1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
3: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
4: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
5: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
6: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
7: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
9: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
10: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
11: % 2) bibtex apssamp
12: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
13: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
14: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
15: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
16: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
17: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
18: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
19: % Include figure files
20: % Align table columns on decimal point
21: % bold math
22: %\nofiles
23:
24: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers]{revtex4}%
25: \usepackage{amssymb}
26: \usepackage{amsfonts}
27: \usepackage{amsmath}
28: \usepackage{graphicx}
29: \usepackage{dcolumn}
30: \usepackage{bm}%
31: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
32: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
33: %TCIDATA{Version=4.00.0.2321}
34: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11:06:34}
35: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
36: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
37: \begin{document}
38: \preprint{APS/123-QED}
39: \title{Nonlinear Coupling in Nb/NbN Superconducting Microwave Resonators}
40: \author{B. Abdo}
41: \email{baleegh@tx.technion.ac.il}
42: \author{E. Segev}
43: \author{O. Shtempluck}
44: \author{E. Buks}
45: \affiliation{Microelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical Engineering,
46: Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel}
47: \date{\today}
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: In this experimental study we show that the coupling between Nb/NbN
51: superconducting microwave resonators and their feedline can be made amplitude
52: dependent. We employ this mechanism to tune the resonators into critical
53: coupling condition, a preferable mode of operation for a wide range of
54: applications. Moreover we examine the dependence of critical coupling state on
55: other parameters such as temperature and magnetic field. Possible novel
56: applications based on such nonlinear coupling are briefly discussed.
57:
58: \end{abstract}
59: \pacs{84.40.Az, 85.25.-j, 42.50.Dv}
60: \maketitle
61:
62:
63: %Force line breaks with \\
64:
65:
66: %Lines break automatically or can be forced with \\
67:
68:
69: %It is always \today, today,
70: %but any date may be explicitly specified
71:
72:
73: Recently, there has been a growing scientific interest in nonlinear
74: directional couplers especially in the optical regime \cite{squeezing}. It has
75: been shown in a series of publications, that operating such devices by means
76: of parametric downconversion, may exhibit some important quantum phenomena,
77: such as generation of quadrature-squeezed states \cite{squeezing}, occurrence
78: of quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects \cite{zeno}, non-classical correlations
79: \cite{EPR}, and quantum entanglement \cite{entanglement}. Such effects, if
80: generated and engineered, would have immediate and significant implications on
81: a wide range of fields, ranging from basic science to optical communication
82: systems, and quantum computation \cite{correlated},\cite{statics}. The
83: dependence of these mentioned effects on optimal coupling strengths and cavity
84: detunings are almost evident \cite{squeezing},\cite{EPR}.
85:
86: In this study we investigate the coupling between nonlinear NbN/Nb microwave
87: resonators and their feedlines, as a function of injected power, ambient
88: temperature and applied magnetic field. We show that the coupling in these
89: resonators could be, to a large extent, dependent on externally applied
90: parameters, allowing us thus to tune the resonators into critical coupling
91: condition, which is a coupling state where the power transferred to the device
92: is maximized and no power reflection is present. Such a state occurs as both
93: impedances of the device and of the feedline match.
94:
95: Theoretically critical coupling can be achieved by either tuning the coupling
96: parameters or by altering the internal/external losses of the device. Such
97: control was reported in optical systems \cite{Control SOA}, where critical
98: coupling was obtained in microring resonator by altering the internal loss
99: inside the ring by means of integrated semiconductor optical amplifiers. Other
100: critical coupling achieved in a fiber ring resonator configuration may be used
101: in optical communication systems i.e. switches and modulators \cite{cc
102: Yariv},\cite{Control of cc ring-fiber conf}.
103:
104: Our fabricated resonators were assembled in a standard stripline geometry, and
105: were housed in a gold plated Faraday package made of Oxygen Free High
106: Conductivity (OFHC) Cupper. The layout of the Nb and NbN resonators are
107: presented in the insets of Figs.\ref{Nb_ana} and \ref{B2_1_ana} respectively.
108: The resonators were dc-magnetron sputtered, at room temperature, on sapphire
109: substrates with dimensions 34$%
110: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
111: %BeginExpansion
112: \mathrm{mm}%
113: %EndExpansion
114: $ X 30$%
115: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
116: %BeginExpansion
117: \mathrm{mm}%
118: %EndExpansion
119: $ X 1$%
120: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
121: %BeginExpansion
122: \mathrm{mm}%
123: %EndExpansion
124: $ each. A gap of 0.5 mm was set between the feedline and the resonators. The
125: thickness of the Nb sputtered film is $2200%
126: %TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
127: %BeginExpansion
128: \mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
129: %EndExpansion
130: ,$ whereas the thickness of the NbN film is $3000%
131: %TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
132: %BeginExpansion
133: \mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
134: %EndExpansion
135: $. Following the deposition, the Nb resonator was patterned using standard
136: photolithography process and dry etched with photo resist mask. The sputtering
137: parameters of the NbN superconducting microwave resonator have been discussed
138: elsewhere \cite{nonlinear features BB}.
139:
140: The measurements of the resonators were done using the \textit{S} parameter of
141: a vector network analyzer, while varying the input power or the ambient
142: temperature in small steps. In Figs. \ref{NbN_circ},\ref{B2_1_ana} we show a
143: power induced critical coupling data obtained at the first mode of the NbN
144: resonator. In Fig. \ref{NbN_circ} we plot the $S_{11}\left( \omega\right) $
145: curves of the first mode in the complex plane, corresponding to three input
146: powers $0.944%
147: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
148: %BeginExpansion
149: \mathrm{mW}%
150: %EndExpansion
151: $, $1.072$ $%
152: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
153: %BeginExpansion
154: \mathrm{mW}%
155: %EndExpansion
156: $, $1.14%
157: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
158: %BeginExpansion
159: \mathrm{mW}%
160: %EndExpansion
161: $ in the vicinity of the resonance, representing $p<p_{c},$ $p=p_{c},$
162: $p>p_{c}$ states respectively, where $p_{c}$ is the injected power level at
163: which critical coupling is achieved. These three trajectories show clearly
164: that the NbN resonator at its first mode has transformed from overcoupled
165: (strongly coupled), to undercoupled state (loosely coupled) through critically
166: coupled condition via input power increase only. In Fig. \ref{B2_1_ana} (a) we
167: show the resonance curves $\left\vert S_{11}\right\vert $ of the three input
168: powers, presented previously in Fig. \ref{NbN_circ}, in the vicinity of the
169: resonance. The resonances were shifted vertically for clarity. In Fig.
170: \ref{B2_1_ana} (b) we present the nonlinear evolution of the $\left\vert
171: S_{11}\right\vert $ minimum at resonance as the input power is increased
172: through the critical coupling power. The minimum of the graph $\sim$ $-60$ dB
173: at $p_{c}=1.072$ $%
174: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
175: %BeginExpansion
176: \mathrm{mW}%
177: %EndExpansion
178: ,$ corresponds to critical coupling condition where there is no power
179: reflection. The gradual shift of the resonance frequency towards lower
180: frequencies as the input power is increased, is plotted in Fig. \ref{B2_1_ana} (c).%
181:
182: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.6039in}{2.0591in}{0pt}{\Qcb{ NbN resonator first
183: %mode $S_{11}\left( \omega\right) $ curve, drawn in the complex plane for
184: %three input powers $0.944\unit{mW}$, $1.072$ $\unit{mW}$, $1.14\unit{mW},$
185: %with $2\unit{MHz}$ span. The resonator changes from overcoupled to
186: %undercoupled state as the power is increased through $p_{c}=1.072$
187: %$\unit{mW}.$ The unit circle and the origin are also plotted on the same axis
188: %for visual comparison.}}{\Qlb{NbN_circ}}{circ.eps}%
189: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC"; display "USEDEF";
190: %valid_file "F"; width 2.6039in; height 2.0591in; depth 0pt;
191: %original-width 7.0275in; original-height 5.591in; cropleft "0";
192: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
193: %filename 'circ.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
194: %BeginExpansion
195: \begin{figure}
196: [ptb]
197: \begin{center}
198: \includegraphics[
199: height=2.0591in,
200: width=2.6039in
201: ]%
202: {circ.eps}%
203: \caption{ NbN resonator first mode $S_{11}\left( \omega\right) $ curve,
204: drawn in the complex plane for three input powers $0.944\mathrm{mW}$,
205: $1.072$ $\mathrm{mW}$, $1.14\mathrm{mW},$ with
206: $2\mathrm{MHz}$ span. The resonator changes from overcoupled to
207: undercoupled state as the power is increased through $p_{c}=1.072$
208: $\mathrm{mW}.$ The unit circle and the origin are also plotted on the
209: same axis for visual comparison.}%
210: \label{NbN_circ}%
211: \end{center}
212: \end{figure}
213: %EndExpansion
214: %
215:
216: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.9827in}{2.4128in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Data analysis of NbN
217: %\ resonator first mode. (a) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ graphs
218: %representing $p<p_{c},$ $p=p_{c}$ and $p>p_{c}$ cases. The resonance curves
219: %were shifted vertically by a constant offset for clarity. (b) $\left\vert
220: %S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ minimum as a function of input power. The minimum
221: %of the graph is at $p_{c}.$ (c) Resonance frequency vs. input power$.$ (d)
222: %Real $S_{11}$ at resonance vs. power difference from critical coupling power.
223: %The resonator geometry is shown in the inset of subplot (b).}}{\Qlb{B2_1_ana}%
224: %}{nbn.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
225: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
226: %width 2.9827in; height 2.4128in; depth 0pt; original-width 9.3054in;
227: %original-height 7.5213in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
228: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'nbn.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
229: %BeginExpansion
230: \begin{figure}
231: [ptb]
232: \begin{center}
233: \includegraphics[
234: height=2.4128in,
235: width=2.9827in
236: ]%
237: {nbn.eps}%
238: \caption{Data analysis of NbN \ resonator first mode. (a) $\left\vert
239: S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ graphs representing $p<p_{c},$ $p=p_{c}$ and
240: $p>p_{c}$ cases. The resonance curves were shifted vertically by a constant
241: offset for clarity. (b) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ minimum as a
242: function of input power. The minimum of the graph is at $p_{c}.$ (c) Resonance
243: frequency vs. input power$.$ (d) Real $S_{11}$ at resonance vs. power
244: difference from critical coupling power. The resonator geometry is shown in
245: the inset of subplot (b).}%
246: \label{B2_1_ana}%
247: \end{center}
248: \end{figure}
249: %EndExpansion
250:
251:
252: In order to identify and characterize the coupling mechanism responsible for
253: this dependence on the drive amplitude, we apply the following universal
254: expression for reflection amplitude of a linear resonator near resonance
255: \cite{Yurke Eyal}%
256:
257: \begin{equation}
258: S_{11}(\omega)=\frac{i(\omega_{0}-\omega)-(\gamma_{1}-\gamma_{2})}%
259: {i(\omega_{0}-\omega)+(\gamma_{1}+\gamma_{2})}, \label{S11}%
260: \end{equation}
261:
262:
263: where $\gamma_{1}$ and $\gamma_{2}$ are real coupling factors associated with
264: the feedline-resonator and the resonator-reservoir (dissipation) couplings
265: respectively. However, unlike linear oscillators where $\gamma_{1}$,
266: $\gamma_{2}$ and $\omega_{0}$ are constants, here we assume that these factors
267: depend on some externally applied parameter $x,$ such as input power,
268: temperature, and magnetic field. This generalization could be justified by
269: noting that the $\left\vert S_{11}\left( \omega\right) \right\vert $ curves
270: measured in the vicinity of the resonance, are to a good approximation
271: symmetrical Lorentzians. The different possible coupling states of the
272: resonator as described generally by Eq.(\ref{S11}) are shown schematically in
273: Fig. \ref{ccterm}.%
274:
275: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{3.4783in}{1.2851in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Resonator coupling
276: %states as defined by their $S_{11}(\omega)$ curves in the vicinity of the
277: %resonance $\omega_{0},$ (see Eq.(\ref{S11})) corresponding for (a)
278: %undercoupled state (b) critically coupled state (c) overcoupled state.}%
279: %}{\Qlb{ccterm}}{ccterm.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
280: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF";
281: %valid_file "F"; width 3.4783in; height 1.2851in; depth 0pt;
282: %original-width 10.7825in; original-height 3.9271in; cropleft "0";
283: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
284: %filename '../ccterm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
285: %BeginExpansion
286: \begin{figure}
287: [ptb]
288: \begin{center}
289: \includegraphics[
290: height=1.2851in,
291: width=3.4783in
292: ]%
293: {ccterm.eps}%
294: \caption{Resonator coupling states as defined by their $S_{11}(\omega)$ curves
295: in the vicinity of the resonance $\omega_{0},$ (see Eq.(\ref{S11}))
296: corresponding for (a) undercoupled state (b) critically coupled state (c)
297: overcoupled state.}%
298: \label{ccterm}%
299: \end{center}
300: \end{figure}
301: %EndExpansion
302:
303:
304: By expanding $\gamma_{1}$ and $\gamma_{2}$ near critical coupling drive
305: $x_{c},$ to lowest order in $\delta x=x-x_{c},$ we get $\gamma_{1}%
306: =\gamma+g_{1}\delta x$ and $\gamma_{2}=\gamma+g_{2}\delta x,$ where
307: $\gamma,g_{1} $ and $g_{2}$ are real constants.
308:
309: Substituting for $\gamma_{1}$ and $\gamma_{2}$ in the vicinity of $x_{c}$ in
310: Eq.(\ref{S11}) at the corresponding resonance $\omega=\omega_{0},$ yields%
311:
312: \begin{equation}
313: S_{11}\left( \omega_{0}\right) =a_{1}\delta x+a_{2}\left( \delta x\right)
314: ^{2}+O\left( \left( \delta x\right) ^{3}\right) , \label{poly fit}%
315: \end{equation}
316:
317:
318: where $a_{1}=\left( g_{2}-g_{1}\right) /2\gamma,$ $a_{2}=\left( g_{1}%
319: ^{2}-g_{2}^{2}\right) /4\gamma^{2}.$
320:
321: In order to evaluate the critical coupling constant $\gamma$ characterizing
322: the resonance presented earlier, we applied a fit to the resonance curve at
323: $p_{c}$ using Eq.(\ref{S11}) and obtained $\gamma=1.3%
324: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
325: %BeginExpansion
326: \mathrm{MHz}%
327: %EndExpansion
328: .$ Moreover, we extracted $g_{1}$ and $g_{2}$ by applying a quadratic
329: polynomial fit as in Eq.(\ref{poly fit}) to the experimental data of real
330: $S_{11}$ at resonance as a function of $\delta p.$ The data and the quadratic
331: fit are presented in Fig. \ref{B2_1_ana} (d), yielding the following nonlinear
332: coupling rates $g_{1}=-0.1%
333: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
334: %BeginExpansion
335: \mathrm{MHz}%
336: %EndExpansion
337: /%
338: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
339: %BeginExpansion
340: \mathrm{mW}%
341: %EndExpansion
342: $, $g_{2}=1.2%
343: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
344: %BeginExpansion
345: \mathrm{MHz}%
346: %EndExpansion
347: /%
348: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
349: %BeginExpansion
350: \mathrm{mW}%
351: %EndExpansion
352: .$ Having $\left\vert g_{2}\right\vert >\left\vert g_{1}\right\vert $ and
353: $g_{2}>0,$ implies that the critical coupling in this case, is caused mainly
354: by the increase of the dissipation coupling as the input power is increased.
355:
356: In the Nb resonator, power induced critical coupling was attained at $12.589%
357: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GHz}}%
358: %BeginExpansion
359: \mathrm{GHz}%
360: %EndExpansion
361: $ resonance as shown in Fig. \ref{Nb_ana}. The resonator changes from
362: undercoupled state to overcoupled state as the power is increased through the
363: critical coupling power at $6.59%
364: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
365: %BeginExpansion
366: \mathrm{mW}%
367: %EndExpansion
368: $ . The coefficients $\gamma,g_{1},g_{2}$ extracted for this case are $48.5%
369: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
370: %BeginExpansion
371: \mathrm{MHz}%
372: %EndExpansion
373: ,$ $1.6%
374: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
375: %BeginExpansion
376: \mathrm{MHz}%
377: %EndExpansion
378: /%
379: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
380: %BeginExpansion
381: \mathrm{mW}%
382: %EndExpansion
383: ,$ $1.5%
384: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
385: %BeginExpansion
386: \mathrm{MHz}%
387: %EndExpansion
388: /%
389: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
390: %BeginExpansion
391: \mathrm{mW}%
392: %EndExpansion
393: $ respectively. Implying surprisingly that what led to critical coupling in
394: this case, is the increase of the feedline-resonator coupling at higher rate
395: than the increase of the dissipation coupling rate, since we have $\left\vert
396: g_{1}\right\vert >\left\vert g_{2}\right\vert $, $g_{1}>0$. Such increase in
397: the feedline-resonator coupling could be attributed to a nonlinear
398: redistribution of the standing-wave voltage-mode inside the resonator relative
399: to the feedline position, leading to amplitude dependence of $\gamma_{1}.$%
400:
401: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{3.1445in}{2.3912in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Data analysis of Nb
402: %resonator critical coupling at $12.589\unit{GHz}$ resonance. (a) $\left\vert
403: %S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ graphs representing $p<p_{c},$ $p=p_{c}$ and
404: %$p>p_{c}$ cases. The resonance curves were shifted vertically by a constant
405: %offset for clarity. (b) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ minimum as a
406: %function of input power. The minimum of the graph is at $p_{c}$ . (c)
407: %Resonance frequency vs. input power$.$ (d) Real $S_{11}$ at resonance vs.
408: %power difference $\delta p$ from critical coupling power. The resonator
409: %geometry is shown in the inset of subplot (b).}}{\Qlb{Nb_ana}}{nb.eps}%
410: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
411: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
412: %width 3.1445in; height 2.3912in; depth 0pt; original-width 12.794in;
413: %original-height 9.7144in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
414: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'nb.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
415: %BeginExpansion
416: \begin{figure}
417: [ptb]
418: \begin{center}
419: \includegraphics[
420: height=2.3912in,
421: width=3.1445in
422: ]%
423: {nb.eps}%
424: \caption{Data analysis of Nb resonator critical coupling at
425: $12.589\mathrm{GHz}$ resonance. (a) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }%
426: }\right\vert $ graphs representing $p<p_{c},$ $p=p_{c}$ and $p>p_{c}$ cases.
427: The resonance curves were shifted vertically by a constant offset for clarity.
428: (b) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ minimum as a function of input
429: power. The minimum of the graph is at $p_{c}$ . (c) Resonance frequency vs.
430: input power$.$ (d) Real $S_{11}$ at resonance vs. power difference $\delta p$
431: from critical coupling power. The resonator geometry is shown in the inset of
432: subplot (b).}%
433: \label{Nb_ana}%
434: \end{center}
435: \end{figure}
436: %EndExpansion
437:
438:
439: Based on our experimental demonstration of nonlinear coupling between
440: superconducting stripline elements it is interesting to examine the
441: feasibility of implementing some of the theoretical proposals presented in
442: Ref. [1-6] in the microwave regime. \ For that end we consider a resonator
443: made of two stripline elements having nonlinear coupling factor $g$ between
444: them. \ The resonator is also coupled to a feed line employed for delivering
445: the input and output signals. \ Consider operating close to a resonance having
446: angular frequency $\omega_{0}$ and damping rate $\gamma$. \ A detailed
447: analysis of this model is beyond the scope of the present letter. \ However,
448: employing dimensionality analysis and some simplifying assumptions one finds
449: that the onset of nonlinear instability and bifurcation is expected in such a
450: system at input power level of order $p_{NL}^{in}\cong\gamma/g$. \ In the
451: regime of operation when the input power is close to $p_{NL}^{in}$ effects
452: such as intermodulation gain and quantum squeezing \cite{squeezing} are
453: expected to become noticeable \cite{Yurke Eyal}. \ Based on our results with
454: the Nb resonator, we estimate from the experimental values of $\gamma$ and
455: $g_{1}$ (assuming $g=g_{1}$) that such effects can be implemented with a
456: moderate input power of order $10^{-2}%
457: %TCIMACRO{\unit{W}}%
458: %BeginExpansion
459: \mathrm{W}%
460: %EndExpansion
461: $. \ On the other hand, effects such as Zeno and anti-Zeno \cite{zeno} require
462: much stronger nonlinear coupling. \ We estimate that in the limit of zero
463: temperature such effects will become noticeable only when the input power
464: becomes comparable to $p_{\varphi}^{in}\cong\gamma/\hslash\omega_{0}g^{2}$.
465: \ Again, assuming the experimental values extracted from the data of the Nb
466: resonator, one finds $p_{\varphi}^{in}\cong10^{12}%
467: %TCIMACRO{\unit{W}}%
468: %BeginExpansion
469: \mathrm{W}%
470: %EndExpansion
471: $ - far too high for any practical implementation. \ However, further analysis
472: is required to explore other possibilities of implementing such effects in the
473: microwave regime.%
474:
475: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{3.2716in}{2.3999in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Data analysis of NbN
476: %second mode temperature induced critical coupling. (a) $\left\vert S_{11\text{
477: %}}\right\vert $ graphs representing $T<T_{crit},T=T_{crit}$ and $T>T_{crit}$
478: %cases. The resonance curves were shifted vertically by a constant offset for
479: %clarity. (b) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ minimum as a function of
480: %temperature, the minimum of the graph is at $T_{crit}$ . (c) Resonance
481: %frequency vs. temperature$.$ (d) Real $S_{11}$ at resonance vs. temperature
482: %difference $\delta T$ from critical coupling temperature. }}{\Qlb{B2_2_ana_T}%
483: %}{tempcc.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
484: %display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F"; width 3.2716in; height 2.3999in;
485: %depth 0pt; original-width 10.6666in; original-height 6.8822in;
486: %cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
487: %filename 'tempcc.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
488: %BeginExpansion
489: \begin{figure}
490: [ptb]
491: \begin{center}
492: \includegraphics[
493: height=2.3999in,
494: width=3.2716in
495: ]%
496: {tempcc.eps}%
497: \caption{Data analysis of NbN second mode temperature induced critical
498: coupling. (a) $\left\vert S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ graphs representing
499: $T<T_{crit},T=T_{crit}$ and $T>T_{crit}$ cases. The resonance curves were
500: shifted vertically by a constant offset for clarity. (b) $\left\vert
501: S_{11\text{ }}\right\vert $ minimum as a function of temperature, the minimum
502: of the graph is at $T_{crit}$ . (c) Resonance frequency vs. temperature$.$ (d)
503: Real $S_{11}$ at resonance vs. temperature difference $\delta T$ from critical
504: coupling temperature. }%
505: \label{B2_2_ana_T}%
506: \end{center}
507: \end{figure}
508: %EndExpansion
509:
510:
511: In addition to input power tuning, we have succeeded to obtain critical
512: coupling using other modes of operation, one of which was tuning the ambient
513: temperature. To demonstrate this, we applied a constant input power to the NbN
514: resonator and measured its second resonance response as we increased the
515: ambient temperature in 0.01$%
516: %TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
517: %BeginExpansion
518: \mathrm{K}%
519: %EndExpansion
520: $ steps. The input power applied was $0.1%
521: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
522: %BeginExpansion
523: \mathrm{mW}%
524: %EndExpansion
525: $ , lower than $p_{c}$ of that resonance at 4.2 $%
526: %TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
527: %BeginExpansion
528: \mathrm{K}%
529: %EndExpansion
530: ,$ which was about $0.209$ $%
531: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
532: %BeginExpansion
533: \mathrm{mW}%
534: %EndExpansion
535: $. The resonator changed from overcoupled state at $T<T_{crit}$ to
536: undercoupled state at $T>T_{crit}$. $T_{crit}$ was found to be 5.8$%
537: %TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
538: %BeginExpansion
539: \mathrm{K}%
540: %EndExpansion
541: .$ The measurement results of this mode of operation are summarized in Fig.
542: \ref{B2_2_ana_T}. By applying similar fitting procedures as was explained
543: before one can obtain the following constants: $\gamma=4.2%
544: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
545: %BeginExpansion
546: \mathrm{MHz}%
547: %EndExpansion
548: ,g_{1}=-0.6%
549: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
550: %BeginExpansion
551: \mathrm{MHz}%
552: %EndExpansion
553: /%
554: %TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
555: %BeginExpansion
556: \mathrm{K}%
557: %EndExpansion
558: ,g_{2}=220%
559: %TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
560: %BeginExpansion
561: \mathrm{MHz}%
562: %EndExpansion
563: /%
564: %TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
565: %BeginExpansion
566: \mathrm{K}%
567: %EndExpansion
568: ,$ indicating that what led to critical coupling condition, in this case, was
569: the increase of the dissipation coupling as a result of the temperature rise.%
570:
571: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.8037in}{1.9536in}{0pt}{\Qcb{A plot displaying the
572: %critical coupling power dependence of the first mode of the NbN resonator on
573: %ambient temperature. The critical coupling power decreases as the temperature
574: %is increased. }}{\Qlb{CC vs temp}}{ccvstemp.eps}%
575: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC"; display "USEDEF";
576: %valid_file "F"; width 2.8037in; height 1.9536in; depth 0pt;
577: %original-width 7.9883in; original-height 6.0079in; cropleft "0";
578: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
579: %filename 'ccvstemp.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
580: %BeginExpansion
581: \begin{figure}
582: [ptb]
583: \begin{center}
584: \includegraphics[
585: height=1.9536in,
586: width=2.8037in
587: ]%
588: {ccvstemp.eps}%
589: \caption{A plot displaying the critical coupling power dependence of the first
590: mode of the NbN resonator on ambient temperature. The critical coupling power
591: decreases as the temperature is increased. }%
592: \label{CC vs temp}%
593: \end{center}
594: \end{figure}
595: %EndExpansion
596:
597:
598: Moreover to better understand the dual relation between the input power and
599: the ambient temperature, additional measurement was carried out on the first
600: mode of the NbN resonator. We varied the temperature of the resonator as a
601: parameter and at each given temperature, we scanned the input power in search
602: for the critical coupling power $p_{c}$ . The measurement result is shown in
603: Fig. \ref{CC vs temp}, where we see that in the case of the first mode of the
604: NbN resonator at $\sim2.5%
605: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GHz}}%
606: %BeginExpansion
607: \mathrm{GHz}%
608: %EndExpansion
609: $, increasing the ambient temperature decreased the input power at which
610: critical coupling occurred, and thus divided the $T-p^{in}$ plane into two
611: regions representing the overcoupled and undercoupled resonator states,
612: approximately separated by the guideline shown in the figure.%
613:
614: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{3.0528in}{2.0401in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Critical coupling
615: %achieved by magnetic field at the first mode resonance of the NbN resonator
616: %while applying constant input power of $1.23\unit{mW}$. (a) $\left\vert
617: %S_{11}\right\vert $ vs. frequency corresponding to an increased applied
618: %magnetic field. The resonance curves were shifted vertically by a constant
619: %offset for clarity. (b) The $\left\vert S_{11}\right\vert $ value at the
620: %resonance frequency. }}{\Qlb{CC mag}}{mag.eps}%
621: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC"; display "USEDEF";
622: %valid_file "F"; width 3.0528in; height 2.0401in; depth 0pt;
623: %original-width 7.6268in; original-height 5.6896in; cropleft "0";
624: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
625: %filename 'mag.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
626: %BeginExpansion
627: \begin{figure}
628: [ptb]
629: \begin{center}
630: \includegraphics[
631: height=2.0401in,
632: width=3.0528in
633: ]%
634: {mag.eps}%
635: \caption{Critical coupling achieved by magnetic field at the first mode
636: resonance of the NbN resonator while applying constant input power of
637: $1.23\mathrm{mW}$. (a) $\left\vert S_{11}\right\vert $ vs. frequency
638: corresponding to an increased applied magnetic field. The resonance curves
639: were shifted vertically by a constant offset for clarity. (b) The $\left\vert
640: S_{11}\right\vert $ value at the resonance frequency. }%
641: \label{CC mag}%
642: \end{center}
643: \end{figure}
644: %EndExpansion
645:
646:
647: Critical coupling condition was also achieved in the NbN resonator by means of
648: applied magnetic field. To show this we set a constant input power of $1.23%
649: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
650: %BeginExpansion
651: \mathrm{mW}%
652: %EndExpansion
653: $ (the critical coupling power at the time of the measurement in the absence
654: of magnetic field was $1.259%
655: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mW}}%
656: %BeginExpansion
657: \mathrm{mW}%
658: %EndExpansion
659: $), and increased a perpendicular magnetic field by small steps. The results
660: of this mode of operation, unlike power and temperature, showed a distinct
661: instability and frequent transitions around the critical coupling state as can
662: be inferred from Fig. \ref{CC mag}. A possible explanation to this instable
663: behavior could be vortex penetration into the grain boundaries of our NbN
664: film, as $H_{c_{1}}$ in NbN could be in the order of $35%
665: %TCIMACRO{\unit{mT}}%
666: %BeginExpansion
667: \mathrm{mT}%
668: %EndExpansion
669: $ \cite{nonlinear dynamics}.
670:
671: In summary, we have succeeded to tune our superconducting microwave resonators
672: into critical coupling condition using input power, ambient temperature and
673: applied magnetic field. By data fitting we have been able to extract
674: quantitatively the coupling parameters $\gamma,g_{1},g_{2}$ and identify the
675: dominant factor responsible for the coupling change in each case. In addition
676: we have briefly discussed some of the possible applications of this variable
677: coupling mechanism in exhibiting some important quantum phenomena in the
678: microwave regime.
679:
680: E.B. would especially like to thank Michael L. Roukes for supporting the early
681: stage of this research and for many helpful conversations and invaluable
682: suggestions. Very helpful conversations with Bernard Yurke are also gratefully
683: acknowledged. This work was supported by the German Israel Foundation under
684: grant 1-2038.1114.07, the Israel Science Foundation under grant 1380021, the
685: Deborah Foundation and Poznanski Foundation.
686:
687: %Just because of unusual number of tables stacked at end
688: \bibliographystyle{plain}
689: \bibliography{apssamp}
690: %Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.%
691: %TCIMACRO{\TeXButton{TeX field}{\enlargethispage{-5in}}}%
692: %BeginExpansion
693: \enlargethispage{-5in}%
694: %EndExpansion
695:
696:
697: \begin{thebibliography}{99} %
698:
699:
700: \bibitem {squeezing}A.-B. M. A. Ibrahim, B. A. Umarov, and M. R. B. Wahiddin,
701: Phys. Rev. A \textbf{61}, 043804 (2000).
702:
703: \bibitem {zeno}J. \v{R}eh\'{a}cel, J. Pe\v{r}ina, P. Facchi, S. Pascazi, and
704: L. Mi\v{s}ta Jr., Phys. Rev. A. \textbf{62}, 013804 (2000).
705:
706: \bibitem {EPR}M. K. Olsen and P. D. Drummond, Preprint quant-ph/0412106, (2004).
707:
708: \bibitem {entanglement}J. Herec, J. Fiur\'{a}\v{s}ek, and L. Mi\v{s}ta Jr, J.
709: Opt. B: Quant. Semiclass. Opt. \textbf{5}, 419 (2003).
710:
711: \bibitem {correlated}S. A. Podoshvedov, J. Noh, and K. Kim, Opt. Commun.
712: \textbf{212}, 115, (2002).
713:
714: \bibitem {statics}L. Mi\v{s}ta Jr., J. Herec, V. Jel\'{\i}nek, J.
715: \v{R}eh\'{a}cek, and J. Pe\v{r}ina, J. Opt. B: Quant. Semiclass. Opt.
716: \textbf{2}, 726 (2000).
717:
718: \bibitem {Control SOA}V. M. Menon, W. Tong, and S. R. Forrest, IEEE Photonics
719: Technol. lett. \textbf{16}, 1343 (2004).
720:
721: \bibitem {cc Yariv}A. Yariv, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. \textbf{14}, 483 (2002).
722:
723: \bibitem {Control of cc ring-fiber conf}J. M. Choi, R. K. Lee and Amnon Yariv,
724: Opt. lett. \textbf{26}, 1236 (2001).
725:
726: \bibitem {nonlinear features BB}B. Abdo, E. Segev, Oleg Shtempluck, and E.
727: Buks, arXiv:cond-mat/0501114.
728:
729: \bibitem {Yurke Eyal}B. Yurke and E. Buks, unpublished.
730:
731: \bibitem {nonlinear dynamics}C. C. Chen, D. E. Oates, G. Dresselhaus and M. S.
732: Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B. \textbf{45}, p. 4788 (1992).
733: \end{thebibliography}
734:
735:
736: \end{document}