1: \documentclass[epj,final]{svjour}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{amscd}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Stability analysis of a noise-induced Hopf bifurcation}
11: \author{Kirone Mallick\inst{1} \and Philippe Marcq\inst{2}}
12:
13: \institute{Service de Physique Th\'eorique, Centre d'\'Etudes de Saclay,
14: 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France \\
15: \email{mallick@spht.saclay.cea.fr}\and
16: Institut de Recherche sur les Ph\'enom\`enes Hors \'Equilibre,
17: Universit\'e de Provence,\\
18: 49 rue Joliot-Curie, BP 146, 13384 Marseille Cedex 13, France\\
19: \email{marcq@irphe.univ-mrs.fr}}
20:
21: %\date{\today}
22: \date{August 8, 2003}
23: \abstract{
24: We study analytically and numerically the noise-induced transition
25: between an absorbing and an oscillatory state in a Duffing oscillator
26: subject to multiplicative, Gaussian white noise. We show in a non-perturbative
27: manner that a stochastic bifurcation occurs when the
28: Lyapunov exponent of the linearised system becomes positive.
29: We deduce from a simple formula for the Lyapunov exponent
30: the phase diagram of the stochastic Duffing oscillator.
31: The behaviour of physical observables, such as the oscillator's mean energy,
32: is studied both close to and far from the bifurcation.
33: \PACS{
34: {05.40.-a}{Fluctuation phenomena, random processes, noise, and
35: Brownian motion} \and
36: {05.10.Gg}{Stochastic analysis methods (Fokker-Planck, Langevin, etc.)}
37: \and {05.45.-a}{Nonlinear dynamics and nonlinear dynamical systems}
38: }
39: }
40:
41: \maketitle
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44: \label{sec:intro}
45:
46:
47:
48: The stability of a dynamical system can be strongly
49: affected by the presence of uncontrolled
50: perturbations such as random noise
51: \cite{lefever}. Noise-induced bifurcations are of primary
52: interest in many fields of applied mathematics and physics and occur
53: in various experimental contexts, as for instance:
54: electronic circuits \cite{strato},
55: mechanical oscillators \cite{landaMc},
56: laser physics \cite{lefever},
57: surface waves \cite{fauve}, thermal and electrohydrodynamic
58: convection in fluids or liquid crystals \cite{kramer1,kramer2,behn} and
59: diffusion in random media \cite{frisch}. In nonlinear dynamical systems,
60: the interplay of noise and nonlinearity
61: may produce unusual phenomena:
62: noise can shift the bifurcation threshold
63: from one phase to another \cite{luecke},
64: it can induce new phase-transitions in spatially-extended systems
65: \cite{vandenb1}, or create spatial patterns
66: \cite{vandenb2} (for a recent review see \cite{toral}).
67:
68: One of the simplest systems that may serve as a pa\-ra\-digm for
69: noise-induced transitions is the nonlinear oscillator with
70: parametric noise \cite{lindenberg,landa,drolet}, i.e.,
71: with a frequency that
72: fluctuates randomly with time around a given mean value
73: \cite{bourret,bourretFrisch}.
74: In a recent work \cite{philkir1,philkir2}, we studied the time
75: asymptotic behaviour of such an oscillator in the small damping limit.
76: We showed that physical observables grow algebraically with time
77: until the dissipative time scale is reached;
78: then the system settles into an oscillatory
79: state described by a stationary probability distribution function (PDF)
80: of the energy $E$: the zero equilibrium point ($E = 0$)
81: is unstable in the small damping limit. In the present work,
82: we investigate the stability of the origin for arbitrary
83: damping rate and noise strength.
84:
85: For random dynamical systems, it was recognized early on that
86: various `naive' stability criteria \cite{bourret,bourretFrisch},
87: obtained by linearizing the
88: dynamical equation around the origin, lead to ambiguous results.
89: (This is in contrast with the deterministic case for which
90: the bifurcation threshold is obtained without ambiguity
91: by studying the eigenstates of the linearized equations
92: \cite{manneville}.)
93: In fact, it was conjectured in \cite{bourretFrisch}
94: and proved in \cite{lindenberg3} that, in a linear oscillator
95: with arbitrarily small parametric noise, all moments beyond a certain
96: order diverge in the long time limit. Thus, any criterion based on
97: finite mean displacement, momentum, or energy of the linearized dynamical
98: equation is not adequate to insure global stability: the bifurcation
99: threshold of a nonlinear random dynamical system cannot be determined
100: simply from the moments of the linearized system.
101: In practice, the transition point is usually calculated
102: in a perturbative manner by using weak noise expansions
103: \cite{landaMc,luecke,landa,drolet}.
104:
105:
106: In the present work, we shall obtain in a non-per\-tur\-ba\-tive manner
107: the bifurcation threshold of a stochastic Duffing oscillator
108: with multiplicative, Gaussian white noise.
109: We use a technique described in \cite{philkir1} where
110: the stochastic dynamical equations are expressed
111: in terms of energy-angle variables.
112: Thanks to a detailed analysis of the associated Fokker-Planck equation,
113: we shall show that the bifurcation occurs precisely
114: where the Lyapunov exponent of the \emph{linear} oscillator changes sign.
115: This finding is confirmed by numerical simulations. The stability of
116: the fixed point $E=0$ of the (nonlinear) Duffing oscillator
117: with parametric noise is deduced, in this sense,
118: from the linearized dynamics.
119: We shall also derive the scaling behaviour of physical
120: observables in the vicinity of the
121: bifurcation with respect to the distance to threshold.
122: Finally, we study the behaviour of observables far
123: from the bifurcation, in the small damping or strong noise limit.
124:
125:
126: A rigorous mathematical theory of random dynamical systems
127: has been recently developed and theorems relating
128: the stability of the solution of a stochastic differential
129: equation to the sign of Lyapunov exponents have
130: been proved \cite{arnold}. In the present work, we do not
131: rely upon the sophisticated tools of the general mathematical
132: theory but follow an intuitive approach, easily accessible
133: to physicists, based upon a factorisation hypothesis of the
134: stationary PDF in the limit of small and large energies.
135:
136: This article is organized as follows. In Section~\ref{sec:Duffing},
137: we define the system considered, present the relevant phenomenology,
138: and introduce energy-angle variables for the stochastic
139: Duffing oscillator.
140: We study the stationary PDF of the energy in Section~\ref{sec:pdf}.
141: In Section~\ref{sec:lyapunov}, we derive the stability criterion for
142: the stochastic Duffing oscillator and obtain its phase diagram.
143: In Section~\ref{sec:scaling}, we perform a local analysis
144: of the physical observables in the vicinity of and far from
145: the bifurcation threshold. Section~\ref{sec:disc} is devoted
146: to some concluding remarks. In Appendix~\ref{sec:identity}, we prove some useful
147: identities satisfied by the Lyapunov exponent.
148: In Appendix~\ref{sec:pdfangle}, an explicit formula for
149: the Lyapunov exponent is derived.
150:
151: \begin{figure}
152: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig1a.eps}
153: \bigskip
154:
155: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig1b.eps}
156: \bigskip
157:
158: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig1c.eps}
159:
160: \caption{Phase plane plots of a typical trajectory of the noisy Duffing
161: oscillator. Eq.~(\ref{dissipDuff}) is integrated numerically
162: with a time step $\delta t = 5 \ 10^{-4}$. (a) $\alpha = 0.5$,
163: $\Delta = 20$, $10 \le t \le 100$; (b) $\alpha = 2.0 $,
164: $\Delta = 20$, $t \le 100$; (c) $\alpha = 2.0$,
165: $\Delta = 60$, $10 \le t \le 100$. Early-time relaxation
166: towards noisy oscillations has been omitted for clarity in cases
167: (a) and (c). The trajectory spirals down towards the globally stable origin
168: in case (b).}
169: \label{fig:traj}
170: \end{figure}
171:
172: \section{The Duffing oscillator with multiplicative white noise}
173: \label{sec:Duffing}
174:
175:
176: \subsection{Notations and phenomenology}
177: \label{sec:Duffing:phen}
178:
179: A nonlinear oscillator with a randomly varying frequency due to
180: external noise can be described
181: by the following equation
182: \begin{equation}
183: \frac{\mathrm{d}^2 x}{\mathrm{d} t^2} +
184: \gamma \frac{\mathrm{d} x}{\mathrm{d} t}
185: + ( \omega^2 + \xi(t)) x +
186: \frac { \partial{\mathcal U}(x)}{\partial x} = 0 \, ,
187: \label{eqsto}
188: \end{equation}
189: where $x(t)$ is the position of the oscillator at time $t$,
190: ${\mathcal U}(x)$ an anharmonic confining potential and $\gamma$
191: the (positive) friction coefficient.
192: The linear frequency of the oscillator has a mean value
193: $\omega$ and its fluctuations are modeled by
194: a Gaussian white noise $\xi(t)$ of zero mean-value
195: and of amplitude ${\mathcal D}$
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: \langle \xi(t) \rangle &=& 0 \, ,\nonumber \\
198: \langle \xi(t) \xi (t') \rangle &=& {\mathcal D} \, \delta(t - t') \, .
199: \label{statxi}
200: \end{eqnarray}
201: In this work, all stochastic differential equations are interpreted
202: according to Stratonovich calculus. We shall study the Duffing oscillator
203: with multiplicative noise, the confining
204: potential ${\mathcal U}$ being given by
205: \begin{equation}
206: {\mathcal U}(x) = \lambda \frac{x^4}{4} \,.
207: \end{equation}
208: By rewriting time and amplitude in dimensionless units,
209: $ t := \omega t$ and $ x:= \lambda^{1/2} \omega^{-1} x,$
210: respectively,
211: Eq.~(\ref{eqsto}) becomes
212: \begin{equation}
213: \frac{\mathrm{d}^2 x}{\mathrm{d} t^2} +
214: \alpha \, \frac{\mathrm{d} x}{\mathrm{d} t} + x + x^3 = x \, \Xi(t) ,
215: \label{dissipDuff}
216: \end{equation}
217: where $\Xi(t)$ is a delta-correlated Gaussian variable:
218: \begin{eqnarray}
219: \langle \Xi(t) \rangle &=& 0 \, ,\nonumber \\
220: \langle \Xi(t) \Xi (t') \rangle &=& \Delta \, \delta(t - t') \, .
221: \label{defXi}
222: \end{eqnarray}
223: The parameters
224: \begin{equation}
225: \alpha = \gamma/\omega \,\,\,\,\, \hbox{ and }
226: \,\,\,\,\, \Delta = {\mathcal D}/\omega^3 \label{parametre}
227: \end{equation}
228: correspond to dimensionless dissipation rate and to noise strength,
229: respectively. In the rest of this work, all physical quantities
230: are expressed in dimensionless units.
231:
232: In Fig.~\ref{fig:traj}, we present, for three values of the parameters,
233: a trajectory in the phase plane $(x, v = \dot x)$ characteristic
234: of the oscillator's behaviour. Here as well as for other
235: simulations presented in this article, Eq.~(\ref{dissipDuff}) is
236: integrated numerically by using the one step collocation method advocated in
237: \cite{mannella} and described in detail in \cite{philkir1}.
238: Initial conditions are chosen far from the origin, with an
239: amplitude of order $1$. Noisy oscillations are observed
240: for small values of the damping parameter $\alpha$
241: [See Fig.~\ref{fig:traj}.a]. A larger value of $\alpha$ turns
242: the origin into a global attractor for the dynamics
243: [See Fig.~\ref{fig:traj}.b].
244: Increasing the noise amplitude $\Delta$ at constant $\alpha$
245: makes the origin unstable again [See Fig.~\ref{fig:traj}.c].
246:
247: For all values of the parameters $(\alpha, \Delta)$,
248: the origin $(x = \dot{ x} = 0)$ is a fixed point of
249: the random dynamical system~(\ref{dissipDuff}).
250: Our main goal, in this work, is to investigate
251: the stability properties of the fixed point at the origin
252: when the control parameters vary.
253:
254:
255:
256: \subsection{Energy-angle representation of the Duffing oscillator}
257: \label{sec:Duffing:energyangle}
258:
259: We now follow the method presented
260: in \cite{philkir1} and introduce the energy-angle variables
261: associated with the Duffing oscillator.
262: The deterministic and undamped
263: oscillator corresponding to Eq.~(\ref{dissipDuff})
264: is an integrable dynamical system because the mechanical energy $E$,
265: defined as
266: \begin{equation}
267: E = \frac{1}{2}\dot x^2 + \frac{1}{2} x^2 +
268: \frac{1}{4} x^4 \, ,
269: \label{DuffingE}
270: \end{equation}
271: is a conserved quantity. Introducing
272: the angular variable $\phi$, the constant
273: energy orbits of the Hamiltonian system
274: ${\ddot x} + \, x + \, x^3 = 0$ are parametrized as
275: \begin{eqnarray}
276: x &=& \left( \frac{ 4E^2}{ 4E + 1}\right) ^{1/4}
277: {\rm sd}\left( \phi \; ;k \right),
278: \label{dufx} \\
279: \dot x &=& (2E)^{1/2}
280: \frac{ {\rm cn}\left( \phi \; ;k \right)}
281: { {\rm dn}^2\left( \phi \; ; k \right)} ,
282: \label{dufv}
283: \end{eqnarray}
284: where the functions sd, cn and dn are Jacobi elliptic functions
285: \cite{abram}. The elliptic modulus $k$
286: is a function of the energy and is given by
287: \begin{equation}
288: k^2 = \frac{\sqrt{4E + 1} - 1}{2 \sqrt{4E + 1}} .
289: \label{modulus}
290: \end{equation}
291: In the $(E,\phi)$ coordinate system, the dynamical
292: equations for the Duffing oscillator,
293: without noise and dissipation, become simply
294: \begin{eqnarray}
295: \dot E &=& 0 \, , \nonumber \\
296: \dot\phi &=& (4E + 1)^{\frac{1}{4}} \, .
297: \end{eqnarray}
298:
299: We reintroduce the multiplicative noise and the dissipation terms,
300: and obtain a system of coupled stochastic equations
301: that describes the evolution of the energy and angle variables:
302: %can be written formally as
303: \begin{eqnarray}
304: \dot E &=& J_E(E,\phi) + D_E(E,\phi) \,\Xi(t) \,\,,
305: \label{duffEJD} \\
306: \dot \phi &=& J_{\phi}(E,\phi) + D_{\phi}(E,\phi)
307: \,\Xi(t) \,\,,
308: \label{duffangleJD}
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: where the drift and diffusion coefficients $J_E$, $J_\phi$, $D_E$ and
311: $D_\phi$ are defined by (see \cite{philkir1} for details of the derivation):
312: \begin{eqnarray}
313: &&J_E(E,\phi) = - 2 \, \alpha \, E \, \frac{ {\rm cn}^2(\phi;k)}
314: { {\rm dn}^4(\phi;k)}\\
315: &&D_E(E,\phi) =
316: \frac { 2E } { (4E + 1)^{\frac{1}{4}}} \,
317: \frac{{\rm sn}(\phi;k) {\rm cn}(\phi;k)}{{\rm dn}^3(\phi;k)} \\
318: &&J_{\phi}(E,\phi) = (4E + 1)^{\frac{1}{4}}
319: + \alpha \, \frac{2E + 1}{4E + 1} \,
320: \frac{{\rm sn}(\phi;k) {\rm cn}(\phi;k)}{{\rm dn}^3(\phi;k)} \\
321: &&D_{\phi}(E,\phi) =
322: - \frac{(2E + 1)}{ (4E + 1)^{\frac{5}{4}}}
323: \, {\rm sd}^2(\phi;k) \nonumber \\
324: && - \frac{E}{ (4E + 1)^{\frac{7}{4}}}
325: {\rm sd}^4(\phi;k)
326: + \frac{\alpha \,E }{ (4E +1)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \,
327: \frac{ {\rm cn}(\phi;k) {\rm sd}^3(\phi;k)}{{\rm dn}^2(\phi;k)}
328: \nonumber\\
329: && + \frac{E}{ (4E + 1)^{\frac{7}{4}}} \;
330: \frac{ {\rm sn}(\phi;k) {\rm cn}(\phi;k)}{{\rm dn}^3(\phi;k)} \,
331: \int_0^\phi {\rm sd}^2(\theta;k) d\theta \nonumber \\
332: && - \frac{\alpha \,E }{ (4E +1)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \,
333: \frac{ {\rm cn}^2(\phi;k)}{{\rm dn}^4(\phi;k)} \,
334: \int_0^\phi {\rm sd}^2(\theta;k) d\theta . \label{duffangle}
335: \end{eqnarray}
336:
337:
338: \section{Analysis of the Fokker-Planck equation}
339: \label{sec:pdf}
340:
341: Using the same notations,
342: the Fokker-Planck equation that governs the time evolution of
343: the probability distribution function $P_t(E,\phi)$ associated
344: with the stochastic differential system
345: (\ref{duffEJD})-(\ref{duffangleJD}) reads \cite{vankampen}
346: \begin{eqnarray}
347: \label{FPEphi}
348: \partial_t P_t(E,\phi) &=& - \partial_{E}\left( J_E P \right)
349: - \partial_{\phi}\left( J_{\phi} P \right) \\
350: + \frac{ \Delta}{2} && \left[\right.
351: \partial_{E} \left( D_E\partial_{E} (D_E P ) \right) +
352: \partial_{E} \left( D_E \partial_{\phi}
353: (D_{\phi} P )\right) \nonumber \\
354: && + \partial_{\phi}
355: \left( D_{\phi}\partial_{E} (D_E P ) \right)
356: + \partial_{\phi}
357: \left( D_{\phi}\partial_{\phi}( D_{\phi} P ) \right)
358: \left. \right]. \nonumber
359: \end{eqnarray}
360: The goal of this section is to determine the conditions
361: under which there exist stationary
362: solutions $P_{\rm{stat}}(E, \phi)$ of Eq.~(\ref{FPEphi})
363: with a non-zero mean energy. Such an extended PDF
364: describes an oscillatory asymptotic state.
365:
366:
367: Obtaining an analytical expression of $P_{\rm{stat}}(E, \phi)$
368: in the general case is a daunting task.
369: In the following, we shall perform a local analysis of
370: Eq.~(\ref{FPEphi}) for small and large values of $E$.
371: In these limiting cases, the expressions of the drift and
372: diffusion coefficients take simpler forms. We may write,
373: in full generality,
374: \begin{equation}
375: P_{\rm{stat}}(E, \phi) =
376: P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E) \, {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) \, ,
377: \label{probcond}
378: \end{equation}
379: where $P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E)$ represents, in the stationary state,
380: the conditional probability of the angle $\phi$ at a fixed value of
381: the energy $E$. Assuming the conditional probability
382: $P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E)$ to be independent of $E$ when $E \ll 1$ and
383: $E \gg 1$ (respectively Secs.~\ref{sec:pdf:small} and
384: \ref{sec:pdf:large}), we shall derive the local behaviour
385: of a stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation~(\ref{FPEphi}).
386: This solution is a legitimate PDF when it is normalizable: the normalizability
387: condition provides the location of the bifurcation \cite{graham}.
388:
389:
390:
391: \subsection{Small $E$ limit: the linearized stochastic oscillator}
392: \label{sec:pdf:small}
393:
394: When the oscillator's mechanical energy $E$ is small,
395: the position $x(t)$ and the velocity $\dot x(t)$ are also small:
396: nonlinear terms may be neglected. The Duffing oscillator simplifies
397: to a linear (harmonic) oscillator:
398: \begin{equation}
399: \ddot x + \alpha \dot x + x = x \; \Xi(t)
400: \label{lineaire}
401: \end{equation}
402: with $ \langle \Xi(t) \Xi (t') \rangle = \Delta \; \delta(t - t')$.
403: The energy now reads $E = \frac{1}{2} \, {\dot x}^2 + \frac{1}{2} \, x^2$,
404: and Eqs.~(\ref{dufx}) and (\ref{dufv}) reduce to
405: \begin{eqnarray}
406: x &=& \sqrt{2E} \sin \phi \, , \label{enanglelin1} \\
407: \dot x &=& \sqrt{2E} \cos \phi \, . \label{enanglelin}
408: \end{eqnarray}
409: In the small $E$ limit, the elliptic modulus $k$ goes to zero, the
410: elliptic functions reduce to circular functions \cite{abram}, and
411: the drift and diffusion
412: coefficients simplify to
413: \begin{eqnarray}
414: J_E(E,\phi) &=& -2 \, \alpha \, E \, \cos^2\phi \, \label{lim2JE}\\
415: D_E(E,\phi) &=& 2\, E \, \sin\phi \cos \phi \, , \label{lim2DE} \\
416: J_{\phi}(E,\phi) &=& 1 + \alpha \sin \phi \cos \phi \, ,\label{lim2Jphi} \\
417: D_{\phi}(E,\phi) &=& - \sin^2 \phi \, . \label{lim2Dphi}
418: \end{eqnarray}
419: Substituting the expressions (\ref{lim2JE})--(\ref{lim2Dphi})
420: in Eq.~(\ref{FPEphi}) and integrating
421: over $E$, we obtain an independent Fokker-Planck equation for
422: the marginal PDF ${\tilde P}_{\rm{t}}(\phi)$:
423: \begin{eqnarray}
424: \label{FPlin2}
425: \partial_t {\tilde P}_t(\phi) &=& - \partial_{\phi} \left[
426: (1 + \alpha \sin\phi \cos\phi)\, {\tilde P}_t(\phi) \right] \nonumber\\
427: && + \frac{\Delta}{2} \partial_{\phi} \left[ \sin^2\phi \,
428: \partial_{\phi} (\sin^2\phi \, {\tilde P}_t(\phi)) \right] \,.
429: \end{eqnarray}
430: An explicit formula for the stationary angular
431: measure ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi)$, solution of
432: Eq.~(\ref{FPlin2}), is derived
433: in Appendix~\ref{sec:pdfangle}.
434:
435:
436: We now make the hypothesis
437: that in the small $E$ limit, the stationary conditional measure
438: $P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E )$ becomes independent of $E$
439: and is identical to the stationary
440: angular distribution ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi)$
441: of the harmonic oscillator:
442: \begin{equation}
443: \hbox{ for }
444: \,\,\,\,\, E \ll 1 \,, \,\,\,\,\, P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E ) =
445: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi) \, . \label{hypfactor}
446: \end{equation}
447: Equation~(\ref{probcond}) becomes
448: \begin{equation}
449: P_{\rm{stat}}(E, \phi) = {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E)
450: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi) \, ,
451: \label{factor}
452: \end{equation}
453: i.e., we assume that the stationary PDF factorizes when $E \ll 1$.
454: An exactly solvable equation for
455: ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E)$ can now be obtained by
456: inserting expressions (\ref{lim2JE})--(\ref{lim2Dphi})
457: and the identity~(\ref{factor}) in the Fokker-Planck
458: equation~(\ref{FPEphi}) and then averaging over $\phi$:
459: \begin{eqnarray}
460: & \frac{\Delta}{2} \, \left\langle \sin^2\phi \cos^2\phi \right\rangle \,
461: \partial_E \left( E {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) \right) =
462: \label{FPEmargpetit} \\
463: &\left( \frac{\Delta}{2} \left\langle \sin^2\phi \,
464: ( \sin^2\phi - \cos^2\phi) \right\rangle - \alpha
465: \left\langle \cos^2\phi \right\rangle \right) {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E)
466: \nonumber \,.
467: \end{eqnarray}
468: Expectation values denoted by brackets $\langle \, \rangle$
469: are calculated using the stationary angular measure
470: ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi)$.
471: Introducing the notations:
472: \begin{eqnarray}
473: \mu(\alpha, \Delta) &=& \frac{\Delta}{2} \,
474: \left\langle \sin^2\phi \cos^2\phi \right\rangle \, , \label{defmu} \\
475: \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) &=& \frac{\Delta}{2} \left\langle \sin^2\phi \,
476: ( \sin^2\phi - \cos^2\phi) \right\rangle - \alpha
477: \left\langle \cos^2\phi \right\rangle \, ,
478: \label{deflyap1}
479: \end{eqnarray}
480: Eq.~(\ref{FPEmargpetit}) becomes:
481: \begin{equation}
482: \mu \, \partial_E \left( E {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) \right)
483: = \Lambda \, {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E)
484: \,, \label{FPEmargpetit2}
485: \end{equation}
486: and admits the solution:
487: \begin{equation}
488: \label{pdfEpetit}
489: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) \propto E^{ \frac{\Lambda }{\mu }
490: - 1 } \,\,\,\,\, \hbox{ for } \,\,\,\, \, E \ll 1 \,.
491: \end{equation}
492: Thus, for $E \ll 1$, the PDF ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E)$ behaves as a
493: power law of the energy.
494:
495: The coefficient $\mu$ is always positive, but the sign of $\Lambda$
496: is a function of the parameters $\alpha$ and $\Delta$.
497: For negative values of $\Lambda$, the stationary solution
498: (\ref{pdfEpetit}) is not normalizable and cannot represent a PDF;
499: the only stationary PDF solution of (\ref{FPEphi})
500: is then a delta function centered at the origin:
501: \begin{equation}
502: \label{pdfEpetitdelta}
503: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) = \delta(E)
504: \,\,\,\,\, \hbox{ for } \,\,\,\, \, \Lambda < 0 \, .
505: \end{equation}
506: Thus for negative values of $\Lambda$, the origin is a global
507: attractor for the stochastic nonlinear oscillator.
508: Non-trivial stationary solutions exist only for $\Lambda > 0$:
509: the bifurcation threshold corresponds to values of the parameters
510: for which $\Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) = 0$.
511:
512:
513:
514:
515: \subsection{Large $E$ limit}
516: \label{sec:pdf:large}
517:
518: For very large values of $E$, the elliptic modulus $k$,
519: defined in Eq.~(\ref{modulus}), tends
520: to $1/\sqrt{2}$, and
521: the drift and diffusion coefficients become
522: \begin{eqnarray}
523: J_E(E,\phi) &=& -2 \, \alpha \, E \, \frac{\rm{cn}^2(\phi)}{\rm{dn}^4(\phi)},
524: \label{limJE} \\
525: D_E(E,\phi) &=& \sqrt{2} \, E^{3/4} \,
526: \frac{\rm{sn}(\phi) \, \rm{cn}(\phi)}{\rm{dn}^3(\phi)} ,
527: \label{limDE} \\
528: J_{\phi}(E,\phi) &=& (4E)^{1/4} + \frac{\alpha}{2}\,
529: \frac{\rm{sn}(\phi) \, \rm{cn}(\phi)}{\rm{dn}^3(\phi)},
530: \label{limJphi} \\
531: D_{\phi}(E,\phi) &=& - \frac{1} {2\sqrt{2} E^{1/4}} \, \rm{sd}^2(\phi),
532: \label{limDphi}
533: \end{eqnarray}
534: in agreement with Eqs.~(3) and (4) of \cite{philkir2}
535: (we have omitted the elliptic modulus $1/\sqrt{2}$ for
536: sake of simplicity).
537: Using expressions (\ref{limJE}) to (\ref{limDphi})
538: for the drift and diffusion
539: coefficients, the stochastic equations
540: (\ref{duffEJD}) and (\ref{duffangleJD}) reduce,
541: in the large $E$ limit, to
542: \begin{eqnarray}
543: \dot{E} & = & -2 \, \alpha \, E \,
544: \frac{\rm{cn}^2(\phi)}{\rm{dn}^4(\phi)}
545: + \sqrt{2} \, E^{3/4} \,
546: \frac{\rm{sn}(\phi) \,
547: \rm{cn}(\phi)}{\rm{dn}^3(\phi)}\, \Xi(t) \label{grandE} \\
548: \dot{\phi} & = & (4E)^{1/4} + \frac{\alpha}{2}
549: \frac{\rm{sn}(\phi) \, \rm{cn}(\phi)}{\rm{dn}^3(\phi)}
550: - \frac{\sqrt{2}} {4 E^{1/4}} \rm{sd}^2(\phi)\, \Xi(t)
551: \label{grandphi}
552: \end{eqnarray}
553: In terms of the variable $\Omega = E^{1/4},$
554: Eq.~(\ref{grandE}) becomes linear and has a form
555: similar to Ornstein-Uhlenbeck's equation.
556: Because the elliptic functions are bounded,
557: $\Omega$ saturates to a value of the order
558: of $\frac{\Delta}{\alpha}$. Thus, we deduce from Eq.~(\ref{grandphi})
559: that the phase $\phi$
560: grows linearly with time. Hence, $\phi$ is a fast variable
561: as compared to $\Omega$.
562: Integrating out this fast variable from the
563: Fokker-Planck equation leads to
564: an effective stochastic dynamics for $\Omega$,
565: as explained in detail in \cite{philkir1}.
566: An equivalent formulation is to assume
567: that, in the large $E$ limit,
568: the stationary conditional probability $P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E)$,
569: defined in Eq.~(\ref{probcond}), becomes uniform in $\phi$ and
570: independent of $E$, i.e.,
571: \begin{equation}
572: \hbox{ for } \,\,\,\, \, E \gg 1 \, , \,\,\,\,\,
573: P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi \, | \, E) \sim 1 \, .
574: \end{equation}
575: Averaging the dynamics over $\phi$
576: yields the following expression
577: for the stationary PDF \cite{lindenberg,philkir2}:
578: \begin{equation}
579: \hbox{ for } \, E \gg 1 , \,
580: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) \propto E^{-1/4}
581: \exp \left\{ - \frac{8 \, \alpha \, E^{1/2}}{ 3 \,{\mathcal M} \, {\Delta} }
582: \right\} \, ,
583: \label{pdfEgrand}
584: \end{equation}
585: with $ {\mathcal M} = \frac{8}{5 \pi^2} \Gamma\left( 3/4 \right)^4 \simeq
586: 0.3655$,
587: $\Gamma$ being the Eulerian factorial function.
588: A stationary solution of (\ref{FPEphi}) decays as a stretched exponential
589: and is always integrable at infinity
590: irrespective of the values of $\alpha$ and $\Delta$.
591:
592: \section{Phase Diagram of the Duffing oscillator}
593: \label{sec:lyapunov}
594:
595: In the long time limit, the energy of a harmonic oscillator
596: with parametric noise (\ref{lineaire}) varies exponentially with time
597: \cite{bourret}. This behaviour is characterized by a
598: Lyapunov exponent, defined as
599: $\lim_{t \to \infty} \; \frac{1}{2t} \, \overline{ \log E }$,
600: where the overline means averaging over $P_t(E, \phi)$ \cite{hansel}.
601: [The factor $1/2$ is included for consistency with the usual definition
602: of the Lyapunov exponent in terms of the position $x(t)$.]
603:
604: In Appendix~\ref{sec:identity}, we prove that the coefficient
605: $\Lambda(\alpha,\Delta)$ defined in Eq.~(\ref{deflyap1})
606: is equal to the Lyapunov exponent:
607: \begin{equation}
608: \Lambda(\alpha,\Delta) =
609: \lim_{t \to \infty} \; \frac{1}{2t} \, \overline{ \log E } \, .
610: \label{defLyap1}
611: \end{equation}
612:
613: \begin{figure}[ht]
614: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig2.eps}
615: \caption{\label{fig:lyap:diag}
616: Phase diagram of the Duffing oscillator with multiplicative noise.
617: The critical curve separates an absorbing and an oscillatory phase
618: in the $(\alpha,\Delta)$ plane. The dashed line represents the
619: asymptotic approximation, Eq.~(\ref{smalla}).}
620: \end{figure}
621:
622:
623: For the (nonlinear) Duffing oscillator, we found in Section~\ref{sec:pdf}
624: that a non-trivial stationary
625: solution $P_{\rm{stat}}(E, \phi)$ of Eq.~(\ref{FPEphi})
626: exists only when the Lyapunov exponent $\Lambda(\alpha, \Delta)$
627: of the associated linear oscillator is positive.
628: This extended PDF describes an oscillatory asymptotic
629: state for the Duffing oscillator, as opposed to the
630: absorbing state associated with the delta function (\ref{pdfEpetitdelta}).
631: The location of the stochastic bifurcation threshold of the Duffing
632: oscillator, which separates the two states, is given by the curve
633: $\Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) = 0$. The following explicit formula
634: is derived in Appendix~\ref{sec:pdfangle}:
635: \begin{equation}
636: \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) = \frac{1}{2} \left\{ \frac {\int_0^{+\infty}
637: \mathrm{d}u \; {\sqrt u} \;
638: e^{ -\frac{2}{\Delta} \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{4} ) u
639: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) } }
640: {\int_0^{+\infty} \frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt u}
641: e^{-\frac{2}{\Delta} \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{4} ) u
642: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) } }
643: - \alpha \right\} \, .
644: \label{Lyapunov}
645: \end{equation}
646:
647:
648: The transition line is
649: determined by the relation between $\alpha$ and $\Delta$ for which
650: the Lyapunov exponent vanishes. For a given value
651: of $\Delta$, the critical value of the damping
652: $\alpha = \alpha_c(\Delta)$ satisfies
653: \begin{equation}
654: \alpha_c = {\displaystyle { \frac {\int_0^{+\infty}
655: \mathrm{d}u \; {\sqrt u} \;
656: \exp\left\{-\frac{2}{\Delta} \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4} ) u
657: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) \right\} }
658: {\int_0^{+\infty} \frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt u}
659: \exp\left\{-\frac{2}{\Delta} \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4} ) u
660: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) \right\} } }. }
661: \label{alphac}
662: \end{equation}
663: The critical curve
664: $\alpha = \alpha_c(\Delta)$ [Eq.~(\ref{alphac})]
665: is represented in Fig.~\ref{fig:lyap:diag}.
666: It separates two regions in parameter space: for $ \alpha < \alpha_c$
667: (resp. $\alpha > \alpha_c$)
668: the Lyapunov exponent is positive (resp. negative),
669: the stationary PDF is an extended function (resp. a delta
670: distribution) of the energy, the origin is unstable (resp. stable).
671: For a detailed analytical study, we must now distinguish three cases
672: corresponding
673: to an underdamped ($\alpha_c < 2$), critically damped ($\alpha_c =2$)
674: and overdamped ($ \alpha_c > 2$) oscillator.
675:
676:
677:
678:
679:
680: \subsection{Underdamped oscillator}
681: \label{sec:lin:diag:under}
682:
683: The case $\alpha_c < 2$ can formally be
684: mapped onto that of a linear oscillator with no damping.
685: In terms of the variables
686: $v = u \left[1 - \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4} \right]^{-1/2}$ and
687: $\Delta_< = \Delta \left[1 - \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4}\right]^{-3/2}$,
688: Eq.~(\ref{alphac}) reads
689: \begin{eqnarray}
690: \alpha_c &=& \left[1 - \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4}\right]^{1/2} \;
691: \frac { \int_0^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}v \, {\sqrt v} \,
692: \exp\left\{-\frac{2}{\Delta_<} \left( v+\frac{v^3}{12} \right) \right\} }
693: {\int_0^{+\infty} \frac{\mathrm{d}v}{\sqrt v} \exp\left\{-\frac{2}{\Delta_<}
694: \left( v + \frac{v^3}{12} \right) \right\} } \nonumber \\
695: &=& \frac{\Delta_< }{2} \;
696: \left[1 - \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4}\right]^{1/2} \;
697: \frac { \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n }{n!} \,
698: \Gamma\left(3n + \frac{3}{2}\right) \,
699: \left(\frac{\Delta_<^2 }{48}\right)^n}
700: { \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{n!} \,
701: \Gamma\left(3n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \,
702: \left( \frac{\Delta_<^2 }{48}\right)^n } \, . \nonumber
703: %\label{alphac2}
704: \end{eqnarray}
705: Retaining only the lowest order term in this series,
706: we obtain the limiting behaviour of the critical
707: curve $\alpha_c(\Delta)$, for small values of $\alpha$ and $\Delta$:
708: \begin{equation}
709: \alpha_c = \frac{\Delta }{4} .
710: \label{smalla}
711: \end{equation}
712: The change of variables used here breaks down at $\alpha_c = 2$,
713: we shall therefore consider this case separately.
714:
715:
716:
717: \subsection{Critically damped oscillator}
718: \label{sec:lin:diag:crit}
719:
720: For a critically damped oscillator,
721: we substitute $ \alpha_c = 2 $ in Eq.~(\ref{alphac}) and obtain
722: \begin{equation}
723: 2 = \frac {\int_0^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}u \, {\sqrt u}\,
724: \exp\left(- \frac{u^3}{6 \Delta_c} \right) }
725: {\int_0^{+\infty} \frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt u} \,
726: \exp\left(- \frac{u^3}{6 \Delta_c} \right) }
727: = ( 6 \Delta_c )^{1/3} \, \frac {\Gamma\left( \frac{1}{2} \right)}
728: {\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{6} \right)} \, .
729: \label{dcrit}
730: \end{equation}
731: Thus, the critical
732: noise amplitude $\Delta_c$ for $ \alpha_c = 2 $ is
733: \begin{equation}
734: \Delta_c = \frac{4}{3} \; \frac{ \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{6} \right)^3}
735: { \pi^{3/2}} \simeq 41.2969...,
736: \label{dcrit2}
737: \end{equation}
738: and the expression~(\ref{Lyapunov}) for the Lyapunov exponent reduces to
739: \begin{equation}
740: \label{eq:Lyap:alpha2}
741: \Lambda = \left(\frac{\Delta}{\Delta_c} \right)^{1/3} - 1 \, .
742: \end{equation}
743:
744:
745:
746: \subsection{Overdamped oscillator}
747: \label{sec:lin:diag:over}
748:
749: For $\alpha_c > 2$, we define
750: $v = u \left[ \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4} - 1 \right]^{-1/2} $ and
751: $\Delta_> = \Delta \left[ \frac{\alpha_c^2}{4} - 1 \right]^{-3/2}$.
752: Equation~(\ref{alphac}) then becomes
753: \begin{eqnarray}
754: \alpha_c \, \left[\frac{\alpha_c^2}{4}- 1 \right]^{-1/2}
755: &=& \frac { \int_0^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}v \, {\sqrt v} \,
756: e^{-\frac{2}{\Delta_>} \left(- v +\frac{v^3}{12} \right) } }
757: {\int_0^{+\infty}
758: \frac{\mathrm{d}v}{\sqrt v} e^{-\frac{2}{\Delta_>}
759: \left( -v + \frac{v^3}{12} \right) } } \label{alphacseries2} \\
760: &=& (6{\Delta_> })^{1/3} \;
761: \frac { \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}
762: \frac{1}{n!} \Gamma\left(\frac{2n+3}{6}\right)
763: \left(\frac{48}{\Delta_>^2 }\right)^{n/3 } }
764: { \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} \,
765: \Gamma\left(\frac{2n+1}{6}\right)
766: \left(\frac{48}{\Delta_>^2 }\right)^{n/3 } } \nonumber
767: \end{eqnarray}
768:
769: When $\alpha_c \to \infty$, the left hand side of Eq.~(\ref{alphacseries2})
770: the previous equation converges to 2 and
771: ${\Delta_>}$ tends to a limiting value ${\cal K}$ that
772: we computed numerically: ${\cal K} \simeq 28.337$.
773: Thus, in the large $\alpha_c$ limit, we find
774: the following relation between $\alpha_c$ and $\Delta$
775: \begin{equation}
776: \Delta \simeq {\cal K} \,\left[\frac{\alpha_c^2}{4}- 1 \right]^{3/2}
777: \simeq \frac{ {\cal K} }{8} \, \alpha_c^3 \simeq 3.54 \, \alpha_c^3 .
778: \label{largea}
779: \end{equation}
780:
781: When $\alpha_c \to 2^{+}$, the left hand side of Eq.~(\ref{alphacseries2})
782: increases to infinity. Retaining only the leading order term
783: of the series, we obtain
784: \begin{equation}
785: 2 \, \left[\frac{\alpha_c^2}{4}- 1 \right]^{-1/2}=
786: (6{\Delta_> })^{1/3} \frac{\Gamma(1/2)}{\Gamma(1/6)} \, .
787: \end{equation}
788: This equation is consistent with Eq.~(\ref{dcrit2}).
789:
790:
791: \section{Physical observables}
792: \label{sec:scaling}
793:
794: The goal of this section is to determine how physical observables,
795: such as the energy and the position of the oscillator, scale
796: near the bifurcation threshold as well as far from it.
797: The agreement between analytical calculations
798: and numerical simulations will validate the assumptions
799: made in Section~\ref{sec:pdf} concerning the behaviour of the
800: conditional PDF $P_{\rm{stat}}(\phi | E)$ for small and large values of $E$.
801:
802: Let us first of all review the results obtained in Section~\ref{sec:pdf}.
803: For parameter values such that $\Lambda < 0$, we demonstrated that
804: ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) = \delta(E)$: the origin is a
805: global attractor of the dynamics. Conversely, when $\Lambda > 0$,
806: the origin becomes unstable. The stationary measure of the energy
807: is then an extended function: it behaves as a power law
808: for small values of $E$ [see Eq.~(\ref{pdfEpetit})],
809: and decreases as a stretched exponential for large values of $E$
810: [see Eq.~(\ref{pdfEgrand})]:
811: \begin{eqnarray}
812: \hbox{ for } \, \, E \ll 1 \, , \,\,\,
813: {\tilde P}^{<}_{\rm{stat}}(E) &=& A
814: E^{ \frac{ \Lambda }{ \mu }
815: - 1 } \,, \nonumber \\
816: \hbox{ for } \, \, E \gg 1 \, , \,\,\,
817: {\tilde P}^{>}_{\rm{stat}}(E) &=& B E^{-\frac{1}{4}}
818: \exp \left\{ - \frac{8 \, \alpha \, E^{1/2}}{ 3 \,{\mathcal M} \, {\Delta} }
819: \right\} \, .
820: \label{matching}
821: \end{eqnarray}
822: The precise values of $A$ and $B$ can only
823: be obtained by solving the full Fokker-Planck
824: equation~(\ref{FPEphi}), and matching
825: the two asymptotic expressions in the
826: intermediate regime $E \simeq 1$.
827:
828:
829:
830: \subsection{Behaviour in the vicinity of the bifurcation}
831: \label{sec:NL:bif}
832:
833:
834: \begin{figure}[th]
835: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig3a.eps}
836: \bigskip
837: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig3b.eps}
838:
839: \caption{\label{fig:bifn3} Scaling behaviour of physical
840: observables of the stochastic Duffing oscillator
841: in the vicinity of the bifurcation threshold as a function of
842: the reduced control parameter
843: $\varepsilon = (\Delta - \Delta_c)/\Delta_c$. (a) Average energy; (b)
844: Variance of the position. Dashed lines corresponding to a linear function
845: of $\varepsilon$ are drawn to guide the eye. The corresponding
846: linear-linear graphs are shown as insets. Eq.~(\ref{dissipDuff})
847: is integrated numerically for $\alpha = 2$, with a time step
848: $\delta t = 5 \ 10^{-4}$. The threshold value is given by Eq.~(\ref{dcrit2}):
849: $\Delta_c(2) \simeq 41.3$. Ensemble averages are computed over
850: $10^3$ realisations.}
851: \end{figure}
852:
853: \begin{figure}[th]
854: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig4.eps}
855: \caption{\label{fig:bifn} Scaling behaviour of the mean energy
856: of the general nonlinear oscillator in the vicinity of the
857: bifurcation threshold as a function of the reduced control
858: parameter $\varepsilon = (\Delta -\Delta_c)/\Delta_c$. Dashed lines
859: indicating a linear dependence in $\varepsilon$ are drawn to guide the eye.
860: Eq.~(\ref{eqsto}) is integrated numerically for $\alpha = 2$,
861: and with ${\mathcal U}(x) = x^{2n}/(2n)$, $n = 2$, $3$ and $4$.
862: Data obtained for $n = 2$ are the same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:bifn3}.
863: The time step is $\delta t = 5 \ 10^{-4}$; ensemble averages are computed over
864: $10^3$ realisations. }
865: \end{figure}
866:
867:
868: For a given value of the damping rate $\alpha$,
869: let us choose the noise strength $\Delta$ such
870: that $0 < \Delta -\Delta_c(\alpha) \ll 1$. In this case,
871: the parameters of the system
872: are tuned just above the bifurcation threshold and
873: the Lyapunov exponent is slightly positive:
874: $0 < \Lambda \ll 1$.
875: The stationary PDF is an extended function but,
876: as can be inferred from Eq.~(\ref{matching}),
877: most of its mass is concentrated in the vicinity
878: of $E=0$. Therefore, a good approximation of
879: the stationary PDF is obtained by taking it equal to
880: ${\tilde P}^{<}_{\rm{stat}}(E)$ over a finite
881: interval in the vicinity of 0 (e.g., $0 \le E \le E_0$),
882: and equal to zero outside this interval.
883: The mean value of the energy is given by:
884: \begin{equation}
885: \langle E \rangle_{\mathrm{stat}} \simeq
886: \frac{ \int_0^{E_0} E^{\frac{\Lambda }{\mu}} \mathrm{d} E }
887: { \int_0^{E_0} E^{ \frac{\Lambda }{\mu } - 1 } \mathrm{d} E }
888: \propto E_0 \, \frac { \Lambda }{ \mu} \, .
889: \label{multif1}
890: \end{equation}
891: If we now take into account that: $(i)$
892: $ \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta_c(\alpha)) =0$; and
893: $(ii)$ the Lyapunov exponent and the coefficient $\mu$ are regular
894: functions of the noise strength $\Delta$ when $\Delta \neq 0$,
895: we obtain from Eq.~(\ref{multif1})
896: \begin{equation}
897: \langle E \rangle_{\mathrm{stat}}
898: \propto \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) - \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta_c)
899: \propto (\Delta -\Delta_c) \, ,
900: \label{multif2}
901: \end{equation}
902: where the last identity is obtained by a Taylor expansion
903: of $\Lambda$ for $\Delta$ close to $\Delta_c$.
904: This result is confirmed by numerical simulations
905: [See Fig.~\ref{fig:bifn3}.a]. A similar reasoning
906: shows that $ \langle E \rangle_{\mathrm{stat}} $ scales
907: linearly with $\alpha - \alpha_c(\Delta)$ at fixed noise strength $\Delta$.
908:
909: Let us now consider the variance of the oscillator's
910: position close to the bifurcation.
911: Using Eqs.~(\ref{enanglelin1}) and (\ref{factor}), we find
912: \begin{eqnarray}
913: \langle x^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{stat}}
914: &=& \iint P_{\mathrm{stat}}(E,\phi) \, 2 E \sin^2 \phi
915: \; \mathrm{d}E \, \mathrm{d}\phi \nonumber \\
916: &=& 2 \, \langle \sin^2 \phi \rangle \,
917: \langle E \rangle_{\mathrm{stat}} \nonumber \\
918: &\propto& (\Delta -\Delta_c) \, . \label{eq:scalingx2}
919: \end{eqnarray}
920: The variance of the position scales linearly with the distance to
921: threshold [See Fig.~\ref{fig:bifn3}.b].
922: Using a similar argument, one also finds that
923: $\langle v^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{stat}} \propto (\Delta -\Delta_c)$.
924:
925:
926:
927:
928:
929: As seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:bifn}
930: the linear scaling (\ref{multif2}) of the energy with respect
931: to the distance to threshold is observed
932: for ${\mathcal U}(x) \propto x^{2n} $, $n = 2$, $3$ and $4$,
933: where $\Delta_c(\alpha)$ is \emph{always} given by
934: $\Lambda(\alpha, \Delta_c(\alpha)) = 0$.
935: The threshold is independent of the nonlinearity
936: involved in the confining potential ${\mathcal U}$ appearing
937: in Eq.~(\ref{eqsto}), because the local expression
938: ${\tilde P}^{<}_{\rm{stat}}(E)$ of the stationary PDF
939: in the vicinity of $E = 0$ is obtained from the \emph{linearized}
940: stochastic differential equation. The observed dependence of the
941: constant of proportionality in Eq.~(\ref{multif2}) upon
942: the stiffness of the anharmonic potential remains to be understood.
943:
944:
945:
946:
947:
948: \begin{figure}[ht]
949: \includegraphics*[width=0.75\columnwidth]{fig5.eps}
950: \caption{\label{fig:loin} Scaling behaviour of the mean energy
951: of the general nonlinear oscillator far from the bifurcation
952: as a function of the parameter $\Delta/\alpha$.
953: Eq.~(\ref{eqsto}) is integrated numerically with
954: ${\mathcal U}(x) = x^{2n}/(2n)$, $n = 2$, $3$ and $4$.
955: Dashed lines correspond to the predicted scaling (\ref{avgEtn}),
956: with a scaling exponent $n/(n-1) = 2$, $3/2$ and $4/3$.
957: The time step is $\delta t = 5 \ 10^{-4}$; ensemble averages are computed over
958: $10^3$ realisations. }
959: \end{figure}
960:
961:
962: \subsection{Scaling far from the bifurcation}
963:
964: We shall now study the scaling of the physical observables far from the
965: bifurcation point. This situation is encountered,
966: for instance,
967: when the damping rate is vanishingly
968: small for a given noise strength. The Lyapunov exponent
969: is then a finite, strictly positive, number.
970: When $\alpha \to 0$,
971: most of the mass of the stationary PDF is concentrated at large
972: values of $E$ as can be seen from Eq.~(\ref{matching}).
973: Thus, a satisfactory approximation of
974: the stationary PDF is to assume it to be identical to the expression
975: ${\tilde P}^{>}_{\rm{stat}}(E)$ for all $E$.
976: After a suitable normalisation, we find
977: \begin{equation}
978: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(E) = \frac{1}{ 2 E \Gamma \left(3/2\right)}% \,
979: \left( \frac{8 \, \alpha \, E^{1/2}}{ 3 \,{\mathcal M} \, {\Delta} }
980: \right)^{3/2}
981: \exp \left\{ - \frac{8 \, \alpha \, E^{1/2}}{ 3 \,{\mathcal M} \, {\Delta} }
982: \right\} ,
983: \label{pdfstat}
984: \end{equation}
985: with the numerical factor ${\mathcal M}$
986: defined in Eq.~(\ref{pdfEgrand}).
987: In this low damping regime, we recover,
988: as expected, the results derived in Refs.~\cite{philkir1,philkir2}.
989: The average energy is readily obtained from Eq.~(\ref{pdfstat})
990: \begin{equation}
991: \langle E \rangle_{\rm{stat}} = \frac{135 }{256} \, {\mathcal M}^2 \,
992: \left( \frac{ {\Delta} }{\alpha }\right)^2
993: \simeq 0.070 \left( \frac{ {\Delta} }{\alpha }\right)^2 \, .
994: \label{avgEt}
995: \end{equation}
996: This result is
997: at variance with the usual equilibrium fluc\-tua\-tion-dissipation theorem
998: ($\langle E \rangle_{\mathrm{eq}} \propto {\Delta}/\alpha $);
999: yet this is not a contradiction since
1000: Eq.~(\ref{dissipDuff}) models a system out of equilibrium.
1001:
1002:
1003: Far from the bifurcation threshold, the scaling behaviour
1004: depends strongly on the stiffness of the potential ${\mathcal U}$.
1005: If we take ${\mathcal U}(x) \propto x^{2n} $, Eq.~(\ref{avgEt})
1006: can be generalized to \cite{philkir2}
1007: \begin{eqnarray}
1008: \langle E \rangle_{\rm{stat}} = &&
1009: \frac{1}{2n} \; \frac{\Gamma \left(\frac{3n+1}{2(n-1)} \right)}
1010: {\Gamma \left(\frac{n+1}{2(n-1)} \right)} \label{avgEtn} \\
1011: && \left( ( n-1) \;
1012: \frac{\Gamma \left(\frac{3}{2n} \right)
1013: \; \Gamma \left(\frac{3n+1}{2n} \right)}
1014: {\Gamma \left(\frac{1}{2n} \right) \;
1015: \Gamma \left(\frac{3n+3}{2n} \right)}
1016: \right)^{\frac{n}{n-1}} \;
1017: \left( \frac{ {\Delta} }{\alpha }\right)^{\frac{n}{n-1}} \, .
1018: \nonumber
1019: \end{eqnarray}
1020: This prediction is again confirmed by numerical simulations
1021: [See Fig.~\ref{fig:loin}].
1022:
1023:
1024: \section{Conclusion}
1025: \label{sec:disc}
1026:
1027: For a deterministic Duffing oscillator with linear damping,
1028: the fixed point at the origin $(x = \dot{x} =0)$ is a
1029: global attractor: irrespective of the choice of initial conditions,
1030: the mechanical energy is totally dissipated in the long time limit
1031: and the system converges to the origin.
1032: This picture is no longer valid once the oscillator is
1033: subject to parametric noise. Indeed, the dissipative Duffing
1034: oscillator with parametric white noise undergoes a noise-induced
1035: bifurcation between: $(i)$ an absorbing state reminiscent of the
1036: deterministic system; and $(ii)$ an oscillatory state, resulting
1037: from a dynamical balance between energy dissipation and
1038: (noise-induced) energy injection. Noisy oscillations appear
1039: when the fixed point at the origin becomes unstable: this transition
1040: is thus referred to as a (forward) stochastic Hopf bifurcation.
1041: Both states may be characterized by the stationary probability
1042: distribution function of the oscillator's mechanical energy $E$.
1043: The PDF of the absorbing state is a delta-function, whereas
1044: the oscillatory state corresponds to an extended PDF.
1045:
1046: Our main result concerns the location of the transition point:
1047: a noise-induced bifurcation for the Duffing oscillator occurs precisely
1048: where the Lyapunov exponent of the linear oscillator with
1049: parametric noise changes sign. We emphasize that this result
1050: is genuinely non-perturbative. It results from a simple hypothesis
1051: on the behaviour of the conditional probability of the angular variable
1052: at fixed energy, valid for very small values of the energy
1053: and for \emph{arbitrary} noise amplitude.
1054: This assumption is physically plausible (i.e. mean-field-like) and
1055: justified by the consequences deduced from it.
1056: Having identified the Lyapunov exponent of the stochastic
1057: \emph{linear} oscillator as the important physical quantity, we
1058: give a simple analytical expression of this exponent as a
1059: function of the system's parameters, the damping rate and the noise strength.
1060: The location of the transition line that separates the absorbing and
1061: oscillatory states of the (nonlinear) Duffing oscillator follows
1062: immediately.
1063:
1064: Although we have considered here only a cubic
1065: oscillator with parametric Gaussian
1066: white noise, we believe that the relation
1067: between the sign of the Lyapunov exponent and the
1068: location of the noise-induced transition holds
1069: irrespective of the nonlinearity and of the nature
1070: of the noise. Finally, we demonstrate that
1071: all physical observables scale linearly with respect to the distance
1072: to threshold. Indeed, the argument we use to evaluate the mean energy
1073: $\langle E \rangle$ may be easily generalized to show that
1074: all moments $\langle E^k \rangle$ also scale linearly,
1075: suggesting that the concept of critical exponents
1076: is not relevant here.
1077: One would certainly like to test experimentally whether
1078: noise-induced transitions may indeed be characterized
1079: by a multifractal order parameter, at variance with the
1080: theory of equilibrium continuous transitions.
1081:
1082:
1083:
1084: \appendix
1085:
1086:
1087: \section{Some useful identities for the Lyapunov exponent}
1088: \label{sec:identity}
1089:
1090:
1091: In this appendix, we prove that the Lyapunov exponent, defined as
1092: $\lim_{t \to \infty} \; \frac{1}{2t} \, \overline{ \log E }$,
1093: satisfies the relation~(\ref{defLyap1}).
1094: Using the `radial' variable $\rho$ defined by
1095: \begin{equation}
1096: \rho = \frac{1}{2} \log \left( 2 E \right) \, , \label{defU}
1097: \end{equation}
1098: we rewrite Eq.~(\ref{lineaire}) as a
1099: system of nonlinear coupled stochastic equations
1100: \begin{eqnarray}
1101: \dot \rho &=& - \alpha \cos^2 \phi + \sin\phi \cos\phi \, \Xi(t)
1102: \, , \label{eqUlin} \\
1103: \dot \phi &=& 1 + \alpha \sin\phi \cos\phi - \sin^2\phi\, \Xi(t)
1104: \, .\label{eqthetalin}
1105: \end{eqnarray}
1106: The Fokker-Planck
1107: evolution equation for the joint probability distribution
1108: $P_t(\rho,\phi)$ is then given by \cite{vankampen}
1109: \begin{eqnarray}
1110: \partial_t P_t& = & \label{FPlin3}
1111: \alpha \cos^2 \phi \, \partial_{\rho} P_t - \partial_{\phi}
1112: \left[ (1 + \alpha \sin\phi \cos\phi)\, P_t \right] \label{FPlin1} \\
1113: && + \frac{\Delta}{2} \left\{\right.
1114: \sin^2 \phi \cos^2\phi \, \partial^2_{\rho\rho} P_t
1115: - \sin\phi \cos\phi \,
1116: \partial^2_{\rho \phi} \left[\sin^2\phi \, P_t \right] \nonumber \\
1117: && - \partial_{\phi} \left[ \sin^3\phi \cos\phi \,
1118: \partial_\rho P_t \right] + \partial_{\phi} \left[ \sin^2\phi \,
1119: \partial_{\phi} (\sin^2\phi \, P_t \,) \right] \left.\right\} \nonumber
1120: \end{eqnarray}
1121: From Eq.~(\ref{FPlin1}) we derive the time evolution
1122: of the mean value $\overline{ \rho }$, where the overline
1123: indicates averaging with respect to
1124: $P_t(\rho,\phi)$. After suitable integration by parts, we obtain
1125: \begin{equation}
1126: \frac{ \rm{d}}{ \rm{d} t}\overline{ \rho } =
1127: -\alpha \; \overline{ \cos^2\phi} \,
1128: + \frac{\Delta}{2} \overline{ \sin^2\phi\, ( \sin^2\phi - \cos^2\phi )}
1129: \, . \label{evolmoyU}
1130: \end{equation}
1131: Similarly, we deduce the time evolution
1132: of $ \overline{ \log | \sin\phi | }$
1133: \begin{eqnarray}
1134: \frac{ \rm{d}}{\rm{d} t} \overline{ \log | \sin\phi | }
1135: & = & \overline{ \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi }
1136: + \alpha \; \overline{ \cos^2\phi } \nonumber\\
1137: && - \frac{\Delta}{2} \; \overline{ \sin^2\phi\,
1138: ( \sin^2\phi - \cos^2\phi )}
1139: \, . \label{evolmoylog}
1140: \end{eqnarray}
1141: From Eqs.~(\ref{evolmoyU}) and (\ref{evolmoylog}), we obtain
1142: \begin{equation}
1143: \frac{ \rm{d}} { \rm{d} t}\overline{ \rho } =
1144: \overline{ \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi } -
1145: \frac{ \rm{d}}{\rm{d} t}\overline{ \log | \sin\phi | }
1146: \, . \label{lienmoys}
1147: \end{equation}
1148: At large times, the PDF ${ P}_t(E, \phi)$ reaches
1149: a stationary limit ${ P}_{\rm{stat}}(E,\phi)$.
1150: Thus, when $ t \to \infty $,
1151: the averages $\overline{ \log | \sin\phi | }$ and
1152: $\overline{ \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi }$ have finite limits,
1153: given by $\langle \log | \sin\phi | \rangle$ and
1154: $ \left\langle \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi \right\rangle $, respectively,
1155: where the expectation values denoted by brackets $\langle \rangle$
1156: are calculated by using the marginal
1157: PDF, ${\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi)$.
1158: Therefore
1159: \begin{equation}
1160: \lim_{t \to \infty } \frac{ \rm{d}} { \rm{d} t} \overline{ \rho} =
1161: \left\langle \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi \right\rangle \,.
1162: \label{meanrho}
1163: \end{equation}
1164: From Eqs.~(\ref{defU})~and~(\ref{meanrho}),
1165: we derive
1166: \begin{equation}
1167: \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{1}{2 t} \overline{ \log E }
1168: = \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{1}{2}
1169: \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \overline{ \log E }
1170: = \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t}
1171: \overline{ \rho}
1172: = \left\langle \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi \right\rangle \, .
1173: \label{formLyap}
1174: \end{equation}
1175: Similarly, we take the stationary limit of Eq.~(\ref{evolmoylog})
1176: and obtain
1177: \begin{equation}
1178: \left\langle \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi \right\rangle =
1179: - \alpha \; \left\langle \cos^2\phi \right\rangle
1180: + \frac{\Delta}{2} \;\left\langle \sin^2\phi\,
1181: ( \sin^2\phi - \cos^2\phi ) \right\rangle .
1182: \label{Lyapfin}
1183: \end{equation}
1184: The right hand side of this equation is nothing but $\Lambda$ [See
1185: Eq.~(\ref{deflyap1})]. This
1186: concludes the derivation of Eq.~(\ref{defLyap1}) :
1187: \begin{equation}
1188: \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{1}{2 t} \overline{ \log E }
1189: = \left\langle \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi \right\rangle
1190: = \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) \, .
1191: \label{idLyap}
1192: \end{equation}
1193:
1194:
1195:
1196:
1197:
1198:
1199: \section{Calculation of the Lyapunov exponent}
1200: \label{sec:pdfangle}
1201:
1202:
1203: Expressions for the Lyapunov exponent have been
1204: available for a long time
1205: in the literature \cite{hansel},
1206: but they are rather unwieldy.
1207: In a recent article
1208: about the quantum localisation problem \cite{tessieri},
1209: an expression for the
1210: localisation length is derived: it is shown to be identical
1211: to the inverse Lyapunov exponent of the linear oscillator
1212: with parametric noise and zero damping.
1213: In this appendix, we generalize the calculation
1214: of \cite{tessieri} to the dissipative case
1215: and derive a particularly simple formula for the Lyapunov exponent.
1216:
1217: Since $\Lambda = \langle \mathrm{cotan}\phi \rangle $
1218: [See Eq.~(\ref{idLyap})],
1219: we introduce the auxiliary variable $z$ defined as
1220: \begin{equation}
1221: z = \dot x/x = \mathrm{cotan}\, \phi \, .
1222: \label{defz}
1223: \end{equation}
1224: Then, equation~(\ref{lineaire}) becomes
1225: \begin{equation}
1226: \dot z + 1 + \alpha \; z + z^2 = \Xi(t) \,.
1227: \label{eqz}
1228: \end{equation}
1229: The stationary Fokker-Planck equation associated with Eq.~(\ref{eqz})
1230: is given by
1231: \begin{equation}
1232: \frac{\Delta}{2} \; \frac{ \rm{d}} { \rm{d} z} P_{\rm{stat}}
1233: = -( 1 + \alpha z + z^2) P_{\rm{stat}} + J \,,
1234: \label{StatFPz}
1235: \end{equation}
1236: where we have introduced the stationary current $J$.
1237: The solution of this equation is found by the method
1238: of the variation of constants:
1239: \begin{equation}
1240: P_{\rm{stat}}(z) = \frac{1}{N} \int_{-\infty}^z \exp\left\{\frac{2}{\Delta}
1241: (\Phi(y) - \Phi(z) ) \right\} \mathrm{d}y,
1242: \label{Pstatz}
1243: \end{equation}
1244: where $\Phi(y) = y +\frac{\alpha}{2} y^2 + \frac{1}{3} y^3$.
1245: Writing $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} P_{\rm{stat}}(z) \; \mathrm{d}z = 1$, we
1246: obtain the normalisation constant $N$:
1247: \begin{equation}
1248: N = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}z \int_{-\infty}^z \mathrm{d}y
1249: \exp\left\{\frac{2}{\Delta} (\Phi(y) - \Phi(z) ) \right\} .
1250: \label{formN1}
1251: \end{equation}
1252: Following \cite{tessieri}, we
1253: change the $y$ variable to $u = z -y$ in Eq.~(\ref{formN1}):
1254: \begin{equation}
1255: N = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}z \int_0^{+\infty}\mathrm{d}u \,
1256: e^{-\frac{2}{\Delta} \big(u - \frac{\alpha}{2}u^2 + \frac{u^3}{3}
1257: + z^2 u + z( \alpha u - u^2) \big) } \, .
1258: \end{equation}
1259: The integral over $z$ is now Gaussian, and can be evaluated
1260: before the integral over $u$. Hence, we obtain
1261: \begin{equation}
1262: N = \sqrt{\frac{\pi \Delta}{2}} \; \int_0^{+\infty}
1263: \frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt u} \,
1264: \exp \left\{ -\frac{2}{\Delta} \, \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{4} ) u
1265: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) \right\} \, .
1266: \label{Norm}
1267: \end{equation}
1268:
1269: The use of the identity
1270: \begin{equation}
1271: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi)\rm{d}\phi = P_{\rm{stat}}(z) \rm{d}z \, ,
1272: \end{equation}
1273: yields the stationary angular measure
1274: \begin{equation}
1275: \label{probastatphi}
1276: {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi) = \frac{1}{N \sin^2\phi}
1277: \int_{-\infty}^{\rm{cotan}\;\phi}
1278: \mathrm{d}y \;
1279: e^{ \frac{2}{\Delta} \left(\Phi(y) - \Phi(\mathrm{cotan}\;\phi) \right)}
1280: \, .
1281: \end{equation}
1282: We deduce that the
1283: Lyapunov exponent satifies
1284: \begin{eqnarray}
1285: \Lambda &=&
1286: \int_0^\pi {\tilde P}_{\rm{stat}}(\phi) \, \mathrm{cotan} \phi \,
1287: \mathrm{d}\phi \label{eqlambdaz} \\
1288: &=& \frac{1}{N}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}z \; z
1289: \int_{-\infty}^z \exp\left\{\frac{2}{\Delta}
1290: (\Phi(y) - \Phi(z) ) \right\} \mathrm{d}y \, .\nonumber
1291: \end{eqnarray}
1292: We again change the variables from $(y,z)$ to $(u,z)$
1293: with $u = z -y$, and obtain
1294: \begin{equation}
1295: \Lambda = \frac{1}{N}
1296: \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \mathrm{d}z \, z \int_0^{+\infty}\mathrm{d}u \,
1297: e^{-\frac{2}{\Delta} \left(u - \frac{\alpha}{2}u^2 + \frac{u^3}{3}
1298: + z( \alpha u - u^2) + z^2 u \right) }
1299: \end{equation}
1300: Evaluating the Gaussian integral in $z$ leads to
1301: the expression of the Lyapunov exponent given in the text
1302: \begin{equation}
1303: \Lambda(\alpha, \Delta) = \frac{1}{2} \left\{ \frac {\int_0^{+\infty}
1304: \mathrm{d}u \; {\sqrt u} \;
1305: e^{ -\frac{2}{\Delta} \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{4} ) u
1306: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) } }
1307: {\int_0^{+\infty} \frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt u}
1308: e^{-\frac{2}{\Delta} \left( ( 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{4} ) u
1309: + \frac{u^3}{12} \right) } }
1310: - \alpha \right\} .
1311: \label{Lyapunovapp}
1312: \end{equation}
1313: This formula also appears in
1314: recent mathematical literature \cite{imkeller}.
1315: It constitutes an exact result,
1316: obtained without approximations. We have computed numerically the Lyapunov
1317: exponent by measuring $\overline{\log E}$ in the time-asymp\-to\-tic regime
1318: and thus confirmed the validity of (\ref{Lyapunovapp}).
1319:
1320:
1321:
1322:
1323:
1324: \begin{thebibliography}{article}
1325: \bibitem{lefever} H. Horsthemke and R. Lefever, {\it Noise
1326: Induced Transitions} (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
1327: \bibitem{strato} R.L.~Stratonovich, {\it Topics on the
1328: Theory of Random Noise } (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1963 (Vol. 1),
1329: 1967 (Vol. 2)).
1330: \bibitem{landaMc} P.S. Landa and P.V.E. McClintock,
1331: Phys. Rep. {\bf 323}, 1 (2000).
1332: \bibitem{fauve} R. Berthet, S. Residori,
1333: B. Roman and S. Fauve, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 33}, 557 (2002).
1334: \bibitem{kramer1} A.~Becker and L.~Kramer, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1335: {\bf 73}, 955 (1994); Physica D {\bf 90}, 408 (1996).
1336: \bibitem{kramer2} J. R\"oder, H. R\"oder and L.~Kramer,
1337: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 55}, 7068 (1997).
1338: \bibitem{behn} U.~Behn, A.~Lange and T.~John,
1339: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 58}, 2047 (1998).
1340: \bibitem{frisch} U. Frisch, in {\em Probabilistic Methods
1341: in Applied Mathematics}, edited by A.T.~Bharucha-Reid
1342: (Academic Press, New York, 1968).
1343: \bibitem{luecke} M.~L\"ucke and F.~Schank, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1344: {\bf 54}, 1465 (1985); M. L\"ucke, in {\em Noise in Dynamical
1345: Systems, Vol. 2: Theory of Noise-induced Processes in Special
1346: Applications}, edited by F.~Moss and P.V.E.~Mc Clintock
1347: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
1348: \bibitem{vandenb1} C. van den Broeck, J.M.R. Parrondo and R. Toral,
1349: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 73}, 3395 (1994).
1350: \bibitem{vandenb2} J.M.R. Parrondo, C. van den Broeck, J. Buceta
1351: and F. Javier de la Rubia, Physica {\bf 224} A, 153 (1996).
1352: \bibitem{toral} M. San Miguel and R. Toral, {\it Stochastic Effects
1353: in Physical Systems}, in {\em Instabilities and Nonequilibrium
1354: Structures }{\bf VI}, edited by E. Tirapegui and W. Zeller (Kluwer,
1355: Dordrecht, 1997).
1356: \bibitem{lindenberg} V. Seshadri, B. J. West and K. Lindenberg,
1357: Physica {\bf 107} A, 219 (1981).
1358: \bibitem{landa} P.S.~Landa and A.A.~Zaikin, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 54},
1359: 3535 (1996).
1360: \bibitem{drolet} F.~Drolet and J.~Vi\~nals,
1361: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 57}, 5036 (1998).
1362: \bibitem{bourret} R.C.~Bourret, Physica {\bf 54}, 623 (1971).
1363: \bibitem{bourretFrisch} R.C.~Bourret, U.~Frisch and A.~Pouquet,
1364: Physica {\bf 65}, 303 (1973).
1365: \bibitem{philkir1} K.~Mallick and P.~Marcq, Phys. Rev. E
1366: {\bf 66}, 041113 (2002).
1367: \bibitem{philkir2} K.~Mallick and P.~Marcq,
1368: Physica {\bf 325} A, 213 (2003).
1369: \bibitem{manneville} P.~Manneville, {\it Dissipative structures
1370: and weak turbulence} (Academic Press, New York, 1990).
1371: \bibitem{lindenberg3} K.~Lindenberg, V.~Seshadri and
1372: B.J.~West, Physica {\bf 105} A, 445 (1981).
1373: \bibitem{arnold} L.~Arnold, \emph{Random Dynamical Systems}
1374: (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
1375: \bibitem{mannella} R. Mannella, in {\em Noise in Dynamical
1376: Systems, Vol. 3: Experiments and Simulations}, edited by
1377: F.~Moss and P.V.E.~Mc Clintock (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
1378: \bibitem{abram} M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, {\em Handbook
1379: of Mathematical Functions}
1380: (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1966).
1381: \bibitem{vankampen} N.G.~van Kampen, {\it Stochastic Processes in Physics
1382: and Chemistry} (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992).
1383: \bibitem{graham} A.~Schenzle and H.~Brand, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 20}, 1628 (1979).
1384: \bibitem{hansel} D.~Hansel and J.F.~Luciani,
1385: J. Stat. Phys. {\bf 54}, 971 (1989).
1386: \bibitem{tessieri} L.~Tessieri and F.M.~Izrailev, Phys. Rev. E
1387: {\bf 62}, 3090 (2000).
1388: \bibitem{imkeller} P.~Imkeller and C.~Lederer,
1389: Dyn. and Stab. Syst. {\bf 14}, 385 (1999).
1390:
1391: \end{thebibliography}
1392:
1393:
1394: \end{document}
1395: