1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %
3: \usepackage{bm}
4: \usepackage{natbib}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}
7: \usepackage{color}
8: %
9: \begin{document}
10: %
11: %
12: \title{X-ray Dichroism in Noncentrosymmetryc crystals}
13: %
14: \author{Paolo Carra}
15: \email{carra@esrf.fr}
16: \author{Andr\'{e}s Jerez}
17: \author{Ivan Marri}
18: %
19: \altaffiliation[Also at ]{INFM and Dipartimento di Fisica
20: dell'Universit\`{a} degli Studi
21: di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.}
22: %
23: \affiliation{European Synchrotron Radiation Facility,
24: B.P. 220, F-38043 Grenoble C\'{e}dex, France}
25: %
26: \date{\today}
27: %
28: \begin{abstract}
29: %
30: In this paper the authors analyse near-edge absorption of x rays
31: in noncentrosymmetric crystals. The work is motivated by recent
32: observations of x-ray dichroic effects which stems from
33: parity-nonconserving electron interactions. We provide a theoretical
34: description of these experiments and show that they are sensitive
35: to microscopic {\it polar} and {\it magnetoelectric} properties of the
36: sample. Our derivation extends previous theoretical work on
37: centrosymmetric systems and identifies new directions in the
38: microscopic analysis of crystalline materials using x-ray absorption
39: spectroscopy.
40: %
41: \end{abstract}
42: %
43: \pacs{PACS numbers:78.70.Dm, 33.55.Ad}
44: \maketitle
45: %
46: \section{Introduction}
47: %
48: \subsection{Pure electric transitions}
49: %
50: Near-edge x-ray dichroism with synchrotron radiation is a powerful
51: probe of electronic states in crystals. As is known, its effectiveness
52: stems from two prominent features of inner-shell excitations
53: %
54: \begin{itemize}
55: %
56: \item[] {\em site selectivity}, resulting from the tuning of the x-ray
57: energy at a given inner-shell threshold;
58: \item[] electron {\em angular momentum resolution}, as enforced by the
59: selection rules
60: of pure electric multipole (E1, E=2, ...) transitions, which raise
61: an inner-shell electron to empty valence orbitals.
62: %
63: \end{itemize}
64: %
65: Linear or circular polarisations are employed in experiments,
66: leading to linear or circular x-ray dichroism, respectively.
67: The former implies a difference between radiations with linear
68: polarisations parallel or perpendicular to a local symmetry axis and is
69: sensitive to charge anisotropies.
70: The latter measures the difference in absorption between right and
71: left circularly polarised radiations and reflects magnetic
72: properties of crystals.
73:
74: Following the pioneering work of Templeton and Templeton \cite{TT80}
75: and Sch\"{u}tz and coworkers \cite{Sch87}, a number of authors have
76: recorded x-ray dichroic signals in a variety of samples, ranging across
77: the periodic table from 3d transition metals to actinides.
78:
79: In parallel with this experimental activity, theory has aimed
80: at identifying the microscopic origin of the observed spectra.
81: Working within an atomic model \cite{Tho92,Car93a,Car93b} (a good
82: approximation, as it was later demonstrated \cite{BCA00}) a set of sum
83: rules was obtained, which relate integrated dichroic intensities to the
84: ground-state expectation value of effective {\it one-electron
85: operators} (irreducible tensors) \cite{Note1}. Two classes of operators
86: are obtained, which are identified
87: by their transformation properties under space inversion (${\bf x}
88: \rightarrow -{\bf x}$, $I$-transformation) and time reversal ($t\rightarrow -t$,
89: $R$-transformation). They correspond to charge ($I$-even, $R$-even)
90: and magnetic ($I$-even, $R$-odd) {\em order parameters} of crystals. X-ray
91: dichroism is thus sensitive to long-range crystalline orderings; and these are
92: distinguished by photon polarisation and by the nature (E1 or E2) of
93: the inner-shell excitation. Undoubtedly, the most important result
94: of this theoretical analysis has been to show that, in a ferromagnet (or
95: ferrimagnet), x-ray circular dichroism provides a direct and independent
96: determination of orbital and spin contributions to the magnetic moment
97: \cite{Tho92,Car93a}.
98:
99: It is important to observe that pure electric multipole transitions cannot
100: probe electronic properties which stem from the breaking of space inversion:
101: all order parameters revealed by pure E1 and E2 transitions are
102: even under the transformation $I$.
103: %
104: \subsection{Interference}
105: %
106: In the x-ray region, other classes of dichroic phenomena have recently
107: been investigated
108: by Goulon {\it et al.} who reported the observation of three effects:
109: %
110: \begin{itemize}
111: %
112: \item[] {\it X-ray natural circular dichroism} (XNCD),
113: probed in
114: Na$_3$Nd(digly)$_3\cdot$2NaBF$_4\cdot$6H$_2$O \cite{Ala98} and in
115: $\alpha$-LiIO$_3$ \cite{Gou98}.
116: (The effect was observed near the Nd $L_3$ edge
117: and near the iodine $L$ edges.)
118: \item[] {\it X-ray nonreciprocal linear dichroism} (XNLD),
119: detected near the vanadium $K$ edge in the low-temperature
120: insulating phase of a Cr-doped V$_{2}$O$_{3}$ crystal\cite{Gou00}.
121: \item[] {\it X-ray magnetochiral dichroism} (XM$\chi$D), observed
122: at the cromium K edge \cite{Gou02} in crystalline Cr$_2$O$_3$.
123: %
124: \end{itemize}
125: %
126: Here, inner-shell excitations are ascribed to the
127: E1-E2 interference; detecting a nonvanishing signal thus requires an ordered
128: structure and the breaking of space inversion.
129:
130: In our view, the work of Goulon and his collaborators is of particular importance
131: as it identifies new directions in the microscopic analysis of materials
132: using x-ray absorption spectroscopy. In fact, symmetry considerations
133: indicate that XNCD, XNLD and XM$\chi$D are sensitive to {\it polar} and
134: {\it magnetoelectric} (ME) properties of crystals.
135: %
136: \begin{table*}
137: %
138: \caption{\label{TableI} Order parameters and x-ray dichroic effects.}
139: %
140: \begin{ruledtabular}
141: %
142: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
143: Order Parameter & Space Inversion & Time Reversal &
144: X-ray Dichroism & X-ray Transition
145: \\ \hline
146: Charge & even & even & Linear & Pure E1 or E2 \\ \hline
147: Magnetic & even & odd & Magnetic Circular & Pure E1 or E2 \\ \hline
148: Electric & odd & even & Natural Circular & Interference E1-E2\\
149: \hline
150: Magnetoelectric & odd & odd & Nonreciprocal & Interference E1-E2\\
151: %
152: \end{tabular}
153: %
154: \end{ruledtabular}
155: %
156: \end{table*}
157: %
158:
159: It is immediately obvious that the microscopic theory of integrated spectra
160: previously mentioned does not apply to the E1-E2 interference. Broader
161: symmetry considerations are required to identify order parameters
162: probed by x-ray natural and
163: non-reciprocal dichroism. Such an analysis is outlined in
164: the current work. Our discussion will be restricted to
165: spectra integrated over the energy range corresponding to the two partners
166: of a spin-orbit split inner shell: $j_{\pm} = l_c \pm \frac{1}{2}$, where
167: $l_c$ denotes the angular momentum of the inner electron. Only
168: orbital degrees of freedom (no spin) are observed in this case.
169:
170: It will be shown that the E1-E2 interference is described by $I$-odd
171: microscopic operators, revealing the presence of parity nonconserving
172: interactions. (We remind the reader that the expectation value
173: of an $I$-odd operator vanishes in any state of definite parity.) As in
174: the case of pure electric multipole transitions, such operators are further
175: distinguished by their behaviour under time reversal. Two classes of
176: order parameters are therefore identified
177: %
178: \begin{itemize}
179: %
180: \item[]
181: $R$-even and $I$-odd operators corresponding to one-electron
182: polar properties, which arise from a
183: noncentrosymmetric distribution of charge.
184: \item[]
185: $I$-odd and $R$-odd
186: operators, obviously invariant under the combined
187: symmetry $RI$ and thus describing one-electron ME
188: properties of crystals \cite{Dzy60}.
189: %
190: \end{itemize}
191: %
192: It is thus readily seen that E1-E2 x-ray dichroism is sensitive to
193: additional charge and magnetic orderings, which manifest themselves
194: when the crystal lacks space-inversion symmetry.
195:
196: For convenience of the reader, a classification of order parameters
197: as probed by various x-ray dichroisms is provided in Table
198: \ref{TableI}. [Notice that a class may contain more than one
199: order parameter, as illustrated by the following example. Consider
200: pure E2 absorption. Four irreducible tensors of rank $k=0,1, ..., 4$
201: contribute to the integrated spectrum, for arbitrary polarisation
202: \cite{Car93b}. In this case, magnetic circular dichroism selects
203: two order parameters: a vector ($k=1$) and an octapole ($k=3$).]
204: %
205: \section{E1-E2 x-ray dichroism}
206: %
207: This Section discusses general features of E1-E2 x-ray absorption.
208: As we have anticipated, we will consider integrated spectra and express
209: them as a linear combination of ground-state expectation values of
210: one-electron irreducible tensors (order parameters). These order
211: parameters are obtained by implementing Racah-Wigner recoupling
212: techniques \cite{VMK88}, a convenient framework for dealing with
213: the angular part of matrix elements. The ensuing results will then
214: be applied to x-ray natural and nonreciprocal dichroism.
215: Our discussion focusses on the physical interpetation of
216: dichroic spectra; algebraic details of the derivation will
217: be given in an appendix.
218:
219: %
220: \subsection{\label{ord-par} Space-odd order parameters}
221: %
222: Central to our considerations is the absorption cross section
223: %
224: \begin{widetext}
225: %
226: \begin{equation}
227: %
228: \sigma^{\bm \epsilon}(\omega) = 4\pi^2\alpha\hbar\omega
229: \left[
230: \frac{i}{2}\sum_f
231: \sum_{\iota \iota'}
232: \langle g\mid {\bm \epsilon}^{\ast}\cdot {\bf r}_{\iota}
233: \mid f\rangle
234: \langle f\mid {\bm \epsilon} \cdot {\bf r}_{\iota'}
235: {\bf k}\cdot {\bf r}_{\iota'} \mid g\rangle
236: + {\rm c.c.}
237: \right]
238: \delta(E_f-E_g-\hbar\omega)\, ,
239: \label{cross_section}
240: %
241: \end{equation}
242: %
243: \end{widetext}
244: %
245: picking out the E1-E2 interference in the ${\bm p}\cdot{\bm A}$ interaction
246: between x rays and and electrons.
247: The notation is as follows: $\hbar\omega$, ${\bf k}$
248: and ${\bm \epsilon}$ represent energy, wave vector and
249: polarisation of the photon; $\mid g\rangle$ and $\mid f\rangle$
250: denote ground and final states of the electron system,
251: with energies $E_g$ and $E_f$ respectively; electrons are labelled
252: by $\iota$ and $\iota'$; $\alpha = e^2/\hbar c$.
253:
254: The integrated intensity\cite{Note14}.
255: %
256: \begin{equation}
257: %
258: \int_{j_-+j_+}
259: \frac{\sigma^{\bm \epsilon}(\omega)}{(\hbar\omega)^2}
260: d(\hbar\omega)\,,
261: \label{master}
262: %
263: \end{equation}
264: %
265: expands into a linear combinations of pairs of irreducible tensors of
266: increasing rank, $\mu=1,2,3$.
267: Each pair is given by the scalar product between a wave-vector and
268: polarisation response (geometrical factor) and the ground-state expectation
269: value of an effective one-electron operator
270: %
271: \begin{displaymath}
272: %
273: \sum_q T^{(\mu,\pm)*}_q(\bm \epsilon, \hat{\bf k})\,
274: \langle g |{\cal O}^{(\mu,\pm)}_q(l,l')
275: | g \rangle\,.
276: %
277: \end{displaymath}
278: %
279: In the second quantisation formalism, the latter is defined by
280: %
281: \begin{equation}
282: %
283: \sum_{\iota}{\cal O}^{(\mu,\pm)}_q (l,l')_{\iota}
284: =\sum_{mm'}\langle l'm' |
285: {\cal O}^{(\mu,\pm)}_q|lm \rangle
286: a^{\dagger}_{l'm'}a_{lm}+{\rm c.c.}\, ,
287: \label{one_part}
288: %
289: \end{equation}
290: %
291: where $l'=l\pm1$ and $|lm\rangle$ stands for a spherical harmonic;
292: $a^{\dagger}_{l m}$ and $a_{l' m'}$ create and annihilate valence electrons.
293: All ${\cal O}^{(\mu,\pm)}(l,l')$ are odd under space inversion; their
294: behaviour (even or odd) under time reversal is denoted by the superscript
295: $\pm$.
296:
297: Four operators ${\cal O}^{(\mu,\pm)}$ contribute to the E1-E2 absorption
298: spectrum for arbitrary polarisation. They can all be written out in
299: terms of three dimensionless order parameters: the familiar orbital
300: angular momentum ${\bm L}$, an electric dipole ${\bm n}={\bf r}/r$, and
301: ${\bm \Omega} = ({\bm n}\times{\bm L} - {\bm L}\times{\bm n})/2$, a ME
302: vector.
303:
304: By applying suitable recoupling transformations to
305: Eq. (\ref{cross_section}), we obtain
306: %
307: \begin{widetext}
308: %
309: \begin{equation}
310: {\cal O}^{(1,-)} = {\bm \Omega}\, ,\quad
311: {\cal O}^{(2,+)} =[{\bm L},{\bm \Omega}]^{(2)}\, ,
312: \quad
313: {\cal O}^{(2,-)} =[{\bm L},{\bm n}]^{(2)}\quad
314: {\rm and}\quad
315: {\cal O}^{(3,-)} = [[{\bm L},{\bm L}]^{(2)},{\bm \Omega}]^{(3)}\,,
316: \label{ord_par}
317: %
318: \end{equation}
319: %
320: \end{widetext}
321: %
322: where the couplings are defined via Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
323: %
324: \begin{displaymath}
325: %
326: [U^{(p)}, V^{(\kappa)}]^{(k)}_q\equiv
327: \sum_{\mu,\nu}C^{kq}_{p\mu;\,\kappa\nu}U^{(p)}_{\mu}V^{\kappa}_{\nu}.
328: %
329: \end{displaymath}
330: %
331:
332: Equations (\ref{ord_par}) identify one-electron properties revealed
333: by E1-E2 absorption in the x-ray domain. The corresponding geometrical
334: factors are given in Table \ref{TableII}.
335: [As $T^{(1,+)}({\bm \epsilon},\hat{\bf k}) =
336: T^{(3,+)}({\bm \epsilon},\hat{\bf k})\equiv 0$, the polar moments
337: ${\cal O}^{(1,+)}={\bm n}$ and
338: ${\cal O}^{(3,+)}=[[{\bm L},{\bm L}]^{(2)},{\bm n}]^{(3)}$
339: do not contribute to expression (\ref{master}).]
340:
341: Our derivation is based on a localised model, which considers a
342: single ion with a partially filled valence shell; all other shells
343: filled. Inclusion of spin-orbit interactions and/or crystal fields
344: results in a deformation
345: of the electronic cloud. Its multipolar expansion will contain spin
346: and orbital moments characteristic of the symmetry of the deformation
347: and described by one-particle irreducible tensors. Valence states
348: are hybridised in general, with the orbital part given as a superposition
349: of two angular momenta: $l$ and $l'=l\pm1$, corresponding to $sp$ or
350: $pd$ hybridisation in the actual case. (In our formalism, valence electrons
351: are labelled using uncoupled orbital and spin quantum numbers.)
352: %
353: \begin{table}
354: %
355: \caption{\label{TableII} Polarisation responses of the E1-E2 interference.}
356: %
357: \begin{ruledtabular}
358: %
359: \begin{tabular}{l}
360: %
361: \\
362: $T^{(1,-)} (\hat{\bf k})_2=
363: -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{5}}\hat{\bf k}$\\
364: \\
365: $T^{(2,+)} ({\bm \epsilon}, \hat{\bf k})_2
366: =\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[[{\bm \epsilon}^*,
367: {\bm \epsilon}]^{(1)},\hat{\bf k}]^{(2)}$\\
368: \\
369: $T^{(2,-)}({\bm \epsilon}, \hat{\bf k})_2=\frac{1}{2}
370: \left[\left[{\bm \epsilon}^*,
371: {\bm \epsilon}\right]^{(2)},\hat{\bf k}\right]^{(2)}$\\
372: \\
373: $T^{(3,-)} ({\bm \epsilon}, \hat{\bf k})_2
374: =\left[\left[{\bm \epsilon}^*,{\bm \epsilon}\right]^{(2)}
375: ,\hat{\bf k}\right]^{(3)}$
376: \\
377: \\ \\
378: %
379: \end{tabular}
380: %
381: \end{ruledtabular}
382: %
383: \end{table}
384: %
385:
386: As shown in previous work \cite{Tho92,Car93a,Car93b}, integrated dichroic
387: spectra which stem from pure E1 or E2 transitions provide a measure
388: of the ground-state expectation value of $I$-even irreducible tensors.
389: Only the diagonal part (in the sense of $\delta_{l,l'}$) contributes to the
390: ground-state matrix elements in this case.
391: Angular momentum and parity are good quantum numbers; the known
392: sum rules for linear and circular dichroism are recovered \cite{Note3}.
393:
394: Integrated E1-E2 dichroic spectra are related to the ground-state
395: expectation value of $I$-odd irreducible tensors. Only the off-diagonal
396: part contributes to the ground-state matrix elements, in this case.
397: Orbital angular momentum is not a good quantum number and electron states
398: do not have definite parity. Hybridisation effects are now
399: observable and described by the operators ${\cal O}^{(\mu,\pm)}$.
400:
401: Relations between XNCD, XNLD, XM$\chi$D and the order
402: parameters given by Eqs. (\ref{ord_par}) will be provided below.
403: %
404: \subsection{Interpretation of experiments}
405: %
406: \subsubsection{XNCD}
407: %
408: In this case, a recoupling of Eq. (\ref{cross_section}) leads to the
409: following integral relation
410: %
411: \begin{widetext}
412: %
413: \begin{equation}
414: %
415: \int_{j_-+j_+}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
416: \frac{\sigma^{\bm \epsilon^+}_{\rm X}(\omega) -
417: \sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^-}_{\rm X}(\omega)}{(\hbar\omega)^2}
418: d(\hbar\omega)
419: =\frac{16\pi^2\alpha}{3\hbar c}(2l_c+1)
420: \sum_{l=l_c\pm1 \atop l'=l\pm1}\sum_{\iota,q }
421: R_{l_cl}^{(1)}R_{l_cl'}^{(2)}\,a^{(2,+)}_{l'}(l_c,l)
422: \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}
423: T^{(2,+)*}_q({\bm \epsilon}^-,{\bm \epsilon}^+,\hat{\bf k})
424: \langle g |
425: \left[{\bm L}_{\iota},{\bm \Omega}_{\iota}\right]^{(2)}_q(l,l')
426: | g \rangle \, ,
427: \label{XNCD}
428: %
429: \end{equation}
430: %
431: \end{widetext}
432: %
433: which reveals the microscopic origin of XNCD spectra.
434: Here, ${\bm \epsilon}^{\pm}=\mp(i/\sqrt{2})
435: ({\bm \epsilon}_1\pm i{\bm \epsilon}_2)$ define
436: circular polarisation states; the index $\iota$ runs over valence
437: electrons \cite{Note4}. Furthermore,
438: %
439: \begin{widetext}
440: %
441: \begin{equation}
442: %
443: a^{(2,+)}_{l'}(l_c,l)
444: =\frac{2(2l+1)(2l'+1)[6+3l_c(l_c+1)-2l(l+1)-l'(l'+1)]}{(l+l'+1)
445: (l_c-3l'+2l)(l_c+3l'-2l+1)
446: (l_c+l)^2(l_c+l+2)^2}
447: \label{a2+}
448: \, .
449: %
450: \end{equation}
451: %
452: \end{widetext}
453: %
454: The XNCD experiment of Goulon {\it et al.}
455: on $\alpha$-LiIO$_3$ \cite{Gou98}, whose crystal structure
456: (space group $P6_3$)
457: is depicted in Fig. \ref{Fig.1}, is readily interpreted with
458: the help of Eq. (\ref{XNCD}).
459: %
460: \begin{figure}
461: %
462: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{LiIO3}
463: \caption{\label{Fig.1} Crystal structure of $\alpha$-LiIO$_3$,
464: with \textcolor[rgb]{.5,.1,.1}{$\bullet$} = Li,
465: \textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,.05}{$\bullet$} = O, and
466: \textcolor[rgb]{0,.5,.5}{$\bullet$} = I.}
467: %
468: \end{figure}
469: %
470:
471: We focus on charge properties stemming from $sp$
472: hybridisation. (The $4d$ shell of iodine is filled and the
473: crystal displays no magnetism.) At the iodine sites the symmetry
474: is $C_3$. Notice that ${\cal O}^{(2,+)} =
475: \left[{\bm L},{\bm \Omega}\right]^{(2)}$, known as
476: {\it pseudodeviator} or {\it gyration} tensor, is totally
477: symmetric in this point group {\it i.e.}, it is invariant
478: under all $C_3$ transformations. It yields therefore
479: a nonvanishing ground-state expectation value at each iodine site.
480: The threefold axes of all the iodate groups are parallel in the unit
481: cell of $\alpha$-LiIO$_3$ ($P6_3$ is noncentrosymmetric).
482: As a consequence, all the microscopic pseudodeviators add up
483: upon absorption of circularly polarised x rays. This contribution
484: to the E1-E2 absorption profile is selected by circular dichroism
485: (see Table \ref{TableII}) yielding the observed XNCD spectrum.
486: The effect can thus be viewed as the $I$-odd analog of ferroquadrupolar
487: ordering, which is probed by pure E1 x-ray linear dichroism \cite{Car93b}.
488: %
489: \subsubsection{XNLD}
490: %
491: In the case of XNLD, the integral relation reads
492: %
493: \begin{widetext}
494: %
495: \begin{eqnarray}
496: %
497: &&
498: \int_{j_-+j_+}
499: \!\!\!\!\!\frac{\sigma^{\parallel}_{\rm X}(\omega) -
500: \sigma^{\perp}_{\rm X}(\omega)}
501: {(\hbar\omega)^2}
502: d(\hbar\omega)=\frac{8\pi^2\alpha}{\hbar c}
503: (2l_c+1)\sum_{l=l_c\pm1 \atop l'=l\pm1}
504: R_{l_cl}^{(1)}R_{l_cl'}^{(2)}
505: \sum_q\left\{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}
506: a^{(2,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l)\right.
507: \nonumber
508: i\left(
509: T^{(2,-)*}_q({\bm \epsilon}^{\parallel},\hat{\bf k})
510: -T^{(2,-)*}_q({\bm \epsilon}^{\perp},\hat{\bf k})\right)
511: \nonumber
512: \\
513: &&
514: \langle g |\sum_{\iota} \left[
515: {\bm L}_{\iota},{\bm n}_{\iota}\right]^{(2)}_q(l,l')
516: | g \rangle
517: -2 a^{(3,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l)
518: \left(
519: T^{(3,-)*}_q({\bm \epsilon}^{\parallel},\hat{\bf k})
520: -T^{(3,-)*}_q({\bm \epsilon}^{\perp},\hat{\bf k})\right)
521: \langle g |\sum_{\iota} \left[
522: [{\bm L}_{\iota},{\bm L}_{\iota}]^2,
523: {\bm \Omega}_{\iota}\right]^{(3)}_q(l,l')
524: | g \rangle
525: \left.
526: \vphantom{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}}\right\}\, ,
527: \label{XNLD}
528: %
529: \end{eqnarray}
530: %
531: \end{widetext}
532: %
533: where
534: $\parallel$ and $\perp$ denote two orthogonal linear-polarisation
535: states. The expansion coefficients are given by
536: %
537: \begin{equation}
538: %
539: a^{(3,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l) = \frac{a^{(2,+)}_{l'}(l_c,l)}
540: {6+3l_c(l_c+1)-2l(l+1)-l'(l'+1)}
541: %
542: \end{equation}
543: %
544: and
545: %
546: \begin{equation}
547: %
548: a^{(2,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l)=\frac{(l+l'+1)(l'-l)}{2}a^{(2,+)}_{l'}(l_c,l)\, ,
549: %
550: \end{equation}
551: %
552: with $a^{(2,+)}_{l'}(l_c,l)$ defined by Eq. (\ref{a2+}).
553: %
554:
555: Equation (\ref{XNLD}) reveals the microscopic ME
556: nature of XNLD. (Notice the peculiarity of this form of linear
557: dichroism: {\it it changes sign upon reversal of an external
558: applied magnetic field}\cite{Note17}. The result implies that Goulon and
559: his co-workers have probed ME properties of (V$_{1-x}$Cr$_x$)$_2$O$_3$.
560:
561: V$_2$O$_3$ is characterised by a strongly destructive first-order
562: transition from a paramagnetic metallic phase (corundum structure)
563: to an antiferromagnetic (AFM) insulating phase (monoclinic) at
564: T$_N\approx 150 ^{\circ}$K. The unit cells of pure V$_2$O$_3$
565: are depicted in Fig. \ref{Fig.2}.
566: %
567: \begin{figure}
568: %
569: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{V2O3}
570: \caption{\label{Fig.2} Corundum and monoclinic structures of V$_2$O$_3$.
571: (\textcolor[rgb]{1,0,0}{$\bullet$} and
572: \textcolor[rgb]{0,1,0}{$\bullet$} denote different orientations of
573: the oxygen octahedra.) The AFM structure is also
574: displayed.}
575: %
576: \end{figure}
577: %
578:
579: Substitution of Cr$^{3+}$ in the V$_2$O$_3$ lattice results in a
580: Mott metal-to-insulator transition. At room temperature,
581: charge properties of the compound can be deduced from structural studies,
582: which have been reported by Dernier and Marezio \cite{DaM70,Der70}.
583: These authors ascribe the Cr-induced metal-to-insulator transition to an
584: increase in the nearest neighbour vanadium-vanadium
585: distances, which is accompanied by an 'umbrella-like' distortion of the
586: oxygen octahedra. Crystal-structure refinements indicate that at each vanadium
587: site the point group is C$_{3v}$ \cite{Der70}. Formation
588: of an electric-dipole moment is thus permitted by symmetry. Crystallography
589: also suggests that nearest-neighbour pairs of vanadium atoms
590: are antiferroeletrically ordered along the hexagonal {\bf c} axis
591: (the symmetry of a pair is D$_{3h}$ \cite{Der70}),
592: as shown in Fig. \ref{Fig.3}. We can thus argue that, at about $300\, ^{\circ}$K
593: in the insulating phase, (V$_{1-x}$Cr$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ is
594: an antiferroelectric (AFE) crystal \cite{Note19}.
595: %
596: \begin{figure}
597: %
598: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{v2o3_dip1}
599: \caption{\label{Fig.3} Antiferroelectric structure of
600: (V$_{.972}$Cr$_{.028}$)$_2$O$_3$ at high temperature, as
601: inferred from crystallographic data reported
602: in Ref. \cite{Der70}.}
603: %
604: \end{figure}
605: %
606: %
607: \begin{figure}
608: %
609: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{v2o3_dip2}
610: \caption{\label{Fig.4} Tilting of the electric moments in the monoclinic
611: phase of (V$_{.972}$Cr$_{.028}$)$_2$O$_3$. (The arrows at about 71$^{\circ}$
612: with respect to the {\bf c} axis denote the magnetic moments.)}
613: %
614: \end{figure}
615: %
616:
617: At $T = T_N$, the crystal makes a nearly second-order transition to an
618: AFM monoclinic phase \cite{Mon70}. The driving mechanism of this
619: transition is not fully understood \cite{Yet87}. The lattice space
620: group lowers to $I2/a$, with magnetic point group $C_{2h}\otimes R$
621: \cite{DiM02}. Notice that this symmetry is incompatible
622: with the observation of XNLD. However, a reduction of magnetic
623: symmetry leading to $C_{2h}(C_{1h})$ or $C_{2h}(C_2)$ might take
624: place\cite{Note20}.
625:
626: A lowering of magnetic symmetry could occur as follows.
627: The structural change to the monoclinic phase eliminates the
628: three-fold axis, which characterises the corundum structure. It
629: probably involves a co-operative Jahn-Teller distortion, which tilts the
630: electric moments. A tilting with the pattern depicted in Fig. \ref{Fig.4}
631: would render (V$_{1-x}$Cr$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ an AFM, AFE, and ME crystal, thus
632: explaining the observations of Goulon and his collaborators.
633:
634: A physical interpretation of Eq. (\ref{XNLD}) is obtained by
635: expanding the "energy" function $W(\bm n,\bm L)$\cite{Bar82}.
636: The $m$th term in the MacLaurin formula reads:
637: $
638: \frac{1}{m!}\left(n_{\alpha}\partial_{n_{\alpha}}
639: +L_{\beta}\partial_{L_{\beta}}\right)^m W(0,0)\, ;
640: $
641: here, greek letters denote cartesian components and repeated
642: indexes are summed over. It is readily seen that
643: $\left[{\bm L},{\bm n}\right]^{(2)}$ stems from the $m=2$
644: term and describes a linear ME effect. The contribution
645: $\left[[{\bm L},{\bm L}]^2,
646: {\bm \Omega}\right]^{(3)}$ is found in the $m=4$ term and accounts
647: for a trilinear ME effect.
648: %
649: \subsubsection{XM$\chi$D}
650: %
651: The third form of E1-E2 x-ray dichroism, namely XM$\chi$D,
652: was probed by Goulon and co-workers \cite{Gou02}
653: at the cromium K-edge in Cr$_2$O$_3$ by
654: implementing a new experimental technique:
655: {\it the dichroism of unpolarised x rays}. A microscopic
656: description of this spectroscopy, which is readily obtained from our
657: theory of integrated spectra, is reported in the current subsection.
658:
659: As is known \cite{Car93b}, the following integral relationship
660: holds for pure E1 transitions
661: %
662: \begin{widetext}
663: %
664: \begin{equation}
665: %
666: \int_{j_++j_-} \frac{(\sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^+}
667: +\sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^-})_{E1}}{(\hbar\omega)^2}d(\hbar\omega)
668: =4\pi^2 \alpha \sum_l
669: \left[\frac{2}{3}\frac{n_h (l)}{2l+1} + b^{(2,+)}(l_c,l)
670: \langle g|\sum_{\iota}(3L^2_z-{\bm L}^2)_{\iota} |g\rangle
671: \right]
672: [P_{l_cl}^{(1)}]^2
673: \, ,
674: \label{unpol}
675: %
676: \end{equation}
677: %
678: %
679: \end{widetext}
680: %
681: where $n_h(l)= 4l+2- \langle g|n|g\rangle$ denotes the number
682: of holes in the valence $l$ shell, and
683: $P_{l_cl}^{(1)}=\langle c||\sqrt{4\pi/3}\,{\bf Y}^{(1)}||l\rangle
684: R^{(1)}_{l_c,l}$. Furthermore,
685: %
686: \begin{widetext}
687: %
688: \begin{equation}
689: %
690: b^{(2,+)}(l_c,l)=\frac{l(l+1)[3l(l+1)+1-6l_c(l_c+1)]+3l_c(l_c+1)
691: [l_c(l_c+1)-3]}{6l
692: (2l-1)(2l+1)(l+1)(2l+3)}
693: %
694: \end{equation}
695: %
696: \end{widetext}
697: %
698:
699: In the case of a magnetoelectric crystal, E1-E2 corrections
700: to Eq. (\ref{unpol}) need to be taken into account. They read
701: %
702: \begin{widetext}
703: %
704: \begin{eqnarray}
705: %
706: \int_{j_++j_-} \frac{(\sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^+}
707: +\sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^-})_{E1-E2}}{(\hbar\omega)^2}d(\hbar\omega)
708: &=& \frac{2\pi^2\alpha}{\hbar c}\,(2l_c+1)
709: \sum_{l=l_c\pm1 \atop l'=l\pm1}R_{l_cl}^{(1)}R_{l_cl'}^{(2)}
710: \left[\frac{2}{5}\, a^{(1,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l)\, k_z\,
711: \langle g | \sum_{\iota}
712: {\bm \Omega}_{\iota}(l,l')_z | g \rangle \right.
713: \nonumber
714: \\
715: &-&
716: \left.
717: \frac{16}{\sqrt{10}}\, a^{(3,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l)\, k_z\,
718: \langle g |\sum_{\iota} \left[
719: [{\bm L}_{\iota},{\bm L}_{\iota}]^2,
720: {\bm \Omega}_{\iota}\right]^{(3)}_z(l,l')
721: | g \rangle
722: \right]
723: \label{corrs}
724: %
725: \end{eqnarray}
726: %
727: \end{widetext}
728: %
729: with
730: %
731: \begin{equation}
732: %
733: a^{(1,-)}_{l'}(l_c,l) = \frac{(l_c+l+1)(l_c+l-2l')
734: h_1(l_c,l,l')}{(l_c+l)(l_c+l+2)(l+l'+1)^2}\, ,
735: %
736: \end{equation}
737: %
738: where $h_1(l_c,l,l') = l_c+2l'-l+1$ and $l' =l \pm 1$. We have set
739: ${\bf k} = k_z\, \hat{\bf z}$ in Eqs. (\ref{unpol} - \ref{corrs}).
740:
741: Eqs. (\ref{unpol} - \ref{corrs}) indicate that XM$\chi$D is observed
742: as follows. Record the $\sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^+}
743: +\sigma^{{\bm \epsilon}^-}$ spectrum in a
744: magnetoeletric cystal annealed in the parallel
745: configuration. Ditto for antiparallel annealing. Subtract the two
746: spectra.
747:
748: It goes without saying that such a dichroic spectrum, which is
749: described by Eq. (\ref{corrs}), reflects ME properties of crystals.
750: %
751: \section{Discussion and outlook}
752: %
753: To provide a theoretical interpretation of recent x-ray experiments,
754: which have detected XNCD, XNLD and XM$\chi$D respectively in $\alpha$-LiIO$_3$,
755: (V$_{.972}$Cr$_{.028}$)$_2$O$_3$ and Cr$_2$O$_3$,
756: the current paper has presented a theoretical analysis of
757: near-edge absorption of polarised x rays in noncentrosymmetric
758: crystals. Our work has centred on the derivation of integral
759: relations for dichroic effects which stem from E1-E2 inner-shell
760: excitations. Such relations are written out in terms of one-electron
761: effective operators (order parameters), which identify
762: crystalline microscopic properties revealed by the observed spectra.
763: Two classes of parity-breaking order parameters have been found, which
764: correspond to polar and magnetoelectric moments of valence electrons.
765: Only orbital degrees of freedom have been considered in our derivation;
766: inclusion of spin would be straightforward.
767:
768: We remind the reader that two irreducible tensors,
769: namely ${\cal O}^{(1,+)}={\bm n}$ and
770: ${\cal O}^{(3,+)}=[[{\bm L},{\bm L}]^{(2)},{\bm n}]^{(3)}$
771: (see Section \ref{ord-par}), have not entered our discussion
772: of integrated XNCD, XNLD and XM$\chi$D spectra.
773: As previously observed, ${\cal O}^{(1,+)}$ and
774: ${\cal O}^{(3,+)}$ have vanishing geometrical factors and do not
775: appear in our coupled expansion of expression (\ref{master}). They do
776: contribute however to x-ray resonant diffaction, as can be verified by
777: extending the work of Luo {\it et al.} \cite{Luo93} to include E1-E2
778: processes. (Such a lengthy derivation will not be reported here.)
779: The result is of interest as it indicates the possibiity of detecting
780: {\it Bragg peaks from ferrolectric and AFE structures} with x rays at
781: resonance.
782:
783: In conclusion, the pioneering experiments of Goulon and his collaborators
784: appear to have paved the way for new investigations of electronic states in
785: noncentrosymmetric crystals using x-ray absorption and resonant scattering.
786: As shown by our work, a variety of one-electron properties, which result from
787: parity-nonconserving electron interactions, can be measured, yielding valuable
788: information in condensed matter physics and material science.
789:
790: \begin{acknowledgments}
791: %
792: Stimulating discussions with F. de Bergevin, P. J. Brown, J. Goulon,
793: and E. Katz are gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank
794: S. di Matteo for pointing out an error in an earlier version
795: of Eq. (\ref{XNLD}). We are indebted to B. G. Searle for providing
796: the computer program that generated Fig. \ref{Fig.1}.
797: %
798: \end{acknowledgments}
799: %
800: \appendix*
801: %
802: \section{Symmetry Analysis}
803: %
804: Lie groups (or, alternatively, Lie algebras) furnish
805: a powerful tool for
806: interpreting x-ray dichroism in non-centrosymmetric crystals.
807: In fact, effective microscopic operators, which express electronic
808: properties revealed by the spectra, are readily deduced
809: from the pertinent group generators.
810: Our approach hinges therefore on spectrum-generating algebras,
811: a concept originally introduced in nuclear \cite{GoL59}
812: and particle physics \cite{DGN65,DaN66}.
813:
814: We follow Carra and Benoist\cite{CaB00} and consider the
815: general framework of a de Sitter algebra:
816: $so(3,2)$ \cite{GoL59,Eng72}.
817: A realisation of such an algebra is provided by the
818: operators:
819: %
820: \begin{equation}
821: %
822: {\bm A}^-=i({\bm A}-{\bm A}^{\dagger})/2,\quad
823: {\bm A}^+=({\bm A}+{\bm A}^{\dagger})/2,
824: %
825: \end{equation}
826: %
827: \begin{equation}
828: %
829: {\bm L} \quad {\rm and} \quad N_0,
830: %
831: \end{equation}
832: %
833: where ${\bm L}$ denotes the orbital angular momentum (in units
834: of $\hbar$) and $N_0|lm\rangle=(l+\frac{1}{2})|lm\rangle$, with
835: $|lm\rangle$ a spherical harmonic. Furthermore,
836: %
837: \begin{equation}
838: %
839: {\bm A}={\bm n}\,f_1(N_0)+{\bm \nabla}_{\Omega}f_2(N_0)\, ,
840: %
841: \end{equation}
842: %
843: with ${\bm n}={\bf r}/r$,
844: ${\bm \nabla}_{\Omega}=-i{\bm n}\times{\bm L}$ and
845: %
846: \begin{equation}
847: %
848: f_1(N_0)=(N_0 - 1/2)f_2(N_0)\, ,
849: %
850: \end{equation}
851: %
852: %
853: \begin{equation}
854: %
855: f_2(N_0)=\sqrt{(N_0-1)/N_0}.
856: %
857: \end{equation}
858: %
859: ${\bm A}$ and ${\bm A}^{\dagger}$
860: are known as shift operators as their action on $|lm\rangle$
861: changes $l$ into $l\pm1$.
862: %
863:
864: A physical interpretation of ${\bm A}^-$
865: is provided by the relation
866: %
867: \begin{widetext}
868: %
869: \begin{equation}
870: %
871: {\bm \Omega} =
872: ({\bm n}\times{\bm L}-{\bm L}\times{\bm n})/2
873: =i\left[{\bm n},{\bm L}^2\right]/2
874: =\frac{i}{2}\left({\bm \nabla}_{\Omega} -
875: {\bm \nabla}_{\Omega}^{\dagger}
876: \right)
877: =\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_0}}\left[ N_0, {\bm A}^-
878: \right]_+\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_0}}\, ,
879: \label{anapole}
880: %
881: \end{equation}
882: %\
883: \end{widetext}
884: %
885: where $[...]_+$ denotes an anticommutator.
886: Eq. (\ref{anapole}) defines the (purely angular)
887: {\it orbital anapole} \cite{Zel57,FaK80,BaB97}.
888:
889: A physical representation of the generator ${\bm A}^+$ is provided
890: by
891: %
892: \begin{equation}
893: %
894: {\bm A}^+ = \sqrt{N_0} {\bm n} \sqrt{N_0}\, .
895: \label{elec_dip}
896: %
897: \end{equation}
898: %
899:
900: ${\bm L}, {\bm n}$ and ${\bm \Omega}$ provide the building blocks of our
901: derivation. They form a triad of
902: mutually orthogonal dimensionless vectors. Their nature (magnetic,
903: electric and magnetoelectric, respectively) is readily inferred from
904: behaviour under space inversion and time reversal.
905:
906: Notice that ${\bm L}$ (rotations) and ${\bm \Omega}$ (boosts)
907: generate a {\it homogeneous Lorentz group}: SO(3,1).
908: Also ${\bm L}$ and $\sqrt{N_0}{\bm n}\sqrt{N_0}$, where $N_0 |lm\rangle =
909: (l+\frac{1}{2})| lm \rangle$, generate SO(3,1). The homogeneous Lorentz
910: group enters our derivation of $I$-odd operators in a natural way, given
911: its deep interweaving with chirality. Notice that ${\bm L}$, ${\bm \Omega}$
912: and $\sqrt{N_0}{\bm n}\sqrt{N_0}$ provide a realisation of the
913: $so(3,2)$ de Sitter algebra. This is the required
914: symmetry extension, with respect to pure E1 or E2 transitions, that was
915: mentioned in the Introduction.
916: %
917: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
918: %
919: \bibitem{TT80} D. H. Templeton and L. K. Templeton, Acta Crystallogr. A
920: {\bf 36}, 237 (1980).
921: \bibitem{Sch87} G. Sch\"{u}tz, W. Wagner, W. Wilhelm, P. Kienle,
922: R. Zeller, R. Frahm, and G. Materlik, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 58}, 737 (1987).
923: \bibitem{Tho92} B. T. Thole, P. Carra, F. Sette, and G. van der Laan,
924: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 68}, 1943 (1992).
925: \bibitem{Car93a} P. Carra, B. T. Thole, M. Altarelli, and X. D. Wang,
926: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70}, 694 (1993).
927: \bibitem{Car93b} P. Carra, H. K\"{o}nig, B. T. Thole, and M. Altarelli,
928: Physica B {\bf 192}, 182 (1993).
929: \bibitem{BCA00} R. Benoist, P. Carra, and O. K. Andersen, Eur. Phys. J. B
930: {\bf 18}, 193 (2000).
931: \bibitem{Note1} X-ray dichroism implies excitations from inner shells,
932: which are filled in the ground state and can therefore be 'integrated out'.
933: As a result, one-electron properties of valence states are probed in the
934: x-ray region.
935: \bibitem{Ala98} L. Alagna, T. Prosperi, S. Turchini, J. Goulon, A. Rogalev,
936: C. Goulon-Ginet, C. R. Natoli, R. D. Peacock, and B. Stewart, Phys. Rev.
937: Lett. {\bf 80}, 4799 (1998).
938: \bibitem{Gou98} Goulon J., C. Goulon-Ginet, A. Rogalev, V. Gotte, C. Malgrange,
939: C. Brouder, and C. R. Natoli, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 108}, 6394 (1998).
940: \bibitem{Gou00}
941: J. Goulon, A. Rogalev, C. Goulon-Ginet, G. Benayoun, L. Paolasini,
942: C. Brouder, C.. Malgrange, and P. A. Metcalf, Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 85},
943: 4385 (2000).
944: \bibitem{Gou02} J. Goulon, A. Rogalev, F. Wilhelm, C. Goulon-Ginet, P. Carra,
945: D. Cabaret, and C. Brouder, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 237401 (2002).
946: \bibitem{Dzy60} I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U. S. S. R.)
947: {\bf 37}, 881 (1959) [translation: Soviet Phys. JETP {\bf 10}, 628 (1960)].
948: \bibitem{VMK88} D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii,
949: {\it Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum} (World Scientific Publishing,
950: Singapore, 1988).
951: \bibitem{Note14} Integration is over a finite energy interval,
952: which corresponds to the two partners of a spin-orbit split inner shell.
953: \bibitem{Note3} Sum rules for pure E1 or E2 transitions were derived by
954: representing valence-electron states within an $|lm\rangle$ basis.
955: In this case, the pertinent order parameters are derived from the
956: generators of rotation groups: the components of spin and orbital
957: angular momentum.
958: Such a formulation can be extended to include parity-conserving
959: hybridisation; for example, it can be shown that pure E1 linear
960: dichroism mixes $|lm\rangle$ and $|l\pm 2 m\rangle$. Discussion of these
961: effects is beyond the scope of the current paper.
962: \bibitem{Note4} In Eq. (\ref{XNCD}), the radial integrals are defined by
963: %
964: \begin{displaymath}
965: %
966: R^{(L)}_{l_cl}=\int_0^{\infty} dr \varphi_{l_c}(r) r^{L+2}
967: \varphi_l(r)\, ,
968: %
969: \end{displaymath}
970: %
971: where $\varphi_{l_c}(r)$ and $\varphi_l(r)$ denote inner-shell
972: and valence radial wave functions, respectively.
973: Our derivation neglegts relativistic corrections to the radial part
974: of the atomic wave functions.
975: \bibitem{Note17} It is the magnetic field of the so-called
976: {\it magnetoelectric annealing}, a standard technique for
977: creating a single magnetoelectric domain in the crystal.
978: \bibitem{DaM70} P. D. Dernier and M. Marezio, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 2}, 3771 (1970).
979: \bibitem{Der70} P. D. Dernier, J. Phys. Chem. Solids {\bf 31}, 2569 (1970).
980: \bibitem{Note19} Notice that $x=0.038$ in Ref. 20
981: and $x=0.028$ in Ref. 10. As shown by the phase diagram
982: of McWhan and Remeika [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 2}, 3734
983: (1970)], the two substitutions are equivalent.
984: \bibitem{Mon70} R. M. Moon, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 25}, 527 (1970).
985: \bibitem{Yet87} M. Yethiraj, S. A. Werner, W. B. Yelon, and J. M. Honig,
986: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 36}, 8675 (1987).
987: \bibitem{DiM02} S. Di Matteo, N. B. Perkins, and C. R. Natoli, Phys. Rev.
988: B {\bf 65} 054413 (2002).
989: \bibitem{Note20} These two ME point groups
990: are subgroups of $C_{2h}\otimes R$; in international notation
991: they are denoted by $2/\underline{m}$ and $\underline{2}/m$,
992: respectively.
993: \bibitem{Bar82} The method is expounded in L. D. Barron, {\it Molecular Light
994: Scattering and Optical Activity} (Cmbridge University Press, Cambridge,
995: 1982); Chapter 2.
996: \bibitem{Luo93} J. Luo. G. T. Trammell, and J. P. Hannon,
997: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 71}, 287 (1993).
998: \bibitem{GoL59} S. Goshen and H. J. Lipkin, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) {\bf 6}, 301 (1959);
999: and in {\it Spectroscopic and Group Theoretical
1000: Methods in Physics - Racah Memorial Volume}, F. Bloch {\it et al.} Eds.,
1001: North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.
1002: \bibitem{DGN65} Y. Dothan, M. Gell-Mann, and Y. Ne'eman, Phys.
1003: Lett. {\bf 17}, 148 (1965); N. Mukunda, L. O'Raifeartaigh and E.C.G. Sudarshan,
1004: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 15}, 1041 (1965).
1005: \bibitem{DaN66} Y. Dothan and Y. Ne'eman, {\it Band Spectra Generated
1006: By Non-Compact Algebra}, reprinted in F.J. Dyson, {\it Symmetry Groups
1007: in Nuclear and Particle Physics - A Lecture-Note and Reprint Volume},
1008: Bejamin, New York, 1966.
1009: \bibitem{CaB00} P. Carra and R. Benoist, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 62}, R7703 (2000).
1010: \bibitem{Eng72} M. J. Englefield, {\it Group Theory and the Coulomb Problem},
1011: Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972.
1012: \bibitem{Zel57} Ya. B. Zel'dovich, Zh. \'{E}ksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 33}, 1531 (1957)
1013: [Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 6}, 1184 (1958)].
1014: \bibitem{FaK80} V. V. Flambaum and I. B. Khriplovich, Zh. \'{E}ksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 79},
1015: 1656 (1980) [Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 52}, 835 (1980)].
1016: \bibitem{BaB97} M.-A. Bouchiat and C. Bouchiat, Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 60},
1017: %
1018: \end{thebibliography}
1019: %
1020: \end{document}
1021: %
1022:
1023: