1: %May 4, 2003
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %%\documentstyle[11pt,epsf,aps,floats,epsfig,subeqn,amssymb]{article}
4: %\documentstyle[11pt,epsfig]{article}
5: \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
6: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,floats,epsfig,subeqn,amssymb]
7: \input epsf
8: %%\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
9: %%\usepackage[cp866]{inputenc}
10: %%\usepackage[english,russian]{babel}
11: \evensidemargin=-1cm
12: \textheight=24.5cm
13: \textwidth=16.cm
14: \oddsidemargin=0cm
15: \topmargin=-1cm
16: \topskip=0cm
17: \headheight=0cm
18: \headsep=0cm
19: \newcounter{fixy}
20: \begin{document}
21: \newenvironment{fixy}[1]{\setcounter{figure}{#1}}
22: {\addtocounter{fixy}{1}}
23: \renewcommand{\thefixy}{\arabic{fixy}}
24: \renewcommand{\thefigure}{\thefixy\alph{figure}}
25: \setcounter{fixy}{1}
26: \baselineskip 100pt
27: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}
28: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.666666666}
29: %\parindent=0pt
30: \large
31: \parskip.2in
32: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
33: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
34: \newcommand{\br}{\bar}
35: \newcommand{\fr}{\frac}
36: \newcommand{\lm}{\lambda}
37: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}
38: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}
39: \newcommand{\bt}{\beta}
40: \newcommand{\pr}{\partial}
41: \newcommand{\hs}{\hspace{5mm}}
42: \newcommand{\up}{\upsilon}
43: \newcommand{\dg}{\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\vphi}{\vec{\phi}}
45: \newcommand{\ve}{\varepsilon}
46: \newcommand{\acc}{\\[3mm]}
47: \newcommand{\dl}{\delta}
48: \newcommand{\grad}{\vec\partial}
49: \def\tablecap#1{\vskip 3mm \centerline{#1}\vskip 5mm}
50: \def\p#1{\partial_#1}
51: \def\DP#1#2{D_{#1}\phi^{#2}}
52: \def\dP#1#2{\partial_{#1}\phi^{#2}}
53: \def\xh{\hat x}
54: % PaperH defs
55: %\def\cmod#1{ \vert #1 \vert ^2 }
56: \def\mod#1{ \vert #1 \vert }
57: \def\chapter#1{\hbox{Introduction.}}
58: \def\Sin{\hbox{sin}}
59: \def\Cos{\hbox{cos}}
60: \def\Exp{\hbox{exp}}
61: \def\Ln{\hbox{ln}}
62: \def\Tan{\hbox{tan}}
63: \def\Cot{\hbox{cot}}
64: \def\Sinh{\hbox{sinh}}
65: \def\Cosh{\hbox{cosh}}
66: \def\Tanh{\hbox{tanh}}
67: \def\Asin{\hbox{asin}}
68: \def\Acos{\hbox{acos}}
69: \def\Atan{\hbox{atan}}
70: \def\Asinh{\hbox{asinh}}
71: \def\Acosh{\hbox{acosh}}
72: \def\Atanh{\hbox{atanh}}
73: \def\frac#1#2{{\textstyle{#1\over #2}}}
74:
75: \newcommand{\Ref}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
76: \newcommand{\ie}{{\it i.e.}}
77: \newcommand{\cmod}[1]{ \vert #1 \vert ^2 }
78: %\newcommand{\mod}[1]{ \vert #1 \vert }
79: \newcommand{\nhat}{\mbox{\boldmath$\hat n$}}
80: \nopagebreak[3]
81:
82: \title{Solitons and deformed lattices I}
83: \author{
84: B. Hartmann\thanks{e-mail address: Betti.Hartmann@durham.ac.uk}
85: and
86: W.J. Zakrzewski\thanks{e-mail address: W.J.Zakrzewski@durham.ac.uk}
87: \\
88: \\
89: \\
90: Department of Mathematical Sciences,University of Durham, \\
91: Durham DH1 3LE, UK\\} \date{}
92:
93: \maketitle
94: \begin{abstract}
95: We study a model describing some aspects of the dynamics of biopolymers. The
96: models involve
97: either one or two finite chains with a number $N$ of sites that represent the ``units"
98: of a biophysical system. The mechanical degrees of freedom of these
99: chains are coupled to the internal degrees of freedom through position
100: dependent excitation transfer functions. We reconsider the case of the one
101: chain model discussed by Mingaleev et al. and present new results concerning
102: the soliton sector of this model.
103: We also give new (preliminary) results in
104: the two chain model in which case we have introduced an
105: interaction potential inspired by the Morse potential.
106:
107:
108: \end{abstract}
109: \medskip
110:
111:
112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
113: \section{Introduction}
114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
115:
116: Recently some work has been done on the study of curvature-induced
117: symmetry breaking effects in nonlinear Schr\"odinger models \cite{Gai}.
118: The idea here is to study a one-dimensional
119: discrete Nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation
120: \begin{equation}
121: i{d\over dt}\psi_i\,+\,\sum_k J_{ik}\,\psi_k\,+\, \chi\vert \psi_i\vert\sp2
122: \psi_i\,=\,0
123: \end{equation}
124: in which the excitation transfer function ($J_{ik}$) depends
125: on the positions of the lattice
126: points. Often \cite{Abl} one restricts oneself to the
127: nearest neighbour approximation in which case
128: $J_{ik}=J\delta_{i-k,\pm 1}$ but, as pointed out in
129: \cite{Gai}, a more general case involves $J_{ik}=J(\vert\vec{r_i}-\vec{r_k}
130: \vert)$ where $\vec{r_i}$ describes the spatial position of
131: the $i\sp{th}$ lattice site. Of course we expect $J(\vert\vec{r_i}-\vec{r_k}
132: \vert)$ to be a fast decreasing function of its argument.
133: When all the points of the lattice lie along a straight line, i.e. $\vec{r_i}
134: =\vec a + \alpha_i \vec b$, where $\alpha_i$ is a linearly growing
135: function of $i$,
136: the results are not that different from the case of a regular lattice
137: with the nearest neighbour approximation.
138: However, as pointed out in \cite{Gai}, any curvature in $\vec{r}_i$ can induce
139: extra effects which do affect the behaviour of the $\psi$ fields.
140:
141: In \cite{Gai} the authors have studied the case when the lattice points lie on a
142: parabola with some curvature. Then they have considered $J(a)$ to be given
143: by $J(a)\,=\,J\,\exp{(-\alpha a)}$ and they have showed that the effective
144: Hamiltonian for the $\psi$ field involves a double well potential
145: whose shape depends on the curvature of the parabola.
146: This has an implication on the ground states of the theory.
147:
148:
149: This idea has then been applied to the study of the dynamics of biopolymers
150: \cite{Gai2}. The authors of \cite{Gai2} have considered the case
151: of an excitation field $\psi$
152: on a one polymer chain. The links of the polymers have
153: been allowed to move, and their motion
154: has been controlled by their inter-link forces and
155: also by the force due to the excitation field $\psi$.
156:
157: The total Hamiltonian describing the system they have considered is given by
158: \begin{equation}
159: H=T+U+V
160: \end{equation}
161: where the kinetic energy $T$ and the inter-particle interaction
162: potential $U$ read:
163: \begin{equation}
164: T= \frac{M}{2}\sum_{i} (\frac{d\vec{r}_{i}}{dt})^2\quad \hbox{and}\quad
165: U(\vec{r}_{i})=U_{S}+U_{R}+U_{B} \ .
166: \end{equation}
167: The streching energy $U_S$ is given by:
168: \begin{equation}
169: U_{S}=\frac{\sigma}{2}\sum_{i}
170: (|\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{i-1}|-a)^2 \ .
171: \end{equation}
172: $\sigma$ is the elastic module of the streching rigidity of the chain
173: and $a$ denotes the equilibrium lattice spacing. The repulsive potential
174: \begin{equation}
175: U_{R}=\frac{\delta}{2}\sum_{i}\sum_{k\neq i}(d-
176: |\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{k}|)^2 \Theta(d-
177: |\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{k}|)
178: \end{equation}
179: comes only into play if the distance between two particles
180: becomes smaller than the diameter $d$ of the particles themselves.
181: I.e. if the particles start to overlap, they are repelled.
182: However, since the strength $\delta$ of the repulsion is chosen finite,
183: particles are still allowed to overlap to some extend.
184: The final bit of the inter-particle
185: interaction describes the bending energy:
186: \begin{equation}
187: U_{B}=\frac{\kappa}{2}\sum_{i}\frac{\theta_{i}^2}
188: {1-(\theta_{i}/\theta_{max})^2} \ , \ \theta_{i}=\theta_{i}(\vec{r}_{i}) \ .
189: \end{equation}
190: $\kappa$ is the elastic module of the bending rigidity while $\theta(\vec{r}_i)$ is
191: the angle between the two vectors $(\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{i-1})$
192: and $(\vec{r}_{i+1}-\vec{r}_{i})$ (for a detailed
193: formula see further in this paper or \cite{Gai2}). $\theta_{max}$ is the corresponding
194: maximal bending angle.
195: Finally the potential of the complex scalar field $\psi$ reads:
196: \begin{equation}
197: V=\sum_{i}\{2|\psi_{i}|^2-\sum_{k\neq i} J_{ik}\psi_{i}^*
198: \psi_{k}-
199: \frac{1}{2}\chi |\psi_{i}|^4 \}
200: \end{equation}
201: where $\chi$ denotes the self-trapping nonlinearity and the exciation-transfer
202: coefficients are given by:
203: \begin{equation}
204: J_{ik}=(e^{\beta}-1)\exp(-\beta |\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{k}|).
205: \end{equation}
206: Note that the non-linear
207: Schr\"odinger equation for the $\psi$ field
208: and the Newton equations for the chain are coupled only by the $J_{ik}$ term.
209:
210: In biophysical
211: systems the excitation $\psi_i$ can be thought of as an amide-I vibration, i.e. an excitation
212: in the C=0 bond of the peptide group, which transmits along the chain
213: and deforms it. Through this interaction
214: a new localized energy state is created, the Davydov soliton \cite{davy}, which can
215: transport energy without dispersion. Similarly, the electron excitation
216: on a lattice leads to a localized state called the polaron through the electron-phonon
217: interaction \cite{davy,peyrard}.
218:
219: One end of the polymer has been set to be free; the other one, assumed to be far away,
220: has been kept fixed.
221:
222: The authors of \cite{Gai2} then have performed many interesting simulations
223: of the equations which govern the dynamics of the electron and the lattice.
224: Their most spectacular results have involved them showing that a single excitation
225: of the $\psi$ field at the free end results, after a long period of time,
226: in a gradual folding of the chain. Then they have explained their results as
227: coming from the instability generated by the development of the curvature
228: of the chain.
229:
230: These exciting results have made us think of systems involving more chains
231: with an interchain interaction.
232: Proteins often consist of two or more polypeptide chains and take on
233: characteristic structures in $3$-d space. Examples of such
234: secondary structures are the $\alpha$-helix and the $\beta$-sheet, where
235: in the latter pairs of chains lie side by side being stabilised by
236: hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl oxygen atom of one chain and
237: the NH group of the other. Furthermore, DNA consists of two polynucleotide
238: chains which are connected to each other by hydrogen-bonding and are
239: coiled around each other in a double helix.
240:
241: In view of these points, we have decided to extend the investigations
242: of \cite{Gai2} to systems of two chains with the simplest interchain interaction
243: as given in, e.g., \cite{Pey} and inspired by the Morse potential \cite{morse}.
244: So we have looked at a system of two chains with coupling
245: constants given by the appropriate
246: generalisations of those of \cite{Gai2}. Note that the coupling
247: between the $\psi$ fields on the two chains allows the field to spread
248: between them altering the values of the effective coupling constants
249: on each chain.
250:
251: Our model is presented in the next section.
252:
253: To test our program, we have, first of all, tried to reproduce
254: the results of \cite{Gai2}. Unfortunately, ref \cite{Gai2} does not
255: give all the details of their simulations - so in fact,
256: not being sure what their initial conditions had been, we have not
257: been able to reproduce their results. However, we have found some interesting
258: properties of the system which we discuss in the following section.
259:
260: Then we have looked at the system involving two chains.
261: Our results are presented in Section 4.
262:
263: We end the paper with some conclusions and our plans for the further studies.
264:
265:
266:
267:
268:
269:
270:
271:
272:
273: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
274: \section{Our model}
275: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
276:
277: As our model we take a straightforward generalisation of the model of
278: \cite{Gai2} to which we have added an interaction between the chains
279: $W_{int}$.
280:
281:
282: \subsection{The Hamiltonian}
283: Thus the total Hamiltonian is given by~:
284: \begin{equation}
285: H=T+U+V+W_{int}
286: \end{equation}
287: with the kinetic energy
288: \begin{equation}
289: T=\sum_{j=1}^{2} \frac{M_{j}}{2}\sum_{i} (\frac{d\vec{r}_{ij}}{dt})^2 \ , \
290: \end{equation}
291: and the inter-particle interaction:
292: \begin{equation}
293: U(\vec{r}_{ij})=U_{S}+U_{B}+U_{R}
294: \end{equation}
295: where the stretching energy is a sum of the respective stretching energies
296: on chain $j=1$ and chain $j=2$:
297: \begin{equation}
298: U_{S}=\sum_{j=1}^{2}\frac{\sigma_{j}}{2}\sum_{i}
299: (|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|-a_j)^2 \ .
300: \end{equation}
301: Similarly, the bending energy reads:
302: \begin{equation}
303: U_{B}=\sum_{j=1}^{2}\frac{\kappa_{j}}{2}\sum_{i}\frac{\theta_{ij}^2}
304: {1-(\theta_{ij}/\theta_{max})^2} \ , \ \theta_{ij}=\theta_{ij}(\vec{r}_{ij}) \ .
305: \end{equation}
306: Finally, the repulsive potential is a sum of the respective repulsive
307: potentials on the two chains and a new term, which describes the repulsion
308: if the two chains come closer than $d_{j'j}$ to each other:
309: \begin{eqnarray}
310: \label{ur}
311: U_{R}&=&\sum_{j=1}^{2}(\frac{\delta_{j}}{2}\sum_{i}\sum_{k\neq i}(d_j-
312: |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|)^2\Theta(d_j-
313: |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|) \nonumber \\
314: &+& \sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\frac{\delta_{j^{'}j}}{2}
315: \sum_{i} (d_{j^{'}j}-|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}|)^2)
316: \Theta(d_{j^{'}j}-|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}|) \ .
317: \end{eqnarray}
318:
319: The energy of the excitation $\psi_{ij}$ is given by~:
320: \begin{equation}
321: \label{v}
322: V=\sum_{j=1}^{2}\sum_{i}\{2|\psi_{ij}|^2-\sum_{k\neq i} J^j_{ik}\psi_{ij}^*
323: \psi_{kj}-\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{l} K^{jj^{'}}_{il}\psi_{ij}^*\psi_{lj^{'}}-
324: \frac{1}{2}\chi_j |\psi_{ij}|^4 \}
325: \end{equation}
326: with the energy transfer coefficients:
327: \begin{equation}
328: J^j_{ik}=\lambda_j(e^{\beta_j}-1)\exp(-\beta_j |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|) \ ,
329: \end{equation}
330: \begin{equation}
331: K^{jj^{'}}_{il}=(e^{\gamma}-1)\exp(-\gamma |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{lj^{'}}|) \ .
332: \end{equation}
333: The second term on the rhs of (\ref{v}) describes the energy transfer along one
334: chain, while the third term corresponds to the energy transfer between
335: the two chains.
336:
337: For the interaction potential between the chains we take:~
338: \begin{equation}
339: \label{morse}
340: W_{int}=\sum_{ j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{i} D \{ \exp(-\alpha |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}
341: _{ij^{'}}|)
342: -1 \}^2.
343: \end{equation}
344: The expression for the interaction potential is inspired by the Morse potential. The latter arises in a convenient model for the potential in a diatomic molecule.
345: $D$ then is the potential energy for the bond formation and
346: $\alpha$ a parameter controlling the width of the potential well.
347: Since the minimum of (\ref{morse}) is given for $\vec{r}_{ij}=\vec{r}
348: _{ij^{'}}$ for all $i$ this potential leads to an attraction
349: between the chains.
350:
351: Note that our terms are simple generalisations of the expressions from
352: \cite{Gai2}. All fields and coupling constants have an extra index $j=1,2$
353: which tells us which chain they refer to.
354: We have also added a term $\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{l} K^{jj^{'}}_{il}\psi_{ij}^*\psi_{lj^{'}}$
355: coupling $\psi_{ij}$ fields on two different chains and, as we have mentioned before,
356: $W_{int}$. In addition, we have multiplied $J^j_{ik}$ by an extra constant $\lambda_j$ to
357: extend the model to cases where the extension of the interaction over the chain and the strength
358: of the interaction can be chosen independently from each other.
359:
360:
361: \subsection{Equations}
362: It is easy to derive equations which follow from our Hamiltonian. They are given
363: by:
364: \subsubsection{The Schr\"odinger equations}
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: i \frac{\partial \psi_{ij}}{\partial t} &=&
367: 2\psi_{ij}-\sum_{k\neq i} (e^{\beta_j}-1)
368: \exp(-\beta_j |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|)\psi_{kj}\nonumber \\
369: &-& \sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{l} (e^{\gamma}-1)
370: \exp(-\gamma |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{lj^{'}}|)\psi_{lj^{'}}\nonumber\\
371: &-& \chi_j |\psi_{ij}|^2\psi_{ij}\ , \hspace{1cm} j=1,2
372: \end{eqnarray}
373:
374: and, for the chains themselves:
375:
376:
377: \subsubsection{The Newton equations}
378: \begin{eqnarray}
379: M_j\frac{d^2\vec{r}_{ij}}{dt^2} &=&
380: -\nu_j\frac{d\vec{r}_{ij}}{dt} - \frac{dU}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}+
381: \sum_{m}\sum_{k\neq m}\frac{dJ^j_{mk}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}\psi^{*}_{mj}\psi_{kj}
382: \nonumber \\
383: &+& \sum_{m}\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{l}\frac{dK^{jj^{'}}_{ml}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}\psi^{*}_{mj}\psi_{lj^{'}}
384: -\frac{dW_{int}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}\ , \hspace{1cm} j=1,2
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: where $M_j$ is the mass of the particles on the $j$-th chain and $\nu_j$ are the
387: corresponding damping parameters.
388: The derivatives of the different potential terms with respect to $\vec{r}_{ij}$
389: read:
390: \begin{equation}
391: \frac{dU_{S}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}=\sigma_j \left( (|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|-a_j)
392: \cdot \frac{\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|}-
393: (|\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}|-a_j)
394: \cdot \frac{\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}}{|\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}|}
395: \right)
396: \end{equation}
397: \begin{equation}
398: \label{angle1}
399: \frac{dU_{B}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}=\kappa_j\frac{\theta_{ij}\frac{d\theta_{ij}}
400: {d\vec{r}_{ij}}}{(1-(\theta_{ij}/\theta_{max})^2)^2}
401: \end{equation}
402: \begin{equation}
403: \frac{dU_{R}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}=-\delta_j\sum_{k\neq i}
404: (d_j-|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|)
405: \cdot \frac{\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|}
406: -\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\delta_{j^{'}j}(d_{j^{'}j}-|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}|)
407: \cdot \frac{\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}|}
408: \end{equation}
409: \begin{equation}
410: \sum_{m}\sum_{k\neq m}\frac{dJ^j_{mk}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}
411: \psi^{*}_{mj}\psi_{kj}
412: = \lambda_j\beta_j (1-e^{\beta_j})\sum_{k\neq i} \exp
413: \{-\beta_{j}|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|\}
414: \cdot \frac{\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{kj}|}
415: \cdot (\psi^*_{ij}\psi_{kj}+\psi^*_{kj}\psi_{ij})
416: \end{equation}
417: \begin{equation}
418: \sum_{m}\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{l}\frac{dK^{jj^{'}}_{ml}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}
419: \psi^{*}_{mj}\psi_{lj^{'}}
420: =\gamma(1-e^{\gamma})\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}\sum_{l}\exp(-\gamma|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{lj^{'}}|)
421: \cdot \frac{\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{lj^{'}}}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{lj^{'}}|}
422: \cdot (\psi^*_{ij}\psi_{lj^{'}}+\psi^*_{lj^{'}}\psi_{ij})
423: \end{equation}
424: \begin{equation}
425: \frac{dW_{int}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}=-2D\alpha\sum_{j^{'}\neq j}
426: \{ \exp(-\alpha |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}
427: _{ij^{'}}|)-1 \}
428: \cdot\frac{\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}|}
429: \cdot \exp(-\alpha |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij^{'}}|).
430: \end{equation}
431: As in \cite{Gai2}, we have introduced a viscous damping $\nu_j$ resulting from the assumption of having an aqueous environment. This is a physical
432: reason for the introduction of such a term. On the other hand we will
433: try to find the lowest energy (stationary) state of our system and we will
434: use the absorption to reduce the energy and to `drive' the system to its
435: ground state. Thus, in practice, we will start with a good approximation
436: to the ground (lowest energy) state and then evolve it with nonzero
437: absorption - thus letting it `flow' towards this true ground state.
438:
439: To proceed further we need to determine the dependence of
440: angles $\theta_{ij}$ on
441: $\vec{r}_{ij}$. Geometrical reasoning gives:
442: \begin{equation}
443: \theta_{ij}=\pi-\tilde{\theta}
444: \end{equation}
445: where
446: \begin{equation}
447: \tilde{\theta}=\arccos(\frac{\vec{r}_{ij}^2-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
448: \cdot\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij}
449: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}+\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
450: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}}
451: {|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}||\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}|}).
452: \end{equation}
453: Then
454: \begin{equation}
455: \frac{d\theta_{ij}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}=[\frac{d\theta_{ij}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}]_{i}
456: +[\frac{d\theta_{ij}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}]_{i-1}+[\frac{d\theta_{ij}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}]_{i+1}
457: \label{dphi}
458: \end{equation}
459: The first term on the rhs is given by:
460: \begin{equation}
461: [\frac{d\theta_{ij}}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}]_{i}=(1-
462: (\frac{\vec{r}_{ij}^2-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
463: \cdot\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij}
464: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}+\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
465: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}}
466: {|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}||\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}|})^{2})^{-1/2}
467: \cdot\frac{F_1(\vec{r}_{ij})}{F_2(\vec{r}_{ij})}
468: \end{equation}
469: with
470: \begin{eqnarray}
471: F_1(\vec{r}_{ij})&=&
472: (2\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j})
473: (|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}||\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij}|)\ \nonumber\\
474: &-&(\vec{r}_{ij}^2-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
475: \cdot\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij}
476: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}+\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
477: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j})\ \nonumber \\
478: &\cdot&((\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j})\frac{|\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
479: -\vec{r}_{i,j}|}{|\vec{r}_{i,j}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|}-
480: (\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij})\frac{|\vec{r}_{i,j}-
481: \vec{r}_{i-1,j}|}{|\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}|})
482: \end{eqnarray}
483: and
484: \begin{equation}
485: F_2(\vec{r}_{ij})=(|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|
486: |\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij}|)^2.
487: \end{equation}
488:
489: The second and the third terms on the rhs of (\ref{dphi})
490: are given by similar expressions
491: with functions $F_3$, $F_4$, and $F_5$, $F_6$, respectively.
492:
493:
494:
495:
496: \subsubsection{New terms for the curvature and the torsion}
497: We have also considered different terms to describe the effects
498: of the curvatures of the chains. Thus we have replaced
499: $U_B$ by $U_C$:
500: \begin{equation}
501: U_C=\sum_{j=1}^{2}\Lambda^{'}_{j}\sum_{i} k_{ij}^{2}
502: \end{equation}
503: where $k_{ij}$ is the curvature of the $j$th chain at site $i$
504: and so $U_C$ is given by
505: \begin{equation}
506: U_C=\sum_{j=1}^{2}\Lambda_{j}\sum_{i} (1-\frac{(\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j})
507: (\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij})}{|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|
508: |\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij}|})
509: \end{equation}
510: where $\Lambda_{j}=2\Lambda^{'}_{j}$.\\
511: Replacing $\frac{dU_B}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}$ by $\frac{dU_C}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}$, we get:
512: \begin{equation}
513: \frac{dU_C}{d\vec{r}_{ij}}=\Lambda_{j}(\frac
514: {F_1(\vec{r}_{ij})}{F_2(\vec{r}_{ij})}+\frac
515: {F_3(\vec{r}_{ij})}{F_4(\vec{r}_{ij})}+\frac
516: {F_5(\vec{r}_{ij})}{F_6(\vec{r}_{ij})})
517: \end{equation}
518: with $F_1$ etc. given by the previous equations.\
519:
520: Now, comparing with the expressions we have had before, we see that
521: \begin{equation}
522: k^2_{ij}\propto (1+\cos \tilde{\theta})=(1+\cos (\pi-\theta_{ij}))=
523: (1-\cos \theta_{ij})
524: \label{cur}
525: \end{equation}
526: so that for $\theta_{ij}=0$ (straight line), $k^2_{ij}=0$.
527:
528:
529:
530: We can also introduce torsion. To do this we note that
531: from Frenet's formulas we have
532: \begin{equation}
533: \tau^2=\frac{d\vec{n}}{ds}-\kappa^2=\frac{d^3 \vec{r}}{ds^3}-\kappa^2.
534: \end{equation}
535:
536: Thus it would make sense to use an analog of (\ref{cur}) and so write
537: \begin{equation}
538: \tau^2\propto(1-\cos \phi)
539: \end{equation}
540: where $\phi$ is the angle between the two planes we compare. For $\phi=0$
541: it is clear that
542: $\tau^2=0$. In general $\phi$ is given by:
543: \begin{equation}
544: \cos \phi=\frac{[(\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j})\times
545: (\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij})]\cdot[(\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij})\times
546: (\vec{r}_{i+2,j}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j})]}{\sin\theta_{ij}\sin\theta_{i+1,j}
547: |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|
548: |\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij}|^{2}
549: |\vec{r}_{i+2,j}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}|}.
550: \label{angle}
551: \end{equation}
552: %Using the rule for the vector quadruple product
553: %$(A\times B)\cdot(C\times D)=(A\cdot C)(B \cdot D)- (A\cdot D)(B \cdot C)$, we %can
554: %write
555: This can be rewritten as
556: \begin{eqnarray}
557: \cos \phi &=& \frac{[(\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j})
558: \cdot (\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij})]
559: [(\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij})
560: \cdot (\vec{r}_{i+2,j}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j})]}
561: {\sin\theta_{ij}\sin\theta_{i+1,j}
562: |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|
563: |\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{ij}|^2
564: |\vec{r}_{i+2,j}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}|}\ \nonumber \\
565: &-& \frac{[(\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j})
566: \cdot (\vec{r}_{i+2,j}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j})]
567: }{\sin\theta_{ij}\sin\theta_{i+1,j}
568: |\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}|
569: |\vec{r}_{i+2,j}-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}|}.
570: \label{angle2}
571: \end{eqnarray}
572: We know that $\sin \theta_{ij}=\sin\tilde{\theta}_{ij}$ and that $\sin(\arccos(x))=
573: \sqrt{1-x^2}$. Thus
574: \begin{equation}
575: \sin \theta_{ij}=\sqrt{1-(\frac{\vec{r}_{ij}^2-\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
576: \cdot\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{ij}
577: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}+\vec{r}_{i+1,j}
578: \cdot\vec{r}_{i-1,j}}
579: {|\vec{r}_{ij}-\vec{r}_{i-1,j}||\vec{r}_{i+1,j}-\vec{r}_{i,j}|})^2}.
580: \end{equation}
581: For a straight line, we have to be careful since in Eq.(\ref{angle})
582: $\sin\theta_{ij}=0$.
583:
584: We intend to compare the effects of all these terms on the dynamics
585: of the chains and of the excitation field. The preliminary results indicate
586: that the dependence on the detailed form of these terms is not very strong.
587: So in this paper we report the results for the case of $U_{B}$ leaving the
588: detailed study of the dependence on the form of $U_C$ to a future
589: publication. The same applies to the effects
590: associated with non-vanishing torsion.
591: At the same time our observation of the weak dependence on the details
592: of $U_C$ shows that our results are quite generic in their nature
593: with most observed effects determined by the other terms in our
594: Hamiltonian (2).
595:
596:
597:
598:
599:
600:
601:
602:
603:
604:
605:
606:
607:
608:
609:
610:
611:
612: %\newpage
613:
614:
615:
616:
617:
618:
619: \subsection{Initial and boundary conditions}
620: Next we have to decide on the initial and boundary conditions.
621:
622: First of all we have chosen the chains, initially, to lie parallel
623: to each other (and we have placed them along the $x$ axis in the $xy$ plane, starting
624: at $x=0$ and running to $x=N$, where $N$ is the total number of links
625: of each chain).
626: So we have put $\vec{r}_{i1}|_{t=0}=(x_{i1},0,0)$, and
627: $\vec{r}_{i2}|_{t=0}=(x_{i2},1,0)$. It can then be shown that all angles vanish identically:
628: \begin{equation}
629: \tilde{\theta}|_{t=0}=\arccos(-1)=\pi \rightarrow \theta_{ij}|_{t=0}=0.
630: \end{equation}
631:
632: It is possible to fix the ends of the chains ($x=N$) by requiring that
633: \begin{equation}
634: \frac{dx_{N,j}}{dt}=0 \ , \ \frac{dy_{N,j}}{dt}=0\ ,
635: \ \frac{dz_{N,j}}{dt}=0.
636: \end{equation}
637: However, in most of our simulations, the end has been allowed to move freely.
638:
639: We cannot define $\theta_{ij}$ at $x=0$. Thus, at this point, we have taken
640: the bending angle as
641: the angle between the $x$-direction and the vector $\vec{r}_{2j}-\vec{r}_{1j}$:
642: \begin{equation}
643: \theta_{1j}=\arcsin(\sqrt{(y_{2j}-y_{1j})^2+
644: (z_{2j}-z_{1j})^2}/|\vec{r}_{2j}-\vec{r}_{1j}|).
645: \end{equation}
646:
647:
648:
649:
650:
651:
652:
653:
654: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
655: \section{One chain}
656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
657: In this case we have put $\sigma_2=\kappa_2=\delta_2=\delta_{12}=D=
658: \beta_2=\gamma=\chi_2=\nu_2=0$. Thus the second chain is completely
659: decoupled and our problem is reduced to that of ref [3].
660:
661: We have redone some of the work reported in \cite{Gai2}. We have started
662: the simulations by putting, initially, $\psi_{1,1}=1$ and $\psi_{i,1}=0$,
663: when $i=2,..N$.
664: Using the parameters of \cite{Gai2}, ie $\sigma_1=1000$, $\kappa_1=0.06$,
665: $\delta_1=100$, $\beta_1=2$, $\chi_1=3.2$, $\nu_1=0.3$, $\theta_{max}=\pi/3$, $M_1=0.5$,
666: $d_1=0.6$ and in addition $\lambda_1=1$,
667: we have found that the links of the chain have moved very little,
668: and that the motion was only in the $x$ direction. This is easy to understand
669: as nothing breaks the symmetry keeping the motion restricted to the
670: $y=z=0$ line. Of course, this symmetry can be broken dynamically
671: through the numerical inaccuracies but this process is extremely slow.
672:
673: Hence we have broken the symmetry explicitly by introducing a small initial
674: displacement of the chain in the $y$ as well as in the $z$ direction.
675: Thus we put initially $y_{1,1}=0.1$, $z_{1,1}=0.01$ and set all
676: other $y_{i,1}$, $z_{i,1}$ equal to zero. In all our simulations,
677: the energy has decreased due to the absorption and has settled quite
678: quickly to its final value.
679:
680: We have first studied the existence of a soliton-like structure
681: as a function of the parameters
682: $\beta_1\equiv \beta$ and $\lambda_1$. We have found that the range of $\lambda_1$ for which the soliton doesn't get
683: destroyed is very limited for all $\beta_1$. For $\lambda_1\geq 5$, $\psi_{i,1}$ is completely spread over the
684: chain after some finite time, while for $\lambda_1=2,3$, a soliton-like structure is still seen to move up
685: and down the chain, however, a lot of ``background"
686: noise is present. A sharp soliton seems to be present
687: only for $\lambda_1\sim 1$. We have thus fixed $\lambda_1\equiv 1$ and studied the dependence of the height,
688: width and velocity of the soliton on the parameter $\beta_1\equiv\beta$.
689: For the position $i_{max}$ and
690: the height $(\psi_{i,1}\psi_{i,1}^{*})_{max}=\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert^2_{max}$
691: of the soliton's maximum, we have used a quadratic approximation.
692: For the width $\Delta$ of the soliton in the $x$-direction we can use two different definitions:
693: \begin{itemize}
694: \item a ``quantum-mechanical" definition:
695: \begin{equation}
696: \Delta^{qm}= \sqrt{<x^2>-<x>^2}
697: \end{equation}
698: with $ <x^2>=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i}x_{i,1}^2\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert^2$ and
699: $<x>^2=(\frac{1}{N}\sum_i x_{i,1} \vert\psi_{i,1}\vert^2)^2$, or
700: \item a definition using the half-maximum of $\psi\psi^{*}$:
701: \begin{equation}
702: \Delta^{1/2}=x_{1/2}^{+}-x_{1/2}^{-}
703: \end{equation}
704: where $x_{1/2}^{+} > x_{max}$ and $x_{1/2}^{-} < x_{max}$ denote
705: the two $x$-values for which
706: $\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert\sp2(x_{1/2}^{+})=\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert\sp2(x_{1/2}^{-})
707: =(\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert\sp2)_{max}/2$.
708: \end{itemize}
709:
710: Our results for the height, position and width
711: of the soliton as a function of $\beta_1\equiv\beta$ after $t=26.4$ sec are
712: shown in Fig.s 1(a), (b), (c), (d) for three different values of the
713: coupling $\chi_1\equiv\chi$. From these figures we see that
714: the soliton moves quicker with the decreasing of $\beta$.
715: Moreover, the height of the soliton's maximum decreases with
716: the decreasing of $\beta$, while at the same time the soliton gets
717: broader as can be seen from Fig.s 1(c) and 1(d).
718: Comparing Fig.s 1(c) and 1(d) it is also clear that the qualitative
719: results from the
720: two different expressions for the width are in good agreement with
721: each other, even though the ``quantum mechanical"
722: expression takes into account all $\psi_{i,1}$ for
723: $i \leq 40$ along the chain.
724:
725: For $\beta > 10$,
726: the excitation is completely trapped at its initial position
727: $\psi_{1,1}=1$. This can be explained by noting
728: that for large $\beta$, the $\psi$ field equation essentially
729: decouples from the chain positions. For $\beta < 1$ it spreads over the chain with an oscillating
730: behaviour of $\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert\sp2$. This is already noticeable for $\beta$s slightly
731: larger
732: than this value, where the soliton maximum decreases as it moves along the chain.
733: For the reasons above, we can only calculate the
734: maxima of the soliton etc. for the interval $\beta$ $\epsilon$ $[1:10]$.
735:
736: It had already been noticed in \cite{Gai2} that the soliton exists only for $2.5 < \chi < 3.5$. We find the
737: same in our simulations with the initial excitation
738: being trapped at its initial position
739: for $\chi > 3.5$ and being completely destroyed for $\chi < 2.5$. Thus we have chosen
740: $\chi=2.8$, $=3.0$ and $=3.2$ to investigate
741: the dependence on this parameter. Clearly, as seen from
742: Fig. 1(a), the soliton moves faster as $\chi$ decreases. Moreover, its height
743: decreases with decreasing $\chi$ (at least comparing the results for $\chi=3.2$ and $\chi=2.8$).
744: The curve for $\chi=3.0$ is not very conclusive; however, we believe that this is due to
745: the quadratic approximation we have used.
746: Both methods of computing the width of the soliton again give the same qualitative result
747: that the width decreases with increasing $\chi$. Thus the soliton is ``sharper" for larger values of
748: $\chi$ as could have been expected.
749:
750: Following \cite{lomdahl}, we have further studied the correlation between
751: the position of the soliton and the average displacement of the site $i$ given by~:
752: \begin{equation}
753: \delta_{i+1}-\delta_{i-1}=\sqrt{dx_{i+1,1}^2+dy_{i+1,1}^2+dz_{i+1,1}^2}-
754: \sqrt{dx_{i-1,1}^2+dy_{i-1,1}^2+dz_{i-1,1}^2}
755: \end{equation}
756: where $dx_{i,1}$, $dy_{i,1}$ and $dz_{i,1}$ are the displacements
757: from the initial position
758: of the site $i$ in the $x$, $y$ and $z$ directions. For two
759: typical examples with $\chi=3.2$, $\beta=5$ and $\beta=10$, respectively,
760: with all other values given as before, we show $\delta_i$ as well as
761: $\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert\sp2$ in Fig.s 2 (a) and 2 (b).
762: Clearly there is a correlation between these two quantities in the sense
763: that the maximum of $\vert\psi_{i,1}\vert\sp2$ is located in the region
764: where $\delta_i$ has a local minimum.
765: %In the region that the soliton structure
766: %has travelled through from the initial excitation at $i=0$, ``background" noise
767: %is present that influences the displacement from the initial position
768: %of the sites.
769: Of course, the soliton movement generates also some ``background" noise
770: which influences the displacement of the sites from their initial position.
771: The minimum of the displacement at the left end of the chain
772: can be attributed to the fact that we have introduced an initial displacement of
773: the chain in both the $y$ and $z$ directions.
774:
775:
776:
777:
778:
779: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
780: \section{Two chains}
781: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
782: We have performed several studies of a two chain system.
783: In each case we have originally placed two chains along the $x\ge 0$ axis, one of them at $y=0$, the other at $y=1$ (with $z=0$). Such a
784: configuration does not depend on $z$ and this symmetry is preserved by the
785: equations of motion. Hence, to see any effects like folding,
786: we have chosen to break the symmetry explicitly by
787: displacing, initially, the first two links of the first chain in the
788: $z$ direction by: $z_{1,1}=0.2$ and $z_{2,1}=0.1$. We have also used other values for this displacement but we have found our results not
789: to be too sensitive to the initial values of this displacement (as long
790: as it was nonzero).
791:
792: Then we have considered several initial conditions for the $\psi_{ij}$ fields.
793: In particular we have performed many simulations with $\psi_{12,1}=1$ (and all
794: others are zero), or with $\psi_{12,1}=0.95$, $\psi_{13,1}=i0.3$ and all other
795: vanishing.
796:
797: We have performed these simulations for many values of $\beta_j$ and
798: $\chi_j$. For the other parameters we have used $\sigma_1=\sigma_2=3000$,
799: $a_1=a_2=\kappa_1=\kappa_2=1$, $\delta_1=\delta_2=\delta_{12}=100$,
800: $d_1=d_2=d_{12}=0.6$ and $\gamma=2,\, d=0.5,\, \alpha=1.8$.
801:
802:
803: At first this evolution is very fast, then it slows down and after a while
804: it approaches the final configuration exponentially slowly. During the
805: evolution at first the changes of the positions of the chains are clearly
806: visible, then become hardly noticeable and finally the chains look as
807: if they were essentially static.
808: The $\psi$ fields still evolve but even their evolution is not very
809: dramatic.
810: Having reached this stage we are reasonably confident that our
811: configurations are not very different from the final
812: asymptotic lowest energy configuration.
813: In fact, in each case, to be absolutely certain that we are well ``beyond''
814: any transient effects, we have run each of our simulations over
815: periods of several months of CPU time on various SUN workstations or PCs.
816: Thus we are ready to present our results. They are somewhat qualitative.
817:
818: We have preformed several simulations (for a range of values of
819: $\chi_j$ (from 2 to 9) and for various values of $\beta_j$ (from 1.5 to 2.5).
820:
821: All the simulations have shown a localised (soliton-like) behaviour
822: of the $\psi_{ij}$
823: fields, i.e. the effects on $\psi_{ij}$ fields were reasonably well localised. This localisation
824: concerns both chains and it
825: depends crucially on the values of $\chi_j$. For larger values (say $\chi_j=6.4$)
826: we end up with a well defined soliton-like peak (clearly visible
827: when you add the two chains) oscillating (relatively little) in size.
828: Like in the case of a single chain the soliton moves and its speed depends
829: on $\beta_j$. For larger values of $\chi_j$ the soliton is narrower and
830: so more sharply defined while for smaller values it is more spread out.
831: For $\chi_j=3.2$ one can still identify a clearly localised structure
832: but whether this structure should be called a soliton remains to be decided.
833:
834: We have found that the dynamics of the chains themselves depends
835: strongly on the soliton structure. For the case of small $\chi_j$ and thus
836: spread out $\vert\psi_{ij}\vert\sp2$, the chains get very much deformed
837: (at least over short periods of time) in the sense
838: that they have large local curvature. For sharp solitons
839: however, i.e. large $\chi_j$, the behaviour of the chains is very similar
840: to that observed in the one chain model. Namely, the chains change their
841: shape very little and remain more or less straight.
842:
843: We show a typical example of the minimal energy configuration
844: in Fig.~3. This is for $\beta_1=\beta_2=2.0$ and $\chi_1=\chi_2=4.0$.
845: Note that
846: this example corresponds
847: to a spread out $\vert\psi_{ij}\vert\sp2$.
848: Clearly, the chains have large local curvature for
849: $0 \le x \le 60$. Looking at one chain by itself, it seems that
850: loops have formed. Especially the red-coloured chain has formed a large
851: one. Moreover, at small $x$, the two chains have overlapped each other
852: in the $x$-$y$-plane and it seems like they are winding around each other.
853: This winding also happens in the $\alpha$-helix, the feature that appears
854: e.g. in DNA.
855:
856:
857: Thus our results suggest that solitons exist when the chains are
858: little deformed; while the large deformations of the chains correspond
859: to more spread out $\vert\psi_{ij}\vert\sp2$ fields. Moreover, we have not
860: observed any behaviour which suggests any ``folding up of the chains".
861: At this stage our results are a little qualitative. We hope to present
862: a more quantative discussion of our results and an analysis of the
863: dependence on $\beta$ and $\kappa$
864: in the next paper (sometime in the future) \cite{hz}.
865:
866:
867:
868:
869: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
870: %\section{Numerical Solutions}
871: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
872:
873:
874: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
875: \section{Conclusions and Outlook}
876: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
877: In this paper we report our first results on
878: the dynamics of biopolymer chains. While the authors of \cite{Gai2}
879: put emphasis on the dynamics of a chain itself (they studied one chain)
880: and found that for suitable choices of the coupling constants
881: the chain folds up, we have been mainly intersted in the dynamics
882: of the soliton moving along the chain. We have found that the soliton
883: exists only for very specific choices of the coupling constants.
884: We have studied numerically
885: how the speed, height and width of the soliton depend on
886: the coupling constants. Morever, we have confirmed the
887: existence of a direct
888: correlation between the average displacement of the sites and the
889: location of the soliton.
890:
891: For the case of the two chain model, we have introduced
892: suitable generalisations of the energy transfer coefficients
893: and the rigidity potential. Moreover, we have added an
894: attractive interaction potential
895: between the chains inspired by the Morse potential. We have found again
896: that the existence of the soliton depends crucially on the
897: non-linearity parameter $\chi$. However, while for one chain
898: the soliton is either completely spread over the chain or sharpely localised,
899: it seems that in the case of two chains there exist a sort of intermediate
900: situation. In this, a number of small peaks in $\vert\psi\vert\sp2$ exist that
901: travel up and down the chain. Remarkably, the dynamics of the chains
902: themselves becomes only interesting in this latter case. We find features
903: like the formation of loops and the winding of the two chains around each
904: other which also happens in biological systems like e.g. DNA.
905: We plan to report a more detailed quantative analysis of the two-chain
906: model in a future publication \cite{hz}.
907:
908: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
909: \section{Acknowledgement}
910: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
911:
912:
913: WJZ wants to thank Y. Kivshar and S.F. Mingaleev for drawing his
914: attention to this topic and showing him papers \cite{Gai} and \cite{Gai2}.\\
915: We also want to thank B. Piette, R. Ward, L. Brizhik and A. Eremko for their
916: interest.\\
917: BH has been supported by an EPSRC grant.
918:
919:
920:
921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
922:
923: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
924: \bibliographystyle{plain}
925: \bibitem{Gai}
926: Yu. B. Gaididei, S. F. Mingaleev and P. J. Christiansen,
927: {\it Phys. Rev. E} {\bf 62}, 2000, pp. R53-56.
928: \bibitem{Abl}
929: {see eg M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, {\it Solitons, Nonlinear
930: Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering}, 1991, CUP.}
931: \bibitem{Gai2}
932: {S. F. Mingaleev, Yu. B. Gaididei, P. J. Christiansen and
933: Yu. S. Kivshar, {\it Europhys. Lett.}{\bf 59}, 2002, pp. 403-409. }
934: \bibitem{davy} {A. S. Davydov, {\it Solitons in molecular systems}, Reidel, Dordrecht,
935: 1985; A. Scott, {\it Phys. Rep. } {\bf 217}, 1992, pp. 1-67 }
936: \bibitem{peyrard} { {\it Nonlinear excitations in Biomolecules}, Ed.: M. Peyrard,
937: Springer, Berlin, 1996.}
938: \bibitem{Pey}
939: {M. Peyrard and A. R. Bishop, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}{\bf 62}, 1989, pp. 2755-2758;
940: J. J. L. Ting and M. Peyrard, {\it Phys. Rev. E} {\bf 53}, 1996, pp. 1011-1020.}
941: \bibitem{morse}{P. M. Morse, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 34}, 1929, pp. 57-64.}
942: \bibitem{lomdahl} P. S. Lomdahl, {\it Soliton models of protein dynamics}
943: in {\it Soliton theory: a survey of results}, Ed. A. P. Fordy, Manchester
944: University Press, 1990, pp. 209-232.
945: \bibitem{hz} B. Hartmann and W. J. Zakrzewski,
946: {\it Solitons and deformed lattices II}, in preparation.
947:
948:
949:
950: \end{thebibliography}
951:
952: %%%%%%%%%%6 FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
953: \newpage
954: \begin{fixy}{0}
955: \begin{figure}
956: \centering
957: \epsfysize=13cm
958: \mbox{\epsffile{hz2.eps}}
959: \caption{\label{Fig.1(a)} The dependence of the position of the soliton's
960: maximum at site $i$ is shown as function of $\beta_1\equiv\beta$ after
961: $t=26.4$ sec for three different values of $\chi$. }
962: \end{figure}
963:
964: \begin{figure}
965: \centering
966: \epsfysize=13cm
967: \mbox{\epsffile{hz3.eps}}
968: \caption{\label{Fig.1(b)}The height of the soliton's maximum
969: $(\psi\psi^{*})_{max}$ after $t=26.4$ sec is shown as function of
970: $\beta_1\equiv\beta$ for three different values of $\chi$. }
971: \end{figure}
972:
973: \begin{figure}
974: \centering
975: \epsfysize=13cm
976: \mbox{\epsffile{hz4.eps}}
977: \caption{\label{Fig.1(c)}The ``half-maximum" width $\Delta ^{1/2}$ of
978: the soliton after $t=26.4$ sec
979: is given as function of
980: $\beta_1\equiv\beta$ for three different values of $\chi$. }
981: \end{figure}
982: \begin{figure}
983: \centering
984: \epsfysize=13cm
985: \mbox{\epsffile{hz5.eps}}
986: \caption{\label{Fig.1(d)}The ``quantum-mechanical"
987: width $\Delta ^{qm}$ of the soliton after $t=26.4$ sec
988: is given as function of
989: $\beta_1\equiv\beta$ for three different values of $\chi$. }
990: \end{figure}
991: \end{fixy}
992: \begin{fixy}{0}
993: \begin{figure}
994: \centering
995: \epsfysize=13cm
996: \mbox{\epsffile{hz1.eps}}
997: \caption{\label{Fig.2 (a)}The average displacement $\delta_i$ of the site
998: $i$ as well
999: as $\psi_{i,1}\psi_{i,1}^*\equiv\psi\psi^*$ is shown as function of
1000: $i$ for $\beta=5$ after $t=36.6$ sec. }
1001: \end{figure}
1002: \begin{figure}
1003: \centering
1004: \epsfysize=13cm
1005: \mbox{\epsffile{hz6.eps}}
1006: \caption{\label{Fig.2 (b)}The average displacement $\delta_i$ of the site $i$ as well
1007: as $\psi_{i,1}\psi_{i,1}^*\equiv\psi\psi^*$ is shown as
1008: function of $i$ for $\beta=10$ after $t=24.6$ sec. }
1009: \end{figure}
1010: \end{fixy}
1011: \begin{fixy}{-1}
1012: \begin{figure}
1013: \centering
1014: \epsfysize=13cm
1015: \mbox{\epsffile{hz7.eps}}
1016: \caption{\label{Fig. 3} The minimal energy configuration of the two chains
1017: for $\beta_1=\beta_2=2.0$ and $\chi_1=\chi_2=4.0$ is shown in $x$-$y$-$z$-space.
1018: The two dashed lines at $z=-0.5$ represent the $x$-$y$-plots ($z\equiv 0$)
1019: of the chains. }
1020: \end{figure}
1021: \end{fixy}
1022: \end{document}
1023:
1024:
1025:
1026:
1027:
1028:
1029:
1030:
1031: