1:
2: \documentclass[prb,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{ Small-polaron hopping conductivity in bilayer manganite
7: La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ }
8: \author{X. J. Chen, C. L. Zhang, and C. C. Almasan}
9: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242 }
10: \author{J. S. Gardner}
11: \affiliation{NRC-NPMR, Chalk River Laboratory, Chalk River ON KOJ 1PO, Canada}
12: \author{J. L. Sarrao}
13: \affiliation{Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 }
14: \date{\today}
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17: We report anisotropic resistivity measurements on a La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$
18: single crystal over a temperature $T$ range from 2 to 400 K and in magnetic fields $H$
19: up to 14 T. For $T\geq 218$ K, the temperature dependence of the zero-field in-plane
20: $\rho_{ab}(T)$ resistivity obeys the adiabatic small polaron hopping mechanism, while
21: the out-of-plane $\rho_{c}(T)$ resistivity can be ascribed by an Arrhenius law with the
22: same activation energy. Considering the magnetic character of the polarons and the close
23: correlation between the resistivity and magnetization, we developed a model which allows
24: the determination of $\rho_{ab,c}(H,T)$. The excellent agreement of the calculations with
25: the measurements indicates that small polarons play an essential role in the electrical
26: transport properties in the paramagnetic phase of bilayer manganites.
27: \end{abstract}
28: \pacs{75.30.Vn, 72.20.-i, 71.38.Ht }
29: \maketitle
30:
31: Elucidating the nature of the paramagnetic-insulating state is crucial to understanding the
32: correlation between the electrical transport and magnetic properties of $3d$ transition-metal
33: manganese-oxides. Most previous studies of the manganite perovskites
34: R$_{1-x}$A$_{x}$MnO$_{3}$ films (R$=$rare-earth ion and A$=$divalent ion) reveal that the
35: high temperature $T$ resistivity follows the adiabatic small polaron transport.\cite{worl,tere}
36: The effect of an applied magnetic field $H$ on the resistivity and thermal expansion above
37: the Curie temperature $T_{c}$ indicates that the polarons have magnetic character.\cite{dete}
38: The existence of polarons in the paramagnetic phase of bilayer manganites
39: La$_{2-2x}$Sr$_{1+2x}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ ($x=0.4$) has been supported by measurements
40: of Raman spectra,\cite{rome} x-ray and neutron scattering,\cite{vasi} optical conductivity
41: spectra,\cite{ishi,hjlee} and thermoelectric power.\cite{zhou} However, there are no
42: magneto-transport measurements which support the presence of polarons in the paramagnetic
43: state of these materials.
44:
45: Recently, bilayer manganites La$_{2-2x}$Sr$_{1+2x}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ have attracted
46: considerable attention since: (i) the physical properties along the $ab$ plane and $c$
47: axis are strongly anisotropic, which should yield important insight into the colossal
48: magnetoresistance (CMR) effect, (ii) they can be viewed as an infinite array of
49: ferromagnetic metal (FM)-insulator (I)-FM junctions,\cite{kimura2} (iii) both the in-plane
50: and out-of-plane magnetoresistivities are sensitive to even small magnetic fields,
51: \cite{morit} pointing to their possible device applications, (iv) they display a rich
52: magnetic phase diagram which depends strongly on the doping level $x$,\cite{hirota} and
53: (v) they are good candidates for systematic investigations of the electrical resistivity
54: in the paramagnetic regime over a broad $T$ range due to their relative lower $T_{c}$
55: compared to the manganite perovskites.
56:
57: The understanding of electrical transport in the paramagnetic state and in the presence of
58: an applied magnetic field and of the enhanced CMR effect in bilayer manganites is still
59: incomplete and challenging. It has been found that the resistivity is
60: semiconducting-like in the high $T$ paramagnetic state. On cooling, it reaches a
61: maximum followed by a metallic behavior. When an external magnetic field is applied, this
62: metal-insulator transition shifts to higher temperatures, the ferromagnetic transition
63: broadens significantly, and a large reduction of electrical resistivity appears. It is highly
64: desirable to understand the mechanism responsible for this charge dissipation and to develop
65: a quantitative description of these behaviors. This is also essential to the understanding of
66: the microscopic origin for the CMR effect.
67:
68: In this paper we address the above issues through magnetotransport measurements in a
69: La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ single crystal. Our data show that the adiabatic
70: small polaron hopping dominates the electrical transport of this bilayer manganite.
71: Specifically, all the main characteristics of charge transport, $i.e.$, the $T$ and
72: $H$ dependence of both the in-plane $\rho_{ab}$ and out-of-plane $\rho_{c}$
73: resistivities, the resistivity cusp, its shift to higher $T$ with increasing $H$, and the
74: decrease of the resistivity with increasing $H$, are extremely well reproduced by our
75: analysis based on the small polaron hopping, the existence of ferromagnetic clusters in
76: the paramagnetic phase, and the close correlation between the resistivity and magnetization.
77:
78: Single crystals of La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ were melt grown in a floating-zone
79: optical image furnace in flowing oxygen. The crystal used here was cleaved from a boule
80: that was grown at a rate of 4 mm/h and had the lowest impurity phase content.\cite{moreno}
81: We used a multiterminal lead configuration \cite{jiang} for the simultaneous measurement
82: of $\rho_{ab}$ and $\rho_{c}$ on the same single crystal, over temperatures from 2 to 400 K
83: and magnetic fields up to 14 T applied along the $ab$ planes. The electrical current was
84: always applied along one of the crystal faces, while the top and bottom face voltages were
85: measured simultaneously.
86:
87: Figure 1 shows $\rho_{ab}(T)$ and $\rho_{c}(T)$ measured in zero field and in several
88: magnetic fields up to 14 T. The trends followed by these data are in good agreement with
89: previous reports,\cite{morit} though our single crystal has lower resistivities. The
90: metal-insulator transition temperature $T_{MI}=130$ K is found to be slightly higher
91: than $T_{c}=125$ K.\cite{moreno} We also found $T_{MI}^{ab}\simeq T_{MI}^{c}$ in
92: the magnetic fields studied. Both $\rho_{ab}$ and $\rho_{c}$ decrease with increasing
93: $H$, the cusp becomes less pronounced, and $T_{MI}$ shifts to higher temperatures.
94: Recently, we found that both $\rho_{ab}$ and $\rho_{c}$ follow a $T^{9/2}$ dependence
95: in the metallic regime (50 K$\leq T \leq$ 110 K) and both the in-plane $\sigma_{ab}$
96: and out-of-plane $\sigma_{c}$ conductivities obey a $T^{1/2}$ dependence at even lower
97: $T$ ($T<50$ K), which are consistent with the two-magnon scattering and weak localization
98: effect, respectively.\cite{zhang}
99:
100: \begin{figure}[t]
101: \begin{center}
102: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figure1.eps}
103: \end{center}
104: \caption{In-plane $\rho_{ab}$ and out-of-plane $\rho_{c}$ resistivities as a function of
105: temperature $T$ of a La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ single crystal for various magnetic
106: fields. }
107: \end{figure}
108:
109: The resistivity as a result of hopping of adiabatic small polarons is given by\cite{emin}
110: \begin{equation}
111: \rho=CT\exp\left(\frac{E_{A}}{k_{B}T}\right)~~.
112: \end{equation}
113: Here $k_{B}$ is Boltzmann's constant and $E_{A}$ is the activation energy. In the adiabatic
114: limit, the electron motion is assumed to be much faster than the ionic motion of the lattice.
115: In the approximation that all correlations except on-site Coulomb repulsion are ignored, one
116: can express the prefactor $C$ as \cite{worl,raff}
117: \begin{equation}
118: C=\frac{k_{B}\Omega}{x(1-x)e^{2}a^{2}\nu}~~.
119: \end{equation}
120: Above $\Omega$ is the unit-cell volume, $x$ is the fraction concentration of occupied sites,
121: $a$ is the site to site hopping distance, and $\nu$ is the frequency of the longitudinal
122: optical phonons.
123:
124: \begin{figure}[b]
125: \begin{center}
126: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figure2.eps}
127: \end{center}
128: \caption{Plot of $\ln(\rho_{ab}/T)$ and resistive anisotropy $\rho_c/ \rho_{ab}$, measured in
129: zero field, vs $1000/T$ for a La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ single crystal. }
130: \end{figure}
131:
132: To examine the polaronic nature of the high-temperature resistivity of
133: La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$, we plot in Fig. 2, $\ln(\rho_{ab}/T)$ vs $1000/T$ for
134: $T\geq140$ K and in zero field. The adiabatic polaron model of Eq. (1) gives a convincing
135: fit to the in-plane resistivity data for $T\geq 218$ K, with a zero-field activation
136: energy $E_{A}^{0}=93.8$ meV and a prefactor $C=2.0\times 10^{-6}$ $\Omega$ cm/K. The fact
137: that Eq. (1) is valid for $T>\Theta_{D}/2$ indicates that the Debye temperature $\Theta_{D}
138: \approx 430$ K in the present bilayer compound. Indeed, recent specific heat measurements
139: have shown $\Theta_{D}=425$ K in this compound.\cite{osero} The experimentally determined
140: $E_{A}^{0}$ of 93.8 meV from the above resistivity data is much larger the activation energy
141: $E_{S}$ of 18 meV from thermoelectric power measurements.\cite{naka} This large difference
142: comes from the thermally activated nature of the hopping transport at high temperatures and
143: is a characteristic signature of polaronic transport.
144:
145: Based on the experimentally determined prefactor $C$ along with the doping level $x=0.4$
146: and the lattice parameters $a=3.87\times 10^{-8}$ cm and $c=2.0\times 10^{-7}$ cm taken
147: from neutron diffraction measurements,\cite{jfmitc} we estimated a characteristic frequency
148: $\nu=2.24\times 10^{14}$ Hz for La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ by using Eq. (2). This
149: value is in good agreement with the frequencies of phonon peaks in optical conductivity spectra,
150: \cite{ishi,hjlee} which provides strong evidence in favor of small polaronic transport in
151: the $ab$ plane of bilayer manganites.
152:
153: Figure 2 shows also the plot of the resistive anisotropy $\rho_{c}/\rho_{ab}$ vs $1000/T$ for
154: La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ for $T\geq 140$ K and zero field. Note that, for $150\leq
155: T \leq 400$ K in zero field, there is the following relationship between resistivities:
156: $\gamma \equiv \rho_{c}/\rho_{ab} = A+B/T$, with $A=-14.8$ and $B=2.63\times 10^{4}$ K. Since
157: $\rho_{ab}(T)$ is well described by Eq. (1) for $T\geq 218$ K, it follows that $\rho_{c}(T)$
158: is described by an Arrhenius-type behavior with the same activation energy $E_{A}$ as
159: $\rho_{ab}(T)$, if the preexponential factor $\gamma$ is taken into account. Hence,
160: \begin{equation}
161: \rho_{c}=C\gamma T\exp\left(\frac{E_{A}}{k_{B}T}\right)~~.
162: \end{equation}
163:
164: \begin{figure}[b]
165: \begin{center}
166: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figure3.eps}
167: \end{center}
168: \caption{ Temperature $T$ dependence of (a) the activation energy $E_{A}$, and calculated
169: (solid lines) and measured (open circles) (b) normalized in-plane resistivity $\rho_{ab}$ and
170: (c) normalized out-of-plane resistivity $\rho_{c}$ in a La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$
171: single crystal for various magnetic fields $H$. Inset: Value of mean number of spins per
172: cluster $D$ vs $T$. }
173: \end{figure}
174:
175: In the case of magnetic polarons, there is a magnetic exchange contribution to the activation
176: energy. In the presence of a magnetic field, the activation energy in Eqs. (1) and (3) has to
177: be replaced by
178: \begin{equation}
179: E_{A}=E_{A}^{0}(1-<\cos\theta_{ij}>)~~,
180: \end{equation}
181: where $\theta_{ij}$ is the angle between the spins of two Mn ion cores between which the
182: $e_{g}$ electron hops. If the azimuthal angle $\phi_{i}$ is randomly distributed and if
183: $\theta_{i}$, the angle the spins make with the applied field, is uncorrelated, then, by
184: averaging over $\phi_{i}$, it can be shown that $<\cos\theta_{ij}>=<\cos \theta_{i}>^{2}$.
185: \cite{viret} The local magnetization $M$ can also be expressed as a function of
186: $\theta_{i}$, $i.e.$, $M=M_{s}<\cos\theta_{i}>$, where $M_{s}$ is the saturation
187: magnetization. Then, Eq. (4) becomes
188: \begin{equation}
189: E_{A}=E_{A}^{0}\left[1-(\frac{M}{M_{s}})^{2}\right]~~.
190: \end{equation}
191: This equation shows that the magnetic field affects the activation energy through the
192: magnetization. At present, there is not an agreement on the theories proposed responsible
193: for the magnetic properties of manganites. It has been shown \cite{viret,bril,dion} that
194: the Brillouin function $B_{s}(\lambda)$ approximately provides a quantitative description
195: of the reduced magnetization $M/M_{s}$ observed experimentally. It is therefore reasonable
196: to take $M/M_{s}\simeq B_{s}(\lambda)$ with
197: \begin{equation}
198: B_{s}(\lambda)=\frac{2S+1}{2S}\coth\left(\frac{2S+1}{2S}\lambda\right)
199: -\frac{1}{2S}\coth\left(\frac{1}{2S}\lambda\right).
200: \end{equation}
201: Here $S$ is the average spin and the exchange coefficient and varies with doping as
202: $S=3/2+(1-x)/2$. An empirical model \cite{dion} is used to sort out the magnetic field and
203: temperature dependence of magnetization via the self-consistent equation
204: \begin{equation}
205: \lambda=\frac{\mu H}{k_{B}T}+3\frac{S}{S+1}\frac{T_{c}}{T}\frac{M}{M_{s}}~~,
206: \end{equation}
207: where the effective magnetic moment $\mu/\mu_{B}=gS$ with $\mu_{B}$ being the Bohr magneton
208: and $g$ being the gyromagnetic ratio.
209:
210: We note that, when using the mean-field expression for $M/M_{s}$ to analyze their measured
211: magnetization data of pseudocubic manganese-oxide perovskites, Sun $et$ $al.$ \cite{jzsun}
212: found that $\mu/\mu_{B}=gS$ should be replaced by $\mu/\mu_{B}=DgS$, where $D$ is the mean
213: number of spins per cluster. The ferromagnetic character in the paramagnetic phase of
214: La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ has already been revealed by magnetization measurements
215: \cite{moreno,pott} and other experiments.\cite{perr} Moreover, it was suggested \cite{dete}
216: that the size of the ferromagnetic clusters correlates with the magnetic correlation length
217: $\xi$, which increases slightly with decreasing temperature from the high-temperature
218: paramagnetic side and suddenly diverges at $T_{c}$.\cite{dete,sro3} Thus the temperature
219: dependence of $D$ should reflect this behavior. We determined $D(T)$ values from the
220: isothermal resistivity curves. The temperature dependence of $D(T)$ can be expressed as
221: $D=2.7+2^{-3/2}csch ^{3/2}((T-T_{c})/320)$, which is shown in the inset of Fig. 3(a).
222:
223: We calculated the $T$ and $H$ dependences of $E_{A}$ and $\rho_{ab,c}$ from Eqs. (5)-(7)
224: and from Eq. (1). $\rho_{c}(H,T)$ was then determined from the experimentally measured
225: anisotropy $\gamma (H,T)$. These results for magnetic fields of 1, 3, 6, 10, and 14 T are
226: shown in Figs. 3(a)--3(c) along with the experimental data of resistivities for comparison.
227: In these calculations, we took $g=2$, $S=1.8$ (valid for $x=0.4$), $T_{c}=125$ K, $E_{A}^{0}
228: = 93.8$ meV, and $C=2.0\times 10^{-6}$ $\Omega$ cm/K. There is a good agreement between the
229: calculated and experimental results in the paramagnetic state.
230:
231: As Fig. 3(a) shows, $E_{A}$ decreases slowly with decreasing $T$ and suddenly drops near
232: $T_{MI}$. This characteristic behavior is responsible for the resistivity cusp shown in
233: Figs. 3(b) and 3(c). With increasing magnetic field, $E_{A}$ is suppressed and its onset
234: shifts systematically to high temperatures. This is the origin of the decrease of the
235: resistivity as well as the shift of the resistivity cusp to higher $T$ with increasing $H$.
236:
237: In summary, the small polaron model and the existence of the ferromagnetic clusters in the
238: paramagnetic phase reproduce extremely well the $T$ and $H$ dependence of $\rho_{ab,c}$ for
239: bilayer manganite La$_{1.2}$Sr$_{1.8}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$. Moreover, the present model also
240: accounts for the resistivity cusp, its shift to higher $T$ with increasing $H$, and the
241: decrease of the resistivity with increasing $H$. Hence, this work provides direct evidence
242: of the presence of adiabatic small polarons in bilayer manganites and their essential role
243: in both the electrical transport and the CMR effect.
244:
245: This research was supported at KSU by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.
246: DMR-0102415. The work at LANL was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of
247: Energy.
248:
249: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
250:
251: \bibitem{worl} D. C. Worledge, G. Jeffrey Snyder, M. R. Beasley, T. H. Geballe, R. Hiskes,
252: and S. DiCarolis, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf80}, 5158 (1996).
253:
254: \bibitem{tere} J. M. De Teresa, K. D\"{o}rr, K. H. M\"{u}ller, L. Schultz, and R. I.
255: Chakalova, Phys. Rev. B {\bf58}, R5928 (1998).
256:
257: \bibitem{dete} J. M. De Teresa, M. R. Ibarra, P. A. Algarabel, C. Ritter, C. Marquina, J.
258: Blasco, J. Garc\'{i}a, A. del Moral, and Z. Arnold, Nature (London) {\bf386}, 256 (1997).
259:
260: \bibitem{rome} D. B. Romero, V. B. Podobedov, A. Weber, J. P. Rice, J. F. Mitchell, R. P.
261: Sharma, and H. D. Drew, Phys. Rev. B {\bf58}, R14 737 (1998).
262:
263: \bibitem{vasi} L. Vasiliu-Doloc, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, S. K. Sinha, J. W. Lynn, J. Mesot,
264: O. H. Seeck, G. Preosti, A. J. Fedro, and J. F. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf83}, 4393
265: (1999).
266:
267: \bibitem{ishi} T. Ishikawa, T. Kimura, T. Katsufuji, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B {\bf67}, R8079
268: (1998).
269:
270: \bibitem{hjlee} H. J. Lee, K. H. Kim, J. H. Jung, T. W. Noh, R. Sunyanarayanan, G. Dhalenne,
271: and A. Revcolevschi, Phys. Rev. B {\bf62}, 11 320 (2000).
272:
273: \bibitem{zhou} J.-S. Zhou, J. B. Goodenough, and J. F. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. B {\bf58}, R579
274: (1998).
275:
276: \bibitem{kimura2} T. Kimura, A. Asamitsu, Y. Tomioka, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett.
277: {\bf79}, 3720 (1997).
278:
279: \bibitem{morit} Y. Moritomo, A. Asamitsu, H. Kuwahara, and Y. Tokura, Nature (London)
280: {\bf380}, 141 (1996).
281:
282: \bibitem{hirota} K. Hirota, Y. Moritomo, H. Fujioka, M. Kubota, H. Yoshizawa, and Y. Endoh,
283: Jpn. J. Phys. Soc. {\bf67}, L3380 (1998).
284:
285: \bibitem{moreno} N. O. Moreno, P. G. Pagliuso, C. Rettori, J. S. Gardner, J. L. Sarrao, J. D.
286: Thompson, D. L. Huber, J. F. Mitchell, J. J. Martinez, and S. B. Oseroff, Phys. Rev. B
287: {\bf63}, 174413 (2001).
288:
289: \bibitem{jiang} C. N. Jiang, A. R. Baldwin, G. A. Levin, T. Stein, C. C. Almasan, D. A.
290: Gajewski, S. H. Han, and M. B. Maple, Phys. Rev. B {\bf55}, R3390 (1997).
291:
292: \bibitem{zhang} C. L. Zhang, X. J. Chen, C. C. Almasan, J. S. Gardner, and J. L. Sarrao,
293: Phys. Rev. B {\bf65}, 134439 (2002).
294:
295: \bibitem{emin} D. Emin and T. Holstein, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) {\bf53}, 439 (1969).
296:
297: \bibitem{raff} R. Raffaelle, H. U. Anderson, D. M. Sparlin, and P. E. Parris, Phys. Rev. B
298: {\bf43}, 7991 (1991).
299:
300: \bibitem{osero} S. B. Oseroff, private communication.
301:
302: \bibitem{naka} S. Nakamae, D. Colson, A. Forget, I. Legros, J.-F. Marucco, C. Ayache, and M.
303: Ocio, Phys. Rev. B {\bf63}, 092407 (2001).
304:
305: \bibitem{jfmitc} J. F. Mitchell, D. N. Argyriou, J. D. Jorgensen, D. G. Hinks, C. D. Potter,
306: and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. B {\bf55}, 63 (1997).
307:
308: \bibitem{viret} M. Viret, L. Ranno, and J. M. D. Coey, Phys. Rev. B {\bf55}, 8067 (1997).
309:
310: \bibitem{bril} see, M. Oretzki and P. Gaunt, Can. J. Phys. {\bf48}, 346 (1970); K. Kubo and
311: N. Ohata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf33}, 21 (1972); G. Jakob, W. Westerburg, F. Martin, and H.
312: Adrian, Phys. Rev. B {\bf58}, 14 966 (1998); P. Wagner, I. Gordon, L. Trappeniers, J.
313: Vanacken, F. Herlach, V. V. Moshchalkov, and Y. Bruynseraede, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf81}, 3980
314: (1998).
315:
316: \bibitem{dion} G. F. Dionne, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf79}, 5172 (1996).
317:
318: \bibitem{jzsun} J. Z. Sun, L. Krusin-Elbaum, A. Gupta, G. Xiao, and S. S. P. Parkin, Appl.
319: Phys. Lett. {\bf69}, 1002 (1996).
320:
321: \bibitem{pott} C. D. Potter, M. Swiatek, S. D. Bader, D. N. Argyriou, J. F. Mitchell, D. J.
322: Miller, D. G. Hinks, and J. D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf57}, 72 (1998).
323:
324: \bibitem{perr} T. G. Perring, G. Aeppli, Y. Moritomo, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett.
325: {\bf78}, 3197 (1997).
326:
327: \bibitem{sro3} S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, L. Vasiliu-Doloc, J. W. Lynn, S. K. Sinha, and J. F.
328: Mitchell, cond-mat/9909059 (1999).
329:
330: \end{thebibliography}
331:
332: \end{document}
333: