1: 

2: 

3: 

4: 

5: 

6: \documentclass{jpsj2}

7: 

8: 

9: 

10: 

11: 

12: % 2002/12/16

13: %\usepackage[mtbold]{mathtime}

14: 

15: 

16: 

17: 

18: 

19: 

20: 

21: \def\runtitle{Evaluation of Dynamic spin structure factor

22:                for the spin-1/2 XXZ chain in a magnetic field}

23: 

24: 

25: 

26: %\def\runtitle{Dynamical correlation functions

27: %               for the spin-1/2 XXZ chain in a magnetic field}

28: \def\runauthor{Jun Sato, Masahiro Shiroishi and Minoru Takahashi}

29: 

30: 

31: 

32: 

33: 

34: 

35: 

36: 

37: 

38: 

39: 

40: 

41: 

42: 

43: 

44: 

45: 

46: 

47: 

48: 

49: 

50: 

51: 

52: 

53: \newcommand{\nc}{\newcommand}

54: \nc{\rnc}{\renewcommand}

55: 

56: 

57: \nc{\nn}{\nonumber}

58: \nc{\ds}{\displaystyle}

59: 

60: 

61: \nc{\ch}{\cosh}

62: \nc{\varph}{\sinh}

63: \nc{\sh}{\sinh}

64: \rnc{\th}{\tanh}

65: 

66: \nc{\lam}{\lambda}

67: \nc{\gam}{\gamma}

68: \rnc{\d}{\Delta}

69: 

70: \nc{\feta}{\frac{\eta}{2}}

71: \nc{\fgam}{\frac{\gam}{2}}

72: \nc{\ifgam}{\frac{i\gam}{2}}

73: \nc{\p}{\Psi\Psi^{\ast}}

74: 

75: \nc{\inv}{^{-1}}

76: \nc{\sm}{$-$}

77: 

78: 

79: \nc{\bra}{\langle}

80: \nc{\ket}{\rangle}

81: 

82: \nc{\vac}{\mid0\,\ket}

83: \nc{\vacc}{\bra\,0\mid}

84: 

85: 

86: \nc{\sumir}{\sum^r_{i=1}}

87: \nc{\sumiN}{\sum^N_{i=1}}

88: \nc{\sumnN}{\sum^N_{n=1}}

89: \nc{\summr}{\sum^r_{m=1}}

90: \nc{\prodiN}{\prod^N_{i=1}}

91: \nc{\prodjN}{\prod^N_{j=1}}

92: \nc{\prodkN}{\prod^N_{k=1}}

93: 

94: 

95: \rnc{\(}{\left(}

96: \rnc{\)}{\right)}

97: \rnc{\[}{\left[}

98: \rnc{\]}{\right]}

99: 

100: \nc{\xxx}{$XXX \,$}

101: 

102: 

103: 

104: 

105: 

106: 

107: 

108: 

109: 

110: 

111: 

112: 

113: 

114: 

115: 

116: 

117: 

118: 

119: 

120: 

121: 

122: \title

123: {

124: Evaluation of Dynamic spin structure factor\\

125: for the spin-1/2 XXZ chain in a magnetic field

126: }

127: 

128: 

129: 

130: 

131: 

132: 

133: 

134: 

135: 

136: 

137: \author

138: { 

139: Jun Sato, Masahiro Shiroishi and Minoru Takahashi

140: }

141: 

142: 

143: 

144: 

145: 

146: 

147: 

148: 

149: 

150: 

151: 

152: 

153: 

154: \inst

155: {

156: Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, 

157: Chiba 277-8581, Japan

158: }

159: 

160: 

161: 

162: 

163: 

164: 

165: 

166: 

167: 

168: 

169: \recdate{\today}

170: 

171: 

172: 

173: 

174: 

175: 

176: 

177: 

178: 

179: 

180: 

181: \abst{

182: Transition rates and dynamic spin structure factor at zero temperature 

183: for the spin-1/2 XXZ chain at critical regime in a magnetic field

184: are numerically evaluated in terms of the exact determinant representations for 

185: the form factors and norms of the Bethe eigenstates.

186: We have seen that the transition rates converges toward the constant

187: function with the value $1$ in the limit $\d\rightarrow0$.

188: The observed critical exponent of the singularity at the lower boundary

189: is compared with the one predicted

190: from the comformal field theory.

191: We confirm that they are in good agreement.

192: Further we have discovered that a small peak emerges near the upper boundary

193: in the line shape of $S(q,\omega)$ for $0<\d<1$.

194: }

195: 

196: 

197: 

198: 

199: 

200: 

201: 

202: 

203: 

204: 

205: 

206: \kword{

207: Bethe ansatz, XXZ model, dynamic spin structure factor, CFT

208: }

209: 

210: 

211: 

212: 

213: 

214: 

215: 

216: 

217: 

218: 

219: 

220: 

221: 

222: 

223: 

224: 

225: 

226: 

227: \begin{document}

228: 

229: 

230: 

231: 

232: 

233: 

234: 

235: \maketitle

236: 

237: 

238: 

239: 

240: 

241: 

242: 

243: 

244: 

245: 

246: 

247: 

248: 

249: 

250: 

251: 

252: 

253: 

254: 

255: 

256: 

257: 

258: 

259: 

260: \section{Introduction}

261: 

262: 

263: Since Bethe\cite{Bethe} in 1931 formulated the method (Bethe ansatz)

264:  for obtaining the exact 

265: eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the one-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg model,

266: it has been extensively

267: generalized

268: to study the excitations and the thermodynamics of

269: the model exactly.\cite{Takabook}

270: %

271: %

272: However, from the point of view of the dynamics of Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains,

273: only approximate results had been obtained until recently,

274: partly due to the lack of the exact expression for the form factors.

275: 

276:  

277: Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains are realized in quasi-one-dimensional magnetic

278: insulators, such as,

279: $\mathrm{Cu(C_4H_4N_2)(NO_3)_2}$ \cite{cuno}, and $\mathrm{KCuF_3}$ \cite{kcu}.

280: Dynamic spin structure factor $S(q,\omega)$, which is the Fourier transform of 

281: dynamical correlation functions, is of considerable importance,

282: %for the understanding of the dynamics of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet,

283: since they

284: are directly comparable with inelastic neutron scattering experiments

285: of these quasi one-dimensional substances.\cite{stone}

286: 

287: In 1967 Niemeijer obtained an exact expression of $S(q,\omega)$

288: for the spin-1/2 XY model at any temperature\cite{nmj}.

289: It is the special case ($\d=0$) of XXZ model,

290: %(see eq.(\ref{ham}) for the definition of the anisotropy parameter $\d$),

291: where all the correlation functions can be calculated by Jordan-Wigner

292: transformation.

293: %On account of the fact that

294: Unfortunately

295: this exact calculation can not be extended for general case of $\d\neq 0$,

296: and only approximate evaluations of $S(q,\omega)$ had been attempted.\cite{beck}

297: %

298: %

299: It was worth noting, therefore, that an analytical result for the 

300: two-spinon dynamic spin structure factor for the spin-1/2 massive XXZ model ($\d\geq 1$) 

301: in zero magnetic field was obtained \cite{bg,bgkar1,bgkar2}

302: from the multiple integral representation for form factors\cite{jimbo},

303: which is based on the infinite dimensional symmetries of the quantum affine algebra 

304: $U_q(\hat{sl}(2,{\bf C}))$.

305: 

306: 

307: 

308: 

309: 

310: 

311: 

312: However, this analytical calculation is not applicable

313: to the case with nonzero magnetic field.

314: Karbach et al. classified the dynamically dominant excitations of the spin-1/2 XXX

315: Heisenberg model ($\d=1$)

316: in a magnetic field.

317: They subsequently calculated their transition rates

318: pertaining to dynamic spin structure factor,

319: directly from 

320: the Bethe wave functions for finite chains with up to $N=32$ sites\cite{line,quasi}.

321: %

322: %

323: Although

324: solving the Bethe ansatz equations in its own is possible for

325: $N\approx 10^3$,

326: constructing the Bethe wave functions is limited to

327: $N\approx 32$.

328: %

329: %

330: The problem of this direct calculation lies in 

331: the evaluation of the sum over the $r!$ magnon permutations in the coefficients of the

332: coordinate Bethe wave functions, where $r$ is the number of the down spins.

333: 

334: 

335: Quite recently,

336: this problem was solved by the novel work of Kitanine et al.,

337: who derived

338: the exact determinant representation

339: for the form factors of local spin operators for arbitrary finite systems.

340: \cite{kitanine}

341: %

342: %

343: In the framework of

344: %which is based on 

345: the algebraic Bethe ansatz\cite{Korepinbook},

346: they have found that

347: any local operators can be written as the elements of

348: the quantum monodromy matrix.

349: %

350: %

351: %which reduces

352: Consequently

353: the calculation of form factors reduces to

354: that of scalar products between a Bethe state and an arbitrary state,

355: which has a determinant representation.

356: %

357: Then

358: it enables us to calculate transition rates directly from the solution

359: of Bethe ansatz equations,

360: without constructing the Bethe wave functions.

361: 

362: Biegel et al. calculated dynamic spin structure factors

363: for chains with the order $N\approx 10^3$

364: using this determinant

365: representation in the case of XXX Heisenberg chain in a magnetic field\cite{karxxx}

366: and in the case of XXZ Heisenberg chain 

367: at critical regime in zero magnetic field\cite{karxxz,karxx0}.

368: As much as these calculations are still for the finite systems,

369: we can deal with much larger system sizes than in the past.

370: 

371: In this paper,

372: as an extension of these works,

373: we shall generalize the work by Biegel et al. and

374: evaluate dynamic spin structure factors

375: for the spin-1/2 XXZ chain in a magnetic field. Under the existance of a

376: magnetic field, only the XXX case has been dealt with so far.

377: 

378: 

379: 

380: 

381: 

382: 

383: 

384: 

385: 

386: 

387: 

388: 

389: 

390: 

391: 

392: 

393: 

394: 

395: 

396: 

397: 

398: 

399: 

400: 

401: 

402: 

403: 

404: 

405: 

406: 

407: 

408: 

409: 

410: 

411: 

412: \section{Bethe ansatz}

413: 

414: Let us consider the one-dimensional spin-1/2 XXZ model

415: with periodic boundary conditions

416: in a magnetic field

417: %

418: %

419: \begin{equation}

420: \label{ham}

421: H=J\sum^N_{n=1}\left\{S_n^xS^x_{n+1}+S_n^yS^y_{n+1}

422:     +\Delta (S_n^zS^z_{n+1}-\dfrac{1}{4})\right\}

423:     -h\sumnN S_n^z,

424: \end{equation}

425: %

426: %

427: where $J>0$ is the coupling constant,

428: $S^{x,y,z}=\dfrac{1}{2}\sigma^{x,y,z}$,

429: %$S_T^z=\sumnN S_n^z$,

430: $\d$ is the anisotropy parameter

431: and $h$ is the external magnetic field applied to the positive direction of $z$-axis.

432: $\sigma^{x,y,z}$ represents the standard Pauli matrices.

433: 

434: It is exactly solved by Bethe ansatz method.

435: Bethe eigenstates with $r$ down spins are constructed by a set of rapidities

436: $\{z_1,\dots,z_r\}$,

437: which is a solution of Bethe ansatz equations

438: %

439: %

440: \begin{eqnarray}

441: \label{bae}

442: N\tan\inv[\cot\frac{\gam}{2}\tanh z_i]

443: &=\pi I_i+\sum^r_{j\neq i}\tan\inv[\cot\gam\th(z_i-z_j)],\nn\\

444: &i=1,\dots,r,

445: \end{eqnarray}

446: %

447: %

448: where the parameter $\gam$ is related to the anisotropy $\d$ as

449: $\gam=\cos\inv\d$.

450: %

451: %

452: %and 

453: $I_i$ are Bethe quantum numbers,

454: which have integer values for odd $r$ and

455: half odd integer values for even $r$.

456: The total momentum and energy eigenvalues are given by

457: \begin{subequations}

458: \begin{equation}

459: k=\pi r-\frac{2\pi}{N}\sumir I_i,

460: \end{equation}

461: \begin{equation}

462: E=J\sumir\frac{-\sin^2\gam}{\ch 2z_i-\cos\gam}-h\(\frac{N}{2}-r\).

463: \end{equation}

464: \end{subequations}

465: 

466: 

467: 

468: Every solution of Bethe ansatz equations is uniquely determined

469: by Bethe quatum numbers $I_1<\dots<I_r$,

470: which provide us the classification of the excitations.

471: The ground state $|G\ket$ at magnetization $0\leq M_z\leq N/2$

472: is specified by the set of $r=N/2-M_z$ Bethe quantum numbers

473: %

474: %

475: $I_i=-N/4+M_z/2+i-1/2$.

476: %

477: %

478: 

479: 

480: 

481: 

482: 

483: 

484: 

485: 

486: 

487: 

488: 

489: 

490: 

491: 

492: 

493: 

494: 

495: 

496: 

497: 

498: 

499: 

500: 

501: 

502: 

503: 

504: 

505: 

506: 

507: 

508: \section{Dynamically dominant excitations}

509: 

510: 

511: In neutron scattering experiment at sufficiently low temperature,

512: the cross section is considered to be proportional to the dynamic spin structure factor

513: $S(q,\omega)$ at zero temperature,

514: which is defined by the space-time Fourier transform of the dynamical

515: correlation function:

516: %

517: %

518: %

519: \begin{eqnarray}

520: S_{\mu\bar{\mu}}(q,\omega)

521: &=&\frac{1}{N}\sum^N_{n,n'}e^{iq(n-n')}

522:   \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}dt\,e^{i\omega t}

523:   \bra S^{\mu}_n(t)S^{\bar{\mu}}_{n'}(0)\ket\nn\\

524: &=&\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}dt\,e^{i\omega t}\bra S^{\mu}_q(t)S^{\mu\dagger}_q(0)\ket\nn\\

525: &=&2\pi\sum_{\lam}|\bra G|S^{\mu}_q|\lam\ket|^2\delta(\omega-\omega_{\lam}),

526: \end{eqnarray}

527: %

528: %

529: %

530: where

531: %

532: %

533: %

534: $(\mu,\bar{\mu})=(z,z),(+,-),(-,+)$,

535: $\omega_{\lam}=E_{\lam}-E_G$.

536: $E_G$ and $E_{\lam}$ are the energy eigenvalues of

537: the ground state $|G\ket$ and

538: one of the excited states $|\lam\ket$,

539: respectively.

540: %

541: %

542: %

543: The spin fluctuation operator $S_q^{\mu}$ is defined by

544: %

545: \begin{equation}

546: S_q^{\mu}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sumnN e^{iqn}S^{\mu}_n

547: \,,

548: \quad

549: \mu=z,+,-,

550: \end{equation}

551: %

552: %

553: for wave numbers $q=2\pi l/N$, $l=1,\dots,N$.

554: 

555: 

556: 

557: 

558: In the following, we will focus on the case for the parallel spin fluctuations

559: $(\mu,\bar{\mu})=(z,z)$,

560: $q=\pi/2$,

561: and for half the saturation magnetic field

562: $M_z=N/4$,

563: $r=N/2-M_z=N/4$.

564: %

565: %

566: %

567: In the case of XXX model ($\d=1$),

568: it was established that the spectral weight of $S_{zz}(q,\omega)$

569: is dominated by the set of collective excitations,

570: called "\textit{psinon}($\Psi$)-\textit{antipsinon}($\Psi^{\ast}$)" excitations,

571: which is denoted by $\Psi\Psi^{\ast}$\cite{line}.

572: Their Bethe quantum numbers are shown in figure \ref{configuration}.

573: %

574: %

575: The $I_i$ are given by the position of small black circles in each row.

576: The positions of large circles represent the $I_i$ vacancies.

577: %

578: The first row represents the ground state $|G\ket$,

579: whose Bethe quantum numbers are uniformly cofigured at the center.

580: 

581: When one of the Bethe quantum numbers of the ground state is moved to the

582: sea of $I_i$ vacancies, it becomes antipsinon.

583: Then it makes a hole in the $I_i$ configurations,

584: which represents the psinon.

585: In this way,

586: we have a set of excitations with two parameters,

587: which is called psinon-antipsinon excitations.

588: %

589: We label the $\p$ states with the integer parameter $m$.

590: The state $|m\ket$ has the Bethe quantum number $I_1=-r/2-m+1/2$.

591: %At $q=\pi/2$,

592: %the other Bethe quantum numbers are given by

593: %$I_i=-r/2+i-3/2$ ($2\leq i\leq r-m+1$),

594: %$I_i=-r/2+i-1/2$ ($r-m+2\leq i\leq r$)

595: %

596: %$I_{\Psi^{\ast}}=I_1$ represents the antipsinon,

597: %which lives in the psinon vacuum.

598: %It is isolated from the other $I_i$ configuration.

599: %$I_{\Psi}=r/2-m+1/2$ represents the psinon,

600: %which is the hole in the uniform configuration of $I_i$.

601: 

602: 

603: 

604: 

605: 

606: 

607: 

608: 

609: 

610: 

611: \begin{figure}

612: %

613: \label{configuration}

614: %

615: %

616: \begin{picture}(430,420)

617: %

618: \put(15,380){\line(1,0){275}}

619: %

620: \multiput(15,376)(25,0){12}{\line(0,1){8}}

621: %

622: \put(0,390){$-\frac{11}{2}$}

623: \put(27,390){$-\frac{9}{2}$}

624: \put(52,390){$-\frac{7}{2}$}

625: \put(77,390){$-\frac{5}{2}$}

626: \put(102,390){$-\frac{3}{2}$}

627: \put(127,390){$-\frac{1}{2}$}

628: \put(161,390){$\frac{1}{2}$}

629: \put(186,390){$\frac{3}{2}$}

630: \put(211,390){$\frac{5}{2}$}

631: \put(236,390){$\frac{7}{2}$}

632: \put(261,390){$\frac{9}{2}$}

633: \put(286,390){$\frac{11}{2}$}

634: %

635: \put(340,380){$I_i$}

636: \put(408,380){$m$}

637: \put(447,380){$q$}

638: %

639: %

640: \put(410,335){1}

641: \put(410,315){1}

642: \put(410,295){1}

643: \put(410,275){1}

644: %

645: \put(410,245){2}

646: \put(410,225){2}

647: \put(410,205){2}

648: \put(410,185){2}

649: %

650: \put(410,155){3}

651: \put(410,135){3}

652: \put(410,115){3}

653: \put(410,95){3}

654: %

655: \put(410,65){4}

656: \put(410,45){4}

657: \put(410,25){4}

658: \put(410,5){4}

659: %

660: %

661: \put(447,361){0}

662: %

663: \put(445,335){$\frac{\pi}{8}$}

664: \put(445,315){$\frac{2\pi}{8}$}

665: \put(445,295){$\frac{3\pi}{8}$}

666: \put(445,275){$\frac{4\pi}{8}$}

667: %

668: \put(445,245){$\frac{2\pi}{8}$}

669: \put(445,225){$\frac{3\pi}{8}$}

670: \put(445,205){$\frac{4\pi}{8}$}

671: \put(445,185){$\frac{5\pi}{8}$}

672: %

673: \put(445,155){$\frac{3\pi}{8}$}

674: \put(445,135){$\frac{4\pi}{8}$}

675: \put(445,115){$\frac{5\pi}{8}$}

676: \put(445,95){$\frac{6\pi}{8}$}

677: %

678: \put(445,65){$\frac{4\pi}{8}$}

679: \put(445,45){$\frac{5\pi}{8}$}

680: \put(445,25){$\frac{6\pi}{8}$}

681: \put(445,5){$\frac{7\pi}{8}$}

682: %

683: %

684: %

685: \put(15,365){\circle{12}}

686: \put(40,365){\circle{12}}

687: \put(65,365){\circle{12}}

688: \put(90,365){\circle{12}}

689: \put(115,365){\circle*{6}}

690: \put(140,365){\circle*{6}}

691: \put(165,365){\circle*{6}}

692: \put(190,365){\circle*{6}}

693: \put(215,365){\circle{12}}

694: \put(240,365){\circle{12}}

695: \put(265,365){\circle{12}}

696: \put(290,365){\circle{12}}

697: \put(315,363)

698: {\small{$\{\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

699: %

700: %

701: \put(15,335){\circle{12}}

702: \put(40,335){\circle{12}}

703: \put(65,335){\circle{12}}

704: \put(90,335){\circle*{6}}

705: \put(115,335){\circle{12}}

706: \put(140,335){\circle*{6}}

707: \put(165,335){\circle*{6}}

708: \put(190,335){\circle*{6}}

709: \put(215,335){\circle{12}}

710: \put(240,335){\circle{12}}

711: \put(265,335){\circle{12}}

712: \put(290,335){\circle{12}}

713: \put(315,333){\small{$\{\sm\frac{5}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

714: %

715: %

716: \put(15,315){\circle{12}}

717: \put(40,315){\circle{12}}

718: \put(65,315){\circle{12}}

719: \put(90,315){\circle*{6}}

720: \put(115,315){\circle*{6}}

721: \put(140,315){\circle{12}}

722: \put(165,315){\circle*{6}}

723: \put(190,315){\circle*{6}}

724: \put(215,315){\circle{12}}

725: \put(240,315){\circle{12}}

726: \put(265,315){\circle{12}}

727: \put(290,315){\circle{12}}

728: \put(315,313){\small{$\{\sm\frac{5}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

729: %

730: %

731: \put(15,295){\circle{12}}

732: \put(40,295){\circle{12}}

733: \put(65,295){\circle{12}}

734: \put(90,295){\circle*{6}}

735: \put(115,295){\circle*{6}}

736: \put(140,295){\circle*{6}}

737: \put(165,295){\circle{12}}

738: \put(190,295){\circle*{6}}

739: \put(215,295){\circle{12}}

740: \put(240,295){\circle{12}}

741: \put(265,295){\circle{12}}

742: \put(290,295){\circle{12}}

743: \put(315,293){\small{$\{\sm\frac{5}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

744: %

745: %

746: \put(15,275){\circle{12}}

747: \put(40,275){\circle{12}}

748: \put(65,275){\circle{12}}

749: \put(90,275){\circle*{6}}

750: \put(115,275){\circle*{6}}

751: \put(140,275){\circle*{6}}

752: \put(165,275){\circle*{6}}

753: \put(190,275){\circle{12}}

754: \put(215,275){\circle{12}}

755: \put(240,275){\circle{12}}

756: \put(265,275){\circle{12}}

757: \put(290,275){\circle{12}}

758: \put(315,273){\small{$\{\sm\frac{5}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\}$}}

759: %

760: %

761: \put(15,245){\circle{12}}

762: \put(40,245){\circle{12}}

763: \put(65,245){\circle*{6}}

764: \put(90,245){\circle{12}}

765: \put(115,245){\circle{12}}

766: \put(140,245){\circle*{6}}

767: \put(165,245){\circle*{6}}

768: \put(190,245){\circle*{6}}

769: \put(215,245){\circle{12}}

770: \put(240,245){\circle{12}}

771: \put(265,245){\circle{12}}

772: \put(290,245){\circle{12}}

773: \put(315,243){\small{$\{\sm\frac{7}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

774: %

775: %

776: \put(15,225){\circle{12}}

777: \put(40,225){\circle{12}}

778: \put(65,225){\circle*{6}}

779: \put(90,225){\circle{12}}

780: \put(115,225){\circle*{6}}

781: \put(140,225){\circle{12}}

782: \put(165,225){\circle*{6}}

783: \put(190,225){\circle*{6}}

784: \put(215,225){\circle{12}}

785: \put(240,225){\circle{12}}

786: \put(265,225){\circle{12}}

787: \put(290,225){\circle{12}}

788: \put(315,223){\small{$\{\sm\frac{7}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

789: %

790: %

791: \put(15,205){\circle{12}}

792: \put(40,205){\circle{12}}

793: \put(65,205){\circle*{6}}

794: \put(90,205){\circle{12}}

795: \put(115,205){\circle*{6}}

796: \put(140,205){\circle*{6}}

797: \put(165,205){\circle{12}}

798: \put(190,205){\circle*{6}}

799: \put(215,205){\circle{12}}

800: \put(240,205){\circle{12}}

801: \put(265,205){\circle{12}}

802: \put(290,205){\circle{12}}

803: \put(315,203){\small{$\{\sm\frac{7}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

804: %

805: %

806: \put(15,185){\circle{12}}

807: \put(40,185){\circle{12}}

808: \put(65,185){\circle*{6}}

809: \put(90,185){\circle{12}}

810: \put(115,185){\circle*{6}}

811: \put(140,185){\circle*{6}}

812: \put(165,185){\circle*{6}}

813: \put(190,185){\circle{12}}

814: \put(215,185){\circle{12}}

815: \put(240,185){\circle{12}}

816: \put(265,185){\circle{12}}

817: \put(290,185){\circle{12}}

818: \put(315,183){\small{$\{\sm\frac{7}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\}$}}

819: %

820: %

821: \put(15,155){\circle{12}}

822: \put(40,155){\circle*{6}}

823: \put(65,155){\circle{12}}

824: \put(90,155){\circle{12}}

825: \put(115,155){\circle{12}}

826: \put(140,155){\circle*{6}}

827: \put(165,155){\circle*{6}}

828: \put(190,155){\circle*{6}}

829: \put(215,155){\circle{12}}

830: \put(240,155){\circle{12}}

831: \put(265,155){\circle{12}}

832: \put(290,155){\circle{12}}

833: \put(315,153){\small{$\{\sm\frac{9}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

834: %

835: %

836: \put(15,135){\circle{12}}

837: \put(40,135){\circle*{6}}

838: \put(65,135){\circle{12}}

839: \put(90,135){\circle{12}}

840: \put(115,135){\circle*{6}}

841: \put(140,135){\circle{12}}

842: \put(165,135){\circle*{6}}

843: \put(190,135){\circle*{6}}

844: \put(215,135){\circle{12}}

845: \put(240,135){\circle{12}}

846: \put(265,135){\circle{12}}

847: \put(290,135){\circle{12}}

848: \put(315,133){\small{$\{\sm\frac{9}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

849: %

850: %

851: \put(15,115){\circle{12}}

852: \put(40,115){\circle*{6}}

853: \put(65,115){\circle{12}}

854: \put(90,115){\circle{12}}

855: \put(115,115){\circle*{6}}

856: \put(140,115){\circle*{6}}

857: \put(165,115){\circle{12}}

858: \put(190,115){\circle*{6}}

859: \put(215,115){\circle{12}}

860: \put(240,115){\circle{12}}

861: \put(265,115){\circle{12}}

862: \put(290,115){\circle{12}}

863: \put(315,113){\small{$\{\sm\frac{9}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

864: %

865: %

866: \put(15,95){\circle{12}}

867: \put(40,95){\circle*{6}}

868: \put(65,95){\circle{12}}

869: \put(90,95){\circle{12}}

870: \put(115,95){\circle*{6}}

871: \put(140,95){\circle*{6}}

872: \put(165,95){\circle*{6}}

873: \put(190,95){\circle{12}}

874: \put(215,95){\circle{12}}

875: \put(240,95){\circle{12}}

876: \put(265,95){\circle{12}}

877: \put(290,95){\circle{12}}

878: \put(315,93){\small{$\{\sm\frac{9}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\}$}}

879: %

880: %

881: \put(15,65){\circle*{6}}

882: \put(40,65){\circle{12}}

883: \put(65,65){\circle{12}}

884: \put(90,65){\circle{12}}

885: \put(115,65){\circle{12}}

886: \put(140,65){\circle*{6}}

887: \put(165,65){\circle*{6}}

888: \put(190,65){\circle*{6}}

889: \put(215,65){\circle{12}}

890: \put(240,65){\circle{12}}

891: \put(265,65){\circle{12}}

892: \put(290,65){\circle{12}}

893: \put(315,63){\small{$\{\sm\frac{11}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

894: %

895: %

896: \put(15,45){\circle*{6}}

897: \put(40,45){\circle{12}}

898: \put(65,45){\circle{12}}

899: \put(90,45){\circle{12}}

900: \put(115,45){\circle*{6}}

901: \put(140,45){\circle{12}}

902: \put(165,45){\circle*{6}}

903: \put(190,45){\circle*{6}}

904: \put(215,45){\circle{12}}

905: \put(240,45){\circle{12}}

906: \put(265,45){\circle{12}}

907: \put(290,45){\circle{12}}

908: \put(315,43){\small{$\{\sm\frac{11}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

909: %

910: %

911: \put(15,25){\circle*{6}}

912: \put(40,25){\circle{12}}

913: \put(65,25){\circle{12}}

914: \put(90,25){\circle{12}}

915: \put(115,25){\circle*{6}}

916: \put(140,25){\circle*{6}}

917: \put(165,25){\circle{12}}

918: \put(190,25){\circle*{6}}

919: \put(215,25){\circle{12}}

920: \put(240,25){\circle{12}}

921: \put(265,25){\circle{12}}

922: \put(290,25){\circle{12}}

923: \put(315,23)

924: {\small{$\{\sm\frac{11}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{3}{2}\}$}}

925: %

926: %

927: \put(15,5){\circle*{6}}

928: \put(40,5){\circle{12}}

929: \put(65,5){\circle{12}}

930: \put(90,5){\circle{12}}

931: \put(115,5){\circle*{6}}

932: \put(140,5){\circle*{6}}

933: \put(165,5){\circle*{6}}

934: \put(190,5){\circle{12}}

935: \put(215,5){\circle{12}}

936: \put(240,5){\circle{12}}

937: \put(265,5){\circle{12}}

938: \put(290,5){\circle{12}}

939: \put(315,3)

940: {\small{$\{\sm\frac{11}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{3}{2}\,,\,\sm\frac{1}{2}\,,\,\frac{1}{2}\}$}}

941: %

942: %

943: \end{picture}

944: %

945: %

946: \caption{

947: Configurations of Bethe quantum numbers of 

948:          psinon-antipsinon excitations for $N=16, M_z=4, r=4$.

949: $I_i$ are represented by the positions of small black circles.

950: Large circles represent $I_i$ vacancies.

951: The first row represents the ground state $|G\ket$.

952: }

953: %

954: %

955: \end{figure}

956: 

957: 

958: 

959: 

960: 

961: 

962: 

963: 

964: The relative contribution of psinon-antipsinon excitations

965: is determined by

966: the ratio of the integrated intensity

967: %

968: %

969: %

970: \begin{equation}

971: S_{zz}(q)=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}S_{zz}(q,\omega)

972: =\sum_{\lam}|\bra G|S^z_q|\lam\ket|^2

973: =\bra G|S^z_qS^z_{-q}|G\ket

974: \end{equation}

975: %

976: %

977: %

978: and $\Psi\Psi^{\ast}$ contribution

979: %

980: %

981: %

982: \begin{equation}

983: S_{zz}^{\p}(q)=\sum_{\p}|\bra G|S^z_q|\p\ket|^2

984: =\sum_m|\bra G|S^z_q|m\ket|^2.

985: \end{equation}

986: %

987: %

988: %

989: Relative contributions 

990: for various values of $\d$ are shown in table \ref{cont}.

991: %

992: %

993: We see

994: they are more than

995: 98\%

996: for general $\d$.

997: %

998: Although

999: the relative contribution actually decreases as the system size $N$ increases,

1000: it was shown in Ref.[11] that

1001: the relative contribution for the XXX model ($\d=1$)

1002: is more than

1003: $93\%$

1004: from an extrapolation of the data for $N=12,16,20,24,28,32$.

1005: %

1006: %

1007: %It can be seen that the relative contribution

1008: %

1009: %

1010: Also we find that the relative contribution

1011: is monotonously increasing

1012: when we bring down the value of $\d$ from $1$ to $0$.

1013: %

1014: % converges toward

1015: %$100\%$

1016: %when $\d\rightarrow 0$.

1017: %

1018: Hence we can conclude

1019: %which means 

1020: that the $\p$ excitation is dynamically dominant

1021: in the whole region $0<\d<1$.

1022: 

1023: 

1024: \begin{table}

1025: \caption

1026: {Relative contributions of psinon-antipsinon excitations for $N=24$, $M_z=r=6$, $q=\pi/2$.}

1027: \label{cont}

1028: \begin{tabular}

1029: {@{\hspace{\tabcolsep}\extracolsep{\fill}}cccc}

1030: %

1031: \hline

1032: \hline

1033: %

1034: $\d$

1035: %

1036: &$S_{zz}^{\Psi\Psi^{\ast}}(\pi/2)$

1037: %

1038: &$S_{zz}(\pi/2)$

1039: %

1040: &Relative contribution(\%)\\

1041: %

1042: \hline

1043: %

1044: -0.4  & 0.228545 & 0.232882 & 98.1378 \\

1045: -0.3  & 0.234930 & 0.237182 & 99.0504 \\

1046: -0.1  & 0.245605 & 0.245782 & 99.9282 \\

1047: -0.01 & 0.249581 & 0.249582 & 99.9994 \\

1048: \hline

1049: 0.01  & 0.250415 & 0.250417 & 99.9994 \\

1050: 0.1   & 0.253984 & 0.254114 & 99.9489 \\

1051: 0.3   & 0.260983 & 0.261918 & 99.6431 \\

1052: 0.4   & 0.264076 & 0.265574 & 99.4360 \\

1053: 0.5   & 0.266954 & 0.269056 & 99.2189 \\

1054: 0.7   & 0.272230 & 0.275491 & 98.8161 \\

1055: 0.9   & 0.277048 & 0.281247 & 98.5068 \\

1056: 1     & 0.279318 & 0.283887 & 98.3907 \\

1057: \hline

1058: 1.1   & 0.281503 & 0.286378 & 98.2977 \\

1059: 1.5   & 0.289411 & 0.295027 & 98.0965 \\

1060: 2.0   & 0.297553 & 0.303452 & 98.0559 \\

1061: \hline\hline

1062: \end{tabular}

1063: \end{table}

1064: 

1065: 

1066: 

1067: 

1068: 

1069: 

1070: 

1071: 

1072: 

1073: 

1074: 

1075: 

1076: 

1077: 

1078: 

1079: 

1080: 

1081: 

1082: 

1083: 

1084: 

1085: 

1086: 

1087: 

1088: 

1089: 

1090: 

1091: 

1092: 

1093: \section{Transition rates and Dynamic spin structure factor}

1094: 

1095: 

1096: 

1097: We numerically evaluate the dynamic spin structure factor

1098: from the contribution of $\p$ excitations:

1099: %

1100: %

1101: \begin{equation}

1102: S^{\p}_{zz}(q,\omega)=2\pi\sum_{m}|\bra G|S^z_q|m\ket|^2\delta(\omega-\omega_{m}).

1103: \end{equation}

1104: %

1105: %

1106: In the thermodynamic limit $N\rightarrow\infty$,

1107: it can be represented by the product of the transition rates

1108: $M_{zz}(q,\omega_m)=N|\bra G|S^z_q|m\ket|^2$

1109: and the density of states

1110: $D_{zz}(q,\omega_m)=\ds{\frac{2\pi}{N}\frac{1}{\omega_{m+1}-\omega_m}}$

1111: \cite{quasi}.

1112: 

1113: 

1114: 

1115: From the determinant representations for the form factors and norms of

1116: Bethe eigenstates\cite{kitanine},

1117: we have the following formula for transition rates:

1118: %

1119: %

1120: %

1121: \begin{equation}

1122: \label{formula}

1123: \begin{split}

1124: M_{zz}(q,\omega)

1125: =&\frac{N^2}{4}\,\,

1126: \frac{\ds{\prod^r_{j=1}\mid\sh(z^0_j-\ifgam)\mid^2}}

1127:      {\ds{\prod^r_{j=1}\mid\sh(z_j-\ifgam)\mid^2}}\,\,

1128: \left|\prod^r_{j<k}\frac{1}{\sinh^2(z^0_{j}-z^0_{k})+\sin^2\gam}\right|

1129: \left|\prod^r_{\alpha<\beta}\frac{1}{\sinh^2(z_{\alpha}-z_{\beta})+\sin^2\gam}\right|\\

1130: &\times

1131: \frac{\mid \det(H-2P)\mid^2}{|\det{\it \Phi}(\{z^0_j\})|\,\,

1132: |\det{\it \Phi}(\{z_j\})|}\,\,,

1133: \end{split}

1134: \end{equation}

1135: %

1136: %

1137: %

1138: where the matrix elements of $H$, $P$ and $\Phi$ are given by

1139: %

1140: %

1141: % 

1142: \begin{equation}

1143: \left\{

1144: \begin{split}

1145: &{\it \Phi}(\{z_j\})_{ab}=\left\{

1146: \begin{array}{ll}

1147: \ds{\frac{\sin 2\gam}{\sh^2(z_a-z_b)+\sin^2\gam}}&(a\neq b)\\[10pt]

1148: \displaystyle{N\frac{\sin\gam}{\sh^2z_a+\sin^2\fgam}

1149: -\sum_{\substack{k=1\\k\neq a}}^r\frac{\sin 2\gam}{\sh^2(z_a-z_k)+\sin^2\gam}}&(a=b)

1150: \end{array}

1151: \right.\\

1152: &H(\{z^0_j\},\{z_k\})_{ab}

1153: =\frac{1}{\sh(z^0_a-z_b)}

1154:   \left(\prod^r_{j\neq a}\sh(z^0_j-z_b-i\gam)-

1155: \left[\frac{\varph(z_b-\frac{i\gam}{2})}{\varph(z_b+\frac{i\gam}{2})}\right]^N

1156: \prod^r_{j\neq a}\sh(z^0_j-z_b+i\gam)\right)\\

1157: &P(\{z^0_j\},\{z_k\})_{ab}

1158: =\frac{1}{\ds{\sh^2z^0_a+\sin^2\fgam}}\,\,\prod_{k=1}^r\sh(z_k-z_b-i\gam).

1159: \end{split}

1160: \right.

1161: \end{equation}

1162: %

1163: %

1164: %

1165: $\{z^0_1,\dots,z^0_r\}$ and $\{z_1,\dots,z_r\}$

1166: are the rapidities corresponding to

1167: the ground state $|G\ket$

1168: and one of the $\p$ states $|m\ket$,

1169: respectively.

1170: To obtain the desired transition rates,

1171: we first solve the Bethe ansatz equations (\ref{bae})

1172: for given Bethe quantum numbers $I_i$,

1173: and then substitute the solution to the formula (\ref{formula}).

1174: 

1175: 

1176: 

1177: 

1178: 

1179: We rewrite the Bethe quantum numbers $I_i$ 

1180: of the $\p$ state $|m\ket$ at $q=\pi/2$:

1181: \begin{equation}

1182: \begin{split}

1183: I_1&=-r/2-m+1/2\\

1184: I_i&=-r/2+i-3/2 \quad (2\leq i\leq r-m+1)\\

1185: I_i&=-r/2+i-1/2 \quad (r-m+2\leq i\leq r)\\

1186:    & \quad \quad \textrm{for}\quad 1\leq m\leq r

1187: \end{split}

1188: \end{equation}

1189: %

1190: %

1191: %

1192: When $m$ increases and approaches toward $r$,

1193: the first Bethe quantum number $I_1$ gets away from 

1194: the other $I_i$ configurations,

1195: and the transition rate monotonously decreases.

1196: At the same time it is getting more

1197: %Then it becomes 

1198: difficult to find the solution of the first rapidity $z_1$.

1199: %

1200: %

1201: %

1202: %In the case of XXX model ($\d$=1) for $N=4096$,

1203: %we can find the solutions of Bethe ansatz equations

1204: %for all the excitations $1\leq m\leq r=N/4=1024$.

1205: %

1206: %

1207: %On the other hand in the XXZ case for $N=4096$,

1208: %we could find the root only for

1209: %$1\leq m\leq 1003,976,955,954,959,980,1009$

1210: %at

1211: %$\d=0.01,0.1,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.7,0.9$

1212: %,respectively.

1213: %The corresponding data are therefore missing

1214: %in the following calculation.

1215: 

1216: 

1217: 

1218: 

1219: 

1220: 

1221: 

1222: In figure \ref{trbun}(b),

1223: we plot transition rates $M_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$ for $N=4096$.

1224: %in the range of $m$ as mentioned above.

1225: Also shown in the inset (a) are

1226: the excitation spectrum of $\p$ states for each $\d$.

1227: %

1228: %

1229: %

1230: Note that

1231: in the XXX case ($\d=1$),

1232: %it was already calculated by Biegel et al. 

1233: %

1234: %In this case,

1235: the transition rates $M_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$ can be observed as a smooth function

1236: of $\omega$,

1237: which has a singularity at the lower boundary,

1238: and converges toward zero at the upper boundary.\cite{karxxx}

1239: 

1240: 

1241: 

1242: 

1243: \begin{figure}

1244: \includegraphics{fig2.eps}

1245: \caption{

1246: (a)Energy versus momentum of the psinon-antipsinon excitations

1247:    at $M_z=N/4$ for $N$=256.

1248: (b)Transition rates between the ground state and the psinon-antipsinon excitations

1249:    at $q=\pi/2$, $M_z=N/4$ for $N$=4096.

1250: }

1251: \label{trbun}

1252: \end{figure}

1253: 

1254: 

1255: 

1256: %We also evaluate transition rates 

1257: In the XXZ case

1258: at the critical regime

1259: $0<\d<1$,

1260: it can be observed that

1261: when we bring close to $\d=0$ starting from $\d=1$,

1262: the singularity at the lower boundary has been weakened

1263: and at last the function $M_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$

1264: converges to the constant function with the value $1$.

1265: 

1266: The critical exponent of the  singularity at the lower boundary

1267: can be compared with the prediction of conformal field theory.

1268: The observed critical exponent $\eta_z$ in table \ref{crit} is a fit

1269: $M_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)=a+\omega^{\eta_z-2}$

1270: from the data of the lowest and the second lowest excitations

1271: $m=1,2$.

1272: Conformal field theory predicts that it is equal to

1273: the scaled energy gap

1274: $2\theta_z=\Omega_z/(\pi v)$.\cite{crit}

1275: %

1276: %

1277: %

1278: $\Omega_z$ and the spin-wave velocity $v$ are defined by

1279: the scaled lowest excitation energy

1280: at $q=\pi/2$ and $q=2\pi/N$ in the thermodynamic limit:

1281: \begin{equation}

1282: \begin{split}

1283: \Omega_z&=\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}N\omega(m=1,q=\pi/2)\\

1284: 2\pi v&=\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}N\omega(m=1,q=2\pi/N).

1285: \end{split}

1286: \end{equation}

1287: %

1288: %

1289: %

1290: They are shown for $0<\d\leq 1$ in table \ref{crit}.

1291: We can see that the observed singularity and the prediction from

1292: conformal field theory agree quite well.

1293: 

1294: 

1295: 

1296: 

1297: \begin{table}

1298: \caption{Critical Exponent of the singularity at the lower boundary}

1299: \label{crit}

1300: \begin{tabular}

1301: {

1302: %@

1303: %{

1304: %\hspace

1305: %{\tabcolsep}

1306: %\extracolsep

1307: %{\fill}

1308: %}

1309: ccccc}

1310: %

1311: \hline

1312: \hline

1313: %

1314: $\Delta$    & 1 & 0.9 & 0.7 & 0.5  \\

1315: %

1316: \hline

1317: %

1318: $\Omega_z$  & 4.38286228 & 4.39050106 & 4.40585570 & 4.42060672 \\

1319: %

1320: $2\pi v$    & 5.72474288 & 5.64334684 & 5.45713287 & 5.23326627 \\

1321: %

1322: \hline

1323: %

1324: $2\theta_z$ & 1.53119969 & 1.55599192 & 1.61471447 & 1.68942549 \\

1325: %

1326: $\eta_z$    &   1.5313   &  1.5565    &  1.6163    &  1.6923    \\

1327: %

1328: \hline

1329: \hline

1330: %

1331: \end{tabular}

1332: %

1333: %

1334: %

1335: %

1336: %

1337: \begin{tabular}

1338: {

1339: %@

1340: %{

1341: %\hspace

1342: %{\tabcolsep}

1343: %\extracolsep

1344: %{\fill}

1345: %}

1346: cccccc}

1347: %

1348: \hline

1349: \hline

1350: %

1351: $\Delta$     & 0.4 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 0.1 & 0.01 \\

1352: %

1353: \hline

1354: %

1355: $\Omega_z$   & 4.42734708 & 4.43333735 & 4.43823777 & 4.44160837 & 4.44286904 \\

1356: %

1357: $2\pi v$     & 5.10437806 & 4.96243131 & 4.80595322 & 4.63334574 & 4.46278471 \\

1358: %

1359: \hline

1360: %

1361: $2\theta_z$  & 1.73472538 & 1.78676018 & 1.84697501 &1.91723589 & 1.99107478 \\

1362: %

1363: $\eta_z$     &  1.7384    &  1.7910    &  1.8516    &  1.9213    &  1.9918    \\

1364: %

1365: \hline

1366: \hline

1367: %

1368: \end{tabular}

1369: \end{table}

1370: 

1371: 

1372: 

1373: 

1374: 

1375: 

1376: Next we consider the dynamic spin structure factor $S_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$,

1377: which is obtained by the product of transition rates $M_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$

1378: and density of states $D_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$.

1379: Density of states of $\p$ excitations are shown in figure \ref{sqd}(a).

1380: It begins with flat function from the lower boundary,

1381: and gradually increases toward the singularity at the upper boundary.

1382: 

1383: The spectral-weight distribution

1384: $S_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$ is shown in figure \ref{sqd}(b).

1385: In the XXX case $\d=1$, it has double singularities

1386:  at the lower and upper boundary.\cite{karxxx}

1387: Almost the same line shapes are observed for $0.7\leq\d<1$.

1388: When we further decrease the value of $\d$,

1389: a small peak near the upper boundary emerges for $\d\leq 0.5$,

1390: and grows as

1391: %which is getting stronger when 

1392: $\d$ is further decreasing.

1393: %

1394: %

1395: In the limit $\d\rightarrow 0$,

1396: this peak eventually becomes the singularity at the upper boundary,

1397: where the line shape coincides with the density of states.

1398: %On the other hand,

1399: %the singularity at the upper boundary is getting weaker,

1400: %which can not be observed

1401: %in our calculation

1402: %at $\d=0.1,0.01$.

1403: 

1404: 

1405: 

1406: 

1407: 

1408: 

1409: \begin{figure}

1410: \includegraphics{fig3.eps}

1411: \caption{

1412: (a)Density of states for psinon-antipsinon excitations

1413:          at $q=\pi/2$ , $M_z=N/4$ from data for $N$=4096.\\

1414: (b)Spectral-weight distribution of psinon-antipsinon excitations in $S_{zz}(q,\omega)$

1415:          at $q=\pi/2$ , $M_z=N/4$ from data for $N$=4096.

1416: }

1417: \label{sqd}

1418: \end{figure}

1419: 

1420: 

1421: 

1422: \section{Conclusion}

1423: 

1424: We have evaluated 

1425: the longitudinal dynamic spin structure factor $S_{zz}(q,\omega)$

1426: for the massless ($0<\d\leq1$) spin-1/2 XXZ chain

1427: at $q=\pi/2$

1428: with half the saturation magnetization $M_z=N/4$,

1429: for the system size $N=4096$.

1430: We have calculated the relative contribution of psinon-antipsinon excitations

1431: and confirmed that they are also dominant in the critical regime.

1432: We have also seen that

1433: the observed critical exponents of the singularity at the lower boundary

1434: agree with the prediction of conformal field theory.

1435: 

1436: We have observed here, for the first time,

1437: that the $\d$-dependece of transition rates and

1438: the spectral weight distribution

1439: in the magnetic field.

1440: It can be seen that the transition rates coverges toward the

1441: constant function with the value $1$ in the limit $\d\rightarrow0$.

1442: An interesting behavior of line shapes for $S_{zz}(\pi/2,\omega)$

1443: is observed around $0.1<\d<0.5$,

1444: where a small peak emerges near the upper boundary

1445: and grows as $\d\rightarrow0$.

1446: %

1447: %

1448: %which has the possibility to be observed

1449: %in the inelastic neutron scattering experiments.

1450: We hope this peculiar behavior of the peak will be measured

1451: in inelastic neutron scattering experiments.

1452: 

1453: 

1454: 

1455: 

1456: 

1457: \section*{Acknowledgement}

1458: 

1459: We thank K. Sakai for useful discussions.

1460: M. S. was supported by Grant-in-Aid for

1461: Young Scientists No. 14740228.

1462: 

1463: 

1464: 

1465: 

1466: 

1467: 

1468: 

1469: 

1470: 

1471: 

1472: 

1473: 

1474: \begin{thebibliography}{19}

1475: %

1476: %

1477: \bibitem{Bethe} H.  Bethe, Z. Phys. {\bf 71}, 205 (1931).

1478: %

1479: %

1480: \bibitem{Takabook} M. Takahashi,

1481:                    \textit{Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models},

1482:                    (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).

1483: %

1484: %

1485: \bibitem{cuno} P. R. Hammar, M. B. Stone, D. H. Reich, C. Broholm, P. J. Gibson, M. T. nad C. P. Landee,

1486:                and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59}, 1008 (1999).

1487: %

1488: %

1489: \bibitem{kcu} S. E. Nagler, D. A. Tennant, R. A. Cowley, T. G. Perring, and S. K. Satija, 

1490:               Phys. Rev. B {\bf 44}, 12361 (1991). 

1491: %

1492: %

1493: \bibitem{nmj} Th. Niemeijer, Physica {\bf 36}, 377 (1967).

1494: %

1495: %

1496: \bibitem{stone} M. B. Stone, D. H. Reich, C. Broholm, K. Lefmann,

1497:                 C. Rischel, C. P. Landee and M. M. Turnbull,

1498:                   Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 037205 (2003).

1499: %

1500: %

1501: \bibitem{beck} G. M\"{u}ller, H. Thomas, H. Beck, and J. C. Bonner

1502:                 , Phys. Rev. B {\bf 24}, 1429 (1981).

1503: %

1504: %

1505: \bibitem{bg} A. H. Bougourzi, M. Couture, and M. Kacir, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, R12 669 (1996).

1506: %

1507: %

1508: \bibitem{bgkar1} M. Karbach, G. M\"{u}ller, A. H. Bougourzi, A. Fledderjohann, and 

1509:                  K. -H. M\"{u}tter, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 12 510 (1997).

1510: %

1511: %

1512: \bibitem{bgkar2} A. H. Bougourzi, M. Karbach, G. M\"{u}ller, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, 11 429 (1998).

1513: %

1514: %

1515: \bibitem{jimbo} M. Jimbo and T. Miwa,

1516:                 \textit{Algebraic Analysis of Solvable Lattice Models},

1517:                 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994)

1518: %

1519: %

1520: \bibitem{line} M. Karbach and G. M\"{u}ller, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 62}, 14 871 (2000).

1521: %

1522: %

1523: \bibitem{quasi} M. Karbach, D. Biegel, and G. M\"{u}ller, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 66}, 054405 (2002).

1524: %

1525: %

1526: \bibitem{kitanine} N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, and V. Terras, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 554}, 647 (1999).

1527: %

1528: %

1529: \bibitem{Korepinbook} V. E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov and A. G. Izergin,

1530:                    \textit{Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions},

1531:                    (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).

1532: \bibitem{karxxx} D. Biegel, M. Karbach, and G. M\"{u}ller

1533:                   , Europhys. Lett {\bf 59}, 882 (2002).

1534: %

1535: %

1536: \bibitem{karxxz} D. Biegel, M. Karbach, and G. M\"{u}ller

1537:                   , J. Phys. A : Math. Gen. {\bf 36}, 5361 (2003).

1538: %

1539: %

1540: \bibitem{karxx0} D. Biegel, M. Karbach, G. M\"{u}ller and K. Wiele,

1541:                   , Phys. Rev. B {\bf 69}, 174404 (2004).

1542: %

1543: %

1544: \bibitem{crit} A. Fledderjohann, C. Gerhardt, K. H. M\"{u}tter and A. Schmitt

1545:                   , Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 7168 (1996).

1546: %

1547: %

1548: \end{thebibliography}

1549: 

1550: 

1551: 

1552: 

1553: 

1554: 

1555: 

1556: 

1557: 

1558: 

1559: 

1560: 

1561: 

1562: 

1563: 

1564: \end{document}

1565: 

1566: 

1567: 

1568: 

1569: 

1570: 

1571: 

1572: 

1573: 

1574: