1: %Introduction
2: %Intro.tex
3: %2004/02/16 Created
4: %2004/02/24 Last Modified Date
5:
6: Polymer chains in solutions or gels
7: may be highly self-entangled:
8: such entanglements should be important to understand
9: some features of polymeric materials.
10: A variety of knots can appear by connecting the two ends of a polymer chain.
11: In fact, various knotted DNAs are synthesized in experiments
12: through random closure of nicked DNA chains
13: ~\cite{SHAW-WANG.1993.01,RYBENKOV-COZZARELLI-VOLOGODSKII.1993.01}.
14: Since topological questions
15: were addressed by Delbr\"uck, Frisch and Wasserman~\cite{DELBRUCK.1962.01,FRISCH-WASSERMAN.1961.01},
16: several aspects of knotted ring polymers,
17: such as the probability of random
18: knotting~\cite{VOLOGODSKII-ET-AL.1974.01,MICHELS-WIEGEL.1982.01,DES_CLOIZEAUX-MEHTA.1979.01,SUMNERS-WHITTINGTON.1988.01,PIPPENGER.1989.01,KONIARIS-MUTHUKUMAR.1991.01,DEGUCHI-TSURUSAKI.1994.01,DEGUCHI-TSURUSAKI.1997.02,SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2001.01,DOBAY-SOTTAS-DUBOCHET-STASIAK.2001.01}, the average sizes ~\cite{ORANDINI-TESI-JANSE_VAN_RENSBURG-WHITTINGTON.1998.01,SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2002.01}
19: and the complexity of their conformations~\cite{SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2003.01}
20: have been studied numerically and analytically.
21:
22:
23: Let us discuss the average size of knotted ring polymers with no
24: excluded volume, i.e.,
25: the mean-squared gyration radius $R^2_K(N)$ of $N$-noded random polygons
26: with fixed knot type $K$
27: ~\cite{DES_CLOIZEAUX.1981.01,DEUTSCH.1999.01,GROSBERG.2000.01,SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2001.03,MATSUDA-YAO-TSUKAHARA-DEGUCHI-FURUTA-INAMI.2003.01,DOBAY-DUBOCHET-MILLET-SOTTAS-STASIAK.2003.01,GROSBERG.2003.01}.
28: We consider random polygons as a simple model of ring polymers
29: in solution at the $\theta$-point~\cite{DE_GENNES.1979.01}.
30: At the $\theta$-point polymers should have no effect of excluded volume.
31: Furthermore, ring polymers keep their topology unchanged.
32: It has now been established in simulations
33: ~\cite{DEUTSCH.1999.01,SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2001.03,MATSUDA-YAO-TSUKAHARA-DEGUCHI-FURUTA-INAMI.2003.01,DOBAY-DUBOCHET-MILLET-SOTTAS-STASIAK.2003.01}
34: that the average size of random polygons with a fixed knot
35: is larger than that with no topological constraint,
36: when $N$ is large.
37: The topological swelling of random polygons may be explained in terms of
38: entropic repulsion caused by the topological constraint.
39: The phenomenon should be closely related to the ``topological excluded volume"
40: proposed for such random polygons that possess the trivial knot $\emptyset$
41: ~\cite{DES_CLOIZEAUX.1981.01}.
42: Concerning the large-$N$ behavior of $R^2_K(N)$,
43: however, the numerical studies do not unanimously arrive
44: at the same conclusion.
45: We have analyzed the data of $R^2_K(N)$ for a model of random polygons
46: ~\cite{MATSUDA-YAO-TSUKAHARA-DEGUCHI-FURUTA-INAMI.2003.01},
47: assuming the scaling formula of the following form:
48: \begin{equation}
49: R_K^2(N) = A_K N^{2 \nu_K} \left( 1 + B_K N^{-\Delta_K} + \ldots \right) \, .
50: \label{eq:size_scaling}
51: \end{equation}
52: The result favors to the interpretation of
53: $\nu_K = \nu_{\rm SAW}$. However, limiting the analysis to a narrower
54: range of $N$, the alternative interpretation $\nu_K = \nu_{\rm RW}$
55: is also possible.
56: Here, self-avoiding walks (SAW) and random walks (RW)
57: have the scaling exponent
58: $\nu_{\rm SAW} = 0.588$ and $\nu_{\rm RW}=0.5$, respectively.
59: %
60: %It seems that it is nontrivial to determine
61: %the asymptotic exponent $\nu_K$ numerically.
62: %
63: %Furthermore, even other possibilities have not been completely
64: %excluded, yet.
65: Thus, in order to clarify the large-$N$ behavior
66: of random polygons with fixed knots,
67: it would be interesting to investigate some other quantity
68: associated with the asymptotic behavior.
69:
70:
71: In this paper we study the following two quantities
72: of random polygons with a fixed knot:
73: i) the distribution function of the distance between opposite nodes
74: and ii) the distribution of the radius of gyration.
75: If the ``topological excluded volume" corresponds
76: to a certain amount of excluded volume,
77: then the distance between opposite nodes
78: should follow a non-Gaussian distribution.
79: For ring polymers with excluded volume,
80: the distribution of the distance between opposite nodes
81: should be non-Gaussian,
82: while it is Gaussian for random polygons.
83: Here we assume that the distance between opposite polygonal nodes
84: plays the similar role as the end-to-end distance of a linear chain.
85: For the self-avoiding walk, the end-to-end distance distribution
86: is non-Gaussian~\cite{BISHOP-CLARKE.1991.01,BISHOP-CLARKE.1991.02}.
87: %Its scaling behaviors have been discussed in terms of field theories.
88:
89:
90: Through computer simulation of random polygons with fixed knots,
91: we have evaluated the distributions of the distance $r$
92: between opposite nodes of random polygons under the
93: topological constraints \cite{YAO.2004.01}.
94: We are concerned with the trivial knot, the trefoil knot,
95: and the composite knot consisting of two
96: trefoil knots, which are denoted by
97: $\emptyset$, $3_1$, and $3_1 \sharp 3_1$, respectively.
98: We show that the scaling form of the self-avoiding walk gives good fitting curves to the
99: data of the distributions in a wide range.
100: It should be remarkable, since the scaling form
101: of the end-to-end distance distribution is derived when
102: $\rho= r / N^{\nu}$ is finite and very large
103: ~\cite{FISHER.1966.01,MCKENZIE-MOORE.1971.01,DES_CLOIZEAUX.1974.01,LIPKIN-OONO-FREED.1981.01,
104: BISHOP-CLARKE.1991.01,BISHOP-CLARKE.1991.02,CARACCIOLO-CAUSO-PELISSETTO.2000.01,LUE-KISELEV.1999.01}.
105: Furthermore, we show that the distribution function of normalized distance $r/R_K$
106: should be given by the same Gaussian form for any $N$ and $K$.
107: Here we recall that $R_K$ denotes the average size of random polygons of knot $K$.
108: Thus, it is suggested that the effect of the
109: ``topological excluded volume'' should be
110: different from the standard excluded-volume effect.
111:
112: %. In fact, the scaling form of the end-to-end distance distribution of
113: % SAW is derived in a limited range by taking the limit where the length $N$
114: % and the distance $r$ goes to infinity keeping the normalized distance
115: %$\rho= r / N^{\nu}$ finite and very large
116:
117:
118: We have also evaluated the distribution of the gyration radius
119: for random polygons under some topological constraints~\cite{YAO.2004.01}.
120: We introduce a formula for describing the distribution,
121: and discuss its fitting curves.
122: The formula of the gyration-radius distribution
123: is new, in particular, for random polygons
124: under topological constraints.
125: We note that
126: for the Gaussian random walk, several approximate formulas of the gyration-radius
127: distribution are known~\cite{FIXMAN.1962.01,YAMAKAWA.1971.01}.
128:
129: %
130: % Compared to the end-to-end distribution function, however,
131: %scaling properties of the gyration-radius distribution have not been
132: %extensively discussed, yet, either theoretically or even numerically.
133: %For instance, it is not known whether there exist
134: %connections between a certain asymptotic behavior of the gyration-radius
135: % distribution and the critical exponent of a macroscopic quantity.
136: %
137:
138:
139:
140: The paper consists of the following. In \S 2, we
141: explain the model of random polygons, and define some symbols
142: for the distribution functions. In \S 3, we describe briefly
143: some procedures of the computer simulation.
144: In \S 4, we discuss the numerical results of the present research.
145: We plot the distribution function of the intersegment distance
146: for random polygons under topological constraints.
147: Through fitting curves to the data, we discuss that the distribution
148: of the intersegment distance should be well approximated
149: by the Gaussian distribution. We also plot the distribution of the gyration radius
150: for random polygons under topological constraints.
151: We thus investigate topological effects on the average sizes of random polygons.
152: In \S 5, we discuss that the ``topological excluded volume'' should be different
153: from the standard excluded volume, and present an open question.
154:
155: