1: %
2: \documentclass[prl,aps,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: % \documentclass[prl,aps]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{dcolumn}
6: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
7: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
8: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
9: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
10: \newcommand{\nn}{ \nonumber}
11: \newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
12: \begin{document}
13: \topmargin=-20mm
14: % \Large
15:
16:
17:
18: \title {Local Geometry of the Fermi Surface and Quantum Oscillations in the Linear Response of Metals }
19:
20: \author{ Natalya A. Zimbovskaya}
21:
22: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Asronomy, St. Cloud State University, St. CLoud, MN 56301, USA, and Department of Physics and Electronics, University of Puerto Rico at Humacao, PR 00791}
23:
24: \begin{abstract} %1
25: In this paper we present a theoretical analysis of the
26: effect of anomalies of the Fermi surface (FS) curvature on
27: oscillations in the electron density of states (DOS) in
28: strong magnetic fields. It is shown that the oscillations
29: could be significantly weakened when the FS curvature
30: takes on zero or extremely large values or diverges in the
31: vicinities of some extremal cross-sections. This
32: leads to a characteristic dependence of the oscillations
33: magnitude on the direction of the magnetic field which is
34: studied. The results of these general studies are employed
35: to analyze the effects of the FS curvature anomalies on the
36: quantum oscillations in the velocity of sound waves
37: travelling in metals.
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40:
41: \pacs{71.18.+y, 71.20-b, 72.55+s}
42: \date{\today}
43: \maketitle
44:
45: \section{1. Introduction}
46:
47:
48: Experimental data concerning quantum oscillations in various
49: observables in metals under strong magnetic fields were
50: repeatedly used in studies of their electron characteristics
51: \cite{1}.
52: It is known that the electron response of a metal to an
53: external disturbance depends on the geometry of the FS.
54: The Fermi surfaces of metals are mostly complex in
55: shape and this can essentially influence observables.
56: At present those
57: phenomena which are determined by the main geometric
58: characteristics of the FS's, i.e. their connectivity, are
59: well studied. However those effects which appear due to
60: some fine geometrical features of the FSs such as nearly cylindrical segments or points of flattening have not been investigated in detail so
61: far. Meanwhile these elements in the FS geometry
62: can noticeably affect the electron response of
63: metal.
64:
65:
66: When the FS includes points and/or lines where its curvature turns zero, this it leads to an enhancement of the contribution from the neighborhood of these points/lines to the electron density of states (DOS) on the
67: FS. Usually this enhanced contribution is small compared to
68: the main term in the DOS which originates from the
69: remaining major part of the FS. Therefore it cannot produce
70: noticeable changes in the response of the metal when all
71: segments of the FS contribute to the response functions
72: essentially equally.
73: However, some effects (including those originating from
74: quantum oscillations in the electron DOS) are determined
75: with small ``effective" segments of the FS. The
76: contribution to the DOS
77: from the vicinities of the points and lines of zero curvature can be
78: congruent to the contribution of an ``effective''
79: segment. In other words, when the curvature of the surface
80: becomes zero at some part on an ``effective'' segment of
81: the FS, it can give a sensible enhancement of efficient
82: electrons and, in consequence, a pronounced change in the
83: response of the metal to the disturbance.
84:
85:
86: It has been shown that when the FS includes points or lines
87: where at least one of the principal radii of curvature
88: becomes infinitely large, then
89: changes may be observed in the frequency and temperature
90: dependences of sound dispersion and absorption \cite{2,3,4,5,6}, and in the frequency dependence of the
91: surface impedance of a conventional metal under anomalous skin effect \cite{7,8}. Likewise, the flattening points at the FS may give rise to some anomalies in the magnetoacoustic response of a two-dimensional electron gas, as shown in the papers \cite{9,10}.
92:
93: In the present work we concentrate on quantum oscillations in observables in metals which originate from the DOS oscillations in strong magnetic fields. The oscillating term in the DOS is formed by the neighborhoods of the FS cross-sections with extremal areas. Usually, the latter are narrow strips on the FS. Therefore the FS curvature anomalies at these strips may significantly affect their contributions to the DOS quantum oscillations. Consequently, the effect of the FS local geometry can be revealed in oscillations of various observables in metalls, such as magnetization, magnetic susceptibility, resistivity, sound velocity and attenuation.
94: Qualitative anomalies of the de-Haas-van Alphen oscillations associated with cylindrical pieces of the FSs were considered before in Refs. \cite{11,12,13}.
95: Also, it was shown that nearly cylindrical pieces inserted in the FS could cause noticeable softening of some acoustic modes near the peaks of the DOS quantum oscillations (see Refs. \cite{14,15}).
96:
97:
98: Along with the points and lines of zero curvature there can
99: exist points and lines, where the FS curvature diverges.
100: A simple illustration is a kink line on a
101: surface where the electron velocity is discontinuous.
102: If the FS inserts such lines, then the effective
103: belts could be missed for appropriate directions of
104: propagation of electromagnetic or sound waves, which brings
105: anomalies in high-frequency properties of the metal. It is
106: shown \cite{16,17} that under these conditions
107: electromagnetic waves of some special kind can propagate in
108: metals. The lines of a singular (infinite) curvature can be arranged on edges of narrow lenses or needle-shaped cavities, which are elements of the FSs of some metals. However, it could
109: happen that the FS curvature diverges at some points where the velocity of electrons varies continuously
110: as discussed below.
111:
112: A characteristic feature of quantum oscillations attributed
113: to the extremal cross sections of anomalous curvature is a
114: clearly manifested dependence of their amplitude on the
115: direction of an external magnetic field $\bf B$. The effect
116: could be revealed only for certain directions,
117: when the effective cross-section runs along that part
118: of the FS where the curvature turns zero or
119: diverges. When the magnetic field is tilted away from such
120: direction by an angle $ \Phi $ the effective cross section slips from the ``anomalous" segment of the FS. This brings sensible changes in the oscillations magnitude. This is typical for all effects arising due to local peculiarities in the FS geometry. For instance, angular dependence of the amplitudes of magnetoacoustic commensurability oscillations in a two-dimensional electron system was discussed in Ref \cite{10}. In the present work we analyze angular dependencies
121: of quantum oscillations magnitudes for different kinds of
122: local anomalies of the FS curvature.
123: The results could be employed to analyze manifestations of the FS local geometry in quantum oscillations of various characteristics in metals. As an example, we briefly consider the effect of the FS curvature anomalies on quantum oscillations in the velocity of an ultrasonic wave propagating in a metal. To avoid further prolixities in this work, other applications are not included. These applications are to be discussed elsewhere.
124:
125: \section{2. The model}
126:
127: The concept of a zero curvature line (nearly cylindrical cross-section) on the FS does not require further explanation. On the contrary, the concept of the line where the FS curvature diverges needs clarification. Before introducing the FS model used in the following analysis, we present a simple illustration to clear this concept.
128:
129:
130: It is known that FSs of cadmium and zinc (both metals have a hcp crystalline structure) include an axially symmetric electron lens. The lens is located at the center of third Brillouin zone, with its axis running along the [0001] direction. We can roughly reproduce this lens using the Harrison method of construction of free electron FSs. Assuming that ``z" axis of the coordinate system is directed along the axis of symmetry, we arrive at the following energy-momentum
131: relation for electrons associated with the lens:
132: \be %f1
133: E({\bf p}) = \frac{{\bf p}^2_\perp}{2m} +
134: \frac{p^2_m}{2m} \left (sgn (x) \cdot x + \frac{hG}{2 p_m}
135: \right )^2 .
136: \ee
137: Here, $\bf p_\perp $ and $ p_z$ are the electron
138: quasimomentum components across and along the symmetry axis,
139: respectively: $ m $ is the electron effective mass; $ x =
140: p_z / p_m $ where $ p_m$ is the maximum value of the
141: quasimomentum along the "z" axis; and $ {\bf G } = (0,0,G)
142: $ is the corresponding reciprocal lattice vector.
143:
144:
145: The lens described with (1) has a kink line running
146: along its edge. However, this curvature anomaly appears
147: owing to our free electron approximation. In actual metals
148: we can expect it to be smoothed by means of crystalline
149: fields. To better reproduce the shape of the lens near the
150: edge we start from the standard asymptotic for the sign
151: function which is valid for $ |x| < 1, $ namely:
152: \be %f2
153: sgn (x) = \lim_{l \to \infty} f (x,l) \equiv \lim_{l \to \infty} |x|^{1/l + 1}/x.
154: \ee
155: To proceed we use the approximation $ sgn (x) \approx
156: f (x,l). $ Substituting this approximation into (1) we see
157: that now the velocity of the electrons belonging to the lens
158: varies continuously, and its longitudinal component reduces
159: to zero at the central cross-section $ (p_z = 0 )$. Keeping
160: only the greatest terms, we can write the following
161: expression for the cross-sectional area near the central
162: cross-section:
163: \be %f3
164: A(x) = A_{ex}(1 - b^2 |x|^{2k} ).
165: \ee
166: Here, $A_{ex} $ is the central cross-sectional area,
167: $b^2$ is a dimensionless positive constant, and $ k =
168: \frac{1}{2} (1 + 1/l). $ The lens curvature near the
169: central cross-section could be approximated as follows:
170: \be %f4
171: K(x) \approx - \frac{1}{2 p_m^2 A_{ex}}
172: \frac{d^2 A}{dx^2} \sim \frac{|x|^{2k-2}}{p_m^2}.
173: \ee
174: Since $ k < 1, $ the curvature tends to infinity when
175: $ p_z $ tends to zero although these is no break in the
176: longitudinal velocity at $ p_z = 0 $, as shown in the Fig. 1. This means that the central cross-section of our FS is not a kink line, and the effective strip still exists here. However, there could be a considerable decrease in the number of electrons associated with the vicinity of this cross-section. It can influence some properties of the metal including quantum oscillations.
177: Actually, there exists a piece of experimental evidence for
178: the curvature anomaly at the edge of the electron lens in
179: cadmium. A resonance feature at the cyclotron frequency was
180: observed in the surface impedance derivative when the
181: magnetic field was directed along the [0001] axis \cite{18}.
182: This resonance originates from the contribution of the
183: electrons associated with the edge of the lens, and it could
184: be explained assuming that the lens curvature diverges
185: there \cite{19}.
186:
187: \begin{figure}[t] % fig.1a,b,c,d
188: \begin{center}
189: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm,height=8cm]{m2_1c.eps}
190: %[width=5.0cm,height=6.6cm]{M1.eps}%{g2.eps}
191: \caption{
192: Curvature anomalies at axially symmetric Fermi surface. Top panels: Plots of $v_z $ versus $ p_z $ (left panel) and $ K $ versus $p_z $ (right panel) in the vicinity of the extremal cross-section at $ p_z = 0 $ where the FS curvature $ K $ diverges. The curves are plotted according to Eqs.(4) and (5) for $ m_\perp = m_{||}; \ k = 3/4, 5/6, 1 $ from the top to the bottom. Bottom panels: Plots of $ v_z $ versus $ p_z $ (left panel) and $ K $ versus $ p_z $ (right panel) in the vicinity of the nearly cylindrical cross-section at $ p_z = 0. $ The curves are plotted for $ m_\perp = m_{||}; \ k = 1, 9/8, 4/3 $ from the top to the bottom.
193: }
194: \label{rateI}
195: \end{center}
196: \end{figure}
197:
198:
199:
200:
201: In further calculations we use a simple
202: model of a closed simply connected and axially symmetric FS
203: which has a unique extremal cross section for any
204: direction of the external magnetic field.
205: Such FS could be described with the energy-momentum relation:
206: \be %f5
207: E {\bf (p)} = \frac{{\bf p}_\perp^2}{2 m_\perp} + \frac{p_m^2}{2m_{||}} |x|^{2k} .
208: \ee
209: When $ k = 1, $ Eq.(5) corresponds to the ellipsoidal FS. In this case $ m_\perp, m_{||} $ are the principal values of the effective mass tensor. As previously, the cross-sectional area of the FS near its central cross-section is described with the expression (3), where $ b^2 = 1. $ It follows from (4) that at $ \Phi = 0 $ (the magnetic field is directed along the symmetry axis), the chosen FS is nearly cylindrical in the vicinity of the central cross-section when $ k > 1. $ However, for $ 1/2 < k < 1 $ the FS curvature diverges here. Suppose that the magnetic field $ \bf B $ deviates from the symmetry axis by the angle $ \Phi. $ Then the expression for the cross-sectional area changes. After some straightforward calculations we arrive at the result:
210: \bea% f6,7
211: A(x) &=&A_{ex}(1 - a^2x^2 - b^2x^{2k}); \nn\\
212: \qquad k &>& 1/2.
213: \eea %
214: Here, $ a^2 , b^2 $ and $ A_{ex} $ are functions of the angle $\Phi $ between the magnetic field and the FS
215: symmetry axis, $ a^2(0) = 0, $ and it increases whereas $\Phi $ enhances. When the angle takes on a certain value $ \Phi_0 , \ a^2 (\Phi)$ becomes greater than $ b^2 (\Phi), $ and
216: stays likewise when $ \Phi $ further increases.
217:
218: \section
219: {3. The effect of the Fermi surface curvature anomalies on the quantum oscillations in the electronic density of states}
220:
221: For FSs with a single extremal cross-section the electron DOS is given by:
222: % f7,10,5
223: \be
224: N_\zeta \equiv - \sum_\nu \frac{d f_\nu}{\partial E_\nu}
225: = g(1 + \Delta).
226: \ee
227: Here, $ f_\nu $ is the Fermi distribution function for
228: quasiparticles with energies $ E_\nu; \ g $ is the value of
229: the electron DOS in the absence of the magnetic field, and
230: the oscillating function $\Delta$ is described by
231: the expression
232: % f8,11,6
233: \be
234: \Delta = \sum\limits_{r=1}^\infty (-1)^r \psi_r(\theta)
235: \cos\left[\pi r\frac{m_{\perp }}{m} \right]
236: %$$$$ \times
237: \int_0^1
238: \cos\left[\frac{rcA(x)}{\hbar|e|B}\right]dx,
239: \ee
240: where $\ds \psi (\theta)= {r \theta}/{\sinh r \theta};
241: \ \theta = {2 \pi^2 T}/{\hbar \Omega}; \, \ \hbar
242: \Omega $ is the cyclotron quantum; $T$ is the temperature
243: expressed in energy units.
244:
245: Substituting (6) into (8), we obtain
246: % f9,12
247: \bea
248: \Delta &=& \sum\limits_{r=1}^\infty (-1)^r \psi_r(\theta)
249: \cos\left(\pi r\frac{m_\perp}{m}\right)
250: \nn \\ & \times &
251: \big[\cos(\pi r\gamma^2)U_r(\Phi) +
252: \sin(\pi r\gamma^2)W_r(\Phi) \big].
253: \eea
254: Here,
255: \bea % f10,13
256: U_r(\Phi) &=& \int_0^1\cos \left [\pi r\gamma^2
257: (a^2x^2 + b^2 x^{2k})\right]dx,
258: \\ %\ee
259: % f11,14
260: %\be
261: W_r(\Phi) &=& \int_0^1\sin \left [\pi r\gamma^2
262: (a^2x^2 + b^2 x^{2k}) \right]dx .
263: \eea
264: In further analysis we assume that the number of
265: Landau levels under the FS is large, and the
266: parameter $\ds \gamma^2 = 2 \zeta/\hbar \Omega \ (\zeta $ is
267: the chemical potential of electrons) takes values much
268: larger than unity. So, we can derive asymptotic expressions
269: for the integrals (10), (11) using the stationary phase method.
270:
271:
272: The principal terms in the expansions of these integrals
273: in powers of the small parameter $\gamma^{-1} $ are
274: easily obtained in two limiting cases: $ a^2 \ll b^2$ and
275: $ a^2 \gg b^2. $ The first inequality is satisfied for small
276: values of the angle between the magnetic field and symmetry
277: axis, when the extremal cross-section of the FS
278: nearly coincides with the line of anomalous curvature.
279: The asymptotic expression for the oscillating function
280: $ \Delta $ has the form
281: % f12,15,11
282: \be
283: \Delta = \frac{\eta_k}{\gamma^{1/k}}
284: \sum\limits_{r=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^r}{r^{1/2k}}
285: \psi_r(\theta)
286: \cos\left[\frac{rcA_{ex}}{\hbar|e|B} - \frac{\pi}{4k}\right]
287: \cos\left[\pi r\frac{m_\perp}{m}\right],
288: \ee
289: where
290: $$
291: \eta_k = \frac{\Gamma(1/2k)}{2k(b\sqrt\pi)^{1/k}} \frac{m_\perp p_m}{\pi^2 \hbar^3 g}.
292: $$
293: \begin{figure}[t]
294: \begin{center}
295: \includegraphics[width=8.4cm,height=4.2cm]{m2a_2a.eps}
296: %[width=5.0cm,height=6.6cm]{M1.eps}%{g2.eps}
297: \caption{
298: Effect of the FS curvature on the temperature dependence of quantum oscillation amplitudes at moderately low temperatures $ (\theta \sim 1) .$ Left panel: nearly cylindrical cross-sections; $ k =4,2,1 $ from the top to the bottom. Right panel: cross-sections where the FS curvature diverges; $ k = 1,3/4,5/8 $ from the top to the bottom. Curves are plotted assuming $ m_{||} = m_\perp,\ \pi \gamma^2 = 10^3. $
299: }
300: \label{rateI}
301: \end{center}
302: \end{figure}
303:
304: In the opposite limit $ a^2 \gg b^2,$ which corresponds to
305: sufficiently large values of the angle $ \Phi $,
306: the principal term in the expansion of $ \Delta $ in powers
307: of $\gamma^{-1} $ equals:
308: % f13,16,12
309: \be
310: \Delta = \frac{1}{\gamma}
311: \sum\limits_{r=1}^\infty
312: \frac{(-1)^r}{\sqrt r} \psi_r(\theta)
313: \cos\left[\frac{rcA_{ex}}{\hbar|e|B} - \frac{\pi}{4}\right]
314: \cos\left[\pi r\frac{m_\perp}{m}\right].
315: \ee
316: So, in this case, the function $\Delta$ describes ordinary
317: oscillations of the electron density of states in a
318: quantizing magnetic field.
319:
320: It is well known that amplitudes of quantum oscillations depend on temperature. Ordinary quantum oscillations of the electron DOS described by the Eq. (13) have the amplitude of the order of $ \gamma^{-1/2} \theta^{-1/2}. $ The amplitude of the oscillations related to the ``anomalous" cross-section given by (12) may be estimated as $ \gamma^{-1/k} \theta^{(1-2k)/2k}. $ Comparing these estimates, we see that the amplitude of oscillations associated with the extremal cros-section of zero/diverging curvature significantly differs from that of the usual quantum oscillations. The contribution from a nearly cylindrical cross-section can considerably exceed in amplitude contributions from usual cross-sections.
321: As well, the amplitude of DOS oscillations originating from a cross-section where the FS curvature diverges is smaller than that of the ordinary oscillations. Also, the fine geometrical structure of the FS near the extremal cross-sections may bring changes in the temperature dependence of the oscillations amplitude. As shown in the Fig. 2, the closer is the vicinity of an extremal cross-section to a cylinder, the more pronounced is the decrease in the oscillation amplitude while the temperature rises. Oscillations associated with a cross-section where the FS curvature diverges, exhibit weaker temperature dependence compared to ordinary quantum oscillations.
322:
323:
324:
325: Now we analyze the amplitude of oscillations within the intermediate range where $ a^2$ and $ b^2 $ have the same
326: order of magnitude. We present the integrals (10) and (11)
327: as expansions in powers of the parameter $ w \;(w = \pi
328: r \gamma^2a^2/(\pi r\gamma^2b^2)^{1/k}).$ In particular, the
329: expression for $ U_r $ in the case $ w < 1 $ has the form
330: \bea %f14,17,13
331: U_r(\omega) &=& \frac{(\pi r\gamma^2b^2)^{-1/2k}}{2k}
332: \sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!} w^n
333: \nn \\ &\times &
334: \Gamma\left(\frac{2n + 1}{2k} \right)
335: \cos\left[\pi\frac{n(1 - k)}{2k} + \frac{\pi}{4k}\right],
336: \eea
337: while for $ w > 1$ we arrive at the following expansion:
338: \bea % f15,18,14
339: U_r(\omega)&=& \frac{1}{2\pi a\gamma\sqrt r}
340: \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}w^{-nk}
341: \nn\\ &\times&
342: \Gamma\left( kn +\frac{1}{2}\right)
343: \cos\left[\pi\frac{n(k - 1)}{2} + \frac{\pi}{4}\right].
344: \eea
345: Expansions for $ W_r $ could be obtained from (14) and
346: (15) by replacing cosines with sines of the same arguments.
347:
348:
349: The results of computation of the oscillation
350: amplitude $ Y \ (Y = \sqrt{U^2 + W^2})$ as a function
351: of $ w, $ are presented in the Fig. 2.
352: Calculations were carried out assuming that $ \theta
353: \approx 1.$ Accordingly, only the first term was kept
354: in the sum over $ r $ included in (12). The dependence of $ Y $ on $ w $ calculated for $ k = 2$ and $ k = 4$ is shown in the left panel. In this case the central cross section of the FS for $\Phi = 0 $ is quasi-cylindrical. The oscillations amplitude takes on the
355: largest value when $ \Phi = 0 $ and decreases monotonically
356: as $ w $ increases. Both curves are asymptotically
357: approaching the straight line $Y = 1/\gamma $ when $ w \gg 1.
358: $ As expected, the amplitude variation is
359: much better pronounced for the curve 2. This curve is
360: plotted for the larger value
361: of the parameter $ k $ when the FS is closer to a
362: cylinder near its central cross-section.
363: In the right panel the behavior of the ampitude of quantum
364: oscillations of the DOS upon a variation of the angle $\Phi$ is
365: shown under the assumption that the FS curvature diverges
366: at the central cross-section at $\Phi = 0.$ The curves presented here are plotted for $k = 3/4$ and $k = 5/8.$
367: The second value of $k$ corresponds to a stronger anomaly in
368: the FS curvature at the extremal cross-section. For
369: $k = 5/8,$ the oscillation amplitude increases monotonically
370: with $w $ and tends to the value $1/\gamma.$ For a
371: less pronounced anomaly in the curvature
372: $(k = 3/4),$ the dependence of $Y$
373: on $w$ is nonmonotonic. However, in this case the
374: decrease in the value of $Y$ for small values of $ w $ is
375: replaced by its increase when $ w $ takes on greater values.
376:
377:
378:
379:
380: \begin{figure}[t]
381: \begin{center}
382: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=4.8cm]{m2a_2.eps}%{m2_5.eps}
383: %[width=5.0cm,height=6.6cm]{M1.eps}%{g2.eps}
384: \caption{
385: The amplitude of the electron DOS quantum oscillations as a function of the magnetic field orientation. Left panel: $k = 2$ (curve 1), $ k= 4$ (curve 2). Right panel: $ k = 3/4$ (curve 1), $k = 5/8$ (curve 2). The curves are plotted for $ \pi \gamma^2 = 10^3. $
386: }
387: \label{rateI}
388: \end{center}
389: \end{figure}
390:
391:
392: Now, we remark that two parameters characterizing the FS local geometry were used in the present work, and they both could be easily evaluated provided that we possess relevant experimental data. The angle $ \Phi_0 $ describing the width of the FS strip where the curvature anomalies are revealed is a directly measurable quantity, and the shape parameter $ k $ introduced in the Eqs. (3) and (5) could be estimated basing on the variation in the oscillations magnitude between its maximum/minimum $ (\Phi = 0) $ and plateau $ (\Phi \gg \Phi_0) $ values. The magnitudes of oscillations described by Eqs. (12),(13) have the order of $\gamma^{-1/k} \theta^{(1/2k)-1}, $ and $\gamma^{-1} \theta^{-1/2},$ respectively. So, the ratio of maximum/minimum and plateau magnitudes $ \rho $ takes on value: $\rho \sim \gamma^{1 - 1/k} \theta^{(1-k)/2k} $ which gives the following estimate for the shape parameter: $ k \approx \big (\frac{1}{2} \ln \theta - \ln \gamma \big )\big /\big (\frac{1}{2} \ln \theta - \ln \gamma + \ln \rho \big ). $
393:
394:
395: \section{4. An application: quantum oscillations in the ultrasound velocity}
396:
397:
398:
399: To make the presented results more specific we apply our analysis to study the
400: effects of the FS local geometry on the quantum oscillations
401: of the velocity of ultrasound waves travelling in a metal.
402: When an ultrasound wave propagates in a metal the crystalline
403: lattice is periodically deformed. It gives rise to electric
404: fields which influence the electrons. Besides, the
405: periodical deformations of the lattice cause changes in the
406: electronic spectrum. Here, we omit these deformation
407: corrections to simplify further analysis.
408:
409: The emergence of the electric field accompanying the lattice deformation,
410: leads to a redistribution of the electron density $ N .$ The
411: local change in the electronic density $ \delta N \bf (r) $
412: equals:
413: % f17,19,17
414: \be
415: \delta N ({\bf r}) = \frac{\partial N}{\partial \zeta}
416: e \varphi ({\bf r})
417: \equiv N_\zeta
418: e \varphi ({\bf r}) .
419: \ee
420: The relation (17) has to be complemented by the
421: condition of electrical neutrality of the system:
422: %f18,20,18
423: \be
424: \delta N ({\bf r}) -
425: e N {\mbox {div}} {\bf u} ({\bf r}) = 0 .
426: \ee
427:
428: We use these equations to express the
429: potential $ \varphi ({\bf r}) $ in terms of the lattice
430: displacement vector. As a result we derive the expression
431: for the electron force {\bf F}({\bf r}) acting upon the
432: lattice under its displacement by the vector
433: {\bf u}({\bf r}). For a longitudinal ultrasound wave
434: travelling along the magnetic field $ \bf B $ we obtain:
435: \be % f19,21,19
436: F {\bf (r)} = - \frac{N^2}{N_\zeta} {\bf b}_{0}
437: \Delta \bf u (r) .
438: \ee
439: Here, $ \bf b_0 $ is unit vector directed along the
440: field $ \bf B.$ More thorough analysis taking into account
441: deformation corrections to the electron energies does not
442: bring qualitative changes in the expression (19).
443: We arrive at the modified expression for the force
444: $ F \bf (r)$ simply multiplying (19) by a dimensionless
445: factor of the order of unity which could be treated as a
446: constant.
447:
448: Starting from (19) we obtain the well known result for the
449: oscillating correction $ \tilde s $ to the sound velocity
450: $ s:$
451: \be % f20,22,1
452: \frac{\tilde s}{s} = - \frac{N^2}{\rho s^2 g}
453: \sum_i \Delta_i
454: \ee
455: where
456: $ \rho $ is the metal density and
457: the summation is carried out over all extremal
458: cross-sections on the FS corresponding to the given direction
459: of the magnetic field. So, the above angular dependences of
460: magnitudes of quantum oscillations arising due to the local
461: geometry of the FS could be revealed in oscillations of the
462: velocity of ultrasound waves propagating in metals.
463:
464:
465: \section{5. Conclusion}
466:
467: In summary, we showed that when the FS of a metal inserts lines where its curvature turns zero or reveals discontinuity, this can significantly affect both amplitude and phase of electron DOS oscillations in strong (quantizing) magnetic fields. The effect arises due to increase/decrease of the relative number of electrons associated with the neighborhoods of these lines. It reveals itself at certain directions of the magnetic field, and disappears when the magnetic field is tilted away from such direction. This results in angular dependence of the DOS oscillation amplitudes. The latter could be observed in experiments on quantum oscillations in various characteristics of a metal such as magnetization, magnetic susceptibility and resisitivity, for all these oscillations arise due to the DOS quantum oscillations. Quantum oscillations in the sound velocity discussed in this work is a mere example of the effect of the FS curvature local anomalies on observables.
468:
469: The most obvious
470: materials where we can expect the FS curvature anomalies
471: to be manifested include layered
472: structures with metallic-type conductivity
473: (e.g. $\alpha-(BEDT-TTF)_2MHg(SCN)_4 $ group of organic
474: metals). Fermi surfaces of these materials are sets of
475: rippled cylinders, isolated or connected by links
476: \cite{20}. The angular dependence of the magnetic oscillations
477: magnitude resembling that shown in the Fig. 3 is well known
478: for such materials. The appearance of this effect shows that
479: the quasi-two-dimensional FSs of some organic metals include
480: segments with zero curvature. The effect was first analyzed
481: in \cite{21}, and further discussed in some later works (see e.g. \cite{20}).
482:
483: Local
484: geometry of the FSs of usual metals also can be displayed
485: in the angular dependences of magnitudes of quantum
486: oscllations.
487: For instance, there is an
488: experimental evidence that ``necks" connecting quasispherical
489: pieces of the FS of copper include nearly cylindrical belts
490: \cite{1}. When the magnetic field is directed along the
491: axis of a ``neck" (for instance, along the [111] direction in the quasimomenta space), the extremal cross section of the
492: ``neck" could be expected to run along the nearly cylindrical
493: strip where the FS curvature turns zero. It is also likely
494: that the FS of gold possesses the same geometrical features
495: for it closely resembles that of copper. As for possible
496: divergences of the FS curvature, experiments
497: of \cite{18} give grounds to conjecture that such
498: anomalies could be found on the FSs of cadmium and zink. It
499: is possible that the curvature is anomalously large at the
500: edge of the electron lens which is the part of the FSs in
501: both metals. For all above listed
502: substances we can expect the effect to be revealed at
503: reasonably low temperatures $ (\sim 1K)$ and reasonably
504: strong magnetic fields $ (1 \div 10 T),$ giving additional information on the FSs fine geometrical characteristics.
505:
506:
507:
508: \section{Acknowledgments}
509: I thank G.M. Zimbovsky for help with the manuscript. This work was supported in part by NSF Advance program SBE-0123654 and PR Space Grant NGTS/40091.
510:
511:
512:
513:
514: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
515: %\newpage
516:
517: \bibitem{1} D. Shoenberg, {\it Magnetic Oscillations in
518: Metals} (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984).
519:
520:
521: \bibitem{2} G.T. Avanesjan, M.I. Kaganov and T.Yu.
522: Lisovskaya, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 75}, 1786 (1978)
523: [Sov. Phys. JETP { \bf 48}, 900 (1978)].
524:
525: \bibitem{3} V.M. Kontorovich and N.A. Stepanova, Zh. Eksp.
526: Teor. Fiz. {\bf 76}, 642 (1979) [Sov. Phys. JETP { \bf 49},
527: 321 (1979)].
528:
529: \bibitem{4} I.M. Suslov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela {\bf 23}, 1652
530: (1981) [Sov. Phys. Solid State {\bf 23}, 1114 (1981)].
531:
532:
533: \bibitem{5} N.A. Zimbovskaya, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,
534: {\bf 107}, 1672 (1995) [JETP {\bf 80}, 932 (1995)].
535:
536: \bibitem{6} N.A. Zimbovskaya and J.L. Birman, J. Phys: Condens. Matter {\bf 12}, 3337 (2000).
537:
538:
539: \bibitem{7} M.I. Kaganov and Yu.V. Gribkova, Fiz. Nizk.
540: Temp. {\bf 17}, 907 (1991) [Sov. J. Low Themp. Phys. {\bf 17}, 473 (1991)].
541:
542: \bibitem{8} M.I. Kaganov and P. Kontreras, Zh. Eksp. Teor.
543: Phys. {\bf 106}, 1814 (1994) [JETP {\bf 79}, 360 (1994)].
544:
545: \bibitem{9} N.A. Zimbovskaya and J.L. Birman, Phys. Rev. B
546: {\bf 60}, 16762 (1999).
547:
548:
549: \bibitem{10} N.A. Zimbovskaya, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, {\bf 16}, 7353 (2004).
550:
551:
552: \bibitem{11} G. Lacueva and A.W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev.
553: B {\bf 46}, 1273 (1992).
554:
555:
556: \bibitem{12} Ya.M. Blanter, M.I. Kaganov, D.B.
557: Posvyanskii, Usp. Fiz. Nauk {\bf 165}, 213 (1995)
558: [Phys.-Usp. {\bf 165}, 178 (1995)].
559:
560:
561: \bibitem{13} N.A. Zimbovskaya, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. {\bf 21},
562: 286 (1995) [Low Temp. Phys. {\bf 21}, 217 (1995)].
563:
564: \bibitem{14} N.A. Zimbovskaya and J.L. Birman,
565: Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf 16}, 1767 (2002).
566:
567: \bibitem{15} N.A. Zimbovskaya, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 71}, 024109 (2005).
568:
569: \bibitem{16} V.G. Peschanskii, V.S. Lekhtzier and A.
570: Tada, Fiz. Met. and Metalloved {\bf 56}, 855 (1983)
571: [In Russian].
572:
573: \bibitem{17} V.G. Peschanskii, M. Dasanaeka and E.V.
574: Tzibulina, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. {\bf 11}, 297 (1985) [Sov. J.
575: Low Temp. Phys. {\bf 11}, 118 (1985)].
576:
577:
578: \bibitem{18} V.P. Naberezhnykh and N.K. Dan'shin,
579: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 56}, 1223 (1969) [Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 29}, 658 (1969)].
580:
581: \bibitem{19} N.A. Zimbovskaya, {\it Local Geometry of
582: Fermi Surface and High-Frequency Phenomena in Metals} (Springer, New York, 2001).
583:
584:
585: \bibitem{20} J. Wosnitza, {\it Fermi Surface of
586: Low-Dimensional Organic Metals and Superconductors}
587: (Springer, Berlin, 1996).
588:
589:
590: \bibitem{21} K. Yamaji, J. Phys. Soc. Jp. {\bf 58},
591: 1520 (1989).
592:
593:
594: \end{thebibliography}
595:
596: \end{document}
597:
598:
599: we consider a simple example. Suppose that the FS
600: corresponds to an energy-momentum relation:
601: \be % f1
602: E({\bf p}) = \frac{{\bf p}_\perp^2}{2 m_\perp} +
603: \frac{2}{3} p_m v_m |x|^{3/2} .
604: \ee
605: Here, $ \bf p_\perp $ is the component of the quasimomentum
606: across the symmetry axis; $ m_\perp $ is the transverse
607: effective mass of electrons; $ p_m, v_m $ are maximum values
608: of the electron quasimomentum and velocity components along
609: the symmetry axis; $ x = p_{||} / p_m.$
610: We see that velocity of electrons on the FS corresponding
611: to (1) varies continuously, and its longitudinal component
612: reduces to zero at the central cross-section $ (p_{||} = 0)
613: .$ The cross-sectional area for this surface is given by:
614:
615: \be % f2
616: A(x) = A_{ex} (1 - |x|^{3/2})
617: \ee
618:
619:
620: Suppose that the axis of symmetry of the FS coincides with
621: "z" axis of a chosen coordinate system. Then we can use the
622: following expression for the FS curvature:
623: \be % f3
624: K (x) = \frac{\ds m_\perp^2 v_z^2 - \frac{1}{2\pi}
625: \frac{p_\perp^2}{p_m^2} \frac{d^2 A}{dx^2} }{
626: (p_\perp^2 + m_\perp^2 v_z^2)^2}.
627: \ee
628: Using this formula and the expression (1), (2) we
629: obtain the asymptotic for the curvature of the
630: surface near the central cross-section:
631: \be % f4
632: K (x) = \frac{\pi m_\perp v_m}{2 A_{ex} p_m}
633: \frac{1}{\sqrt{|x|}}.
634: \ee
635:
636: When $ p_z$ tends to zero the curvature tends to infinity
637:
638:
639: \vspace{5mm}
640: \LARGE
641:
642: $ \bf 0.0 \ \ 1.0 \ \ 2.0 \ \ 0.1 \ \ 0.2 \ \ 0.3 \ \ Y \ \ k \ \ 1 \ \ 2$
643: \vspace{3mm}
644:
645: $ \bf 0.0 \ \ 1.0 \ \ 2.0 \ \ 0.1 \ \ 0.2 \ \ 0.3 \ \ Y \ \ k \ \ 1 \ \ 2$
646:
647:
648: \vspace{3mm}
649: $ \bf 0.0 \ 1.0 \ 2.0 \ 0.1 \ 0.2 \ 0.3 \ Y \ k \ 1 \ \ 2$
650:
651: Now , we estimate the range of variation of the angle
652: $ \Phi $ corresponding to a well-manifested angular
653: dependence of the
654: magnitude of the oscillations. While
655: the parameter $ w $ characterizes the shape of the FS in the
656: vicinity of its extremal cross-section, $\Phi_0 $
657: describes the width of the FS strip where the
658: curvature anomalies are revealed. The order-of-magnitude
659: estimate for $\Phi_0$ can be easily obtained
660: at $ k = 2. $ In this case
661: we can use the asymptotic expression:
662: \be % f15
663: w (\Phi) \approx 2 \sqrt \hbar \frac{m_\perp}{m_{||}}
664: \sin^2 \Phi \cos \Phi,
665: \ee
666: where $ m_{||} $ is the longitudinal mass at the reference
667: points $ (p_z = \pm p_m).$ Since the dependence $ Y(w) $ for
668: $ k= 2 $ becomes weak for $ w \ge 2, $ we arrive at the
669: following estimate:
670: \be % f16
671: \Phi_0 \approx \sqrt{m_{||} \big / m_\perp \gamma}.
672: \ee
673: Thus, if the ratio $ m_{||} / m_\perp $ accepts values of
674: the order of unity and $ \gamma^2 \approx 10^4, \; \Phi_0 $
675: can be of the order of $ 5^o - 10^o.$ We can expect that
676: the quantity $ \Phi_0 $ does not exceed a few degrees in the
677: general case. This agrees with the experimental
678: results obtained for copper (see \cite{one}), as well as
679: with the results on cyclotron resonance in a
680: magnetic field normal to the metal surface \cite{fourteen}.
681:
682: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
683:
684: (+1)
685: { 1. Anomalies of the Fermi surface curvature}
686: (+2)
687: { 2. The model}
688:
689: (+3)
690: {3. The effect of the Fermi surface curvature anomalies on the quantum oscillations in the electronic density of states}
691:
692: (+4){4. An application: quantum oscillations in the ultrasound velocity}
693:
694: (+5)
695: { 5. Discussion}
696:
697: (+6)
698: It is well known that amplitudes of quantum oscillations depend om temperature. Ordinary quantum oscillations of the electron DOS described by the Eq. (13) have the amplitude of the order of $ \gamma^{-1/2} \theta^{-1/2}. $ The amplitude of the oscillations related to the ``anomalous" cross-section given by (12) may be estimated as $ \gamma^{-1/k} \theta^{(1-2k)/2k}. $ Comparing these estimates,we see that the amplitude of oscillations associated with the extremal cros-section of zero/diverging curvature significantly differs from that of the usual quantum oscillations. The contribution from a nearly cylindrical cross-section can considerably exceed in amplitude contributions from usual cross-sections.
699:
700: As well, the amplitude of DOS oscillations originating from a cross-section where the FS curvature diverges is smaller than that of the ordinary oscillations. The effect of the FS local geometry on the amplitude of the electron DOS quantum oscillations is presented in the Fig. 2. Also, the fine geometrical structure of the FS near the extremal cross-sections may bring changes in the temperature dependence of the oscillations amplitude. As shown in the Fig. 2, the closer is the vicinity of an extremal cross-section to a cilynder, the more pronounced is the decrease in the oscillation amplitude while the temperature rises. Oscillations associated with a cross-section where the FS curvature diverges, exhibit a weak temperature dependence compared to the ordinary quantum oscillations.
701:
702: (+7)
703: some fine geometrical features of the FSs such as nearly cylindrical segments or points of flattening
704:
705: (+8)
706: and/or lines where its curvature turns zero, this
707:
708: (+9)
709: /lines
710:
711: (+10)
712: Likewise, the flattening points at the may give rise to some anomalies in the magnetoacoustic response of a two-dimensional electron gas, as shown in the papers \cite{9,10}.
713:
714: In the present work we concetrate on quantum oscillations in observables in metals which originate from the DOS oscillations in strong magnetic fields. The oscillating term in the DOS is formed by the neighborhoods of the FS cross-sections with extremal areas. Usually, the latter are narrow strips on the FS. Therefore the FS curvature anomalies at these strips may significantlyaffect their contributions to the DOS quantum oscillations. Consequently, the effect of the FS local geometry can be revealed in oscillations of various observables in metalls, such as magnetization, resistivity, sound velocity and attenuation.
715:
716: (+11)
717: Also, it was shown that nearly cylindrical pieces inserted in the FS could cause noticeable softening of some acoustic modes near the peaks of the DOS quantum oscillations (see Refs. \cite{14,15}).
718:
719: (+12)
720: where the electron velocity is discontinuous.
721:
722: (+13)
723: as discussed below. dal'she vstavit' abzatz s kras. str. so str 3.
724:
725: (+14)
726: The results could be employed to analyze manifestations of the FS local geometry in quantum oscillations of various observables in metals. As an example, we briefly consider the effect of the FS curvature anomalies on quantum oscillations in the velocity of an ultrasonic wave propagating in a metal. To avoid prolixities in this work, other applications are not included in consideration. These applications are to be discussed elsewhere.
727:
728: The model
729:
730: The concept of a zero curvature line (nearly cylindrical cross-section) on the FS does not require further explanations. On the contrary, the concept of the line where the FS curvature diverges needs clarification. Before introducing the FS model used in the following analisis, we present a simple illustration to clear the concept
731:
732: dal'hse ctr2 O!!
733:
734: (+15)
735: Conclusion
736:
737: In summary, we showed that when the FS of a metal inserts lines where its curvature turns zero or reveals descontinuity, this can significantly affect both amplitude and phase of electron DOS oscillations in strong (quantizing) magnetic fields. The effect arises due to increase/decrease of the relative number of electrons associated with the neghborhoods of these lines. It reveals itself at certain directions of the magnetic field, and disappears when the manetic field is tilted away from such direction. This results in angular dependence of the DOS oscillation amplitudes. The latter could be observed in experiments on quantum oscillations in various characteristics of a metal such as magnetization, and manetic susceptibility and resisitivity for all these oscillations arise due to the DOS oscillations. Quantum oscillations in the sound velocity discussed in this work is a mere example of the effect of the FS curvature local anomalies.
738:
739: (+16 Fig. 2.)
740: Effect of the FS curvature on the temperature dependence of quantum oscillation amplitudes at moderately low temperatures $ (\theta \sim 1) .$ Left panel: nearly cylindrical cross-sections; $ k =4,2,1 $ from the top to the bottom. Right panel: cross-sections where the FS curvature diverges; $ k = 1,3/4,5/8 $ from the top to the bottom. Curves are plotter assuming $ m_n = m_\perp,\ \pi \gamma^2 = 10^3. $
741:
742:
743:
744: \end{document}
745:
746:
747: