1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentstyle[aps]{revtex}
3: %----------------------------------------------------------------
4: \begin{document}
5: \draft
6: \title{
7: Mean-field and fluctuation analyses
8: of a forced turbulence
9: simulated by the lattice Boltzmann method
10: }
11: \author{
12: W. Sakikawa and O. Narikiyo
13: }
14: \address{
15: Department of Physics,
16: Kyushu University,
17: Fukuoka 810-8560,
18: Japan
19: }
20: \date{
21: July 16, 2003
22: }
23: \maketitle
24: %----------------------------------------------------------------
25: \begin{abstract}
26: On the basis of the lattice Boltzmann method
27: we have done a numerical experiment of a forced turbulence
28: in real space and time.
29: Our new findings are summarized into two points.
30: First
31: in the analysis of the mean-field behavior of the velocity field
32: using the exit-time statistics
33: we have verified Kolmogorov's scaling and Taylor's hypothesis
34: for the first time
35: in the simulation for the Navier-Stokes equation.
36: Second
37: in the analysis of the intermittent velocity fluctuations
38: using a non-equilibrium probability distribution function
39: and the wavelet denoising
40: we have clarified that the coherent vortices sustain
41: the power-law velocity correlation in the non-equilibrium state.
42: \end{abstract}
43: %----------------------------------------------------------------
44: \vskip 18pt
45: \section{Introduction}
46: \label{intro}
47:
48: Understanding turbulence has not been attained over millenniums.
49: However, new approaches to turbulence\cite{Frisch}
50: have been invented successively.
51:
52: Recently turbulence data in nature and laboratories
53: are analyzed from new view points.
54: One\cite{exit-time-stat} is based on the exit-time statistics
55: and discusses Kolmogorov's scaling\cite{Frisch}.
56: The other\cite{PDF-space}
57: on the basis of the R\'enyi-Tsallis statistics\cite{RT1,RT2}
58: discusses the probability distribution functions (PDF).
59:
60: Our study starts from the application of the above two schemes
61: to our numerical simulation data
62: and aims to obtain some new insight of the turbulence.
63:
64: Before reporting our study of the turbulence
65: we briefly review here
66: our strategy approaching intermittency problems
67: in other non-equilibrium systems.
68: In the numerical study
69: of the critical spin-state of the Ising model\cite{SN1}
70: we have observed
71: that the degree of the non-Gaussianity of the R\'enyi-Tsallis PDF
72: represents that of the non-equilibrium.
73: On the other hand,
74: in the numerical study of a supercooled liquid\cite{SN2}
75: near the glass transition
76: we have observed
77: that the spatial distribution of the coherently moving regions
78: is well analyzed by the singularity spectrum of multifractal.
79: Since the R\'enyi-Tsallis statistics can describe
80: the systems with multifractality,
81: the above two observations are closely related.
82:
83: In these two systems
84: the correlation length of the fluctuations becomes divergently large
85: and we can expect the scale-invariance.
86: A scale-invariant system has multifractal nature.
87: On the other hand,
88: we can also expect the scale-invariance
89: in the turbulent systems at high Reynolds number\cite{Frisch}.
90: Thus we adopt the same strategy
91: to intermittency problem in turbulence.
92:
93: The next section describes our simulation method.
94: In the following sections the simulation data are analyzed
95: at the mean-field level at first
96: and subsequently taking fluctuations into account.
97: In the final section a brief summary is given.
98:
99: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
100:
101: \section{Lattice Boltzmann simulation}
102: \label{LBsimulation}
103:
104: We simulate a forced turbulence in real space and time
105: and adopt the lattice Boltzmann method\cite{LB2,LB1}
106: as one of the easiest ways for such a purpose.
107:
108: The distribution function $f_i({\vec r},t)$
109: of the particle with the velocity ${\vec c}_i$
110: at position ${\vec r}$ and time $t$
111: obeys the lattice Boltzmann equation\cite{LB2,LB1}
112: %============================================
113: \begin{equation}
114: f_i({\vec r}+{\vec c}_i,t+1) - f_i({\vec r},t)
115: = - \omega [ f_i({\vec r},t) - f_i^0({\vec r},t) ],
116: \label{f}
117: \end{equation}
118: %============================================
119: where we have adopted the Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) model
120: for the collision term
121: and the time step has been chosen as unity.
122: The position ${\vec r}$ of the particle
123: is restricted on the cubic lattice
124: and the lattice spacing is chosen as unity.
125: The local equilibrium distribution $f_i^0({\vec r},t)$ is assumed
126: to be given as
127: %============================================
128: \begin{equation}
129: f_i^0({\vec r},t)
130: = w_i \rho [ 1 + 3 ({\vec c}_i\cdot{\vec u})
131: + {9 \over 2} ({\vec c}_i\cdot{\vec u})^2
132: - {3 \over 2} ({\vec u}\cdot{\vec u}) ].
133: \label{f0}
134: \end{equation}
135: %============================================
136: The density $\rho$ and the velocity ${\vec u}$ of the fluid
137: are given by the sum of the contributions of the particles as
138: $\rho = \sum_i f_i({\vec r},t)$ and
139: $\rho {\vec u} = \sum_i f_i({\vec r},t) {\vec c}_i$, respectively.
140: Using the multiscale analysis
141: the Navier-Stokes equation,
142: which is supposed to be able to describe turbulence,
143: is derived from the present BGK lattice Boltzmann equation
144: and the corresponding viscosity $\nu = (1/\omega - 1/2)/3$.
145:
146: In the following
147: we use a 15-velocity model and ${\vec c}_i$ is chosen as
148: ${\vec c}_1 = (0,0,0)$,
149: ${\vec c}_i = (\pm1,0,0),(0,\pm1,0),(0,0,\pm1)$
150: for $i=2,3,\cdot\cdot\cdot,7$
151: and
152: ${\vec c}_i = (\pm1,\pm1,\pm1)$ for $i=8,9,\cdot\cdot\cdot,15$.
153: Then the weight factor $w_i$ for the local equilibrium distribution
154: is determined as
155: $w_1 = 2/9$,
156: $w_i = 1/9$ for $i=2,3,\cdot\cdot\cdot,7$ and
157: $w_i = 1/72$ for $i=8,9,\cdot\cdot\cdot,15$.
158: The relaxation frequency $\omega$ is chosen as $\omega=1.94$.
159:
160: In order to simulate forced turbulence
161: we add the forcing term ${\vec g}_i\cdot{\vec F}({\vec r},t)$
162: due to an applied body force ${\vec F}({\vec r},t)$
163: to the right hand side of Eq.\ (\ref{f}).
164: In order to reproduce the Navier-Stokes equation
165: we should choose as ${\vec g}_i = {\vec c}_i/10$
166: for the present 15-velocity model\cite{LB2}.
167: For simplicity we apply a solenoidal force in $y$-direction\cite{LB1},
168: ${\vec F}=(0,F_y(z,t),0)$, and $F_y(z,t)$ is a Gaussian white noise
169: whose variance $\sigma_F$ is a function of the lattice coordinate
170: in $z$-direction,
171: $\sigma_F = |0.01 \times \sin(2\pi k_f z / L)|$,
172: where $L$ is the linear dimension
173: of the simulation region of cubic box.
174: We have chosen as $L = 200$ so that $1 \leq x,y,z \leq 200$.
175: We have adopted the periodic boundary condition.
176: Although we have chosen as $k_f = 4$,
177: the results of the simulation is insensitive to the choice.
178:
179: In the initial state of the simulation
180: the fluid density is uniform, $\rho = 1$, and
181: the spatial distribution of the fluid velocity ${\vec u}$
182: is chosen to be random.
183:
184: In Fig.\ \ref{fig1}
185: we show a snapshot of the vorticity field,
186: $\vec \omega = \nabla \times \vec u$,
187: in order to visualize a turbulent structure.
188: We see an inhomogeneous distribution of the vortices.
189:
190: The Reynolds number $Re$ for our simulation\cite{LB2,LB1} is
191: estimated as $Re = \sqrt{ \langle {\vec u}^2 \rangle } L / 2\pi\nu$
192: and time-dependent as shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig2}.
193: Here $\langle \cdot\cdot\cdot \rangle$ represents the spatial average.
194: In our simulation
195: we can realize a turbulent state for relatively small Reynolds number,
196: since we add random force.
197:
198: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
199:
200: \section{Mean-field behavior}
201: \label{MF}
202:
203: In this section
204: we discuss the mean-field aspects of the velocity field.
205:
206: Turbulence is one of the typical phenomena
207: with multiscale motions.
208: Each phenomena of a scale strongly couples with
209: all the other scales of turbulent motion.
210: In order to analyze such a system
211: a scale-dependent entropy, the so-called $\epsilon$-entropy,
212: works well\cite{exit-time-stat}.
213: For example, the time series of the velocity fluctuation in turbulence
214: leads to a non-trivial scaling relation of the $\epsilon$-entropy,
215: $ h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3} $,
216: expected from Kolmogorov's scaling\cite{exit-time-stat}.
217: The existing experimental data are consistent
218: with this scaling\cite{exit-time-stat}.
219: In this section we try to show the consistency of the scaling
220: with our numerical experiment simulating the Navier-Stokes equation.
221:
222: We focus our attention to the time series of
223: the $y$-component $u_y({\vec r},t)$ of
224: the fluid velocity ${\vec u}({\vec r},t)$
225: as shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig3},
226: since our system is anisotropic due to the forcing.
227: This turbulent signal is characterized by the exit-time
228: $\tau(\epsilon;{\vec r})$ at position ${\vec r}$.
229: At the exit-time $t=\tau(\epsilon;{\vec r})$
230: the first exit satisfying the condition,
231: $|u_y({\vec r},t_0+\tau) - u_y({\vec r},t_0)| > \epsilon/2$,
232: occurs.
233: Here the time $\tau$ is measured from $t_0$ and $t_0=1000$ in our simulation
234: regarding the states at the first 1000 time-steps as transitional.
235:
236: The mean of the exit-time,
237: $\tau(\epsilon) \equiv \langle \tau(\epsilon;{\vec r}) \rangle$,
238: is related to the $\epsilon$-entropy, $h(\epsilon)$,
239: as\cite{exit-time-stat}
240: %============================================
241: \begin{equation}
242: h(\epsilon) \propto {1 \over \tau(\epsilon)}.
243: \label{h}
244: \end{equation}
245: %============================================
246: In the region
247: where Kolmogorov's scaling, the 4/5 law\cite{Frisch,exit-time-stat}, holds
248: the velocity difference between two points behaves as
249: %============================================
250: \begin{equation}
251: \langle|{\vec u}({\vec r}+{\vec R},t_0)-{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0)|\rangle
252: \propto |{\vec R}|^{1/3} .
253: \label{space-scaling}
254: \end{equation}
255: %============================================
256: Using Taylor's hypothesis\cite{Frisch,exit-time-stat}, we obtain
257: %============================================
258: \begin{equation}
259: \langle|{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0+\tau)-{\vec u}({\vec r},t_0)|\rangle
260: \propto \tau^{1/3},
261: \label{time-scaling}
262: \end{equation}
263: %============================================
264: as a mean-field description.
265: In spite of the absence of the global flow in our simulation
266: Taylor's hypothesis is valid in a local sense\cite{JPV}
267: as shown in the following.
268: Namely in the mean-field description
269: the velocity difference in temporal and spatial directions
270: have the same fractal scaling exponent.
271: With Eq.\ (\ref{time-scaling}) the definition of the exit-time leads to
272: $\tau(\epsilon)^{1/3} \propto \epsilon$.
273: From Eq.\ (\ref{h}) we can conclude
274: that $h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3}$
275: in the above mean-field description\cite{exit-time-stat}.
276:
277: In accordance with the above scaling analysis
278: our simulation data\cite{SN3} for $1/\tau(\epsilon)$
279: shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig4}
280: have the scaling region for $\epsilon > \epsilon_0$
281: where $\epsilon_0 \sim 0.04$.
282: Thus by our simulation we have established
283: that $h(\epsilon) \propto \epsilon^{-3}$.
284: For $\epsilon \ll \epsilon_0$
285: the exit in the simulation occurs within one time step
286: and the curve saturates at small $\epsilon$.
287: These behaviors are consistent
288: with the experimantal data\cite{exit-time-stat}.
289:
290: In Fig.\ \ref{fig5}
291: the result of the similar analysis in spatial direction is shown.
292: In place of $\tau(\epsilon)$ we measure $r(\epsilon)$
293: where at the exit-length $r=r(\epsilon;{\vec r})$
294: the first exit satisfying the condition,
295: $|u_y(x+r,y,z,t) - u_y(x,y,z,t)| > \epsilon/2$,
296: occurs at a time $t$.
297: Here $r(\epsilon) = \langle r(\epsilon;{\vec r}) \rangle$.
298: Because of the smallness of the number of the available data
299: in space direction, 200, in comparison with that in time direction, 7000,
300: the scaling region is narrow.
301: Since $1/\tau(\epsilon)$and $1/r(\epsilon)$
302: have the same scaling exponent,
303: Taylor's hypothesis is confirmed to be valid.
304:
305: In conclusion we have confirmed
306: Kolmogorov's scaling and Taylor's hypothesis at the same time.
307: In contrast to the evaluation of the energy spectrum,
308: which is usually employed for testing Kolmogorov's scaling
309: and determined by the two-point correlation function,
310: Kolmogorov's scaling is easily observed in the $\epsilon$-entropy,
311: since it is a mean-field description and fluctuations are averaged out.
312: Such a mean-field scaling is a unifractal description and
313: fluctuations can be taken into account in a multifractal analysis
314: as shown in the following.
315:
316: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
317:
318: \section{Fluctuations: qualitative observation}
319: \label{quality}
320:
321: We have discussed the mean-field aspects of the velocity field
322: in the preceding section.
323: Next we discuss the fluctuations of the velocity field.
324: In this section we make a qualitative observation
325: using the correlation maps.
326:
327: In Fig.\ \ref{fig6} we show the space correlation.
328: The correlation decays as the length scale is increased.
329: In Fig.\ \ref{fig7} we show the time correlation.
330: The correlation decays as the time scale is increased.
331: At small length or time scale
332: the strong correlation leads to a non-equilibrium state
333: which is identified as the coherent vortex in the following section.
334:
335: We see a multiscale structure in the correlation map,
336: Fig.\ \ref{fig8},
337: which is one of the characteristics of turbulence
338: neither periodic nor random.
339:
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
341:
342: \section{Fluctuations: non-equilibrium nature}
343: \label{non-equilibrium-nature}
344:
345: We have discussed the qualitative aspects of the velocity fluctuation
346: in the preceding section.
347: Next we try to quantify the fluctuation
348: by two measures.
349: One is the non-equilibrium parameter used in this section and
350: the other is the singularity spectrum in the next section.
351:
352: In order to analyze the distribution of the fluctuation
353: we use the R\'enyi-Tsallis PDF\cite{RT1,RT2}
354: %============================================
355: \begin{equation}
356: P(X) = P_0 \cdot [ 1 + {q-1 \over 2\sigma_X^2} X^2 ]^{1 \over 1-q},
357: \label{PDF-RT}
358: \end{equation}
359: %============================================
360: for a variable $X$.
361: Here the parameter $q$ represents
362: the degree of non-equilibrium\cite{SN1}.
363: To be precise,
364: the deviation of $q$ from unity
365: is the measure for the degree of non-equilibrium,
366: since the equilibrium Gaussian distribution
367: is expressed by Eq.\ (\ref{PDF-RT})
368: in the limit of $q \rightarrow 1$.
369:
370: The PDF in Eq.\ (\ref{PDF-RT})
371: is derived from the R\'enyi or Tsallis entropy
372: by using the maximum entropy principle\cite{AA}.
373: The Tsallis entropy is non-extensive,
374: while the R\'enyi entropy is extensive.
375: The functional form of the distribution is independent of
376: the choice of the entropy, the R\'enyi or Tsallis,
377: so that our result is independent of the extensivity of the entropy.
378:
379: We show the PDF for the velocity difference
380: between two points in Fig.\ \ref{fig9} and
381: the vorticity difference in Fig.\ \ref{fig10}.
382: The $q$-value of the PDF is length-scale dependent.
383: Similarly the PDF for the velocity or vorticity difference
384: between two times at a point is time-scale dependent.
385: In any case
386: the degree of non-equilibrium is larger
387: at smaller spatio-temporal scales
388: where the correlation survives.
389: As shown later on,
390: the formation of the coherent vortex structure
391: sustains the strong correlation leading to non-Gaussian PDF.
392: At larger scales the contribution of the structureless
393: incoherent background among vortices dominates.
394: This incoherency leads to Gaussian PDF.
395: The Gaussian PDF is a parabola in the semi-logarithmic plane
396: as Fig.\ \ref{fig9} and Fig.\ \ref{fig10}.
397:
398: Although our data in Fig.\ \ref{fig9}
399: are not enough to discuss the scaling between $q$ and $r$ quantitatively,
400: we have to derive such a relation in our future study.
401: Already a scaling relation between $q$ and $r$
402: has been proposed\cite{Beck}
403: under the assumption of a cascade picture.
404: On the other hand, another scheme
405: with a $r$-independent $q$-value
406: has been proposed\cite{AA}
407: under the assumption of another cascade picture.
408: In contrast to these two approaches
409: our analysis has nothing to do with cascades.
410:
411: In Fig.\ \ref{fig11}
412: we show the PDF for the vorticity itself
413: taken from a snapshot of the vorticity field.
414: This PDF is also non-Gaussian.
415: The Gaussian components can be removed from the snapshot
416: by using the wavelet denoising technique\cite{FSK}.
417: It can be seen from the coincidence
418: between the left and right panels in Fig.\ \ref{fig12}
419: that the non-Gaussian components corresponds to the vortices.
420: Here the Gaussian component is filtered out
421: by the wavelet denoising in the right panel.
422: This visualization is not new,
423: since it has already been done
424: in the study of the coherent vortex simulation\cite{FSK}.
425: Our new contribution is to clarify the origin of
426: the scale-dependent $q$-value
427: in terms of the coherent vortex structure.
428: The strong correlation leading to the non-Gaussian PDF
429: at smaller scales is sustained in the inner region of the vortices,
430: while the PDF at larger scales than the vortex size tends to Gaussian.
431: In other words the inner region is coherent
432: and the outer is incoherent.
433:
434: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
435:
436: \section{Fluctuations: multifractal nature}
437: \label{multifractal-nature}
438:
439: We have discussed the local nature of the vortex
440: as the elemntary excitation in the preceding section.
441: In this section we discuss the spatial distribution
442: of the vortices in a global point of view.
443:
444: First we make a qualitative observation.
445: Already as seen in Fig.\ \ref{fig12}
446: the spatial distribution of the coherent vortices is intermittent.
447: In Fig.\ \ref{fig13}
448: we also see a intermittent behavior
449: for the derivative of the vorticity.
450: Similar intermittent behavior is observed
451: in experimental data\cite{MSKF}.
452:
453: Next we quantify the intermittency
454: by introducing the measure, $\mu_{k}(l)$, defined as the probability
455: of finding a coherent vortex in the $k$-th cubic box
456: of the linear dimension $l$ in a snapshot of the vorticity field.
457: The total number of the boxes $N_L = (L/l)\times(L/l)$
458: where $L$ is the linear dimension of the simulation region.
459: The measure behaves as
460: %----------------------------------------------------------------
461: \begin{equation}
462: \mu_{k}(l) \propto l^{\alpha_k},
463: \end{equation}
464: %----------------------------------------------------------------
465: for small $l/L$.
466: The number density $N(\alpha)$ for the exponent $\alpha_k$ is
467: defined as
468: %----------------------------------------------------------------
469: \begin{equation}
470: N(\alpha) \equiv \sum_k \delta(\alpha - \alpha_k)
471: \propto l^{-f(\alpha)}.
472: \end{equation}
473: %----------------------------------------------------------------
474: This relation defines the singularity spectrum,
475: $f(\alpha)$, which is the key quantity to qualify multifractal systems.
476: Using the normalized $q$-th moment $\mu_{k}(q,l)$
477: of the measure $\mu_{k}(l)$,
478: %----------------------------------------------------------------
479: \begin{equation}
480: \mu_{k}(q,l) = \{\mu_{k}(l)\}^{q}
481: / \sum_{k'=1}^{N_L} \{\mu_{k'}(l)\}^{q},
482: \end{equation}
483: %----------------------------------------------------------------
484: the sigularity spectrum $f(\alpha)$ is obtained
485: by the following formulae,\cite{Schreiber}
486: %----------------------------------------------------------------
487: \begin{equation}
488: \alpha(q) = \sum_{k=1}^{N_L} \mu_{k}(q,l) \ln \mu_{k}(l) / \ln (l/L),
489: \end{equation}
490: %----------------------------------------------------------------
491: and
492: %----------------------------------------------------------------
493: \begin{equation}
494: f(\alpha(q)) = \sum_{k=1}^{N_L} \mu_{k}(q,l) \ln \mu_{k}(q,l) / \ln (l/L).
495: \end{equation}
496: %----------------------------------------------------------------
497:
498: In Fig.\ \ref{fig14}
499: we show the singularity spectrum
500: for the coherent vortex.
501: For simplicity we have used the definition $N_k/N_L = l^{\alpha_k}$
502: where $N_k$ is the number of lattice points
503: satisfying the condition $\omega_z > \langle \omega_z \rangle$.
504: The spectrum is similar to the typical one
505: measured for the energy-dissipation rate
506: by experiments\cite{MSKF} or simulations\cite{HY}.
507:
508: In the last part of this section
509: we give some speculations.
510: As seen in our previous study\cite{SN2}
511: the width of the singularity spectrum
512: depends on the degree of intermittency
513: so that we expect some Reynolds-number dependence
514: of the spectrum.
515: It has been discussed by many authors\cite{Sreenivasan}
516: and should be claryfied in future systematic study.
517: In our present study
518: the density of the vortex is dilute
519: as seen in Fig.\ \ref{fig12}.
520: Thus the singularity spectrum in Fig.\ \ref{fig14}
521: describes the spatial distribution of relatively free vortices.
522: As the Reynolds number is increased
523: the density increases\cite{KM}.
524: In this case
525: the interaction among vortices becomes important and
526: the correlation length of the vorticity fluctuation becomes large.
527: While we can observe the vortex
528: only as an individual elementary excitation
529: in our numerical experiment,
530: some collective excitation is expected to dominate
531: at higher Reynolds number.
532: In the limit of divergently large Reynolds number
533: the correlation length becomes divergently large
534: so that we can expect full scale-invariance.
535: We can find a resemblance to the case of the scaling theory\cite{deGennes}
536: in polymers where an ideal scaling relation is realized for dense solutions
537: where polymers are strongly entangled.
538: In the limit of high Reynolds number
539: each boxes counting the coherent vortex
540: will be filled by almost equal number of vortices
541: so that intermittency will disappear and
542: unifractal Kolmogorov's scaling will prevail.
543:
544: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
545:
546: \section{Summary}
547: \label{summary}
548:
549: Numerical simulation data, in real space and time,
550: for a forced turbulence
551: on the basis of the lattice Boltzmann method
552: have been analyzed by unifractal and multifractal schemes.
553:
554: Our new findings are summarized into two points.
555: First in the unifractal analysis using the exit-time statistics
556: we have verified Kolmogorov's scaling and Taylor's hypothesis
557: at the same time.
558: Second in the analysis
559: using the R\'enyi-Tsallis PDF and the wavelet denoising
560: we have clarified that the coherent vortices sustain
561: the power-law velocity correlation in the non-equilibrium state.
562:
563: Finally in the multifractal analysis
564: it is clarified
565: that the intermittent distribution
566: of the coherent vortices in space-time
567: is described as a multifractal.
568:
569: This work was supported in part
570: by a Grand-in-Aid for Scientific Research
571: from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
572: and Technology of Japan.
573:
574: %----------------------------------------------------------------
575: \begin{references}
576:
577: \bibitem{Frisch}
578: U. Frisch,
579: Turbulence,
580: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
581:
582: \bibitem{exit-time-stat}
583: M. Abel, L. Biferale, M. Cencini, M. Falcioni, D. Vergni,
584: A. Vulpiani,
585: Physica D 147 (2000) 12.
586:
587: \bibitem{PDF-space}
588: F.M. Ramos, R.R. Rosa, C.R. Neto, M.J.A. Bolzan,
589: L.D.A. S\'a, H.F.C. Velho,
590: Physica A 295 (2001) 250.
591:
592: \bibitem{RT1}
593: C. Beck, F. Schl\"ogl,
594: Thermodynamics of chaotic systems,
595: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
596:
597: \bibitem{RT2}
598: C. Tsallis,
599: Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications
600: (eds. S. Abe, Y. Okamoto),
601: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, p.3.
602:
603: \bibitem{SN1}
604: W. Sakikawa, O. Narikiyo,
605: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71 (2002) 1200.
606:
607: \bibitem{SN2}
608: W. Sakikawa, O. Narikiyo,
609: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 (2003) 450.
610:
611: \bibitem{LB2}
612: D.A. Wolf-Gladrow,
613: Lattice-Gas Cellular Automata and Lattice Boltzmann Models,
614: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
615:
616: \bibitem{LB1}
617: S. Succi,
618: The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond,
619: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001.
620:
621: \bibitem{SN3}
622: The first simulation data for a smaller system ($100^3$)
623: to confirm Kolmogorov's scaling
624: has been reported by us in an unpublished preprint,
625: cond-mat/0208094.
626:
627: \bibitem{JPV}
628: M.H. Jensen, G. Paladin, A. Vulpiani,
629: Phys. Rev. A 45 (1992) 7214.
630:
631: \bibitem{AA}
632: T. Arimitsu, N. Arimitsu,
633: Physica A 295 (2001) 177.
634:
635: \bibitem{Beck}
636: C. Beck,
637: Physica A 277 (2000) 115.
638:
639: \bibitem{FSK}
640: M. Farge, K. Schneider, N. Kevlahan,
641: Phys. Fluids 11 (1999) 2187.
642:
643: \bibitem{MSKF}
644: C. Meneveau, K.R. Sreenivasan, P. Kailasnath, M.S. Fan,
645: Phys. Rev. A 41 (1990) 894.
646:
647: \bibitem{Schreiber}
648: M. Schreiber,
649: Computational Physics,
650: (eds. K.H. Hoffmann and M. Schreiber),
651: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996, p.147.
652:
653: \bibitem{HY}
654: I. Hosokawa, K. Yamamoto,
655: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59 (1990) 401.
656:
657: \bibitem{Sreenivasan}
658: K.R. Sreenivasan,
659: More Things in Heaven and Earth:
660: A Celebration of Physics at the Millenium,
661: (ed. B. Bederson),
662: Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999, p.644.
663:
664: \bibitem{KM}
665: S. Kida, H. Miura,
666: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67 (1998) 2166.
667:
668: \bibitem{deGennes}
669: P-G. de Gennes,
670: Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics,
671: Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979.
672:
673: \end{references}
674:
675: \vskip 15pt
676: %----------------------------------------------------------------
677: \begin{figure}
678: \caption{
679: The snapshot of the $z$-component of the vorticity, $\omega_z$,
680: in the $xy$-plane at $z=100$ and $t=4000$.
681: }
682: \label{fig1}
683: \end{figure}
684:
685: \vskip -15pt
686:
687: \begin{figure}
688: \caption{
689: The Reynolds number $Re$ as a function of time $t$.
690: }
691: \label{fig2}
692: \end{figure}
693:
694: \vskip -15pt
695:
696: \begin{figure}
697: \caption{
698: The $y$-component of the fluid velocity $u_y$
699: as a function of time $t$ at ${\vec r}=(100,100,100)$.
700: }
701: \label{fig3}
702: \end{figure}
703:
704: \vskip -15pt
705:
706: \begin{figure}
707: \caption{
708: The inverse of the mean exit-time $\tau(\epsilon)$.
709: The exits are measured at $200^3$ lattice points for $1000 \le t \le 8000$.
710: Here the dots and straight line represent the simulation data
711: and $\epsilon^{-3}$ law, respectively.
712: }
713: \label{fig4}
714: \end{figure}
715:
716: \vskip -15pt
717:
718: \begin{figure}
719: \caption{
720: The inverse of the mean exit-length $r(\epsilon)$.
721: The exits are measured at $200^3$ lattice points at $t=6000$.
722: Here the dots and straight line represent the simulation data
723: and $\epsilon^{-3}$ law, respectively.
724: }
725: \label{fig5}
726: \end{figure}
727:
728: \vskip -15pt
729:
730: \begin{figure}
731: \caption{
732: The space correlation of the velocity fluctuation at $t=4000$.
733: The horizontal and vertical axes represent $u_y(x,y,z,t)$ and
734: $u_y(x,y+y_{\rm corr},z,t)$, respectively.
735: The space difference $y_{\rm corr}$ is taken as
736: $y_{\rm corr}=1$ for the left,
737: $y_{\rm corr}=4$ for the center and
738: $y_{\rm corr}=30$ for the right.
739: }
740: \label{fig6}
741: \end{figure}
742:
743: \vskip -15pt
744:
745: \begin{figure}
746: \caption{
747: The time correlation of the velocity fluctuation
748: at $\vec r =(100,100,100)$.
749: The horizontal and vertical axes represent $u_y(\vec r,t)$ and
750: $u_y(\vec r,t+t_{\rm corr})$, respectively for $1000 \le t \le 8000$.
751: The time difference $t_{\rm corr}$ is taken as
752: $t_{\rm corr}=10$ for the left,
753: $t_{\rm corr}=100$ for the center and
754: $t_{\rm corr}=500$ for the right.
755: }
756: \label{fig7}
757: \end{figure}
758:
759: \vskip -15pt
760:
761: \begin{figure}
762: \caption{
763: The correlation map for the velocity difference between two times
764: $t_i$ and $t_j$
765: for $1000 \le t_0+t_i \le 8000$ and $1000 \le t_0+t_j \le 8000$
766: with $t_0=1000$. Namely $0 \le i \le 7000$ (horizontal axis) and
767: $0 \le j \le 7000$ (vertical axis).
768: The dot is marked at $(i,j)$ if $D(i,j)<\theta$
769: where $D(i,j)=|u_y(\vec r,t_i)-u_y(\vec r,t_j)|$
770: and $\theta=0.2D_{\rm max}$
771: with $D_{\rm max}$ being the maximum of $D(i,j)$.
772: The position $\vec r$ is fixed at $(100,100,50)$.
773: }
774: \label{fig8}
775: \end{figure}
776:
777: \vskip -15pt
778:
779: \begin{figure}
780: \caption{
781: The unnormalized PDF $P(X)$ for the velocity difference
782: $X=|u_y(x,y+\Delta y,z,t)-u_y(x,y,z,t)|$
783: between two points $(x,y+\Delta y,z)$ and $(x,y,z)$ at $t=4000$.
784: The difference in $y$-direction is chosen as $\Delta y = 1, 4, 30$.
785: The data are fitted by the R\'enyi-Tsallis PDF with
786: $q = 1.218, 1.164, 1.100$ for $\Delta y = 1, 4, 30$, respectively.
787: }
788: \label{fig9}
789: \end{figure}
790:
791: \vskip -15pt
792:
793: \begin{figure}
794: \caption{
795: The unnormalized PDF $P(X)$ for the vorticity difference
796: $X=|\omega_y(x,y+\Delta y,z,t)-\omega_y(x,y,z,t)|$
797: between two points $(x,y+\Delta y,z)$ and $(x,y,z)$ at $t=6000$.
798: The difference in $y$-direction is chosen as $\Delta y = 1, 4, 30$.
799: The data are fitted by the R\'enyi-Tsallis PDF with
800: $q = 1.240, 1.209, 1.179$ for $\Delta y = 1, 4, 30$, respectively.
801: }
802: \label{fig10}
803: \end{figure}
804:
805: \vskip -15pt
806:
807: \begin{figure}
808: \caption{
809: The unnormalized PDF $P(X)$ for the vorticity
810: $X=|\omega_y(x,y,z,t)|$ at $t=6000$.
811: The data are fitted by the R\'enyi-Tsallis PDF with $q = 1.392$.
812: }
813: \label{fig11}
814: \end{figure}
815:
816: \vskip -15pt
817:
818: \begin{figure}
819: \caption{
820: The snapshot of the $z$-component of the vorticity, $\omega_z$,
821: in the $xy$-plane at $z=100$ and $t=4000$.
822: In contrast to Fig.\ \ref{fig1}
823: the regions satisfying the condition,
824: $\omega_z > \langle \omega_z \rangle + 2\sigma \equiv \Theta$,
825: are depicted in the left panel.
826: Here $\langle \omega_z \rangle$ is the spatial average
827: and $\sigma$ is the standard deviation.
828: In the right panel
829: the high vorticity regions satisfying the same condition,
830: $\tilde \omega_z > \Theta$, are depicted
831: where $\tilde \omega_z$ is the non-Gaussian component
832: after the wavelet denoising filtering out the Gaussian component.
833: By the restriction of the algorithm of the wavelet transform
834: we have used only 128$\times$128 lattice points.
835: }
836: \label{fig12}
837: \end{figure}
838:
839: \vskip -15pt
840:
841: \begin{figure}
842: \caption{
843: The spatial distribution of the vorticity gradient,
844: $\Delta\omega_z = \omega_z(x+1,y,z,t) - \omega_z(x,y,z,t)$,
845: in $x$-direction ($1 \le x \le 200$) with $y=z=100$ at $t=6000$.
846: }
847: \label{fig13}
848: \end{figure}
849:
850: \vskip -15pt
851:
852: \begin{figure}
853: \caption{
854: The singularity spectrum of the coherent vortex with $l/L = 1/10$.
855: The data correspond to $-90 \le q \le 95$.
856: }
857: \label{fig14}
858: \end{figure}
859: %----------------------------------------------------------------
860: \end{document}
861: %----------------------------------------------------------------
862: \bye
863: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
864: