1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
18: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
19: % For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
20: % Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
21: % Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
22: % Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
23: % Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
24:
25: \documentclass[aps,prb,twocolumn,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
28: \usepackage{graphicx}
29:
30: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
31: % Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
32: % BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line
33: % below if necessary.
34: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
35:
36: \begin{document}
37:
38: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
39: % number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
40: % Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
41: % Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults
42: % to display numbers if necessary
43: %\preprint{}
44:
45: %Title of paper
46: \title{Lattice dynamics and the electron-phonon interaction in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$}
47:
48: % repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
49: % \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
50: % author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
51: % address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
52: % Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information
53:
54: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
55: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
56: % other information
57: % \affiliation can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
58:
59: \author{H. Rho,$^{1,2}$ S. L. Cooper,$^2$
60: S. Nakatsuji,$^{3}$ H. Fukazawa,$^3$ and Y. Maeno,$^{3,4}$ }
61: %\email[Electronic address: ]{rho@chonbuk.ac.kr}
62:
63: %\homepage[]{Your web page}
64: %\thanks{}
65: %\altaffiliation{}
66: \affiliation{ $^{1}$Department of Physics, Chonbuk National
67: University, Jeonju 561-756, Korea\\
68: $^{2}$Department of Physics and Frederick Seitz Materials Research
69: Laboratory,
70: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801\\
71: $^{3}$Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502,
72: Japan\\
73: $^{4}$International Innovation Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto
74: 606-8501, Japan
75: }
76:
77: %Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress
78: %option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be
79: %used with the \author command).
80: %\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
81: %\collaboration{}
82: %\noaffiliation
83:
84: \date{\today}
85:
86: \begin{abstract}
87:
88:
89: We present a Raman scattering study of Ca$_2$RuO$_4$, in which we
90: investigate the temperature-dependence of the lattice dynamics and
91: the electron-phonon interaction below the metal-insulator
92: transition temperature ({\it T}$_{\rm MI}$). Raman spectra
93: obtained in a backscattering geometry with light polarized in the
94: ab-plane reveal 9\,B$_{1g}$ phonon modes (140, 215, 265, 269, 292,
95: 388, 459, 534, and 683 cm$^{-1}$) and 9\,A$_g$ phonon modes (126,
96: 192, 204, 251, 304, 322, 356, 395, and 607 cm$^{-1}$) for the
97: orthorhombic crystal structure (Pbca$-$D$_{2h}^{15}$). With
98: increasing temperature toward {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$, the observed
99: phonon modes shift to lower energies and exhibit reduced spectral
100: weights, reflecting structural changes associated with the
101: elongation of the RuO$_6$ octahedra. Interestingly, the phonons
102: exhibit significant increases in linewidths and asymmetries for
103: {\it T} $>$ {\it T}$_{\rm N}$. These results indicate that there
104: is an increase in the effective number of electrons and the
105: electron-phonon interaction strengths as the temperature is raised
106: through {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, suggesting the presence of orbital
107: fluctuations in the temperature regime {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ $<$ {\it
108: T} $<$ {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$.
109:
110: \end{abstract}
111:
112: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
113: \pacs{75.30.-m, 75.50.Ee, 78.30.-j, 71.30.+h}
114: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
115: %\keywords{}
116:
117: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords
118: \maketitle
119:
120: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
121:
122:
123: {\section{INTRODUCTION}}
124:
125: Like many other transition-metal oxides that exhibit strong
126: correlations among spin, charge, orbital, and lattice degrees of
127: freedom, Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ exhibits many exotic phenomena
128: throughout its rich phase diagram. \cite{Maeno, Nakatsuji1, Hotta,
129: Nakatsuji2, Anisimov, Lee, Jung, Mizokawa1, Snow, Rho, Nakatsuji3}
130: For instance, not only do the ruthenates exhibit orbital ordering,
131: \cite{Anisimov, Lee, Jung, Mizokawa1}, but also orbital-dependent
132: superconductivity, heavy-mass Fermi liquid behavior, and
133: metal-insulator transitions. \cite {Maeno, Nakatsuji1, Nakatsuji2}
134:
135: The single-layer ruthenate material Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ is a
136: superconductor below {\it T}$_{\rm c}$ = 1.5 K, possibly with an
137: unconventional {\it p}-wave pairing state. \cite{Ishida}
138: Substitution of Ca for Sr significantly distorts the lattice
139: structure and lowers the crystal symmetry from cubic to
140: orthorhombic, giving rise to remarkable changes in magnetic,
141: electronic, and structural properties. \cite{Nakatsuji1,
142: Nakatsuji2, Friedt} The ground state of Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ is
143: antiferromagnetic (AF) insulating. \cite{Satoru, Alexander} With
144: increasing temperature, Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ becomes paramagnetic (PM)
145: insulating at {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ = 113 K and then PM metallic at
146: {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$ = 357 K. \cite{Nakatsuji1, Alexander, Fukazawa}
147: The metal-insulator (MI) transition is first-order, as evidenced
148: by the observation of thermal hysteresis. Further, the transition
149: is driven by an elongation of the RuO$_6$ octahedra with
150: increasing temperature through {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$, and therefore
151: the insulating and metallic states are characterized by short
152: (S-Pbca) and long (L-Pbca) c-axis lattice parameters,
153: respectively. \cite{Friedt, Braden} As a function of
154: Sr-substitution, {\it x}, the AF ground state of
155: Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ persists for {\it x} $<$ 0.2. Sr
156: substitution changes both {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ and {\it T}$_{\rm
157: MI}$, and significantly affects magnetic, electronic, orbital, and
158: structural correlations in this material. For instance, Raman
159: scattering results obtained on Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ have shown
160: that Sr substitution causes a dramatic increase in the
161: renormalization of the two-magnon (2M) energy and linewidth, and
162: an increase of the electron-phonon interaction strength.
163: \cite{Rho} Raman scattering measurements further suggest that the
164: exchange coupling constant {\it J} in Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ is
165: relatively insensitive to pressure \cite{Snow} and Sr content.
166: \cite{Rho}
167:
168:
169: Other complex oxides are known to exhibit significant changes in
170: phonon dynamics near important phase transitions. For example,
171: La$_{0.7}$Ca$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$ displays a significant shift of the
172: transverse optical phonon energy near the MI transition, giving
173: rise to an increased electron-phonon interaction related to
174: changes in the lattice parameters. \cite{Kim} Raman studies of
175: LaMnO$_3$ reveal an effect of the spin-lattice interaction near
176: the transition to AF order. \cite{Podobedov} In
177: La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$, an increase of Sr concentration causes
178: the appearance of an asymmetric phonon lineshape and a dramatic
179: decrease of the phonon intensity associated with the apical oxygen
180: vibration, indicating that the electron-phonon interaction is also
181: important in this material. \cite{Nimori} Inelastic neutron
182: scattering and x-ray scattering studies have suggested the
183: presence of orbital fluctuations in LaTiO$_3$. \cite{Keimer} As
184: described in Ref. 21, an electronic continuum and anomalous phonon
185: behavior with a Fano profile observed in the Raman response of
186: {\it R}TiO$_3$ ({\it R}=rare earth) \cite{Reedyk} may also
187: indicate the presence of orbital fluctuations in the insulating
188: region of this system. Therefore, it is of great interest to study
189: how spin, charge, orbital, and lattice correlations evolve in
190: Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ through different phase transitions, particularly as
191: a means of comparing the exotic properties of this system to those
192: of complex oxides such as the cuprates, manganites, and titanates.
193: In this paper, we use the unique strengths of Raman scattering to
194: explore lattice dynamics and the electron-phonon interaction in
195: Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ as a function of temperature between 10 K and 300 K.
196:
197:
198: \begin{table*}
199: \caption{\label{tab:table2}Site symmetries and IR's of the atoms
200: in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ with space group Pbca$-$D$_{2h}^{15}$. Mode
201: classifications are: $\Gamma$$_{\rm Raman}$ = 9 (A$_g$ + B$_{1g}$
202: + B$_{2g}$ + B$_{3g}$), $\Gamma$$_{\rm infrared}$ = 11 (B$_{1u}$ +
203: B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$), $\Gamma$$_{\rm silent}$ = 12 A$_u$, and
204: $\Gamma$$_{\rm acoustic}$ = B$_{1u}$ + B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$. The
205: corresponding polarization tensor elements for each of the
206: Raman-active factor group species are: A$_g$ $\rightarrow$
207: $\alpha$$_{xx}$, $\alpha$$_{yy}$, $\alpha$$_{zz}$; B$_{1g}$
208: $\rightarrow$ $\alpha$$_{xy}$, $\alpha$$_{yx}$; B$_{2g}$
209: $\rightarrow$ $\alpha$$_{xz}$, $\alpha$$_{zx}$; and B$_{3g}$
210: $\rightarrow$ $\alpha$$_{yz}$, $\alpha$$_{zy}$.}
211: \begin{ruledtabular}
212: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
213: &Atom&Site symmetry&IR's&\\
214: \hline &Ru& C$_i$ & 3 (A$_u$ +B$_{1u}$ + B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$)& \\
215: &Ca& C$_1$ & 3 (A$_g$ + B$_{1g}$ + B$_{2g}$ + B$_{3g}$ + A$_u$ +B$_{1u}$ + B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$)& \\
216: &O(1)& C$_1$ & 3 (A$_g$ + B$_{1g}$ + B$_{2g}$ + B$_{3g}$ + A$_u$ +B$_{1u}$ + B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$)& \\
217: &O(2)& C$_1$ & 3 (A$_g$ + B$_{1g}$ + B$_{2g}$ + B$_{3g}$ + A$_u$ +B$_{1u}$ + B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$)& \\
218: \end{tabular}
219: \end{ruledtabular}
220: \end{table*}
221:
222:
223: $\newline$
224: {\section{EXPERIMENT}}
225:
226: A single-crystal sample of Ca$_2$RuO$_4$, which was grown by a
227: floating-zone method, \cite{Nakatsuji1, Fukazawa, Nakatsuji4} was
228: mounted inside a continuous He-flow cryostat. The 647.1-nm
229: excitation wavelength from a Kr-ion laser was used in a
230: backscattering geometry with the propagation vector ({\bf k})
231: oriented along the c axis of the sample, {\bf k} $\parallel$
232: c-axis. Scattered light from the sample was dispersed using a
233: triple-stage spectrometer, and then recorded using a
234: liquid-nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) detector.
235: Various polarization configurations of the incident and scattered
236: light were employed in order to identify the scattering symmetries
237: of the Raman spectra obtained for Ca$_2$RuO$_4$: ({\bf E}$_i$,
238: {\bf E}$_s$) = (x, y), B$_{1g}$ symmetry; ({\bf E}$_i$, {\bf
239: E}$_s$) = (x, x), A$_g$ symmetry; and ({\bf E}$_i$, {\bf E}$_s$) =
240: (x$'$, x$'$), B$_{1g}$ + A$_g$ symmetry, where {\bf E}$_i$ and
241: {\bf E}$_s$ are the incident and the scattered polarization
242: directions, respectively, B$_{1g}$ and A$_g$ are irreducible
243: representations (IR's) of the space group D$_{2h}$, and x
244: $\parallel$ [1,0,0], y $\parallel$ [0,1,0], and x$'$ $\parallel$
245: [1,1,0]. All the Raman spectra were corrected, first, by removing
246: the CCD dark current response, and second, by normalizing the
247: spectrometer response using a calibrated white light source.
248: Finally, the corrected spectra were divided by the Bose thermal
249: factor, giving rise to the spectral responses displayed in this
250: paper. These responses are proportional to the imaginary part of
251: the Raman susceptibility.
252:
253:
254: $\newline$
255: {\section{ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION }}
256:
257: \begin{figure}
258: \centering
259: %\includegraphics{fig01.eps}
260: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{fig01.eps}
261: \vspace{0.1cm}
262: \caption{\label{}Polarized Raman spectra at {\it T}
263: = 10 K with B$_{1g}$, A$_g$, and B$_{1g}$ + A$_g$ scattering
264: symmetries from top to bottom, respectively. The inset shows a
265: high-resolution Raman spectrum, indicating two resolved 265 and
266: 269 cm$^{-1}$ phonon modes.}
267: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
268: \end{figure}
269:
270:
271: Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ has an orthorhombic crystal structure (space group
272: Pbca$-$D$_{2h}^{15}$) with four formula units per unit cell. A
273: factor-group analysis, summarized in Table I, yields a total of 81
274: $\Gamma$-point phonons, of which 36 [9 (A$_g$ + B$_{1g}$ +
275: B$_{2g}$ + B$_{3g}$)] are Raman-active modes involving Ca,
276: in-plane oxygen [O(1)], and apical oxygen [O(2)] ions, 33
277: [11(B$_{1u}$ + B$_{2u}$ + B$_{3u}$)] are infrared-active modes,
278: and 12 (12 A$_u$) are silent modes. The Ru ions are located at a
279: center of inversion symmetry and, thus, do not participate in any
280: Raman-active phonon modes. Unlike tetragonal Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, in
281: which 2\,A$_{1g}$ and 2\,E$_g$ symmetry optical phonons are
282: Raman-active, orthorhombic Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ exhibits numerous phonon
283: lines. This reflects the fact that substitution of Ca for Sr
284: strongly distorts the RuO$_6$ octahedra, causing a rotation of the
285: octahedra around the c axis, and a tilt of the octahedra around an
286: axis on the RuO$_2$ plane. \cite {Friedt, Braden} As shown in
287: Fig.\,1, polarized Raman spectra in a backscattering geometry
288: (with the propagation vector {\bf k} $\parallel$ c-axis) reveal
289: all of the phonon modes corresponding to each of scattering
290: symmetries: 9\,B$_{1g}$ symmetry modes in ({\bf E}$_i$, {\bf
291: E}$_s$) = (x, y), 9\,A$_g$ symmetry modes in ({\bf E}$_i$, {\bf
292: E}$_s$) = (x, x), and 9\,B$_{1g}$ + 9\,A$_g$ symmetry modes in
293: ({\bf E}$_i$, {\bf E}$_s$) = (x$'$, x$'$) polarization
294: configurations, respectively. Note in the inset of Fig. 1 that
295: the B$_{1g}$ phonon peak energies assigned at 265 and 269
296: cm$^{-1}$ are clearly resolved in a high-resolution Raman
297: spectrum. More specific assignments of the observed optical
298: phonons to particular atomic normal modes will require lattice
299: dynamic calculations.
300:
301:
302: \begin{figure}
303: \centering
304: %\includegraphics{fig02.eps}
305: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig02.eps}
306: %\vspace{-0.3cm}
307: \caption{\label{}(a) B$_{1g}$ and (b) A$_g$ Raman
308: spectra with increasing temperature from 10 K to room
309: temperature.}
310: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
311: \end{figure}
312:
313: Figure 1 also shows a Raman-active mode at 102 cm$^{-1}$ (denoted
314: with an asterisk) that is observed only in the B$_{1g}$ scattering
315: geometry. This mode is likely associated with a 2M scattering
316: response, although we cannot completely rule out the possibility
317: that it is a one-magnon excitation. The 2M scattering response,
318: which involves a photon-induced flipping of spins on
319: nearest-neighbor Ru sites, provides useful information concerning
320: the AF correlations. \cite{Fleury, Sugai, Rho, Snow} Using the
321: fact that the 2M energy for an S\,=\,1 AF insulator is given by
322: $\hbar$$\omega$\,=\,6.7\,{\it J},\cite{Sugai} where {\it J} is the
323: in-plane exchange coupling constant between nearest-neighbor
324: Ru-4$d^4$ sites, we can estimate {\it J} = 15.2 cm$^{-1}$ in
325: Ca$_2$RuO$_4$. With increasing temperature toward {\it T}$_{\rm
326: N}$, as shown in Fig. 2(a), the 2M response weakens in intensity,
327: broadens in linewidth, and shifts to lower energy, reflecting the
328: reduction of the AF correlations in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ as the
329: temperature is increased to {\it T}$_{\rm N}$. Unlike the
330: cuprates, the 2M scattering intensity in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ diminishes
331: rapidly above {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, indicating that local AF order
332: disappears for {\it T} $>$ {\it T}$_{\rm N}$. More details of the
333: 2M characteristics in Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ have been described
334: elsewhere, including the effects of pressure \cite {Snow} and Sr
335: substitution. \cite {Rho}
336:
337: With increasing temperature toward {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$, the
338: out-of-plane Ru-O(2) bond length is nearly unchanged for {\it T}
339: $<$ {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, but gradually elongates as temperature is
340: raised above {\it T}$_{\rm N}$. \cite{Friedt, Braden} In order to
341: elucidate the temperature-dependence of the lattice parameters and
342: the electron-phonon interaction below {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$, both
343: B$_{1g}$ and A$_g$ symmetry Raman spectra from Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ were
344: studied as a function of increasing temperature from 10 to 300 K,
345: as summarized in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). There are several key
346: features observed in the Raman spectra as a function of increasing
347: temperature, including (i) a softening of all the B$_{1g}$ and the
348: A$_g$ optical phonon energies, (ii) a decrease of phonon spectral
349: weights, and (iii) a significant broadening and increased
350: asymmetry of phonon lineshapes across {\it T}$_{\rm N}$.
351:
352: \begin{figure}
353: \centering
354: %\includegraphics{fig03.eps}
355: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{fig03.eps}
356: %\vspace{-0.3cm}
357: \caption{\label{}Temperature-dependent frequency
358: shifts of B$_{1g}$ modes at (a) 140, (b) 215, (c) 388, (d) 459
359: cm$^{-1}$, and of A$_g$ modes at (e) 126 and (f) 607 cm$^{-1}$.}
360: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
361: \end{figure}
362:
363: The systematic shifts of phonon peaks to lower energies with
364: increasing temperature through {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ primarily reflect
365: an elongation of the RuO$_6$ octahedra along the c axis. Figures
366: 3(a) to 3(f) summarize the phonon energy changes with increasing
367: temperature for some representative B$_{1g}$ (140, 215, 388, and
368: 459 cm$^{-1}$) and A$_g$ (126 and 607 cm$^{-1}$) optical phonon
369: modes. The phonon-energy shifts are negligible for {\it T} $<$
370: {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, indicating little or no change in the lattice
371: parameters in this temperature regime. In contrast, remarkable
372: phonon-energy shifts are observed for {\it T} $>$ {\it T}$_{\rm
373: N}$. Most of phonon modes display downward shifts of $\sim$ 15
374: cm$^{-1}$ as temperature is raised from 10 to 300 K.
375: Interestingly, the B$_{1g}$ phonon at 215 cm$^{-1}$ shows a much
376: more dramatic energy shift of $\sim$ 30 cm$^{-1}$. These Raman
377: results are consistent with neutron scattering measurements, which
378: show that there is little change in the lattice parameters for
379: {\it T} $<$ {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, but that there is a significant
380: change in the lattice parameters for {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ $<$ {\it T}
381: $\sim$ {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$. \cite{Friedt, Braden} All the other
382: B$_{1g}$ and A$_g$ optical phonons decrease in energy with
383: increasing temperature. Note that all the B$_{1g}$ phonon modes
384: exhibit a dramatic decrease in intensity as temperature is raised
385: toward {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$ ($\sim$ 357 K $\sim$ 3.2{\it T}$_{\rm
386: N}$), possibly reflecting increased damping of the modes by
387: thermally activated carriers.
388:
389: One notes in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) that the B$_{1g}$ and the A$_g$
390: phonon lineshapes at low temperatures for {\it T} $<$ {\it
391: T}$_{\rm N}$ are quite symmetric and narrow. In contrast, with
392: increasing temperature through {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, the phonon
393: linewidths broaden significantly and the lineshapes become
394: increasingly asymmetric. The latter reveals a Fano effect, caused
395: by the interaction between the discrete phonon state and a broad
396: electronic continuum of states. \cite{Fano} Similar behavior has
397: been observed in Raman spectra of numerous other strongly
398: correlated materials such as Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$, \cite{Rho}
399: La$_{1-x}$Ca$_x$MnO$_3$, \cite{Naler} Ca$_3$Ru$_2$O$_7$,
400: \cite{Liu} Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, \cite{Sakita} and {\it R}TiO$_{3}$ ({\it
401: R} = rare earth). \cite{Reedyk}
402:
403: To study the temperature-dependence of the electron-phonon
404: interaction in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ in detail, the temperature-dependence
405: of the phonon linewidths and asymmetries of the B$_{1g}$ and A$_g$
406: phonon modes were extracted by fitting these modes to a Fano
407: lineshape, $I$($\omega$) = $I$$_0$($q$ + $\epsilon$)$^2$/(1 +
408: $\epsilon$$^2$), where $\epsilon$ = ($\omega$ $-$
409: $\omega$$_0$)/$\Gamma$, $\omega$$_0$ is the phonon energy,
410: $\Gamma$ is the effective phonon linewidth, and $q$ is the
411: asymmetry parameter. In this way, one obtains information on the
412: electron-phonon interaction. The inverse of the asymmetry
413: parameter, $1/|q|$, is proportional to the electron-phonon
414: coupling strength V and the imaginary part of the electronic
415: susceptibility $\rho$ according to $1/q$ $\sim$ $V\rho$.
416: \cite{Rho, Fano, Naler} Moreover, the electron-phonon coupling
417: contribution to the phonon linewidth can be estimated from the
418: fractional change in the phonon damping rate below {\it T}$_{\rm
419: MI}$, [$\Gamma$($T$) $-$ $\Gamma$($RT$)]/$\omega$$_0$ =
420: $\Delta$$\Gamma$/$\omega$$_0$ $\propto$ N(0)$\omega$$_0$$\lambda$,
421: where N(0) is the electronic density of states at the Fermi
422: surface, $\omega$$_0$ is the phonon energy, and $\lambda$ is the
423: dimensionless electron-phonon coupling parameter. \cite{Nyhus,
424: Allen, Axe} The parameter $\lambda$ is related to the BCS
425: parameter N(0)V$_{ph}$, where V$_{ph}$ is the pairing potential
426: arising from the electron-phonon interaction. \cite{Allen, Axe,
427: McMillan} Therefore, by carefully monitoring the phonon
428: linewidths, as well as the inverse asymmetry parameters, as a
429: function of temperature, one can obtain useful information
430: regarding the evolution of the electronic density of states and
431: the electron-phonon coupling strengths in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$.
432:
433: \begin{figure}
434: \centering
435: %\includegraphics{fig04.eps}
436: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig04.eps}
437: %\vspace{-0.3cm}
438: \caption{\label{}(a) Phonon linewidth changes
439: divided by the corresponding phonon energy at {\it T} = 10 K,
440: [$\Gamma$($T$) $-$ $\Gamma$($RT$)]/$\omega$(10 K) =
441: $\Delta$$\Gamma$/$\omega$(10 K), as a function of temperature
442: normalized to {\it T}$_{\rm N}$. (b) Magnitudes of inverse of the
443: asymmetry parameters, $1/|q|$, as a function of temperature
444: normalized to {\it T}$_{\rm N}$.}
445: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
446: \end{figure}
447:
448: The role of the electronic contribution to the system above {\it
449: T}$_{\rm N}$, which influences the substantial phonon energy
450: renormalizations observed above {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, can be explored
451: by plotting as a function of temperature the phonon linewidth
452: changes divided by the corresponding phonon energy at {\it T} = 10
453: K, $\Delta$$\Gamma$/$\omega$(10\,K). These plots are displayed in
454: Fig.\,4(a). Interestingly, in contrast to the negligible change
455: in phonon linewidths observed below {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, there is
456: significant broadening in the phonon linewidths above {\it
457: T}$_{\rm N}$. For example, the phonon linewidths at 300 K are
458: significantly broader than those at 10 K,
459: $\Delta$$\Gamma$/$\omega$$_0$ $\sim$ 5.3 $\%$, which is even
460: larger than the fractional broadening observed in the correlation
461: gap material FeSi, $\Delta$$\Gamma$/$\omega$$_0$ $\sim$ 3.5 $\%$.
462: \cite{Nyhus} We attribute the systematic broadening of the phonon
463: linewidths with increasing temperature above {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ to
464: an increase of the effective number of electrons in the system for
465: {\it T} $>$ {\it T}$_{\rm N}$. Indeed, Jung et al. recently
466: reported that the effective number of electrons systematically
467: increases, and the optical gap closes, with increasing temperature
468: above {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$. \cite{Jung}
469:
470: The evolution of the electron-phonon interaction in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$
471: can be carefully illustrated by plotting the inverse of the
472: asymmetry parameter, $1/|q|$, for different modes as a function of
473: temperature, as shown in Fig.\,4(b). Note that the magnitudes of
474: the inverse asymmetry parameters, $1/|q|$, which are obtained from
475: the representative B$_{1g}$ and the A$_g$ phonon modes, are
476: negligible at low temperatures, but increase significantly as
477: temperature is raised through T$_N$. Even when the temperature is
478: much lower than the MI transition temperature, there is no
479: additional increase of the inverse asymmetry parameters for {\it
480: T}/{\it T}$_{\rm N}$ $>$ $\sim$ 1.2. These results strongly
481: suggest that the largest increase in the electron-phonon coupling
482: strength occurs near {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, rather than near {\it
483: T}$_{\rm MI}$. By contrast, between {\it x} = 0.45 and 0.76 in
484: La$_{1-x}$Ca$_x$MnO$_3$, the $1/|q|$ value decreases linearly with
485: increasing {\it x} in the ferromagnetic low-temperature metallic
486: region ({\it x} $\leq$ 0.52), and vanishes in the AF region (for
487: {\it x} $>$ 0.52). \cite{Naler} Note also that the magnitudes of
488: the inverse asymmetry parameters, $1/|q|$, in the PM insulating
489: region of Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ for {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ $<$ {\it T} $<$ {\it
490: T}$_{\rm MI}$ are comparable to those in the metallic region of
491: Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ (Ref. 29) and La$_{1-x}$Ca$_x$MnO$_3$. \cite{Naler}
492:
493: It is interesting to note that previous Raman results on
494: Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ have revealed that substitution of Sr for
495: Ca increases the electron-phonon coupling strength, as evidenced
496: by an increase of both the inverse asymmetry parameters and the
497: phonon linewidths with Sr substitution at {\it T} = 10 K.
498: \cite{Rho} Moreover, for the Sr-substituted samples ({\it x} =
499: 0.06 and 0.09), a charge gap observed at 10 K was found to close
500: well below the MI transition temperature, suggesting that the
501: intermediate temperature regime between {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ and {\it
502: T}$_{\rm MI}$ consists of a coexistence of insulating S-Pbca and
503: metallic L-Pbca phases. \cite{Rho} In contrast, in this study,
504: the broadening of phonon linewidths and the increase of the
505: $1/|q|$ values upon heating through {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ ($\ll$ {\it
506: T}$_{\rm MI}$) in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ are probably not attributable to
507: the coexistence of metallic and insulating phases in this
508: temperature regime for several reasons, including the high
509: stoichiometry of the sample, and the absence of any residual low
510: frequency conductivity in Ca$_2$RuO$_4$ in the temperature regime
511: {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ $<$ {\it T} $<$ {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$. \cite {Lee,
512: Jung}
513:
514: In Ca$_2$RuO$_4$, the observed increase in both the
515: electron-phonon coupling strength and the number of effective
516: carriers with increasing temperature near {\it T}$_{\rm N}$
517: strongly suggests that enhanced orbital fluctuations, which are
518: associated with increased electron transfer between the {\it
519: d}$_{\rm xy}$ and {\it d}$_{\rm yz/zx}$ orbitals, are responsible
520: for the behavior observed in this temperature regime. Indeed, a
521: recent O 1{\it s} x-ray absorption spectroscopy study of
522: Ca$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$RuO$_4$ ({\it x} = 0.0 and 0.09) has suggested
523: that orbital fluctuations gradually increase upon heating even in
524: the insulating region well below {\it T}$_{\rm MI}$.
525: \cite{Mizokawa} Note that the inverse asymmetry parameters and
526: the spectral linewidths for the phonon mode near 300 cm$^{-1}$ in
527: the insulating {\it R}TiO$_3$ ({\it R} = Gd, Sm, Nd, Pr, Ce, La)
528: exhibit the largest values in LaTiO$_3$, \cite{Reedyk} suggesting
529: that orbital fluctuations are important in LaTiO$_3$, as pointed
530: out by Keimer et al. \cite{Keimer}
531:
532:
533: $\newline$
534: {\section{ CONCLUSIONS }}
535:
536: In summary, temperature-dependent Raman spectra of Ca$_2$RuO$_4$
537: allow us to explore the lattice dynamics near the MI transition
538: temperature of this system. With increasing temperature through
539: the N\'{e}el temperature, the B$_{1g}$ and the A$_g$ phonon modes
540: exhibit a substantial shift to lower energies. Moreover, the
541: phonons significantly broaden and exhibit increasingly asymmetric
542: lineshapes upon heating in the vicinity of {\it T}$_{\rm N}$.
543: These results demonstrate that both the electron-phonon coupling
544: strength and the effective number of electrons increase as
545: temperature is raised through {\it T}$_{\rm N}$, suggesting that
546: orbital fluctuations are present in the PM insulating region in
547: the temperature regime {\it T}$_{\rm N}$ $<$ {\it T} $<$ {\it
548: T}$_{\rm MI}$.
549:
550: $\newline$
551: \begin{acknowledgments}
552:
553: Work in Korea was supported by Korea Research Foundation Grant
554: (KRF-2004-005-C00003). Work in Illinois was supported by the
555: National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR02-44502 and by the
556: Department of Energy through the Materials Research Laboratory
557: under Grant No. DEFG02-91ER45439. The work at Kyoto Univ. was
558: supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from
559: JSPS and for the 21st Century COE ``Center for Diversity and
560: Universality in Physics" from MEXT of Japan.
561:
562: \end{acknowledgments}
563:
564: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
565:
566: % Create the reference section using BibTeX:
567: %\vspace{-0.7cm}
568:
569: \bibliography{basename of .bib file}
570:
571: \begin{thebibliography}{}
572:
573: %\bibitem[*]{email} rho@chonbuk.ac.kr
574:
575: \bibitem{Maeno} Y. Maeno, H. Hashimoto, K. Yoshida, S. Nishizaki, T. Fujita, J.G. Bednorz, and F. Lichtenberg, Nature (London) \textbf{372}, 532 (1994).
576:
577: \bibitem{Nakatsuji1} S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{84}, 2666 (2000); S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{62}, 6458 (2000).
578:
579: \bibitem{Hotta} T. Hotta and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{88}, 17201 (2002).
580:
581: \bibitem{Nakatsuji2} S. Nakatsuji, D. Hall, L. Balicas, Z. Fisk, K. Sugahara, M. Yoshioka, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{90}, 137202 (2003).
582:
583: \bibitem{Anisimov} V.I. Anisimov, I.A. Nekrasov, D.E. Kondakov, T.M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, Eur. Phys. J. B \textbf{25}, 191 (2002).
584:
585: \bibitem{Lee} J.S. Lee, Y.S. Lee, T.W. Noh, S.-J. Oh, J. Yu, S. Nakatsuji, H. Fukazawa, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{89}, 257402 (2002).
586:
587: \bibitem{Jung} J.H. Jung, Z. Fang, J.P. He, Y. Kaneko, Y. Okimoto, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{91}, 56403 (2003).
588:
589: \bibitem{Mizokawa1} T. Mizokawa, L. H. Tjeng, G. A. Sawatzky, G. Ghiringhelli, O.
590: Tjernberg, N. B. Brookes, H. Fukazawa, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno,
591: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{87}, 77202 (2001).
592:
593: \bibitem{Snow} C.S. Snow, S. L. Cooper, G. Cao, J.E. Crow, H. Fukazawa, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{89}, 226401 (2002).
594:
595: \bibitem{Rho} H. Rho, S.L. Cooper, S Nakatsuji, H. Fukazawa, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{68}, 100404(R) (2003).
596:
597: \bibitem{Nakatsuji3} S. Nakatsuji, V. Dobrosavljevi\'{c}, D. Tanaskovi\'{c}, M. Minakata, H. Fukazawa, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett.
598: \textbf{93}, 146401 (2004).
599:
600: \bibitem{Ishida} K. Ishida, H. Mukuda, Y. Kitaoka, Z.Q. Mao, H. Fukazawa, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{63}, 60507(R) (2001).
601:
602: \bibitem{Friedt} O. Friedt, M. Braden, G. Andr\'{e}, P. Adelmann, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{63}, 174432 (2001).
603:
604: \bibitem{Satoru} S. Nakatsuji, S. Ikeda, and Y. Maeno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \textbf{66}, 1868 (1997).
605:
606: \bibitem{Alexander} C.S. Alexander, G. Cao, V. Dobrosavljevic, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, E. Lochner, and R.P. Guertin, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{60}, 8422(R) (1999).
607:
608: \bibitem{Fukazawa} H. Fukazawa, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno, Physica B \textbf{281$\&$282}, 613 (2000).
609:
610: \bibitem{Braden} M. Braden, G. Andr\'{e}, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{58}, 847 (1998).
611:
612: \bibitem{Kim} K.H. Kim, J.Y. Gu, H.S. Choi, G.W. Park, and T.W. Noh, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{77}, 1877 (1996).
613:
614: \bibitem{Podobedov} V.B. Podobedov, A. Weber, D.B. Romero, J.P. Rice, and H.D. Drew, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{58}, 43 (1998).
615:
616: \bibitem{Nimori} S. Nimori, S. Sakita, F. Nakamura, T. Fujita, H. Hata, N. Ogita, and M. Udagawa, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{62}, 4142 (2000).
617:
618: \bibitem{Keimer} B. Keimer, D. Casa, A. Ivanov, J.W. Lynn, M.v. Zimmermann, J.P.
619: Hill, D. Gibbs, Y. Taguchi, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett.
620: \textbf{85}, 3946 (2000).
621:
622: \bibitem{Reedyk} M. Reedyk, D.A. Crandle, M. Cardona, J.D. Garrett, and J.E. Greedan, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{55}, 1442 (1997).
623:
624: \bibitem{Nakatsuji4} S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, J. Solid State Chem. \textbf{156}, 26 (2001).
625:
626: \bibitem{Fleury} P.A. Fleury and R. Loudon, Phys. Rev. \textbf{166}, 514 (1968); P.A. Fleury and H.J. Guggenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{24}, 1346 (1970).
627:
628: \bibitem{Sugai} S. Sugai, M. Sato, T. Kobayashi, J. Akimitsu, T. Ito, H. Takagi, S. Uchida, S. Hosoya, T. Kajitani, and T. Fukuda, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{42}, 1045 (1990).
629:
630: \bibitem{Fano} U. Fano, Phys. Rev. \textbf{124}, 1866 (1961).
631:
632: \bibitem{Naler} S. Naler, M. Rubhausen, S. Yoon, S.L. Cooper, K. H. Kim, and S.W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{65}, 92401 (2002).
633:
634: \bibitem{Liu} H.L. Liu, S. Yoon, S.L. Cooper, G. Cao, and J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{60}, R6980 (1999).
635:
636: \bibitem{Sakita} S. Sakita, S. Nimori, Z.Q. Mao, Y. Maeno, N. Ogita, and M. Udagawa, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{63}, 134520 (2001).
637:
638: \bibitem{Nyhus} P. Nyhus, S.L. Cooper, and Z. Fisk, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{51}, 15626 (1995).
639:
640: \bibitem{Allen} P.B. Allen, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{6}, 2577 (1972).
641:
642: \bibitem{Axe} J.D. Axe and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{30}, 214 (1973).
643:
644: \bibitem{McMillan} W.L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. \textbf{167}, 331 (1968).
645:
646: \bibitem{Mizokawa} T. Mizokawa, L.H. Tjeng, H.-J. Lin, C.T. Chen, S. Schuppler, S.
647: Nakatsuji, H. Fukazawa, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{69},
648: 132410 (2004).
649:
650: \end{thebibliography}
651:
652:
653: \end{document}
654:
655:
656: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
657: %\section{}
658: % Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
659: %\section{\label{}}
660: %\subsection{}
661: %\subsubsection{}
662:
663: % If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column
664: % format so that long equations can be displayed. Use
665: % sparingly.
666: %\begin{widetext}
667: % put long equation here
668: %\end{widetext}
669:
670: % figures should be put into the text as floats.
671: % Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)
672: % and the \includegraphics macro defined in those packages.
673: % See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,
674: % and Frank Mittelbach for instance.
675: %
676: % Here is an example of the general form of a figure:
677: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
678: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
679: % Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the
680: % entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.
681:
682: %\begin{figure}
683: %\includegraphics{}%
684: %\caption{\label{}}
685: %\end{figure}
686:
687:
688: % Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape
689: % figure
690: % \begin{turnpage}
691: % \begin{figure}
692: % \includegraphics{}%
693: % \caption{\label{}}
694: % \end{figure}
695: % \end{turnpage}
696:
697:
698: % tables should appear as floats within the text
699: %
700: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:
701: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
702: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
703: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
704: % \begin{tabular}{} command.
705: % The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a
706: % reasonable default table settings.
707: % Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column
708: % Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}
709: % environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]
710: % placement option to break a long table (with less control than
711: % in longtable).
712: % \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages
713: % \caption{\label{}}
714: % \begin{ruledtabular}
715: % \begin{tabular}{}
716: % Lines of table here ending with \\
717: % \end{tabular}
718: % \end{ruledtabular}
719: % \end{table}
720:
721: % Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape
722: % table
723: % \begin{turnpage}
724: % \begin{table}
725: % \caption{\label{}}
726: % \begin{ruledtabular}
727: % \begin{tabular}{}
728: % \end{tabular}
729: % \end{ruledtabular}
730: % \end{table}
731: % \end{turnpage}
732:
733: % Specify following sections are appendices. Use \appendix* if there
734: % only one appendix.
735: %\appendix
736: %\section{}
737:
738: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
739: %\begin{acknowledgments}
740: %The authors (H.\,R., C.\,S.\,S., S.\,L.\,C.) acknowledge support
741: %of this work by the Department of Energy (DEFG02-96ER45439) and
742: %the National Science Foundation (DMR97-00716).
743: %\end{acknowledgments}
744:
745: %
746: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
747: