1: \documentclass[aps,showpacs,showkeys,prb,preprint,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{amssymb}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \title {$Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}(Ba_{1-x}Sr_{x})_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ ($x$ = 0, 0.5 and
8: 1) superconductors prepared by high pressure synthesis}
9:
10: \author{Z.A. Ren}
11: \email[Corresponding author's email: ]{renzhian@ssc.iphy.ac.cn}
12: \author{G.C. Che}
13: \author{Y.M. Ni}
14: \author{C. Dong}
15: \author{H. Chen}
16: \author{S.L. Jia}
17: \author{Z.X. Zhao}
18: \affiliation{National Laboratory for Superconductivity, Institute of Physics,
19: Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 603, Beijing, 100080, P.R. China}
20: \date{\today}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: In this paper, the $Fe$-containing superconductors
24: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$,
25: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
26: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ were successfully prepared by common
27: solid-state reaction followed with a procedure of high pressure synthesis. The
28: structural change and superconducting properties in
29: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ ($x$ = 0 $\sim$ 1.0) systems were also
30: investigated. Annealing experiments indicate that the occurrence of
31: superconductivity in $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}(Ba_{1-x}Sr_{x})_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ ($x$
32: = 0, 0.5 and 1) systems is mainly induced by the procedure of high pressure
33: synthesis, which causes the increase of oxygen content and the redistribution
34: of $Fe$ atoms between $Cu(1)$ and $Cu(2)$ sites, but not from possible
35: secondary phase of $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$, $YBaSrCu_3O_{7-\delta}$ or
36: $YSr_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$ superconductors.
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: \pacs{74.62.Bf; 74.62.Dh; 74.70.-b}
40:
41: \keywords{Fe-containing cuprate superconductor, high pressure synthesis,
42: superconductivity}
43: \maketitle
44:
45: %---------------------------------------------------
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49:
50: It is well known that $YBa_2(Cu_{1-x}M_x)_3O_{6+\delta}$ ($M$ = $Fe$ and $Co$)
51: systems (We denote it as $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$) have been
52: extensively investigated for providing information about the mechanism of
53: superconductivity and understanding the correlation among superconductivity,
54: magnetism and crystal structure in high temperature ceramic superconductors
55: \cite{30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45}. The main conclusions
56: concerning its crystal structure and superconducting properties are as follows:
57:
58: \setcounter{paragraph}{0}
59: \paragraph{}
60: In undoped $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$ superconductor, there are two different
61: structural $Cu$ sites: $Cu(1)$ and $Cu(2)$. The $Cu(1)$ site has a square
62: planar oxygen coordination and forms $Cu-O$ chain, and the $Cu(2)$ site has a
63: five fold pyramidal coordination of oxygen and forms $CuO_2$ plane. There is
64: strong evidence from neutron diffraction results that $Cu(1)$ sites are the
65: preferred occupation sites for $Fe$ and $Co$ atoms in substituted
66: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ compound \cite{30,31,32,33,34}.
67:
68: \paragraph{}
69: Neutron and X-Ray diffraction analysis indicate that
70: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ undergoes a structural phase transition
71: from orthorhombic to tetragonal at $Fe$ concentration $x$ $\sim$ 0.12$-$0.15
72: \cite{36,37,38}. Electron microscopy observations indicate that the
73: microstructure of $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ evolves as the $Fe$
74: concentration changes \cite{39,40,41,42,43}.
75:
76: \paragraph{}
77: The superconducting transition temperature $T_c$, decreases with the increasing
78: $Fe$ concentration $x$, when $x$ exceeds 0.3, superconductivity disappears
79: completely \cite{30, 35, 43, 45}.
80:
81: \paragraph{}
82: The oxygen content, $7+\delta$, in $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$,
83: increases with the increasing $Fe$ concentration due to the higher valence of
84: $Fe$ \cite{30, 43, 44}.
85:
86: In previous studies, several groups \cite{12,13,14,15,16,17,18} have reported
87: superconductivity in $YSr_2Cu_{3-x}M_xO_{6+\delta}$ compounds with $Fe$ (or
88: $Co$) light-substitution, but the heavily-substituted compounds ($x$ $>$ 0.3)
89: did not exhibit superconductivity. T. Denetial \cite{19} observed
90: superconductivity with $T_c$ $\sim$ 30$-$50K in $Fe$($Co$ or $Ti$)-doped R-123
91: phase $YSr_2Fe_xCu_{1-x}O_{6+\delta}$ with $x$ = 0.3, while $x$ $>$ 0.3,
92: superconductivity could not be observed. F. Shi {\it et al.} \cite{20} improved
93: the superconductivity of $YSr_2Cu_{2.7}Fe_{0.3}O_{7+\delta}$ compound by
94: high-pressure oxygen annealing, $T_c$ reaches 60K and a shielding fraction of
95: nearly 100$\%$ is achieved. Recently J. Shimoyama {\it et al.} \cite{21}
96: prepared $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor with $T_c$ $\sim$ 60K using a
97: complex synthesis procedure and T. Mochiku {\it et al.} \cite{22} determined
98: the crystal structure of this superconductor by neutron powder diffraction
99: studies. Besides, some $Fe$-containing oxides with perovskite structure, such
100: as $(Pb_{0.5}Fe_{0.5})Sr_2(Y_{0.5}Ca_{0.5})Cu_2O_7$ \cite{23},
101: $BaR(Cu_{0.5+x}Fe_{0.5-x})_2O_{5+\delta}$ ($R$ = $Y$, $Sm$) \cite{24, 25, 26},
102: $Bi_2Sr_3Fe_2O_x$ \cite{27}, $BaYCuFeO_5$ \cite{28}, $etc$. have also been
103: reported, but none of these compounds is superconducting.
104:
105: We have prepared a $Fe$-containing cuprate superconductor
106: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ with $T_c$ $\sim$ 77K in year $2000$ by
107: solid-state reaction and high pressure synthesis. The preliminary results of
108: this superconductor have been reported\cite{29}. After that, the studies of
109: $Fe$-containing superconductors were developed and new superconductors of
110: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
111: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ were successfully prepared. In this
112: paper, the preparation, superconductivity, structure and the results related to
113: these superconductors are presented.
114:
115: \section{Experiment}
116:
117: \subsection{Sample Preparation}
118:
119: The predried $Y_2O_3$, $BaCO_3$, $SrCO_3$, $Fe_2O_3$, and $CuO$ powders of
120: 99.99$\%$ purity were used as the starting materials. The powders with the
121: stoichiometric composition of
122: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}(Ba_{1-x}Sr_x)_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ ($x$ = 0, 0.5, and 1.0)
123: were mixed, ground thoroughly and calcined twice at 925$^o$C for 60 hours in
124: air with intermediate grinding. The products were pressed into pellets, and
125: calcined again at 925$^o$C for 60 hours and cooled down to room temperature at
126: the rate of 30$^o$C per hour in air. These samples prepared by the common
127: solid-state reaction procedure were labeled as AM-sample.
128:
129: The AM-sample powders were oxygenated under high pressure of 6GPa at 1000$^o$C
130: for 0.5 hour by the addition of $5wt.\%$ $KClO_4$ (which was used as an oxygen
131: source) in a six-anvil of tungsten carbide high pressure apparatus. Samples
132: were quenched from high temperature quickly by cutting off the furnace power
133: before releasing the high pressure\cite{29}. These samples were labeled as
134: HP-sample.
135:
136: \subsection{Sample Characterization}
137:
138: The phase and structure of these samples were characterized by powder X-Ray
139: diffraction (XRD) analysis on an $MXP18A-HF$ type diffractometer with
140: $Cu$-$K_{\alpha}$ radiation. All investigated samples exhibited single phase
141: diagram. $PowderX$, $Finax$ and $Rietweld$ programs were used for lattice
142: parameter calculations. The data of DC magnetization and electrical resistance
143: were measured using a DC-SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS 5.5T) and
144: standard four-probe technique respectively.
145:
146: \section{Experimental Results}
147:
148: \subsection{The structural change and superconductivity in
149: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ synthesized by solid-state reaction under
150: ambient pressure}
151:
152: Fig.1 shows the XRD patterns of the $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
153: systems of AM-samples ($x$ = 0$\sim$1.0), indicating that all samples are of
154: single phase. Fig.2 shows the changes of lattice parameters. With the
155: increasing of $Fe$ concentration $x$, lattice parameter $a$ increases and $b$
156: decreases, and a structural transition undergoes from orthorhombic to
157: tetragonal at $Fe$ concentration $x$ $\sim$ 0.15, afterwards lattice parameter
158: $a$ increases slightly. The lattice parameter $c$ always decreases whereas unit
159: cell volume $V$ increases with the increasing $x$. Fig.3 shows some typical
160: curves of resistivity $vs.$ temperature, which indicates that the substitution
161: of $Fe$ atoms suppresses the electric conductance and superconductivity for the
162: AM-samples, when $x$ $>$ 0.3, all samples become non-superconducting and
163: exhibit semi-conducting behavior in $R$-$T$ curves. The inset is the dependence
164: of superconducting transition temperature on $Fe$ content $x$, which displays a
165: linear depression. These results are similar to those of
166: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system.
167:
168: \subsection
169: {Superconductivity of $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ prepared by high
170: pressure synthesis}
171:
172: XRD patterns of $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ HP-samples indicate that
173: all samples ($x$ varies from 0 to 1.0) are still single phase after high
174: pressure synthesis. Fig.4 shows $T_c(onset)$ $vs.$ $Fe$ concentration $x$ and
175: magnetization $vs.$ temperature curves obtained using ZFC mode under applied
176: external magnetic field of 10Oe, indicating that all samples exhibit
177: superconductivity and the samples with $x$ = 0.35$-$0.6 have relatively high
178: superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ and high superconducting volume
179: fraction $V_m$. Typical curves of the dependence of resistivity and
180: magnetization on temperature for $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
181: superconductor are shown in Fig.5, it can be calculated from the ZFC and FC
182: curves that the superconducting shielding volume fraction is 48$\%$ and the
183: Meissner volume fraction is 31$\%$ at 10K by the relationship of $V_m$ =
184: $(4\pi\rho M/H)$, where $\rho$ is the density of sample in $g/cm^3$, $M$ is
185: mass magnetization in $emu/g$ using ZFC and FC data respectively, and $H$ is
186: the applied magnetic field in $Oe$.
187:
188: \subsection{$Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor}
189:
190: As mentioned previously, the $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ sample
191: prepared by solid-state reaction in air is semi-conductor. While after high
192: pressure synthesis, this sample becomes superconducting. Fig.6 presents the XRD
193: patterns of the AM-sample and HP-sample, $R$-$T$ and $M$-$T$ curves of
194: HP-sample. The lattice parameters for HP-sample are $a$ = 0.3870(3)nm, $c$ =
195: 1.1601(5)nm, while for AM-sample, $a$ = 0.3871(3)nm, $c$ = 1.1671(5)nm. From
196: the $R$-$T$ curve, the superconducting transition temperature, $T_c(onset)$ is
197: found at 83K and $T_c(zero)$ is at 63K. From the ZFC and FC curves it can be
198: calculated that the superconducting shielding volume fraction is 55$\%$ and the
199: Meissner volume fraction is 22$\%$ at 10K.
200:
201:
202: \subsection{$Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor}
203:
204: The synthesis and crystal structure of $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor
205: have been reported by J. Shimoyama {\it et al.} and T. Mochiku {\it et al.}
206: \cite{21, 22}. This suggests that $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
207: superconductor might be obtained. It has been known that R-123 or 1212 phase
208: can not be prepared by solid-state reaction under ambient pressure in R-Sr-Cu-O
209: systems. However, in $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system, single phase
210: of (Cu,Fe)-1212 phase can be obtained because this phase can be stabilized by
211: the substitution of $Fe$ for $Cu$.
212:
213: The $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ sample prepared under ambient
214: pressure is not superconducting, but after high pressure synthesis, the sample
215: becomes superconducting. This suggests that the origin of superconductivity in
216: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ is similar to that in
217: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
218: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductors of HP-samples. XRD
219: patterns and $M$-$T$ curve of $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
220: superconductor are shown in Fig.7, the $T_c(onset)$ is about 77K, and the
221: sample is nearly single phase. The lattice parameters for HP-sample are $a$ =
222: 0.3859(4)nm, $c$ = 1.1602(5)nm, while for AM-sample, $a$ = 0.3871(3)nm, $c$ =
223: 1.1669(5)nm.
224:
225: \subsection{The annealing experiments of
226: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor}
227:
228: The oxygen content in the $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ samples
229: prepared by solid-state reaction under ambient pressure and high pressure
230: synthesis were determined by a volumetric method \cite{43}. The principle of
231: this method is to dissolve the sample in diluted hydrochloric acid, according
232: to the liberated oxygen volume, the oxygen content is calculated. The obtained
233: results are: 7+$\delta$ = 7.20(2) in AM-sample and 7+$\delta$ = 7.35(2) in
234: HP-sample. This indicates clearly that the oxygen content is increased by high
235: pressure synthesis.
236:
237: A superconducting $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ sample with $T_c$
238: $\sim$ 60K was annealed in air at 210, 290 400, 500, 700, 900 and 950$^o$C for
239: 2 hours step by step.
240:
241: Fig.8(a) shows the magnetization $vs.$ temperature curves of the annealed
242: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ HP-sample, indicating that the
243: superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ and superconducting volume
244: fraction decrease rapidly with the increase of annealing temperature, and the
245: sample became non-superconducting when annealing temperature were higher than
246: 500$^o$C, and even after annealed under as low as 290$^o$C, superconductivity
247: in this sample was almost destroyed completely. The results of the annealed
248: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor are similar to these
249: results, which are shown in Fig.8(b).
250:
251: Fig.9 shows the local region XRD patterns (46$^o$$\sim$48$^o$ in 2$\theta$) of
252: the $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ AM-sample and the annealed
253: HP-sample at different temperatures. After high pressure synthesis, the peaks
254: of (006) and (200) shift to high angle degree and overlap each other, and with
255: the increase of annealing temperature, the peaks shift to low angle degree
256: again. When the annealing temperature is higher than 400$^o$C, the positions of
257: the peaks are nearly constant within experimental error, indicating that
258: lattice parameters $a$ and $c$ stop increasing. It means that the extra oxygen
259: introduced by high pressure synthesis is liberated almost completely at
260: 400$^o$C. As a result, the annealed sample becomes non-superconducting. When
261: temperature is higher than 500$^o$C, the main role of the annealing is the
262: improvement of lattice distortion, homogenizing and the increase of crystal
263: grain size, which makes the peaks narrower and makes (006) and (200) peaks
264: gradually apart from each other.
265:
266: \section{Discussions}
267:
268: A well-known fact in R-123 phase superconductors is that the superconductors
269: with higher oxygen content have smaller lattice parameters $a$ and $c$. This
270: phenomenon was also observed in the $YSr_2Cu_{2.7}Fe_{0.3}O_{7+\delta}$
271: superconductor \cite{20} and in $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor
272: \cite{22} obtained by high oxygen pressure synthesis. In these superconductors,
273: the diffraction peaks of (006) and (200) shift systematically to higher angle
274: degree with the increase of oxygen content, which is similar to our results.
275: All our HP-samples have smaller lattice parameters $a$ and $c$ than the
276: corresponding AM-samples, and the lattice unit cell of HP-samples displays an
277: obvious shrinkage. Since the relative shrinkage is not more bigger than other
278: samples annealed under high oxygen pressure, and also for that
279: $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ sample can be made superconducting without high
280: pressure synthesis, thereby this shrinkage can be attributed to the increase of
281: oxygen content, but not the pressure effect caused by the high pressure
282: synthesis procedure. Then it can be deduced that in all
283: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}(Ba_{1-x}Sr_{x})_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ samples the oxygen
284: content increased after high pressure synthesis, which is validated by the
285: oxygen content measurement in $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system
286: where 7+$\delta$ increased from 7.20(2) in AM-sample to 7.35(2) in HP-sample.
287: The increased oxygen content provided the required charge which made the
288: semiconducting-like AM-samples changed to superconducting HP-samples.
289:
290: The diffusion of $Fe$ atom into $CuO_2$ planes in R-123 systems is believed to
291: be very unfavorable for superconductivity because of its magnetic moment, and
292: with the increase of $Fe$ concentration, this diffusion is inevitable in
293: samples synthesized by common solid-state reaction \cite{PC288}. J. Shimoyama
294: {\it et al.} \cite{21} used a complex annealing procedure which is believed to
295: suppress the incorporation of $Fe$ to the $CuO_2$ planes in
296: $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system, and finally made it superconducting with
297: $T_c$ $\sim$ 60K. Using neutron powder diffraction studies, T. Mochiku {\it et
298: al.} \cite{22} investigated the site-mixing between $Fe$ and $Cu$ atoms in
299: $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ samples synthesized through different procedures, and
300: proved that simply increasing the oxygen content could not produce
301: superconductivity and the ordered distribution of $Fe$ and $Cu$ atoms between
302: $Cu(1)$ and $Cu(2)$ sites is also one of the key points to the origin of
303: superconductivity. In our heavily $Fe$-doped R-1212 systems, high pressure
304: synthesis procedure is believed to promote the transfer of $Fe$ atoms from
305: $Cu(2)$ site to $Cu(1)$ site, and to make almost all the $Fe$ atoms to occupy
306: the $Cu(1)$ chain site. This redistribution of $Fe$ atoms is a needed
307: requirement to ensure the occurrence of superconductivity, while the increase
308: of oxygen content provides the needed amount of charge.
309:
310: The annealing experiments of $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
311: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductors indicate clearly that
312: the concentration of oxygen content affects superconductivity in HP-samples
313: directly. Since annealed under the temperature as low as 290$^o$C during a
314: short time of 2 hours, the occupation site of $Fe$ atoms could not be changed,
315: but superconductivity in these superconductors was destroyed sharply. The local
316: region XRD patterns in Fig.9 indicated that the lattice parameters increased
317: rapidly with the increase of annealing temperature below 400$^o$C, which
318: suggested the release of oxygen content, and this was the main reason for the
319: loss of superconductivity.
320:
321: After the discovery of $FeSr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
322: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductors, there is a doubt that
323: the superconductivity in these superconductors is possibly from
324: $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$, $YBaSrCu_3O_{7-\delta}$ or $YSr_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$
325: phase formed by phase segregation. It is known that $YSr_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$
326: superconductor with $T_c$ = 30-80K can be obtained also by high pressure
327: synthesis and its superconductivity disappears after heat treating at
328: 300-500$^o$C. Although the single phase of XRD pattern results and high
329: superconducting volume fraction of these superconductors have excluded these
330: disputes, the achievement of $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
331: superconductor and the similarity of its superconductivity to those of
332: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
333: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductors eliminate this doubt.
334: The annealing experiments also eliminate the possibility that the
335: superconductivity in $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ HP-sample is from
336: $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$ phase due to phase segregation, since it is well known
337: that the superconductivity in $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$ can not be destroyed by
338: annealing at the temperature of 200-500$^o$C and the $T_c$ of
339: $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$ obtained by high pressure synthesis is 92K \cite{46}.
340:
341: The discovery of these heavily-substituted superconductors with magnetic metal
342: of $Fe$ atoms provides new platforms to investigate the mechanism of high
343: temperature superconductivity and the correlation of magnetism and
344: superconductivity, and it seems that we need to reconsider the influence of
345: magnetism on superconductivity.
346:
347: \section{Conclusions}
348:
349: Three kind of superconductors with high $Fe$ concentration
350: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$,
351: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ and
352: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ were successfully prepared by
353: solid-state reaction and high pressure synthesis. The high pressure synthesis
354: resulted in the increase of oxygen content and redistribution of $Fe$ and $Cu$
355: atoms between $Cu(1)$ and $Cu(2)$ sites, which are two key factors for the
356: occurrence of superconductivity. The annealing experimental results indicate
357: these clearly and eliminate the doubt of superconductivity relative to possible
358: secondary phase of $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$, $YBaSrCu_3O_{7-\delta}$ or
359: $YSr_2Cu_3O_{7-\delta}$ superconductors.
360:
361:
362: \begin{thebibliography}{}
363: \bibitem{30} J.M. Tarascon, P. Barboux, P.F. Miceli, L.H. Greene, G.W. Hull, M. Eibschutz and S.A. Sunshine, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{37}, 7458(1988)
364: \bibitem{31} V.N. Narozhnyi and V.N. Kochetkov, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{53}, 5856(1996)
365: \bibitem{32} P. Bordet, J. L. Hodeau, P. Strobel, M. Marezio and A. Santoro, Solid State Comm. \textbf{66}, 435(1988)
366: \bibitem{33} T. Kajitani, K. Kusaba, M. Kikuchi, Y. Syono and M. Hirabayashi, Japn. J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{27}, L354(1988)
367: \bibitem{34} T. Kajitani, K. Kusaba, M. Kikuchi, Y. Syono and M. Hirabayashi, Japn. J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{26}, L1727(1987)
368: \bibitem{36} X.S. Wu, S.S. Jiang, C.C. Lam, D.W. Wang, X.R. Huang, Z.H. Wu, Y. Xuan and X. Jin, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) \textbf{157}, 439(1996)
369: \bibitem{37} X.S. Wu, C. Gou, C. C. Lam, W. M. Chen, D. F. Chen, K. Sun, W. Ji, W. J. Liu, X. Jin and S. S. Jiang, Physica C \textbf{282}, 833(1997)
370: \bibitem{38} H. Obara, H. Oyanagi, K. Murata, H. Yamasaki, H. Ihara, M. Tokumoto, Y. Nishihara and Y. Kimura, Japn. J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{27}, L603(1988)
371: \bibitem{39} H. Renevier, J.L. Hodeau, M. Marezio and A. Santoro, Physica C \textbf{220}, 143(1994)
372: \bibitem{40} G. V. S. Sastray, R. Wordenweber and H.C. Freyhardt, J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{65}, 3975(1989)
373: \bibitem{41} Z. Hiroi, M. Takano, Y. Takeda, R. Kanno and Y. Bando, Japn. J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{27}, L580(1988)
374: \bibitem{42} W.M. Chen, X.X. Yao, Yuan Chang Guo, Hua Kun Liu and S.X. Dou, J of Superconductivity: Incorporating Novel Magnetism \textbf{13}, 129(2000)
375: \bibitem{43} Zhang Jincang, Liu lihua, Li Jianqi, Chen Dong, Li Xigui and Cheng Guosheng, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{65}, 054513(2002)
376: \bibitem{35} Y. Oda, H. Fujita, H. Toyoda, T. kaneko, T. Kohara, I. Nakada and K. Asayama, Japn. J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{26}, L1660(1987)
377: \bibitem{44} J.F. Bringley, T.M. Chen, B.A. Averill, K.M. Wong and S.J. poon, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{38}, 2432(1988)
378: \bibitem{45} S.K. Nikogosyan, A.A. Sahakyan, H.N. Yeritsyan, V.A. Grigoryan, E.G. Zargaryan, A.G. Sarkissyan, Physica C \textbf{299}, 65(1998)
379: \bibitem{12} P.R. Slater and C. Greaves, Physica C \textbf{180}, 299 (1991)
380: \bibitem{13} B. Okai, Japn. J. Appl. Phys. \textbf{29}, L2180 (1990)
381: \bibitem{14} S. A. Sunshine, L.F. Schneemeyer, T. Siegrist, D.C. Douglass, J.V. Waszczak, R.J. Cava, E.M. Gyorgy and D.W. Murphy, Chem. Matter \textbf{1}, 331 (1989)
382: \bibitem{15} Q. Xiong, Y. Y. Xue, J. W. Chu, Y. Y. Sun, Y. Q. Wang, P. H. Hor and C. W. Chu, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{47}, 11337 (1993)
383: \bibitem{16} M. G. Smith, R. D. Taylor and J. D. Thompson, Physica C \textbf{208}, 91 (1993)
384: \bibitem{17} M. Pissas, G. Kallias, E. Moraitakis, D. Niarchos and A. Simopoulous, Physica C \textbf{234}, 127(1994)
385: \bibitem{18} V. Terziev, R. Suryanarayanan, Mamidanna S. R. Rao, L. Ouhammou, O. Gorochov, and J. L. Dorman, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{48}, 13037(1993)
386: \bibitem{19} Tohru Den and Tamaki Kobayashi, Physica C \textbf{196}, 141(1992)
387: \bibitem{20} F. Shi, W.J. Bresser, M. Zhang, Y. Wu, D. McDaniel and P. Boolchand, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{54}, 6776(1996)
388: \bibitem{21} J. Shimoyama, K. Otzschi, T. Hinouchi and K. Kishio, Physica C \textbf{341-348}, 563(2000)
389: \bibitem{22} T. Mochiku, Y. Mihara, Y. Hata, S. Kamisawa, M. furuyama, J. Suzuki, K. Kadowaki, N. Metoki, H. Fujii and K. Hirata, J. of Phys. Soc. Japan. \textbf{71}, 790(2002)
390: \bibitem{23} T. Maeda, M. Taniwaki, K. Isawa, K. Sakuyama and H. Yamauchi, Advances in superconductivity V, proceedings of the 5th international symposium on superconductivity (ISS'92) November 16-19, 1992, Kobe, Eds. Bando Vamauchi
391: \bibitem{24} J. Nakamura, J. Linden, H. Suematsu, M. Karppinen and H. Yamauchi, Physica C \textbf{338}, 121(2000)
392: \bibitem{25} M. Nagase, J. Linden, H. Suematsu, M. Karppinen, H. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{59}, 1377(1999)
393: \bibitem{26} P. Karen, P.H. Andersen and A. Kjekshus, J. Solid State Chem. \textbf{101}, 48(1992)
394: \bibitem{27} V. Sedykh, I. S. Smirnova, E. V. Suvorov, A. V. Dubovitskii and V. I. Kulakov, Physica C \textbf{336}, 239(2000)
395: \bibitem{28} L. Er-Rakho, C. Michel, Ph. Lacorre, and B. Raveau, J. Solid State Chem. \textbf{73}, 53191988)
396: \bibitem{29} Z. A. Ren, G.C. Che, H. Xiong, K.Q. Li, Y.S. Yao, D.N. Zheng, Y.M. Ni, S.L. Jia, H. Chen, C. Dong, J.L. Shen and Z.X. Zhao, Solid State Comm. \textbf{119}, 579(2000)
397: \bibitem{46} Bin Okai and Masatsune Onta, Japn. J. of Appl. Phys. \textbf{1378}, 30(1991)
398: \bibitem{PC288} E. Suard, I. Mirebeau, V. Caignaert, P. Imbert and A. M. Balagurov, Physica C \textbf{288}, 10(1997)
399: \end{thebibliography}
400:
401: \newpage
402: %Figure captions
403: \centerline{Figure Captions} Fig.1 Typical XRD patterns for AM-samples of
404: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system
405:
406: Fig.2 Lattice parameters $a$, $b$, $c$ and unit cell volume $V$ $vs.$ $x$ in
407: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system for AM-samples
408:
409: Fig.3 Typical $R$-$T$ curves and $T_c$ $vs.$ $x$ in
410: $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system for AM-samples
411:
412: Fig.4 $M$-$T$ curves obtained using ZFC mode under the applied field of 10Oe
413: for HP-samples of $(Fe_xCu_{1-x})BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ system; insert shows
414: $T_c$ $vs.$ $x$
415:
416: Fig.5 Typical $R$-$T$ and $M$-$T$ curves under the applied field of 10Oe for
417: $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ HP-sample superconductor
418:
419: Fig.6 XRD patterns of AM-sample and HP-sample and $R$-$T$ and $M$-$T$ (applied
420: field of 10Oe) curves of HP-sample of $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
421:
422: Fig.7 XRD patterns of AM-sample and HP-sample and $M$-$T$ curves (applied field
423: of 10Oe) of HP-sample of $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Sr_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
424:
425: Fig.8 (a) $M$-$T$ curves obtained using ZFC mode under applied field of 10Oe
426: for $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$ superconductor annealed at
427: different temperatures (b) For $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}Ba_2YCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
428: superconductor annealed at different temperatures
429:
430: Fig.9 Local region XRD patterns of $Fe_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}BaSrYCu_2O_{7+\delta}$
431: AM-sample and HP-sample annealed at different temperatures
432:
433: \end{document}
434:
435:
436: %%%%%%%%%%%% the end
437: