1: \documentclass[aps,preprint,groupedaddress,floatfix]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphics}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
5: %\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Maximisation Principles and Daisyworld}
8: \author{G.J. Ackland}
9: \affiliation{School of Physics, The University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Road,
10: Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK
11: E-mail: gjackland@ed.ac.uk}
12:
13:
14: \begin{abstract}
15: {\bf We investigate whether the equilibrium time averaged state of
16: a self-organising system with many internal
17: degrees of freedom, 2D- daisyworld, can be described by
18: optimising a single quantity.
19: Unlike physical systems where a principle of maximum energy production
20: has been observed, Daisyworld follows evolutionary dynamics rather
21: than Hamiltonian dynamics. We find that this is sufficient to
22: invalidate the MEP principle, finding instead a different principle,
23: that the system self-organises to a state which maximises the amount of life.}
24:
25: Keywords: Daisyworld, entropy, feedback, gaia, logistic
26: \end{abstract}
27:
28: \date{\today}
29: \maketitle
30:
31:
32:
33: \section{Introduction}
34:
35:
36: Thermodynamics provides an excellent macroscopic description of the
37: physics of matter in terms of time-independent
38: averaged quantities such as energy, entropy, free energy.
39: These arise from the underlying microscopic, time-dependent motions of
40: atoms. The two descriptions are unified through statistical
41: mechanics, and therefore contain the same information, but in
42: in the absence of atomic-level detail
43: the thermodynamic picture is far more useful for everyday application.
44:
45: It is interesting to consider whether ecosystems can similarly be described
46: by macroscopic averages rather than details of individual species.
47:
48: Recent work has suggested that the principle of
49: maximum entropy production (MEP) may be a good way to investigate
50: complex, self organising systems. Lorenz et al (2001,2002)
51: suggest that the atmosphere of Earth and Titan may be in such a state.
52: Dewar (2003) has shown
53: that other known distributions of open, dynamical systems, such as
54: self-organised criticality (Bak et al, 1988), the fluctuation theorem (Crooks, 1999) and Zipf's Law (Zipf 1932).
55: The basis of Dewar's argument is that if one takes an appropriate
56: average over all its internal possibilities\footnote{This is implicit
57: in using the sum over all paths to build a partition function},
58: consistent with the known
59: fluxes and internal energies, MEP will emerge. Of course, real
60: systems do not actually sample all possibilities, so this only
61: provides a sufficient conditions for MEP, the necessary condition is
62: that the average over possibilities actually observed converges
63: rapidly. This parallels an argument in equilibrium statistical
64: mechanics, where thermodynamic averages are calculated from an ergodic
65: hypothesis (that all microstates contribute according to Boltzmann
66: statistics) to which the chaotic trajectories of real systems
67: rapidly converge.
68:
69: Boltzmann statistics follow from Hamiltonian
70: dynamics. In the case of ecological systems,
71: the dynamics are driven by evolution, and no proof of
72: convergence of an evolving
73: system to a Boltzmann-type distribution yet exists. It is interesting
74: to ask whether more general principles, such as MEP, can be applied in
75: an ecological context. In this paper we explore a particular
76: ecological model, 2D-Daisyworld, in which the MEP state can be
77: rigorously defined, to see whether the system does, in fact,
78: self-organise thereto.
79:
80: The
81: 2D-Daisyworld, is based on
82: previous work (Von Bloh et al., 1997,1999, Ackland et al 2003). Life is
83: reduced to a single species 'daisies' with a single property
84: (albedo) upon which selection can act. The local environment is
85: reduced to a single variable temperature. The planet is warmed by
86: a Sun whose heat production (insolation) increases slowly. Growth is
87: only possible across a narrow range of temperatures (5-40$^o$C) with
88: the mid point 22.5$^o$C being optimal and the growth rate dropping
89: parabolically to zero at the extremes. Local temperature is partly
90: determined by insolation and albedo and partly by diffusive heat flow
91: across the planet. Growth occurs by seeding of bare ground adjacent to
92: existing daisy populations, eliminating the need in the original,
93: zero-dimensional daisyworld of Watson and Lovelock, (1983) to predefine
94: different local environments for different albedo types. Each
95: (asexual) offspring mutates in albedo at random.
96:
97: The original daisyworld is deterministic, cast in
98: the form of differential equations, and has spawned many variants
99: to incorporate specific evolutionary dynamics or natural selection
100: (Lenton, 1998, Lenton and Lovelock 2000, Lovelock 1998, Robertson
101: and Robinson, 1998, Staley 2002, Sugimoto, 2002).
102: The 2D version is stochastic, with
103: many internal degrees of freedom, allowing an entropy production to
104: be defined by the range of albedo (called biodiversity), as well as
105: through heat flow.
106:
107: Historically, daisyworlds were designed to illustrate the
108: self-regulating effects of coupling between life and the
109: environment, and their impact on evolution by group selection.
110: This is not the issue of interest here - daisyworld is used as
111: a test case for MEP.
112:
113:
114: \section{Methods}
115: The temperature field changes as:
116:
117: \begin{eqnarray} C\dot{T}(x,y,t) &=& D_T\nabla^2{T}(x,y,t) \nonumber \\
118: & & -\sigma_B{T}^4(x,y,t) \nonumber \\
119: & & + S_L(1-A(x,y,t)) \end{eqnarray}
120:
121:
122: Where $C=2500$ is the heat
123: capacity, T the temperature field, $D_T=D/C$ the thermal diffusion
124: constant $\sigma_B=5.67\times 10^{-8}$
125: the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, $S_L=S/432.3$, the insolation
126: normalised to that which gives T=295.5K on a bare planet
127: and $A$ the albedo field (daisy/bare ground). Each lattice point has an
128: associated temperature and albedo. $A$ ranges from 0 to 1, with 0.5
129: being the value for bare ground. The daisy field is discrete and
130: evolves stochastically. We use a square lattice with eight
131: neighbouring sites. At each time step each site is examined and:
132:
133: (1) If occupied by a daisy, it changes to bare ground with probability
134: $\gamma(T)$
135: (the "death rate").
136:
137: (2) If
138: occupied by bare ground, the site is populated with probability $\beta(T)$
139: (the "growth rate").
140:
141: The new daisy
142: has the albedo of its parent, from a randomly chosen neighbouring site,
143: with a random fluctuation
144: (mutation) drawn from a uniform distribution between r and -r. If the
145: neighbouring site is bare, no growth occurs.
146:
147:
148:
149: \section{MEP or Gaia?}
150:
151: Two global principles will be advanced, these are not new, but formal
152: definitions for the present system are made.
153:
154: 1/ Maximal Entropy Production (Dewar, 2003) - the system self organises
155: to produce entropy as rapidly as possible
156:
157: 2/ The Gaia principle (Lovelock, 1998) - the system self organises
158: to maximise the amount of life
159:
160: In previous work on the 2D case (Ackland et al 2003), it was shown that
161: multiple solutions satisfied the Gaia principle. A secondary
162: criterion was found, maximisation of biodiversity
163: entropy\footnote{Finite diffusivity leads to clump formation, which confounds this
164: result due to neglect the entropy associated with variation in clump
165: size. In principle this could be incorporated, but for the present
166: purposes the maximum entropy principle observed in the limit of
167: infinite diffusivity is sufficient.}
168: $N_A \ln N_A$
169: where $N_A$ is the number of daisies with albedo A, leading to a mean
170: distribution
171:
172: \begin{equation} \langle N_A \rangle = e^{\beta A} \end{equation}
173:
174: with $\beta$ given by the solution of:
175:
176: \begin{equation} \langle A \rangle \int^1_0 \exp(\beta A)dA =
177: \int^1_0 A \exp(\beta A)dA\end{equation}
178:
179:
180: Thus the global state of 2D daisyworld was classified
181: in terms of two quantities, maximised
182: growth (i.e. temperature regulation at the favoured growth
183: temperature) and maximised biodiversity. These are equivalent
184: to satisfying both MEP and Gaia principles simultaneously.
185:
186: It is possible to make a small change to the 2D daisyworld so that
187: Gaia and MEP cannot be satisfied simultaneously.
188: To do this simply requires making the
189: death rate temperature dependent, and the temperature for minimum
190: death rate ($T_d$) different from that for maximum birthrate ($T_g$). In
191: this case the MEP will predict that the temperature will adjust close
192: to $T_g$, while the Gaia hypothesis predicts it will adjust close to $T_d$.
193: \footnote{We say "close to": these are the limiting cases for low death rates
194: and high birth rates, assuming uncorrelated dead patches.}
195: The
196: explanation for this is straightforward: MEP predicts that entropy
197: (biodiversity) be produced at the fastest possible rate: maximising
198: the birthrate. By contrast, the Gaia hypothesis
199: is that the total number of daisies be maximised: minimising deathrate.
200: Thus investigating whether the mean
201: temperature tends to $T_g$ or $T_d$ determines which (if either)
202: of the two hypotheses
203: applies. Figure.\ref{fig:2d2} shows the variation of
204: mean temperature and population as a function of insolation: the mean
205: temperature obtained is $T_d$ and the population is $1-\gamma(T_d)$.
206: Thus we conclude that the dynamics satisfy Gaia rather than MEP.
207:
208:
209:
210: \section{Thermal Entropy Production}
211:
212: The arguments above pertain to biodiversity entropy. With a finite
213: diffusivity, one can also investigate whether the MEP can be applied
214: to entropy production by heatflow in daisyworld. There are conceptual
215: difficulties with defining the system here - the models for MEP on
216: Earth (Ozawa et al, 2003), and Dewar's (2002)
217: formulation assume constant flows of
218: energy into and out of the system; the self-organising albedo of
219: daisyworld is able to regulate these flows. Similarly, the diffusion
220: constant is fixed in 2D-daisyworld, whereas in atmospheric models it
221: is assumed to self adjust. Notwithstanding this, there is a range of
222: temperatures in 2D daisyworld, and heat is transported from hotter to
223: colder regions, so we can define thermal entropy production\footnote{factor of two arises from double counting} as
224:
225: \begin{equation}
226: dS/dT = \int \frac{dQ}{T} = \sum_{i} \sum^8_{k=1} \frac{D_T (T_i - T_k)}{2T_i}
227: \end{equation}
228:
229: Given the constraints on flow, it is not straightforward to determine
230: the maximum possible entropy production. However, after
231: an abrupt change in the external forcing (insolation) the system will
232: be out of equilibrium, and will then evolve towards a steady state. If
233: MEP holds, the state immediately after the change should have lower
234: entropy production than the steady state. Figure \ref{fig:entropy}
235: shows no sign of
236: such behaviour. Monitoring entropy production also enables us to
237: monitor another property, the net heat flow in and out of the system.
238: In steady state, the mean values of these heat flows should be equal
239: - in 0D daisyworlds solutions initially assumed
240: input and output were in balance at all times -
241: this is not required for a nonlinear system, but proof of the
242: stability of these solutions came later (Saunders, 1994). In the
243: 2D-daisyworld Figure \ref{fig:ebalance}
244: shows the time variation of flow in and flow out. An
245: interesting feature here is that flow in (basically albedo)
246: fluctuates much faster than flow out
247: (basically temperature), which also has a delayed response
248: of many daisy lifetimes.
249:
250: Observations of planetary MEP are
251: presumed to indicate that large-scale atmospheric heat transfer mechanisms are
252: self-organising. However, even in the curved-planet
253: version of 2D-daisyworld (Ackland et al, 2003),
254: very strong temperature regulation
255: eliminates large scale temperature variation and hence the driving
256: force for the atmosphere (except in the case of desert formation).
257: Figure \ref{fig:entropy}
258: shows that the mean heat entropy produced per cell does not tend
259: to a maximum during equilibration after a sharp change in insolation.
260: We this conclude that no MEP principle applies to heatflow in 2D daisyworld.
261:
262: We examined whether there was an optimum value for
263: the diffusion constant D: at given S, heat entropy
264: is largely independent of D. This is non-trivial, since it
265: implies that for high D temperature variations are suppressed
266: precisely enough to compensate for the increased diffusion constant.
267: However, it indicates that even if D could be optimised by
268: a hypothetical daisyworld atmosphere, in the presence of strong temperature
269: regulation no detectable maximum entropy producing value
270: of D exists.
271:
272: \section{ MEP in Original daisyworld }
273:
274: In Watson and Lovelock's (1983) 0D
275: daisyworld two daisy albedos exist, denoted by suffices b and
276: w, with albedo $A_b=0.25$ and $A_w=0.75$
277: respectively. The relevant equations are:
278:
279:
280: Change of fractional areas occupied by each daisy type (set to zero at
281: equilibrium)
282:
283: \begin{equation} da_i/dt = a_i(x\beta_i-\gamma);
284: \label{D1} \end{equation}
285:
286: Fraction of free surface for growth
287:
288: \begin{equation}x=1-\sum_i a_i; \label{D2} \end{equation}
289:
290: Growth rates for daisies.
291:
292: \begin{equation}\beta_i={\rm max}\{0,1-((22.5-T_i)/17.5)^2 \};
293: \label{D3}\end{equation}
294:
295: Mean planetary albedo (reflectivity)
296:
297: \begin{equation} A_p = x/2 + \sum_i A_ia_i; \label{D4} \end{equation}
298:
299: Local temperatures over daisyfields
300:
301: \begin{equation} \label{D5}
302: (T_i+273)^4 = q(A_p-A_i)+(T_e+273)^4 \end{equation}
303:
304: One further equation closes the set - this represents the equality of
305: absorbed and emitted heat,
306: As we
307: saw in the 2D case, this equality strictly should be considered as a
308: time average, however if we assume that no variable large heat
309: reservoirs (e.g. icecaps) exist the timescales are such that the
310: following equality holds:
311:
312: \begin{equation}(T_e +273)^4 = LS/\sigma_{B}(1-A_p) \label{D6} \end{equation}
313:
314: S being an insolation, L a variable of order unity, and
315: emitted by Stefan-Boltzmann radiation.
316:
317: The usual conclusion from this model is that the daisies
318: moderate the temperature, however
319: the graph of T $vs$ L (figure \ref{fig:0d2}a): shows that
320: $T_e$ is not optimised to the optimum for growth.
321: In contrast, a plot of x $vs$ L (figure \ref{fig:0d2}b)
322: shows that x is a minimum for all L.
323:
324: The daisyworld equations can be solved analytically. The solutions
325: fall into four
326: independent classes: no daisies, black-only, white-only, both types.
327: At a given
328: insolation
329: only one ``living'' solution is stable if the simulation is
330: started with non-zero concentration of both daisy types. Dead and living
331: solutions coexist in regions where the dead planet temperature lies
332: outside the limits for growth (5-40$^o$C).
333: The stable solutions (Fig.\ref{fig:0d2}) have been found dynamically,
334: (iterating equations \ref{D1}-\ref{D6} to self consistency) by
335: numerous authors. The important point here is that
336: the {\it stable} solution
337: can be determined by minimisation of $x$ among allowed
338: solutions. Adopting the lowest $x$ is the
339: 0D equivalent to the Gaian principle of maximum life,
340: as found in the 2D case.
341:
342: As a further test, we introduce a third daisy species (grey) with
343: albedo 0.5, the same as bare ground and therefore with no regulating effect.
344: Equations \ref{D1} show that coexistence of three species is impossible,
345: and in fact the stable solutions (Fig.\ref{fig:0d3})
346: traverse regions of black-only,
347: black and grey, grey only, grey and white, white only. In each region
348: unstable equilibria exist for other combinations, and in each case the
349: unstable equilibria have higher $x$ than the total one. This result is
350: robust against changes to $q$, $A_i$ and $\gamma$ (including species
351: dependent $\gamma$).
352:
353: The equilibrium solution to daisyworld can also be obtained by
354: either integrating equation \ref{D1} or with a minimisation of
355: $x$ with respect to $a_i$ subject to constraints.
356: Each gives the same solution (Figs.\ref{fig:0d2},\ref{fig:0d3}),
357: independent of the history of the system. Thus {\it the equilibrium state
358: in 2D and 0D daisyworld can be determined assuming the Gaia principle,
359: without knowing
360: detailed dynamics, just as the equilibrium states of thermodynamic systems
361: can be determined by minimising free energy.}
362:
363:
364: \section{Gaia and MEP in the logistic Map}
365:
366: The logistic map is another widely used model for population growth
367: (Hassell, Lawton and May, 1976).
368: The resulting populations famously follow the period doubling route
369: to chaos. There is no natural selection and again it is interesting
370: to ask whether this model displays any kind of maximum population/maximum
371: entropy behaviour.
372:
373: The classical logistic map gives an nth population size
374: of
375:
376: \begin{equation}
377: y(n)=ay(n-1)[1-y(n-1)]
378: \end{equation}
379:
380: The equilibrium distribution for $y$ depends only on the parameter $a$.
381: The mean population, averaged over 40000 iterations, is shown
382: as a function of $a$ in fig\ref{log1}. It exhibits a lot of
383: structure which can be connected with the bifurcation diagram of the
384: logistic map. The mean population of the attractor is higher than would be
385: expected from maximum entropy (all levels equally occupied).
386:
387: Turning now to entropy, there are many definitions related to the
388: population distribution by analogy with the 2D daisyworld. For example,
389: the Tsallis entropy (Latora et al 2000)
390:
391: \begin{equation}
392: S = \sum_{i=1}^N log(P(y_i)) / Nlog(M/N)
393: \end{equation}
394:
395: where $P(y_i)$ is the number of occurences of a population
396: between $\frac{i-1}{N}$ and $\frac{i}{N}$ during M iterations
397: of the logistic map (taken after a 1000 iteration equilibration period).
398:
399: This quantity has a maximum possible value of 1, and
400: (neglecting numerous distinct special cases of
401: limit cycles) its value tends relatively smoothly to this value
402: with increasing $a$. However, its actual
403: value depends on N. This only
404: tells us that the area lying within the attractor increases with $a$.
405:
406: The attractors in the logistic map provide some constraints
407: on the mean value of $y$ and the Tsallis entropy: it is
408: difficult to define what the
409: ``maximum life'' solution would be. Thus while it is notable that
410: perturbed logistic map dynamics gives mean population in its
411: stable region above 0.5 for all $a$, no quantitative principle emerges.
412:
413: \section{Conclusions} The 2D-daisyworld model has been used as a
414: testbed to determine whether any global maximisation is applicable to a
415: system governed by the dynamics of natural selection.
416: We find that Maximum Entropy Production is not valid here, either
417: for biodiversity or heat transfer entropy. This casts doubt on some
418: recent work in which the MEP is assumed as a constraint and used to
419: obtain a solution (e.g. Pujol, 2003). Analysis of 2D and 0D cases
420: suggests that daisyworlds appear to obey a separate
421: optimisation principle, in the simple 2D case indistinguishable from
422: MEP, that of maximising the amount of life present
423: in the system. The logistic map attractors have above average population,
424: but for this system it is difficult to define what the maximal population
425: value should be.
426:
427: The more fundamental implication is that stability of a
428: dynamic equilibrium can be determined as an optimisation problem on
429: the properties of the system as observed, and that detailed
430: integration of system dynamics through time may be unnecessary in
431: determining the equilibrium state.
432:
433:
434: \section{References}
435:
436:
437: P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, "Self-organized
438: criticality", Physical Review A 38 (1988) 364
439:
440: G. E. Crooks,
441: "The Entropy Production Fluctuation Theorem and the Nonequilibrium Work Relation for Free Energy Differences",
442: Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721 (1999),
443:
444: Dewar, R.C.
445: Information theoretic explanation of maximum entropy production, the fluctuation theorem and self-organized criticality in non-equilibrium stationary states.
446: J.Phys.A 36 631 (2003)
447:
448:
449: %Harding, S.P. and Lovelock, J.E. (1996). Exploiter-mediated Coexistence and Frequency
450: %Dependent Selection in a Numerical Model of Biodiversity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 182, 109-116.
451:
452: Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H. and R. M. May. 1976. Patterns of dynamical behavior in single species populations. J. Animal Ecology. 45: 471-476.
453:
454:
455:
456: Kirchner, J.W. (2002). The Gaia hypothesis: Fact, theory, and wishful thinking. Climatic
457: Change 52, 391-408.
458:
459: Lenton, T.M. (1998). Gaia and natural selection. Nature 394, 439-447.
460:
461: Lenton, T.M. and Lovelock, J.E. (2000). Daisyworld is Darwinian: Constraints on
462: Adaptation are Important for Planetary Self-Regulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology
463: 206, 109-114.
464:
465: %Lenton, T.M. and Von Bloh, W. (2001). Biotic feedback extends the life span of the biosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 28, 1715-1718.
466:
467: Lorenz, R.D. (2002)
468: Planets, life and the production of entropy.
469: International Journal of Astrobiology 1, 3-13.
470:
471: Lorenz, R.D., Lunine, J.I., Withers, P.G. and McKay, C.P. (2001)
472: Titan, Mars and Earth: Entropy Production by Latitudinal Heat Transport.
473: Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 415-418.
474:
475: Lovelock, J.E. (1988). The Ages of Gaia - A Biography of Our Living Earth. New
476: York: W. W. Norton and Co.
477:
478: % Ya.B. Pesin, Russian Math. Surveys 32 (1977) 55.
479:
480: Latora,V. Baranger,M. Rapisarda,A. and C. Tsallis,C. "Generalization to nonextensive systems of the rate of entropy increase: the case of the logistic map", Physics Letters A 273 (2000) 97.
481:
482: May, R. M. 1976. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature. 261: 459-467.
483:
484: Ozawa,H. Ohmura,A. Lorenz,R.D. Pujol,T.
485: The second law of thermodynamics and the global climate system - A review of maximum entropy production principle. Reviews of Geophysics (accepted)
486:
487: Prasad, A, Mehra, V and Ramaswamy, R. Strange nonchaotic attractors
488: in the quasiperiodically forced logistic map
489: Physical Review E, 57, 1576-84 (1998)
490:
491: Pujol, T. (2002)
492: The consequence of maximum thermodynamic efficiency in Daisyworld.
493: J. theor. Biol. 217, 53-60.
494:
495: % R.Rai, R. S. Johal
496: %Generalized bit cumulants for chaotic systems: Numerical results.
497: %CondMat/9909288
498:
499:
500: Robertson, D. and Robinson, J. (1998). Darwinian Daisyworld. Journal of Theoretical
501: Biology 195, 129-134.
502:
503: Saunders, P.T. (1994). Evolution without Natural Selection: Further Implications of the
504: Daisyworld Parable. Journal of Theoretical Biology 166, 365-373.
505:
506: Staley M
507: Darwinian selection leads to Gaia in the long run
508: J Theor Biology 218 35 2002
509:
510: Sugimoto, T. (2002). Darwinian evolution does not rule out Gaia hypothesis. Journal of
511: Theoretical Biology.218, 447-455.
512:
513: Von Bloh, W., Block, A. and Schellnhuber, H.J. (1997) Self-stabilization of the biosphere
514: under global change: a tutorial geophysiological approach. Tellus 49B, 249-262.
515:
516: Von Bloh, W., Block, A. and Schellnhuber, H.J. (1999) Tutorial Modelling of geosphere-
517: biosphere interactions: the effect of percolation-type habitat fragmentation. Physica A
518: 266, 186-196.
519:
520: Watson, A.J. and Lovelock, J.E. (1983). Biological homeostasis of the global
521: environment: the parable of Daisyworld. Tellus 35B, 284-289.
522:
523: Zipf, G.K Selective Studies and the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1932)
524:
525:
526: \begin{figure}[htb]
527: \protect{\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{daisydie.eps}}
528: \caption{\label{fig:2d2}
529: Fractional daisy coverage and temperature
530: (in units of optimal growth temperature, $T_g=295.5$ ) from a calculation
531: with a 200x200 lattice
532: ($\gamma=0.02(1 - (\delta+T_d-T)(T+\delta-T_d)/2\delta^2$,
533: $\beta(T) =(\delta+T_g-T)(T+\delta-T_g)/\delta^2$.
534: $T_d=305.5$, $\delta=17.5) D=0.1, r=0.02$)
535: with scaled insolation S varied from 0.7 to 1.7
536: over $10^6$ updates of daisy and temperature fields with a temperature
537: dependent death rate, minimal at $T_d=305.5$. The graph shows that
538: in the non-desert regime population tends to its maximal value
539: ($1-x=\gamma/(\gamma+\beta)=0.99$
540: in the mean field approximation, where regrowth is always possible)
541: while temperature is regulated at $T_d$, rather than $T_g$ which would maximise(bio-)entropy production. Thus the governing global principal appears to be Gaian
542: (maximal life) rather then MEP. At higher S, fluctuations lead to long
543: lived deserts, which cause the mean field approximation to break down
544: as daisies cannot grow in the interior.
545: }
546: \end{figure}
547:
548:
549:
550: \begin{figure}[htb]
551: \protect{\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{Flow_inset2.eps}}
552: \caption{\label{fig:ebalance} Graph showing net total energy flows into (solid line) and out of
553: (dotted line) a 200x200 cell
554: 2D daisyworld system (diffusion = 0.1, death = 0.02, mutation = 0.02).
555: The simulation starts with S=1.0 and increases by discrete jumps of 0.1
556: every 10000 timesteps. Up to S=1.7 this is sufficient to allow the
557: system to return to equilibrium: the excess
558: incoming flow of energy is reduced by evolution of the albedo.
559: Beyond 1.7 (see inset) the sudden change generates sufficient die back
560: to create deserts in the system, which initially cause positive feedback
561: and increase the incoming flow still further. Ultimately, evolution of
562: paler daisies in the non-desert regions allow reinvasion of the deserts,
563: but the simulation had to be run for 20000 timesteps (S=1.7) and 50000
564: (S=1.8) to achieve this. Even in equilibrium, transient desert regions
565: occur. At S=1.9 the simulation was run for 120000
566: timesteps, throughout which desert and populated regions coexisted and
567: migrated around the planet (there being no curvature to favour one
568: region over another).
569: Throughout, note that the energy emitted is smoother than that absorbed
570: and lags the energy absorbed by about 500 timesteps (10 mean daisy lifetimes)
571: $\gamma = 0.02, D = 0.1, r=0.02$.
572: }
573: \end{figure}
574:
575:
576: \begin{figure}[htb]
577: % Look for minimum
578: \protect{\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{ent.eps}}
579: \caption{\label{fig:entropy} Graphs showing variation of
580: configuration (biodiversity) entropy
581: $ \langle \sum_{i=1}^{20} p(A_i) \ln p(A_i) \rangle $ from partitioning
582: the albedos into 20 groups, and (heat) entropy
583: production $ \langle \int dQ/T \rangle $
584: averaged over the 200x200 lattice and over a period of 50 timesteps
585: (one mean daisy lifetime) for the same calculation as Fig.\protect{\ref{fig:ebalance}}.
586: Each changes monotonically as the temperature is increased through the
587: region of full coverage. Beyond S=1.7, where fluctuating deserts appear,
588: each measure becomes less well defined. There is significantly increased
589: heat flow from the hot deserts to the covered regions, so the heat flow
590: becomes dominated by the area of desert. Conversely, the biodiversity
591: is reduced when much of the planet is unpopulated.
592: Reversing the change in temperature shows that the entropy change
593: is reversible.
594: }
595: \end{figure}
596:
597: \begin{figure}[htb]
598: % Energy volume
599: \protect{\includegraphics[width=90mm]{Temp0D}}
600: \newline
601: \protect{\includegraphics[width=90mm]{Cover0D}}
602: \caption{\label{fig:0d2}
603: Results from 0D daisyworld with parameter values from Lenton and Lovelock:
604: $S/\sigma_B = 1.68\times 10^{10}K^4$,
605: $q = 2.06425\times10^9$ and
606: $\gamma = 0.3$.
607: a) Temperature variation with increasing solar insolation.
608: Thick line show planetary average, dotted lines show $T_b$ and $T_w$.
609: The four regimes are shown in their region of stability: Simulations
610: commencing with temperatures outside the growing range can stabilise
611: the bare planet solution, but single-daisy and two-daisy solutions do
612: not coexist. Only stable solutions are shown, including the bistable
613: living/dead regime.
614: b) coverage: Thick line denotes bare ground, thin lines denote individual species.
615: %The full analytic expression for $T_w$ in terms of $q$ is:
616: %\protect{$ T_w=\frac{
617: %(-1397124q+1397124\sqrt{2204936436478415714892+q^2})^{2/3}-
618: %162662955948+5698562(-1397124q+1397124\sqrt{2204936436478415714892+q^2})^{1/3})}{2364
619: %((-1397124*q+1397124\sqrt{2204936436478415714892+q^2})^{1/3})} - 273
620: %$
621: %
622: %with a1=2204936436478415714892
623: %}
624: For non-zero $a_b$ and $a_w$,
625: $da_i/dt=0$ means that $\beta_b=\beta_w$ and
626: from \ref{D3} and \ref{D5}, $T_w$ and $T_b$ are also independent of
627: $L$: $T_w = 22.5$ for $q=0$ falling almost linearly to zero for
628: $q=9.34\times10^9$. For standard parameter values from Watson and Lovelock,
629: $\beta_b=\beta_w=0.918$ $T_w$=17.5 and $T_b$=27.5.
630: With $T_w$ and $\beta_w$ fixed by the choice of $q$,
631: independent of $L$, as is the amount of bare ground at equilibrium:
632: $x=\gamma/\beta_w$; (from 1). Equations \ref{D2} and \ref{D4}
633: now give us simple
634: linear expressions for $a_b$ and $a_w$ in terms of $x$ and the single
635: variable $A_p$. Thus, once the assumption of species coexistence is
636: made, the only $L$-dependent variables are $T_e$, $A_p$ which can be
637: solved for analytically. There are three unstable equilibrium solutions,
638: either without daisies or with a single species Saunders (1994).
639: }
640: \end{figure}
641:
642: \begin{figure}[htb]
643: % Three species daisyworld
644: \protect{\includegraphics[width=100mm]{Temp3}}
645: \newline
646: \protect{\includegraphics[width=100mm]{Cover3.eps}}
647: \caption{\label{fig:0d3}
648: Daisyworld with additional grey daisy species with albedo 0.5.
649: Other parameters as for Fig 4.
650: a) Temperature - thick line shows planetary average, thin lines denote
651: local temperatures over daisies. Note that the grey-only solution
652: is stable because it maximises life, despite having no temperature
653: regulatory effect.
654: b) Coverage: Thick line denotes bare ground, thin lines denote
655: individual species. Note that graph is continuous, with bare ground
656: (x) falling below 0.30625 only in the single-species regions.
657: }\end{figure}
658:
659: \begin{figure}[htb]
660: % Logistic map
661: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{logx.eps}
662: \caption{\label{log1}
663: Bold line shows the mean amount of life from the logistic map,
664: plotted against recursion parameter $a$. Background dots show the
665: bifurcation diagram.
666: A small amount of random noise added to $y(n)$ (drawn from a flat
667: distribution $\pm 0.001$) eliminates most of the
668: ordered behaviour, and the gives mean population above 0.5 throughout.
669: Without noise, the mean population is still above 0.5 for all the
670: chaotic cases, and for all the ordered windows except for the tiny
671: region between 3.9602 and 3.9616, 0.04\% of the total.
672: Populations above 0.5 are found for
673: stable attractors across the family of logistic maps of the form
674: $y_{n+1}=a[y_n(1-y_n)]^\nu$
675: }
676: \end{figure}
677:
678:
679:
680: \end{document}
681:
682:
683:
684:
685:
686: