1: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \begin{document}
4: \title{Geometric phases and Wannier functions of Bloch electrons in 1-dimension}
5: \author{Joydeep Bhattacharjee and Umesh V Waghmare}
6: \affiliation{Theoretical Sciences Unit,
7: Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research,\\ Jakkur PO,
8: Bangalore 560 064, India}
9: %==========================================================================================
10: \begin{abstract}
11: We present a formal expression for Wannier functions of composite bands of 1-D
12: Bloch electrons in terms of parallel-transported Bloch functions and their
13: non-Abelian geometric phases. Spatial decay properties of these Wannier functions
14: are studied in the case of simple bands of 1-D model insulator and metal. Within
15: first-principles density functional theory, we illustrate the formalism through the
16: construction of Wannier functions of polyethylene and polyacetylene.
17: \end{abstract}
18: \pacs{71.15.-m 71.20.-b 71.23.An}
19: \maketitle
20: %===================================================================================
21: %\section{Introduction}
22:
23: Since the introduction in 1937, Wannier functions (WF)\cite{Wan} have been
24: conceptually interesting and useful in studies of electronic properties of materials.
25: They highlight the atomic orbital character of electrons and chemical bonding\cite{kohn73}
26: and appear naturally in the symmetry and analytical properties of energy bands
27: in solids\cite{descloizeux, Zak89}. They form an excellent basis set for use
28: in the construction of first-principles model Hamiltonians in studies of
29: phase transitions\cite{rabe95,ole}. There is growing interest in WFs as they
30: provide a localized basis in real space for the description of electronic states
31: and are useful in the implementation of computationally efficient``linear scaling"
32: algorithms \cite{galli, goedecker}.
33:
34: WFs are obtained as a unitary transformation of Bloch functions\cite{Wan}.
35: A relationship between the first moment of squared WFs (density) and geometric phases\cite{berry} of
36: Bloch electron was uncovered in the context of adiabatic dynamics of Bloch electron\cite{Zak} and
37: later in the modern theory of polarization\cite{KSV, Resta}. WFs are {\it not}
38: unique due to the freedom in choice of phases accompanying Bloch functions, but they are
39: desired to be highly localized for practical applications. The second moment (cumulant) of
40: squared WFs, a measure of their spatial range, is used as an objective function for
41: minimization in the variational procedure to construct WFs developed by
42: Marzari and Vanderbilt\cite{MV}.
43:
44: In this paper, we focus on the solution of WF problem for systems periodic in 1-D,
45: and comment on its relation and extension to higher dimensions.
46: We use Bloch functions parallel transported along the Bloch vector {\bf k}
47: in the Brillouin zone as a starting point in the construction of WFs.
48: As these are not periodic in reciprocal space, we present an explicit form for a unitary
49: transformation to construct a set that is periodic as a function of {\bf k}. For the 1-D case,
50: we show that the WFs obtained as a Fourier transform of this set are
51: maximally localized.
52:
53: Starting with a subspace $S_{k_0}$ of $N$ energy eigenfunctions at $k_0$,
54: we use parallel transport to obtain Bloch
55: functions $e^{ikx} u^{||}_{kn}(x)$ for $k \in ( k_0, k_0+ \frac{2 \pi}{a})$, $a$
56: being the lattice constant and $n$ being an index for electronic states.
57: This is accomplished using $|\frac{\partial u_{kn}}{\partial k}>$ obtained routinely
58: within the parallel transport gauge:
59: \begin{equation}
60: \langle u^{||}_{km}|\frac{\partial u^{||}_{kn}}{\partial k} \rangle=0
61: \label{paralleltrnpt}
62: \end{equation}
63: in density functional theory linear
64: response\cite{BGT, GAT} (or $k.p$ perturbation theory) calculations.
65: We use second-order Runge-Kutta procedure\cite{recipes} to translate from
66: $u^{||}_{kn}(x)$ to $u^{||}_{k+\Delta k n}(x)$. Geometric phases, generalized for
67: degenerate states\cite{WilZee} and paths closed within a gauge transformation\cite{Zak},
68: form an $N\times N$ Hermitian matrix $\Gamma$ and are given by:
69: \begin{equation}
70: \left[e^{i \Gamma}\right]_{mn} = \langle u_{m k_0}^{||}
71: \vert \exp\left(i\frac{2 \pi x}{a}\right)
72: \vert u_{n k_0+\frac{2\pi}{a}}^{||} \rangle
73: \label{nonabelianGammaPar}
74: \end{equation}
75: The electronic part of the macroscopic polarization\cite{KSV} $P$ is readily given
76: by $\frac{2\pi e}{a}Tr(\Gamma)$.
77: \iffalse by $\frac{e}{\Omega}Tr(\Gamma)$.
78: $\Omega$ being the unit cell volume \fi
79:
80: Non-diagonal form of the matrix $\Gamma$, in general, indicates that a starting
81: wavefunction at $k_0$ mixes with other members of the subspace $S_{k_0}$ as $k$ is
82: transported to $k_0+\frac{2\pi}{a}$, amounting to a unitary transformation of the
83: subspace $S_{k_0}$. Diagonalization of $\Gamma$ and corresponding transformation
84: of Bloch functions
85: in $S_{k_0}$ result in states that are decoupled from each other during parallel transport,
86: effectively reducing the problem of composite bands to $N$ simple bands. If $M$ forms
87: an $N\times N$ matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors of $\Gamma$, we obtain
88: an auxiliary set of parallel transported wavefunctions $\tilde{u}_{nk}$:
89: \begin{equation}
90: \vert \tilde{u}_{nk} \rangle = \sum^N_m M^{\star}_{mn} \vert u^{||}_{mk} \rangle
91: \label{diagonalspace}
92: \end{equation}
93: where $ \gamma_n \delta_{m n} = (M^{\dagger} \Gamma M)_{m n} $. The resulting wave functions
94: $\left\{|\tilde{u}_{nk}\rangle\right\}$ are independent of the choice of $k_0$
95: and satisfy:
96: $\langle \tilde{u}_{mk_0}|\exp{\left(i\frac{2\pi x}{a}\right)}|\tilde{u}_{n(k_0+2\pi/a)}\rangle
97: =\exp{\left(i\gamma_n\right)}\delta_{mn}$ where $\gamma_n$ is the $n$-th eigen value
98: of $\Gamma$ and $\gamma_n\frac{a}{2\pi}=<x>_n$.
99: %================FIGURE====================================================================
100: \begin{figure}[b]
101: \centering
102: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{figure_1.ps}
103: \caption{(A) WF constructed using (\ref{finaleqni}), for the lowest
104: non-degenerate band (n=1) in case of 1D insulator modeled with:
105: Gaussian centro-symmetric potential (solid line)
106: with $ c=-10, b=0.3$ and asymmetric potential (dashed line) with
107: $ d_1=-0.3, d_2=-0.2, c_1=-5.0, -c_2=-3.0$, both with $ a=1.0 $.
108: (B) and (C) shows decay of WF and E(R) respectively for the Gaussian centro-symmetric potential.
109: The power law exponents appear as the coefficients of ln(x) and ln(R) in (B) and (C) respectively
110: (all in atomic units).}
111: \label{HeVanderbilt}
112: \end{figure}
113: %==========================================================================================
114: %=========TABLE================================== T A B L E ================================
115: \begin{table}[t]
116: \caption{Polarization $<x>$ and squared localization length $\ell^2$ calculated for a
117: single isolated band $(n=1)$ for different potentials:
118: (1) Gaussian potential with $c=-10.0, d=0.3 $;
119: and (2) asymmetric potential with $d_1=-0.3, d_2=-0.2, c_1=-5.0, -c_2=-3.0$ both with $a=1.0$
120: (all in atomic units).}
121: %\begin{center}
122: \begin{tabular*}{3.4in}{c@{\extracolsep{\fill}}c@{\extracolsep{\fill}}c@{\extracolsep{\fill}}
123: c@{\extracolsep{\fill}}c@{\extracolsep{\fill}}}
124: \hline
125: \hline
126: V(x) & $<x>$ & $\ell^2_{WF}$ & $\ell^2_{LR}$ & $\ell^2_{BF}$ \\
127: \hline
128: (1) & $ 0.0 $ & $ 0.305 $ & $ 0.305 $ & $ 0.305 $ \\
129: %\hline
130: (2) & $ 0.288 $ & $ 0.484 $ & $ 0.484 $ & $ 0.484 $ \\
131: \hline
132: \hline
133: \end{tabular*}
134: %\end{center}
135: \label{LocLengthCompare}\\
136: \end{table}
137: %==========================================================================================
138: %================FIGURE====================================================================
139: \begin{figure*}[t]
140: \centering
141: \includegraphics[scale=0.26]{figure_2.ps}
142: \caption{Polyethylene: (a) Band structure,
143: (b) Transformed band structure of $\langle \tilde{u}_{nk}|H(k)| \tilde{u}_{nk}\rangle$,
144: (c) WF corresponding to C-H bond,
145: (d) WF corresponding to C-C bond. }
146: \label{polyethylene}
147: \end{figure*}
148: %==========================================================================================
149: %================FIGURE====================================================================
150: \begin{figure*}[t]
151: \centering
152: \includegraphics[scale=0.28]{figure_3.ps}
153: \caption{Polyacetylene: (a) Band structure,
154: (b) Transformed band structure of $\langle \tilde{u}_{nk}|H(k)| \tilde{u}_{nk}\rangle$,
155: (c) WF corresponding to C-C $ \sigma-$bond,
156: (d) WF corresponding to C-C $ \pi-$bond. In (c) and (d) the isosurfaces are prepared
157: using XCrysDen software\cite{xcrysden}.}
158: \label{polyacetylene}
159: \end{figure*}
160: %==========================================================================================
161: Wavefunctions $\left\{|\tilde{u}_{nk}\rangle\right\}$ are not periodic in $k$ with a period
162: $\frac{2\pi}{a}$ if $\gamma_n\not=0$.
163: A simple U(1) transformation can be used to derive $\left\{|v_{nk}\rangle\right\}$
164: that have the lattice periodicity in both reciprocal and real space:
165: \begin{equation}
166: |v_{nk}\rangle = \exp \left\{-ik\left(\frac{\gamma_n a}{2\pi}\right)\right\}|\tilde{u}_{nk}\rangle
167: \label{Solution2}
168: \end{equation}
169:
170: %================FIGURE====================================================================
171: \begin{figure}[b]
172: \centering
173: \includegraphics[scale=0.67]{figure_4.ps}
174: \caption{Decay of WF for metal with half filled band
175: modeled by a centro-symmetric potential at T=0K:
176: $ d1=0.25, c1=-5.0, d2=0, c2=0 $ with $ a=1.0 $ ( all in atomic units ).}
177: \label{metalWanDecay}
178: \end{figure}
179: %==========================================================================================
180: In terms of parallel transported wave functions,
181: $|v_{nk}\rangle = \sum_m U_{nm,k}|u^{||}_{mk}\rangle$,
182: where
183: \begin{equation}
184: U_{nm,k} =\exp \left\{-ik\left(\frac{\gamma_n a}{2\pi}\right)\right\} M^{\star}_{mn}
185: \label{nettransformation}
186: \end{equation}
187:
188: In the frame-work of differential geometry\cite{SBh} the transformation $U_{nm,k}$
189: projects the \{$|u^{||}_{mk}\rangle$ \} in the ray space onto \{$|v_{nk}\rangle$ \}
190: in the physical space. Each function $|v_{nk}\rangle$ is periodic and continuous in
191: $k-$space and can be Fourier transformed to obtain the WF $W_n(x, R)$:
192: \begin{eqnarray}
193: |W_n(x,R)\rangle&=&\sum_{k} e^{ik(x-R)} |v_{nk}\rangle \nonumber \\
194: &=&\sum_{k,r} e^{ik(x-R)} C_{nr} |u_{rk}\rangle
195: \label{finaleqni}
196: \end{eqnarray}
197: where $\left\{|u_{rk}\rangle\right\}$ are the energy eigenfunctions obtained from
198: diagonalization and $C_{nr}=\langle v_{nk}|u_{rk}\rangle$.
199: Eqn (\ref{finaleqni}) is the main formal result of this paper that gives WF
200: in the general case of composite bands for systems that are periodic in one dimension.
201: Using Eqn (\ref{paralleltrnpt}) and (\ref{nettransformation}), these WFs
202: can be shown to have two important properties (in addition to being orthonormal):
203: \begin{eqnarray}
204: 1.& &\int x W^{\star}_n(x,0)W_n(x,0) dx = \gamma_n \nonumber\\
205: 2.& &\ell^2_{WF,n} = \int x^2 W^{\star}_n(x,0)W_n(x,0) dx - \gamma_n^2
206: \label{omega}
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: squared localization length $\ell^2_{WF,n}$ is independent
209: of phase factors accompanying the energy eigenfunctions and can be shown to be
210: equal to the one obtained using linear response\cite{viethen, Waghmare}.
211: Thus, these WFs are the same as maximally localized Wannier
212: functions\cite{MV} in 1-dimension.
213: A general form of $U(1)$ transformation in Eqn (\ref{Solution2}) is
214: $\exp \left\{-ik\left(\frac{\gamma_n a}{2\pi}\right)-i k.La-i g(k)\right\}$,
215: where $L$ is an integer and $g(k)$ a periodic function of k.
216: It is readily shown that the term $k.La$ in the exponent alters\cite{KSV} $<x>_n$
217: by $La$ but keeps $\ell^2_{WF,n}$ unchanged.
218: On the other hand, the term $g(k)$ keeps $<x>_n$ unchanged, but increases $\ell^2_{WF,n}$.
219:
220: We propose a generalization of expression (\ref{finaleqni}) to metals by
221: including the Fermi-Dirac distribution factor $f(E_{nk},T)$:
222: \begin{equation}
223: |W^T_n(x,R)\rangle=\sum_{k,r} e^{ik(x-R)} C_{nr}\left[f(E_{rk},T)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}
224: |u_{rk}\rangle
225: \label{finaleqn}
226: \end{equation}
227: These generalized WFs do not form an orthonormal set in general, but yield the same form
228: of density matrix for metals as that for insulators:
229: $$\rho^T(x,x')=\sum_{nR}W^{T \star}_n(x,R)W^T_n(x',R).$$
230: Secondly, they can be shown to have infinite localization length in the case of partially
231: filled bands, arising from the discontinuity in $f(E_{nk},T)$ at the Fermi energy\cite{BeigiArias}.
232:
233: We first use above formalism to construct WFs for an isolated single band
234: in 1D model insulator and metal (partially filled band). We consider two
235: generic types of model potentials:
236: (1) Gaussian centro-symmetric potential:
237: $ V(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{c}{d\sqrt{2\pi}}exp[-\left(x-na\right)^2/d^2] $, which was used
238: by He and Vanderbilt\cite{HeVanderbilt} in analysis of spatial decay of WFs
239: and is used to benchmark our calculation, and (2) general asymmetric potential:
240: $V(x)=c_1\left[1+\cos\left\{2\pi(x+d_1)/a\right\}\right]+c_2\left[1+\cos\left\{4\pi(x+d_2)/a
241: \right\}\right]$, which we use to test the universality\cite{HeVanderbilt} of decay exponents
242: of WFs. Fig.\ref{HeVanderbilt}(A) shows WFs constructed using our formalism for the two
243: potentials.
244:
245: We calculate the squared localization length $\ell^2_{n}$ using three different methods:
246: $\ell^2_{WF,n}$ using Eqn (\ref{omega}), $\ell^2_{LR,n}= \langle \frac{\partial u_{kn}}
247: {\partial k} \vert \frac{\partial u_{kn}}{\partial k} \rangle$ obtained using linear
248: response and
249: $\ell^2_{BF,n} =\frac{2}{\triangle k^2}\sum_{BZ} (1-Re\langle u^{||}_{n,k} | u^{||}
250: _{n,k+\triangle k}\rangle) \triangle k $, calculated from the parallel transported
251: Bloch functions.
252: As summarized in Table \ref{LocLengthCompare}, $\ell^2$ calculated using the three methods
253: for both the potentials studied here are identical within numerical errors.
254: As the $\ell^2_{LR,n}$ is known to be gauge invariant for a given subspace\cite{viethen},
255: and correspond to maximum localization, this numerically verifies maximal localization of the
256: WFs constructed using the present formalism for the two cases.
257:
258: We now compare the spatial decay behavior of the present WFs with the maximally
259: localized WFs\cite{MV} which exhibit a power law decay\cite{HeVanderbilt}
260: in addition to the exponential one\cite{Kohn}: $ W_n(x)\approx x^{-3/4}e^{hx} $,
261: where $ h $ is defined from the $k-$ point $ \pi/a+i h $ at which $E_0=E_1$ in the complex band structure.
262: Similarly $ E_n(R) $, defined as $ E_n(R)=\langle W_n(x,R) |{H}| W_n(x,0)\rangle $, decays as:
263: $ E(R)\approx x^{-3/2}e^{hR}$.
264: The power law decay exponents $ -3/4 $ for $ W_n(x,R) $ and $ -3/2 $ for $ E_n(R) $ are universal
265: numbers\cite{HeVanderbilt}. Calculating $ h $ from the complex band structure and
266: fitting these general decay forms to the WFs in this work, we find the same power law
267: exponents for both the model potentials considered.
268: Results for the centro-symmetric potential are shown in Fig.\ref{HeVanderbilt}(B) and (C).
269:
270: WF constructed using Eqn. (\ref{finaleqn}) for a partially filled band
271: ($T=0K$) is shown in Fig.\ref{metalWanDecay}. Form of the spatial decay of this WF
272: agrees with that of the density matrix ($\propto x^{-\eta}$) predicted analytically
273: by Beigi and Arias\cite{BeigiArias}. We observe that the
274: exponent $\eta$ is between 0.95 and 1 for any fraction of band filling at 0K. This means
275: the localization length of metals being infinity.
276:
277: We now illustrate the present method within first-principles density functional theory
278: in the general case of composite bands by constructing WFs for
279: two polymer chain molecules: polyethylene (PE) and polyacetylene (PA).
280: A unit cell of a polyethylene (polyacetylene) chain consists of 2[CH$_2$] (2[CH]) with twelve
281: (ten) valence electrons occupying the lowest six (five) bands. The unit cell considered is large
282: enough in the transverse directions to minimize the interaction between the periodic images of the chain.
283: We use standard density functional theory code\cite{castep} to carry out these calculations. We used
284: 100 Runge-Kutta steps in the parallel transport and 20 $k-$points in the Fourier transform (Eqn (\ref{finaleqni})) to obtain WFs.
285:
286: The electronic structure of PE [Fig.\ref{polyethylene}(a)] apparently groups into two non-crossing sets of
287: bands (the lowest two and the rest). Interestingly, unitary matrix $ M $ we determined from the
288: geometric phases mixes bands from these groups. We use $M$ to transform the $u_{nk}$ to $\tilde{u}_{nk}$,
289: and plot a transformed band structure [Fig.\ref{polyethylene}(b)] with expectation values of energy
290: of $\tilde{u}_{nk}$.
291: We find two distinct bands: (1) the lower one with double degeneracy corresponding to C-C bonds and
292: (2) the upper one with quadruple degeneracy corresponding to C-H bonds.
293: In Table \ref{polyethdata} we summarize $<\vec{r}>$ and $\ell^2$ values for the six WFs
294: in two groups corresponding to the two transformed bands (1) and (2).
295: \iffalse
296: We find two distinct bands, lower one with double degeneracy corresponding to C-C bonds and
297: upper one with quadruple degeneracy corresponding to C-H bonds.
298: We summarize
299: $<\vec{r}>$ and $\ell^2$ values for the six WFs in Table \ref{polyethdata}.
300: \fi
301: The average squared localization length $ \bar{\ell}^2_{WF}=(1/N)\sum^N_n \ell^2_{WF,n} $ is 0.23 $\AA^2$ and
302: agrees well with linear response calculation $\bar{\ell}^2_{LR}$ of value 0.23 $\AA^2$ indicating
303: maximal localization. Contour-plots of the two WFs are shown in
304: Fig.\ref{polyethylene}(c,d)
305: %=========TABLE================================== T A B L E ================================
306: \begin{table}[t]
307: \caption{Polarization $<\vec{r}>$ and squared localization length $\ell^2_{WF}$ of polyethylene
308: WFs (all lengths are in \AA).}
309: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc} \hline
310: \hline
311: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Bond} & \multicolumn{9}{c}{$<\vec{r}>$}
312: & \multicolumn{1} {c} {$\ell^2_{WF}$} \\ \hline
313: C-C& &(0.0,0.0,0.0)& & &(1.25.0,0.0)& & & & &0.24 \\
314: C-H& &($\mp$0.63,0.53,$\pm$0.91)& & &($\pm$0.63,-0.53,$\mp$0.73)& & & & &0.23 \\
315: \hline
316: \hline
317: %\multicolumn{11}{c}{All lengths are in \AA }
318: \end{tabular}
319: %\end{center}
320: \label{polyethdata}
321: \end{table}
322: %==========================================================================================
323:
324: Similarly, electronic structure of PA (Fig.\ref{polyacetylene}(a)) yields
325: the transformed band structure (Fig.\ref{polyacetylene}(b)) consisting of
326: four isolated bands: two of them (lowest in energy) are almost degenerate corresponding to the two C-C
327: $\sigma$-bonds of slightly different lengths. The one in the middle is doubly degenerate and corresponds to
328: the two C-H bonds and the one highest in energy corresponds to the C-C $ \pi$-bond.
329: Fig.\ref{polyacetylene}(c,d) shows isosurfaces of WFs describing C-C $\sigma$ bond
330: ($\ell^2_{WF}=0.22\AA^2$) and C-C $\pi$ bond ($\ell^2_{WF}=2.95\AA^2$) in polyacetylene.
331: An order of magnitude higher $\ell^2_{WF}$ of C-C $\pi$ bonds than the others
332: makes $\pi$-conjugated systems particularly interesting for transport properties.
333:
334: While the logic behind the present formalism is the construction of simple continuous and periodic
335: functions from parallel transported Bloch functions, the resulting WFs in 1-D are maximally
336: localized. Its generalization to higher dimensions is natural when the geometric phases $\Gamma_{\alpha}$
337: for paths along different directions in the Brillouin zone commute. In most cases, however,
338: the $\Gamma_{\alpha}$'s do not commute (corresponding to nontrivial phases for closed paths within the
339: Brillouin zone) implying the WFs can not be perfectly localized in all the
340: three directions simultaneously.
341:
342: In conclusion, we have presented a formal expression for WFs of 1-d Bloch
343: electrons and a first-principles method for their construction through calculation of geometric phase matrices $\Gamma$.
344: It can be readily implemented in any DFT code that includes linear response. It naturally identifies
345: the groups of bands that make up WFs (or bonds) through the eigenvectors of the
346: $\Gamma$ and their polarization through eigenvalues of $\Gamma$. The method should be very useful in
347: studies of 1-D periodic systems in nano-science.
348:
349: \acknowledgements
350: UVW thanks Karin M. Rabe for many useful discussions.
351: We also thank G. Baskaran, J. Samuel and Ayan Datta for stimulating discussions.
352: JB thanks CSIR, India for a research fellowship.
353: This work was supported by the J Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, funded
354: by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.
355: %==================== REFERENCES =========================================================
356: \begin{references}
357: \bibitem{Wan} G. Wannier, Phys. Rev. {\bf 52}, 191 (1937).
358: \bibitem{kohn73} W. Kohn and J. R. Onffroy, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 8}, 2485 (1973).
359: \bibitem{descloizeux} J. Des Cloizeux, Phys. Rev. {\bf 129}, 554 (1963)
360: \bibitem{Zak89} J. Zak, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 62}, 2747 (1989)
361: \bibitem{rabe95} K. M. Rabe and U. V. Waghmare, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 52}, 13236 (1995).
362: \bibitem{ole} E. Pavarini, I. Dasgupta, T. Saha-Dasgupta, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 047003 (2001)
363: \bibitem{galli}G. Galli and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 69}, 3574 (1992).
364: \bibitem{goedecker} S. Geodecker and L. Colombo, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 73}, 122 (1994).
365: \bibitem{berry} M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A {\bf 329}, 45 (1994)
366: \bibitem{Zak} J. Zak, Europhys. Lett. {\bf 9}, (7), pp. 615-620 (1989)
367: \bibitem{KSV} R.D.~King-Smith and David.~Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 47}, 1651 (1992).
368: \bibitem{Resta} R. Resta, \emph{Berry Phase in Electronic Wave functions}, available at:\\
369: http://ale2ts.ts.infm.it:6163/\char126resta/publ/notes\_trois.ps.gz.
370: \bibitem{MV} N.~Marzari and D.~Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 12 847 (1997).
371: \bibitem{BGT} S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, and A. Testa, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 59}, 2662 (1987).
372: \bibitem{GAT} X. Gonze, D. C. Allan, and M. P. Teter, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 68}, 3603 (1992)
373: \bibitem{recipes} W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery,
374: \emph{Numerical Recipes} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1986/1992)
375: \bibitem{WilZee} F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 52}, 2111 (1984)
376: \bibitem{xcrysden}A. Kokalj, XCrySDen -- a new program for displaying
377: crystalline structures and electron densities, J. Mol. Graphics Modelling, {\bf 17}, 176 (1999).
378: \bibitem{SBh} J. Samuel and R. Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 60}, 2331 (1988).
379: \bibitem{viethen} M.Viethen, X. Gonze, and Ph. Gosez, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 66}, (2002).
380: \bibitem{Waghmare} U. V. Waghmare , N. A. Spaldin, H. C. Kandpal, and R. Seshadri, Phys. Rev. B,
381: {\bf 67}, 125111 (2003).
382: \bibitem{BeigiArias} S. Ismail-Beigi and T. A. Arias, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 2127 (1999).
383: \bibitem{HeVanderbilt} L. He and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 5341 (2001).
384: \bibitem{Kohn} W.~Kohn, Phys. Rev. {\bf 115}, 809 (1959).
385: \bibitem{castep} CASTEP 2.1, M. C. Payne, X. Weng, B. Hammer, G. Francis, I. Stich, U.
386: Bertram, A. de Vita, J. S. Lin, A. Qteish and V. Milman, Cavendish Laboratory, University
387: of Cambridge; LRESP, U. V. Waghmare, V. Milman and K. M. Rabe.
388: \end{references}
389: \end{document}
390:
391: