1: \begin{thebibliography}{54}
2: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
3: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
4: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
5: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
6: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
7: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
8: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
9: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
10: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
11: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
12: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
13: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
14:
15: \bibitem[{Row()}]{Rowlinson}
16: \bibinfo{note}{J.S. Rowlinson, B. Widom, {\it Molecular Theory of
17: Capillarity\/}, Oxford University Press (1982), chap.~9}.
18:
19: \bibitem[{Wid({\natexlab{a}})}]{Widom77}
20: \bibinfo{note}{B. Widom, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 67}, 872 (1977)}.
21:
22: \bibitem[{Wid({\natexlab{b}})}]{Widom80}
23: \bibinfo{note}{F. Ramos-G\'omez, B. Widom, Physica A {\bf 104}, 595 (1980)}.
24:
25: \bibitem[{NWW()}]{NWW}
26: \bibinfo{note}{N. Nagarajan, W.W. Webb, B. Widom, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 77}, 5771
27: (1982), to be denoted here as {\bf NWW}.}
28:
29: \bibitem[{Die({\natexlab{a}})}]{Diehl2000}
30: \bibinfo{note}{H.W. Diehl, M. Smock, Physica A {\bf 281}, 268 (2000)}.
31:
32: \bibitem[{Die({\natexlab{b}})}]{Diehl2001}
33: \bibinfo{note}{H.W. Diehl, M. Smock, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 21}, 567 (2001)}.
34:
35: \bibitem[{Fis({\natexlab{a}})}]{Fisher90a}
36: \bibinfo{note}{M.E. Fisher, P.J. Upton, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 2402
37: (1990)}.
38:
39: \bibitem[{Fis({\natexlab{b}})}]{Fisher90b}
40: \bibinfo{note}{M.E. Fisher, P.J. Upton, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 3405
41: (1990)}.
42:
43: \bibitem[{Wid({\natexlab{c}})}]{Widom65}
44: \bibinfo{note}{B. Widom, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 43}, 3892, 3898 (1965)}.
45:
46: \bibitem[{Wid({\natexlab{d}})}]{Widom72}
47: \bibinfo{note}{B. Widom, in {\it Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena\/},
48: C. Domb, M.S. Green (Ed.), Academic, London (1972), vol.~2, p.~79}.
49:
50: \bibitem[{Zin({\natexlab{a}})}]{Zinn99}
51: \bibinfo{note}{M.E. Fisher, S.-Y. Zinn, P.J. Upton, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59},
52: 14533 (1999); \textit{ibid\/}. {\bf 64}, 149901 (E) (2001).}
53:
54: \bibitem[{Zin({\natexlab{b}})}]{Zinn03}
55: \bibinfo{note}{S.-Y. Zinn, M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 71}, 011601 (2005)
56: [cond:mat/0410673] to be denoted {\bf I}}.
57:
58: \bibitem[{aKr()}]{aKreuser}
59: \bibinfo{note}{H. Kreuser, D. Woermann, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 97}, 7757 (1992)}.
60:
61: \bibitem[{Mai()}]{Mainzer}
62: \bibinfo{note}{T. Mainzer-Althof, D. Woermann, Physica A {\bf 234}, 623
63: (1997)}.
64:
65: \bibitem[{Kno({\natexlab{a}})}]{Knobler}
66: \bibinfo{note}{R.G. Howland, N.-C. Wong, C.M. Knobler, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 73},
67: 522 (1980) to be denoted {\bf HWK}.}
68:
69: \bibitem[{Gre({\natexlab{a}})}]{Greer}
70: \bibinfo{note}{S.C. Greer, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 14}, 1770 (1976)}.
71:
72: \bibitem[{Peg()}]{Pegg85}
73: \bibinfo{note}{I.L. Pegg, M.C. Goh, R.L. Scott, C.M. Knobler, Phys. Rev. Lett.
74: {\bf 55}, 2320 (1985)}.
75:
76: \bibitem[{Pri()}]{Privat}
77: \bibinfo{note}{M. Amara, M. Privat, R. Bennes, E. Tronel-Peyroz, Europhys.
78: Lett. {\bf 16}, 153 (1991)}.
79:
80: \bibitem[{Woe()}]{Woerman95}
81: \bibinfo{note}{J. Ataiyan, D. Woermann, Pure Appl. Chem. {\bf 67}, 889 (1995)}.
82:
83: \bibitem[{Zin({\natexlab{c}})}]{Zinn98}
84: \bibinfo{note}{M.E. Fisher, S.-Y. Zinn, J. Phys. A {\bf 31}, L629 (1998)}.
85:
86: \bibitem[{But()}]{Butera2000}
87: \bibinfo{note}{P. Butera, M. Comi, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 62}, 14837 (2000)}.
88:
89: \bibitem[{Pel()}]{Pelissetto2002}
90: \bibinfo{note}{A. Pelissetto, E. Vicari, Phys. Repts. {\bf 368}, 549 (2002)}.
91:
92: \bibitem[{Gui()}]{Guida1998}
93: \bibinfo{note}{R. Guida, J. Zinn-Justin, J. Phys. A {\bf 31}, 8103 (1998)}.
94:
95: \bibitem[{Cam({\natexlab{a}})}]{Campostrini2002}
96: \bibinfo{note}{M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. E
97: {\bf 65}, 066127 (2002)}.
98:
99: \bibitem[{Zin({\natexlab{d}})}]{Zinn1997}
100: \bibinfo{note}{S.-Y. Zinn, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 1997, chap.~5.
101: Note that the value $\beta = 0.328_{25}$ was adopted here for some of the
102: analysis: that corresponds to the value $\beta = 0.328 \pm 0.004$ that Greer
103: \cite{Greer} reports as a good fit to the volume fraction difference on
104: neglecting any correction terms to the leading power law. However, within the
105: overall accuracy obtainable, this deviation from the value in Table~I has no
106: serious consequences here.}
107:
108: \bibitem[{Zin({\natexlab{e}})}]{Zinn}
109: \bibinfo{note}{S.-Y. Zinn, M.E. Fisher, Physica A {\bf 226}, 168 (1996)}.
110:
111: \bibitem[{Fis({\natexlab{c}})}]{Fisher2000}
112: \bibinfo{note}{M.E. Fisher, G. Orkoulas, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 696
113: (2000)}.
114:
115: \bibitem[{Kim({\natexlab{a}})}]{Kim1998}
116: \bibinfo{note}{Y.C. Kim, M.E. Fisher, G. Orkoulas, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 67},
117: 061506 (2003): see especially Eq.~(3.20) and prior material}.
118:
119: \bibitem[{Wid({\natexlab{e}})}]{Widom70}
120: \bibinfo{note}{B. Widom, J.S. Rowlinson, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 52}, 1670 (1970)}.
121:
122: \bibitem[{Reh()}]{Rehr71}
123: \bibinfo{note}{N.D. Mermin, J.J. Rehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 26}, 1155 (1971)}.
124:
125: \bibitem[{Fis({\natexlab{d}})}]{Fisher75}
126: \bibinfo{note}{M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 34}, 1634 (1975)}.
127:
128: \bibitem[{Gre({\natexlab{b}})}]{GreerDiameter}
129: \bibinfo{note}{In contrast to the {\bf NWW} data, the coexistence curve
130: measured by Greer~\cite{Greer} is somewhat less symmetric: on the basis of
131: her data, the diameter can be represented by ${\check{\overline \rho}}(T)
132: \simeq 0.993 - 0.066 t$.}
133:
134: \bibitem[{Kim({\natexlab{b}})}]{Kim2001}
135: \bibinfo{note}{See also Y.C. Kim, M.E. Fisher, J. Phys. Chem. {\bf 105}, 11785
136: (2001).}
137:
138: \bibitem[{Phi()}]{Phi}
139: \bibinfo{note}{{\bf NWW} supposed the volume fraction $\phi_w$ of water in the
140: mixture to be related to the mass fraction $m_w$ via $\phi_w = m_w / [m_w +
141: (1 - m_w) / c]$ where $c=0.970$ is a constant that represents the ratio of
142: the density of pure isobutyric acid to that of pure water at $20 \thinspace
143: \celc$. (B. Widom, private communication.)}.
144:
145: \bibitem[{Kpr()}]{Kprob}
146: \bibinfo{note}{Moldover in his review of experiments on many
147: systems~\cite{Moldover85}, quotes $\check K = 31.0$ from {\bf HWK}; but as we
148: discuss further in the Appendix, Moldover also reports the value $\check K =
149: 11.6$ on the basis of a private communication from I. L. Pegg and C. M.
150: Knobler: unfortunately, these two values are drastically inconsistent.
151: However, since the first accords well with our analysis of \textit{both} the
152: {\bf HWK} and {\bf NWW} data, we proceed, at this point, with the estimate
153: (3.12).}
154:
155: \bibitem[{Mol({\natexlab{a}})}]{Moldover85}
156: \bibinfo{note}{M.R. Moldover, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 31}, 1022 (1985)}.
157:
158: \bibitem[{Mol({\natexlab{b}})}]{Moldover86}
159: \bibinfo{note}{H. Chaar, M.R. Moldover, J.W. Schmidt, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 85},
160: 418 (1986). It should be noted that in summarizing the data on other binary
161: systems in Table I the authors accept, without discussion, the ``preliminary
162: result'' of Pegg and Knobler for the critical surface tension amplitude of
163: isobutyric acid $+$ water as cited in Ref.~\cite{Moldover85}. See further the
164: discussion in the Appendix here.}
165:
166: \bibitem[{Fen()}]{Fenzl}
167: \bibinfo{note}{W. Fenzl, Europhys. Lett. {\bf24}, 557 (1993) has discussed the
168: {\bf NWW} data and challenged the validity of Antonow's rule for their
169: experiments. However, as pointed out in the article by Fenzl himself (B.
170: Widom, private communication), the direction in which it is argued that the
171: rule is violated actually contradicts thermodynamic interfacial stability. In
172: Fig.~\ref{fig5:chk} the tendency for the high-density surface tension data to
173: rise up (relative to the parallelogram) and vice-versa for the low-density
174: data, indicates a trend (violating stability) that Fenzl may have noticed.
175: Otherwise, Fenzl also argues that, contrary to our approach and the
176: theoretical analysis of {\bf NWW}, the critical behavior they observed
177: corresponds to a very small surface field $h_1$ (and, correspondingly, small
178: $M_1$). In light of the observations just made concerning Antonow's rule and
179: the successful fits we achieve here, Fenzl's proposal does not seem
180: sustainable.}
181:
182: \bibitem[{Cam({\natexlab{b}})}]{Campbell68}
183: \bibinfo{note}{A.N. Campbell, E.M. Kartzmark, S.C. Anand, Y. Cheng, H.P.
184: Dzikowski, S.M. Skrynk, Can. J. Chem. {\bf 46}, 2399 (1968)}.
185:
186: \bibitem[{McL()}]{McLure79}
187: \bibinfo{note}{I.A. McLure, B. Edwards, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 70}, 3999 (1979)}.
188:
189: \bibitem[{Las()}]{LastNote}
190: \bibinfo{note}{We are indebted to B. Widom for drawing our attention to Refs.
191: \cite{Campbell68} and \cite{McLure79}.}
192:
193: \bibitem[{Tha()}]{ThankCK}
194: \bibinfo{note}{This point has been reconfirmed by C. M. Knobler who has kindly
195: re-examined the original records of the {\bf HWK} experiments and sees no
196: reasonable sources of larger errors.}
197:
198: \bibitem[{Chu({\natexlab{a}})}]{Chu73}
199: \bibinfo{note}{B. Chu, S.P. Lee, W. Tscharnuter, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 7}, 353
200: (1973)}.
201:
202: \bibitem[{Chu({\natexlab{b}})}]{Chu68}
203: \bibinfo{note}{B. Chu, F.J. Schoenes, W.P. Kao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. {\bf 90},
204: 3042 (1968)}.
205:
206: \bibitem[{Bey()}]{Beysens}
207: \bibinfo{note}{D. Beysens, A. Bourgou, P. Calmettes, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 26},
208: 3589 (1982)}.
209:
210: \bibitem[{Pin()}]{Pinn94}
211: \bibinfo{note}{M. Hasenbusch, K. Pinn, Physica A {\bf 203}, 189 (1994); see
212: also M. Hasenbusch, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C {\bf 12}, 911 (2001).}
213:
214: \bibitem[{Liu()}]{Liu}
215: \bibinfo{note}{A.J. Liu, M.E. Fisher, Physica A {\bf 156}, 35 (1989)}.
216:
217: \bibitem[{Gel()}]{Gelfand90}
218: \bibinfo{note}{M.P. Gelfand, M.E. Fisher, Physica A {\bf 166}, 1 (1990)}.
219:
220: \bibitem[{Die({\natexlab{c}})}]{Dietrich}
221: \bibinfo{note}{See, e.g., S. Dietrich in {\it Phase Transitions and Critical
222: Phenomena\/}, C. Domb, J.L. Lebowitz (Ed.), vol. 14, p. 1.}
223:
224: \bibitem[{Kno({\natexlab{b}})}]{Knobler05}
225: \bibinfo{note}{Private communications from C. M. Knobler and I. L. Pegg. The
226: records of the Pegg--Knobler observations have been generously made available
227: to us: we have confirmed that they differ by more than a factor of two from
228: the {\bf HWK} and {\bf NWW} measurements.}
229:
230: \bibitem[{REF({\natexlab{a}})}]{REF51}
231: \bibinfo{note}{See J.-N. Aqua, S. Banerjee, M.E. Fisher, arXiv cond-mat/0410692
232: (2004) and \cite{REF52, REF53, REF54}.}
233:
234: \bibitem[{REF({\natexlab{b}})}]{REF52}
235: \bibinfo{note}{M.J. Sparnaay, {\it The Electrical Double Layer\/}, Pergamon
236: Press, Oxford (1972), pp. 4, 338.}
237:
238: \bibitem[{REF({\natexlab{c}})}]{REF53}
239: \bibinfo{note}{J.O'M. Bockris, A.K.N. Reddy, {\it Modern Electrochemistry\/},
240: Plenum Press, New York (1970), vol.~2, sec.~7.2.5.}
241:
242: \bibitem[{REF({\natexlab{d}})}]{REF54}
243: \bibinfo{note}{P.B. Warren, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 112}, 4683 (2000)}.
244:
245: \end{thebibliography}
246: