf r},t) = \sqrt{N_1(t)}e^{i\phi_1(t)} \psi_1({\bf r}) +
81: \sqrt{N_2(t)} e^{i\phi_2(t)} \psi_2({\bf r}) \; ,
82: \eeq
83: where $N_1(t)$ is the number of particles in the first well and
84: $N_2(t)$ is the number of particles in the second well, such as
85: $N=N_1(t)+N_2(t)$ [1]. If the double-well is simmetric,
86: it is not difficult to show
87: that the time-dependent behavior of the condensate in the tunneling
88: energy range can be described, with a suitable rescaling of time,
89: by the two-mode equations
90: \beq
91: {\dot \zeta}=-\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}\sin{\phi} \; , \;\;\;\;\;\;\;
92: {\dot \phi}=\Lambda \zeta +{\zeta\over \sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}\cos{\phi} \; ,
93: \eeq
94: where $\zeta=(N_1-N_2)/N$ is the fractional population
95: imbalance of the condensate in the two wells,
96: $\phi=\phi_1-\phi_2$ is the relative phase
97: (which can be initially zero), and $\Lambda = 2 E_I/E_T$ with
98: $E_I$ the inter-atomic energy and
99: $E_T$ the tunneling energy, i.e. the kinetic+potential energy
100: splitting between the ground state and the quasi-degenerate
101: odd first excited state of the GP equation [1,2].
102: Note that $E_T=\hbar \omega_0$,
103: where $\omega_0$ is the oscillation frequency of the Bose condensate
104: between the two wells when the inter-atomic interaction
105: is zero ($E_I=0$) [1-4].
106: \par
107: The two-mode equations have been studied by many authors and
108: they are the Hamilton equations of the following Hamiltonian
109: \beq
110: H = {\Lambda\over 2}\zeta^2 - \sqrt{1-\zeta^2}\cos{\phi} \; ,
111: \eeq
112: where $\zeta$ is the conjugate momentum of the generalized
113: coordinate $\phi$. Actually, it is possible to introduce [1]
114: an equivalent Hamiltonian, given by
115: \beq
116: H'= {1\over 2} p_{\zeta}^2 + a \zeta^2 + b \zeta^4 \; ,
117: \eeq
118: where
119: \beq
120: a={1\over 2} \sqrt{1-\Lambda H_0} \; , \;\;\;\;\;\;\;
121: b={\Lambda^2\over 8} \; ,
122: \eeq
123: with $H_0=\Lambda\zeta(0)^2/2-\sqrt{1-\zeta(0)^2}\cos{\phi(0)}$.
124: For the Hamiltonian $H'$ the generalized coordinate is $\zeta$ and
125: its conjugate momentum is $p_{\zeta}$. The equations of motion
126: derived by $H'$ are
127: \beq
128: {\dot \zeta} = p_{\zeta} \; , \;\;\;\;\;\;\;
129: {\dot p_{\zeta}} = - 2 a \zeta - 4 b \zeta^3 \; .
130: \eeq
131: \par
132: The analysis of the two-mode equations (3) or (7) has shown that for
133: $\Lambda <2$ there is a periodic macroscopic quantum tunneling (PMQT)
134: of the Bose-condensate with Josephson-like oscillations
135: of frequency $\omega_J = \omega_0 \sqrt{1+\Lambda}$ [1,2].
136: Instead, for $\Lambda >2$, there exists a critical
137: $\zeta_c =2\sqrt{\Lambda -1}/\Lambda$
138: such that for $0 < \zeta(0) << \zeta_c$ there is PMQT
139: of condensate with frequency $\omega_J$,
140: but for $\zeta_c<\zeta(0) \leq 1$ there is macroscopic quantum
141: self-trapping (MQST) of the condensate: even if the populations
142: of the two wells are initially set in an asymmetric state
143: ($\zeta(0)\ne 0$) they maintain, on the average,
144: the original population imbalance with a very small periodic
145: transfer of particles through the barrier with frequency
146: $\omega_{ST}=\omega_0 \sqrt{2(\Lambda H_0-1)}$ [1,2].
147:
148: \section{An oscillating barrier in the double-well potential}
149:
150: In this section we analyze the effect of a periodic
151: oscillating energy barrier in the double-well potential.
152: The presence of a oscillating barrier can be modelled
153: by a time-dependent $\Lambda$. We choose the following form
154: \beq
155: \Lambda(t) = \Lambda_0 (1+\epsilon \sin{(\omega t)}) \; ,
156: \eeq
157: where $\Lambda_0$ is the static value, $\epsilon$ is a small
158: perturbation ($\epsilon \ll 1$) and $\omega$ is the oscillation
159: frequency of the barrier.
160: \par
161: We numerically solve the two-mode equations (7) with (8) by using a
162: forth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm.
163: First we consider the case of pulsed macroscopic
164: quantum tunneling (PMQT). We set $\Lambda_0 = 0.8$, $\zeta(0)=0.5$
165: and $\phi(0)=0$.
166: In Figure 1 we plot the population imbalance
167: $(t,\zeta)$ and its phase-space portrait $(\zeta , p_{\zeta})$
168: for some values of $\epsilon$ and $\omega$.
169: For $\epsilon=0$ the population imbalance harmonically
170: oscillates between the values $-0.5$ and $0.5$
171: with frequency $\omega_J=1.27$, but for $\epsilon\neq 0$
172: the motion is not fully harmonic. In particular,
173: Figure 1 shows that under the parametric
174: resonance condition $\omega = 2 \omega_J$ the dynamics of the
175: population imbalance is modified: the amplitude of
176: the oscillation is modulated and reaches the
177: values $-1$ and $1$.
178: \par
179: Now we consider the case of macroscopic quantum
180: self-trapping (MQST). We set $\Lambda_0 = 25$, $\zeta(0)=0.6$
181: and $\phi(0)=0$. Figure 2 confirms that for $\epsilon=0$
182: the population imbalance does not change sign and it
183: periodically oscillates between the values $0.47$
184: and $0.6$ with frequency $\omega_{ST}=13.53$.
185: As shown in Figure 2, MQST is strongly affected by
186: the parametric resonance between
187: the frequency $\omega_{ST}$ of MQST oscillation and the frequency
188: $\omega$ of oscillation of the energy barrier. Moreover,
189: Figure 3 shows that at the parametric resonance condition
190: $\omega=2\omega_{ST}$ and with a sufficiently large perturbation
191: ($\epsilon =0.2$) the system eventually escapes from the self-trapping
192: configuration. Note that this remarkable effect has been
193: confirmed [11] by using the nonpolynomial Schr\"odinger equation,
194: an effective one-dimensional equation derived from the three-dimensional
195: Gross-Pitaevskii equation [12].
196:
197: \section*{Conclusions}
198:
199: We have studied the periodic tunneling and the quantum self-trapping
200: of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a double-well
201: potential with an oscillating energy barrier.
202: We have used the two-mode classical-like equations to find
203: that the periodic macroscopic quantum tunneling can be enhanced and
204: the macroscopic quantum self-trapping can be reduced or suppressed
205: by changing the frequency of the oscillating barrier.
206: In the latter case, we have proved that
207: the system escapes from the self-trapping configuration
208: if the the frequency of oscillation of the double-well energy barrier
209: and the frequency of MQST oscillations of the condensate
210: satisfy the parametric resonance condition
211: with a sufficiently large perturbation of the energy barrier.
212:
213: \section*{References}
214:
215: \begin{description}
216:
217: \item{\ [1]} Smerzi, A., Fantoni, S., Giovannazzi, G.
218: and Shenoy, S.R., 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79} 4950;
219: Raghavan, S., Smerzi, A., Fantoni, S.,
220: and Shenoy, S.R., 1999, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 59} 620.
221:
222: \item{\ [2]} Milburn, G.J., Corney, J., Wright, E.,
223: and Walls, D.F., 1997, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 55} 4318.
224:
225: \item{\ [3]} Zapata, I., Sols, F., and Leggett, A.J., 1998,
226: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 57} R28.
227:
228: \item{\ [4]} Salasnich, L., Parola, A., and Reatto, L., 1999,
229: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 60} 4171;
230: Pozzi, B., Salasnich, L., Parola, A., and Reatto, L., 2000,
231: Eur. Phys. J. D {\bf 11} 367.
232:
233: \item{\ [5]} Anderson, B.P. and Kasevich, M., 1999,
234: Science {\bf 282} 1686.
235:
236: \item{\ [6]} Cataliotti, F.S., Burger, S., Fort, C., Maddaloni, P.,
237: Trombettoni, A., Smerzi, A., and M. Inguscio, 2001,
238: Science {\bf 293} 843.
239:
240: \item{\ [7]} Morsch, O., Muller, J.H., Cristiani, M., Ciampini, D.,
241: and Arimondo, E., 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} 140402.
242:
243: \item{\ [8]} Landau, L.D. and Lifsits, E.M., 1991,
244: {\it Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics},
245: vol. 3 (Pergamon Press, Oxford);
246: Arnold, V.I., 1990, {\it Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics}
247: (Springer, Berlin).
248:
249: \item{\ [9]} Courteille, P.W., Bagnato, V.S., and
250: Yukalov, Y.I., 2001, Laser Phys. {\bf 11}, 659.
251:
252: \item{\ [10]} Gross, E.P., 1961, Nuovo Cimento {\bf 20} 454;
253: Pitaevskii, L.P., 1961, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 40}, 646.
254:
255: \item{\ [11]} Salasnich, L., Parola, A., and Reatto, L., 2002,
256: J. Phys. B {\bf 35}, 3205.
257:
258: \item{\ [12]} Salasnich, L., 2002, Laser Phys. {\bf 12} 198;
259: Salasnich, L., Parola, A., and Reatto, L., 2002, Phys. Rev. A
260: {\bf 65} 043614.
261:
262: \end{description}
263:
264: \newpage
265:
266: \begin{figure}
267: \centerline{\psfig{file=lp2-f1.eps,height=5.in}}
268: \caption{PMQT regime. Fractional population
269: imbalance $\zeta(t)$ and its phase-space portrait
270: $(\zeta,p_{\zeta})$. Initial conditions:
271: $\zeta(0)=0.5$, $\phi(0)=0$.
272: $\Lambda=\Lambda_0(1+\epsilon \sin{(\omega t)})$
273: where $\Lambda_0=0.8$. From top to bottom:
274: (a) $\epsilon = 0$; (b) $\epsilon = 0.25$ and
275: $\omega= \omega_{J}$; (c) $\epsilon =0.25$ and $\omega= 2 \omega_J$;
276: where $\omega_J$ is the frequency of unperturbed PMQT oscillations.}
277: \end{figure}
278:
279:
280: \newpage
281:
282: \begin{figure}
283: \centerline{\psfig{file=lp2-f2.eps,height=5.in}}
284: \caption{MQST regime. Fractional population
285: imbalance $\zeta(t)$ and its phase-space portrait
286: $(\zeta,p_{\zeta})$. Initial conditions:
287: $\zeta(0)=0.6$, $\phi(0)=0$.
288: $\Lambda=\Lambda_0(1+\epsilon \sin{(\omega t)})$
289: where $\Lambda_0=25$. From top to bottom:
290: (a) $\epsilon = 0$; (b) $\epsilon = 0.1$ and
291: $\omega= \omega_{ST}/2$; (c) $\epsilon =0.1$
292: and $\omega = 2 \omega_{ST}$;
293: where $\omega_{ST}$ is the frequency of unperturbed MQST oscillations.}
294: \end{figure}
295:
296: \newpage
297:
298: \begin{figure}
299: \centerline{\psfig{file=lp2-f3.eps,height=5.in}}
300: \caption{MQST regime at the parametric resonance.
301: Fractional population imbalance $\zeta(t)$ of the Bose condensate.
302: Initial conditions: $\zeta(0)=0.6$, $\phi(0)=0$.
303: $\Lambda=\Lambda_0(1+\epsilon \sin{(\omega t)})$
304: where $\Lambda_0=25$ and $\omega = 2\omega_{ST}$ with
305: $\omega_{ST}$ the frequency of unperturbed MQST oscillations.
306: From top to bottom and from left to right: (a) $\epsilon = 0.01$;
307: (b) $\epsilon = 0.05$; (c) $\epsilon = 0.1$; (d) $\epsilon = 0.2$. }
308: \end{figure}
309:
310: \end{document}
311:
312:
313:
314:
315:
316:
317:
318:
319:
320: