1: \let\prp=\perp
2: \let\pll=\parallel
3: \overfullrule=0pt
4: \newcount\mgnf %ingrandimento
5: \mgnf=0
6:
7: \ifnum\mgnf=0
8: \def\openone{\leavevmode\hbox{\ninerm 1\kern-3.3pt\tenrm1}}%
9: \def\*{\vglue0.3truecm}\fi
10: \ifnum\mgnf=1
11: \def\openone{\leavevmode\hbox{\ninerm 1\kern-3.63pt\tenrm1}}%
12: \def\*{\vglue0.5truecm}\fi
13: \ifnum\mgnf=0
14: \magnification=\magstep0
15: \hsize=15truecm\vsize=23truecm
16: \parindent=4.pt\baselineskip=0.45cm
17: \font\titolo=cmbx12
18: \font\titolone=cmbx10 scaled\magstep 2
19: \font\cs=cmcsc10
20: %\font\css=cmcsc7
21: \font\ottorm=cmr8
22: \font\msxtw=msbm10
23: \font\euftw=eufm10
24: \font\msytw=msbm10
25: \font\msytww=msbm8
26: \font\msytwww=msbm7
27: \font\indbf=cmbx10 scaled\magstep1
28: \font\grbold=cmmib10
29: \fi
30: \ifnum\mgnf=2
31: \magnification=\magstep0\hoffset=0.truecm
32: \hsize=15truecm\vsize=24.truecm
33: \baselineskip=18truept plus0.1pt minus0.1pt \parindent=0.9truecm
34: \lineskip=0.5truecm\lineskiplimit=0.1pt \parskip=0.1pt plus1pt
35: \font\titolo=cmbx12 scaled\magstep 1
36: \font\titolone=cmbx10 scaled\magstep 3
37: \font\cs=cmcsc10 scaled\magstep 1
38: \font\ottorm=cmr8 scaled\magstep 1
39: \font\msxtw=msbm10 scaled\magstep1
40: \font\euftw=eufm10 scaled\magstep1
41: \font\msytw=msbm10 scaled\magstep1
42: \font\msytww=msbm8 scaled\magstep1
43: \font\msytwww=msbm7 scaled\magstep1
44: \font\grbold=cmmib10 scaled\magstep1
45: \font\indbf=cmbx10 scaled\magstep2
46: \fi
47:
48: \global\newcount\numsec\global\newcount\numapp
49: \global\newcount\numfor\global\newcount\numfig\global\newcount\numsub
50: \numsec=0\numapp=0\numfig=1
51: \def\veroparagrafo{\number\numsec}\def\veraformula{\number\numfor}
52: \def\veraappendice{\number\numapp}\def\verasub{\number\numsub}
53: \def\verafigura{\number\numfig}
54:
55: \def\section(#1,#2){\advance\numsec by 1\numfor=1\numsub=1%
56: \SIA p,#1,{\veroparagrafo} %
57: \write15{\string\Fp (#1){\secc(#1)}}%
58: \write16{ sec. #1 ==> \secc(#1) }%
59: \hbox to \hsize{\titolo\hfill \number\numsec. #2\hfill%
60: \expandafter{\alato(sec. #1)}}\*}
61:
62: \def\appendix(#1,#2){\advance\numapp by 1\numfor=1\numsub=1%
63: \SIA p,#1,{A\veraappendice} %
64: \write15{\string\Fp (#1){\secc(#1)}}%
65: \write16{ app. #1 ==> \secc(#1) }%
66: \hbox to \hsize{\titolo\hfill Appendix A\number\numapp. #2\hfill%
67: \expandafter{\alato(app. #1)}}\*}
68:
69: \def\senondefinito#1{\expandafter\ifx\csname#1\endcsname\relax}
70:
71: \def\SIA #1,#2,#3 {\senondefinito{#1#2}%
72: \expandafter\xdef\csname #1#2\endcsname{#3}\else
73: \write16{???? ma #1#2 e' gia' stato definito !!!!} \fi}
74:
75: \def \Fe(#1)#2{\SIA fe,#1,#2 }
76: \def \Fp(#1)#2{\SIA fp,#1,#2 }
77: \def \Fg(#1)#2{\SIA fg,#1,#2 }
78:
79: \def\etichetta(#1){(\veroparagrafo.\veraformula)%
80: \SIA e,#1,(\veroparagrafo.\veraformula) %
81: \global\advance\numfor by 1%
82: \write15{\string\Fe (#1){\equ(#1)}}%
83: \write16{ EQ #1 ==> \equ(#1) }}
84:
85: \def\etichettaa(#1){(A\veraappendice.\veraformula)%
86: \SIA e,#1,(A\veraappendice.\veraformula) %
87: \global\advance\numfor by 1%
88: \write15{\string\Fe (#1){\equ(#1)}}%
89: \write16{ EQ #1 ==> \equ(#1) }}
90:
91: \def\getichetta(#1){Fig. \verafigura%
92: \SIA g,#1,{\verafigura} %
93: \global\advance\numfig by 1%
94: \write15{\string\Fg (#1){\graf(#1)}}%
95: \write16{ Fig. #1 ==> \graf(#1) }}
96:
97: \def\etichettap(#1){\veroparagrafo.\verasub%
98: \SIA p,#1,{\veroparagrafo.\verasub} %
99: \global\advance\numsub by 1%
100: \write15{\string\Fp (#1){\secc(#1)}}%
101: \write16{ par #1 ==> \secc(#1) }}
102:
103: \def\etichettapa(#1){A\veraappendice.\verasub%
104: \SIA p,#1,{A\veraappendice.\verasub} %
105: \global\advance\numsub by 1%
106: \write15{\string\Fp (#1){\secc(#1)}}%
107: \write16{ par #1 ==> \secc(#1) }}
108:
109: \def\Eq(#1){\eqno{\etichetta(#1)\alato(#1)}}
110: \def\eq(#1){\etichetta(#1)\alato(#1)}
111: \def\Eqa(#1){\eqno{\etichettaa(#1)\alato(#1)}}
112: \def\eqa(#1){\etichettaa(#1)\alato(#1)}
113: \def\eqg(#1){\getichetta(#1)\alato(fig. #1)}
114: \def\sub(#1){\0\palato(p. #1){\bf \etichettap(#1)\hskip.3truecm}}
115: \def\asub(#1){\0\palato(p. #1){\bf \etichettapa(#1)\hskip.3truecm}}
116:
117: \def\equv(#1){\senondefinito{fe#1}$\clubsuit$#1%
118: \write16{eq. #1 non e' (ancora) definita}%
119: \else\csname fe#1\endcsname\fi}
120: \def\grafv(#1){\senondefinito{fg#1}$\clubsuit$#1%
121: \write16{fig. #1 non e' (ancora) definito}%
122: \else\csname fg#1\endcsname\fi}
123: \def\secv(#1){\senondefinito{fp#1}$\clubsuit$#1%
124: \write16{par. #1 non e' (ancora) definito}%
125: \else\csname fp#1\endcsname\fi}
126:
127: \def\equ(#1){\senondefinito{e#1}\equv(#1)\else\csname e#1\endcsname\fi}
128: \def\graf(#1){\senondefinito{g#1}\grafv(#1)\else\csname g#1\endcsname\fi}
129: \def\secc(#1){\senondefinito{p#1}\secv(#1)\else\csname p#1\endcsname\fi}
130: \def\sec(#1){{\S\secc(#1)}}
131:
132: \def\BOZZA{
133: \def\alato(##1){\rlap{\kern-\hsize\kern-1.2truecm{$\scriptstyle##1$}}}
134: \def\palato(##1){\rlap{\kern-1.2truecm{$\scriptstyle##1$}}}
135: }
136:
137: \def\alato(#1){}
138: \def\galato(#1){}
139: \def\palato(#1){}
140:
141:
142: {\count255=\time\divide\count255 by 60 \xdef\hourmin{\number\count255}
143: \multiply\count255 by-60\advance\count255 by\time
144: \xdef\hourmin{\hourmin:\ifnum\count255<10 0\fi\the\count255}}
145:
146: \def\oramin{\hourmin }
147:
148: \def\data{\number\day/\ifcase\month\or gennaio \or febbraio \or marzo \or
149: aprile \or maggio \or giugno \or luglio \or agosto \or settembre
150: \or ottobre \or novembre \or dicembre \fi/\number\year;\ \oramin}
151: \setbox200\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle \data $}
152: \footline={\rlap{\hbox{\copy200}}\tenrm\hss \number\pageno\hss}
153:
154:
155: \let\a=\alpha \let\b=\beta \let\g=\gamma \let\d=\delta \let\e=\varepsilon
156: \let\z=\zeta \let\h=\eta \let\th=\vartheta \let\k=\kappa \let\l=\lambda
157: \let\m=\mu \let\n=\nu \let\x=\xi \let\p=\pi \let\r=\rho
158: \let\s=\sigma \let\t=\tau \let\f=\varphi \let\ph=\varphi \let\c=\chi
159: \let\ps=\psi \let\y=\upsilon \let\o=\omega \let\si=\varsigma
160: \let\G=\Gamma \let\D=\Delta \let\Th=\Theta \let\L=\Lambda \let\X=\Xi
161: \let\P=\Pi \let\Si=\Sigma \let\F=\Phi \let\Ps=\Psi
162: \let\O=\Omega \let\Y=\Upsilon
163:
164: \def\\{\hfill\break} \let\==\equiv
165: \let\txt=\textstyle\let\dis=\displaystyle
166: \let\io=\infty \def\Dpr{\V\dpr\,}
167: \def\aps{{\it a posteriori}}
168: \let\0=\noindent \def\pagina{{\vfill\eject}}
169: \def\bra#1{{\langle#1|}}\def\ket#1{{|#1\rangle}}
170: \def\media#1{{\langle#1\rangle}}
171: \def\ie{\hbox{\it i.e.\ }}\def\eg{\hbox{\it e.g.\ }}
172: \let\dpr=\partial \let\circa=\cong
173: \let\bs=\backslash
174: \def\defin{{\buildrel def\over=}}
175: \def\tende#1{\,\vtop{\ialign{##\crcr\rightarrowfill\crcr
176: \noalign{\kern-1pt\nointerlineskip}
177: \hskip3.pt${\scriptstyle #1}$\hskip3.pt\crcr}}\,}
178: \def\otto{\,{\kern-1.truept\leftarrow\kern-5.truept\to\kern-1.truept}\,}
179: \def\fra#1#2{{#1\over#2}}
180: \def\Pf{{\rm Pf}\,}\def\up{{\underline\p}}\def\bI{{\bf I}}
181:
182: \def\PP{{\cal P}}\def\EE{{\cal E}}\def\MM{{\cal M}}\def\VV{{\cal V}}
183: \def\CC{{\cal C}}\def\FF{{\cal F}}\def\HH{{\cal H}}\def\WW{{\cal W}}
184: \def\TT{{\cal T}}\def\NN{{\cal N}}\def\BB{{\cal B}}
185: \def\RR{{\cal R}}\def\LL{{\cal L}}\def\JJ{{\cal J}}
186: \def\DD{{\cal D}}\def\AA{{\cal A}}\def\GG{{\cal G}}\def\SS{{\cal S}}
187: \def\OO{{\cal O}}
188:
189: \def\der{{\rm d}}
190: \def\T#1{{#1_{\kern-3pt\lower7pt\hbox{$\widetilde{}$}}\kern3pt}}
191: \def\VVV#1{{\underline #1}_{\kern-3pt
192: \lower7pt\hbox{$\widetilde{}$}}\kern3pt\,}
193: \def\W#1{#1_{\kern-3pt\lower7.5pt\hbox{$\widetilde{}$}}\kern2pt\,}
194: \def\Re{{\rm Re}\,}\def\Im{{\rm Im}\,}
195: \def\lis{\overline}\def\tto{\Rightarrow}
196: \def\etc{{\it etc}} \def\acapo{\hfill\break}
197: \def\mod{{\rm mod}\,} \def\per{{\rm per}\,} \def\sign{{\rm sign}\,}
198: \def\indica{\leaders \hbox to 0.5cm{\hss.\hss}\hfill}
199: \def\guida{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss.\hss}\hfill}
200: \mathchardef\oo= "0521
201:
202: \def\V#1{{\bf #1}}
203: \def\pp{{\bf p}}\def\qq{{\bf q}}\def\ii{{\bf i}}\def\xx{{\bf x}}
204: \def\yy{{\bf y}}\def\kk{{\bf k}}\def\mm{{\bf m}}\def\nn{{\bf n}}
205: \def\dd{{\bf d}}\def\zz{{\bf z}}\def\uu{{\bf u}}\def\vv{{\bf v}}
206: \def\xxi{\hbox{\grbold \char24}} \def\bP{{\bf P}}\def\rr{{\bf r}}
207: \def\tt{{\bf t}}
208: \def\ss{{\underline \sigma}}\def\oo{{\underline \omega}}
209: \def\ee{{\underline \varepsilon}}\def\aa{{\underline \alpha}}
210: \def\un{{\underline \nu}}\def\ul{{\underline \lambda}}
211: \def\um{{\underline \mu}}
212: \def\xxx{{\underline\xx}}
213: \def\Overline#1{{\bar#1}}
214: \let\ciao=\bye
215: \def\qed{\raise1pt\hbox{\vrule height5pt width5pt depth0pt}}
216: \def\hf#1{{\hat \f_{#1}}}
217: \def\barf#1{{\tilde \f_{#1}}} \def\tg#1{{\tilde g_{#1}}}
218: \def\bq{{\bar q}} \def\bh{{\bar h}} \def\bp{{\bar p}} \def\bpp{{\bar \pp}}
219: \def\Val{{\rm Val}}
220: \def\indic{\hbox{\raise-2pt \hbox{\indbf 1}}}
221: \def\bk#1#2{\bar\kk_{#1#2}}
222: \def\tdh{{\tilde h}}
223: \def\virg{\quad,\quad}
224: \def\bT{{\bf T}}
225:
226: \def\MMM{\hbox{\euftw M}}
227: \def\RRR{\hbox{\msytw R}} \def\rrrr{\hbox{\msytww R}}
228: \def\rrr{\hbox{\msytwww R}} \def\CCC{\hbox{\msytw C}}
229: \def\cccc{\hbox{\msytww C}} \def\ccc{\hbox{\msytwww C}}
230: \def\NNN{\hbox{\msytw N}} \def\nnnn{\hbox{\msytww N}}
231: \def\nnn{\hbox{\msytwww N}} \def\ZZZ{\hbox{\msytw Z}}
232: \def\zzzz{\hbox{\msytww Z}} \def\zzz{\hbox{\msytwww Z}}
233: \def\TTT{\hbox{\msytw T}} \def\tttt{\hbox{\msytww T}}
234: \def\ttt{\hbox{\msytwww T}}
235:
236: %%% INSERIMENTO FIGURE ( se si usa DVIPS )
237: %
238: % Se si vuole utilizzare delle macro postscript personali, contenute
239: % nel file ini.ps, togliere il commento alla riga seguente
240: %\special{header=ini.pst}
241: %
242: % Il comando seguente inserisce una scatola contenente #3 in modo che
243: % l'angolo superiore sinistro occupi la posizione (#1,#2)
244: %
245: \def\ins#1#2#3{\vbox to0pt{\kern-#2 \hbox{\kern#1 #3}\vss}\nointerlineskip}
246: %
247: % Il comando seguente crea una scatola di dimensioni #1x#2 contenente
248: % il disegno descritto in #4.ps;
249: % in questo disegno si possono introdurre delle stringhe usando \ins
250: % e mettendo le istruzioni relative nell'argomento #3.
251: % Il file #4.ps contiene le istruzioni postscript, che devono essere scritte
252: % presupponendo che l'origine sia nell'angolo inferiore sinistro della
253: % scatola, mentre per il resto l'ambiente grafico e' quello standard.
254: % #5 deve essere della forma \eqg("nome simbolico").
255: %
256: % Le istruzioni postscript possono essere inserite nel file che contiene
257: % l'istruzione \insertplot, racchiudendole fra le istruzioni \initfig{#4}
258: % e \endfig; inoltre ogni riga deve cominciare con "write13<" e deve finire
259: % con ">". In questo modo si crea il file #4.ps relativo alla figura.
260: %
261: \newdimen\xshift \newdimen\xwidth \newdimen\yshift
262:
263: \def\insertplot#1#2#3#4#5{\par%
264: \xwidth=#1 \xshift=\hsize \advance\xshift by-\xwidth \divide\xshift by 2%
265: \yshift=#2 \divide\yshift by 2%
266: \line{\hskip\xshift \vbox to #2{\vfil%
267: #3 \special{psfile=#4.ps}}\hfill \raise\yshift\hbox{#5}}}
268:
269: \def\initfig#1{%
270: \catcode`\%=12\catcode`\{=12\catcode`\}=12
271: \catcode`\<=1\catcode`\>=2
272: \openout13=#1.ps}
273:
274: \def\endfig{%
275: \closeout13
276: \catcode`\%=14\catcode`\{=1
277: \catcode`\}=2\catcode`\<=12\catcode`\>=12}
278:
279: \def\insertplotttt#1#2#3#4{\par%
280: \xwidth=#1 \xshift=\hsize \advance\xshift by-\xwidth \divide\xshift by 2%
281: \yshift=#2 \divide\yshift by 2%
282: \line{\hskip\xshift \vbox to #2{\vfil%
283: \ifnum\driver=0 #3
284: \special{ps::[local,begin] gsave currentpoint translate}%
285: \special{ps: plotfile #4.ps} \special{ps::[end]grestore}\fi
286: \ifnum\driver=1 #3 \special{psfile=#4.ps}\fi
287: \ifnum\driver=2 #3
288: \ifnum\mgnf=0\special{#4.ps 1. 1. scale} \fi
289: \ifnum\mgnf=1\special{#4.ps 1.2 1.2 scale}\fi
290: \fi }\hfill}}
291:
292: %%%%% FIGURE fig51.ps
293:
294: \initfig{fig51}
295: \write13<%!>
296: \write13<%%BoundingBox 0 0 300 150>
297: \write13<gsave .5 setlinewidth 40 20 260 {dup 0 moveto 140 lineto} for stroke
298: grestore>
299: \write13</punto { gsave % uso: x1 y1 punto>
300: \write13<2 0 360 newpath arc fill stroke grestore} def>
301: \write13<40 75 punto>
302: \write13<60 75 punto>
303: \write13<80 75 punto>
304: \write13<100 75 punto 120 68 punto 140 61 punto 160 54 punto 180 47 punto 200
305: 40 punto>
306: \write13<220 33 punto 240 26 punto 260 19 punto>
307: \write13<120 82.5 punto>
308: \write13<140 90 punto>
309: \write13<160 80 punto>
310: \write13<160 100 punto>
311: \write13<180 110 punto>
312: \write13<180 70 punto>
313: \write13<200 60 punto>
314: \write13<200 120 punto>
315: \write13<220 110 punto>
316: \write13<220 50 punto>
317: \write13<240 100 punto>
318: \write13<240 60 punto>
319: \write13<120 50 punto>
320: \write13<260 20 punto>
321: \write13<240 40 punto>
322: \write13<240 50 punto>
323: \write13<260 70 punto>
324: \write13<200 80 punto>
325: \write13<260 90 punto>
326: \write13<260 110 punto>
327: \write13<220 130 punto>
328: \write13<40 75 moveto 100 75 lineto 140 90 lineto 200 120 lineto 220 130
329: lineto>
330: \write13<200 120 moveto 240 100 lineto 260 110 lineto>
331: \write13<240 100 moveto 260 90 lineto>
332: \write13<140 90 moveto 180 70 lineto 200 80 lineto>
333: \write13<180 70 moveto 220 50 lineto 260 70 lineto>
334: \write13<220 50 moveto 240 40 lineto>
335: \write13<220 50 moveto 240 50 lineto>
336: \write13<100 75 moveto 260 20 lineto>
337: \write13<100 75 moveto 120 50 lineto stroke>
338: \write13<grestore>
339: \endfig
340:
341: \openin14=\jobname.aux \ifeof14 \relax \else
342: \input \jobname.aux \closein14 \fi
343: \openout15=\jobname.aux
344: \footline={\tenrm\hss \number\pageno\hss}
345: %\BOZZA
346: {\baselineskip=12pt
347: \centerline{\titolone Anomalous universality in the
348: Anisotropic Ashkin--Teller model}
349: \vskip1.truecm
350: \centerline{\titolo{A. Giuliani%
351: \footnote{${}^{\ast}$}{\ottorm Partially supported by
352: NSF Grant DMR 01--279--26;
353: Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a
354: di Roma ``La Sapienza'', P.zzale A. Moro, 2, I-00185, Roma;
355: and INFN, sezione di Roma1; e--mail:
356: alessandro.giuliani@roma1.infn.it}, V. Mastropietro%
357: \footnote{${}^{\ast\ast}$}{\ottorm Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit\`a
358: di Roma ``Tor
359: Vergata'', Via della Ricerca Scientifica, I-00133, Roma; e--mail:
360: mastropi@mat.uniroma2.it}}}
361: \vskip.5truecm
362: \0{\cs Abstract.}
363: {\it The Ashkin--Teller (AT) model
364: is a generalization of Ising 2--d
365: to a four states spin model; it can be written in the form
366: of two Ising layers (in general
367: with different couplings)
368: interacting via a four--spin interaction.
369: It was conjectured long ago (by Kadanoff and Wegner,
370: Wu and Lin, Baxter and others) that
371: AT has in general two critical points, and that universality holds,
372: in the sense that the critical exponents are the same as in the Ising model,
373: except when the couplings of the two Ising layers are equal (isotropic case).
374: We obtain an explicit expression for the specific
375: heat from which we prove this conjecture in the
376: weakly interacting case
377: and we locate precisely the critical points.
378: We find the somewhat unexpected feature that,
379: despite universality holds for the specific heat,
380: nevertheless nonuniversal critical indexes
381: appear: for instance the distance between
382: the critical points rescales with an anomalous exponent
383: as we let the couplings of the two Ising layers
384: coincide (isotropic limit); and so does the
385: constant in front of the logarithm in the specific heat.
386: Our result also explains
387: how the crossover from universal to nonuniversal
388: behaviour is realized.}
389: }
390: \*
391: \section(1,Introduction)
392: \*
393: \sub(1.1) {\it Historical introduction.}
394: Ashkin and Teller [AT] introduced
395: their model as a generalization
396: of the Ising model to a four
397: component system; in each site of a bidimensional
398: lattice there is a spin which can take four values,
399: and only nearest neighbor spins interact.
400: The model can be also considered a generalization
401: of the four state Potts model to which
402: it reduces for a suitable choice of the parameters.
403:
404: A very convenient representation
405: of the Ashkin Teller model is
406: in terms of Ising spins [F];
407: one associates with each site of the square
408: lattice two spins variables, $\s^{(1)}_\xx$ and
409: $\s^{(2)}_\xx$;
410: the partition function is given by
411: $Z_{\L_M}=\sum_{\s^{(1)},\s^{(2)}} e^{-H_{\L_M}}$, where
412: %
413: $$\eqalign{&H_{\L_M}(\s^{(1)},\s^{(2)})=J^{(1)}H_I(\s^{(1)})+
414: J^{(2)}H_I(\s^{(2)})+\l V(\s^{(1)},\s^{(2)})=\sum_{\xx\in\L_M}
415: H_\xx^{AT}\;,\cr
416: &H_I(\s^{(j)})=-\sum_{\xx\in\L_M} [\s^{(j)}_{\xx}\s^{(j)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}+
417: \s^{(j)}_{\xx}\s^{(j)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}]\;,\cr
418: &V(\s^{(1)},\s^{(2)})=-
419: \sum_{\xx\in\L_M}[\s^{(2)}_{\xx}\s^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}
420: \s^{(1)}_{\xx}\s^{(1)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}+
421: \s^{(2)}_{\xx}\s^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}
422: \s^{(1)}_{\xx}\s^{(1)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}]\;,\cr}\Eq(1.1)$$
423: %
424: where $H_I$ is the Ising model hamiltonian,
425: $\hat e_1$, $\hat e_0$ are the unit vectors $\hat e_1=(1,0)$,
426: $\hat e_0=(0,1)$ and $\L_M$ is a square subset of $\ZZZ^2$ of side $M$.
427: The free energy
428: and the specific heat are given by
429: %
430: $$f=\lim_{M\to\io}{1\over M^2}\log Z_{\L_M}\virg
431: C_{v}=\lim_{M\to\io}{1\over M^2}\sum_{\xx,\yy\in\L_M}<H_\xx^{AT}
432: H_\yy^{AT}>_{\L_M,T}\;,\Eq(cv)$$
433: %
434: where $<\cdot>_{\L_M,T}$ denotes
435: the truncated expectation w.r.t. the Gibbs distribution
436: with Hamiltonian \equ(1.1).
437: The case $J^{(1)}=J^{(2)}$ is called {\it isotropic}.
438: For $\l=0$ the model
439: reduces to two independent Ising models
440: and it has
441: {\it two critical points} if $J^{(1)}\not= J^{(2)}$;
442: it was conjectured by Kadanoff and Wegner [K][KW]
443: and later on by
444: Wu and Lin [WL] that the AT model
445: has in general two critical points
446: also when $\l\not=0$,
447: except when the model is isotropic.
448:
449: The {\it isotropic} case was studied
450: by Kadanoff [K] who,
451: by scaling theory, conjectured a relation between
452: the critical exponents of {\it isotropic} AT
453: and those of the {\it Eight vertex} model,
454: which had been solved by Baxter and has nonuniversal indexes.
455: Further evidence for the validity
456: of Kadanoff's prediction was given by [PB]
457: (using second order renormalization group arguments)
458: and by [LP][N] (by a heuristic mapping of both
459: models into the massive Luttinger model describing
460: one dimensional interacting fermions
461: in the continuum).
462: Indeed non universal
463: critical behaviour in the specific heat
464: in the isotropic AT model, for small
465: $\l$, has been rigorously established in [M1].
466:
467: The {\it anisotropic} case is much less understood.
468: As we said, it is believed that
469: there are {\it two} critical points,
470: contrary to what happens in the isotropic case.
471: Baxter [Ba] conjectured that
472: "presumably" {\it universality} holds at the critical points
473: for $J^{(1)}\not= J^{(2)}$
474: (\ie the critical indices are the same as in the Ising model),
475: except when $J^{(1)}=J^{(2)}$ when the two critical
476: points coincide and nonuniversal behaviour is found.
477: Since the 1970's, the anisotropic AT model
478: was studied by various approximate or numerical methods:
479: Migdal--Kadanoff Renormalization Group [DR],
480: Monte Carlo Renormalization group [Be],
481: finite size scaling [Bad]; such results give evidence of
482: the fact that, far away from the isotropic point,
483: AT has two critical points and belongs to the same universality class
484: of Ising; however they do not give informations
485: about the precise relative location of the critical points
486: and the critical behaviour of the specific heat
487: when $J^{(1)}$ is close to $J^{(2)}$.
488: The problem of how
489: the crossover from universal to nonuniversal
490: behaviour is realized in the isotropic limit
491: remained for years completely unsolved,
492: even at a heuristic level.
493:
494: We will study the anisotropic Ashkin--Teller model
495: by writing the partition function and the specific heat
496: as Grassmann integrals corresponding to a $d=1+1$
497: {\it interacting} fermionic theory;
498: this is possible because the Ising model
499: can be reformulated as a {\it free fermions} model
500: (see [SML][H][S] or [ID]). One can then
501: take advantage from the theory
502: of Grassmann integrals for
503: weakly interacting $d=1+1$ fermions, which is quite
504: well developed, starting from [BG1]
505: (see also [BG][GM] or [BM] for extensive
506: reviews). Fermionic RG methods for classical spin models
507: have been already applied in [PS] to the
508: Ising model perturbed by a four spin
509: interaction, proving a {\it universality} result
510: for the specific heat; and in [M1] to prove a {\it
511: nonuniversality} result for the 8 vertex or the isotropic
512: AT model. By such techniques one can develop a
513: perturbative expansion, convergent up to the critical points,
514: uniformly in the parameters.
515:
516:
517: \sub(1.1a) {\it Main results.}
518: We find convenient to introduce the variables
519: $t^{(j)}=\tanh J^{(j)}$, $j=1,2$ and
520: %
521: $$t={t^{(1)}+t^{(2)}\over 2}
522: \virg u={t^{(1)}-t^{(2)}\over 2}\;\Eq(1.1aa).$$
523: %
524: The parameter $u$ measures the {\it anisotropy}
525: of the system. We consider then the free
526: energy or the specific heat as functions of $t,u,\l$.
527:
528: If $\l=0$, AT is exactly
529: solvable, because the Hamiltonian \equ(1.1)
530: is the sum of two indipendent Ising model
531: Hamiltonians. From the Ising model exact solution
532: [O][SML][MW] one finds that $f$
533: is analytic for all $t,u$ except for
534: %
535: $$t=t_c^\pm=\sqrt2-1\pm|u|\Eq(1.aa)$$
536: %
537: and for $t$ close to $t_c^\pm$
538: the specific heat $C_v$ has a logarithmic
539: divergence: $C_v\simeq -C\log|t-t_c^\pm|$, where
540: $C>0$ and $\simeq$ means that the
541: ratio of both sides tends to 1 as $t\to t_c^\pm$.
542:
543: We consider the case in which $\l$
544: is small with respect to $\sqrt2-1$ and
545: we distinguish two
546: regimes.\\
547: \01) If $u$ is much bigger than $\l$ (so that the unperturbed
548: critical points are well separated)
549: we find that the presence of
550: $\l$ just changes by a small amount
551: the location of the critical points, \ie we find that
552: the critical points have the form $t^\pm_c=\sqrt2-1+O(\l)\pm|u|
553: \big(1+O(\l)\big)$; moreover the asymptotic behaviour
554: of $C_v$ at criticality remains essentially
555: unchanged: $C_v\simeq-C\log|t-t^\pm_c|$.
556: \\
557: \02) When $u$ is small compared to $\l$ the interaction
558: has a more dramatic effect.
559: We find that the system has still only two critical points $t^\pm_c(\l,u)$;
560: their center $(t^+_c+t_c^-)/2$ is just shifted by $O(\l)$
561: from $\sqrt2-1$, as in item (1);
562: however their relative location
563: scales, as $u\to 0$,
564: with an ``anomalous critical exponent'' $\h(\l)$,
565: continously varying with $\l$: more precisely
566: we find that $t^+_c-t_c^-=O(|u|^{1+\h})$,
567: where $\h$ is analytic in $\l$ near $\l=0$ and
568: $\h=-b \l +O\big(\l^2\big)$, $b>0$. In particular the relative
569: location of the critical points as a function of the anisotropy parameter $u$
570: with $\l$ fixed and small has a different qualitative behaviour,
571: depending on the sign of $\l$, see Fig 1.
572:
573: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
574: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURA 1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
575: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
576:
577: \insertplot{300pt}{110pt}%
578: {\ins{170pt}{-24pt}{$u$}
579: \ins{44pt}{83pt}{$t^+_c-t^-_c$}
580: \ins{151pt}{18pt}{$\l<0$}
581: \ins{107pt}{60pt}{$\l>0$}
582: \ins{110pt}{25pt}{$\l=0$}
583: }%
584: {tc}{}
585: \vskip1.5cm
586: \line{\vtop{\line{\hskip2.5truecm\vbox{\advance\hsize by -5.1 truecm
587: \0{\ottorm FIG 1.
588: The qualitative behaviour of ${\scriptstyle
589: t^+_c(\l,u)-t_c^-(\l,u)}$ as a function of
590: ${\scriptstyle u}$ for two different values of ${\scriptstyle \l}$
591: (in arbitrary units). The graphs are (qualitative) plots of ${\scriptstyle
592: 2|u|^{1+\h}}$, with ${\scriptstyle \h\simeq -b\l}$, ${\scriptstyle b>0}$.
593: } \hfill} }}}
594: \vskip.5cm
595:
596: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
597: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
598:
599: For $t\to t_c^\pm(\l,u)$
600: the specific heat $C_v$ has still a logarithmic
601: divergence but, for all $u\not=0$, the constant in front of the log
602: is $O(|u|^{\h_c})$, where $\h_c$ is analytic in $\l$ for small $\l$ and $\h_c
603: =a \l+O\big(\l^2\big)$, $a\not=0$. The logarithmic behaviour is found only
604: in an extremely small region around
605: the critical points; outside this region, $C_v$ varies as $t\to t_c^\pm(\l,u)$
606: according to a power law behaviour with nonuniversal
607: exponent.
608: The conclusion is that, for all $u\not=0$,
609: there is universality for the
610: specific heat (which diverges with the same exponent as in the Ising model);
611: nevertheless {\it nonuniversal critical indexes} appear in the theory,
612: in the difference between the critical points and in the constant
613: in front of the logarithm in the specific heat.
614: One can speak of {\it anomalous universality}
615: as the specific heat diverges at criticality
616: as in Ising, but the isotropic limit $u\to 0$
617: is reached with nonuniversal
618: critical indices.
619:
620: %The presence of nonuniversal critical exponents implies that
621: %the anisotropic AT model is not analytically close
622: %to the Ising model uniformly in $u$
623: %(for instance the ratio
624: %$C_v(\l)/C_v(0)$, which is $O(|u|^{\h_c})$
625: %for $|u|<<|\l|$, cannot be written
626: %as a power series in $\l$ uniformly convergent in $u$),
627: %even though is in the
628: %same universality class (at least for what concerns the
629: %critical behaviour of the specific heat).\\
630:
631: With the notations introduced above
632: and calling $D$ a sufficiently small $O(1)$ interval
633: (\ie with amplitude independent of $\l$)
634: centered around $\sqrt2-1$,
635: we can express our main result as follows.
636: \*
637: \0{\bf Main Theorem.}
638: {\it
639: There exists $\e_1$ such that, for
640: $t\pm u\in D$, $j=1,2$,
641: and $|\l|\le \e_1$, one can define two functions
642: $t_c^\pm(\l,u)$ with the following properties:
643: %
644: $$t_c^\pm(\l,u)=\sqrt2-1+\n^*(\l)
645: \pm|u|^{1+\h}\big(1+F^\pm(\l,u)\big)\;,
646: \Eq(1.5)$$
647: %
648: where
649: $|\n^*(\l)|\le c|\l|$,
650: $|F^\pm(\l,u)|\le c|\l|$,
651: for some positive constant $c$ and
652: $\h=\h(\l)$ is an analytic function of $\l$ s.t.
653: $\h(\l)=-b \l +O(\l^2)$, $b>0$, and:
654: \\
655: \01) the free energy $f(t,u,\l)$
656: and the specific heat $C_v(t,u,\l)$ in \equ(cv)
657: are analytic in the region $t\pm u\in D$, $|\l|\le \e_1$ and
658: $t\not=t_c^\pm(\l,u)$;\\
659: \02) in the same region of parameters,
660: the specific heat can be written as:
661: %
662: $$\eqalign{&C_v=-C_1
663: \D^{2\h_c}\log{\big|t-t_c^-\big|\big|t-t_c^+\big|
664: \over \D^2}
665: +C_2{1-\D^{2\h_c}\over \h_c}+C_3\cr
666: %&{\rm where:}\qquad \cr
667: }\Eq(1.6)$$
668: %
669: where:
670: $\D^2\ \defin (t-\lis t_c)^2+(u^2)^{1+\h}$ and
671: $\lis t_c\defin (t^+_c+t^-_c)/ 2$;
672: the exponent $\h_c=\h_c(\l)=a \l +O(\l^2)$,
673: $a\not =0$, is analytic in $\l$;
674: the functions $C_j=C_j(\l,t,u)$, $j=1,2,3$, are
675: bounded above and below by $O(1)$ constants; finally $C_1-C_2$
676: vanishes for $\l=u=0$.}
677: \*
678: \0{\bf Remarks}\\
679: \01) The key hypothesis
680: for the validity of Main Theorem is the
681: smallness of $\l$. When $\l=0$ the critical points
682: correspond to $t\pm u=\sqrt2-1$: hence for simplicity
683: we restrict $t\pm u$ in a sufficiently small $O(1)$
684: interval around $\sqrt2-1$. A possible explicit choice for $D$,
685: convenient for our proof,
686: could be $D=[{3(\sqrt2-1)\over 4},{5(\sqrt2-1)\over 4}]$.
687: Our technique would allow us to prove the above theorem, at the cost of a
688: lengthier discussion,
689: for any $t^{(1)},t^{(2)}>0$: of course in that case we should
690: distinguish different regions of parameters and treat in a different
691: way the cases of low or high temperature or the case of big anisotropy
692: (\ie the cases $t<<\sqrt2-1$ or $t>>\sqrt2-1$ or $|u|>>1$).\\
693: \02) \equ(1.6) shows how the crossover from universal to nonuniversal behaviour
694: is realized. When $u\not=0$ only the first term in \equ(1.6) can be singular
695: in correspondence of the two critical points; it has a logarithmic singularity
696: (as in the Ising model) with a constant $O(\D^{2\h_c})$ in front. However
697: the logarithmic term dominates on the second one only if $t$ varies
698: inside an extremely small region $O(|u|^{1+\h}e^{-a/|\l|})$, $a>0$,
699: around the
700: critical points. Outside such region the power law behaviour
701: corresponding to the second addend in \equ(1.6) dominates. When $u\to 0$ one
702: recovers the power law decay found in [M1] for the isotropic case. See Fig 2.
703:
704: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
705: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURA 2%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
706: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
707:
708: \insertplot{300pt}{90pt}%
709: {%\ins{30pt}{70pt}{$C_v$}
710: %\ins{113pt}{30pt}{$\l>0$}
711: %\ins{130pt}{-30pt}{$\l=0$}
712: %\ins{270pt}{-53pt}{$\l<0$}
713: %\ins{290pt}{-115pt}{$t-\lis t_c$}
714: %\ins{158pt}{68pt}{$t^+_c$}
715: %\ins{115pt}{56pt}{$(\ )$}
716: %\ins{155.5pt}{56pt}{$(\ )$}
717: %\ins{234pt}{47pt}{$t$}
718: %\ins{234pt}{-2pt}{$t$}
719: %\ins{130pt}{78pt}{$4|u|^{1+\h}$}
720: %\ins{130pt}{46pt}{$2|u|^{1+\h}$}
721: %\ins{43pt}{40pt}{$|u|^{1+\h}\Big\{$}
722: %\ins{43pt}{60pt}{$|u|^{1+\h}\Big\{$}
723: %\ins{138pt}{18pt}{$\lis t_c$}
724: %\ins{134pt}{-5pt}{$|D|$}
725: }%
726: {cv3}{}
727: \vskip6.18cm
728: \line{\vtop{\line{\hskip1.3truecm\vbox{\advance\hsize by -2.0 truecm
729: \0{\ottorm FIG 2. The qualitative behaviour of ${\scriptstyle C_v}$
730: as a function of ${\scriptstyle t-\lis t_c}$,
731: where ${\scriptstyle \lis t_c=(t^+_c+t^-_c)/2}$. The three graphs are
732: plots of \equ(1.6), with ${\scriptstyle C_1=C_2=1}$, ${\scriptstyle C_3=0}$,
733: ${\scriptstyle u=0.01}$,
734: ${\scriptstyle \h=\h_c=0.1,0,-0.1}$ respectively; the central curve
735: corresponds to ${\scriptstyle\l=0}$, the upper one to ${\scriptstyle\l>0}$
736: and the lower to ${\scriptstyle\l<0}$.
737: } \hfill} }}}
738: \vskip.5cm
739:
740: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
741: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
742:
743: \03) By the result of item (1) of Main Theorem, $C_v$ is analytic in
744: $\l,t,u$ outside the critical line. This is not appearent
745: from \equ(1.6), because $\D$ is non analytic in $u$ at $u=0$ (of course the
746: bounded functions $C_j$ are non analytic in $u$ also, in a suitable
747: way compensating the non analyticity of $\D$). We get to \equ(1.6)
748: by interpolating two different asymptotic behaviours of $C_v$ in the regions
749: $|t-\lis t_c|<2|u|^{1+\h}$ and $|t-\lis t_c|\ge 2|u|^{1+\h}$ and the
750: non analyticity of $\D$ is introduced ``by hands'' by our estimates
751: and it is not intrinsic for $C_v$. \equ(1.6) is simply a convenient
752: way to describe the crossover between different
753: critical behaviours of $C_v$.\\
754: \04) We do not study the free energy directly at $t=t_c^\pm(\l,u)$,
755: therefore in order to show that
756: $t=t_c^\pm(\l,u)$ is a critical point we must study
757: some thermodynamic property like
758: the specific heat by evaluating
759: it at $t\ne t_c^\pm(\l,u)$ and $M=\io$ and then verify that it has a
760: singular behavior as $t\to t_c^\pm$. The case $t$ precisely equal to
761: $t_c^\pm$ cannot be discussed at the moment
762: with our techniques, in spite of the uniformity
763: of our bounds as $t\to t_c^\pm$. The reason is that
764: we write the AT partition function as a sum
765: of 16 different partition functions, differing
766: for boundary terms. Our estimates on each single term
767: are uniform up to the critical point;
768: however, in order to show that the free energy computed with one of the
769: 16 terms is the same as the complete free energy,
770: we need to stay at $t\ne t_c^\pm$: in this case boundary terms are suppressed
771: as $\sim e^{-\k M|t-t_c^\pm|}$, $\k>0$, as $M\to\io$. If we stay exactly
772: at the critical point cancellations between the 16 terms can be present
773: (as it is well known already from the Ising model exact solution [MW])
774: and we do not have control on the behaviour of the free energy, as
775: the infinite volume limit is approached.\\
776:
777: \sub(1.1b) {\it Strategy of the proof.}
778: It is well known that the free energy and the specific heat of
779: the Ising model can be expressed as a sum of {\it Pfaffians} [MW]
780: which can be equivalently written,
781: see [ID][S],
782: as {\it Grassmann functional integrals}, see for instance App A of [M1] or
783: \S 4 of [GM]
784: for the basic definitions of Grassmann variables and Grassmann integration.
785: The formal action of the Ising model in terms
786: of Grassmann variables $\psi,\lis\psi$ has the form
787: %
788: $$\eqalign{&%S(\psi,\lis\psi)=
789: \sum_\xx{t\over 4}\Big[
790: \psi_\xx(\partial_1-i\partial_0)\psi_\xx+
791: \lis\psi_\xx(\partial_1+i\partial_0)\lis\psi_\xx-2
792: i\lis\psi_\xx(\partial_1+\dpr_0)\psi_\xx\Big]
793: +i(\sqrt{2}-1-t)\lis\psi_\xx\psi_\xx\;,\cr}\Eq(isi)$$
794: %
795: where $\dpr_j$ are discrete derivatives. $\psi$ and $\lis\psi$ are called
796: {\it Majorana} fields, see [ID], because of an analogy with
797: relativistic Majorana fermions.
798: They are massive, because of the presence
799: of the last term in \equ(isi); criticality corresponds
800: to the massless case ($t=\sqrt2-1$).
801: If $\l=0$ the free energy and specific
802: heat can be written as sum of Grassmann integrals describing {\it two}
803: kinds of Majorana fields, with masses $m^{(1)}=t^{(1)}-\sqrt2+1$
804: and $m^{(2)}=t^{(2)}-\sqrt2+1$.
805: The critical points are obtained by choosing
806: one of the two fields massless
807: (in the isotropic case $t^{(1)}=t^{(2)}$ and the two fields
808: become massless togheter).
809:
810: If $\l\not=0$ again the free energy and the specific heat
811: can be written as Grassmann integrals, but the Majorana
812: fields are {\it interacting} with a short range potential.
813: By performing a suitable change
814: of variables, the partition function can be written, see \S 2 and \S 3, as
815: a sum of terms $\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}$ ($\g_1,\g_2$ label
816: different boundary conditions) of the form
817: %
818: $$\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}=\int P(d\psi) e^{-\VV^{(1)}(\sqrt{Z_1}\psi)}\virg
819: P(d\psi)=\DD\psi\ e^{-Z_1(\psi^+,A\psi)}\;,\Eq(Xi)$$
820: %
821: where: $\psi=\{\psi^+_{\o,\xx},\psi^{-}_{\o,\xx}\}_{\o=\pm 1}$
822: are elements of a Grassmann algebra; $\DD\psi$ is a symbol for
823: the Grassmann integration; $\VV^{(1)}$ is a short range interaction,
824: sum of monomials in $\psi$
825: of any degree, whose quartic term is weighted by a constant $\l_1=O(\l)$;
826: and $Z_1(\psi^+,A\psi)$ has the form:
827: %
828: $$Z_1\sum_{\xx,\o}
829: \psi^+_{\o,\xx}(\dpr_1-i\o\dpr_0)\psi^-_{\o,\xx}
830: -i\o\s_1\psi^+_{\o,\xx}\psi^-_{-\o,\xx}+
831: i\o\m_1\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}
832: \psi^\a_{-\o,-\xx}-\b_1\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}(\dpr_1-i\o\dpr_0)\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}
833: \Eq(lab1)$$
834: %
835: with $\s_1=O(t-\sqrt2+1)+O(\l)$, $\m_1,\b_1=O(u)$
836: (in particular in the isotropic case the terms proportional to $\m_1$ and
837: $\b_1$ are absent).
838: If $\l=0$, $\s_1=(m^{(1)}+m^{(2)})/2$
839: and $\m_1=(m^{(2)}-m^{(1)})/2$.
840: $\psi^\pm$ are called {\it Dirac} fields, because of an analogy with
841: relativistic Dirac fermions; they are
842: combinations of the Majorana variables $\psi^{(j)},\lis\psi^{(j)}$, $j=1,2$,
843: associated with the two Ising layers
844: in \equ(1.1): hence the description in terms
845: of Dirac variables mixes intrinsically the two Ising models
846: and will be useful in a range of momentum scale
847: in which the two layers appear to be essentially equal.
848:
849: One can compute $\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}$ by expanding $e^{-\VV^{(1)}(
850: {\sqrt Z_1}\psi)}$
851: in Taylor series and integrating term by term the Grassmann monomials;
852: since the propagators of $P(d\psi)$ (\ie the elements
853: of $A^{-1}$, see \equ(Xi), \equ(lab1)) diverge for $\kk={\bf 0}$
854: and $\s_1\pm\m_1=0$
855: in the infinite volume limit $M\to\io$,
856: the series can converge uniformly in $M$ only in a region
857: outside $|\s_1\pm\m_1|\le c$, for some $c$, \ie in the thermodynamic
858: limit it can converge
859: only far from the critical points.
860:
861: Since we are interested in the critical behaviour of the system,
862: we set up a more complicated procedure to evaluate
863: the partition function, based on (Wilsonian)
864: Renormalization Group (RG).
865: The first step is to decompose the integration $P(d\psi)$ as a product of
866: independent integrations: $P(d\psi)=\prod_{h=-\io}^{1} P(d\psi^{(h)})$,
867: where the momentum space propagator corresponding to $P(d\psi^{(h)})$ is
868: not singular, but $O(\g^{-h})$, for $M\to\io$, $\g$ being a fixed {\it
869: scaling parameter} larger than $1$. This decomposition is realized by
870: slicing in a smooth way the momentum space, so that $\psi^{(h)}$, if $h\le
871: 0$, depends only on the momenta between $\g^{h-1}$ and $\g^{h+1}$.
872: We compute the Grassmann integrals defining the partition function
873: by iteratively integrating
874: the fields $\psi^{(1)},\psi^{(0)},\ldots$, see \S 4.
875: After each integration step we rewrite the partition function in a way
876: similar to \equ(Xi), with the quadratic form $Z_1(\psi^+,A\psi)$ replaced by
877: $Z_h(\psi^+, A^{(h)}\psi)$, which has the same structure of \equ(lab1),
878: with $Z_h,\s_h,\m_h$
879: replacing $Z_1,\s_1,\m_1$; the structure of $Z_h(\psi^+, A^{(h)}
880: \psi)$ is preserved because of
881: symmetry properties, guaranteeing that many other possible
882: quadratic ``local'' terms are indeed vanishing,
883: or {\it irrelevant} in a RG sense.
884: The interaction $\VV^{(1)}$ is replaced by an {\it effective
885: action} $\VV^{(h)}$, $h\le 0$,
886: given by a sum of monomials of $\psi$ of arbitrary
887: order, with kernels decaying in real space on scale $\g^{-h}$; in particular
888: the quartic term is weighted by a coupling constant $\l_h$ and
889: the kernels of $\VV^{(h)}$ are {\it analytic functions}
890: of $\{\l_h,\ldots,\l_1\}$,
891: if $\l_k$ are small enough, $k\ge h$, and $|\s_k|\g^{-k},|\m_k|\g^{-k}\le 1$
892: (say -- the constant $1$ could be replaced by any other constant $O(1)$).
893:
894: In this way the problem of finding good bounds for $\log\Xi_{AT}$
895: is reformulated
896: into the problem of controlling the size of $\l_h,\s_h,\m_h$, $h\le 0$,
897: under the RG iterations.
898: We use a crucial property,
899: called {\it vanishing of Beta function},
900: to prove that actually, if $\l$ is small enough, $|\l_h|\le 2|\l_1|$
901: (recall that $\l_1=O(\l)$). The possibility of controlling the flow of
902: $\l_h$ is
903: the main reason for describing the system in terms of Dirac variables.
904: For $\s_h,\m_h,Z_h$, we find that, under RG iterations, they
905: evolve as: $\s_h\simeq\s_1 \g^{b_2\l h}$, $\m_h\simeq \m_1 \g^{-b_2\l h}$,
906: $Z_h\simeq\g^{-b_1\l^2h}$. Note in particular that $Z_h$ grows exponentially
907: with an exponent $O(\l^2)$; this is connected with the presence of
908: ``critical indexes'' in the correlation functions, which means that
909: their long distance behaviour is qualitatively changed by the interaction.
910:
911: We perform the iterative integration descrided above up to a
912: scale $h^*_1$ such that $(|\s_{h^*_1}|+|\m_{h^*_1}|)\g^{-h^*_1}=O(1)$,
913: in such a way that $(|\s_{h}|+|\m_{h}|)\g^{-h}\le O(1)$, for all
914: $h\ge h^*_1$ and convergence of the kernels
915: of the effective potential can be guaranteed by our estimates.
916: In the range of scales $h\ge h^*_1$ the flow
917: of the effective coupling constant $\l_h$ is essentially the same
918: as for the isotropic AT model [M1] (since $|\m_h|\g^{-h}$ is small the
919: iteration ``does not see'' the anisotropy and
920: the system seems to behave
921: as if there was just one critical point) and nonuniversal critical indexes are
922: generated (they appear in the flows of $\s_h,\m_h$ and $Z_h$), following
923: the same mechanism of the isotropic case.
924:
925: We note that after the integration of $\psi^{(1)},\ldots,\psi^{(h^*_1+1)}$,
926: we can still reformulate the problem in terms of the original
927: Majorana fermions
928: $\psi^{(1, \le h^*_1)}$, $\psi^{(2, \le h^*_1)}$
929: associated with the two Ising models in \equ(1.1).
930: On scale $h^*_1$ their masses are deeply changed
931: w.r.t. $t^{(1)}-\sqrt2+1$ and $t^{(2)}-\sqrt2+1$:
932: they are given by $m_{h^*_1}^{(1)}=
933: |\s_{h^*_1}|+|\m_{h^*_1}|$
934: and $m_{h^*_1}^{(2)}=|\s_{h^*_1}|-|\m_{h^*_1}|$. Note that
935: the condition $|\s_{h^*_1}|+|\m_{h^*_1}|=O(\g^{h^*_1})$
936: implies that the field $\psi^{(1,\le h^*_1)}$ is massive on scale $h^*_1$
937: (so that the Ising layer with $j=1$ is ``far from criticality''
938: on the same scale). This implies
939: that we can integrate (without any multiscale decomposition)
940: the massive Majorana
941: field $\psi^{(1,\le h^*_1)}$, obtaining
942: an effective theory
943: of a single Majorana field with mass $|\s_{h^*_1}|-|\m_{h^*_1}|$, which
944: can be arbitrarly small.
945: The integration of the scales $\le h^*_1$, see \S 6, is done again by
946: a multiscale decomposition similar to the one just described; an
947: important feature is however that there are no more quartic
948: marginal terms, because the anticommutativity
949: of Grassmann variables forbids local quartic monomials
950: of a single Majorana fermion. The problem is essentially
951: equivalent to the study of a single perturbed Ising model
952: with ``upper'' cutoff on momentum space $O(\g^{h^*_1})$ and mass
953: $|\s_{h^*_1}|-|\m_{h^*_1}|$. The flow of the effective mass and
954: of $Z_h$ is non anomalous in this regime: in particular
955: the mass of Majorana field is just shifted by $O(\l\g^{h^*_1})$ from
956: $|\s_{h^*_1}|-|\m_{h^*_1}|$. Criticality
957: is found when the effective mass on scale $-\io$ is vanishing;
958: the values of $t,u$ for which this happens
959: are found by solving a non trivial implicit function problem.
960:
961: Finally, see \S 7, we define a similar expansion
962: for the specific heat and
963: we compute its asymptotic behaviour arbitrarily near the
964: critical points.
965:
966: Technically it is an interesting
967: feature of this problem that there are two regimes in which the
968: system must be described in terms of different fields:
969: a first one in which the natural variables are Dirac Grassmann variables,
970: and a second one in which they are Majorana; note that
971: the scale separating the two
972: regimes is dynamically generated by the RG iterations (and of course
973: its precise location is not crucial and $h^*_1$ can be modified in $h^*_1+n$,
974: $n\in\ZZZ$, without qualitatively affecting the bounds).
975: %something similar is believed to happen in BCS theory in which
976: %in the first regime one uses fermionic variables, in the second
977: %bosonic ones.
978:
979: \*
980: \section(2,Fermionic representation)
981:
982: \sub(2.1) The partition function $\Xi_{I}^{(j)}=\sum_{\s^{(j)}}
983: \exp\{-J^{(j)}H_I(\s^{(j)})\}$ of the Ising model can
984: be written as a Grassmann integral; this is a classical result, mainly
985: due to [LMS][Ka][H][MW][S]. In Appendix A1, starting from a formula
986: obtained in [MW], we prove that
987: %
988: $$\Xi_I^{(j)}=(-1)^{M^2}{(2\cosh J^{(j)})^{M^2} \over
989: 2}\sum_{\e,\e'=\pm} \int \prod_{\xx\in\L_M} dH^{(j)}_\xx
990: d\lis H^{(j)}_\xx d V^{(j)}_\xx d\lis V^{(j)}_\xx
991: (-1)^{\d_{\g}} e^{S^{(j)}_\g(t^{(j)})}
992: \Eq(2.1)$$
993: %
994: where $j=1,2$ denotes the lattice, $\g= (\e,\e')$ and $\d_\g$ is
995: $\d_{+,+}=1,\d_{+,-}=\d_{-,+}=\d_{-,-}=2$ and, if $t^{(j)}=\tanh J^{(j)}$,
996: %
997: $$\eqalign{S^{(j)}_\g(t^{(j)})&=
998: t^{(j)}\sum_{\xx\in\L_M} \left[\lis H^{(j)}_{\xx} H^{(j)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}+
999: \lis V^{(j)}_{\xx} V^{(j)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}\right]+\cr
1000: &+\sum_{\xx\in\L_M}\left[\lis H^{(j)}_{\xx} H^{(j)}_{\xx}+
1001: \lis V^{(j)}_{\xx}
1002: V^{(j)}_{\xx}+\lis V^{(j)}_{\xx} \lis H^{(j)}_{\xx}+
1003: V^{(j)}_{\xx} \lis H^{(j)}_{\xx}+
1004: H^{(j)}_{\xx} \lis V^{(j)}_{\xx}+
1005: V^{(j)}_{\xx} H^{(j)}_{\xx}\right]\;,\cr}\Eq(2.2)$$
1006: %
1007: where $H^{(j)}_\xx,\lis H^{(j)}_\xx,V^{(j)}_\xx,
1008: \lis V^{(j)}_\xx$ are {\it Grassmann variables} verifying different
1009: boundary conditions depending on the label $\g=(\e,\e')$ which is not
1010: affixed explicitly, to simplify the notations, \ie
1011: %
1012: $$\eqalign{
1013: &\lis H^{(j)}_{\xx+M\hat e_0}=\e\lis H^{(j)}_{\xx}
1014: \virg\lis H^{(j)}_{\xx+M\hat e_1}=\e'\lis H^{(j)}_{\xx}\cr
1015: &H^{(j)}_{\xx+M\hat e_0}=\e H^{(j)}_{\xx}\virg
1016: H^{(j)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}=\e' H^{(j)}_{\xx}\cr}\virg\e,\e'=\pm\Eq(2.3)$$
1017: %
1018: and identical definitions are set for the variables $V^{(j)},{\lis
1019: V}^{(j)}$; we shall say that $\lis H^{(j)}, H^{(j)},\lis V^{(j)},V^{(j)}$
1020: satisfy $\e$--periodic
1021: ($\e'$--periodic) boundary conditions in vertical (horizontal)
1022: direction. \\
1023:
1024: \sub(2.2) By expanding in power series $\exp\{-\l V\}$, we see that
1025: the partition function of the model \equ(1.1) is
1026: %
1027: $$\eqalign{\Xi_{AT}&=\sum_{\s^{(1)},\,\s^{(2)}}
1028: e^{-J^{(1)}H_I(\s^{(1)})}e^{-J^{(2)}
1029: H_I(\s^{(2)})}e^{-\l V(\s^{(1)},\,\s^{(2)})}
1030: =\cr
1031: &=(\cosh \l)^{2M^2}\sum_{\s^{(1)},\,\s^{(2)}}
1032: e^{- J^{(1)}H_I(\s^{(1)})- J^{(2)}
1033: H_I(\s^{(2)})}\cdot\cr
1034: &\cdot\prod_{\xx\in\L_M}
1035: \left(1+\hat\l
1036: \s^{(1)}_{\xx}\s^{(1)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}
1037: \s^{(2)}_{\xx}\s^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}\right)\left(1+\hat\l
1038: \s^{(1)}_{\xx}\s^{(1)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}
1039: \s^{(2)}_{\xx}\s^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}\right)\;,\cr}\Eq(2.8)$$
1040: %
1041: where $\hat\l=\tanh \l$. The r.h.s. of \equ(2.8) can be rewritten as:
1042: %
1043: $$\Xi_{AT}=\Bigg[\prod_{\xx\in\L_M\atop i=0,1}
1044: \Big(1+\hat\l{\dpr^2\over\dpr
1045: J^{(1)}_{\xx,\xx+\hat e_i}\dpr J^{(2)}_{\xx,\xx+\hat e_i}}\Big)\Bigg]
1046: \Xi_{I}^{(1)}(\{J^{(1)}_{\xx,\xx'}\})\Xi_{I}^{
1047: (2)}(\{J^{(2)}_{\xx,\xx'}\})\Big|_{
1048: \{J^{(j)}_{\xx,\xx'}\}=\{J^{(j)}\}}\;,\Eq(2.9)$$
1049: %
1050: where $\Xi_I^{(j)}(\{J^{(j)}_{\xx,\xx'}\})$ is the partition function
1051: of an Ising model in which the couplings are allowed to depend on the
1052: bonds (the coupling associated to the n.n. bond $(\xx,\xx')$ on the lattice
1053: $j$ is called $J^{(j)}_{\xx,\xx'}$).
1054: Using for $\Xi_{I}^{(1)}(\{J^{(1)}_{\xx,\xx'}\})$ an expression similar
1055: to \equ(2.1), we find that we can
1056: express $\Xi_{AT}$ as a sum of sixteen partition functions labeled
1057: by $\g_1,\g_2=(\e_1,\e_1'),(\e_2,\e_2')$ (corresponding to
1058: choosing each $\e_j$ and $\e_j'$ as $\pm$):
1059: %
1060: $$\Xi_{AT}= {1\over 4} (\cosh \l)^{2M^2}\sum_{\g_1,\g_2}
1061: (-1)^{\d_{\g_1}+\d_{\g_2}}Z_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}\;,\Eq(2.10)$$
1062: %
1063: each of which is given by a functional integral
1064: %
1065: $$\eqalign{&\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}=
1066: \big[4(1+\hat\l t^{(1)} t^{(2)})\big]^{M^2}\prod_{j=1}^2
1067: (\cosh J^{(j)})^{M^2}(-1)^{M^2}
1068: \cdot\cr
1069: &\qquad\cdot
1070: \int\prod_{\xx\in\L_M}^{j=1,2} dH^{(j)}_\xx d
1071: \lis H^{(j)}_\xx d V^{(j)}_\xx
1072: d\lis V^{(j)}_\xx\, e^{S^{(1)}_{\g_1}(t_\l^{(1)})+S^{(2)}_{\g_2}
1073: (t_\l^{(2)})+V_\l}\;,\cr}
1074: \Eq(2.11)$$
1075: %
1076: where, if we define
1077: %
1078: $$\eqalign{&
1079: \l^{(j)}={\hat\l \big[t(1-t^2+u^2)+(-1)^ju(1+t^2-u^2)\big]\over 1+\hat\l
1080: (t^2-u^2)}
1081: \;,\cr}\Eq(2.13)$$
1082: %
1083: we have that $t_\l^{(j)}$, $j=1,2$,
1084: is given by $t_\l^{(j)}=t^{(j)}+\l^{(j)}$ and
1085: $V_\l$ by:
1086: %
1087: $$V_\l=\sum_{\xx\in\L_M}
1088: \l \left(\lis H^{(1)}_{\xx} H^{(1)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}
1089: \lis H^{(2)}_{\xx} H^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}+ \lis V^{(1)}_\xx V^{(1)}_{
1090: \xx+\hat e_0} \lis V^{(2)}_{\xx} V^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}\right)
1091: \;,\qquad
1092: \l={\l^{(1)}\l^{(2)}\over \hat\l (t^2-u^2)}\;.\Eq(2.15)$$
1093: %
1094: \\
1095: \sub(2.3)
1096: From now on, we shall study in detail only the partition function
1097: $\Xi_{AT}^{-}\defin \Xi_{AT}^{(-,-),(-,-)}$, \ie the partition function
1098: in which all Grassmannian variables verify antiperiodic boundary
1099: conditions (see \equ(2.3)). We shall see in \sec(an) below that,
1100: if $(\l, t, u)$ {\it does not belong} to the {\it critical surface}, which
1101: is a suitable 2--dimensional subset of $[-\e_1,\e_1]\times D\times [-{|D|\over
1102: 2},{|D|\over 2}]$ which we will
1103: explicitely determine in \sec(6.1),
1104: the partition function $\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}$ divided by
1105: $\Xi_I^{(1)\g_1}\Xi_I^{(2)\g_2}$
1106: is exponentially insensitive to boundary conditions as $M\to\io$.
1107:
1108: As in [M1] we find convenient to perform the following change of
1109: variables, $\a=\pm$, $\o=\pm 1$:
1110: %
1111: $$\eqalign{&{1\over \sqrt2}\sum_{j=1,2}(-i\a)^{j-1}\big(\lis H_\xx^{(j)}
1112: +i\o H^{(j)}_\xx\big)=e^{i\o\p/4}\big(\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}-\c^\a_{\o,\xx}\big)\cr
1113: &{1\over \sqrt2}\sum_{j=1,2}(-i\a)^{j-1}\big(\lis V_\xx^{(j)}
1114: +i\o V^{(j)}_\xx\big)=\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}+\c^\a_{\o,\xx}\;.\cr}\Eq(2.19)$$
1115: %
1116: Let $\kk\in D_{-,-}$, where $D_{-,-}$ is the set of $\kk$'s
1117: such that $k=2\p/M(n_1+1/2)$ and $k_0=2\p/M(n_0+1/2)$, where
1118: $-[M/2]\le n_0,n_1\le [(M-1)/2]$, $n_0,n_1\in\ZZZ$. The
1119: Fourier transform of the Grassmanian fields $\phi^\a_{\o,\xx}$, $\phi=\psi,\c$,
1120: is given by $\hat\phi^\a_{\o,\kk}\defin\sum_{\xx\in\L_M}
1121: e^{-i\a\kk\xx}\phi^\a_{\o,\xx}$.\\
1122:
1123: With the above definitions,
1124: it is straightforward algebra to verify that the final expression is:
1125: %
1126: $$\Xi_{AT}^-=e^{-E M^2}\int P(d\psi)
1127: P(d\chi)e^{Q(\psi,\c)+V(\psi,\c)}\;,\Eq(2.26)$$
1128: %
1129: where: $E$ is a suitable constant; $Q(\psi,\c)$ collects the quadratic
1130: terms of the form $\psi^{\a_1}_{\o_1,\xx_1}\c^{\a_2}_{\o_2,\xx_2}$;
1131: $V(\psi,\c)$ is the quartic interaction (it is equal to $V_\l$, see
1132: \equ(2.15), in terms of the $\psi^\pm_\o$, $\c^\pm_\o$ variables);
1133: $P(d\phi)$, $\phi=\psi,\c$, is:
1134: %
1135: $$\eqalign{
1136: &P(d\phi)=\NN^{-1}_\phi\prod_{\kk\in D_{-,-}} \prod_{\o=\pm 1}
1137: d\phi^{+}_{\o,\kk}
1138: d\phi^{-}_{\o,\kk}
1139: \exp\Bigl\{-{t_\l\over 4M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_{-,-}}
1140: {\bf\Phi_\kk^{+,T}} A_\phi(\kk){\bf\Phi}_\kk\Bigr\}\;,\cr
1141: &A_\phi(\kk)=
1142: \left( \matrix{i\sin k+\sin k_0 & -i \s_\phi(\kk)
1143: & -{\m\over 2}(i\sin k+\sin k_0) & i \m(\kk)\cr
1144: i \s_\phi(\kk) & i\sin k-\sin k_0& -i \m(\kk)&
1145: -{\m\over 2}(i\sin k-\sin k_0) \cr
1146: -{\m\over 2}(i\sin k+\sin k_0)&
1147: i \m(\kk) & i\sin k+\sin k_0 & -i \s_\phi(\kk)\cr
1148: -i \m(\kk)& -{\m\over 2}(i\sin k-\sin k_0)&i \s_\phi(\kk)&i\sin k-\sin k_0\cr}
1149: \right)\cr}\Eq(2.27)$$
1150: %
1151: where
1152: %
1153: $${\bf\Phi^{+,T}}_\kk=(\hat\phi^+_{1,\kk},
1154: \hat\phi^+_{-1,\kk},\hat\phi^-_{1,-\kk},
1155: \hat\phi^-_{-1,-\kk})\virg
1156: {\bf\Phi^{T}}_\kk=(\hat\phi^-_{1,\kk},\hat\phi^-_{-1,\kk},
1157: \hat\phi^+_{1,-\kk},\hat\phi^+_{-1,-\kk})
1158: \;,\Eq(2.28)$$
1159: %
1160: $\NN_\phi$ is chosen in such a way that $\int P(d\phi)=1$ and, if
1161: we define $t_\l\defin(t_\l^{(1)}+t_\l^{(2)})/ 2$,
1162: $u_\l\defin
1163: (t_\l^{(1)}-t_\l^{(2)})/ 2$, for $\phi=\psi,\c$ we have:
1164: %&c(\kk)\defin \cos k_0+\cos k-2\virg d(\kk)\defin
1165: %(u_\l/t_\l)(2-\cos k-\cos k_0)\;,\cr}
1166: %\Eq(2.250a)$$
1167: %%
1168: %we have
1169: %
1170: $$\eqalign{&\s_\phi(\kk)=2\Bigl(1+{\pm\sqrt 2+1 \over
1171: t_\l}\Bigr)+\cos k_0+\cos k-2\virg \mu(\kk)=-(u_\l/t_\l)(\cos k+\cos k_0)
1172: \;.\cr}\Eq(2.29)$$
1173: %
1174: In the first of \equ(2.29) the $-$ ($+$) sign corresponds to $\phi=\psi$
1175: ($\phi=\c$). The parameter $\m$ in \equ(2.27) is given by
1176: $\m\defin\m({\bf 0})$.
1177:
1178: It is convenient to split the $\sqrt2-1$ appearing in the definition of
1179: $\s_{\psi}(\kk)$ as:
1180: %
1181: $$\sqrt2-1=(\sqrt2-1+{\n\over 2})-{\n\over 2}\defin t_\psi-{\n\over 2}
1182: \;,\Eq(nu)$$
1183: %
1184: where $\n$ is a parameter
1185: to be properly chosen later as a function of $\l$,
1186: in such a way that the average location of the critical points
1187: will be given by $t_\l=t_\psi$; in other words
1188: $\n$ has the role of a {\it counterterm} fixing
1189: the middle point of the critical temperatures. The splitting \equ(nu)
1190: induces the following splitting of $P(d\psi)$:
1191: %
1192: $$P(d\psi)=P_\s(d\psi)e^{-\n F_\n(\psi)}\virg
1193: F_\n(\psi)\defin {1\over 2M^2}\sum_{\kk,\o}
1194: (-i\o)\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}\;,\Eq(ppsi)$$
1195: %
1196: where $P_\s(d\psi)$
1197: is given by \equ(2.27) with $\phi=\psi$ and
1198: $\s\defin 2(1-t_\psi/t_\l)$ replacing $\s_\psi({\bf 0})$.
1199:
1200: \*
1201: \sub(2.6) {\it Integration of the $\chi$ variables}.
1202: The propagators $<\phi_{\xx,\o}^\s\phi_{\yy,\o'}^{\s'}>$
1203: of the fermionic integration $P(d\phi)$ verify
1204: the following bound, for some $A,\k>0$:
1205: %
1206: $$|<\phi_{\xx,\o}^\s\phi_{\yy,\o'}^{\s'}>|\le A e^{-\k \bar m_\phi
1207: |\xx-\yy|}\;,\Eq(b)$$
1208: %
1209: where $\bar m_\phi$ is the minimum between
1210: $|m^{(1)}_{\phi}|$ and $|m^{(2)}_{\phi}|$ and, for $j=1,2$,
1211: $m^{(j)}_{\phi}$ is given by $m^{(j)}_{\phi}\defin
1212: 2(t_\l^{(j)}-t_\phi)/t_\l$, $j=1,2$.
1213: Note that both $m^{(1)}_{\c}$
1214: and $m^{(2)}_{\c}$ are $O(1)$.
1215: This suggests to integrate first the $\chi$ variables.\\
1216:
1217: After the integration of the $\c$ variables we shall rewrite \equ(2.26)
1218: as
1219: %
1220: $$\Xi^-_{AT}=e^{-M^2 E_1}\int P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)
1221: e^{-\VV^{(1)}(\sqrt{Z_1}\psi)}\;,
1222: \qquad \VV^{(1)}(0)=0\;,\Eq(2.36)$$
1223: %
1224: where $C_1(\kk)\=1$, $Z_1=t_\psi$, $\s_1={\s/(1-{\s\over 2})}$,
1225: $\m_1={\m/(1-{\s\over 2})}$
1226: and $P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)$ is the exponential
1227: of a quadratic form:
1228: %
1229: $$\eqalign{& P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)=\NN_1^{-1}
1230: \prod_{\kk\in D_{-,-}}^{\o=\pm 1}
1231: d\psi^{+}_{\o,\kk}
1232: d\psi^{-}_{\o,\kk}
1233: \exp\Bigl[-{1 \over 4 M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_{-,-}}
1234: Z_1 C_1(\kk)
1235: \Psi_\kk^{+,T} A_\psi^{(1)}(\kk)\Psi_\kk\Bigr]\;,\cr
1236: &A_\psi^{(1)}(\kk)=\left( \matrix{M^{(1)}(\kk)& N^{(1)}(\kk)\cr
1237: N^{(1)}(\kk)&M^{(1)}(\kk)\cr}\right)\cr
1238: &M^{(1)}(\kk)=\left(\matrix{i \sin k+\sin k_0+a^+_1(\kk)&
1239: -i\left(\s_1+c_1(\kk)\right)\cr
1240: i\left(\s_1+c_1(\kk)\right) & i \sin k-\sin k_0+a^-_1(\kk)
1241: \cr}\right)\cr
1242: &N^{(1)}(\kk)=\left(\matrix{b^+_1(\kk)&i\left(\m_1+d_1(\kk)\right)\cr
1243: -i\left(\mu_1+d_1(\kk)\right)& b^-_1(\kk)\cr}
1244: \right)\;,\cr}\Eq(2.38)$$
1245: %
1246: where $\NN_1$ is chosen
1247: in such a way that $\int P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d \psi)=1$.
1248: Moreover $\VV^{(1)}$ is the {\it interaction}, which can be expressed as a sum
1249: of monomials in $\psi$ of arbitrary order:
1250: %
1251: $$\VV^{(1)}(\psi)=\sum_{n=1}^\io
1252: \sum_{\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n}\atop\aa,\oo}
1253: \prod_{i=1}^{2n}\hat\psi^{\a_i(\le 1)}_{\o_i,\kk_i}
1254: \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(1)}(\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n-1})
1255: \d(\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\a_i\kk_i)\Eq(vv1)$$
1256: %
1257: and $\d(\kk)=\sum_{\nn\in\zzz^2}\d_{\kk,2\p\nn}$. The constant $E_1$ in
1258: \equ(2.36), the functions $a^\pm_1,b^\pm_1,c_1,d_1$ in \equ(2.38)
1259: and the kernels $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(1)}$
1260: in \equ(vv1) have the properties described in the following Theorem,
1261: proved in Appendix \secc(a1).
1262: Note that from now on we will consider all functions
1263: appearing in the theory as functions of $\l,\s_1,\m_1$ (of course
1264: $t$ and $u$ can be analytically and elementarily expressed in terms
1265: of $\l,\s_1,\m_1$). We shall also assume $|\s_1|,|\m_1|$ bounded by some $O(1)$
1266: constant.
1267: Note that if $t\pm u$ belong
1268: to a sufficiently small interval $D$ centered around $\sqrt2-1$,
1269: as assumed in the hypothesis of the Main Theorem in \sec(1), then of course
1270: $|\s_1|,|\m_1|\le c_1$ for a suitable constant $c_1$ (in
1271: particular, if $D$ is chosen as in Remark (1) following the Main Theorem,
1272: we find $|\s_1|\le 1+O(\e_1)$ and $|\m_1|\le 2+O(\e_1)$).
1273: \\
1274:
1275: {\bf Theorem 2.1} {\it Assume that $|\s_1|,|\m_1|\le c_1$
1276: for some constant $c_1>0$.
1277: There exist a constant
1278: $\e_1$ such that,
1279: if $|\l|,|\n|\le \e_1$,
1280: then $\Xi^-_{AT}$ can be written as in \equ(2.36), \equ(2.38), \equ(vv1),
1281: where:\\
1282: \01) $E_1$ is an $O(1)$ constant;\\
1283: \02) $a^\pm_1(\kk), b^\pm_1(\kk)$ are analytic odd
1284: functions of $\kk$ and $c_1(\kk),d_1(\kk)$ real analytic
1285: even functions of $\kk$; in a neighborhood of $\kk= {\bf 0}$,
1286: $a_1^\pm(\kk)=O(\s_1\kk)
1287: +O(\kk^3)$, $b_1^{\pm}(\kk)=O(\m_1\kk)+O(\kk^3)$,
1288: $c_1(\kk)=O(\kk^2)$ and $d_1(\kk)=O(\m_1\kk^2)$;\\
1289: \03) the determinant
1290: $|\det A_\psi(\kk)|$ can be bounded above and below by some
1291: constant times $\big[(\s_1-\m_1)^2+|c(\kk)|\big]\big[(\s_1+\m_1)^2+|c(\kk)|
1292: \big]$
1293: and $c(\kk)=\cos k_0+\cos k-2$;\\
1294: \04) $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(1)}$ are analytic functions of
1295: $\kk_i,\l,\n,\s_1,\m_1$, $i=1,\ldots,2n$ and, for some constant $C$,
1296: %
1297: $$|\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(1)}(\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n-1})|
1298: \le M^2 C^n|\l|^{\max\{1,n/2\}}\;;
1299: \Eq(2.40)$$
1300: %
1301: \04--a) the terms in \equ(2.40) with $n=2$ can be written as
1302: %
1303: $$\eqalign{
1304: &L_1\sum_{\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_4} \hat\psi^{+}_{1,\kk_1}
1305: \hat\psi^{+}_{-1,\kk_2}\hat\psi^{-}_{-1,\kk_3}\hat\psi^{-}_{1,
1306: \kk_4}\d(\kk_1+\kk_2-\kk_3-\kk_4)+
1307: \cr &+\sum_{\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_4}\sum_{\aa,\oo}
1308: \widetilde W_{4,
1309: \underline\a,\underline\o}(\kk_1,\kk_2,\kk_3)
1310: \hat\psi^{\a_1}_{\o_1,\kk_1}\hat\psi^{\a_2}_{\o_2,\kk_2}
1311: \hat\psi^{\a_3}_{\o_3,\kk_3}\hat\psi^{\a_4}_{\o_4,\kk_4}
1312: \d(\sum_{i=1}^4\a_i\kk_i)\;,\cr}\Eq(8.29)$$
1313: %
1314: where $L_1$ is real and $\widetilde W_{4,
1315: \underline\a,\underline\o}(\kk_1,\kk_2,\kk_3)$ vanishes at
1316: $\kk_1=\kk_2=\kk_3=\left({\p\over M},{\p\over
1317: M}\right)$;\\
1318: \04--b)
1319: the term in \equ(2.40) with $n=1$ can be written as:
1320: %
1321: $$\eqalign{
1322: &{1\over 4}\sum_{\o,\a=\pm}\
1323: \sum_\kk \Bigl[S_1(-i\o)\hat\psi^{+}_{\o,\kk}\hat
1324: \psi^{-}_{-\o,\kk}+ M_1(i\o)\hat\psi^{\a}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{\a}_{
1325: -\o,-\kk}+F_1(i\sin k+\o\sin k_0)\hat\psi^{\a}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{\a
1326: }_{\o,-\kk}+\cr
1327: &+G_1(i\sin k+\o\sin k_0)\hat\psi^{+}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{-
1328: }_{\o,\kk}\Bigr]
1329: +\sum_{\kk}\sum_{\aa,\oo}\widetilde
1330: W_{2,\underline\a,\underline\o}(\kk)
1331: \hat\psi^{\a_1}_{\o_1,\kk}
1332: \hat\psi_{\o_2,-\a_1\a_2\kk}^{\a_{2}}\cr}\Eq(8.30)$$
1333: %
1334: where: $\widetilde
1335: W_{2,\underline\a,\underline\o}(\kk)$ is $O(\kk^2)$ in a neighborhood
1336: of $\kk={\bf 0}$; $S_1, M_1, F_1,G_1$ are real analytic functions of
1337: $\l,\s_1,\m_1,\nu$ s.t. $F_1=O(\l\m_1)$ and
1338: %
1339: $$\eqalign{&L_1=l_1+O(\l\s_1)+O(\l\m_1)\virg
1340: S_1=s_1+\g n_1+O(\l\s_1^2)+O(\l\m_1^2)\cr
1341: &M_1=m_1+O(\l\m_1\s_1)+O(\l\m_1^3)\virg
1342: G_1=z_1+O(\l\s_1)+O(\l\m_1)\cr}\Eq(8.30a)$$
1343: %
1344: with $s_1=\s_1 f_1$, $m_1=\m_1 f_2$ and
1345: $l_1, n_1, f_1, f_2, z_1$ independent of $\s_1,\m_1$;
1346: moreover $l_1=\l/Z_1^2+O(\l^2)$,
1347: $f_1,f_2=O(\l)$, $\g n_1=\n/Z_1+c^\n_1\l+O(\l^2)$, for some $c^\n_1$
1348: independent of $\l$, and $z_1=O(\l^2)$.}
1349:
1350: \*
1351: \0{\bf Remark.}
1352: The meaning of Theorem 2.1 is that after the integration of the $\chi$
1353: fields we are left with a fermionic integration similar
1354: to \equ(2.27) up to corrections which are at least $O(\kk^2)$,
1355: and an effective interaction containing terms with any number
1356: of fields.
1357:
1358: {\it A priori} many
1359: bilinear terms with kernel $O(1)$ or $O(\kk)$ with respect to
1360: $\kk$ near $\kk={\bf 0}$
1361: could be generated by the $\chi$--integration
1362: besides the ones originally present in \equ(2.27); however
1363: {\it symmetry considerations restrict drastically the number
1364: of possible bilinear terms} $O(1)$ or $O(\kk)$.
1365: Only one new term of the form
1366: $\sum_\kk(i\sin k+\o\sin k_0)\hat\psi^{\a}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{\a}_{\o,-\kk}$
1367: appears, which is ``dimensionally'' {\it marginal}
1368: in a RG sense; however it is weighted by a constant
1369: $O(\l\m_1)$ and this will improve its
1370: ``dimension'', so that it will result to be {\it irrelevant},
1371: see \sec(4.2) below.\\
1372:
1373: \*
1374: \section(4,Integration of the {$\psi$} variables: first regime)
1375:
1376: \sub(4.1) {\it Multiscale analysis}.
1377: From the bound on $\det A^{(1)}_\psi(\kk)$ described in Theorem 2.1,
1378: we see that the $\psi$ fields have a mass
1379: given by $\min\{|\s_1-\m_1|,|\s_1+\m_1|\}$, which can be arbitrarly small;
1380: their integration in the
1381: infrared region (small $\kk$) needs a multiscale analysis.
1382: We introduce a {\sl scaling parameter} $\g>1$ which will be used to
1383: define a geometrically growing sequence of length scales
1384: $1,\g,\g^2,\ldots$, \ie of geometrically decreasing momentum
1385: scales $\g^h,\,h=0,-1,-2,\ldots$
1386: Correspondingly we introduce
1387: $C^\io$ compact support functions $f_h(\kk)$ $h\le 1$,
1388: with the following properties: if $|\kk|\defin\sqrt{\sin^2 k+\sin^2 k_0}$,
1389: when $h\le 0$, $f_h(\kk) = 0$ for $|\kk| <\g^{h-2}$ or $|\kk|
1390: >\g^{h}$, and $f_h(\kk)= 1$, if $|\kk| =\g^{h-1}$;
1391: $f_1(\kk)=0$ for $|\kk|\le\g^{-1}$ and $f_1(\kk)=1$ for $|\kk|\ge 1$;
1392: furthermore:
1393: %
1394: $$1=\sum_{h=h_{M} }^1 f_h(\kk)\virg {\rm where:}\qquad h_M=\min
1395: \{h:\g^{h}> \sqrt2\sin{\p\over M}\}
1396: \;,\Eq(4.2)$$
1397: %
1398: and $\sqrt2\sin(\p/ M)$ is the smallest momentum allowed by
1399: the antiperiodic boundary conditions, \ie $\sqrt2\sin(\p/ M)=\min_{\kk\in
1400: D_{-,-}}|\kk|$.
1401:
1402: The purpose is to perform the integration of \equ(2.38) over the
1403: fermion fields in an iterative way.
1404: After each iteration we shall be left with a ``simpler''
1405: Grassmannian integration to perform: if
1406: $h=1,0,-1,\ldots,h_M$, we shall write
1407: %
1408: $$\Xi^-_{AT}=\int P_{Z_h,\s_h,\m_h,C_h}(d\psi^{(\le h)}) \, e^{-\VV^{(h)}
1409: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})-M^2 E_h}\;,\quad \VV^{(h)}(0)=0\;,\Eq(4.3)$$
1410: %
1411: where the quantities $Z_h$,
1412: $\s_h$, $\m_h$, $C_h$, $P_{Z_h,\s_h,\m_h,C_h}(d\psi^{(\le h)})$,
1413: $\VV^{(h)}$ and $E_h$ have to be defined recursively and the result of
1414: the last iteration will be $\Xi_{AT}^-=e^{-M^2 E_{-1+h_M}}$,
1415: \ie the value of the partition function.
1416:
1417: $P_{Z_h,\s_h,\m_h,C_h}(d\psi^{(\le h)})$ is defined by \equ(2.38) in which
1418: we replace $Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,a^\o_1, b^\o_1,c_1,d_1,C_1(\kk)$ with
1419: $Z_h,\s_h,\m_h,a^\o_h, b^\o_h,c_h,d_h,C_h(\kk)$, where
1420: $C_h(\kk)^{-1}=\sum_{j=h_{M}}^hf_j(\kk)$. Moreover
1421: %
1422: $$\eqalign{\VV^{(h)}(\psi)&= \sum_{n=1}^\io{1\over M^{2n}}
1423: \sum_{\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n-1},\atop \aa,\oo}
1424: \prod_{i=1}^{2n}\hat\psi^{\a_i(\le h)}_{\o_i,\kk_i}
1425: \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}
1426: (\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n-1})\d(\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\a_i\kk_i)\defin\cr
1427: &\defin
1428: \sum_{n=1}^\io
1429: \sum_{\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_{2n},\atop \ss,\underline j,\oo,\aa}
1430: \prod_{i=1}^{2n}\partial^{\s_i}_{j_i}\psi^{\a_i(\le h)}_{\o_i,\xx_i}
1431: W_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}(\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_{2n})\;,\cr}\Eq(4.6)$$
1432: %
1433: where in the last line $j_i=0,1$, $\s_i\ge 0$ and
1434: $\dpr_j$ is the forward discrete derivative in the $\hat e_j$ direction.
1435:
1436: Note that the field $\psi^{(\le h)}$, whose propagator is given by the
1437: inverse of $Z_h C_h(\kk)A^{(h)}_\psi$,
1438: has the same support of $C_h^{-1}(\kk)$, that is
1439: on a strip of width $\g^h$ around the singularity $\kk={\bf 0}$. The field
1440: $\psi^{(\le 1)}$ coincides with the field $\psi$ of previous section, so that
1441: \equ(2.36) is the same as \equ(4.3) with $h=1$.
1442:
1443: It is crucial for the following to think
1444: $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}$, $h\le 1$, as functions of the
1445: variables $\s_k(\kk),\m_k(\kk)$,
1446: $k=h, h+1,\ldots,0,1$, $\kk\in D_{-,-}$. The iterative construction below
1447: will inductively imply that the dependence on these variables
1448: is well defined (note that for $h=1$
1449: we can think the kernels of $\VV^{(1)}$ as functions of $\s_1,\m_1$, see
1450: Theorem 2.1).
1451:
1452: \*
1453: \sub(4.2) {\it The localization operator.}
1454: We now begin to describe the iterative construction leading to \equ(4.3).
1455: The first step consits in defining a {\it localization} operator $\LL$
1456: acting on the kernels of $\VV^{(h)}$, in terms of which we shall rewrite
1457: $\VV^{(h)}=\LL\VV^{(h)}+\RR\VV^{(h)}$, where $\RR=1-\LL$. The iterative
1458: integration procedure will use such splitting, see \sec(4.3) below.
1459:
1460: $\LL$ will be non zero only if
1461: acting on a kernel $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}$ with $n=1,2$. In this case
1462: $\LL$ will be the combination of four different operators:
1463: $\LL_j$, $j=0,1$,
1464: whose effect on a function of $\kk$
1465: will be essentially to extract the term of order $j$
1466: from its Taylor series in $\kk$; and $\PP_j$, $j=0,1$,
1467: whose effect on a functional of the sequence
1468: $\s_h(\kk),\m_h(\kk),\ldots,\s_1,\m_1$ will be essentially
1469: to extract the term of order $j$ from its power series
1470: in $\s_h(\kk),\m_h(\kk),\ldots,\s_1,\m_1$.
1471:
1472: The action of $\LL_j$, $j=0,1$, on the kernels
1473: $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}(\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n})$
1474: is defined as follows.\\
1475: \\
1476: \01) If $n=1$,
1477: %
1478: $$\eqalign{&\LL_0\widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}(\kk,\a_1\a_2\kk)=\fra14
1479: \sum_{\h,\h'=\pm 1}\widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo}
1480: ^{(h)}(\bk\h{\h'},\a_1\a_2\bk\h{\h'})
1481: \cr
1482: &\LL_1\widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}(\kk,\a_1\a_2\kk)=\fra14
1483: \sum_{\h,\h'=\pm 1}\widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo}
1484: ^{(h)}(\bk\h{\h'},\a_1\a_2\bk\h{\h'})
1485: \big[\h {\sin k\over \sin{\p\over M}} +
1486: \h'{\sin k_0\over \sin{\p\over M}}\big]\;,\cr}\Eq(4.7)$$
1487: %
1488: where $\bk\h{\h'} = \left(\h{\p\over M},\h'{\p\over
1489: M}\right)$ are the smallest momenta allowed by
1490: the antiperiodic boundary conditions.\\
1491: \\
1492: \02) If $n=2$, $\LL_1\widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}=0$ and
1493: %
1494: $$\LL_0 \widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}(\kk_1,\kk_2,\kk_3,\kk_4)\defin
1495: \widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}(\bk++,\bk++,\bk++,\bk++)\;.\Eq(4.8)$$
1496: %
1497: \03) If $n>2$, $\LL_0\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}=\LL_1\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}
1498: =0$.\\
1499:
1500: The action of $\PP_j$, $j=0,1$, on the kernels $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}$,
1501: thought as functionals of the sequence $\s_h(\kk),\m_h(\kk),\ldots,\s_1,\m_1$
1502: is defined as follows.
1503: %
1504: $$\eqalign{&
1505: \PP_0 \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}\defin
1506: \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}\Big|_{\ss^{(h)}=\underline\m^{(h)}=0}\cr
1507: &\PP_1 \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}\defin\sum_{k\ge h,\kk}\Big[
1508: \s_{k}(\kk){\dpr \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}\over \dpr\s_k(\kk)}
1509: \Big|_{\ss^{(h)}=\underline\m^{(h)}=0}+
1510: \m_{k}(\kk){\dpr \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}\over \dpr\m_k(\kk)}
1511: \Big|_{\ss^{(h)}=\underline\m^{(h)}=0}\Big]\;.\cr}\Eq(4.9)$$
1512: %
1513: Given $\LL_j,\PP_j$, $j=0,1$ as above, we define the action of $\LL$
1514: on the kernels $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}$ as follows.\\
1515: \\
1516: \01) If $n=1$, then
1517: %
1518: $$\LL \widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo}\defin\cases{
1519: \LL_0(\PP_0+\PP_1)
1520: \widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if $\o_1+\o_2=0$ and $\a_1+\a_2=0$,\cr
1521: \LL_0\PP_1
1522: \widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if $\o_1+\o_2=0$ and $\a_1+\a_2\not=0$,\cr
1523: \LL_1\PP_0\widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$ and
1524: $\a_1+\a_2=0$,\cr
1525: 0 & if $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$ and $\a_1+\a_2\not=0$.}$$
1526: %
1527: \02) If $n=2$, then
1528: $\LL \widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}\defin \LL_0\PP_0\widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}$.\\
1529: %
1530: \03) If $n>2$, then $\LL \widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}=0$.\\
1531:
1532: Finally, the effect of $\LL$ on $\VV^{(h)}$ is, by definition,
1533: to replace on the r.h.s. of \equ(4.6) $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}$ with
1534: $\LL\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}$. Note that $\LL^2\VV^{(h)}=\LL\VV^{(h)}$.
1535:
1536: Using the previous definitions we get the following result, proven in Appendix
1537: \secc(A1.2). We use the notation $\ss^{(h)}=\{\s_k(\kk)\}^{k=h,\ldots,1}_{
1538: \kk\in D_{-,-}}$ and $\underline\m^{(h)}=\{\m_k(\kk)\}^{k=h,\ldots,1}_{
1539: \kk\in D_{-,-}}$.
1540: \*
1541: {\bf Lemma 3.1.} {\it Let the action of $\LL$ on $\VV^{(h)}$
1542: be defined as above. Then
1543: %
1544: $$\LL\VV^{(h)}(\psi^{(\le h)})=(s_h+\g^h n_h) F_\s^{(\le h)}
1545: +m_h F^{(\le h)}_{\m}+l_h
1546: F_\l^{(\le h)} +z_{h} F_\z^{(\le h)}
1547: \;,\Eq(4.10) $$
1548: %
1549: where $s_h,n_h,m_h,l_h$ and $z_h$ are real constants and:
1550: $s_h$ is linear in $\ss^{(h)}$ and independent of $\underline\m^{(h)}$;
1551: $m_h$ is linear in $\underline\m^{(h)}$ and independent of $\ss^{(h)}$;
1552: $n_h,l_h,z_h$ are independent of $\ss^{(h)},\underline\m^{(h)}$;
1553: moreover,
1554: if $D_h\defin D_{-,-}\cap\{\kk:C_h^{-1}(\kk)>0\}$,
1555: %
1556: $$\eqalign{
1557: F_\s^{(\le h)}(\psi^{(\le h)})&=
1558: {1\over 2 M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_h}\sum_{\o=\pm 1} (-i\o)
1559: \widehat\psi^{+(\le h)}_{\o,\kk}
1560: \widehat\psi^{-(\le h)}_{-\o,\kk}\ \ \defin\ \
1561: {1\over M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_h}
1562: \widehat F_\s^{(\le h)}(\kk)\;,\cr
1563: F_\m^{(\le h)}(\psi^{(\le h)})&=
1564: {1\over 4M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_h}\sum_{\a,\o=\pm 1} i\o
1565: \widehat\psi^{\a(\le h)}_{\o,\kk}
1566: \widehat\psi^{\a(\le h)}_{-\o,-\kk}\ \ \defin\ \
1567: {1\over M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_h}
1568: \widehat F_\m^{(\le h)}(\kk)\;,\cr
1569: F_\l^{(\le h)}(\psi^{(\le h)})&={1\over M^8}\sum_{\kk_1,...,\kk_4
1570: \in D_h}
1571: \widehat\psi^{+(\le h)}_{1,\kk_1}
1572: \widehat\psi^{+(\le h)}_{-1,\kk_2} \widehat\psi^{-(\le h)}_{-1,\kk_3}
1573: \widehat\psi^{-(\le h)}_{1,\kk_4}\d(\kk_1+\kk_2-\kk_3-\kk_4)\;\cr
1574: F_{\z}^{(\le h)}(\psi^{(\le h)})&={1\over 2M^2}
1575: \sum_{\kk\in D_h}\sum_{\o=\pm 1}
1576: (i\sin k+\o\sin k_0)\widehat\psi^{+(\le h)}_{\o,\kk}
1577: \widehat\psi^{-(\le h)}_{\o,\kk}\ \ \defin\ \
1578: {1\over M^2}\sum_{\kk\in D_h}
1579: \widehat F_\z^{(\le h)}(\kk)\;.\cr}\Eq(4.11)$$
1580: %
1581: where $\d(\kk)=M^2\sum_{{\bf n}\in\zzz^2}\d_{\kk,2\p{\bf n}}$.}\\
1582:
1583: {\bf Remark.}
1584: The application of $\LL$ to the kernels of the effective potential generates
1585: the sum in \equ(4.10), \ie a linear combination of the Grassmannian
1586: monomials in \equ(4.11) which, in the renormalization group language,
1587: are called ``{\it relevant}'' (the first two) or ``{\it marginal}''
1588: operators (the two others).\\
1589:
1590: We now consider the operator $\RR\defin 1-\LL$. The following result
1591: holds, see Appendix \secc(a1) for the proof. We use the notation
1592: $\RR_1=1-\LL_0$, $\RR_2=1-\LL_0-\LL_1$, $\SS_1=1-\PP_0$, $\SS_2=1-\PP_0-
1593: \PP_1$.
1594: \*
1595: {\bf Lemma 3.2.} {\it The action of $\RR$ on $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}$
1596: for $n=1,2$ is the following.\\
1597: %
1598: \01) If $n=1$, then
1599: %
1600: $$\RR \widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo}=\cases{
1601: [\SS_2+\RR_2(\PP_0+\PP_1)]
1602: \widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if $\o_1+\o_2=0$,\cr
1603: [\RR_1\SS_1+\RR_2\PP_0]
1604: \widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if
1605: $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$ and $\a_1+\a_2=0$,\cr
1606: \RR_1\SS_1\widehat W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if
1607: $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$ and $\a_1+\a_2\not=0$,\cr}$$
1608: %
1609: \02) If $n=2$, then
1610: $\RR \widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}= [\SS_1+\RR_1\PP_0]
1611: \widehat W_{4,\aa,\oo}$.}\\
1612: \\
1613: {\bf Remark.}
1614: The effect of $\RR_j$, $j=1,2$ on $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}$
1615: consists in
1616: extracting the rest of a Taylor series in $\kk$ of order $j$.
1617: The effect of $\SS_j$, $j=1,2$ on $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}$
1618: consists in extracting the rest of a
1619: power series in $(\ss^{(h)},\underline\m^{(h)})$
1620: of order $j$. The definitions are given in such a way that
1621: $\RR\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}$ is at least quadratic in $\kk,\ss^{(h)},
1622: \underline\m^{(h)}$ if $n=1$ and at least linear in $\kk,\ss^{(h)},
1623: \underline\m^{(h)}$ when $n=2$. This will give dimensional gain
1624: factors in the bounds for $\RR\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}$ w.r.t.
1625: the bounds for $\widehat W_{2n,\aa,\oo}^{(h)}$, $n=1,2$, as we shall see in
1626: details in Appendix \secc(4a).\\
1627:
1628: \*
1629: \sub(4.3) {\it Renormalization.}
1630: Once that the above definitions are given we can describe our
1631: integration procedure for $h\le 0$.
1632: \*
1633: We start from \equ(4.3) and we rewrite it as
1634: %
1635: $$\int P_{Z_h,\s_h,\m_h,C_h}(d\psi^{(\le h)}) \, e^{-\LL\VV^{(h)}
1636: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})-\RR\VV^{(h)}
1637: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)}) -M^2 E_h}\;,\Eq(4.3a)$$
1638: %
1639: with $\LL\VV^{(h)}$ as in \equ(4.10).
1640: Then we include the quadratic part of
1641: $\LL\VV^{(h)}$ (except the term proportional to $n_h$)
1642: in the fermionic integration, so obtaining
1643: %
1644: $$\int P_{\widehat Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},C_h}(d\psi^{(\le h)}) \, e^{-l_h
1645: F_\l(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})-\g^h n_h F_\s(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})-
1646: \RR\VV^{(h)}
1647: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)}) -M^2 E_h}\;,\Eq(4.3aa)$$
1648: %
1649: where $\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)\defin Z_h (1+z_h C_h^{-1}(\kk))$ and
1650: %
1651: $$\eqalign{
1652: &\s_{h-1}(\kk)\defin{Z_h\over\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}
1653: (\s_h(\kk)+s_hC_h^{-1}(\kk))\virg
1654: \m_{h-1}(\kk)\defin {Z_h\over \widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}
1655: (\m_h(\kk)+m_h C_h^{-1}(\kk))\cr
1656: &a^\o_{h-1}(\kk)\defin{Z_h\over \widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}
1657: a^\o_h(\kk)\virg
1658: b^\o_{h-1}(\kk)\defin {Z_h\over \widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}
1659: b^\o_h(\kk)\cr
1660: &c_{h-1}(\kk)\defin{Z_h\over\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}c_h(\kk)\virg
1661: d_{h-1}(\kk)\defin{Z_h\over\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}d_h(\kk)\;.\cr}\Eq(4.17a)$$
1662: %
1663: The integration in \equ(4.3aa) differs from the one in \equ(4.3)
1664: and \equ(4.3a): $P_{\widehat Z_{h-1},
1665: \s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},C_h}$\\ is defined by \equ(2.38)
1666: with $Z_1$ and
1667: $A^{(1)}_\psi$ replaced by $\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)$ and
1668: $A^{(h-1)}_\psi$.
1669:
1670: \*
1671: Now we can perform the integration of the $\psi^{(h)}$ field.
1672: It is convenient to rescale the fields:
1673: %
1674: $${\widehat\VV}^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})\ \defin\
1675: \l_h F_\l(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})+
1676: \g^h\n_h F_\s(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})
1677: +\RR\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})
1678: \;,\Eq(4.18)$$
1679: %
1680: where $\l_h=\big({Z_h\over Z_{h-1}}\big)^2l_h$, $\n_h={Z_h\over Z_{h-1}}n_h$
1681: and $\RR\VV^{(h)}=(1-\LL)\VV^{(h)}$ is the irrelevant part of $\VV^{(h)}$, and
1682: rewrite \equ(4.3aa) as
1683: %
1684: $$e^{-M^2(t_h+E_h)}\int
1685: P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},C_{h-1}}(d\psi^{(\le h-1)}) \,
1686: \int P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},
1687: {\widetilde f}^{-1}_h}
1688: (d\psi^{(h)})\, e^{-\widehat
1689: \VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})}
1690: \Eq(4.20)$$
1691: %
1692: where we used the decomposition $\psi^{(\le h)}=\psi^{(\le h-1)}+\psi^{(h)}$
1693: (and $\psi^{(\le h-1)},\psi^{(h)}$ are independent) and
1694: ${\widetilde f}_h(\kk)$ is defined by the relation $C_h^{-1}(\kk)\widehat
1695: Z_{h-1}^{-1}(\kk)=C_{h-1}^{-1}(\kk)Z_{h-1}^{-1}+\widetilde f_h(\kk)
1696: Z_{h-1}^{-1}$, namely:
1697: %
1698: $$\widetilde f_h(\kk)\ \defin\ Z_{h-1}\Bigl[
1699: {C_h^{-1}(\kk)\over \widehat Z_{h-1}
1700: (\kk)}-{C_{h-1}^{-1}(\kk)\over Z_{h-1}}\Bigr]=f_h(\kk)\Bigl[
1701: 1+ {z_hf_{h+1}(\kk)\over
1702: 1+z_hf_h(\kk)}
1703: \Bigr]\;.\Eq(4.21)$$
1704: %
1705: Note that $\widetilde f_h(\kk)$ has the same support as $f_h(\kk)$.
1706: Moreover
1707: $P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},{\widetilde f}^{-1}_h}
1708: (d\psi^{(h)})$ is defined in the same way as
1709: $P_{\widehat Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},C_h}
1710: (d\psi^{(h)})$, with $\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)$ resp. $C_h$
1711: replaced by $Z_{h-1}$ resp. $\widetilde f^{-1}_h$.
1712: The {\it single scale} propagator is
1713: %
1714: $$\int P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},\widetilde f_h^{-1}}(d\psi^{(h)})\,
1715: \psi^{\a(h)}_{\xx,\o}\psi^{\a'(h)}_{\yy,\o'} ={1\over Z_{h-1}}
1716: g^{(h)}_{\underline a,\underline a'}(\xx-\yy)\virg
1717: \underline a=(\a,\o)\virg \underline a'=(\a',\o')\;,\Eq(4.210a)$$
1718: %
1719: where
1720: %
1721: $$g^{(h)}_{\underline a,\underline a'}(\xx-\yy)={1\over 2M^2}
1722: \sum_{\kk}e^{i\a\a'\kk(\xx-\yy)}
1723: \widetilde f_h(\kk)[A_\psi^{(h-1)}(\kk)]^{-1}_{j(\underline a),
1724: j'(\underline a')}\Eq(4.210b)$$
1725: %
1726: with $j(-,1)=j'(+,1)=1$, $j(-,-1)=j'(+,-1)=2$, $j(+,1)=j'(-,1)=3$ and
1727: $j(+,-1)=j'(-,-1)=4$. One finds that
1728: $g^{(h)}_{\underline a,\underline a'}(\xx)=g_{\o,\o'}^{(1,h)}(\xx)-\a\a'
1729: g_{\o,\o'}^{(2,h)}(\xx)$, where
1730: $g_{\o,\o'}^{(j,h)}(\xx)$, $j=1,2$ are defined in Appendix \secc(a3),
1731: see \equ(4.24).
1732:
1733: The long distance behaviour of the propagator is given by the following
1734: Lemma, proved in Appendix \secc(a3).
1735:
1736: \*
1737: {\bf Lemma 3.3.} {\it Let $\s_h\defin\s_h({\bf 0})$ and $\m_h\defin
1738: \m_h({\bf 0})$ and assume $|\l|\le \e_1$ for a small constant $\e_1$.
1739: Suppose that for $h>\bar h$
1740: %
1741: $$|z_h|\le {1\over 2}\virg |s_h|\le {1\over 2}|\s_h|\virg
1742: |m_h|\le {1\over 2}|\m_h|\;,\Eq(4.40yz)$$
1743: %
1744: that there exists $c$ s.t.
1745: %
1746: $$e^{-c|\l|}\le \Big|{\s_h\over\s_{h-1}}\Big|\le e^{c|\l|}
1747: \virg
1748: e^{-c|\l|}\le \Big|{\m_h\over\m_{h-1}}\Big|\le e^{c|\l|}\virg
1749: e^{-c|\l|^2}\le \Big|{Z_h\over Z_{h-1}}\Big|\le e^{c|\l|^2}\;,\Eq(4.40z)$$
1750: %
1751: and that, for some constant $C_1$,
1752: %
1753: $${|\s_{\bar h}|\over\g^{\bar h}}\le C_1\virg
1754: {|\m_{\bar h}|\over\g^{\bar h}}\le C_1\;;\Eq(4.40a)$$
1755: %
1756: then, for all $h\ge \bar h$,
1757: given the positive integers $N, n_0,n_1$ and putting $n=n_0+n_1$,
1758: there exists a constant $C_{N,n}$ s.t.
1759: %
1760: $$|\dpr^{n_0}_{x_0}\dpr^{n_1}_{x}g_{\underline a,\underline a'}^{(h)}
1761: (\xx-\yy)|\le C_{N,n}{\g^{(1+n)h}\over 1+(\g^{h}
1762: |\dd(\xx-\yy)|)^N}\virg{\it where}\quad
1763: \dd(\xx)={M\over\p}\big(\sin{\p x\over M},\sin{\p x_0\over M})\;.
1764: \Eq(4.400)$$
1765: %
1766: Furthermore, if $\PP_0$, $\PP_1$ are
1767: defined as in \equ(4.9) and $\SS_1$, $\SS_2$ are defined as in
1768: Lemma 3.2,
1769: we have that $\PP_jg^{(h)}_{\underline a,
1770: \underline a'}$, $j=0,1$ and $\SS_jg^{(h)}_{\underline a,
1771: \underline a'}$, $j=1,2$, satisfy the same bound \equ(4.400),
1772: times a factor $\big({|\s_{h}|+|\m_{h}|\over \g^{h}}\big)^j$.
1773: The bounds for $\PP_0g^{(h)}_{\underline a,
1774: \underline a'}$ and $\PP_1g^{(h)}_{\underline a,
1775: \underline a'}$ hold even without hypothesis \equ(4.40a).}\\
1776:
1777: After the integration of the field on scale $h$ we are left with an
1778: integral involving the fields
1779: $\psi^{(\le h-1)}$ and the new effective interaction
1780: $\VV^{(h-1)}$, defined as
1781: %
1782: $$e^{-\VV^{(h-1)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h-1)})-\tilde E_h M^2}=
1783: \int P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},\widetilde f_h}(d\psi^{(h)})
1784: e^{-\widehat \VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})}\;.\Eq(4.20a)$$
1785: %
1786: It is easy to see that $\VV^{(h-1)}$ is of the form \equ(4.6) and that
1787: $E_{h-1}=E_h+t_h+\tilde E_h$. It is sufficient to use the well known identity
1788: %
1789: $$M^2\tilde E_h+\VV^{(h-1)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h-1)})=
1790: \sum_{n\ge 1}{1\over n!}(-1)^{n+1}\EE^T_h(\widehat\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}
1791: \psi^{(\le h)});n)\;,\Eq(4.20az)$$
1792: %
1793: where $\EE^T_h(X(\psi^{(h)});n)$
1794: is the truncated expectation of order $n$ w.r.t. the
1795: propagator $Z_{h-1}^{-1}g^{(h)}_{\underline a,\underline a'}$, defined
1796: as
1797: %
1798: $$\EE^T_h(X(\psi^{(h)});n)={\dpr\over\dpr\l^n}\log\int P_{Z_{h-1},
1799: \s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},\widetilde f_h}(d\psi^{(h)})e^{\l X(\psi^{(h)})}\Big|_{\l=
1800: 0}\;.\Eq(eth)$$
1801: %
1802:
1803: Note that the above procedure allow us to write the
1804: {\it running coupling constants} $\vec v_{h-1}=(\l_{h-1},\n_{h-1})$, $h\le 1$,
1805: in terms of $\vec v_k$, $h\le k\le 1$, namely
1806: $\vec v_{h-1}=\b_h(\vec v_h,\ldots,\vec v_1)$,
1807: where $\b_h$ is the so--called {\it Beta function}.
1808: \\
1809:
1810: \sub(4.6){\it Analiticity of the effective potential}.
1811: We have expressed the effective potential $\VV^{(h)}$
1812: in terms of the {\it running coupling constants} $\l_k,\n_k$, $k\ge h$,
1813: and of the {\it renormalization constants} $Z_k,\m_k(\kk),\s_k(\kk)$, $k\ge h$.
1814:
1815: In Appendix \secc(4a) we will prove the following result.
1816: \*
1817: {\bf Theorem 3.1.} {\it Let $\s_h\defin\s_h({\bf 0})$ and $\m_h\defin
1818: \m_h({\bf 0})$ and assume
1819: $|\l|\le \e_1$ for a small constant $\e_1$.
1820: Suppose that for $h> \bar h$ the hypothesis \equ(4.40yz),
1821: \equ(4.40z) and \equ(4.40a) hold.
1822: If, for some constant $c$,
1823: %
1824: $$\max_{h> \bar h}\{|\l_h|,|\n_h|\}\le c|\l|\;,\Eq(4.40)$$
1825: %
1826: then there exists $C>0$ s.t. the kernels in \equ(4.6) satisfy
1827: %
1828: $$\int d\xx_1\cdots d\xx_{2n}|W^{(\bar h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}
1829: (\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_{2n})|
1830: \le M^2 \g^{-\bar h D_k(n)} \,(C\,|\l|)^{max(1,n-1)}\Eq(4.45)$$
1831: %
1832: where $D_k(n)=-2+n+k$
1833: and $k=\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\s_i$.
1834:
1835: Moreover $|\tilde E_{\bar h+1}|+|t_{\bar h+1}|\le c|\l|\g^{2\bar h}$ and
1836: the kernels of $\LL\VV^{(\bar h)}$ satisfy
1837: %
1838: $$|s_{\bar h}|\le C|\l||\s_{\bar h}|\virg
1839: |m_{\bar h}|\le C|\l||\m_{\bar h}|\Eq(4.45y)$$
1840: %
1841: and
1842: %
1843: $$|n_{\bar h}|\le C|\l|\virg
1844: |z_{\bar h}|\le C|\l|^2\virg|l_{\bar h}|\le C|\l|^2\;.\Eq(4.45yz)$$
1845: %
1846: The bounds \equ(4.45y) holds even if \equ(4.40a) does not hold.
1847: The bounds \equ(4.45yz) holds even if \equ(4.40a) and the
1848: first two of \equ(4.40z) do not hold.}\\
1849:
1850: {\bf Remarks.}\\
1851: 1) The above result immediately implies analyticity of the effective potential
1852: of scale $h$
1853: in the running coupling constants $\l_k,\n_k$, $k\ge h$, under the assumptions
1854: \equ(4.40yz), \equ(4.40z), \equ(4.40a) and \equ(4.40).\\
1855: %2) From the result of the Theorem (in particular from \equ(4.45y))
1856: %it is clear that {\it a posteriori}
1857: %the hypothesis \equ(4.40yz) is not necessary. In fact, using \equ(4.45y),
1858: %one can prove \equ(4.40yz) inductively (\equ(4.40yz) is true for $h=1$,
1859: %as it follows from Theorem 2.1).\\
1860: 2) The assumptions \equ(4.40z) and \equ(4.40)
1861: will be proved in \sec(5) and Appendix \secc(a5) below, solving the
1862: {\it flow equations} for $\vec v_h=(\l_h,\n_h)$ and $Z_h,\s_h,\m_h$,
1863: given by $\vec v_{h-1}=\b_h(\vec v_h,\ldots,\vec v_1)$, $Z_{h-1}=Z_h(1+z_h)$
1864: and \equ(4.17a). They will be proved to
1865: be true up to $h=-\io$.\\
1866: %3)
1867: %Using \equ(4.40z)
1868: %we see that the assumptions
1869: %\equ(4.40a) will hold for all the scales $\bar h$ s.t.
1870: %
1871: %$${|\s_{\bar h}|\over \g^{\bar h}}\le |\s_1|\g^{-(1+c|\l|)\bar h}\le C\virg
1872: %{|\m_{\bar h}|\over \g^{\bar h}}\le |\m_1|\g^{-(1+c|\l|)\bar h}\le C\;,$$
1873: %
1874: %namely for all the scales
1875: %$\bar h\ge O(\max\{\log_\g|\s_1|^{1\over 1+c|\l|},
1876: %\log_\g|\m_1|^{1\over 1+c|\l|}\})$.
1877: %Then we can apply
1878: %Theorem 3.1 up to a scale $h^*_1$ of
1879: %the form $h^*_1=O(\max\{\log_\g|\s_1|^{1+O(\l)},
1880: %\log_\g|\m_1|^{1+O(\l)}\})$, which will be defined more precisely in
1881: %\sec(6.100) below. The property of $h^*_1$ that we stress now is the
1882: %following.\\
1883: %{\it $h^*_1$ is a scale such that
1884: %$C_2 \g^{h^*_1}\le |\s_{h^*_1}|+|\m_{h^*_1}|\le
1885: %C_1 \g^{h^*_1}$, with $C_1,C_2$ independent from $\l,\m_1,\s_1$}.\\
1886: %or scales smaller than $h^*_1$,
1887: %he construction described above and leading to Theorem 3.1 is no longer
1888: %onvenient. We shall integrate the fields on scale $\le h^*_1$ with
1889: % different iterative procedure, described in \sec(6) below.
1890:
1891: \*
1892: \section(5, The flow of the running coupling constants.)
1893:
1894: The convergence of the expansion for the effective potential
1895: is proved by Theorem 3.1 under the hypothesis that
1896: the running coupling constants are small, see \equ(4.40),
1897: and that the bounds \equ(4.40yz), \equ(4.40z) and \equ(4.40a)
1898: are satisfied. We now want to show that, choosing $\l$ small enough and
1899: $\n$ as a suitable function of $\l$, such hypothesis are indeed verified.
1900: In order to prove this, we will solve the flow equations for the
1901: renormalization constants (following
1902: from \equ(4.17a) and preceding line):
1903: %
1904: $${Z_{h-1}\over Z_h} = 1+ z_h\virg
1905: {\s_{h-1}\over \s_h} = 1+{s_h/\s_h-z_h\over 1+z_h}\virg
1906: {\m_{h-1}\over \m_h} = 1+{m_h/\m_h-z_h\over 1+z_h}\;,\Eq(5.4z)$$
1907: %
1908: together with those for the running coupling constants:
1909: %
1910: $$\eqalign{&\l_{h-1}=\l_h+\b^h_\l(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)\cr
1911: &\n_{h-1}=\g\n_h+\b^h_\n(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)\;.\cr}\Eq(5.1)$$
1912: %
1913: The functions $\b^h_\l, \b^h_\n$ are called
1914: the $\l$ and $\n$ components of the Beta function, see the comment after
1915: \equ(eth), and, by construction, are
1916: {\it independent} of $\s_k,\m_k$, so that their convergence
1917: follow just from \equ(4.40) and the last of \equ(4.40z), \ie
1918: without assuming \equ(4.40a), see Theorem 3.1.
1919: While for a general kernel we will
1920: apply Theorem 3.1 just up to a finite scale $h^*_1$ (in order
1921: to insure the validity of \equ(4.40a) with $\bar h=h^*_1$),
1922: we will inductively study the flow generated by
1923: \equ(5.1) up to scale $-\io$, and we shall prove that it is bounded
1924: for all scales. The main result on the flows of $\l_h$ and $\n_h$,
1925: proven in Appendix \secc(a5), is the following.\\
1926:
1927: {\bf Theorem 4.1.} {\it If $\l$ is small enough, there exists an
1928: analytic function $\n^*(\l)$ independent of $t,u$
1929: such that the running coupling constants
1930: $\{\l_h,\n_h\}_{h\le 1}$ with $\n_1=\n^*(\l)$
1931: verify
1932: $|\n_h|\le c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)h}$ and $|\l_h|\le c|\l|$.
1933: Moreover the kernels $z_h,s_h$ and $m_h$ satisfy
1934: \equ(4.40yz) and the solutions of the flow equations \equ(5.4z)
1935: satisfy \equ(4.40z).}
1936: \\
1937: %The key property we use to achieve
1938: %Theorem 4.1 is that the $\l$--component of
1939: %the Beta function
1940: %can be written as the sum of the Luttinger model Beta
1941: %function, which is vanishing (see [BGPS][GS][BM1] or [BeM1] for
1942: %a simplified proof)
1943: %plus a small rest, which is summable w.r.t. $h$. See Lemma A5.1
1944: %in Appendix \secc(a5).\\
1945:
1946: Once that $\n_1$ is conveniently
1947: chosen as in Theorem 4.1, one can study in more detail the flows of the
1948: renormalization constants. In Appendix \secc(a5) we prove the following.
1949: \\
1950:
1951: {\bf Lemma 4.1.} {\it If $\l$ is small enough and $\n_1$ is
1952: chosen as in Theorem
1953: 4.1, the solution of \equ(5.4z) can be written as:
1954: %
1955: $$Z_h=\g^{\h_z(h-1)+F^h_\z}\virg \mu_h=\m_1\g^{\h_\m(h-1)+F^h_\m}\virg
1956: \s_h=\s_1\g^{\h_\s(h-1)+F^h_\s}\Eq(lem4.1)$$
1957: %
1958: where $\h_z,\h_\m,\h_z$ and $F^h_\z,F^h_\m,F^h_\s$ are $O(\l)$
1959: functions, independent of $\s_1,\m_1$.
1960:
1961: Moreover $\h_\s-\h_\m=-b\l+O(|\l|^2)$, $b>0$.}\\
1962:
1963: \sub(6.100) {\it The scale $h^*_1$}.
1964: The integration described in \sec(4) is iterated
1965: until a scale $h^*_1$ defined in the following way:
1966: %
1967: $$h^*_1\defin\cases{\min\big\{1,
1968: \big[\log_\g|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}\big]\big\}
1969: & if $|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}
1970: >2|\m_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$,\cr
1971: \min\big\{1,\big[\log_\g|u|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}\big]\big\} & if
1972: $|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}\le 2|\m_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$.\cr}\Eq(hhh)$$
1973:
1974: From \equ(hhh) it follows that
1975: %
1976: $$C_2\g^{h^*_1}\le |\s_{h^*_1}|+|\m_{h^*_1}|
1977: \le C_1\g^{h^*_1}\;,\Eq(5.20)$$
1978: %
1979: with $C_1,C_2$ independent of $\l,\m_1,\s_1$.
1980:
1981: This is obvious in the case $h^*_1=1$. If $h^*_1<1$ and
1982: $|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}
1983: >2|\m_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$, then $\g^{h^*_1-1}=c_\s
1984: |\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}$, with $1\le c_\s<\g$,
1985: so that, using the third of \equ(lem4.1), we see that
1986: $C_2\g^{h^*_1}\le |\s_{h^*_1}|\le C_1'g^{h^*_1}$, for some $C_1',C_2=O(1)$.
1987: Furthermore, using also the second of \equ(lem4.1), we find
1988: %
1989: $${|\m_{h^*_1}|\over|\s_{h^*_1}|}=c_\s^{\h_\m-\h_\s}
1990: |\m_1||\s_1|^{-{1-\h_\m\over 1-\h_\s}}
1991: \g^{F^{h^*_1}_\m-F^{h^*_1}_\s}<1\Eq(1/3)$$
1992: %
1993: and \equ(5.20) follows.
1994:
1995: If $h^*_1<1$ and $|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}\le 2|\m_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$, then
1996: $\g^{h^*_1-1}=c_u
1997: |u|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$, with $1\le c_\m<\g$,
1998: so that, using the second of \equ(lem4.1) and $|\m_1|=O(|u|)$, we see that
1999: $C_2\g^{h^*_1}\le |\m_{h^*_1}|\le C_1'\g^{h^*_1}$. Furthermore,
2000: using the third \equ(lem4.1), we find
2001: %
2002: $${|\s_{h^*_1}|\over|\m_{h^*_1}|}=c_u^{\h_\s-\h_\m}
2003: |\s_1||u|^{-{1-\h_\s\over 1-\h_\m}}
2004: \g^{F^{h^*_1}_\s-F^{h^*_1}_\m}<C_1''\;,\Eq(1/0)$$
2005: %
2006: for some $C_1''=O(1)$, and \equ(5.20) again follows.\\
2007:
2008: \0{\bf Remark.} The specific value of $h^*_1$ is not crucial:
2009: if we change $h^*_1$ in $h^*_1+n$, $n\in\ZZZ$,
2010: the constants $C_1,C_2$ in \equ(5.20)
2011: are replaced by different $O(1)$ constants
2012: and the estimates below
2013: are not qualitatively modified. Of course, the specific values
2014: of $C_1,C_2$ (then, the specific value of $h^*_1$) can affect
2015: the convergence radius of the pertubative series
2016: in $\l$. The optimal value of $h^*_1$ should be chosen by maximizing the
2017: corresponding convergence radius. Since here we are not interested in
2018: optimal estimates, we find the choice in \equ(hhh) convenient.
2019:
2020: Note also that $h^*_1$ is a non analytic function of $(\l,t,u)$
2021: (in particular for small $u$ we have $\g^{h^*_1}\sim |u|^{1+O(\l)}$).
2022: As a consequence, the asymptotic expression for the specific heat
2023: near the critical points (that we shall obtain in next section)
2024: will contain non analytic functions of $u$ (in fact it will contain
2025: terms depending on $h^*_1$).
2026: However, as explained in Remark (3) after the Main Theorem, this does not
2027: imply that $C_v$ is non analytic: it is clear that in this case
2028: the non analyticity
2029: is introduced ``by hands'' by our specific choice of $h^*_1$.
2030: \\
2031:
2032: From the results of Theorem 4.1 and Lemma 4.1, together with \equ(hhh) and
2033: \equ(5.20), it follows that the assumptions of Theorem 3.1
2034: are satisfied for any $\bar h\ge h^*_1$. The integration of the scales
2035: $\le h^*_1$ must be performed in a different way, as discussed in
2036: next section.
2037:
2038: \*
2039: \section(6,Integration of the {$\psi$} variables: second regime)
2040:
2041:
2042: \sub(6.aaa){\it Integration of the $\psi^{(1)}$ field.}
2043: If $h^*_1$ is fixed as in \sec(6.100), we can use Theorem 3.1 up to
2044: the scale $\bar h=h^*_1+1$.
2045:
2046: Once that all the scales $> h^*_1$ are integrated out,
2047: it is more convenient to describe the system in terms of
2048: the fields $\psi^{(1)}_{\o},\psi^{(2)}_{\o}$, $\o=\pm 1$,
2049: defined through the following
2050: change of variables:
2051: %
2052: $$\hat\psi^{\a(\le h^*_1)}_{\o,\kk}= {1\over\sqrt{2}} (\hat\psi^{(1,
2053: \le h^*_1)}_{\o,-\a\kk}-i\a \hat\psi^{(2,\le h^*_1)}_{\o,-\a\kk})\;,
2054: \quad \psi^{(j)}_{\o,\xx}={1\over M^2}\sum_{\kk}e^{-i\kk\xx}\hat\psi^{
2055: (j)}_{\o,\kk}\;.\Eq(4.21b)$$
2056: %
2057: If we perform this change of variables, we find
2058: $P_{Z_{h^*_1},\s_{h^*_1},\m_{h^*_1},C_{h^*_1}}
2059: =
2060: \prod_{j=1}^2 P^{(j)}_{
2061: Z_{h^*_1},m_{h^*_1}^{(j)},C_{h^*_1}}$ where, if
2062: $\Psi^{(j,\le h^*_1),T}_\kk\defin(\psi^{(j,\le h^*_1)}_{1,\kk},\
2063: \psi^{(j,\le h^*_1)}_{-1,\kk})$,
2064: %
2065: $$\eqalign{& P^{(j)}_{Z_{h^*_1},m_{h^*_1}^{(j)},C_{h^*_1}}
2066: (d\psi^{(j,\le h^*_1)})\defin\cr
2067: &\defin{1\over N_{h^*_1}^{(j)}}\prod_{\kk,\o} d\psi^{(j,\le h^*_1)}_{\o,\kk}
2068: \exp\Big\{-{Z_{h^*_1}\over 4M^2}\sum_{\kk\in
2069: D_{h^*_1}}
2070: C_{h^*_1}(\kk)\Psi^{(j,\le h^*_1),T}_{\kk}
2071: A^{(h^*_1)}_j(\kk)\Psi^{(j,\le h^*_1)}_{-\kk}
2072: \Big\}
2073: \cr
2074: &A^{(h^*_1)}_j(\kk)\defin\pmatrix
2075: {(-i\sin k-\sin k_0)+a^{+(j)}_{h^*_1}(\kk)&
2076: -i \big(m_{h^*_1}^{(j)}(\kk)+c_{h^*_1}^{(j)}(\kk)\big)\cr i
2077: \big(m_{h^*_1}^{(j)}(\kk)+c_{h^*_1}^{(j)}(\kk)\big)&
2078: (-i\sin k+\sin k_0)+a^{-(j)}_{h^*_1}(\kk)\cr}\cr}\Eq(4.22)$$
2079: %
2080: and $a^{\o(j)}_{h^*_1}$, $m_{h^*_1}^{(j)}$, $c_{h^*_1}^{(j)}$
2081: are given by \equ(4.24y) with $h=h^*+1$.
2082:
2083: The propagators $g^{(j,\le h^*_1)}_{\o_1,\o_2}$
2084: associated with the fermionic integration \equ(4.22)
2085: are given by \equ(4.24) with $h=h^*_1+1$.
2086: Note that, by \equ(5.20), $\max\{|m_{h^*_1}^{(1)}|,|m_{h^*_1}^{(2)}|\}=
2087: |\s_{h^*_1}|+|\m_{h^*_1}|=O(\g^{h^*_1})$ (see \equ(4.24y) for the definition
2088: of $m_{h^*_1}^{(1)}$, $m_{h^*_1}^{(2)}$).
2089: From now on, for definiteness we shall suppose that
2090: $\max\{|m_{h^*_1}^{(1)}|,|m_{h^*_1}^{(2)}|\}\=|m_{h^*_1}^{(1)}|$.
2091: Then, it is easy to realize that the propagator
2092: $g_{\o_1,\o_2}^{(1,\le h^*_1)}$ is bounded as follows.
2093: %
2094: $$|\dpr^{n_0}_{x_0}\dpr^{n_1}_{x}g_{\o_1,\o_2}^{(1,\le h^*_1)}
2095: (\xx)|\le C_{N,n}{\g^{(1+n)h^*_1}\over 1+(\g^{h^*_1}
2096: |\dd(\xx)|)^N}\virg n=n_0+n_1\;,\Eq(4.4*)$$
2097: %
2098: namely $g_{\o_1,\o_2}^{(1,\le h^*_1)}$ satisfies the same bound as
2099: the single scale propagator on scale $h=h^*_1$. This suggests to
2100: integrate out $\psi^{(1,\le h^*_1)}$, without any
2101: other scale decomposition. We find the following result.\\
2102:
2103: {\bf Lemma 5.1} {\it If $|\l|\le \e_1$,
2104: $|\s_1|,|\m_1|\le c_1$ ($c_1,\e_1$ being the same as in Theorem 2.1)
2105: and $\n_1$ is fixed as in Theorem 4.1,
2106: we can rewrite the partition function as
2107: %
2108: $$\Xi_{AT}^-=\int P^{(2)}_{Z_{h^*_1}, \widehat m^{(2)}_{h^*_1}, C_{h^*_1}}
2109: (d\psi^{(2,\le h^*_1)})e^{-\lis \VV^{(h^*_1)}({\sqrt Z_{h^*_1}}\psi^{(2,
2110: \le h^*_1)})-M^2\lis E_{h^*_1}}
2111: \;,\Eq(zh*)$$
2112: %
2113: where: $\widehat m^{(2)}_{h^*_1}(\kk)=m^{(2)}_{h^*_1}(\kk)-
2114: \g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}C_{h^*_1}^{-1}(\kk)$,
2115: with $\p_{h^*_1}$ a free parameter, s.t. $|\p_{h^*_1}|\le c|\l|$;
2116: $|\lis E_{h^*_1}-E_{h^*_1}|\le c|\l|\g^{2h^*_1}$;
2117: and
2118: %
2119: $$\eqalign{\lis\VV^{(h^*_1)}(\psi^{(2)})-
2120: \g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}F_\s^{(2,\le h^*_1)}(
2121: \psi^{(2\le h^*_1)})
2122: &=\sum_{n=1}^{\io}\sum_{\oo}\prod_{i=1}^{2n}
2123: \hat\psi^{(2)}_{\o_i,\kk_i}
2124: \lis W^{(h^*_1)}_{2n,\oo}(\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n-1})
2125: \d(\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\kk_i)=\cr
2126: &=\sum_{n=1}^{\io}
2127: \sum_{\ss,\underline j,\oo}\prod_{i=1}^{2n}
2128: \dpr^{\s_i}_{j_i}\psi^{(2)}_{\o_i,\xx_i}
2129: \lis W^{(h^*_1)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\oo}(\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_{2n})
2130: \;,\cr}\Eq(4.50)$$
2131: %
2132: `with $F_\s^{(2,\le h)}$ given by the first of
2133: \equ(4.11) with $\hat\psi^{(2,\le h)}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{(2,\le h)}_{\o',-\kk}$
2134: replacing $\hat\psi^{+(\le h)}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{-(\le h)}_{\o',\kk}$; and
2135: $\lis W^{(h^*_1)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\oo}$ satisfying the same
2136: bound \equ(4.45) as $W^{(\bar h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}$
2137: with $\bar h=h^*_1$.}\\
2138:
2139: In order to prove the Lemma it
2140: is sufficient to consider \equ(4.3) with $h=h^*_1$
2141: and rewrite
2142: $P_{Z_{h^*_1},\s_{h^*_1},\m_{h^*_1},C_{h^*_1}}$ as
2143: the product $\prod_{j=1}^2 P^{(j)}_{
2144: Z_{h^*_1},m_{h^*_1}^{(j)},C_{h^*_1}}$. Then the integration
2145: over the $\psi^{(1,\le h^*_1)}$ field is done as the integration
2146: of the $\chi$'s in Appendix \secc(a1), recalling the bound \equ(4.4*).
2147:
2148: Finally we rewrite $m^{(2)}_{h^*_1}(\kk)$
2149: as $\widehat m^{(2)}_{h^*_1}(\kk)+\g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}C_{h^*_1}^{-1}
2150: (\kk)$, where
2151: $\p_{h^*_1}$ is a parameter to be suitably fixed below as a function
2152: of $\l,\s_1,\m_1$.\\
2153:
2154: \sub(6.2aaa){\it The localization operator.}
2155: The integration of the r.h.s. of \equ(zh*)
2156: is done in an iterative way similar to the one described
2157: in \sec(4).
2158: now we shall perform an iterative integration of the
2159: field $\psi^{(2)}$. If $h=h^*_1,h^*_1-1,\ldots$, we shall write:
2160: %
2161: $$\Xi_{AT}^-=\int P^{(2)}_{Z_{h}, \widehat m^{(2)}_{h}, C_{h}}
2162: (d\psi^{(2,\le h)})e^{-\lis\VV^{(h)}
2163: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(2,\le h)})-M^2E_h}\;,\Eq(veff)$$
2164: %
2165: where $\lis\VV^{(h)}$ is given by an expansion similar to \equ(4.50), with
2166: $h$ replacing $h^*_1$ and $Z_{h}, \widehat m^{(2)}_{h}$
2167: are defined recursively in the following way. We first
2168: introduce a {\it localization operator} $\LL$. As in \sec(4.2),
2169: we define $\LL$ as a combination of four operators $\LL_j$
2170: and $\lis\PP_j$, $j=0,1$. $\LL_j$ are defined as in \equ(4.7) and \equ(4.8),
2171: while $\lis\PP_0$ and $\lis\PP_1$,
2172: in analogy with \equ(4.9), are defined as the operators extracting from a
2173: functional of $\widehat m^{(2)}_h(\kk)$, $h\le h^*_1$, the contributions
2174: independent and linear in $\widehat m^{(2)}_h(\kk)$.
2175: Note that inductively the kernels $\lis W_{2n,\oo}^{(h)}$ can be thought
2176: as functionals of $\widehat m_k(\kk)$, $h\le k\le h^*_1$.
2177: Given $\LL_j,\lis\PP_j$, $j=0,1$ as above, we define the action of $\LL$
2178: on the kernels $\lis W_{2n,\oo}^{(h)}$ as follows.\\
2179: \\
2180: \01) If $n=1$, then
2181: %
2182: $$\LL \lis W_{2,\oo}^{(h)}\defin\cases{
2183: \LL_0(\lis\PP_0+\lis\PP_1)
2184: \lis W_{2,\oo}^{(h)} & if $\o_1+\o_2=0$,\cr
2185: \LL_1\lis\PP_0\lis W_{2,\oo}^{(h)} & if $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$.}$$
2186: %
2187: \02) If $n>2$, then $\LL \lis W_{2n,\oo}^{(h)}=0$.\\
2188:
2189: It is easy to prove the analogue of Lemma 3.1:
2190: %
2191: $$\LL\lis\VV^{(h)}=(s_h+\g^h p_h)F_\s^{(2,\le h)}+z_h
2192: F_\z^{(2,\le h)}\;,\Eq(4.54)$$
2193: %
2194: where $s_h,p_h$ and $z_h$ are real constants and: $s_h$ is linear
2195: in $\widehat m_k^{(2)}(\kk)$, $h\le k\le h^*_1$; $p_h$ and $z_h$ are
2196: independent of $\widehat m_k^{(2)}(\kk)$. Furthermore
2197: $F_\s^{(2,\le h)}$ and $F_\z^{(2,\le h)}$ are given by the first and the last
2198: of
2199: \equ(4.11) with $\hat\psi^{(2,\le h)}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{(2,\le h)}_{\o',-\kk}$
2200: replacing $\hat\psi^{+(\le h)}_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^{-(\le h)}_{\o',\kk}$.\\
2201:
2202: {\bf Remark.} Note that the action of $\LL$ on the quartic
2203: terms is trivial. The reason of such a choice is that in the present case
2204: no quartic local term can appear, because of Pauli principle:
2205: $\psi^{(2,h)}_{1,\xx}\psi^{(2,h)}_{1,\xx}\psi^{(2,h)}_{-1,\xx}
2206: \psi^{(2,h)}_{-1,\xx}\=0$,
2207: so that $\LL_0\lis W_{4,\oo}=0$.\\
2208:
2209: Using the symmetry properties exposed in Appendix \secc(A1.2), we can
2210: prove the analogue of Lemma 3.2: if $n=1$, then
2211: %
2212: $$\RR \lis W_{2,\oo}=\cases{
2213: [\lis\SS_2+\RR_2(\lis\PP_0+\lis\PP_1)]
2214: \lis W_{2,\oo} & if $\o_1+\o_2=0$,\cr
2215: [\RR_1\lis\SS_1+\RR_2\lis\PP_0]
2216: \lis W_{2,\aa,\oo} & if
2217: $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$,\cr}\Eq(rr*)$$
2218: %
2219: where $\lis\SS_1=1-\lis\PP_0$ and $\lis\SS_2=1-\lis\PP_0-\lis\PP_1$;
2220: if $n=2$, then
2221: $\lis W_{4,\oo}= \RR_1\lis W_{4,\oo}$.\\
2222:
2223: \sub(6.3aaa){\it Renormalization for $h\le h^*_1$.}
2224: If $\LL$ and $\RR=1-\LL$ are defined as in previous subsection, we can rewrite
2225: \equ(veff) as:
2226: %
2227: $$\int P^{(2)}_{Z_{h}, \widehat m^{(2)}_{h}, C_{h}}
2228: (d\psi^{(2,\le h)})e^{-\LL\lis\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(2,\le h)})
2229: -\RR\lis\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(2,\le h)})-M^2E_h}\;.\Eq(veff1)$$
2230: %
2231: Furthermore, using \equ(4.54) and defining:
2232: %
2233: $$\widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)\defin
2234: Z_h(1+C_h^{-1}(\kk) z_h)\virg
2235: \widehat m_{h-1}^{(2)}(\kk)\defin{Z_h\over \widehat Z_{h-1}(\kk)}
2236: \left(\widehat m_h^{(2)}(\kk)+C_h^{-1}(\kk) s_h\right)\;,\Eq(flow)$$
2237: %
2238: we see that \equ(veff1) is equal to
2239: %
2240: $$\int P^{(2)}_{\widehat Z_{h-1},\widehat m^{(2)}_{h-1}, C_{h}}
2241: (d\psi^{(2,\le h)})e^{-\g^h p_h F_\s^{(2,\le h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h}}
2242: \psi^{(2),\le h})-
2243: \RR\lis\VV^{h}(\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(2),\le h})-M^2 (E_h+t_h)}\Eq(4.58*)$$
2244: %
2245: Again, we rescale the potential:
2246: %
2247: $$\widetilde\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}
2248: \psi^{(\le h)})\defin \g^h\p_h F_\s^{(2,\le h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}
2249: \psi^{(2,\le h)})+
2250: \RR\lis\VV^{h}(\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(2,\le h)})\;,\Eq(recsale)$$
2251: %
2252: where $Z_{h-1}=\widehat Z_{h-1}({\bf 0})$ and
2253: $\p_h=( Z_h/ Z_{h-1})p_h$; we
2254: define $\widetilde f_h^{-1}$ as in \equ(4.21), we perform
2255: the single scale integration and we define the new effective potential as
2256: %
2257: $$e^{-\lis\VV^{(h-1)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(2,\le h-1)})-M^2
2258: \tilde E_{h}}\defin \int
2259: P^{(2)}_{Z_{h-1},\widehat m^{(2)}_{h-1}, \widetilde f^{-1}_h}
2260: (d\psi^{(2,h)})
2261: e^{-\widetilde\VV^{h}(\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(2,\le h)})}
2262: \;.\Eq(4.58)$$
2263: %
2264: Finally we pose $E_{h-1}=E_h+t_h+\tilde E_h$.
2265: Note that the above procedure allow us to write the
2266: $\p_h$ in terms of $\p_k$, $h\le k\le h^*_1$, namely
2267: $\p_{h-1}=\g^h\p_h+\b^h_\p(\p_h,\ldots,\p_{h^*_1})$,
2268: where $\b^h_\p$ is the {\it Beta function}.
2269:
2270: Proceeding as in \sec(4) we can inductively show that $\lis\VV^{(h)}$ has
2271: the structure of \equ(4.50), with $h$ replacing $h^*_1$ and that
2272: the kernels of $\lis\VV^{(h)}$ are bounded as follows.\\
2273:
2274: {\bf Lemma 5.2.} {\it Let the hypothesis of Lemma 5.1 be satisfied
2275: and suppose that, for $\bar h< h\le h^*_1$ and some constants $c,\th>0$
2276: %
2277: $$e^{-c|\l|}\le{\widehat m^{(2)}_h\over \widehat m^{(2)}_{h-1}}\le
2278: e^{c|\l|}\virg
2279: e^{-c|\l|^2}\le{Z_h\over Z_{h-1}}\le e^{c|\l|^2}
2280: \virg |\p_h|\le c|\l|\virg |\widehat m^{(2)}_{\bar h}|\le
2281: \g^{\bar h}\;.\Eq(lem5.2)$$
2282: %
2283: Then the partition
2284: function can be rewritten as in \equ(veff)
2285: and there exists $C>0$ s.t. the kernels of
2286: $\lis\VV^{(h)}$ satisfy:
2287: %
2288: $$\int d\xx_1\cdots d\xx_{2n}|\lis W^{(\bar h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\oo}
2289: (\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_{2n})|
2290: \le M^2 \g^{-\bar h D_k(n)} \,(C\,|\l|)^{max(1,n-1)}\Eq(5.45*)$$
2291: %
2292: where $D_k(n)=-2+n+k$ and $k=\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\s_i$.
2293: Finally $|E_{\bar h+1}|+|t_{\bar h+1}|\le c|\l|\g^{2\bar h}$.}\\
2294:
2295: The proof of Lemma 5.2 is essentially identical to the proof
2296: of Theorem 3.1 and we do not repeat it here.\\
2297:
2298: %{\bf Remarks}\\
2299: %1) The hypothesis \equ(lem5.2) can be proven by solving the flow equations
2300: %for $\p_h, Z_h$ and $\widehat m^{(2)}_h$ in a way similar (but much simpler)
2301: %to the one followed in \sec(5) to study the flow equations for $\l_h,\n_h,
2302: %Z_h,\s_h$ and $\m_h$. We shall sketch the proof of \equ(lem5.2) in
2303: %next subsection and in Appendix \secc(pi).\\
2304: %2) In order to insure the condition $\widehat m^{(2)}_{\bar h}\le
2305: %\g^{\bar h}$, we shall iterate the procedure described above up to
2306: %the scale $\bar h=h^*_2$ with $h^*_2$ defined by the condition:
2307: %$|\widehat m_k^{(2)}|\le\g^{k-1}$ for any
2308: %$h^{*}_2\le k\le h^{*}_1$ and
2309: %$|\widehat m_{h^{*}_2-1}^{(2)}|> \g^{h^*_2-2}$.\\
2310:
2311: It is possible to fix $\p_{h^*_1}$
2312: so that the first three assumptions
2313: in \equ(lem5.2) are valid for any $h\le h^*_1$. More precisely,
2314: the following result holds, see Appendix \secc(pi).\\
2315:
2316: {\bf Lemma 5.3. } {\it If $|\l|\le \e_1$,
2317: $|\s_1|,|\m_1|\le c_1$ and $\n_1$ is fixed as in Theorem 4.1,
2318: there exists
2319: $\p^*_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1,\m_1)$ such that, if we fix $\p_{h^*_1}=
2320: \p^*_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1,\m_1)$, for $h\le h^*_1$ we have:
2321: %
2322: $$|\p_h|\le c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)(h-h^*_1)}\virg
2323: \widehat m^{(2)}_h=\widehat m^{(2)}_{h^*_1}\g^{ F^h_m}\virg
2324: Z_h=Z_{h^*_1}\g^{\lis F^h_\z}\;,\Eq(4.58b)$$
2325: %
2326: where $F^h_m$ and $\lis F^h_\z$ are $O(\l)$. Moreover:
2327: %
2328: $$\Big|\p^*_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1,\m_1)-\p^*_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1',\m_1')\Big|
2329: \le c|\l|\left(\g^{(\h_\s-1)h^*_1}|\s_1-\s_1'|+
2330: \g^{(\h_\m-1)h^*_1}|\m_1-\m_1'|\right)\;.\Eq(ph)$$}
2331:
2332: \sub(6.101){\it The integration of the scales $\le h^*_2$.}
2333: In order to insure that the last assumption in \equ(lem5.2) holds,
2334: we iterate the preceding construction up to the scale
2335: $h^*_2$ defined as the scale s.t. $|\widehat m_k^{(2)}|\le\g^{k-1}$ for any
2336: $h^{*}_2\le k\le h^{*}_1$ and
2337: $|\widehat m_{h^{*}_2-1}^{(2)}|> \g^{h^*_2-2}$.
2338:
2339: Once we have integrated all the fields $\psi^{(>h^*_2)}$, we can integrate
2340: $\psi^{(2,\le h^*_2)}$ without any further multiscale
2341: decomposition. Note in fact that by definition the propagator
2342: satisfies the same bound \equ(4.4*) with $h^*_2$ replacing $h^*_1$.
2343: Then, if we define
2344: %
2345: $$e^{-M^2\tilde E_{\le h^*_2}}\defin \int P_{Z_{h^*_2-1},
2346: \widehat m^{(2)}_{h^*_2-1},C_{h^*_2}}e^{-\widetilde \VV^{(h^*_2)}(\sqrt{Z_{
2347: h^*_2-1}}\psi^{(2,\le h^*_2)})}\;,\Eq(e*2)$$
2348: %
2349: we find that $|\tilde E_{\le h^*_2}|
2350: \le c|\l|\g^{2h^*_2}$ (the proof is a repetition
2351: of the estimates on the single scale integration).
2352:
2353: Combining this bound with the results of Theorem 3.1, Lemma 5.1, Lemma 5.2
2354: and Lemma 5.3,
2355: together with the results of \sec(5) we finally find
2356: that the free energy associated to $\Xi_{AT}^-$ is given by the following
2357: {\it finite} sum, uniformly convergent with the size of $\L_M$:
2358: %
2359: $$\lim_{M\to\io}
2360: {1\over M^2}\log \Xi_{AT}^-=E_{\le h^*_2}+(\lis E_{h^*_1}-E_{h^*_1})
2361: +\sum_{h=h^*_2+1}^1 (\tilde E_h+t_h)\;,\Eq(oh)$$
2362: %
2363: where $E_{\le h^*_2}=\lim_{M\to\io}\tilde E_{\le h^*_2}$ and it is easy to
2364: see that $E_{\le h^*_2}$, for any finite $h^*_2$, exists and satisfies
2365: the same bound of $\tilde E_{h^*_2}$.\\
2366:
2367: \sub(an){\it Keeping $h^*_2$ finite.}
2368: From the discussion of previous subsection, it follows that, for
2369: any finite $h^*_2$, \equ(oh) is an analytic function of $\l,t,u$,
2370: for $|\l|$ sufficiently small, uniformly in $h^*_2$
2371: (this is an elementary consequence of Vitali's convergence theorem).
2372: Moreover, repeating the discussion of Appendix G in [M1], it can be
2373: proved that,
2374: for any $\g^{h^*_2}>0$ (here $\g^{h^*_2}$ plays the
2375: role of $|t-t_c|$ in Appendix G of [M1]), the limit \equ(oh) coincides with
2376: $\lim_{M\to\io}1/M^2 \log \Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}$ for any choice
2377: $\g_1,\g_2$ of boundary conditions; hence this limit coincides
2378: with $-2\log\cosh \l$ plus
2379: the free energy in \equ(cv), see also \equ(2.10). We can state the result
2380: as follows.\\
2381:
2382: {\bf Lemma 5.4.} {\it There exists $\e_1>0$ such that, if $|\l|\le\e_1$
2383: and $t\pm u\in D$ (the same as in Main Theorem),
2384: the free energy $f$ defined in \equ(cv)
2385: is real analytic in $\l,t,u$, except
2386: possibly for the choices of $\l,t,u$ such that $\g^{h^*_2}=0$.}\\
2387:
2388: We shall see in \sec(7) below that the specific heat is logarithmically
2389: divergent as $\g^{h^*_2}\to 0$. So the
2390: critical point is really given by the condition $\g^{h^*_2}=0$.
2391: We shall explicitely solve the equation for the critical point
2392: in next subsection.
2393:
2394: \*
2395: \sub(6.1) {\it The critical points}.
2396: In the present subsection we check that, if $t\pm u\in D$, $D$ being a suitable
2397: interval centered around $\sqrt2-1$, see Main Theorem,
2398: there are precisely two critical points, of the form \equ(1.5). More precisely,
2399: keeping in mind that the equation
2400: for the critical point is simply $\g^{h^*_2}=0$ (see the end of
2401: previous subsection), we prove the following.\\
2402:
2403: {\bf Lemma 5.5. } {\it Let
2404: $|\l|\le\e_1$, $t\pm u\in D$ and $\p_{h^*_1}$
2405: be fixed as in Lemma 5.3.
2406: Then $\g^{h^*_2}=0$ only if $(\l,t,u)=
2407: (\l,t_c^\pm(\l,u),u)$, where $t_c^\pm(\l,u)$ is given by \equ(1.5).}\\
2408:
2409: {\bf Proof\ }
2410: From the definition of $h^*_2$ given above, see \sec(6.101),
2411: it follows that $h^*_2$ satisfies the following equation:
2412: %
2413: $$\g^{h^*_2-1}=c_m\g^{F^{h^*_2}_m}\Big|
2414: |\s_{h^*_1}|-|\m_{h^*_1}|-\a_\s\g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}\Big|\;,
2415: \Eq(4.61a)$$
2416: %
2417: for some $1\le c_m<\g$ and $\a_\s=\sign\s_1$.
2418: Then, the equation $\g^{h^*_2}=0$ can be rewritten as:
2419: %
2420: $$|\s_{h^*_1}|-|\mu_{h^*_1}|-\a_\s \g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}=0\;.
2421: \Eq(4.61aa)$$
2422: %
2423: First note that the result of Lemma 5.5 is trivial when $h^*_1=1$.
2424: If $h^*_1<1$, \equ(4.61aa)
2425: cannot be solved when $|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}>2
2426: |\m_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$. In fact,
2427: %
2428: $$\eqalign{&|\s_1|\g^{\h_\s(h^*_1-1)+F^{h^*_1}_\s}-|\m_1|\g^{\h_\m(h^*_1-1)+
2429: F^{h^*_1}_\m}
2430: -\a_\s\g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}=\cr
2431: &=|\s_1|^{1+{\h_\s\over 1-\h_\s}}c_1-
2432: \Big(|\m_1||\s_1|^{-{1-\h_\m\over 1-\h_\s}}\Big)|\s_1|^{{1-\h_\m\over 1-\h_\s}
2433: -{\h_\m\over 1-\h_\s}}c_1'-\a_\s\g^{h^*_1}\p_{h^*_1}\ge {\g^{h^*_1-1}
2434: \over 3\g}\;,\cr}\Eq(4.61aaa)$$
2435: %
2436: where $c_1,c_1'$ are constants $=1+O(\l)$,
2437: $\p_{h^*_1}=O(\l)$ and $\g^{h^*_1-1}=c_\s
2438: |\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}$,
2439: with $1\le c_\s< \g$. Now, if $|\m_1|>0$, the r.h.s. of \equ(4.61aaa)
2440: equation is strictly positive.\\
2441:
2442: So, let us consider the case $h^*_1<1$ and $|\s_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\s}\le 2
2443: |\m_1|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$
2444: (s.t. $\g^{h^*_1}=c_u\log_\g|u|^{1\over 1-\h_\m}$, with $1\le c_u\le \g$).
2445: In this case
2446: \equ(4.61aa) can be easily solved to find:
2447: %
2448: $$|\s_1|=|\m_1||u|^{\h_\m-\h_\s\over 1-\h_\m}c_u^{\h_\m-\h_\s}\g^{F^{h^*_1}_\m
2449: -F^{h^*_1}_\s}+|u|^{1-\h_\s\over 1-\h_\m}
2450: c_u^{1-\h_\s}\a_\s\g^{1-F^{h^*_1}_\s}\p_{h^*_1}\;.
2451: \Eq(6.102)$$
2452: %
2453: Note that $c_u^{\h_\m-\h_\s}\g^{F^{h^*_1}_\m
2454: -F^{h^*_1}_\s}=1+O(\l)$ is just a function of $u$,
2455: (it does not depend on $t$), because
2456: of our definition of $h^*_1$.
2457: Moreover $\p_{h^*_1}$ is a smooth
2458: function of $t$: if we call $\p_{h^*_1}(t,u)$ resp.
2459: $\p_{h^*_1}(t',u)$
2460: the correction corresponding
2461: to the initial data $\s_1(t,u),\m_1(t,u)$ resp. $\s_1(t',u),\m_1(t',u)$,
2462: we have
2463: %
2464: $$|\p_{h^*_1}(t,u)-\p_{h^*_1}(t',u)|\le c|\l|
2465: |u|^{\h_\s-1\over 1-\h_\m}|t-t'|\;,\Eq(6.106)$$
2466: %
2467: where we used \equ(ph) and the bounds $|\s_1-\s_1'|\le c|t-t'|$ and
2468: $|\m_1-\m_1'|\le c|u||t-t'|$, following from
2469: the definitions of $(\s_1,\m_1)$ in terms of $(\s,\m)$ and
2470: of $(t,u)$, see \sec(2).
2471:
2472: Using the same definitions we also realize that \equ(6.102) can be rewritten as
2473: %
2474: $$t=\Big[\sqrt2-1+{\n(\l)\over 2}\pm|u|^{1+\h}\Big(1+\l f(t,u)\Big)
2475: \Big]{1+\hat\l(t^2-u^2)\over 1+\hat\l}\;,\Eq(6.105)$$
2476: %
2477: where
2478: %
2479: $$1+\h\defin{1-\h_\s\over 1-\h_\m}\;,\Eq(eta)$$
2480: %
2481: and the crucial property is that $\h=-b\l+O(\l^2)$, $b>0$, see Lemma 4.1
2482: and Appendix \secc(a5). We also recall that both $\h$ and $\n$ are
2483: functions of $\l$ and are independent of $t,u$.
2484: Moreover $f(t,u)$ is a suitable bounded function s.t.
2485: $|f(t,u)-f(t',u)|\le c|u|^{-(1+\h)}|t-t'|$, as it follows from the Lipshitz
2486: property of $\p_{h^*_1}$ \equ(6.106).
2487: The r.h.s. of \equ(6.105) is
2488: Lipshitz in $t$ with constant $O(\l)$, so that \equ(6.105) can be inverted
2489: w.r.t. $t$ by contractions and, for both choices of the sign,
2490: we find a unique solution
2491: %
2492: $$t=t_c^\pm(\l,u)=\sqrt2-1+\n^*(\l)\pm|u|^{1+\h}\big(1+F^\pm(\l,u)\big)\;,
2493: \Eq(6.103)$$
2494: %
2495: with $|F^\pm(\l,u)|\le c\big|\l|$, for some $c$.\qed\\
2496:
2497: \sub(6.2) {\it Computation of $h^*_2$.}
2498: Let us now solve \equ(4.61a) in the general case of
2499: $\g^{h^*_2}\ge0$.
2500: Calling $\e\defin\g^{h^*_2-h^*_1-F^{h^*_2}_m}/c_m$, we find:
2501: %
2502: $$\eqalign{\e&=\left||\s_1|\g^{(\h_\s-1)(h^*_1-1)+F^{h^*_1}_\s}-|\m_1|
2503: \g^{(\h_\m-1)(h^*_1-1)+F^{h^*_1}_\m}
2504: -\a_\s\g\p_{h^*_1}\right|=\cr
2505: &=\g^{(\h_\s-1)(h^*_1-1)+F^{h^*_1}_\s}\left||\s_1|-|\m_1|
2506: \g^{(\h_\m-\h_\s)(h^*_1-1)+F^{h^*_1}_\m-F^{h^*_1}_\s}
2507: -\a_\s\g^{1+(1-\h_\s)(h^*_1-1)-F^{h^*_1}_\s}\p_{h^*_1}\right|\;.
2508: \cr}
2509: \Eq(6.103)$$
2510: %
2511: If $|\s_1|^{1/(1-\h_\s)}\le 2|\m_1|^{1/(1-\h_\m)}$,
2512: we use $\g^{h^*_1-1}=c_u|u|^{1/(1-\h_\m)}$ and,
2513: from the second row of \equ(6.103), we find: $\e=C{\left||\s_1|-
2514: |\s_{1,c}^{\a_\s}|\right||u|^{-(1+\h)}}$, where
2515: $\s_{1,c}^\pm=\s_1(\l,t_c^\pm,u)$
2516: and $C=C(\l,t,u)$ is bounded above and below by $O(1)$ constants; defining
2517: $\D$ as in \equ(1.6), we can rewrite:
2518: %
2519: $$\e=C{\left||\s_1|-
2520: |\s_{1,c}^{\a_\s}|\right|\over|u|^{1+\h}}=C'{\left|\s_1^2-
2521: (\s_{1,c}^{\a_\s})^2\right|\over \D|u|^{1+\h}}=C''{|t-t_c^+|\cdot|t-t_c^-|\over
2522: \D^2}\;,\Eq(epsilon)$$
2523: %
2524: where $C'=C'(\l,t,u)$ and $C''=C''(\l,t,u)$
2525: are bounded above and below by $O(1)$ constants.
2526:
2527: In the opposite case ($|\s_1|^{1/(1-\h_s)}> 2|\m_1|^{1/(1-\h_\m)}$),
2528: we use $\g^{h^*_1-1}=c_\s|\s_1|^{1/(1-\h_\s)}$ and, from the first row
2529: of \equ(6.103), we find
2530: $\e=\tilde C(1-{|\m_1||\s_1|^{-1/(1+\h)}}-\a_\s\g\p_{h^*_1})=\bar C$,
2531: where $\tilde C$ and $\bar C$ are bounded above and below by $O(1)$ constants.
2532: Since in this region of parameters $|t-t_c^\pm|\D^{-1}$
2533: is also bounded above and below
2534: by $O(1)$ constants, we can in both cases write
2535: %
2536: $$\e=C_\e(\l,t,u) {|t-t_c^+|\cdot|t-t_c^-|\over
2537: \D^2}\virg C_{1,\e}\le C_\e(\l,t,u) \le C_{2,\e}\Eq(eps2)$$
2538: %
2539: and $C_{j,\e}$, $j=1,2$, are suitable positive $O(1)$ constants.
2540:
2541: \\
2542: \section(7, The specific heat)
2543:
2544: Consider the specific heat defined in \equ(cv).
2545: The correlation function $<H^{AT}_{\xx}H^{AT}_{\yy}>_{\L_M,T}$
2546: can be conveniently written as
2547: %
2548: $$<H^{AT}_{\xx}H^{AT}_{\yy}>_{\L,T}=
2549: {\dpr^2\over \dpr\phi_\xx\dpr\phi_\yy}\log \Xi_{AT}(\phi)\Big|_{\phi=0}\virg
2550: \Xi_{AT}(\phi)\defin\sum_{\s^{(1)},\s^{(2)}}e^{-\sum_{\xx\in\L}(1+\phi_\xx)
2551: H^{AT}_\xx}\Eq(7.2)$$
2552: %
2553: where $\phi_\xx$ is a real commuting auxiliary field (with periodic boundary
2554: conditions).\\
2555: \\
2556: Repeating the construction of \sec(2), we see that $\Xi_{AT}(\phi)$
2557: admit a Grassmanian representation similar to the one of $\Xi_{AT}$,
2558: and in particular, if $\xx\not =\yy$:
2559: %
2560: $$\eqalign{&{\dpr^2\over \dpr\phi_\xx\dpr\phi_\yy}\log
2561: \Xi_{AT}(\phi)\Big|_{\phi=0}={\dpr^2\over \dpr\phi_\xx\dpr\phi_\yy}
2562: \log\sum_{\g_1,\g_2}(-1)^{\d_{\g_1}+\d_{\g_2}}
2563: \widehat \Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}(\phi)\Big|_{\phi=0}\cr
2564: &\widehat
2565: \Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}(\phi)=\int\prod_{\xx\in\L_M}^{j=1,2} dH^{(j)}_\xx d
2566: \lis H^{(j)}_\xx d V^{(j)}_\xx
2567: d\lis V^{(j)}_\xx\, e^{S^{(1)}_{\g_1}(t^{(1)})+S^{(2)}_{\g_2}(t^{(2)})+
2568: V_\l+\BB(\phi)}\cr}\Eq(7.3)$$
2569: %
2570: where $\d_\g$, $S^{(j)}(t^{(j)})$ and $V_\l$ where defined in \sec(2)
2571: (see \equ(2.2) and previous lines, and \equ(2.15)),
2572: the apex $\g_1,\g_2$ attached to $\widehat \Xi_{AT}$ refers to the
2573: boundary conditions assigned to the Grassmanian fields, as in \sec(2)
2574: and finally $\BB(\phi)$ is defined as:
2575: %
2576: $$\eqalign{\BB(\phi)=
2577: \sum_{\xx\in\L}&\phi_\xx\Big\{a^{(1)}\big(\lis H^{(1)}_{\xx} H^{(1)}_{
2578: \xx+\hat e_1}+\lis V^{(1)}_{\xx} V^{(1)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}\big)+
2579: a^{(2)}\big(\lis H^{(2)}_{\xx} H^{(2)}_{
2580: \xx+\hat e_1}+\lis V^{(2)}_{\xx} V^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}\big)+\cr
2581: &+\l \widetilde a
2582: \big(\lis H^{(1)}_{\xx} H^{(1)}_{
2583: \xx+\hat e_1}\lis H^{(2)}_{\xx} H^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_1}+
2584: \lis V^{(1)}_{\xx} V^{(1)}_{
2585: \xx+\hat e_0}\lis V^{(2)}_{\xx} V^{(2)}_{\xx+\hat e_0}\big)\Big\}\defin
2586: \sum_{\xx\in\L}\phi_\xx A_\xx\;,\cr}
2587: \Eq(7.4)$$
2588: %
2589: where $a^{(1)}$, $a^{(2)}$ and $\widetilde a$ are $O(1)$ constants, with
2590: $a^{(1)}-a^{(2)}=O(u)$. Using \equ(7.3) and \equ(7.4) we can rewrite:
2591: %
2592: $$<H^{AT}_{\xx}H^{AT}_{\yy}>_{\L,T}={1\over 4}(\cosh J)^{2M^2}
2593: \sum_{\g_1,\g_2}(-1)^{\d_{\g_1}+\d_{\g_2}}
2594: {\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}\over \Xi_{AT}}<A_\xx A_\yy>_{\L_M,T}^{\g_1,\g_2}\;,
2595: \Eq(axay)$$
2596: %
2597: where $<\cdot>_{\L_M,T}^{\g_1,\g_2}$ is the average w.r.t. the
2598: boundary conditions $\g_1,\g_2$. Proceeding as in Appendix G of [M1]
2599: one can show that, if $\g^{h^*_2}>0$,
2600: $<A_\xx A_\yy>_{\L_M,T}^{\g_1,\g_2}$ is exponentially
2601: insensitive
2602: to boundary conditions and $\sum_{\g_1,\g_2}(-1)^{\d_{\g_1}+\d_{\g_2}}
2603: {\Xi_{AT}^{\g_1,\g_2}/ \Xi_{AT}}$ is an $O(1)$ constant. Then from
2604: now on we will
2605: study only $\Xi_{AT}^-(\phi)\defin
2606: \widehat \Xi_{AT}^{(-,-),(-,-)}(\phi)$ and $<A_\xx A_\yy>_{\L_M,T}^{
2607: (-,-),(-,-)}$.
2608:
2609: As in \sec(2)
2610: we integrate out the $\c$ fields and, proceeding as in Appendix A, we find:
2611: %
2612: $$\Xi_{AT}^-(\phi)=
2613: \int P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi) e^{\VV^{(1)}+\BB^{(1)}}\;,\Eq(7.5)$$
2614: %
2615: where
2616: %
2617: $$\BB^{(1)}(\psi,\phi)=\sum_{m,n=1}^\io
2618: \sum^{\underline\s,\underline j,
2619: \underline\a,\oo}_{\xx_1\cdots\xx_m\atop\yy_1\cdots \yy_{2n}}
2620: B^{(1)}_{m,2n;\underline\s,\underline j,
2621: \underline\a,\oo}(\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_m;\yy_1,
2622: \ldots,\yy_{2n})
2623: \Big[\prod_{i=1}^m\phi_{\xx_i}\Big] \Big[\prod_{i=1}^{2n}
2624: \partial^{\s_i}_{j_i}\psi^{\a_i}_{\yy_i,\o_i}\Big]\;.\Eq(6.6)$$
2625: %
2626: We proceed as for the partition function, namely as described in \sec(4)
2627: above. We introduce
2628: the scale decomposition described in \S 3
2629: and we perform iteratively
2630: the integration of the single scale fields, starting from the field of
2631: scale $1$.
2632: After the integration of the fields $\psi^{(1)},\ldots,\psi^{(h+1)}$,
2633: $h^*_1<h\le 0$, we are left with
2634: %
2635: $$\Xi_{AT}^-(\phi)=e^{-M^2 E_h+S^{(h+1)}(\phi)}\int P_{Z_h,\s_h,
2636: \m_h,C_h}(d\psi^{\le
2637: h})e^{-\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})+\BB^{(h)}
2638: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)}\;,\Eq(7.6)$$
2639: %
2640: where $P_{Z_h,\s_h,\m_h m_h,C_h}(d\psi^{(\le h)})$
2641: and $\VV^{(h)}$ are the same as in \S 3, $S^{(h+1)}$ $(\phi)$
2642: denotes the sum of the contributions dependent on $\phi$ but independent of
2643: $\psi$, and finally $\BB^{(h)}(\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)$ denotes the
2644: sum over all terms containing at least one $\phi$ field and two $\psi$
2645: fields. $S^{(h+1)}$ and $\BB^{(h)}$ can be represented as
2646: %
2647: $$\eqalign{&S^{(h+1)}(\phi)=\sum_{m=1}^\io\sum_{\xx_1\cdots\xx_m}
2648: S^{(h+1)}_m(\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_m)
2649: \prod_{i=1}^m\phi_{\xx_i}\cr
2650: &\BB^{(h)}(\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)=
2651: \sum_{m,n=1}^\io
2652: \sum_{\xx_1\cdots\xx_m\atop \yy_1\cdots\yy_{2n}}^{\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}
2653: B^{(h)}_{m,2n;\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}(\xx_1,
2654: \ldots,\xx_m;\yy_1,\ldots,\yy_{2n})
2655: \Big[\prod_{i=1}^m\phi_{\xx_i}\Big] \Big[\prod_{i=1}^{2n}
2656: \partial^{\s_i}\psi^{(\le h)\a_i}_{\yy_i,\o_i}\Big]\;.\cr}\Eq(7.7)$$
2657: %
2658: Since the field $\phi$ is equivalent, as regarding dimensional
2659: bounds, to two $\psi$ fields (see Theorem 6.1 below for a more precise
2660: statement), the only terms in the
2661: expansion for $\BB^{(h)}$
2662: which are not irrelevant are those with $m=n=1$, $\s_1=\s_2=0$
2663: and they are marginal.
2664: Hence we extend the definition of the localization operator $\LL$,
2665: so that its action on $\BB^{(h)}(\psi^{(\le
2666: h)},\phi)$ is defined by its action on the kernels
2667: $\widehat B^{(h)}_{m,2n;\aa,\oo}
2668: (\qq_1,\ldots,\qq_m;\kk_1,\ldots,\kk_{2n})$:\\
2669: %
2670: \01) if $m=n=1$ and $\a_1+\a_2=\o_1+\o_2=0$, then
2671: $\LL \widehat B^{(h)}_{1,2;\ss,\aa,\oo}(\qq_1;\kk_1,\kk_2)\defin
2672: \PP_0\widehat B^{(h)}_{1,2;\aa,\oo}
2673: (\kk_+;\kk_+,\kk_+)$,
2674: where $\PP_0$ is defined as in \equ(4.9);\\
2675: \02) in all other cases $\LL
2676: \widehat B^{(h)}_{m,2n;\aa,\oo}=0$.
2677: \*
2678:
2679: Using the symmetry considerations of Appendix B together with the remark that
2680: $\phi_\xx$ is invariant under {\it Complex conjugation}, {\it
2681: Hole--particle} and $(1)\otto(2)$, while under {\it Parity}
2682: $\phi_\xx\to\phi_{-\xx}$ and under
2683: {\it Rotation} $\phi_{(x,x_0)}\to\phi_{(-x_0,
2684: -x)}$,
2685: we easily realize that $\LL\BB^{(h)}$ has necessarily the following form:
2686: %
2687: $$\LL\BB^{(h)}(\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)={\lis Z_h\over Z_h}
2688: \sum_{\xx,\o}{(-i\o)\over 2}\phi_\xx\psi^{
2689: (\le h)+}_{\o,\xx}\psi^{(\le h)-}_{-\o,\xx}\;,\Eq(7.10)$$
2690: %
2691: where $\lis Z_h$ is real and $\lis Z_1=a^{(1)}|_{\s=\m=0}\=
2692: a^{(2)}|_{\s=\m=0}$.
2693:
2694: Note that apriori a term $\sum_{\xx,\o,\a}
2695: \phi_\xx\psi^{(\le h)\a}_{\o,\xx}\psi^{(\le h)\a}_{-\o,\xx}$ is allowed
2696: by symmetry but, using $(1)\otto(2)$ symmetry,
2697: one sees that its kernel is proportional
2698: to $\m_k$, $k\ge h$. So, with our definition of localization,
2699: such term contributes to $\RR\BB^{(h)}$.\\
2700:
2701: Now that the action of $\LL$ on $\BB$ is defined,
2702: we can describe the single scale integration, for $h> h^*_1$.
2703: The integral in the r.h.s. of \equ(7.6) can be rewritten as:
2704: %
2705: $$\eqalign{&e^{-M^2 t_h}\int P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},
2706: \m_{h-1},C_{h-1}}(d\psi^{\le
2707: h-1})\cdot\cr
2708: &\qquad\qquad\cdot\int P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},
2709: \m_{h-1},\widetilde f^{-1}_{h}}(d\psi^{(h)})
2710: e^{-\widehat \VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})+\widehat \BB^{(h)}
2711: (\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)}\;,\cr}\Eq(7.11)$$
2712: %
2713: where $\widehat \VV^{(h)}$ was defined in \equ(4.18) and
2714: %
2715: $$\widehat \BB^{(h)}
2716: (\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)\defin \BB^{(h)}
2717: (\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)\;.\Eq(7.12)$$
2718: %
2719: Finally we define
2720: %
2721: $$\eqalign{&
2722: e^{-\widetilde E_h M^2+\widetilde S^{(h)}(\phi)-\VV^{(h-1)}
2723: (\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h-1)})+\BB^{(h-1)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}
2724: \psi^{(\le h-1)},\phi)}\defin\cr
2725: &\qquad\defin \int P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},
2726: \m_{h-1},\widetilde f^{-1}_{h}}(d\psi^{(h)})
2727: e^{-\widehat \VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)})+\widehat \BB^{(h)}
2728: (\sqrt{Z_{h-1}}\psi^{(\le h)},\phi)}\;,\cr}\Eq(7.13)$$
2729: %
2730: and
2731: %
2732: $$E_{h-1}\defin E_h+t_h+\widetilde E_h\virg S^{(h)}(\phi)\defin S^{(h+1)}(\phi)
2733: +\widetilde S^{(h)}(\phi)\;.\Eq(7.14)$$
2734: %
2735: With the definitions above, it is easy to verify that $\lis Z_{h-1}$
2736: satisfies the equation $\lis Z_{h-1}=\lis Z_h(1+\lis z_h)$,
2737: where $\lis z_h=\lis b\l_h+O(\l^2)$, for some $\lis b\not =0$.
2738: Then, for some $c>0$,
2739: $\lis Z_1e^{-c|\l|h}\le \lis Z_h\le\lis Z_1 e^{c|\l|h}$.
2740: The analogous of Theorem 3.1 for the kernels of $\BB^{(h)}$ holds:\\
2741: \\
2742: {\bf Theorem 6.1.} {\it Suppose that the hypothesis of Lemma 5.1 are satisfied.
2743: Then, for $h^*_1\le \bar h\le 1$ and a suitable constant $C$,
2744: the kernels of $\BB^{(h)}$ satisfy
2745: %
2746: $$\int d\xx_1\cdots d\xx_{2n}|B^{(\bar h)}_{2n,m;\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}
2747: (\xx_1,\ldots,\xx_m;\yy_1,\ldots,\yy_{2n})|
2748: \le M^2 \g^{-\bar h (D_k(n)+m)} \,(C\,|\l|)^{max(1,n-1)}\;,\Eq(7.17)$$
2749: %
2750: where $D_k(n)=-2+n+k$ and $k=\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\s_i$.}\\
2751:
2752: Note that, consistently with our definition of localization,
2753: the dimension of $B^{(h)}_{2,1;(0,0),(+,-),(\o,-\o)}$ is $D_0(1)+1=0$.
2754:
2755: Again, proceeding as in \sec(5),
2756: we can study the flow of $\lis Z_h$ up to $h=-\io$ and prove that
2757: $\lis Z_h=\lis Z_1\g^{\lis\h(h-1)+F^h_{\bar z}}$,
2758: where $\lis \h$ is a non trivial analytic function of $\l$ (its linear part is
2759: non vanishing) and $F^h_{\bar z}$ is a suitable
2760: $O(\l)$ function (independent of $\s_1,\m_1$).
2761: We recall that $\lis Z_1=O(1)$.
2762:
2763: We proceed as above up to the scale $h^*_1$. Once that the scale $h^*_1$
2764: is reached we pass to the $\psi^{(1)},\psi^{(2)}$ variables,
2765: we integrate out (say) the $\psi^{(1)}$ fields and we get
2766: %
2767: $$\int P^{(2)}_{Z_{h^*_1},\widehat m^{(2)}_{h^*_1},C_{h^*_1}}
2768: (d\psi^{(2)(\le h^*_1)})e^{-\lis\VV^{(h^*_1)}
2769: (\sqrt{Z_{h^*_1}}\psi^{(2,\le h^*_1)})+\lis
2770: B^{(h^*_1)}(\sqrt{Z_{h^*_1}}
2771: \psi^{(2,\le h^*_1)})}\;,\Eq(7.19)$$
2772: %
2773: with $\LL\lis B^{h^*_1}(\sqrt{Z_{h^*_1}}\psi^{(2),\le h^*_1})=
2774: \lis Z_{h^*_1}\sum_\xx i\phi_{\xx}
2775: \psi^{(2,\le h^*_1)}_{1,\xx}\psi^{(2,\le h^*_1)}_{-1,\xx}$.
2776:
2777: The scales $h^*_2\le h\le h^*_1$
2778: are integrated as in \sec(6) and
2779: one finds that the flow of $\lis Z_{h}$ in this regime is trivial, \ie
2780: if $h^*_2\le h\le h^*_1$, $\lis Z_h=\lis Z_{h^*_1}\g^{F^h_{z}}$,
2781: with $F^h_{z}=O(\l)$.
2782:
2783: The result is that the correlation function $<H^{AT}_\xx H^{AT}_\yy>_{\L_M,T}$
2784: is given by a convergent power series in $\l$, uniformly in $\L_M$.
2785: Then, the leading behaviour of the specific heat is given by the sum
2786: over $\xx$ and $\yy$ of the lowest order contributions to
2787: $<H^{AT}_\xx H^{AT}_\yy>_{\L_M,T}$, namely
2788: by the diagrams in Fig 3. Absolute convergence of the power series
2789: of $<H^{AT}_\xx H^{AT}_\yy>_{\L_M,T}$ implies that the rest is
2790: a small correction.
2791:
2792: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2793: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURA 3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2794: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2795:
2796: \insertplot{300pt}{50pt}%
2797: {\ins{-3pt}{8pt}{$\sum_{h=h^*_2}^{h^*_1}$}
2798: \ins{53pt}{-3pt}{$\xx$}
2799: \ins{91pt}{-3pt}{$\yy$}
2800: \ins{73pt}{25pt}{$h$}
2801: \ins{73pt}{-15pt}{$h$}
2802: \ins{130pt}{4pt}{$+$}
2803: \ins{150pt}{8pt}{$\sum_{h=h^*_1}^1$}
2804: \ins{215pt}{-3pt}{$\xx$}
2805: \ins{253pt}{-3pt}{$\yy$}
2806: \ins{233pt}{25pt}{$h$}
2807: \ins{233pt}{-15pt}{$h$}
2808: }%
2809: {fig1}{}
2810: \vskip1.5cm
2811: \line{\vtop{\line{\hskip2.5truecm\vbox{\advance\hsize by -5.1 truecm
2812: \0{\ottorm FIG 3.
2813: The lowest order diagrams contributing to ${\scriptstyle
2814: <H^{AT}_\xx H^{AT}_\yy>_{\L_M,T}}$.
2815: The wavy lines ending in the points labeled ${\scriptstyle \xx}$ and
2816: ${\scriptstyle \yy}$ represent
2817: the fields ${\scriptstyle \phi_\xx}$ and ${\scriptstyle \phi_\yy}$
2818: respectively.
2819: The solid lines labeled by ${\scriptstyle h}$
2820: and going from ${\scriptstyle \xx}$ to ${\scriptstyle \yy}$
2821: represent the propagators ${\scriptstyle g^{(h)}(\xx-\yy)}$.
2822: The sums are over the scale indeces and, even if not explicitly written, over
2823: the indexes ${\scriptstyle \aa,\oo}$
2824: (and the propagators depend on these indexes).
2825: }
2826: } \hfill} }}
2827: \vskip.5cm
2828:
2829: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2830: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2831:
2832: The conclusion is that $C_v$, for $\l$ small and
2833: $|t-\sqrt2+1|,|u|\le (\sqrt2-1)/4$, is given by:
2834: %
2835: $$\eqalign{&C_v={1\over |\L|}\sum_{\xx,\yy\in\L_M}\sum_{\o_1,\o_2=\pm1}
2836: \sum_{h,h'=h^*_2}^{1}{(Z_{h\vee h'}^{(1)})^2\over Z_{h-1} Z_{h'-1}}
2837: \Bigg[G^{(h)}_{(+,\o_1),(+,\o_2)}(\xx-\yy)
2838: G^{(h')}_{(-,-\o_2),(-,-\o_1)}(\yy-\xx)+\cr
2839: &+
2840: G^{(h)}_{(+,\o_1),(-,-\o_2)}(\xx-\yy)
2841: G^{(h')}_{(-,-\o_1),(+,\o_2)}(\xx-\yy)\Bigg]+{1\over |\L|}\sum_{\xx,\yy\in\L_M}
2842: \sum_{h^*_2}^1
2843: \Big({\lis Z_h\over Z_h}\Big)^2\O_{\L_M}^{(h)}(\xx-\yy)\;,\cr}\Eq(wow)$$
2844: %
2845: where $h\vee h'=\max\{h,h'\}$ and $G^{(h)}_{(\a_1,\o_1),(\a_2,\o_2)}(\xx)$
2846: must be interpreted as
2847: %
2848: $$G^{(h)}_{(\a_1\o_1),(\a_2,\o_2)}(\xx)=\cases{
2849: g^{(h)}_{(\a_1\o_1),(\a_2,\o_2)}(\xx) & if $h>h^*_1$,\cr
2850: g^{(1,\le h^*_1)}_{\o_1,\o_2}(\xx)+g^{(2,h^*_1)}_{\o_1,\o_2}(\xx)
2851: & if $h=h^*_1$,\cr
2852: g^{(2,h)}_{\o_1,\o_2}(\xx) & if $h^*_2<h<h^*_1$,\cr
2853: g^{(2,\le h^*_2)}_{\o_1,\o_2}(\xx) & if $h=h^*_2$.\cr}$$
2854: %
2855: Moreover, if $N,n_0,n_1\ge 0$ and $n=n_0+n_1$,
2856: $|\dpr_{x}^{n_0}\dpr_{x_0}\O_{\L_M}^{(h)}(\xx)|\le C_{N,n}|\l|{\g^{(2+n)h}
2857: \over 1+(\g^h|\dd(\xx)|)^N}$.
2858: Now, calling $\h_c$ the exponent associated to $\lis Z_h/Z_h$, from \equ(wow)
2859: we find:
2860: %
2861: $$\eqalign{&C_v=-C_1 \g^{2\h_c h^*_1}\log_\g\g^{h^*_1-h^*_2}
2862: \big(1+\O_{h^*_1,h^*_2}^{(1)}(\l)\big)
2863: +C_2{1-\g^{2\h_c(h^*_1-1)}\over 2\h_c}
2864: \big(1+\O^{(2)}_{h^*_1}(\l)\big)\;,\cr}\Eq(7.22)$$
2865: %
2866: where $|\O^{(1)}_{h^*_1,h^*_2}(\l)|,|\O^{(2)}_{h^*_1}(\l)|
2867: \le c|\l|$, for some $c$.
2868: Note that, defining $\D$ as in \equ(1.6), $\g^{(1-\h_\s)h^*_1}\D^{-1}$
2869: is bounded above and below by $O(1)$ constants. Then, using \equ(eps2),
2870: \equ(1.6) follows.
2871: \\
2872:
2873: \appendix(0, Proof of {\equ(2.1)})
2874:
2875: We start from eq. (V.2.12) in [MW], expressing the partition
2876: function of the Ising model with periodic boundary condition
2877: on a lattice with an even number of sites
2878: as a combination of the Pfaffians of four matrices with
2879: different boundary conditions, defined by (V.2.10) and (V.2.11) in [MW].
2880: In the general case (\ie $M^2$ not necessarily even), the
2881: (V.2.12) of [MW] becomes:
2882: %
2883: $$Z_I=\sum_{\s}e^{-\b J H_I(\s)}=(-1)^{M^2}{1\over 2}(2\cosh\b J)^{M^2}
2884: \Big(-\Pf \lis A_1+\Pf \lis A_2+\Pf \lis A_3+\Pf \lis A_4\Big)\;,\Eqa(0.1)$$
2885: %
2886: where
2887: $\lis A_i$ are matrices with elements $(\lis A_i)_{\xx,j;\yy,k}$, with
2888: $\xx,\yy\in \L_M$, $j,k=1,\ldots,6$, given by:
2889: %
2890: $$\eqalign{&({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx}=\pmatrix{0&0&-1&0&0&1\cr
2891: 0&0&0&-1&1&0\cr
2892: 1&0&0&0&0&-1\cr
2893: 0&1&0&0&-1&0\cr
2894: 0&-1&0&1&0&1\cr
2895: -1&0&1&0&-1&0\cr}\cr
2896: %&({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx+\hat e_1}=\pmatrix{
2897: %0&t&0&0&0&0\cr
2898: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2899: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2900: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2901: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2902: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr}=-({\lis A_i}^T)_{\xx+\hat e_1;\xx}\cr
2903: %&({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx+\hat e_0}=\pmatrix{
2904: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2905: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2906: %0&0&0&t&0&0\cr
2907: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2908: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr
2909: %0&0&0&0&0&0\cr}=-({\lis A_i}^T)_{\xx+\hat e_0;\xx}\cr
2910: }\Eqa(0.2)$$
2911: %
2912: and $\big(({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx+\hat e_1}\big)_{i,j}=t\d_{i,1}\d_{j,2}$,
2913: $\big(({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx+\hat e_0}\big)_{i,j}=t\d_{i,2}\d_{j,1}$,
2914: $({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx+\hat e_1}=-({\lis A_i}^T)_{\xx+\hat e_1;\xx}$,
2915: $({\lis A_i})_{\xx;\xx+\hat e_0}=-({\lis A_i}^T)_{\xx+\hat e_0;\xx}$;
2916: moreover
2917: %
2918: $$\eqalign{& (\lis A_i)_{(M,x_0);(1,x_0)}=-(\lis A_i^T)_{(1,x_0);(M,x_0)}=
2919: (-1)^{[{i-1\over 2}]}(\lis A_i)_{(1,x_0);(2,x_0)}\cr
2920: & (\lis A_i)_{(x,M);(x,1)}=-(\lis A_i^T)_{(x,1);(x,M)}=
2921: (-1)^{i-1}(\lis A_i)_{(x,1);(x,2)}\;,\cr}\Eqa(0.3)$$
2922: %
2923: where $[{i-1\over 2}]$ is the bigger integer $\le {i-1\over 2}$;
2924: in all the other cases the matrices $(\lis A_i)_{\xx,\yy}$ are
2925: identically zero.
2926:
2927: Given a $(2n)\times(2n)$ antisymmetric matrix $A$, it is well--known
2928: that $\Pf A=(-1)^n\int d\psi_1\cdots d\psi_{2n}\cdot$ $\cdot\exp\{{1\over 2}
2929: \sum_{i,j}\psi_i A_{ij}\psi_j\}$,
2930: where $\psi_1,\ldots,\psi_{2n}$ are Grassmanian variables.
2931: Then, we can rewrite \equ(0.1) as:
2932: %
2933: $${1\over 2}(2\cosh\b J)^{M^2}
2934: \sum_{\g}(-1)^{\d_\g}\int \prod_{\xx\in\L_M}d\lis H^\g_\xx d H^\g_\xx
2935: d\lis V^\g_\xx
2936: d V^\g_\xx d\lis T^\g_\xx d T^\g_\xx e^{S^\g(t;H,V,T)}\;,\Eqa(0.5)$$
2937: %
2938: where: $\g=(\e,\e')$; $\e,\e'=\pm 1$; $\d_\g$ is defined after \equ(2.1);
2939: $\lis H^\g_\xx, H^\g_\xx,
2940: \lis V^\g_\xx, V^\g_\xx$
2941: are Grassmanian variables with $\e$--periodic resp. $\e'$--periodic
2942: boundary conditions in vertical resp. horizontal direction, see \equ(2.3)
2943: and following lines. Furthermore:
2944: %
2945: $$\eqalign{&S^\g(t;H,V,T)=t\sum_\xx\Big[\lis H^\g_\xx
2946: H^\g_{\xx+\hat e_1}
2947: +\lis V^\g_\xx V^\g_{\xx+\hat e_0}\Big]+\cr
2948: &+\sum_\xx\Big[\lis V^\g_\xx \lis H^\g_\xx+\lis H^\g_\xx T^\g_\xx
2949: +V^\g_\xx H^\g_\xx+H^\g_\xx \lis T^\g_\xx
2950: +T^\g_\xx \lis V^\g_\xx+\lis T^\g_\xx V^\g_\xx
2951: +\lis T^\g_\xx T^\g_\xx\Big]\;.\cr}\Eqa(0.6)$$
2952: %
2953: The $T$--fields appear only in the diagonal elements and they can be easily
2954: integrated out:
2955: %
2956: $$\eqalign{&
2957: \prod_{\xx\in\L_M}\int d\lis T^\g_\xx d T^\g_\xx \exp\Big\{
2958: \lis H^\g_\xx T^\g_\xx
2959: +H^\g_\xx \lis T^\g_\xx
2960: +T^\g_\xx \lis V^\g_\xx+\lis T^\g_\xx V^\g_\xx
2961: +\lis T^\g_\xx T^\g_\xx\Big\}=\cr
2962: &=\prod_{\xx\in\L_M}(-1-\lis H^\g_\xx H^\g_\xx-\lis V^\g_\xx V^\g_\xx-
2963: V^\g_\xx\lis H^\g_\xx-V^\g_\xx\lis H^\g_\xx)=\cr
2964: &=(-1)^M\exp\sum_{\xx\in\L_M}\Big[
2965: \lis H^\g_\xx H^\g_\xx+\lis V^\g_\xx V^\g_\xx+
2966: V^\g_\xx\lis H^\g_\xx+H^\g_\xx\lis V^\g_\xx\Big]\;,\cr}\Eqa(0.7)$$
2967: %
2968: where in the last identity we used that $\Big[
2969: \lis H^\g_\xx H^\g_\xx+\lis V^\g_\xx V^\g_\xx+
2970: V^\g_\xx\lis H^\g_\xx+H^\g_\xx\lis V^\g_\xx\Big]^2=0$.
2971: Substituting \equ(0.7) into \equ(0.5) we find \equ(2.1).\\
2972:
2973: \appendix(a1, Integration of the heavy fermions. Symmetry properties)
2974:
2975: \asub(A1.1){\it Integration of the $\c$ fields.}
2976: Calling $\lis\VV(\psi,\c)=Q(\psi,\c)-\n F_\s(\psi)+
2977: V(\psi,\c)$, we obtain
2978: %
2979: $$-\widetilde E_1 M^2-Q^{(1)}(\psi)-\VV^{(1)}(\psi)=\log
2980: \int P(d\c)e^{\lis\VV(\psi,\c)}=\sum_{n=0}^{\io}{(-1)^n\over n!}\EE^T_\chi(
2981: \lis\VV(\psi,\c);n)\;,\Eqa(8.1)$$
2982: %
2983: where $\widetilde E_1$ is a constant
2984: and $\VV^{(1)}$ is at least quadratic in $\psi$
2985: and vanishing when $\l=\n=0$.
2986: $Q^{(1)}$ is the rest (quadratic in $\psi$).
2987: Given $s$ set of labels $P_{v_i}$, $i=1,\ldots,s$ and
2988: $\widetilde\c(P_{v_i})\defin
2989: \prod_{f\in P_{v_i}}\c^{\a(f)}_{\o(f),\xx(f)}$, the truncated expectation
2990: $\EE^T_\c(\widetilde\chi(P_{v_1}),\ldots,\widetilde\chi(P_{v_s}))$
2991: can be written as
2992: %
2993: $$\EE^T_\c(\widetilde\chi(P_{v_1}),\ldots,\widetilde\chi(P_{v_s}))=
2994: \sum_{T}\a_T\prod_{\ell\in T}
2995: g_\c(f^1_\ell,f^2_\ell)
2996: \int dP_{T}(\tt) \Pf G^{T}(\tt)\Eqa(8.7)$$
2997: %
2998: where: $T$ is a set of lines forming an {\it anchored tree} between
2999: the cluster of poins $P_{v_1},\ldots,P_{v_s}$ \ie $T$ is a set
3000: of lines which becomes a tree if one identifies all the points
3001: in the same clusters;
3002: $\tt=\{t_{i,i'}\in [0,1], 1\le i,i' \le s\}$, $dP_{T}(\tt)$
3003: is a probability measure with support on a set of $\tt$ such that
3004: $t_{i,i'}=\uu_i\cdot\uu_{i'}$ for some family of vectors $\uu_i\in \RRR^s$ of
3005: unit norm;
3006: $\a_T$ is a sign (irrelevant for the subsequent bounds);
3007: $f^1_\ell, f^2_\ell$ are the field labels associated
3008: to the points connected by $\ell$; if
3009: $\underline a(f)=(\a(f),\o(f))$, the propagator
3010: $g_\c(f,f')$ is equal to
3011: %
3012: $$g_\c(f,f')=
3013: g^\c_{\underline a(f),\underline a(f')}(\xx(f)-\xx(f'))\defin
3014: <\c^{\a(f)}_{\o(f),\xx(f)}
3015: \c^{\a(f')}_{\o(f'),\xx(f')}>\;;\Eqa(1000)$$
3016: %
3017: if $2n=\sum_{i=1}^s|P_{v_i}|$, then
3018: $G^{T}(\tt)$ is a $(2n-2s+2)\times (2n-2s+2)$ antisymmetrix matrix, whose
3019: elements are given by $G^{T}_{f,f'}=t_{i(f),i(f')}g_\c(f,f')$, where:
3020: $f, f'\not\in F_T$ and $F_T\defin\cup_{\ell\in T}\{f^1_\ell,f^2_\ell\}$;
3021: $i(f)$ is s.t. $f\in P_{i(f)}$; finally $\Pf G^T$ is the {\it Pfaffian}
3022: of $G^T$.
3023: If $s=1$ the sum over $T$ is empty, but we can still
3024: use the above equation by interpreting the r.h.s.
3025: as $1$ if $P_{v_1}$ is empty, and ${\rm det} G(P_1)$ otherwise.
3026: \\
3027:
3028: {\bf Sketch of the proof of \equ(8.7).} Equation \equ(8.7)
3029: is a trivial generalization of the well--known formula expressing
3030: truncated fermionic expectations in terms of sums of determinants [Le]. The
3031: only difference here is that the propagators $<\c^\a_{\o_1,\xx_1}\c^\a_{
3032: \o_2,\xx_2}>$ are not vanishing, so that Pfaffians appear instead of
3033: determinants. The proof can be done along the same lines
3034: of Appendix A3 of [GM].
3035: The only difference here is that the identity known as
3036: the {\it Berezin integral}, see (A3.15) of [GM], that is the starting
3037: point to get to \equ(8.7), must be replaced by the (more general) identity:
3038: %
3039: $$\EE_\c\Big(\prod_{j=1}^{s}\widetilde\c(P_{j}) \Big)
3040: = \Pf G = (-1)^n\int {\cal D}\c \, \exp\Big[
3041: {1\over 2}\left( \c,G\c \right) \Big] \;,\Eqa(A3.12) $$
3042: %
3043: where: the expectation $\EE_\c$ is w.r.t. $P(d\c)$;
3044: if $2m=\sum_{j=1}^{s} \left| P_{j} \right|$,
3045: $G$ is the $2m\times 2m$ antisymmetric matrix with entries
3046: $G_{f,f'}=g^\c_{\underline a(f),\underline a(f')}(\xx(f)-\xx(f'))$; and
3047: %
3048: $${\cal D}\c=\prod_{j=1}^{n}
3049: \prod_{f\in P_{j}} \der\c^{\a(f)}_{\xx(f),\o(f)}
3050: \quad \quad\left ( \c,G\c \right) =
3051: \sum_{f,f'\in \cup_{i}P_i}
3052: \c^{\a(f)}_{\xx(f),\o(f)}G_{f,f'}\c^{\a(f')}_{\xx(f'),\o(f')}\;.
3053: \Eqa(A3.9) $$
3054: %
3055: Starting from \equ(A3.12), the proof in Appendix A3 of [GM] can be repeated
3056: step by step in the present case, to find finally the analogue of (A.3.55)
3057: of [GM]. Then, using again that $\int{\cal D}\c \exp(\c, G\c)/2$ is,
3058: unless for a sign, the Pfaffian of $G$, we find \equ(8.7).\qed\\
3059:
3060: We now use the
3061: well--known property $|\Pf G^T|=\sqrt{|\det G^T|}$ and we can bound
3062: $\det G^T$ by Gram--Hadamard (GH) inequality.
3063: Let $\HH\defin\RRR^s\otimes\HH_0$, where
3064: $\HH_0$ is the Hilbert space of complex
3065: four dimensional vectors $F(\kk)=(F_1(\kk),\ldots,F_4(\kk)$), $F_i(\kk)$
3066: being a function on the set $\DD_{-,-}$, with scalar product
3067: $<F,G>=\sum_{i=1}^4 {1/M^2}\sum_{\kk} F^*_i(\kk) G_i(\kk)$.
3068: We can write the elements of $G^T$ as inner products of
3069: vectors of $\HH$:
3070: %
3071: $$G_{f,f'}=t_{i(f),i(f')} g_\c(f,f')=
3072: <\uu_{i(f)}\otimes A_{f},
3073: \uu_{i(f')}\otimes B_{f'}>\;,\Eqa(3.97)$$
3074: %
3075: where $\uu_i\in \RRR^s$, $i=1,\ldots,s$, are vectors such that
3076: $t_{i,i'}=\uu_i\cdot\uu_{i'}$, and, if
3077: $\hat g^\c_{\underline a,\underline a'}(\kk)$ is the Fourier transform of
3078: $g^\c_{\underline a,\underline a'}(\xx-\yy)$,
3079: $A_f(\kk)$ and $B_{f'}(\kk)$ are given by
3080: %
3081: $$\eqalign{& A_f(\kk)=e^{-i\kk\xx(f)}\Big(\hat g^\c_{
3082: \underline a(f),(-,1)}(\kk),
3083: \hat g^\c_{\underline a(f),(-,-1)}(\kk),
3084: \hat g^\c_{\underline a(f),(+,1)}(\kk),
3085: \hat g^\c_{\underline a(f),(+,-1)}(\kk)\Big)\;,\cr
3086: &B_{f'}(\kk)=e^{-i\kk\xx(f')}\cases{(1,0,0,0),& if $\underline a(f')=(-,1)$,\cr
3087: (0,1,0,0),& if $\underline a(f')=(-,-1)$,\cr
3088: (0,0,1,0),& if $\underline a(f')=(+,1)$,\cr
3089: (0,0,0,1),& if $\underline a(f')=(+,-1)$,\cr}}
3090: \Eqa(3.98m)$$
3091: %
3092: With these definitions and remembering \equ(b),
3093: it is now clear that $|Pf G^T|\le C^{n-s+1}$, for some constant $C$.
3094: Then, applying \equ(8.7) and the previous bound we find the second of
3095: \equ(2.40).\\
3096:
3097: We now turn to the construction of $P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}$, in order to prove
3098: \equ(2.38).
3099:
3100: We define $e^{-t_1 M^2} P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)
3101: \defin P_\s(d\psi)e^{-Q^{(1)}(\psi)}$,
3102: where $t_1$ is a normalization constant.
3103: In order to write $P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)$
3104: as an exponential of a quadratic form, it is sufficient to calculate
3105: the correlations
3106: %
3107: $$\eqalign{<\psi^{\a_1}_{\o_1,\kk}
3108: \psi^{\a_2}_{\o_2,-\a_1\a_2\kk}>_1&\defin
3109: \int P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)\psi^{\a_1}_{\o_1,\kk}
3110: \psi^{\a_2}_{\o_2,-\a_1\a_2\kk}=\cr
3111: &=e^{-t_1M^2}
3112: \int P_\s(d\psi)P(d\c)e^{Q(\c,\psi)}\psi^{\a_1}_{\o_1,\kk}
3113: \psi^{\a_2}_{\o_2,-\a_1\a_2\kk}\;.\cr}\Eqa(corr)$$
3114: %
3115: It is easy to realize that the measure
3116: $\sim P_\s(d\psi)P(d\c)e^{Q(\c,\psi)}$
3117: factorizes into the product of two
3118: measures generated by the fields $\psi^{(j)}_{\o,\xx}$, $j=1,2$,
3119: defined by $\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}=(\psi^{(1)}_{\o,\xx}+i(-1)^\a\psi^{(2)}_{
3120: \o,\xx})/\sqrt2$.
3121: In fact, using this change of variables, one finds that
3122: %
3123: $$ P_\s(d\psi)P(d\c)e^{Q(\c,\psi)}=\prod_{j=1,2}P^{(j)}(d\psi^{(j)},d\c^{(j)})=
3124: \prod_{j=1,2}{1\over \NN^{(j)}}\exp\{-{t_\l^{(j)}\over 4M^2}\sum_{\kk}
3125: \x^{(j),T}_\kk C^{(j)}_\kk \x^{(j)}_{-\kk}\}\;,\Eqa(8.17)$$
3126: %
3127: for two suitable matrices $C^{(j)}_\kk$, whose determinants
3128: $B^{(j)}(\kk)\defin \det C^{(j)}_\kk$ are equal to
3129: %
3130: $$B^{(j)}(\kk)={16\over (t_\l^{(j)})^4}\big\{
3131: 2t_\l^{(j)}[1-(t_\l^{(j)})^2](2-\cos k-\cos k_0)+(t_\l^{(j)}-t_\psi)^2
3132: (t_\l^{(j)}-t_\c)^2\big\}\Eqa(8.18)$$
3133: %
3134: From the explicit expression of $C^{(j)}_\kk$ one finds
3135: %
3136: $$\eqalign{
3137: &<\psi^{(j)}_{-\kk}\psi^{(j)}_{\kk}>_1={4M^2\over t_\l^{(j)}}
3138: {c_{1,1}^{(j)}(\kk)\over B^{(j)}(\kk)}\virg
3139: <\lis\psi^{(j)}_{-\kk}\psi^{(j)}_{\kk}>_1={4M^2\over t_\l^{(j)}}
3140: {c_{-1,1}^{(j)}(\kk)\over B^{(j)}(\kk)}\virg\cr
3141: &<\lis\psi^{(j)}_{-\kk}\lis\psi^{(j)}_{\kk}>_1={4M^2\over t_\l^{(j)}}
3142: {c_{-1,-1}^{(j)}(\kk)\over B^{(j)}(\kk)}\;,\cr}\Eqa(8.20)$$
3143: %
3144: where, if $\o=\pm 1$, recalling that $t_\psi=\sqrt 2 -1+\n/2$ and
3145: defining $t_\c=-\sqrt 2-1$,
3146: %
3147: $$\eqalign{c_{\o,\o}^{(j)}(\kk)\defin&
3148: {4\over (t_\l^{(j)})^2}\big\{2t_\l^{(j)}t_\c(-i\sin k\cos k_0+\o
3149: \sin k_0\cos k)+[(t_\l^{(j)})^2+t_\c^2](i\sin k-\o\sin k_0)\big\}\cr
3150: c^{(j)}_{\o,-\o}(\kk)\defin& -i\o{4\over (t_\l^{(j)})^2}\big\{
3151: -t_\l^{(j)}(3t_\c+t_\psi)\cos k\cos k_0+[(t_\l^{(j)})^2+2t_\c t_\psi+
3152: t_\c^2](\cos k+\cos k_0)-\cr
3153: &\qquad\qquad -\big(t_\l^{(j)}(t_\psi+t_\c)+2{t_\psi t_\c^2\over
3154: t_\l^{(j)}}\big)\big\}\;.\cr}\Eqa(8.21)$$
3155: %
3156: It is clear that, for any monomial $F(\psi^{(j)})$,
3157: $\int P(d\psi^{(j)},d\c^{(j)})F(\psi^{(j)})=\int
3158: P^{(j)}(d\psi^{(j)})F(\psi^{(j)})$, with
3159: %
3160: $$\eqalign{&
3161: P^{(j)}(d\psi^{(j)})\defin{1\over N_j}\prod_\kk d\psi^{(j)}_\kk
3162: d\lis\psi^{(j)}_\kk\cdot\cr
3163: &\cdot\exp\Bigl\{-{t_\l^{(j)}B^{(j)}(\kk)\over 4M^2\det c^{(j)}_\kk}
3164: (\psi^{(j)}_\kk, \lis\psi^{(j)}_{\kk})\left(\matrix{c^{(j)}_{-1,-1}(\kk)
3165: &-c^{(j)}_{1,-1}(\kk)\cr-c^{(j)}_{-1,1}(\kk)&c^{(j)}_{1,1}(\kk)\cr}\right)
3166: \left(\matrix{\psi^{(j)}_{-\kk}\cr \lis\psi^{(j)}_{-\kk}\cr}\right)
3167: \Bigr\}\;,\cr}\Eqa(8.23)$$
3168: %
3169: where $\det c^{(j)}_\kk=c^{(j)}_{1,1}(\kk)c^{(j)}_{-1,-1}(\kk)-
3170: c^{(j)}_{1,-1}(\kk)c^{(j)}_{-1,1}(\kk)$.
3171: If we now use the identity $t_\l^{(j)}=t_\psi(2+(-1)^j\m)/(2-\s)$
3172: and rewrite
3173: the measure $P^{(1)}(d\psi^{(1)})P^{(2)}(d\psi^{(2)})$
3174: in terms of $\psi^{\pm}_{\o,\kk}$ we find:
3175: %
3176: $$P^{(1)}(d\psi^{(1)})P^{(2)}(d\psi^{(2)})=
3177: {1\over \NN^{(1)}}\prod_{\kk,\o} d\psi^{+}_{\o,\kk}d\psi^{-}_{\o,\kk}
3178: \exp\{-{Z_1 C_1(\kk)
3179: \over 4M^2}\Psi^{+,T}_\kk A_\psi^{(1)}\Psi^-_\kk\}=
3180: P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)\;,\Eqa(8.25)$$
3181: %
3182: with $C_1(\kk)$, $Z_1$, $\s_1$ and $\m_1$
3183: defined as after \equ(2.36), and
3184: $A^{(1)}_\psi(\kk)$ as in \equ(2.38), with
3185: %
3186: $$\eqalign{& M^{(1)}(\kk)={2\over 2-\s}\left(\matrix{-c^+_{-1,-1}(\kk)&
3187: c^+_{-1,1}(\kk)\cr
3188: c^+_{1,-1}(\kk) & -c^+_{1,1}(\kk)\cr}\right)\virg
3189: N^{(1)}(\kk)={2\over 2-\s}\left(\matrix{-c^-_{-1,-1}(\kk)&
3190: c^-_{-1,1}(\kk)\cr
3191: c^-_{1,-1}(\kk) & -c^-_{1,1}(\kk)\cr}\right)\;,\cr}
3192: \Eqa(8.27)$$
3193: %
3194: where $c^\a_{\o_1,\o_2}(\kk)\defin
3195: [(1-\m/2)B^{(1)}(\kk)c^{(1)}_{\o_1,\o_2}(\kk)/\det c^{(1)}_\kk+\a(1+\m/2)
3196: B^{(2)}(\kk)c^{(2)}_{\o_1,\o_2}(\kk)/\det c^{(2)}_\kk]/2$.
3197: It is easy to verify that $A_\psi^{(1)}(\kk)$
3198: has the form \equ(2.38).
3199: In fact, computing the functions in \equ(8.27), one finds that, for $\kk$,
3200: $\s_1$ and $\m_1$ small,
3201: %
3202: $$\eqalign{&M^{(1)}(\kk)=\left(\matrix{\big(1+{\s_1\over 2}
3203: \big)(i\sin k+\sin k_0)+O(\kk^3) &
3204: -i\s_1+O(\kk^2)\cr
3205: i\s_1+O(\kk^2)
3206: &\big(1+{\s_1\over 2}
3207: \big)(i\sin k-\sin k_0)+O(\kk^3)\cr}\right)\cr
3208: &N^{(1)}(\kk)=\left(\matrix{-{\m_1\over 2}(i\sin k+\sin k_0)+O(\kk^3)&
3209: i\m_1+O(\m_1\kk^2)\cr
3210: -i\m_1+O(\m_1\kk^2) &
3211: -{\m_1\over 2}(i\sin k-\sin k_0)+O(\kk^3)\cr}\right)\;,\cr}
3212: \Eqa(8.28)$$
3213: %
3214: where the higher order terms in $\kk$, $\s_1$ and $\m_1$
3215: contribute to the corrections $a_1^\pm(\kk)$, $b_1^{\pm}(\kk)$,
3216: $c_1(\kk)$ and $d_1(\kk)$. They have the reality and parity properties
3217: described after \equ(2.38) and it is appearent that $a_1^\pm(\kk)=O(\s_1\kk)
3218: +O(\kk^3)$, $b_1^{\pm}(\kk)=O(\m_1\kk)+O(\kk^3)$,
3219: $c_1(\kk)=O(\kk^2)$ and $d_1(\kk)=O(\m_1\kk^2)$.\\
3220:
3221: \asub(A1.2){\it Symmetry properties.}
3222: In this section we identify some symmetries of
3223: model \equ(2.11) and we prove that the quadratic and quartic terms
3224: in $\VV^{(1)}$ have the structure described in \equ(8.29), \equ(8.30)
3225: and \equ(8.30a).
3226:
3227: The formal action appearing in \equ(2.11) (see also
3228: \equ(2.2) and \equ(2.15) for an explicit form)
3229: is invariant under the following transformations.\\
3230: \\
3231: \01) {\it Parity}: $H_\xx^{(j)}\to\lis H_{-\xx}^{(j)}$, $\lis H_\xx^{(j)}\to
3232: -H_{-\xx}^{(j)}$ (the same for $V$ and $\lis V$).
3233: In terms of the variables $\hat\psi^{\a}_{\o,\kk}$, this transformation
3234: is equivalent to $\hat\psi^\a_{\o,\kk}\to i\o\hat\psi^\a_{\o,-\kk}$
3235: (the same for $\c$) and we shall call it {\it parity}.\\
3236: \\
3237: \02) {\it Complex conjugation}:
3238: $\hat\psi^\a_{\o,\kk}\to\hat\psi^{-\a}_{-\o,\kk}$ (the same for $\c$)
3239: and $c\to c^*$,
3240: where $c$ is a generic constant appearing in the formal action and
3241: $c^*$ is its complex conjugate. Note that \equ(2.19) is left invariant by
3242: this transformation, that we shall
3243: call {\it complex conjugation}.\\
3244: \\
3245: \03) {\it Hole-particle}:
3246: $H_\xx^{(j)}\to(-1)^{j+1}H_{\xx}^{(j)}$ (the same for $\lis H,V,\lis V$).
3247: This transformation is equivalent to $\hat\psi^\a_{\o,\kk}\to\hat
3248: \psi^{-\a}_{\o,-\kk}$ (the same for $\c$) and we shall
3249: call it {\it hole-particle}.\\
3250:
3251: \04) {\it Rotation}:
3252: $H_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to i\lis V_{-x_0,-x}^{(j)}$,
3253: $\lis H_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to i V_{-x_0,-x}^{(j)}$,
3254: $V_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to i\lis
3255: H_{-x_0,-x}^{(j)}$, $\lis V_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to i H_{-x_0,-x}^{(j)}$.
3256: This transformation is equivalent to
3257: %
3258: $$\hat\psi^\a_{\o,(k,k_0)}\to-\o e^{-i\o\p/4}\hat
3259: \psi^{\a}_{-\o,(-k_0,-k)}\virg\hat\c^\a_{\o,(k,k_0)}\to\o e^{-i\o\p/4}\hat
3260: \c^{\a}_{-\o,(-k_0,-k)}\Eqa(rot)$$
3261: %
3262: and we shall call it {\it rotation}.\\
3263:
3264: \05) {\it Reflection}:
3265: $H_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to i\lis H_{-x,x_0}^{(j)}$, $\lis H_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to i
3266: H_{-x,x_0}^{(j)}$,
3267: $V_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to -iV_{-x,x_0}^{(j)}$, $\lis V_{x,x_0}^{(j)}\to
3268: i \lis V_{-x,x_0}^{(j)}$.
3269: This transformation is equivalent to $\hat\psi^\a_{\o,(k,k_0)}\to i\hat
3270: \psi^{\a}_{-\o,(-k,k_0)}$
3271: (the same for $\c$) and we shall call it {\it reflection}.\\
3272:
3273: \06) {\it The $(1)\otto (2)$ symmetry:}
3274: $H_{\xx}^{(1)}\otto H_{\xx}^{(2)}$,
3275: $\lis H_{\xx}^{(1)}\otto\lis H_{\xx}^{(2)}$,
3276: $V_{\xx}^{(1)}\otto V_{\xx}^{(2)}$,
3277: $\lis V_{\xx}^{(1)}\otto\lis V_{\xx}^{(2)}$, $u\to -u$.
3278: This transformation is equivalent to
3279: $\hat\psi^\a_{\o,\kk}\to-i\a\hat\psi^{-\a}_{\o,-\kk}$ (the same for $\c$)
3280: together with $u\to -u$ and we shall call it {\it
3281: $(1)\otto(2)$ symmetry}.\\
3282:
3283: It is easy to verify that the quadratic forms $P(d\c)$, $P(d\psi)$
3284: and $P_{Z_1,\s_1,\m_1,C_1}(d\psi)$
3285: are separately invariant
3286: under the symmetries above. Then the effective action $\VV^{(1)}(\psi)$
3287: is still invariant under the same symmetries.
3288: Using the invariance of $\VV^{(1)}$ under transformations (1)--(6), we now
3289: prove that the structure of its quadratic and quartic terms is the one
3290: described in Theorem 2.1, see in particular \equ(8.29), \equ(8.30)
3291: and \equ(8.30a).\\
3292:
3293: \0{\it Quartic term.}
3294: The term $\sum_{\kk_i}W(\kk_1,\kk_2,\kk_3,\kk_4)
3295: \hat\psi^+_{1,\kk_1}\hat\psi^+_{-1,\kk_2}
3296: \hat\psi^-_{-1,\kk_3}\hat\psi^-_{1,\kk_4}\d(\kk_1+\kk_2-\kk_3-\kk_4)$
3297: under complex conjugation becomes equal to
3298: $\sum_{\kk_i}W^*(\kk_1,\kk_2,\kk_3,\kk_4)
3299: \hat\psi^-_{-1,\kk_1}\hat\psi^-_{1,\kk_2}
3300: \hat\psi^+_{1,\kk_3}\hat\psi^+_{-1,\kk_4}\d(\kk_3+\kk_4-\kk_1-\kk_2)$,
3301: so that $W(\kk_1,\kk_2,\kk_3,\kk_4)=W^*(\kk_3,\kk_4,\kk_1,\kk_2)$.
3302: Then, defining $L_1=W(\bk++,\bk++,\bk++,\bk++)$, where
3303: $\bk++=(\p/M,\p/M)$,
3304: and $l_1=\PP_0 L_1\defin L_1\big|_{\s_1=\m_1=0}$,
3305: we see that $L_1$ and $l_1$ are
3306: real. From the explicit computation of the
3307: lower order term we find $l_1=\l+O(\l^2)$.\\
3308:
3309: \0{\it Quadratic terms.}
3310: We distinguish 4 cases (items (a)--(d) below).\\
3311: {\it \0a)} Let $\a_1=-\a_2=+$ and $\o_1=-\o_2=\o$ and
3312: consider the expression $\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;\m_1)\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}
3313: \hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}$.
3314: Under parity it becomes
3315: %
3316: $\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;\m_1)
3317: (i\o)\hat\psi^+_{\o,-\kk}(-i\o)\hat\psi^-_{-\o,-\kk}=
3318: \sum_{\o,\kk}
3319: W_\o(-\kk;\m_1)\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}$,
3320: %\;,\Eqa(B1)$$
3321: %
3322: so that $W_\o(\kk;\m_1)$ is even in $\kk$.\\
3323: Under complex conjugation it becomes
3324: %
3325: $\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;\m_1)^*
3326: \hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}=-\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;\m_1)^*
3327: \hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}$,
3328: %\;,\Eqa(B2)$$
3329: %
3330: so that $W_\o(\kk;\m_1)$ is purely imaginary.\\
3331: Under hole-particle it becomes
3332: %
3333: $\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;\m_1)\hat\psi^-_{\o,-\kk}
3334: \hat\psi^+_{-\o,-\kk}=-\sum_{\o,\kk}W_{-\o}(\kk;\m_1)\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}
3335: \hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}$,
3336: %\;,\Eqa(B3)$$
3337: %
3338: so that $W_\o(\kk;\m_1)$ is odd in $\o$.\\
3339: Under $(1)\otto(2)$ it becomes
3340: %
3341: $\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;-\m_1)(-i)
3342: \hat\psi^-_{-\o,-\kk}(i)\hat\psi^+_{\o,-\kk}=
3343: \sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;-\m_1)\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^-_{-\o,\kk}$,
3344: %\;,\Eqa(B4)$$
3345: %
3346: so that $W_\o(\kk;\m_1)$ is even in $\m_1$.
3347: Let us define $S_1=i\o/2\sum_{\h,\h'=\pm 1}W_\o(\bk\h{\h'})$,
3348: where $\bk\h{\h'}=(\h\p/M,\h'\p/M)$, and $\g n_1=\PP_0 S_1$,
3349: $s_1=\PP_1 S_1=\s_1\dpr_{\s_1}S_1\big|_{\s_1=\m_1=0}+
3350: \m_1\dpr_{\m_1}S_1\big|_{\s_1=\m_1=0}$. From the
3351: previous discussion we see that
3352: $S_1, s_1$ and $n_1$ are real and $s_1$ is independent
3353: of $\m_1$. From the computation of the lower order terms
3354: we find $s_1=O(\l\s_1)$ and $\g n_1=\n+c^\n_1\l+O(\l^2)$,
3355: for some constant $c^\n_1$ independent of $\l$.
3356: Note that, since $W_\o(\kk;\m_1)$ is even in $\kk$
3357: (so that in particular no linear terms in $\kk$ appear)
3358: in real space no terms of the form
3359: $\psi^+_{\o,\xx}\dpr\psi^-_{-\o,\xx}$ can appear.\\
3360: {\it \0b)} Let $\a_1=\a_2=\a$ and $\o_1=-\o_2=\o$ and
3361: consider the expression $\sum_{\o,\a,\kk}W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)
3362: \hat\psi^\a_{\o,\kk}
3363: \hat\psi^\a_{-\o,-\kk}$. We proceed as in item (a) and,
3364: by using parity, we see that $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$ is even in $\kk$
3365: and odd in $\o$.\\
3366: By using complex conjugation, we see that
3367: $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)=-W^{-\a}_{\o}(\kk;\m_1)^*$.\\
3368: By using hole-particle, we see that
3369: $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$ is even in $\a$ and $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)=-
3370: W^{-\a}_{\o}(\kk;\m_1)^*$ implies that $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$
3371: is purely imaginary.\\
3372: By using $(1)\otto(2)$ we see that
3373: $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$ is odd in $\m_1$.
3374:
3375: If we define
3376: $M_1=-i\o/2\sum_{\h,\h'}W_\o^\a(\bk\h{\h'};\m_1)$
3377: and $m_1=\PP_1 M_1$, from the previous properties follows
3378: that $M_1$ and $m_1$ are real, $m_1$ is independent of $\s_1$
3379: and, from the computation of its lower order, $m_1=O(\l\m_1)$.
3380: Note that, since $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$ is even in $\kk$
3381: (so that in particular no linear terms in $\kk$ appear)
3382: in real space no terms of the form
3383: $\psi^\a_{\o,\xx}\dpr\psi^\a_{-\o,\xx}$ can appear.\\
3384: {\it \0c)} Let $\a_1=-\a_2=+$, $\o_1=\o_2=\o$ and consider
3385: the expression $\sum_{\o,\kk}W_\o(\kk;\m_1)\hat\psi^+_{\o,\kk}
3386: \hat\psi^-_{\o,\kk}$. By using parity we see that
3387: $W_\o(\kk;\m_1)$ is odd in $\kk$.\\
3388: By using reflection we see that $W_\o(k,k_0;\m_1)=W_{-\o}(k,-k_0;\m_1)$.\\
3389: By using complex conjugation we see that
3390: $W_\o(k,k_0;\m_1)=W^*_{\o}(-k,k_0;\m_1)$.\\
3391: By using rotation we find $W_\o(k,k_0;\m_1)=-i\o W_\o(k_0,-k;\m_1)$.\\
3392: By using $(1)\otto(2)$ we see that
3393: $W_{\o}(\kk;-\m_1)$ is even in $\m_1$.
3394:
3395: If we define
3396: %
3397: $$G_1(\kk)={1\over 4}\sum_{\h,\h'}W_\o(\bk\h{\h'};\m_1)(\h
3398: {\sin k\over \sin\p/M}+\h'{\sin k_0\over \sin\p/M})\= a_\o\sin k+
3399: b_\o\sin k_0\;,\Eqa(g1)$$
3400: %
3401: it can be easily verified that the previous properties imply
3402: that
3403: %
3404: $$a_\o=a_{-\o}=-a^*_\o=i\o b_\o\defin ia\virg
3405: b_\o=-b_{-\o}=b^*_\o=-i\o a_\o\defin \o b=-i\o i a\Eqa(4.38)$$
3406: %
3407: with $a=b$ real and independent of $\o$. As a consequence,
3408: $G_1(\kk)=G_1(i\sin k+\o\sin k_0)$ for some real constant $G_1$. If $z_1
3409: \defin\PP_0 G_1$ and we compute the lowest order contribution to $z_1$,
3410: we find $z_1=O(\l^2)$.\\
3411: {\it\0d)} Let $\a_1=\a_2=\a$, $\o_1=\o_2=\o$ and consider the expression
3412: $\sum_{\a,\o,\kk}W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)\hat\psi^\a_{\o,\kk}\hat\psi^\a_{\o,-\kk}$.
3413: Repeating the proof in item (c) we see that
3414: $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$ is odd in $\kk$ and in $\m_1$ and, if we define
3415: $F_1(\kk)={1\over 4}\sum_{\h,\h'}W_\o^\a(\bk\h{\h'};\m_1)(\h
3416: {\sin k\over \sin\p/M}+\h'{\sin k_0\over \sin\p/M})$,
3417: we can rewrite $F_1(\kk)=F_1(i\sin k+\o\sin k_0)$. Since
3418: $W_\o^\a(\kk;\m_1)$ is odd in $\m_1$, we find $F_1=O(\l\m_1)$.\\
3419:
3420: Note that, with the definition of $\LL$ introduced in \sec(4.2), the
3421: result of the previous discussion is the following:
3422: %
3423: $$\LL\VV^{(1)}(\psi)=(s_1+\g n_1) F_\s^{(\le 1)}
3424: +m_1 F^{(\le 1)}_{\m}+l_1
3425: F_\l^{(\le 1)} +z_1 F_\z^{(\le 1)}
3426: \;,\Eqa(BB.10) $$
3427: %
3428: where $s_1,n_1,m_1,l_1$ and $z_1$ are real constants and:
3429: $s_1$ is linear in $\s_1$ and independent of $\m_1$;
3430: $m_1$ is linear in $\m_1$ and independent of $\s_1$;
3431: $n_1,l_1,z_1$ are independent of $\s_1,\m_1$;
3432: moreover $F_\s^{(\le 1)}$, $F_\m^{(\le 1)}$, $F_\l^{(\le 1)}$,
3433: $F_\z^{(\le 1)}$ are defined by \equ(4.11) with $h=1$.\\
3434:
3435: \0{\bf Proof of Lemma 3.1.}
3436: The symmetries (1)--(6) discussed above are preserved by the iterative
3437: integration procedure. In fact it is easy to verify that
3438: $\LL\VV^{(h)}$, $\RR\VV^{(h)}$ and $P_{Z_{h-1},\s_{h-1},\m_{h-1},\widetilde
3439: f_h}(d\psi^{(h)})$ are, step by step, separately
3440: invariant under the transformations (1)--(6). Then Lemma 3.1 can be proven
3441: exactly in the same way \equ(BB.10) was proven above.\\
3442:
3443: \0{\bf Proof of Lemma 3.2.}
3444: It is sufficient to note that the symmetry
3445: properties discussed above imply that: $\LL_1 W_{2,\aa,\oo}=0$ if
3446: $\o_1+\o_2=0$; $\LL_0 W_{2,\aa,\oo}=0$ if
3447: $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$; $\PP_0 W_{2,\aa,\oo}=0$ if
3448: $\a_1+\a_2\not=0$; and use the definitions of $\RR_i$, $\SS_i$, $i=1,2$.
3449:
3450: \*
3451: \appendix(a3, Proof of Lemma 3.3)
3452:
3453: The propagators $g_{\underline a,\underline a'}^{(h)}(\xx)$
3454: can be written in terms of the propagators
3455: $g_{\o,\o'}^{(j,h)}(\xx)$, $j=1,2$,
3456: see \equ(4.210b) and following lines; $g_{\o,\o'}^{(j,h)}(\xx)$
3457: are given by
3458: %
3459: $$\eqalign{&g^{(j,h)}_{\o,\o}(\xx-\yy)=\cr
3460: &\qquad\qquad={2\over M^2}
3461: \sum_\kk e^{-i\kk(\xx-\yy)}\widetilde f_h(\kk)
3462: {-i\sin k+\o\sin k_0+a^{-(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)\over
3463: \sin^2 k+\sin^2 k_0+\big(\lis m^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)\big)^2+
3464: \d B^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)}\cr
3465: &g^{(j,h)}_{\o,-\o}(\xx-\yy)=\cr
3466: &\qquad\qquad={2\over M^2}
3467: \sum_\kk e^{-i\kk(\xx-\yy)}
3468: \widetilde f_h(\kk)
3469: {-i\o \lis m^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)
3470: \over \sin^2 k+\sin^2 k_0+\big(\lis m^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)
3471: \big)^2+\d B^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)}
3472: \;,\cr}\Eqa(4.24)$$
3473: %
3474: where
3475: %
3476: $$\eqalign{&a^{\o(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)\defin -a^\o_{h-1}(\kk)+(-1)^j
3477: b^\o_{h-1}(\kk)\virg
3478: c^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)\defin c_{h-1}(\kk)+(-1)^jd_{h-1}(\kk)\cr
3479: &m_{h-1}^{(j)}(\kk)\defin \s_{h-1}(\kk)+(-1)^j\m_{h-1}(\kk)\virg
3480: \lis m_{h-1}^{(j)}(\kk)\defin m_{h-1}^{
3481: (j)}(\kk)+c^{(j)}(\kk)\cr
3482: &\d B^{(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)\defin\sum_\o\big[a_{h-1}^{\o(j)}(\kk)
3483: (i\sin k-\o\sin k_0)+a^{\o(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)
3484: a^{-\o(j)}_{h-1}(\kk)/2\big]\;.\cr}\Eqa(4.24y)$$
3485: %
3486: In order to bound the propagators defined above, we need estimates
3487: on $\s_h(\kk),\m_h(\kk)$ and on the ``corrections''
3488: $a^\o_{h-1}(\kk)$, $b^\o_{h-1}(\kk)$, $c_{h-1}(\kk)$, $d_{h-1}(\kk)$.
3489: As regarding $\s_h(\kk)$ and $\m_h(\kk)$, in [BM] is proved (see Proof
3490: of Lemma 2.6) that, on the support of $f_h(\kk)$, for some $c$,
3491: %
3492: $c^{-1}|\s_h|\le|\s_{h-1}(\kk)|\le c|\s_h|$ and
3493: $c^{-1}|\m_h|\le|\m_{h-1}(\kk)|\le c|\m_h|$.
3494: %\;.\Eqa(4.41)$$
3495: %
3496: Note also that, if $h\ge \bar h$, using the first two of \equ(4.40z), we have
3497: %
3498: ${|\s_h|+|\m_h|\over \g^h}\le 2C_1$.
3499: As regarding the corrections,
3500: using their iterative definition \equ(4.17a), the asymptotic estimates
3501: near $\kk={\bf 0}$ of the corrections on scale $h=1$ (see lines after
3502: \equ(2.38)) and the hypothesis \equ(4.40z), we easily find that,
3503: on the support of $f_h(\kk)$:
3504: %
3505: $$\eqalign{&
3506: a_{h-1}^\o(\kk)= O(\s_h\g^{(1-2c|\l|)h})+O(\g^{(3-c|\l|^2)h})\virg
3507: b_h^\o(\kk)=O(\m_h\g^{(1-2c|\l|)h})+O(\g^{(3-c|\l|^2)h})\;,\cr
3508: & c_h(\kk)=O(\g^{(2-c|\l|^2)h})\virg d_h(\kk)=O(\m_h\g^{(2-2c|\l|)h})\;.\cr}
3509: \Eqa(c.5)$$
3510: %
3511: The bounds on the propagators follow from the remark that, as a consequence
3512: of the estimates discussed above,
3513: the denominators in \equ(4.24) are $O(\g^{2h})$
3514: on the support of $f_h$.\\
3515:
3516: \*
3517: \appendix(4a, Analyticity of the effective potentials)
3518: It is possible to write $\VV^{(h)}$ \equ(4.6)
3519: in terms of {\it Gallavotti-Nicolo' trees.}\\
3520:
3521: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3522: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURA 4%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3523: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3524:
3525: \insertplot{300pt}{150pt}%
3526: {\ins{30pt}{85pt}{$r$}\ins{50pt}{85pt}{$v_0$}\ins{130pt}{100pt}{$v$}%
3527: \ins{35pt}{-2pt}{$h$}\ins{55pt}{-2pt}{$h+1$}\ins{135pt}{-2pt}{$h_v$}%
3528: \ins{215pt}{-2pt}{$0$}\ins{235pt}{-2pt}{$+1$}\ins{255pt}{-2pt}{$+2$}}%
3529: {fig51}{}
3530: \vskip.7cm
3531: \line{\vtop{\line{\hskip5.5truecm\vbox{\advance\hsize by -5.1 truecm
3532: \0{\ottorm FIG 4. A tree with its scale labels.}
3533: } \hfill} }}
3534: \vskip.5cm
3535:
3536: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3537: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3538:
3539: We need some definitions and notations.
3540:
3541: \0 1) Let us consider the family of all trees which can be constructed
3542: by joining a point $r$, the {\it root}, with an ordered set of $n\ge 1$
3543: points, the {\it endpoints} of the {\it unlabeled tree},
3544: so that $r$ is not a branching point. $n$ will be called the
3545: {\it order} of the unlabeled tree and the branching points will be called
3546: the {\it non trivial vertices}.
3547: Two unlabeled trees are identified if they can be superposed by a suitable
3548: continuous deformation, so that the endpoints with the same index coincide.
3549: Then the number of unlabeled trees with $n$ end-points
3550: is bounded by $4^n$.
3551:
3552: \0 2) We associate a label $h\le 0$ with the root and we denote $\TT_{h,n}$
3553: the corresponding set of labeled trees with $n$ endpoints. Moreover,
3554: we introduce
3555: a family of vertical lines, labeled
3556: by an integer taking values in
3557: $[h,2]$, and we represent any
3558: tree $\t\in\TT_{h,n}$ so that, if $v$ is an
3559: vendpoint or a non trivial vertex, it is contained in a vertical line with
3560: index $h_v>h$, to be called the {\it scale} of $v$, while the root is on the
3561: line with index $h$. There is the constraint that, if $v$ is an endpoint,
3562: $h_v>h+1$; if there is only one end-point its scale must
3563: be equal to $h+2$,
3564: for $h\le 0$.
3565: %The tree will intersect in general the vertical lines in set of
3566: %points different from the root, the endpoints and the non trivial vertices;
3567: %these points will be called {\it trivial vertices}. The set of the {\it
3568: %vertices} of $\t$ will be the union of the endpoints, the trivial vertices
3569: %and the non trivial vertices.
3570: %Note that, if $v_1$ and $v_2$ are two vertices and $v_1<v_2$, then
3571: %$h_{v_1}<h_{v_2}$.
3572: Moreover, there is only one vertex immediately following
3573: the root, which will be denoted $v_0$ and can not be an endpoint;
3574: its scale is $h+1$.
3575:
3576: \0 3) With each endpoint $v$ of scale $h_v=+2$ we associate one of the
3577: contributions to $\VV^{(1)}$ given by \equ(2.40);
3578: with each endpoint $v$ of
3579: scale $h_v\le 1$ one of the terms in
3580: $\LL \VV^{(h_v-1)}$ defined in \equ(4.10).
3581: Moreover, we impose the constraint that, if $v$ is an endpoint and
3582: $h_v\le 1$,
3583: $h_v=h_{v'}+1$, if $v'$ is the non trivial vertex immediately preceding $v$.
3584:
3585: %\0 4) If $v$ is not an endpoint, the {\it cluster } $L_v$ with frequency $h_v$
3586: %is the set of endpoints following the vertex $v$; if $v$ is an endpoint, it is
3587: %itself a ({\it trivial}) cluster. The tree provides an organization of
3588: %endpoints into a hierarchy of clusters.
3589:
3590: \0 4) We introduce a {\it field label} $f$ to distinguish the field variables
3591: appearing in the terms associated with the endpoints as in item 3);
3592: the set of field labels associated with the endpoint $v$ will be called $I_v$.
3593: Analogously, if $v$ is not an endpoint, we shall
3594: call $I_v$ the set of field labels associated with the endpoints following
3595: the vertex $v$; $\xx(f)$, $\s(f)$ and $\o(f)$ will denote the space-time
3596: point, the $\s$ index and the $\o$ index, respectively, of the
3597: field variable with label $f$.
3598:
3599: \0 5) We associate with any vertex $v$ of the tree a subset $P_v$ of $I_v$,
3600: the {\it external fields} of $v$. These subsets must satisfy various
3601: constraints. First of all, if $v$ is not an endpoint and $v_1,\ldots,v_{s_v}$
3602: are the $s_v$ vertices immediately following it, then $P_v \subset \cup_i
3603: P_{v_i}$; if $v$ is an endpoint, $P_v=I_v$. We shall denote $Q_{v_i}$ the
3604: intersection of $P_v$ and $P_{v_i}$; this definition implies that $P_v=\cup_i
3605: Q_{v_i}$. The subsets $P_{v_i}\bs Q_{v_i}$, whose union will be made, by
3606: definition, of the {\it internal fields} of $v$, have to be non empty, if
3607: $s_v>1$, that is if $v$ is a non trivial vertex.
3608: Given $\t\in\TT_{j,n}$, there are many possible choices of the subsets $P_v$,
3609: $v\in\t$, compatible with the previous constraints; let us call $\bP$ one of
3610: this choices.
3611: Given $\bP$, we consider the family $\cal G_\bP$ of all
3612: connected Feynman graphs, such that, for any $v\in\t$, the internal fields of
3613: $v$ are paired by propagators of scale $h_v$, so that the following condition
3614: is satisfied: for any $v\in\t$, the subgraph built by the propagators
3615: associated with all vertices $v'\ge v$ is connected. The sets $P_v$ have, in
3616: this picture, the role of the external legs of the subgraph associated with$v$.
3617: The graphs belonging to $\cal G_\bP$ will be called {\it compatible with
3618: $\bP$} and we shall denote $\PP_\t$ the family of all choices of $\bP$ such
3619: that $\cal G_\bP$ is not empty.
3620:
3621: \06) we associate with any vertex $v$ an index $\r_v\in\{s,p\}$
3622: and correspondingly an operator $\RR_{\r_v}$, where
3623: $\RR_s$ or $\RR_p$ are defined as
3624: %
3625: $$\RR_s\defin\cases{\SS_2 & if $n=1$ and $\o_1+\o_2=0$,\cr
3626: \RR_1\SS_1 & if $n=1$ and $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$,\cr
3627: \SS_1 & if $n=2$,\cr
3628: 1 & if $n>2$;\cr}\Eqa(rs)$$
3629: %
3630: and
3631: %
3632: $$\RR_p\defin\cases{\RR_2(\PP_0+\PP_1) & if $n=1$ and $\o_1+\o_2=0$,\cr
3633: \RR_2\PP_0 & if $n=1$, $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$
3634: and $\a_1+\a_2=0$,\cr
3635: 0 & if $n=1$, $\o_1+\o_2\not=0$
3636: and $\a_1+\a_2\not=0$,\cr
3637: \RR_1\PP_0 & if $n=2$,\cr
3638: 0 & if $n>2$.\cr}\Eqa(rp)$$
3639: %
3640: Note that $\RR_s+\RR_p=\RR$, see Lemma 3.1.
3641:
3642: \*
3643: The effective potential can be written in the following way:
3644: %
3645: $$\VV^{(h)}(\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)}) + M^2 \tilde E_{h+1}=
3646: \sum_{n=1}^\io\sum_{\t\in\TT_{h,n}}
3647: \VV^{(h)}(\t,\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)});,\Eqa(3.27a)$$
3648: %
3649: where, if $v_0$ is the first vertex of $\t$ and $\t_1,\ldots,\t_s$
3650: are the subtrees of $\t$ with root $v_0$,\\
3651: $\VV^{(h)}(\t,\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})$ is defined inductively by the relation
3652: %
3653: $$\eqalign{
3654: &\qquad \VV^{(h)}(\t,\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})=\cr
3655: &{(-1)^{s+1}\over s!} \EE^T_{h+1}[\bar
3656: V^{(h+1)}(\t_1,\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(\le h+1)});\ldots; \bar
3657: V^{(h+1)}(\t_{s},\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(\le h+1)})]\;,\cr}\Eqa(3.28a)$$
3658: %
3659: and $\bar V^{(h+1)}(\t_i,\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(\le h+1)})$:
3660:
3661: \0 a) is equal to $\RR_{\r_{v_i}}\widehat
3662: \VV^{(h+1)}(\t_i,\sqrt{Z_{h}}\psi^{(\le h+1)})$ if
3663: the subtree $\t_i$ with first vertex $v_i$
3664: is not trivial (see \equ(4.18) for the definition of
3665: $\widehat \VV^{(h)}$);
3666:
3667: \0 b) if $\t_i$ is trivial and $h\le -1$, it
3668: is equal to one of the terms in $\LL\widehat\VV^{(h+1)}$,
3669: see \equ(4.18), or,
3670: if $h=0$, to one of the terms contributing to
3671: $\widehat\VV^{(1)}(\sqrt{Z_1}\psi^{\le 1})$.\\
3672:
3673: \asub(a.0) The explicit
3674: expression for the kernels of $\VV^{(h)}$ can be found from
3675: \equ(3.27a) and \equ(3.28a) by writing the truncated expectations
3676: of monomials of $\psi$ fields using the analogue of \equ(8.7): if
3677: $\widetilde\psi(P_{v_i})=\prod_{f\in P_{v_i}}\psi^{\a(f)(h_v)}_{\xx(f),
3678: \o(f)}$, the following identity holds:
3679: %
3680: $$\EE^T_{h_v}(\widetilde\psi(P_{v_1}),\ldots,\widetilde\psi(P_{v_s}))=
3681: \Big({1\over Z_{h_v-1}}\Big)^n\sum_{T_v}\a_{T_v}\prod_{\ell\in T_v}
3682: g^{(h_v)}(f^1_\ell,f^2_\ell)
3683: \int dP_{T_v}(\tt) \Pf G^{T_v}(\tt)\Eqa(a.1)$$
3684: %
3685: where $g^{(h)}(f,f')=g_{\underline a(f),\underline a(f')}(\xx(f)-\xx(f'))$
3686: and the other symbols in \equ(a.1) have the same meaning as those in
3687: \equ(8.7).
3688:
3689: Using iteratively \equ(a.1) we can express the kernels
3690: of $\VV^{(h)}$ as sums of products of propagators of the fields (the ones
3691: associated to the anchored trees $T_v$) and Pfaffians of matrices $G^{T_v}$.
3692: %
3693: %We begin to the describe the effect of the iterative construction in a
3694: %case simpler than the one we are really interested in.\\
3695:
3696: \asub(a.1) {\it If the $\RR$ operator were not applied to
3697: the vertices $v\in\t$} then the result of the iteration would lead to the
3698: following relation:
3699: %
3700: $$\VV^*_h(\t,\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})=\sqrt{Z_h}^{|P_{v_0}|}\sum_{
3701: \bP\in\PP_\t}\sum_{T\in\bT}\int d\xx_{v_0}W^*_{\t,\bP,\bT}
3702: (\xx_{v_0})\Big\{\prod_{f\in P_{v_0}}
3703: \psi^{\a(f)(\le h)}_{
3704: \xx(f),\o(f)}\Big\}\;,\Eqa(a.2)$$
3705: %
3706: where $\xx_{v_0}$ is the set of integration variables
3707: asociated to $\t$ and $T=\bigcup_v T_v$;
3708: $W^*_{\t,\bP,\bT}$ is given by
3709: %
3710: $$\eqalign{&W^*_{\t,\bP,\bT}(\xx_{v_0})=
3711: \Big[\prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}}
3712: \Big({Z_{h_v}\over Z_{h_v-1}}\Big)^{|P_v|\over 2}\Big]
3713: \Big[\prod_{i=1}^n K^{h_i}_{v^*_i}(\xx_{v^*_i})\Big]
3714: \Big\{\prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}}{1\over s_v!} \int
3715: dP_{T_v}(\tt_v) \;\cdot\cr
3716: &\cdot\; \Pf G^{h_v,T_v}(\tt_v)
3717: \Big[\prod_{l\in T_v} g^{(h_v)}(f^1_l,f^2_l)\Big]\Big\}\;,\cr}
3718: \Eqa(a.3)$$
3719: %
3720: where: $e.p.$ is an abbreviation of ``end points'';
3721: $v_1^*,\ldots, v_n^*$ are the endpoints of $\t$, $h_i\=h_{v_i^*}$
3722: and $K^{h_v}_v(\xx_v)$ are the corresponding kernels (equal to
3723: $\l_{h_v-1}\d(\xx_v)$ or $\n_{h_v-1}\d(\xx_v)$ if $v$ is an endpoint
3724: of type $\l$ or $\n$ on scale $h_v\le 1$; or equal to one of the kernels
3725: of $\VV^{(1)}$ if $h_v=2$).
3726:
3727: We can bound \equ(a.3)
3728: using \equ(4.400) and the Gram--Hadamard inequality,
3729: see Appendix \secc(a1), we would find:
3730: %
3731: $$\int d\xx_{v_0} |W^*_{\t,\bP,T}(\xx_{v_0})|\le
3732: C^n M^2|\l|^n \g^{-h(-2+|P_{v_0}|/2 )}
3733: \prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}} \left\{ {1\over s_v!}
3734: \Big({Z_{h_v}\over Z_{h_v-1}}\Big)^{|P_v|\over 2}
3735: \g^{-[-2+{|P_v|\over 2}]}\right\}\;.\Eqa(a.170)$$
3736: %
3737: We call $D_v=-2+{|P_v|\over 2}$ the {\it dimension}
3738: of $v$, depending on the number of the external
3739: fields of $v$. If $D_v<0$ for any $v$ one can
3740: sum over $\t,\bP,T$ obtaining convergence
3741: for $\l$ small enough; however
3742: $D_v\le 0$ when there are two or four external lines.
3743: We will take now into account the effect of the $\RR$ operator
3744: and we will see how the bound \equ(a.170) is improved.
3745:
3746: \asub(a.1)
3747: The effect of application of $\PP_j$ and $\SS_j$
3748: is to replace a kernel $W^{(h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}$
3749: with $\PP_j W^{(h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}$ and
3750: $\SS_j W^{(h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}$.
3751: If inductively, starting from the end--points,
3752: we write the kernels $W^{(h)}_{2n,\ss,\underline j,\aa,\oo}$
3753: in a form similar to
3754: \equ(a.3), we easily realize that, eventually,
3755: $\PP_j$ or $\SS_j$ will act on some
3756: propagator of an anchored tree or on some Pfaffian $\Pf G^{T_v}$,
3757: for some $v$.
3758: It is easy to realize that $\PP_j$ and $\SS_j$, when applied to Pfaffians,
3759: do not break the Pfaffian structure. In fact the effect
3760: of $\PP_j$ on the Pfaffian of an antisymmetric matrix $G$
3761: with elements $G_{f,f'}$, $f,f'\in J$, $|J|=2k$,
3762: is the following (the proof is trivial):
3763: %
3764: $$\PP_0\Pf G=\Pf G^0\virg
3765: \PP_1\Pf G=
3766: {1\over 2 }\sum_{f_1,f_2\in J}\PP_1G_{f_1,f_2}
3767: (-1)^\p\Pf G_1^0\;,\Eqa(a.500)$$
3768: %
3769: where $G^0$ is the matrix with elements $\PP_0 G_{f,f'}$, $f,f'\in J$;
3770: $G_1^0$ is the matrix with elements $\PP_0 G_{f,f'}$, $f,f'\in J_1\defin
3771: J\setminus
3772: \{f_1\cup f_2\}$ and $(-1)^\p$ is the sign of the permutation
3773: leading from the ordering $J$ of the labels $f$ in the l.h.s. to the
3774: ordering $f_1,f_2,J_1$ in the r.h.s. The effect of
3775: $\SS_j$ is the following, see Appendix \secc(a7) for a proof:
3776: %
3777: $$\SS_1\Pf G={1\over 2\cdot k!}\sum_{f_1,f_2\in J}\SS_1G_{f_1,f_2}
3778: \sum_{J_1\cup J_2=
3779: J\setminus\cup_i f_i}^*(-1)^\p k_1!\, k_2!\,
3780: \Pf G_1^0\,\Pf G_2\;,\Eqa(a.5)$$
3781: %
3782: where: the $*$ on the sum means that $J_1\cap J_2=\emptyset$; $|J_i|=2k_i$,
3783: $i=1,2$; $(-1)^\p$ is the sign of the permutation leading
3784: from the ordering $J$ of the fields labels on the l.h.s. to the ordering
3785: $f_1,f_2,J_1,J_2$ on the r.h.s.;
3786: $G_1^0$ is the matrix with elements $\PP_0 G_{f,f'}$, $f,f'\in J_1$;
3787: $G_2$ is the matrix with elements $G_{f,f'}$, $f,f'\in J_2$.
3788: The effect of $\SS_2$ on $\Pf G^T$ is given by a formula
3789: similar to \equ(a.5).
3790: % furthermore:
3791: %%
3792: %$$\eqalign{&\SS_2\Pf G={1\over 2}\sum_{f_1,f_2\in J}\SS_2G_{f_1,f_2}
3793: %(-1)^\p \Pf G_1^{0}+\cr
3794: %&+{1\over 2^3\cdot k!}\sum_{f_1,\ldots,f_4\in J}^{**}\PP_1 G_{f_1,f_2}\,
3795: %\PP_1 G_{f_3,f_4}\sum_{J_1\cup J_2=
3796: %J\setminus\cup_i f_i}^*(-1)^\p k_1!\, k_2!\,
3797: %\Pf G_1^{0}\,\Pf G_2\;,\cr}\Eqa(a.6)$$
3798: %%
3799: %where the $**$ on the sum over $f_1,\ldots,f_4$ means that $f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4$
3800: %are all different. \equ(a.6) can be proven analogously to \equ(a.5), see
3801: %Appendix \secc(a7).
3802: %A consequence of \equ(a.500), \equ(a.5) and \equ(a.6) is that
3803: %any term of the form $\PP_i\Pf G$ or $\SS_i\Pf G$
3804: %can still be bounded by Gram inequality,
3805: %in a way similar to the one explained in Appendix \secc(a1)
3806: %for the integration of
3807: %the $\c$ fields: the key remark is that
3808: Note that the
3809: number of terms in the sums appearing in
3810: \equ(a.500), \equ(a.5) (and in the analogous equation for $\SS_2\Pf G^T$),
3811: is bounded by $c^k$ for some constant $c$.
3812: \\
3813: \asub(a.2) It is possible to show
3814: that the $\RR_j$ operators
3815: produce derivatives applied to the propagators of the anchored
3816: trees and on the elements of $G^{T_v}$; and a product of ``zeros''
3817: of the form $d_{j}^{b}(\xx(f^1_\ell)-\xx(f^2_\ell))$, $j=0,1$, $b=0,1,2$,
3818: associated to the lines $\ell\in T_v$.
3819: This is a well known result, and a very detailed discussion
3820: can be found in \S 3 of [BM]. By such analysis, and using
3821: \equ(a.500),\equ(a.5),
3822: we get the following expression for
3823: $\RR\VV^{(h)}(\t,\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})$:
3824: %
3825: $$\eqalign{&\RR\VV^{(h)}(\t,\sqrt{Z_h}\psi^{(\le h)})=\cr
3826: &\qquad=\sqrt{Z_h}^{|P_{v_0}|}\sum_{
3827: \bP\in\PP_\t}\sum_{T\in\bT}\sum_{\b\in B_T}\int d\xx_{v_0}W_{\t,\bP,\bT,\b}
3828: (\xx_{v_0})\Big\{\prod_{f\in P_{v_0}}
3829: \hat\dpr^{q_\b(f)}_{j_\b(f)}\psi^{\a(f)(\le h)}_{
3830: \xx_\b(f),\o(f)}\Big\}\;,\cr}\Eqa(a.7)$$
3831: %
3832: where: $B_T$ is a set of indeces which allows to distinguish the
3833: different terms produced by the non trivial $\RR$ operations;
3834: $\xx_\b(f)$ is a coordinate obtained by interpolating two points in $
3835: \xx_{v_0}$, in a suitable way depending on $\b$; $q_\b(f)$ is a nonnegative
3836: integer $\le 2$; $j_\b(f)=0,1$ and $\hat\dpr^q_j$ is a suitable differential
3837: operator, dimensionally equivalent to $\dpr^q_j$ (see [BM] for a precise
3838: definition); $W_{\t,\bP,\bT,\b}$ is given by:
3839: %
3840: $$\eqalign{W_{\t,\bP,\bT,\b}(\xx_{v_0})&=
3841: \Big[\prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}}
3842: \Big({Z_{h_v}\over Z_{h_v-1}}\Big)^{|P_v|\over 2}\Big]
3843: \Big[\prod_{i=1}^n d^{b_\b(v_i^*)}_{j_\b(v_i^*)}(\xx^i_\b,
3844: \yy^i_{\b})\PP_{I_\b(v^*_i)}^{C_\b(v^*_i)}
3845: \SS_{i_\b(v^*_i)}^{c_\b(v^*_i)}K^{h_i}_{v^*_i}(\xx_{v^*_i})\Big]\cdot\cr
3846: &\cdot\Big\{\prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}}{1\over s_v!} \int
3847: dP_{T_v}(\tt_v)\PP_{I_\b(v)}^{C_\b(v)}
3848: \SS_{i_\b(v)}^{c_\b(v)}\Pf G^{h_v,T_v}_\b(\tt_v)\cdot\cr
3849: &\cdot\Big[\prod_{l\in T_v}\hat\dpr^{q_\b(f^1_l)}_{j_\b(f^1_l)}
3850: \hat\dpr^{q_\b(f^2_l)}_{j_\b(f^2_l)}[d^{b_\b(l)}_{j_\b(l)}(\xx_l,\yy_l)
3851: \PP_{I_\b(l)}^{C_\b(l)}
3852: \SS_{i_\b(l)}^{c_\b(l)}g^{(h_v)}(f^1_l,f^2_l)]\Big]\Big\}\;,\cr}
3853: \Eqa(a.8)$$
3854: %
3855: where: $v^*_1,\ldots,v^*_n$ are the endpoints of $\t$;
3856: $b_\b(v)$, $b_\b(l)$, $q_\b(f^1_l)$ and $q_\b(f^2_l)$ are
3857: nonnegative integers $\le 2$; $j_\b(v)$, $j_\b(f^1_l)$, $j_\b(f^2_l)$
3858: and $j_\b(l)$ can be
3859: $0$ or $1$; $i_\b(v)$ and $i_\b(l)$ can be $1$ or $2$;
3860: $I_\b(v)$ and $I_\b(l)$ can be $0$ or $1$; $C_\b(v)$, $c_\b(v)$, $C_\b(l)$
3861: and $c_\b(l)$ can be $0,1$ and $\max\{C_\b(v)+c_\b(v),C_\b(l)+ c_\b(l\})\le 1$;
3862: $G^{h_v,T_v}_\b(\tt_v)$ is obtained from $G^{h_v,T_v}(\tt_v)$
3863: by substituting the element $t_{i(f),i(f')}g^{(h_v)}(f,f')$ with
3864: $t_{i(f),i(f')}\hat\dpr^{q_\b(f)}_{j_\b(f)}
3865: \hat\dpr^{q_\b(f')}_{j_\b(f')}g^{(h_v)}(f,f')$.\\
3866:
3867: It would be very difficult to give a precise description
3868: of the various contributions of the sum over $B_T$, but fortunately
3869: we only need to know some very general properties, which easily
3870: follows from the construction in \S 3.
3871:
3872: 1)There is a constant $C$ such that, $\forall T\in {\bf T}_\t$,
3873: $|B_T|\le C^n$;
3874: for any $\b\in B_T$, the following inequality is satisfied
3875: %
3876: $$\Big[\prod_{f\in \cup_v P_v} \g^{h(f) q_\b(f)} \Big]
3877: \Big[\prod_{l\in T} \g^{-h(l) b_\b(l)} \Big]\le
3878: \prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}} \g^{-z(P_v)}\;,\Eqa(a.9)$$
3879: %
3880: where: $h(f)=h_{v_0}-1$ if $f\in P_{v_0}$, otherwise it is the scale of
3881: the vertex where the field with label $f$ is contracted;
3882: $h(l)=h_v$, if $l\in T_v$ and
3883: %
3884: $$z(P_v)=\cases{
3885: 1 & if $|P_v|=4$ and $\r_v=p\;,$ \cr
3886: 2 & if $|P_v|=2$ and $\r_v=p\;,$ \cr
3887: 1 & if $|P_v|=2$, $\r_v=s$ and $\sum_{f\in P_v}\o(f)\not=0\;,$ \cr
3888: 0 & otherwise.\cr}\Eqa(a.10)$$
3889: %
3890: 2)If we define
3891: %
3892: $$\prod_{v\in\t}\Big[\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
3893: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{c_\b(v)i_\b(v)}
3894: \prod_{\ell\in T_v}\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
3895: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{c_\b(\ell)i_\b(\ell)}\Big]
3896: \defin \prod_{v\in V_\b}\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
3897: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{i(v,\b)}\;.\Eqa(a.11)$$
3898: the indeces $i(v,\b)$ satisfy, for any $B_T$, the following property:
3899: %
3900: $$\sum_{w\ge v}i(v,\b)\ge z'(P_v)\;,\Eqa(a.11z)$$
3901: %
3902: where
3903: %
3904: $$z'(P_v)=\cases{
3905: 1 & if $|P_v|=4$ and $\r_v=s\;,$ \cr
3906: 2 & if $|P_v|=2$ and $\r_v=s$ and $\sum_{f\in P_v}\o(f)=0\;,$ \cr
3907: 1 & if $|P_v|=2$, $\r_v=s$ and $\sum_{f\in P_v}\o(f)\not=0\;,$ \cr
3908: 0 & otherwise.\cr}\Eqa(a.12)$$
3909: %{\bf Remark.}
3910: %As we shall see below, the factors $\g^{h(f) q_\b(f)}$ and
3911: %$\g^{-h(l) b_\b(l)}$ in \equ(a.9), unless for a
3912: %constant $c^n$, are the contributions to the bound
3913: %on $W_{\t,\bP,\bT,\b}$ coming from
3914: %the zeros and the derivative operators
3915: %in \equ(a.8) (in fact it is easy to realize that each
3916: %derivative applied on a
3917: %propagator on scale $h$ contributes to the bounds with
3918: %a factor $\sim\g^h$; each zero associated to a line of $T_v$ with a factor
3919: %$\g^{-h_v}$). As we said in section \secc(a.2) and as described in [BM],
3920: %these zeros and derivatives operators
3921: %come from the application of $\RR_1$ and $\RR_2$ on the nodes of $\t$;
3922: %then the r.h.s. of \equ(a.9) collects the dimensional
3923: %gains associated to the operators $\RR_1$ and $\RR_2$, in terms of which
3924: %$\RR_s$ and $\RR_p$ are written, see \equ(rs) and \equ(rp).
3925: %Note that these gain factors are not enough to
3926: %give negative dimension to all the vertices of $\t$:
3927: %in fact their effect is to replace $-2+|P_v|/2$ with
3928: %$-2+|P_v|/2+z(P_v)$ in the analogous of \equ(a.170). Then, the
3929: %vertices with $|P_v|=2,4$ and $\r_v=s$ still have positive dimension,
3930: %\ie they have $2-|P_v|/2-z(P_v)\ge 0$. In order to
3931: %improve the power counting for such vertices we will have to use the
3932: %gain factors coming from
3933: %the $\SS_i$ operators in \equ(a.8).\\
3934:
3935: \asub(a.6)
3936: %We now want to bound $\int d\xx_{v_0}|W_{\t,\bP,\bT,\b}(\xx_{v_0})|$,
3937: %using the expression \equ(a.8). The different factors in
3938: %\equ(a.8) give the contributions described in items (1) and (2)
3939: %below, easily understood by
3940: %dimensional arguments (see [BM] for a more detailed proof).
3941: %In particular we shall extensively use that the
3942: %derivative operators and the zeros coming from the action
3943: %of $\RR_i$, $i=1,2$, can be
3944: %dimensionally bounded as described in the last Remark;
3945: %and the operators $\PP_i$ or $\SS_i$, when
3946: %applied on a propagator or on a Pfaffian
3947: %on scale $h$, contribute with a factor $c[(|\s_h|+|\m_h|)/\g^h]^i$.
3948: We can bound
3949: any $|\PP_{I_\b(v)}^{C_\b(v)}\SS_{i_\b(v)}^{c_\b(v)}
3950: \Pf G^{h_v,T_v}_\b|$ in \equ(a.8), with $C_\b(v)+c_\b(v)=0,1$,
3951: by using \equ(a.500), \equ(a.5) and
3952: Gram inequality, as illustrated in Appendix \secc(a1) for the case of the
3953: integration of the $\c$ fields. Using that the elements of $G$ are all
3954: propagators on scale $h_v$, dimensionally bounded as in Lemma 3.3, we find:
3955: %
3956: $$\eqalign{&
3957: |\PP_{I_\b(v)}^{C_\b(v)}\SS_{i_\b(v)}^{c_\b(v)}
3958: \Pf G^{h_v,T_v}_\b|\le C^{\sum_{i=1}^{s_v}|P_{v_i}|-|P_v|-
3959: 2(s_v-1)}\cdot\cr
3960: &\qquad\cdot
3961: \g^{{h_v\over 2}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{s_v}|P_{v_i}|-|P_v|-2(s_v-1)\right)}
3962: \Big[\prod_{f\in J_v}
3963: \g^{h_v q_\b(f)}\Big]\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
3964: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{c_\b(v)i_\b(v)+C_\b(v)I_\b(v)}\;,\cr}\Eqa(a.13)$$
3965: %
3966: where $J_v=\cup_{i=1}^{s_v}P_{v_i}\setminus Q_{v_i}$.
3967: We will bound
3968: the factors $\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
3969: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{C_\b(v)I_\b(v)}$
3970: using \equ(4.40a) by a constant.\\
3971:
3972: If we call
3973: %
3974: $$\eqalign{
3975: J_{\t,\bP,T,\b}&=\int d\xx_{v_0}
3976: \Big| \Big[ \prod_{i=1}^n d_{j_\b(v^*_i)}^{b_\b(v^*_i)}(\xx^i_\b,\yy^i_\b)
3977: \PP_{I_\b(v^*_i)}^{C_\b(v^*_i)}
3978: \SS_{i_\b(v^*_i)}^{c_\b(v^*_i)}K^{h_i}_{v^*_i}(\xx_{v^*_i})\Big]\cdot\cr
3979: &\cdot \Big\{ \prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}} {1\over s_v!}
3980: \Big[\prod_{l\in T_v} \hat\partial^{q_\b(f^1_l)}_{j_\b(f^1_l)}
3981: \hat\partial^{q_\b(f^2_l)}_{j_\b(f^2_l)} [d^{b_\b(l)}_{j_\b(l)}(\xx_l,\yy_l)
3982: \PP_{I_\b(l)}^{C_\b(l)}\SS_{i_\b(l)}^{c_\b(l)}
3983: g^{(h_v)}(f^1_l,f^2_l)]\Big]\Big\}\Big|\;,\cr}
3984: \Eqa(a.14)$$
3985: %
3986: we have, under the hypothesis \equ(4.40),
3987: %
3988: $$\eqalign{&
3989: J_{\t,\bP,T,\a}\le C^n M^2 |\l|^n\Big[\prod_{i=1}^n
3990: \Big({|\s_{h^*_i}|+|\m_{h^*_i}|\over
3991: \g^{h^*_i}}\Big)^{c_\b(v^*_i)i_\b(v^*_i)}\Big]\cdot\cr
3992: &\cdot\Big\{\prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}}{1\over s_v!} C^{2(s_v-1)}
3993: \g^{h_v n_\n(v)}\g^{-h_v\sum_{l\in T_v}b_\b(l)}
3994: \g^{-h_v\sum_{i=1}^n b_\b(v_i^*)}
3995: \g^{-h_v(s_v-1)}\cdot\cr
3996: &\cdot\g^{h_v\sum_{l\in T_v}\left[q_\b(f^1_l)+q_\b(f^2_l)\right]}
3997: \Big\}\Big[\prod_{\ell\in T}\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
3998: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{c_\b(\ell)i_\b(\ell)}
3999: \Big]\;,\cr} \Eqa(a.15)$$
4000: %
4001: where $n_\n(v)$ is the number
4002: of vertices of type $\n$ with scale $h_v+1$.
4003:
4004: Now, substituting \equ(a.13), \equ(a.15) into \equ(a.8), using
4005: \equ(a.9), we find that:
4006: %
4007: $$\eqalign{
4008: &\int d\xx_{v_0} |W_{\t,\bP,T,\b}(\xx_{v_0})|\le
4009: C^n M^2|\l|^n \g^{-h D_k(|P_{v_0}|)}
4010: \prod_{v\in V_\b}\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over\g^{h_v}}\Big)^{i(v,\b)}
4011: \;\cdot\cr
4012: &\cdot\; \prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}} \left\{ {1\over s_v!}
4013: C^{\sum_{i=1}^{s_v}|P_{v_i}|-|P_v|}
4014: \Big({Z_{h_v}\over Z_{h_v-1}}\Big)^{|P_v|\over 2}
4015: \g^{-[-2+{|P_v|\over 2}+z(P_v)]}\right\}\;,\cr}\Eqa(a.17)$$
4016: %
4017: where, if $k=\sum_{f\in P_{v_0}}q_\b(f)$, $D_k(p)=-2+p+k$ and we
4018: have used \equ(a.11).
4019: %
4020: Note that, given $v\in \t$ and $\t\in \TT_{h,n}$ and
4021: using \equ(4.40a) together with the first two of \equ(4.40z),
4022: %
4023: $$\eqalign{&{|\sigma_{h_v}|\over \g^{h_v}}={|\sigma_h|\over \g^h}
4024: {|\sigma_{h_v}|\over |\sigma_h|}
4025: \g^{h-h_v} \le {|\sigma_h|\over \g^h} \g^{(h-h_v)(1-c|\l|)}\le
4026: C_1\g^{(h-h_{\bar v})(1-c|\l|)}\cr
4027: &{|\m_{h_v}|\over \g^{h_v}}={|\m_h|\over \g^h}
4028: {|\m_{h_v}|\over |\m_h|}
4029: \g^{h-h_v} \le {|\m_h|\over \g^h} \g^{(h-h_v)(1-c|\l|)}\le
4030: C_1\g^{(h-h_v)(1-c|\l|)}\cr}\Eqa(a.18)$$
4031: %
4032: Moreover
4033: the indeces $i(v,\b)$ satisfy, for any $B_T$,
4034: \equ(a.12) sso that, using \equ(a.18) and \equ(a.11z), we find
4035: %
4036: $$\prod_{v\in V_\b}\Big({|\s_{h_v}|+|\m_{h_v}|\over
4037: \g^{h_v}}\Big)^{i(v,\b)}\le C_1^n \prod_{v\, {\rm not}\, {\rm e.p.}}
4038: \g^{-z'(P_v)}\;.\Eqa(esse)$$
4039: %
4040: %{\bf Remark.}
4041: %The r.h.s. of \equ(esse) collects the dimensional
4042: %gains associated to the operators $\SS_1$ and $\SS_2$, in terms of which
4043: %$\RR_s$ is written, see \equ(rs).
4044: %Note that these gain factors, together with the factors
4045: %$\prod_{v\, {\rm not}\, {\rm e.p.}}
4046: %\g^{-z(P_v)}$ are now enough to renormalize all the vertices of $\t$:
4047: %the key property is
4048: %
4049: %$$z(P_v)+z'(P_v)=\cases{
4050: %1 & if $|P_v|=4$\cr
4051: %2 & if $|P_v|=2$\cr
4052: %0 & otherwise,\cr}\Eqa(a.12)$$
4053: %
4054: %so that
4055: %
4056: %$$D_v\defin -2+{|P_v|\over 2}+z(P_v)+(1-c|\l|)z'(P_v)\ge {|P_v|\over 6}\;,
4057: %\Eqa(a.20)$$
4058: %
4059: %which means that any vertex $v\in\t$ has negative dimension $-D_v$.\\
4060: Substituting \equ(a.18) into \equ(a.17) and using \equ(a.11z), we find:
4061: %
4062: $$\eqalign{
4063: &\int d\xx_{v_0} |W_{\t,\bP,T,\b}(\xx_{v_0})|\le
4064: C^n M^2|\l|^n \g^{-h D_k(|P_{v_0}|)}
4065: \;\cdot\cr
4066: &\cdot\; \prod_{v\,\hbox{\ottorm not e.p.}} \left\{ {1\over s_v!}
4067: C^{\sum_{i=1}^{s_v}|P_{v_i}|-|P_v|}
4068: \Big({Z_{h_v}\over Z_{h_v-1}}\Big)^{|P_v|\over 2}
4069: \g^{-[-2+{|P_v|\over 2}+z(P_v)+(1-c|\l|)z'(P_v)]}\right\}\;.\cr}\Eqa(a.19)$$
4070: %
4071: where
4072: %
4073: $$D_v\defin -2+{|P_v|\over 2}+z(P_v)+(1-c|\l|)z'(P_v)\ge {|P_v|\over 6}\;.
4074: \Eqa(a.20)$$
4075: %
4076: Then
4077: \equ(4.45) in Theorem 3.1
4078: follows from the previous bounds and the remark that
4079: %
4080: $$\sum_{\t\in\TT_{h,n}}
4081: \sum_{\bP\in\PP_\t}\sum_{T\in\bT}\sum_{\b\in B_T}
4082: \prod_{v}{1\over s_v!}\g^{-{|P_v|\over 6}}\le
4083: c^n\;,\Eqa(a.21)$$
4084: %
4085: for some constant $c$, see [BM] or [GM] for further details.\\
4086:
4087: The bound on $\tilde E_h$, $t_h$, \equ(4.45y) and \equ(4.45yz) follow
4088: from a similar analysis.
4089: The remarks following \equ(4.45y) and \equ(4.45yz) follows from noticing
4090: that in the expansion for $\LL\VV^{(h)}$ appear only propagators of type
4091: $\PP_0 g^{(h_v)}_{\underline a,\underline a'}$ or
4092: $\PP_1 g^{(h_v)}_{\underline a,\underline a'}$ (in order to bound
4093: these propagators we do not need \equ(4.40a), see
4094: the last statement in Lemma 3.3).
4095: Furthermore, by construction $l_h,n_h$ and $z_h$ are
4096: independent of $\s_k,\m_k$, so that, in order to prove \equ(4.45yz)
4097: we do not even need the first two inequalities in \equ(4.40z).
4098: \qed
4099: \\
4100:
4101: \asub(short) The sum over all the trees with root scale $h$
4102: and with at least a $v$ with $h_v=k$ is $O(|\l|\g^{{1\over 2}(h-k)})$;
4103: this follows from the fact that
4104: the bound \equ(a.21) holds, for some $c=O(1)$,
4105: even if $\g^{-|P_v|/6}$ is replaced
4106: by $\g^{-\k |P_v|}$, for any constant $\k>0$ independent of $\l$;
4107: and that $D_v$, instead of using \equ(a.20), can also
4108: be bounded as $D_v\ge 1/2 +|P_v|/12$. This property
4109: is called {\it short memory property.}
4110: \*
4111: \appendix(a5, Proof of Theorem 4.1 and Lemma 4.1)
4112:
4113: We consider the space $\MMM_\th$ of sequences $\un=\{\n_h\}_{h\le 1}$
4114: such that $|\n_h|\le c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)h}$; we shall think $\MMM_\th$
4115: as a Banach space with norm $||\cdot||_\th$, where $||\un||_\th\defin
4116: \sup_{k\le 1}|\n_k|\g^{-(\th/2)k}$. We will proceed as follows: we
4117: first show that, for any sequence $\un\in\MMM_\th$,
4118: the flow equation for $\n_h$, the hypothesis
4119: \equ(4.40yz), \equ(4.40z) and the property $|\l_h(\un)|\le c|\l|$
4120: are verified, uniformly in $\un$. Then we fix $\un\in\MM_\th$
4121: via an exponentially convergent iterative procedure, in such a way that
4122: the flow equation for $\n_h$ is satisfied.\\
4123:
4124: \asub(a5.1) {\it Proof of Theorem 4.1.}
4125: Given $\un\in\MMM_\th$,
4126: let us suppose inductively that \equ(4.40yz), \equ(4.40z) and that,
4127: for $k>\bar h+1$,
4128: %
4129: $$|\l_{k-1}(\un)-\l_k(\un)|\le c_0|\l|^{2}
4130: \g^{(\th/2)k}\;,\Eqa(5.7)$$
4131: %
4132: for some $c_0>0$. Note that \equ(5.7) is certainly true for $h=1$
4133: (in that case the r.h.s. of \equ(5.7)
4134: is just the bound on $\b^1_\l$).
4135: Note also that \equ(5.7) implies
4136: that $|\l_k|\le c|\l|$, for any $k> \bar h$.
4137:
4138: Using \equ(4.45y), the second of
4139: \equ(4.45yz) and \equ(5.4z) we find that \equ(4.40yz), \equ(4.40z)
4140: are true with $\bar h$ replaced by $\bar h-1$.
4141:
4142: We now consider the equation $\l_{h-1}=\l_h+\b^h_\l(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;
4143: \l_1,\n_1)$, $h>\bar h$.
4144: The function $\b^h_\l$ can be expressed as a convergent
4145: sum over tree diagrams, as described in Appendix \secc(4a); note that
4146: it depends on $(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;
4147: \l_1,\n_1)$ directly through the end--points of the trees and indirectly
4148: through the factors $Z_h/Z_{h-1}$.
4149:
4150: We can write $\PP_0 g^{(h)}_{(+,\o),(-,\o)}(\xx-\yy)=
4151: g^{(h)}_{L,\o}(\xx-\yy)+
4152: r^{(h)}_\o(\xx-\yy)$, where
4153: %
4154: $$g^{(h)}_{L,\o}(\xx-\yy)\defin {4\over M^2}\sum_{\kk}e^{-i\kk(\xx-\yy)}
4155: \widetilde f_h(\kk){1\over ik+\o k_0}\Eqa(gL)$$
4156: %
4157: and $r^{(h)}_\o$ is the rest, satisfying the same bound as
4158: $g^{(h)}_{(+,\o),(-,\o)}$, times a factor $\g^h$. This decomposition
4159: induces the following decomposition for $\b^h_\l$:
4160: %
4161: $$\eqalign{&\b^h_\l(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)=\cr
4162: &\qquad=\b_{\l,L}^h
4163: (\l_h,\ldots,\l_h)+
4164: \sum_{k=h+1}^1
4165: D^{h,k}_\l + r^h_\l(\l_h,\ldots,\l_1)+\sum_{k\ge h}\n_k\tilde\b_\l^{h,k}
4166: (\l_k,\n_k;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)\;,\cr}\Eqa(5.1aaa)$$
4167: %
4168: with
4169: %
4170: $$\eqalign{&|\b^h_{\l,L}|\le c|\l|^2 \g^{\th h}\;,\qquad
4171: |D^{h,k}_\l|\le c |\l| \g^{\th(h-k)} |\l_k-\l_h|\;,\qquad\cr
4172: &|r^h_\l|\le c|\l|^2\g^{(\th/2) h}\;,\qquad |\tilde\b_\l^{h,k}|\le
4173: c|\l|\g^{\th(h-k)}\;.\cr}\Eqa(5.1bbb)$$
4174: %
4175: The first two terms in \equ(5.1aaa)
4176: $\b^h_{\l,L}$ collect the contributions
4177: obtained by posing $r^{(k)}_\o=0$, $k\ge h$ and substituting
4178: the discrete $\d$ function defined after \equ(4.11) with
4179: $M^2\d_{\kk,{\bf 0}}$.
4180: The first of \equ(5.1bbb) is called
4181: the {\it vanishing of the Luttinger
4182: model Beta function} property, see [BGPS][GS][BM1] (or [BeM1] for
4183: a simplified proof), and it is a crucial property
4184: of interacting fermionic systems in $d=1$.
4185:
4186: Using the decomposition \equ(5.1aaa) and the bounds \equ(5.1bbb)
4187: we prove the following bounds for $\l_{\bar h}(\un)$, $\un\in\MMM_\th$:
4188: %
4189: $$|\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_1(\un)|\le c_0|\l|^2
4190: \virg
4191: |\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_{\bar h+1}(\un)|\le c_0|\l|^2\g^{(\th/2) \bar h}
4192: \;,\Eqa(5.1cc)$$
4193: %
4194: for some $c_0>0$.
4195: Moreover, given $\un,\un'\in\MMM_\th$, we show that:
4196: %
4197: $$|\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_{\bar h}(\un')|\le c|\l|
4198: ||\un-\un'||_0\;,\Eqa(5.1d)$$
4199: %
4200: where $||\un-\un'||_0\defin\sup_{h\le 1}|\n_h-\n_h'|$.\\
4201:
4202: \0{\it Proof of \equ(5.1cc).}
4203: We decompose $\l_{\bar h}-\l_{\bar h+1}=\b^{\bar h+1}_\l$
4204: as in \equ(5.1aaa). Using the bounds
4205: \equ(5.1bbb) and the inductive hypothesis \equ(5.7), we find:
4206: %
4207: $$\eqalign{|\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_{\bar h+1}(\un)|
4208: &\le c|\l|^2\g^{\th (\bar h+1)}+
4209: \sum_{k\ge \bar h+2}c|\l|\g^{\th(\bar h+1-k)}\sum_{k'=\bar h+2}^k
4210: c_0|\l|^{2}\g^{(\th/ 2)k'}+\cr
4211: &+c|\l|^2\g^{(\th/2)(\bar h+1)}+\sum_{k\ge \bar h+1}
4212: c^2|\l|^2\g^{(\th/2)k}\g^{(\th(\bar h+1-k))}
4213: \;,\cr}
4214: \Eqa(5.8)$$
4215: %
4216: which, for $c_0$ big enough, immediately implies the second of
4217: \equ(5.1cc) with $h\to h-1$; from this bound and the
4218: hypothesis \equ(5.7) follows the first of \equ(5.1cc).\qed\\
4219:
4220: \0{\it Proof of \equ(5.1d).} If we take two sequences
4221: $\un,\un'\in\MMM_\th$, we
4222: easily find that the beta function for $\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_{\bar h}(\un')$
4223: can be represented by a tree expansion similar to the one for $\b^h_\l$,
4224: with the property that the trees giving a non vanishing contribution
4225: have necessarily one end--point on scale $k\ge h$ associated to a
4226: coupling constant $\l_k(\un)-\l_k(\un')$ or $\n_k-\n_k'$. Then we find:
4227: %
4228: $$\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_{\bar h}(\un')
4229: =\l_{1}(\un)-\l_{1}(\un')+\sum_{\bar h+1\le k\le 1}
4230: [\b^k_\l(\l_k(\un),\n_k;
4231: \ldots;\l_1,\n_1)-\b^k_\l(\l_k(\un'),\n_k';
4232: \ldots;\l_1,\n_1')]
4233: \;.\Eqa(5.8aaa)$$
4234: %
4235: Note that $|\l_1(\un)-\l_1(\un')|\le c_0|\l||\n_1-\n_1'|$,
4236: because $\l_1=\l/Z_1^2+O(\l^2/Z_1^4)$
4237: and $Z_1=\sqrt2-1+\n/2$.
4238: If we inductively suppose that,
4239: for any $k> \bar h$, $|\l_k(\un)-\l_k(\un')|\le 2c_0|\l|
4240: ||\un-\un'||_0$, we
4241: find, by using the decomposition
4242: \equ(5.1aaa):
4243: %
4244: $$|\l_{\bar h}(\un)-\l_{\bar h}(\un')|\le c_0|\l||\n_1-\n_1'|+
4245: c|\l|\sum_{k\ge \bar h+1}\g^{(\th/2)k}\sum_{k'\ge k}
4246: \g^{\th(k-k')}\Big[2c_0|\l|\,||\un-\un'||_0+
4247: |\n_k-\n'_k|\Big]\;.\Eqa(5.8aab)$$
4248: %
4249: Choosing $c_0$ big enough, \equ(5.1d) follows.\qed\\
4250:
4251: We are now left with fixing the sequence $\un$ in such a way that
4252: the flow equation for $\n$ is satisfied.
4253: Since we want to fix $\un$ in such a way that $\n_{-\io}=0$, we must have:
4254: %
4255: $$\n_1=-\sum_{k=-\io}^1\g^{k-2}\b^k_\n(\l_k,\n_k;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)\;.
4256: \Eqa(5.8a)$$
4257: %
4258: If we manage to fix $\n_1$ as in \equ(5.8a), we also get:
4259: %
4260: $$\n_h=-\sum_{k\le h}\g^{k-h-1}\b^k_\n(\l_k,\n_k;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)\;.
4261: \Eqa(5.8b)$$
4262: %
4263: We look for a fixed point
4264: of the operator $\bT:\MMM_\th\to\MMM_\th$ defined as:
4265: %
4266: $$(\bT\un)_h=-\sum_{k\le h}\g^{k-h-1}\b^k_\n(\l_k(\un),\n_k;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)
4267: \,.\Eqa(5.8c)$$
4268: %
4269: where $\l_k(\un)$ is the solution of the first line of \equ(5.1),
4270: obtained as a function of the {\it parameter} $\un$, as described above.
4271:
4272: If we find a fixed point $\un^*$ of \equ(5.8c),
4273: the first two lines in \equ(5.1)
4274: will be simultaneously solved by $\ul(\un^*)$ and $\un^*$ respectively,
4275: and the solution will have the desired smallness properties for $\l_h$ and
4276: $\n_h$.
4277:
4278: First note that, if $|\l|$ is sufficiently small, then $\bT$ leaves
4279: $\MMM_\th$ invariant: in fact, as a consequence of parity
4280: cancellations, the $\n$--component
4281: of the Beta function satisfies:
4282: %
4283: $$
4284: \b^h_\n(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)=
4285: \b^h_{\n,1}(\l_h;\ldots;\l_1)+\sum_{k}\n_k
4286: \tilde\b^{h,k}_\n(\l_h,\n_h;\ldots;\l_1,\n_1)\Eqa(gg)$$
4287: %
4288: where, if $c_1, c_2$ are suitable constants
4289: %
4290: $$|\b^h_{\n,1}|\le c_1 |\l|\g^{\th h}\;\quad
4291: |\tilde\b^{h,k}_\n|\le c_2|\l|\g^{\th(h-k)}\;.\Eqa(kmn)$$
4292: %
4293: by using \equ(gg)
4294: and choosing $c=2 c_1$ we obtain
4295: %
4296: $$|(\bT \n)_h|\le \sum_{k\le h} 2 c_1|\l|\g^{(\th/2) k}\g^{k-h}\le
4297: c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)h}\;,\Eqa(5.8d)$$
4298: %
4299: Furthermore, using \equ(gg) and \equ(5.1d), we find that
4300: $\bT$ is a contraction on $\MMM_\th$:
4301: %
4302: $$\eqalign{&|(\bT \n)_h-(\bT\un')_h|\le \sum_{k\le h}
4303: \g^{k-h-1}|\b^k_\n(\l_k(\un),\n_k;
4304: \ldots;\l_1,\n_1)-\b^k_\n(\l_k(\un'),\n_k';
4305: \ldots;\l_1,\n_1')|\le\cr
4306: &\le c\sum_{k\le h}\g^{k-h-1}
4307: \left[\g^{\th k}\sum_{k'=k}^1 |\l_{k'}(\un)-
4308: \l_{k'}(\un')|+\sum_{k'=k}^1\g^{\th(k-k')}|\l||\n_{k'}-\n_{k'}'|
4309: \right]\le \cr
4310: &\le c'\sum_{k\le h}\g^{k-h-1}\Big[|k|\g^{\th k}|\l|\,||\un-\un'||_0
4311: +\sum_{k'=k}^1\g^{\th(k-k')}
4312: |\l|\g^{(\th/2)k'}||\un-\un'||_\th
4313: \le\cr
4314: &\le c''|\l|\g^{(\th/2)h}
4315: ||\un-\un'||_\th\;.\cr}\Eqa(5.8e)$$
4316: %
4317: hence $||(\bT \n)-(\bT\un')||_\th\le c''|\l|||\un-\un'||_\th$.
4318: Then, a unique fixed point $\un^*$ for $\bT$ exists on $\MMM_\th$.
4319: Proof of
4320: Theorem 4.1 is concluded by noticing that $\bT$
4321: is analytic (in fact
4322: $\b^h_\n$ and $\ul$ are analytic in $\un$ in the domain $\MMM_\th$).\qed\\
4323:
4324: \asub(a5.2){\it Proof of Lemma 4.1}
4325: From now on we shall think $\l_h$ and $\n_h$ fixed, with $\n_1$ conveniently
4326: chosen as above ($\n_1=\n_1^*(\l)$). Then we have $|\l_h|\le c|\l|$
4327: and $|\n_h|\le c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)h}$, for some $c,\th>0$. Having fixed
4328: $\n_1$ as a convenient function
4329: of $\l$, we can also think $\l_h$ and $\n_h$ as functions of $\l$.\\
4330:
4331: \0{\it The flow of $Z_h$.}
4332: The flow of $Z_h$ is given by the first of \equ(5.4z) with $z_h$
4333: independent of $\s_k,\m_k$, $k\ge h$. By Theorem 3.1
4334: we have that $|z_h|\le c|\l|^2$, uniformly in $h$. Again, as for $\l_h$ and
4335: $\n_h$, we can formally study this equation up to $h=-\io$.
4336: We define $\g^{-\h_z}
4337: \defin\lim_{h\to-\io} 1+z_h$, so that
4338: %
4339: $$\eqalign{&
4340: \log_\g Z_h=\sum_{k\ge h+1}\log_\g (1+z_k)=\h_z(h-1)+\sum_{k\ge h+1}
4341: r_\z^k\virg
4342: r^k_\z\defin\log_\g\big(1+{z_k-z_{-\io}\over 1+z_{-\io}}
4343: \big)\;.\cr}\Eqa(5.9)$$
4344: %
4345: Using the fact that $z_{k-1}-z_k$ is necessarily proportional
4346: to $\l_{k-1}-\l_k$ or to $\n_{k-1}-\n_k$ and that $\l_{k-1}-\l_k$
4347: is bounded as in \equ(5.7), we easily find:
4348: $|r^k_\z|\le c\sum_{k'\le k}|z_{k'-1}-z_{k'}|\le c'|\l|^2\g^{(\th/2)k}$.
4349: So, if $F^h_\z\defin \sum_{k\ge h+1}
4350: r_\z^k$ and
4351: $F^1_\z=0$, then $F^h_\z=O(\l)$ and $Z_h=\g^{\h_z(h-1)+F^h_\z}$.
4352: Clearly, by definition, $\h_z$ and $F^h_\z$ only depend on $\l_k$, $\n_k$,
4353: $k\le 1$, so they are independent of $t$ and $u$.\\
4354:
4355: \0{\it The flow of $\m_h$.}
4356: The flow of $\m_h$ is given by the last of \equ(5.4z).
4357: One can easily show inductively
4358: that $\m_k(\kk)/\m_h$, $k\ge h$, is independent of $\m_1$, so that
4359: one can think that $\m_{h-1}/\m_h$ is just a function of $\l_h$, $\n_h$.
4360: Then, again we can study the flow equation for $\m_h$ up to $h\to -\io$.
4361: We define $\g^{-\h_\m}\defin \lim_{h\to-\io} 1+(m_h/\m_h-z_h)/(1+z_h)$,
4362: so that, proceeding as for $Z_h$, we see that
4363: %
4364: $$\mu_h=\m_1\g^{\h_\m(h-1)+F^h_\m}\;,\Eqa(mu)$$
4365: %
4366: for a suitable $F^h_\m=O(\l)$.
4367: Of course $\h_\m$ and $F^h_\m$ are independent of $t$ and $u$.\\
4368:
4369: \0{\it The flow of $\s_h$.}
4370: The flow of $\s_h$ can be studied as the one of $\m_h$. If
4371: we define $\g^{-\h_\s}\defin\lim_{h\to-\io}1+(s_h/\s_h-z_h)/(1+z_h)$, we find
4372: that
4373: %
4374: $$\s_h=\s_1\g^{\h_\s(h-1)+F^h_\s}\;,\Eqa(sigma)$$
4375: %
4376: for a suitable $F^h_\s=O(\l)$.
4377: Again, $\h_\s$ and $F^h_\s$ are independent of $t,u$.\\
4378:
4379: We are left with proving that $\h_\s-\h_\m\not=0$. It is sufficient to note
4380: that, by direct computation of the lowest order terms,
4381: for some $\th>0$, \equ(5.4z) can
4382: be written as:
4383: %
4384: $$\eqalign{&
4385: z_h=b_1 \l_h^2+O(|\l|^2\g^{\th h})+O(|\l|^3)\virg b_1>0\cr
4386: &{s_h/ \s_h}=-b_2\l_h+O(|\l|\g^{\th h})+O(|\l|^2)\virg b_2>0\cr
4387: &{m_h/ \m_h}=b_2\l_h+O(|\l|\g^{\th h})+O(|\l|^2)\virg b_2>0\;,\cr}
4388: \Eqa(5.5z)$$
4389: %
4390: where $b_1,b_2$ are constants independent of $\l$ and $h$.
4391: Using \equ(5.5z) and the definitions of $\h_\m$ and $\h_\s$ we
4392: find: $\h_\s-\h_\m=(2b_2/\log\g)\l+O(\l^2)$.\qed\\
4393:
4394: \appendix(pi, Proof of Lemma 5.3)
4395:
4396: Proceeding as in
4397: \sec(5) and Appendix \secc(a5), we first solve the equations for
4398: $Z_h$ and $\widehat m^{(2)}_h$ parametrically in
4399: $\underline\p=\{\p_h\}_{h\le h^*_1}$.
4400: If $|\p_h|\le c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)
4401: (h-h^*_1)}$, the first two assumptions of \equ(lem5.2) easily follow.
4402: Now we will construct a sequence $\underline\p$ such that
4403: $|\p_h|\le c|\l|\g^{(\th/2)
4404: (h-h^*_1)}$ and satisfying the
4405: flow equation $\p_{h-1}=\g^h\p_h+\b^h_\p(\p_h,\ldots,
4406: \p_{h^*_1})$.\\
4407:
4408: \asub(pi1) {\it Tree expansion for {$\b^h_\p$}.}
4409: $\b^h_\p$ can be expressed
4410: as sum over tree diagrams, similar to those used in Appendix
4411: \secc(4a). The main difference
4412: is that they
4413: have vertices on scales $k$ between $h$ and $+2$. The vertices on scales
4414: $h_v\ge h^*_1+1$ are associated to the truncated expectations \equ(3.28a);
4415: the vertices on scale $h_v=h^*_1$
4416: are associated to truncated expectations w.r.t. the propagators
4417: $g^{(1,h^*_1)}_{\o_1,\o_2}$; the vertices on scale $h_v<h^*_1$
4418: are associated to truncated expectations w.r.t. the propagators
4419: $g^{(2,h_v+1)}_{\o_1,\o_2}$. Moreover the end--points
4420: on scale $\ge h^*_1+1$ are associated to the couplings $\l_h$ or $\n_h$,
4421: as in Appendix \secc(4a);
4422: the end--points on scales $h\le h^*_1$ are necessarily associated to the
4423: couplings $\p_h$.\\
4424:
4425: \asub(pi2) {\it Bounds on {$\b^h_\p$}.}
4426: The non vanishing trees contributing to $\b^h_\p$ must have at least
4427: one vertex on scale $\ge h^*_1$: in fact the diagrams depending only on
4428: the vertices of type $\p$ are vanishing (they are chains,
4429: so they are vanishing, because of the compact support property
4430: of the propagator). This means that, by the short
4431: memory property, see the Remark at the end of Appendix \secc(4a):
4432: $|\b^h_\p|\le c|\l|\g^{\th(h-h^*_1)}$.\\
4433:
4434: \asub(pi3) {\it Fixing the counterterm.}
4435: We now proceed as in Appendix \secc(a5)
4436: but the analysis here is easier, because no $\l$
4437: end--points can appear and the bound $|\b^h_\p|\le c|\l|\g^{\th(h-h^*_1)}$
4438: holds.
4439: As in Appendix \secc(a5), we can formally consider the flow equation
4440: up to $h=-\io$, even if $h^*_2$ is a finite integer. This
4441: is because the beta function is independent of
4442: $\widehat m^{(2)}_k$, $k\le h^*_1$
4443: and admits bounds uniform in $h$. If we want to fix
4444: the counterterm $\p_{h^*_1}$
4445: in such a way that $\p_{-\io}=0$, we must have, for any $h\le h^*_1$:
4446: %
4447: $$\p_h=-\sum_{k\le h}\g^{k-h-1}\b^k_\p(\p_k,\ldots,\p_{h^*_1})\;.\Eqa(must)$$
4448: %
4449: Let $\tilde{\MMM}$ be the space of sequences $\underline\p=
4450: \{\p_{-\io},\ldots,\p_{h^*_1}\}$
4451: such that $|\p_h|\le c |\l| \g^{-(\th/2) (h-h^*_1)}$.
4452: We look for a fixed point
4453: of the operator $\tilde{\bT}:\tilde{\MMM}
4454: \to\tilde{\MMM}$ defined as:
4455: %
4456: $$(\tilde\bT\underline\p)_h=-\sum_{k\le h}\g^{k-h-1}
4457: \b^k_\p(\p_k;\ldots;\p_{h^*_1})\,.\Eqa(5.8c0)$$
4458:
4459: Using that $\b^k_\p$ is independent from $\hat m_k^{(2)}$
4460: and
4461: the bound on the beta function, choosing $\l$ small enough and proceeding
4462: as in the proof of Theorem 4.1, we find that $\tilde\bT$ is a contraction
4463: on $\tilde{\MMM}$, so that we find a unique fixed point, and the first
4464: of \equ(4.58b) follows.\\
4465:
4466: \asub(pi4) {\it The flows of $Z_h$ and $\widehat m^{(2)}_h$.}
4467: Once that $\p_{h^*_1}$ is fixed via the iterative procedure of \sec(pi3),
4468: we can study in more detail the flows of $Z_h$ and $\widehat m^{(2)}_h$
4469: given by \equ(flow). Note that $z_h$ and $s_h$ can be again expressed as
4470: a sum over tree diagrams and, as discussed for $\b^h_\p$, see \sec(pi2),
4471: any non vanishing diagram must have at least one vertex on scale $\ge h^*_1$.
4472: Then, by the short memory property, see \sec(short), we have
4473: $z_h=O(\l^2\g^{\th(h-h^*_1)})$ and $s_h=O(\l\widehat m^{(2)}_h\g^{\th
4474: (h-h^*_1)})$ and, repeating the proof of Lemma 4.1,
4475: we find the second and third of \equ(4.58b).\\
4476:
4477: \asub(pi6){\it The Lipshitz property {\equ(ph)}.}
4478: Clearly,
4479: $\p_{h^*_1}^*(\l,\s_1,\m_1)-\p^*_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1',\m_1')$ can be expressed
4480: via a tree expansion similar to the one discussed above;
4481: in the trees with non vanishing value, there
4482: is either a difference of propagators at scale $h\ge h^*_1$
4483: with couplings $\s_h,\m_h$ and $\s'_h,\m'_h$, giving
4484: in the dimensional bounds
4485: an extra factor
4486: $O(|\s_h-\s_h'| \g^{-h})$ or $O(|\m_h-\m_h'| \g^{-h})$; or a
4487: difference of propagators at scale $h\le h^*_1$
4488: (computed by definition at $\widehat m^{(2)}_h=0$)
4489: with the ``corrections'' $a^\o_h,c_h$ associated to $\s_1,\m_1$ or
4490: $\s'_1,\m'_1$, giving
4491: in the dimensional bounds
4492: an extra factor
4493: $O(|\s_1-\s_1'|)$ or $O(|\m_1-\m_1'|)$. Then,
4494: %
4495: $$\eqalign{&\Big|\p_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1,\m_1)-\p_{h^*_1}(\l,\s_1',\m_1')\Big|
4496: \le c|\l|\sum_{k\le h^*_1}\g^{k-h^*_1-1}\cdot\cr
4497: &\qquad\cdot \Big[ \sum_{h\ge h^*_1}
4498: \left({|\s_h-\s_h'|\over \g^h}+{|\m_h-\m_h'|\over \g^h}\right)+
4499: \sum_{k\le h\le h^*_1}\big(|\s_1-\s_1'|+|\m_1-\m_1'|\big)\Big]\;,\cr}
4500: \Eqa(last)$$
4501: %
4502: from which, using \equ(mu) and \equ(sigma), we easily get \equ(ph).
4503:
4504: \*
4505: \appendix(a7, Proof of {\equ(a.5)})
4506:
4507: We have, by definition
4508: $\Pf G=(2^k k!)^{-1}\sum_{\pp}(-1)^\pp G_{p(1)p(2)}\cdots
4509: G_{p(2k-1)p(2k)}$,
4510: where $\pp=(p(1),\ldots$ $\ldots,p(|J|))$
4511: is a permutation of the indeces $f\in J$ (we suppose $|J|=2k$)
4512: and $(-1)^\pp$ its sign.
4513:
4514: If we apply $\SS_1=1-\PP_0$ to $\Pf G$ and we call
4515: $G^0_{f,f'}\defin \PP_0G_{f,f'}$, we find that $\SS_1\Pf G$
4516: is equal to
4517: %
4518: $$\eqalign{&{1\over 2^k k!}\sum_{\pp}(-1)^\pp \Big[G_{p(1)p(2)}
4519: \cdots
4520: G_{p(2k-1)p(2k)}-G^0_{p(1)p(2)}\cdots
4521: G^0_{p(2k-1)p(2k)}\Big]={1\over 2^k k!}\sum_{\pp}(-1)^\pp\sum_{j=1}^k\cdot\cr
4522: &\cdot\Big(G^0_{p(1)p(2)}\cdots G^0_{
4523: p(2j-3)p(2j-2)}\Big)\SS_1 G_{p(2j-1)p(2j)} \Big(G_{p(2j+1)p(2j+2)}\cdots
4524: G_{p(2k-1)p(2k)}\Big)\;,\cr}\Eqa(a7.2)$$
4525: %
4526: where in the last sum the meaningless factors must be put equal to 1.
4527: We rewrite the two sums over $\pp$ and $j$ in the following way:
4528: %
4529: $$\sum_\pp\sum_{j=1}^k=\sum_{j=1}^k\sum_{f_1,f_2\in J\atop f_1\not=
4530: f_2}
4531: \sum_{J_1,J_2}^*\sum_{\pp}^{**}\;,\Eqa(a7.3)$$
4532: %
4533: where: the $*$ on the second sum means that the sets $J_1$ and $J_2$ are s.t.
4534: $(f_1,f_2,J_1,J_2)$ is a partition of $J$; the $**$ on the second
4535: sum means that $p(1),\ldots,p(2j-2)$ belong to $J_1$, $(p(2j-1),p(2j))=
4536: (f_1,f_2)$ and $p(2j+1),\ldots,p(2k)$ belong to $J_2$.
4537: Using \equ(a7.3) we can rewrite \equ(a7.2) as
4538: %
4539: $$\eqalign{&
4540: \SS_1\Pf G={1\over 2^k k!}\sum_{j=1}^k\sum_{f_1,f_2\in J\atop f_1\not=
4541: f_2}(-1)^\p\SS_1 G_{f_1,f_2}\sum_{J_1,J_2}^{*}\cdot\cr
4542: &\qquad\cdot\sum_{\pp_1,\pp_2}(-1)^{\pp_1+\pp_2}
4543: \Big(G^0_{p_1(1)p_1(2)}\cdots G^0_{
4544: p_1(2k_1-1)p(2k_1)}\Big)\Big(G_{p_2(1)p_2(2)}\cdots
4545: G_{p_2(2k_2-1)p(2k_2)}\Big)\;,\cr}\Eqa(a7.4)$$
4546: %
4547: where: $(-1)^\p$ is the sign of the permutation leading
4548: from the ordering $J$ to the ordering $(f_1,f_2,$ $J_1,J_2)$;
4549: $\pp_i$, $i=1,2$ is a permutation of the labels in $J_i$ (we suppose $|J_i|=
4550: 2k_i$) and $(-1)^{\pp_i}$
4551: is its sign. It is clear that \equ(a7.4) is equivalent to \equ(a.5).\\
4552:
4553: {\bf Acknowledgments. } AG thanks Prof. J. L. Lebowitz
4554: for his invitation at Rutgers University, where part of this work was done;
4555: and acknowledges the NSF Grant DMR
4556: 01--279--26, which partially supported his work. VM thanks
4557: Prof. T. Spencer for his nice invitation
4558: at the Institute for Advanced Studies, in Princeton,
4559: where part of this work was done. We both thank Prof. G. Gallavotti
4560: for many important remarks and suggestions.
4561:
4562: \baselineskip=12pt
4563: \vskip1cm
4564:
4565: \centerline{\titolo References}
4566: \*
4567: \halign{\hbox to 1.2truecm {[#]\hss} &%
4568: \vtop{\advance\hsize by-1.25truecm\0#}\cr
4569: %
4570: AT& {J. Ashkin, E.Teller: Statistics of Two-Dimensional
4571: Lattices with Four Components.
4572: Phys. Rev. {\bf 64}, 178-184 (1943). }\cr
4573: %
4574: B& {R.J. Baxter:
4575: Eight-Vertex Model in Lattice Statistics.
4576: {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 26}, 832--833 (1971). }\cr
4577: %
4578: Ba&{R. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics,
4579: Academic Press (1982)}\cr
4580: %
4581: BG1& {G. Benfatto, G. Gallavotti:
4582: Perturbation Theory of the Fermi Surface in Quantum Liquid. A General
4583: Quasiparticle Formalism and One-Dimensional Systems.
4584: {\it J. Stat. Phys.} {\bf 59}, 541--664 (1990). }\cr
4585: %
4586: BG& {G. Benfatto, G. Gallavotti:
4587: Renormalization group. Physics notes 1, Princeton University
4588: Press (1995). }\cr
4589: %
4590: BGPS& {G. Benfatto, G. Gallavotti, A. Procacci, B. Scoppola:
4591: Beta function and Schwinger functions for a Many Fermions System
4592: in One Dimension. {\it Comm. Math. Phys.} {\bf 160}, 93--171 (1994).}\cr
4593: %
4594: BM& {G. Benfatto, V.Mastropietro.
4595: Renormalization group, hidden symmetries
4596: and approximate Ward identities in the $XYZ$ model.
4597: {\it Rev. Math. Phys.} 13 (2001), no. 11, 1323--143;
4598: and {\it Comm. Math. Phys.} 231, 97-134 (2002)}\cr
4599: %
4600: BM1& {F. Bonetto, V. Mastropietro: Beta function and Anomaly
4601: of the Fermi Surface for a d=1 System of interacting Fermions in a
4602: Periodic Potential. {\it Comm. Math. Phys.} {\bf 172}, 57--93 (1995).}\cr
4603: %
4604: Bad& { M. Badehdah et al, Physica B, 291, 394 (2000)}\cr
4605: %
4606: Bez& { C.G.Bezerra, A.M. Mariz. The anisotropic Ashkin-Teller model:
4607: a renormalization Group study. Cond-mat010280, to appear on
4608: {\it Physica A}}\cr
4609: %
4610: Bar& { N.C. Bartelt, T.L. Einstein et al.:
4611: {\it Phys. Rev. B} 40, 10759 (1989)}\cr
4612: %
4613: Be& { S. Bekhechi et al
4614: Physica A, 264, 503 (1999)}\cr
4615: %
4616: BeM1& {G. Benfatto, V. Mastropietro: Ward identities and Dyson equations
4617: in interacting Fermi systems. To appear on {\it J. Stat. Phys.}}\cr
4618: %
4619: DR& {E. Domany, E.K. Riedel:
4620: {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 40, 562 (1978)}\cr
4621: %
4622: GM& {G. Gentile, V. Mastropietro:
4623: Renormalization group for one-dimensional fermions.
4624: A review on mathematical results. {\it Phys. Rep.} 352 (2001), no. 4-6,
4625: 273--43}\cr
4626: %
4627: GS& {G. Gentile, B. Scoppola: Renormalization Group and
4628: the ultraviolet problem in the Luttinger model. {\it Comm. Math. Phys.}
4629: {\bf 154}, 153--179 (1993).}\cr
4630: %
4631: K&{L.P. Kadanoff,
4632: Connections between the Critical Behavior of the Planar Model and That of the
4633: Eight-Vertex Model. {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 39, 903-905 (1977)}\cr
4634: %
4635: KW&{L.P. Kadanoff and F.J. Wegner, {\it Phys. Rev. B} 4, 3989--3993 (1971)}\cr
4636: %
4637: Ka&{P.W.Kasteleyn, Dimer Statistics and phase transitions, {\it J. Math.Phys.}
4638: 4, 287 (1963)}\cr
4639: %
4640: F&{C. Fan, On critical properties of the Ashkin-Teller model,
4641: {\it Phis. Lett.}, 6, 136-136 (1972)}\cr
4642: %
4643: H&{C.Hurst, New approach to the Ising problem,
4644: {\it J.Math. Phys.} 7,2, 305-310 (1966)}\cr
4645: %
4646: ID&{ C. Itzykson, J. Drouffe, "Statistical field theory: 1," Cambridge Univ.
4647: Press, 1989.}\cr
4648: %
4649: Le& {A. Lesniewski:
4650: Effective action for the Yukawa 2 quantum field Theory.
4651: {\it Comm. Math. Phys.} {\bf 108}, 437-467 (1987). }\cr
4652: %
4653: Li& {H. Lieb, Exact solution of the problem of entropy of two-dimensional
4654: ice,
4655: {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 18, 692-694, (1967)}\cr
4656: %
4657: LP&{A.Luther, I.Peschel. Calculations
4658: of critical exponents in two dimension from quantum
4659: field theory in one dimension.
4660: {\it Phys. Rev. B} 12, 3908-3917 (1975)}\cr
4661: %
4662: M1&{V. Mastropietro:
4663: Ising
4664: models with four spin interaction at criticality, {\it Comm. Math. Phys}
4665: {\bf 244}, 595--642 (2004)}\cr
4666: %
4667: ML&{D. Mattis, E. Lieb:
4668: Exact solution of a many fermion system and its associated boson field.
4669: {\it J. Math. Phys.} {\bf 6}, 304--312 (1965). }\cr
4670: %
4671: MW&{B. McCoy, T. Wu, The two-dimensional Ising model,
4672: Harvard Univ. Press, 1973.}\cr
4673: %
4674: MPW&{E.Montroll, R.Potts, J.Ward. Correlation
4675: and spontaneous magnetization of the two dimensional
4676: Ising model. {\it J. Math. Phys.} 4,308 (1963)}\cr
4677: %
4678: N& {M.P.M. den Nijs: Derivation of extended scaling relations between
4679: critical exponents in two dimensional models from the one dimensional
4680: Luttinger model, {\it Phys. Rev. B}, 23, 11 (1981)
4681: 6111-6125}\cr
4682: %
4683: O& {L.Onsager: Critical statistics. A two dimensional
4684: model with an order-disorder transition.
4685: {\it Phys. Rev.}, 56, 117-149 (1944)}\cr
4686: %
4687: PB& {A.M.M. Pruisken, A.C. Brown.
4688: Universality fot the critical lines of the eight vertex,
4689: Ashkin-Teller and Gaussian models, {\it Phys. Rev.} B, 23, 3 (1981)
4690: 1459-1468}\cr
4691: %
4692: PS& {H. Pinson, T.Spencer: Universality in 2D critical Ising model.
4693: To appear in Comm. Math. Phys.}\cr
4694: %
4695: S& { S. Samuel:
4696: The use of anticommuting variable integrals in statistical mechanics'',
4697: {\it J. Math. Phys.} 21 (1980) 2806}\cr
4698: %
4699: Su& {S.B. Sutherland:
4700: Two-Dimensional Hydrogen Bonded Crystals.
4701: {\it J. Math. Phys.} {\bf 11}, 3183--3186 (1970). }\cr
4702: %
4703: Spe& {T. Spencer: A mathematical approach to universality in
4704: two dimensions. {\it Physica A} {\bf 279}, 250-259 (2000). }\cr
4705: %
4706: SML& { T. Schultz, D. Mattis, E. Lieb: Two-dimensional
4707: Ising model as a soluble problem
4708: of many Fermions. {\it Rev. Mod. Phys.} 36 (1964) 856.}\cr
4709: %
4710: W& {F.J. Wegner: Duality relation between the Ashkin-Teller
4711: and the eight-vertex model, {J. Phys. C}, 5,L131--L132
4712: (1972)}\cr
4713: %
4714: WL& {F.Y. Wu, K.Y. Lin: Two phase transitions in
4715: the Ashkinh-Teller model. {J. Phys. C}, {\bf 5}, L181--L184
4716: (1974).}\cr
4717: %
4718: Wu& {F.W.Wu: The Ising model with four spin interaction.
4719: {\it Phys. Rev.} B 4, 2312-2314 (1971).}\cr}
4720:
4721: \bye
4722:
4723: