1: \documentclass[twocolumn,prl,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
4: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
5: \usepackage{latexsym}
6: \usepackage{amstext}
7: \usepackage{amsxtra}
8: \newcommand{\bs}{\boldsymbol}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{Realization of a magnetically guided atomic beam in the collisional regime}
12: \author{T. Lahaye, J. M. Vogels, K. G\"unter, Z. Wang, J. Dalibard,
13: and D. Gu\'ery-Odelin}
14: \affiliation{Laboratoire Kastler Brossel$^{*}$, 24 rue Lhomond,
15: F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France}
16: \date{\today}
17:
18: \begin{abstract}
19: We describe the realization of a magnetically guided beam of cold
20: rubidium atoms, with a flux of $7\times 10^9$ atoms/s, a
21: temperature of 400~$\mu$K and a mean velocity of 1~m/s. The rate
22: of elastic collisions within the beam is sufficient to ensure
23: thermalization. We show that the evaporation induced by a
24: radio-frequency wave leads to appreciable cooling and increase in
25: phase space density. We discuss the perspectives to reach the
26: quantum degenerate regime using evaporative cooling.
27: \end{abstract}
28:
29: \pacs{32.80.Pj,03.75.Pp}
30:
31: \maketitle
32:
33: The recent realization of slow atom sources using laser cooling
34: methods has constituted a major advance for many applications in
35: metrology and matter wave interferometry \cite{Interferometry}.
36: The possibility to complement laser cooling by forced evaporation
37: has led to even colder and denser atomic gases, and has culminated
38: with the observation of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC)
39: \cite{BEC} and pulsed ``atom lasers" extracted from the condensate
40: \cite{atomlaser}. These advances in atom cooling allow in
41: principle to build a continuous and coherent source of matter
42: waves which would be the equivalent of a monochromatic laser. It
43: should lead to unprecedented performances in terms of focalization
44: or collimation, and provide a unique tool for future developments
45: in atom manipulation and precision measurements.
46:
47: Two paths have been considered to reach the goal of a continuous
48: and coherent source of atoms (``cw atom laser''). The first
49: possibility \cite{ScienceK02} consists in using the ``standard"
50: condensation procedure to periodically replenish with new
51: condensates a gas sample held in an optical dipole trap. The
52: second possibility, that we are currently investigating, consists
53: in transposing the evaporative cooling method to a guided atomic
54: beam \cite{Mandonnet00}. As the beam progresses in a magnetic
55: guide \cite{mguide,cren}, the most energetic atoms are removed and
56: the remaining particles thermalize at a lower temperature and a
57: larger density, so that the beam can eventually reach the
58: degenerate regime. This method should in principle allow for a
59: large flux, since it consists in a parallel implementation of the
60: various steps to BEC. Instead of performing sequentially the
61: optical cooling and the evaporation sequences at the same place,
62: these occur simultaneously in different locations along the guided
63: beam. This gain in flux can constitute a major advantage for
64: applications.
65:
66: To implement this method, the initial atomic beam needs to be
67: deeply in the collisional regime. The number $N_{\rm col }$ of
68: elastic collisions undergone by each atom as it travels along the
69: guide must be large compared to unity, to provide the
70: thermalization required for evaporative cooling. Such beams were
71: so far not available. In this Letter we report on the realization
72: of a rubidium atomic beam in the collisional regime, with $N_{\rm
73: col }\sim 8$. It propagates in a 4.5~m long magnetic guide with a
74: mean velocity of 1~m/s. We also demonstrate a first step of
75: evaporative cooling, and show that the measured increase in phase
76: space density is in good agreement with expectations. Finally we
77: discuss possible improvements of the current setup which should
78: allow to reach the degenerate regime.
79:
80: Fig. 1 shows the layout of our experimental setup, composed of
81: three main parts lying in the $xy$ horizontal plane: the Zeeman
82: slower along the $y$ axis, the magneto-optical trap (MOT) and the
83: magnetic guide along the $x$ axis. The Zeeman slower
84: \cite{zeemanslower} consists in a 1.1~m long tapered solenoid in
85: which atoms emerging from an oven are decelerated by resonant
86: radiation pressure. It delivers a flux of $2\times
87: 10^{11}$s$^{-1}$ $^{87}$Rb atoms, with a velocity of 20~m/s.
88:
89: The slow atoms are captured in a 3-dimensional MOT formed by 3
90: pairs of counter-propagating beams. One pair of beam is aligned
91: with the vertical ($z$) axis, and the two other pairs are along
92: the directions $\bs e_x \pm \bs e_y$. Each trapping beam has a
93: circular profile, with a $1/e^2$ radius of 17~mm and a power of
94: 15~mW. It is spatially filtered using a single mode optical fiber
95: and intensity stabilized to better than $1\%$. The MOT magnetic
96: gradients are $b'_x=0.6$~G/cm, $b'_y=5.4$~G/cm and $b'_z=-6$~G/cm.
97: The MOT is thus cigar-shaped, and its long axis coincides with the
98: magnetic guide direction. The capture rate of the MOT is $2\times
99: 10^{10}$ atoms/s.
100:
101: \begin{figure}[t]
102: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=80mm]{fig1.eps}} \caption{Top
103: view of the setup. The atoms emerging from the oven are slowed
104: down by radiation pressure, captured in the magneto-optical trap,
105: and launched into the magnetic guide.} \label{fig1}
106: \end{figure}
107:
108: The entrance of the magnetic guide is located 4.6 cm away from the
109: MOT center. The guide, which is placed inside the vacuum system,
110: consists of four parallel, water-cooled copper tubes, in which we
111: run a current $I$ up to $400$~A. Unless otherwise stated,
112: parameters and results given below correspond to $I=240$~A. The
113: entrance of the guide consists in a ring shaped metal part, that
114: is used for the recombination of the electric and cooling water
115: circuits \cite{cren}. The guide is held in place and shaped by
116: means of ceramic pieces. At the entrance of the guide the distance
117: between the centers of adjacent tubes is 14~mm, resulting in a
118: gradient of $b'_0=200$~G/cm. The first 40 cm of the magnetic guide
119: form a tapered section, obtained by reducing progressively the
120: distance between the tubes to 8~mm. This results in an increase of
121: the trapping gradient to $b'_1=$600~G/cm. The guide provides a
122: confinement of the atoms with a linear potential $\mu b'
123: (y^2+z^2)^{1/2}$, where $\mu$ is the magnetic moment of the atoms
124: \cite{Majorana}.
125:
126: To optimize the transfer of the atoms from the MOT into the
127: magnetic guide, we operate in pulsed mode \cite{vogels}, with a
128: duration of $t_{\rm seq}=283$~ms per sequence. In the first 140~ms
129: we capture $3\times10^{9}$ atoms in the MOT. All beams are set at
130: the same frequency $\omega_L$, corresponding to a detuning
131: $\Delta=\omega_L-\omega_A=-3~\Gamma$, where $\Gamma/2\pi=5.9$~MHz
132: is the natural width of the $5P_{3/2}$ excited state and
133: $\omega_A$ the resonance frequency of a rubidium atom. The trapped
134: cloud is cigar-shaped, with a $1/\sqrt{e}$ radius of 1.4~mm and a
135: length of 35~mm.
136:
137: The MOT magnetic field is then turned off and a 3~ms launching
138: phase occurs. The detunings of the beams in the $xy$ plane are
139: shifted by $\pm k_L v/\sqrt{2}$ with respect to the detuning
140: $\Delta$ of the vertical beams, where $k_L=\omega_L/c$. This forms
141: a moving molasses which sets the atoms in motion at velocity
142: $v=1.1$~m/s in the direction of the magnetic guide \cite{launch}.
143: The detuning $\Delta$ during the launching phase is ramped to
144: $-10~\Gamma$, which reduces the temperature of the gas to
145: $T_{0}=40 \,\mu$K in the frame moving at velocity $v$.
146:
147: The final phase of the sequence consists in (i) optical pumping of
148: the moving atoms into the weak-field-seeking ground state
149: $|F=1,m_F=-1\rangle$, and (ii) magnetic pre-guiding of the atom
150: cloud. The pre-guiding is provided by a two-dimensional ($yz$)
151: quadrupole magnetic field $b'_2=65\,$G/cm generated by four
152: elongated coils (not shown in Fig. \ref{fig1}), located around the
153: MOT chamber. It prevents the atom cloud from expanding during its
154: flight towards the entrance of the magnetic guide. During the
155: pre-guiding phase we also apply at the MOT location a $56$~G bias
156: field along the $x$ axis to match the oscillation frequency in the
157: pre-guide with the cloud parameters. The overall efficiency of the
158: pumping+pre-guiding process is $60\%$ so that each packet loaded
159: into the guide contains $N_{\rm load}\sim 2\times 10^9$ atoms. We
160: measure the atom number and mean velocity by monitoring the
161: absorption of a resonant probe beam at the exit of the 4.5~m
162: magnetic guide. Losses due to collisions with residual gas are
163: negligible.
164:
165: We have estimated numerically the influence of the rapid variation
166: of the magnetic gradient from $b'_2$ to $b'_0$ at the entrance in
167: the main guide by analyzing single particle trajectories. The
168: cloud is compressed to a final transverse radius $r_0=400\, \mu$m
169: and an energy per atom of $k_B\times 500\,\mu$K in the moving
170: frame. In the subsequent propagation into the tapered section of
171: the guide, the gradient increases to $b'_1$ and the bias field
172: decreases to 0 \cite{Majorana}. It leads to a further,
173: quasi-adiabatic, compression of the cloud and the energy per atom
174: raises to $k_B\times 1400$~$\mu$K. Assuming that thermalization
175: occurs via elastic collisions, this corresponds to a temperature
176: of $T_1=400\,\mu$K shared as $3k_BT_1/2$ for the kinetic energy in
177: the moving frame and $2k_BT_1$ for the potential energy of the
178: transverse linear confinement. This estimate for $T_1$ is in good
179: agreement with our measurement as we shall see below.
180:
181: \begin{figure}[t]
182: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=80mm]{fig2.eps}}
183: \caption{a) Absorption signal measured at the end of the guide for 1, 2, 4 and 24 launches. b) Number of atoms
184: (area of the absorption signal) as a function of the number of
185: launches. The time origin corresponds to the launching of the
186: first packet.} \label{fig2}
187: \end{figure}
188:
189: The next capture+launch sequence starts 140~ms after the beginning
190: of the pre-guiding phase, so that the atom packet has moved $\sim
191: 14$~cm away from the MOT center and is now well inside the main
192: guide. A remarkable feature of this protocol is that the light
193: scattered from the MOT during the preparation of a packet does not
194: produce detectable losses on the previous packet. Fig.~\ref{fig2}
195: shows the signal detected for different numbers of launches. One
196: can check that the area of the signal scales linearly with this
197: number.
198:
199: To generate a continuous beam we repeat the sequence with a
200: cycling rate of $t_{\rm seq}^{-1}=3.5$~Hz. For $T=400\,\mu$K the
201: packets overlap after a propagation of 60~cm. The flux is
202: $\phi=N_{\rm load} t_{\rm seq}^{-1}= 7\,(\pm 2) \times 10^{9}$
203: atoms/s.
204:
205: We now turn to the characterization of the beam and the
206: demonstration that the collisional regime has indeed been reached.
207: The main tools for this study are radio-frequency (r.f.) antennas
208: located along the guide, which generate an oscillating magnetic
209: field at frequency $\nu$. An antenna flips the magnetic moment of
210: the atoms passing at a distance $r_{\rm e}=h\nu/(\mu b')$ from the
211: $x$ axis (r.f. evaporation \cite{rfevaporation}). For an atom with
212: transverse energy $E$ and angular momentum $L$ along the $x$ axis,
213: the evaporation criterion $r=r_{\rm e}$ is fulfilled at some
214: points of the atom trajectory if
215: \begin{equation}
216: E\; \geq \; \frac{L^2}{2mr_{\rm e}^2}+\mu b' r_{\rm e}\ ,
217: \label{evapcond}
218: \end{equation}
219: where $m$ is the atom mass. The range of an antenna is $\sim
220: 20$~cm, so that it constitutes a local probe of the $(E,L)$
221: distribution at the scale of the whole guide.
222:
223: \begin{figure}[t]
224: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=85mm]{fig3.eps}} \caption{
225: Experiment with two antennas separated by a distance $d$:
226: remaining fraction after the second antenna, with the first
227: antenna set at a fixed value $\nu_1$. a) Antenna 1 off, flux
228: $\phi$, $b'_1=600$~G/cm and $d=3$~m. Using (\ref{fitfunction}) as
229: a fit function (solid line), we find $T_1=384\, (\pm\, 13)\,\mu$K.
230: b) $\nu_1=24$~MHz with the same conditions as for a). The fit
231: gives $T_2=281 \,(\pm8)\;\mu$K indicating a significant cooling.
232: c) $\nu_1=8$~MHz and reduced number of collisions between
233: antennas: flux $\phi/3$, $b'_1=400$~G/cm, $d=0.85$~m. The dotted
234: line is the prediction for the collisionless regime. The solid
235: line is the result expected if thermalization had occurred.}
236: \label{fig3}
237: \end{figure}
238:
239: The temperature in the guide is deduced from the variation of the
240: fraction $f(\nu)$ of remaining atoms after the antenna. For
241: $r_{\rm e}$ small compared to the thermal size $r_{\rm
242: th}=2k_BT/(\mu b')$, only a very small fraction of atoms has a
243: sufficiently low angular momentum to be evaporated, as a
244: consequence $f(\nu\rightarrow 0)=1$. In the opposite limit $r_{\rm
245: e}\gg r_{\rm th}$, the evaporated fraction is negligible because
246: of the exponential decay of the energy distribution, thus
247: $f(\infty)=1$. We have used a Monte-Carlo determination of
248: $f(\nu)$, that is accurately fitted by the analytical form:
249: \begin{equation}
250: f(\nu)=1-A\,\eta^{B}\,e^{-C\eta} \quad \mbox{ with }\quad
251: \eta=h\nu/(k_BT)
252: \label{fitfunction}
253: \end{equation}
254: with $A=1.65$, $B=1.13$ and $C=0.92$. A minimum value $f^*\simeq
255: 0.33$ is expected for $ h\nu^*/(k_BT) \simeq 1.25\,$.
256:
257: A typical measurement of $f(\nu)$ is given in Fig. 3a, together
258: with a fit using (\ref{fitfunction}). The transverse temperature
259: corresponding to the best fit is $384\, (\pm\, 13)\,\mu$K, in good
260: agreement with the expected temperature given above. For the fit
261: we allow the coefficient $A$ in (\ref{fitfunction}) to vary, to
262: account for a possible uncomplete efficiency of the evaporation
263: process. For the data of Fig. \ref{fig3}a, the efficiency is
264: better than 90\%.
265:
266: The thermal equilibrium assumption used above is valid only if a
267: sufficient number of elastic collisions (at least a few per atom)
268: has occurred in the guide. The good agreement between the shapes
269: of the experimental and predicted functions $f(\nu)$ is a first
270: indication that the collisional regime has indeed been reached. To
271: investigate this point further, we now turn to a two-antenna
272: experiment (Fig.~\ref{fig3}b). These antennas are located
273: respectively $d_1=1$~m and $d_2=4$~m after the entrance of the
274: guide. The frequency $\nu_1$ of the first antenna is fixed at
275: $\nu_1=24$ MHz, which corresponds to $\eta_1\equiv
276: h\nu_1/(k_BT_1)=3$, where $T_1$ is the temperature deduced from
277: the analysis of Fig.~\ref{fig3}a. This antenna evaporates the
278: atoms fulfilling (\ref{evapcond}), thus producing a non thermal
279: ($E,L)$ distribution. We measure the function $f(\nu_2)$ with the
280: second antenna, and check whether a thermal distribution is
281: recovered during the propagation from $d_1$ to $d_2$. The result
282: for $f(\nu_2)$ in Fig.~\ref{fig3}b shows clearly that this is
283: indeed the case. We infer from this set of data a temperature
284: $T_2=281 \,(\pm8)\;\mu$K. The fact that $T_2<T_1$ is a clear
285: demonstration of evaporative cooling of the beam by the first
286: antenna.
287:
288: \begin{figure}[t]
289: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=80mm]{fig4.eps}}
290: \caption{Ratio $T_2/T_1$ between the
291: temperature $T_2$ of the beam when the first antenna is set at
292: $\nu_1$ and the temperature $T_1$ of the beam in absence of
293: evaporation, as a function of the dimensionless parameter
294: $\eta_1=h\nu_1/(k_BT_1)$. The solid line is the theoretical
295: prediction for a linear potential (no adjustable parameter). The
296: open square corresponds to the data of Fig. \ref{fig3}b. The
297: squares (resp. circles) have been obtained with $I=240$~A (resp.
298: $400$~A).}
299: \label{fig4}
300: \end{figure}
301:
302: We have investigated the thermalization process as a function of
303: the evaporation frequency $\nu_1$ (Fig.~\ref{fig4}). For $\eta_1
304: \lesssim 1.25$ the evaporated atoms have less energy than average,
305: leading to heating ($T_2>T_1$). Cooling is observed in the
306: opposite case $\eta_1 \gtrsim 1.25$. The continuous line in
307: Fig.~\ref{fig4} is the theoretical prediction assuming full
308: thermalization between $d_1$ and $d_2$. It is in excellent
309: agreement with the experimental results. The phase space density
310: at the center of the beam scales as $\phi/T^{7/2}$. When we choose
311: $\eta_1=3$ (Fig. \ref{fig3}b), we measure a decrease of the flux
312: by $36\%$ and a decrease of temperature of $27\%$. This
313: corresponds to an \emph{increase} in phase space by a factor
314: $1.92\,(\pm \,0.15)$, to be compared with the expected gain of
315: 1.90. It shows that this transverse evaporation mechanism is
316: indeed well suited for our final goal, i.e. bringing the beam in
317: the degenerate regime.
318:
319: We have also investigated the transition between the collisional
320: and collisionless regimes. For this study we have reduced the
321: collision rate by decreasing the flux to $\phi/3$ and by operating
322: the magnetic guide at a lower current (160~A). The measured
323: temperature is in this case $T_1=230\,(\pm\,6)\;\mu$K. To minimize
324: the thermalization process between the antennas, we have also
325: reduced the distance $d_2-d_1$ to 0.85~m. The result for
326: $f(\nu_2)$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}c for the particular choice
327: $\nu_1=8\,$MHz. The dashed line gives the result expected in the
328: collisionless regime. In this case the second antenna does not
329: induce extra loss when $\nu_2=\nu_1$ since no modification of the
330: $(E,L)$ distribution occurs between the two antennas. The measured
331: $f(\nu_2)$ is in good agreement with this prediction. For
332: comparison we also indicate in Fig.~\ref{fig3}c the expected
333: signal in case of a complete thermalization between the antennas.
334: It clearly does not agree with our data, contrary to the large
335: flux case (Fig.~\ref{fig3}b).
336:
337:
338: To summarize, our guided beam is deeply in the collisional regime
339: when operated at the maximum flux. The collision rate in the
340: linear guide is $\gamma_c=n_0\, \sigma\, \Delta
341: v/\sqrt{\pi}=2\,$s$^{-1}$, where $n_0=2.8\times
342: 10^{10}\,$cm$^{-3}$ is the central density, $\sigma=6.8\times
343: 10^{-12}\,$cm$^2$ is the s-wave elastic cross-section at low
344: temperature for spin polarized $^{87}$Rb atoms and $\Delta
345: v=\sqrt{k_BT/ m}=19\,$cm/s. This corresponds to $N_{\rm col}=8$
346: collisions per atom along the whole guide. For the thermalization
347: experiment of Fig. \ref{fig3}b and taking into account the
348: reduction of flux by the first antenna, we estimate that each atom
349: undergoes 3 collisions between the two antennas. This is known to
350: be the minimum value to ensure thermalization (see e.g.
351: \cite{timecoll}).
352:
353:
354: Finally we briefly discuss the possibility to use this device for
355: producing a coherent continuous atomic wave. The current phase
356: space density at the center of the beam is $2\times 10^{-8}$. To
357: reach quantum degeneracy, we plan to use several antennas with
358: decreasing frequencies. Operating all antennas at the same $\eta$,
359: the cooling distance is minimized for $\eta\sim\,$4. A total of 40
360: antennas (each providing a phase space increase of 1.63) is
361: needed. The expected output flux is $2\times 10^{-4}\phi$ for a
362: cooling distance of $\sim 100\, v/\gamma_c$. To match this
363: distance with the length of our guide, we need to increase the
364: initial collision rate $\gamma_c$ by one order of magnitude. A
365: fraction of this gain can be obtained by slowing down the beam by
366: gravity, using a bent or tilted guide \cite{ldea}. In addition we
367: plan to transpose to our elongated MOT the ``dark spot" technique,
368: which is known to lead to a significant gain in terms of spatial
369: density of the laser cooled atomic source \cite{Darkspot}. A
370: continuous coherent atomic beam will be a very useful tool not
371: only for the interferometric and metrology applications mentioned
372: above, but also for studies of fundamental issues, such as the
373: existence of superfluidity in quasi one-dimensional systems.
374: Another exciting challenge will be the miniaturization of the
375: setup, along the line of what has been achieved recently with
376: ``atom chips'' for the production of standard BEC \cite{chips}.
377:
378: We acknowledge stimulating discussion with the ENS laser cooling
379: group. We thank A. Senger for his participation to the data
380: acquisition. K. G\"unter acknowledges support from the Marie Curie
381: Host Fellowship ``QPAF'' HPMT-CT-2000-00102. J. M. Vogels
382: acknowledges support from the Research Training Network ``Cold
383: Quantum Gases'' HPRN-CT-2000-00125. This work was partially
384: supported by the CNRS, the R\'egion Ile-de-France, the Coll\`{e}ge
385: de France, the Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure, the Bureau National de
386: la M\'etrologie, the University of Paris VI and the D\'el\'egation
387: G\'en\'erale de l'Armement.
388:
389:
390: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
391:
392: \bibitem[*]{byline}
393: Unit\'e de Recherche de l'Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure et de
394: l'Universit\'e Pierre et Marie Curie, associ\'ee au CNRS.
395:
396: \bibitem{Interferometry}
397: P. R. Berman, {\sl Atom interferometry}, (Academic Press, London,
398: 1997).
399:
400: \bibitem{BEC}
401: C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, {\sl Bose-Einstein Condensation in
402: Dilute Gases}, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002); L.
403: P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, {\sl Bose-Einstein condensation},
404: (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003).
405:
406:
407: \bibitem{atomlaser}
408: K. Helmerson, D. Hutchinson and W. Phillips, Physics World {\bf
409: 12}, 31 (1999) and refs. therein.
410:
411: \bibitem{ScienceK02}
412: A. P. Chikkatur {\it et al.}, Science \textbf{296}, 2193 (2002).
413:
414: \bibitem{Mandonnet00}
415: E. Mandonnet {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys J. D \textbf{10}, 9 (2000).
416:
417: \bibitem{mguide}
418: M. Key {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{84}, 1371 (2000); N.
419: H. Dekker {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{84}, 1124 (2000);
420: B. K. Teo and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. A \textbf{63}, 031402 (2001);
421: J. A. Sauer, M. D. Barrett, and M. S. Chapman, Phys. Rev. Lett.
422: \textbf{87}, 270401 (2001).
423:
424: \bibitem{cren}
425: P. Cren {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys J. D \textbf{20}, 107 (2002).
426:
427: \bibitem{zeemanslower}
428: H. J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten, {\sl Laser Cooling and
429: Trapping}, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999).
430:
431:
432: \bibitem{Majorana}
433: Strictly speaking, the magnetic field at the center of the guide
434: does not vanish thanks to the $x$ component of the Earth magnetic
435: field, which prevents Majorana spin flips.
436:
437: \bibitem{vogels}
438: J. M. Vogels {\it et al.}, cond-mat/0404560.
439:
440: \bibitem{launch} A. Clairon, C. Salomon, S. Guellati. and W.D. Phillips,
441: Europhys. Lett., {\bf 16}, 165 (1991).
442:
443: \bibitem{rfevaporation}
444: O. Luiten, M. Reynolds, J. Walraven, Phys. Rev. A \textbf{53}, 381
445: (1996); W. Ketterle and N. van Druten, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.
446: \textbf{37}, 181 (1996).
447:
448: \bibitem{timecoll}
449: C. R. Monroe {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{70}, 414,
450: (1993).
451:
452: \bibitem{ldea}
453: T. Lahaye, P. Cren, C. Roos, D. Gu\'ery-Odelin, Comm. Nonlin. Sci.
454: Num. Sim. {\bf 8}, 315 (2003).
455:
456:
457: \bibitem{Darkspot}
458: W. Ketterle {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{70}, 2253,
459: (1993).
460:
461: \bibitem{chips}
462: W. H\"ansel, P. Hommelhoff, T. W. H\"ansch, and J. Reichel, Nature
463: (London) \textbf{413}, 498 (2001); H. Ott, J. Fort\"agh, G.
464: Schlotterbeck, A. Grossmann, and C. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. Lett.
465: \textbf{87}, 230401 (2001); A. E. Leanhardt {\it et al.}, ibid
466: \textbf{89}, 040401 (2002); S. Schneider {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. A
467: \textbf{67}, 023612 (2003).
468:
469: \end{thebibliography}
470:
471: \end{document}
472: