1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%% written in LaTeX2e using jpsj2.cls <ver.1.2>

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: %

6: \documentclass[twocolumn]{jpsj2}

7: %\documentclass{jpsj2}

8: %\voffset -1.8cm

9: %\hoffset -0.8cm

10: 

11: \def\runtitle{Thermohydrodynamics in Quantum Hall Systems}

12: \def\runauthor{Hiroshi \textsc{Akera} and Hidekatsu \textsc{Suzuura}}

13: 

14: \title{Thermohydrodynamics in Quantum Hall Systems}

15: 

16: \author{Hiroshi \textsc{Akera}\thanks{E-mail address: akera@eng.hokudai.ac.jp} 

17: and Hidekatsu \textsc{Suzuura}\thanks{E-mail address: suzuura@eng.hokudai.ac.jp}}

18: 

19: \inst{Department of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, 

20: Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628}

21: 

22: \recdate{\today}

23: 

24: \abst{

25: A theory of thermohydrodynamics 

26: in two-dimensional electron systems in quantizing magnetic fields 

27: is developed including a nonlinear transport regime. 

28: Spatio-temporal variations of 

29: the electron temperature and the chemical potential in the local equilibrium

30: are described by the equations of conservation 

31: with the number and thermal-energy flux densities.   

32: A model of these flux densities due to hopping and drift processes 

33: is introduced for a random potential varying slowly compared to 

34: both the magnetic length and the phase coherence length. 

35: The flux measured in the standard transport experiment is derived 

36: and is used to define a transport component of the flux density. 

37: The equations of conservation can be written in terms of 

38: the transport component only. 

39: As an illustration, the theory is applied to the Ettingshausen effect, 

40: in which a one-dimensional spatial variation 

41: of the electron temperature is produced perpendicular to the current.  

42: }

43: 

44: \kword{integer quantum Hall effect, Ettingshausen effect, 

45: nonlinear transport, local equilibrium, thermohydrodynamics, theory}

46: 

47: \begin{document}

48: \maketitle

49: 

50: %

51: \def\muec{\mu_{\rm ec}}

52: \def\much{\mu}

53: \def\lvh{l_{\rm vh}}

54: \def\vj{\mib j}

55: \def\vJ{\mib J}

56: \def\vI{\mib I}

57: \def\vb{\mib b}

58: \def\vB{\mib B}

59: \def\vM{\mib M}

60: \def\vE{\mib E}

61: \def\vF{\mib F}

62: \def\vr{\mib r}

63: \def\vn{\mib n}

64: \def\vt{\mib t}

65: \def\vnabla{\mib \nabla}

66: 

67: \def\Lnnxx{L^{11}_{xx}}

68: \def\Lnqxx{L^{12}_{xx}}

69: \def\Lqnxx{L^{21}_{xx}}

70: \def\Lqqxx{L^{22}_{xx}}

71: 

72: \def\Lnnxy{L^{11}_{xy}}

73: \def\Lnqxy{L^{12}_{xy}}

74: \def\Lqnxy{L^{21}_{xy}}

75: \def\Lqqxy{L^{22}_{xy}}

76: 

77: \def\Lnnyx{L^{11}_{yx}}

78: \def\Lnqyx{L^{12}_{yx}}

79: \def\Lqnyx{L^{21}_{yx}}

80: \def\Lqqyx{L^{22}_{yx}}

81: 

82: \def\Lnnyy{L^{11}_{yy}}

83: \def\Lnqyy{L^{12}_{yy}}

84: \def\Lqnyy{L^{21}_{yy}}

85: \def\Lqqyy{L^{22}_{yy}}

86: 

87: \def\K21yx{K^{21}_{yx}}

88: \def\Aqnyx{A^{21}_{yx}}

89: \def\Aqqyy{A^{22}_{yy}}

90: \def\Bqnyy{B^{21}_{yy}}

91: \def\Bqqyy{B^{22}_{yy}}

92: 

93: \def\sxx{\sigma_{xx}}

94: \def\sxy{\sigma_{xy}}

95: \def\syx{\sigma_{yx}}

96: \def\syy{\sigma_{yy}}

97: \def\rxx{\rho_{xx}}

98: \def\rxy{\rho_{xy}}

99: \def\ryx{\rho_{yx}}

100: \def\ryy{\rho_{yy}}

101: \def\kB{k_{\rm B}}

102: \def\Te{T_{\rm e}}

103: \def\TL{T_{\rm L}}

104: \def\PL{P_{\rm L}}

105: \def\oc{\omega_{\rm c}}

106: \def\ve{\varepsilon}

107: \def\Cp{C_{\rm p}}

108: \def\edge{{\rm edge}}

109: \def\bulk{{\rm bulk}}

110: \def\tr{\rm tr}

111: \def\Streda{St$\check{\rm r}$eda}

112: %

113: 

114: %####################################################

115: \section{Introduction} 

116: 

117: Studies on spatial and temporal variations of 

118: thermodynamic and hydrodynamic variables 

119: reveal important properties of the studied 

120: system.~\cite{Groot1962,Scholl2001} 

121: A length scale and a time scale of variations, 

122: which occur in response to an external perturbation 

123: as well as in self-organization, 

124: are fundamental quantities 

125: which are never obtained by 

126: studying the system in uniform steady states. 

127: 

128: Studies in this direction have already been performed by many authors 

129: in two-dimensional electron systems in quantizing magnetic fields, 

130: which exhibit the quantum Hall effect in the region of low temperatures 

131: and small currents.~\cite{Klitzing1980,Kawaji1981}

132: Theoretical\cite{Chklovskii1992} and experimental

133: studies on spatial variations of the electrostatic potential in equilibrium 

134: have revealed a unique spatial pattern consisting of  

135: compressible and incompressible strips, 

136: which is a manifestation of the Landau quantization. 

137: These studies have recently been extended to 

138: nonequilibrium states with the applied current,  

139: and the response of the electrostatic potential to the applied current 

140: has been investigated experimentally\cite{Ahlswede2001} 

141: and theoretically.\cite{Guven2003}

142: However, most of these previous works have been restricted to  

143: quantities related to 

144: the chemical potential and the electrostatic potential.  

145: The electron temperature is known to be the key variable 

146: in the large-current regime where 

147: the breakdown of the quantum Hall 

148: effect~\cite{Ebert1983,Cage1983,Kuchar1984} takes place.

149: The spin density is the order parameter of the ferromagnetic phase 

150: which appears when the Landau level filling factor is an odd integer.  

151: For a complete description of 

152: thermohydrodynamics in quantum Hall systems,  

153: studies need to be extended to 

154: spatial variations of such variables and to their temporal variations.  

155: 

156: 

157: Spatio-temporal variations of the electron temperature 

158: have been investigated indirectly by measuring 

159: spatial~\cite{Komiyama1996,Kaya1998,Kaya1999} 

160: and temporal~\cite{Cage1983,Ahlers1993,Sagol2001} variations

161: of the diagonal component of the resistivity tensor. 

162: Kawano and Komiyama~\cite{Kawano2000,Kawano2003} 

163: have recently investigated the electron temperature 

164: more directly by measuring the local cylotron emission intensity 

165: using a scanning optical probe,   

166: and have revealed a variety of spatial variations of the electron temperature.  

167: The first attempt to construct a general theory 

168: for spatio-temporal variations of the electron temperature and the chemical potential 

169: in quantum Hall systems 

170: was made by one of the present authors.~\cite{Akera2002} 

171: However, this previous theory has been found 

172: to employ an inexact formula of the thermal flux density. 

173: 

174: In this paper we develop a theory of 

175: thermohydrodynamics in quantum Hall systems, 

176: which is a revision and a generalization of the previous theory.~\cite{Akera2002}   

177: We describe spatio-temporal variations of 

178: the electron temperature and the chemical potential

179: in the local equilibrium including the nonlinear transport regime 

180: with use of the equations of conservation, 

181: as in the previous theory.~\cite{Akera2002} 

182: A revision is made by writing the equations in terms of 

183: the total thermal-energy flux density due to the drift motion.   

184: We generalize the previous theory 

185: to study thermohydrodynamics 

186: in the presence of a nonuniform potential 

187: such as a slowly-varying confining potential. 

188: 

189: The organization of the paper is as follows. 

190: In \S 2, 

191: we introduce a model, assumptions, and macroscopic variables.  

192: Random potential due to ionized impurities is assumed to be 

193: slowly varying in the scale of 

194: both the magnetic length and the phase coherence length. 

195: In \S 3, 

196: we describe the equations of conservation and 

197: introduce a model of the number and thermal-energy flux densities 

198: due to hopping and drift processes.  

199: Each of the flux densities is a linear function of 

200: gradients of the electron temperature, the electrochemical potential, 

201: and the electrostatic potential.  

202: The coefficients in these linear functions depend on 

203: the local electron temperature and the local chemical potential. 

204: Such dependences are the origin of nonlinearity in this theory. 

205: In \S 4, 

206: we derive formulas for fluxes measured 

207: in the standard transport experiment 

208: for a narrow sample with a steep confining potential. 

209: In \S 5, 

210: we define a transport flux density for each of the measured fluxes. 

211: We show that the transport flux density defined in this manner 

212: is equal to the total flux density minus the magnetization current density. 

213: We find that the equations of conservation can be written in terms of 

214: the transport component only. 

215: It is shown that the transport flux densities  

216: satisfy the Einstein relation and the Onsager relation,  

217: while the total flux densities do not. 

218: In \S 6, as an illustration, we apply our theory to the Ettingshausen effect, 

219: in which a one-dimensional spatial variation 

220: of the electron temperature is produced perpendicular to the current. 

221: In \S 7, we review briefly the existing literature 

222: on the thermoelectric-transport theory in quantizing magnetic fields

223: and on thermohydrodynamics in quantum Hall systems.   

224: In \S 8, conclusions are given. 

225: 

226: %####################################################

227: \section{Model, Assumptions and Macroscopic Variables}

228: 

229: \subsection{Drift and Hopping Processes}  

230: 

231: We consider a two-dimensional electron system 

232: (in the $xy$ plane)  

233: in a perpendicular magnetic field $\vB=(0,0,B)$.  

234: The local potential energy $V_{\rm loc}$ 

235: consists of 

236: the disorder potential due to ionized donors 

237: with the fluctuation length scale 

238: of $\lvh \sim 0.1\ {\rm \mu m}$~\cite{Nixon1990} 

239: and the macroscopic potential $V$.  

240: The macroscopic potential $V$ consists of 

241: the potential in equilibrium such as the confining potential 

242: and that induced by the applied current.  

243: The fluctuation length scale $\lvh$ 

244: is much longer than 

245: the magnetic length $l=\sqrt{\hbar c /e|B|}$ ($e>0$)

246: which is about $0.01\ {\rm \mu m}$ at $|B|=5$T. 

247: 

248: An electron loses the phase coherence by  

249: a scattering from other electrons and phonons. 

250: The phase coherence length is assumed to be less than $\lvh$. 

251: Therefore the Anderson localization due to the interference in the disorder potential 

252: as well as the energy quantization for closed orbits around potential hills and valleys 

253: are negligible. 

254: Then we employ the classical-drift model~\cite{Iordansky1982,Prange1982,Apenko1985}, 

255: in which each electron state is described by a wave packet with extent of the order of $l$ 

256: drifting along the equipotential line. 

257: The energy of the wave packet at $\vr_{\rm wp}$ 

258: in the Landau level specified by a set of quantum numbers $\alpha=\{N, \sigma\}$ 

259: with the Landau index $N=0,1,2,\cdots$ and spin $\sigma$ is given by 

260: %====================================================

261: \begin{equation}

262: \ve^0_{\alpha} + V_{\rm loc}(\vr_{\rm wp}) ,

263: \end{equation}

264: %====================================================

265: where $\ve^0_{\alpha}$ is the energy of the Landau level

266: in the absence of the potential.

267: The wave packet  follows 

268: the equipotential line of $V_{\rm loc}$ with a velocity given by 

269: %====================================================

270: \begin{equation}

271: \frac{d \vr_{\rm wp}}{d t}

272: = \frac{l^2}{\hbar} s_B \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla V_{\rm loc}(\vr_{\rm wp}) , \ 

273: s_B=\frac{B}{|B|}, \

274: \hat{\epsilon}= \left( \!\! \begin{array}{cc}

275:                                   0 & 1 \\

276:                                  -1 & 0 

277:             \end{array}  \!\! \right)  .	 

278: \label{eq:Xt}

279: \end{equation}

280: %====================================================

281: 

282: A wave packet with energy at the center of the broadened Landau level 

283: follows the extended equipotential line of the disorder potential  

284: and contributes to the macroscopic current by 

285: the drift motion given by eq.(\ref{eq:Xt}). 

286: Other wave packets follow closed orbits within each vh-region. 

287: Here a vh-region is a subspace which is 

288: bounded by extended equipotential lines 

289: and contains one potential hill or valley. 

290: A hopping of such a localized wave packet between neighboring vh-regions 

291: by a scattering from other electrons 

292: contributes to the macroscopic current.~\cite{Akera2000}   

293: A tunneling through a saddle point of the potential 

294: also produces the macroscopic current, 

295: although its contribution is estimated to be small.~\cite{Ise2002} 

296: Compared to such intra-Landau-level transitions, 

297: the contribution of inter-Landau-level transitions to the macroscopic current 

298: is negligible in the slowly-varying potential.\cite{Akera2000} 

299: In this paper we consider the drift and the hopping processes 

300: within each Landau level in calculating the macroscopic current. 

301: 

302: 

303: \subsection{Local Equilibrium}  

304: \label{sec:Local_Equilibrium}

305: 

306: We employ the local-equilibrium approximation, 

307: which has been used extensively in various systems 

308: and is described in detail, for example, in refs.\citen{Groot1962} and \citen{Cooper1997}. 

309: We assume the local equilibrium within each vh-region, which means that   

310: the energy distribution of electrons in each vh-region is described by 

311: the Fermi distribution function with 

312: the electron temperature $\Te$ and the electrochemical potential $\muec$

313: of the vh-region: 

314: %====================================================

315: \begin{equation}

316: f( \ve, \muec, \Te ) = 1/\{\exp[(\ve -\muec)/\kB \Te] +1\} . 

317: \end{equation}

318: %====================================================

319: Each of $\Te$ and $\muec$ differs from vh-region to vh-region 

320: in nonequilibrium states. 

321: The same electron distribution within the condition of constant $\Te$ 

322: has been used in a theory on the quantum Hall effect.~\cite{Iordansky1982}

323: To maintain the local equilibrium, 

324: it is necessary that the applied current and the magnetic field should vary slowly in time 

325: compared with the time necessary for the relaxation to the local equilibrium. 

326: The slowest process involved in this relaxation is 

327: the transition of electrons between Landau levels  

328: in the case where the distribution of electrons to different Landau levels 

329: deviates from that in the local equilibrium. 

330: We also assume that phonons are in equilibrium 

331: with the lattice temperature $\TL$, 

332: and that $\TL$ does not change by the presence of the applied current. 

333: 

334: 

335: \subsection{Spatial Averaging and Macroscopic Variables}  

336: 

337: Since the potential due to ionized donors is random,  

338: quantities such as electron and energy densities fluctuate 

339: in the length scale of $\lvh \sim 0.1 \ {\rm \mu m}$. 

340: We eliminate such random fluctuations by a spatial averaging,  

341: while we retain variations in the scale larger than $\lvh$ 

342: which are produced by the confining potential and by the applied current. 

343: We assume that $\Te$ and $\muec$ in nonequilibrium vary slowly in space 

344: compared with $\lvh$.

345: We note that the spatial variation of the measured cyclotron emission intensity  

346: is also macroscopic because of 

347: the limited spatial resolution of $50 \ {\rm \mu m}$.~\cite{Kawano2003} 

348: 

349: Thermohydrodynamics studies spatio-temporal variations of 

350: macroscopic variables. 

351: The macroscopic variables in the present system are 

352: the electron temperature $\Te(\vr,t)$, 

353: the electrochemical potential $\muec(\vr,t)$, 

354: and the potential energy $V(\vr,t)$. 

355: The chemical potential $\much(\vr,t)$ is defined by 

356: $\much = \muec - V$. 

357: The macroscopic electric field $\vE(\vr,t)$ is given by 

358: $\vE=\vnabla V /e $.  

359: The macroscopic potential $V(\vr,t)$ is determined by 

360: electrostatics in terms of the averaged electron density 

361: which is a function of $\Te$ and $\much$. 

362: Other macroscopic variables $\Te$ and $\muec$ 

363: are determined by the following equations of conservation. 

364: 

365: 

366: \section{Formulation with the Total Fluxes}

367: 

368: \subsection{Equations with the Total Flux Densities}

369: 

370: There are two equations of conservation in our model of quantum Hall systems. 

371: One describes the conservation of the electron number,  

372: and the other describes the conservation of the energy. 

373: The equation of the momentum conservation is absent 

374: since in the classical-drift model 

375: the velocity of the wave packet is not an additional degree of freedom but 

376: given in eq.(\ref{eq:Xt}) to be a function of its position. 

377: 

378: The equation of the electron number conservation is 

379: %====================================================

380: \begin{equation}

381: \frac{\partial n}{\partial t} = -\vnabla \cdot \vj_n \ ,

382: \label{eq:nt}

383: \end{equation}

384: %====================================================

385: where $n$ is the electron density and 

386: $\vj_n$ is the number flux density.  

387: The equation of the energy conservation is 

388: %====================================================

389: \begin{equation}

390: \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial t} = -\vnabla \cdot \vj_{\epsilon} \ - \PL.

391: \label{eq:et}

392: \end{equation}

393: %====================================================

394: Here $\epsilon$ is the energy density and   

395: $\vj_{\epsilon}$ is the energy flux density, while 

396: $\PL$ is the energy loss per unit area at point $\vr$ 

397: due to the heat transfer between electrons and phonons 

398: and is in general a function of $\much$, $\Te$, and $\TL$. 

399: The energy density 

400: is the sum of the kinetic energy density and the potential energy density:  

401: $\epsilon = \epsilon_{\rm kin}+nV$. 

402: 

403: Equations describing the time evolution of $\much$ and $\Te$ 

404: are derived from those of $n(\much, \Te)$ and the entropy density $s(\much, \Te)$, 

405: respectively.   

406: The equation for the time evolution of $s$ is derived 

407: using eqs. (\ref{eq:nt}), (\ref{eq:et}), and 

408: %====================================================

409: \begin{equation}

410: \Te ds = d\epsilon - \muec dn , 

411: \label{eq:tds}

412: \end{equation}

413: %====================================================

414: to be 

415: %====================================================

416: \begin{equation}

417: \Te \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = -\vnabla \cdot \vj_q \ 

418:                               - \vnabla \muec \cdot   \vj_n   - \PL,

419: \label{eq:tst}

420: \end{equation}

421: %====================================================

422: where $\vj_q$ is the thermal flux density defined by 

423: %====================================================

424: \begin{equation}

425: \vj_q = \vj_{\epsilon} - \muec \vj_n  . 

426: \label{eq:jq}

427: \end{equation}

428: %====================================================

429: 

430: 

431: 

432: %####################################################

433: \subsection{Number and Thermal Flux Densities}

434: 

435: \subsubsection{Hopping Components}

436: 

437: First we consider the number flux between neighboring vh-regions 

438: due to hopping processes, denoted as $J_n^{\rm hop}$. 

439: Since we consider only hopping processes within each Landau level, we have 

440: $J_n^{\rm hop}=\sum_{\alpha} J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop}$.  

441: Each $J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop}$ is induced by 

442: the difference in the electron temperature $\Delta \Te$ and 

443: that in the electrochemical potential $\Delta \muec$ between the two vh-regions.

444: In the first order of $\Delta \Te$ and $\Delta \muec$, 

445: $J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop}$ is given by 

446: %====================================================

447: \begin{equation}

448: J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop} =  A_{\alpha} \Delta \muec +B_{\alpha} \Delta \Te  .  

449: \end{equation}

450: %====================================================

451: In the following we show that the coefficients $A_{\alpha}$ and $B_{\alpha}$ 

452: are related to each other in our model of hopping processes. 

453: 

454: The wave packets contributing to the hopping processes are only those in the vicinity of 

455: the boundary between the two vh-regions,  

456: since the transition rate is negligible when 

457: the distance between the wave packets is much larger than $l$. 

458: The energies of such wave packets 

459: are confined within an energy range around $\ve_{\alpha}(\vr)$ 

460: with width $\Gamma_{\rm hop}$ 

461: where $\ve_{\alpha}(\vr) =  \ve^0_{\alpha} + V(\vr)$ 

462: and $\Gamma_{\rm hop} \sim \Gamma l/\lvh$ 

463: with $\Gamma$ the width of the broadened Landau level.  

464: Therefore 

465: the corresponding occupation probability is well approximated to be 

466: %====================================================

467: \begin{equation}

468: f_{\alpha} =  f( \ve_{\alpha},\muec, \Te ) ,

469: \end{equation}

470: %====================================================

471: when $\Gamma_{\rm hop} \ll \kB\Te$.  

472: In the case of elastic hopping processes between 

473: a vh-region with $\muec$ and $\Te$ 

474: and its neighbor with $\muec+\Delta\muec$ and $\Te+\Delta \Te$, 

475: $J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop}$ is given by

476: %====================================================

477: \begin{equation}

478: \!\!\!\!\!J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop} = 

479: - C_{\alpha} 

480: [f( \ve_{\alpha}, \!\muec+\!\Delta\muec, \Te+\!\Delta \Te ) - f( \ve_{\alpha}, \muec, \Te)] . 

481: \end{equation}

482: %====================================================

483: In the first order of $\Delta \Te$ and $\Delta \muec$, we obtain 

484: %====================================================

485: \begin{equation}

486: J_{n\alpha}^{\rm hop} = - C_{\alpha} 

487: \left( \frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial \muec}\Delta \muec 

488: + \frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial \Te} \Delta \Te \right). 

489: \label{eq:Jn_hop}

490: \end{equation}

491: %====================================================

492: Also in the case of inelastic electron-electron scatterings, 

493: this formula is approximately applicable 

494: as long as the energy change in each hopping process

495: is much smaller than $\kB\Te$.

496: We assume eq.(\ref{eq:Jn_hop}) in the following. 

497: 

498: The hopping number flux density $\vj^{\rm hop}_n$ 

499: averaged in the macroscopic scale 

500: is then given by 

501: %====================================================

502: \begin{equation}

503: \vj^{\rm hop}_{n}=  - \sum_{\alpha} D_{\alpha} 

504:       \left(  \frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial \muec } \vnabla \muec 

505:           +\frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial \Te } \vnabla \Te  \right) .

506: \label{eq:jn_hop0}

507: \end{equation}

508: %====================================================

509: Here $D_{\alpha}$ is written in terms of the transition rate of each hopping process,    

510: which depends on the disorder potential. 

511: The disorder potential in turn is a function of $\much$ and $\Te$ 

512: since it is screened by electrons.  

513: 

514: We introduce transport coefficients $\Lnnxx$ and $\Lnqxx$ 

515: and write $\vj^{\rm hop}_{n}$ as 

516: %====================================================

517: \begin{equation}

518: \vj^{\rm hop}_{n}=  - \Lnnxx \vnabla \muec  - \Lnqxx \Te^{-1} \vnabla \Te .

519: \label{eq:jn_hop}

520: \end{equation}

521: %====================================================

522: From eq.(\ref{eq:jn_hop0}) we have

523: %====================================================

524: \begin{eqnarray}

525: \Lnnxx  =  e^{-2}\sxx =  (\kB\Te)^{-1} \sum_{\alpha} D_{\alpha} 

526:              f_{\alpha} (1- f_{\alpha}) ,  \\

527: \Lnqxx  =   (\kB\Te)^{-1} \sum_{\alpha} D_{\alpha} 

528:   f_{\alpha} (1- f_{\alpha})  ( \ve^0_{\alpha} - \much ) .  

529: \end{eqnarray}

530: %====================================================

531: When we assume the $N$ dependence of $D_{\alpha}$ to be $D_{\alpha}= (2N+1) D_0$ 

532: with $D_0$ the coefficient for $N=0$, 

533: the above formula of $\Lnnxx$ coincides 

534: with that for short-range scatterings 

535: in the self-consistent Born approximation\cite{Ando1974} 

536: in the case where $\Gamma \ll \kB \Te$.  

537: Note that the above formula is applicable 

538: as long as $\Gamma_{\rm hop} \ll \kB\Te$. 

539: The coefficients $\Lnnxx$ and $\Lnqxx$ are functions of $\Te(\vr,t)$ and $\much (\vr,t)$. 

540: In the linear-response regime, 

541: $\Lnnxx$ and $\Lnqxx$ are to be evaluated in equilibrium  

542: and eq.(\ref{eq:jn_hop}) reduces to 

543: the so-called phenomenological equation.~\cite{Groot1962}  

544: In our model, a nonlinear effect is taken into account 

545: in dependences of $\Lnnxx$ and $\Lnqxx$ on 

546: deviations of $\Te(\vr,t)$ and $\much (\vr,t)$ from their equilibrium values. 

547: 

548: The thermal flux density [eq.(\ref{eq:jq})] is given similarly, in hopping processes, by 

549: %====================================================

550: \begin{equation}

551: \vj^{\rm hop}_{q}=  - \sum_{\alpha} (\ve_{\alpha} - \muec ) D_{\alpha} 

552:       \left(  \frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial \muec } \vnabla \muec 

553:           +\frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial \Te } \vnabla \Te  \right) .

554: \end{equation}

555: %====================================================

556: This expresses that an electron in the Landau level $\alpha$ 

557: carries a thermal energy $\ve_{\alpha}-\muec$. 

558: In terms of transport coefficients, $\vj^{\rm hop}_{q}$ is expressed as  

559: %====================================================

560: \begin{equation}

561: \vj^{\rm hop}_{q}=  - \Lqnxx \vnabla \muec  - \Lqqxx \Te^{-1} \vnabla \Te ,

562: \end{equation}

563: %====================================================

564: where 

565: %====================================================

566: \begin{eqnarray}

567: &\Lqnxx =  \Lnqxx  \ , \\

568: &\Lqqxx = (\kB\Te)^{-1} \sum_{\alpha} D_{\alpha} 

569:   f_{\alpha} (1- f_{\alpha})  ( \ve^0_{\alpha} - \much )^2 . 

570: \end{eqnarray}

571: %====================================================

572: 

573: 

574: %####################################################

575: \subsubsection{Drift Components}

576: 

577: The local flux density due to the drift motion fluctuates spatially since  

578: the local potential $V_{\rm loc}$ contains the random potential. 

579: We average the local flux density to obtain the macroscopic flux density. 

580: The macroscopic number flux density in the Landau level $\alpha$, 

581: $\vj^{\rm drift}_{n\alpha}$, is written as

582: %====================================================

583: \begin{equation}

584: \vj^{\rm drift}_{n\alpha} = 

585:     \left\langle f(\ve^0_{\alpha}+V_{\rm loc}, \muec,\Te)   

586:     h^{-1} s_B \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla V_{\rm loc}

587:      \right\rangle_{\rm av} . 

588: \end{equation}

589: %====================================================

590: Since localized states make no contributions 

591: to the macroscopic flux density, 

592: the occupation probability of localized states in the above equation 

593: can be replaced by  

594: that of extended states. Then we have 

595: %====================================================

596: \begin{equation}

597: \vj^{\rm drift}_{n\alpha} =  f(\ve^0_{\alpha}+V, \muec,\Te)

598:     \left\langle    h^{-1} s_B \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla V_{\rm loc}

599:     \right\rangle_{\rm av} .  

600: \end{equation}

601: %====================================================

602: Since the spatial average of $\vnabla V_{\rm loc}$ is equal to $\vnabla V$,  

603: then the number flux density $\vj^{\rm drift}_{n}$ 

604: due to all the Landau levels becomes 

605: %====================================================

606: \begin{equation}

607: \vj^{\rm drift}_{n} =  \Lnnyx \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla V , 

608: \label{eq:jn_drift}

609: \end{equation}

610: %====================================================

611: with

612: %====================================================

613: \begin{equation}

614: \Lnnyx = \frac{\syx}{e^2}= \frac{s_B}{h} \sum_{\alpha} f_{\alpha} .

615: \end{equation}

616: %====================================================

617: Similarly we have for the thermal flux density 

618: %====================================================

619: \begin{equation}

620: \vj^{\rm drift}_{q} =  \K21yx \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla V , 

621: \end{equation}

622: %====================================================

623: with

624: %====================================================

625: \begin{equation}

626: \K21yx = \frac{s_B}{h} \sum_{\alpha} (\ve^0_{\alpha} - \much) f_{\alpha} .

627: \end{equation}

628: %====================================================

629: 

630: The coefficients $\Lnnyx$ and $\K21yx$ can be written as 

631: %====================================================

632: \begin{equation}

633: \Lnnyx = s_B  \frac{2\pi l^2}{h} n_0 \ , 

634: \end{equation}

635: %====================================================

636: %====================================================

637: \begin{equation}

638: \K21yx = s_B \frac{2\pi l^2}{h} (\Omega_0 +\Te s_0 ) \ , 

639: \label{eq:K21}

640: \end{equation}

641: %====================================================

642: in terms of thermodynamic quantities $n_0$, $\Omega_0$, and $s_0$. 

643: Here $\Omega_0$ is 

644: the thermodynamic potential density 

645: corresponding to the grand canonical ensemble 

646: in the absence of disorder ($V_{\rm loc}=V$):  

647: %====================================================

648: \begin{equation}

649: \!\!\!\! \Omega_0(\Te,\much,B) \!= \!

650:     - \frac{\kB \Te}{2\pi l^2}  \sum_{\alpha}

651:       \ln \! \left[1 \!+\! \exp \! \left( \!- \frac{\ve^0_{\alpha} \!-\! \much}{\kB \Te} \right) 

652:          \right]  ,

653: \end{equation}

654: %====================================================

655: while $n_0$ and $s_0$ are the electron density and the entropy density, 

656: respectively, in this case: 

657: %====================================================

658: \begin{equation}

659: n_0= - \left( \frac{\partial \Omega_0}{\partial \much}\right)_{\Te,B} , \ \ \ 

660: s_0= - \left( \frac{\partial \Omega_0}{\partial \Te}\right)_{\mu,B} . 

661: \end{equation}

662: %====================================================

663: 

664: %The thermodynamic potential $\Omega(\Te,\much,B)$ per unit area is

665: %====================================================

666: %\begin{equation}

667: %\Omega(\Te,\much,B) = 

668: %      -\kB \Te \int d\ve \rho (\ve) 

669: %      \ln \left[1+ \exp \left(- \frac{\ve -\much}{\kB \Te} \right) \right] ,

670: %\end{equation}

671: %====================================================

672: %where $\rho (\ve)$ is the density of states. 

673: %Since in the absence of disorder  

674: %====================================================

675: %\begin{equation}

676: %\rho (\ve) =  \frac{1}{2\pi l^2} \sum_{\alpha} \delta (\ve-\ve^0_{\alpha}) ,

677: %\end{equation}

678: %====================================================

679: %then the thermodynamic potential in this case is given by.....

680: %====================================================

681: %\begin{equation}

682: %n_0= - \left( \frac{\partial \Omega_0}{\partial \much}\right)_{\Te,B} 

683: %      =  \frac{1}{2\pi l^2} \sum_{\alpha} f_{\alpha} \ . 

684: %\end{equation}

685: %====================================================

686: %====================================================

687: %\begin{equation}

688: %s_0= - \left( \frac{\partial \Omega_0}{\partial \Te}\right)_{\muec,B} 

689: %      =  - \frac{\Omega_0}{\Te}  + \frac{1}{2\pi l^2 \Te} \sum_{\alpha} 

690: %                     (\ve^0_{\alpha} - \much) f_{\alpha} \ , 

691: %\end{equation}

692: %====================================================

693: 

694: %####################################################

695: \subsubsection{Total Flux Densities}

696: 

697: The total flux densities 

698: $\vj_n = \vj^{\rm hop}_{n} + \vj^{\rm drift}_{n}$ and 

699: $\vj_q = \vj^{\rm hop}_{q} + \vj^{\rm drift}_{q}$ are written as  

700: %====================================================

701: \begin{equation}

702: j_{nx}= - \Lnnxx \nabla_x \muec 

703:                              + \Lnnyx \nabla_y V 

704:                              -  \Lnqxx \Te^{-1} \nabla_x \Te , 

705: \label{eq:jnx}

706: \end{equation}

707: %====================================================

708: %====================================================

709: \begin{equation}

710: j_{ny}= - \Lnnyx \nabla_x V 

711:                              - \Lnnxx \nabla_y \muec 

712:                              - \Lnqxx \Te^{-1}  \nabla_y \Te , 

713: \label{eq:jny}

714: \end{equation}

715: %====================================================

716: %====================================================

717: \begin{equation}

718: j_{qx}= - \Lnqxx \nabla_x \muec 

719:                              + \K21yx \nabla_y V 

720:                              -  \Lqqxx \Te^{-1}  \nabla_x \Te , 

721: \label{eq:jqx}

722: \end{equation}

723: %====================================================

724: %====================================================

725: \begin{equation}

726: j_{qy}= - \K21yx \nabla_x V 

727:                              - \Lnqxx \nabla_y \muec 

728:                              - \Lqqxx \Te^{-1}  \nabla_y \Te .  

729: \label{eq:jqy}

730: \end{equation}

731: %====================================================

732: The total flux densities are produced not only by 

733: $\vnabla \muec$ and $\vnabla \Te$, but also by $\vnabla V$, 

734: and therefore they are in general nonzero in equilibrium. 

735: The standard transport experiment measures 

736: a flux through a cross section of the sample, which is zero in equilibrium. 

737: Such a flux, which is induced in nonequilibrium, is calculated in the next section. 

738: 

739: 

740: %####################################################

741: \section{Measured Fluxes in a Narrow Wire} 

742: 

743: \subsection{Model and Assumptions}

744: \label{sec:model}

745: 

746: In this section we derive formulas for the fluxes 

747: measured in the standard transport experiment. 

748: We consider a narrow two-dimensional system along the $x$ direction 

749: and separate the system into the bulk region $0<y<\Delta y$ 

750: and the edge region $y<0, \Delta y<y$. 

751: In the edge region we assume the presence of a confining potential which 

752: increases to infinity 

753: so that the electron density decreases to zero 

754: within a length scale of the order of $\lvh$. 

755: The width of the edge region $\Delta \eta$ is quite small and 

756: variations of $\Te(x,y)$ and $\muec(x,y)$ within $\Delta \eta$ are negligible.   

757: Therefore we calculate the fluxes in the zeroth-order of $\Delta \eta$

758: (zero edge-width model). 

759: We also assume that the width of the bulk region $\Delta y$ is small 

760: compared with the length scale of variations of $\Te$ and $\muec$, 

761: and calculate the fluxes in the first-order of $\Delta y$ 

762: (narrow wire model).

763: 

764: 

765: %####################################################

766: \subsection{Edge Currents}

767: \label{sec:edge_currents}

768: 

769: We introduce coordinates $(\xi, \eta)$ 

770: for each boundary of the two-dimensional system. 

771: The unit vector normal to the boundary, directed to the outside 

772: of the sample, is denoted by $\vn$.  

773: We take the $\eta$ axis in the direction of $\vn$ 

774: and the $\xi$ axis along the boundary in the direction of $\hat{\epsilon} \vn$. 

775: 

776: We calculate fluxes in the edge region 

777: $\eta_{\edge}<\eta<\eta_{\edge}+\Delta \eta$.  

778: In the region $\eta>\eta_{\edge}+\Delta \eta$ the electron density and the flux densities 

779: are assumed to be negligible. 

780: Since $\Delta \eta$ is small in the present steep confining potential,  

781: the hopping flux in the edge region is negligible. 

782: The drift flux is not negligible

783: because of the large gradient of the confining potential. 

784: With use of eq.(\ref{eq:jn_drift}), the drift number flux is given by 

785: %====================================================

786: \begin{equation}

787: \vJ^{\edge}_n = K_n \hat{\epsilon} \vn  ,

788: \end{equation}

789: %====================================================

790: with

791: %====================================================

792: \begin{equation}

793: K_n=  \frac{s_B}{h} \sum_{\alpha} 

794:        \int_{\eta_{\edge}}^{\eta_{\edge}+\Delta \eta} d\eta 

795:       \frac{\partial V}{\partial \eta}

796:             f( \ve^0_{\alpha}+V, \muec,\Te)   . 

797: \end{equation}

798: %====================================================

799: Since the $\eta$ dependence of $\muec$ and $\Te$ is neglected, 

800: %====================================================

801: \begin{equation}

802: K_n=  \frac{s_B}{h} \sum_{\alpha} 

803:                  \int_{\ve_{\alpha}}^{\infty}  f( \ve,\muec,\Te) d\ve

804: 	 = - s_B \frac{2\pi l^2}{h} \Omega_0  ,

805: \end{equation}

806: %====================================================

807: where $\ve_{\alpha}$, $\muec$, $\Te$ and $\Omega_0$ 

808: are to be evaluated at $\eta_{\edge}$.  

809: The quantitiy $K_n$ is related to the magnetization per unit area, $M$, at $\eta_{\edge}$   

810: by 

811: %====================================================

812: \begin{equation}

813: K_n(\eta_{\edge})  = (c/e) M(\eta_{\edge}) \ , 

814: \label{eq:M}

815: \end{equation}

816: %====================================================

817: since the edge electric current $\vI$ and $M$

818: are related~\cite{Landau1960} by $\vI= - c M  \hat{\epsilon} \vn$. 

819: The thermal flux is given by

820: %====================================================

821: \begin{equation}

822: \vJ^{\edge}_q = K_q \hat{\epsilon} \vn ,

823: \end{equation}

824: %====================================================

825: with 

826: %====================================================

827: \begin{equation}

828: K_q =  \frac{s_B}{h} \sum_{\alpha} 

829:                        \int_{\ve_{\alpha}}^{\infty} 

830:                        (\ve-\muec )  f( \ve, \muec,\Te) d\ve  ,

831: \label{eq:Kq}

832: \end{equation}

833: %====================================================

834: which is written as 

835: %====================================================

836: \begin{equation}

837: K_q = s_B \frac{2\pi l^2}{h}

838:              \int_{-\infty}^{\much} 

839:              \left( \Omega_0 (\much')+ \Te s_0 (\much') \right)  d \much' .

840: \end{equation}

841: %====================================================

842: 

843: Derivatives of $K_n$ and $K_q$ are given by 

844: %====================================================

845: \begin{equation}

846: \frac{\partial K_n}{\partial \much} = \Lnnyx , \ \ 

847: \frac{\partial K_n}{\partial \Te} =   \frac{\Lnqyx}{\Te}  ,

848: \end{equation}

849: %====================================================

850: %====================================================

851: \begin{equation}

852: \frac{\partial K_q}{\partial \much} = \K21yx , \ \ 

853: \frac{\partial K_q}{\partial \Te} =   \frac{\Lqqyx}{\Te}  ,

854: \label{eq:Lqqyx}

855: \end{equation}

856: %====================================================

857: with

858: %====================================================

859: \begin{equation}

860: \Lnqyx =  s_B \frac{2\pi l^2}{h} \Te s_0 = \K21yx + K_n \ ,

861: \label{eq:Lnqyx}

862: \end{equation}

863: %====================================================

864: %====================================================

865: \begin{equation}

866: \Lqqyx =  s_B \frac{2\pi l^2}{h} \Te^2

867:              \int_{-\infty}^{\much} 

868:              \frac{\partial s_0 (\much') }{\partial \Te} d \much' .

869: \end{equation}

870: %====================================================

871: $\Lqqyx$ is also expressed from eqs.(\ref{eq:Kq}) and (\ref{eq:Lqqyx}) by 

872: %====================================================

873: \begin{equation}

874: \Lqqyx = 2 K_q + 

875: \frac{s_B}{h} \sum_{\alpha} (\ve_{\alpha} -\muec)^2 f_{\alpha} .

876: \end{equation}

877: %====================================================

878: 

879: %####################################################

880: \subsection{Measured Fluxes}

881: 

882: \subsubsection{Fluxes through the Sample}

883: 

884: First we consider fluxes through a cross section of the sample  

885: along the $x$ direction. 

886: Each of the number and thermal fluxes is written 

887: as the sum of the bulk and edge contributions. 

888: 

889: The number flux, denoted as $J^{\tr}_{nx}$, is given by

890: %====================================================

891: \begin{equation}

892: J^{\tr}_{nx}= \int_{0}^{\Delta y} j_{nx} dy 

893:            + J^{\edge(\Delta y)}_{nx} + J^{\edge(0)}_{nx}  .

894: \end{equation}

895: %====================================================

896: Here $J^{\edge(0)}_{nx}$ and $J^{\edge(\Delta y)}_{nx}$ are 

897: the edge current flowing in $y<0$ and that in $y>\Delta y$, respectively. 

898: The sum of these edge currents is zero in equilibrium. 

899: In nonequilibrium states it is induced 

900: by the differences 

901: $\Delta \much= \much (\Delta y) -  \much (0) $ 

902: and $\Delta \Te= \Te (\Delta y) -  \Te (0) $, 

903: and is written in their first order as 

904: %====================================================

905: \begin{eqnarray}

906: &J^{\edge(\Delta y)}_{nx} + J^{\edge(0)}_{nx} =  K_n(\Delta y) -K_n(0) \nonumber \\

907: &=  \Lnnyx  \Delta \much    + \frac{\Lnqyx}{\Te } \Delta \Te   \ .

908: \end{eqnarray}

909: %====================================================

910: The flux density in the bulk region, $j_{nx}$, is given by eq.(\ref{eq:jnx}) 

911: and is independent of $y$ in the lowest order of $\Delta y$.   

912: Therefore $J^{\tr}_{nx}$ is given by

913: %====================================================

914: \begin{equation}

915: \frac{J^{\tr}_{nx}}{\Delta y}\!=\! - \Lnnxx  \nabla_x \muec 

916:                              +\! \Lnnyx \nabla_y \muec

917:                              -\! \frac{\Lnqxx}{\Te } \nabla_x \Te

918:                              +\! \frac{\Lnqyx}{\Te } \nabla_y \Te .

919: \label{eq:jtr_nx}

920: \end{equation}

921: %====================================================

922: The measured number flux $J^{\tr}_{nx}$ is written only 

923: in terms of $\vnabla \muec$ and $\vnabla \Te$  

924: since it is zero in equilibrium. 

925: 

926: The thermal flux $J^{\tr}_{qx}$ is given by

927: %====================================================

928: \begin{equation}

929: J^{\tr}_{qx}= \int_{0}^{\Delta y} j_{qx} dy 

930:            + J^{\edge(\Delta y)\tr}_{qx} + J^{\edge(0)\tr}_{qx}  ,

931: \end{equation} 

932: %====================================================

933: where

934: %====================================================

935: \begin{equation}

936: J^{\edge,\tr}_{qx} =  J^{\edge}_{\epsilon x} - \muec^0 J^{\edge}_{nx}

937: =  J^{\edge}_{qx} +  (\muec - \muec^0) J^{\edge}_{nx} .

938: \end{equation} 

939: %====================================================

940: Here $\muec^0$ is a reference electrochemical potential  

941: and lies between $\muec(0)$ and $\muec(\Delta y)$. 

942: It is the value of the uniform electrochemical potential 

943: in a fictitous thin electrode, 

944: which is inserted into the sample 

945: to measure the fluxes through a cross section at any $x$.   

946: In the first order of $\Delta y$, the contribution from edges becomes

947: %====================================================

948: \begin{equation}

949: J^{\edge (\Delta y)\tr}_{qx} \!+\! J^{\edge (0)\tr}_{qx} =  \K21yx \Delta \much 

950:    + \frac{\Lqqyx}{\Te} \Delta \Te      + K_n \Delta \muec  \ ,

951: \end{equation}

952: %====================================================

953: where $\Delta \muec =\muec (\Delta y) -  \muec (0)$. 

954: The contribution of the last term, $ K_n \Delta \muec$, 

955: due to the diamagnetic surface current 

956: has been first pointed out by Obraztsov.~\cite{Obraztsov1964}

957: Then $J^{\tr}_{qx}$ is given by

958: %====================================================

959: \begin{equation}

960: \frac{J^{\tr}_{qx}}{\Delta y}\!=\! - \Lnqxx \nabla_x \muec 

961:                              +\!  \Lnqyx \nabla_y \muec

962:                              -\!  \frac{\Lqqxx}{\Te } \nabla_x \Te 

963:                              +\! \frac{\Lqqyx}{\Te} \nabla_y \Te \ .

964: \label{eq:jtr_qx}

965: \end{equation}

966: %====================================================

967: 

968: 

969: %####################################################

970: \subsubsection{Fluxes through the Boundary}

971: 

972: Next we consider fluxes along the $y$ direction 

973: through each of boundaries at $y=0$ and $y=\Delta y$ 

974: into a fictitious electrode outside the sample.

975: 

976: First we use again the coordinates $(\xi, \eta)$ 

977: introduced in \S \ref{sec:edge_currents} and 

978: write fluxes through a segment of the boundary with length $\Delta \xi$ 

979: in terms of the bulk and edge currents.  

980: We integrate eq.(\ref{eq:nt}) 

981: over an infinitesimal region with width $\Delta \xi$ 

982: in $\eta_{\edge}<\eta<\eta_{\edge}+\Delta \eta$.  

983: The integration of the left hand side of eq.(\ref{eq:nt})  

984: is of the order of $\Delta \eta$ and is neglected.  

985: By considering additionally the number flux through the segment of the boundary, 

986: which is denoted as $\Delta J^{\tr}_{n\eta}$, 

987: we have 

988: %====================================================

989: \begin{equation}

990: j_{n\eta}(\eta_{\edge}) \Delta \xi  

991:  + \left[ J^{\edge}_{n\xi}(\xi) - J^{\edge}_{n\xi}(\xi+\Delta \xi)  \right] 

992:  = \Delta J^{\tr}_{n\eta}  .  

993: \end{equation}

994: %====================================================

995: By taking the limit of small $\Delta \xi$, we obtain 

996: %====================================================

997: \begin{equation}

998: \frac{\Delta J^{\tr}_{n\eta}}{\Delta \xi} =    j_{n\eta}(\eta_{\edge})

999:                      -  \nabla_\xi J^{\edge}_{n\xi}  \ .

1000: \label{eq:BCn}

1001: \end{equation}

1002: %====================================================

1003: For the thermal flux, we have from eq.(\ref{eq:tst}) 

1004: %====================================================

1005: \begin{equation}

1006: \frac{\Delta J^{\tr}_{q\eta}}{\Delta \xi}  =    j_{q\eta}(\eta_{\edge})

1007:      -  \nabla_\xi J^{\edge}_{q\xi} 

1008:      -  J^{\edge}_{n\xi} \nabla_\xi \muec  \ .

1009: \label{eq:BCq}

1010: \end{equation}

1011: %====================================================

1012: 

1013: The above formulas are now applied to the boundaries of the sample 

1014: at $y=0$ and $\Delta y$.  

1015: At $y=\Delta y$, 

1016: %====================================================

1017: \begin{equation}

1018: \nabla_x J^{\edge}_{nx} =\nabla_x K_n

1019: =  \Lnnyx  \nabla_x \much    + \frac{\Lnqyx}{\Te } \nabla_x \Te   \ , 

1020: \end{equation}

1021: %====================================================

1022: and the measured number flux $\Delta J^{\tr}_{ny}$ is obtained to be 

1023: %====================================================

1024: \begin{equation}

1025: \! \frac{\Delta J^{\tr}_{ny}}{\Delta x}\!=\!  - \Lnnyx \nabla_{\!x} \muec

1026:                                                                  \!-\! \Lnnxx  \nabla_{\!y} \muec 

1027:                           \!-\! \frac{\Lnqyx}{\Te } \nabla_{\!x} \Te 

1028:                           \!-\! \frac{\Lnqxx}{\Te } \nabla_{\!y} \Te \ .

1029: \label{eq:dJny}

1030: \end{equation}

1031: %====================================================

1032: The same formula is obtained for the boundary at $y=0$. 

1033: For the thermal flux at $y=\Delta y$, 

1034: %====================================================

1035: \begin{equation}

1036: \nabla_x J^{\edge}_{qx}

1037: =  \K21yx  \nabla_x \much    + \frac{\Lqqyx}{\Te} \nabla_x \Te   \ , 

1038: \end{equation}

1039: %====================================================

1040: and 

1041: the measured thermal flux $\Delta J^{\tr}_{qy}$ is

1042: %====================================================

1043: \begin{equation}

1044: \! \frac{\Delta J^{\tr}_{qy}}{\Delta x}  \!=\!    - \Lnqyx \nabla_{\!x} \muec

1045:                                                                     \!-\! \Lnqxx  \nabla_{\!y} \muec 

1046:                                    \!-\! \frac{\Lqqyx}{\Te} \nabla_{\!x} \Te 

1047:                                    \!-\! \frac{\Lqqxx}{\Te } \nabla_{\!y} \Te\ ,

1048: \label{eq:dJqy}

1049: \end{equation}

1050: %====================================================

1051: which is the case both at $y=0$ and at $y=\Delta y$. 

1052: 

1053: 

1054: %####################################################

1055: \section{Formulation with Transport Fluxes}

1056: 

1057: \subsection{Transport Flux Densities}

1058: 

1059: In this section we introduce a transport flux density at each point within the large sample 

1060: by using the formula for each of the measured fluxes in the narrow system 

1061: in the previous section. 

1062: The transport flux densities, denoted as $\vj_n^{\rm tr}(\vr,t)$ and $\vj_q^{\rm tr}(\vr,t)$, 

1063: are defined at each point $\vr$ by

1064: %====================================================

1065: \begin{equation}

1066: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c}

1067:                             \vj^{\tr}_{n}(\vr,t) \\  \\

1068:                              \vj^{\tr}_{q}(\vr,t) 

1069:             \end{array}  \!\! \right)

1070:  \!=\!      

1071: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{cc}

1072:                  L^{11}   & \!\!  L^{12}  \\  \\

1073:                  L^{21}   &  L^{22}     

1074:            \end{array}  \!\! \right)   \!\! 

1075: \left(  \!\! \begin{array}{c}

1076:                            -\vnabla \muec           \\  \\

1077:                            -\Te^{-1} \vnabla \Te   

1078:             \end{array}    \!\! \right)  \!, 

1079: \label{eq:transport_flux}

1080: \end{equation}

1081: %====================================================

1082: with

1083: %====================================================

1084: \begin{eqnarray}

1085: L^{11} \!= \!

1086: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{rr}

1087:                            \Lnnxx     &    \Lnnxy    \\  \\

1088:                            \Lnnyx     &    \Lnnyy    

1089:            \end{array}  \!\! \right)   \! ,  \

1090: L^{12} \!= \!

1091: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{rr}

1092:                             \Lnqxx     &     \Lnqxy         \\  \\

1093:                             \Lnqyx     &     \Lnqyy   

1094:            \end{array}  \!\! \right)   \! , 

1095:            \nonumber \\

1096: L^{21} \!= \!

1097: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{rr}

1098:                             \Lqnxx     &     \Lqnxy         \\  \\

1099:                             \Lqnyx     &     \Lqnyy   

1100:            \end{array}  \!\! \right)   \! ,  \ 

1101: L^{22} \!= \!

1102: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{rr}

1103:                             \Lqqxx     &      \Lqqxy     \\  \\

1104:                             \Lqqyx     &      \Lqqyy

1105:            \end{array} \!\! \right)  \! ,

1106: \label{eq:transport_coeff}

1107: \end{eqnarray}

1108: %====================================================

1109: where $\Lqnyx=\Lnqyx$ and,  

1110: since the system is isotropic in the $xy$ plane, 

1111: we have the following symmetry relation: 

1112: $L_{yy}^{ij}=L_{xx}^{ij}$ and $L_{xy}^{ij}=-L_{yx}^{ij}$ 

1113: with $i=1,2$ and $j=1,2$.

1114: The right hand side of eq.(\ref{eq:transport_flux}) is equivalent to 

1115: that of the formulas of the measured fluxes in the previous section. 

1116: We note that the coefficients here depend in general on $x$, $y$, and $t$  

1117: through $\Te (\vr,t)$ and $\much (\vr,t)$.  

1118: 

1119: Diagonal and off-diagonal transport coefficients have different microscopic origins: 

1120: diagonal transport coefficients are due to hopping processes, 

1121: while off-diagonal ones are due to drift processes. 

1122: Note also that off-diagonal transport coefficients 

1123: are written in terms of thermodynamic quantities 

1124: and do not depend on any transition rates. 

1125: 

1126: It is straightforward to show from 

1127: eqs. (\ref{eq:jnx}), (\ref{eq:jny}), (\ref{eq:jqx}), (\ref{eq:jqy}),  

1128: and (\ref{eq:transport_flux})

1129: that 

1130: the transport flux densities and the total flux densities are related by 

1131: %====================================================

1132: \begin{equation}

1133: \vj_n = \vj_n^{\rm tr} + \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla M_n    \ , \ \  

1134: \vj_{\epsilon} = \vj_{\epsilon}^{\rm tr} + \hat{\epsilon} \vnabla M_{\epsilon}  \ ,  

1135: \label{eq:total-trans}

1136: \end{equation}

1137: %====================================================

1138: with

1139: %====================================================

1140: \begin{equation}

1141: M_n = - K_n    \ , \ \  

1142: M_{\epsilon} = -(K_q + \muec K_n)  \ ,  

1143: \end{equation}

1144: %====================================================

1145: where $\vj_{\epsilon}^{\tr}$ and $\vj_q^{\tr}$ are related by 

1146: $\vj_q^{\tr}=\vj_{\epsilon}^{\tr} - \muec \vj_n^{\tr}$, and 

1147: $K_n$ and $K_q$ are now to be evaluated at a point $\vr$ within the sample. 

1148: The quantity $M_n$ in the above equation is proportional to the magnetization $M$,   

1149: $M_n=-(c/e)M$, from eq.(\ref{eq:M}). 

1150: The above equation states that 

1151: each of the total flux densities, $\vj_n$ and $\vj_{\epsilon}$, 

1152: is the sum of the transport flux density and 

1153: the current density due to spatial variations of the magnetization,   

1154: which is called the magnetization current density.

1155: 

1156: \subsection{Equations with Transport Flux Densities}

1157: 

1158: We now rewrite 

1159: the equations of conservation, eqs.(\ref{eq:nt}) and (\ref{eq:tst}), 

1160: in terms of the transport flux densities. 

1161: Because the divergence of each magnetization current density 

1162: in eq.(\ref{eq:total-trans}) is zero, 

1163: the equations

1164: can be written in terms of $\vj_n^{\tr}$ and 

1165: $\vj_q^{\tr}$ only:  

1166: %====================================================

1167: \begin{equation}

1168: \frac{\partial n}{\partial t} = -\vnabla \cdot \vj_n^{\tr} \ ,  

1169: \label{eq:nt2}

1170: \end{equation}

1171: %====================================================

1172: %====================================================

1173: \begin{equation}

1174: \Te \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = -\vnabla \cdot \vj_q^{\tr} \ 

1175:                               - \vnabla \muec \cdot   \vj_n^{\tr}   - \PL .

1176: \label{eq:tst2}

1177: \end{equation}

1178: %====================================================

1179: The term $- \vnabla \muec \cdot   \vj_n^{\tr}$ is of the second order of the current, 

1180: while the corresponding term in eq.(\ref{eq:tst}), $- \vnabla \muec \cdot   \vj_n$, 

1181: contains a first-order contribution  

1182: due to the drift component in $\vj_n$ when the confining potential is considered. 

1183: 

1184: The equation for the time evolution of the entropy density

1185: is obtained from eq.(\ref{eq:tst2}) as

1186: %====================================================

1187: \begin{equation}

1188: \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = - \vnabla \cdot \vj_s  

1189:       + \left( \frac{ds}{dt} \right)_{\rm i}  

1190:       + \left( \frac{ds}{dt} \right)_{\rm e} \ , 

1191: \label{eq:st}

1192: \end{equation}

1193: %====================================================

1194: where 

1195: %====================================================

1196: \begin{equation}

1197: \vj_s= \Te^{-1} \vj_q^{\tr} , 

1198: \end{equation}

1199: %====================================================

1200: is the entropy flux density, 

1201: %====================================================

1202: \begin{equation}

1203:  \left( \frac{ds}{dt} \right)_{\rm i} =  

1204:       -  \vj_n^{\tr}  \cdot \Te^{-1}  \vnabla \muec      

1205:       -  \vj_q^{\tr} \cdot \Te^{-2} \vnabla \Te  \ , 

1206: \label{eq:entropy_production}

1207: \end{equation}

1208: %====================================================

1209: is the rate of entropy production per unit area at $\vr$,  

1210: and 

1211: %====================================================

1212: \begin{equation}

1213:  \left( \frac{ds}{dt} \right)_{\rm e} =  - \Te^{-1} \PL , 

1214: \end{equation}

1215: %====================================================

1216: is due to the heat transfer to the phonon system. 

1217: 

1218: 

1219: %####################################################

1220: \subsection{Relations between Transport Coefficients}

1221: 

1222: The Einstein relation tells that 

1223: the coefficient in front of $\vnabla \mu$ 

1224: and that in front of $\vnabla V$ in each of the flux densities are equal. 

1225: This is satisfied for the transport flux densities 

1226: since they are written in terms of 

1227: $\vnabla \muec = \vnabla \mu  + \vnabla V$. 

1228: 

1229: The Onsager relation~\cite{Onsager1931a,Onsager1931b} 

1230: tells that 

1231: %====================================================

1232: \begin{equation}

1233: L_{kl}(B)= L_{lk}(-B) ,

1234: \end{equation}

1235: %====================================================

1236: where $L_{kl}(B)$ is the coefficient in the formula of the $k$th flux density

1237: in front of the $l$th thermodynamic force. 

1238: In the present case 

1239: with the entropy production in eq.(\ref{eq:entropy_production}), 

1240: the thermodynamic forces~\cite{Groot1962} 

1241: associated with $\vj_n^{\tr}$ and $\vj_q^{\tr}$ are given by  

1242: %====================================================

1243: \begin{equation}

1244: \vF_n = - \Te^{-1} \vnabla \muec \ , \ \ \vF_q = - \Te^{-2} \vnabla \Te \ ,

1245: \end{equation}

1246: %====================================================

1247: respectively. 

1248: Therefore $L_{kl}(B)$ in this case is equal to 

1249: the corresponding coefficient in eq.(\ref{eq:transport_coeff}) 

1250: except the common factor $\Te^{-1}$. 

1251: The coefficients 

1252: in eq.(\ref{eq:transport_coeff}) have the following symmetry 

1253: with respect to the reversal of $\vB$: 

1254: %====================================================

1255: \begin{eqnarray}

1256: L_{xx}^{ij}(\Te,\much, - B)=L_{xx}^{ij}(\Te,\much,  B) , \\

1257: L_{yx}^{ij}(\Te,\much, - B)= - L_{yx}^{ij}(\Te,\much,  B) ,

1258: \end{eqnarray}

1259: %====================================================

1260: with $i=1,2$ and $j=1,2$. 

1261: Then we confirm that they satisfy the Onsager relation. 

1262: 

1263: In contrast to the coefficients of the transport flux densities, 

1264: those of the total flux densities 

1265: in eq.(\ref{eq:jnx}), (\ref{eq:jny}), (\ref{eq:jqx}), and (\ref{eq:jqy}) 

1266: do not satisfy the Einstein relation nor the Onsager relation. 

1267: We also note that 

1268: the coefficient of the drift component of the total thermal flux density, $\K21yx$, is 

1269: proportional to $\Te s_0 + \Omega_0$ instead of $\Te s_0$ 

1270: [eq.(\ref{eq:K21})], 

1271: while the corresponding coefficient of the transport flux density, $\Lnqyx $, 

1272: is proportional to $\Te s_0$  [eq.(\ref{eq:Lnqyx})] 

1273: and this transport thermal flux density divided by $\Te$

1274: accords with the definition of the entropy flux density. 

1275: 

1276: Smr$\check{\rm c}$ka and \Streda\cite{Smrcka1977} have proved that 

1277: the transport coefficients for number and energy fluxes 

1278: in quantizing magnetic fields 

1279: are given by integrals of the zero-temperature conductivity tensor

1280: in the case of elastic scatterings

1281: (the relation for number and thermal fluxes has been written 

1282: in ref.\citen{Streda1984a}). 

1283: The same relation holds in the present case. 

1284: Each coefficient $L_{\alpha \beta}^{ij}$ 

1285: with $i=1,2$, $j=1,2$, $\alpha=x,y$, and $\beta=x,y$ 

1286: can be expressed by

1287: %====================================================

1288: \begin{equation}

1289: L_{\alpha \beta}^{ij} = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} d\ve 

1290: \left( - \frac{\partial f}{\partial \ve} \right) 

1291: (\ve - \muec)^{i+j-2} L_{\alpha \beta}^{11(0)}(\ve)  ,

1292: \end{equation}

1293: %====================================================

1294: in terms of the zero-temperature coefficients 

1295: %====================================================

1296: \begin{eqnarray}

1297: &L_{xx}^{11(0)}(\ve)= L_{yy}^{11(0)}(\ve) = 

1298:      \sum_{\alpha} D_{\alpha} \delta(\ve- \ve_{\alpha}) , \\

1299: &L_{yx}^{11(0)}(\ve)= -L_{xy}^{11(0)}(\ve) = 

1300:       (s_B/h) \sum_{\alpha} \theta(\ve- \ve_{\alpha})  ,

1301: \end{eqnarray}

1302: %====================================================

1303: where $\theta(\ve)=0$ for $\ve<0$ and $\theta(\ve)=1$ for $\ve>0$. 

1304: 

1305: 

1306: %####################################################

1307: \section{Linear-Response Ettingshausen Effect}

1308: 

1309: As an illustration, 

1310: we apply the present theory with the transport fluxes 

1311: to the Ettingshausen effect, 

1312: in which the gradient of the electron temperature is developed 

1313: in the direction perpendicular to the current 

1314: in the presence of the magnetic field. 

1315: A spatial variation of the electron temperature in 

1316: the Ettingshausen effect in a quantum Hall system has been 

1317: studied previously in the nonlinear transport regime.~\cite{Akera2002}

1318: Here we make a linear-response calculation 

1319: and investigate spatial variations and quantum oscillations 

1320: of the electron temperature. 

1321: 

1322: \subsection{Model and Equations}

1323: 

1324: We consider a two-dimensional system in the region $-W/2 <y< W/2$. 

1325: We employ the zero edge-width model in \S \ref{sec:model}.  

1326: The following two cases are studied. 

1327: In the first case the width of the sample $W$ is comparable to or larger than 

1328: the length scale of the electron-temperature variation $\lambda$. 

1329: The formula of $\lambda$ is given below. 

1330: In the second case $W$ is much smaller than $\lambda$, 

1331: and here only terms in the lowest order of $W/ \lambda$ are retained. 

1332: 

1333: We use eqs.(\ref{eq:nt2}) and (\ref{eq:tst2}) 

1334: and restrict the calculation to the linear-response regime and to steady states. 

1335: We also assume a uniformity along $x$ where 

1336: flux densities and thermodynamic quantities have no dependence on $x$. 

1337: The exception is $\muec$ which has a constant gradient along $x$.  

1338: The gradient $\nabla_x \muec$ is also independent of $y$

1339: since $\nabla_y \nabla_x \muec =\nabla_x \nabla_y \muec =0$,  

1340: and is equal to $\nabla_x V=eE_x$.  

1341: Then the equations become

1342: %====================================================

1343: \begin{equation}

1344: \nabla_y j_{ny}^{\tr} =0 \ ,  

1345: \label{eq:n(y)}

1346: \end{equation}

1347: %====================================================

1348: %====================================================

1349: \begin{equation}

1350: \nabla_y j_{qy}^{\tr} + \PL =0 \ . 

1351: \label{eq:q(y)}

1352: \end{equation}

1353: %====================================================

1354: We employ the simplest model of the energy loss $\PL$:  

1355: %====================================================

1356: \begin{equation}

1357: \PL=\Cp [\Te (y) - \TL] \ ,

1358: \end{equation}

1359: %====================================================

1360: where $\Cp$ is a constant.  

1361: The boundary conditions at $y=\pm W/2$ are 

1362: %====================================================

1363: \begin{equation}

1364: j_{ny}^{\tr} =0 \ , \ \  j_{qy}^{\tr} =0 \ ,  

1365: \label{eq:BC}

1366: \end{equation}

1367: %====================================================

1368: since the fluxes to the outside of the sample are absent 

1369: ($\Delta J^{\tr}_{ny}=0$ and $\Delta J^{\tr}_{qy}=0$) 

1370: in eqs.(\ref{eq:dJny}) and (\ref{eq:dJqy}). 

1371: Using eq.(\ref{eq:n(y)}) and (\ref{eq:BC}) we have

1372: %====================================================

1373: \begin{equation}

1374: j_{ny}^{\tr} =0 \ , \ \ -W/2 <y< W/2 \ .  

1375: \label{eq:jnytr0}

1376: \end{equation}

1377: %====================================================

1378: 

1379: \subsection{Spatial Variations}

1380: 

1381: We substitute $\nabla_x \muec =eE_x$ and $\nabla_x \Te =0$ into 

1382: the formula of $j_{qy}^{\tr}$, 

1383: and use eq.(\ref{eq:jnytr0}) to eliminate $\nabla_y \muec$.  

1384: Then we obtain 

1385: %====================================================

1386: \begin{equation}

1387: j^{\tr}_{qy}=   - \Aqnyx eE_x  - \Aqqyy \nabla_y \Te \  ,

1388: \label{eq:jqytr}

1389: \end{equation}

1390: %====================================================

1391: with

1392: %====================================================

1393: \begin{eqnarray}

1394: &\Aqnyx= \Lqnyx - \Lqnyy (\Lnnyy)^{-1} \Lnnyx  , \\ 

1395: &\Aqqyy= [\Lqqyy - \Lqnyy (\Lnnyy)^{-1} \Lnqyy ] \TL^{-1} .

1396: \end{eqnarray}

1397: %====================================================

1398: The transport coefficients are constant in the bulk region in the linear-response regime. 

1399: By substituting eq.(\ref{eq:jqytr}) into eq.(\ref{eq:q(y)}), 

1400: we obtain the equation for $\Te(y)$: 

1401: %====================================================

1402: \begin{equation}

1403: \Aqqyy  \nabla_y^2  \Te = \Cp (\Te-\TL)  \ , 

1404: \end{equation}

1405: %====================================================

1406: with the boundary condition: 

1407: %====================================================

1408: \begin{equation}

1409: j^{\tr}_{qy}=  - \Aqnyx eE_x  - \Aqqyy \nabla_y \Te  =0, \ y=\pm W/2 \ .

1410: \end{equation}

1411: %====================================================

1412: This boundary condition immediately shows that 

1413: the electric field $E_x$ along the current induces 

1414: the temperature gradient $\nabla_y \Te$. 

1415: Solving the equation, we find the spatial variation of $\Te$ to be  

1416: %====================================================

1417: \begin{equation}

1418: \Te(y) -\TL 

1419: =  T_0 [ e^{-(y+W/2)/\lambda} - e^{(y-W/2)/\lambda}  ] .\  

1420: \label{eq:Te(y)}

1421: \end{equation}

1422: %====================================================

1423: The relaxation length of the $\Te$ deviation is found to be

1424: %====================================================

1425: \begin{equation}

1426: \lambda =  (\Aqqyy/ \Cp)^{1/2}\  , 

1427: \end{equation}

1428: %====================================================

1429: where $\Aqqyy>0$ as is proved from the Schwarz inequality. 

1430: The magnitude of the $\Te$ deviation is 

1431: %====================================================

1432: \begin{equation}

1433: T_0  = (\lambda \Aqnyx / \Aqqyy) (1+e^{-W/\lambda})^{-1} eE_x  \ .

1434: \end{equation}

1435: %====================================================

1436: If we assume that $D_{\alpha}= (2N+1) D_0$, 

1437: $T_0/E_x$ depends on $D_0$ and also on $\Cp$. 

1438: 

1439: \subsection{Quantum Oscillations}

1440: 

1441: In order to obtain a universal result independent of $D_0$ and $\Cp$, 

1442: we consider $\nabla_y \Te / \nabla_y \muec$ in the limit of $W \ll \lambda$.

1443: In this limit the $y$ dependence of $\nabla_y \Te$ and $\nabla_y \muec$ 

1444: are negligible from eqs.(\ref{eq:Te(y)}) and (\ref{eq:jnytr0}), respectively. 

1445: We use $\nabla_x \Te =0$ again and 

1446: eliminate $\nabla_x \muec$ by using $j_{ny}^{\tr} =0$.  

1447: We then obtain 

1448: %====================================================

1449: \begin{equation}

1450: j^{\tr}_{qy}=   - \Bqnyy \nabla_y \muec  - \Bqqyy \nabla_y \Te \  .

1451: \end{equation}

1452: %====================================================

1453: with

1454: %====================================================

1455: \begin{eqnarray}

1456: &\Bqnyy= \Lqnyy - \Lqnyx (\Lnnyx)^{-1} \Lnnyy  , \\ 

1457: &\Bqqyy= [\Lqqyy - \Lqnyx (\Lnnyx)^{-1} \Lnqyy ] \TL^{-1} .

1458: \end{eqnarray}

1459: %====================================================

1460: From the boundary condition $j^{\tr}_{qy}=0$, we find

1461: %====================================================

1462: \begin{equation}

1463: \nabla_y \Te / \nabla_y \muec =   - \Bqnyy / \Bqqyy  \  .

1464: \end{equation}

1465: %====================================================

1466: Here we assume that $D_{\alpha}= (2N+1) D_0$. 

1467: Then we find that $\nabla_y \Te / \nabla_y \muec$ is independent of $D_0$ and $\Cp$. 

1468: The dimensionless quantity $\kB \nabla_y \Te  / \nabla_y \muec $ 

1469: is a universal function of $\much/ \hbar \oc$ and $\kB \TL/\hbar \oc$, which is plotted in Fig.1. 

1470: Here the spin splitting is neglected. 

1471: We find that the sign of $\nabla_y \Te$ exhibits quantum oscillations 

1472: as a function of $\much$ at $\kB \TL < \hbar \oc$. 

1473: Detailed analysis of the Ettingshausen effect will be given elsewhere. 

1474: %#############################################################

1475: \begin{figure}

1476: \begin{center}

1477: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{thdfig1.eps}

1478: \end{center}

1479: \caption{

1480: Electron temperature gradient $\nabla_y \Te$ perpendicular to the current  

1481: divided by the Hall field $\nabla_y \muec /e$ ($\muec$: the electrochemical potential)  

1482: is plotted as a function of 

1483: the chemical potential $\much$ for several values of the lattice temperature $\TL$. 

1484: } 

1485: \end{figure}

1486: %#############################################################

1487: 

1488: 

1489: %####################################################

1490: \section{Discussion}

1491: 

1492: \subsection{Thermoelectric-Transport Theory}

1493: 

1494: Nearly half a century ago, 

1495: the thermoelectric coefficients in a magnetic field 

1496: have been calculated quantum-mechanically 

1497: (the references are cited in some papers~\cite{Obraztsov1964,Obraztsov1965,Herring1966}).

1498: Several authors encountered a difficulty 

1499: of violating the Einstein relation 

1500: and the Onsager relation

1501: when calculating the coefficients for the local current density.  

1502: This problem was due to the confusion of the local current density 

1503: with the averaged current density, 

1504: which is defined as 

1505: the measured current through a sample divided by a cross section of the sample.

1506: The Einstein relation and the Onsager relation should be applied to 

1507: the measured current, or to its averaged density, 

1508: and the local current density is different from the averaged current density in a magnetic field 

1509: due to the presence of the diamagnetic surface current 

1510: (a description is given in a textbook~\cite{Landau1960} and a review paper~\cite{Herring1966}). 

1511: Obraztsov~\cite{Obraztsov1964,Obraztsov1965} 

1512: has shown explicitly that the Onsager relation holds 

1513: for the averaged current density 

1514: by calculating the total current through the sample 

1515: including the diamagnetic surface current 

1516: in the case of three-dimensional electron systems. 

1517: He has also shown~\cite{Obraztsov1965} that 

1518: the thermoelectric coefficients in the absence of disorder 

1519: can be expressed in terms of the entropy. 

1520: 

1521: A current density, 

1522: which satisfies both the Einstein relation and the Onsager relation, 

1523: can be defined also at each point in a sample. 

1524: It has been defined by 

1525: $\vj_{\rm cond}=\vj - c \vnabla \! \times \! \vM$ 

1526: and has been called the conduction current density,~\cite{Landau1960,Herring1966} 

1527: the macroscopic current density,~\cite{Obraztsov1964}

1528: or the transport current density.~\cite{Cooper1997} 

1529: Here $\vj$ is the local current density and 

1530: $c \vnabla \! \times \! \vM$ is the magnetization current density 

1531: with the magnetization $\vM$. 

1532: The current density $\vj_{\rm cond}$ is zero in equilibrium by definition. 

1533: 

1534: Later the discovery of the quantum Hall effect~\cite{Klitzing1980,Kawaji1981} 

1535: has stimulated theoretical~\cite{Zelenin1982,Girvin1982,Jonson1984,

1536: Streda1983,Streda1984b,Oji1984a,Oji1984b,Oji1985,Zawadzki1984,Grunwald1987,Cooper1997} 

1537: and experimental~\cite{Obloh1984,Gallagher1992} 

1538: studies on thermoelectric effects 

1539: in two-dimensional systems in strong magnetic fields.

1540: The edge current in a two-dimensional system corresponds to 

1541: the surface current in a three-dimensional system. 

1542: The thermoelectric power has been calculated 

1543: in a two-dimensional system of noninteracting electrons 

1544: in a quantizing magnetic field in the absence of disorder~\cite{Zelenin1982,Girvin1982} 

1545: and in the presence of disorder~\cite{Jonson1984,Oji1984b} 

1546: for short-range scatterings

1547: in the self-consistent Born approximation.~\cite{Ando1974} 

1548: Effects of the localization of wave function on the thermoelectric transport 

1549: have been studied~\cite{Grunwald1987} 

1550: within the classical-drift model.~\cite{Iordansky1982,Prange1982,Apenko1985} 

1551: Effects of the interaction between electrons on the thermoelectric transport 

1552: have also been studied.~\cite{Cooper1997}

1553: 

1554: 

1555: In this paper 

1556: we have defined a number transport flux density and an energy transport flux density 

1557: from the corresponding measured fluxes in a narrow wire 

1558: and shown that each transport flux density is equal to 

1559: the total flux density minus the magnetization current density, 

1560: namely that corresponding to $\vj - c \vnabla \! \times \! \vM$. 

1561: Note that the current in this paper is due to only the orbital-center motion 

1562: as in refs.\citen{Obraztsov1965,Girvin1982,Grunwald1987}, 

1563: while those in refs.\citen{Landau1960,Herring1966,Obraztsov1964,Cooper1997} 

1564: are due to both the orbital-center and relative motions. 

1565: The localization has been taken into account 

1566: within the classical-drift model,~\cite{Iordansky1982,Prange1982,Apenko1985} 

1567: and the transport coefficients obtained in the present paper 

1568: eq.(\ref{eq:transport_coeff}) reduces to 

1569: those obtained by Grunwald and Hajdu~\cite{Grunwald1987} 

1570: in the absence of hopping processes. 

1571: The transport coefficients in the present paper are 

1572: generalized so that they are applicable 

1573: to a nonlinear transport regime within the local equilibrium 

1574: by including their dependences 

1575: on the local electron temperature and the local chemical potential. 

1576: 

1577: %####################################################

1578: \subsection

1579: {Hot-Electron Theory and Thermohydrodynamics}

1580: 

1581: One of the most typical nonlinear effects is the electron heating.  

1582: Uchimura and Uemura~\cite{Uchimura1979} have applied 

1583: the hot-electron theory and the self-consistent Born approximation~\cite{Ando1974} 

1584: to explain the electric-field dependence of the diagonal conductivity, 

1585: observed by Kawaji and Wakabayashi,~\cite{Kawaji1976}

1586: in two-dimensional systems in quantizing magnetic fields.  

1587: 

1588: Shortly after the discovery of the quantum Hall effect, 

1589: the breakdown of the quantum Hall effect has been 

1590: found,~\cite{Ebert1983,Cage1983,Kuchar1984}  in which 

1591: $\rxx$ increases by several orders of magnitude

1592: when the current is increased up to a critical value.  

1593: As a mechanism of the breakdown, 

1594: a hot-electron model,~\cite{Ebert1983,Gurevich1984,Komiyama1985}  

1595: has been proposed, which combines  

1596: the electron heating and the strong $\Te$ dependence of $\rxx$. 

1597: Later the hot-electron model has been supported by 

1598: the observed spatial evolutions of $\rxx$.~\cite{Komiyama1996,Kaya1998,Kaya1999} 

1599: 

1600: Gurevich and Mints~\cite{Gurevich1984} have proposed 

1601: a hydrodynamic equation based on the hot-electron model 

1602: to calculate spatio-temporal variations of $\Te$ in quantum Hall systems. 

1603: Their equation, however, is restricted to one-dimensional variations of $\Te$, 

1604: and the thermal flux due to the drift motion is missing. 

1605: 

1606: The previous theory by one of the present authors~\cite{Akera2002}

1607: has proposed a set of hydrodynamic equations for 

1608: two-dimensional variations of $\Te$ and $\muec$ 

1609: as well as a model of flux densities due to drift and hopping processes,   

1610: which is a generalization of the theory for one-dimensional variations 

1611: by the same author.~\cite{Akera2001} 

1612: In this theory,~\cite{Akera2002} however, 

1613: the drift thermal flux density was not correct: 

1614: the drift thermal flux density in eq.(3.13) there 

1615: was $\vj_q^{\rm drift} - \vj^{\rm drift}_{q0}$ 

1616: where $\vj^{\rm drift}_{q0}$ is the drift thermal flux density at $\Te =0$, 

1617: but it should be $\vj_q^{\rm drift}$. 

1618: Equation (3.13) in ref.\citen{Akera2002}

1619: should be replaced by eq.(\ref{eq:tst}) in the present paper and 

1620: boundary conditions eq.(3.14) should be corrected to

1621: $\vj_n^{\tr} \cdot \vn_{\rm b}=0$, $\vj_q^{\tr} \cdot \vn_{\rm b}=0$ 

1622: where $\vn_{\rm b}$ is the unit vector perpendicular to the boundary. 

1623: %####################################################

1624: %The difference between $\vj^{\rm drift}_{q0}$ and $\vj_q^{\rm mag}$ 

1625: %is large around $\much =\ve^0_{\alpha}$ (odd-integer filling factors), 

1626: %while $\vj^{\rm drift}_{q0}$ is qualitatively similar to $\vj_q^{\rm mag}$ 

1627: %around $\much =\ve^0_{\alpha}\pm \hbar \oc /2$ (even-integer filling factors). 

1628: %####################################################

1629: 

1630: 

1631: %####################################################

1632: \section{Conclusions}

1633: 

1634: We have developed a theory of thermohydrodynamics in quantum Hall systems  

1635: to study spatio-temporal variations in the linear- and nonlinear-transport regime

1636: in the local-equilibrium approximation.

1637: A nonlinear effect has been taken into account through 

1638: dependences of the transport coefficients 

1639: on the local electron temperature and the local chemical potential.

1640: This theory can be used to investigate, for example,  

1641: the electron temperature distribution 

1642: in the vicinity of the breakdown of the quantum Hall effect 

1643: in a system with compressible and incompressible strips. 

1644: 

1645: Quantum Hall systems possess several unique features. 

1646: The formation of the Landau levels gives rise to 

1647: quantum oscillations of thermoelectric properties as a function of the filling factor. 

1648: The activation energy for the transport 

1649: plays an essential role in producing the bistability 

1650: in the breakdown of the quantum Hall effect. 

1651: The large drift current is responsible for 

1652: the observed long relaxation length of 

1653: the electron temperature.~\cite{Komiyama1996,Kaya1998,Kaya1999}  

1654: These features will continue to provide a variety of unique thermohydrodynamic phenomena 

1655: in quantum Hall systems. 

1656: 

1657: 

1658: %####################################################

1659: \section*{Acknowledgments}

1660: 

1661: The authors would like to thank 

1662: T. Ise, K. Shimoyama, T. Maeda, T. Nakagawa, and S. Kanamaru 

1663: for valuable discussions. 

1664: This work was supported in part by 

1665: the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

1666: from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

1667: 

1668: %####################################################

1669: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1670: 

1671: \bibitem{Groot1962} 

1672: S.R. de Groot and P. Mazur: 

1673: {\it Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics} 

1674: (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962).

1675: 

1676: \bibitem{Scholl2001} 

1677: E. Sch{\"o}ll: 

1678: {\it Nonlinear Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Chaos in Semiconductors} 

1679: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001). 

1680: 

1681: \bibitem{Klitzing1980} 

1682: K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda and M. Pepper: 

1683: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 45} (1980) 494. 

1684: 

1685: \bibitem{Kawaji1981} 

1686: S. Kawaji and J. Wakabayashi: 

1687: in {\it Physics in High Magnetic Fields} 

1688: (Springer, Berlin, 1981) p.\ 284.

1689: 

1690: \bibitem{Chklovskii1992}

1691: D. B. Chklovskii, B. I. Shklovskii, and L. I. Glazman: 

1692: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 46} (1992) 4026. 

1693: 

1694: \bibitem{Ahlswede2001}

1695: E. Ahlswede, P. Weitz, J. Weis, K. von Klitzing, and K. Eberl: 

1696: Physica B {\bf 298} (2001) 562. 

1697: 

1698: \bibitem{Guven2003}

1699: K. G\"uven and R. R. Gerhardts: 

1700: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67} (2003) 115327.

1701: 

1702: \bibitem{Ebert1983} G. Ebert, K. von Klitzing, K. Ploog and G. Weimann: 

1703: J. Phys. C {\bf 16} (1983) 5441.

1704: 

1705: \bibitem{Cage1983} M. E. Cage, R. F. Dziuba, B. F. Field, 

1706: E. R. Williams, 

1707: S. M. Girvin, A. C. Gossard, D. C. Tsui and R. J. Wagner: 

1708: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 51} (1983) 1374. 

1709: 

1710: \bibitem{Kuchar1984} F. Kuchar, G. Bauer, G. Weimann and H. Burkhard:

1711: Surf. Sci. {\bf 142} (1984) 196.

1712: 

1713: \bibitem{Komiyama1996} 

1714: S. Komiyama, Y. Kawaguchi, T. Osada and Y. Shiraki: 

1715: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77} (1996) 558. 

1716: 

1717: \bibitem{Kaya1998} I. I. Kaya, G. Nachtwei, K. von Klitzing and K. Eberl: 

1718: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58} (1998) R7536. 

1719: 

1720: \bibitem{Kaya1999} I. I. Kaya, G. Nachtwei, K. von Klitzing and K. Eberl: 

1721: Europhys. Lett. {\bf 46} (1999) 62. 

1722: 

1723: \bibitem{Ahlers1993} F. J. Ahlers, G. Hein, H. Scherer, L. Bliek, 

1724: H. Nickel, R. L{\"o}sch and W. Schlapp: 

1725: Semicond.\ Sci.\ Technol. {\bf 8} (1993) 2062.

1726: 

1727: \bibitem{Sagol2001} B.E. Sagol, G. Nachtwei, I. I. Kaya, 

1728: K. von Klitzing and K. Eberl: 

1729: Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Phys. Semicond., eds. N. Miura and T. Ando 

1730: (Springer, Berlin, 2001) p. 959.

1731: 

1732: \bibitem{Kawano2000} Y. Kawano and S. Komiyama: 

1733: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61} (2000) 2931. 

1734: 

1735: \bibitem{Kawano2003} Y. Kawano and S. Komiyama: 

1736: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 68} (2003) 085328.

1737: 

1738: \bibitem{Akera2002} 

1739: H. Akera: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 71} (2002) 228.

1740: 

1741: \bibitem{Nixon1990} J. A. Nixon and J. H. Davies:

1742: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 41} (1990) 7929.

1743: 

1744: \bibitem{Iordansky1982} S. V. Iordansky: 

1745: Solid State Commun. {\bf 43} (1982) 1.

1746: 

1747: \bibitem{Prange1982} R. E. Prange and R. Joynt: 

1748: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 25} (1982) 2943.

1749: 

1750: \bibitem{Apenko1985} S. M. Apenko and Yu. E. Lozovik: 

1751: J. Phys. C {\bf 18} (1985) 1197. 

1752: 

1753: \bibitem{Akera2000} 

1754: H. Akera: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 69} (2000) 3174.

1755: 

1756: \bibitem{Ise2002}

1757: T. Ise and H. Akera: 

1758: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 71} (2002) 1712.

1759: 

1760: \bibitem{Cooper1997}

1761: N. R. Cooper, B. I. Halperin and I. M. Ruzin: 

1762: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55} (1997) 2344.

1763: 

1764: \bibitem{Ando1974}

1765: T. Ando and Y. Uemura: 

1766: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 36} (1974) 959.

1767: 

1768: \bibitem{Landau1960} 

1769: L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz: 

1770: {\it Electrodynamics of Continuous Media}

1771: (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1960) \S 29.

1772: 

1773: \bibitem{Obraztsov1964}

1774: Yu. N. Obraztsov: Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) {\bf 6} (1964) 414  

1775: [Sov. Phys. Solid State {\bf 6} (1964) 331]. 

1776: 

1777: \bibitem{Onsager1931a}

1778: L. Onsager: Phys. Rev. {\bf 37} (1931) 405.

1779: 

1780: \bibitem{Onsager1931b}

1781: L. Onsager: Phys. Rev. {\bf 38} (1931) 2265.

1782: 

1783: \bibitem{Smrcka1977}

1784: L. Smr$\check{\rm c}$ka and P. \Streda: J. Phys. C {\bf 10} (1977) 2153. 

1785: 

1786: \bibitem{Streda1984a} 

1787: P. St$\check{\rm r}$eda and H. Oji: Phys. Lett. {\bf 102A} (1984) 201. 

1788: 

1789: \bibitem{Grunwald1987}

1790: A. Grunwald and J. Hajdu: 

1791: Solid State Commun. {\bf 63} (1987) 289. 

1792: 

1793: \bibitem{Obraztsov1965}

1794: Yu. N. Obraztsov: Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) {\bf 7} (1965) 573  

1795: [Sov. Phys. Solid State {\bf 7} (1965) 455]. 

1796: 

1797: \bibitem{Herring1966}

1798: C. Herring: 

1799: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 21}, Suppl. (1966) v.

1800: 

1801: \bibitem{Zelenin1982}

1802: S. P. Zelenin, A. S. Kondrat'ev, and A. E. Kuchma: 

1803: Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. {\bf 16} (1982) 551  

1804: [Sov. Phys. Semicond. {\bf 16} (1982) 355]. 

1805: 

1806: \bibitem{Girvin1982}

1807: S. M. Girvin and M. Jonson: J. Phys. C {\bf 15} (1982) L1147. 

1808: 

1809: \bibitem{Jonson1984}

1810: M. Jonson and S. M. Girvin: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 29} (1984) 1939.

1811: 

1812: \bibitem{Streda1983}

1813: P. \Streda: J. Phys. C {\bf 16} (1983) L369. 

1814: 

1815: \bibitem{Streda1984b}

1816: P. \Streda: Phys. Status Solidi. (b) {\bf 125} (1984) 849. 

1817: 

1818: \bibitem{Oji1984a}

1819: H. Oji: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 29} (1984) 3148.

1820: 

1821: \bibitem{Oji1984b}

1822: H. Oji: J. Phys. C {\bf 17} (1984) 3059.

1823: 

1824: \bibitem{Oji1985}

1825: H. Oji and P. \Streda: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 31} (1985) 7291.

1826: 

1827: \bibitem{Zawadzki1984}

1828: W. Zawadzki and R. Lassnig: Surf. Sci. {\bf 142} (1984) 225. 

1829: 

1830: \bibitem{Obloh1984}

1831: H. Obloh, K. von Klitzing, and K. Ploog: 

1832: Surf. Sci. {\bf 142} (1984) 236.

1833: 

1834: \bibitem{Gallagher1992} 

1835: B. L. Gallagher and P. N. Butcher: 

1836: in {\it Handbook on Semiconductors}, edited by P. T. Landsberg 

1837: (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992), Vol. 1, p. 721.

1838: 

1839: \bibitem{Uchimura1979}

1840: N. Uchimura and Y. Uemura: 

1841: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 47} (1979) 1417.

1842: 

1843: \bibitem{Kawaji1976}

1844: S. Kawaji and J. Wakabayashi: Surf. Sci. {\bf 58} (1976) 238.

1845: 

1846: \bibitem{Gurevich1984} A. Vl. Gurevich and R. G. Mints: 

1847: Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 39} (1984) 318 

1848: [JETP Lett. {\bf 39} (1984) 381]. 

1849: 

1850: \bibitem{Komiyama1985} 

1851: S. Komiyama, T. Takamasu, S. Hiyamizu and S. Sasa: 

1852: Solid State Commun. {\bf 54} (1985) 479.

1853: 

1854: \bibitem{Akera2001} H. Akera: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 70} (2001) 1468.

1855: 

1856: \end{thebibliography}

1857: 

1858: \end{document}

1859: