1:
2: \documentclass[
3: %preprint,
4: aps,prb,
5: twocolumn,
6: groupedaddress]{revtex4}
7: \input{epsf}
8: \usepackage{epsfig}
9: \usepackage{amsfonts}
10: \usepackage{pifont}
11: \usepackage{epstopdf}
12: \usepackage{epsfig}
13: \usepackage{amsfonts}
14:
15: \def\mts2f{${\cal M}({\cal T}^{*(2F)})$}
16: \def\mtsa4{${\cal M}({\cal T}^{*(A_4)})$}
17: \def\ms{${\cal M}^{s}$}
18: \def\msr{${\cal M}^{s_r}$}
19: \def\msf{${\cal M}^{s_f}$}
20:
21: \def\mf{$M_F$}
22: \def\mi{$M_I$}
23:
24: \def\tp{${\cal T}^{(P)}$}
25: \def\ts2f{${\cal T}^{*(2F)}$}
26: \def\tsq{${\cal T}^{*(z)}$}
27: \def\cstsa4{${\cal C}^s_{{\cal T}^{*(A_4)}}$}
28: \def\tsa4{${\cal T}^{*(A_4)}$}
29:
30: \def\ep{$\mathbb{E}_\parallel$}
31: \def\es{$\mathbb{E}_\perp$}
32: \def\zsix{${\mathbb{Z}}_6$}
33:
34: \def\qdsix{$q_{D_6}$}
35: \def\dsix{$D_6$}
36: \def\d*six{$D^*_6$}
37: \def\ih{ $I_h$ }
38:
39: \usepackage{times}
40: \usepackage{pifont}
41:
42: \def\zfo{\ding{193}}
43: %Achse zwei
44: \def\dfo{\ding{194}}
45: %Achse drei
46: \def\ffo{\ding{196}}
47: %Achse fuenf
48: %%%
49:
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53:
54: \title{
55: Thick atomic layers of maximum density as
56: bulk terminations of quasicrystals
57: }
58:
59: \author{Zorka Papadopolos}
60: \email[]{zorka.papadopolos@uni-tuebingen.de}
61:
62: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
63: Univ. T\"ubingen, D-72076 T\"ubingen, Germany}
64:
65: \author{Gerald Kasner}
66: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
67: Univ. Magdeburg, PF 4120, D-39016
68: Magdeburg, Germany}
69:
70:
71: \date{\today}
72:
73: \begin{abstract}
74: The clean surfaces of quasicrystals,
75: orthogonal to the directions of the main symmetry axes,
76: have a terrace-like appearance.
77: We extend the Bravais' rule for crystals
78: to quasicrystals, allowing that instead of a
79: \emph{ single} atomic plane
80: a \emph{ layer} of atomic planes may form a bulk
81: termination.
82:
83: \end{abstract}
84:
85: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
86: \pacs{
87: %Quasicrystals:
88: 61.44.Br,
89: %Structure of clean surfaces (reconstruction):
90: 68.35.Bs,
91: %Scanning tunneling microscopy (including chemistry
92: %induced with STM):
93: 68.37.Ef,
94: %Electron diffraction and scattering (for
95: %electron diffractometers, see 07.78.+s):
96: 61.14.-x
97: }
98:
99: \maketitle
100:
101:
102:
103: We consider clean surfaces of quasicrystals
104: by comparing their STM (scanning tunneling microscopy)
105: and SEI (secondary electron imaging) images
106: to the bulk terminations in the deterministic atomic
107: models.
108: A bulk model is defined as an ideal quasiperiodic
109: tiling with atomic decoration on a finite number of
110: tiles. In Section~\ref{sec:decagonal},
111: an STM image of a decagonal quasicrystal is compared
112: to the Burkov model\cite{Bur93} \mtsa4,
113: based on a decagonal tiling \tsa4,
114: see Ref.\cite{Baake90}.
115: In section~\ref{sec:ico}, STM and SEI images of an
116: icosahedral quasicrystal are compared to the
117: model~\cite{Aper97}
118: \mts2f, based on icosahedral tiling
119: \ts2f, see Refs~\cite{
120: ts2f,
121: PHK}.
122: The clean surfaces, that we study, are considered not
123: to be reconstructed.
124:
125: In our previous work on terrace-like clean surfaces
126: of icosahedral quasicrystals we tried to define
127: the 5fold terminations over the most dense layers of
128: Bergman polytopes~\cite{KPKB},
129: which are the icosahedral motifs on a
130: quasilattice \ts2f.
131: Later, we noticed that the
132: 5fold terminations should better be defined by the
133: 0.48~{\AA} thin, plane-like atomic layers, all of equal,
134: maximum density~\cite{LGPK2}.
135: In Ref.~\cite{PP2} we adopted Bravais' rule
136: of maximum density,
137: allowing that also the densities of thin
138: ($< 0.6$~{\AA} broad), plane-like atomic layers in
139: quasicrystals should be treated as the planes.
140: The idea we developed in Ref. \cite{PP2}, and gave
141: a possible explanation of the experimental
142: fact, that although the 2fold planes in the model
143: \mts2f\ are more dense than the 5fold planes,
144: the 5fold surfaces are the most stable in
145: icosahedral quasicrystals \cite{Shen00}.
146: In Ref.~\cite{PP2}, in which we used the ``thin''
147: layer concept in order to determine the terminations
148: in all principle symmetry directions, we announced the
149: ``thick'' layer concept as well, that we elaborate in
150: the present manuscript.
151:
152:
153:
154: \section{Surfaces of decagonal quasicrystals
155: \label{sec:decagonal}}
156:
157:
158: Decagonal Al$_{65}$Cu$_{15}$Co$_{20}$ (d-AlCuCo) is
159: periodic in $z$-direction~\cite{Kor90},
160: with periodicity t=4.13~{\AA}. The $z$-direction is
161: orthogonal to the quasiperiodic decagonal $x-y$ plane.
162: The phase crystallizes in a shape of long thin
163: decagonal prisms, with the 2fold surfaces considerably
164: larger than the 10-fold surfaces,
165: see Fig.~\ref{fig:deca}(a).
166: %
167: %
168: % Fig. 1
169: %
170: \begin{figure}[]
171: \includegraphics[width=0.27\textwidth]
172: {PK-Fig1a.eps}
173: \includegraphics*[width=0.30\textwidth]
174: {PK-Fig1b.eps}
175: \includegraphics*[width=0.40\textwidth]
176: {PK-Fig1c.eps}
177: \caption{
178: (a)~(top) Long, thin decagonal prisms~\cite{K0}
179: of the d-AlCuCo;
180: (b)~(middle) Estimated positions of 2fold surfaces
181: on an STM image of the 10fold terrace-like
182: surface of d-AlCuCo;
183: (c)~(bottom) 2fold bulk terminations in \mtsa4\
184: marked on a 10fold one~\cite{Kram95}.
185: Note the $1.23$~{\AA} gaps on both sides of
186: a termination.
187: \label{fig:deca}
188: }
189: \end{figure}
190: The size of the surface area is evidently a parameter
191: of it's stability.
192: In Fig.~\ref{fig:deca}(b), over the image of the 10fold
193: surface \cite{Kor90}, we determine the positions of
194: possible 2fold surfaces, orthogonal to the 10fold
195: surface.
196: In the model \mtsa4\ (t=4.18~{\AA})~\cite{Bur93} we
197: investigate the densities of the ``thin'', 2fold layers
198: containing 2 atomic planes.
199: Among these, the most dense one is a $0.47$~{\AA}-layer
200: of the density $\rho_{2}^{0.47A}=0.124$~{\AA}$^{-2}$.
201: Comparing it to the much smaller 10fold surface,
202: which is of the density $\rho_{10}=0.146$~{\AA}$^{-2}$,
203: we conclude that the $0.47$~{\AA}-layer can not
204: represent the 2fold termination. But, on some positions
205: in the bulk these layers appear in
206: pairs, $0.29$~{\AA} apart. Such, a rather ``thick''
207: $1.23$~{\AA}-layer of 4 planes on mutual
208: small distances (see Fig.~\ref{fig:deca}(c)) is a
209: candidate for a terminating layer. These layers appear
210: on distances mutually scaled by the factor
211: $\tau=(1+\sqrt{5})/2$ ($12.3$~{\AA}, $19.9$~{\AA},
212: $32.2$~{\AA}, $52.1$~{\AA}\ldots,
213: as in Fig.~\ref{fig:deca}(c)), in excellent agreement
214: with those found on the STM image ($21$~{\AA},
215: $31$~{\AA}, $54$~{\AA}, see Fig.~\ref{fig:deca}(b)).
216:
217:
218:
219:
220:
221: \section{ Surfaces of icosahedral quasicrystals
222: \label{sec:ico}}
223:
224: A feature of the surface of \mbox{i-AlPdMn}, not
225: accounted for by the ``thin'' layer analysis \cite{PP2},
226: is that not all types of maximally dense layers appear
227: as surfaces:
228: for example, $(q,b)$ layers~\cite{classes},
229: $0.48$~{\AA} apart, are seen in 5fold
230: surfaces but equally dense $(b,q)$ layers,
231: also $0.48$~{\AA} apart,
232: are not. If both kind of layers were possible
233: terminations, the sequence of much
234: shorter terrace heights, than observed, could appear.
235: %
236: % Fig. 2
237: %
238: \begin{figure}[]
239: \includegraphics*[width=0.48\textwidth]
240: {PK-Fig2a.eps}
241: \includegraphics*[width=0.48\textwidth]
242: {PK-Fig2b.eps}
243: \caption{
244: (a)~(top)
245: Density graph $\rho_{5f}(z_{\perp})$ of the ``thick''
246: 5fold layers $(q,b,b,q)$ (full line). The plateau
247: (maximum density) of the graph defines the terminations.
248: It is compared to the density graph of the $0.48$~{\AA}
249: thin, plane-like layer $(q,b)$ (dotted line).
250: The symbol \ffo\ is the standard distance along
251: a 5fold axis $z_{\perp}$ in the coding space \es.
252: (b)~(bottom) Density graph of the
253: 5fold layers $(b,a,q,b,q,a,b)$, with spacings as in the
254: image.
255: The bottom of the
256: cavity
257: defines a sequence of the
258: {\em minimum density} layers in \mts2f, situated above
259: a {\em subsequence} of the
260: 5fold terminations.
261: \label{fig:5f-thick-term}
262: }
263: \end{figure}
264: If one chooses to define a
265: termination incorporating the neighboring planes too,
266: as we did in decagonal case
267: (in Section~\ref{sec:decagonal}),
268: one could introduce a ``thick'' layer as a bundle of
269: high density planes (or thin, plane-like layers).
270: A 5fold termination can be considered to
271: be a ``thick'' layer consisting of a
272: $(q,b)$ layer and a $(b,q)$ layer,
273: each with the spacing $0.48$~{\AA}.
274: Such a layer contains 4 planes with
275: spacings:
276: $q$-plane, $0.48$~{\AA}, $b$-plane, $1.56$~{\AA},
277: $b$-plane, $0.48$~{\AA}, $q$-plane.
278: For a bundle we define an effective
279: (averaged) density of within contained ``thin''
280: layers/planes
281:
282: \vspace{0.3cm}
283: \noindent
284: { \small
285: $\rho_{5f}(z_{\perp})=({\rho}_{q_1}(z_{\perp})+
286: {\rho}_{b_1}(z_{\perp}))/2 +
287: ({\rho}_{q_2}(z_{\perp})+
288: {\rho}_{b_2}(z_{\perp}))/2$
289: }.
290:
291: \vspace{0.3cm}
292: \noindent
293: As we see in Fig.~\ref{fig:5f-thick-term}(a),
294: whereas for the thin-layer concept the width of the
295: support of the plateau is approximately
296: $\frac{2{\tau}^2 }{\tau+2}$\ffo\ broad,
297: and consequently~\cite{PP2} encodes the
298: Fibonacci sequence of terrace heights $S=4.08$~{\AA}
299: and $L=\tau S=6.60$~{\AA}
300: ($\tau=(1+\sqrt{5})/2$),
301: in the thick-layer concept the width is
302: exactly
303: $\frac{2{\tau} }{\tau+2}$\ffo\
304: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:5f-thick-term}(a))
305: and encodes the Fibonacci sequence of by factor $\tau$
306: larger terrace heights, i.e. $L=6.60$~{\AA} and
307: $L+ S=\tau L=10.68$~{\AA}.
308: Whereas on the clean surfaces, obtained at lower
309: annealing temperature, even the terrace height
310: $\tau^{-1}S=2.52$~{\AA} appears~\cite{Shen99},
311: on the
312: surfaces obtained at the highest
313: annealing temperature, on the contrary,
314: a terrace height $L+ S$ appears
315: (see Fig.~1 in Ref.~\cite{KPKB}).
316:
317:
318: The height of the plateau of the graph
319: $\rho_{5f}$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:5f-thick-term}(a))
320: defines the densities of the ``thick'' layer
321: terminations to be $0.134$~{\AA}$^{-2}$,
322: see table~\ref{tab:densities}.
323: The 5fold layers intertwining the terminations are
324: of densities not higher than
325: $0.072$~{\AA}$^{-2}(\ll 0.134$~{\AA}$^{-2}$).
326: It is also a fact, that the density graphs of the
327: ``thin'' and the ``thick'' layers have a strong overlap,
328: see Fig.~\ref{fig:5f-thick-term}(a).
329: Hence, almost any $(q,b)$ ``thin'' layer termination
330: occurs within such a $(q,b,b,q)$ ``thick'' layer
331: termination.
332: The same holds true for any icosahedral quasicrystal
333: described by the \mts2f\ model.
334:
335:
336:
337: Above each termination, there is a $2.04$~{\AA} gap,
338: if we dare to neglect an $a$-plane of a density
339: smaller than $0.013$~{\AA}$^{-2}$.
340: But, if each gap of $2.04$~{\AA}
341: in the model \mts2f\ would be declared as
342: a criterion of a termination to appear below it,
343: as in Ref.~\cite{Y04}, the $2.04$~{\AA} terrace heights,
344: that were not observed, should appear as well.
345: However in the model \mts2f\ there is a
346: low density 5fold layer $(b,a,q,b,q,a,b)$
347: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:5f-thick-term}(b)),
348: $4.08$~{\AA} broad.
349: The width of the
350: cavity
351: on the density graph of these layers,
352: $W=(2/(\tau +2))$\ffo, encodes a Fibonacci
353: sequence with the intervals
354: $\tau L=10.68$~{\AA} and $\tau^2 L=17.28$~{\AA}.
355: These are the {\em minimum density} layers
356: of equal, $0.041$~{\AA}$^{-2}$ density,
357: placed in the model over a {\em subsequence} of
358: the terminations.
359: Hence, the minimum density layer sequence
360: alone can not define
361: the terminations, because
362: it does not reproduce
363: the pairs of large terraces $6.60$~{\AA}
364: apart, which were frequently observed.
365:
366:
367:
368:
369:
370: %
371: % Fig. 3
372: %
373: \begin{figure}[]
374: \includegraphics*[width=0.48\textwidth]
375: {PK-Fig3a.eps}
376: \includegraphics*[width=0.48\textwidth]
377: {PK-Fig3b.eps}
378: \caption{
379: (a)~(top)
380: Density graph $\rho_{2f}(z_{\perp})$
381: of the ``thick'' 2fold
382: layers (full line). The plateau (maximum density)
383: of the graph defines the terminations. It is compared
384: to the ``thin'' layer termination (dotted line),
385: which is a single, $abq$-plane termination.
386: The symbol \zfo\ is the standard distance
387: along a 2fold axis $z_{\perp}$ in the coding space
388: \es.
389: (b)~(bottom)
390: Density graph of the
391: 2fold layer $(bq,bq)$. The cavity
392: defines a sequence of the {\em minimum density} layers
393: in \mts2f,
394: of which a {\em subsequence} is situated above
395: {\em all} the 2fold terminations.
396: \label{fig:2f-thick-term}
397: }
398: \end{figure}
399: In the case of 2fold surfaces, we may replace a single
400: dense 2fold terminating atomic
401: $abq$-plane~\cite{PP2} by a layer of 4 atomic planes
402: with spacings:
403: $abq$-plane, $1.48$~{\AA}, $bq$-plane, $0.92$~{\AA},
404: $bq$-plane, $1.48$~{\AA}, $abq$-plane.
405: For a bundle we define an effective
406: (averaged) density of planes
407:
408: \noindent
409: \vspace{0.3cm}
410: \noindent
411: {\small$\rho_{2f}(z_{\perp})=
412: (1/4)[{\rho}_{abq_1}(z_{\perp})+
413: {\rho}_{bq_1}(z_{\perp})+
414: {\rho}_{bq_2}(z_{\perp})+
415: {\rho}_{abq_2}(z_{\perp})$]},
416:
417: \vspace{0.3cm}
418: \noindent
419: For this ``thick'' 2fold layer
420: the peak of $\rho_{2f}(z_{\perp})$ is a perfectly
421: flat plateau, see Fig.~\ref{fig:2f-thick-term}(a).
422: The height of the plateau defines the effective
423: densities of terminations to be $0.086$~{\AA}$^{-2}$,
424: see Table~\ref{tab:densities}.
425: The support of the width of the plateau equals
426: $W=(1/2)$\zfo\ and encodes the
427: Fibonacci sequence of 2fold terminations with the
428: terrace heights $S=6.3$~{\AA} and
429: $L=\tau S=10.2$~{\AA}.
430: The standard distances along 5, 2 and 3fold axes
431: in icosahedral structures are
432: \ffo~/$\sqrt{\tau +2}={}$~\zfo~/2$(=1/\sqrt{2(\tau +2)})
433: ={}$~\dfo~$/\sqrt{3}$, where $\tau=(1+\sqrt{5})/2$.
434: The heights of the larger 2fold terraces were
435: measured to be
436: $S=
437: %(\tau^2/2)$~\zfo${}=
438: 6.2$~{\AA} and $L=9.5$~{\AA}
439: (see Fig.~3(a) and 3(c) in Ref.~\cite{PP2}),
440: in good agreement with the predicted values.
441: The 2fold layers intertwining the terminations are
442: of densities not higher than
443: $0.079$~{\AA}$^{-2}(<0.086$~{\AA}$^{-2}$).
444: The small 2fold terraces, or rather the
445: pits within the big terraces
446: (see Fig.~3(a) and 3(c) in Ref. \cite{PP2})
447: may be explained by the comparatively large distances
448: between the atomic planes inside of the ``thick''
449: terminating layer ($1.5$~{\AA}, $2.4$~{\AA} and
450: $3.9$~{\AA}).
451: These excellently reproduce the measured values
452: ($2.4$~{\AA} and $3.6$~{\AA}),
453: see Fig.3(a) and 3(c) in Ref. \cite{PP2}.
454:
455: In the model \mts2f\ there is a low density
456: 2fold layer
457: $(bq,bq)$:
458: $0.92$~{\AA} gap, $bq$-plane, $0.57$~{\AA},
459: $bq$-plane, $0.92$~{\AA} gap
460: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:2f-thick-term}(b)).
461: The width of the
462: cavity
463: on the graph of these layers,
464: $W=(\tau/2)$\zfo, encodes a Fibonacci
465: sequence with the intervals
466: $\tau^{-1} S=3.9$~{\AA} and $S=6.3$~{\AA}.
467: These are the {\em minimum density} layers
468: of almost equal density,
469: somewhat above $0.063$~{\AA}$^{-2}$.
470: A member of a {\em subsequence} of these layers
471: is placed over {\em each} 2fold termination.
472: %that allow also a $4.08$~{\AA} terrace heights.
473: Nevertheless, in the 2fold case the
474: minimum density layer sequence {\em alone}
475: can not define the terminations, because it predicts
476: by $\tau^{-1}$ shorter terrace heights between the
477: large 2fold terminations, than observed.
478:
479:
480: The 3fold terminations could also be modeled
481: as ``thick'' layers of atomic planes in \mts2f,
482: see table~\ref{tab:densities}.
483: But, inspecting the intertwining 3fold layers,
484: we see that these are of the densities {\em comparable}
485: to the ``terminating'' ones.
486: We also know that the 3fold surfaces facet readily
487: \cite{Shen00},
488: and some correlated STM measurements,
489: (as those in Fig.3(a) and 3(c) of Ref. \cite{PP2})
490: for the 3fold surfaces do not exist so far.
491: %
492: % Table I
493: %
494: \begin{table}[h]
495: \begin{center}
496: \caption{
497: Relative and absolute densities of the planes
498: and layer terminations orthogonal to 5, 2 and 3fold
499: symmetry axes in \mts2f\ of \mbox{i-AlPdMn}.
500: The corresponding data for \mbox{i-AlCuFe} are similar.
501: \label{tab:densities}
502: }
503: \begin{tabular}{l|lll}
504: \hline
505: & 5fold & 2fold & 3fold\\
506: \hline
507: Densest planes (abs.) & 0.086\,{\AA}$^{-2}$&
508: 0.101\,{\AA}$^{-2}$&0.066\,{\AA}$^{-2}$ \\%[1mm]
509: Densest ``thin'' layers (abs.) &0.133\,{\AA}$^{-2}$&
510: 0.101\,{\AA}$^{-2}$&0.066\,{\AA}$^{-2}$\\
511: Densest ``thin'' layers (rel.) & 1 & 0.76 & 0.50\\
512: Densest ``thick'' layers (abs.) &0.134\,{\AA}$^{-2}$&
513: 0.086\,{\AA}$^{-2}$&0.058\,{\AA}$^{-2}$\\
514: Densest ``thick'' layers (rel.) & 1 & 0.64 & 0.44\\
515: \hline
516: \end{tabular}
517: \end{center}
518: \end{table}
519:
520:
521: On the STM measurements it is in general
522: hard to judge whether ``thin'' layer or ``thick''
523: layer terminations best model the physical surfaces.
524: However, in the 5fold case, the ``thick'' layer concept
525: removes the contradiction with respect to the
526: Bravais' rule, that some, equally dense layers
527: do not appear on the surfaces, see Ref.~\cite{PP2}.
528: In the 2fold case the ``thick'' layer concept is
529: evidently better, it treats differently
530: the large terraces compared to the small pits inside.
531: That the effective densities of the 2fold terminations
532: are somewhat lower than the densities of some single
533: 2fold planes is not contradictory, because these are
534: included in the most dense layers.
535:
536:
537: Fig.~\ref{fig:compSEI}(a)
538: shows the secondary-electron pattern
539: %\cite{erbu,SEI}
540: \cite{B04}
541: obtained from the clean pentagonal surface of a
542: quasicrystalline
543: Al$_{70}$Pd$_{20}$Mn$_{10}$
544: sample~\cite{K0}.
545: %
546: % Fig. 4
547: %
548: \begin{figure}
549: \includegraphics[width=0.465\textwidth]
550: {PK-Fig4.eps}
551: \caption{
552: (a)~(left) Secondary-electron pattern obtained from
553: the pentagonal surface of a single icosahedral
554: Al$_{70}$Pd$_{20}$Mn$_{10}$ quasicrystal.
555: The center of the pattern is obscured by the
556: shadow of the electron gun used for the
557: excitation. The edge of the screen corresponds
558: to~\cite{B04} $\theta=52^\circ$.
559: (b)~(right) Calculated secondary-electron pattern based
560: on the single scattering approximation of electrons
561: using model~\cite{E03} \mts2f.
562: \label{fig:compSEI}
563: }
564: \end{figure}
565: Secondary-electron images
566: (SEI) represent an orthogonal
567: projection to the sphere of the symmetry directions
568: below a near-surface region
569: of the sample.
570: Apart from the icosahedral symmetry of the pattern,
571: some groups of bright patches are seen to lie
572: within bands, similar to Kikuchi bands
573: %\cite{stern},
574: \cite{B04} connecting the
575: 2fold-, 3fold-, and 5fold-symmetry directions.
576: In case of crystals these
577: bands are a direct consequence of well-defined dense
578: {\it planes}
579: of atoms.
580: The bands observed by a quasicrystal
581: should be also a consequence of dense planes or
582: plane-like layers within the quasicrystal, which,
583: according to the secondary-electron pattern,
584: lie perpendicular to the principal directions of the
585: icosahedron.
586: Hence, the pattern in Fig.~\ref{fig:compSEI}(a)
587: carries an
588: information of the long-range order.
589: We note that there are bands
590: perpendicular to 2fold- and 5fold-symmetry directions,
591: but not to 3fold-symmetry directions.
592:
593:
594:
595:
596: A quantum mechanical single-site scattering calculation
597: %\cite{fadley}
598: \cite{B04} is a faithful representation of the SEI
599: pattern because it accounts for the wave nature of the
600: secondary electrons.
601: Fig.~\ref{fig:compSEI}(b) illustrates the results of
602: the calculation~\cite{E03} using the coordinate set
603: of the model \mts2f. This approximation overestimates
604: the scattering intensity along chains of atoms
605: %\cite{egel},
606: \cite{B04}
607: but suffices for
608: purposes, since our interest is
609: mainly in the presence or absence of bands on the
610: screen.
611: As in case of crystals \cite{B04} the band width
612: is inversely proportional to the spacing of
613: crystallographic planes,
614: and the band width is related to the distance
615: of interatomic planes
616: %\cite{stern},
617: \cite{B04}.
618: The observed band widths reveal that the
619: inter-planar distances of the highly dense
620: 2fold planes are broader than these of the
621: 5fold planes/plane-like layers
622: by a factor
623: 1.6.
624: In 5fold case, from the model we predict the distance
625: $d_5=\tau/(\tau+2)$\ffo$=2.04$~{\AA}, which is the
626: distance between the highly dense $(q,b)$ and the
627: $(b,q)$ plane-like layers in the terminating
628: thick layer $(q,b,b,q)$:
629: $2.04$~{\AA}$=0.48$~{\AA}$+1.56$~{\AA},
630: see also Ref.~\cite{Z04}.
631: In the 2fold case, between the highly dense planes
632: in the above defined ``thick'' layer, appears
633: once the distance of 0.92~{\AA} and twice the distance
634: of 1.48~{\AA}.
635: Hence, an average distance between the highly dense
636: planes is
637: $d_2=\frac{\tau}{3\sqrt{\tau+2}}$\zfo$=1.29$~{\AA}.
638: And their ratio is $d_5/d_2=3/\sqrt{\tau+2}
639: \approx 1.6$.
640:
641: The SEI method does not determine the bulk termination,
642: (it is testing the bulk circa 30~{\AA} below
643: the surface). However,
644: in the case of the ordinary
645: crystals, the Kikuchi bands are related to the most
646: dense atomic planes, and we show that the same holds
647: true in the case of quasicrystals as well.
648: %see also~\cite{B04}.
649: Hence we may claim that SEI images are supporting the
650: thick atomic layers of the high effective
651: density to be the bulk terminations, if the Bravais'
652: rule should be valid in quasicrystals as well.
653: The not existing 3fold Kikuchi bands are also
654: supporting
655: the model \mts2f, in which we find that the
656: atoms collected by the 3fold planes are almost
657: uniformly distributed among these, without the
658: notable repetitive layers of higher densities.
659:
660: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
661:
662:
663: \bibitem{Bur93} S.~E.~Burkov,
664: %Enforcement of matching rules by chemical ordering
665: %in the decagonal AlCuCo quasicrystals,
666: Phys.~Rev.~B,
667: {\bf 47}, R12325
668: %-12328,
669: (1993).
670:
671:
672: \bibitem{Baake90} M.~Baake,
673: P.~Kramer, M.~Schlottmann
674: and D.~Zeidler,
675: %Planar Patterns with Fivefold Symmetry as Sections
676: %of Periodic Structures in 4-space,
677: Int.~J.~Mod.~Phys.~B {\bf 4}, 2217
678: %-2268
679: (1990).
680:
681:
682: \bibitem{Aper97} Z.~Papadopolos,
683: P.~Kramer and W.~Liebermeister,
684: %{\em Atomic Positions for the Icosahedral F-Phase
685: %Tiling},
686: in {\em Proc. of the Int. Conf. on
687: Aperiodic Crystals, Aperiodic 1997},
688: %173-181,
689: edited by M.~de~Boissieu,
690: J.-L.~Verger-Gaugry and
691: R.~Currant
692: (World Scientific, Singapore,
693: 1998), p.~173.
694: % series ={AIP Conference Proceedings},
695: % number = 505,
696:
697:
698: \bibitem{ts2f} P.~Kramer,
699: Z.~Papadopolos and D.~Zeidler,
700: in {\em Proc. of the Symp.
701: ``Symmetries in Science V: Algebraic
702: structures,
703: %\ldots''
704: their representations,
705: realizations and physical applications''
706: },
707: %Symmetries of icosahedral quasicrystals
708: %pages = {395-427},
709: edited by B.~Gruber,
710: and L.~C.~Biedenharn,
711: (Plenum, New York, 1991), p.~395.
712:
713:
714: \bibitem{PHK} Z.~Papadopolos,
715: C.~Hohneker and P.~Kramer,
716: %Tiles-inflation rules for the class of canonical
717: %tilings ${\cal T}^{*(2F)}$ derived by the projection
718: %method,
719: Discrete Math., {\bf 221}, 101
720: %-112,
721: (2000).
722:
723: \bibitem{KPKB} G.~Kasner,
724: Z.~Papadopolos, P.~Kramer and
725: D.~E.~B\"urgler,
726: %Surface structure of i-Al$_{68}$Pd$_{23}$Mn$_{9}$:
727: %An analysis based on the ${\cal T}^{*(2F)}$ tiling
728: %decorated by Bergman polytopes,
729: Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 60}, 3899
730: %-3907,
731: (1999).
732:
733:
734: \bibitem{LGPK2} Z.~Papadopolos,
735: G.~Kasner, J.~Ledieu,
736: E.~J.~Cox, N.~V.~Richardson, Q.~Chen,
737: R.~D.~Diehl, T.~A.~Lograsso,
738: A.~R.~Ross and R.~McGrath,
739: %Bulk termination of the quasicrystalline fivefold
740: %surface of Al$_{70}$Pd$_{21}$Mn$_{9}$}},
741: Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 66}, 184207
742: %-(1-13),
743: (2002).
744:
745: \bibitem{PP2} Z.~Papadopolos,
746: P.~Pleasants, G.~Kasner,
747: V.~Fourn\'{e}e, C.~J.~Jenks, J.~Ledieu
748: and R.~McGrath,
749: %A maximum density rule for bulk terminations of
750: %quasicrystals,
751: Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 69}, 224201
752: %-(1-7),
753: (2004).
754:
755: \bibitem{Shen00} Z.~Shen,
756: W.~Raberg, M.~Heinzig,
757: C.~J.~Jenks, V.~Fourn\'{e}e,
758: M.~A.~Van~Hove, T.~A.~Lograsso,
759: D.~Delaney, T.~Cai, P.~C.~Canfield,
760: I.~R.~Fisher, A.~I.~Goldman,
761: M.~J.~Kramer and P.~A.~Thiel,
762: %A LEED comparison of structural stability of the
763: %three high-symmetry surfaces of Al-Pd-Mn bulk
764: %quasicrystals,
765: Surf.~Sci. {\bf 450}, 1
766: %-11,
767: (1999).
768:
769:
770:
771:
772: \bibitem{Kor90} A.~R.~Kortan,
773: R.~S.~Becker, F.~A.~Thiel
774: and H.~S.~Chen,
775: %Real-Space Atomic Structure of a Two-Dimensional
776: %Decagonal Quasicrystal,
777: Phys.~Rev.~Lett., {\bf 64}, 200
778: %-203,
779: (1990).
780:
781: \bibitem{K0} due to A.~R.~Kortan.
782:
783:
784:
785:
786: \bibitem{Kram95} P.~Kramer,
787: A.~Quandt, M.~Schlottmann,
788: and T.~Schneider,
789: %{\em Atomic clusters and electrons in
790: %the Burkov model of AlCuCo},
791: Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 51}, 8815 (1995).
792:
793:
794: \bibitem{classes} The labels ``$q$'', ``$b$'' and
795: ``$a$'' denote the three classes of
796: atomic points in the model \mts2f.
797:
798: \bibitem{Shen99} Z.~Shen,
799: C.~R.~Stoldt, C.~J.~Jenks,
800: T.~A.~Lograsso, and P.~A.~Thiel,
801: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 60}, 14688 (1999).
802:
803:
804:
805: \bibitem{Y04} H.~R.~Sharma,
806: V.~Fourn\'ee, M.~Shimoda,
807: A.~R.~Ross, T.~A.~Lograsso, A.~P.~Tsai,
808: and A.~Yamamoto,
809: % {\em Structure of the Fivefold Surface
810: % of the Icosahedral Al-Cu-Fe Quasicrystal:
811: % Experimental Evidence of Bulk Truncations
812: % at Larger Interlayer Spacings},
813: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 93}, 165502 (2004).
814:
815:
816:
817: \bibitem{E03} due to M.~Erbudak.
818:
819:
820: \bibitem{B04} B.~Bolliger, Diss. Naturwissenschaften
821: ETH Z\"urich, Nr. 13562, 2000,
822: %``Time-resolved structural
823: %investigation of quasicrystal surfaces''
824: on http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/
825:
826:
827:
828:
829: \bibitem{Z04} Jin-Cheng~Zheng,
830: C.~H.~A.~Huan,
831: A.~T.~S.~Wee, M.~A.~Van~Hove, C.~S.~Fadley,
832: F.~J.~Shi, E.~Rotenberg, S.~R.~Barman,
833: J.~J.~Paggel, K.~Horn, Ph.~Ebert,
834: and K.~Urban,
835: % {\em Atomic-scale structure of the fivefold
836: % surface of an AlPdMn quasicrystals:
837: % A quantitative x-ray photoelectron
838: % diffraction analysis},
839: Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 69}, 134107 (2004).
840:
841: \end{thebibliography}
842:
843:
844: \end{document}
845: