1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %%%\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: %%%\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
4: %%%\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
5: %%%\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
6:
7: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
8: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
9: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
10: \usepackage{natbib}
11:
12: %\nofiles
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title
17: {
18: Infrared spectroscopy under multi-extreme conditions: Direct observation of pseudo gap formation and collapse in CeSb
19: }
20:
21: \author{T. Nishi$^{1}$}
22: \author{S. Kimura$^{1,2}$}\thanks{Electric address: kimura@ims.ac.jp}
23: \author{T. Takahashi$^{3}$}
24: \author{Y. Mori$^{4}$}
25: \author{Y.S. Kwon$^{2,5}$}
26: \author{H.J. Im$^{1}$}
27: \author{H. Kitazawa$^{6}$}
28:
29: \affiliation{
30: $^1$Department of Structural Molecular Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan\\
31: $^2$UVSOR Facility, Institute for Molecular Science, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan\\
32: $^3$Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Osaka 590-0494, Japan\\
33: $^4$Department of Physics, Okayama University of Science, Okayama 700-0005, Japan\\
34: $^5$Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, South Korea\\
35: $^6$Nano-Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan
36: }
37:
38: \date{\today}
39:
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: \begin{abstract}
42: Infrared reflectivity measurements of CeSb under multi-extreme conditions (low temperatures, high pressures and high magnetic fields) were performed.
43: A pseudo gap structure, which originates from the magnetic band folding effect, responsible for the large enhancement in the electrical resistivity in the single-layered antiferromagnetic structure (AF-1 phase) was found at a pressure of 4~GPa and at temperatures of 35 - 50~K.
44: The optical spectrum of the pseudo gap changes to that of a metallic structure with increasing magnetic field strength and increasing temperature.
45: This change is the result of the magnetic phase transition from the AF-1 phase to other phases as a function of the magnetic field strength and temperature.
46: This result is the first optical observation of the formation and collapse of a pseudo gap under multi-extreme conditions.
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \pacs{71.27.+a, 78.20.Ls, 75.30.Kz}
50: \maketitle
51:
52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53: Ce monopnictides have many magnetic phases with complex magnetic structures at low temperatures, high pressures and high magnetic fields.~\cite{ref01}
54: The magnetic moments originate from the localized Ce$^{3+}4f^1$ electron.
55: Direct magnetic exchange interaction between Ce$4f$ electrons does not occur, but the magnetic interaction mediated by the conduction and valence electrons plays an important role.
56: In the case of CeSb, the interaction is known to be due to the hybridization between the Ce$4f$ and Sb$5p$ orbitals, referred to as $pf$ mixing.~\cite{ref02}
57:
58: The magnetic properties and magnetic structures of CeSb have been thoroughly investigated by neutron scattering experiments.~\cite{ref03,ref04}
59: However, only a few studies on the modulation of the Sb$5p$ bands due to the $pf$ mixing have been performed.
60: In particular, at pressures of several GPa, the electrical resistivity ($\rho\sim$ several m$\Omega$cm) at around $T$ = 30~K increases by one full order over that at ambient pressure ($\rho\sim140\mu\Omega$cm).~\cite{ref05}
61: The origin of this increase is believed to be the strong modulation of the Sb$5p$ bands.
62: In this Letter, we show that the Sb$5p$ band modulation can be convincingly confirmed by optical measurements.
63:
64: The magnetic phase in which the enhancement appears is the single-layered antiferromagnetic (AF-1) phase, which is not present at ambient pressure.
65: The magnetic structure is $+-$, where $+$ and $-$ indicate the magnetic moment direction of the ferromagnetic layer along the magnetic field.
66: The double-layered antiferromagnetic ($++--$, AF-1A) phase, which is different from the AF-1 phase, appears at ambient pressure and also at high pressures.
67: The only difference between the AF-1A and AF-1 phases is in their magnetic structures, but $\rho$ in the AF-1A phase ($\rho\leq10\mu\Omega$cm) is that of a metallic phase, which is also different from that in the AF-1 phase.
68: Clarification of the difference in the electronic structures of the AF-1 and AF-1A phases and their temperature and magnetic field dependencies is fundamental for understanding the changes in the Sb$5p$ band due to the different magnetic structure.
69:
70: Angle-resolved photoemission~\cite{ref06,ref07} and infrared reflection spectroscopy~\cite{ref08,ref09} are employed to observe the electronic structure.
71: The photoemission spectroscopy cannot be performed at high pressures or in the presence of magnetic fields, in which cases infrared spectroscopy is used.
72: Recently, Kimura {\it et al.} reported a change in the electronic structure of CeSb due to a change in the magnetic order using infrared reflection spectroscopy and magnetic circular dichroism.~\cite{ref10,ref11}
73: The change in the Sb$5p$ bands due to $pf$ mixing in addition to the hybridization between the Sb$5p$ and Ce$5d$ orbitals plays an important role in the formation and stabilization of the double-layered magnetic structure.~\cite{ref12}
74:
75: The electronic structure of CeSb at high pressures has been investigated using infrared spectroscopy in our previous paper.~\cite{ref13}
76: In the paper, the spectral changes of $R(\omega)$ due to two magnetic phase transition at $P$~=~2.5~GPa were observed.
77: However, the dependences of temperature and magnetic field were not performed.
78: In this study, to clearly investigate the electronic structure of CeSb in the AF-1 phase and its temperature and magnetic field dependencies, the higher pressure of 4.0~GPa is applied to the sample to stabilize the AF-1 phase.
79: And then $\sigma(\omega)$ spectra at 4.0~GPa, low temperatures and magnetic fields are investigated.
80: As the results, we found that the formation of the pseudo gap at the Fermi level ($E_{\rm F}$) due to the magnetic band folding effect and its collapse by temperature and magnetic field in $\sigma(\omega)$.
81: This is the first ever report involving infrared reflection spectroscopy under multi-extreme conditions.
82:
83: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
84: Single crystalline samples of CeSb were grown by the Bridgman method using a tungsten heater crucible.~\cite{ref14}
85: A 0.2~$\times$~0.2~$\times$~0.05~mm$^3$ sample was set in a diamond anvil cell with Apiezon-N grease as the pressure medium and with a gold film on the sample as a reference.
86: The pressure was calibrated using a ruby fluorescence method.
87: Infrared reflectivity measurements were performed at the magneto-optical imaging station of BL43IR at SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan.~\cite{ref15}
88: The station is equipped with an infrared microscope, a superconducting magnet, and a cryostat for cooling samples.~\cite{ref16}
89: The diamond anvil cell was mounted at the sample position.
90: The measurement parameters include the photon energy range of 0.1 - 1~eV, temperatures of 4 - 70~K, magnetic fields of 0 - 14~T and a pressure of 4.0$\pm$0.1~GPa.
91: A laboratorial infrared microscopy system without a magnetic field was also used in the photon energy range of 0.065 - 1.5~eV.
92: To derive the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectra via the Kramers-Kronig analysis (KKA), the obtained infrared $R(\omega)$ spectra were connected to the $R(\omega)$ spectrum in the photon energy region of 1.2 - 200~eV recorded only at room temperature~\cite{ref11} and were extrapolated using $R(\omega) \propto \omega^{-4}$ above 200~eV.~\cite{ref17}
93: In the lower energy region, Hagen-Rubens function (HRF) ($R(\omega) = 1 - [2 \cdot \omega / (\pi \sigma_0)]^{1/2}$, where $\sigma_0$ is the direct current conductivity) was used for the metallic spectra.
94: In the event case that the HRF cannot be connected to the obtained $R(\omega)$ spectra, a constant extrapolation was employed.
95: This situation would not indicate metallic electronic structures.
96: A detailed analysis is shown below.
97:
98: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
99: \begin{figure}[t]
100: \begin{center}
101: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{fig1.eps}
102: \end{center}
103: \caption{
104: (a) Temperature dependence of the reflectivity spectrum of CeSb at $P$ = 4~GPa and $B$ = 0~T.
105: Successive curves are offset by 0.25 for clarity.
106: The spectra at 10~K and 70~K are also plotted by dotted and dot-dashed lines, respectively, in the intermediate temperature range as a guide.
107: (b) The difference ($\Delta$) between the reflectivity at 0.2~eV and that at 0.4~eV as a function of temperature.
108: The hatched areas are the phase transition temperatures.
109: The phase names of AF-1A, AF-1 and P follow the same notation as for neutron scattering.~\cite{ref03}
110: }
111: \label{fig1}
112: \end{figure}
113: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
114: The temperature dependence of the $R(\omega)$ spectrum at $P$ = 4~GPa and $B$ = 0~T is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1}(a).
115: At $T$ = 10 and 70~K, the spectra are typically metallic because $R(\omega)$ approaches unity with decreasing photon energy.
116: At intermediate temperatures, the $R(\omega)$ spectrum displays a strong temperature dependence.
117: At 30~K, the spectrum changes drastically.
118: Particularly, $R(\omega)$ below 0.2~eV does not approach unity and cannot be fitted by HRF.
119: This means that the metallic character is suppressed at intermediate temperatures.
120:
121: To clarify the temperature dependence of $R(\omega)$, the differential intensity ($\Delta$) between $R(\hbar\omega = 0.2~{\rm eV})$ and $R(\hbar\omega = 0.4~{\rm eV})$ is plotted as a function of temperature in Fig.~\ref{fig1}(b).
122: This figure indicates that the temperature dependence of $\Delta$ is very weak below 20~K and above 60~K.
123: A large jump appears at 30~K and $\Delta$ slightly increases with increasing temperature between 35 and 50~K.
124: At around 50~K, $\Delta$ smoothly connects to the constant value above 60~K.
125: The two characteristic temperatures shown by the hatched area is in good agreement with the magnetic phase transition temperatures at 4~GPa determined by other methods.~\cite{ref04,ref05}
126: Based on this figure, it is clear the electronic structures in the AF-1A and P phases are almost constant.
127: At the transition temperature from the AF-1A to AF-1 phases, the electronic structure drastically changes.
128: In the AF-1 phase, the electronic structure gradually changes with increasing temperature, eventually reaching the value of that in the P phase.
129: This is consistent with the behavior of the intensity at the sublattice peak $[1,1,0]$ indicating the presence of the AF-1 phase magnetic structure detected by neutron scattering.~\cite{ref03}
130: The magnetic scattering intensity at the sublattice peak as a function of temperature illustrates the second-order nature of the transition from the P to AF-1 phases and the first-order one from the AF-1 to AF-1A phases.
131: This behavior is consistent with the temperature dependence of $\Delta$.
132: This directly provides that the magnetic structure strongly couples to the Sb$5p$ electronic structure.
133: This same result has been obtained in CeBi at ambient pressure.~\cite{ref18}
134: CeBi has an AF-1 phase even at ambient pressure.
135: In the CeBi case, the $pf$ mixing intensity increases with decreasing temperature.
136: CeSb at $P$ = 4~GPa gives the same result, indicating the temperature dependent $pf$ mixing intensity is responsible for the change in $\Delta$.
137:
138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139: \begin{figure}[t]
140: \begin{center}
141: \includegraphics[width=5.5cm]{fig2.eps}
142: \end{center}
143: \caption{
144: Temperature dependence of the optical conductivity spectrum ($\sigma(\omega)$) of CeSb at $P$ = 4~GPa and $B$ = 0~T.
145: The direct current conductivities at $T$ = 35~K ($\bigcirc$), 45~K ($\triangle$) and 50~K ($\Box$) are also plotted.
146: Since the measured energy range was above 0.65~eV, the $R(\omega)$ in the energy range below 0.65~eV was extrapolated using Hagen-Ruben's function at 10 and 70~K or the modified Hagen-Ruben's function at 35, 45 and 50~K for the Kramers-Kronig analysis.
147: See the text for detail.
148: (Inset) The effective electron number ($N_{eff}(\omega)$) derived from $\sigma(\omega)$.
149: }
150: \label{fig2}
151: \end{figure}
152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
153: To clarify the change in the electronic structure at $P$ = 4~GPa and $B$ = 0~T as a function of temperature, $\sigma(\omega)$ derived from the KKA of $R(\omega)$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
154: To perform the KKA, the HRF derived from $\sigma_0$ must smoothly connect to $R(\omega)$ at the temperatures below 25~K and above 55~K.
155: The obtained $\sigma(\omega)$ spectra at 10 and 70~K shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2} look like normal metallic ones.
156: However, the HRF derived from $\sigma_0$ does not connect to $R(\omega)$ at the temperatures between 30 and 50~K.
157: This means that the measured $R(\omega)$ spectra are not the tail of the metallic Drude function but a part of low-energy interband transitions like in insulators.
158: So, $R(\omega)$ at $\hbar \omega$ = 0.065~eV is extrapolated to the lower energy side as a constant and is connected to the HRF derived from $\sigma_0$.
159: The absolute value of $R(\omega)$ must contain the physical properties at around this energy.
160: Therefore, the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum in the extrapolated region has a qualitative meaning.
161: To evaluate this quantitatively, these measurements in the lower energy region under the same multi-extreme conditions should be performed, which is impossible at present.
162: The $\sigma(\omega)$ spectra derived from the KKA using this extrapolation method are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
163: The $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum at 35~K has a peak with a peak energy of 0.065~eV.
164: The peak energy, which originates from both of the absolute value of $R(\omega)$ and $\sigma_0$, shifts to the lower energy side with increasing temperature.
165: In CeBi, a similar peak appears in the AF-1 phase.~\cite{ref18}
166: The peak shifts to the low energy side with increasing temperature in the same way as that of CeSb.
167: However, CeBi differs in that it has a metallic $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum and also a metallic $\sigma_0$ value even in the AF-1 phase.
168: This indicates that the AF-1 phases in both CeSb and CeBi have a gap shape electronic structure in common.
169: However, the gap in CeBi is distant from $E_{\rm F}$ and that of CeSb is just on $E_{\rm F}$.
170: This directly accounts for the different behavior in $\rho$ between these materials.
171:
172: To investigate the origin of the pseudo gap, the effective electron number ($N_{eff}(\omega)=\frac{2 m_0}{\pi e^2} \int_0^\omega \sigma(\omega_0) d\omega_0$) is plotted in the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
173: Here $m_0$ means free electron mass.
174: Based on the figure, the temperature dependence occurs below 0.4~eV.
175: This means that only the electronic structure 0.4~eV below $E_{\rm F}$ depends on temperature.
176: The energy of 0.4~eV is similar to the $pf$ mixing energy ($E(pf\sigma)=$0.35~eV, $E(pf\pi)=$-0.245~eV) of CeSb.~\cite{ref02, ref12}
177: This indicates that the Sb$5p$ band modified by the Ce$4f$ spin structure due to the $pf$ mixing is the origin of the pseudo gap.
178: The enhancement in the electrical resistivity originates from the decrease in the density of states on $E_{\rm F}$ through the creation of the pseudo gap structure.
179: A similar pseudo gap structure is also observed in cases of pairing due to a charge/spin density wave~\cite{ref19}, of a lattice distortion due to the Jahn-Teller effect~\cite{ref20} etc.
180: In the present case, no pairing effect was observed.
181: On the other hand, a very small lattice contraction appears in the magnetically ordered states in the form of a change in the Ce$4f$ ground state from $\Gamma_7$ with a large charge distribution in the P phase to $\Gamma_8$ with a small distribution in the AF-1 phase.~\cite{ref21,ref22}
182: However, if the lattice distortion would be the origin of the pseudo gap, the gap structure would remain in the AF-1A phase, as the $\Gamma_8$ ground state is common even in the AF-1A phase.
183: Since the difference between the AF-1 and AF-1A phases is only in the alignment of the magnetic moments, the origin of the pseudo gap must be the periodicity of the Ce$4f$ magnetic moments contained in the Sb$5p$ band through the $pf$ mixing.
184: This is referred to as the magnetic band folding effect.
185:
186: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
187: \begin{figure}[t]
188: \begin{center}
189: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{fig3.eps}
190: \end{center}
191: \caption{
192: Optical conductivity ($\sigma(\omega)$) spectra of CeSb at $P$ = 4~GPa.
193: (a) Magnetic field dependence at $T$ = 10~K.
194: (b) Magnetic field dependence at $T$ = 40~K.
195: (c) Temperature dependence at $B$ = 14~T.
196: (d) Magnetic field - temperature $(B, T)$ phase diagram of CeSb at $P$ = 4~GPa derived from $\sigma(\omega)$ spectra under multi-extreme conditions.
197: The first-order and second-order like spectral changes are shown by lines and hatchings, respectively.
198: The arrows indicate the scans (a) - (c).
199: }
200: \label{fig3}
201: \end{figure}
202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
203: Next, we show an example of a magnetic-field-induced nonmetal-metal transition under a high pressure.
204: Figure~\ref{fig3} indicates the magnetic field dependence of $\sigma(\omega)$.
205: In Fig.~\ref{fig3}(a), the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum at $B$ = 0~T is equal to that at 6~T.
206: The spectrum at 7~T is different from that at 6~T and is equal to that at 14~T.
207: This indicates that the region below 6~T is all the same phase and that above 7~T is a different one.
208: The phase transition magnetic field is 6.5 $\pm$ 0.5~T.
209: The data in Fig.~\ref{fig3}(b) indicate the same situation as that in Fig.~\ref{fig3}(a).
210: However, the spectrum at $T$ = 40~K and $B$ = 0~T is different from that at 10~K and 0~T because these magnetic phases are different, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1}.
211: Since the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum at $T$ = 10~K and $B$ = 14~T is the same as that at ambient pressure, 6.5~K and 6~T for the ferromagnetic (F) phase,~\cite{ref10} the condition of $P$ = 4~GPa, $T$ = 10~K and $B$ = 14~T is also in the F phase.
212: The transition magnetic field from the AF-1A to F phases shifts from 4.4~T at ambient pressure to 6.5~T at 4~GPa.
213: The reason for this shift is that the $pf$ mixing increases and stabilizes the double-layered magnetic structure with a decrease in the distance between the Ce and Sb atoms as a result of the applied pressure.
214: At 40~K in Fig.~\ref{fig3}(b), the pseudo gap structure appears below $B$ = 6~T.
215: The gap structure disappears at 7~T across the transition magnetic field of 6.5~$\pm$~0.5~T, and the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum changes to a metallic one.
216: This is an example of a magnetic-field-induced nonmetal-metal transition under a high pressure.
217:
218: At 0~T, the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum drastically changes with temperature because of the magnetic phase transition, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
219: The same spectral transition at the same transition temperature was observed below 6~T (not shown).
220: Above 7~T, a different spectral change was observed, in which the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum displayed a more typical temperature dependence, shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}(c).
221: This temperature dependence indicates that the F phase below 30~K gradually changes to a different phase above 50~K.
222: Since the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum above 50~K is the same as that at 70~K and 0~T, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}, the higher temperature phase must be the P phase.
223: Based on this, these results indicate the F phase gradually changes to the P phase with increasing temperature in the magnetic field range above 7~T.
224:
225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
226: The magnetic field - temperature $(B, T)$ phase diagram at 4~GPa resulting from changes in the $\sigma(\omega)$ spectrum is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}(d).
227: In the figure, the solid lines and the hatchings are the first-order-like and second-order-like spectral transitions, respectively.
228: The temperature and magnetic field region of the AF-1A phase expands at 4~GPa in comparison with that at ambient pressure.
229: This is the plausible result of the $pf$ mixing increasing due to the applied pressure.
230: On the other hand, the phase diagram at 4~GPa becomes simpler than that at ambient pressure.
231: In particular, the complex magnetic structure, for example, in AFP$x$ ($x~=~1~\sim~6$) phases at ambient pressure~\cite{ref01} disappears at 4~GPa.
232: At ambient pressure, since the $pf$ mixing competes with other magnetic interactions and crystal field splitting, such complex magnetic phases and structures appear.
233: With increasing pressure, the $pf$ mixing increases and then dominates among these interactions.
234: The increase of the $pf$ mixing also makes the simpler magnetic phase diagram at 4~GPa.
235:
236: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
237: In summary, infrared reflection spectroscopy on CeSb at low temperatures, high pressures and high magnetic fields was performed.
238: The pseudo gap structure was clearly observed in the AF-1 phase at 4~GPa, as well as the collapse of the gap with increasing magnetic field.
239: The pseudo gap originates from the magnetic band folding effect.
240: CeSb has the necessary electronic structure to create the pseudo gap in the AF-1 phase.
241: CeSb in the AF-1 phase is the model system of the magnetic band folding.
242: This paper indicates the first optical observation of the magnetic field induced nonmetal-metal phase transition at high pressures.
243: The magnetic field - temperature phase diagram of CeSb at 4~GPa was also determined.
244:
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246: We would like to thank to Drs. Kaneta and Sichelschmidt for valuable discussions and also thank SPring-8 BL43IR staff members for their technical support.
247: This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (Grant No. 14702011) from MEXT of Japan.
248: The experiments were performed with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (Proposal Nos. 2003A0076-NS1-np, 2004A0231-NSa-np and 2004B0545-NSa-np).
249:
250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
251: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
252: \bibitem{ref01} J. Rossat-Mignod {\it et al.}, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. {\bf 52}, 111 (1985).
253: \bibitem{ref02} H. Takahashi and T. Kasuya, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. {\bf 18}, 2697 (1985); {\it ibid} 2709; {\it ibid} 2721; {\it ibid} 2731; {\it ibid} 2745; {\it ibid} 2755.
254: \bibitem{ref03} T. Chattopadhyay {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 49}, 15096 (1994).
255: \bibitem{ref04} T. Osakabe {\it et al.}, Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf 34}, 1469 (2003).
256: \bibitem{ref05} N. M\^ori {\it et al.}, JJAP Series 8, {\it pp}. 182 (1993).
257: \bibitem{ref06} H. Kumigashira {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 13654 (1997).
258: \bibitem{ref07} T. Ito {\it et al.}, Physica B {\bf 351}, 268 (2004).
259: \bibitem{ref08} Y. S. Kwon {\it et al.}, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Series 8, {\it pp}. 104 (1993).
260: \bibitem{ref09} F. Salghetti-Drioli {\it et al.}, Solid State Commun. {\bf 109}, 687 (1999).
261: \bibitem{ref10} S. Kimura {\it et al.}, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 69}, 647 (2000).
262: \bibitem{ref11} S. Kimura {\it et al.}, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 71}, 2200 (2002).
263: \bibitem{ref12} F. Ishiyama and O. Sakai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 72}, 2071 (2003).
264: \bibitem{ref13} S. Kimura {\it et al.}, Physica B, in press.
265: \bibitem{ref14} T. Suzuki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Series 8. {\it pp}. 44 (1993).
266: \bibitem{ref15} S. Kimura {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A {\bf 467-468}, 893 (2001).
267: \bibitem{ref16} S. Kimura {\it et al.}, Physica B {\bf 329-333}, 1625 (2003).
268: \bibitem{ref17} F. Wooten, {\it Optical Properties of Solids} (Academic Press, New York, 1972).
269: \bibitem{ref18} S. Kimura {\it et al.}, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 73}, 2041 (2004).
270: \bibitem{ref19} M. Dressel and G. Gr\"uner, {\it Electrodynamics of Solids} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
271: \bibitem{ref20} ex.) M. Quijada {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58}, 16093 (1998).
272: \bibitem{ref21} K. Iwasa, Y. Arakaki, M. Kohgi and T. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 68}, 2468 (1999).
273: \bibitem{ref22} K. Iwasa,A. Hannan, M. Kohgi and T. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 207201 (2002).
274:
275: \end{thebibliography}
276:
277: \end{document}
278: