1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,prb]{revtex4}
22: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
23:
24: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
25: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
28:
29: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
30: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
31: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
32:
33: %\nofiles
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: %\preprint{}
38:
39: \title{Ferroquadrupole ordering and $\bold \Gamma_5$ rattling motion\\in clathrate compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$}% Force line breaks with \\
40:
41: \author{Yuichi Nemoto, Takashi Yamaguchi, Takenobu Horino,\\ Mitsuhiro Akatsu, Tatsuya Yanagisawa, and Terutaka Goto}
42: \affiliation{Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan}
43:
44: \author{Osamu Suzuki}
45: \affiliation{National Institute for Materials Science, 3-13 Sakura, Tsukuba 305-0003, Japan}
46:
47: \author{Andreas D\"{o}nni}
48: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan}
49:
50: \author{Takemi Komatsubara}
51: \affiliation{Center for Low Temperature Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
52:
53: \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
54: % but any date may be explicitly specified
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57: Lattice effects in a cerium based clathrate compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ with a cubic Cr$_{23}$C$_6$-type structure
58: have been investigated by ultrasonic and thermal expansion measurements. Elastic softenings of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ and
59: $C_{44}$ proportional to the reciprocal temperature $1/T$ above $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K are well described
60: in terms of the quadrupole susceptibility for the ground state $\Gamma_8$ quartet.
61: A huge softening of 50 \% in $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ and a spontaneous expansion $\Delta L/L=1.9\times10^{-4}$
62: along the [001] direction in particular indicate the ferroquadrupole ordering of $O_2^0$ below $T_{\rm Q1}$.
63: The elastic anomalies associated with the antiferromagnetic ordering at $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K and
64: the incommensurate antiferromagnetic ordering are also found. Notable frequency dependence of $C_{44}$ around 10 K is
65: accounted for by the Debye-type dispersion indicating a $\Gamma_5$ rattling motion of an off-center Ce ion along the [111]
66: direction with eight fractionally occupied positions around the 4a site in a cage.
67: The thermally activated $\Gamma_5$ rattling motion obeying a relaxation time $\tau = \tau_0$exp$(E/k_BT)$
68: with an attempt time $\tau_0=3.1\times10^{-11}$ sec and an activation energy $E=70$ K dies out with decreasing temperature,
69: and then the off-center tunneling state of Ce ion in the 4a-site cage will appear at low temperatures.
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \pacs{71.27.+a, 62.20.Dc, 65.40.De}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
73: % Classification Scheme.
74: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
75: %display desired
76: \maketitle
77:
78: \section{INTRODUCTION}
79: The 4f-electronic systems with spin and orbital degrees of freedom in rare earth compounds frequently reveal electric
80: quadrupole orderings in addition to magnetic dipole orderings at low temperatures. The cubic compounds based on Ce$^{3+}$
81: ion with a $\Gamma_8$ quartet ground state in particular have received much attention because the competitive phenomena
82: associated with magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole degrees of freedom are expected.
83: The direct product of $\Gamma_8 \otimes \Gamma_8$ is reduced to a direct sum
84: $\Gamma_1 \oplus \Gamma_2 \oplus \Gamma_3 \oplus 2\Gamma_4 \oplus 2\Gamma_5$.
85: The magnetic dipole $J_x$, $J_y$, $J_z$ belonging to $\Gamma_4$ symmetry are order parameters for magnetic orderings.
86: The quadrupole orderings of $O_2^0$, $O_2^2$ with $\Gamma_3$ or $O_{yz}$, $O_{zx}$, $O_{xy}$
87: with $\Gamma_5$ are interesting phenomena in the $\Gamma_8$ system.
88: We refer to CeAg exhibiting the ferroquadrupole (FQ) ordering of $O_2^0$ at $T_{\rm Q}=15$ K.\cite{ref01,ref02} CeB$_6$ is known as
89: the antiferroquadrupole (AFQ) ordering of $O_{xy}$-type with the propagation vector of \mbox{\boldmath $k$}=[111]
90: at $T_{\rm Q}=3.2$ K.\cite{ref03,ref04} The octupole moments $T_{xyz}$ with $\Gamma_2$ symmetry, $T_x^\alpha$, $T_y^\alpha$, $T_z^\alpha$
91: with $\Gamma_4$ and $T_x^\beta$, $T_y^\beta$, $T_z^\beta$ with $\Gamma_5$ may play a role in the $\Gamma_8$ system.\cite{ref05}
92:
93: \begin{figure}[t]
94: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 652 636,width=0.9\linewidth]{fig01.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
95: \caption{\label{eps01} Cage of 4a site with O$\rm_h$ symmetry consisting of Ge and Pd2 atoms and
96: cage of 8c site with T$\rm_d$ of Pd1 and Pd2 atoms in clathrate compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
97: The 4a site Ce2 forms a simple cubic lattice, while 8c site Ce1 makes a face centered cubic one.
98: The ferroquadrupole ordering below $T_{\rm Q1}$ is relevant for the 8c sites and the antiferromagnetic ordering
99: below $T_{\rm N2}$ occurs at 4a sites. The $\Gamma_5$ rattling motion originates from the off-center Ce1 atom in 4a-site cage.}
100: \end{figure}
101:
102: A cerium-based ternary compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ with the $\Gamma_8$ ground state has received much attention
103: because the competition between quadrupole and magnetic orderings is expected at low temperatures.\cite{ref06}
104: Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ crystallizes in a cubic Cr$_{23}$C$_6$-type structure with a space group $Fm\bar{3}m$
105: consisting of four molecular units with 116 atoms in a unit cell.\cite{ref07}
106: The twelve Ce sites located in cages are divided into two nonequivalent sites in crystallography.
107: As shown in Fig.~\ref{eps01} the Ce ion at 4a site in a cage consisting of twelve Pd-atoms and six Ge atoms
108: possesses point group symmetry O$\rm_h$, while the Ce ion at 8c site in a cage of sixteen Pd atoms has T$\rm_d$.
109: The 4a sites form a face-centered cubic lattice, while the 8c sites make a simple cubic lattice.
110: Inelastic neutron scattering on Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ revealed overlapping two peaks
111: for the crystalline electric field (CEF) potentials, which correspond to magnetic dipole transitions
112: from the $\Gamma_8$ ground quartet to the $\Gamma_7$ excited doublet at 60 K of the 4a site and
113: from the $\Gamma_8$ ground quartet to the $\Gamma_7$ at 46 K of 8c site.\cite{ref08}
114: The entropy obtained by low-temperature specific heat measurement on Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
115: also indicates the ground state $\Gamma_8$ quartet at both 4a and 8c sites.\cite{ref09}
116:
117: The low-temperature specific heat of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ shows a rounded small peak at $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K
118: and a sharp $\lambda$-peak at $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K.\cite{ref09} Magnetic susceptibility shows a clear cusp at $T_{\rm N2}$,
119: but exhibits no sign of anomaly at $T_{\rm Q1}$.\cite{ref06} In addition to these experimental results,
120: an elastic softening of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ in our preliminary paper suggests that the paramagnetic phase I
121: transforms to the FQ phase II at $T_{\rm Q1}$ and successively changes to the antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase III
122: at $T_{\rm N2}$.\cite{ref10} The neutron scattering on Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ reveals a paramagnetic state of Ce ions
123: at both 4a and 8c sites even in phase II between $T_{\rm Q1}$ and $T_{\rm N2}$. The AFM ordering in phase III
124: with a propagation vector $\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_1=[001]$ for cerium ions at 4a site is observed below $T_{\rm N2}$.\cite{ref11}
125: Even in phase III below $T_{\rm N2}$, the 8c site still remains to be the paramagnetic state.
126: The AFM ordering with incommensurate structure at 8c site appears only below $T_{\rm N}^*=0.45$ K.
127:
128: The clathrate compounds exhibiting the rattling motion or off-center motion in a cage have received attention
129: because their remarkable reduction of thermal conductivity is favorable for application to thermoelectric device
130: with a high figure of merit.\cite{ref12} The ultrasonic waves are scattered by the rattling motion in an over-sized cage
131: of a semiconductor Sr$_8$Ga$_{16}$Ge$_{30}$ and a filled skutterudite compound PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$.\cite{ref13,ref14}
132: The off-center tunneling motion of OH ion doped in NaCl gives rise to elastic softening at low temperatures.\cite{ref15}
133: The rattling motion in the present compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ with clathrate structure has not been reported so far.
134:
135: In the present paper we show ultrasonic measurements on Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ in order to examine lattice effects
136: associated with the quadrupole ordering and rattling motion in the system. The thermal expansion measurement is also
137: employed to detect the spontaneous distortion below $T_{\rm Q1}$. In Sec. II, the experimental procedure and apparatus
138: are described. The results of the elastic constant, magnetic phase diagram, thermal expansion are presented in Sec. III.
139: The ultrasonic dispersion due to rattling motion is also argued in Sec. III. In Sec. IV, we present concluding remarks.
140:
141: \section{EXPERIMENT}
142: Single crystals of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ used in the present measurements were grown by a Czochralski puling method.
143: We have made the ultrasonic velocity measurements using an apparatus consisting of a phase difference detector.
144: Piezoelectric plates of LiNbO$_3$ for the ultrasonic wave generation and detection are bonded on plane parallel surfaces
145: of sample. The {\it x}-cut plate of LiNbO$_3$ is available for transverse ultrasonic waves and the 36$^\circ${\it y}-cut plate is for
146: longitudinal waves. The ultrasonic velocity {\it v} was measured by fundamental frequencies of 10 MHz and overtone excitations
147: of 30, 50 and 70 MHz. In the estimation of the elastic constant $C=\rho v^2$, we use the mass density $\rho=10.254$ g/cm$^3$
148: for Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ with a lattice parameter $a=12.457$ {\AA}.\cite{ref06}
149:
150: A homemade $^3$He-refrigerator equipped with a superconducting magnet was used for low-temperature measurements down to
151: 450 mK in magnetic fields up to 12 T. A $^3$He-$^4$He dilution refrigerator with a top-loading probe was used for
152: the ultrasonic measurements in low-temperature region down to 20 mK in fields up to 16 T.
153: Low input-power condition provides the low-temperature ultrasonic measurements
154: free from a self-heating effect in the ultrasonic transducers. The sample length as a function of temperature
155: or applied magnetic field was measured precisely by a capacitance dilatometer in the $^3$He-refrigerator.
156:
157: \section{RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS}
158: \subsection{Temperature dependence \\of the elastic constants}
159: The elastic constants of $C_{11}$ and $C_{\rm L}=(C_{11}+C_{12}+2C_{44})/2$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ in Fig.~\ref{eps02}
160: were measured by the longitudinal ultrasonic waves with frequencies 10 MHz propagating along the [100] and [110] directions, respectively.
161: The elastic constant $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ in Fig.~\ref{eps03} was measured by the transverse ultrasonic wave
162: of 10 MHz propagating along the [110] direction polarized to the $[1\bar{1}0]$ one. The elastic constant $C_{44}$ of
163: Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ in Fig.~\ref{eps03} was determined by the transverse wave of 30 MHz propagating along [100] polarized to [010].
164: The bulk modulus $C_B= (C_{11}+2C_{12})/3$ in Fig.~\ref{eps02} was calculated by $C_{11}$ in Fig.~\ref{eps02} and $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ in Fig.~\ref{eps03}.
165:
166: It is remarkable that $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ exhibits a huge softening of 50\% with decreasing temperature down to $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K.
167: In phase II below $T_{\rm Q1}$ the ultrasonic echo signal of the $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ mode completely disappears
168: due to a marked ultrasonic attenuation. The softening of the longitudinal $C_{11}$ and $C_{\rm L}$ modes in Fig. 2 originates from
169: the softening of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$, because $C_{11}$ and $C_{\rm L}$ involve $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ in part. The softening of
170: $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ above $T_{\rm Q1}$ and the spontaneous tetragonal distortion below $T_{\rm Q1}$, that will be shown
171: in Sec. III D, provide evidence for the FQ ordering in phase II. The $C_{44}$ in Fig.~\ref{eps03} also exhibits a softening of 2.5\%
172: down to $T_{\rm Q1}$. The low-temperature behavior of $C_{11}$ and $C_{44}$ shown in insets of Figs.~\ref{eps02} and \ref{eps03}
173: indicates the transition to the FQ phase II at $T_{\rm Q1}$ and successive transition to the AFM phase III at $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K.
174: On the other hand, $C_{\rm B}$ shows monotonic increase with decreasing temperature.
175:
176: Neutron scattering on Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ revealed the para-magnetic state for Ce ions at both 4a and 8c sites in phase II,
177: which is consistent with the present scenario of the FQ ordering at 8c site in phase II below $T_{\rm Q1}$.\cite{ref11}
178: The AFM ordering in phase III at 4a site below $T_{\rm N2}$ has been detected by the neutron scattering.
179: It has been proposed that the inter-site quadrupole interaction among 8c sites brings
180: about the FQ ordering at 8c sites in phase II and Ce ions at 4a sites still remain to be the
181: para-state even in phase II. The inter-site magnetic interaction among 4a sites
182: gives rise to the AFM ordering in phase III below $T_{\rm N2}$. The magnetic ordering at 8c sites appears only below 0.4 K.
183: We discuss about this transition in the following Sec. III C.
184:
185: \subsection{Quadrupole susceptibility}
186: In order to analyze the elastic softening of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ and $C_{44}$ in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ of Fig.~\ref{eps03},
187: we introduce the coupling of the quadrupole $O_{\Gamma\gamma}$ of Ce ions to the elastic strain
188: $\varepsilon_{\Gamma\gamma}$ as ~\cite{ref16}
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: H_{QS}&=&-\sum_i g_\Gamma O_{\Gamma\gamma}(i)\varepsilon_{\Gamma\gamma},
191: \end{eqnarray}
192: where the summation $\sum_i$ takes over Ce ions in unit volume and $g_\Gamma$ is a coupling constant.
193: The inter-site quadrupole interaction mediated by phonons and conduction electrons
194: is written in a mean field approximation as
195: \begin{eqnarray}
196: H_{QQ}&=&-\sum_j g'_\Gamma \langle O_{\Gamma\gamma} \rangle O_{\Gamma\gamma}(j),
197: \end{eqnarray}
198: where $\langle O_{\Gamma\gamma} \rangle$ denotes a mean field of the quadrupole and $g'_\Gamma$ means a coupling constant for
199: the inter-site quadrupole interaction. By differentiating the total free energy consisting of 4f-electron and lattice parts
200: with respect to the elastic strain $\varepsilon_{\Gamma\gamma}$, we obtain the temperature dependence of
201: the elastic constant $C_\Gamma(T)$ as ~\cite{ref16}
202: \begin{figure}
203: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig02.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
204: \caption{\label{eps02} Temperature dependence of the elastic constants $C_{11}$, $C_{\rm L}$ and
205: the bulk modulus $C_{\rm B}$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$. Inset shows the anomalies of $C_{11}$
206: around the ferroquadrupole transition $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K and the antiferromagnetic transition $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K.}
207: \end{figure}
208: \begin{figure}
209: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig03_.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
210: \caption{\label{eps03} Temperature dependence of the elastic constants $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ and $C_{44}$
211: corresponding to shear waves in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$. Inset shows the anomalies of $C_{44}$
212: around the ferroquadrupole transition $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K and the antiferromagnetic transition $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K.
213: Solid lines are the calculation by the quadrupole susceptibility for the $\Gamma_8$ ground state and $\Gamma_7$ state
214: at 46 K of Ce ions. The broken lines were back ground $C_\Gamma ^0$ as shown in the text. A shoulder in $C_{44}$ around 30 K means the ultrasonic dispersion
215: due to the $\Gamma_5$ rattling motion.}
216: \end{figure}
217: \begin{eqnarray}
218: C_\Gamma (T)&=&C_\Gamma ^0 -\frac{Ng_\Gamma ^2\chi _\Gamma (T)}{1-g'_\Gamma \chi _\Gamma (T)}.
219: \end{eqnarray}
220: Here $C_\Gamma^0(T)$ denotes a background elastic constant without the quadrupole-strain interaction
221: and {\it N} is the number of Ce ions in unit volume. The quadrupole susceptibility of $\chi_\Gamma(T)$ in Eq. (3) is written as
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: -g_\Gamma^2 \chi_\Gamma (T)&=&\langle\frac{\partial^2 E_i}{\partial \varepsilon _{\Gamma\gamma} ^2}\rangle
224: -\frac{1}{k_BT}\{\langle (\frac{\partial E_i}{\partial \varepsilon_{\Gamma\gamma}})^2\rangle-\langle \frac{\partial E_i}{\partial \varepsilon _{\Gamma\gamma}}\rangle^2\},
225: \end{eqnarray}
226: where $E_i$ is a second-order perturbation energy with respect to $\varepsilon_{\Gamma\gamma}$ for CEF state. \cite{ref16}
227: The first part in right hand of Eq. (4) corresponds to the Van Vleck-term and the second part to the Curie term.
228: The Ce ions at both 4a and 8c sites in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ have the $\Gamma_8$ ground state,
229: while the $\Gamma_7$ state has excited energies of 46 K at 8c site and 60 K at the 4a site.
230: As was already mentioned, the neutron scattering revealed that the FQ ordering of 8c sites occurs
231: at $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K and the AFM ordering of 4a sites appears at $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K.
232: These facts indicate that the inter-site quadrupole interaction of Eq. (2) among the Ce ions at 8c sites dominates
233: the softening of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ as a precursor of the FQ ordering at $T_{\rm Q1}$. In the following analysis
234: we simply assume the quadrupole-strain interaction of Eq. (1) and quadrupole interaction of Eq. (2)
235: for the 8c site with the CEF splitting of $\Gamma_8$ (0 K) and $\Gamma_7$ (46 K).
236:
237: The solid lines for $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ and $C_{44}$ with Eq. (3) in Fig.~\ref{eps03} reproduce well the softening
238: in paramagnetic phase I above $T_{\rm Q1}$. It should be noted that the softening above $T_{\rm Q1}$
239: proportional to the reciprocal temperature $1/T$ originates from the Curie term of Eq. (4).
240: The coupling constants were determined to be $|g_{\Gamma 3}|=107$ K, $g'_{\Gamma 3}=0.01$ K for $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$
241: and $|g_{\Gamma 5}|=89$ K, $g'_{\Gamma 5}=0.19$ K for $C_{44}$.
242: The back ground $(C_{11}^0-C_{12}^0)/2=(4.12-0.001T)\times10^{10}$ J/m$^3$ and
243: $C_{44}^0=(3.44-0.0007T)\times10^{10}$ J/m$^3$ indicated by broken lines in Fig.~\ref{eps03} was used.
244: The positive value of $g'_{\Gamma 3}>0$ are consistent with the FQ ordering in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
245: A shoulder like anomaly in $C_{44}$ around 10 K results from ultrasonic dispersion that is caused by a rattling motion
246: of the rare-earth ion at 4a site in an oversized cage of Fig.~\ref{eps01}. We discuss about this remarkable behavior in Sec. III E.
247:
248: \subsection{Magnetic phase diagram}
249: In order to examine the magnetic phase diagrams of the FQ and AFM orderings in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$,
250: we have made the low-temperature ultrasonic measurements of $C_{11}$, $C_{44}$ and $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$
251: under magnetic fields. The softening of $C_{11}$ of Fig.~\ref{eps04} reduces with increasing fields applied
252: along the [001] direction parallel to the propagation direction of longitudinal wave.
253: The FQ transition points $T_{\rm Q1}$ indicated by downward arrows in Fig.~\ref{eps04} shift to higher temperatures
254: and become indistinct in high fields up to 6 T. In Fig.~\ref{eps05}, the FQ transition points $T_{\rm Q1}$ also shift to
255: higher temperatures accompanied by reduction of the softening in $C_{44}$ with increasing applied fields
256: along the [001] direction.
257:
258: \begin{figure}
259: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig04.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
260: \caption{\label{eps04} Low-temperature behavior of $C_{11}$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ under magnetic fields
261: along the [001] direction. Downward arrows indicate the ferroquadrupole ordering temperature $T_{\rm Q1}$
262: and upward arrow means the antiferromagnetic ordering temperature $T_{\rm N2}$.}
263: \end{figure}
264:
265: \begin{figure}
266: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig05.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
267: \caption{\label{eps05} Low-temperature behavior of $C_{44}$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ under magnetic fields along [001].
268: Downward arrows indicate the ferroquadrupole ordering temperature $T_{\rm Q1}$ and upward arrow means
269: the antiferromagnetic ordering temperature $T_{\rm N2}$.}
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: \begin{figure}
273: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig06.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
274: \caption{\label{eps06} Low temperature behavior of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ under magnetic fields
275: along the [001] direction. The successive phase transitions I-II-III are indicated by arrows.}
276: \end{figure}
277:
278: \begin{figure}
279: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig07.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
280: \caption{\label{eps07} Low temperature behavior of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
281: under magnetic fields along the [110] direction. The successive phase transitions I-II-II$'$ are indicated by arrows.}
282: \end{figure}
283:
284: In Figs.~\ref{eps06} and \ref{eps07}, we show the field dependence of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ applying fields
285: along the [001] and [110] directions, respectively.
286: In zero magnetic field, the $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ mode exhibits the considerable softening of 50\% and
287: the strong ultrasonic attenuation losing the echo signal in the vicinity of the FQ transition $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K.
288: The magnitude of the softening decreases abruptly with increasing fields along both [001] and [110] directions.
289: In magnetic fields, clear minima of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ corresponding to the transitions $T_{\rm Q1}$
290: from the paramagnetic phase I to the FQ phase II shift to higher temperatures. Only broad round anomalies
291: around $T_{\rm Q1}$ have been observed in high fields of 5 T. This behavior of $T_{\rm Q1}$ is similar to the results of
292: the FQ ordering accompanied by the soft $C_{44}$ mode in HoB$_6$.\cite{ref17} The Neel temperature $T_{\rm N2}$ in Fig.~\ref{eps06}
293: shifts slightly to lower temperatures with increasing magnetic fields. In Fig.~\ref{eps07} the anomalies associated
294: with the transition between phase II and II$'$ below $T_{Q1}$ have been found.
295:
296: For the investigation of low-temperature and high-field behavior in FQ II and AFM III phases,
297: we have measured field dependence of the $C_{44}$ and $C_{\rm L}=(C_{11}+C_{12}+2C_{44})/2$
298: employing the dilution refrigerator. In Fig.~\ref{eps08} we show $C_{44}$ versus $H$ at 30 mK in fields up to 12 T
299: applied along [001]. Inset of Fig. 8 is expanded view below 2.5 T.
300: An anomaly of the phase II-III boundary at 2.1 T indicated by a vertical line has been observed.
301: Furthermore, several anomalies at 0.5, 1.2 and 1.6 T associated with sub-phases of the phase III have been found.
302: It should be emphasized that appreciable hysteresis phenomena between increasing and decreasing field sequences
303: have been found only in phase III.
304:
305: In Fig.~\ref{eps09} we show the low-temperature field dependence of the $C_{\rm L}$ in fields up to 16 T applied along [110].
306: Low-field behavior below 2.5 T is shown in inset of Fig. 9.
307: We have observed a new phase boundary around 8.2 T in phase II, which is probably a sub-phase of the FQ phase II.
308: However, this phase boundary is absent in fields along [001] as shown in Fig.~\ref{eps08}. At low field in phase III,
309: we have found several anomalies in $C_{\rm L}$ of Fig.~\ref{eps09} showing a hysteresis behavior.
310: As can been seen in inset of Fig.~\ref{eps09}, this hysteresis becomes pronounced with decreasing temperature.
311: These sub-phases with hysteresis behavior in phase III in magnetic fields along both [001] and [110] are well consistent
312: with the results of neutron scattering experiments that detect weak incommensurate magnetic Bragg peaks
313: with a propagation vector \mbox{\boldmath $k$}=[0 0 1-$\tau$], ($\tau\sim$ 0.06) at 8c site.\cite{ref11}
314:
315: The magnetic phase diagrams of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ in Figs.~\ref{eps10} and \ref{eps11} are obtained in fields
316: along the [001] and [110] directions, respectively. We present the results of the ultrasonic measurements
317: together with the results of thermal expansions in Sec. III D. It is of importance that the FQ phase II
318: is stabilized in fields for the [001] direction in Fig.~\ref{eps10} and the [110] direction in Fig.~\ref{eps11}.
319: The FQ sub-phase II$'$ was added to the phase diagram and the upper limit at 8.2 T of the phase II$'$
320: newly determined in fields along [110] of Fig.~\ref{eps11}.
321: However, the FQ sub-phase is absent in fields along [001] of Fig.~\ref{eps10}.
322: This result indicates strong anisotropy of the quadrupole interaction of $O_2^0$ in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
323:
324: \begin{figure}
325: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig08.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
326: \caption{\label{eps08} Field dependence of the $C_{44}$ at 30 mK in fields along [001] up to 12 T.
327: Inset is expanded view below 2.5 T indicating the magnetic transitions.}
328: \end{figure}
329:
330: \begin{figure}
331: \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{fig09.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
332: \caption{\label{eps09} Field dependence of the $C_{\rm L}=(C_{11}+C_{12}+2C_{44})/2$ at various temperatures
333: in fields along [110] up to 16 T. Inset is expanded view below 2.5 T indicating the magnetic transitions}
334: \end{figure}
335:
336: \begin{figure}
337: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig10.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
338: \caption{\label{eps10} Magnetic phase diagram of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ under fields along the [001] direction.
339: The boundary from paramagnetic phase I to the ferroquadrupole phase II shifts to higher temperatures with increasing fields,
340: while the boundary from phase II to the antiferromagnetic phase III shifts to lower temperatures in fields.}
341: \end{figure}
342:
343: \begin{figure}
344: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig11.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
345: \caption{\label{eps11} Magnetic phase diagram of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ under fields along the [110] direction.
346: The sub-phase II$'$ exists in the AFQ phase II.}
347: \end{figure}
348:
349: The series of R$_3$Pd$_{20}$X$_6$ compounds usually show two successive AFM orderings of 8c site at $T_{\rm N1}$
350: with a propagation vector $\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_1=[111]$ and of 4a site at $T_{\rm N2} (<T_{\rm N1})$
351: with $\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_2=[001]$, Nd$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ ($T_{\rm N1}=1.75$ K, $T_{\rm N2}=0.58$ K) \cite{ref18},
352: Nd$_3$Pd$_{20}$Si$_6$ ($T_{\rm N1}=2.4$ K, $T_{\rm N2}=0.7$ K) \cite{ref19},
353: Tb$_3$Pd$_{20}$Si$_6$ ($T_{\rm N1}=10.2$ K, $T_{\rm N2}=4.1$ K) \cite{ref20},
354: Dy$_3$Pd$_{20}$Si$_6$ ($T_{\rm N1} \sim 5.8$ K, $T_{N2} \sim 1.8$ K) \cite{ref21} and so on.
355: One can reasonably expect that the transition temperature $T_{\rm N1}$ at 8c site is always higher than $T_{\rm N2}$
356: at 4a site since the distance $\sim$ 6.2 {\AA} between rare-earth ion of 8c site is much shorter than
357: the one $\sim$ 8.8 {\AA} of 4a site. In the present Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$, at first the FQ ordering at 8c site
358: with a structural change from cubic lattice to tetragonal one occurs at $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K.
359: Therefore, the AFM ordering at 8c site is hard to take place
360: because the favorable propagation vector $\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_1=[111]$
361: of 8c site does not match to the tetragonal lattice in phase II. In other words, the AFM ordering at 8c site is
362: replaced by the FQ ordering in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$. While, the AFM ordering of 4a site
363: with a propagation vector $\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_2=[001]$ is easy to occur even in tetragonal structure below $T_{\rm N2}$.
364: Neutron experiments detected large enough value of saturation cerium moments $\mu(4a)=(1.1\pm0.1)\mu_{\rm B}$/Ce
365: that is expected from the ground state quartet $\Gamma_8$ perpendicular to the $\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_1=[001]$
366: in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ far below $T_{\rm N2}$ at 50 mK.\cite{ref11}
367:
368: \subsection{Thermal expansion}
369: In order to examine the structural change due to the FQ ordering at $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K,
370: we have measured the thermal expansion along the [001] direction in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
371: The sample lengths along the [001] and [111] directions are written by the symmetry strains as
372: $(\Delta L/L)_{[001]}=\varepsilon_{zz}=\varepsilon_{\rm B}/3+\varepsilon_u/\sqrt3$ and
373: $(\Delta L/L)_{[111]}=\varepsilon_{\rm B}/3+2(\varepsilon_{yz}+\varepsilon_{zx}+\varepsilon_{xy})/3$.
374: Here, $\varepsilon_{\rm B} = \varepsilon_{xx} + \varepsilon_{yy} + \varepsilon_{zz}$ is a volume strain with $\Gamma_1$ symmetry,
375: $\varepsilon_u =(2\varepsilon_{zz} - \varepsilon_{xx} - \varepsilon_{yy})/\sqrt3$ is a tetragonal strain with $\Gamma_3$ and
376: $\varepsilon_{xy}$ is a shear strain with $\Gamma_5$. The length along [001] in Fig.~\ref{eps12} shows a monotonous decrease with
377: decreasing temperature in paramagnetic phase I above $T_{\rm Q1}$ and abruptly expands
378: about $\Delta L/L=1.9\times10^{-4}$ below $T_{\rm Q1}$. The thermal expansion along [001] in phase II
379: and the huge softening of 50\% in $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ of Fig.~\ref{eps03} indicate the $O_2^0$-type FQ ordering accompanied
380: by the structural transition from cubic lattice to tetragonal one with the spontaneous strain
381: $\langle\varepsilon_u\rangle$ in phase II. This spontaneous strain is proportional to the order parameter as
382: $\langle\varepsilon_u\rangle=Ng_{\Gamma3} \langle O_2^0 \rangle (2/(C_{11}^0-C_{12}^0))$ in mean-field approximation.
383: Below $T_{\rm N2}=0.75$ K, the $\Delta L/L$ along [001] slightly shrinks. Inset of Fig.~\ref{eps12} is expanded view of $\Delta L/L$
384: and the coefficient of the thermal expansion $\alpha$ at low temperatures.
385: A sharp anomaly in the coefficient $\alpha$ has been found at the FQ transition $T_{Q1}$.
386:
387: \begin{figure}[b]
388: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig12.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
389: \caption{\label{eps12} Thermal expansion $\Delta L/L$ in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
390: Inset shows the thermal expansion coefficient $\alpha$ and thermal expansion $\Delta L/L$ at low temperatures.}
391: \end{figure}
392:
393: \begin{figure}[b]
394: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig13.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
395: \caption{\label{eps13} Thermal expansion $\Delta L/L$ along [001] in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ under fields up to 12 T
396: along the [001] direction .}
397: \end{figure}
398:
399: Measurements of $\Delta L/L$ versus $T$ in various magnetic fields parallel to [001] are shown in Fig.~\ref{eps13}.
400: The magnitude of the expansion $\Delta L/L$ in fields exhibits noticeable increase up to
401: $\Delta L/L=2.5\times10^{-4}$ compared with that in zero magnetic field. The sharp increase of $\Delta L/L$
402: at the transition point to the FQ phase II has been observed in low magnetic fields below 1 T.
403: On the other hand, the gradual increase in the thermal expansion $\Delta L/L$ above 5 T up to 12 T indicates
404: an obscure character of the I-II phase boundary in high fields.
405: This is consistent with the fact that the elastic constants in fields of Figs.~\ref{eps04}, \ref{eps05}, \ref{eps06}
406: and \ref{eps07} show obscure transitions in fields.
407: This behavior is similar to the liquid-gas transition near the critical end point under hydrostatic pressures.
408:
409: The thermal expansion along the [001] direction in fields parallel to [001] and the considerable softening of
410: $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ of 50\% in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ strongly suggests that the order parameter of the FQ ordering
411: in phase II is $O_2^0$ with $\Gamma_3$ symmetry. The relatively small softening of 2.5\% in $C_{44}$ in Fig.~\ref{eps03}
412: means that the quadrupole of $O_{xy}$-type with $\Gamma_5$ is irrelevant for the transition at $T_{\rm Q1}$.
413: The thermal expansion of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ along [111] is required to examine an interplay of the spontaneous strain
414: $\varepsilon_{xy}$ for the phase II. We refer to our recent study of the FQ transition in HoB$_6$
415: and the phase IV in Ce$_x$La$_{1-x}$B$_6$ ({\it x}=0.75, 0.70), \cite{ref17,ref22} where the trigonal strain
416: $\varepsilon_{yz}=\varepsilon_{zx}=\varepsilon_{xy}$ plays a significant role and
417: the tetragonal strain $\varepsilon_u$ is irrelevant. These facts are well consistent with
418: the pronounced elastic softening in $C_{44}$ of 70\% in HoB$_6$ and of 31\% in Ce$_x$La$_{1-x}$B$_6$ ({\it x}=0.75, 0.70).
419:
420: \subsection{Ultrasonic dispersion of $\mbox{\boldmath $C_{44}$}$}
421: The $C_{44}$ mode associated with the elastic strain $\varepsilon_{yz},\varepsilon_{zx},\varepsilon_{xy}$
422: of $\Gamma_5$ symmetry of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ in Figs.~\ref{eps03} and \ref{eps05}
423: exhibits a shoulder like anomaly around 10 K in addition to the characteristic softening
424: due to the quadrupolar coupling above $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K. It should be noted that this anomaly is absent
425: for the $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ mode associated with $\Gamma_3$ elastic strain $\varepsilon_v$ and
426: the bulk modulus $C_{\rm B}$ with $\Gamma_1$ volume strain $\varepsilon_{\rm B}$. In order to examine the origin of
427: this anomaly, we have measured the frequency dependence of $C_{44}$ from 10 MHz up to 250 MHz.
428: The elastic constant $C_{44}$ of Fig.~\ref{eps14}(a) exhibits shoulders showing remarkable frequency dependence.
429: An increase in ultrasonic attenuation around shoulder has also been found, but not discussed here.
430: We describe this frequency dependence of the elastic constant $C_{44}^D(\omega)$ in terms of Debye-type dispersion as
431: \begin{eqnarray}
432: C_{44}^D(\omega)&=&C_{44}^D(\infty)-\frac{C_{44}^D(\infty)-C_{44}^D(0)}{1+\omega^2\tau^2},
433: \end{eqnarray}
434: where $C_{44}^D(\infty)$ and $C_{44}^D(0)$ are the elastic constants of high frequency limit and low frequency one, respectively.
435: Here $\omega$ is an angular frequency of the ultrasonic wave and $\tau$ means the relaxation time of the system.
436: In fittings of Fig.~\ref{eps14}(b), we take into account the superposition of two susceptibilities by the quadrupole one
437: of Eq.(3) and the Debye-type dispersion of Eq.(5) as $C_{44} = C_{44}^Q + C_{44}^D(\omega)$.
438: The inflection points around 10 K in $C_{44}$ indicated by arrows in Fig.~\ref{eps14}(a) mean the temperatures
439: where the $\tau$ coincides with the $\omega$ as $\omega\tau=1$.
440: The ultrasonic attenuation is expected to be maximum at the temperatures for $\omega\tau=1$.
441: The solid lines of Fig.~\ref{eps14}(b) being the calculations with Eq. (5) well reproduce the experimental results of Fig.~\ref{eps14}(a).
442: The relaxation time obeying the Arrhenius-type temperature dependence $\tau=\tau_0$exp$(E/k_BT)$
443: with the attempt time $\tau_0=3.1\times10^{-11}$ sec and the activation energy $E=70$ K has been determined.
444: The parameter of $\Delta C=C_{44}^D(\infty)-C_{44}^D(0)=0.004\times10^{10}$ J/m$^3$ is used.
445:
446: \begin{figure}
447: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{fig14.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
448: \caption{\label{eps14} Frequency dependence of the elastic constant of the transverse $C_{44}$ mode
449: in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$. (a) represents the experimental results with the frequencies from 10 MHz up to 250 MHz.
450: (b) is the calculation in terms of the Debye-type dispersion of Eq. (5) in text.}
451: \end{figure}
452:
453: The ultrasonic dispersion due to electron thermal hopping has already found
454: in the inhomogeneous valence fluctuation compounds of Sm$_3$X$_4$ (X=Se, Te),
455: Yb$_4$(As$_{0.71}$Sb$_{0.29}$)$_3$ \cite{ref23} and Sr$_{12}$Ca$_2$Cu$_{24}$O$_{41}$ \cite{ref24}.
456: It is remarkable that the very slow relaxation time $\tau$ and extremely low activation energy $E$
457: for Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ are exceptional as compared to those of charge fluctuation compounds
458: Sm$_3$Se$_4$ \cite{ref25} and Sm$_3$Te$_4$ \cite{ref26}, $\tau_0 \sim 2.5\times10^{-13}$ sec and $E \sim 1600$ K,
459: and Sr$_{12}$Ca$_2$Cu$_{24}$O$_{41}$, $\tau_0=1.01\times10^{-13}$ sec and $E=1900$ K.\cite{ref24}
460: This discrepancy of the order of $\tau_0$ and $E$ between the present Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
461: and the charge fluctuation compounds indicates that thermally activated rattling motion of heavy mass particle,
462: which is probably rare-earth ion in a cage, gives rise to the ultrasonic dispersion in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
463:
464: Glass materials and charge fluctuation compounds exhibit frequently the ultrasonic dispersion,
465: which results from a thermally activated motion in a double- or multi-well potential.
466: The compounds such as Sm$_3$X$_4$ (X=S, Se, Te) with different valence of Sm$^{2+}$ and Sm$^{3+}$ ions and
467: Sr$_{12}$Ca$_2$Cu$_{24}$O$_{41}$ with Cu$^{2+}$ and Cu$^{3+}$ ions cause the ultrasonic dispersions
468: due to thermally assisted charge fluctuation in the temperature region between 100-200 K.
469: The two-level system (TLS) due to an atomic tunneling \cite{ref27} or electron tunneling \cite{ref26} manifests itself
470: in glass materials at low temperatures, where the thermally activated motion dies out.
471: The TLS yields the decrease in the elastic constant proportional to ln$T$,\cite{ref28}
472: the specific heat to $T$ and thermal conductivity to $T^2$.\cite{ref29} Besides in the case of Sm$_3$Te$_4$,
473: remarkable logarithmic decrease in the elastic constant appears below about 15 K down to the spin glass transition
474: at $T_g=1.5$ K, which suggests the existence of the 4f-electron tunneling motion between Sm$^{2+}$ and Sm$^{3+}$ ions
475: situated charge glass state.\cite{ref26}
476:
477: \begin{table*}
478: \caption{\label{tab:table1}
479: Rattling modes with eight off-center positions along the three-fold [111] direction in the 4a-site cage
480: with O$\rm_h$ point group symmetry. Corresponding elastic strains are also listed.
481: There is a $\Gamma _5$ rattling mode coupled to the $\varepsilon _{xy}$-type strain of the $C_{44}$ mode.
482: This is contrary to the absence of the $\Gamma _3$ rattling mode to the $\varepsilon _u, \varepsilon _v$
483: of the $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ mode. The present ultrasonic dispersion in $C_{44}$ of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
484: originates from the $\Gamma _5$-type rattling at 4a site.}
485: \begin{ruledtabular}
486: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
487: Symmetry & Rattling mode & Strain\\
488: \hline
489: $\Gamma _1$ & $\rho _{\Gamma 1}=\rho _1+\rho _2+\rho _3+\rho _4+\rho _5+\rho _6+\rho _7+\rho _8$ & $\varepsilon _{\rm B}=\varepsilon _{xx} + \varepsilon _{yy} + \varepsilon _{zz}$\\
490: $\Gamma _2$ & $\rho _{\Gamma 2}=\rho _1+\rho _2+\rho _3+\rho _4-\rho _5-\rho _6-\rho _7-\rho _8$ &\\
491: $\Gamma _3$ & & $\varepsilon _u=(2\varepsilon _{zz}-\varepsilon _{xx}-\varepsilon _{yy})/\sqrt{3}$\\
492: & & $\varepsilon _v=\varepsilon _{xx}-\varepsilon _{yy}$\\
493: $\Gamma _4$ & $\rho _{\Gamma 4,x}=\rho _1-\rho _2-\rho _3+\rho _4+\rho _5-\rho _6+\rho _7-\rho _8$ & \\
494: & $\rho _{\Gamma 4,y}=\rho _1-\rho _2+\rho _3-\rho _4+\rho _5-\rho _6-\rho _7+\rho _8$ & \\
495: & $\rho _{\Gamma _4,z}=\rho _1+\rho _2-\rho _3-\rho _4-\rho _5-\rho _6+\rho _7+\rho _8$ & \\
496: $\Gamma _5$ & $\rho _{\Gamma _5,yz}=\rho _1-\rho _2-\rho _3+\rho _4-\rho _5+\rho _6-\rho _7+\rho _8$ & $\varepsilon _{yz}$\\
497: & $\rho _{\Gamma _5,zx}=\rho _1-\rho _2+\rho _3-\rho _4-\rho _5+\rho _6+\rho _7-\rho _8$ & $\varepsilon _{zx}$\\
498: & $\rho _{\Gamma _5,xy}=\rho _1+\rho _2-\rho _3-\rho _4+\rho _5+\rho _6-\rho _7-\rho _8$ & $\varepsilon _{xy}$\\
499: \end{tabular}
500: \end{ruledtabular}
501: \end{table*}
502:
503: The present clathrate compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ is a crystal possessing an ideal periodic arrangement of cages in space.
504: The stable trivalent Ce ions in cages of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ are free from the valence fluctuation phenomena.
505: As shown in Fig.~\ref{eps01}, the clathrate compound Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ is made up of the cage at 4a site consisting of Pd and Ge
506: with distances $d\rm_{Ce1-Ge}$=3.332 {\AA}, $d\rm_{Ce1-Pd2}$=3.067 {\AA}, and the cage at 8c site of Pd with $d\rm_{Ce2-Pd1}$=2.868 {\AA},
507: $d\rm_{Ce2-Pd2}$=3.373 {\AA}. The trivalent Ce-ion with radii $a=1.7\sim1.8$ {\AA} inside the 4a-site cage in particular
508: is expected to show the rattling motion over the off-center positions being away from the center of the cage.
509: Actually the neutron scattering on Pr$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ and Nd$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ revealed the sharp transition peaks
510: indicating the stable CEF splitting at 8c site and no indication for CEF state at 4a site.\cite{ref08}
511: These results may imply the obscure CEF state due to the off-center Ce ion at 4a site contrary to
512: the well-defined CEF splitting at 8c site being stable Ce ion position.
513:
514: \subsection{${\bold \Gamma_5}$ rattling motion}
515: Notable finding of Fig.~\ref{eps14} is that the ultrasonic dispersion in the $C_{44}$ mode associated with $\varepsilon_{xy}$-type
516: strain indicates the rattling motion with specific $\Gamma_5$ symmetry in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
517: It is expected that the Ce ion in 4a cage with cubic symmetry O$\rm_h$ favors off-center positions
518: along one of the three principle directions of [100], [110] and [111].
519: As one can see the cage at 4a site in Fig.~\ref{eps01}, it is of particular interest that no atom exists
520: along the three-fold [111] directions, while the Ge atom occupies along the four-fold [100] and the Pd atom
521: along the two-fold [110] ones. This crystallographic character may promise a flat potential
522: along the three-fold [111] directions and profound potentials along the four-fold [100] and two-fold [110] directions.
523: Presumably the Ce ion at 4a site prefers the off-center eight positions along the [111] directions,
524: which are defined as $r_1=(a,a,a)$, $r_2=(-a,-a,a)$, $r_3=(-a,a,-a)$, $r_4=(a,-a,-a)$, $r_5=(a,a,-a)$, $r_6=(-a,-a,-a)$,
525: $r_7=(a,-a,a)$, $r_8=(-a,a,a)$. The atomic densities $\rho_i=\rho_i(r_i) (i=1\sim8)$
526: at the eight off-center positions are also defined.
527: When 48 symmetry operators of O$\rm_h$ point group are acted on the atomic densities $\rho_i$,
528: one can derive the transfer representation matrices with $8\times8$ elements. Consequently,
529: one obtains the characters $\chi_{rat}^{[111]}$ for the rattling motion by tracing the diagonal elements
530: of the representation matrices. Using the characters $\chi_{rat}^{[111]}$ and the character table
531: for the irreducible representations of O$\rm_h$,\cite{ref30} the rattling motion over the eight off-center positions
532: along the [111] direction is reduced to the direct sum of $\Gamma_1$(1D)$\oplus$$\Gamma_2$(1D)$\oplus$$\Gamma_4$(3D)$\oplus$$\Gamma_5$(3D).
533:
534: Employing projection operators on appropriate atomic density $\rho_i$, we obtain the rattling modes
535: for the irreducible representations as listed in Table 1 together with the elastic strains $\varepsilon_{\Gamma\gamma}$.
536: One can see the presence of $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode $\rho_{\Gamma 5,yz},\rho_{\Gamma 5,zx},\rho_{\Gamma 5,xy}$
537: coupled to the strain $\varepsilon_{yz}$, $\varepsilon_{zx}$, $\varepsilon_{xy}$ contrary to the absence of $\Gamma_3$
538: rattling mode coupled to the strain $\varepsilon_u$, $\varepsilon_v$.
539: This is consistent with the fact that the ultrasonic dispersion reveals in $C_{44}$ and is absent in $(C_{11}-C_{12})$/2.
540: The Ce atom in the cage of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ obeys a harmonic oscillation of $\zeta(z)=(1/\pi z_0)1/2$exp$(-z^2/2z_0^2)$
541: with a mean square displacement $z_0=(1/2\pi)(h\tau_0/M)^{1/2}$. The attempt time $\tau_0=3.1\times10^{-11}$ sec
542: and the mass $M=140m_{\rm p}$ where $m_{\rm p}$ is a proton mass, leads to the mean square displacement $z_0$
543: being approximately twice of off-center distances $a$ as $z_0=2a=0.48$ {\AA}.\cite{ref31}
544:
545: The full symmetry $\Gamma_1$ rattling mode
546: $\rho_{\Gamma 1}=\rho_1+\rho_2+\rho_3+\rho_4+\rho_5+\rho_6+\rho_7+\rho_8$ means the uniform atomic distribution
547: with fraction 1/8 at each eight off-center positions. While the $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode, for instance
548: $\rho_{\Gamma 5,xy}=\rho_1+\rho_2-\rho_3-\rho_4+\rho_5+\rho_6-\rho_7-\rho_8$, represents anisotropic atomic distribution
549: being quadrupole $O_{xy}$ at the lowest order such as fraction 1/4 at $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_5$, $r_6$ and zero at $r_3$, $r_4$, $r_7$, $r_8$
550: as shown in Fig.~\ref{rat}. The present group theoretical analysis for the rattling mode is essentially the same treatment
551: previously argued for the charge fluctuation mode.\cite{ref24,ref26,ref32} In the present system Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$,
552: the thermally activated $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode may be a ground state and the $\Gamma_1$, $\Gamma_2$, $\Gamma_4$
553: be excited states.
554:
555: Our group has recently found similar ultrasonic dispersion around 30 K in a heavy fermion superconductor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$
556: with a filled skutterudite structure. It should be noted that ultrasonic dispersion in the $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ mode of
557: PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ indicates the $\Gamma_3$ rattling motion of Pr atom over six fractionally occupied positions along [100].
558: The dispersion of $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ in PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ is contrary to the one of $C_{44}$
559: in the present compound of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.\cite{ref14} The attempted time $\tau_0=8.8\times10^{-11}$ sec,
560: activation energy $E=168$ K and mean square displacement $z_0=0.80$ {\AA} in PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ are comparable to
561: the present results of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
562:
563: The thermally activated $\Gamma_5$ rattling motion with fractional atomic state in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ dies out
564: with decreasing temperature. At further low temperatures, the off-center tunneling state of Ce ions in the 4a-site cages will appear,
565: which means a quantum state being occupied four positions,
566: for instance at $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_5$, $r_6$ for the case of $\rho_{\Gamma 5,xy}$, at the same time.
567: The charge glass state in the inhomogeneous mixed valence compound Sm$_3$Te$_4$ revealed
568: the low-temperature softening in elastic constants proportional to ln$T$ being resemble the structural glass.\cite{ref26}
569: The present scenario of the atomic tunneling of Ce ions in 4a-site cages in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ is also expected to
570: show the elastic softening at low temperatures. However, the low-temperature quadrupole and magnetic orderings in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
571: may mask the character of the tunneling state in the present case. In order to clarify the tunneling and rattling
572: in the present clathrate compounds, the low-temperature thermodynamic and ultrasonic measurements on La$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
573: without 4f-electron in particular is required.
574:
575: \begin{figure}
576: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{fig15.eps}
577: \caption{\label{rat} Schematic view for the $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode $\rho_{\Gamma 5,xy}$ due to the off-center Ce-ion
578: along the three-fold [111] direction in the 4a-site cage. The $\rho_{\Gamma 5,xy}$ represents that fractional atomic density
579: 1/4 is located at $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_5$, $r_6$ and null at $r_3$, $r_4$, $r_7$, $r_8$.
580: The freezing of the thermally activated motion of the $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode brings about the atomic tunneling state at low temperatures.}
581: \end{figure}
582:
583: \section{CONCLUDING REMARKS}
584: In the present paper we have measured the elastic constants and thermal expansion of Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
585: The characteristic elastic softening in $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ and $C_{44}$ is well described
586: in terms of the quadrupole susceptibility for the $\Gamma_8$ ground state.
587: The important finding is that the $(C_{11}-C_{12})/2$ shows the huge softening of 50\% towards $T_{\rm Q1}=1.25$ K
588: and the $C_{44}$ exhibits the softening of 2.5\% only. This result strongly indicates the FQ ordering
589: with the order parameter of the $\Gamma_3$ symmetry in phase II below $T_{\rm Q1}$.
590: Actually we have successfully observed the sharp increase of $\Delta L/L=1.9\times10^{-4}$
591: in length along the [001] direction below $T_{\rm Q1}$. This is the evidence for the $O_2^0$-type FQ ordering
592: accompanied by the structural change from cubic lattice to tetragonal one at $T_{\rm Q1}$ in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$.
593:
594: For the investigation of the magnetic phase diagram concerning the FQ phase II and AFM phase III in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$,
595: the elastic constants and thermal expansion in fields have been measured.
596: We have found that the boundary from the paramagnetic phase I to the FQ phase II of $O_2^0$
597: shifts to higher temperatures with increasing magnetic fields. The result that the I-II phase transition
598: becomes obscure in fields is similar to the liquid-gas transition approaching to the critical end point under pressure.
599: This result consistent with the fact that the FQ order parameter $O_2^0$ in Ce$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$
600: has the total symmetry under fields along the [001] direction.\cite{ref05}
601: The boundary from the phase II to the AFM ordering shifts to lower temperatures as similar as the conventional AFM ordering.
602:
603: We have found the ultrasonic dispersion in the $C_{44}$ mode indicating the rattling motion with $\Gamma_5$ symmetry.
604: Taking into account the absence of the atom along the [111] direction in 4a-site cage,
605: we have successfully picked up the specific $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode
606: $\rho_{\Gamma 5,yz}$, $\rho_{\Gamma 5,zx}$, $\rho_{\Gamma 5,xy}$
607: with the fractional atomic density over the eight minimum positions of potential
608: along the four-fold [111], $[\bar{1}11]$, $[1\bar{1}1]$ and $[11\bar{1}]$ directions.
609: The dispersion of the $C_{44}$ mode obeying the Debye-formula revealed the thermally activated-type relaxation time
610: $\tau=\tau_0$exp$(E/k_BT)$ for the $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode with an attempt time $\tau_0=3.1\times10^{-11}$ sec
611: and an activation energy $E=70$ K. The estimated mean square displacement $z_0=0.48$ {\AA} for the harmonic oscillation
612: of Ce atom leads to the distance of the potential minima along the [111] direction as $a = z_0/2 =0.24$ {\AA}.
613: In order to confirm the anisotropic atomic distribution in the 4a-site cage, the neutron or x-ray scattering is required.
614: The freezing of the thermally activated motion due to the $\Gamma_5$ rattling mode with lowering temperature
615: brings about the atomic tunneling state.
616: By analogy of the charge glass compound Sm$_3$Te$_4$, the Ce-ion tunneling is expected at low temperatures.
617: The ultrasonic investigation on La$_3$Pd$_{20}$Ge$_6$ free from the long-range ordering due to 4f-electrons is now
618: in progress to shed light on the tunneling and rattling in cages.
619:
620: \begin{acknowledgments}
621: This work was supported by a Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research
622: from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
623: \end{acknowledgments}
624:
625: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
626: \bibitem{ref01}D. Schmitt, P. Morin, and J. Pierre, J. Magn. Magn. Matter. $\bold 8$, 249 (1978).
627: \bibitem{ref02}R. Takke, N. Dolezal, W. Assmus, and B. L\"{u}thi, J. Magn. Magn. Matter. $\bold{23}$, 247 (1981).
628: \bibitem{ref03}H. Nakao, K. Magishi, Y. Wakabayashi, Y. Murakami, K. Koyama, K. Hirota, Y. Endoh, and S. Kunii, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{70}$, 1857 (2001).
629: \bibitem{ref04}S. Nakamura, T. Goto, S. Kunii, K. Iwashita, and A. Tamaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{63}$, 623 (1994).
630: \bibitem{ref05}R. Shiina, H. Shiba, and P. Thalmeier, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{66}$, 1741 (1997); R. Shiina, O. Sakai, H. Shiba, and P. Thalmeier, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{67}$, 941 (1998).
631: \bibitem{ref06}J. Kitagawa, N. Takeda, and M. Ishikawa, Phys. Rev. B $\bold{53}$, 5101 (1996).
632: \bibitem{ref07}A. V. Grivanov, Yu. D. Seropegin, and O. I. Bodak, J. Alloys. Comp. $\bold{204}$, L9 (1994).
633: \bibitem{ref08}L. Keller, A. D\"{o}nni, M. Zolliker, and T. Komatsubara, Physica B $\bold{259}$-$\bold{261}$, 336 (1999).
634: \bibitem{ref09}J. Kitagawa, N. Takeda, M. Ishikawa, T. Yoshida, A. Ishiguro, N. Kimura, and T. Komatsubara, Phys. Rev. B $\bold{57}$, 7450 (1998).
635: \bibitem{ref10}O. Suzuki, T. Horino, Y. Nemoto, T. Goto, A. D\"{o}nni, T. Komatsubara, and M. Ishikawa, Physica B $\bold{259}$-$\bold{261}$, 334 (1999); T. Goto, T. Horino, Y. Nemoto, T. Yamaguchi, A. D\"{o}nni, O. Suzuki, and T. Komatsubara, Physica B $\bold{312}$-$\bold{313}$, 492 (2002).
636: \bibitem{ref11}A. D\"{o}nni, T. Herrmannsd\"{o}rfer, P. Fischer, L. Keller, F. Fauth, K A McEwen, T. Goto, and T. Komatsubara, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter $\bold{12}$, 9441 (2000).
637: \bibitem{ref12}L. Mihaly, Nature $\bold{395}$, 839 (1998); V. Keppens, D. Mandrus, B.C. Sales, B.C. Chakoumakos, P. Dai, R. Coldea, M.B. Maple, D.A. Gajewski, E.J. Freeman, and S. Bennington, Nature $\bold{395}$, 876 (1998).
638: \bibitem{ref13}V. Keppens, B.C. Sales, D. Mandrus, B.C. Chakoumakos, and C. Laermans, Phil. Mag. Lett., $\bold{80}$, 807 (2000).
639: \bibitem{ref14}T. Goto, Y. Nemoto, K. Sakai, T. Yamaguchi, M. Akatsu, T. Yanagisawa, H. Hazama, K. Onuki, H. Sugawara, and H. Sato, to be submitted Phys. Rev. Lett.
640: \bibitem{ref15}E. Kanda, T. Goto, H. Yamada, S. Suto, S. Tanaka, T. Fujita, and T. Fujimura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{54}$, 175 (1985)., H. Yamada, S. Tanaka, Y. Kayanuma, T. Kojima, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{54}$, 1180 (1985).
641: \bibitem{ref16}P. Thalmeier and B. L\"{u}thi, Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, ed. K. A. Gschneider Jr. and L. Eyring (North-Holland, 1991) Vol. 14. Chap. 96.
642: \bibitem{ref17}T. Goto, Y. Nemoto, Y. Nakano, S. Nakamura, T. Kajitani, and S. Kunii, Physica B $\bold{281}$-$\bold{282}$, 586 (2000); T. Yamaguchi, M. Akatsu, Y. Nakano, T. Washizawa, Y. Nemoto, T. Goto, A. D\"{o}nni, S. Nakamura, and S. Kunii, Physica B, $\bold{329}$-$\bold{333}$, 622 (2003).
643: \bibitem{ref18}A. D\"{o}nni, L. Keller, P. Fischer, Y. Aoki, H. Sato, F. Fauth, M. Zolliker, T. Komatsubara, and Y. Endoh, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter $\bold{10}$, 7219 (1998); N. Kimura, N. Tateiwa, M. Nakayama, H. Aoki, T. Komatsubara, T. Sakon, M. Motokawa, Y. Koike, and N. Metoki, Physica B $\bold{259}$-$\bold{261}$, 338 (1999).
644: \bibitem{ref19}T. Herrmannsd\"{o}rfer, A. D\"{o}nni, P. Fischer, L. Keller, E. Clementyev, A. Furrer, S. Mango, B. van den Brandt, and H. Kitazawa, J. Alloys. Comp. $\bold{323}$-$\bold{324}$, 509 (2001).
645: \bibitem{ref20}T. Herrmannsd\"{o}rfer, A. D\"{o}nni, P. Fischer, L. Keller, G. B\"{o}ttger, M. Gutmann, H. Kitazawa, and J. Tang, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter $\bold{11}$, 2929 (1999).
646: \bibitem{ref21}T. Herrmannsd\"{o}rfer, A. D\"{o}nni, P. Fischer, L. Keller, and H. Kitazawa, Physica B $\bold{281}$-$\bold{282}$, 167 (2000).
647: \bibitem{ref22}O. Suzuki, T. Goto, S. Nakamura, T. Matsumura, and S. Kunii, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{67}$, 4243 (1998); M. Akatsu, T. Goto, Y. Nemoto, O. Suzuki, S. Nakamura, and S. Kunii, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. $\bold{72}$, 205 (2003).
648: \bibitem{ref23}Y. Nemoto, H. Aoki, T. Goto, A. Ochiai, and T. Suzuki, Physica B $\bold{259}$-$\bold{261}$, 275 (1999).
649: \bibitem{ref24}T. Goto and B. L\"{u}thi, Advances in Phys. $\bold{52}$, 67 (2003).
650: \bibitem{ref25}A. Tamaki, T, Goto, S. Kunii, T. Suzuki, T. Fujimura, and T. Kasuya, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. $\bold{18}$, 5849 (1985).
651: \bibitem{ref26}Y. Nemoto, T. Goto, A. Ochiai, and T. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B $\bold{61}$, 12050 (2000).
652: \bibitem{ref27}P. W. Anderson, B. I. Halperin, and C. M. Varma, Philos. Mag. $\bold{25}$, 1 (1972).
653: \bibitem{ref28}See for example; S. Hunklinger and W. Arnold, Physical Acoustics (Academic, New York, 1976), Vol. XII, p. 155.
654: \bibitem{ref29}See for example; Amorphous Solids: Low-Temperature Properties, edited by W. A. Phillips (Springer, Berlin, 1981).
655: \bibitem{ref30}T. Inui, Y. Tanabe, and Y. Onodera, Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1990).
656: \bibitem{ref31}D.L. Cox and A. Zawadowski, Advances in Phys., $\bold{47}$, 599 (1998).
657: \bibitem{ref32}T. Goto, Y. Nemoto, A. Ochiai, and T. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B $\bold{59}$, 269 (1999).
658: \end{thebibliography}
659:
660: \end{document}
661: %
662: % ****** End of file apssamp.tex ***