1: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
4:
5: \usepackage{epsfig,psfrag}
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
7: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: %\preprint{preprint not for distribution}
12:
13: \title{ Destruction of interference by
14: many-body interactions in cold atomic Bose gases }
15:
16: \author{S.~Chen and R.~Egger}
17:
18: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
19: Heinrich-Heine-Universit\"at,
20: D-40225 D\"usseldorf, Germany}
21:
22: \date{\today}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: We study the effects of many-body interactions on the interference
26: in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer for matter
27: waves of ultracold Bose atoms. After switching off
28: an axial trapping potential, the thermal
29: initial wavepacket expands, and subsequently interference fringes
30: may be observed in a circular 1D trap. These are computed for
31: axial harmonic or $\delta$-function traps, and for
32: interaction strengths from the Thomas-Fermi regime to
33: the Tonks-Girardeau limit. It is shown that many-body correlations
34: in a realistic setup destroy interference to a large degree.
35: Analytical expressions allowing to infer
36: the observability of phase coherence and interference are provided.
37: \end{abstract}
38: \pacs{03.75.Kk, 03.75.-b, 05.30.Jp}
39:
40:
41: \maketitle
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: Recent experimental advances in the control of ultracold atomic gases
46: have opened new exciting possibilities to systematically study the effects
47: of many-body interactions in low-dimensional
48: strongly correlated mesoscopic systems \cite{Kasevich,Feshbach,Rolston}.
49: Two main experimental routes are
50: presently being pursued, namely magnetic or magneto-optical trap
51: technology \cite{Rolston,Dumke,Schreck,Richard}, and the formation
52: of atomic waveguides on
53: microchips \cite{Hansel,Ott,Pritchard,Bongs}.
54: A particularly interesting limit arises in the true 1D case,
55: which may, for instance,
56: be realized by confining $N$ atoms in a highly anisotropic cigar-shaped
57: trap with large transverse trapping frequency $\omega_\perp$
58: \cite{Gorlitz,Dettmer}.
59: In this paper we study interacting
60: 1D Bose gases, but similar ideas and conclusions apply to cold fermionic
61: gases as well. In the 1D case, in an infinitely long system,
62: quantum fluctuations prevent the existence of a Bose-Einstein
63: condensate (BEC) even at $T=0$. For a finite system and very
64: weak interactions, however, BEC could happen
65: at extremely low temperatures not reachable at present
66: \cite{Monien,Petrov1D,Lieb2,Graham1,Graham2}.
67: The physics of a trapped 1D atomic Bose gas
68: is then characterized by a crossover from the high-density
69: weakly correlated Thomas-Fermi (TF)
70: regime to a strongly correlated Tonks-Girardeau (TG) regime
71: \cite{Tonks,Gir1} at low density,
72: see Refs.~\cite{Petrov1D,Dunjko,mora,stoof}.
73: The relevant dimensionless interaction
74: parameter governing this crossover in a uniform
75: system is
76: \begin{equation} \label{gamma}
77: \gamma= mg/\hbar^2 \rho_0,
78: \end{equation}
79: where $g$ is an effective 1D
80: interaction constant \cite{Olshanii}, see Eq.~(\ref{gdef}) below,
81: and $\rho_0$ is the density.
82: While for the uniform system, a Bethe ansatz solution due to Lieb and
83: Liniger \cite{Lieb} is available, for the case of a
84: (possibly time-dependent) axial trapping potential $V(x,t)$,
85: no exact statements are known, and one generally
86: resorts to approximate or numerical methods \cite{GW,Ohberg,Pedri}.
87: We mention in passing that this
88: system also has very interesting
89: single-particle excitations with exotic properties
90: such as fractional (anyon) statistics.
91: While such systems could also be realized in more conventional
92: condensed matter systems, the high quality and tunability
93: of atomic Bose gases renders them very attractive
94: for fundamental studies.
95:
96: In this paper, we address the influence of interactions on the
97: phase coherence and the interference properties of a 1D Bose gas.
98: To be specific, we consider the
99: circular geometry indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig1}. At time $t=0$,
100: the axial trapping potential $V(x,t)$ localized around $x\approx 0$ is
101: switched off, and after some characteristic expansion time, the
102: expanding right- and left-moving wave packets will then meet at the other side
103: of the ring, $x\approx \pm L/2$.
104: If phase coherence of the wave packets is not lost during the
105: propagation, a Mach-Zehnder-type
106: interference signal should be observable at this side.
107: While a modified Gross-Pitaevskii (GP)
108: approach, obtained from combining the Lieb-Liniger solution with
109: a local density approximation (LDA)
110: valid for large enough systems \cite{Dunjko},
111: is able to yield
112: accurate ground-state density profiles $\rho_0(x,t)$
113: of a 1D Bose gas after switching off the axial trap even
114: in the Tonks limit \cite{Ohberg},
115: it typically overestimates interference signals
116: by orders of magnitude \cite{GW}.
117: For a correct description of
118: interference, it is thus necessary to take into account quantum-mechanical
119: phase fluctuations, which have so far
120: only been addressed in the static case \cite{Gangardt,Petrov3D}
121: or in the Tonks limit under rather special initial conditions
122: \cite{Das1,Das2}.
123: Below we show that under realistic modelling of the initial preparation
124: and the subsequent dynamics,
125: phase coherence and interference are strongly reduced by
126: many-body interactions in 1D Bose gases. Moreover,
127: we provide quantitative expressions
128: to assess this effect in experiments.
129: Proper insight into this question is of practical importance for
130: the development of future atom interferometers and for the
131: understanding of current experiments \cite{Pfau,Hellweg,Bongs}.
132: The remainder of the paper is organized as follows.
133: In Sec.~\ref{sec2} we study magneto-optical or magnetic
134: traps with
135: \begin{equation}\label{trappot}
136: V(x,t)= \frac12 m\omega_x^2 x^2 \Theta(-t),
137: \end{equation}
138: with angular frequencies $\omega_x\ll \omega_\perp$; here
139: $\Theta$ is the Heaviside function.
140: In Sec.~\ref{sec2}, the validity of LDA is presumed.
141: In Sec.~\ref{sec3}, we briefly discuss a related setup employing
142: a $\delta$-trap which
143: may be more realistic for microchip-trapped gases yet
144: allows for an exact solution of the time-dependent problem.
145: Finally, we conclude in Sec.~\ref{sec4}.
146:
147: \begin{figure}
148: \centerline{\epsfysize=8cm \epsffile{f1.eps}}
149: \caption{\label{fig1} Schematic geometry of a Mach-Zehnder
150: interferometer realized in a circular trap
151: with circumference $L$. By applying an axial trap potential
152: at $t<0$ around $x\approx 0$, a thermal non-equilibrium initial state
153: is prepared, whose time evolution and interference
154: at $x\approx \pm L/2$ are the subject of this paper.
155: }
156: \end{figure}
157:
158: \section{Interference signal: Harmonic initial trap}
159: \label{sec2}
160:
161: Let us consider a circular trap
162: at ultralow temperature, $k_B T\ll
163: \hbar \omega_\perp$, such that motion in the transverse direction is frozen out,
164: see Fig.~\ref{fig1}.
165: The effective 1D interaction strength is \cite{Olshanii}
166: \begin{equation}\label{gdef}
167: g= -\frac{2\hbar^2}{m a_{\rm 1D}} , \quad
168: a_{\rm 1D}= - \frac{ d_\perp^2}{2a_s} \left[1-{\cal C}(a_s/d_\perp)\right],
169: \end{equation}
170: where $a_s>0$ is the 3D $s$-wave scattering length
171: describing the repulsive atom-atom interactions,
172: $d_{\perp} = (2\hbar/m \omega_{\perp})^{1/2}$, and
173: ${\cal C}\approx 1.4603$.
174: The interaction strength can be tuned by Feshbach resonances \cite{Inouye} or
175: by using optical lattices \cite{Feshbach}.
176:
177: \subsection{Fluctuation modes}
178:
179: The resulting
180: Hamiltonian of the 1D Bose gas at fixed particle number $N$,
181: including an arbitrary time-dependent axial trap potential $V(x,t)$, is
182: \begin{eqnarray} \nonumber
183: H(t) & = & \int_{-L/2}^{L/2}
184: d x \ {\hat{\psi}}^{\dagger}(x,t) \left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \partial_x^2
185: +V(x,t) \right]\hat{\psi}(x,t) \\ & +& \frac{g}{2} \int d x
186: : \left[ {\hat{\psi}}^{\dagger}(x,t) \hat{\psi}(x,t) \right]^2 : ,
187: \label{1dH}
188: \end{eqnarray}
189: where the colons denote normal-ordering.
190: For $V(x,t)=0$, this model was solved exactly by Lieb and Liniger \cite{Lieb}.
191: To make progress in the presence of the
192: external potential, the field operator $\hat{\psi}$ is expressed
193: in terms of the density $\rho(x)$ and the phase $\phi(x)$,
194: \begin{equation} \label{density-phase}
195: \hat{\psi}(x) = \sqrt{\rho(x)} e^{i\phi(x)} .
196: \end{equation}
197: We employ canonically conjugate density [phase]
198: fluctuation operators $\Pi(x,t)=\rho(x,t)-\rho_0(x,t)$
199: [$\Phi(x,t) =\phi(x,t)-\phi_0(x,t)$] describing
200: quantum fluctuations around the solution
201: $ \psi_0(x,t) = \sqrt{\rho_0(x,t)} \exp[i\phi_0(x,t)]$
202: of the time-dependent modified GP equation \cite{Dunjko,Ohberg},
203: \begin{equation} \label{TGPE}
204: i \hbar \partial_t \psi_0(x,t)=
205: \left[ - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 m} \partial_x^2 + V(x,t)
206: + \tilde{F}(\rho_0(x,t)) \right] \psi_0(x,t),
207: \end{equation}
208: where $\tilde{F}(\rho_0)$ is the (exactly known)
209: chemical potential for the Lieb-Liniger problem
210: \cite{Dunjko}, with limiting values
211: \begin{equation}\label{frho}
212: \tilde{F}(\rho_0)= \left \{ \begin{array}{cc}
213: g\rho_0, & \gamma \ll 1\\
214: \pi^2\hbar^2 \rho_0^2/2m, & \gamma \gg 1. \end{array} \right.
215: \end{equation}
216: For arbitrary time-dependent potential $V(x,t)$,
217: no closed solution of Eq.~(\ref{TGPE}) for arbitrary $\gamma$ is available.
218: {}From numerical work, however,
219: the expansion of a 1D Bose gas after switching off an harmonic axial trap
220: potential has recently been shown to violate self-similarity \cite{Ohberg}
221: in the intermediate regime between the TF and the TG limit, $\gamma\approx 1$,
222: which can be traced back to the variable nonlinearity of $\tilde{F}(\rho_0)$ for
223: different $\gamma$.
224:
225: Substituting Eq.~(\ref{density-phase}) into
226: Eq.~(\ref{1dH}) and expanding up to quadratic order
227: in $\Phi$ and $\Pi$, we obtain the effective low-energy
228: Hamiltonian describing quantum fluctuations around the
229: solution to Eq.~(\ref{TGPE}).
230: Neglecting terms containing $\Pi\partial_x^2 \Pi$ or
231: $(\rho_0^{-1}\partial^2_x \rho_0)\Pi^2$, we obtain
232: the time-dependent Hamiltonian
233: \begin{eqnarray} \label{HLLt}
234: H(t) & = & \int dx \Bigl [\frac{\hbar^2 \rho_0}{2m}
235: (\partial_x\Phi)^2 \\ \nonumber &+& \frac{\hbar^2}{m} (\partial_x\phi_0)
236: \Pi\ \partial_x \Phi + \frac{1}{2}
237: \frac{\partial \tilde{F}(\rho_0)}{\partial\rho_0} \Pi^2 \Bigr] .
238: \end{eqnarray}
239: While terms involving $\Pi \partial_x^2\Pi$ are irrelevant in
240: the long-wavelength low-energy regime, the neglect of terms $\propto
241: (\rho_0^{-1}\partial_x^2 \rho_0) \Pi^2$ requires that the interaction
242: strength $g$ is not too weak \cite{Wu}. In practice, this
243: approximation is valid to high accuracy even in the TF regime,
244: and therefore in all cases of interest here.
245: Interference fringes are correctly captured in such
246: a long-wavelength theory despite their rapidly oscillating character,
247: since the oscillations arise due to a mixing
248: of left- and right-moving wave-packets. These wave-packets are both
249: correctly described within the present theory.
250:
251:
252: Equation (\ref{HLLt}) resembles
253: the Hamiltonian of a Luttinger liquid \cite{Monien},
254: generalized to a time-dependent and spatially non-uniform system,
255: where a non-standard coupling between $\Pi$ and $\partial_x \Phi$
256: is induced by the time dependence of the external potential.
257: The Hamiltonian (\ref{HLLt}) is quadratic in the fluctuation operators and
258: can therefore be diagonalized by a Bogoliubov-de Gennes transformation.
259: However, explicit diagonalization is rather difficult for
260: arbitrary potential $V(x,t)$, and here we shall limit ourselves
261: to the form given in Eq.~(\ref{trappot}).
262: Although the full Hamiltonian (\ref{1dH}) is time-independent for $t>0$,
263: the Hamiltonian (\ref{HLLt}) governing quantum fluctuations becomes
264: explicitly time-dependent due to the time dependence of
265: $\rho_0(x,t)$ and $\phi_0(x,t)$.
266: Furthermore, to make progress, we restrict ourselves to the
267: self-similar limits $\gamma\ll 1$ and $\gamma\gg 1$. Then the
268: density $\rho_0(x,t>0)$ is self-similar with some
269: scale factor $b(t)$ \cite{Ohberg},
270: \begin{equation}\label{selfsimilar}
271: \rho_0(x,t) = \frac{n(x/b(t))}{b(t)},
272: \end{equation}
273: where $b(0)=1$ and $n(x)=\rho_0(x,0)$ is the initial density profile.
274: Solving Eq.~(\ref{TGPE}) with Eq.~(\ref{selfsimilar}) results in
275: the phase
276: \begin{equation}\label{phi0}
277: \phi_0(x,t) = \frac{mx^2}{2\hbar} \frac{\dot{b}(t)}{b(t)} .
278: \end{equation}
279:
280: Under self-similarity, it is then possible to diagonalize the
281: quadratic Hamiltonian (\ref{HLLt}) by
282: solving the equation of motion generated by it.
283: Using the long derivative
284: \begin{equation}\label{lder}
285: \hat{ D } = \partial_t + x (\dot{b}/b) \partial_x ,
286: \end{equation}
287: some algebra shows that the equation of motion for $\Phi$ is
288: \begin{equation}\label{f_jLL}
289: \left (\hat{D}+ \alpha \frac{\dot{b}}{b}\right) \hat{D}
290: \Phi(x,t) =\frac{1}{m} \frac{\partial \tilde{F}(\rho_0)}{\rho_0}
291: \partial_x [ \rho_0 \partial_x\Phi],
292: \end{equation}
293: where $\alpha=1$ in the TF regime and $\alpha=2$ in the TG regime.
294: To solve Eq.~(\ref{f_jLL}), we use the ansatz
295: \begin{equation}\label{phians}
296: \Phi(x,t) = \sum_j C_j(t) f_j(x/b(t)) \hat{B}_j(t) + {\rm H.c.},
297: \end{equation}
298: where $\hat{B}_{j}^{\dagger },\hat{B}_{j}$ are standard Bose operators with
299: time dependence governed by time-dependent eigenfrequency $\Omega_j(t)$,
300: \begin{equation}
301: \hat{B}_j(t)= \exp\left [-i\int_0^t dt' \Omega_j(t') \right] \hat{B}_j(0).
302: \end{equation}
303: Furthermore, $f_j$ are suitably normalized eigenfunctions,
304: and the prefactor $C_j$ is needed to bring $H(t)$ into the
305: canonical form
306: \begin{equation}\label{hom}
307: H (t) = \sum_{j}\hbar \Omega_j (t)
308: \hat{B}_{j}^{\dagger}(t) \hat{B}_{j}(t),
309: \end{equation}
310: where the summation extends over all eigenmodes.
311: One finds a similar expression to Eq.~(\ref{phians})
312: for the conjugate field $\Pi$
313: by using the commutation relation with $\Phi$.
314: Given the scale-factor $b(t)$ and the initial density $n(x)$
315: entering Eq.~(\ref{selfsimilar}),
316: solving the eigenproblem (\ref{f_jLL}) thus leads to a complete
317: description of the time-dependent quantum phase fluctuations.
318: This program is carried out in this
319: section separately for the TF limit, see Sec.~\ref{sec22},
320: and the TG regime, see Sec.~\ref{sec23}.
321:
322: To investigate coherence properties during the self-similar
323: expansion process, we calculate the (equal-time) density matrix
324: \begin{equation}\label{1pdm}
325: W(x,x',t)=\langle \hat{\psi}^{\dagger}(x,t) \hat{\psi}(x',t) \rangle.
326: \end{equation}
327: Following Refs.~\cite{Ho,Petrov1D},
328: here it is justified to neglect density fluctations
329: against phase fluctuations, resulting in
330: \begin{eqnarray} \label{W}
331: W(x, x', t) &\simeq& W_0(x,x',t) e^{-F(x,x',t)}, \\ \nonumber
332: W_0(x,x',t) &=& \sqrt{\rho_0(x,t)\rho_0(x',t)}
333: e^{-i[\phi_0(x,t)-\phi_0 (x',t)]}, \\ \nonumber
334: F(x,x',t) & =& \langle [\Phi(x,t)-\Phi(x',t)]^{2} \rangle/2.
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: The task is then to compute the fluctuation correlator $F$. Substituting
337: Eq.~(\ref{phians}) into $F(x,x',t)$, it follows that
338: \begin{eqnarray}\nonumber
339: F(x,x^{\prime },t)
340: & = & \sum _{j=0}^{\infty}
341: \frac12 |C_j(t)|^2 (1 + 2 n_j)
342: [ f_{j}(x,t) - f_j(x',t) ]^2, \\
343: & = & \sum _{j=0}^{\infty}
344: |C_j(t)|^2 \coth[\hbar \Omega_j(t)/2 k_B T] \nonumber \\
345: \label{F}
346: &\times&
347: \frac12 [ f_{j}(x,t) - f_j(x',t) ]^2,
348: \end{eqnarray}
349: with the Bose-Einstein distribution
350: $n_j = \langle \hat{B}_{j}^{\dagger} \hat{B}_{j} \rangle
351: = [\exp(\hbar \Omega_j(t)/ k_B T) -1]^{-1}$.
352:
353: To analyze interference fringes, it is convenient to
354: switch to $y=x- L/2$ ($y=x+L/2$) for $L/2>x>0$ $(-L/2<x<0)$, such that the
355: center of the overlapping clouds is at $y=0$,
356: and the detection signal is given by
357: \begin{eqnarray*}
358: I(y,t) &=& \langle\rho(y+L/2,t) \rangle + \langle\rho(-y+L/2,t)\rangle \\
359: & +& 2 {\rm Re}\ W(y+L/2,-y+L/2,t) .
360: \end{eqnarray*}
361: The last term corresponds to the (first-order) interference signal
362: $I_{\rm int}(y)$ of interest here. Using Eq.~(\ref{W}),
363: it reads
364: \begin{eqnarray} \label{signal}
365: I_{\rm int}(y) &=& 2 \cos[2 Q y] e^{-F(y+L/2,- y+L/2,t)} \\
366: \nonumber
367: &\times& \sqrt{\rho_0 (y+L/2,t)\rho_0(- y+L/2,t)} ,
368: \end{eqnarray}
369: with time-dependent modulation wavevector $Q= [\phi_0(y+L/2,t)-\phi_0(-y
370: +L/2,t)]/2y$, which for $|y|\ll L$ takes the form
371: \begin{equation}\label{Q}
372: Q(t) = \partial_x\phi_0(L/2,t) = \frac{m L}{2\hbar} \frac{\dot{b}}{b}.
373: \end{equation}
374: It is obvious from Eq.~(\ref{signal}) that
375: phase fluctuations entering $F(x,x',t)$ suppress interference.
376:
377: \subsection{Thomas-Fermi regime}\label{sec22}
378:
379: In this subsection, we assume that the initial trapped gas (at $t<0$)
380: is within the TF regime, and also stays within this
381: regime throughout all relevant timescales.
382: Then the initial density is given by \cite{Kagan}
383: \begin{equation} \label{rho_TF}
384: n(x) = \frac{m}{2g} \omega_x^2 (R^2 -x^2) \Theta(R^2-x^2),
385: \end{equation}
386: where the TF radius $R$ follows from
387: $\int n(x) dx = N$,
388: \begin{equation}\label{rTF}
389: R = (3 N l_x^4 / |a_{\rm 1D}|)^{1/3}, \quad
390: l_x =\sqrt{\hbar/m \omega_x}.
391: \end{equation}
392: Provided the expanding gas indeed stays in the TF regime,
393: the expansion is well described by the
394: self-similar profile (\ref{selfsimilar}),
395: where $b(t)$ is the solution to \cite{Kagan,Castin}
396: \begin{equation}\label{tfb}
397: \ddot{b} =\omega_x^2/b^2 , \quad {\rm with} \
398: b(0)=1, \ \dot{b}(0) =0.
399: \end{equation}
400: The phase $\phi_0(x,t)$ is then given by Eq.~(\ref{phi0}).
401: While the eigenproblem for the quantum
402: fluctuations has previously been solved in the static TF case
403: \cite{Stringari,Wu,Ho,Petrov1D,Luxat}, the
404: coupling of $\partial_x \Phi$ and $\Pi$ in the time-dependent case, see
405: Eq.~(\ref{HLLt}), complicates the analysis considerably.
406: Remarkably, it is nevertheless possible to solve the full dynamical problem
407: analytically.
408:
409: The equation of motion (\ref{f_jLL}) is solved under the
410: ansatz (\ref{phians}) with
411: \begin{equation}
412: C_j(t) = [2\hbar R \Omega_j(t) b(t)/g ]^{-1/2}.
413: \end{equation}
414: To see this, we note that the long derivative (\ref{lder})
415: acts on the part belonging to the annihilation operator
416: $\hat{B}_j$ in Eq.~(\ref{phians}) as
417: \[
418: \hat {D} \Phi_j =\left (-i\Omega_j -\frac{\dot{b}}{2b}
419: -\frac{\dot{\Omega_j}}{2\Omega_j} \right) \Phi_j.
420: \]
421: After some algebra, using $y=x/R b(t)$, Eq.~(\ref{f_jLL}) then takes the form
422: \begin{equation}\label{legendre}
423: \frac{G_j}{\omega_x^2}
424: f_j(y) + \frac{d}{dy} \left [(1-y^2) \frac{d}{dy} f_j(y) \right]=0,
425: \end{equation}
426: where $G_j(t)$ is given by
427: \begin{equation}\label{Gj}
428: G_j = b^3 \left(\Omega_j^2 - \frac{3}{4} (\dot{\Omega}_j/\Omega_j)^2
429: + \ddot{\Omega}_j/2\Omega_j - (\dot{b}/2b)^2
430: + \ddot{b}/2b\right) .
431: \end{equation}
432: Equation (\ref{legendre}) has a standard solution in terms
433: of Legendre polynomials $P_j$, with normalized eigenfunctions
434: \begin{equation}
435: f_j(y)= \sqrt{j+1/2} \ P_j(y), \quad \int_{-1}^{1} dy F^2_j(y)=1,
436: \end{equation}
437: iff $G_j(t)$ is time-independent and given by
438: \begin{equation}\label{deq}
439: G_j[\Omega_j(t)] = j(j+1) \omega_x^2 ,
440: \end{equation}
441: where $j$ is a non-negative integer.
442: Eigenfrequencies $\Omega_j(t)$ thus follow as solutions
443: to the differential equation induced by Eq.~(\ref{deq}).
444: On not too long time scales,
445: Eq.~(\ref{deq}) with (\ref{Gj}) has the solution
446: \begin{equation} \label{omegajt}
447: \frac{\Omega_j(t)}{\omega_x} = \sqrt{\frac{2j(j+1)+1}{4 b^3(t)} } ,
448: \end{equation}
449: which holds as long as $\dot{b}(t)/2b(t) \ll \Omega_j(t)$.
450: For the results shown below in Figs.~\ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3}, this
451: condition is accurately fulfilled.
452: On much longer time scales, one should instead
453: (numerically) solve Eq.~(\ref{deq}).
454: The fluctuation correlations (\ref{W}) and the interference
455: signal (\ref{signal}) then follow immediately using these results.
456: It is obvious that $C_j(t) \propto g^{1/2}$, and therefore the
457: interaction parameter
458: $g$ enters the fluctuation correlator $F$ and
459: suppresses the interference in an exponential manner.
460: The validity of the self-similar TF solution
461: and the subsequent treatment of the quantum fluctuation modes
462: is guaranteed by the validity of $\tilde{F}(\rho_0)=g\rho_0$, which in turn is
463: accurate to $1\%$ for $\gamma<0.05$ \cite{Lieb}.
464:
465: To give concrete examples, consider a system of $N=10^3 \ $ ${}^{23}$Na
466: atoms on a ring of circumference $L=16 R$, where $R$ is the
467: TF radius.
468: The axial trap potential is switched off at $t=0$, and we study the
469: resulting interference signal.
470: A qualitative estimate for the effective interaction strength
471: at time $t>0$ can be
472: given in terms of $\gamma(t)=2/[|a_{1D}|\rho_m(t)]$
473: \cite{Dunjko,Ohberg}, where $\rho_m(t)=\rho_0(x=0,t)$.
474: Let us first consider a system with trap frequencies $\omega_x=0.5$~kHz
475: and $\omega_\perp=50$~kHz, where $\gamma(0) \approx 0.0006$
476: indicates that the system is deeply in the TF regime
477: and phase fluctuations are very small.
478: The expanding wave packets begin to meet at time $t= 13$~ms.
479: We calculated the phase fluctuations from Eq.~(\ref{F})
480: with a UV cutoff $\hbar \Omega_j < \mu$ given by
481: the $t=0$ TF chemical potential, $\mu=m\omega_x^2 R^2/2$,
482: see Eq.~(\ref{rTF}).
483: In Fig.~\ref{fig2}, the resulting
484: interference fringes at time $t=$~16 ms
485: corresponding to $b(t) = 10$ are shown.
486: While there is a detectable interference signal at $T=4$~nK, interference
487: is completely washed out by thermal fluctuations at 10 nK.
488: As second example, consider the same system but with higher trap
489: frequencies,
490: $\omega_x = 1$~kHz and $\omega_{\perp}=100$~kHz,
491: see Fig.~\ref{fig3}.
492: Here we have stronger interactions, $\gamma(0) \approx 0.001$, but
493: the system still stays in the TF regime on the timescales of interest.
494: Clearly, pronounced interference patterns can be observed again.
495:
496: \begin{figure}
497: \centerline{\epsfysize=7cm \epsffile{f2.eps}}
498: \caption{ \label{fig2}
499: The scaled density profile in units of
500: $\rho_m(0)$ for $N=10^3$ expanding Na atoms at time
501: $t=16$~ms and temperature $T=4$ nK.
502: Trap frequencies are $\omega_x = 0.5$~kHz and
503: $\omega_{\perp}=50$~kHz. The inset shows the
504: corresponding density profile at $T=10$~nK.}
505: \end{figure}
506:
507: \begin{figure}
508: \centerline{\epsfysize=7cm \epsffile{f3.eps}}
509: \caption{ \label{fig3} Same as Fig.~\ref{fig2}, but with
510: $\omega_x=1$~kHz and $\omega_\perp=100$~kHz. The expanding clouds
511: meet at time $t=6.5$~ms, the snapshot is shown for $t=8$~ms.
512: The inset shows details of the interference fringes.}
513: \end{figure}
514:
515: \subsection{Tonks-Girardeau regime}\label{sec23}
516:
517: When the system leaves the TF regime during the expansion process,
518: self-similarity is violated \cite{Ohberg}, and
519: the solution of Eq.~(\ref{f_jLL}) is much more complicated.
520: However, analytical progress
521: is possible in the opposite TG limit. Assuming that one starts
522: with an initial trap corresponding to the TG regime, during the
523: subsequent expansion one will also stay in this regime,
524: and the density becomes self-similar again \cite{Dunjko},
525: see Eq.~(\ref{selfsimilar}) with $b(t)=\sqrt{1+\omega_x^2 t^2}$ and
526: \begin{equation}\label{tonks}
527: n(x)= n_{\rm Tonks}^0 \sqrt{1-x^2/R_0^2},
528: \end{equation}
529: where $n_{\rm Tonks}^0=2N/\pi R_0$ and
530: \begin{equation}
531: R_0= \sqrt{2N\hbar/m\omega_x}
532: \end{equation}
533: denotes the Tonks radius. Furthermore, Eq.~(\ref{phi0}) specifies
534: $\phi_0(x,t)$ again.
535:
536: Now Eq.~(\ref{f_jLL}) can be solved by the ansatz (\ref{phians}) with
537: \begin{equation}\label{ans2}
538: C_j(t) = [2\hbar m R_0 \Omega_j(t) b^2(t)/ \pi^2\hbar^2
539: n_{\rm Tonks}^0]^{-1/2}.
540: \end{equation}
541: Proceeding in the same spirit as above, using $y=x/R_0 b(t)$,
542: Eq.~(\ref{f_jLL}) leads to
543: \begin{equation}\label{fff}
544: \frac{ \tilde{G}_j}{\omega_x^2}
545: f_j(y) + (1-y^2) \frac{d^2}{dy^2} f_j(y) - y \frac{d}{dy} f_j(y) =
546: 0,
547: \end{equation}
548: where
549: \begin{equation}\label{tGj}
550: \tilde{G}_j = b^4 \left(\Omega_j^2 - \frac{3}{4}
551: (\dot{\Omega}_j/\Omega_j)^2 + \ddot{\Omega}_j/2\Omega_j
552: + \ddot{b}/b \right) .
553: \end{equation}
554: With $j$ denoting positive integers, Eq.~(\ref{fff}) has
555: a solution provided that
556: \begin{equation}\label{deq2}
557: \tilde{G}_j = j^2 \omega_x^2,
558: \end{equation}
559: which gives a differential equation determining $\Omega_j(t)$.
560: The solution to Eq.~(\ref{fff}) is then
561: \begin{equation}\label{tonksnew}
562: f_j(y) =\sqrt{ \frac{2j\Gamma(j+1)\Gamma(j)}{\Gamma^2(j+1/2)}}
563: P_j^{(-1/2, -1/2)} (y) ,
564: \end{equation}
565: where $P_j^{(-1/2,-1/2)}$ are Jacobi polynomials, and the
566: normalization condition is
567: \[
568: \int_{-1}^{1} dy (1-y^2)^{-1/2} f_j^2(y)=1.
569: \]
570: Amazingly, Eq.~(\ref{deq2}) is solved by the simple form
571: \begin{equation}\label{om2}
572: \Omega_j(t)/\omega_x = j/b^2(t),
573: \end{equation}
574: which holds on all timescales.
575: It is then straightforward
576: to obtain the fluctuation correlations from Eq.~(\ref{F}),
577: and the interference signal from Eq.~(\ref{signal}).
578:
579: \begin{figure}
580: \centerline{\epsfysize=7cm \epsffile{f4.eps}}
581: \caption{ \label{fig4}
582: The scaled density profile in units of $n_{\rm Tonks}^0$
583: for $N=10^3$ expanding ${}^{87}$Rb atoms at time $t=1$~s (see text).
584: The inset shows details of the interference fringes.
585: }
586: \end{figure}
587:
588: Notably, even at zero temperature, interference is practically
589: completely suppressed by many-body interactions.
590: In Fig.~\ref{fig4}, we show the results of the above
591: calculation for $N=10^3 \ $ ${}^{87}$Rb
592: atoms on a ring of circumference $L=16 R_0$, where
593: we assume a scattering length $a_s= 42.32$~nm,
594: e.g.~resulting from tuning via a Feshbach resonance.
595: Trap frequencies are $\omega_x = 10$~Hz and
596: $\omega_{\perp}=100$~kHz, which puts the system well into
597: the Tonks regime, $\gamma(0)\approx 14.3$.
598: At $t=0.8$~s the expanding wavepackets begin to meet, and
599: the scaled density profile
600: at time $t=1$~s and zero temperature is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig4}.
601: Interference amplitudes have decreased by orders of magnitude
602: when compared to the TF regime, but still tiny signatures
603: are observable.
604: At finite temperature, one then finds virtually no
605: sign of interference anymore, in accordance with
606: expectations based on previous work \cite{Gangardt}.
607: As a result, phase coherence is drastically suppressed in
608: the Tonks limit.
609:
610: Finally, in between the TF and TG limits, one must resort to
611: numerical techniques. After numerical solution of Eq.~(\ref{TGPE}),
612: numerical data for $\rho_0(x,t)$ and $\phi_0(x,t)$
613: could be used to solve the
614: eigenproblem corresponding to Eq.~(\ref{f_jLL}),
615: and subsequently the interference
616: problem. It is presently unclear whether this program can be
617: carried out in practice.
618: We shall pursue a different route in the next section, where analytical
619: results are given for a related setup employing a
620: $\delta$ potential for the initial axial trap. This allows to access
621: the full crossover between the two limiting cases
622: without approximations.
623: These results qualitatively confirm our
624: above statements obtained in the
625: TF and TG limits.
626:
627:
628: \section{Alternative approach}
629: \label{sec3}
630:
631: So far we have studied interference properties of atomic Bose gases
632: in 1D circular traps
633: after switching off an axial harmonic trap potential. Our
634: treatment had to rely on
635: the local density approximation (LDA) \cite{Dunjko}
636: (which requires sufficiently small $\omega_x$),
637: and, moreover, explicit results were only obtained in the TF and TG limits.
638: To check that the above picture is
639: consistent and robust,
640: in this section we consider a trap potential of the form
641: $V(x,t)=-V_0\delta(x) \Theta(-t)$,
642: assuming the circular
643: atom waveguide in Fig.~\ref{fig1} to already contain
644: $N_0$ atoms in the absence of $V(x,t)$, so that $\rho_0=N_0/L$
645: is the density away from the trap at $t<0$.
646: Let us then imagine that
647: $N\ll N_0$ additional atoms are injected ($N\propto V_0$ is tuned by the
648: trap depth)
649: in the distant past at $x=0$ by adiabatically switching on $V(x,t)$,
650: e.g.~from a BEC atom reservoir using a quantum tweezer \cite{Tweezer}.
651: At time $t=0$, the trap is switched off, and
652: we again wish to compute the interference signal. This setup
653: may be of relevance to experiments using injection of particles
654: with a quantum tweezer, or for microchip-trapped
655: cold atoms where confinement potentials are quite steep
656: \cite{Hansel}. Importantly, under the condition $N\ll N_0$,
657: this interference problem can be solved exactly by virtue of the
658: bosonization method. Using Eq.~(\ref{density-phase})
659: and the quantum fluctuations defined in Sec.~\ref{sec2}, one now arrives
660: at a standard (uniform and time-independent) Luttinger liquid Hamiltonian
661: \cite{Monien} plus the contribution of the trap,
662: \begin{equation} \label{Hlas}
663: H(t)= \frac{\hbar u}{2\pi } \int dx [ K
664: (\partial_x\Phi)^2 + K^{-1} (\pi \Pi)^2
665: ]- V_0 \Theta(-t) \Pi(0,t),
666: \end{equation}
667: where $u$ is the sound velocity and
668: $1\leq K <\infty$ is the dimensionless Luttinger parameter. Both
669: parameters are determined
670: by $g$ and $\rho_0$ \cite{Monien}. In particular, in the TG limit, $K=1$,
671: while $K\gg 1$ in the TF limit.
672: The effect of the trap potential
673: can then be included exactly by the time-dependent unitary
674: transformation $\Pi(x,t)\to \Pi(x,t)+ N \delta(x)\Theta(-t)$,
675: where $N= KV_0/\pi\hbar u$
676: ($N$ is assumed to be integer) gives the number of added atoms.
677: This allows us to obtain the expansion dynamics $\rho_0(x,t)=
678: \rho_0+\langle\Pi(x,t)\rangle$ and
679: the interference signal in closed form. From the equation of motion,
680: \begin{equation}
681: (-\partial_t^2 + u^2 \partial_x^2) \Pi(x,t) = N \Theta(-t)\partial_x^2
682: \delta(x) ,
683: \end{equation}
684: for $t<0$ we infer the density $n(x) = \rho_0+ N \delta(x)$, while for
685: $t>0$ the expanding density profile is
686: \begin{equation}
687: \rho_0(x,t) = \rho_0+ N [ \delta(x-ut) + \delta(x+ut) ]/2.
688: \end{equation}
689: Apparently, the initial $\delta$-peak in the density is
690: split into two counterpropagating parts, each moving with
691: velocity $u$. Furthermore, the phase $\phi_0(x,t)$ is easily found
692: in the form
693: \[
694: \phi_0(x,t)= \frac{\pi N}{2K} \Theta(t-|x|/u).
695: \]
696:
697: The interference signal then follows from Eq.~(\ref{signal}),
698: with the quantum fluctuations at $x\approx x'\approx \pm L/2$
699: entering as
700: \begin{equation}\label{FLL}
701: F(x,x',t) = \frac{1}{2K}
702: \ln\left|\frac{\hbar u}{\pi a_0 k_B T}\sinh\left(\frac{ \pi L k_B T}
703: {\hbar u} \right)\right|,
704: \end{equation}
705: where $a_0$ is a nonuniversal
706: UV cutoff length limiting the applicability of the continuum model
707: (\ref{Hlas}). Note that due to our assumption of
708: a constant density $\rho_0$ in the absence of the axial trap,
709: the fluctuation factor is now time-independent.
710: Equation (\ref{FLL}) implies power-law suppression of the
711: interference signal $\propto 1/L^{1/2K}$ for short circumference
712: $L<L_T$, where
713: \begin{equation}\label{LT}
714: L_T= \hbar u / \pi k_B T.
715: \end{equation}
716: This power law decays quite rapidly
717: in the Tonks limit ($K=1$), but interference
718: is only weakly suppressed in the TF limit.
719: Moreover, for large circumference $L>L_T$,
720: we find an exponential suppression of the interference signal,
721: $\propto \exp(- L/2 K L_T)$.
722: The findings of the previous section are therefore confirmed from
723: this simple yet exact calculation. There is a smooth crossover
724: between the TF and TG limits, described by the above expressions.
725:
726: \section{Conclusions}\label{sec4}
727:
728: In this paper, interference properties of interacting atomic Bose
729: gases in a 1D circular trap have been analyzed. After switching
730: off a trapping potential keeping the atoms in the narrow initial
731: region, the expanding atom clouds meet at the opposite side and
732: may produce an interference signal. This signal has been
733: computed for the case of a harmonic initial trap, with explicit
734: results in the Tonks-Girardeau regime and in the Thomas-Fermi limit,
735: including the effects of thermal fluctuations.
736: Our central conclusion is that many-body interactions strongly
737: suppress phase coherence and interference. In fact, using this
738: setup interference is unlikely to be observed in the strongly
739: interacting Tonks gas. Even in the Thomas-Fermi regime,
740: one needs rather low temperatures and steep initial
741: traps to ensure a significant interference signal.
742: Further support for these conclusions can be drawn from
743: a simple yet exact calculation based on a slightly different
744: setup where one injects a small number of additional atoms
745: into the system, traps them for some time and then studies
746: the expansion and the subsequent interference signal.
747:
748: \acknowledgments
749:
750: We thank R. Graham for valuable discussions.
751: This work has been supported by the DFG under the SFB/TR-12.
752:
753:
754: \begin{thebibliography}{41}
755: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
756: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
757: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
758: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
759: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
760: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
761: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
762: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
763: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
764: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
765: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
766: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
767:
768: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kasevich}(2002)}]{Kasevich}
769: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~A.} \bibnamefont{Kasevich}},
770: \bibinfo{journal}{Science} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{298}},
771: \bibinfo{pages}{136} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
772:
773: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Burnett et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Burnett, Julienne,
774: Lett, Tiesinga, and Williams}}]{Feshbach}
775: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Burnett}},
776: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~S.} \bibnamefont{Julienne}},
777: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~D.} \bibnamefont{Lett}},
778: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Tiesinga}}, \bibnamefont{and}
779: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~J.} \bibnamefont{Williams}},
780: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{416}},
781: \bibinfo{pages}{225} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
782:
783: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Rolston and Phillips}(2002)}]{Rolston}
784: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~L.} \bibnamefont{Rolston}} \bibnamefont{and}
785: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~D.} \bibnamefont{Phillips}},
786: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{416}},
787: \bibinfo{pages}{219} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
788:
789: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dumke et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Dumke, Muther, Volk,
790: Ertmer, and Birkl}}]{Dumke}
791: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Dumke}},
792: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Muther}},
793: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Volk}},
794: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ertmer}}, \bibnamefont{and}
795: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Birkl}},
796: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}},
797: \bibinfo{pages}{220402} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
798:
799: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Schreck et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Schreck, Khaykovich,
800: Corwin, Ferrari, Bourdel, Cubizolles, and Salomon}}]{Schreck}
801: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Schreck}},
802: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Khaykovich}},
803: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~L.} \bibnamefont{Corwin}},
804: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Ferrari}},
805: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Bourdel}},
806: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Cubizolles}},
807: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Salomon}},
808: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}},
809: \bibinfo{pages}{080403} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
810:
811: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Richard et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Richard, Gerbier,
812: Thywissen, Hugbart, Bouyer, and Aspect}}]{Richard}
813: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Richard}},
814: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Gerbier}},
815: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~H.} \bibnamefont{Thywissen}},
816: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Hugbart}},
817: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Bouyer}}, \bibnamefont{and}
818: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Aspect}},
819: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{91}},
820: \bibinfo{pages}{010405} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
821:
822: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{H{\"a}nsel et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{H{\"a}nsel,
823: Hommelhoff, H{\"a}nsch, and Reichel}}]{Hansel}
824: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{H{\"a}nsel}},
825: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Hommelhoff}},
826: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~W.} \bibnamefont{H{\"a}nsch}},
827: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Reichel}},
828: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{413}},
829: \bibinfo{pages}{498} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
830:
831: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ott et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Ott, Fortagh,
832: Schlotterbeck, Grossmann, and Zimmermann}}]{Ott}
833: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Ott}},
834: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Fortagh}},
835: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Schlotterbeck}},
836: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Grossmann}},
837: \bibnamefont{and}
838: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Zimmermann}},
839: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}},
840: \bibinfo{pages}{230401} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
841:
842: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Leanhardt et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Leanhardt, Shin,
843: Chikkatur, Kielpinski, Ketterle, and Pritchard}}]{Pritchard}
844: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~E.} \bibnamefont{Leanhardt}},
845: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Shin}},
846: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~P.} \bibnamefont{Chikkatur}},
847: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Kielpinski}},
848: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ketterle}}, \bibnamefont{and}
849: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~E.} \bibnamefont{Pritchard}},
850: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{90}},
851: \bibinfo{pages}{100404} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
852:
853: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Bongs et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Bongs, Burger,
854: Dettmer, Hellweg, Arlt, Ertmer, and Sengstock}}]{Bongs}
855: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Bongs}},
856: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Burger}},
857: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Dettmer}},
858: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Hellweg}},
859: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Arlt}},
860: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ertmer}}, \bibnamefont{and}
861: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Sengstock}},
862: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{63}},
863: \bibinfo{pages}{031602} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
864:
865: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gorlitz et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Gorlitz, Vogels,
866: Leanhardt, Raman, Gustavson, Abo-Shaeer, Chikkatur, Gupta, Inouye, Rosenband
867: et~al.}}]{Gorlitz}
868: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gorlitz}},
869: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~M.} \bibnamefont{Vogels}},
870: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~E.} \bibnamefont{Leanhardt}},
871: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Raman}},
872: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~L.} \bibnamefont{Gustavson}},
873: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~R.} \bibnamefont{Abo-Shaeer}},
874: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~P.} \bibnamefont{Chikkatur}},
875: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Gupta}},
876: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Inouye}},
877: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Rosenband}},
878: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
879: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}}, \bibinfo{pages}{130402}
880: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
881:
882: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dettmer et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Dettmer, Hellweg,
883: Ryytty, Arlt, Ertmer, Sengstock, Petrov, Shlyapnikov, Kreutzmann, Santos
884: et~al.}}]{Dettmer}
885: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Dettmer}},
886: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Hellweg}},
887: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Ryytty}},
888: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{Arlt}},
889: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ertmer}},
890: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Sengstock}},
891: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~S.} \bibnamefont{Petrov}},
892: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~V.} \bibnamefont{Shlyapnikov}},
893: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Kreutzmann}},
894: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Santos}},
895: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
896: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}}, \bibinfo{pages}{160406}
897: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
898:
899: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Monien et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Monien, Linn, and
900: Elstner}}]{Monien}
901: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Monien}},
902: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Linn}}, \bibnamefont{and}
903: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Elstner}},
904: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}},
905: \bibinfo{pages}{3395} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
906:
907: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lieb et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Lieb, Seiringer, and
908: Yngvason}}]{Lieb2}
909: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~H.} \bibnamefont{Lieb}},
910: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Seiringer}},
911: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Yngvason}}
912: (\bibinfo{year}{2003}), \eprint{cond-mat/0304071}.
913:
914: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Petrov et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Petrov, Shlyapnikov,
915: and Walraven}}]{Petrov1D}
916: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~S.} \bibnamefont{Petrov}},
917: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~V.} \bibnamefont{Shlyapnikov}},
918: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~T.~M.}
919: \bibnamefont{Walraven}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
920: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{85}}, \bibinfo{pages}{3745} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
921:
922: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Graham}(2000)}]{Graham1}
923: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Graham}},
924: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},
925: \bibinfo{pages}{023609} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
926:
927: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Csord{\'a}s and Graham}(2001)}]{Graham2}
928: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Csord{\'a}s}} \bibnamefont{and}
929: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Graham}},
930: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{64}},
931: \bibinfo{pages}{013619} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
932:
933: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Tonks}(1936)}]{Tonks}
934: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Tonks}},
935: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{50}},
936: \bibinfo{pages}{955} (\bibinfo{year}{1936}).
937:
938: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Girardeau}(1960)}]{Gir1}
939: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Girardeau}},
940: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{1}},
941: \bibinfo{pages}{516} (\bibinfo{year}{1960}).
942:
943: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dunjko et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Dunjko, Lorent, and
944: Olshanii}}]{Dunjko}
945: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Dunjko}},
946: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Lorent}}, \bibnamefont{and}
947: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Olshanii}},
948: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{86}},
949: \bibinfo{pages}{5413} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
950:
951: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Mora and Castin}(2003)}]{mora}
952: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Mora}} \bibnamefont{and}
953: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Castin}},
954: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{67}},
955: \bibinfo{pages}{053615} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
956:
957: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Andersen et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Andersen,
958: AlKhawaja, and Stoof}}]{stoof}
959: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~O.} \bibnamefont{Andersen}},
960: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.}~\bibnamefont{AlKhawaja}},
961: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~T.~C.}
962: \bibnamefont{Stoof}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
963: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{88}}, \bibinfo{pages}{070407}
964: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
965:
966: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Olshanii}(1998)}]{Olshanii}
967: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Olshanii}},
968: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{81}},
969: \bibinfo{pages}{938} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
970:
971: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lieb and Liniger}(1963)}]{Lieb}
972: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~H.} \bibnamefont{Lieb}} \bibnamefont{and}
973: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Liniger}},
974: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{130}},
975: \bibinfo{pages}{1605} (\bibinfo{year}{1963}).
976:
977: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{\"O}hberg and Santos}(2002)}]{Ohberg}
978: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{\"O}hberg}} \bibnamefont{and}
979: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Santos}},
980: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}},
981: \bibinfo{pages}{240402} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
982:
983: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Girardeau and Wright}(2000)}]{GW}
984: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~D.} \bibnamefont{Girardeau}}
985: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~M.}
986: \bibnamefont{Wright}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
987: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{84}}, \bibinfo{pages}{5239} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
988:
989: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pedri et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Pedri, Santos,
990: {\"O}hberg, and Stringari}}]{Pedri}
991: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Pedri}},
992: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Santos}},
993: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{\"O}hberg}},
994: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Stringari}}
995: (\bibinfo{year}{2003}), \eprint{cond-mat/0304660}.
996:
997: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gangardt and Shlyapnikov}(2003)}]{Gangardt}
998: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~M.} \bibnamefont{Gangardt}} \bibnamefont{and}
999: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~V.} \bibnamefont{Shlyapnikov}},
1000: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{90}},
1001: \bibinfo{pages}{010401} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
1002:
1003: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Petrov et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Petrov, Shlyapnikov,
1004: and Walraven}}]{Petrov3D}
1005: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~S.} \bibnamefont{Petrov}},
1006: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~V.} \bibnamefont{Shlyapnikov}},
1007: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~T.~M.}
1008: \bibnamefont{Walraven}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
1009: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}}, \bibinfo{pages}{050404}
1010: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
1011:
1012: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Das et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Das,
1013: Girardeau, and Wright}}]{Das1}
1014: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~K.} \bibnamefont{Das}},
1015: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~D.} \bibnamefont{Girardeau}},
1016: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~M.}
1017: \bibnamefont{Wright}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
1018: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}}, \bibinfo{pages}{170404}
1019: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}{\natexlab{a}}).
1020:
1021: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Das et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{Das,
1022: Lapeyre, and Wright}}]{Das2}
1023: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~K.} \bibnamefont{Das}},
1024: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~J.} \bibnamefont{Lapeyre}},
1025: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~M.}
1026: \bibnamefont{Wright}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A}
1027: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{65}}, \bibinfo{pages}{063603}
1028: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}{\natexlab{b}}).
1029:
1030: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Inouye et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Inouye, Pfau, Gupta,
1031: Chikkatur, Gorlitz, Pritchard, and Ketterle}}]{Pfau}
1032: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Inouye}},
1033: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Pfau}},
1034: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Gupta}},
1035: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~P.} \bibnamefont{Chikkatur}},
1036: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gorlitz}},
1037: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~E.} \bibnamefont{Pritchard}},
1038: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ketterle}},
1039: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{402}},
1040: \bibinfo{pages}{641} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
1041:
1042: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hellweg et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Hellweg,
1043: Cacciapuoti, Kottke, Schulte, Sengstock, Ertmer, and Arlt}}]{Hellweg}
1044: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Hellweg}},
1045: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Cacciapuoti}},
1046: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Kottke}},
1047: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Schulte}},
1048: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Sengstock}},
1049: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ertmer}}, \bibnamefont{and}
1050: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{Arlt}},
1051: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{91}},
1052: \bibinfo{pages}{010406} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
1053:
1054: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Inouye et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Inouye, Andrews,
1055: Stenger, Miesner, Stamper-Kurn, and Ketterle}}]{Inouye}
1056: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Inouye}},
1057: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~R.} \bibnamefont{Andrews}},
1058: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Stenger}},
1059: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-J.} \bibnamefont{Miesner}},
1060: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~M.} \bibnamefont{Stamper-Kurn}},
1061: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ketterle}},
1062: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{392}},
1063: \bibinfo{pages}{151} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
1064:
1065: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Wu and Griffin}(1996)}]{Wu}
1066: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~C.} \bibnamefont{Wu}} \bibnamefont{and}
1067: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Griffin}},
1068: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}},
1069: \bibinfo{pages}{4204} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
1070:
1071: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ho and Ma}(1999)}]{Ho}
1072: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~L.} \bibnamefont{Ho}} \bibnamefont{and}
1073: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Ma}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.
1074: Low. Temp. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{115}}, \bibinfo{pages}{61}
1075: (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
1076:
1077: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kagan et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{Kagan, Surkov, and
1078: Shlyapnikov}}]{Kagan}
1079: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Kagan}},
1080: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~L.} \bibnamefont{Surkov}},
1081: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~V.}
1082: \bibnamefont{Shlyapnikov}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A}
1083: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1753} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
1084:
1085: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Castin and Dum}(1996)}]{Castin}
1086: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Castin}} \bibnamefont{and}
1087: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Dum}},
1088: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{77}},
1089: \bibinfo{pages}{5315} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
1090:
1091: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Stringari}(1996)}]{Stringari}
1092: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Stringari}},
1093: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{77}},
1094: \bibinfo{pages}{2360} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
1095:
1096: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Luxat and Griffin}(2003)}]{Luxat}
1097: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~L.} \bibnamefont{Luxat}} \bibnamefont{and}
1098: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Griffin}},
1099: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{67}},
1100: \bibinfo{pages}{043603} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
1101:
1102: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Diener et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Diener, Wu, Raizen,
1103: and Niu}}]{Tweezer}
1104: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~B.} \bibnamefont{Diener}},
1105: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Wu}},
1106: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~G.} \bibnamefont{Raizen}},
1107: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Niu}},
1108: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}},
1109: \bibinfo{pages}{070401} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
1110:
1111: \end{thebibliography}
1112: \end{document}
1113: