1:
2: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,prb,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
3:
4: \usepackage{epsfig}% Include figure files
5: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
7: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Static impurities in the kagome lattice: dimer freezing and mutual
12: repulsion}
13:
14: \author{S. Dommange}
15: \affiliation{Institut Romand de Recherche Num\'erique en Physique des
16: Materiaux (IRRMA), PPH--Ecublens, CH--1015 Lausanne, Switzerland}
17:
18: \author{M. Mambrini}
19: \affiliation{Laboratoire de Physique Th\'eorique, Universit\'e Paul Sabatier,
20: FRE 2603, F--31062 Toulouse Cedex, France}
21:
22: \author{B. Normand}
23: \affiliation{D\'epartement de Physique, Universit\'e de Fribourg,
24: CH--1700 Fribourg, Switzerland}
25:
26: \author{F. Mila}
27: \affiliation{Institut de Physique Th\'eorique, Universit\'e de Lausanne,
28: CH--1015 Lausanne, Switzerland}
29:
30: \date{\today}
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33:
34: We consider the effects of doping the $S$ = 1/2 kagome lattice with
35: static impurities. We demonstrate that impurities lower the number
36: of low--lying singlet states, induce dimer--dimer correlations
37: of considerable spatial extent, and do not generate free spin degrees
38: of freedom. Most importantly, they experience a highly unconventional
39: mutual repulsion as a direct consequence of the strong spin frustration.
40: These properties are illustrated by exact diagonalization, and reproduced
41: to semi--quantitative accuracy within a dimer resonating--valence--bond
42: description which affords access to longer length scales. We calculate
43: the local magnetization induced by doped impurities, and consider its
44: implications for nuclear magnetic resonance measurements on known kagome
45: systems.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \pacs{75.10.Jm, 75.30.Hx, 76.60.-k}
50:
51: \maketitle
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The kagome geometry (Fig.~1) presents one of the most highly frustrated
56: quantum spin systems achievable in two dimensions (2d) with only
57: nearest--neighbor Heisenberg interactions. The $S$ = 1/2 kagome lattice
58: has been found to have a spin--liquid ground state,\cite{rce} whose
59: ultra--short spin--spin correlation lengths are effectively those of a dimer
60: liquid,\cite{rle,rze} and whose excitation spectrum\cite{rlblps} shows a
61: manifold containing an extremely large number of low--lying singlets.\cite{rm}
62: These properties are reproduced very well by a short--range
63: resonating--valence--bond (RVB) description,\cite{rmm} based in fact
64: only on nearest--neighbor dimer formation (Fig.~1).
65:
66: On the theoretical level, a similar degree of frustration is found only
67: in quantum dimer models,\cite{rrk,rms} which have also been considered
68: recently in the kagome geometry,\cite{rmsp} and in models containing
69: higher--order spin terms and multiple--spin exchange.\cite{rmblw}
70: Experimentally, a variety of materials displaying the kagome structure
71: is known to exist, although to date none have been found which contain
72: an ideal, 2d, vacancy--free system of spins $S = 1/2$. These
73: include the jarosites (H$_3$O)Fe$_3$(OH)$_6$(SO$_4$)$_2$,\cite{rwhrs}
74: KFe$_3$(OH)$_6$(SO$_4$)$_2$, and KCr$_3$(OH)$_6$(SO$_4$)$_2$\cite{rkea,rlea}
75: and the volborthite Cu$_3$V$_2$O$_7$(OH)$_2$.H$_2$O.\cite{rhhkntkt}
76: The best characterized of these compounds is the magnetoplombite
77: SrCr$_{9p}$Ga$_{12-9p}$O$_{19}$ (SCGO),\cite{rlmcmombm} in which some of
78: the $S$ = 3/2 Cr$^{3+}$ ions form approximately 2d kagome planes. However,
79: because in this case the ideal stoichiometry ($p = 0$) remains unachievable,
80: discussion of the influence of static (and also, for Ga$^{3+}$, spinless)
81: impurities represents an important issue.
82:
83: \begin{figure}[t!]
84: \medskip
85: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kknnc.eps,width=5.5cm,angle=0}}
86: \medskip
87: \caption{The kagome lattice. Thick black lines represent an arbitrarily
88: chosen covering by nearest--neighbor dimers formed between $S = 1/2$ spins
89: on each lattice site. }
90: \label{fig:1}
91: \end{figure}
92:
93: Studies of static vacancies in spin liquids have tended to focus on
94: the question of induced free spin degrees of freedom.\cite{rlmgmdhlr}
95: In systems such as spin ladders, and also for the 2d square
96: lattice,\cite{rbhsl} the total energy appears to decrease as such holes
97: in the spin background are made to approach each other, implying an
98: effective mutual attraction. It is generally believed that in an RVB
99: description of the ground state the minimal disruption of the wave
100: function, and thus the most favorable energy state, occurs when holes
101: occupy adjacent sites, thus generating a simple pairing mechanism for
102: mobile dopants. The issue of impurites in frustrated magnets has received
103: less attention, and appears to be more involved: it has been proposed that
104: an absence of induced free spins corresponds to deconfined, spinon-like
105: excitations.\cite{rsv} Consideration of the problem for the 1d frustrated
106: chain,\cite{rnm} which provides an example with no free spins localized
107: around the vacancies, suggests the importance of degenerate singlets in
108: the ground--state manifold. This result indicates that the kagome geometry
109: presents the most probable candidate for exotic behavior\cite{rs} as a
110: consequence of strong frustration in 2d.
111:
112: In this study we investigate the effects of static impurities in the kagome
113: lattice. We find that, despite the very short intrinsic spin--spin
114: correlation lengths, dimer--dimer correlations develop over considerable
115: distances in the presence of dopants. Further, we show that there is no
116: evidence for free local moments induced around impurity sites, and that
117: a highly unusual effective repulsive interaction arises between such
118: holes in the spin background.
119:
120: In Sec.~II we provide an outline of the numerical and anaytical methods
121: to be employed, and discuss the fundamental effects on the excitation
122: spectrum of doping by spinless impurities. In Sec.~III we consider the
123: case of one hole in an odd--site cluster, demonstrating ``dimer freezing''
124: in the spin--spin correlation functions and dimer--dimer correlations of
125: anomalously long range. The induced magnetizations in the spin sectors
126: $S$ = 1 and higher are used to illustrate the consequences for nuclear
127: magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. Sec.~IV presents spin--spin
128: correlation functions which characterize the situation with two impurities,
129: supplemented by total--energy analyses quantifying the novel repulsive
130: interaction between the holes which emerges from this study. Sec.~V
131: contains further discussion and our conclusions.
132:
133: \section{Elimination of singlet states and absence of localized spins}
134:
135: \subsection{Exact Diagonalization}
136:
137: By ``impurity'' we refer henceforth to nonmagnetic impurities. The
138: techniques we employ are based primarily on numerical calculations for
139: small clusters with periodic boundary conditions chosen as symmetrically
140: as possible. Specifically, we perform exact diagonalization (ED) studies
141: of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian
142: \begin{equation}
143: H = J \sum_{\langle ij \rangle} {\bf S}_i {\bf \cdot S}_j ,
144: \label{ehh}
145: \end{equation}
146: where $J$ is the antiferromagnetic superexchange interaction and $\langle
147: ij \rangle$ denotes nearest--neighbor sites, for clusters up to 27 sites
148: with one impurity, and up to 24 sites with two impurities for all available
149: configurations. We analyze the total energies, the energies per doped
150: impurity, and also the form of the energy spectra, focusing on the number
151: of singlet states in the low--energy manifold below the first triplet for
152: the finite systems under consideration, as well as on the number of these
153: states removed by impurity doping. The frustrated spin interactions in the
154: presence of impurities are characterized for the entire cluster by the bond
155: spin--spin correlation functions and by the induced site magnetizations
156: in every spin sector.
157:
158: \begin{figure}[t!]
159: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kkded18.eps,width=7.0cm,angle=0}}
160: \medskip
161: \caption{Integrated density of states for an 18--site $S$ = 1/2 kagome
162: cluster, computed by exact diagonalization both without impurities (solid
163: line) and with 2 impurities (dashed line). The vertical lines mark the
164: position of the first triplet state in the absence of impurities (solid)
165: and in their presence (dashed). }
166: \label{fig:2}
167: \end{figure}
168:
169: The density of states integrated over the lowest--lying energy levels
170: is shown in Fig.~2 for systems with and without impurities. Fig.~2
171: compares ED results from systems of 18 sites, for which in the impurity
172: configuration illustrated 8 of the 12 singlet states occurring below
173: the first triplet, indicated by the vertical lines, are eliminated by
174: the presence of 2 impurities. Although the separation of the triplet
175: from the lowest remaining singlet decreases, this energy gap always
176: remains a finite fraction of the superexchange interaction $J$. Thus the
177: most important qualitative result emerging even for the smallest systems is
178: that, in contrast to spin--ladder and dimerized or quadrumerized systems,
179: no low--lying triplet state is induced by the presence of impurities. This
180: implies directly\cite{rnm} that there are no quasi--free spin degrees of
181: freedom, by which is meant spins effectively isolated from their local
182: environment and interacting with each other only on an effective energy
183: scale much smaller than $J$. The fact that no localized moments are formed
184: in the vicinity of impurities may be ascribed to the continuum of singlets
185: beyond the ground state, which has the same function as the two--fold
186: degeneracy of the ground state in the frustrated chain,\cite{rnm} namely
187: that the rearrangement of dimers incurs no energy penalty. The absence of
188: local spins around nonmagnetic impurities represents one of the most
189: significant differences between frustrated and unfrustrated systems, and
190: has been further interpreted as implying a deconfinement of the spin
191: degrees of freedom.\cite{rsv}
192:
193: \begin{table}[b!]
194: %\begin{ruledtabular}
195: \begin{tabular}{|c|cccc|ccccc|} \hline
196: $N$ & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{12} & \multicolumn{5}{c|}{18} \\
197: \hline
198: $d_{\rm M}$ & 1 & 2 & 2 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 3 & 3 \\
199: $N_s^0$ & 4 & 4 & 4 & 4 & 12 & 12 & 12 & 12 & 12 \\
200: $N_s^2$ & 2 & 2 & 3 & 1 & 3 & 4 & 4 & 3 & 4 \\
201: \hline
202: \end{tabular}
203: %\end{ruledtabular}
204: \caption{\label{tab:deltaE} Number of low--lying singlets below the first
205: triplet for kagome clusters without impurities ($N_s^0$, third row) and
206: with two impurities ($N_s^2$, fourth row) as a function of the Manhattan
207: distance $d_{\rm M}$ between impurities. Results obtained by ED are shown
208: for clusters of $N$ = 12 and 18 sites. }
209: \end{table}
210:
211: Table 1 provides more details of the number of states in the singlet
212: manifold which are removed by impurity doping for clusters of 12 and 18
213: sites, for all possible configurations of 2 impurities. The numbers vary
214: little as a function of the proximity of the impurities, and the average
215: number of low--lying states which are eliminated is in agreement with simple
216: considerations of the number of singlet states in the small system (below).
217: We have also performed analogous calculations for 24-site clusters of
218: different shapes. For all clusters the same behavior is found upon
219: introducing two impurities, in that the number of singlets below the
220: first triplet is reduced, but here the lowest--lying excitation is not
221: a triplet. However, these clusters do not appear to be representative of
222: the generic kagome physics, as the number of low--lying singlets in the
223: absence of impurities is significantly smaller than the expected
224: value\cite{rlblps} of $1.15^N$. This situation is presumed to be a
225: consequence of the low symmetry of the 24--site clusters, some of which
226: are essentially 1d systems, and as a result the densities of states are
227: not presented here.
228:
229: \begin{figure}[t!]
230: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kkdrvb18.eps,width=7.0cm,angle=0}}
231: \medskip
232: \caption{Integrated density of singlet states for an 18--site $S$ = 1/2
233: kagome cluster, calculated in the dimer--RVB basis both without impurities
234: (solid line) and with 2 impurities (dashed). }
235: \label{fig:3}
236: \end{figure}
237:
238: \subsection{Dimer--RVB Basis}
239:
240: We calculate in addition the ground--state properties, namely the energy
241: and spin--spin correlation functions, of clusters doped with one and with
242: two impurities within the dimer--RVB basis. This is the basis of states in
243: which every spin forms a singlet dimer with one of its nearest neighbors
244: in such a way that every spin of the lattice is involved in a dimer
245: (Fig.~1). The use of this basis\cite{rmm} naturally implies a truncation
246: of the total number of available states in the manifold of low--lying
247: singlets, but we will show below that it provides a satisfactory description
248: of the ground state of the doped system. Dimer--RVB calculations permit
249: the consideration of somewhat larger cluster sizes, and we will present
250: results up to and including 39 sites with one impurity and 36 sites with
251: two impurities.
252:
253: Calculations performed in the dimer--RVB basis yield results very similar
254: to the exact ones for the integrated density of states (Fig.~3), giving
255: clear evidence of a strong linear correlation (see also Fig.~9) between
256: the ED and dimer--RVB spectra in both 0-- and 2--impurity cases.
257: Demonstration of a quantitative correspondence between the spectra
258: would require shift and scaling factors arising from an energetic
259: renormalization related to the fact that calculations in the dimer--RVB
260: basis are variational in nature, so that the true eigenstates are dressed
261: RVB wave functions, but this procedure is not necessary for the analysis
262: to be presented here.
263:
264: Given that the RVB basis represents a very significant truncation of the
265: total Hilbert space, the qualitative similarity of the dimer--RVB spectra
266: to those obtained from the exact calculations, both with and without
267: impurities, provides important information about the nature of the exact
268: wave functions of the kagome system. This observation is further confirmed
269: by the semi--quantitative agreement with exact results for spin correlation
270: functions and ground--state energies computed using the dimer--RVB basis.
271: We defer this comparison to Secs.~III and IV, and comment here only that
272: our results in the presence of impurities provide additional strong
273: justification for the statement that the ground state of the kagome spin
274: system is described appropriately by a maximally short--ranged RVB wave
275: function, presumably as a consequence of the very strong frustration.
276:
277: The dimer--RVB basis is a natural framework for understanding the absence
278: of localized spins around an impurity site, as all remaining spins are
279: simply incorporated within rearranged singlet dimer coverings. It also
280: provides a qualitative reflection of the ``evaporation'' of low--lying
281: singlets from the ground--state manifold (Figs.~2--3 and Table I) which
282: arises on doping a cluster with two impurities, and in fact yields
283: additional insight into the mechanism for this exclusion. It can be
284: shown that the total number of singlet dimer coverings of a doped system
285: is given by
286: \begin{equation}
287: N_{\rm coverings} = 2^{N/3 - N_{\rm imp} + N_G + N_{\rm et}},
288: \label{endc}
289: \end{equation}
290: where $N$ is the number of sites of the system under consideration,
291: $N_{\rm imp}$ the number of doped impurities, $N_G$ the number of independent
292: clusters into which the system is divided by the dopant distribution, and
293: $N_{\rm et}$ the number of triangles containing 3 impurities. A complete
294: derivation of this result lies beyond the scope of the current analysis,
295: and we present only the following heuristic explanation. By reducing each
296: triangle to an effective $S = 1/2$ degree of freedom,\cite{rm,rmm} the
297: dimer basis involves a truncation of the $2^N$ total states to $2^{N/3}$,
298: multiplied by an additional factor of 2 for the overall spin direction on
299: each independent cluster. Each added impurity removes one spin, halving
300: the number of states in every manifold and thus justifying the dependence
301: on $N_{\rm imp}$. The only exception to this statement occurs when the
302: added impurity falls on a triangle which already contains two impurities,
303: as a result of which it is already fully constrained and removal of the
304: third site no longer affects the number of coverings. Eq.~(\ref{endc})
305: can be shown to remain valid for all vacancy concentrations, including
306: most notably values of $N_{\rm imp}$ exceeding the percolation threshold,
307: beyond which $N_G > 1$, under the condition that the impurity distribution
308: does not cut the system into segments containing odd numbers of spins.
309:
310: \section{Spin correlation functions and induced magnetization}
311:
312: \subsection{Dimer ``freezing''}
313:
314: In this section we consider the effects of a single impurity introduced
315: in an odd--site cluster. The bond spin--spin correlation functions
316: $\langle {\bf S}_i {\bf \cdot S}_j \rangle$ around a single impurity
317: may be computed by ED for clusters of up to 27 sites. The ED calculations
318: permit in addition the determination of the magnetizations induced on each
319: site by the presence of the impurity, with results for every spin sector
320: corresponding to the situation in all applied magnetic fields, which
321: are presented in Subsec.~C below.
322:
323: \begin{figure}[t!]
324: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kkssc27.eps,width=5.5cm,angle=0}}
325: \medskip
326: \caption{Spin--spin correlations for a single impurity in a 27--site
327: cluster, obtained by ED. Bar width represents the strength of correlation
328: functions on each bond on a linear scale where the strongest correlation
329: function is $\langle {\bf S}_i {\bf \cdot S}_j \rangle = - 0.69$. Dashed
330: lines denote bonds on which $\langle {\bf S}_i {\bf \cdot S}_j \rangle > 0$.}
331: \label{fig:4}
332: \end{figure}
333:
334: The correlation functions obtained by ED are illustrated in Fig.~4
335: for a 27--site cluster with periodic boundary conditions. The most
336: striking feature of these results is that dimer bonds are effectively
337: frozen in the two depleted triangles, taking a value $\langle {\bf S}_i
338: \cdot {\bf S}_j \rangle \simeq - 0.69$ close to the theoretical minimum
339: of $-3/4$ for a pure singlet state. For comparison, the average value of
340: $\langle {\bf S}_i \cdot {\bf S}_j \rangle$ in the pure system, which
341: retains full freedom to resonate, is a factor of 3 smaller
342: ($- 0.22$).\cite{rle} The bonds neighboring the frozen dimers then show
343: very weak correlations, while the next neighbors are again enhanced, and
344: the spin correlations oscillate with distance away from the impurity
345: [also illustrated in Fig.~5(b)]. Thus although spin--spin correlations
346: in the kagome system are extremely short--ranged,\cite{rle} induced
347: dimer--dimer correlations show a considerable spatial extent, reaching
348: in fact well beyond the sizes obtainable by studying small clusters using
349: either ED or dimer--RVB techniques. For the limited data available it is
350: unfortunately not possible to specify the functional form of the decay to
351: equilibrium. Further analysis of this issue, based on data obtained from
352: mutual hole repulsion, is presented in Sec.~IV.
353:
354: \begin{figure}[t!]
355: \psfig{figure=kkcfsc.eps,width=5.0cm,angle=270}
356: \centerline{(a)}
357: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kkssca39.eps,width=5.0cm,angle=270}}
358: \centerline{(b)}
359: \caption{(a) Spin--spin correlation functions $C(d_{\rm M}) = \langle
360: {\bf S}_i \cdot {\bf S}_j \rangle$ on nearest--neighbor bonds as a function
361: of their Manhattan distance $d_{\rm M}$ from a single impurity, for
362: clusters of 21 and 27 sites. (b) Spin--spin correlations as a function of
363: (Manhattan) bond distance from a single impurity, obtained by dimer--RVB
364: calculations for a 39--site cluster. Points represent the average over all
365: bonds at the same distance from the impurity, the solid line the value
366: $\langle {\bf S}_i {\bf \cdot S}_j \rangle = - 0.22$ for the impurity--free
367: system.}
368: \label{fig:5}
369: \end{figure}
370:
371: \subsection{Dimer--RVB Basis}
372:
373: Fig.~5(a) compares the bond spin correlation values $\langle {\bf S}_i
374: \cdot {\bf S}_j \rangle$ obtained from ED and from the dimer--RVB basis
375: for all bonds in clusters of 21 and 27 sites with one impurity. These
376: clusters represent the maximal sizes accessible by ED, and for such
377: systems it is clear that the dimer--RVB basis reproduces the exact
378: values with quantitative accuracy. From the nature of the RVB basis it is
379: perhaps to be expected that nearest--neighbor bond correlations are treated
380: more accurately than any other physical property. We make use of this
381: feature to extend the calculations of spin correlation functions to a
382: system of 39 sites with oie impurity. Because on this cluster the boundary
383: conditions lead to a rather low symmetry, Fig.~5(b) shows the value of
384: $\langle {\bf S}_i {\bf \cdot S}_j \rangle$ averaged over all bonds at
385: the same Manhattan distance from the impurity, which illustrates both
386: the oscillatory nature of the frozen dimerization pattern and the very
387: long range over which an impurity acts to disrupt the spin configuration.
388:
389: \begin{figure}[t!]
390: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kkmag27.eps,width=6.5cm,angle=0}}
391: \medskip
392: \caption{Site magnetization profile of the lowest triplet state induced
393: by a single impurity in a 27--site cluster, obtained by ED. Dot radius
394: represents the magnitude of the local moment on a linear scale where the
395: largest dot corresponds to a moment of 0.13$\mu_{\rm B}$, and the grey dots
396: represent sites with induced moments opposite to the field.}
397: \label{fig:6}
398: \end{figure}
399:
400: \subsection{Induced magnetic moments}
401:
402: The local magnetization pattern induced in the vicinity of a doped
403: nonmagnetic impurity may be computed by exact diagonalization in the sector
404: of total spin $(S,S_z)$ = (1,1), and is displayed for the 27--site cluster
405: in Fig.~6. The site magnetizations exhibit a certain anticorrelation with
406: the strength of the dimers formed on each bond, and thus have a tendency
407: to oscillate with increasing distance from the impurity. The induced
408: moments are particularly enhanced on sites far from the impurity, where
409: different paths on the periodic cluster interfere, and the interference
410: in this regime may even result in moments oriented opposite to the
411: effective magnetic field (Figs.~6, 7). The magnetization profile of the
412: surrounding sites is the single most important consequence of impurities
413: which is reflected in local--probe measurements of doped spin systems.
414:
415: \begin{figure}[t!]
416: %\centerline{
417: \psfig{figure=kkks27.eps,width=7.2cm,angle=270}
418: %}
419: \medskip
420: \caption{Induced magnetization per site $\mu_i$ as a function of the spin
421: sector $S_z$ (analogous to an applied magnetic field) for all inequivalent
422: sites\cite{footnote1} neighboring an impurity, computed by ED for a
423: 27--site cluster. With reference to the site labels in Fig.~6, the
424: separate lines $i$ represent 1st (4, 5, 23, 24), 2nd (6, 9, 22, 25), 3rd
425: (10, 12, 19, 20), 4th (2, 3), equal 5th [(7, 8, 26, 27) and (13, 15, 16,
426: 18)], 7th (14, 17), and 8th (11, 21) neighbors of the impurity site (1).}
427: \label{fig:7}
428: \end{figure}
429:
430: Fig.~7 shows the magnetization per site induced by proximity to a
431: nonmagnetic impurity for each spin sector obtainable by ED for a
432: 27--site cluster. The spin sector may be considered as equivalent to an
433: effective magnetic field which varies between zero ($S_z = 0$) and
434: saturation ($S_z = 13$). The most pronounced variation is observed for
435: the nearest--neighbor sites (filled circles in Fig.~7), which have very
436: small magnetization at low fields because they are bound into the strong
437: dimers frozen by the presence of the impurity on the same triangle.
438: However, between $S_z = 4$ and $S_z = 6$ the moment shows an abrupt jump
439: to saturation, implying the breaking and full polarization of these dimers
440: at fields in excess of 1/3 of the saturation field. We speculate that this
441: behavior may be due to the presence of a particularly stable state of the
442: remaining spins which corresponds to a 1/3 magnetization plateau of the
443: undoped kagome lattice.\cite{rhcs} The moments of the
444: further--neighbor sites show a generally less systematic evolution,
445: usually with a non--monotonic character which implies a very significant
446: rearrangement of the induced local magnetization as a function of field.
447: This evolution is again marked by the most significant changes occurring
448: close to the net magnetization value of 1/3.
449:
450: NMR has emerged as the technique of choice for analyzing in real space
451: the effects of doped impurities on magnetizations and spin correlations.
452: Information concerning these quantities is extracted from Knight--shifts,
453: linewidth alterations and, for certain cases, from relaxation times. A
454: detailed NMR and NQR (nuclear quadrupole resonance) analysis has been
455: conducted recently for $^{71}$Ga impurities in the kagome planes of the $S$
456: = 3/2 spin system SrCr$_{9p}$Ga$_{12-9p}$O$_{19}$ (SCGO).\cite{rlmcmombm}
457: While a quantitative determination of any shifts or linewidths depends
458: on a detailed Hamiltonian for the hyperfine interactions in a specific
459: material, the results obtained in Fig.~7 may be considered as illustrative
460: for the kagome geometry.
461:
462: The important qualitative features are the absence of a single spin--1/2
463: degree of freedom anywhere in the vicinity of the impurity, and the rather
464: large extent of the area of affected sites in spite of the very short spin
465: correlation lengths. The latter effect is contained in Fig.~7 in that the
466: induced site magnetization values on the vertical axis are directly
467: proportional to the peak shifts measured in an NMR field sweep. Impurities
468: in the kagome lattice therefore produce a large number of satellite peaks.
469:
470: Finally, with regard to the fact that most known kagome systems, including
471: SCGO, are not $S = 1/2$, there remain rather few studies of this geometry
472: for higher values of the spin.\cite{rhcs,rrsr} On rather general grounds
473: based on the geometry of the lattice, one expects that both triangles and
474: depleted triangles retain the integral or half--integral nature of the
475: spin per site. Thus it is at least plausible that the results for the
476: $S$ = 1/2 system are directly relevant to higher half--integral--spin
477: systems such as SCGO.\cite{footnote2}
478:
479: \begin{figure}[t!]
480: \psfig{figure=kkd2ed.eps,width=5.0cm,angle=270}
481: \medskip
482: \caption{Energy $\Delta_2$ for a pair of holes as a function of hole
483: separation, obtained by ED for clusters of 12, 18 and 24 sites with two
484: impurities. }
485: \label{fig:8}
486: \end{figure}
487:
488: \section{Hole repulsion}
489:
490: In this section we present results characterizing the behavior of an
491: even--site cluster doped with two impurities. A comparison with the
492: undisturbed system\cite{rlblps} reveals that the average energy per
493: remaining site not only increases in the presence of impurities, but
494: increases further as the impurities are brought closer together. Both
495: of these features are evident from the ED results of Fig.~8, which shows
496: the energies of all different two--hole states available for the relevant
497: system sizes. The higher energy per site of doped systems confirms, by
498: considering the contributing processes, that the net loss of resonance
499: energy for dimers constrained by the presence of impurities to occupy
500: only the bonds on which they are essentially ``frozen'' (Sec.~III) is not
501: compensated by the gains in dimerization energy for those bonds which
502: are enhanced.
503:
504: The effective hole repulsion is most unusual in low--dimensional spin
505: systems,\cite{rbhsl,rdrs} and in fact we are unaware of analogous results
506: for any model other than the frustrated chain.\cite{rrnm}
507: This repulsion of holes constitutes the central result of our analysis:
508: particularly in the context of short--range RVB wave functions, it
509: contradicts directly the most straightforward expectation for the
510: behavior of doped holes, namely that when mobile these would choose to
511: minimize the net disruption of the system by occupying the same dimer,
512: and thus would exhibit a pairing attraction.\cite{ra} The consequences
513: for mobile impurites with repulsive interactions may be expected to
514: include hole crystallization, phase separation and the possibility of
515: transitions between metallic and insulating phases, and would bear
516: considerable further investigation.
517:
518: \begin{figure}[t!]
519: \psfig{figure=kkd2dc.eps,width=5.0cm,angle=270}
520: \medskip
521: \caption{Comparison of energies $\Delta_{2,{\rm ED}}$ and $\Delta_{2,{\rm
522: RVB}}$ obtained respectively from ED and from calculations in the dimer--RVB
523: basis for a pairs of holes of different separations on clusters of 12,
524: 18, and 24 sites with two impurities. }
525: \label{fig:9}
526: \end{figure}
527:
528: \subsection{Dimer--RVB Basis}
529:
530: We illustrate in Fig.~9 the efficacy of the dimer--RVB basis for the
531: purposes of comparing ground--state energies. The correspondence between
532: the dimer--RVB and ED results is shown by comparing the energies of all
533: two--hole states in clusters of 12, 18 and 24 sites with two impurities,
534: which represent all system sizes accessible by ED. Full details of the
535: extraction of the energy values $\Delta_2$ in Fig.~9 are given below.
536: Although an inspection of the abcissae reveals that the agreement between
537: individual pairs of values is not as convincing as for the spin correlation
538: functions (Sec.~III), the main difference between the two sets of data
539: may be reduced to a relative upward shift of all the RVB energies.
540: The direct linear correlation between ED and dimer--RVB results (alluded
541: to in Sec.~II) demonstrates unambiguously that comparing the energies of
542: different configurations of the two impurities, which is the primary goal
543: of the energy analysis to follow, is a valid qualitative exercise when
544: performed using the dimer--RVB results.
545:
546: We show first the spin--spin correlation functions in the presence
547: of a pair of impurities (Fig.~10). When considering the overlap of
548: single--impurity dimerization patterns (Sec.~III), it is evident that
549: these are not fully mutually compatible. In fact, one finds by inspection
550: that not only the configuration illustrated in Fig.~10 but all possible
551: configurations of two impurities on the kagome lattice are in some measure
552: incompatible. Comparison with other quantum spin systems suggests that
553: this complete incompatibility is very specific to the kagome geometry,
554: and its extent may be quantified by extracting the effective interaction
555: energy of the holes (Fig.~11). In cluster calculations the frustration is
556: also shown by the presence of relatively large local moments induced on
557: the sites at the mismatch between dimerization regimes ({\it cf.}~Fig.~6).
558:
559: \begin{figure}[t!]
560: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kkssc36c.eps,width=7.0cm,angle=0}}
561: \medskip
562: \caption{Spin--spin correlations for two impurities in a 36--site cluster,
563: obtained in the dimer--RVB basis. Bar width represents the strength of
564: correlation functions for each bond on a linear scale where the largest
565: value is $- 0.66$. }
566: \label{fig:10}
567: \end{figure}
568:
569: \subsection{Interaction between impurities}
570:
571: Fig.~11 shows twice the energy per hole as a function of separation for all
572: configurations of two impurities on 30-- and 36--site clusters, obtained
573: in the dimer--RVB basis. We have analyzed the data in the following manner.
574: $E_0$ is the ground--state energy of each cluster in the absence of
575: impurities, and is computed for even clusters then extrapolated for
576: odd clusters from the results for systems of sizes $N - 3$ and $N + 3$.
577: $E_1$ is the ground--state energy in the presence of a single impurity,
578: which is computed for odd clusters and may then be extrapolated for
579: even clusters from the results for systems of sizes $N - 3$ and $N + 3$.
580: $E_2$ is the ground--state energy with two impurities, and again may be
581: computed directly for even clusters and extrapolated for odd clusters.
582: We then define
583: \begin{equation}
584: \Delta_1 = E_1 - E_0
585: \label{ed1}
586: \end{equation}
587: as the energy of one hole,
588: \begin{equation}
589: \Delta_2 = E_2 - E_0
590: \label{ed2}
591: \end{equation}
592: as the energy of a two--hole state, and
593: \begin{equation}
594: \epsilon = \Delta_2 - 2 \Delta_1 = E_2 - 2 E_1 + E_0
595: \label{ede}
596: \end{equation}
597: as the energy of interaction between two holes. Because of the extrapolation
598: procedure it is important that the data sets for different system sizes be
599: comparable. While certain problems arise for some system sizes due to the
600: relatively large influence of the boundary conditions, we find the process
601: to be valid for systems in excess of 27 sites. In this connection we note
602: that the two--hole energies $\Delta_2$ shown in Fig.~11 are independent of
603: the extrapolation between different system sizes, and it is only the direct
604: comparison with $\Delta_1$ for the 33--site system which requires
605: validation of the procedure.
606:
607: \begin{figure}[t!]
608: \psfig{figure=kkd2ls.eps,width=5.0cm,angle=270}
609: \medskip
610: \caption{Energies $\Delta_2$ for two--hole states as a function of hole
611: separation for all configurations of two impurities on 30-- and 36--site
612: clusters, obtained by dimer--RVB calculations. The solid line marks twice
613: the single--hole energy 2$\Delta_1$ relevant for comparison, taken from
614: the 33--site cluster. }
615: \label{fig:11}
616: \end{figure}
617:
618: It is clear that the effective mutual repulsion decays only slowly. Because
619: of the restricted sizes of the acccessible clusters we are unable to
620: speculate on the functional form of this decay, and in particular on the
621: possibility that it may be long--ranged. We note only that for short
622: distances (3--4 lattice constants) it appears to exhibit an approximate
623: $1/d_r$ dependence, beyond which a steeper decrease is observed which may
624: be either an intrinsic property of the interaction or a consequence of the
625: system size. The form of the decay appears similar to that of the bond spin
626: correlation functions towards their undisturbed value [Fig.~5(b)].
627:
628: At the phenomenological level, a repulsive interaction between two
629: impurities may be regarded as surprising in that their interference might
630: have been expected to suppress the freezing of individual dimer patterns,
631: leading to a restoration of resonance energy. Our findings to the contrary
632: indicate that the dominant effect of increasing increasing impurity
633: separation lies in the reduction in strength of the partially frozen
634: single--impurity dimerization patterns at the boundaries where they are
635: forced to mesh, which reduces the corresponding energetic penalty. Given
636: the slow decay of the dimer--dimer correlations, the possibility remains
637: that the net repulsive interaction between holes could be long--ranged.
638: Such an unexpected result may indeed be connected with a true deconfinement
639: of spinon--like excitations for the kagome system, which would confirm
640: speculation to this effect in 2d.\cite{rsv} We comment further on the
641: issue of deconfinement below.
642:
643: \section{Conclusion}
644:
645: We have illustrated a variety of novel phenomena associated with the
646: effects of static, spinless impurities doped into the $S = 1/2$
647: antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model in kagome geometry. By analysis of
648: spin--spin correlation functions and of the local magnetization patterns
649: induced around impurities, we find that, despite the very short spin--spin
650: correlation lengths of the highly frustrated system, dimer--dimer
651: correlations develop over considerable distances due to a hole--induced
652: freezing of their resonance. Furthermore, as a consequence of the
653: continuum of states in the low--lying singlet manifold, there is no
654: evidence for free local moments in the vicinity of impurity sites.
655:
656: Most importantly, we have shown from the total energies of doped systems
657: that impurities in the kagome lattice have an effective repulsive
658: interaction, a phenomenon unique to our knowledge and in direct
659: contradiction to the conventional expectation for short--range RVB
660: systems of a net pairing attraction. Furthermore, this effective
661: repulsion is found to be rather long--ranged in nature, a most unusual
662: result which is presumably related with the very strong frustration
663: inherent to the kagome geometry.
664:
665: Our comparisons of doping effects provide additional justification for the
666: validity of the short--range dimer--RVB framework as a suitable description
667: of the ground--state singlet manifold in the kagome antiferromagnet. We
668: have shown that the dimer--RVB basis provides a valuable means of probing
669: the nature of spin and charge degrees of freedom in a further class of
670: quantum magnets. This realization of a highly resonant RVB state, arising
671: as a consequence of the extremely frustrated nature of the system, also
672: presents an important contrast to other low--dimensional spin systems
673: which are known to be described by RVB--type wave functions, particularly
674: with regard to the localization of free spins and to the pairing of holes.
675:
676: We summarize only briefly the consequences of our analysis for experiment.
677: The majority of known kagome materials do not have complete filling of the
678: lattice sites by a single value of the spin $S$, and as such the study of
679: impurities is a significant component of their characterization. Nonmagnetic
680: impurities in the kagome lattice have the important property that they do
681: not generate localized spins at the vacant site, and do generate by the
682: nature of their extended range of influence a significant number of
683: satellites for each peak. On heuristic grounds we believe that our analysis
684: of the qualitative features to be expected in the $S = 1/2$ system are
685: relevant also for $S = 3/2$, and perhaps for higher half--integral spins.
686:
687: Finally, on the issue of deconfinement in highly frustrated systems of
688: dimensionality higher than one, we have shown clearly from the presence
689: of the mutual repulsive interaction between holes that charge degrees
690: of freedom are deconfined. Further, the absence of localized $S = 1/2$
691: degrees of freedom around vacancies in the lattice demonstrates that
692: spin and charge are deconfined. However, on the question of whether
693: the spin excitations of the undoped system are appropriately described
694: by deconfined spinon excitations, our results do not provide a proof of
695: this hypothesis.
696:
697: \acknowledgments
698:
699: We are grateful to P. Sindzingre for helpful provision of ED spectra for
700: undoped clusters. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science
701: Foundation and by the French Centre National de Recherche Scientifique.
702:
703: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
704:
705: \bibitem{rce} J. T. Chalker and J. F. Eastmond, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 46},
706: 14 201 (1992).
707:
708: \bibitem{rle} P. W. Leung and V. Elser, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 47}, 5459 (1993).
709:
710: \bibitem{rze} C. Zeng and V. Elser, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 8318 (1995).
711:
712: \bibitem{rlblps} P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, and
713: P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 2521 (1997); C. Waldtmann, H.-U.
714: Everts, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, P. Lecheminant, and
715: L. Pierre, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 2}, 501 (1998).
716:
717: \bibitem{rm} F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 2356 (1998).
718:
719: \bibitem{rmm} M. Mambrini and F. Mila, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 17}, 651 (2000).
720:
721: \bibitem{rrk} D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61},
722: 2376 (1988).
723:
724: \bibitem{rms} R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86},
725: 1881 (2001).
726:
727: \bibitem{rmsp} G. Misguich, D. Serban and V. Pasquier, Phys. Rev. Lett.
728: {\bf 89}, 137202 (2002); G. Misguich, D. Serban and V. Pasquier, unpublished
729: (cond-mat/0302152).
730:
731: \bibitem{rmblw} G. Misguich, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and C. Waldtmann,
732: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 1098 (1998); W. LiMing, G. Misguich, P. Sindzingre,
733: and C. Lhuillier, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 62}, 6372 (2000).
734:
735: \bibitem{rwhrs} A. S. Wills, A. Harrison, C. Ritter, and R. I. Smith,
736: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61}, 6156 (2000).
737:
738: \bibitem{rkea} A. Keren, K. Kojima, L. P. Le, G. M. Luke, W. D. Wu,
739: Y. J. Uemura, M. Takano, H. Dabkowska, and M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev.
740: B {\bf 53}, 6451 (1996).
741:
742: \bibitem{rlea} S.-H. Lee, C. Broholm, M. F. Collins, L. Heller,
743: A. P. Ramirez, Ch. Kloc, E. Bucher, R. W. Erwin, and N. Lacevic.
744: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 8091 (1997).
745:
746: \bibitem{rhhkntkt} Z. Hiroi, M. Hanawa, N. Kobayashi, M. Nohara, H. Takagi,
747: Y. Kato, and M. Takigawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., {\bf 70}, 3377 (2001).
748:
749: \bibitem{rlmcmombm} L. Limot, P. Mendels, G. Collin, C. Mondelli, B.
750: Ouladdiaf, H. Mutka, N. Blanchard, and M. Mekata, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65},
751: 144447 (2002), and references therein.
752:
753: \bibitem{rlmgmdhlr} M. Laukamp, G. B. Martins, C. Gazza, A. L. Malvezzi,
754: E. Dagotto, P. M. Hansen, A. C. Lopez, and J. Riera, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57},
755: 10755 (1998).
756:
757: \bibitem{rbhsl} N. Bulut, D. Hone, D. J. Scalapino, and E. Y. Loh, Phys.
758: Rev. Lett. {\bf 62}, 2192 (1989).
759:
760: \bibitem{rsv} S. Sachdev and M. Vojta, in Proceedings of the XIII
761: International Congress on Mathematical Physics, edited by A. Fokas,
762: A. Grigoryan, T. Kibble, and B. Zegarlinski, (International Press,
763: Boston, 2001).
764:
765: \bibitem{rnm} B. Normand and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 104411 (2002).
766:
767: \bibitem{rs} S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45}, 12 377 (1992).
768:
769: \bibitem{footnote1} The behavior of the number of inequivant sites as a
770: function of the spin sector arises from the presence of an additional
771: permutation symmetry among the sites for the 27--site cluster with the
772: chosen boundary conditions. This symmetry does not in general commute
773: with the two reflection symmetries of the cluster, and so cannot be
774: obtained simultaneously with these. However, in the majority of spin
775: sectors it is possible to obtain all three symmetries simulataneously,
776: making sites $i = 2$ and 3, $i = 5$ and $5^{\prime}$, and $i = 4$ and 7
777: equivalent in these cases.
778:
779: \bibitem{rhcs} K. Hida, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 70, 3673 (2001); D. C. Cabra,
780: M. D. Grynberg, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and P. Pujol, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65},
781: 094418 (2002); J. Schulenburg, A. Honecker, J. Schnack, J. Richter, and
782: H.-J. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 167207 (2002).
783:
784: \bibitem{rrsr} I. Rudra, D. Sen, and S. Ramasesha, unpublished
785: (cond--mat/0210122).
786:
787: \bibitem{footnote2} A further heuristic justification for the relevance
788: of the current results at least to the $S = 3/2$ case may be obtained
789: by considering that the kagome geometry supports a non--degenerate
790: valence--bond--solid state\cite{raklt} for spins $S = 2$. In an RVB basis
791: a system of spins $S = 3/2$ is equivalent to a set of dimer vacancies in
792: this background which have exactly the same degeneracy as the dimers in
793: the $S = 1/2$ system.
794:
795: \bibitem{raklt} I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev.
796: Lett. {\bf 59}, 799 (1987); Commun. Math. Phys.{\bf 115}, 477 (1988).
797:
798: \bibitem{rdrs} E. Dagotto, J. Riera, and D. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45},
799: 5744 (1992).
800:
801: \bibitem{rrnm} Reexamination of results obtained by two of the
802: authors\protect{\cite{rnm}} reveals that a mutual repulsion of
803: impurities also occurs in the spin chain with frustrating next--neighbor
804: interactions.
805:
806: \bibitem{ra} P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
807:
808: \end{thebibliography}
809:
810: \end{document}
811:
812: