1: %Results
2: %Results.tex
3: %2004/02/16 Created
4: %2004/02/18 Last Modified Date
5:
6:
7: %Approach to analysis
8: %Approach.tex
9: %2004/02/16 Created
10: %2004/02/18 Last Modified Date
11:
12: %We are concerned with the asymptotic behaviors of
13: %the distribution $f_K(r;\lambda,N)$ in the scaling limit
14: %where $N$ and $r$ grows infinitely
15: %but the ratio $\rho = r/R_K(N)$ is kept finite.
16:
17: \subsection{Functional forms of the distributions }
18:
19:
20:
21: The asymptotic scaling form of the end-to-end distance
22: distribution of the self-avoiding walks
23: is derived for the region $\rho=r/N^{\nu} \gg 1$
24: ~\cite{FISHER.1966.01,MCKENZIE-MOORE.1971.01,DES_CLOIZEAUX.1974.01}.
25: We now apply it to the data of the distribution function
26: for the distance between opposites nodes for random polygons
27: under topological constraint $K$. We thus
28: have the following:
29: \begin{eqnarray}
30: f_K(r;\lambda,N) & = & A_K r^{2 + \theta_K}
31: \exp\left[-D_K r^{\delta_K}\right],
32: \label{eq:scaling_large_dist_inter_K}
33: \\
34: \theta_K &=& {d \nu_K + 1 - \gamma_K - d/2 \over 1 - \nu_K},
35: \label{eq:theta_large_dist_inter_K}
36: \\
37: \delta_K &=& {1 \over 1 - \nu_K} .
38: \label{eq:delta_large_dist_inter_K}
39: \end{eqnarray}
40: Hereafter we set $d=3$.
41:
42: For the distribution $g_K(R;N)$ of gyration radius
43: $R$, we introduce the following formula:
44: \begin{equation}
45: g_K(R;N) = A_{g,K} |R - c_K|^{\theta_{g,K}}
46: \exp \left[ -D_{g,K} |R - c_K|^{\delta_{g,K}} \right] \, .
47: \label{eq:scaling_dist_size_K}
48: \end{equation}
49: For the Gaussian random walk there are some approximate expressions for
50: the distribution of the gyration radius ~\cite{FIXMAN.1962.01,Flory-Fisk}.
51: (See also \S 8 of Ref. \cite{YAMAKAWA.1971.01}.)
52: For instance, the large $R$ case of Fixman's result~\cite{FIXMAN.1962.01} corresponds
53: to a special case of the formula (\ref{eq:scaling_dist_size_K}), where we set
54: $\delta_{g,K}=2$, $c_K=0$, and $\theta_{g,K}= 1$.
55:
56:
57:
58:
59: \subsection{Distribution function $f_K(r; \lambda, N)$
60: of intersegment distance $r$ }
61:
62:
63: The intersegment distributions $f_K(r; \lambda, N)$ at $\lambda=1/2$
64: for $N=300$ and $600$
65: are presented in figures~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_300} and
66: \ref{fig:dist_inter_half_600}, respectively.
67: Here the topological conditions denoted by $K$
68: correspond to restriction of random polygons
69: into the following sets:
70: (i) all polygons;
71: (ii) polygons of the trivial knot $\emptyset$;
72: (iii) polygons of the trefoil knot $3_1$;
73: (iv) polygons of the composite knot $3_1 \sharp 3_1$;
74: (v) polygons of any knot types other than the three knots
75: $\emptyset$, $3_1$, and $3_1 \sharp 3_1$.
76: We thus consider the five different topological conditions.
77: We note that the case (i) corresponds to no topological constraint.
78: We denote the distribution functions
79: of the five cases simply as $f_{all}$, $f_{\emptyset}$,
80: $f_{3_1}$, $f_{3_1 \sharp 3_1}$, and $f_{others}$, respectively.
81:
82:
83:
84:
85: The fitting curves of figures~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_300}
86: and \ref{fig:dist_inter_half_600} are fit well to the data points.
87: The curves are given by the scaling form
88: (\ref{eq:scaling_large_dist_inter_K}),
89: and are all very close to the Gaussian distributions.
90: Here we note that it is also the case with the data for
91: $\lambda = 1/4$ and $3/4$.
92: %
93: The numerical estimates for the exponents $\theta_K$ and $\delta_K$
94: and the constants $A_K$ and $D_K$ are given in
95: table~\ref{table:fit_result_dist_inter}.
96: The actual ranges of distance $r$ used for the fitting curves
97: are also shown in table~\ref{table:fit_result_dist_inter}.
98: The fitting curves fit very well to the data points not only
99: in the range of $r$ larger than the peak position
100: but almost in the entire range of $r$.
101: The $\chi^2$ values per datum are very small.
102: Very small deviations are only seen in the small $r$ region,
103: although the region is out of the fitting ranges.
104:
105:
106: The best estimates of the exponents $\theta_K$ and $\delta_K$
107: almost agree with the Gaussian values, i.e.,
108: $\nu_K \approx 1/2$ and $\gamma_K \approx 1$,
109: within the range of estimation errors,
110: for all the five different topological conditions
111: and for both $N = 300$ and $600$.
112: The constant $D_K$ depends on the polygonal length $N$.
113: However, it does not change very much for the different knot types
114: with respect to the estimation errors.
115: The constant $A_K$ depends on the knot type $K$ for $N = 300$.
116: However, the difference among $A_K$'s becomes smaller for $N = 600$ than for
117: $N=300$. It is thus suggested that they should become
118: the same value when $N$ is very large.
119:
120:
121: Let us denote by $r_K^{*}$ the peak position of the distribution $f_K(r)$.
122: % The positions of peaks reflect their topological conditions.
123: Assuming the scaling form (\ref{eq:scaling_large_dist_inter_K}),
124: the peak position $r_K^{*}$ is given by
125: % $f_K(r)$ have its largest value
126: \begin{equation}
127: r_K^{*} = \left( {\frac {2 + \theta_K } {D_K \delta_K}} \right)^{1 - \nu_K}
128: \end{equation}
129: The peak position $r_K^{*}$ may characterize the knot dependence
130: of the distribution function $f_K(r)$.
131: When $\nu_K=0.5$ and $\gamma_K=1.0$,
132: the form of $f_K(r)$ is determined by the parameter $D_K$.
133: %
134: %Here $A_K$ is derived from the normalization condition.
135: %
136:
137:
138: In figure~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_300}, the peak position $r_{\emptyset}^{*}$
139: of the distribution $f_{\emptyset}(r)$ is larger than $r_{all}^{*}$
140: of $f_{all}$.
141: For $f_{others}$, $r_{others}^{*}$ is smaller than $r_{all}^{*}$.
142: %
143: %
144: In figure~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_600},
145: the peak positions of $f_{\emptyset}$, $f_{3_1}$,
146: and $f_{3_1 \sharp 3_1}$ are all larger than that of $f_{all}$ for $N=600$.
147: Their values of $N=600$ are
148: much closer to each other than in the case of $N=300$.
149: Here the peak position $r_{others}^{*}$ of $f_{others}$
150: is smaller than that of $f_{all}$ also in the case of $N=600$.
151: It is thus suggested that when $N$ is very large,
152: the peak positions of $f_K(r)$ of simple knots
153: should be given by the same value
154: and the distributions $f_K(r)$ should approach a universal form.
155:
156:
157: The observations in figures~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_300} and
158: ~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_600}
159: suggest that fixing a knot type of a random polygon
160: leads to effective repulsion or attraction
161: among internal segments of the polygon
162: depending on the complexity of the knot type.
163: When the length $N$ becomes very large,
164: polygons of very complex knots can appear.
165: They should have smaller conformations
166: than other polygons of simpler knots.
167: As we see in figure~\ref{fig:dist_inter_half_300} for $N=300$,
168: random polygons with the trivial knot
169: have larger conformations on the average
170: than those of no topological constraints,
171: while random polygons of more complex knots
172: have smaller conformations.
173: This should be consistent with the effective swelling
174: observed in the studies on the average sizes of
175: random polygons with some fixed knots
176: ~\cite{DEUTSCH.1999.01,SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2001.03,MATSUDA-YAO-TSUKAHARA-DEGUCHI-FURUTA-INAMI.2003.01,DOBAY-DUBOCHET-MILLET-SOTTAS-STASIAK.2003.01}.
177:
178:
179:
180:
181: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
182: % Normalized distance distribution
183: % for two points of polygons
184: %
185: %\vskip 24pt
186: %
187:
188: Let us discuss the $\lambda$- and $N$-dependence of the distribution
189: function $f_K(r, \lambda, N)$ for a knot $K$.
190: We denote by $r_K(\lambda,N)$
191: the average of the intersegment distance $r$
192: at the parameter $\lambda$ for random polygons of $N$ nodes with the knot $K$.
193: We shall suggest that for a given knot $K$,
194: the distribution function ${f}_K(r, \lambda, N)$
195: should depend on $N$ and $\lambda$ only through the value
196: $r_K(\lambda,N)$.
197:
198:
199: We introduce the distribution ${\tilde f}_K$ of
200: normalized intersegment distance $x=r/r_K$. Here we note
201: ${\tilde f}_K(x, \lambda, N) dx$ = $f_K(r, \lambda, N) dr $.
202: The data for the three knots show that
203: the function ${\tilde f}_K$ does not depend on either
204: $\lambda$ or $N$. In figure~\ref{fig:universal} the data points of
205: the distribution function ${\tilde f}_{\emptyset}(x; \lambda,N)$
206: of the normalized intersegment distance
207: $x=r/r_{\emptyset}$ are shown
208: for the four cases: $\lambda$ = 1/2 or 1/4 and
209: $N$ = 300 or 600. It is clear that
210: the data points for all the four cases are located on the
211: same curve.
212: The best estimates of the fitting
213: parameters to the data of ${\tilde f}_K$ are given
214: in tables \ref{table:refit_result_1/2}
215: and \ref{table:refit_result_1/4} for $\lambda=1/2$ and
216: 1/4, respectively. As far as the five topological conditions are concerned,
217: each of the fitting parameters of a condition $K$ has almost the same value for
218: $N$=300 or 600 and for $\lambda=1/2$ or 1/4.
219: Thus, we suggest that for a given knot $K$ the distribution
220: of the normalized intersegment distance, ${\tilde f}_K(x, \lambda, N)$,
221: should be given by the same Gaussian form for any $N$ and $\lambda$.
222:
223:
224:
225: We now show that the $\lambda$- and $N$-dependence of the average distance
226: $r_K(\lambda,N)$ is given by the Gaussian one
227: in the cases of $\lambda=$ 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 for the three knots.
228: Let us denote by $P({\bf r}; N)$ the end-to-end distance
229: distribution of the Gaussian random walk of $N$ steps.
230: For random polygons consisting of two Gaussian chains of
231: $\lambda N$ steps and $(1-\lambda)N$ steps,
232: the probability distribution of the vector ${\bf r}$ connecting the two end-points
233: should be proportional to the product
234: $P({\bf r}; \lambda N)P({\bf r}; (1-\lambda)N)$.
235: Here we note that the intersegment vector ${\bf r}$
236: for the parameter $\lambda$ connects the common end-points of
237: the two random walks of length $\lambda N$ and $(1-\lambda)N$.
238: For the case of no topological constraint, therefore,
239: the constant $D_{all}$ is given by
240: \begin{equation}
241: D_{all} = {\frac 3 {2 \lambda (1-\lambda) N a^2}}
242: \end{equation}
243: Here $a$ denotes the bond length, and $a=1$ in the paper.
244: We thus have
245: \begin{equation}
246: r_{all}(\lambda, N) = \sqrt{ {\frac {8} {3 \pi}} } \,
247: \sqrt{ \lambda (1-\lambda)N } \, a
248: \end{equation}
249: The ratio $r_K(\lambda,N)/r_{all}(\lambda,N)$ is plotted in figure~\ref{fig:ratio}
250: for $N=$ 300 and 600 with respect to the topological conditions,
251: $\emptyset$, $3_1$, $3_1 \sharp 3_1$, and
252: $others$. In each case of the four topological conditions,
253: the ratio takes almost the same value for
254: $\lambda=$ 1/2, 1/4 and 3/4. Furthermore, we find that the ratio should also coincide
255: with the ratio of the gyration radii, $R_K/R_{all}$.
256: Thus, we have the conjecture: $r_K(\lambda,N) = r_{all}(\lambda, N) {R_K}/{R_{all}}$.
257: If the conjecture is true, then the $\lambda$-dependence of
258: the distribution $f_K(r, \lambda, N)$ is completely given by the Gaussian one,
259: and the $N$-dependence is given by the Gaussian with the rescaling factor
260: ${R_K}/{R_{all}}$. Here we remark that the ratio ${R_K}/{R_{all}}$ may depend on
261: the number of nodes $N$, since random polygons under a topological constraint can be
262: larger or smaller than that of no topological constraint
263: due to entropic repulsion induced by the topological constraint.
264:
265:
266: We explain some details about the average size of random polygons.
267: We first recall that the symbol $R_K$ denotes
268: the square root of the mean square radius of gyration
269: for random polygons of a topological constraint $K$.
270: We denote by $\langle R_K \rangle$
271: the mean gyration radius of a polygon
272: averaged over an ensemble of random polygons of a topological constraint $K$.
273: In figure~\ref{fig:ratio}, the ratio
274: $\langle R_K \rangle/\langle R_{all} \rangle$ is plotted
275: for the four topological conditions.
276: However, the difference between the two ratios,
277: $R_K/R_{all}$ and $\langle R_K \rangle/\langle R_{all} \rangle$,
278: should be smaller than the error bars.
279:
280:
281: Let us discuss the knot-dependence of the distribution $f_K$.
282: We show that the distribution ${\tilde f}_K$ of normalized distance $x$
283: for a knot $K$ should be almost independent of the knot type.
284: In figure \ref{fig:knot} the rescaled distribution ${\tilde f}_K$
285: for the five topological conditions
286: are plotted against the normalized intersegment distance $x=r/r_K$
287: for the case of $N=300$ and $\lambda=1/2$.
288: We see in figure~\ref{fig:knot} that
289: the distributions ${\tilde f}_K$ should almost the same for the three knots.
290: It is consistent with the observation that
291: the estimates of the parameters are of similar values
292: for the five topological conditions, as shown in tables
293: \ref{table:refit_result_1/2} and \ref{table:refit_result_1/4}.
294: Thus, the knot-dependence of the distribution $f_K$ should be
295: renormalized into the value $r_K(\lambda,N)$.
296:
297:
298:
299:
300: %Let us summarize the results in the subsection. We have found that the distribution
301: %$f_K(r;\lambda,N)$ is well fitted by the same functional form as the Gaussian one.
302: %However, the position of the peak depends on the knot type $K$.
303: %For simple knots such as the $\emptyset$, $3_1$ and $3_1 \sharp 3_1$,
304: %the peak positions are shifted to larger values than that of the
305: %distribution $f_{all}$ of polygons under no topological constraint.
306:
307:
308:
309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
310: %\newpage
311:
312: \subsection{Distribution $g_K(R;N)$ of gyration radius $R$ }
313:
314:
315: The distribution functions $g_K(R;N)$
316: of gyration radius $R$ are shown in
317: figures~\ref{fig:dist_size_300} and \ref{fig:dist_size_600}
318: with respect to the five topological conditions
319: for $N = 300$ and $600$, respectively.
320: Here the five cases are the same as in \S 4.2. We denote
321: the distributions $g_K$ for the five cases briefly
322: as $g_{all}$, $g_\emptyset$, $g_{3_1}$, $g_{3_1 \sharp 3_1}$,
323: and $g_{others}$, respectively.
324: %
325: %
326: The fitting curves in figures~\ref{fig:dist_size_300}
327: and \ref{fig:dist_size_600} fit well to the data points
328: in some ranges of $R$.
329: The curves are given by the formula (\ref{eq:scaling_dist_size_K}).
330: Thus, the formula (\ref{eq:scaling_dist_size_K})
331: approximates the distribution $g_K(R;N)$ of gyration radius
332: effectively. They could be useful for studying topological effects
333: on the gyration radius.
334:
335:
336: Let us consider plotting the distribution $g_K$ with respect to
337: a normalized variable of the gyration radius, $R/R_K$.
338: More precisely, we consider plotting $g_K$ in terms of
339: the variable $R/\langle R_K \rangle$. Here we recall
340: that $\langle R_K \rangle$ denotes the
341: average of the gyration radius of a polygon
342: averaged over an ensemble of random polygons with a given knot $K$.
343: We introduce distribution
344: ${\tilde g}_K(y; N)$ of the variable $y=R/\langle R_K \rangle$ by the relation:
345: ${\tilde g}_K(y; N) dy = g_K(R; N) dR$. Hereafter, however,
346: we denote $\langle R_K \rangle$ simply by $R_K$, except for figure captions.
347:
348:
349:
350:
351: We now present the rescaled distribution ${\tilde g}_K$
352: in figures~\ref{fig:normalized_300} and \ref{fig:normalized_600}
353: for $N=300$ and $N=600$, respectively.
354: We find that for a given knot $K$
355: the distribution ${\tilde g}_K$ of normalized gyration radius $y=R/R_K$
356: should be independent of the knot type almost completely.
357: In figures~\ref{fig:normalized_300} and \ref{fig:normalized_600},
358: the data points and their fitting curves of ${\tilde g}_K$
359: overlap each other for the cases of the three knots, $\emptyset$, $3_1$,
360: and $3_1 \sharp 3_1$.
361: %
362: We also find that the fitting curves are fit well to
363: the data points both in figures~\ref{fig:normalized_300}
364: and \ref{fig:normalized_600}. They are drawn by a fitting formula
365: corresponding to (\ref{eq:scaling_dist_size_K})
366: \begin{equation}
367: {\tilde g}_K(y; N) = {\tilde A}_{g,K} |y - {\tilde c}_K|^{\theta_{g,K}}
368: \exp \left[ -{\tilde D}_{g,K} |y - {\tilde c}_K|^{\delta_{g,K}} \right]
369: \label{eq:normalized_dist_size_K}
370: \, .
371: \end{equation}
372: The fitting parameters
373: ${\tilde A}_{g,K}$, ${\tilde D}_{g,K}$ and ${\tilde c}_K$ correspond
374: to ${A}_{g,K}$, $D_{g,K}$ and ${c}_K$ of
375: the formula (\ref{eq:scaling_dist_size_K}) as
376: \begin{equation}
377: A_{g,K}= {\tilde A}_{g,K} /R_K^{1 + \theta_{g,K}} \, ,
378: \quad
379: D_{g,K} = {\tilde D}_{g,K} /R_K^{\delta_{g,K}} \, ,
380: \quad
381: c_K = {\tilde c}_K \, R_K \, .
382: \end{equation}
383: The best estimates of the fitting parameters are listed
384: in table~\ref{table:size_dist}.
385: The $\chi^2$ values are good, in particular,
386: for the cases of the three knots,
387: ${\tilde g}_{\emptyset}$, ${\tilde g}_{3_1}$ and ${\tilde g}_{3_1 \sharp 3_1}$.
388: Here the fitting range of $y=R/R_K$ is given by from 0.4 to 2.0
389: for all the fitting parameters given in table~\ref{table:size_dist}.
390:
391:
392:
393: The knot-dependence and the $N$-dependence
394: of distribution $g_K$ should be renormalized
395: into the mean square radius of gyration, $R^2_K(N)$.
396: The rescaled distributions ${\tilde g}_K$ for
397: the three knots do not depend
398: on the polygonal length, $N$. The fitting curves
399: of ${\tilde g}_K$ for the three knots are almost the same
400: for $N=300$ and $N=600$.
401: We can confirm the observation in figures~\ref{fig:normalized_300}
402: and \ref{fig:normalized_600}
403: by comparing the estimates shown in table~\ref{table:size_dist}.
404: The fitting parameters ${\theta}_{g,K}$,
405: ${\delta}_{g,K}$, ${\tilde A}_{g,K}$
406: and ${\tilde c}_{K}$ depend on neither
407: the knot type $K$ nor the polygonal length $N$
408: with respect to their errors.
409: %
410: The normalization of gyration radius, $R/R_K$,
411: should be thus essential when analyzing
412: the distribution function $g_K$.
413:
414:
415:
416: Random polygons of relatively simple knots should be larger in size
417: than the average one, while those of more complex knots should be smaller.
418: It depends on the polygonal length $N$ whether
419: the size of random polygons of a given knot should be
420: larger or smaller than the average.
421: In figure~\ref{fig:dist_size_300},
422: the peak position of the distribution $g_{\emptyset}$ is larger than those of the
423: other distributions $g_{all}$, $g_{3_1}$, $g_{3_1 \sharp 3_1}$
424: and $g_{others}$. In figure~\ref{fig:dist_size_600},
425: the peaks of $g_{\emptyset}$, $g_{3_1}$, $g_{3_1 \sharp 3_1}$
426: are clearly located on the right hand side of the peak of $g_{all}$, while
427: the peak of $g_{others}$ is located on the left hand side.
428: The equilibrium length of a random knot
429: can be a criterion whether it is larger or smaller than the average
430: ~\cite{DIAO-AKOS-KUSNER-MILLETT-STASIAK.2003.1}.
431: We also note that the peak positions of distributions $g_K$ shown in
432: figures~\ref{fig:dist_size_300} and \ref{fig:dist_size_600}
433: are roughly consistent with the average values of $R_K$~\cite{DEUTSCH.1999.01,SHIMAMURA-DEGUCHI.2001.03,MATSUDA-YAO-TSUKAHARA-DEGUCHI-FURUTA-INAMI.2003.01,DOBAY-DUBOCHET-MILLET-SOTTAS-STASIAK.2003.01}.
434:
435:
436:
437:
438: