1: \documentclass[twocolumn,floatfix,showpacs,pre]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{times}
6: %\usepackage{mathtime}
7: \usepackage{color}
8:
9: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.01}
10: \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.99}
11: \renewcommand{\dbltopfraction}{0.99}
12: \renewcommand{\dblfloatpagefraction}{0.99}
13: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.99}
14: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{0.99}
15: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}
16: \setcounter{totalnumber}{4}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{Spectral representation of the effective dielectric constant of graded composites}
21:
22:
23: \author{L. Dong}
24: \affiliation{Biophysics and Statistical Mechanics Group,
25: Laboratory of Computational Engineering,
26: Helsinki University of Technology, P.\,O.~Box 9203, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland}
27: \affiliation{Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,
28: Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong}
29: \author{Mikko Karttunen}
30: \affiliation{Biophysics and Statistical Mechanics Group,
31: Laboratory of Computational Engineering,
32: Helsinki University of Technology, P.\,O.~Box 9203, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland}
33: \author{K. W. Yu}
34: \affiliation{Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,
35: Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong}
36:
37: \date{\today}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40:
41: We generalize the Bergman-Milton spectral representation, originally
42: derived for a two-component composite, to extract the spectral density
43: function for the effective dielectric constant of a graded composite.
44: This work has been motivated by a recent study of the optical absorption
45: spectrum of a graded metallic film (Applied Physics Letters, {\bf 85}, 94
46: (2004)) in which a broad surface-plasmon absorption band has been shown
47: to be responsible for enhanced nonlinear optical response as well as an
48: attractive figure of merit. It turns out that, unlike in the case of
49: homogeneous constituent components, the characteristic function of a
50: graded composite is a continuous function because of the continuous
51: variation of the dielectric function within the constituent components.
52: Analytic generalization to three dimensional graded composites is
53: discussed, and numerical calculations of multilayer composites are given
54: as a simple application.
55:
56: \pacs{77.22.Ej, 42.65.An, 42.79.Ry}
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \maketitle
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: In graded materials~\cite{Milton1} the physical
64: properties may vary continuously in space making them distinctly
65: different from homogeneous materials. Hence,
66: composite media consisting of graded inclusions
67: have attracted much interest in various engineering
68: applications~\cite{Yamanouchi}, such as reduced residual and thermal
69: barrier coatings of high temperature components in gas turbines,
70: surface hardening for tribological protection, and graded interlayers used
71: in multilayered microelectronic and optoelectronic
72: components~\cite{Holt,Cherradi}.
73:
74:
75: Like graded materials, thin films are of great interest in many practical applications
76: and often possess different optical
77: properties~\cite{Kammler} in comparison to bulk materials.
78: Recently, it was found experimentally that graded thin films may have
79: high relative dielectric permittivity as well as a flatter temperature
80: characteristic of permittivity~\cite{Kawasaki} than single-layer
81: films~\cite{LuAPL03}.
82:
83: The traditional theories used to deal
84: with the homogeneous materials~\cite{Jackson,AIP}, however fail to deal
85: with composites of graded inclusions. To treat these composites, we
86: have recently developed a first-principles approach~\cite{Dong,Gu-JAP}
87: and a differential effective dipole approximation~\cite{Huang}.
88:
89:
90: This work has been motivated by a recent study of the optical absorption
91: spectrum of a graded metallic film~\cite{Huang1}. In that work, a broad
92: surface plasmon absorption band was observed in addition to a strong
93: Drude absorption peak at zero frequency. Such a broad absorption band has
94: been shown to be responsible for the enhanced nonlinear optical response
95: as well as an attractive figure of merit (the degree of optical
96: absorption). Yuen {\em et al.}~\cite{Yuen1} pointed out that such an
97: absorption spectrum, being related to the imaginary part of the effective
98: dielectric constant, should equally well be reflected in the
99: Bergman-Milton spectral representation of the effective dielectric
100: constant~\cite{Bergman,Milton}.
101:
102: Bergman-Milton spectral representation was originally developed for calculating the
103: effective dielectric constant and other response functions of
104: two-component composites~\cite{Bergman,Milton}. However, the two
105: concerned components are all homogeneous. Therefore, it is worth
106: extending the spectral representation to graded composite materials. The
107: work on graded films is just a simple example of a more general graded
108: composite in three dimensions. One of the main purpose of this work help
109: to identify the physical origin of the broad absorption band. It turns
110: out that, unlike in the case of homogeneous materials, the characteristic
111: function of a graded composite is a continuous function because of the
112: continuous variation of the dielectric function within the constituent
113: component.
114:
115: Moreover, we apply our theory to a special case of graded composites,
116: i.\,e., multilayer material, which is more convenient to fabricate in
117: practice than graded material~\cite{Hobson}, and many algorithms are now
118: available for designing of multilayer coatings~\cite{Martin,Verly}. Thus,
119: the present work is necessary in the sense that we shall discuss the
120: multilayer effect as the number of layers inside the material increases.
121: In this regard, this work should be expected to have practical relevance.
122: As the number of layers $N$ increases, we shall show a gradual transition
123: from sharp peaks to a broad continuous band until the graded composite
124: results are recovered by the limit of $N\to \infty$.
125:
126: The paper is organized as follows. In Sec.~\ref{sec:forma}, the general derivation
127: of the spectral representation for graded composites is presented. In
128: Sec.~\ref{sec:spectral}, we describe the model and present analytical results for the
129: spectral representation of the effective dielectric constant of a graded
130: film with an interface, as well as a graded sphere. In those cases, the
131: Bergman-Milton formalism has been modified for graded composites. We
132: further obtain an analytic form for the spectral density function of a
133: multilayer film and a multilayer sphere in Sec.~\ref{sec:multi}. Numerical results
134: are presented in Sec.~\ref{sec:numerical}, and discussion and conclusion are given in
135: Sec.~\ref{sec:discussion}.
136:
137: \section{Formalism \label{sec:forma}}
138:
139:
140: We consider a two-component composite in which graded inclusions of
141: dielectric constant $\epsilon_{1}({\bf r})$ are embedded in a homogeneous
142: host medium of dielectric constant $\epsilon_{2}$. It is noted that the
143: dielectric constant $\epsilon_{1}({\bf r})$ is a gradation profile as a
144: function of the position ${\bf r}$. And we will restrict our discussion
145: and calculation to the quasi-static approximation, i.\,e., $dc/{\omega}
146: \leq 1$, where $d$ is the characteristic size of the inclusion, $c$ is
147: the speed of light in vacuum and $\omega$ is the frequency of the applied
148: field. In the quasi-static approximation, the whole graded structure can
149: be regarded as an effective homogeneous one with effective (overall)
150: linear dielectric constant defined as~\cite{Stroud}
151: %
152: \begin{equation}
153: \epsilon_{e}=\frac{1}{V}\int \displaystyle \frac{{\bf E}\cdot {\bf D}}{E_{0}^{2}}dV,
154: \label{eq:1}
155: \end{equation}%1
156: %
157: where ${\mathit E}_{0}$ is the applied electric field along $z$
158: direction, ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf D}$ are the local electric field and local
159: displacement, respectively.
160:
161: The object of the present section is to solve the Laplace's equation
162: %
163: \begin{equation}
164: {\bf \nabla}\cdot(\epsilon({\bf r})\nabla \phi({\bf r}))=0
165: \label{eq:2}
166: \end{equation}%2
167: %
168: subject to the boundary condition $\phi_{0}=-{\mathit E}_{0}z$. The
169: dielectric function $\epsilon({\bf r})$ varies from component to
170: component but has a fixed mathematical expression for a given component.
171: It can be expressed as~\cite{Bergman}
172: %
173: \begin{equation}
174: \epsilon({\bf r})=\epsilon_{2}\left[1-\frac{1}{{\mathit s}}\eta({\bf r})\right],
175: \label{eq:3}
176: \end{equation}%3
177: %
178: where ${\mathit s}=[1-\epsilon_\mathrm{ref}/\epsilon_{2}]^{-1}$ is the
179: material parameter and $\epsilon_\mathrm{ref}$ is some reference
180: dielectric constant in the graded component. The characteristic function
181: $\eta({\bf r})$ is may be written in terms of a real function $f({\bf
182: r})$ as
183: %
184: \[
185: %%\begin{equation}
186: \eta({\bf r})=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}
187: 1+f({\bf r}) \ \ & \text{ in inclusion}, \\
188: 0 \ \ \ \ & \text{in host},
189: \end{array}
190: \right.
191: %%\label{eq:4}
192: %%\end{equation}%4
193: \]
194: %
195: which accords for the microstructure of graded composites. The function
196: $f({\bf r})$ depends on the specific variation of the dielectric constant
197: in the inclusion component. For homogeneous constituent component, i.\,e.,
198: $f({\bf r})=0$, $\eta({\bf r})=1$ in the inclusion component, while
199: $\eta({\bf r})=0$ in the host medium. For graded systems, $\eta({\bf r})$
200: can be a continuous function in the inclusion component because of the
201: continuous variation of the dielectric function within the inclusion
202: component. Thus, Eq.~(\ref{eq:1}) can be solved
203: %
204: \begin{equation}\label{medbvp}
205: \phi({\bf r})=-{\mathit E}_{0}z+\frac{1}{s}\int
206: d{\mathit V}^{\prime} \eta({\bf r}^{\prime})
207: {\nabla}^{\prime}G({\bf r}-{\bf r}^{\prime})
208: \cdot {\nabla}^{\prime} \phi({\bf r}^{\prime}),
209: \end{equation}%5
210: where $G({\bf r-r^\prime })$ is a Green's function satisfying:
211: %
212: \[
213: %%\begin{equation}
214: \left\{\begin{array}{cc}
215: {\nabla}^2 G({\bf r- r^\prime })=-\delta^3({\bf r- r^\prime }) \ \ \text{for {\bf r} in
216: V},\\
217: G=0 \ \text{ for {\bf r} on the boundary.}
218: \end{array}
219: \right.
220: %%\end{equation}%6
221: \]
222: %
223: In order to obtain a solution for Eq.~(\ref{eq:2}), we introduce an
224: integral-differential Hermitian operator $\hat {\Gamma}$, which satisfies
225: %
226: \[
227: %%\begin{equation}\label{Gammadef}
228: \hat{\Gamma} \equiv \int d{\mathit V}^{\prime}
229: \eta({\bf r}^{\prime}){\nabla}^{\prime}
230: G({\bf r}-{\bf r}^{\prime}) \cdot {\nabla}^{\prime},
231: %%\end{equation}%7
232: \]
233: %
234: and define an inner product as
235: %
236: \begin{equation}\label{scalPr}
237: \left< \phi | \psi \right>=
238: \int d {\mathit V} \eta({\bf r}) \nabla \phi^{*}\cdot \nabla \psi.
239: \end{equation}%8
240: %
241: With the above definitions, Eq.~(\ref{medbvp}) can be simplified to
242: %
243: \[
244: %\begin{equation}\label{bvpIntegral}
245: \phi({\bf r})= -E_{0} z +\frac{1}{s} \hat{\Gamma} \phi({\bf r}).
246: %\end{equation}%9
247: \]
248:
249: Let $s_n$ and $|\phi_n \rangle$ be the $n$th eigenvalue and eigenfunction
250: of operator $ \hat{\Gamma}$. Then, the generalized eigenvalue problem
251: becomes
252: %
253: \[
254: %%\begin{equation}
255: {\bf \nabla}\cdot(\eta({\bf r})\nabla \phi_{n})={\mathit s}_{n} {\nabla}^{2}
256: \phi_{n}.
257: %%\end{equation}%10
258: \]
259: %
260: The potential $|\phi \rangle$ can be expanded in series of eigenfunctions,
261: %
262: \begin{equation}\label{solution}
263: |\phi\rangle
264: %=\left(\frac{1}{s} \hat{\Gamma}-1\right)^{-1}|z\rangle
265: \equiv \sum_{n} \left(\frac{s}{s_n-s}\right)
266: \frac{|\phi_n\rangle\langle\phi_n|z\rangle}{\langle\phi_n|\phi_n\rangle},
267: \end{equation}%11
268: %
269: where we choose $E_{0}=1$ for convenience. Since $\eta({\bf r})$ is a
270: real function, the eigenvalues ${\mathit s}_{n}$ will be real. Also, for
271: graded component, $\eta({\bf r})$ is a continuous function, which will
272: cover the full region, i.\,e., $-\infty \le \eta({\bf r}) \le \infty$.
273: Therefore, the eigenvalues ${\mathit s}_{n}$, which depend on the
274: continuously graded microstructure $\eta({\bf r})$, do not lie within the
275: interval $[0,1]$ but extend to $-\infty \le s_n \le \infty$ as first
276: pointed by Gu and Gong~\cite{GuYing} for three-component composites case.
277: However, eigenvalues $s_n$ still lie in $[0,1]$ for $0 \le \eta({\bf r})
278: \le 1$.
279:
280: We are now in the position to find an analytical representation for the
281: effective dielectric constant $\epsilon_{e}$ according to Eq.~(\ref{eq:1}). We
282: take advantage of Green's theorem, the boundary condition $\phi_{0}=-z$,
283: and the Maxwell equation ${\bf \nabla}\cdot {\bf D}=0$ to obtain the
284: effective dielectric constant
285: %
286: \begin{eqnarray}\label{tfeps_e}
287: \frac{\epsilon_e}{\epsilon_2}
288: &=& \frac {1}{\epsilon_2 V}\int \left(-\nabla\phi\right)\cdot {\bf D} dV\nonumber\\
289: %= \frac {-1}{\epsilon_2 V}\oint z{\bf D}\cdot d{\bf S}
290: %= \frac {-1}{\epsilon_2 V }\int \hat {\bf z}\cdot{\bf D} dV \nonumber \\
291: &=&\frac {-1}{V}\int \hat{\bf z} \cdot \left[ \left(
292: 1-\frac{1}{s} \eta({\bf r})\right) \nabla\phi
293: \right] dV \\
294: %= \frac {1}{V} \oint z\hat {\bf z} \cdot d{\bf S}
295: %% +\frac {1}{sV}\int \eta({\bf r}) \nabla z \cdot \nabla \phi dV \\
296: &=& 1+ \frac{1}{sV} \langle z | \phi\rangle\nonumber.
297: \end{eqnarray}%12
298: %
299: If we now introduce the reduced response~\cite{Bergman}
300: %
301: \begin{equation}
302: F(s)=1-\frac{\epsilon_e}{\epsilon_2},
303: \label{eq:13}
304: \end{equation}%13
305: and substitute Eq.~(\ref{solution}) into Eq.~(\ref{tfeps_e}) we find
306: %
307: \[
308: %\begin{equation}\label{Fofs}
309: F(s)
310: %&=&-\frac{1}{sV} \langle z | \phi\rangle
311: %= \frac {1}{V} \langle z | \frac 1{s-\hat{\Gamma}}|z\rangle \nonumber\\
312: = \frac{1}{V} \sum_{n}
313: \frac{\left| \langle z|\phi_n\rangle \right| ^2}
314: { \langle \phi_n|\phi_n\rangle}
315: \left(\frac {1}{s-s_n}\right).
316: %\end{equation}%14
317: \]
318: %
319: We can now express the effective dielectric constant as
320: \begin{equation}\label{effective}
321: \epsilon_e=\epsilon_2 \left (1- \sum_{n}\frac{f_n}{s-s_n}\right),
322: \end{equation}%15
323: where $f_n$ is given by
324: %
325: \[
326: %\begin{equation}
327: f_n=\frac{1}{V}\frac{\left| \langle z|\phi_n\rangle \right| ^2}
328: { \langle \phi_n|\phi_n\rangle}.
329: %\end{equation}%16
330: \]
331: %
332: Using the above equations, we obtain the following sum rule
333: %
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \sum_{n}f_{n}&=&\frac{1}{V}\langle z|z \rangle\nonumber\\
336: &=&\frac{1}{V}\int d V \eta({\bf r}) \nabla z \cdot \nabla z\nonumber\\
337: &=&\frac{1}{V}\int d V \eta({\bf r}).
338: \label{eq:17}
339: \end{eqnarray}%17
340: %
341:
342:
343: It is worth noting that the sum rule will not equal to the volume
344: fraction of inclusion. This is different from the Bergman-Milton spectral
345: representation for two homogeneous systems, in which the sum rule equals
346: to the volume fraction of the inclusion.
347:
348: \begin{figure}[tbh]
349: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=150pt}}
350: \caption{(a) Dielectric profile of various graded films at $h=0.6$.
351: (b) Dielectric proifle of various graded sphere with unit radius.
352: Parameters used: $\epsilon_{2}=1$ and $s=-2$.}
353: \label{fig:1}
354: \end{figure}
355:
356:
357:
358:
359: When the operator $\hat{\Gamma}$ has a continuous spectrum,
360: Eq.~(\ref{effective}) should be replaced with the integral form
361: %
362: \begin{equation}
363: \epsilon_e=\epsilon_2 \left(1- \int ds^\prime \frac{m(s^\prime)}{s-s^\prime} \right),
364: \label{eq:18}
365: \end{equation}%18
366: %
367: where $m(s^\prime)$ is the spectral density function. Then, the reduced
368: response becomes
369: %
370: \begin{equation}
371: F(s)=\int ds^{\prime}\frac{m(s^\prime)}{s-s^\prime}.
372: \label{eq:19}
373: \end{equation}%19
374: %
375: If we write $s$ as $s+i0^{+}$, the right side of Eq.~(\ref{eq:19}) becomes
376: %
377: \[
378: %\begin{equation}
379: P\int ds^{\prime}\frac{m(s^\prime)}{s-s^\prime}-i\pi m(s),\nonumber
380: %\end{equation}%20
381: \]
382: %
383: and thus, $m(s^\prime)$ is given through the limiting process
384: %
385: \begin{equation}
386: m(s^\prime)=-\frac{1}{\pi}\mathrm{Im}[F(s^\prime+i0^{+})].
387: \label{eq:21}
388: \end{equation}%21
389:
390: This final result is identical in form to Bergman's expression for the
391: analogous function in scalar composite materials. However, there are
392: differences in the derivation, namely, the definition of the inner
393: product Eq.~(\ref{scalPr}), the continuous graded microstructure
394: $\eta({\bf r})$, the sum rule, as well as the range of eigenvalues $s_n$.
395:
396: From Eq.~(\ref{eq:18}) it is evident that if the spectral density function
397: ${\mathit m}({\mathit s}^{\prime})$ is known, the effective dielectric
398: constant can be obtained accurately, and vice versa. The spectral
399: representation has been used to analyze the effective dielectric
400: properties of composites. Recently, Levy and Bergman~\cite{Levy} also
401: used it in their study of nonlinear optical susceptibility. In this
402: regard, Sheng and coworkers~\cite{Ma} developed a practical algorithm for
403: calculating the effective dielectric constants based on the spectral
404: representation. In what follows, we restrict ourselves to a graded
405: composite both in one dimension and three dimensions, as well as
406: corresponding multilayer composites.
407:
408:
409: \section{Spectral density function of graded composites \label{sec:spectral}}
410: \subsection{Spectral density function of a graded film}
411:
412:
413:
414: \begin{figure}[tbh]
415: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=150pt}}
416: \caption{(a) Spectral density function of a graded film without an interface,
417: i.\,e., ${\mathrm h}=1.0$. (b) Spectral density function of a graded
418: film meeting a homogeneous medium at an interface ${\mathit h}=0.5$, and $\epsilon_{2}=1$.}
419: \label{fig:2}
420: \end{figure}
421:
422: We consider a graded dielectric film of width ${\mathit L}$ , in which
423: two media meet at a planar interface as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:1}\,(a). The first
424: medium $\epsilon_{1}(z)$ varies along $z-$axis, while the second medium
425: $\epsilon_2$ is homogeneous. We define the graded microstructure as
426: %
427: \begin{equation}
428: \eta(z)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}
429: 1+{\mathit a}z \ \ &0<z \le {\mathit h}, \\
430: 0 \ \ & {\mathit h}< z<{\mathit L},
431: \end{array}
432: \right.
433: \label{eq:22}
434: \end{equation}%22
435: %
436: where ${\mathit a}$ and ${\mathit h}$ are real constants. They can be
437: varied to describe different graded films. Thus, according to Eq.~(\ref{eq:3}),
438: the dielectric function of graded film can be expressed as
439: %
440: \begin{equation}
441: \epsilon(z)=\epsilon_{2}\left(1-\displaystyle
442: \frac{\eta(z)}{{\mathit s}}\right).
443: \label{eq:23}
444: \end{equation}%23
445:
446: Owing to the simple geometry of a graded film, we can use the equivalent
447: capacitance of a series combination to calculate the effective dielectric
448: constant as
449: %
450: \begin{equation}
451: \frac{1}{\epsilon_{e}}=\frac{1}{{\mathit L}}\int_{0}^{{\mathit L}}\frac{1}{\epsilon(z)} {\mathit d}z.
452: \label{eq:24}
453: \end{equation}%24
454: %
455: Substituting Eqs.~(\ref{eq:22}) and (\ref{eq:23}) into Eq.~(\ref{eq:24}), we obtain
456: %
457: \[
458: %\begin{equation}
459: \frac{1}{\epsilon_e} =\displaystyle \frac{1 - {\mathit h}}{\epsilon_2}
460: + \displaystyle \frac{s \left[\ln
461: \left (1 - \displaystyle \frac{\eta(0)}{s}\right )
462: -\ln
463: \left(1 - \displaystyle \frac{\eta(h)}{s}\right)\right]}{{\mathit a}\epsilon_{2}},
464: %\end{equation}%25
465: \]
466: %
467: with the assumption $L=1$.
468:
469: We are now in a position to extend the Bergman-Milton spectral
470: representation of the effective dielectric constant~\cite{Bergman,Milton}
471: to a graded film. For a graded system, $\eta(z)$ can be a continuous
472: function in the inclusion medium. Using Eqs.~(\ref{eq:18})$-$(\ref{eq:21}), we obtain the
473: spectral density function for a graded film as
474: %
475: \begin{widetext}
476: \[
477: %\begin{equation}
478: {\mathit m}({\mathit s}^{\prime})=-\displaystyle
479: \frac{{\mathit a}s^{\prime} \mathrm{arg}
480: \left(\displaystyle \frac{s-1}{s-ah-1}\right)}
481: {\pi\left[\left( s^{\prime}\mathrm{arg}
482: \left(\displaystyle \frac{s-1}{s-ah-1} \right)\right)^{2}
483: +\left({\mathit a}({\mathit h}-1)
484: -s^{\prime} \ln \left(\displaystyle
485: \frac{s^{\prime}-1}{s\prime -ah-1}\right) \right)^{2}\right]},
486: %\end{equation}%26
487: \]
488: \end{widetext}
489: %
490: where ${\mathit s}^{\prime}=\mathrm{Re}[{\mathit s}]$ and
491: $\mathrm{arg}[\cdots]$ denote the arguments of complex functions.
492: %It should be
493: %remarked that the definition of the spectral parameter is not unique.
494: %For
495: %instance, we may have defined ${\mathit s}=(1-\epsilon({\mathit
496: %h})/\epsilon_{2})^{-1}$, and obtained a different spectral density
497: %function, while the characteristic function would change too. However,
498: %the spectral function must yield the same effective dielectric constant.
499:
500: \subsection{Spectral density function of a graded sphere}
501:
502: The above theory can be generalized to graded composites in three
503: dimensions. We consider a graded sphere with dielectric constant
504: $\epsilon_{1}(r)$ embedded into a homogeneous host medium with dielectric
505: constant $\epsilon_2$. The dielectric constant of the graded sphere
506: $\epsilon_1(r)$ varies along the radius $r$. We can obtain the effective
507: dielectric constant of a graded sphere using the spectral representation.
508: We consider the graded microstructure as
509: %
510: %\begin{equation}
511: \[
512: \eta(r)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}
513: 1+{\mathit a}r \ \ & 0<r \le {\mathit R},\\
514: 0 \ \ & r>{\mathit R},
515: \end{array}\right.
516: %\end{equation}%27
517: \]
518: %
519: where ${\mathit R}$ is the radius of the graded sphere. Thus, from
520: Eq.~(\ref{eq:3}) the dielectric constant in the graded sphere is given by
521: %
522: \begin{equation}
523: \epsilon(r)=\epsilon_{2}\left( 1-\frac{\eta(r)}{s}\right).
524: \label{eq:28}
525: \end{equation}%28
526: %
527: In the dilute limit the effective dielectric constant of a small volume
528: fraction ${\mathit p}$ of graded spheres embedded in a host medium is
529: given by~\cite{YuHui,Zhang}
530: %
531: \begin{equation}
532: \epsilon_{e}=\epsilon_{2}+3 \epsilon_{2} {\mathit p}{\mathit b},
533: \label{eq:29}
534: \end{equation}%29
535: %
536: where ${\mathit b}$ is the dipole factor of graded spheres embedded in a
537: host as given in Ref.~\cite{Dong}. Using Eq.~(\ref{eq:13}) and Eq.~(\ref{eq:29}), the
538: reduced response can be obtained as
539: %
540: \begin{equation}
541: {\mathit F}({\mathit s})=-3 \epsilon_{2} {\mathit p}{\mathit b}.
542: \label{eq:30}
543: \end{equation}%30
544: %
545: Thus, the spectral density function of a graded sphere can be given
546: through a numerical evaluation of Eq.~(\ref{eq:21}).
547:
548: \section{spectral density function of multilayer composites \label{sec:multi}}
549:
550: A multilayer composite is a special case of graded composites. The
551: gradation becomes continuous as the number of layers approaches infinity.
552: To investigate the multilayer effect, we shall use a finite difference
553: approximation for the graded profile (Eqs.~(\ref{eq:23}) and (\ref{eq:28})) for a finite
554: number of layers. To mimic a multilayer system, we divide the interval
555: $[0,1]$ into $N$ equally spaced sub-intervals, $[0,z_1]$, $(z_1,z_2]$,
556: $\cdots$, $(z_N-1,1]$. Then we adopt the midpoint value of $\epsilon(z)$
557: for each sub-interval as the dielectric constant of that sublayer. In
558: this way, we calculate the effective dielectric constant, eigenvalues, as
559: well spectral density function for each $N$. It is worth noting that the
560: results of $N\to \infty$ (e.\,g., $N=1024$ recovers the results of graded
561: composites.
562:
563: In addition to multilayer films, we can use the above approach to study
564: the much simpler problem of a two-layer film. In this system, we have two
565: layers of dielectric constants $\epsilon_1$, $\epsilon_2$, and host
566: $\epsilon_0$. Thickness are $hy$, $h(1-y)$, and $1-h$, respectively,
567: where $y$ is the length ratio between component $\epsilon_1$ and
568: component $\epsilon_{2}$. We also define two microstructure parameters,
569: $\eta_1$ and $\eta_2$. If we let $s=1/(1-\epsilon_1/\epsilon_0)$, then
570: $\eta_1=1$, and
571: $\eta_2=(\epsilon_{0}-\epsilon_{2})/(\epsilon_{0}-\epsilon_{1})$.
572: According to Eq.~(\ref{eq:23}), the effective dielectric constant of the two-layer
573: film is now given by
574: %
575: \[
576: %\begin{equation}
577: \frac{1}{\epsilon_e}=\frac{hy}{\epsilon_1}+\frac{h(1-y)}{\epsilon_2}+\frac{1-h}{\epsilon_0}.
578: %\end{equation}%31
579: \]
580: %
581: According to Eq.~(\ref{eq:13}), the reduced response can be given by
582: \begin{equation}
583: F(s)=\frac{F_1}{s-s_1}+\frac{F_2}{s-s_2},
584: \label{eq:32}
585: \end{equation}%32
586: %
587: where
588: \begin{eqnarray}
589: F_1&=&\frac{h(s_1(y-y\eta+\eta)-\eta)}{s_1-s_2},\nonumber\\
590: F_2&=&-\frac{h(s_2(y-y\eta+\eta)-\eta)}{s_1-s_2},\nonumber\\
591: s_1&=&\frac{1}{2}\left[ 1-h(y-y\eta+\eta)+\eta \right. \nonumber\\
592: & & \left. -\sqrt{4\eta (-1+h)+(1-h(y-y\eta+\eta)+\eta)^2} \right],\nonumber\\
593: s_2&=&\frac{1}{2}\left[ 1-h(y-y\eta+\eta)+\eta \right. \nonumber\\
594: & & \left. +\sqrt{4\eta (-1+h)+(1-h(y-y\eta+\eta)+\eta)^2} \right].\nonumber
595: \end{eqnarray}
596: %
597: From the sums of $F_1$ and $F_2$ and the integral of graded
598: microstructure $\eta(z)$ given by Eq.~(\ref{eq:22}), we can check that the sum
599: rule expressed by Eq.~(\ref{eq:17}) is obeyed. It should also be noted that there
600: are two poles in the expression for the reduced response corresponding to
601: two peaks in the spectral density function. If $h=1$, then $s_{1}=0$,
602: that is, one peak is located at zero, which is explicitly shown in
603: Fig.~\ref{fig:2}(a).
604:
605: \begin{figure}[tbh]
606: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig3.eps,width=200pt}}
607: \caption{(Spectral density function of a graded sphere with volume fraction ${\mathit p}=0.1$.}
608: \label{fig:3}
609: \end{figure}
610:
611: \begin{figure*}[tbh]
612: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=350pt}}
613: \caption{Spectral density function of various multilayer film with $\epsilon_0=1$ and $a=-0.8$.}
614: \label{fig:4}
615: \end{figure*}
616:
617: Similarly, we can also apply our graded spectral representation to a
618: single-shell sphere of core dielectric constant $\epsilon_1$, covered by
619: a shell of $\epsilon_2$, and suspended in a host of $\epsilon_0$. In this
620: example, we can also define two microstructure parameters $\eta_1$ and
621: $\eta_2$. If we let $s=1/(1-\epsilon_1/\epsilon_0)$, then $\eta_1=1$, and
622: $\eta_2=(\epsilon_{0}-\epsilon_{2})/(\epsilon_{0}-\epsilon_{1})$. The
623: dipole factor of single-shell sphere is given~\cite{YuHui,Zhang}
624: %
625: %\begin{equation}
626: \[
627: b=\frac{\epsilon_{2}-\epsilon_{0}+
628: (\epsilon_{0}+2\epsilon_{2})xf^3}{\epsilon_{2}+2\epsilon_{0}+2
629: (\epsilon_{2}-\epsilon_{0})xf^3},
630: \]
631: %\end{equation}%33
632: %
633: where $f$ is the ratio between radius core and radius shell, and $x$ is
634: given by
635: %
636: %\begin{equation}
637: \[
638: x=\frac{\epsilon_{1}-\epsilon_{2}}{\epsilon_{1}+2\epsilon_{2}}.
639: \]
640: %\end{equation}%34
641: %
642: Then, we can also write Eq.~(\ref{eq:30}) similarly to Eq.~(\ref{eq:32}), where the
643: residues and eigenvalues are given by,
644: %
645: \begin{eqnarray}
646: F_1&=&\displaystyle \frac{-3 p s_1 [(-1+\eta)y^3-\eta]-\eta p [1-2(-1+\eta)y^3+2 \eta]}{3(s_1-s_2)},\nonumber\\
647: F_2&=&\displaystyle \frac{3 p s_2 [(-1+\eta)y^3-\eta]+\eta p [1-2(-1+\eta)y^3+2 \eta]}{3(s_1-s_2)},\nonumber\\
648: s_1&=&\frac{1}{6}\left[ 1+3\eta-\sqrt{1+(2-8y^3)\eta+(1+8y^3)\eta^2}\right],\nonumber\\
649: s_2&=&\frac{1}{6}\left[ 1+3\eta+\sqrt{1+(2-8y^3)\eta+(1+8y^3)\eta^2}\right].\nonumber
650: \end{eqnarray}
651: %
652: Analysis shows that the spectral representation for $N=2$ contains two
653: simple poles corresponding to two peaks in the spectral density function.
654: Therefore, we draw the conclusion that, $N$ peaks are a result of $N$
655: layers. Moreover, $N-1$ peaks will accumulate into a continuous broad
656: absorption spectrum when $N$ tends toward infinity, which can be seen
657: from Fig.~\ref{fig:4}(f)~and~\ref{fig:5}(f).
658:
659:
660:
661:
662: \section{Numerical results \label{sec:numerical}}
663:
664: We are now in a position to do some numerical calculations of the
665: spectral density function from Eqs.~(\ref{eq:18}) and (\ref{eq:21}). A small but finite
666: imaginary part in the complex parameter has been used in the
667: calculations. Without any loss of generality, we choose ${\mathit L}=1$
668: and ${\mathit R}=1$ for convenience. We show the effect of different
669: graded profiles, as well as the effect of the thickness of the inclusion.
670: It should be noted, that in all figures the range of $s$ is limited to
671: $[0,1]$, because we chose $-1<a<0$ which limits the value of $\eta$ into
672: $[0,1]$.
673:
674: Fig.~\ref{fig:1} displays the dielectric profile of a graded film (Fig.~\ref{fig:1}(a)) and a
675: graded sphere (Fig.~\ref{fig:1}(b)). This figure obviously shows that the dielectric
676: constant varies with the position in inclusion while a constant in host
677: medium. Also, different values of $a$ accord with different graded
678: materials.
679:
680: In Fig.~\ref{fig:2}(a), we plot the spectral density function ${\mathit m}({\mathit
681: s})$ of a graded film without an interface against the spectral parameter
682: for various graded microstructures $\eta(z)$. It is evident that there is
683: always a broad continuous band in the spectral density function. Both the
684: strength as well as the width of the continuous part of ${\mathit
685: m}({\mathit s})$ increase with the gradient of the dielectric profile.
686: Thus, the previous results of the broad surface-plasmon band can be
687: expected. Note that there is a sharp peak at ${\mathit s}=0$, which is
688: also present in a homogeneous film. In Fig.~\ref{fig:2}(b), we plot the spectral
689: density function of a graded film meeting a homogeneous medium at an
690: interface for various graded microstructure $\eta(z)$. Again, there is
691: always a broad continuous band in the spectral density function. However,
692: the sharp peak has now shifted to a finite value of ${\mathit s}$, which
693: is also present in a homogeneous film.
694:
695: In Fig.~\ref{fig:3}, the spectral density function of graded sphere is displayed
696: for a volume fraction ${\mathit p}=0.1$. In this case, the interface
697: always exists. It is clear that a broad continuous function in the
698: spectral density function is always observed, as well as the shift of the
699: sharp peak. However, the decrease of the broad continuous function is
700: more abrupt for graded sphere than for graded film with increasing
701: ${\mathit s}$.
702:
703: \begin{figure*}[tbh]
704: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig5.eps,width=350pt}}
705: \caption{Spectral density function of various multi-shell sphere with $\epsilon_0=1$, $a=-0.8$ and $p=0.1$.}
706: \label{fig:5}
707: \end{figure*}
708:
709: Figures~\ref{fig:4}~and~\ref{fig:5} display the spectral density function for a multilayer
710: film and a sphere, respectively. It is clear that there are always $N$
711: sharp peaks for $N$ layers. Moreover, it is worth noting that there
712: occurs a transition from sharp peaks to a broad continuous band with
713: increasing $N$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:4}(f) and Fig.~\ref{fig:5}(f)), that is, the graded results
714: are recovered by the limit results of $N\to \infty$. In particular, we
715: had obtained the analytical expression of spectral density function for
716: $N=2$. There are two resonances corresponding to the two peaks in
717: Fig.~\ref{fig:4}(a) and Fig.~\ref{fig:5}(a).
718:
719: \section{Discussion and Conclusion \label{sec:discussion}}
720:
721: We have investigated a graded composite film and a sphere by means of the
722: Bergman-Milton spectral representation. It has been shown that the
723: spectral density function can be obtained analytically for a graded
724: system. However, unlike in the case of homogeneous constituent
725: components, the characteristic function is a continuous function due to
726: the presence of gradation. Moreover, the derivation as well as some
727: salient properties, namely, the sum rule, the definition of inner
728: product, the definition of the integral-differential operators, and the
729: range of spectral parameters, do change because of the continuous
730: variation of the dielectric profile within the constituent components.
731: It should be noted that in graded composite, the eigenvalues are not
732: limited to $[0,1]$, and they can be extended to $-\infty \le s_n \le
733: \infty$ for the full region $\eta$, i.\,e., $-\infty \le \eta \le
734: \infty$. In this work, however for simplicity, we investigated the
735: spectral density function in $0 \le s \le 1$ by choosing $-1 < a <0$ to
736: limit the value of $\eta$ into $[0,1]$.
737:
738: We also study multilayer composites and calculated the spectral density
739: function versus the number of layers, to explicitly demonstrate that the
740: broad continuous spectrum arises from the accumulation of poles when the
741: number of layers tends to infinity. This finding coincides with the broad
742: surface-plasmon absorption band associated with the optical properties of
743: graded composites.
744:
745: To sum up, we have investigated the spectral density function of graded
746: film and graded sphere, as well as multilayer cases. There is always a
747: broad continuous function in the spectral density function in graded
748: composite, but simple poles in multilayer composite, the number of pole
749: depends on the number of layers. Moreover, there is a gradual transition
750: from sharp peaks to a broad continuous band until the graded composite
751: results recover in the limit of $N\to \infty$.
752:
753: \begin{acknowledgments}
754:
755: This work was supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong SAR
756: Government Earmarked Grant (K.\,W.\,Y.)
757: and by the Academy of Finland (L.\,D., M.\,K.).
758:
759:
760: \end{acknowledgments}
761:
762: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
763:
764:
765:
766:
767: \bibitem{Milton1} G. W. Milton, {\it The Theory of Composites},
768: Chapter 7 (Cambrige University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
769:
770: \bibitem{Yamanouchi} M. Yamanouchi, M. Koizumi, T. Hirai and I. Shioda,
771: in {\it Proceedings of the First International Symposium on
772: Functionally Graded Materials} (Sendi, Japan, 1990).
773:
774: \bibitem{Holt} J. B. Holt, M. Koizumi, T. Hirai and Z. A. Munir,
775: Ceramic transaction: Functionally gradient materials,
776: Vol.\,{\bf 34},
777: (Westerville, (OH), The American Ceramic Society, 1993).
778:
779: \bibitem{Cherradi} B. Ilschner and N. Cherradi, Proceedings
780: of the Third International Symposium on Structure and Functional
781: Gradient Materials, Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses Polytechniquies
782: et Universititaires Romands, 1994.
783:
784: \bibitem{Kammler} D. R. Kammler, T. O. Mason, D. L. Young,
785: T. J. Coutts, D. Ko, K. R. Poeppelmeier, and D. L. Williamson,
786: J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 90}, 5979 (2001).
787:
788:
789: \bibitem{Kawasaki} A. Kawasaki and R. G. Ford, 97,
790: in {\em Functionally Graded Materials: Design, Processing, and Application},
791: Y. Miyamoto, W. A. Kaysser, and B. H. Rabin (Eds), (Kluwer, Boston, 1999).
792:
793: \bibitem{LuAPL03} S. G. Lu, X. H. Zhu, C. L. Mak, K. H. Wong,
794: H. L. W. Chan, and C. L. Choy, Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 82}, 2877 (2003).
795:
796: \bibitem{Jackson} J. D. Jackson, {\it Classical Electrodynamics}
797: (Wiley, New York, 1975).
798:
799: \bibitem{AIP} See, for example, the articles in
800: {\it Electric Transport and Optical Properties of Inhomogeneous Media},
801: edited by J. C. Garland and D. B. Tanner, AIP Conference Proceedings
802: No.\,40 (AIP New York, 1978).
803:
804: \bibitem{Dong} L. Dong, G. Q. Gu, and K. W. Yu, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67},
805: 224205 (2003).
806:
807: \bibitem{Gu-JAP} G. Q. Gu and K. W. Yu, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 94}, 3376
808: (2003).
809:
810: \bibitem{Huang} J. P. Huang, K. W. Yu, G. Q. Gu, and M. Karttunen,
811: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 67}, 051405 (2003).
812:
813: \bibitem{Huang1} J. P. Huang and K. W. Yu, Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 85 }, 94 (2004).
814:
815: \bibitem{Yuen1} K. P. Yuen, M. F. Law, and K. W. Yu, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 56}, R1322 (1997).
816:
817: \bibitem{Bergman} D. J. Bergman and D. Stroud, in {\em Solid state Physics},
818: Vol.\,46, p. 147, H. Ehrenreich and D. Turnbull (Eds.), (Academic Press, New York, 1992),
819:
820:
821: \bibitem{Milton} G. W. Milton, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 52}, 5286 (1980); Appl. Phys. A {\bf 26}, 1207 (1981).
822:
823: \bibitem{Hobson} M. P. Hobson and J. E. Baldwin, Appl. Opt. {\bf 43}, 2651 (2004).
824:
825: \bibitem{Martin} S. Martin, J. Rivory, and M. Schoenauer, Appl. Opt. {\bf 34}, 2247 (1995).
826:
827: \bibitem{Verly} P. G. Verly, Appl. Opt. {\bf 37}, 7327 (1998).
828:
829: \bibitem{Stroud} D. Stroud and P. M. Hui, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 37}, 8719 (1988).
830:
831: \bibitem{GuYing} Y. Gu and Q. H. Gong, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 014209 (2003).
832:
833: \bibitem{Levy} O. Levy and D. J. Bergman, Phys. A{\bf 207}, 157 (1994).
834:
835: \bibitem{Ma}H. Ma, B. Zhang, W, Y. Tam, and P. Sheng, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61}, 962 (2000).
836:
837: \bibitem{YuHui} K. W. Yu, P. M. Hui, and D. Stroud, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 47}, 14150 (1993).
838:
839: \bibitem{Zhang} X. Zhang and D. Stroud, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 49}, 944 (1994).
840:
841:
842: \end{thebibliography}
843:
844:
845:
846:
847:
848:
849:
850:
851:
852: \end{document}
853:
854: \newpage
855: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=250pt}}
856: \centerline{Fig.~1/Dong, Karttunen and Yu}
857:
858:
859:
860: \newpage
861: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=250pt}}
862: \centerline{Fig.~2/Dong, Karttunen and Yu
863: }
864:
865:
866: \newpage
867: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig3.eps,width=250pt}}
868: \centerline{Fig.~3/Dong, Karttunen and Yu
869: }
870:
871: \newpage
872: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=400pt}}
873: \centerline{Fig.~4/Dong, Karttunen and Yu
874: }
875:
876:
877: \newpage
878: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig5.eps,width=400pt}}
879: \centerline{Fig.~5/Dong, Karttunen and Yu
880: }
881: \end{document}
882:
883:
884:
885:
886:
887:
888:
889:
890:
891:
892:
893: