1: \documentclass[twocolumn,prb,color,psfig,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{Topological phase separation in 2D
7: hard-core Bose-Hubbard system away from half-filling}
8: \author{A.S. Moskvin}
9: \author{I.G. Bostrem}
10: \author{A.S. Ovchinnikov}
11: \affiliation{Ural State University, 620083, Ekaterinburg, Russia}
12:
13:
14: \date{\today}
15: \begin{abstract}
16: We suppose that the doping of the 2D
17: hard-core boson system away from half-filling may result in the formation of
18: multi-center topological defect such as charge order (CO) bubble domain(s) with
19: Bose superfluid (BS) and extra bosons both localized in domain wall(s), or a
20: {\it topological} CO+BS {\it phase
21: separation}, rather than an uniform mixed CO+BS supersolid phase. Starting from
22: the classical model we predict the properties of the respective quantum system.
23: The long-wavelength behavior of the system is believed to remind that of
24: granular superconductors, CDW materials, Wigner crystals, and multi-skyrmion
25: system akin in a quantum Hall ferromagnetic state of a 2D electron gas.
26: \end{abstract}
27:
28: \maketitle
29:
30:
31: %\section{Introduction}
32:
33: One of the fundamental hot debated problems in bosonic physics concerns the
34: evolution of the charge ordered (CO) ground state of 2D hard-core Bose-Hubbard
35: (BH) model (hc-BH) with a doping away from half-filling.
36: Numerous model studies steadily confirmed the emergence of "supersolid" phases
37: with simultaneous diagonal and off-diagonal long range order while Penrose and
38: Onsager \cite{Penrose} were the first showing as early as 1956 that supersolid
39: phases do not occur.
40:
41:
42: The most recent quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) simulations
43: \cite{Batrouni,Hebert,Schmid}
44: found two significant features of the 2D BH model with a
45: screened Coulomb repulsion: the absence of supersolid
46: phase at half-filling, and a growing tendency to phase separation (CO+BS)
47: upon doping away from half-filling. Moreover, Batrouni and Scalettar
48: \cite{Batrouni} studied quantum phase transitions in the ground state
49: of the 2D hc-BH Hamiltonian and have shown numerically that,
50: contrary to the generally held belief, the most commonly discussed
51: "checkerboard" supersolid is thermodynamically unstable and phase separates
52: into solid and superfluid phases. The physics of the CO+BS phase separation in
53: BH model is associated with a rapid increase of the energy of a
54: homogeneous CO state with doping away from half-filling due to a large
55: "pseudo-spin-flip" energy cost.
56: Hence, it appears to be
57: energetically more favorable to "extract" extra bosons (holes) from the CO
58: state and arrange them into finite clusters with a relatively small number of
59: particles. Such a droplet scenario is believed to minimize the long-range
60: Coulomb repulsion.\cite{Cagan}
61: However, immediately there arise several questions. Whether a simple
62: mean-field approximation (MFA)
63: and classical continuum model can predict such a behavior? What is the detailed
64: structure of the CO+BS phase separated state? What are the main factors
65: governing the essential low-energy and long-wavelength physics? Is it possible
66: to make use of
67: simple toy models?
68:
69:
70: In the Letter we
71: present a topological scenario of CO+BS phase separation in 2D hc-BH model with
72: inter-site repulsion. The extra
73: bosons/holes doped to a checkerboard CO phase of 2D boson system are believed
74: to be confined in the ring-shaped domain wall of the skyrmion-like topological
75: defect which looks like a bubble domain in an easy-axis antiferromagnet. This
76: allows us to
77: propose the mechanism of 2D {\it topological} CO+BS {\it phase separation} when
78: the
79: doping of the bare checkerboard CO phase results in the formation of a
80: multi-center topological defect, which simplified pseudo-spin pattern looks
81: like a system of bubble CO domains with Bose superfluid confined in charged
82: ring-shaped domain walls.
83:
84:
85:
86:
87: %\section{Hard-core Bose-Hubbard model}
88: %\subsection{Effective Hamiltonian. Pseudo-spin formalism}
89:
90: The Hamiltonian of hard-core Bose gas on a lattice can be written in a standard
91: form as follows:
92: %\begin{widetext}
93: \begin{equation}
94: \smallskip
95: H_{BG}=-\sum\limits_{i>j}t_{ij}{\hat
96: P}(B_{i}^{\dagger}B_{j}+B_{j}^{\dagger}B_{i}){\hat P}
97: +\sum\limits_{i>j}V_{ij}N_{i}N_{j}-\mu \sum\limits_{i}N_{i}, \label{Bip}
98: \end{equation}
99: %\end{widetext}
100: where ${\hat P}$ is the projection operator which removes double occupancy of
101: any site, $N_{i}=B_{i}^{\dagger}B_{i}$, $\mu $ the chemical potential
102: determined from the condition of fixed full number of bosons $N_{l}=
103: \sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}\langle N_{i}\rangle $ or concentration $\;n=N_{l}/N\in
104: [0,1]$. The $t_{ij}$ denotes an effective transfer integral, $V_{ij}$ is an
105: intersite interaction between the bosons. \smallskip Here $B^{\dagger}(B)$ are
106: the Pauli creation (annihilation) operators which are Bose-like commuting for
107: different sites $[B_{i},B_{j}^{\dagger}]=0,$ for $i\neq j,$ while for the same
108: site $B_{i}^{2}=(B_{i}^{\dagger})^{2}=0$, $[B_{i},B_{i}^{\dagger}]=1-2N_i$, $N_i
109: = B_{i}^{\dagger}B_{i}$; $N$ is a full number of sites.
110:
111: \smallskip The model of hard-core Bose-gas with an intersite repulsion is
112: equivalent to a system of spins $s=1/2$ exposed to an external magnetic field
113: in the $z$%
114: -direction
115: \begin{equation}
116: H_{BG}=\sum_{i>j}J^{xy}_{ij}(s_{i}^{+}s_{j}^{-}+s_{j}^{+}s_{i}^{-})+\sum\limits_
117: {i>j}
118: J^{z}_{ij}s_{i}^{z}s_{j}^{z}-h \sum\limits_{i}s_{i}^{z}, \label{spinBG}
119: \end{equation}
120: where $J^{xy}_{ij}=2t_{ij}$, $J^{z}_{ij}=V_{ij}$, $h =\mu -\sum\limits_{j
121: (j\neq i)}V_{ij}$, $s^{-}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}B_ , s^{+}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
122: B^{\dagger}, s^{z}=-\frac{1}{2}+B_{i}^{\dagger}B_{i}$,
123: $s^{\pm}=\mp \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(s^x \pm \imath s^y)$.
124:
125: In frames of of a conventional two-sublattice MFA approach one may introduce two
126: vectors, the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ones:
127: $$
128: {\bf m}=\frac{1}{2s}(\langle{\bf s}_1 \rangle +\langle{\bf s}_2 \rangle);\,
129: {\bf l}=\frac{1}{2s}(\langle{\bf s}_1 \rangle -\langle{\bf s}_2
130: \rangle);\,\,{\bf m}^2 +{\bf l}^2 =1\, .
131: $$
132: where ${\bf m}\cdot {\bf l}=0$. For the plane where these vectors lie one may
133: introduce two-parametric angular description: $m_x = \sin \alpha \cos\beta ,m_z
134: = -\sin \alpha \sin\beta , l_x = \cos \alpha \sin\beta , l_z = \cos \alpha
135: \cos\beta $.
136: %In terms of these vectors the concentration constraint looks like
137: %$sm_z = -s\sin \alpha \sin\beta = n_B -\frac{1}{2}$.
138: The hard-core boson system in a two-sublattice approximation is described by
139: two diagonal order parameters $l_z ,m_z$ and two complex off-diagonal
140: order parameters $m_{\pm}=\mp \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(m_x \pm \imath m_y)$ and
141: $l_{\pm}=\mp \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(l_x \pm \imath l_y)$. The complex superfluid
142: order parameter $\Psi ({\bf r})=|\Psi ({\bf r})|\exp-\imath\varphi $ is
143: determined by the in-plane components of ferromagnetic vector: $ \Psi ({\bf
144: r})=\frac{1}{2}\langle (\hat B_1 +\hat B_2 )\rangle
145: =sm_{-}=sm_{\perp}\exp-\imath\varphi $, $m_{\perp}$ being the length of the
146: in-plane component of ferromagnetic vector. So, for a local condensate density
147: we get $n_s = s^2 m_{\perp}^2$. It is of interest to note that in
148: fact all the conventional uniform $T=0$ states with nonzero $\Psi ({\bf r})$
149: imply simultaneous long-range order both for modulus $|\Psi ({\bf r})|$ and
150: phase $\varphi$. The in-plane components of antiferromagnetic vector $l_{\pm}$
151: describe a staggered off-diagonal order. It is worth noting that by default one
152: usually considers the negative sign of the transfer integral $t_{ij}$, that
153: implies the ferromagnetic in-plane pseudospin ordering.
154:
155: The model exhibits many fascinating quantum phases and phase
156: transitions. Early investigations predict at $T=0$ charge order (CO), Bose
157: superfluid (BS) and mixed (CO+BS) supersolid uniform phases with an Ising-type
158: melting transition (CO-NO) and Kosterlitz-Thouless-type (BS-NO) phase
159: transitions to a non-ordered normal fluid (NO).\cite{MFA}
160: The detailed mean-field and spin-wave analysis of the uniform phases of 2D hc-BH
161: model is given by Pich and Frey.\cite{Pich}
162:
163:
164: MFA yields for the
165: conventional uniform supersolid phase \cite{Kubo}
166: $$
167: \sin^2 \beta = m_z \frac{\sqrt{V-2t}}{\sqrt{V+2t}}; \quad \sin^2 \alpha = m_z
168: \frac{\sqrt{V+2t}}{\sqrt{V-2t}}
169: $$
170: with a constant chemical potential $\mu = 4s\sqrt{(V^2 -4t^2)}$. It
171: should be noted that the supersolid phase appears to be unstable
172: with regard to small perturbations in the Hamiltonian. The
173: mean-field energy per site of the uniform supersolid phase is
174: written as follows:\cite{Pich}
175: $$
176: E_{SS}=E_{CO}+s\mu m_z = E_{CO}+\mu (n_B -\frac{1}{2}),
177: $$
178: where $E_{CO}=-2Vs^2$. The cost of doping both for CO and CO+BS phase appears
179: to be rather high as compared with an easy-plane BS phase at half-filling where
180: the chemical potential turns into zero.\cite{Bernardet}
181:
182:
183: Magnetic analogy allows us to make unambiguous predictions as
184: regards the doping of BH system away from half-filling. Indeed,
185: the boson/hole doping of checkerboard CO phase corresponds to the magnetization
186: of an antiferromagnet in $z$-direction. In the uniform easy-axis $l_z$-phase of
187: anisotropic antiferromagnet the local spin-flip energy cost is rather big. In
188: other words, the energy cost for boson/hole doping into checkerboard CO phase
189: appears to be big due to a large contribution of boson-boson repulsion.
190:
191: However, the magnetization of the anisotropic antiferromagnet in an easy axis
192: direction may proceed as a first order phase transition with a ``topological
193: phase separation'' due to the existence of antiphase domains.\cite{AFM-domain}
194: The antiphase domain walls provide the natural nucleation centers for a
195: spin-flop phase having enhanced magnetic susceptibility as compared with small
196: if any longitudinal susceptibility thus providing the advantage of the field
197: energy. Namely domain walls would specify the inhomogeneous magnetization
198: pattern for such an anisotropic easy-axis antiferromagnet in relatively weak
199: external magnetic field. As concerns the domain type in quasi-two-dimensional
200: antiferromagnet one should emphasize the specific role played by the
201: cylindrical, or bubble domains which have finite energy and size. These
202: topological solitons have the vortex-like in-plane spin structure and often
203: named "skyrmions". The classical, or Belavin-Polyakov (BP) skyrmion
204: \cite{Belavin} describes the
205: solutions of a non-linear $\sigma$-model with a classical isotropic 2D
206: Heisenberg
207: Hamiltonian and represents one of the generic toy model spin textures.
208: It is of primary importance to note that skyrmion-like bubble domains in
209: easy-axis layered antiferromagnets were actually observed in the experiments
210: performed by Waldner,\cite{Waldner} that were supported later by different
211: authors (see, e.g. Refs.\onlinecite{Kochelaev,Carsten}). Although some
212: questions were not completely clarified and remain open until now,
213: \cite{Kamppeter,Sheka} the classical and quantum \cite{Istomin} skyrmion-like
214: topological defects are believed to be a genuine element of essential physics
215: both of ferro- and antiferromagnetic 2D easy-axis systems.
216:
217:
218: The magnetic analogy seems to be a little bit naive, however, it catches the
219: essential physics of doping the hc-BH system.
220: As regards the checkerboard CO phase of such a system, namely a finite
221: energy skyrmion-like bubble domain \cite{AFM} seems to be the most
222: preferable candidate for the domain with antiphase domain wall providing the
223: natural reservoir for extra bosons.
224: The classical description of nonlinear excitations in hc-BH model includes the
225: skyrmionic solution given $V=2t$. \cite{AFM}
226: The skyrmion spin texture
227: consists of a vortex-like
228: arrangement of the in-plane components of ferromagnetic ${\bf m}$ vector with
229: the $l_z$-component reversed
230: in the centre of the skyrmion and gradually increasing to match the homogeneous
231: background at infinity. The simplest spin distribution within classical skyrmion
232: is given as follows
233: $$
234: m_{x}=m_{\perp}\cos (\varphi + \varphi _0) ;\,
235: m_{y}=m_{\perp}\sin (\varphi + \varphi _0);
236: $$
237: \begin{equation}
238: m_{\perp}=\frac{2r\lambda }{r^{2}+\lambda ^{2}} ;
239: l_z=\frac{r^{2}-\lambda^{2}}{r^{2}+\lambda^{2}},
240: \label{sk}
241: \end{equation}
242: where $\varphi _0$ is a global phase ($U(1)$ order parameter), $\lambda$
243: skyrmion radius. The skyrmion spin texture describes the
244: coexistence and competition of the charge order parameter $l_z$ and BS order
245: parameter $m_{\perp}$ that reflects a complex spatial interplay of potential and
246: kinetic energies.
247: The skyrmion looks like a bubble domain in an easy-axis magnet.
248: Skyrmions are characterized by the magnitude and sign of its topological
249: charge, by its size (radius), and by the global orientation of the spin. The
250: scale invariance of classical BP skyrmionic solution reflects in that its energy
251: does not
252: depend on radius, and global phase.
253: An interesting example of topological inhomogeneity is provided by a
254: multi-center
255: BP skyrmion \cite{Belavin} which energy does not depend on the
256: position of the centers. The latter are believed to be addressed
257: as an additional degree of freedom, or positional order
258: parameter.
259:
260:
261: It should be noted that the domain wall in such a
262: bubble domain somehow created in the checkerboard CO phase of 2D hc-BH system
263: represents an effective ring-shaped reservoir both for Bose-superfluid and extra
264: boson/hole.
265: Indeed, the magnetic response of a fixed radius skyrmion to a weak longitudinal
266: external magnetic field can be approximated as follows:
267: $$
268: m_{z}(r) \approx \chi (r)h\, ,
269: $$
270: where $\chi (r)=f(r)m_{\perp}(r)$ is a local magnetic susceptibility, and $f(r)$
271: has distinct maximum at the domain wall center $r=\lambda$ with oscillating
272: behavior $f(r)\propto J_{1}(r\sqrt{2})\propto \sin(r\sqrt{2}+\pi /4)/\sqrt{r}$
273: for large $r$. The oscillating character of the magnetization distribution seems
274: to reflect a skyrmion instability. Thus we conclude that the extra boson/hole
275: density described by the order parameter $m_z$ is to be localized in the
276: domain wall.
277: This result is supported by numerical calculations for the static
278: skyrmion-like excitations in a continuous 2D hc-BH model with a strong
279: boson-boson repulsion that was considered by us earlier in
280: Ref.\onlinecite{AFM}.
281: The Fig. 1 sketches the calculated radial distribution of the order
282: parameter $m_z$ for a single bubble domain in hc-BH system with injected
283: small boson concentration away from half-filling. It appears to be trapped
284: inside the domain wall. As expected, the soliton energy depends quadratically
285: on the number $ \Delta n$ of bosons bound in
286: domain wall (see insert in Fig. 1), similarly to that of homogeneous BS
287: phase.\cite{Bernardet} In other words, $\partial E/\partial n =0$ and one might
288: say about a zero value of the effective boson/hole chemical potential for the CO
289: bubble domain configuration would it be a ground state.
290:
291:
292: In the continuous model the classical BP skyrmion is a topological excitation
293: and cannot
294: dissipate. However, the classical static skyrmion is unstable with regard to an
295: external field, anisotropic interactions both of easy-plane and easy-axis type.
296: Small easy-axis anisotropy or external field are sufficient to shrink
297: skyrmion to a nanoscopic size when magnetic length $l_0$:
298: $$
299: l_0 =\left( \sqrt{\left(2V/t\right) ^{2}-\left( \mu /t\right) ^{2}}-4\right)
300: ^{-\frac{1}{2}}
301: $$
302: is of the order of
303: several lattice parameters, and the continuous approximation fails to correctly
304: describe excitations.
305: Nonetheless, Abanov and Pokrovsky \cite{Abanov} have shown that the easy-axis
306: anisotropy together with fourth-order exchange term can stabilize skyrmion with
307: radius $R\propto \sqrt{l_0}.$
308: \begin{figure}[t]
309: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm,angle=0]{ME1.eps}
310: \caption{The results of numerical calculations by shooting method
311: for a shrinked skyrmion given $v=2.1$, $t=1$: main panel - the
312: radial distribution of the order parameter $m_z$ (the filled
313: region points to a center of a domain wall); the insert shows the
314: dependence of the soliton energy on the number $\Delta n$ of bosons
315: bound in a domain wall. } \label{fig1}
316: \end{figure}
317:
318: A skyrmionic scenario in hc-BH model allows us to make several important
319: predictions.
320: Away from half-filling one may
321: anticipate the nucleation of a topological defect in the unconventional form of
322: the multi-center skyrmion-like object with ring-shaped Bose superfluid regions
323: positioned in an antiphase domain wall separating the CO core
324: and CO outside of the single skyrmion. The specific spatial separation of BS
325: and CO order parameters that avoid each other reflects the competition of
326: kinetic and potential energy. Such a {\it topological} (CO+BS) {\it phase
327: separation} is believed to provide a minimization of the total energy as
328: compared with its uniform supersolid counterpart.
329: Thus, the parent checkerboard CO phase may gradually loose its stability under
330: boson/hole doping, while a novel topological self-organized texture is believed
331: to become stable.
332: The most probable possibility is that every domain wall accumulates single
333: boson, or boson hole. Then, the number of centers in a multi-center skyrmion
334: nucleated with doping has to be equal to the number of bosons/holes. In such
335: a case, we anticipate the near-linear dependence of the total BS volume fraction
336: on the doping.
337: Generally speaking, one may assume scenario
338: when the nucleation of a multi-center skyrmion occurs spontaneously
339: with no doping. In such a case we should anticipate the existence of neutral
340: multi-center skyrmion-like object with equal number of positively and
341: negatively charged single skyrmions. However, in practice, namely the
342: boson/hole doping is likely to be a physically clear driving force
343: for a nucleation of a single, or multi-center skyrmion-like self-organized
344: collective mode in the form of multi-center charged topological defect
345: which may be (not strictly correctly) referred to as
346: multi-skyrmion system akin in a quantum Hall ferromagnetic state of a
347: two-dimensional electron gas.\cite{Green} In such a case, we may characterize an
348: individual
349: skyrmion by its position (i.e., the center of skyrmionic texture), its size
350: (i.e., the radius of domain wall), and the orientation of the in-plane
351: components of pseudo-spin (U(1) degree of freedom). An isolated skyrmion is
352: described by the inhomogeneous distribution of the CO parameter, or staggered
353: boson density $l_z$, order parameter $m_z$ characterizing the deviation from
354: the half-filling, and $m_{\perp}$ that corresponds only to the modulus of the
355: superfluid order parameter.
356: %In contrast with the uniform states the phase of
357: %the superfluid order parameter for skyrmion appears to be unordered.
358: %The topological structure must be considered as being largely dynamic in
359: %nature.
360:
361:
362:
363: It seems likely that for a light doping any doped particle (boson/holes)
364: results in a nucleation
365: of a new single-skyrmion state, hence its density changes gradually with
366: particle doping.
367: Therefore, as long as the separation between skyrmionic centers is sufficiently
368: large so that the inter-skyrmion interaction is negligible, the energy of the
369: system per particle remains almost constant. This means that the chemical
370: potential of boson or hole remains unchanged with doping and hence apparently
371: remains fixed.
372:
373: The multi-skyrmionic system in contrast with uniform ones can form the
374: structures
375: with inhomogeneous long-range ordering of the modulus of the superfluid order
376: parameter accompanied by the unordered global phases of single skyrmions.
377: Such a situation resembles in part that of granular superconductivity.
378:
379: In the long-wavelength limit the off-diagonal ordering can be described by an
380: effective Hamiltonian in terms of U(1) (phase) degree of freedom associated
381: with each skyrmion. Such a Hamiltonian
382: contains a repulsive, long-range Coulomb part and a
383: short-range contribution related to the phase degree of freedom. The
384: latter term can be written out in the standard for the $XY$ model form of a
385: so-called Josephson coupling
386: \begin{equation}
387: H_J = -\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}J_{ij}\cos(\varphi _{i}-\varphi _{j}),
388: \end{equation}
389: where $\varphi _{i},\varphi _{j}$ are global phases for skyrmions centered at
390: points $i,j$, respectively, $J_{ij}$ Josephson coupling parameter. Namely the
391: Josephson coupling gives rise to the long-range ordering of the phase of the
392: superfluid order parameter in a multi-center skyrmion. Such a Hamiltonian
393: represents a starting point for the analysis of disordered superconductors,
394: granular superconductivity, insulator-superconductor transition with $\langle
395: i,j\rangle$ array of superconducting islands with phases $\varphi _{i},\varphi
396: _{j}$. Calculating the phase-dependent part of skyrmion-skyrmion interaction
397: Timm {\it et al.}\cite{Timm} arrived at $negative$ sign of $J_{ij}$ that
398: favors antiparallel alignment of the U(1) pseudospins. In other words,
399: two skyrmions are assumed to form a peculiar Josephson $\pi$ micro-junction.
400: There are a number of interesting implications that follow directly from this
401: result:\cite{Kivelson} the spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry with
402: non-zero supercurrents and magnetic fluxes in the ground state, long-time tails
403: in the dynamics of the system, unconventional Aharonov-Bohm period $hc/4e$,
404: negative magnetoresistence.
405:
406: To account for Coulomb interaction and allow for quantum corrections we should
407: introduce into effective Hamiltonian the charging energy \cite{Kivelson}
408: $$
409: H_{ch}=-\frac{1}{2}q^2 \sum_{i,j}n_{i}(C^{-1})_{ij}n_{j}\, ,
410: $$
411: where $n_{i}$ is a boson number operator for bosons bound in $i$-th skyrmion; it
412: is quantum-mechanically conjugated to $\varphi$: $n_{i}=-i \partial /\partial
413: \varphi
414: _{i}$, $(C^{-1})_{ij}$ stands for the capacitance matrix, $q$ for bosonic
415: charge.
416:
417: Such a system appears to reveal a tremendously rich quantum-critical structure.
418: In the absence of disorder, the
419: $T=0$ phase diagram of the multi-skyrmion system implies either triangular, or
420: square crystalline arrangements (Skyrmion crystal)
421: with possible melting transition to a Skyrmion liquid.
422: It should be noted that analogy with charged $2D$ Coulomb gas
423: implies the Wigner crystallization of multi-center skyrmion with Wigner
424: crystal to Wigner liquid melting transition, respectively. Naturally, that the
425: additional degrees of freedom for skyrmion provide a richer physics of
426: Skyrmion
427: lattices. For a WC to be an insulator, disorder is required, which pins the WC
428: and also causes the crystalline order to have a finite correlation length.
429: Traditional approach to a Wigner crystallization implies the formation of a WC
430: for densities lower than a critical density, when the Coulomb energy dominates
431: over the kinetic energy. The effect of quantum fluctuations leads to a
432: (quantum) melting of the solid at high densities, or at a critical lattice
433: spacing. The critical properties of a two-dimensional lattice without any
434: internal degree of freedom are successfully described applying the BKT theory
435: to dislocations and disclinations of the lattice, and proceeds in two steps. The
436: first implies the transition to a liquid-crystal phase with short-range
437: translational order, the second does the transition to isotropic liquid.
438: Disorder pins the Skyrmion lattice and also causes the crystalline order to
439: have a finite correlation length. For such a system provided the skyrmion
440: positions fixed at all temperatures, the long-wave-length physics would be
441: described by an antiferromagnetic $XY$ model with expectable BKT transition and
442: gapless $XY$ spin-wave mode.
443:
444: As regards the superfluid properties the skyrmionic liquid reveals
445: unconventional behavior with two critical temperatures $T_{BS}\leq t$ and $T_c
446: \leq J $, $T_{BS}$ being the temperature of the ordering of the modulus and
447: $T_c < T_{BS}$ that of the phase of order parameter $\Psi$.
448:
449:
450: The low temperature physics in Skyrmion crystals is governed by an
451: interplay of two BKT transitions, for the U(1) phase and positional degrees of
452: freedom, respectively. \cite{Timm}
453: Dislocations in most Skyrmion lattice types lead to a mismatch in the U(1)
454: degree of freedom, which makes the dislocations bind fractional vortices and
455: lead to a coupling of translational and phase excitations. Both BKT temperatures
456: either coincide (square lattice) or the melting one is higher (triangular
457: lattice).\cite{Timm}
458:
459: Quantum fluctuations can substantially affect these
460: results. Quantum melting can destroy U(1) order at sufficiently
461: low densities where the Josephson coupling becomes exponentially small. Similar
462: situation is expected to take place in the vicinity of
463: structural transitions in Skyrmion crystal. With increasing the skyrmion density
464: the quantum effects result in a significant lowering of the melting temperature
465: as compared with classical square-root dependence.
466: The resulting melting temperature can reveal an oscilating behavior as a
467: function of particle density with zeros at the critical (magic) densities
468: associated with structural phase transitions.
469:
470: In terms of our model, the positional order corresponds to an incommensurate
471: charge density wave, while the U(1) order does to a superconductivity. In other
472: words, we arrive at a subtle interplay between two orders. The superconducting
473: state evolves from a charge order with $T_C \leq T_m$, where $T_m$ is the
474: temperature of a melting transition which could be termed as a temperature of
475: the opening of the insulating gap (pseudo-gap!?).
476:
477:
478:
479:
480: The normal modes of a dilute skyrmion system (multi-center skyrmion)
481: include the pseudo-spin waves
482: propagating in-between the skyrmions, the positional fluctuations, or phonon
483: modes, of the skyrmions which are gapless in a pure system, but gapped when
484: the lattice is pinned, and, finally, fluctuations in the skyrmionic in-plane
485: orientation and size.
486: The latter two types of fluctuation are intimitely
487: connected, since the $z$-component of
488: spin and orientation are conjugate coordinates because of commutation
489: relations of quantum
490: angular momentum operators. So, rotating a skyrmion changes its size.
491: The orientational
492: fluctuations of the multi-skyrmion system are governed by the gapless
493: $XY$ model.\cite{Green} The relevant model description is most familiar as
494: an effective theory of the Josephson junction array. An important feature of
495: the model is that it displays a quantum-critical point.
496:
497: The low-energy collective excitations of skyrmion
498: liquid includes an usual longitudinal acoustic phonon branch.
499: The liquid crystal phases differ from the isotropic liquid in that they have
500: massive topological excitations, {\it i.e.}, the disclinations.
501: One should note that the liquids do not support transverse modes, these could
502: survive in a liquid state only as overdamped modes. So that it is reasonable to
503: assume that solidification of the skyrmion lattice would be accompanied by a
504: stabilization of transverse modes with its sharpening below melting transition.
505: In other words an instability of transverse phonon modes signals the
506: onset of melting.
507:
508:
509: A generic property of the positionally ordered skyrmion configuration is the
510: sliding mode which is usually pinned by the disorder. The depinning of sliding
511: mode(s) can be detected in a low-frequency and low-temperature optical response.
512:
513:
514:
515:
516:
517: %\section{Conclusions}
518: In conclusion, the boson/hole doping of the
519: hard-core boson system away from half-filling is assumed to be a driving force
520: for a nucleation of a multi-center skyrmion-like self-organized
521: collective mode that resembles a system of CO
522: bubble domains with a Bose superfluid and extra bosons both confined in domain
523: walls. Such a {\it topological} CO+BS {\it phase separation}, rather than an
524: uniform mixed CO+BS
525: supersolid phase, is believed to describe the evolution of hc-BH model away from
526: half-filling. Starting from the classical model we predict the properties
527: of the respective quantum system. In frames of our scenario we may anticipate
528: for the hc-BH model the emergence
529: of an inhomogeneous BS condensate for superhigh temperatures $T_{TPS}\leq t$,
530: and 3D superconductivity for rather high temperatures $T_{c}\leq J < t$. The
531: system is
532: believed to reveal many properties typical for granular superconductors, CDW
533: materials, Wigner crystals, and multi-skyrmion system akin in a quantum Hall
534: ferromagnetic state of a 2D electron gas.
535: Topological inhomogeneity is believed to be a generic property of 2D
536: hard-core boson systems away from half-filling.
537:
538: Despite all shortcomings, MFA and continuous approximation are expected to
539: provide a physically clear
540: semiquantitative picture of rather complex transformations taking
541: place in bare CO system with doping, and can be instructive as a starting point
542: to analyze possible scenarios. First of all, the MFA analysis allow us to
543: consider the antiphase domain wall in CO phase to be a very
544: efficient ring-shaped potential well for the localization of a single extra
545: boson (hole) thus forming a novel type of a topological defect with a
546: single-charged domain wall. Such a defect can be addressed as a charged
547: skyrmion-like quasiparticle which energy can be approximated by its classical
548: value for CO bubble domain.
549: It is of great importance to note that domain wall simultaneously
550: represents a ring-shaped reservoir for Bose superfluid.
551:
552:
553: Unfortunately, we have no experience to deal with multi-center
554: skyrmions as regards its structure, energetics, and stability. It should be
555: noted that such a texture with strongly polarizable centers is believed to
556: provide an effective screening of
557: long-range boson-boson repulsion thus resulting in an additional
558: self-stabilization.
559: Nucleation of topological phase is likely to proceed in the way typical for the
560: first order phase transitions.
561: The present paper establishes only the framework for analyzing the subtleties
562: of the phase separation in a lattice hc-BH model away from half-filling. Much
563: work remains to be done both in a macroscopic and microscopic aproaches.
564:
565:
566:
567: We acknowledge the support by SMWK Grant, INTAS Grant No. 01-0654, CRDF Grant
568: No. REC-005,
569: RME Grant No. E 02-3.4-392 and No. UR.01.01.042, RFBR Grant No. 01-02-96404.
570: One of us (A.S.M.) has benefited from discussions with C. Timm, S.-L.
571: Drechsler, and T. Mishonov.
572: %\end{acknowledgments}
573:
574:
575:
576:
577: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
578:
579:
580: \bibitem{Penrose}
581: O. Penrose and L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. {\bf 104}, 576 (1956).
582:
583:
584:
585: \bibitem{Batrouni}
586: G. G. Batrouni and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 1599
587: (2000).
588:
589: \bibitem{Hebert}
590: F. H\'{e}bert, G.G. Batrouni, R.T. Scalettar {\it et. al.},
591: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 014513 (2001)
592:
593: \bibitem{Schmid}
594: Guido Schmid, Synge Todo, Matthias Troyer, and Ansgar Dorneich,
595: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 167208 (2002).
596:
597: \bibitem{MFA}
598: R.T. Scalettar, G.G. Batrouni, A.P. Kampf, and G.T. Zimanyi,
599: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 8467 (1995).
600:
601: \bibitem{Cagan}
602: M.Yu. Kagan, K.I. Kugel, and D.I. Khomskii, JETP, {\bf 93}, 415 (2001).
603:
604:
605: \bibitem{Pich}
606: Christian Pich and Erwin Frey, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, 13712 (1998).
607:
608: \bibitem{Bernardet}
609: K. Bernardet, G.G. Batrouni, J.-L. Meunier {\it et. al.},
610: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 104519 (2002).
611:
612: \bibitem{AFM-domain}
613: The antiferromagnetic domain texture appears as
614: a result of the minimization of elastic and magnetoelastic energies.
615:
616: \bibitem{Belavin} A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov, JETP Lett. {\bf 22}, 245 (1975).
617:
618: \bibitem{Waldner}
619: F. Waldner, J. Magn. Mag. Matter {\bf 54-57}, 837 (1986); Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
620: 65}, 1519 (1990).
621:
622: \bibitem{Kochelaev}
623: S.I. Belov, B.I. Kochelaev, Sol. St. Commun. {\bf 103}, 249 (1997).
624:
625: \bibitem{Carsten}
626: Carsten Timm and K. H. Bennemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4994 (2000).
627:
628:
629: \bibitem{Kamppeter}
630: T. Kamppeter, S.A. Leonel, F.G. Mertens, M.E. Gouvêa, A.S.T. Pires, and A.S.
631: Kovalev, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 21}, 93 (2001).
632:
633: \bibitem{Sheka}
634: Denis D. Sheka, Boris A. Ivanov, and G. Mertens,
635: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 64}, 024432 (2001).
636:
637: \bibitem{Istomin}
638: R.A. Istomin, A.S. Moskvin, JETP Lett. {\bf 61}, 898 (2000).
639:
640:
641: \bibitem{AFM}
642: A.S. Ovchinnikov, I.G. Bostrem, A.S. Moskvin, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 66},
643: 134304 (2002).
644:
645: \bibitem{Abanov}
646: Ar. Abanov, V.L. Pokrovsky, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58}, R8889 (1998).
647:
648:
649: \bibitem{Green}
650: A.G. Green, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61}, R16299 (2000).
651:
652: \bibitem{Timm}
653: Carsten Timm, S.M. Girvin, H.A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58}, 10634 (1998).
654:
655: \bibitem{Kivelson}
656: S.A. Kivelson, B.Z. Spivak, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45}, 10490 (1992).
657:
658: \bibitem{Rao}
659: Madan Rao, Surajit Sengupta, and R. Shankar, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 3998
660: (1997).
661:
662: \end{thebibliography}
663:
664:
665: \end{document}
666: