1: % "VERSION 2, last correction: March 16, 2005 by PK"
2: \tolerance = 10000
3:
4: %%%%%%%%%%%For two-column take this:%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress,prb,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix,eqsecnum]{revtex4}
6: % or with one one equation counter:
7: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress,prb,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10: %
11: %%%%%%%%%%%For one-column take this:%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: %\documentclass[galley,showpacs,superscriptaddress,prb,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix,eqsecnum]{revtex4}
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14:
15: %
16: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,prl,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}
17: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,prl,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}
18: %\documentclass[galley,showpacs,prl,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
19: %
20: %\usepackage{dcolumn}
21: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
22: \usepackage{bm}
23: \usepackage{epsfig}
24: \usepackage{psfrag}
25:
26: % set \bd to \bf or \bm
27: \newcommand{\bd}{\bm}
28:
29: \begin{document}
30: \title{Self-consistent Fermi surface renormalization of two coupled Luttinger liquids}
31:
32: % \author{Sascha Ledowski$^1$, Peter Kopietz$^1$, and Alvaro Ferraz$^3$}
33:
34: \author{Sascha Ledowski}
35: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Theoretische Physik, Universit\"{a}t
36: Frankfurt, Max von Laue-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany}
37:
38: \author{Peter Kopietz}
39:
40:
41: \author{Alvaro Ferraz}
42: \affiliation{
43: International Center for Condensed Matter Physics,
44: Universidade de Bras{\'\i}{}lia, 70910-900 Bras{\'\i}{}lia, Brazil}
45:
46: % \author{Alvaro Ferraz}
47: %
48: % \affiliation{International Center for Condensed Matter Physics,
49: %Universidade de Brasilia, 70910-900 Brasilia, Brazil}
50:
51:
52:
53: % \date{\today}
54: \date{December 22, 2004}
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57: Using functional renormalization group methods, we present a
58: self-consistent calculation of
59: the true Fermi momenta $k_F^a$ (antibonding band)
60: and $k_F^b$ (bonding band) of two spinless interacting
61: metallic chains coupled by
62: small interchain hopping.
63: %Here $k_F^a$ [$k_F^b$]refers to the antibonding [bonding] band.
64: %At constant density $n = ( k_F^a + k_F^b) / \pi$ the location of the
65: %Fermi surface is fixed by the value of $\Delta = k_F^b - k_F^a$.
66: In the regime where the system is a Luttinger liquid,
67: we find that
68: $\Delta = k_F^b - k_F^a$
69: is self-consistently determined by
70: $\Delta = \Delta_{1} [ 1 + {g}_0^2 \ln ( \Lambda_0 / \Delta )^2]^{-1}$,
71: where ${g}_0$ is the dimensionless
72: interchain backscattering interaction,
73: $\Delta_{1}$ is the Hartree-Fock result for
74: $k_F^{b}-k_F^a$,
75: and
76: $\Lambda_0 \gg \Delta $ is an ultraviolet cutoff.
77: For $ {g}_0^2 \ln ( \Lambda_0 / \Delta_{1} )^2
78: \gg 1$ even weak interachain backscattering leads to a strong
79: reduction of the distance between the Fermi momenta.
80: % although the Fermi points never merge.
81:
82:
83:
84:
85:
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \pacs{71.10.Pm, 71.27.+a, 71.10.Hf }
89:
90: %\preprint{}
91:
92: %\draft
93:
94: \maketitle
95:
96: \section{Introduction}
97:
98: What survives of the Luttinger liquid properties of a one-dimensional metal
99: if two or more metallic chains are coupled by some weak
100: interchain hopping $t_{\bot}$?
101: Motivated by the proposal
102: that the anomalous normal state
103: properties of the high-temperature superconductors
104: are a manifestation of a two-dimensional non-Fermi liquid state~\cite{Anderson87},
105: many authors tried to find an answer to the above question, using
106: non-perturbative methods such as bosonization or the
107: renormalization group (RG)
108: \cite{Bourbonnais91,Kusmartsev92,Finkelstein93,Fabrizio93,Balents96,Arrigoni98,Ledermann00,Louis01,Dusuel03}.
109: As a first step
110: towards a solution of this rather difficult
111: problem, it is instructive to study
112: just two coupled spinless metallic chains~\cite{Kusmartsev92,Fabrizio93,Ledermann00,Dusuel03}.
113:
114: In spite of many years of research,
115: one fundamental aspect has only recently been addressed \cite{Dusuel03}:
116: the {\it{self-consistent}} renormalization of the
117: Fermi surface (FS).
118: The band structure of
119: two non-interacting metallic chains consists of a
120: bonding and an antibonding band,
121: leading in the generic case to a FS
122: consisting of four points $\pm k_F^a$ and $\pm k_F^b$, as shown in
123: Fig.~\ref{fig:band}.
124: %
125: %
126: \begin{figure}[tb]
127: \begin{center}
128: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=65mm}
129: \end{center}
130: \vspace{-4mm}
131: \caption{%
132: Energy bands of two metallic chains with bare
133: dispersions $\epsilon^a_{k_{\parallel}}$ (antibonding band) and
134: $\epsilon^b_{ k_{\parallel}}$ (bonding band).
135: $\mu$ is the chemical potential.
136: We consider the regime where the FS without interactions consists of four
137: points $\pm k_F^a$ and $\pm k_F^b$.
138: In the text $k_F^a$ and $k_F^b$ always refer to the true FS of the
139: interacting system, defined via Eq.~(\ref{eq:FStrue}).
140: }
141: \label{fig:band}
142: \end{figure}
143: If the density $n$ is held constant, then Luttinger's theorem
144: implies that the sum $k_F^a + k_F^b = \pi n$
145: is not affected by interactions;
146: however, the difference $\Delta = k_F^b - k_F^a$, which
147: is proportional to $t_{\bot}$ in the absence of interactions,
148: can be strongly renormalized.
149: The FS renormalization in two coupled metallic
150: chains has been studied previously using
151: RG methods in Refs. \cite{Fabrizio93,Louis01,Dusuel03}.
152: However, the calculation of the FS in these works is
153: either not self-consistent \cite{Fabrizio93,Louis01} in the sense
154: discussed in the classic book
155: by Nozi\`{e}res~\cite{Nozieres64}, or the self-consistency has not been properly implemented within the
156: framework of the RG~\cite{Dusuel03}.
157: The self-consistent definition of the FS is
158: follows naturally from the fact that the shape of the FS is a
159: characteristic property of
160: a zero temperature RG fixed point~\cite{Kopietz01,Ferraz03a,Ferraz03b,Ledowski03}.
161: We emphasize that in our approach the concept of a flowing
162: FS depending on the RG flow
163: parameter~\cite{Fabrizio93,Louis01} never appears:
164: we construct the true FS as a
165: RG fixed point, which by definition
166: does not flow.
167:
168:
169: In this work we shall use our general
170: method~\cite{Kopietz01,Ferraz03a,Ferraz03b,Ledowski03}
171: of obtaining the FS as a RG fixed point
172: to derive the self-consistency conditions for the
173: true Fermi momenta $k_F^a$ and $k_F^b$
174: of two coupled spinless chains.
175: In the parameter regime where the
176: coupled chain system is a stable Luttinger liquid,
177: these conditions can be cast into a simple transcendental
178: equation for the distance $\Delta = k_F^b - k_F^a$ between the Fermi momenta,
179: which for small $t_{\bot}$ and for
180: weak interactions takes the form
181: \begin{equation}
182: \Delta = \Delta_{1} [ 1 + {g}_0^2 \ln ( \Lambda_0 / \Delta )^2]^{-1}
183: \label{eq:deltares}
184: \; .
185: \end{equation}
186: Here $\Delta_{1}$ is the value of
187: $k_F^b - k_F^a$ within the Hartree-Fock approximation,
188: ${g}_0$ is the bare value of a suitably defined (see below)
189: dimensionless coupling describing interchain backscattering, and
190: $\Lambda_0 \gg \Delta$ is an
191: ultraviolet cutoff.
192: We emphasize that
193: Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) depends
194: only logarithmically on $\Lambda_0$, so that
195: the solution $\Delta$ is not very sensitive to the precise numerical value of $\Lambda_0$.
196: Defining $x = \Delta_{1} / \Delta$
197: and $\gamma = {g}_0^2 \ln ( \Lambda_0 /
198: \Delta_{1} )^2$, we may rewrite
199: Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) in the form $x = 1 + \gamma +
200: {g}_0^2 \ln x^2$, from which it is easy to see graphically
201: that for $\gamma \gg 1$ even weak interchain backscattering
202: leads to a strong reduction of the distance between the two Fermi momenta,
203: although for finite $\gamma$ they never merge.
204: A numerical solution of Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) is shown in
205: Fig.~\ref{fig:FSsolution}.
206: %
207: %
208: %
209: \begin{figure}[tb]
210: \begin{center}
211: \psfrag{Deltaxxx}{${\Delta} / \Delta_{1}\; \; \; $}
212: \psfrag{gamma}{$\gamma$}
213: \psfrag{gxxx}{${g}_0 \; \; $}
214: % \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=80mm}~~~~~~
215: % \epsfig{file=fsurface_041209_pl.nb.ps,width=75mm,height=60mm}~~~~~~
216: % \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=85mm}
217: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=60mm}
218: \end{center}
219: \vspace{-4mm}
220: \caption{%
221: Distance ${\Delta} = k_F^b - k_F^a$ between the Fermi momenta
222: in the Luttinger liquid phase of two spinless
223: chains coupled by weak interchain hopping $t_{\bot}$, see
224: Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}). Here
225: $ \Delta_1$ is the value of $k_F^b - k_F^a$ within the
226: Hartree-Fock approximation, ${g}_0$ is the
227: bare dimensionless interchain backscattering interaction,
228: and $\gamma =
229: {g}_0^2 \ln ( \Lambda_0 / \Delta_{1} )^2$.
230: }
231: \label{fig:FSsolution}
232: \end{figure}
233: %
234: %
235: %
236:
237: Before we discuss of derivation of Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}), let
238: us comment on its physical significance.
239: First of all, Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) predicts a strong
240: ``attraction'' between the two Fermi momenta.
241: It is tempting to extrapolate this
242: result to an infinite array of coupled chains: then the FS forms a continuum
243: consisting of two corrugated sheets.
244: Our two-chain result suggests that the curvature of the sheets should
245: decrease
246: due to interactions. This in turn enforces the
247: nesting singularities and hence might stabilize a Luttinger
248: liquid state even in higher dimensions.
249: The fact that interchain back-scattering
250: reduces the value of $k_F^b - k_F^a$ has already been
251: noticed by Fabrizio \cite{Fabrizio93}. However,
252: he neither studied this phenomenon quantitatively, nor
253: did he try to calculate the true FS self-consistently.
254:
255: The renormalization of $k_F^{b} - k_F^a$
256: predicted by Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares})
257: behaves rather
258: different from the estimate based on
259: perturbation theory around the exact solution of the isolated
260: chains with only forward scattering \cite{Arrigoni98,Wen90,Guinea04}.
261: Such an estimate leads to the
262: prediction that the renormalized interchain hopping is
263: $t_{\bot}^{\ast} \propto t_{\bot} | t_{\bot} / v_F \Lambda_0|^{\frac{\eta}{1- \eta}}$,
264: where $\eta$ is the anomalous dimension of the Luttinger liquid
265: and $v_F$ the Fermi velocity
266: for $t_{\bot}=0$.
267: The fact that without interactions $k_F^b - k_F^a \propto t_{\bot}$
268: suggests that in the interacting system
269: $k_F^{b} - k_F^a \propto t_{\bot}^{\ast} \propto
270: t_{\bot} [ 1 - \eta \ln | v_F \Lambda_0 / t_{\bot} | ]$ for small $\eta$.
271: A comparison with Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) shows that
272: this is not a valid procedure to estimate the location of the
273: true FS.
274: %In fact, the anomalous dimension $\eta$ of the isolated
275: %Luttinger liquids for $t_{\bot}=0$ does not even control the leading logarithmic correction.
276:
277: %A more recent attempt to calculate the renormalized FS of two coupled
278: %metallic chains by means of RG methods can be found in Ref.~\cite{Louis01}.
279: %Their result for $\Delta$ disagree with
280: %our Eq.~\ref{eq:deltares}. In particular, according to
281: %Louis et al.~\cite{Louis01},
282: %the second order correction to $\Delta$ depends not only on the
283: %interchain backscattering, but involves also the other
284: %marginal couplings, in disagreement with
285: %Fabrizio \cite{Fabrizio93} and the present work.
286: % Moreover, the large logarithmic
287: %reduction of $\Delta$ predicted by Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares})
288: %has not been found in Ref.~\cite{Louis01}.
289: %The reason for this discrepancies lies in the fact that
290: %in Ref.~\cite{Louis01}
291: %the momentum and frequency dependence of all
292: %four-point vertices has been ignored. As explained below
293: %Eq.~(\ref{eq:Idef}), this approximation is not sufficient.
294:
295:
296: \section{Exact RG equation for the Fermi surface}
297:
298: In order to derive
299: Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) we need to keep track of the momentum- and
300: frequency dependence of the four-point vertex.
301: To do this we use here the functional
302: RG method \cite{Wetterich93,Morris94,Salmhofer01,Kopietz01,Ferraz03a,Ferraz03b,Ferraz04,Busche02,Schuetz04}.
303: We have derived Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) using both the field
304: theoretical~\cite{Ferraz03a,Ferraz03b,Ferraz04} and the Wilsonian
305: formulation~\cite{Kopietz01,Busche02}
306: of the functional RG.
307: In order to make contact
308: with previous work~\cite{Fabrizio93,Louis01}, let us outline here the derivation
309: within the Wilsonian approach.
310: We shall briefly comment on the corresponding calculation within the field theoretical
311: RG in the concluding paragraph.
312: Starting point in the Wilsonian approach is the exact hierarchy of RG flow equations for the
313: irreducible self-energy
314: $\Sigma_{\Lambda} ( \sigma , K )$ and the one-particle irreducible
315: $2n$-point vertices $\Gamma^{(2n)}_{\Lambda} ( \{ \sigma_i, K_i \})$
316: describing the change of these quantities
317: as we vary the infrared
318: cutoff $\Lambda$. Here $K = ( k_{\parallel} , i \omega)$
319: denotes the momentum $k_{\parallel}$ along the chain and the
320: frequency $i \omega$. The pseudospin $\sigma = a,b$ labels the two bands.
321: We use the Matsubara formalism at zero temperature and the same
322: sign conventions for the vertices as in Ref.~[\onlinecite{Schuetz04}].
323: For convenience we introduce the cutoff $\Lambda$ in momentum
324: space, so that for a given $\Lambda$ all states with
325: $ | k_{\parallel} \pm k_F^{\sigma} | > \Lambda$ are integrated out.
326:
327: To take the scaling properties close to the Luttinger liquid fixed point into
328: account, we introduce rescaled momenta $q$ and frequencies $i \epsilon$
329: by setting $k_{\parallel} = \alpha k_F^{\sigma} + \Lambda q$ and
330: $ i \omega = v_F \Lambda i \epsilon$, where
331: $\alpha = {\rm sgn} k_{\parallel} = \pm 1$ labels the right/left half-axis.
332: We define the rescaled two-point vertex by
333: \begin{equation}
334: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( \sigma , \alpha , Q ) = \frac{Z_l^{\sigma } }{
335: v_F \Lambda }
336: [
337: \Sigma_{\Lambda} ( \sigma , K ) - \Sigma ( {\sigma}, \alpha k_F^{\sigma} ,i0) ]
338: \; ,
339: \label{eq:Gammadef}
340: \end{equation}
341: which is a function of the rescaled energy-momentum
342: $Q = ( q , i \epsilon)$ and the logarithmic flow parameter
343: $ l = \ln ( \Lambda_0 / \Lambda )$.
344: Here $Z_l^{\sigma}$ is the wave-function renormalization factor, and
345: the counter-term
346: $ \Sigma ( \sigma , \alpha k_{F}^{\sigma} , i0)$
347: is the exact self-energy at
348: the exact $k_F^{\sigma}$.
349: Once we know the counter-term
350: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:Gammadef}), we can calculate the
351: true FS for a given chemical
352: potential $\mu$ from the defining equation~\cite{Nozieres64}
353: \begin{equation}
354: \epsilon_{ k_F^{\sigma}}^{\sigma} + \Sigma ( {\sigma}, \alpha k_F^{\sigma}, i0 ) = \mu
355: \; ,
356: \label{eq:FStrue}
357: \end{equation}
358: where $\epsilon_{ k_{\parallel}}^{\sigma}$ is the energy dispersion
359: of band $\sigma = a,b$.
360: In higher dimensions the corresponding counter-term
361: $\Sigma ( {\bf{k}}_F , i0 )$ and the momenta ${\bf{k}}_F$ on the
362: FS can be calculated within
363: self-consistent perturbation theory in the weak coupling regime~\cite{Neumayr03}.
364: On the other hand,
365: in one dimension it is necessary to invoke the RG to properly treat the infrared divergencies.
366: A formally exact equation for the counter-term
367: can be obtained from the requirement that for $ l \to \infty$
368: the relevant part
369: \begin{equation}
370: {r}_l^{\sigma} \equiv \tilde{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( \sigma , \alpha, 0)
371: \end{equation}
372: %${r}_l^{\sigma} \equiv \tilde{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( \sigma , \alpha, 0)$
373: of the two-point vertex (\ref{eq:Gammadef}) flows into a RG fixed point~\cite{Ledowski03}.
374: Defining the rescaled four-point vertex via
375: \begin{eqnarray}
376: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l ( \sigma_1^{\prime} \alpha_1^{\prime} Q_1^{\prime},
377: \sigma_2^{\prime} \alpha_2^{\prime} Q_2^{\prime} ;
378: \sigma_2 \alpha_2 Q_2 , \sigma_1 \alpha_1 Q_1 ) & = & ( 2 \pi v_F )^{-1}
379: \nonumber
380: \\
381: & & \hspace{-67mm}
382: \times \bigl( \prod_{i=1,2} Z_l^{\sigma_i^{\prime}}
383: %Z_l^{\sigma_2^{\prime}}
384: % Z_l^{\sigma_2}
385: Z_l^{\sigma_i} \bigr)^{1/2} \Gamma^{(4)}_{\Lambda} (
386: \sigma_1^{\prime} K_1^{\prime},
387: \sigma_2^{\prime} K_2^{\prime} ;
388: \sigma_2 K_2 , \sigma_1 K_1 )
389: \; ,
390: \label{eq:Gamma4def}
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: the exact RG flow equation for
393: $\tilde{\Gamma}_l^{(2)} ( \sigma, \alpha , Q ) $ reads
394: \begin{equation}
395: \partial_l \tilde{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l =
396: ( 1 - \eta_l^{\sigma} - Q \cdot \partial_Q )
397: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l +
398: \dot{\Gamma}_l^{(2)} ( \sigma \alpha Q )
399: \; ,
400: \label{eq:Gamma2flow}
401: \end{equation}
402: where $\eta_l^{\sigma} = - \partial_l \ln Z_l^{\sigma}$ is the flowing
403: anomalous dimension, $Q \cdot \partial_Q = q \partial_q + \epsilon \partial_{\epsilon}$,
404: and the inhomogeneity is
405: \begin{eqnarray}
406: \dot{\Gamma}_l^{(2)} ( \sigma \alpha Q ) & = & -
407: \sum_{\sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} }
408: \int \frac{dq^{\prime} d \epsilon^{\prime}}{ ( 2 \pi)^2}
409: \dot{G}_l ( \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} )
410: \nonumber
411: \\
412: & & \hspace{-10mm} \times
413: \tilde{\Gamma}_l^{(4)} ( \sigma \alpha Q, \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} ;
414: \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} , \sigma \alpha Q )
415: \; .
416: \label{eq:dotGamma}
417: \end{eqnarray}
418: Here for sharp cutoff and linear dispersion
419: \begin{equation}
420: \dot{G}_l ( \sigma \alpha Q ) = - \delta ( 1 - | q | ) / [ Z_l^{\sigma} ( i
421: \epsilon - \alpha {v}^{\sigma}_0 q ) -
422: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( \sigma \alpha Q )]
423: \; ,
424: \end{equation}
425: with the dimensionless Fermi velocities
426: ${v}^{\sigma}_0 = v_F^{\sigma} / v_F$,
427: where $v_F^{\sigma}$ is the bare
428: Fermi velocity associated with band $\sigma$.
429: Because the coupling $r_l^{\sigma}$ is relevant with scaling dimension
430: $+1$, its initial value ${r}_0^{\sigma}$
431: must to be fine tuned in order to approach a finite limit
432: for $l \to \infty$. This leads to the condition~\cite{Ledowski03}
433: \begin{equation}
434: {r}_0^{\sigma} = - \int_0^{\infty} dl e^{ - l + \int_0^{l} dt \eta_t^{\sigma} }
435: \dot{\Gamma}_l^{(2)} ( \sigma , \alpha , 0 )
436: \; ,
437: \label{eq:r0}
438: \end{equation}
439: which relates
440: the inital value ${r}_0^{\sigma}$ to the
441: RG flow on the entire RG trajectory. Assuming that
442: $\Lambda_0$ is sufficiently large so that
443: $\Sigma_{\Lambda_0}$ can be neglected and
444: $Z_0^{\sigma} \approx 1$, we obtain from Eq.~(\ref{eq:Gammadef}) for the counter-term
445: \begin{equation}
446: \Sigma ( {\sigma} , \alpha k_F^{\sigma} , i0 ) = - v_F \Lambda_0 {r}_0^{\sigma}
447: \; .
448: \end{equation}
449: At constant density $n = (k_F^a + k_F^b ) / \pi$ we then find
450: \begin{equation}
451: k_F^b - k_F^a \equiv \Delta = \Delta_0 + 2 \Lambda_0 ( {v}_0^{b} + {v_0^a} )^{-1}
452: ({r}_0^b - {r}_0^a )
453: \; ,
454: \label{eq:FSshift}
455: \end{equation}
456: where $\Delta_0$ is the value of $k_F^b - k_F^a$
457: at the same density but without interactions.
458:
459:
460: \section{Weak coupling truncation for the effective interaction and the self-energy}
461:
462: The formally exact Eqs.~(\ref{eq:Gamma2flow}--\ref{eq:FSshift}) are now our
463: starting point to calculate
464: $\Delta$ self-consistently.
465: Note that the concept of a ``flowing FS'' never appears in our
466: approach; by definition, $k_F^a$ and $k_F^b$ are the true Fermi momenta of the interacting system,
467: to be determined self-consistently from
468: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:r0}) and (\ref{eq:FSshift}). To make further progress, we need
469: an approximate expression for the effective interaction
470: $\tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:dotGamma}).
471: To simplify the analysis, we neglect vertices describing
472: intrachain umklapp scattering as well as chiral vertices,
473: involving particles moving in the same direction.
474: The latter
475: are expected to give finite renormalizations of the
476: Fermi velocities, which we ignore here.
477: Totally we should then keep track of the RG flow
478: of the following five vertex functions,
479: \begin{subequations}
480: \begin{eqnarray}
481: \tilde{f}_l^{bb} ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2 , Q_1 )
482: =
483: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l ( b Q_1^{\prime}, b Q_2^{\prime};
484: b Q_2, b Q_1 ) ,
485: & &
486: \label{eq:fbb}
487: \\
488: \tilde{f}_l^{aa} ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2 , Q_1 )
489: =
490: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l ( a Q_1^{\prime}, a Q_2^{\prime};
491: a Q_2, a Q_1 )
492: , & &
493: \label{eq:faa}
494: \\
495: \tilde{f}_l^{ab} ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2 , Q_1 )
496: =
497: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l ( a Q_1^{\prime}, b Q_2^{\prime};
498: b Q_2, a Q_1 )
499: , & &
500: \label{eq:fab}
501: \\
502: \tilde{u}_l ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2 , Q_1 )
503: =
504: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l ( b Q_1^{\prime}, b Q_2^{\prime};
505: a Q_2, a Q_1 ) ,
506: & &
507: \label{eq:u}
508: \\
509: \tilde{g}_l ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2 , Q_1 )
510: =
511: \tilde{\Gamma}^{(4)}_l ( b Q_1^{\prime}, a Q_2^{\prime};
512: b Q_2, a Q_1 ) ,
513: & &
514: \label{eq:g}
515: \end{eqnarray}
516: \end{subequations}
517: where on the right-hand side the direction labels
518: are $ (\alpha_1^{\prime} , \alpha_2^{\prime} ; \alpha_2, \alpha_1)
519: = ( +,-;-,+)$.
520: Here $\tilde{f}_l^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}$ describes forward scattering
521: of two fermions associated with bands $\sigma$ and $\sigma^{\prime}$,
522: $\tilde{u}_l$ describes
523: interband umklapp scattering (also called pair tunneling), and
524: $\tilde{g}_l$ corresponds to interband backscattering.
525: The functional RG equations for these five functions follow from the
526: general flow equations given in Ref.~\cite{Kopietz01} in a straightforward
527: way. If we set
528: $Q_i = Q_i^{\prime} =0$ and denote the corresponding coupling
529: {\it{constants}} by
530: $f^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}_l$, $u_l$ and $g_l$ (without a tilde),
531: we obtain the one-loop RG flow equations
532: \begin{equation}
533: \partial_l u_l = - u_l f_l \;, \; \partial_l g_l = g_l f_l
534: \; , \; \partial_l f_l = - A u_l^2 + B_l g_l^2
535: \label{eq:ugflow}
536: \; ,
537: \end{equation}
538: where
539: \begin{equation}
540: f_l = f^{aa}_l / {v}_0^a + f^{bb}_l / {v}_0^b - 2
541: f^{ab}_l / \bar{v}_0
542: \; ,
543: \end{equation}
544: with
545: $A = 2 /( {v}_0^a
546: {v}_0^b) + 2 / \bar{v}_0^2 $ and the average dimensionless velocity
547: $\bar{v}_0 = ( {v}^a_0 + {v}^b_0)/2$.
548: The function
549: \begin{equation}
550: B_l = 2 C_l /( {v}_0^a
551: {v}_0^b) + 2 \bar{C}_l / \bar{v}_0^2
552: \end{equation}
553: depends
554: on the rescaled Fermi point difference
555: $\tilde{\Delta}_l = \Delta e^l / \Lambda_0$
556: via
557: % \begin{equation}
558: \begin{eqnarray}
559: C_l & = & \Theta ( e^l -1 - 2 | \tilde{\Delta}_l |) / ({ 1 +
560: | \tilde{\Delta}_l |})
561: \; ,
562: \\
563: % \end{equation}
564: % \begin{equation}
565: \bar{C}_l & = & \Theta ( e^l -1 - 2 | \tilde{\Delta}_l | )
566: \frac{1}{2} \sum_{\sigma} \frac{\bar{v}_0 }{
567: \bar{v}_0 + {v}_0^{\sigma} | \tilde{\Delta}_l | }
568: \; .
569: %\end{equation}
570: \end{eqnarray}
571: The RG equations (\ref{eq:ugflow}) are equivalent to those derived by
572: Fabrizio \cite{Fabrizio93} at one-loop order.
573: Note that the RG flow of $u_l$ and $g_l$
574: couples to the forward scattering interactions only via
575: the combination $f_l$ defined above.
576: The flow of $f_l^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}$ is
577: \begin{eqnarray}
578: {v}_0^{a} \partial_l f_l^{bb} & = &
579: - u_l^2 + C_l g_l^2 = {v}_0^b \partial_l f_l^{aa}
580: %$ and
581: \; ,
582: \\
583: % \end{equation}
584: % \begin{equation}
585: \bar{v}_0 \partial_l f_l^{ab} & = &
586: u_l^2 - \bar{C}_l g_l^2
587: \; .
588: \end{eqnarray}
589: %From Fig.\ref{fig:flow} it is clear that
590: As discussed by Fabrizio \cite{Fabrizio93},
591: the above RG equations predict
592: a finite regime of initial values
593: $f^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}_0$, $u_0$, and $g_0$ where
594: the system is a stable Luttinger liquid, characterized by
595: finite forward scattering
596: couplings $f_l^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}$ and vanishing
597: $u_l$ and $g_l$ for $l \to \infty$.
598: %
599: %
600: % \begin{figure}[tb]
601: % \begin{center}
602: % \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=75mm}
603: % \end{center}
604: % \vspace{-4mm}
605: % \caption{%
606: % RG flow in the space spanned by
607: %$\tilde{f}$ (forward scattering), $\tilde{u}$ (interchain Umklapp scattering)
608: %and $\tilde{g}$ (interchain backscattering).}
609: % \label{fig:flow}
610: % \end{figure}
611: %
612: %
613: %
614:
615: We now calculate the true FS in the Luttinger liquid regime using our general
616: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:Gamma2flow}--\ref{eq:FSshift}).
617: Assuming that
618: $f_l^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}$, $u_l$, and $g_l$ are small compared with
619: unity, we may adopt the same strategy
620: as in Refs.\cite{Busche02,Ledowski04}: we expand the
621: right-hand side of the flow equations for the
622: momentum- and frequency dependent vertices
623: defined in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fbb}--\ref{eq:g}) to second
624: order in $f_l^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime}}$, $u_l$, and $g_l$.
625: The flow of the above vertex functions is then given by the following set of equations,
626: \begin{subequations}
627: \begin{eqnarray}
628: D_l^{bb} \tilde{f}_l^{bb} ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2, Q_1 )
629: & = &
630: \nonumber
631: \\
632: & & \hspace{-42mm}
633: ( f_l^{bb})^2 [ \dot{\chi}_l^{bb} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) - \dot{\chi}_l^{bb} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) ]
634: \nonumber
635: \\
636: & & \hspace{-42mm} - u_l^2 \dot{\chi}_l^{aa} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) + g_l^2
637: \dot{\chi}_l^{aa} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} + 2 \tilde{\Delta}_l ) \; ,
638: \label{eq:flow1}
639: \end{eqnarray}
640:
641: \begin{eqnarray}
642: D_l^{aa} \tilde{f}_l^{aa} ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2, Q_1 )
643: & = &
644: \nonumber
645: \\
646: & & \hspace{-42mm}
647: ( f_l^{aa})^2 [ \dot{\chi}_l^{aa} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) - \dot{\chi}_l^{aa} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) ]
648: \nonumber
649: \\
650: & & \hspace{-42mm} - u_l^2 \dot{\chi}_l^{bb} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) + g_l^2
651: \dot{\chi}_l^{bb} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} - 2 \tilde{\Delta}_l ) \; ,
652: \label{eq:flow2}
653: \end{eqnarray}
654:
655: \begin{eqnarray}
656: D_l^{ab} \tilde{f}_l^{ab} ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2, Q_1 )
657: & = &
658: \nonumber
659: \\
660: & & \hspace{-42mm}
661: ( f_l^{ab})^2 [ \dot{\chi}_l^{ab} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) - \dot{\chi}_l^{ab} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) ]
662: \nonumber
663: \\
664: & & \hspace{-42mm} + u_l^2 \dot{\chi}_l^{ba} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) - g_l^2
665: \dot{\chi}_l^{ba} ( Q_1 + Q_2 - 2 \tilde{\Delta}_l ) \; ,
666: \label{eq:flow3}
667: \end{eqnarray}
668:
669:
670: \begin{eqnarray}
671: D_l^{ab} \tilde{u}_l ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2, Q_1 )
672: & = &
673: \nonumber
674: \\
675: & & \hspace{-42mm}
676: f_l^{ab} u_l [ \dot{\chi}_l^{ab} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) + \dot{\chi}_l^{ba} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) ]
677: \nonumber
678: \\
679: & & \hspace{-42mm} - f^{bb}_l u_l \dot{\chi}_l^{bb} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) - f_l^{aa} u_l
680: \dot{\chi}_l^{aa} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) \; ,
681: \label{eq:flow4}
682: \end{eqnarray}
683:
684:
685: \begin{eqnarray}
686: D_l^{ab} \tilde{g}_l ( Q_1^{\prime} , Q_2^{\prime} ; Q_2, Q_1 )
687: & = &
688: \nonumber
689: \\
690: & & \hspace{-42mm}
691: - f_l^{ab} g_l [ \dot{\chi}_l^{ab} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) + \dot{\chi}_l^{ba} ( Q_1 + Q_2 ) ]
692: \nonumber
693: \\
694: & & \hspace{-42mm} + f^{bb}_l g_l \dot{\chi}_l^{bb} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) + f_l^{aa} g_l
695: \dot{\chi}_l^{aa} ( Q_1 - Q_2^{\prime} ) \; .
696: \label{eq:flow5}
697: \end{eqnarray}
698: \end{subequations}
699: Here $Q + \tilde{\Delta}_l $ is a short notation for $ ( q + \tilde{\Delta}_l , i \epsilon )$, the generalized
700: susceptibilities $\dot{\chi}_l^{\alpha \beta} ( Q )$
701: are given by
702: \begin{eqnarray}
703: \dot{\chi}_l^{\alpha \beta} ( Q ) & = &
704: \frac{ \Theta ( e^l -1 - | q | ) }{ 2 \bar{v}_0 + v_0^{\alpha} | q | - i \epsilon {\rm sgn} q }
705: \nonumber
706: \\
707: & + &
708: \frac{ \Theta ( e^l -1 - | q | ) }{ 2 \bar{v}_0 + v_0^{\beta} | q | + i \epsilon {\rm sgn} q }
709: \; ,
710: \end{eqnarray}
711: where $\alpha , \beta \in \{ a,b \}$, and
712: \begin{equation}
713: D^{\alpha \beta}_l = \partial_l + \eta_l^{\alpha} + \eta_l^{\beta}
714: + \sum_{i=1}^2 ( Q_i \cdot \partial_{Q_i} + Q_i^{\prime} \cdot \partial_{ Q_i^{\prime}} )
715: \end{equation}
716: are comoving derivatives.
717: The linear partial differential equations
718: (\ref{eq:flow1}--\ref{eq:flow5})
719: can easily be solved exactly \cite{Busche02}, so that we can obtain an explicit
720: expression
721: for the flowing momentum- and frequency dependent effective interaction
722: $
723: \tilde{\Gamma}_l^{(4)} ( \sigma \alpha Q, \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} ;
724: \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} , \sigma \alpha Q )$.
725: Substituting this expression
726: into Eq.~(\ref{eq:dotGamma}) and performing the $Q^{\prime}$-integration we find
727: \begin{eqnarray}
728: \dot{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( a,+, Q ) & = & f^{aa}_l + f_l^{ab}
729: - \partial_l [ f^{aa}_l + f_l^{ab} ]
730: \nonumber
731: \\ & & \hspace{-20mm}
732: - 2 (f_l^{aa})^2 I_{a,l}^{aa} ( Q ) - 2 (f_l^{ab})^2 I_{b,l}^{ab} ( Q )
733: \nonumber
734: \\ & & \hspace{-20mm}
735: - u_l^2 [ I_{a,l}^{bb} ( Q ) + I_{b,l}^{ba} ( Q ) ]
736: \nonumber
737: \\
738: & & \hspace{-20mm} - g_l^2 [ I_{a,l}^{ bb} ( q - 2 \tilde{\Delta}_l , i
739: \epsilon ) + I_{b,l}^{ba} ( q - 2 \tilde{\Delta}_l , i \epsilon ) ]
740: \; ,
741: \label{eq:dotgammares}
742: \end{eqnarray}
743: where for $\alpha , \beta , \gamma \in \{ a,b \}$
744: the integrals $I^{ \alpha \beta }_{ \gamma ,l} ( Q )$ are
745: \begin{eqnarray}
746: I^{\alpha \beta }_{ \gamma , l} ( Q ) & = & \frac{1}{ {v}^{\alpha}_0
747: + {v}^{\beta}_0 } \sum_{ n = \pm 1}
748: n \Theta ( e^{l} -1 - | q + n | )
749: \nonumber
750: \\
751: & & \hspace{-20mm} \times \Biggl\{
752: \Theta ( n s_{ q +n} )
753: \ln \left[ \frac{ e^l ( {v}^{\alpha}_0 + {v}^{\beta}_0 )
754: + {v}^{\gamma}_0 - {v}^{\beta}_0 | q +n | - i n \epsilon }{
755: {v}^{\alpha}_0 + {v}^{\beta}_0
756: + {v}^{\gamma}_0 + {v}^{\alpha}_0 | q +n | - i n \epsilon}
757: \right]
758: \nonumber
759: \\
760: & & \hspace{-20mm} +
761: \Theta ( - n s_{ q +n} )
762: \ln \left[ \frac{ e^l ( {v}^{\alpha}_0 + {v}^{\beta}_0 )
763: + {v}^{\gamma}_0 - {v}^{\alpha}_0 | q +n | - i n \epsilon }{
764: {v}^{\alpha}_0 + {v}^{\beta}_0
765: + {v}^{\gamma}_0 + {v}^{\beta}_0 | q +n | - i n \epsilon}
766: \right]
767: \Biggr\}
768: \,,
769: \nonumber
770: \\
771: \label{eq:Idef}
772: \end{eqnarray}
773: with $s_{ q +n } = {\rm sgn} ( q + n )$.
774: The function
775: $ \dot{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( b,+, Q )$ can be obtained
776: from Eq.~(\ref{eq:dotgammares})
777: by replacing $ a \leftrightarrow b$
778: and $\tilde{\Delta}_l \to
779: - \tilde{\Delta}_l$ on the right-hand side.
780: Once we know the function $\dot{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( \sigma ,+, Q )$, we may
781: calculate the
782: flowing anomalous dimension from~\cite{Busche02}
783: \begin{equation}
784: \eta^{\sigma}_l = - \partial \dot{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( \sigma ,+, Q ) /
785: \partial ( i \epsilon ) |_{ Q = 0}
786: \; .
787: \end{equation}
788:
789:
790: We can reproduce the result by
791: Louis {\it{et al.}}~\cite{Louis01} if we simply set
792: $\dot{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( a,+, Q ) \approx f^{aa}_l + f_l^{ab}$
793: instead of Eq.~(\ref{eq:dotgammares}), which amounts to
794: replacing the effective interaction
795: $
796: \tilde{\Gamma}_l^{(4)} ( \sigma \alpha Q, \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} ;
797: \sigma^{\prime} \alpha^{\prime} Q^{\prime} , \sigma \alpha Q )$
798: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:dotGamma}) by its value at $Q = Q^{\prime} =0$.
799: This approximation does not consistently take into account
800: all contributions to $r_0^{\sigma}$
801: which are quadratic in the bare couplings,
802: because
803: %according to Eqs.~(\ref{eq:dotGamma},\ref{eq:r0},\ref{eq:dotgammares})
804: such second order terms
805: are also generated by
806: the $Q^{\prime}$-dependence of the four-point vertex in Eq.~(\ref{eq:dotGamma}).
807: %Thus, the approximation
808: %$\dot{\Gamma}^{(2)}_l ( a,+, Q ) \approx f^{aa}_l + f_l^{ab}$
809: %employed by Louis {\it{et al.}}~\cite{Louis01} is only consistent
810: %to first order in the bare couplings, which amounts to setting $\Delta \approx \Delta_1$.
811:
812:
813: To calculate the FS from Eq.~(\ref{eq:FSshift}), we still need to perform the
814: trajectory integral (\ref{eq:r0}). Since we are interested in the leading
815: behavior for small $t_{\bot}$, we may at this point
816: ignore the small difference between the bare Fermi velocities,
817: setting ${v}^a_0 = {v}^b_0 = \bar{v}_0 = 1$. To second
818: order in the couplings, we may also set $\eta_t^{\sigma} =0$
819: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:r0}). With these approximations the
820: integral obtained by substituting
821: Eq. ~(\ref{eq:dotgammares}) into Eq.~(\ref{eq:r0}) can be
822: performed analytically to second order
823: in the bare couplings. For $\tilde{\Delta} \equiv
824: \Delta / \Lambda_0 \ll 1$ the result is
825: $r_0^a = - f_0^{aa} -f_0^{ab} - g_0^2 \tilde{\Delta}
826: \ln | \tilde{\Delta}|$ and
827: $r_0^b = - f_0^{bb} -f_0^{ba} + g_0^2 \tilde{\Delta}
828: \ln |\tilde{\Delta}|$ to leading
829: logarithmic order.
830: Substituting
831: %Eq.~(\ref{eq:rares})
832: this into Eq.~(\ref{eq:FSshift}) we arrive at
833: Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}), with
834: $\Delta_{1} = \Delta_0 - \Lambda_0 ( f^{bb}_0 - f^{aa}_0 )$, where
835: we have used $f_0^{ab} = f_0^{ba}$.
836:
837: Finally, let us point out that we have also derived Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) within the
838: field-theoretical RG, where we calculate the renormalized vertex functions
839: directly from perturbation theory. Setting again $v_0^a = v_0^b = 1$ we obtain for
840: the difference between the self-energies
841: $\Sigma_{\sigma} = \Sigma ( \sigma , k_F^{\sigma} , i 0 )$
842: at the true FS, up to two-loop order,
843: \begin{equation}
844: \Sigma_b - \Sigma_a = - 2 t_{\bot} + v_F \Lambda_0 [ f_R^{bb} - f_R^{aa} - g_R^2 \tilde{\Delta}
845: \ln \tilde{\Delta} ^2 ]
846: \; ,
847: \end{equation}
848: where $f_R^{\sigma \sigma^{\prime} }$ and $g_R$ are
849: the renormalized couplings. Since up to this order we do not distinguish
850: between bare and renormalized couplings,
851: the combination of this result with the definition (\ref{eq:FStrue})
852: immediately leads to Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}).
853:
854:
855: %We emphasize that we have also derived
856: %Eq.~(\ref{eq:deltares}) using the field theoretical version of the functional
857: %RG for Fermi systems developed in ~\cite{Ferraz03a,Ferraz03b,Ferraz04}.
858:
859:
860: \section{Summary and conclusions}
861:
862: In summary, we have presented a fully self-consistent calculation of the
863: true FS of two coupled metallic chains in the regime where
864: the Luttinger liquid fixed point is stable.
865: %Our method is general and can be used to
866: %calculate the true FS in higher dimensions within the
867: %framework of the RG; of course, in this case the resulting
868: %integral equations can only be solved numerically.
869: Our final result for the renormalized FS
870: is given by the solution of the transcendental
871: equation (\ref{eq:deltares}) shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:FSsolution}, which
872: is perhaps the simplest example for an explicit solution of the
873: self-consistency problem for the true FS discussed by Nozi\`{e}res \cite{Nozieres64}.
874: We find that for
875: small interchain hopping $t_{\bot}$ even
876: weak interchain backscattering can lead to a strong
877: reduction of the distance between the Fermi points
878: associated with the bonding and the antibonding band.
879: It is tempting to speculate that in higher dimensions a similar
880: smoothing effect of a corrugated FS
881: stabilizes a strongly correlated non-Fermi liquid state.
882: Our method is general and can be used to
883: calculate the true FS in higher dimensions within the
884: framework of the RG; of course, in this case the resulting
885: integral equations can only be solved numerically.
886:
887: %Finally, we would like to emphasize again that conceptually the FS
888: %should be considered as a characteristic property of
889: %a zero-temperature RG fixed point of the RG, so that
890: %the notion of a flowing FS \cite{Fabrizio93,Louis01} is
891: %rather misleading: fixed points do not flow.
892:
893:
894:
895:
896:
897: This work was completed while P.K. was visiting the
898: {\it{International Center of Condensed Matter Physics (ICCMP)}}
899: at the University of Bras{\'\i}{}lia, Brazil.
900: He would like to thank the ICCMP for its hospitality and
901: for financial support.
902:
903:
904:
905:
906: %\vspace{-4mm}
907: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
908: %\vspace{-4mm}
909:
910: \bibitem{Anderson87}
911: P. W. Anderson, Science {\bf{235}}, 1196 (1987).
912: %
913: \bibitem{Bourbonnais91}
914: C. Bourbonnais and L. G. Caron, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B {\bf{5}}, 1033 (1991).
915: %
916: \bibitem{Kusmartsev92}
917: F. Kusmartsev, A. Luther, and A. A. Nersesyan,
918: Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf{55}}, 692 (1992)
919: [JETP Lett. {\bf{55}}, 724 (1992)]; V. M. Yakovenko, {\it{ibid.}} {\bf{56}}, 523 (1992)
920: [{\bf{56}}, 510 (1992)].
921: %
922: \bibitem{Finkelstein93}
923: A. M. Finkelstein and A. I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{47}}, 10461 (1993).
924: %
925: \bibitem{Fabrizio93}
926: M.Fabrizio, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{48}}, 15838 (1993).
927: %
928: \bibitem{Balents96}
929: L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{53}}, 12133 (1996);
930: H.-H. Lin, L. Balents, and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{56}}, 6569 (1997).
931: %
932: \bibitem{Arrigoni98}
933: E. Arrigoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf{80}}, 790 (1998); Phys. Rev. B {\bf{61}}, 7909 (2000).
934: %
935: \bibitem{Ledermann00}
936: U. Ledermann and K. Le Hur, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{61}}, 2497 (2000).
937: %
938: \bibitem{Louis01}
939: K. Louis, J. V. Alvarez, and C. Gros, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{64}}, 113106 (2001);
940: %
941: %\bibitem{Hamacher02}
942: K. Hamacher, C. Gros, and W. Wenzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf{88}}, 217203 (2002).
943: %
944: \bibitem{Dusuel03}
945: S. Dusuel and B. Dou\c{c}ot, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{67}}, 205111 (2003).
946: %
947: \bibitem{Nozieres64}
948: P. Nozi\`{e}res, {\it{Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems}}, (Benjamin,
949: New York, 1964).
950: %
951: \bibitem{Kopietz01}
952: P. Kopietz and T. Busche, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{64}}, 155101 (2001).
953: %
954: \bibitem{Ferraz03a}
955: A. Ferraz, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{68}}, 075115 (2003).
956: %
957: \bibitem{Ferraz03b}
958: A. Ferraz, Europhys. Lett. {\bf{61}}, 228 (2003).
959: %
960: \bibitem{Ledowski03}
961: S. Ledowski and P. Kopietz, J.Phys.: Condens. Matter {\bf{15}}, 4770 (2003).
962: %
963: \bibitem{Wen90}
964: X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{42}}, 6623 (1990).
965: %
966: \bibitem{Guinea04}
967: F. Guinea, M. P. Lopez-Sancho, and M. A. H. Vozmediano,
968: cond-mat/0408062.
969: %
970: \bibitem{Wetterich93}
971: C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B {\bf{301}}, 90 (1993).
972: %
973: \bibitem{Morris94}
974: T. R. Morris, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf{9}}, 2411 (1994).
975: %
976: \bibitem{Salmhofer01}
977: M. Salmhofer and C. Honerkamp, Prog. Theor. Physics {\bf{105}}, 1 (2001).
978: %
979: \bibitem{Ferraz04}
980: H. Freire, E. Corr\^{e}a, and A. Ferraz, Physica C {\bf{408-410}}, 254 (2004);
981: cond-mat/0412305 (to appear in Phys. Rev. B).
982: %
983: \bibitem{Busche02}
984: T. Busche, L. Bartosch, and P. Kopietz,
985: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter {\bf{14}}, 8513 (2002).
986: %
987: \bibitem{Schuetz04}
988: F. Sch\"{u}tz, L. Bartosch, and P. Kopietz, cond-mat/0409404
989: (to appear in Phys. Rev. B).
990: %
991: \bibitem{Neumayr03}
992: A. Neumayr and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B {\bf{67}}, 035112 (2003).
993: %
994: \bibitem{Ledowski04}
995: S. Ledowski, N. Hasselmann, and P. Kopietz,
996: Phys. Rev. A {\bf{69}}, 061601(R) (2004);
997: N. Hasselmann, S. Ledowski, and P. Kopietz,
998: Phys. Rev. A {\bf{70}}, 063621 (2004).
999:
1000: \end{thebibliography}
1001: \end{document}
1002:
1003:
1004: \newpage
1005:
1006: Here some more technical details:
1007: The trajectory integral is for arbitrary $\tilde{\Delta}$,
1008:
1009: \begin{eqnarray}
1010: {r}_0^a &= &
1011: - f_0^{aa} -f_0^{ab} - g_0^2 \Theta ( 1 - 2 | \tilde{\Delta} |)
1012: \nonumber
1013: \\
1014: & & \hspace{-5mm} \times \Biggl\{
1015: \frac{\tilde{\Delta}}{2} \ln
1016: \left[ \frac{ 27 \tilde{\Delta}^2 ( 1 + | \tilde{\Delta} | )}{ ( 1 -
1017: | \tilde{\Delta} | )^3} \right]
1018: + \ln \left[ \frac{ 1 - \tilde{\Delta} }{ 1 + \tilde{\Delta} } \right]
1019: \Biggr\}
1020: \; .
1021: \label{eq:rares}
1022: \end{eqnarray}
1023:
1024:
1025: